Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Sep 25;21(9):e0359236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0359236

Maternal body mass index and child haemoglobin: A national cross-sectional study in Peru

Arnold F Julca Avalos 1, Jeniffer K Pastor Aponte 1, Victor A Ramos Berrocal 1, David R Soriano-Moreno 1,*
Editor: Marly A Cardoso2
PMCID: PMC13614543  PMID: 42789561

Abstract

Background

Childhood anaemia remains a major public health problem in Peru. Although several maternal and environmental factors have been implicated, the association between maternal body mass index (BMI) and anaemia in young children remains inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the association between maternal BMI and both anaemia and haemoglobin levels in children aged 6–59 months in Peru.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analytical study using data from the 2024 Peruvian Demographic and Family Health Survey. Children aged 6–59 months and their mothers were included. Maternal BMI was the exposure variable, while childhood anaemia and haemoglobin concentration were the outcomes. Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios for anaemia, and linear regression models were applied to assess associations with haemoglobin levels.

Results

A total of 16,973 children were analysed. In adjusted analyses, maternal BMI categories were not associated with anaemia prevalence. However, maternal obesity, compared to normal weight, was associated with higher haemoglobin levels in children (adjusted β 0.72 g/dL; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.22). Additionally, each 1 kg/m2 increase in maternal BMI was associated with a 0.07 g/dL increase in child haemoglobin (adjusted β 0.07; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.11).

Conclusion

Maternal body mass index was not associated with the prevalence of anaemia, although a positive association was observed with child haemoglobin levels. These findings support the inclusion of maternal nutritional status within comprehensive anaemia prevention strategies and highlight the need for longitudinal studies to confirm these associations.

Introduction

Anaemia remains a public health problem worldwide, affecting approximately 41.4% of children under five years of age, with iron deficiency being the main cause [1,2]. This condition accounts for 1.8 million deaths annually and 1,252 years lived with disability per 100,000 children under five years, more frequently affecting males and children from low-income countries [3,4]. In Peru, in 2024, according to the Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES), the prevalence of anaemia in children under five years was 33.7%, reaching 43.7% among children under three years of age [5]. This condition increases the risk of stunting and impairments in cognitive and psychomotor development, particularly during the early years of life [6,7].

Various factors have been associated with childhood anaemia, including type of diet, gestational anaemia, socioeconomic conditions, maternal educational level and area of residence [8,9]. In addition, systematic reviews consistently show that poorer maternal nutritional status is associated with poorer nutritional status in the infant [10,11]; however, the influence of maternal nutritional status on childhood anaemia has been less explored. On the one hand, in underweight mothers, a low body mass index (BMI) may reflect household food insecurity or diets of low nutritional quality, with limited consumption of foods rich in bioavailable iron [12,13]. In contrast, in mothers with overweight or obesity, a higher BMI could act as a marker of greater food availability and access to resources, which could potentially be associated with higher iron intake and higher haemoglobin levels in the child. However, it is also possible that hypercaloric diets that are poor in micronutrients may not ensure adequate iron intake, which could contribute to low haemoglobin levels [10,14,15]. Furthermore, the presence of maternal eating disorders, low nutritional education or permissive or restrictive feeding styles may modulate iron availability in the infant’s diet.

Previous studies conducted in lower-middle-income countries among children under five years have shown that mothers with higher BMI tend to have children with higher haemoglobin levels, whereas maternal underweight is associated with lower haemoglobin [16–18]. In Peru, a high prevalence of the double burden of malnutrition has been described, where maternal overweight or obesity coexists with childhood anaemia [19]. This suggests a possible interrelationship between maternal nutritional status and the child’s haematological profile; however, this association has not yet been evaluated at the national level using representative data. Given the inconsistency of previous evidence and the coexistence of multiple forms of malnutrition in the country, it is necessary to generate evidence to determine whether maternal BMI constitutes a factor associated with childhood anaemia and haemoglobin levels. Understanding this relationship is relevant for the design of comprehensive interventions that address not only child supplementation but also maternal nutritional status and household feeding dynamics to reduce the burden of anaemia in Peru.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association between maternal BMI and anaemia and haemoglobin levels in children aged 6–59 months in Peru.

Methods

Design and population

This was a cross-sectional analytical study using data from the ENDES 2024. The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. ENDES is a survey conducted by the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics of Peru (INEI) and is carried out annually, providing nationally representative data of the Peruvian population. It uses a probabilistic, stratified and multistage sampling design. In 2024, a total of 36,760 households were scheduled to be surveyed, as specified in the ENDES 2024 technical report [20]. For the present study, children aged 6–59 months and their mothers with complete data on the variables of interest were included. Pregnant women were excluded.

Variables

The dependent variable was anaemia and haemoglobin among children aged 6–59 months, obtained from the Individual questionnaire of ENDES. Altitude-adjusted haemoglobin levels in g/dL and anaemia status according to the updated 2024 technical guidelines of the Peruvian Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization (WHO) were used. Haemoglobin was measured in ENDES using a portable HemoCue haemoglobinometer [20]. Anaemia classification was performed according to age group. Among children aged 6–23 months, severe anaemia was defined as haemoglobin <7.0 g/dL, moderate as 7.0–9.4 g/dL and mild as 9.5–10.4 g/dL [21]. Among children aged 24–59 months, severe anaemia was defined as <7.0 g/dL, moderate as 7.0–9.9 g/dL and mild as 10.0–10.9 g/dL [21].

The independent variable was BMI among women of reproductive age, obtained from the Individual questionnaire. BMI was categorised according to WHO cut-off points as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (≥30 kg/m2) [22].

Additional covariates were evaluated. Contextual and household characteristics included area of residence, natural region, altitude above sea level, household wealth index and quality of drinking water. Child characteristics included age in months, sex, presence of diarrhoea, cough and fever in the previous two weeks, and antiparasitic medication use in the past 12 months. Maternal characteristics included age, marital status, educational level and parity.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 19.0. Databases from the Household and Individual questionnaires were merged using unique identifiers. These databases are publicly available on the INEI website [23]. Data cleaning was conducted by excluding participants with missing data in the variables of interest or implausible values. Missing data were handled according to a pre-specified strategy based on the proportion of missing values for each variable: variables with less than 10% missing data were retained in the analysis, those with 10–30% missing data were considered for multiple imputation, and those with more than 30% missing data were excluded. None of the variables met the criteria for multiple imputation; therefore, no multiple imputation was performed. Accordingly, variables related to iron supplementation, type of breastfeeding received and prematurity had a high proportion of missing values (61.9%, 41.9%, and 91.9%, respectively) and were therefore not included in the analysis. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design using the svy command. Categorical variables were presented as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and continuous variables were described as means with 95% CI. To assess the association between maternal BMI and anaemia in children aged 6–59 months, Poisson regression models were used to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% CI. To evaluate the association between maternal BMI and haemoglobin levels (g/dL), linear regression models were applied to estimate crude and adjusted beta coefficients with 95% CI. Multicollinearity was assessed and was not present (variance inflation factor <10). The adjusted model followed an epidemiological approach, including confounders and neutral control variables based on theoretical considerations [24]. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

This study was conducted using publicly available survey data that ensure participant confidentiality and anonymity. ENDES obtains informed consent from respondents and complies with ethical principles for research involving human subjects. Additionally, the study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universidad Peruana Unión.

Results

Initially, 17,790 children aged 6–59 months were identified in the ENDES 2024 database, of whom 16,973 were ultimately included in the analysis (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Flow diagram of participant selection.

Fig 1

The mean age of the children was 32.2 months and 51.0% were male. Regarding maternal characteristics, the mean maternal age was 31.1 years. Most mothers resided in urban areas (71.0%), were married or cohabiting (82.2%), had secondary education (47.5%), and had two to three children (54.5%). Concerning child morbidity in the previous two weeks, 34.9% had cough, 20.2% had fever and 12.6% had diarrhoea. The mean maternal BMI was 27.9 kg/m2, and most mothers had overweight (40.1%). The mean haemoglobin concentration among children was 11.2 g/dL, and 29.9% had anaemia (Table 1).

Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of children aged 6–59 months and their mothers (n = 16,973).

Variables % or mean (95% CI)
Child age (months), mean 32.2 (32.0 to 32.5)
Maternal age (years), mean 31.1 (31.0 to 31.2)
Child sex
 Male 51.0 (50.1 to 52.0)
 Female 49.0 (48.0 to 49.9)
Area of residence
 Urban 71.0 (70.2 to 71.9)
 Rural 29.0 (28.1 to 29.8)
Marital status
 Married/cohabiting 82.2 (81.5 to 83.0)
 Never married/not living together 17.5 (16.8 to 18.3)
 Widowed/divorced 0.3 (0.2 to 0.4)
Natural region
 Metropolitan Lima 22.7 (21.8 to 23.5)
 Rest of the Coast 28.0 (26.9 to 29.1)
 Highlands 28.9 (27.6 to 30.3)
 Jungle 20.4 (19.4 to 21.5)
Altitude (metres above sea level), mean 1131.6 (1095.1 to 1168.1)
Educational level
 No formal education 0.9 (0.8 to 1.2)
 Primary 15.6 (14.8 to 16.5)
 Secondary 47.5 (46.4 to 48.6)
 Higher 36.0 (34.9 to 37.0)
Wealth index
 Poorest 28.9 (27.9 to 30.0)
 Poor 24.1 (23.1 to 25.1)
 Middle 19.4 (18.6 to 20.3)
 Rich 15.8 (15.0 to 16.7)
 Richest 11.7 (11.0 to 12.5)
Parity
 One child 27.8 (26.9 to 28.6)
 Two to three children 54.5 (53.5 to 55.5)
 Four or more children 17.7 (16.9 to 18.5)
Water quality
 Safe water 36.9 (35.7 to 38.1)
 Partially chlorinated 11.1 (10.3 to 11.8)
 Unsafe/non-chlorinated 39.4 (38.3 to 40.7)
 Not measured 12.6 (11.8 to 13.4)
Diarrhoea (past 2 weeks)
 No 87.4 (86.8 to 88.0)
 Yes 12.6 (12.0 to 13.2)
Cough (past 2 weeks)
 No 65.1 (64.0 to 66.1)
 Yes 34.9 (33.9 to 36.0)
Fever (past 2 weeks)
 No 79.8 (79.0 to 80.6)
 Yes 20.2 (19.4 to 21.0)
Antiparasitic medication (past 12 months)
 No 59.9 (58.9 to 60.8)
 Yes 40.1 (39.2 to 41.1)
Maternal BMI (kg/m²), mean 27.9 (27.8 to 28.0)
Maternal BMI category
 Underweight 0.9 (0.7 to 1.1)
 Normal weight 28.9 (28.0 to 29.9)
 Overweight 40.1 (39.1 to 41.1)
 Obesity 30.2 (29.2 to 31.1)
Child haemoglobin (g/dL), mean 11.2 (11.2 to 11.3)
Anaemia severity in children
 Severe 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2)
 Moderate 7.2 (6.8 to 7.7)
 Mild 22.5 (21.8 to 23.3)
 No anaemia 70.1 (69.3 to 71.0)
Child anaemia (dichotomous)
 No anaemia 70.1 (69.3 to 71.0)
 Anaemia 29.9 (29.0 to 30.7)

95% CI: 95% confidence interval; BMI: body mass index.

The prevalence of anaemia was higher among children of mothers with normal weight (32.9%, p < 0.001) and among those with lower maternal BMI (27.5 kg/m2, p < 0.001). Other variables significantly associated with higher anaemia prevalence included younger child age (27.9 months, p < 0.001), younger maternal age (30.3 years, p < 0.001), rural area of residence (39.1%, p < 0.001), mothers who were married or cohabiting (30.3%, p = 0.020), residence in the highlands (37.3%, p < 0.001) or jungle region (38.1%, p < 0.001), higher altitude (1,379 metres above sea level, p < 0.001), no formal education (p < 0.001), lowest wealth index category (41.5%, p < 0.001), four or more children (35.6%, p < 0.001), unsafe or non-chlorinated drinking water (34.6%, p < 0.001), recent diarrhoea (35.6%, p < 0.001) or fever (34.9%, p < 0.001), and not receiving antiparasitic medication in last 12 months (32.7%, p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2. Characteristics of children aged 6 to 59 months according to anaemia status (n = 16,973).

Variable Child anaemia status p-value
No anaemia (70.1%)
% or mean (95% CI)
Anaemia (29.9%)
% or mean (95% CI)
Child age (months), mean 34.1 (33.7 to 34.4) 27.9 (27.4 to 28.4) <0.001
Maternal age (years), mean 31.4 (31.3 to 31.6) 30.3 (30.0 to 30.5) <0.001
Child sex 0.073
 Male 69.4 (68.2 to 70.6) 30.6 (29.4 to 31.8)
 Female 70.9 (69.7 to 72.1) 29.1 (27.9 to 30.3)
Area of residence <0.001
 Urban 73.9 (72.9 to 74.9) 26.1 (25.1 to 27.1)
 Rural 60.9 (59.2 to 62.5) 39.1 (37.5 to 40.8)
Marital status 0.020
 Married/cohabiting 69.7 (68.7 to 70.6) 30.3 (29.4 to 31.3)
 Never married/not living together 72.1 (70.1 to 74.0) 27.9 (26.0 to 29.9)
 Widowed/divorced 82.3 (67.1 to 91.4) 17.7 (8.6 to 32.9)
Natural region <0.001
 Metropolitan Lima 80.2 (78.1 to 82.1) 19.8 (17.9 to 21.9)
 Rest of the Coast 75.7 (74.3 to 77.1) 24.3 (22.9 to 25.8)
 Highlands 62.7 (61.1 to 64.4) 37.3 (35.6 to 38.9)
 Jungle 61.9 (60.1 to 63.6) 38.1 (36.4 to 39.9)
Altitude (metres above sea level), mean 1026.0 (987.4 to 1064.7) 1379.5 (1322.6 to 1436.3) <0.001
Educational level <0.001
 No formal education 57.7 (49.1 to 65.8) 42.3 (34.2 to 50.9)
 Primary 63.2 (60.9 to 65.5) 36.8 (34.5 to 39.1)
 Secondary 68.0 (66.8 to 69.3) 32.0 (30.8 to 33.2)
 Higher 76.3 (74.9 to 77.6) 23.8 (22.4 to 25.2)
Wealth index <0.001
 Poorest 58.5 (56.9 to 60.2) 41.5 (39.8 to 43.2)
 Poor 69.1 (67.5 to 70.8) 30.9 (29.3 to 32.6)
 Middle 75.1 (73.3 to 76.9) 24.9 (23.1 to 26.7)
 Rich 78.9 (77.0 to 80.8) 21.1 (19.2 to 23.0)
 Richest 80.7 (78.2 to 83.0) 19.3 (17.0 to 21.9)
Parity <0.001
 One child 73.1 (71.6 to 74.6) 26.9 (25.4 to 28.4)
 Two to three children 70.5 (69.4 to 71.6) 29.5 (28.4 to 30.6)
 Four or more children 64.4 (62.1 to 66.6) 35.6 (33.4 to 37.9)
Water quality <0.001
 Safe water 75.5 (74.1 to 76.8) 24.6 (23.2 to 25.9)
 Partially chlorinated 70.7 (68.3 to 73.0) 29.3 (27.0 to 31.7)
 Unsafe/non-chlorinated 65.4 (64.0 to 66.7) 34.6 (33.3 to 36.0)
 Not measured 69.1 (66.5 to 71.6) 30.9 (28.4 to 33.5)
Diarrhoea (past 2 weeks) <0.001
 No 71.0 (70.0 to 71.9) 29.0 (28.1 to 30.0)
 Yes 64.5 (62.0 to 66.8) 35.6 (33.2 to 38.0)
Cough (past 2 weeks) 0.071
 No 70.7 (69.6 to 71.7) 29.3 (28.3 to 30.4)
 Yes 69.1 (67.7 to 70.5) 30.9 (29.5 to 32.3)
Fever (past 2 weeks) <0.001
 No 71.4 (70.5 to 72.3) 28.6 (27.7 to 29.5)
 Yes 65.1 (63.2 to 67.0) 34.9 (33.0 to 36.9)
Antiparasitic medication (past 12 months) <0.001
 No 67.3 (66.2 to 68.5) 32.7 (31.5 to 33.8)
 Yes 74.3 (73.1 to 75.5) 25.7 (24.5 to 26.9)
Maternal BMI (kg/m²), mean 28.0 (27.9 to 28.2) 27.5 (27.3 to 27.7) <0.001
Maternal BMI category <0.001
 Underweight 70.2 (61.9 to 77.4) 29.8 (22.6 to 38.1)
 Normal weight 67.1 (65.4 to 68.7) 32.9 (31.3 to 34.6)
 Overweight 70.6 (69.2 to 71.9) 29.5 (28.1 to 30.8)
 Obesity 72.5 (71.0 to 74.0) 27.5 (26.0 to 29.0)

95% CI: 95% confidence interval; BMI: body mass index.

When analysing the association between maternal BMI and anaemia prevalence in children, no significant association was observed in the adjusted analysis, either when BMI was evaluated categorically or as a continuous variable (Table 3). In contrast, children of mothers with obesity had haemoglobin levels 0.72 g/dL higher compared with those of mothers with normal weight (adjusted β 0.72; 95% CI: 0.23 to 1.22; p = 0.004). Furthermore, each 1 kg/m2 increase in maternal BMI was associated with an average increase of 0.07 g/dL in child haemoglobin levels (adjusted β 0.07; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.11; p < 0.001) (Table 4). Finally, graphical representation showed a directly proportional and statistically significant relationship between maternal BMI and haemoglobin levels (Fig 2).

Table 3. Association between maternal BMI and anaemia prevalence in children aged 6-59 months (n = 16,973).

Variable Crude PR (95% CI) p-value Adjusted PR* (95% CI) p-value
Maternal BMI category
Normal weight Ref. Ref.
Underweight 0.90 (0.69 to 1.18) 0.460 0.90 (0.69 to 1.17) 0.442
Overweight 0.89 (0.84 to 0.96) 0.001 1.00 (0.94 to 1.07) 0.880
Obesity 0.83 (0.77 to 0.90) <0.001 0.98 (0.91 to 1.06) 0.690
Maternal BMI (kg/m²) 0.984 (0.978 to 0.990) <0.001 0.999 (0.991 to 1.002) 0.290

PR: prevalence ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; Ref.: reference category.

*Adjusted for child age, maternal age (quartiles), child sex, area of residence, maternal marital status, natural region, altitude (quartiles), wealth index, parity, drinking water quality, history of diarrhoea, cough and fever in the past two weeks, and antiparasitic medication use in the past 12 months.

Table 4. Association between maternal BMI and child haemoglobin concentration (g/dL) among children aged 6-59 months (n = 16,973).

Variable Crude β (95% CI) p-value Adjusted β* (95% CI) p-value
Maternal BMI category
Normal weight Ref. Ref.
Underweight −0.16 (−1.88 to 1.57) 0.859 0.40 (−1.23 to 2.03) 0.631
Overweight 1.52 (1.03 to 2.01) <0.001 0.33 (−0.13 to 0.78) 0.156
Obesity 2.37 (1.84 to 2.90) <0.001 0.72 (0.23 to 1.22) 0.004
Maternal BMI (kg/m²) 0.20 (0.16 to 0.24) <0.001 0.07 (0.03 to 0.11) <0.001

β: linear regression coefficient; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; Ref.: reference category.

*Adjusted for child age, maternal age (quartiles), child sex, area of residence, maternal marital status, natural region, altitude (quartiles), wealth index, parity, drinking water quality, history of diarrhoea, cough and fever in the past two weeks, and antiparasitic medication use in the past 12 months.

Fig 2. Association between maternal BMI and child haemoglobin levels.

Fig 2

Discussion

Main findings

This cross-sectional analytical study conducted among children aged 6–59 months and their mothers in Peru found that maternal obesity was associated with higher haemoglobin levels in children. Furthermore, each 1 kg/m2 increase in maternal BMI was associated with an average increase of 0.07 g/dL in child haemoglobin, showing a linear relationship. However, no association was found between BMI and anaemia prevalence.

A previous cross-sectional study conducted in Nigeria among children aged 6–59 months found that maternal overweight (OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.96) and obesity (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.94) were significantly associated with lower odds of childhood anaemia compared with underweight mothers [16]. Another cross-sectional study conducted among 96,804 children aged 6–59 months in Sub-Saharan Africa found that for each 1 kg/m2 increase in maternal BMI, child haemoglobin increased by 0.01 g/dL. Additionally, maternal underweight (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.30) and normal weight (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.19) were associated with higher odds of childhood anaemia compared with mothers with overweight or obesity [17]. Similarly, a study conducted in West Africa found that children of underweight mothers were more likely to have anaemia and underweight [18].

A plausible explanation for the positive association between maternal BMI and child haemoglobin is that maternal BMI may act as an indirect measure of household food security. Mothers with higher BMI may, on average, have greater access to foods rich in bioavailable iron and to preventive actions against anaemia. This is consistent with previous literature showing that higher maternal haemoglobin, child deworming and better household conditions were associated with higher child haemoglobin levels [17]. Another plausible mechanism is that mothers establish and maintain dietary patterns, food availability and feeding norms within the household, which may influence adequate micronutrient intake. In this sense, maternal BMI may reflect persistent dietary behaviours transmitted to the child during the critical complementary feeding period.

Another relevant finding was that, although a linear and statistically significant association was observed between maternal BMI and child haemoglobin levels, no significant differences were found when analysing anaemia as a dichotomous variable. This apparent discrepancy may be explained by the fact that, although the magnitude of the beta coefficient was greater than that reported in previous studies [17], the effect size was likely not large enough to shift a substantial number of children above the diagnostic cut-off point for anaemia. Thus, maternal BMI may exert a gradual influence on haemoglobin as a continuous parameter, but with a more limited impact on the clinical occurrence of anaemia defined categorically.

The directly proportional relationship reinforces the plausibility of a biological gradient between these variables. This finding may have population-level relevance, as even modest increases in haemoglobin levels may translate into substantial reductions in mortality among children under five years of age [3]. Additionally, the low proportion of underweight mothers in our sample (0.9%) limits statistical power to detect differences in this category, particularly considering that previous studies have identified a higher risk of anaemia at this extreme of BMI.

Implications and recommendations

Because this study was based on a nationally representative survey with complex sampling, the findings are generalisable to Peruvian children aged 6–59 months and their non-pregnant mothers. The results suggest that interventions aimed at preventing and controlling childhood anaemia could benefit from a more comprehensive approach that includes maternal nutritional status and maternal dietary education. This does not imply promoting increases in BMI but rather improving diet quality and household feeding practices. Important knowledge gaps remain, including the lack of longitudinal studies to assess temporality of the association. Furthermore, the impact of maternal underweight in the Peruvian context remains unclear due to its low prevalence, which limits the precision of effect estimates. Future research could explore this relationship in specific subgroups and formally evaluate potential mediating mechanisms underlying the observed association.

Limitations and strengths

This study has several limitations. First, its cross-sectional design precludes establishing temporality or inferring causality between maternal BMI and child haemoglobin levels or anaemia. Second, BMI was used as a proxy measure of maternal adiposity, which may underestimate or overestimate true body fat excess [25]. From an analytical perspective, although multiple relevant confounders were adjusted for, it was not possible to control for important factors such as iron supplementation, prematurity, type of breastfeeding due to a high proportion of missing data and child dietary diversity or feeding habits, which may result in residual confounding. Additionally, the low prevalence of underweight mothers limited the precision of estimates for this category. Nevertheless, the study also has important strengths. It used a nationally representative survey of Peru with complex sampling and an adequate sample size. Moreover, the association was evaluated using both anaemia as a dichotomous outcome and haemoglobin as a continuous variable (g/dL), allowing a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship and identifying a directly proportional association that reinforces its plausibility.

Conclusion

Among Peruvian children aged 6–59 months, maternal obesity was associated with higher child haemoglobin levels, and each 1 kg/m2 increase in maternal BMI was associated with an average increase of 0.07 g/dL. However, maternal BMI was not associated with anaemia prevalence. These findings suggest a gradual effect on haemoglobin that does not necessarily translate into changes in anaemia defined by a diagnostic cut-off. Maternal nutritional status should be considered within comprehensive anaemia prevention strategies, and longitudinal studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are publicly available from the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics of Peru (https://proyectos.inei.gob.pe/microdatos/).

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Gedfie S, Getawa S, Melku M. Prevalence and associated factors of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia among under-5 children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Pediatr Health. 2022;9:2333794X221110860. doi: 10.1177/2333794X221110860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gardner WM, Razo C, McHugh TA, Hagins H, Vilchis-Tella VM, Hennessy C. Prevalence, years lived with disability, and trends in anaemia burden by severity and cause, 1990–2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10:e713–34. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00160-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Scott SP, Chen-Edinboro LP, Caulfield LE, Murray-Kolb LE. The impact of anemia on child mortality: An updated review. Nutrients. 2014;6:5915–32. doi: 10.3390/nu6125915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu Y, Ren W, Wang S, Xiang M, Zhang S, Zhang F. Global burden of anemia and cause among children under five years 1990-2019: Findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. Front Nutr. 2024;11:1474664. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1474664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Perú: Encuesta demográfica y de salud familiar 2024 nacional y departamental. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. 2024. https://proyectos.inei.gob.pe/files/WEB_ENDES/INFORME_PRINCIPAL/2024/INFORMES_PRINCIPALES_2024.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gutema BT, Sorrie MB, Megersa ND, Yesera GE, Yeshitila YG, Pauwels NS, et al. Effects of iron supplementation on cognitive development in school-age children: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0287703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Prado EL, Dewey KG. Nutrition and brain development in early life. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(4):267–84. doi: 10.1111/nure.12102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moradi Y, Moradkhani A, Shokri A, Mohammadzadeh P, Azami M, Moradi G, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in the prevalence of anemia: decomposing analysis among Kurdish people. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1392. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22561-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Al-Kassab-Córdova A, Mendez-Guerra C, Robles-Valcarcel P, Iberico-Bellomo L, Alva K, Herrera-Añazco P, et al. Inequalities in anemia among Peruvian children aged 6-59 months: A decomposition analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1068083. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1068083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mannino A, Sarapis K, Moschonis G. The effect of maternal overweight and obesity pre-pregnancy and during childhood in the development of obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. Nutrients. 2022;14(23):5125. doi: 10.3390/nu14235125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Heslehurst N, Vieira R, Akhter Z, Bailey H, Slack E, Ngongalah L, et al. The association between maternal body mass index and child obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019;16(6):e1002817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adams EL, Caccavale LJ, Smith D, Bean MK. Longitudinal patterns of food insecurity, the home food environment, and parent feeding practices during COVID-19. Obes Sci Pract. 2021;7(4):415–24. doi: 10.1002/osp4.499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moosavian SP, Ghodsi M, Farzanehnejad P, Ghanbari N, Mirlohi SH, Moradi S. Association of food insecurity with anemia in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Health Popul Nutr. 2025;44(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00966-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hsu PC, Hwang FM, Chien MI, Mui WC, Lai JM. The impact of maternal influences on childhood obesity. Sci Rep. 2022;12:6258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10216-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Strączek K, Horodnicka-Józwa A, Szmit-Domagalska J, Petriczko E, Safranow K, Walczak M. The influence of maternal nutritional behavior on the nutritional behavior of children with excess body weight. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2021;27(3):159–69. doi: 10.5114/pedm.2021.107721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Amine ZE, Adili-George CF, Belayneh EG, Chilaka CF, Sunday Isaiah U. Maternal risk factors associated with anaemia among children in Nigeria: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Med Health Care. 2025;:1–9. doi: 10.61440/jcmhc.2025.v2.41 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moschovis PP, Wiens MO, Arlington L, Antsygina O, Hayden D, Dzik W, et al. Individual, maternal and household risk factors for anaemia among young children in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(5):e019654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kofi Amegah A, Ayinemi R, Sewor C, Fenta HM, Yeboah K, Mohammed SA, et al. Birth weight mediates the association of maternal undernutrition with child undernutrition prevalence in West Africa. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024;78(9):772–81. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01453-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pradeilles R, Landais E, Pareja R, Eymard-Duvernay S, Markey O, Holdsworth M, et al. Exploring the magnitude and drivers of the double burden of malnutrition at maternal and dyad levels in peri-urban Peru: A cross-sectional study of low-income mothers, infants and young children. Matern Child Nutr. 2023;19(4):e13549. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Encuesta demográfica y de salud familiar - ENDES 2024. 2024.
  • 21.Ministerio de Salud. Norma técnica de salud N° 213-MINSA/DGIESP-2024: Prevención y control de la anemia por deficiencia de hierro en el niño y la niña, adolescentes, mujeres en edad fértil, gestantes y puérperas. Lima: Ministerio de Salud. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. 854. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática - INEI. Plataforma Nacional de Datos Abiertos: Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar (ENDES) 2024. 2024. Available: https://proyectos.inei.gob.pe/microdatos/
  • 24.Cinelli C, Forney A, Pearl J. A crash course in good and bad controls. SSRN Journal. 2020. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3689437 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rubino F, Cummings DE, Eckel RH, Cohen RV, Wilding JPH, Brown WA, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025;13(3):221–62. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00316-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Marly Cardoso

9 Aug 2026

Dear Dr. Soriano-Moreno,

plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

As the corresponding author, your ORCID iD is verified in the submission system and will appear in the published article. PLOS supports the use of ORCID, and we encourage all coauthors to register for an ORCID iD and use it as well. Please encourage your coauthors to verify their ORCID iD within the submission system before final acceptance, as unverified ORCID iDs will not appear in the published article. Only  the individual author can complete the verification step; PLOS staff cannot  verify ORCID iDs on behalf of authors.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Marly A. Cardoso, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The manuscript is well written and the findings supports earlier evidence linking maternal nutritional status with child's hemoglobin level.

Authors should note the following minor comment to improve manuscript:

On page 4, first paragraph: Citation for the anaemia classification of children 6-23 months is missing. If authors used the same cited for the older children they need to cite the first time used, i.e. at the end of sentence on younger children. this is in line with acceptable practice.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript draws on a highly qualified and appropriate data source for the analysis it aims to conduct. However, I would encourage the authors to carefully consider the methodological concerns raised above in order to strengthen the robustness of the analyses and the conclusions presented.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review?  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Dual Burden of Malnutrition.pdf

pone.0359236.s001.pdf (30.3KB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2026 Sep 25;21(9):e0359236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0359236.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


15 Aug 2026

Response to Reviewers

Manuscript: “Maternal body mass index and child haemoglobin: A national cross-sectional study in Peru”

We thank the editor and the reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and for their constructive comments, which helped us improve the clarity and rigour of several aspects of the work. Below, we address each comment individually.

Reviewer 1

Comment 1.1. “On page 4, first paragraph, the citation for the anaemia classification in children aged 6–23 months is missing. If the same reference was used for older children, it should be cited the first time the classification is presented, at the end of the sentence referring to younger children.”

Response. Thank you for pointing this out. The anaemia classification thresholds for both age groups were taken from the same source, the 2024 technical guidelines of the Peruvian Ministry of Health (reference 21). Following the reviewer’s suggestion, we have added this citation at the end of the sentence describing the classification for children aged 6–23 months, so that the reference now appears the first time the classification is presented.

Changes in the Manuscript – Methods, Variables section, first paragraph (dependent variable):

Modified: “Among children aged 6–23 months, severe anaemia was defined as haemoglobin <7.0 g/dL, moderate as 7.0–9.4 g/dL and mild as 9.5–10.4 g/dL [21]. Among children aged 24–59 months, severe anaemia was defined as <7.0 g/dL, moderate as 7.0–9.9 g/dL and mild as 10.0–10.9 g/dL [21].”

Reviewer 2

Comment 2.1. “Please consider removing the database codes for the variables used, as these may not be necessary for the reader.”

Response. We agree. The database variable codes have been removed from the main text, since they are not essential for the reader. The variables remain fully identifiable by their names, and their questionnaire source is still indicated.

Changes in the Manuscript – Methods, Variables section, first paragraph (dependent variable):

Modified: “Altitude-adjusted haemoglobin levels in g/dL and anaemia status according to the updated 2024 technical guidelines of the Peruvian Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization (WHO) were used.”

Changes in the Manuscript – Methods, Variables section, second paragraph (independent variable):

Modified: “The independent variable was BMI among women of reproductive age, obtained from the Individual questionnaire.”

Comment 2.2. “Does the dataset include information on maternal, child, or household dietary diversity? If so, it would be important to include this covariate in the analyses.”

Response. Thank you for this observation. We reviewed the ENDES 2024 database and confirmed that it does not contain information on dietary diversity or feeding habits applicable to the study population (children aged 6–59 months). Breastfeeding is recorded only as exclusive breastfeeding up to six months of age, and the available indicators of fruit and vegetable consumption are restricted to individuals aged 15 years and older. Therefore, a dietary diversity covariate could not be constructed for the analysed sample. We have acknowledged this as a limitation in the revised manuscript.

Changes in the Manuscript – Discussion, Limitations and strengths subsection, first paragraph (sentence added):

Modified: “From an analytical perspective, although multiple relevant confounders were adjusted for, it was not possible to control for important factors such as iron supplementation, prematurity, type of breastfeeding due to a high proportion of missing data and child dietary diversity or feeding habits, which may result in residual confounding.”

Comment 2.3. “The use of VIF < 10 as a reference for assessing multicollinearity may not be the most appropriate choice. To strengthen the robustness of the analysis, it would be preferable to adopt a more conservative threshold, such as VIF < 5.”

Response. We appreciate this suggestion. We chose to retain the VIF > 10 threshold because it is the conventional and most widely used criterion for detecting multicollinearity and corresponds to the rule of thumb explicitly documented in the statistical software used for our analysis. The Stata manual ([R] regress postestimation, estat vif) states that “most analysts rely on informal rules of thumb applied to the VIF” and that there is evidence of multicollinearity when “the largest VIF is greater than 10 (some choose a more conservative threshold value of 30)”, citing Chatterjee and Hadi (2012). The VIF < 10 criterion is therefore not a lenient choice but the standard reference implemented in the software and in the applied literature. In our models, all VIF values were well below this threshold (highest VIF = 6.61; mean VIF = 2.02), indicating no meaningful multicollinearity.

Comment 2.4. “It would also be important to assess whether area of residence, household wealth index, and drinking water quality are conceptually overlapping variables.”

Response. We appreciate this observation. We assessed whether area of residence, household wealth index and drinking water quality were conceptually or statistically redundant. Although these variables are related, as they all reflect underlying social determinants of health, they capture conceptually distinct dimensions: area of residence reflects the geographic context (urban/rural), the wealth index reflects household socioeconomic position, and drinking water quality reflects environmental and sanitary conditions. These dimensions are conceptually distinct and not interchangeable; for example, residing in a given area does not determine a household’s wealth, and a higher wealth level does not necessarily guarantee access to good-quality drinking water. This conceptual distinction was consistent with the collinearity assessment, in which no evidence of multicollinearity was observed among these variables. We therefore retained the three variables in the adjusted model.

Comment 2.5. “Excluding variables with a high proportion of missing values may lead to important losses in the Poisson regression analysis. Variables such as iron supplementation, type of breastfeeding, and prematurity are considered important factors related to the outcome, and excluding them may introduce bias into the final results.”

Response. Thank you for this comment. Missing data were handled following a pre-specified strategy based on the proportion of missing values for each variable: variables with less than 10% missing data were retained in the analysis; variables with 10–30% missing data were considered for multiple imputation; and variables with more than 30% missing data were excluded. Iron supplementation, type of breastfeeding and prematurity showed a high proportion of missing values (>30%), largely because ENDES collects them only for specific subgroups of children. Retaining them would have substantially reduced the analytic sample, and, given the magnitude of missingness, imputation would have relied on strong, unverifiable assumptions. We therefore excluded these variables and acknowledged the resulting potential for residual confounding as a limitation (Discussion, Limitations and strengths subsection). We have also made the missing-data strategy explicit in the Methods.

Changes in the Manuscript – Methods, Statistical analysis section:

Modified: “Missing data were handled according to a pre-specified strategy based on the proportion of missing values for each variable: variables with less than 10% missing data were retained in the analysis, those with 10–30% missing data were considered for multiple imputation, and those with more than 30% missing data were excluded. None of the variables met the criteria for multiple imputation; therefore, no multiple imputation was performed. Accordingly, variables related to iron supplementation, type of breastfeeding received and prematurity had a high proportion of missing values (61.9%, 41.9%, and 91.9%, respectively) and were therefore not included in the analysis.”

Comment 2.6. “Please report the proportion of missing values for iron supplementation, type of breastfeeding, and prematurity, and assess whether there is any systematic pattern related to the missingness.”

Response. Thank you for this request. We now report the proportion of missing values for these three variables: iron supplementation 61.9%, type of breastfeeding 41.9%, and prematurity 91.9%. We also examined the pattern of missingness. In ENDES, these items are recorded only for specific subgroups of children defined by the survey design (for example, birth-related items such as prematurity for recent births, type of breastfeeding for children currently breastfeeding, and iron supplementation within defined age ranges), which is consistent with a structured, non-random pattern of missingness rather than data missing completely at random.

Changes in the Manuscript – Methods, Statistical analysis section:

Modified: “Missing data were handled according to a pre-specified strategy based on the proportion of missing values for each variable: variables with less than 10% missing data were retained in the analysis, those with 10–30% missing data were considered for multiple imputation, and those with more than 30% missing data were excluded. None of the variables met the criteria for multiple imputation; therefore, no multiple imputation was performed. Accordingly, variables related to iron supplementation, type of breastfeeding received and prematurity had a high proportion of missing values (61.9%, 41.9%, and 91.9%, respectively) and were therefore not included in the analysis.”

Comment 2.7. “The authors should consider whether a data imputation strategy could be applied for variables with substantial missing data.”

Response. Thank you for this suggestion. As described above (Comment 2.5), our pre-specified strategy reserved multiple imputation for variables with 10–30% missing data; however, no covariate fell within this range, so imputation was not required for the variables included in the model.

Changes in the Manuscript – Methods, Statistical analysis section:

Modified: “Missing data were handled according to a pre-specified strategy based on the proportion of missing values for each variable: variables with less than 10% missing data were retained in the analysis, those with 10–30% missing data were considered for multiple imputation, and those with more than 30% missing data were excluded. None of the variables met the criteria for multiple imputation; therefore, no multiple imputation was performed. Accordingly, variables related to iron supplementation, type of breastfeeding received and prematurity had a high proportion of missing values (61.9%, 41.9%, and 91.9%, respectively) and were therefore not included in the analysis.”

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0359236.s003.docx (20KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Marly Cardoso

10 Sep 2026

Maternal body mass index and child haemoglobin: A national cross-sectional study in Peru

PONE-D-26-16320R1

Dear Dr. Soriano-Moreno,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Marly A. Cardoso, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

All reviewers´ comments have been addressed accordingly.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review?  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Marly Cardoso

PONE-D-26-16320R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Soriano-Moreno,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS One and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS One Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Marly A. Cardoso

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Dual Burden of Malnutrition.pdf

    pone.0359236.s001.pdf (30.3KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0359236.s003.docx (20KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data that support the findings of this study are publicly available from the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics of Peru (https://proyectos.inei.gob.pe/microdatos/).


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES