Abstract
Imaging difficulties of the built-in electric field within water-splitting catalysts have hampered the acquisition of visual evidence for establishing the direct relationship between electronic structure and catalytic behavior. Herein, modeling on a cobalt–nickel bimetallic oxide comodified by iron doping and oxygen vacancies (Ov), we establish an explicit and comprehensive picture of the enhanced built-in electric field arising from the synergy effect of Fe and Ov at the atomic-level by utilizing differential phase-contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy. Heterogeneous Fe ions are revealed to introduce additional electronic conduction pathways for enhancing the overall electric field intensity. While Ov acted as absorption stations for attracting electrons and leading to a localized accumulation of electron density, Fe and Ov synergistically induce a strong and uniform built-in electric field, thereby enhancing charge migration. In situ spectroscopies further reveal that Fe doping promotes OH* intermediate adsorption by enhancing electric fields, and oxygen vacancies induce localized electric fields to facilitate the lattice oxygen oxidation mechanism. NiCo2–x Fe x Oδ fully exploits the Fe–Ov synergistic effect to achieve long-term stability and high catalytic activity in the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER). We anticipate this work can elucidate the interplay between cation–anion coregulation and the built-in electric field, offering a rational design strategy for high-performance OER electrocatalysts.


Introduction
Oxygen evolution reaction (OER), serving as the anodic half-reaction in clean energy technologies, involves a complex four-electron transfer process that limits the overall efficiency of water splitting. − Transition-metal oxides (TMOs) are regarded as typical matrix catalytic materials due to their flexible elemental composition and crystal structure. − Recent studies have revealed the crucial role of built-in electric field modulation within TMOs in efficient OER catalysis. The efficient built-in electric field can drive interface charge rearrangement, induce ligand field distortion, facilitate electron migration to the active site, and thereby optimize the adsorption behavior of catalytic reaction intermediates, thereby enhancing the overall catalytic efficiency. − Mingkui Wang and his collaborators constructed a NiFe LDH/FeMoO heterostructure catalyst, using the oxygen vacancies in NiFe LDH and the built-in electric field at the material interface to optimize the electronic state, allowing lattice oxygen to directly participate in the oxygen evolution reaction. Dang et al. constructed NFC catalysts, whose unique asymmetric built-in electric field induces electron redistribution at the interface, optimizing the adsorption behavior of hydrogen and oxygen intermediates. However, precise control over the strength and distribution of the built-in electric field to enhance catalytic activity remains technically challenging.
Regulating the internal chemical environment of catalysts through cation doping or anion defects offers a viable approach to optimizing the electronic structure and built-in electric field properties. For instance, introducing heteroatomic cations can modulate electron distribution and band structure, − while anion defects such as oxygen vacancies (Ov) can form localized states that promote charge trapping and separation. − Both strategies enhance OER activity from distinct perspectives. However, in systems where heteroatoms and Ov coexist, the microscopic mechanism governing their synergistic regulation of the intrinsic structure and catalytic behavior of TMOs remains unclear, particularly lacking direct evidence from the built-in electric field and charge migration image. Therefore, visualizing the built-in electric field is crucial for elucidating the intrinsic mechanism by which cation doping and Ov synergistically enhance the catalytic performance of TMOs.
Differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy (DPC-STEM) has enabled direct mapping of charge density distributions and electric field polarities within materials by detecting phase shifts as electrons penetrate the sample. − This technique has been successfully applied to analyze charge transfer at heterojunction interfaces, reveal the polarization fields of ferroelectric domain walls, and visualize localized charge rearrangements around single site defects. Lu and collaborators employed DPC-STEM to map the polarization electric fields around antisite defects in monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2). Zhang et al. applied DPC-STEM to reveal reduced electric field energy at the Ni3S2/NM-I electrode interface, indicating no barrier hindering electron transport. Tan et al. used DPC-STEM to demonstrate an asymmetric electric field distribution on Cu surfaces arising from the arrangement of Ag and Sn atoms. These studies illustrate that DPC-STEM transcends conventional electron microscopy analysis, providing a distinctive tool for visualizing and understanding the built-in electric field in catalytic materials.
Herein, utilizing DPC-STEM and in situ spectroscopic techniques, we for the first time directly image the built-in electric field within a series of nickel–cobalt-based metal oxides, comprehensively elucidating the unique synergistic enhancement mechanism of Fe doping and Ov for OER. The introduction of cationic Fe is revealed to enhance the overall built-in electric field for reducing the activation energy of the key intermediate OH*, thereby strengthening the adsorbate evolving mechanism (AEM). Meanwhile, the localized accumulation of electron density induced by Ov modulates the electronic orbital arrangement of the active metal and the free energy of reaction, which further promotes the partial surface reconstruction to activate the lattice oxygen oxidation mechanism (LOM). Under the synergistic regulation of Fe and Ov, NiCo2–x Fe x Oδ develops a strong and uniform built-in electric field, compared to other oxides with single-factor regulation, to achieve a more efficient charge migration. The Fe–Ov synergistic effect comprehensively utilizes the high stability of AEM and the high activity of LOM to significantly enhance the OER performance. This work has showcased visual and direct evidence for elaborating the synergistic regulatory effect of cation doping and anion vacancies and linking the built-in electric field with the catalytic behavior of TMO-based catalysts.
Results and Discussion
Fe Substitution at Co Sites and Identification of Ov
NiCo2O x (NCO x ) and Fe-doped NiCo2O x (NCFO x ) were synthesized via a one-pot hydrothermal method, and Ov was introduced into the matrix oxide through controlled calcination under a regulated atmosphere to obtain NiCo2Oδ (NCOδ, δ < x) and Fe-doped NiCo2Oδ (NCFOδ) (the synthesis procedure is detailed in Figure S1). The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) characteristic peaks of the as-prepared catalysts match the space group of Fm3̅m (Figure a). The shift of the characteristic peaks reveals that lattice expansion occurred in NCFO x due to the doping of larger Fe3+ ions (0.645 Å), whereas the lattice contraction in NCOδ could be attributed to Ov-induced strain. It is worth noting that the coexistence of Fe doping and Ov led to a net lattice contraction, which could be further corroborated by the blue shift of the characteristic peaks in Raman spectra (Figure S2). Atomic-resolution high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images revealed that this series of oxides exhibits a typical antispinel structure with the crystal orientation of [011] (Figure b and Figures S3-S4). The similar ion occupation of Co and Fe could be directly visualized by the atomic STEM-energy dispersive X-ray (STEM-EDX) elemental mapping (Figure b and Figures S5-S8), suggesting that the Fe ions are incorporated into the oxide lattice by substituting Co. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the Fe 2p region confirmed the octahedral coordination environment of Fe (III) (709.85 eV-Fe 2p3/2, 718.25 eV-Fe 2p1/2), which is consistent with that of the substituted Co site (Figure S9). Density functional theory (DFT) calculations further demonstrated that Fe ions are more inclined to substitute the Co ions at the octahedral sites due to the lower formation energy (−1.69 eV) (Figure c).
1.

Fine structure characterization of catalyst materials. (a) XRD spectra of the four catalysts and zoomed-in comparisons of the (311) characteristic peaks (right panel). (b) Atomic-resolution HAADF-STEM image of NCFOδ crystals obtained from the [011] direction and elemental mappings of Ni, Co, and Fe. (c) Formation energies of Fe-doped catalysts calculated by DFT and a schematic diagram. (d) Calculated Ov content differences in the catalysts from XPS data. (e) Atomic-resolution iDPC-STEM image of NCFOδ crystals along the [011] direction. (f) Atomic contrast distribution map derived from (e). The annotated region indicates oxygen atoms with lower contrast. (g) The pixel intensity profile of the line in (e). (h) DFT-calculated formation energy for catalyst Ov formation and a schematic diagram. (i) Schematic diagram of catalytic-level atomic structural changes.
Deconvolution of the O 1s spectrum revealed that the Ov content of NCOδ increased by 10.2% compared to NCO x , while that of NCFOδ increased by 11.2% relative to NCFO x (Figure d, Figures S10-S11 and Table S1). , The results obtained through electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy further confirmed the differences in the content of Ov in the catalysts (Figure S12). Corresponding shifts of the oxygen peak position in the electron energy loss spectrum (EELS) similarly validate the increasing trend (Figure S13). Moreover, integrated differential phase contrast STEM (iDPC-STEM) imaging and the corresponding atomic contrast distribution map have revealed localized contrast reduction at oxygen sites in NCFOδ, which could be utilized to precisely determine the location of the oxygen vacancies (Figure e,f and Figures S14-S15). Concurrently, we observed low contrast at metal sites near Ov, which corresponds to doped Fe atoms (Figure g). Specifically, theoretical calculations and atomic-level EDS mapping further revealed that the Ov are more readily formed near the Fe-doped sites, suggesting a potential synergistic interaction between the Fe ions and Ov (Figure h and Figure S16). These results collectively indicate that the atmosphere control strategy can effectively construct stable high-Ov catalytic materials with heterogeneous element doping (Figure i). Critically, the anchoring interaction between Ov and Fe ions could produce a synergistic effect, which implies an optimized and regulated electronic structure of the active metal within the oxide matrix.
Homogeneous Built-In Electric Field Distribution Enabled by Fe–Ov Synergy
DPC-STEM was employed to map the electric field information within these catalysts (as schematically illustrated in Figure a; see Supporting Information for technical principles). The atomic-level electric field information on NCO x along the [110] orientation is shown in Figure b, where the arrow direction denotes the direction of the electric field, and color gradients represent the magnitude of the electric field strength. The overall electric field distribution of NCO x is relatively uniform, but the electric field strength is relatively weak (Figures S17-S18). The electric field within the material serves as the primary driving force for internal charge migration. An efficient charge migration is crucial for optimizing the adsorption strength of intermediates during the catalytic process. To further analyze charge migration driven by varying electric field strengths, we performed distribution of relaxation time (DRT) analysis on the electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) of the catalytic materials. The results indicate that NCO x exhibits a high charge transfer resistance during this relaxation time, while the resistances of NCFO x , NCOδ, and NCFOδ gradually decrease (Figures S19-S20).
2.

Analysis of built-in electric fields in catalytic materials. (a) Schematic diagram of the working principle of the DPC-STEM technique. (b) Atomic-level built-in electric field image of NCO x obtained via DPC-STEM. (c–e) Atomic-level built-in electric field images of catalytic materials obtained via DPC-STEM, corresponding to NCFO x , NCOδ, and NCFOδ, respectively. (f) Comparison of the average electric field strength, the 95th percentile, and the median electric field strength of catalytic materials obtained from DPC-STEM. (g) Schematic diagram of the regulatory role of Fe and Ov in the built-in electric field.
Taking the electric field distribution of NCO x as the reference, NCFO x demonstrates an overall enhancement in electric field intensity, as indicated by the blue arrows in Figure c (Figures S21-S22). In contrast, NCOδ displays a locally intensified electric field distribution, yielding a nonuniform distribution state (circled by red dashed lines in Figure d, Figures S23-S24). Notably, the DPC image of NCFOδ reveals the strongest and most uniform electric field intensity, without any signs of excessive localization or attenuation (Figure e and Figures S25-S27). These observations indicate that the Fe doping introduced additional electronic conduction pathways, thereby enhancing the overall electric field intensity, while Ov acted as absorption stations for electrons, strongly attracting electrons and leading to a localized accumulation of electron density. More importantly, the coexistence of Fe and Ov in NCFOδ produces a synergistic effect. The uniformizing effect of Fe extends the local polarization induced by Ov into an overall enhanced built-in electric field, which promotes stronger charge migration within the catalyst. To provide quantitative support for this synergistic electric field enhancement effect, we performed a pixel-by-pixel statistical analysis of the DPC-STEM images and calculated metrics such as electric field intensity. The results show that NCFOδ exhibits the highest average electric field intensity, 95th percentile electric field intensity, and median electric field intensity, quantitatively confirming a significant enhancement in electric field intensity (Figure f, Figures S28–S30 and Table S2). Analysis of the statistical plot of electric field intensity values and a comparison of the maximum and minimum potential differences reveal that NCFOδ exhibits both the highest intensity and the widest distribution, further validating the uniformity of its electric field distribution (Figure S31). These statistical data transform the qualitative descriptions of “stronger” and “more uniform” into quantifiable values, further establishing the central role of the Fe–Ov synergy in modulating the intrinsic electric field. Figure g illustrates the schematic representation of Fe and Ov for electric field regulation. The Tauc plots derived from the ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) diffuse reflectance spectra of the catalytic materials show that NCFOδ has the narrowest bandgap, reflecting its strongest charge-transfer capability (Figure S32). , To bridge the gap between the static built-in electric field visualized by DPC-STEM and the dynamic electrocatalytic kinetics, we performed in situ EIS, in situ DRT, and in situ Bode analysis. The results show that among the four catalysts, the electrochemical impedance of NCFOδ is the lowest, the voltage response speed is the fastest, and the resistance of charge bulk transport and interface electron transfer during the reaction process is the smallest (Figures S33-S35). − Furthermore, in situ Bode peak shift reveals that NCFOδ demonstrates superior initial charge transfer activity and lower voltage dependence (Figures S36-S37). This phenomenon is completely consistent with the expression of the built-in electric field strength in DPC-STEM. A stronger and more uniform static electric field reduces the activation barrier of charge transfer. These results demonstrate that our modification of charge migration through regulating the catalyst’s built-in electric field directly influences the OER process.
Intermediate Adsorption Regulation and Reaction Pathway Identification
The optimization of charge migration dynamics by the built-in electric field ultimately requires precise regulation of intermediate adsorption during the OER. In situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) directly tracked the dynamic adsorption behavior of key reaction intermediates, further investigating the synergistic effects of Fe doping and Ov on the evolution of reaction intermediates. A vibrational band at 1232 cm–1 corresponding to OOH* adsorbate was detected in all catalysts during the OER, indicating that the adsorbate evolution mechanism (AEM) serves as the primary reaction pathway (Figure a–d). − In NCOδ, the metal–oxygen (M–O*) characteristic oxygen-containing intermediate representing the LOM mechanism was observed. The relative vibration intensity of adsorbed OOHads (M–OOHads) and OHads (M–OHads) revealed that Fe doping in NCFO x enhanced the adsorption of OH* intermediates, thereby strengthening the AEM mechanism (Figure e and Figure S38). In NCOδ, the high-Ov strengthened M–O* interaction. Notably, both effects have been concurrently amplified in NCFOδ (Figure d–f). Furthermore, the discrepancy in reaction mechanisms occurred on the surface of these catalysts was further elucidated by in situ differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) with 18O isotopic labeling (Figure g,h, Figure S39 and Table S3). The / ratio remained below 10% for all catalysts, confirming the dominance of the AEM pathway. The / ratio decreased to 0.69% for NCFO x compared to NCO x , which is consistent with enhanced OH* adsorption observed by in situ FT-IR. The partial contribution from the lattice oxygen mechanism (LOM) could be proved by the pronounced increased ratio value of NCOδ, which is consistent with the enhanced M–O* interaction observed in in situ FT-IR spectroscopy. Notably, NCFOδ also exhibits a slightly lower / ratio (6.50%) compared to NCOδ (11.26%), reflecting its appropriate LOM contribution (Figure i). This differentiated regulation of intermediate adsorption energy and reaction pathways also aligns with DPC-STEM results, stemming from distinct charge migration characteristics within the catalytic material. Fe doping induces enhanced electric fields that strengthen charge migration, suppressing excessive activation of lattice oxygen while maintaining AEM dominance by promoting OH* adsorption. Conversely, Ov-induced local electric fields enhance the covalent nature of M–O* bonds to activate the LOM pathway. In NCFOδ, we calculated the synergy factor of the cooperative effect between Fe and Ov (Table S4). The synergistic regulatory effects of these two interactions help achieve the optimal integration of AEM stability and LOM activity.
3.

Analysis of Fe and Ov regulation on catalytic mechanisms and reaction mechanisms. (a–d) In situ FT-IR spectra obtained at different applied potentials: (a) NCO x, (b) NCFO x, (c) NCOδ, and (d) NCFOδ. (e,f) Trend diagrams of characteristic FTIR peak intensities for OOHads and M-Oads. (g,h) DEMS signals of , , and of catalysts from the reaction products cycled in the H2 18O aqueous KOH electrolyte: (g) NCO x and (h) NCFOδ. (i) Signal ratio and error bar of to during the catalyst OER process obtained from DEMS data. (j) Free energy diagram of the catalytic material.
Gibbs free energy changes during the OER were computed to quantitatively assess the reaction energy barriers (Figure j). , In the original NCO x , the transition from OH* to O* represents the rate-determining step and possesses the highest thermodynamic energy barrier. Fe doping significantly reduces the activation energy for OH* formation, aligning with the enhanced adsorption of OH* observed through in situ FT-IR spectroscopy. In contrast, NCOδ experiences a fundamental reorganization of the electronic structure, shifting the rate-determining step to the initial water dissociation (H2O → OH). This shift confirms that Ov stabilizes the O* intermediate by strengthening the M–O* bonding, while simultaneously increasing the energy barrier of the initial adsorption step, which is correlated with the elevated LOM contribution detected by in situ DEMS. Notably, the NCFOδ catalyst demonstrates an equilibrium distribution of free energy across all OER intermediates. The energy barrier of the rate-determining step (O* → OOH*) decreases significantly, resulting in a theoretical overpotential of 0.53 eV. These computational results have revealed that Fe doping promotes OH* adsorption during the early AEM steps, whereas Ov modulates M–O* bond covalency to facilitate the subsequent steps. The synergistic effect between these two key factors leads to an exceptional catalytic performance of NCFOδ compared to that of individually modified catalysts.
Elucidating the Electronic Structure Modulation by Fe and Ov
The synergistic optimization of the electronic structure of active metals by Fe doping and high-Ov is the intrinsic mechanism that influences the built-in electric field strength within catalytic materials and enhances catalytic performance. The L3-edge of Co and Ni in EELS was observed to shift toward the lower-energy direction due to Fe doping and high-Ov content, indicating a reduction in the valence states of Co and Ni (Figure a and Figure S40). Specifically, the dropped Fe ions with low electronegativity act as electron donors to inject electrons into the Co/Ni sites via the Fe–O–Co/Ni pathway, thereby reducing the valence states of Co and Ni. Meanwhile, Ov, a kind of defect carrying an effective positive charge, can transfer its bound electrons toward neighboring metal sites to maintain local charge neutrality, which directly increases the number of occupied electrons at Co/Ni sites. Especially in NCFOδ, the locally low-coordination environment created by Ov enhances the electron-supplying tendency of Fe sites, while the Fe–Ov configuration provides a more direct pathway for electron transfer. This synergistic interaction between Fe and Ov therefore enables efficient charge modulation, producing a more pronounced L3-edge shift of NCFOδ compared to the other oxides. XPS results further proved the trend of decreasing valence states with the Ni2+ and Co2+ ratio progressively increasing (Figure b, Figures S41-S42 and Tables S5-S6). Moreover, the Bader charge of Ni and Co revealed the highest charge values of NCFOδ (Figure c), which confirms that the electron-donating ability of dropped Fe ions and the electron-compensation effect of Ov synergistically optimize the electronic structure.
4.

Electronic structure characterization of catalysts. (a) Peak positions of Co and Ni L3-edge collected from the EELS spectra of catalysts. (b) Changes in Ni3+ and Co2+ content in the catalyst as calculated by XPS. (c) Bader charges of catalysts. (d,e) PDOS diagrams of the Co element of NCFO x and NCFOδ. (f,g) Schematic representations of electronic orbital distribution of NCFO x and NCFOδ.
Projected density of states (PDOS) calculations at octahedral sites , reveal that Fe doping and Ov significantly alter the electronic structure of Co. In contrast, the PDOS at the Ni site has a negligible effect (Figure S43), suggesting that the significant reduction in the Ni valence state detected by EELS is attributed to changes in electron transfer behavior caused by Fe doping and Ov, rather than the direct occupation of the Ni d orbitals. Compared with NCO x , the up-spin component of Co orbital in NCFO x transitions from a partially occupied to fully occupied state. This increases the electron density of the up-spin orbital, enabling the formation of a stronger σ bond with the OER initial intermediate OH*, thereby effectively enhancing the adsorption capacity for OH* (Figure S38). This finding is consistent with infrared spectroscopy results, which demonstrate that Fe doping effectively enhances OH* adsorption during the catalytic process. By comparing the PDOS of NCFO x and NCFOδ, it can be observed that the down-spin portion of the Co orbital shifts downward in energy and becomes fully occupied by electrons after Ov introduction (indicated by the blue arrow in Figure d). Meanwhile, the down-spin portion of the and orbitals shifts upward in energy, raising their levels (indicated by the pink arrow in Figure e). This indicates a shift in the energy levels of the two sets of orbitals, prompting a rearrangement of electrons within them (green arrow in Figure g) and significantly influencing the adsorption behavior of key intermediates in the OER process. Figure f and g clearly contrasts the differences in electronic configurations between the NCFO x and NCFOδ systems during OH* and O* adsorption. In the OH* adsorption state, the partial occupation of the σ* antibonding orbital in the NCFOδ system moderately weakens the initially strong adsorption force, creating a kinetically more favorable starting environment for the conversion step (left panels of Figure f,g). For the O* adsorption state, the introduction of Ov simultaneously weakens the adsorption of both OH* and O*, constrained by the linear scaling relationship of the intermediates. , However, since O* is already bound to the active site via a double bond, its antibonding orbital was partially occupied even before Ov introduction. Consequently, Ov exhibits a more pronounced weakening effect on OH* adsorption (Figure j), thereby promoting the conversion of OH* to O*. This process benefits from the rearrangement of Co’s electronic structure induced by Ov introduction. The fully occupied, energetically lowered orbital acts as a strong σ donor, injecting electrons into electron-deficient O during dehydrogenation to stabilize the intermediate and lower the energy barrier. Concurrently, the orbitalelevated in energy and better matched with O orbitalforms an efficient π feedback pathway with the fully vacant π* acceptor, further stabilizing O* and preventing its excessive adsorption (right panel of Figure g). Comparisons between NCO x and NCOδ similarly validate this perspective (Figures S44-S45).
Based on the above computational analysis, Fe doping and Ov introduction exhibit a distinct synergistic electronic structure regulation mechanism. The core role of Fe doping lies in optimizing the electronic occupation of the spin-up channel at the Co site, transforming the orbital from a partially vacant state to a fully occupied state. This significantly enhances the material’s adsorption capacity for the initial intermediate OH*, laying the foundation for subsequent reactions. The core function of Ov introduction lies in reconstructing the orbital energy levels and occupation of the spin-down pathway. It shifts the orbital energy level downward and fully occupies it, while simultaneously raising the dyz orbital energy level and clearing its associated antibonding π orbital. The essence of this synergistic effect lies in Fe and Ov independently yet complementarily governing the electronic engineering of different spin directions and bonding pathways. Fe enhances the initial electron supply to σ orbitals (spin-up), ensuring effective capture of reactants, while Ov simultaneously optimizes the depth of σ orbital electron supply (spin-down) and the feedback capacity of π orbitals. Together, they drive the efficient conversion of OH* to O* and fine-tune the adsorption strength of each intermediate to overcome scaling limitations. Therefore, Fe and Ov do not act independently but achieve comprehensive multilevel optimization of the electronic structure at the Co active site through precise adjustment of orbital and spin channels.
Fe–Ov Synergistic Regulation of Catalytic Activity and Stability
OER performance was evaluated in 1 M KOH by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). As shown in Figure a, NCFO x and NCOδ exhibited lower overpotential than NCO x at 10 mA/cm2, indicating that both Fe doping and increased Ov content have the effect of enhancing the catalytic performance. Notably, NCFOδ achieved an overpotential of 276 mV. We have again calculated the synergy factor for the synergistic effect of the interaction between Fe and Ov (Table S7), which verified the synergistic enhancement from Fe–Ov comodification. Tafel analysis further confirmed that NCFOδ exhibited faster kinetics with a slope of 83.89 mV/dec, compared with NCO x , NCFO x, and NCOδ (Figure b). This remarkable enhancement in catalytic performance benefits from highly efficient charge migration enabled by the potent built-in electric field in NCFOδ (Figure f), indicating that the Fe–Ov synergistically regulated electric field is the key factor for improving intrinsic activity. Moreover, the distinctive role of high-Ov in exposing active sites was corroborated by the significantly enhanced double-layer capacitance (C dl) values of NCOδ and NCFOδ (Figure c and Figure S46), which correspond to larger electrochemical surface areas (ECSA) for these catalysts. To eliminate the influence of ECSA, we normalized the current density. The results showed that NCFOδ still exhibited the highest catalytic activity, confirming its superior intrinsic activity (Table S8). We further synthesized control samples with different doping concentrations. The electrochemical test results similarly confirmed that NCFOδ exhibits optimal activity and charge transfer capability (Figure S47 and the discussion sections).
5.

Analysis of OER performance and reconstruction behavior in catalysts. (a) LSV polarization curve measured at a scan rate of 5 mV/s (the internal illustration depicts the overpotential of the catalysts). (b) Tafel slope plot. (c) C dl of the catalysts. (d,e) In situ Raman spectra of NCOδ and NCFOδ obtained at different applied potentials. (f,g) HRTEM images of catalysts NCOδ and NCFOδ after 50 h of OER. (h) The thickness of the reconstructed layers of the catalytic material obtained through HRTEM after different reaction times. (i) Polarization curve of the AEM membrane electrode assembly (MEA) composed of NCO x and NCFOδ materials at 80 °C. (j) Stability test of the NCFOδ-based AEMWE system at a current density of 1.0 A/cm2 in 1 M KOH solution.
In situ Raman spectroscopy was employed to probe the structural evolution of the catalysts under operating conditions. Three characteristic peaks at 479 cm–1 (Eg–Ni–O6), 521 cm–1 (F2g–Co–O6), and 687 cm–1 (A1g–Co–O4) were identified and assigned to the spinel framework (Figure d,e and Figures S48-S49). , NCO x exhibited minimal spectral changes with the increasing potential. In contrast, NCOδ underwent reversible structural reconstruction above 1.4 V, evidenced by the appearance of new bands at 452 cm–1 and 565 cm–1, which were assigned to NiOOH and (Fe,Co)OOH species, respectively (Figure d). A similar reconstruction behavior of NCFOδ under a 1.6 V applied bias voltage confirmed the promoting effect of Ov on the phase transformation (Figure e). Notably, NCFO x maintained the spectral features across the measured potential range, indicating that Fe doping does not have the function of triggering the reconstruction. Similarly, HRTEM images show that for NCOδ and NCFOδ, the thickness of the surface reconstruction layer increases with the extension of the reaction time (Figure f,g and Figures S50-S53). However, the reconstruction layer of NCFOδ is always thinner than that of NCOδ at all time points (Figure h). This observation directly confirms the in situ Raman evidence. These results are consistent with the Fe doping-promoted AEM mechanism and Ov-promoted M–O* interaction observed in theoretical calculations, FT-IR, and DEMS. The enhanced electric field effect from Fe doping accelerates charge migration, effectively boosting the stability of the matrix oxide, while high-Ov induces surface restructuring under the localized enhanced electric field. In the NCFOδ system, the synergistic interaction between Fe doping and high-Ov yields a stronger, more uniform electric field and enhanced charge migration. This combination effect simultaneously maintains structural stability and boosts catalytic activitythe sum of these combined effects exceeds the sum of their individual contributions.
To identify the phase composition of the restructured layer and its impact on the electronic structure of the catalytic material, we systematically characterized the postreaction samples. Raman and EDS analyses confirmed that the restructured layer consists of hydroxyl oxides generated by OER (Figures S54-S55). XPS analysis showed that the Ov content in the NCFOδ bulk phase remained essentially stable after the reaction, while the Ov content in the NCOδ phase continued to decrease (Figures S56-S58 and Table S9). Combined with EELS data, this further indicated that the valence states of Ni and Co in the NCFOδ phase underwent the least change (Figures S59-S62). Additionally, postreaction bulk DPC-STEM imaging revealed that the electric field distribution was consistent with that before the reaction (Figure S63), while DEMS confirmed that a moderate LOM contribution was retained after restructuring (Figure S64). Further DFT calculations were performed to model the hydroxyl oxides formed in the restructured phase. The results indicated that Fe could still lower the OH* adsorption energy barrier, and PDOS analysis also revealed an energy level shift in the Co d orbitals that favored OH* adsorption (Figures S65-S66). These findings demonstrate that the Fe–Ov synergistic effect remains stable after restructuring, achieving a balance between structural stability and catalytic activity.
In anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEMWE) operating in 1 M KOH at 80 °C, the NCFOδ-based membrane electrode assembly (MEA) achieved current densities of 0.957 A/cm2 and 1.90 A/cm2 at battery voltages of 1.70 and 1.87 V, respectively. In contrast, NCO x -based MEA could only attain current densities of 0.572 A/cm2 and 1.167 A/cm2 at these voltages (Figure i and Figures S67-S68). More importantly, chronopotentiometry testing of the AEM was carried out at a current density of 1 A/cm2 (Figure j). During the 1000 h chronopotentiometry test, the NCFOδ electrode demonstrated exceptional stability, with no performance degradation observed. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) analysis revealed that during the OER process, both Ni and Co in NCO x continued to dissolve, whereas the dissolution rate of metal ions in NCFOδ increased slowly over time, with the dissolution concentration gradually stabilizing, further confirming the structural stability (Figure S69 and Table S10). This further validates the dual enhancement of activity and stability achieved through Fe–Ov synergistic effects, fully highlighting its application potential in industrial water electrolysis.
Conclusion
In summary, we directly imaged the atomic-level electric field in catalytic materials and elucidated the synergistic interaction between Fe doping and high-Ov. Fe doping enhanced the charge transport by altering electronic orbital occupation, and high-Ov modulated the orbital structure due to the charge concentration effect, which collectively imparted a significantly strengthened built-in electric field to NCFOδ. The enhanced built-in electric field significantly improved the adsorption of the key intermediate OHads and suppressed material restructuring behavior. Thus, NCFOδ can balance the long-term stability characteristic of the AEM with the high activity characteristic of the LOM, thereby improving catalytic performance and accelerating the OER. Our work has revealed the influence of cation–anion regulation on the atomic-level electric field within catalytic materials and clarified the impact of charge migration on catalytic behavior. These findings establish an advanced electron microscopy technology foundation for investigating the catalytic mechanisms governed by electronic-structure modulation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. 22475090, received by Y.H., and 12374011, received by Y.P.), the Gansu Provincial Youth Science and Technology Fund Program (22JR5RA537, received by Y.H.), and the 78th Batch of General Funding from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2025M780947, received by N.Z.).
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.6c10106.
Detailed experimental details, experimental methods (sample synthesis, characterization, testing, and DFT calculations), additional STEM, Raman, XPS, electrochemical, DEMS, and DFT calculation data (PDF)
#.
B.S. and Z.Z. contributed equally to this work.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Seh Z. W., Kibsgaard J., Dickens C. F., Chorkendorff I., Nørskov J. K., Jaramillo T. F.. Combining Theory and Experiment in Electrocatalysis: Insights into Materials Design. Science. 2017;355(6321):eaad4998. doi: 10.1126/science.aad4998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dai J., Zhu Y., Chen Y., Wen X., Long M., Wu X., Hu Z., Guan D., Wang X., Zhou C.. et al. Hydrogen Spillover in Complex Oxide Multifunctional Sites Improves Acidic Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):1189. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28843-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu Y., Lin Q., Zhong Y., Tahini H. A., Shao Z., Wang H.. Metal Oxide-Based Materials as an Emerging Family of Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020;13(10):3361–3392. doi: 10.1039/D0EE02485F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Q., Wang Y., Luk H. M., Tang J., Wu S., Wu D., Hu Z., Cui D., Zhang J.. Recent Advances in Non-Precious Metal Electrocatalysts for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis: Mechanistic Insights, Catalyst Design, and Structural Regulation Strategies. Chem. Eng. J. 2025;523:168587. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.168587. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- An L., Wei C., Lu M., Liu H., Chen Y., Scherer G. G., Fisher A. C., Xi P., Xu Z. J., Yan C.. Recent Development of Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts in Acidic Environment. Adv. Mater. 2021;33(20):2006328. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Guo J., Liu X., Liu Z., Li T., Wang S., Zhang C., Wang K., Xu T., Kong W.. et al. Corrosion-Driven Ni3S4 Gradient in NiFe-LDH Enables Durable Industrial-Scale Water Electrolysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64(49):e202516894. doi: 10.1002/anie.202516894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z., Shen W., Liang X., Liang J., Xu K., Ge X., Lu J., Liu H., Xiao J., Wang L., Gao J., Liu J.. Dual-Regulation Engineering of Spinel Co3 O4 via Mo Electron Buffering and Asymmetric Sites Coupling for Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ACS Catal. 2025;15(11):8943–8953. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c01192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li C., Ye B., Ouyang B., Zhang T., Tang T., Qiu Z., Li S., Li Y., Chen R., Wen W.. et al. Dual Doping of N and F on Co3O4 to Activate the Lattice Oxygen for Efficient and Robust Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2025;37(28):e2501381. doi: 10.1002/adma.202501381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y., Wang J., Xi S., Shen J., Luo S., Ge J., Sun S., Chen Y., Hanna J. V., Li S.. et al. Navigating Surface Reconstruction of Spinel Oxides for Electrochemical Water Oxidation. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):2467. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38017-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W., Zhang J., Yang C., Geng Z., Chen X., Liu Q., Wang B., Wang L.. Modulating Iridium Coordination to Control the Oxygen Evolution Reaction Pathway. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(44):40697–40707. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c13365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu W., Wang Y., Song S., Ge Z., Zhang C., Huang J., Xu G., Wang N., Lu Y., Deng Z.. et al. Built-In Electric Field in Freestanding Hydroxide/Sulfide Heterostructures for Industrially Relevant Oxygen Evolution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64(22):e202504972. doi: 10.1002/anie.202504972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu J., Gao X., Chen Z.. Elucidating the Construction and Modulation of Built-in Electric Field in the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;492:152241. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.152241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tang H., Ding J., Feng Z., Shen K., Chen L., Li Y.. Ultrastable NiFeP-Based Heterostructures for Seawater Electrolysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026;36:e28467. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202528467. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xie W., Shen Z., Xi S., Zhang L., Tang K., Ma Z., Lu C., Xu Z. J.. T2 Occupancy as a Descriptor for Polysulfide Conversion on Spinel Oxides. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):8859. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63903-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ji K., Wang S., Yao S., Ji Y., Li J., Wang X., Shi L., Wang G., Ren W., Wang J.. et al. Built-in Electric Field in Ru/CoP Bifunctional Electrocatalyst Enhances Hydrazine-Assisted Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. 2025;37(29):e2503182. doi: 10.1002/adma.202503182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu S., Sun M., Dai L., Wang S., Yu Z., Li N., Chen F., Wei Y., Shen Y., Zhao C.. et al. Defect-Interface Coupling for Stable Lattice-Oxygen-Driven Oxygen Evolution at Industrial Current Densities. Nat. Commun. 2026;17(1):2135. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-68730-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma W., Zhang Y., Hu L., Lv X., Dang J.. Dynamic Restructuring of Asymmetric Built-in Electric Field Catalysts Facilitates the Efficient Water Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025;35(16):e2422734. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202422734. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng W., Zhao Y., Jiang K., Xie F., Meng L., Gao S., Li J., Lan J., Luo M., Liu L.. et al. Heteroatom Dopants Overcome the Activity-Stability Trade-off in RuO2 for Acidic Oxygen Evolution. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):6716. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62036-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen Z., Song P., Xie W., Tannesia L., Tang K., Sun Y., Xi S., Xu Z. J.. Valence Electron: A Descriptor of Spinel Sulfides for Sulfur Reduction Catalysis. Adv. Mater. 2025;37(8):e2418090. doi: 10.1002/adma.202418090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z., Lu S., Zhu M., Wang F., Yang K., Dong B., Yao Q., Hu W.. Enhancing Water Oxidation Performance of Transition Metal Oxides by Atomically Precise Heteroatom Doping. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(26):22806–22817. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c04572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Liu Y., Liu S., Qin Y., Liu J., Jia X., Jiang Q., Wang X., Zhao Y., Liu L.. et al. Gd-Induced Oxygen Vacancy Creation Activates Lattice Oxygen Oxidation for Water Electrolysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025;35(26):2500118. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202500118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Q., Shao D., Dai C., Wang J., Li X., Song P., Xie W., Xi S., Zhang L., Lin X., Luo S., Sun S., An L., Xi P., Xu Z. J.. Efficient Electrocatalytic Nitrate-to-Ammonia Enabled by Reversible Lattice-Oxygen Control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(33):30401–30411. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c10362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X., Xue S., Huang M., Lin W., Hou Y., Yu Z., Anpo M., Yu J. C., Zhang J., Wang X.. Pressure-Induced Engineering of Surface Oxygen Vacancies on Metal Oxides for Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(6):4945–4951. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c14073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J., Xue X.-X., Shao G., Jing C., Dai S., He K., Jia P., Wang S., Yuan Y., Luo J.. et al. Atomic-Level Polarization in Electric Fields of Defects for Electrocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):7849. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43689-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He W., Wang Y., Zhao Y., Tang C., Cong L., Wang C., Lu Y., Liu X., Dong J., Cherevko S.. et al. Heterointerface-Enabled Anti-Reverse-Current Electrodes for Alkaline Water Electrolyzers at 1000 mA cm–2 . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026;148:5232–5242. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c17603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie F., Wang Z., Kao C.-W., Lan J., Lu Y.-R., Tan Y.. Asymmetric Local Electric Field Induced by Dual Heteroatoms on Copper Boosts Efficient CO2 Reduction Over Ultrawide Potential Window. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63(37):e202407661. doi: 10.1002/anie.202407661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geng W.-R., Wang Y.-J., Zhu Y.-L., Zhang S., Ma H., Tang Y.-L., Tuo S., Ma X.-L.. A Stable Monoclinic Variant and Resultant Robust Ferroelectricity in Single-Crystalline Hafnia-Based Films. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):8842. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63907-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu B., Hu N., Li C., Ma J., Zhang J., Yang Y., Sun D., Yin B., Cui G.. Direct Observation of Li-Ion Transport Heterogeneity Induced by Nanoscale Phase Separation in Li-rich Cathodes of Solid-State Batteries. Angew. Chem. 2022;134(40):e202209626. doi: 10.1002/anie.202209626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu Y., Zheng Y., Jin J., Wang Y., Peng Y., Yin J., Shen W., Hou Y., Zhu L., An L.. et al. Understanding the Sulphur-Oxygen Exchange Process of Metal Sulphides Prior to Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):1949. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37751-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Li S., Hou X., Cui T., Zhuang Z., Zhao Y., Wang H., Wei W., Xu M., Fu Q.. et al. Low-Spin Fe3+ Evoked by Multiple Defects with Optimal Intermediate Adsorption Attaining Unparalleled Performance in Water Oxidation. Adv. Mater. 2024;36(52):2412598. doi: 10.1002/adma.202412598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin Q., Jang H., Jiang X., Wang L., Wang X., Kim M. G., Liu S., Liu X., Cho J.. Constructing Interfacial Oxygen Vacancy and Ruthenium Lewis Acid-Base Pairs to Boost the Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Kinetics. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63(3):e202317622. doi: 10.1002/anie.202317622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng C., Hu M., Zuo S., Luo J., Castaño P., Ren Y., Rueping M., Zhang H.. Ru-OV Site-Mediated Product Selectivity Switch for Overall Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Adv. Mater. 2025;37(5):2411813. doi: 10.1002/adma.202411813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng C., Wang Y., Wang J., Xu H., Huang W., Liu Z., Li W., Li Y., Qu Z., Tu X., Yan N.. Oxygen-Vacancy-Engineered Pd-WO 3– x for Enhanced Plasma-Catalyzed CO2 Hydrogenation to CO. ACS Catal. 2026;16(3):2395–2405. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c07524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu M., Zheng Y., Hu Y., Huang B., Ji D., Sun M., Li J., Peng Y., Si R., Xi P.. et al. Artificially Steering Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction Mechanism by Regulating Oxygen Defect Contents in Perovskites. Sci. Adv. 2022;8(30):eabq3563. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq3563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun K., Mao W., Jin L., Shi W., Niu W., Wei C., He Y., Yan Q., Wang R., Li Y.. et al. Enhancing Heterointerface Coupling for Durable Industrial-Level Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis. Angew. Chem. 2025;137(23):e202502250. doi: 10.1002/ange.202502250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J., Kao C.-C., Gao F., Wang P., Shen H., Wang Z., Zheng Y., Qiao S.-Z.. Operando Insights into Bridging Oxygen-Driven RuOx Lattice Collapse and its Mitigation Strategy for Durable Industrial PEMWE. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2026;65(1):e20766. doi: 10.1002/anie.202520766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuo L., Yang H., Li H., Zhang Y., Gao L., Zhang Y., Wang F.. Magneto–Photo Synergism Enhances Oxygen Evolution Reaction on Hollow NiCo2O 4 Microboxes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026;36(15):e19261. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202519261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wan J., Wu Z., Fang G., Xian J., Dai J., Guo J., Li Q., You Y., Liu K., Yu H., Xu W., Jiang H., Xia M., Jin H.. Microwave-Assisted Exploration of the Electron Configuration-Dependent Electrocatalytic Urea Oxidation Activity of 2D Porous NiCo2O4 Spinel. J. Energy Chem. 2024;91:226–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.12.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez Batalla B., Bachmann J., Weidlich C.. Investigation of the Degradation of Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis Cells Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy with Distribution of Relaxation Times Analysis. Electrochim. Acta. 2024;473:143492. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.143492. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huo X., Shan G., Yang L., Abrar L., Gao L., Li W., Zhang J.. Insights into Kinetic and Transfer Mechanisms for Alkaline Decoupled Water Electrolysis Based on Distribution of Relaxation Times. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2024;91:693–702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Wang Y., Ciucci F.. Distribution of Relaxation Times: Foundations, Methods, Diagnostics, and Prognosis for Electrochemical Systems. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2026;55:101789. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2025.101789. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang B., Zhao K., Yu Z., Sun C., Wang Z., Feng N., Mai L., Wang Y., Xia Y.. In Situ Structural Evolution of the Multi-Site Alloy Electrocatalyst to Manipulate the Intermediate for Enhanced Water Oxidation Reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020;13(7):2200–2208. doi: 10.1039/D0EE00755B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Qin Y., Niu X., Zhao R., Sun J., Xu Z., Guo Z., Liu D., Guo L., Liu C., Zhang J.. et al. Manganese as Electron Reservoir Stabilized RuMnOx@RuOx with Enhanced Activity and Robust Durability for Acidic Water Oxidation. ACS Catal. 2024;14(17):e4c01707. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c01707. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shang L., Xu S., Ni Y., Lu Y., Li H., Zhang K., Yan Z., Cheng F., Chen J.. Structure Engineering Enabled O–O Radical Coupling in Spinel Oxides for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(37):34169–34180. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c13198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tao X., Hou L., Wang X., Jin J., Li H., Gao F.. Iron and Oxygen Vacancies Co-Modulated Adsorption Evolution and Lattice Oxygen Dual-Path Mechanism for Water Oxidation. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):8788. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63844-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qian F., Cao D., Chen S., Yuan Y., Chen K., Chimtali P. J., Liu H., Jiang W., Sheng B., Yi L.. et al. High-Entropy RuO2 Catalyst with Dual-Site Oxide Path for Durable Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):6894. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61763-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang K., Liang X., Wang Y., Zou Y., Zhao X., Chen H., Zou X.. Support-Tuned Iridium Reconstruction with Crystalline Phase Dominating Acidic Oxygen Evolution. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):8164. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63541-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu H., Zhang Z., Fang J., Li M., Sendeku M. G., Wang X., Wu H., Li Y., Ge J., Zhuang Z., Zhou D., Kuang Y., Sun X.. Eliminating Over-Oxidation of Ruthenium Oxides by Niobium for Highly Stable Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution in Acidic Media. Joule. 2023;7(3):558–573. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2023.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pang L., Liu W., Zhao X., Zhou M., Qin J., Yang J.. Engineering Electronic Structures of Nickel Cobalt Phosphide via Iron Doping for Efficient Overall Water Splitting. ChemElectroChem. 2020;7(24):4913–4921. doi: 10.1002/celc.202001390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun L., Marrocchelli D., Yildiz B.. Edge Dislocation Slows down Oxide Ion Diffusion in Doped CeO2 by Segregation of Charged Defects. Nat. Commun. 2015;6(1):6294. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Yuan Z., Cen Z., Yu S., Li C., Tang H., Cao A., Wu T., Ren X., Ma D.. Site-Specific Ir Single Atoms in Spinel Induce 5d Spin Polarization for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2026:e2500154. doi: 10.1002/anie.2500154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li D., Xu D., Pei Y., Zhang Q., Lu Y., Zhang B.. Isolated Octahedral Pt-Induced Electron Transfer to Ultralow-Content Ruthenium-Doped Spinel Co3 O4 for Enhanced Acidic Overall Water Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146(42):28728–28738. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c07089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee D.-G., Kim S. H., Lee H. H., Shin S., Lee J., Joo S. H., Lee Y., Kwak S. K., Song H.-K.. Breaking the Linear Scaling Relationship by a Proton Donor for Improving Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Kinetics. ACS Catal. 2021;11(20):12712–12720. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c02934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Viswanathan V., Hansen H. A., Rossmeisl J., Nørskov J. K.. Universality in Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysis on Metal Surfaces. ACS Catal. 2012;2(8):1654–1660. doi: 10.1021/cs300227s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huo M., Li Q., Liang Y., Liu W., Wang H., Qin K., Sun X., Ma Y., Xing Z., Chang J.. Barium-Induced Compressive Strain Engineering in Low-Iridium Co3O4 Spinel for High-Efficiency Acidic Oxygen Evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2025;519:165555. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.165555. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z., Zhu J., Shi B., Wu S., Wei Y., Hu Y., Zhang N., Li S., Lu M., An L., Xi P., Yan C.-H.. Modulating the Electronic Structures of Co-Based Spinel Compounds via Rare Earth Tetrad Effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026;148(4):4450–4461. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c18963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
