Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2026 Apr 7;27(4):1497–1503. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2026.27.4.1497

The Interplay of CD8+ TILs and Microvascular Density: A Novel Prognostic Indicator in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Heru Fajar Trianto 1,2, Gondo Mastutik 3,*, Desak Gede Agung Suprabawati 4, Mahyarudin Mahyarudin 5
PMCID: PMC13614496  PMID: 41945967

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of CD8⁺ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8⁺ TILs), microvascular density (MVD), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with the TNM (Tumor-Node-Metastasis) stage, as well as to analyze their interrelationships in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study involved 50 FFPE samples of colorectal adenocarcinoma from the Laboratory of Anatomical Pathology at Dr. Soedarso Hospital. Microvascular density (MVD) was assessed on hematoxylin eosin (H&E) slides, while CD8⁺ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8⁺ TILs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression were evaluated using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Correlation analysis was conducted between the biomarkers and the TNM stage, including its components depth of tumor invasion, lymph node status, and distant metastasis using the Chi-square test. Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the relationships among CD8⁺ TILs, MVD, and VEGF.

Results:

High CD8⁺ TILs expression was significantly associated with negative lymph node status (p = 0.047; OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.098–1.001), absence of distant metastasis (p = 0.008; OR = 0.130, 95% CI = 0.025–0.680), and low TNM stage (p = 0.011; OR = 0.221, 95% CI = 0.067–0.727). The distribution of high MVD was correlated with deeper tumor invasion (p = 0.004; OR = 9.036, 95% CI = 1.741–46.890), positive lymph node status (p < 0.001; OR = 10.286, 95% CI = 2.768–38.215), and high TNM stage (p = 0.002; OR = 6.612, 95% CI = 1.924–22.728). High expression of VEGF showed a significant correlation with deeper tumor invasion (p = 0.036; OR = 0.675, 95% CI = 0.544–0.837). Spearman’s test revealed a negative correlation between CD8⁺ TILs and MVD (r = –0.280, p = 0.049), and a positive correlation between MVD and VEGF (r = 0.303, p = 0.032).

Conclusion:

High CD8⁺ TILs and low MVD are favorable prognostic factors in colorectal adenocarcinoma, whereas increased MVD and VEGF expression indicate tumor aggressiveness and enhanced angiogenesis. The combination of immune and angiogenic biomarkers with TNM staging could improve prognostic evaluation in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Key Words: Colorectal adenocarcinoma, CD8+ TILs, MVD, VEGF, TNM Stage, cancer

Introduction

The colorectal adenocarcinoma was the third most common cancer worldwide in 2022, with a mortality rate of 462,252 cases [1]. According to results, mortality and 5-year survival rates for colorectal adenocarcinoma depend on various prognostic factors, one of which is the TNM (Tumor-Nodes-Metastasis) stage [2, 3]. Overall survival (OS) decreases with increasing TNM stage [3, 4].

The cancer cell development is influenced not only by genetic alteration or mutation but also by the tumor microenvironment (TME) within the stromal area of the tumor [5, 6]. TME is a dynamic environment composed of multiple elements, such as the immune and angiogenic systems [5, 7]. CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), components of the immune system around tumors, are essential for recognizing and eliminating tumor cells [8, 9]. High CD8+ TILs expression is correlated with better prognosis in several types of cancers, including colorectal adenocarcinoma [10, 11].

The angiogenic components in the TME play an essential part in cancer progression by forming new blood vessels that promote tumor cell growth and increase the incidence of metastasis [5, 9]. Microvascular density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are pro-angiogenic factors linked to poor cancer outcomes. High MVD increases the risk of angioinvasion and nodal involvement, while high VEGF relates to tumor invasion depth [12, 13].

Various components in the TME influence and interact dynamically [5]. However, there have been few studies directly examining the relationship between immune and angiogenic system components in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the relationship between CD8+ TILs, MVD, and VEGF expression with TNM stage, as well as its components (depth of tumor invasion, lymph node status, and distant metastasis) in colorectal adenocarcinoma, and to investigate the interrelationship among these markers to better understand the immune-angiogenic crosstalk in colorectal adenocarcinoma progression.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study included 50 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma at Dr. Soedarso Hospital’s Laboratory of Anatomical Pathology, Pontianak, between January 2020 and December 2023. The samples were from resection tissue, and contained adequate tumor cells for hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) examination. Furthermore, it also had TNM stage data based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-8, which includes the depth of tumor invasion (pT), lymph node metastasis status (pN), and distant organ metastasis status (pM). Observation of HE and IHC slides was conducted by two pathologists in a blinded manner. This research received ethical clearance from the Health Research Ethics Committee of Dr. Soedarso General Hospital (Approval No. 96/RSUD/KEPK/XI/2024).

Immunohistochemical Procedure

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were cut into 4 µm thick slices, deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated through graded ethanol solutions. Antigen retrieval was performed using heat-induced epitope retrieval in Tris-EDTA buffer pH 9.0 at 95–98 °C for 30 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 minutes, followed by protein blocking for 5 minutes.

The samples were then incubated with anti-CD8 mouse monoclonal antibody (clone IHC542, GenomeMe, Canada; dilution 1:200) and anti-VEGF mouse monoclonal antibody (clone IHC682, GenomeMe, Canada; dilution 1:200) at room temperature for 60 minutes. After primary antibody incubation, sections were treated with a polymer-based detection system for 10 minutes and visualized using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Slides were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared, and mounted. Tonsil tissue was used as a positive control for CD8 expression, and kidney tissue was used as a positive control for VEGF.

MVD Assessment

The observations were carried out on HE slides with a 40x objective magnification. The entire tumor stroma area within the slide was observed, and hot-spot areas containing a high MVD were selected. The MVD was assessed by calculating the average blood vessel count in three fields of view in the hot-spot area [7]. The median value obtained was used as a cut-off point (12.5) to divide the data into low and high groups. The criteria for blood vessels observed were having a diameter of less than 8 erythrocytes, thin-walled, and not being located in sclerotic or necrotic areas.

Assessment of CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Expression

The CD8+ TIL expression was identified on lymphocyte cell membranes within the tumor stroma using semiquantitative IHC staining. To minimize sampling bias, five random fields of view were assessed at 40× objective magnification [14], selected according to a standardized zigzag (serpentine) pattern. The microscope stage was moved from left to right across the tissue section and then shifted downward before being moved in the opposite direction, allowing systematic coverage of the slide while maintaining random field selection. The average value derived from these selected fields was calculated to evaluate CD8⁺ TIL expression following the approach of Fathima et al. [15], with minor modifications. The resulting median value (42.8) was used as the cutoff to stratify samples into low- and high-expression groups. CD8⁺ TIL levels were classified as ‘high’ when exceeding the median and ‘low’ when falling below it.

Assessment of VEGF Expression

The VEGF was assessed in the cytoplasm of tumor cells using IHC staining. The assessment was performed semi-quantitatively using the H-Score method, which involves multiplying the percentage of stained cells by the staining intensity (0 for no staining, 1 for light staining, 2 for moderate staining, and 3 for strong staining). The H-Score results were classified as negative (0-50); weak (51-100); moderate (101-200); and strong (201-300) [16].

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 25. The Chi-square test was employed to assess the associations between CD8⁺ TILs, MVD, and VEGF with tumor depth of invasion, lymph node status, distant metastasis, and TNM stage. For variables showing significant associations, Odds Ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to quantify the strength of these relationships. The association between CD8⁺ TILs expression and VEGF, as well as MVD, was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics

A summary of the clinicopathological characteristics in this study is presented in Table 1. The sample in this study was divided into four groups, including stage I (24%), stage II (26%), stage III (26%), and stage IV (24%). In this study, the mean age of the patients was 59.2 years (range = 25-79 years), with the majority being male (58%). The majority of the sample was pT3 (64%), without lymph node metastasis (54%), and without distant metastasis (76%) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinicopathological Characteristics

Variables n (%)
Age (Years)
< 60 23 (46)
≥ 60 27 (54)
Mean±SD 59.2±12.02
Sex
Male 29 (58)
Female 21 (42)
Tumor depth invasion
pT1 3 (6)
pT2 10 (20)
pT3 32 (64)
pT4 5 (10)
Lymph node metastasis status
Negative 27 (54)
Positive 23 (46)
Distant metastasis
Negative 38 (76)
Positive 12 (24)
Stages
I 12 (24)
II 13 (26)
III 13 (26)
IV 12 (24)
CD8+ TILs Expression
Low 25 (50)
High 25 (50)
MVD
Low 25 (50)
High 25 (50)
VEGF Expression
Negative 0 (0)
Weak 4 (8)
Moderate 36 (72)
Strong 10 (20)

CD8+ TILs, CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; MVD, Microvascular density; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor

Relationship between CD8+ TILs Expression and TNM Stage

The CD8+ TILs were expressed on the membranes of lymphocytes in tumor stroma at various stages of colorectal adenocarcinoma (Figure 1). The Chi-square test results showed that high CD8+ TIL expression in tumor areas was significantly correlated with negative lymph node metastasis status (p = 0.047; OR=0.31, 95%CI = 0.098-1.001), no distant metastasis (p = 0.008; OR=0.130, 95%CI=0.025-0.680), and low TNM stage groups (p = 0.011; OR=0.221. 95%CI=0.067-0.727). However, CD8+ TIL expression showed no correlation with tumor invasion depth (p = 0.107) (Table 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Expression of CD8+ TILs in Tumor Stroma Area. (A) Low group of CD8+ TILs. (B) High group of CD8+ TILs (IHC, Objective 40x).

Table 2.

Relationship between CD8+ TILs, MVD, and VEGF Expression with Clinicopathological Parameters

Variables CD8+ TILs Expression p-value OR (95%CI) MVD p-value OR (95%CI) VEGF Expression p-value OR (95%CI)
Low(n) High(n) Low (n) High (n) Weak - Moderate (n) Strong(n)
Tumor depth invasion
p T1- p T2 4 9 0.107 0.339 (0.088-1.300) 11 2 0.004* 9.036 (1.741-46.890) 13 0 0.036* 0.675 (0.544-0.837)
p T3- p T4 21 16 14 23 27 10
Lymph node metastasis
Negative 10 17 0.047* 0.314 (0.098-1.001) 20 7 0.000* 10.286 (2.768-38.215) 23 4 0.321 2.02 (0.49-8.32)
Positive 15 8 5 18 17 6
Distant metastasis
Negative 15 23 0.008* 0.130 (0.025-0.680) 20 18 0.508 1.556 (0.419-5.779) 31 7 0.619 1.47 (0.31-6.90)
Positive 10 2 5 7 9 3
Stages
I-II 8 17 0.011* 0.221 (0.067-0.727) 18 7 0.002* 6.612 (1.924-22.728) 21 4 0.480 1.65 (0.41-6.78)
III-IV 17 8 7 18 19 6

CD8+ TILs, CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; MVD, Microvascular density; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; *Significant p-value (p<0.05); OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Relationship between MVD and TNM Stage

The amount of MVD was assessed in the stromal area surrounding the tumor (Figure 2). Tumors with high MVD showed higher odds and were associated with deeper tumor invasion (p = 0.004; OR=9.036, 95%CI= 1.741-46.890), positive lymph node metastasis (p = 0.000; OR=10.286, 95%CI = 2.768-38.215), and high TNM stage (p = 0.002, OR=6.612, 95%CI=1.924-22.728). High MVD correlated with deeper tumor invasion, positive lymph node metastasis, and high TNM stage (III-IV). No significant correlation was observed between MVD and distant metastasis (p = 0.508) (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Microvascular Density Evaluation in Hot-Spot Areas. (A) Low microvascular density. (B) High microvascular density (HE; Objective 40x).

Relationship between VEGF Expression and TNM Stage

The expression of VEGF was evaluated in the cytoplasm of colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (Figure 3). Most VEGF expression was moderate (72%), and none were negative. Strong VEGF expression was significantly associated with deeper tumor invasion (p=0.036; OR=0.675, 95%CI= 0.544-0.837). In contrast, VEGF expressions were not significant correlation with lymph node metastasis (p=0.321), distant metastasis (p=0.619), and TNM stage (p=0.480) (Table 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Expression of VEGF in Cytoplasm of Tumor Cells. (A) Weakly staining. (B) Moderate staining. (C) Strong staining (IHC, Objective 40x)

Relationship between CD8+ TILs and VEGF Expression with MVD

The Spearman’s correlation test showed a negative correlation between CD8+ TILs expression and MVD (p = 0.049; r = -0.280). These results show that increasing CD8+ TILs expression is consistent with decreasing MVD counts. Conversely, there was a positive correlation between MVD and VEGF (p=0.032; r=0.303), showing that the higher the MVD count, the stronger the VEGF expression (Table 3).

Table 3.

Relationship between CD8+ TILs and VEGF Expression with MVD

Variables MVD p-value r
Low High
CD8+ TILs expression
Low 9 16 0.049* -0.280
High 16 9
VEGF expression
Weak 4 0 0.032* 0.303
Moderate 18 18
Strong 3 7

CD8+ TILs, CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; MVD, Microvascular density; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; *Significant p-value (p<0.05); r = correlation coefficient

Discussion

Most of the patients in this study were male (58%), with a mean age of 59.2 years, ranging from 25 to 79 years. The youngest patient was 25 years old. The incidence of colorectal adenocarcinoma in young patients is correlated with various factors, including Lynch syndrome, a family history of colorectal adenocarcinoma, dietary patterns, and childhood obesity [17, 18]. The prognosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma in young patients is generally poorer, as it is frequently associated with poorly differentiated histological grade and advanced stage at diagnosis [18, 19].

The AJCC-8 TNM staging, which assesses the combination of depth of tumor invasion (pT), lymph node metastasis status (pN), and distant organ metastasis (pM), correlates with the prognosis and treatment options for colorectal adenocarcinoma. The results of Hong et al.’s study [20] showed a decrease in OS with increasing stage, namely 94.7% in stage I and only 31.5% in stage IV. This study reported that the majority of the tumor were pT3 (64%), which is consistent with studies by Nugrahani et al. [21] and Hashmi et al. [22]. High pT is associated with poorly differentiated tumor and perinodal spread, and is molecularly associated with the consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS) or the poor-prognosis mesenchymal subtype [22, 23]. The majority samples showed no evidence of nodal involvement (54%) and distant metastasis (76%). The metastatic ability of tumor cells is influenced by several molecular mechanisms, including the WNT/β-Catenin, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) pathway, and mutations in KRAS and BRAF that affect the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, as well as the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/MET pathway through CD44 expression [24, 25].

Tumors with high CD8+ TILs in our study demonstrated a significant protective association, characterized with absence of lymph node metastasis, lack of organ metastasis, and lower TNM stage groups (stage I-II). These results show that CD8+ TILs play an essential part in the host-immune response, which can suppress the development and spread of tumor cells, consistent with the studies of Xiao et al. [26] and Kasurinen et al. [11]. Xiao et al. [26] study showed that patients with high CD8+ TILs had more prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to the low CD8+ TILs group. CD8+ TILs are crucial lymphocyte cells in the immune response, as they possess antitumor capabilities by recognizing tumor cell antigens and subsequently destroying them through cytotoxic mechanisms [8,9]. The assessment of CD8+ TILs along with program death-1 (PD-1) and program death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is also the basis for selecting therapy for colorectal adenocarcinoma, particularly immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab [27]. PDL-1 is a molecule expressed by tumor cells that binds to PD-1 on the T lymphocyte cell membrane, thereby suppressing the ability of T lymphocytes to destroy tumor cells [27, 28].

The results of the MVD calculation in this study showed a significant association with several clinicopathological variables. High MVD was more common in the tumor with deeper invasion, lymph node metastasis, and high TNM stage (stage III-IV). These results are in line with those of Den Ulil et al. [29], which showed a higher prevalence of high MVD in stage III than in stage II tumor, and those of Cho et al. [7], which showed a link between MVD and the occurrence of metastasis in colorectal adenocarcinoma. This study indicates that MVD assessment can also be performed on simple staining, such as HE, making it easily applicable to routine pathology reports of colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Another angiogenic component observed in this study, namely VEGF expression, showed significant correlation with deeper invasion, which supports its contribution to tumor progression. These results are in line with the study carried out by Hutajulu et al. [13], who found a significant correlation between VEGF expression with deeper tumor invasion and rectal location. Interestingly, VEGF expression in this study had a positive correlation with the number of MVDs. A study conducted by El Sabaa et al. [30] on cervical carcinoma also yielded similar results, namely an increase in VEGF expression in conjunction with an increase in the number of MVDs. VEGF plays a critical role in tumor cell growth by promoting the formation of new blood vessels that supply nutrients and oxygen to tumor cells, while also facilitating the spread of tumor cells to other organs [31–34].

TME components, including immune and angiogenic factors, interact with each other. This study shows a correlation between increased CD8+ TILs and decreased MVD. This result is in line with the study conducted by Yugawa et al. [35] on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma samples, which showed that patients with low MVD had higher CD8+ TILs and lower numbers of Foxp3+. Angiogenesis in the tumor produces blood vessels that contain few pericytes and have imperfect basement membranes, thereby increasing interstitial fluid pressure accompanied by downregulation of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), which results in impaired migration of T lymphocyte cells towards the tumor [36]. In addition, tumor-associated endothelial cells (TEC) in the TME can influence the immune response in colorectal adenocarcinoma by producing FasL, which can eliminate CD8+ TILs. However, some TEC subsets can increase CCL8 expression, which in turn can enhance CD8+ TIL infiltration around the tumor [33]. Endothelial cells will also increase the migration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) to the stroma area of tumor, which can suppress CD8+ TILs through the expression of arginase-1, IL-10, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), PDL-1, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) [8]. Hypoxic conditions in the tumors also trigger the expression of inhibitory molecules, such as PDL-1, and cytokines, including IL-6, TGF-β, and Tregs, which reduce the T lymphocyte cell response [8, 36]. VEGF can also indirectly increase PD-1 expression, resulting in a decrease in the ability of CD8+ TILs to fight the tumor cells [36].

This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the relatively small sample size may limit the statistical power and the precision of the estimated associations. Second, the single-center, retrospective design introduces potential selection bias and limits the ability to control for unmeasured confounders. Future studies with larger, multicenter cohorts and prospective designs are recommended to validate these findings and to provide more robust prognostic evaluations.

In conclusion, the study showed the significance of immune–angiogenic interplay in colorectal adenocarcinoma. High CD8+ TILs were associated with negative nodal and distant metastasis, as well as a lower TNM stage, supporting their role as a favorable prognostic factor. In contrast, increased MVD and VEGF expression correlated with more advanced disease and emphasizing the contribution of angiogenesis to tumor progression. The integration of immune and angiogenic biomarkers with conventional TNM staging may improve prognostication and provide a rationale for combined therapeutic strategies targeting both immune activation and angiogenesis.

Author Contribution Statement

All authors contributed to the study’s concept and design. HFT: data collection, analysis, and manuscript writing. GM and DGAS: concept, manuscript review, editing. MM: literature search.

Acknowledgements

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Indonesian Education Scholarship, the Center for Higher Education Funding and Assessment, and the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education.

Ethical Declaration

This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Soedarso’s General Hospital (No.96/RSUD/KEPK/XI/2024).

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data Availabality

The data of this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Laversanne M, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I BF. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today (version 1.1) [Internet] Lyon: 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim BH, Kim JM, Kang GH, Chang HJ, Kang DW, Kim JH, et al. Standardized pathology report for colorectal cancer, 2nd edition. J Pathol Transl Med. 2020;54(1):1–19. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2019.09.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amir PN, Avoi R, Yusof SN, Syed Abdul Rahim SS, Robinson F, Giloi N, et al. Survival rate and prognostic factors for colorectal cancer in sabah, borneo, malaysia: A retrospective cohort of a population-based study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022;23(6):1885–92. doi: 10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.6.1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Labeda I, Erasio R, Iwan M, Sampetoding S, Ihwan M, Aboyaman J, et al. Colorectal cancer survival rates in Makassar , Eastern Indonesia : A retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Med Surg. 2021;74(2022):103211. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gallo G, Vescio G, De Paola G, Sammarco G. Therapeutic targets and tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2295):1–18. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Angell HK, Bruni D, Barrett JC, Herbst R. The Immunoscore : Colon Cancer and Beyond. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:332–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cho T, Shiozawa E, Urushibara F, Misawa M, Homma M, Norose T, et al. The role of microvessel density , lymph node metastasis , and tumor size as prognostic factors of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2017;13(6):4327–33. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.5959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang X, Meng T, Cui S, Liu D, Pang Q, Wang P. Roles of ubiquitination in the crosstalk between tumors and the tumor microenvironment ( Review ) Int J Oncol. 2022;61(84):1–18. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2022.5374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anderson NM, Simon MC. Tumor microenvirontment. Curr Biol. 2020;30(16):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li F, Li C, Cai X, Xie Z, Zhou L, Cheng B, et al. The association between CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the clinical outcome of cancer immunotherapy : A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;41:101134. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kasurinen J, Hagström J, Kaprio T, Beilmann-Lehtonen I, Haglund C, Böckelman C. Tumor-associated CD3- and CD8-positive immune cells in colorectal cancer: The additional prognostic value of CD8+-to-CD3+ ratio remains debatable. Tumor Biol. 2022;44:37–52. doi: 10.3233/TUB-211571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anannamcharoen S, Boonya-ussadorn C, Nimmanon T. Tissue Microvessel Density as a Potential Predictive Marker for Vascular Invasion in Colorectal Cancer. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2023;24(12):4097–102. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.12.4097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hutajulu SH, Paramita DK, Santoso J, Sani MIA, Amalia A, Wulandari G, et al. Correlation between vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression and tumor location and invasion in patients with colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018;9(6):1099–108. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.07.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Matsutani S, Shibutani M, Maeda K, Nagahara H, Fukuoka T, Iseki Y, et al. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells in H&E-stained sections of colorectal cancer tissue as a reasonable immunological biomarker. Anticancer Res. 2018;38:6721–7. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fathima ZS, Suresh TNR, Kattepur AK. Immunohistochemical expression of tumor- infiltrating lymphocytes CD8 and FOXP3 in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast. BMC Cancer. 2025;25(1550):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14892-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Soni D, Mukhopadhyay S, Goel G, Kapoor N, Gupta V, Das S. Immunohistochemical evaluation of tumor hypoxia and angiogenesis : Pathological significance and prognostic role in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J Lab Physicians. 2024;16(3):277–85. doi: 10.25259/JLP-2023-9-23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics , 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17–48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dharwadkar P, Zaki TA, Murphy CC. Colorectal cancer in younger adults. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2022;36(3):449–70. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tsabit SS, Trianto HF, Pratiwi SE, Hartono H. Clinicopathological Profile of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma in the Anatomical Pathology Laboratory of Dr . Soedarso Hospital Pontianak. Indones J Cancer. 2023;17(4):292–8. doi: 10.33371/ijoc.v17i4.1004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hong Y, Kim J, Choi YJ, Kang JG. Clinical study of colorectal cancer operation : Survival analysis. Korean J Clin Oncol. 2020;16:3–8. doi: 10.14216/kjco.20002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nugrahani RW, Rahniayu A, Mastutik G. EMMPRIN Correlated with β-CATENIN in Various T Stages of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025;26(3):1001–7. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.3.1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hashmi AA, Hashmi SK, Ali N, Thara K, Ali R, Edhi MM, et al. Clinicopathologic features of colorectal carcinoma: Features predicting higher T-stage and nodal metastasis. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(52):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3183-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Coebergh Van Den Braak RRJ, Ten Hoorn S, Sieuwerts AM, Tuynman JB, Smid M, Wilting SM, et al. Interconnectivity between molecular subtypes and tumor stage in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07316-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Andres SF, Williams KN, Rustgi AK. The Molecular Basis of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Curr Color Cancer Rep. 2018;14(2):69–79. doi: 10.1007/s11888-018-0403-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ferreira RG, Narvaez LEM, Espíndola KMM, Rosario ACRS, Lima WGN, Monteiro MC. Can Nimesulide Nanoparticles Be a Therapeutic Strategy for the Inhibition of the KRAS/PTEN Signaling Pathway in Pancreatic Cancer? Front Oncol. 2021;11:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.594917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xiao B, Peng J, Wang Y, Deng Y, Ou Q, Wu X, et al. Prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes combined with PD-L1 expression for patients with solitary colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(19):1–10. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2762a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bai Z, Zhou Y, Ye Z, Xiong J, Lan H, Wang F. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Colorectal Cancer: The Fundamental Indication and Application on Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2022;12:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sudoyo AW, Kurniawan AN, Kusumo GD, Putra TP, Rexana FA, Yunus M, et al. Increased CD8 Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Colorectal Cancer Microenvironment Supports an Adaptive Immune Resistance Mechanism of PD-L1 Expression. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(11):3421–7. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Den Uil SH, Van Den Broek E, Coupé VMH, Vellinga TT, Delis-Van Diemen PM, Bril H, et al. Prognostic value of microvessel density in stage II and III colon cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(146):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1063-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.El Sabaa BM, Meleiss M, Zaki I. VEGF expression and microvascular density in relation to high-risk-HPV infection in cervical carcinoma – An immunohistochemical study. Alexandria J Med. 2012;48(1):47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ajme.2011.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Goel HL, Mercurio AM. VEGF targets the tumour cell. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(12):871–82. doi: 10.1038/nrc3627.VEGF. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Martins SF, Reis RM, Rodrigues AM, Baltazar F, Filho AL. Role of endoglin and VEGF family expression in colorectal cancer prognosis and anti-angiogenic therapies. World J Clin Oncol. 2011;2(6):272–80. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i6.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li J, Chen D, Shen M. Tumor Microenvironment Shapes Colorectal Cancer Progression, Metastasis, and Treatment Responses. Front Med. 2022;9:1–13. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.869010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yuan Y, Jiang Y, Sun C, Chen Q. Role of the tumor microenvironment in tumor progression and the clinical applications ( Review ) Oncol Rep. 2016;35:2499–515. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.4660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yugawa K, Itoh S, Yoshizumi T, Iseda N, Tomiyama T, Toshima T, et al. Prognostic impact of tumor microvessels in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: association with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Mod Pathol. 2021;34:798–807. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-00702-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zheng W, Qian C, Tang Y, Yang C, Zhou Y, Shen P, et al. Manipulation of the crosstalk between tumor angiogenesis and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment: Insight into the combination therapy of anti-angiogenesis and immune checkpoint blockade. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1–24. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1035323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data of this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES