Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2026 Sep 25;12(39):eaeh0276. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aeh0276

Adaptive ionic moieties for electrolyte structural design

Oliver S Hammond 1,2,3,4,5,*, Guillaume Bousrez 3,4, Stuart J Brown 2,6, Sichao Li 2, Daniel C Morris 5, Serena Cozzolino 2,7, Manishkumar Shimpi 4,8, Liliana de Campo 9, Andrew E Whitten 9, Alexei Vorobiev 7,10, Andrew Nelson 9, Jason B Harper 5, Anja-Verena Mudring 3,4,11,12,*, Oleg N Antzutkin 8,*, Sergei Glavatskih 5,13,14,*, Mark W Rutland 2,5,6,15,16,*
PMCID: PMC13614367  PMID: 42789712

Abstract

Ionic liquids (ILs) are now an established and ubiquitous material class. In energy applications and electroresponsive lubrication, their interfacial self-assembly is crucial for their properties. This in turn is determined by chemical structure and a local hierarchy of Coulombic, van der Waals, and solvophobic interactions. We hypothesize that delocalization of the ionic charge permits the Coulombic interactions to adapt to other self-assembly imperatives, promoting both bulk and interfacial self-assembly structures and enhancing double layer responses. Novel chelated bis(catecholato)borate anion architectures are introduced, with [P66614] cations. Small/wide-angle x-ray scattering of the ILs indicates pronounced cation assemblies. In the electrolyte solvent propylene carbonate, small-angle neutron scattering shows marked anion-dependent self-assembly modulation. Neutron reflectivity reveals analogous response in the electrochemical double layer; the catechols form thicker and more electroresponsive interfacial layers. Density functional theory calculations demonstrate electronic resonance, modulating the anion polarizability. This direct self-assembly control broadly affects electrochemistry, lubrication, and formulation design.

INTRODUCTION

Developments in fields such as ionic liquids (ILs; defined as low-melting salts where Tm < 100°C) offer unrealized opportunities for chemical problem-solving, via the “design” of task-specific solvents (1) that can benefit from decreased toxicity, flammability, and volatility compared to conventional molecular analogues. Yet, the breadth of chemical space ILs occupy, and complexities involved in their manufacture, means that they are by no means a green panacea (2). As the IL research field has matured to ∼100,000 published articles, major issues plaguing popular systems, such as expense and HF liberation, are gradually being resolved (3). This has enabled the development of thousands of patents, and a number of successful industrial processes based on IL chemistry, with some mainstream examples including synthesis, electrochemistry, catalysis, extraction, and recycling (4).

Enormous environmental and economic impacts can therefore be realized through IL design, with lubrication providing one such case study (5, 6). While the science of lubrication involves many approaches to preventing surface contact, reducing wear and friction, a key component is the deployment of so-called boundary lubricants. These are self-assembled interfacial films that resist expulsion in a tribological contact and prevent direct surface contact, as a “last line of defense.” They also provide a well-defined sliding plane, and have a self-healing ability (7). ILs have garnered much attention here because they cannot only form this type of boundary film but also ameliorate the issue of tribocharging. This is the buildup of interfacial charge in lower dielectric media under sliding, the discharging of which is deleterious for the material properties, and which is prevented by self-regulation in the IL boundary films due to the conservation of electroneutrality, thus removing this wear route (8, 9).

Modern expectations of machine efficiency, longevity, and performance necessitate effective contact lubrication, which has been successfully demonstrated with a “double-edged sword” approach of unifying boron chemistry and surface active ionic liquids (SAILs) (8, 10–12). SAILs display surface activity, where amphiphilic moieties induce self-assembly phenomena at interfaces (13), with the interplay between strong electrostatics and the requirement to maintain charge neutrality causing distinct structures such as layers and chequerboards (14). Once adsorbed at the interface, SAILs reduce interfacial friction, but are subject to transient extremes of pressure and temperature (15); the enhanced thermal stability of phosphonium cations is thus favored in the context of inevitable degradation. Being mindful of degradation pathways (10) allows the realization of this philosophy: upon decomposition, chelated orthoborate anions liberate B species directly at the interface, where they rapidly react to form passivating tribofilms of materials such as B2O3 and metal borides, protecting against further wear (16). The correlation between bulk structure and the surface activity of orthoborate-based ILs using the anions bis(oxalato)borate [BOB]−, bis(mandelato)borate [BMB]−, and bis(salicylato)borate [BScB]− has been characterized by various techniques (17–20), providing a structural basis for the observed reduction in friction and wear when orthoborate ILs are deployed as lubricant materials (21). Building in complexity, these ionic lubricant materials have now been realized as “tribotronic” agents (22). By understanding the interfacial structuring and charge distribution in the cation and anion, the application of potentials controllably alters the structure at the interface, which alters the electrochemical double layer (EDL), and thus, the viscoelastic properties of the contact; (15, 18, 23, 24) active control over friction and wear is thus attainable with a holistic approach (9). Orthoborate ILs are one such example where tribotronic control via interfacial phase change is directly achievable (25). The knowledge gap is therefore closing between well-understood and highly configurable aqueous self-assembly systems (26–28) and these more esoteric nonaqueous ionic analogues (29, 30).

The same properties that make a benevolent and tribotronically active IL can also be leveraged for the development of halogen free electrolytes for energy storage technologies. Specifically, supercapacitors can greatly benefit from an electrodependent self-assembly structure, and it has been shown that SAILs can be used to improve capacitance and tune electrochemical properties (13, 31, 32). Supercapacitors are used for grid stability with renewable energy sources, emergency power systems, electric vehicles, and internet-of-things devices (33, 34). Therefore, with modern concerns over the health effects of poly-fluorinated alkyl substances (“forever chemicals”) (35) and ever-growing energy demands, supercapacitors will be one of the key technologies enabling sustainable technological development. We highlight tribology and supercapacitor applications as the main beneficiary fields of this research; however, other key fields that rely on solvophobic self-assembly and liquid nanostructure include detergents, drug delivery, liquid-liquid extractions, and catalysis (36, 37). Thus, the ability to selectively tune and enhance this phenomenon has the potential to generate broad impact.

Here, we therefore designed new ILs with boron-containing anion chemistries based on bis(catecholato)borate [BCB] structures (see Fig. 1), mixed with the “universal liquefier” [P66614] cation (38). [BCB] salts were first reported in 1998 as unexpectedly stable reaction side products, but are to our knowledge hitherto unexplored as IL components (39). In this manuscript, we present our discovery that this seemingly subtle anion modification causes marked changes in the bulk structure and physical properties of the ILs. Using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we show that the softened catechol chemistry provides an ever-correct “jigsaw piece” of electrostatic potential where it is needed, thus controlling the dimensions of self-assembled structures, particularly in nonaqueous solvents pertinent to electrochemical systems. Detailed small-angle scattering and neutron reflectometry (NR) experiments demonstrate this ability, and contrast it with the behavior of known orthoborate anions. We show that [BCB] ILs can act as self-contained aggregation modifiers with function analogous to salicylate in aqueous cationic surfactant systems, negating the need for further salts or additives. These findings constitute a breakthrough in terms of the ashless properties critically required for high-temperature lubrication and general formulation, but moreover in the development of “designer electrolytes” with intrinsically tailored surface coverage, mobility, and capacitance (40).

Fig. 1. Ionic liquid structures.

Fig. 1.

Structures of the cation [P66614]; the reference orthoborate anions [BOB], [BMB], and [BScB]; and the bis(catecholato)borate anions [BCB] and [B4ECB], which are described herein.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Anion effect on bulk ILs

Details of the preparation of the [BCB]-based ILs are provided in the Supplementary Materials alongside their characterization. Throughout this work, the two anions bis(catecholato)borate [BCB] and bis(4-ethylcatecholato)borate [B4ECB] will be compared with three well-known “reference” orthoborates; [BOB], [BMB], and [BScB].

The catecholates display slightly higher melting points (Tm) than the reference species, with [BCB] melting slightly above room temperature. More detailed thermal property investigations revealed some behavioral complexities for the two new catecholate ILs. In terms of stability, [P66614][BCB] decomposes at 462°C in a one-step event, whereas [P66614][B4ECB] decomposes in two steps, the first at 227°C (13% mass loss) and the second at 415°C (full degradation). As shown in Fig. 2B, temperature-dependent small/wide-angle x-ray scattering (SWAXS) measurements confirmed thermotropic effects for [P66614][BCB]. Under controlled supercooling conditions for this IL, it is possible to observe the onset of a highly ordered phase, which could be indexed to a lamellar structure with a d spacing of 35.155 ± 0.122 Å; this is followed by more complete crystallization as cooling continues. Complete details of thermal properties are provided in the Supplementary Materials, namely, discussion of thermal history effects and comprehensive DSC (figs. S6, S13, and S14), TGA (figs. S7 and S15), and the temperature-controlled SWAXS analysis (fig. S16). Overall, the thermal behavior is less eventful than that observed for other state-of-the-art orthoborate anion chemistries, such as bis(butane-1,4-dioxy)borate ([B(bdo)2]−) and tetrakis(pyrazolyl)borate ([B(pyr)4]−), which were shown to be organic ionic plastic crystal formers when paired with a smaller symmetric [P4444] cation (41).

Fig. 2. SWAXS data of neat ILs.

Fig. 2.

(A) Experimental SWAXS data, where measurements taken at elevated temperatures (50°C) to ensure fluidity are denoted by an asterisk (*) and were otherwise taken at 25°C. (B) SWAXS temperature scan measurements of [P66614][BCB].

Beyond basic phase behavior, SWAXS clarifies the nanoscale effects of anion modification (36). ILs have stronger local order than molecular liquids, which is assigned to an L3-type (disordered bilayer spongelike) nanostructure, as was recently demonstrated for various pure “reference” orthoborate ILs using small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) (19). While there is very little difference in peak position and, hence, size, the SWAXS data in Fig. 2A show a clear increase in intensity for the low-Q feature (termed the polar-nonpolar peak, PNPP; d1, or other similar names) (42–44) going from [BOB] to the catecholates, while the short-range close contact adjacency peak (CP; d3) intensity decreases. These phosphonium orthoborate ILs also display a very high-Q broad “d4” feature that is not often resolved (∼2.8 Å−1), while the mid-Q d2 peak is likely convoluted with the PNPP, as shown for alkyl-decorated phosphonium and ammonium SAILs (45). These data therefore suggest that, while the common cation is the main structure-former responsible for hydrophobic domains of a similar size, the anions may play a role in densifying this packing: The integral of the PNPP as a fraction of all integrated peaks (provided in table S1) provides a trend series for this behavior: [BOB] < [BMB] < [BScB] < [BCB] < [B4ECB], where the [B4ECB] has the most profound low-Q peak.

Structure of ILs in nonaqueous media

The polar aprotic model electrolyte, 1,2-propylene-d6 carbonate, was chosen for SANS studies of solution behavior. The same size and self-assembly trend series from bulk SWAXS was observed for these IL dispersions (see Fig. 3, A to E). The SANS I(Q) (especially at higher concentrations) flattens at progressively lower Q as one goes down the anion series, and have increasing I0, indicating that the catecholate ILs display a higher aggregation number. Indirect Fourier transformation (IFT) provides a series of real-space pair distribution functions, P(R) (46, 47), which quantify this extension behavior (see Fig. 3, F to J). The P(R) peak centers (Fig. 3K) shift to longer length scales and simultaneously broaden (Fig. 3L) with asymmetric tailing toward longer lengths, which is characteristic of the formation of longer 1D (i.e., more cylindrical) morphologies (48); this effect begins in earnest with [BScB] and is strongest for [B4ECB]. This structuring is resilient to application-pertinent contaminants: 1 wt % D2O was added to our samples (see fig. S18), which made almost no discernible difference to the measured forward scattering intensity or form factor.

Fig. 3. SANS data and analysis of dispersed ILs.

Fig. 3.

(A to E) Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) data (markers) for the respective ILs dispersed in 1,2-propylene-d6-carbonate as a function of concentration, and fits (colored lines) to the data from IFT analysis; (F to J) corresponding real-space pair distribution functions, P(R), calculated from the IFT fits (note the common x/y-axis scaling); (K and L) peak position and breadth from Lorentzian fits to the P(R)s, as a function of IL mole fraction (XIL). *For the most concentrated samples, the median of 45 wt % is stated, with comprehensive sample composition details provided in the Supplementary Materials.

More detailed fitting was performed using a cylindrical scattering form factor model (49), convoluted with the Hayter-Penfold Rescaled Mean Spherical Approximation (RMSA) S(Q) to describe the interparticle interactions by invoking the DLVO theory; this S(Q) interpretation is functional, but caveated in applicability here due to the high concentrations of nonspherical aggregates (50, 51). The shape-based model fits are shown in fig. S17 alongside the corresponding parameters. We have favored an approach with fewer freely varied parameters to avoid overfitting, but highlight that more detail may be extracted from the data, such as some core-shell character with a solvating corona, and more nuanced directional ion-ion interactions beyond the capability of the RMSA structure factor (52). Nevertheless, all analysis routines point to the same clear conclusion: Catecholate anions cause an outsize increase in aggregate size and encourage 1D growth.

The electrochemical double layer

General interfacial nanostructure

The neutron reflectivity data in Fig. 4 demonstrate remarkable surface affinity and electroresponsivity at the gold solution interface and allow us to unambiguously characterize the EDL structure. This is observed as Kiessig fringes in the reflectivity data in Fig. 4 (A and C) ([BCB] and [B4ECB], respectively) that arise from an interfacial layer whose scattering length density (SLD) is different to that of bulk solution and the gold surface (which are matched to each other). Modeling of these Kiessig fringes using a differential evolution approach produces an SLD profile describing the interfacial layering away from the gold surface and into the bulk (toward −Z in Fig. 4, B and D). The context for this is formed by previous NR data available for the conventional reference borate systems of [BOB] and [BMB] (21, 22). In all cases, two layers are required to fit the data. The near-surface layer is well defined and corresponds with the dimensions of the extended cation or ion pair. For [B4ECB], the layer is thicker, reflecting the larger anion. The slightly lower SLDs reflect both the higher hydrocarbon content and also a slightly increased adsorption, but once again, the layer thickness is consistent with the ion dimensions. The second layer has an SLD much closer to the bulk value, suggesting a much higher solvent content and/or patchiness.

Fig. 4. NR data and analysis of dispersed ILs.

Fig. 4.

(A and C) Neutron reflectivity (NR) data (markers) and two-layer model fits (colored lines) taken on PLATYPUS (ANSTO) and SuperADAM (ILL), for the respective ILs in d6-propylene carbonate as a function of potential, where the order of the legend corresponds with the sequential ordering of applied potentials, where blue is 0 V, orange is −0.5 V, green is 0.25 V, and pink is −1 V; (B and D) scattering length density (SLD) profiles for the respective ILs arising from the two-layer model fits (note the common x/y-axis scaling). The legend applies to all plots and the order (sinistrodextral) corresponds to the experimental sequence of applied potentials.

Electro-responsive interfacial properties

Major changes in the structure of this interfacial layer are observed in response to an electric potential, and described as the electroresponsivity of the IL. Beginning at the open circuit potential (OCP), the low SLD value of the near surface indicates both a high surface affinity and a high cation content, because the cation has by far the lowest SLD value. This surface activity is greater than observed for this cation with the conventional, nondelocalized reference anions (21, 24). In addition, the electroresponsivity of the layers is very large, as witnessed by the change in SLD value with applied potential (see comparison with literature in fig. S24). Both systems display the same electro-conditioning behavior seen earlier: This is a relatively recent observation, revealed in the SLD profile upon exposure to small voltages (which is largely independent of the sign) (53). Somewhat counterintuitively, because of short screening distances combined with very slow surface rearrangement kinetics, an induced bilayer structure such as this can partially resist a small reversal in surface charge, while still maintaining capacitive balance (7). The electro-conditioning thus seems to indicate that the electric field increases the surface excess. However, above a threshold negative potential, there is a pronounced drop in the fitted SLD profiles, indicative of a substantial enhancement in the cation content of the layer, which may be due to depletion of anions, enrichment of cations, or both. The overall dimensions do not change, but in the case of [B4ECB] anions, this cation enrichment is seen for both the inner and outer surface layers.

Rather than the conventional chequerboard structures for spherical or near spherical ILs, the well-defined interfacial layers are characteristic of self-assembly induced layers, which may either crowd or even overscreen the surface charge. The presence of the outer surface layers (with thickness characteristic of cation dimensions) supports this picture, because they imply the presence of intercalation of the catechol anions into the self-assembly induced structures of the primary layer. The second layer is thus required for overall neutralization of the surface charge.

DFT calculations

Ab initio calculations focused on the electronics of the orthoborate anions allow the rationalization of these multimodal experimental observations (refer to the Supplementary Materials for full details, and the electrostatic potential anion surface maps in Fig. 5). Namely, stark differences in anion electron density distribution are evident from the calculated anisotropic polarizabilities (Δα in table S9), alongside the response of the calculated anion Mulliken charges to a proximal +1 point charge placed 5 Å from the B center as demonstrated in the 2D electrostatic potential plots in fig. S23, and also the per-anion root mean square Mulliken charge deviation from these charge placement experiments in table S9. A physical basis is therefore provided for the “net” polarizability; the trends in all of these parameters clearly implicate intra-anion charge mobility for the catecholate systems, where the magnitudes follow the same [BOB] < [BMB] < [BScB] < [BCB] < [B4ECB] trend series from experimental SWAXS. Clearly, the π system is contributing beyond simple inductive effects and gains the ability to form an anion-spanning resonance system, expanding the chromophore region as the electrons become less localized. [BOB] is the most “ideal” anion here, in that it is the most geometrically compact, and closest to spherical, without delocalization. Appending two phenyl groups to [BOB] to create [BMB] decreases the polarity, and slightly increases the aggregate radius and length, but again not in excess of the ion dimensions. Self-assembly effects begin when the five-membered B-O-C ring of [BOB] and [BMB] expands to six-membered for [BScB], and the aggregates exceed ion pair dimensions. The distribution of charge across the orthoborate species is clearly of paramount importance, as [BMB] and [BScB] are very closely chemically related, but the phenyl ring is one step closer to the B center in the case of [BScB]. Thus, while the catecholates revert to a five-membered B-O-C ring structure, the conjugated ring system is now capable of integrating with the B center to form a much larger-scale delocalization, allowing the charge to spread further from B through electron induction, modifying overall polarizability.

Fig. 5. DFT analysis and surface structuring.

Fig. 5.

Electrostatic potential surfaces for the three reference orthoborates (first row) and the two catecholatoborates (second row) where C atoms are gray, O atoms are red, B atoms are pink, blue isosurface coverage denotes regions of negative charge, red isosurface denotes positive charge, and white isosurface is electroneutral. Cartoons demonstrating the degree of interfacial ordering for [P66614] paired with a reference orthoborate (lower left) and for [B4ECB] (lower right) at an applied surface potential of −1 V, stabilized by anion intercalation in the self-assembly structures. Note that due to the 3D rendering (i.e., smoothing, shadowing, ambient occlusion, and, hence, overall raytracing) effects, electrostatic potential surface maps such as these should always be interpreted as semiquantitative despite plotting to the same color scale as that found in fig. S23; definitive lists of calculated charges per site from DFT are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

The combination of SANS and NR electroresponsivity data shows that these nonaqueous catecholate IL systems function analogously to aqueous wormlike micelle assembly (26), where packing and curvature are controlled via the addition of simple salts or hydrotropes to modulate electrostatic screening effects (54–59). [BCB] and especially [B4ECB] form particularly thick near-surface layers with lower SLD values at OCP; the greater interfacial penetration of more polarizable anions stabilizes these high-density cation assemblies (cf. table S3). For [B4ECB], this strongly ordered first layer always exceeds 30 Å in depth, and a second layer is also obvious upon applied potential. Thus, while this adaptive self-assembly property is specifically revealed here for orthoborate anions (Fig. 5, bottom), it is by no means limited to them. We speculate that electronic resonance within any suitable anion could lead to the ability to redistribute its charge to satisfy the constraints of both solvophobicity and Coulombic interactions.

This extended delocalization of catecholate anions has potential application in solvent design (60). Greater polarizability, shown here as responsiveness to electrostatic environment, has potential in affecting solubility, with this responsiveness allowing a broader range of solvation interactions and hence a wider solubility window (61). Such interactions may themselves be extended to focus on species along a reaction coordinate, with these ILs offering a new way to consider reaction control (62).

Two ILs are introduced, based on the chelated orthoborate anions [BCB] and [B4ECB] paired with the [P66614] cation. While they share the same formal ionic borate center as more studied and conventional orthoborates such as [BOB], [BMB], and [BScB], they display remarkable differences. Detailed interrogation has elucidated (i) the neat liquid bulk structure using SWAXS, (ii) the bulk solution structure in a model nonaqueous polar aprotic solvent (propylene carbonate) using SANS, (iii) the solid-liquid solution structure at a gold electrode interface using NR, and, crucially, (iv) the electronic structure of the anions using DFT.

The catechol-based ILs showed the greatest nanodomain segregation in bulk SWAXS measurements, in keeping with the L3-like phase known for autoassemblies of ILs. In solution, catecholate anions cause unexpected increases in the size and definition of the self-assembly structures. This is the case for both the bulk structures measured by SANS and the interfacial near-surface layer observed by NR. We conclude that the emergent properties, particularly the electron distribution from DFT and the consequently marked effects upon experimental self-assembly behavior, are a direct product of resonance across the catecholates; this is forbidden in the conventional orthoborates.

The enhanced catecholate polarizability from this modified electron distribution imbues them with an adaptive ordering behavior. In self-assembly terms, catecholates can better intercalate to interfaces and aggregates and, through an optimization of both Coulombic and solvophobic interactions, can modify the local curvature of bulk aggregates and improve the packing density on an electrode surface. We would see this as a direct nonaqueous analogy to the use of salicylate in aqueous solutions of cationic surfactants, where replacing nonresonant anions with salicylate changes the micelle morphology from spherical to wormlike.

In IL systems, the self-assembly drivers are somewhat different, because hydrophobicity (an entropy driven phenomenon) is absent. Nonetheless, the self-assembly is driven by the balance of Coulombic and solvophobic interactions. This work thus provides a new axis in the control of IL structure and properties in both bulk (solution) and at interfaces. Earlier papers have shown how incremental improvements in IL boundary film ordering can substantially improve lubrication properties. The unprecedented self-assembly control afforded by the delocalization mechanism described here would be expected to substantially enhance this effect, and is consequently of significant interest beyond the IL community, providing a simple design criterion for lubricants, cosmetics, drug delivery systems, and battery and capacitor electrolytes. In particular, the ability to affect the EDL has profound implications for the control of electro-active lubrication and specific capacitance. Our findings therefore prove that the altered electron distribution arising from the bis(catecholato) π resonance allows for more efficient penetration of the anion into the charged [P66614] self-assemblies. Taking this proof one step further, and inserting further e-density into the π system by appending ethyl groups to [BCB] to form [B4ECB], the magnitude of the effect increases. Thus, the adaptability of the anions allows the twin imperatives of Coulombic and solvophobic self-assembly to be simultaneously accommodated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The orthoborate salts sodium bis(catecholato)borate Na[BCB] and sodium bis(4-ethylcatecholato)borate Na[B4ECB] were prepared by adapting literature procedures for the preparation of acid-chelated orthoborates (fig. S1) (63). Fine details for these procedures, and full characterization of the prepared materials, are provided in the Supplementary Materials. DFT calculations were performed of the five orthoborate anions using Gaussian, with both geometry and energy calculated at the M06-2X/6–31++G** level of theory; only the S,S,S configuration of [BMB] was simulated. Polarizability tensors were calculated, and a charge delocalization experiment was performed by placing a +1 point charge 5 Å from the B center. SANS measurements of the two bis(catecholato)borate ILs and the three reference orthoborate ILs were made using the BILBY SANS instrument at ANSTO in Sydney, Australia (64, 65). SWAXS measurements of neat ILs were taken using a Xenocs Xeuss 3.0 system with a single Dectris Eiger 2R detector in WAXS mode, with access provided by the ACNS under proposal P16734. NR measurements of [P66614][BCB] were performed at the PLATYPUS time-of-flight neutron reflectometer (66), also at ANSTO, whereas for [P66614][B4ECB], similar measurements were performed on the SuperADAM reflectometer at the Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France (67). Further Supplementary Materials are provided in support of this article: full synthetic details and characterization of prepared compounds, and minutiae of DFT, SAXS, SANS, and NR analyses.

Acknowledgments

Funding:

We acknowledge the support of the Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering (ACNS), ANSTO, and the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS), for providing access to the neutron research infrastructure used in this work via ACNS proposal P13958 and P16734 on BILBY SANS and the Xenocs Xeuss 3.0 SAXS instrument, and proposal P16994 on the PLATYPUS NR instrument. We gratefully acknowledge Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL), France, for access to the SuperADAM NR instrument (CRG-3038). The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (project no. KAW2012.0078), the Swedish Research Council, VR (project nos. 2017-04080 and 2022-04819), the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (project no. EM16-0013, “REFIT”), Vinnova (project no. 2020-03801), and Villum Foundation are acknowledged for their financial support. We thank the Danish Agency for Science, Technology, and Innovation for funding the instrument center DanScatt [project no. (2021) 7129-00006B]. This work was partially supported by the Wallenberg Initiative Materials Science for Sustainability (WISE) funded by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.

Author contributions:

Conceptualization: O.S.H., G.B., J.B.H., A.-V.M., O.N.A., S.G., and M.W.R. Data curation: O.S.H., G.B., L.d.C., A.E.W., and A.-V.M. Formal analysis: O.S.H., G.B., S.J.B., S.L., A.N., and J.B.H. Funding acquisition: A.-V.M., O.N.A., S.G., and M.W.R. Investigation: O.S.H., G.B., S.J.B., S.L., D.C.M., S.C., L.d.C., A.E.W., A.V., A.N., J.B.H., and M.W.R. Methodology: O.S.H., G.B., S.L., A.V., J.B.H., A.-V.M., and M.W.R. Project administration: O.S.H., S.L., J.B.H., A.-V.M., S.G., and M.W.R. Resources: A.E.W., A.-V.M., O.N.A., S.G., and M.W.R. Software: O.S.H., A.V., A.N., and J.B.H. Supervision: O.S.H., G.B., J.B.H., A.-V.M., O.N.A., S.G., and M.W.R. Data validation: O.S.H., G.B., S.J.B., L.d.C., A.V., J.B.H., A.-V.M., S.G., and M.W.R. Visualization: O.S.H., G.B., and S.J.B. Writing—original draft: O.S.H., G.B., S.J.B., and M.W.R. Writing—review and editing: O.S.H., G.B., S.J.B., S.L., D.C.M., S.C., M.S., L.d.C., A.E.W., A.V., A.N., J.B.H., A.-V.M., O.N.A., S.G., and M.W.R.

Competing interests:

O.N.A. and S.G. are inventors on patent application SE 535675, US 9,518,243 B2, JP 5920900, and EP/France 2688992 held/submitted by Sol-Ionics AB that covers the bis(oxalato)borate, bis(mandelato)borate, and bis(salicylato)borate anions. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data, code, and materials availability:

All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the results in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Neutron data from the Institut Laue-Langevin are available via the ILL data portal: https://dx.doi.org/10.5291/ILL-DATA.CRG-3038. Detailed instructions are provided to facilitate replication of the new materials described in the paper.

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S24

Tables S1 to S9

References

sciadv.aeh0276_sm.pdf (2.2MB, pdf)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rogers R. D., Seddon K. R., Ionic liquids—Solvents of the future? Science 302, 792–793 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jessop P. G., Searching for green solvents. Green Chem. 13, 1391–1398 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clarke C. J., Tu W. C., Levers O., Bröhl A., Hallett J. P., Green and sustainable solvents in chemical processes. Chem. Rev. 118, 747–800 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Greer A. J., Jacquemin J., Hardacre C., Industrial applications of ionic liquids. Molecules 25, 5207 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Somers A. E., Khemchandani B., Howlett P. C., Sun J., MacFarlane D. R., Forsyth M., Ionic liquids as antiwear additives in base oils: Influence of structure on miscibility and antiwear performance for steel on aluminum. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 11544–11553 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ye C., Liu W., Chen Y., Yu L., Room-temperature ionic liquids: A novel versatile lubricant. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2244–2245 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hjalmarsson N., Bergendal E., Wang Y.-L., Munavirov B., Wallinder D., Glavatskih S., Aastrup T., Atkin R., Furó I., Rutland M. W., Electro-responsive surface composition and kinetics of an ionic liquid in a polar oil. Langmuir 35, 15692–15700 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rohlmann P., Watanabe S., Shimpi M. R., Leckner J., Rutland M. W., Harper J. B., Glavatskih S., Boundary lubricity of phosphonium bisoxalatoborate ionic liquids. Tribol. Int. 161, 107075 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reddy A. B., Pilkington G. A., Rutland M. W., Glavatskih S., Tribotronic control of an ionic boundary layer in operando extends the limits of lubrication. Sci. Rep. 12, 20479 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Munavirov B., Black J. J., Shah F. U., Leckner J., Rutland M. W., Harper J. B., Glavatskih S., The effect of anion architecture on the lubrication chemistry of phosphonium orthoborate ionic liquids. Sci. Rep. 11, 24021 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rohlmann P., Black J. J., Watanabe S., Leckner J., Shimpi M. R., Rutland M. W., Harper J. B., Glavatskih S., Tribochemistry of imidazolium and phosphonium bis(oxalato)borate ionic liquids: Understanding the differences. Tribol. Int. 181, 108263 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rohlmann P., Munavirov B., Furó I., Antzutkin O. N., Rutland M. W., Glavatskih S., Non-halogenated ionic liquid dramatically enhances tribological performance of biodegradable oils. Front. Chem. 7, 98 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mao X., Brown P., Červinka C., Hazell G., Li H., Ren Y., Chen D., Atkin R., Eastoe J., Grillo I., Padua A. A. H., Costa Gomes M. F., Hatton T. A., Self-assembled nanostructures in ionic liquids facilitate charge storage at electrified interfaces. Nat. Mater. 18, 1350–1357 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.A. Elbourne, M. N. Awad, L. Meredith, A. J. Christofferson, T. L. Greaves, G. Bryant, S. J. Bryant, “Solid-liquid interfacial nanostructure of ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents,” in Encyclopedia of Solid-Liquid Interfaces (Elsevier, ed. 1, 2024), pp. 627–650. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reddy A. B., Munavirov B., Pilkington G. A., Calderon Salmeron G., Rutland M. W., Glavatskih S., Micro- to nano- and from surface to bulk: Influence of halogen-free ionic liquid architecture and dissociation on green oil lubricity. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng. 9, 13606–13617 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shah F. U., Glavatskih S., Antzutkin O. N., Boron in tribology: From borates to ionic liquids. Tribol. Lett. 51, 281–301 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shah F. U., Holmgren A., Rutland M. W., Glavatskih S., Antzutkin O. N., Interfacial behavior of orthoborate ionic liquids at inorganic oxide surfaces probed by NMR, IR, and Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 18523–18535 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Watanabe S., Pilkington G. A., Oleshkevych A., Pedraz P., Radiom M., Welbourn R., Glavatskih S., Rutland M. W., Interfacial structuring of non-halogenated imidazolium ionic liquids at charged surfaces: Effect of alkyl chain length. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 8450–8460 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hammond O. S., Bousrez G., Mehler F., Li S., Shimpi M. R., Doutch J., Cavalcanti L., Glavatskih S., Antzutkin O. N., Rutland M. W., Mudring A.-V., Molecular architecture effects on bulk nanostructure in bis(orthoborate) ionic liquids. Small 19, e2300912 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li S., Hammond O. S., Nelson A., de Campo L., Moir M., Recsei C., Shimpi M. R., Glavatskih S., Pilkington G. A., Mudring A.-V., Rutland M. W., Anion architecture controls structure and electroresponsivity of anhalogenous ionic liquids in a sustainable fluid. J. Phys. Chem. B 128, 4231–4242 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pilkington G. A., Oleshkevych A., Pedraz P., Watanabe S., Radiom M., Reddy A. B., Vorobiev A., Glavatskih S., Rutland M. W., Electroresponsive structuring and friction of a non-halogenated ionic liquid in a polar solvent: Effect of concentration. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 19162–19171 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Glavatskih S., Höglund E., Tribotronics—Towards active tribology. Tribol. Int. 41, 934–939 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pilkington G. A., Welbourn R., Oleshkevych A., Watanabe S., Pedraz P., Radiom M., Glavatskih S., Rutland M. W., Effect of water on the electroresponsive structuring and friction in dilute and concentrated ionic liquid lubricant mixtures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 28191–28201 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pilkington G. A., Harris K., Bergendal E., Reddy A. B., Palsson G. K., Vorobiev A., Antzutkin O. N., Glavatskih S., Rutland M. W., Electro-responsivity of ionic liquid boundary layers in a polar solvent revealed by neutron reflectance. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 193806 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li S., Pilkington G. A., Mehler F., Hammond O. S., Boudier A., Vorobiev A., Glavatskih S., Rutland M. W., Tuneable interphase transitions in ionic liquid/carrier systems via voltage control. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 652, 1240–1249 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dreiss C. C. A., Wormlike micelles: Where do we stand? Recent developments, linear rheology and scattering techniques. Soft Matter 3, 956–970 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Magid L. J., Li Z., Butler P. D., Flexibility of elongated sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles in aqueous salt solutions: A small-angle neutron scattering study. Langmuir 16, 10028–10036 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Das N. C., Cao H., Kaiser H., Warren G. T., Gladden J. R., Sokol P. E., Shape and size of highly concentrated micelles in CTAB/NaSal solutions by small angle neutron scattering (SANS). Langmuir 28, 11962–11968 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Smith G. N., Brown P., Rogers S. E., Eastoe J., Evidence for a critical micelle concentration of surfactants in hydrocarbon solvents. Langmuir 29, 3252–3258 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sanchez-Fernandez A., Leung A. E., Kelley E. G., Jackson A. J., Boundary layer thickness of non-halogenated ionic liquid lubricants in a polar solvent. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 579, 794–804 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jain P., Antzutkin O. N., 2-Ethylhexylsulfate anion-based surface-active ionic liquids (SAILs) as temperature persistent electrolytes for supercapacitors. J. Ion. Liq. 2, 100034 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jain P., Antzutkin O. N., Nonhalogenated surface-active ionic liquid as an electrolyte for supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 4, 7775–7785 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bhat T. S., Patil P. S., Rakhi R. B., Recent trends in electrolytes for supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 50, 104222 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lakshmi K. C. S., Vedhanarayanan B., High-performance supercapacitors: A comprehensive review on paradigm shift of conventional energy storage devices. Batteries 9, 202 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.J. C. DeWitt, Ed., Toxicological Effects of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (Springer International Publishing, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hayes R., Warr G. G., Atkin R., Structure and nanostructure in ionic liquids. Chem. Rev. 115, 6357–6426 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Greaves T. L., Drummond C. J., Solvent nanostructure, the solvophobic effect and amphiphile self-assembly in ionic liquids. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 1096–1120 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Borah B., Acharya G. R., Grajeda D., Emerson M. S., Harris M. A., Abeykoon A. M. M., Sangoro J., Baker G. A., Nieuwkoop A. J., Margulis C. J., Do ionic liquids slow down in stages? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 25518–25522 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Clegg W., Scott A. J., Lawlor F. J., Norman N. C., Marder T. B., Dai C., Nguyen P., Salts of the bis(catecholato)borate anion with organic cations. Acta Crystallogr. C 54, 1875–1880 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Malviya N., Yasin F. F. M., Sateriale M. T., Coleman F., Gunaratne H. Q. N., Dolfi A., Srinivasan G., Swadźba-Kwaśny M., Task-specific boronium ionic liquids as ashless lubricant additives. RSC Sustain. 2, 3100–3113 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Amir H., Kar M., O’Dell L. A., Forsyth M., Swadźba-Kwaśny M., Holbrey J. D., New tetrabutylphosphonium organic ionic plastic crystals incorporating borate anions. J. Mater. Chem. A 13, 18842–18850 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cabry C. P., D’Andrea L., Shimizu K., Grillo I., Li P., Rogers S., Bruce D. W., Lopes J. N. C., Slattery J. M., Exploring the bulk-phase structure of ionic liquid mixtures using small-angle neutron scattering. Faraday Discuss. 206, 265–289 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cabry C. P., D’Andrea L., Elstone N. S., Kirchhecker S., Riccobono A., Khazal I., Li P., Rogers S. E., Bruce D. W., Slattery J. M., Small-angle neutron scattering from mixtures of long- and short-chain 3-alkyl-1-methyl imidazolium bistriflimides. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 15811–15823 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Triolo A., Russina O., Bleif H. J., Di Cola E., Nanoscale segregation in room temperature ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 4641–4644 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang Y., Marlow J. B., Millar W., Silvester D. S., Warr G. G., Li H., Atkin R., Effect of ion structure on the nanostructure and electrochemistry of surface active ionic liquids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 630, 931–939 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vestergaard B., Hansen S., Application of Bayesian analysis to indirect Fourier transformation in small-angle scattering. J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 797–804 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hansen S., Bayesian estimation of hyperparameters for indirect Fourier transformation in small-angle scattering. J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 1415–1421 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Glatter O., Fritz G., Lindner H., Brunner-Popela J., Mittelbach R., Strey R., Egelhaaf S. U., Nonionic micelles near the critical point: Micellar growth and attractive interaction. Langmuir 16, 8692–8701 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pedersen J. S., Analysis of small-angle scattering data from colloids and polymer solutions: Modeling and least-squares fitting. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 70, 171–210 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hayter J. B., Penfold J., An analytic structure factor for macroion solutions. Mol. Phys. 42, 109–118 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hansen J.-P., Hayter J. B., A rescaled MSA structure factor for dilute charged colloidal dispersions. Mol. Phys. 46, 651–656 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pedersen M. C., Hansen S. L., Markussen B., Arleth L., Mortensen K., Quantification of the information in small-angle scattering data. J. Appl. Cryst. 47, 2000–2010 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.S. Li, Electro-Interfacial Composition Control by Ionic Liquid Technology: Nanostructure, Self-Assembly, and Friction (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.R. G. Weiss, P. Terech, Molecular Gels: Materials with Self-Assembled Fibrillar Networks (Springer, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Abdel-Rahem R., Gradzielski M., Hoffmann H., A novel viscoelastic system from a cationic surfactant and a hydrophobic counterion. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 288, 570–582 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kalur G. C., Raghavan S. R., Anionic wormlike micellar fluids that display cloud points: Rheology and phase behavior. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 8599–8604 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mishra B. K., Samant S. D., Pradhan P., Mishra S. B., Manohar C., A new strongly flow birefringent surfactant system. Langmuir 9, 894–898 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bijma K., Blandamer M. J., Engberts J. B. F. N., Effect of counterions and headgroup hydrophobicity on properties of micelles formed by alkylpyridinium surfactants. 2. Microcalorimetry. Langmuir 14, 79–83 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bijma K., Engberts J. B. F. N., Effect of counterions on properties of micelles formed by alkylpyridinium surfactants. 1. Conductometry and 1H-NMR chemical shifts. Langmuir 13, 4843–4849 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Griffin P., Kostal J., Molecular simulations inform biomass dissolution in ionic liquids in pursuit of benign solvent-system design. Green Chem. 25, 7283–7291 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xu M., Gao W., Liu C., Wei P., Sun H., Leveraging π-conjugation in benzimidazolium ionic liquids for selective extraction of bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A combined experimental and computational study. Energy Fuel 39, 19869–19883 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.R. R. Hawker, J. B. Harper, Organic Reaction Outcomes in Ionic Liquids, in Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry (Elsevier, 2018), vol. 52, pp. 49–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xu W., Wang L.-M., Nieman R. A., Angell C. A., Ionic liquids of chelated orthoborates as model ionic glassformers. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 11749–11756 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sokolova A., Christoforidis J., Eltobaji A., Barnes J., Darmann F., Whitten A. E., de Campo L., Bilby: Time-of-flight small angle scattering instrument. Neutron News 27, 9–13 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sokolova A., Whitten A. E., de Campo L., Christoforidis J., Eltobaji A., Barnes J., Darmann F., Berry A., Performance and characteristics of the Bilby time-of-flight small-angle neutron scattering instrument. J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 1–12 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.James M., Nelson A., Holt S. A., Saerbeck T., Hamilton W. A., Klose F., The multipurpose time-of-flight neutron reflectometer “Platypus” at Australia’s OPAL reactor. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 632, 112–123 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Devishvili A., Zhernenkov K., Dennison A. J. C., Toperverg B. P., Wolff M., Hjörvarsson B., Zabel H., SuperADAM: Upgraded polarized neutron reflectometer at the Institut Laue-Langevin. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84, 025112 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Han M., Kim H., Leal C., Negrito M., Batteas J. D., Espinosa-Marzal R. M., Insight into the electrical double layer of ionic liquids revealed through its temporal evolution. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 7, 2001313 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hayler H. J., Perkin S., The eutectic point in choline chloride and ethylene glycol mixtures. Chem. Commun. 58, 11204–11207 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Arnold O., Bilheux J. C., Borreguero J. M., Buts A., Campbell S. I., Chapon L., Doucet M., Draper N., Leal R. F., Gigg M. A., Lynch V. E., Markvardsen A., Mikkelson D. J., Mikkelson R. L., Miller R., Palmen K., Parker P., Passos G., Perring T. G., Peterson P. F., Ren S., Reuter M. A., Savici A. T., Taylor J. W., Taylor R. J., Tolchenov R., Zhou W., Zikovsky J., Mantid—Data analysis and visualization package for neutron scattering and μSR experiments. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 764, 156–166 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.J. Krzywon, P. Butler, et al. SasView version 6.1.3 (Zenodo, 2026).
  • 72.Glavic A., Björck M., GenX 3: The latest generation of an established tool. J. Appl. Cryst. 55, 1063–1071 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nelson A., Co-refinement of multiple-contrast neutron/X-ray reflectivity data using MOTOFIT. J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 273–276 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wakeham D., Nelson A., Warr G. G., Atkin R., Probing the protic ionic liquid surface using X-ray reflectivity. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 20828–20835 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S24

Tables S1 to S9

References

sciadv.aeh0276_sm.pdf (2.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the results in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Neutron data from the Institut Laue-Langevin are available via the ILL data portal: https://dx.doi.org/10.5291/ILL-DATA.CRG-3038. Detailed instructions are provided to facilitate replication of the new materials described in the paper.


Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES