Skip to main content
Open Life Sciences logoLink to Open Life Sciences
. 2026 Sep 25;21(1):20251379. doi: 10.1515/biol-2025-1379

Morphological and biochemical characterization of bacterial isolates from diverse soil habitats in the Amhara region, Ethiopia

Tirusew Sema Kebede 1,✉, Destaw Damtie 2, Mulugeta Kibert 1, Fasika Melese 1, Amare Bitew 1, Mastewal Alehegn 1
PMCID: PMC13614831  PMID: 42799528

Abstract

Soil harbors diverse microbial communities that play essential roles in ecosystem functioning; however, many microbial populations remain unexplored. In this study, bacterial isolates obtained from 11 selected soil sampling sites in the Amhara region of Ethiopia were characterized. A total of 104 morphologically distinct bacterial isolates were recovered using the serial dilution and spread plate techniques and were subsequently characterized based on their morphological and biochemical characteristics. Presumptive identification based on morphological and biochemical characteristics classified the isolates into nine bacterial genera. The Shannon diversity index (H′ = 1.68) indicated moderate bacterial species diversity, whereas the Simpson diversity index (0.72) suggested a relatively even distribution of taxa within the sampled soils. The present study demonstrated that soil bacterial diversity was significantly and positively correlated with soil pH, total nitrogen (TN), and available phosphorus (AP). In contrast, organic carbon (OC), soil moisture, and temperature showed no significant association with bacterial diversity. Principal component analysis (PCA) explained 73 % of the total variation in the biochemical characteristics of the bacterial isolates. The high enzymatic activity and metabolic versatility exhibited by the isolates highlight their potential for various biotechnological applications, including bioremediation, industrial enzyme production, and agricultural biofertilizer development.

Keywords: soil bacteria, biochemical characterization, bacterial isolates, Shannon diversity index, serial dilution

1. Introduction

Soil is one of the most diverse terrestrial habitats, harboring an immense diversity of microorganisms that play essential roles in maintaining ecosystem functions [1]. Soil microorganisms are key drivers of nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, humus formation, and overall soil fertility, making them indispensable to ecosystem functioning [2]. The major groups of soil microorganisms include bacteria, fungi, archaea, actinomycetes, and algae, among which bacteria are the most abundant and metabolically diverse [3]. The abundance, diversity, and composition of soil microbial communities are influenced by both biotic factors, such as vegetation type, plant diversity, and microbial interactions, and abiotic factors, including soil structure, nutrient availability, pH, moisture content, climate, and temperature [4]. These environmental factors shape microbial community composition by selecting for bacteria with distinct morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics, which can be used for preliminary identification and classification [5].

Morphological characterization involves the examination of colony characteristics, Gram reaction, cell shape, motility, and endospore formation, providing a rapid approach for the preliminary identification of bacterial isolates. Biochemical characterization includes tests such as catalase activity, methyl red, citrate utilization, indole production, triple sugar iron (TSI) agar, starch hydrolysis, urease activity, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production. These biochemical tests provide insights into bacterial metabolic capabilities and aid in differentiating among various bacterial genera. Although these techniques are considered classical microbiological approaches, they remain indispensable first-line tools for assessing microbial diversity, particularly in understudied regions where access to molecular identification facilities is limited [6], 7]. Furthermore, these methods are rapid, simple, and cost-effective for preliminary identification and facilitate the selection of promising isolates for subsequent molecular characterization and downstream applications [7].

Each environment presents unique selective pressures that shape resident bacterial communities and influence their ecological functions and observable characteristics. The composition, abundance, and diversity of soil bacterial communities differ between forest interiors and forest edges due to variations in microclimatic conditions and soil properties [8]. Owing to increased environmental stress, enhanced microbial turnover, and differences in nutrient availability, forest edge soils may support more metabolically active bacterial communities, including antibiotic-producing taxa, compared with forest interior soils [8]. Rice field soils harbor diverse bacterial communities, particularly members of the phyla Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, with Bacillus species frequently reported as dominant taxa occurring as both free-living and plant-associated forms [9]. Solid waste disposal sites are also considered potential reservoirs of bacteria belonging to genera known to include antibiotic-producing species, particularly members of Actinobacteria and Bacillus [10]. Tannery wastewater and contaminated disposal sites are characterized by elevated concentrations of chromium, high chemical oxygen demand (COD), and increased salinity, creating selective conditions that favor bacteria possessing heavy metal resistance mechanisms, robust cell structures, and specialized metabolic pathways for adaptation and survival [11]. Similarly, animal husbandry waste disposal sites represent important reservoirs of antibiotic residues, creating selective conditions that favor the persistence and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria as well as the occurrence of antibiotic-producing microorganisms [12]. The high organic matter content and nutrient availability in these environments support the growth of fast-growing, metabolically versatile, and fermentative bacteria, whose physiological characteristics can be assessed through sugar fermentation tests. Freshwater sediments and silt soils harbor diverse bacterial communities, including several genera with reported antimicrobial-producing potential, such as Actinomycetota (formerly Actinobacteria), Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Micromonospora, Brevibacillus, Paenibacillus, and Chitinimonas [13].

Despite Ethiopia’s recognition as a biodiversity hotspot, the microbial diversity of its diverse ecosystems, ranging from highland forests to agricultural lowlands, remains largely unexplored. In particular, the Amhara region lacks comprehensive baseline information on soil bacterial diversity and community composition, limiting efforts in microbial bioprospecting, ecological assessment, and environmental monitoring. This knowledge gap is increasingly important given the growing anthropogenic pressures associated with agricultural intensification, urban expansion, and industrial development. The region encompasses a wide range of ecosystems that provide valuable opportunities for studying soil microbial diversity, including highland forests such as Tara Gedam, rice cultivation areas in Fogera, and the shoreline environments of Lake Tana, the source of the Blue Nile. These ecosystems, extending from wetlands and agricultural lowlands to rocky mountainous landscapes, including the Simien Mountains (reaching elevations of approximately 4,543 m), and highland plateaus above 1,500 m, harbor diverse microbial communities adapted to varying environmental conditions and ecological stresses, including grazing pressure, agricultural disturbance, and soil erosion.

Therefore, this study aimed to: (1) isolate bacteria from diverse soil habitats in the Amhara region; (2) characterize the morphological and biochemical properties of the bacterial isolates; and (3) identify the bacterial genera and assess the diversity and distribution of culturable bacterial isolates across different sampling sites. This study provides important baseline information on microbial resources and facilitates the selection of promising isolates for further investigation of their antimicrobial potential.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Description of the study area

The study was conducted in the Amhara region of northwestern Ethiopia, located between 9° and 14° N latitude and 36° and 40° E longitude (Figure 1). The region is classified into three major agro-climatic zones: highland (>2,300 m above sea level), semi-highland (1,500–2,300 m above sea level), and lowland (<1,500 m above sea level), which account for approximately 20 %, 44 %, and 28 % of the total area of the region, respectively [14].

Figure 1:

Spatial distribution of soil and sediment sampling sites (A–H) within the Lake Tana basin and surrounding areas in the Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Map of the Amhara Region, Ethiopia, showing the geographic distribution of soil and sediment sampling sites investigated in this study. Sampling locations include Tara Gedam forest (TF), Fogera inner (FI), Fogera outer (FO), municipal solid waste (SW), animal husbandry (AH), tannery effluent (TE), Abay River mouth (AB), Rib River mouth (RB), and Gumara River mouth (GU).

Soil sampling sites across the Amhara region, Ethiopia. Locations: TF = Tara Gedam forest, FI = Fogera inner, FO = Fogera outer, SW = municipal Solid waste, AH = Animal husbandry, TE = Tannery effluent, AB = Abay river mouth, RB = Rib river mouth, GU = Gumara river mouth.

Soil samples were collected from purposively selected sampling sites representing diverse ecological environments. These sites included Tara Gedam Forest (12°04.351′–12°10.926′ N), located in Libo Kemkem District [15]; the Fogera rice cultivation area (11°53′ N and 37°40′ E); and sediment soils collected from the mouths of rivers draining into Lake Tana, including Rib River (11°41.870′ N and 37°29.564′ E) and Gumara River (11°46.317′ N and 37°29.564′ E) in Fogera District. Additional samples were collected from Abay River in North Achefer District and from selected anthropogenically influenced sites in Bahir Dar City, including a municipal solid waste disposal site (11°32′ N and 37°23′ E), an animal husbandry waste disposal site (11°33′ N and 37°23′ E), and a tannery effluent disposal site (11°37′ N and 37°23′ E).

2.2. Collection of soil samples

Soil samples were collected from the study area between March and June 2024. At each of the 11 selected sampling sites, representing contrasting environmental settings, triplicate soil samples were collected at 50 m intervals. The collected samples were then thoroughly mixed to form composite samples, reducing microsite variability and providing a representative sample for each site. A total of 11 composite soil samples were obtained: two from Fogera rice cultivation areas (inside and outside cultivated fields), three from Tara Gedam Forest (forest interior, edge, and outer forest zones), three from anthropogenically influenced sites in Bahir Dar City (animal husbandry waste disposal site, municipal solid waste disposal site, and tannery effluent discharge site), and three from sediment collection sites at the mouths of the Rib, Gumara, and Abay rivers entering Lake Tana. The sampling locations were selected based on the assumption that these diverse environments may harbor distinct bacterial communities suitable for assessing bacterial diversity and comparing microbial distributions across different ecological zones [16].

Soil samples were collected from the upper 10–15 cm soil layer, where a large proportion of soil bacterial populations are concentrated, after removing approximately 3 cm of surface soil [17]. Except for sediment samples, all soil samples were collected using a sterile soil auger, transferred into sterile zip-lock polyethylene bags, and labeled immediately after collection. Sediment samples were collected at the sampling sites using an Ekman grab sampler. All samples were placed in an ice box and transported to the Postgraduate Microbiology Laboratory, where visible debris, pebbles, and other unwanted materials were removed. The samples were air-dried at 25 °C for 7–10 days [18], passed through a 2 mm sieve, and stored at 4 °C until further processing and microbiological analysis [19].

2.3. Isolation of bacterial isolates

One gram of each homogenized soil sample was suspended in 9 mL of sterile normal saline (0.85 % NaCl) and thoroughly mixed using a vortex mixer. Ten-fold serial dilutions were prepared from 10−1 to 10−9 using sterile normal saline (0.85 % NaCl), and aliquots from the appropriate dilution levels (10−4 to 10−9) were used for bacterial isolation. From each selected dilution, 0.1 mL of the suspension was spread onto nutrient agar plates in triplicate using a sterile L-shaped glass spreader (spread plate technique). The inoculated plates were incubated at 28 °C for 24–48 h. Following incubation, colonies exhibiting distinct morphological characteristics, including differences in size, shape, color, and texture, were selected and purified using the streak plate method. The purification process was repeated until pure bacterial cultures were obtained. Each purified isolate was maintained on nutrient agar slants at 4 °C for short-term storage and subcultured periodically for further analysis [20]. All culture media, glassware, and laboratory materials were sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min before use.

2.4. Identification and characterization of bacterial isolates

All purified isolates were examined microscopically to determine their cellular morphology, including cell size, shape, and arrangement. In addition, the Gram reaction of each isolate was determined using the Gram staining method. The Gram staining procedure was performed as follows: bacterial smears were heat-fixed, stained with crystal violet for 1 min, treated with Gram’s iodine for 1 min, decolorized with 95 % ethanol for 30 s, and counterstained with safranin for 1 min.

To evaluate the biochemical characteristics of the bacterial isolates, a series of biochemical tests were performed, including hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production using sulfide indole motility (SIM) medium, catalase activity, urease activity, starch hydrolysis, methyl red (MR) test, citrate utilization, indole production, and triple sugar iron (TSI) agar tests [21], [22], [23]. All biochemical tests were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h and the results were interpreted based on standard color changes, gas production, or other characteristic reaction patterns. Appropriate positive and negative controls were included where necessary to ensure the reliability of the tests. For example, Staphylococcus aureus was used as a positive control for the catalase test, whereas Escherichia coli were used as a negative control for the citrate utilization test.

2.5. Determination of physicochemical properties of soil

Fresh soil samples were air-dried and passed through a 2 mm sieve prior to physicochemical analysis. Soil pH was determined using a 1:2.5 (w/v) soil-to-distilled water ratio. The soil suspension was stirred for 5 min, and the pH was measured using a calibrated glass electrode pH meter according to the method described by [24]. Soil moisture content was determined by oven-drying 10 g of fresh soil at 105 °C until a constant weight was achieved (approximately 24 h). Soil texture was determined using the Bouyoucos hydrometer method on air-dried and sieved soil samples. A thermometer was used to measure the temperature of the soil suspension, and the required temperature correction was applied to the hydrometer readings according to standard procedures [25], 26].

Soil organic carbon content was determined using the Walkley–Black wet oxidation method [27]. Briefly, 1 g of air-dried and sieved soil was placed in a conical flask, followed by the addition of 10 mL of 1 N potassium dichromate. Subsequently, 20 mL of concentrated H2SO4 was carefully added, and the mixture was gently swirled and allowed to stand for 30 min. After dilution with distilled water and addition of ferroin indicator, the excess dichromate was titrated with 0.5 N ferrous ammonium sulfate until the color changed from violet/blue-green to green. The same procedure was performed using a reagent blank for correction.

Total nitrogen content was determined using the Kjeldahl digestion method [28]. Briefly, 0.5–1 g of soil sample was digested in a Kjeldahl flask containing the digestion mixture and concentrated H2SO4. The mixture was heated until a clear green solution was obtained, cooled, and diluted with distilled water. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution was then added to release ammonia, which was distilled into a boric acid solution. The trapped ammonia was subsequently quantified by titration with standard hydrochloric acid (HCl) or sulfuric acid (H2SO4).

Available phosphorus was determined using the Olsen extraction method [29]. Briefly, 2.5 g of soil was extracted with 50 mL of 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) solution adjusted to pH 8.5 and shaken for 30 min. The extract was filtered, and an aliquot was used for phosphorus determination. The addition of ammonium molybdate and ascorbic acid reagents produced a blue-colored complex, and absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at wavelengths ranging from 660 to 882 nm. Phosphorus concentration was calculated using a standard calibration curve.

2.6. Data analysis

The raw data were compiled and organized using Microsoft Excel 2016. All statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.3.2 [30]. Bacterial diversity among the isolates was estimated using the Shannon diversity index (H′) [31], which was calculated based on the relative abundance of distinct bacterial morphotypes. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to visualize patterns, relationships, and clustering of bacterial isolates based on their biochemical characteristics [32]. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationships between soil physicochemical properties and bacterial diversity across the 11 sampling sites [33]. For categorical variables, the chi-square test was applied to evaluate differences in frequency distributions, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. The results of all statistical analyses were presented using tables and figures.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological properties of isolates

Bacterial isolates were analyzed after removing duplicate entries. Among these isolates, 89 (85.6 %) were rod-shaped and 15 (14.4 %) were cocci, while 65 (62.5 %) were Gram-positive and 39 (37.5 %) were Gram-negative. Regarding motility characteristics, 89 (85.6 %) isolates were motile, whereas 15 (14.4 %) were non-motile. Of the total isolates, 53 (51.0 %) were non-spore-forming and 51 (49.0 %) were spore-forming. Colony surface characteristics revealed that 88 (84.6 %) isolates exhibited smooth surfaces, while 16 (15.4 %) showed rough surfaces. In terms of colony pigmentation, 26 (25.0 %) isolates produced creamy-colored colonies, whereas 78 (75.0 %) produced white colonies (Table 1).

Table 1:

Morphological characterization of isolated bacteria.

Isolates Colony morphology
Shape GR Motility Spore
A1 Rod _ + _
A2 Rod + + +
A3 Rod + + +
A4 Rod + + +
A5 Rod + + +
A6 Rod _ + _
A7 Rod _ + _
A8 Rod _ + _
A9 Rod _ + _
A10 Rod _ + _
S1 Rod _ + _
S2 Rod _ + _
S3 Rod _ _ _
S4 Cooci + _ _
S5 Rod + _ +
S6 Rod + + +
S7 Rod _ + _
S8 Rod + + +
S9 Cocci + _ _
S10 Rod _ + _
TF1 Cocci + _ _
TF2 Rod _ + _
TF3 Rod _ + _
TF4 Rod _ + _
TF5 Rod + + +
TF6 Rod _ + _
TF7 Rod _ + _
TF8 Rod + + +
TF9 Rod _ + _
TF10 Rod + + +
TF11 Cocci + _ _
TF12 Rod _ + _
TF13 Cocci + _ _
TF14 Cocci + _ _
TI1 Rod + + +
TI2 Rod + + +
TI3 Rod + + +
TI4 Rod _ + _
TI5 Rod + + +
TI6 Cocci + _ _
TI7 Rod _ + _
TI8 Rod + + +
TI9 Rod _ + _
TI10 Rod _ + _
TI11 Rod + + +
TE1 Rod + + +
TE2 Rod + + +
TE3 Rod + + +
TE4 Rod + + +
TE5 Rod _ + _
TE6 Rod + + +
TE7 Cocci + _ _
TE8 Rod _ + _
TE9 Rod _ + _
TO1 Rod + + +
TO2 Rod _ + _
TO3 Rod + + +
TO4 Rod + + +
TO5 Rod _ + _
TO6 Rod + + +
TO7 Rod + + +
TO8 Rod + + +
TO9 Rod + + +
TO9 Rod + + +
FI1 Rod _ + _
FI2 Rod + + +
FI3 Cocci + _ _
FI4 Rod + + +
FI5 Rod + + +
FI6 Rod _ + _
FO1 Rod _ + _
FO2 Rod + + +
FO3 Cocci + + _
FO4 Rod _ + _
FO5 Rod + + +
FO6 Rod + + +
FO7 Cocci + + _
R1 Rod _ + _
R2 Cocci + _ _
R3 Rod + + +
R4 Rod + + +
R5 Rod + + +
R6 Cocci + _ _
R7 Rod + + +
R8 Rod + + +
R9 Rod _ + _
R10 Rod + + +
AB1 Rod _ + _
AB2 Rod _ + _
AB3 Rod + + +
AB4 Rod + + +
AB5 Rod _ + _
AB6 Rod _ + _
AB7 Rod _ + _
AB8 Rod + + +
AB9 Rod + + +
AB10 Rod + + +
AB11 Rod + + +
AB12 Rod + + +
GU1 Rod + + +
GU2 Rod _ + _
GU3 Rod + + +
GU4 Rod + + +
GU5 Rod + + +
GU6 Cocci + _ _
GU7 Cocci + _ _

Based on morphological characteristics, most isolates exhibited circular colonies with dry or mucoid textures. However, several morphological traits, including colony color, texture, and margin, exhibited considerable variation and served as useful discriminatory characteristics for differentiating among bacterial isolates. Based on Gram reaction and cellular morphology, Gram-positive rod-shaped bacteria were the most abundant group overall (48.6 %), followed by Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria (37.1 %) and Gram-positive cocci (14.3 %) (Figure 2). Gram-positive rod-shaped isolates predominated in forest and sediment soils, whereas Gram-negative rod-shaped isolates were more frequently recovered from waste-impacted soils. Agricultural soils exhibited a relatively balanced distribution of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates. No Gram-negative cocci were detected among the bacterial isolates recovered from the sampled soils.

Figure 2:

Distribution of Gram-positive rods, Gram-positive cocci, and Gram-negative rods across forest, waste, agricultural, and sediment soils. The figure shows the distribution of three bacterial morphological groups—Gram-positive rods, Gram-positive cocci, and Gram-negative rods—across four soil and sediment categories in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia. Forest soils (TI, TE, and TO) are characterized by a predominance of Gram-positive rods. Waste-associated soils (SW, AH, and TF) contain higher proportions of Gram-negative rods. Agricultural soils (FI and FO) show a relatively balanced distribution of Gram-positive rods, Gram-positive cocci, and Gram-negative rods. Sediment samples from the Abay, Rib, and Gumara river mouths (AB, RB, and GU) show a predominance of Gram-positive rods.

Distribution of Gram-positive rods, Gram-positive cocci, and Gram-negative rods across different soil types. Forest soils (TI, TE, TO) showed predominance of Gram-positive rods; waste soils (SW, AH, TF) showed higher proportions of Gram-negative rods; agricultural soil (FI, FO) showed balanced distribution; sediment soils (AB, RB, GU) showed predominance of Gram-positive rods.

3.2. Biochemical properties of the isolates

The biochemical characteristics of the bacterial isolates revealed that 79 isolates were positive for sugar fermentation, 95 were catalase positive, 79 were methyl red positive, 65 were citrate positive, 32 were indole positive, 45 exhibited starch hydrolysis activity, 70 were urease positive, and 13 produced hydrogen sulfide (H2S) (Table 2).

Table 2:

Biochemical characterization of isolated bacteria from each soil samples.

Isolate Biochemical tests Genus identification Ref.
Catalase MR Citrate Indol TSI Starch Urease H2S
A1 + + + _ A/A + G + _ _ Enterobacter [34]
A2 + + _ _ A/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
A3 + + _ _ A/A _ _ _ Bacillus [35]
A4 + _ + _ K/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
A5 + _ + _ K/K _ + _ Bacillus [35]
A6 + + _ + A/A + G _ _ _ Enterobacter [34]
A7 + + + _ K/A _ _ _ Escherichia [36]
A8 _ + _ _ K/K _ _ _ Pseudomonas [37]
A9 _ + _ _ K/K + _ _ Pseudomonas [37]
A10 _ _ + _ K/K + _ _ Pseudomonas [37]
S1 + _ + _ A/A _ _ + Citrobacter [38]
S2 + + + _ K/A _ + + Citrobacter [38]
S3 + _ _ _ K/K + + _ Acinetobacter [39]
S4 _ + _ _ A/A _ + _ Enterococcus [40]
S5 + + + + A/A + _ _ Bacillus [35]
S6 + _ + _ K/K + _ _ Bacillus [35]
S7 + + + + K/A _ _ _ Escherichia [36]
S8 + _ + _ K/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
S9 _ + _ _ K/A _ + _ Enterococcus [40]
S10 + _ + _ A/A + G + + + Proteus [41]
TF1 + + _ _ A/A _ + _ Staphylococcus [42]
TF2 + + _ _ K/K _ + _ Pseudomonas [37]
TF3 + + + _ K/A + + + Citrobacter [38]
TF4 + _ + _ A/A _ _ _ Enterobacter [34]
TF5 + + _ _ K/K _ + _ Bacillus [35]
TF6 + _ + _ K/A _ + _ Enterobacter [34]
TF7 + + _ + K/A + _ + Escherichia [36]
TF8 + + _ _ K/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
TF9 + + _ + A/A + + _ Escherichia [36]
TF10 + + _ + A/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
TF11 + + _ _ A/A _ + _ Staphylococcus [42]
TF12 + + + _ K/A + G _ + _ Enterobacter [34]
TF13 + + + _ A/A + + _ Staphylococcus [42]
TF14 + _ + _ K/A + + _ Staphylococcus [42]
TI1 + _ + + K/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
TI2 + _ + + A/A + _ + Bacillus [35]
TI3 + + + _ K/A _ _ _ Bacillus [35]
TI4 + + + + A/A + G _ + + Proteus [41]
TI5 + _ _ + A/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
TI6 + + _ _ K/A _ + _ Staphylococcus [42]
TI7 + _ + + A/A + G + + + Proteus [41]
TI8 + + _ _ K/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
TI9 + _ + _ A/A _ + + Proteus [41]
TI10 + + _ + K/A _ _ _ Escherichia [36]
TI11 + + + _ K/K + + _ Bacillus [35]
TE1 + + + + A/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
TE2 + + + _ K/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
TE3 + + _ _ K/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
TE4 + + _ _ K/A + _ + Bacillus [35]
TE5 + + _ _ K/K _ _ _ Pseudomonas [37]
TE6 + + + _ A/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
TE7 + + + _ A/A _ + _ Staphylococcus [42]
TE8 + _ + _ K/K _ + _ Pseudomonas [37]
TE9 _ _ + _ A/A + G + + + Proteus [41]
TO1 + + + _ K/A + _ _ Bacillus [35]
TO2 + _ + _ K/K _ _ _ Pseudomonas [37]
TO3 + + + + K/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
TO4 + + _ _ K/K _ + _ Bacillus [35]
TO5 + + + _ A/A + _ _ Escherichia [36]
TO6 + + _ _ K/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
TO7 + + + + A/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
TO8 + + + _ K/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
TO9 + + _ + K/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
FI1 + _ + _ K/K _ _ _ Pseudomonas [37]
FI2 + + + + K/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
FI3 _ + _ _ A/A _ _ _ Enterococcus [40]
FI4 + + _ _ A/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
FI5 + + _ + A/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
FI6 + _ + _ K/K _ + _ Pseudomonas [37]
FO1 + _ + _ K/K _ + _ Pseudomonas [37]
FO2 + + + + A/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
FO3 + + + _ K/A + + _ Staphylococcus [42]
FO4 + + _ + K/A _ + _ Escherichia [36]
FO5 + + _ _ K/A + _ _ Bacillus [35]
FO6 + _ + _ K/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
FO7 + + + _ K/A + + _ Staphylococcus [42]
R1 + + + + K/K _ + _ Pseudomonas [37]
R2 + + + _ K/A _ + _ Staphylococcus [42]
R3 + + _ _ K/K _ + _ Bacillus [35]
R4 + + + _ K/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
R5 + + + + K/A _ _ _ Bacillus [35]
R6 + + + _ K/A + _ _ Staphylococcus [42]
R7 + _ _ _ A/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
R8 + + _ + K/A _ _ _ Bacillus [35]
R9 + _ _ _ K/K _ _ _ Pseudomonas [37]
R10 + + + _ K/A + _ _ Bacillus [35]
AB1 + + + + K/A _ _ _ Escherichia [36]
AB2 + + + + K/A _ _ _ Escherichia [36]
AB3 + + + + A/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
AB4 + + _ + K/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
AB5 + _ + _ K/A _ + + Proteus [41]
AB6 + _ + _ A/K _ + + Proteus [41]
AB7 + + + _ K/A _ + + Citrobacter [38]
AB8 + + + + K/A + _ _ Bacillus [35]
AB9 + + + + K/A + _ _ Bacillus [35]
AB10 + + _ _ A/A + _ _ Bacillus [35]
AB11 + + _ _ K/A _ + _ Bacillus [35]
AB12 + + + _ K/K _ + _ Bacillus [35]
GU1 + + + _ A/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
GU2 + + + + A/A _ + _ Escherichia [36]
GU3 + + + _ K/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
GU4 + + + + A/A + + _ Bacillus [35]
GU5 + + + + A/A + _ _ Bacillus [35]
GU6 _ + _ _ K/A _ + _ Enterococcus [40]
GU7 _ + _ _ A/A _ _ _ Enterococcus [40]

A: animal husbandry; S: solid waste; TF: tannery effluent; TI: Tara Gedam inner; TE: Tara Gedam edge; TO: Tara Gedam outer; FI: Fogera inner; FO: Fogera outer; AB: Abay river mouth; R: Rib river mouth; GU: Gumara river mouth; TSI: triple sugar iron agar; A/A + G: produce both glucose and lactose with Gas; A/K: produce only glucose; K/A: produce only lactose; K/K: not produce both.

Based on their morphological and biochemical characteristics, the 104 bacterial isolates were tentatively classified into nine bacterial genera. The identified genera included Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Escherichia, Proteus, Enterococcus, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Acinetobacter. Among these, Bacillus was the predominant genus, accounting for 49.0 % of the isolates, followed by Pseudomonas (11.5 %) and Staphylococcus (9.6 %). The remaining genera included Escherichia (8.7 %), Proteus (6.7 %), Enterococcus and Enterobacter (4.8 % each), Citrobacter (3.8 %), and Acinetobacter (1.0 %). These findings indicate that Bacillus was the most frequently recovered genus among the culturable bacterial isolates, followed by Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus (Figure 3).

Figure 3:

Bar chart showing the relative abundance of bacterial genera among 104 isolates, with Bacillus as the most abundant genus. The figure shows the relative abundance of nine bacterial genera identified among 104 bacterial isolates. Bacillus was the most abundant genus, representing 49% of the isolates, followed by Pseudomonas (11.5%), Staphylococcus (9.6%), Escherichia (8.7%), Proteus (6.7%), Enterococcus (4.8%), Enterobacter (4.8%), Citrobacter (3.8%), and Acinetobacter (1%). The figure illustrates the predominance of Bacillus among the bacterial isolates compared with the other identified genera.

Abundance of bacterial genera among the 104 isolates. Bacillus dominated (49 %), followed by Pseudomonas (11.5 %), Staphylococcus (9.6 %), Escherichia (8.7 %), Proteus (6.7 %), Enterococcus (4.8 %), Enterobacter (4.8 %), Citrobacter (3.8 %), and Acinetobacter (1 %).

3.3. Physicochemical properties of soil

The soil samples analyzed in this study were collected from different ecological environments, including forest, agricultural cultivation, municipal solid waste, animal husbandry, tannery effluent, and sediment sites. A total of 11 soil samples were evaluated for physicochemical properties, including pH, moisture content, temperature, organic carbon (OC), total nitrogen (TN), and available phosphorus (AvP) (Table 3).

Table 3:

Soil physicochemical properties of the study area (n = 11).

Soil properties AH SW TF TI TE TO FI FO AB RB GU
PH 7.6 7.7 6.9 7.2 7.0 6.9 6.4 7.3 6.1 5.9 6.3
OC (%) 6.65 7.01 7.09 5.43 5.04 3.24 1.85 1.54 3.20 4.01 3.70
TN (%) 0.62 0.65 0.66 0.52 0.48 0.33 0.21 0.18 0.11 0.09 0.10
AvPPM 23.27 28.63 36.98 9.17 15.08 16.49 23.43 20.20 12.05 11.98 12.01
MC 19.13 9.10 18.0 16.83 15.22 8.67 7.50 6.50 72.5 70.1 70.79
Tm 23.76 23.80 23.80 23.33 23.70 23.80 22.96 22.90 24.1 23.8 24.0

TI: Tara Gedam inner; TE: Tara Gedam edge; TO: Tara Gedam outer; FI: Fogera inner; FO: Fogera outer; SW: municipal solid waste; AH: animal husbandry; TF: tannery effluent; AB: Abay; RB: Rib; GU: Gumara; OC: organic carbon; TN: total nitrogen; MC: moisture content; Tm: temperature; AvPPM: available phosphorus (parts per million).

The soil pH values across the 11 sampling sites ranged from 5.9 to 7.7, with a mean value of 6.8 ± 0.6. Two sites, Rib (RB; pH 5.9) and Gumara (GU; pH 6.3), exhibited acidic to slightly acidic conditions, whereas the remaining sites (AH, SW, TF, TI, TE, TO, FI, and FO) showed neutral to slightly alkaline conditions (pH 6.4–7.7).

Soil organic carbon (OC) content varied considerably among the sampling sites, ranging from 1.54 % at FO to 7.09 % at TF, with an overall mean value of 4.16 ± 1.84 %. Similarly, total nitrogen (TN) content ranged from 0.09 % at RB to 0.66 % at TF, with a mean value of 0.33 ± 0.21 %. Available phosphorus (AvP) showed substantial variation among the investigated soil properties, ranging from 9.17 ppm at TI to 36.98 ppm at TF, with a mean value of 18.94 ± 8.39 ppm.

Soil moisture content exhibited a distinct distribution pattern among sampling sites. The sediment-associated sites (AB, RB, and GU) showed exceptionally high moisture levels (70–73 %), whereas five sites (AH, SW, TF, TI, and TE) had moderate moisture contents (15–19 %). The remaining sites (TO, FI, and FO) exhibited relatively low moisture contents, ranging from 6.5 % to 8.7 %.

The study’s descriptive statistics revealed that temperature showed little variation (CV = 1.6 %), while moisture content had the highest coefficient of variation (96.9 %), indicating extreme geographical heterogeneity (Table 4).

Table 4:

Descriptive statistics of soil physicochemical properties.

Soil property Mean SD Min Max CV (%)
pH 6.90 0.600606 5.9 7.7 8.773789
Organic carbon (%) 4.432727 1.966703 1.54 7.09 44.36779
Total nitrogen (%) 0.359091 0.232485 0.09 0.66 64.74255
Available phosphorus (ppm) 19.02636 8.485552 9.17 36.98 44.59891
Moisture content (%) 28.57636 27.67693 6.5 72.5 96.85252
Temperature (°C) 23.63182 0.395849 22.9 24.1 1.675068

OC = organic carbon; TN = total nitrogen; MC = moisture content; Tm = temperature; AvPPM = available phosphorus.

The relationships between soil physicochemical properties and bacterial diversity across the 11 sampling sites were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Soil pH (ρ = 0.688, P = 0.019), total nitrogen (TN) (ρ = 0.709, P = 0.015), and available phosphorus (AvP) (ρ = 0.645, P = 0.032) showed significant positive correlations with the Shannon diversity index (H′). Organic carbon (OC) exhibited a moderate positive correlation with Shannon diversity (ρ = 0.536); however, this relationship was not statistically significant (P = 0.089). No significant correlations were observed between Shannon diversity and either soil temperature or moisture content (P > 0.05).

Similarly, Simpson’s diversity index (1 − D) showed significant positive correlations with soil pH (ρ = 0.670, P = 0.024), total nitrogen (TN) (ρ = 0.700, P = 0.016), and available phosphorus (AvP) (ρ = 0.764, P = 0.006). Soil temperature and moisture content exhibited weak negative correlations with Simpson’s diversity index; however, these relationships were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Organic carbon (OC) showed a moderate positive correlation with Simpson’s diversity index (ρ = 0.473), but this relationship was also not statistically significant (P = 0.142) (Table 5).

Table 5:

Spearman’s rank correlation between soil properties and bacterial diversity indices (n = 11).

Soil property Shannon H′(ρ) P-value Simpson (1 − D) (ρ) P-value
pH 0.688 0.019 0.670 0.024
Organic carbon (%) 0.536 0.089 0.473 0.142
Total nitrogen (%) 0.709 0.015 0.700 0.016
Available phosphorus (ppm) 0.645 0.032 0.764 0.006
Moisture content (%) −0.109 0.750 −0.227 0.502
Temperature (°C) −0.149 0.662 −0.242 0.474

3.4. Diversity indices

The culturable bacterial community exhibited moderate diversity, with a Shannon diversity index (H′) of 1.68 and an evenness value of 0.72, indicating a relatively balanced distribution of bacterial genera. The effective number of equally abundant genera (Hill number, exp (H′)) was 3.6, suggesting that the observed diversity was equivalent to approximately four equally abundant genera. The presence of a low-abundance genus (11.1 % relative abundance) indicates variation in genus distribution and suggests that additional sampling or molecular approaches may reveal further bacterial diversity (Table 6).

Table 6:

Diversity index summary.

Index Value Interpretation
Shannon diversity (H′) 1.679 Moderate diversity (95 % CI: 1.4496–2.1428)
Simpson diversity (1 − D) 0.7188 Moderate diversity (95 % CI: 0.6405–0.8784)
Pielou’s evenness (J′) 0.7641 High evenness
Simpson reciprocal (1/D) 3.56 Effective number of equally abundant genera = 3.6

The distribution analysis revealed a hierarchical pattern of occurrence among the identified bacterial genera, with Bacillus spp. being the most frequently detected genus and occurring across all sampling sites (100 % occurrence). The high prevalence of Bacillus spp. suggests that members of this genus are widely adapted to the diverse environmental conditions represented in the study area. Escherichia spp. (72.7 %) and Pseudomonas spp. (63.6 %) were also frequently detected, indicating their broad distribution among the sampled environments. In contrast, less frequently detected genera, such as Acinetobacter spp., showed wider confidence intervals (1.6–37.7 %), reflecting greater uncertainty in their estimated occurrence due to their lower detection frequency. These findings suggest that additional sampling may provide further insights into the distribution patterns of less abundant culturable bacterial genera (Figure 4).

Figure 4:

Frequency (left) and percentage (right) of occurrence of bacterial genera across all sampling sites, with Bacillus showing the highest occurrence. The figure presents the frequency and percentage of occurrence of bacterial genera across all sampling sites. The left panel shows the frequency of occurrence, while the right panel shows the corresponding percentage of sampling sites in which each genus was detected. Bacillus occurred at all sampling sites, with a 100% occurrence rate, followed by Escherichia at 72.7% and Pseudomonas at 63.6%. The figure illustrates the differences in the distribution and occurrence of bacterial genera across the investigated sampling sites.

Frequency (left) and percentage (right) of bacterial genera across all sampling sites. Bacillus showed 100 % occurrence, followed by Escherichia (72.7 %) and Pseudomonas (63.6 %).

The chi-square test revealed a highly significant difference between the observed and expected frequencies of bacterial genera (χ 2 = 32.45, df = 8, p < 0.001), indicating that the distribution of genera among the sampling sites was unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This significant variation suggests that certain genera were more frequently recovered than others across the studied environments, possibly reflecting differences in environmental conditions and ecological preferences. The observed distribution pattern may indicate habitat-associated variation in culturable bacterial communities (Table 7).

Table 7:

Chi-square test of bacteria.

Parameter Value
Chi-square statistic 32.45
Degrees of freedom 8
P-value <0.001

The bold value indicates it has a strong significance values between the observed and expected frequencies of bacterial genera.

3.5. Principal component analysis

The morphological and biochemical characterization revealed that catalase activity, TSI reactions, motility, and Gram reaction showed high positive frequencies across all sampling sites. Similarly, methyl red, urease, citrate utilization, and spore formation were positive in a large proportion of isolates from most study sites. In contrast, indole production and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production occurred less frequently, whereas starch hydrolysis showed an intermediate level of activity among the tested isolates.

Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to reduce the dimensionality of the biochemical characterization dataset and identify the major variables contributing to variation among bacterial isolates. The first five principal components, each with an eigenvalue greater than one, explained approximately 73 % of the total variance (Figure 5; Table 8). The scree plot demonstrated a clear inflection point after the fifth component, supporting the retention of five principal components for interpretation.

Figure 5:

PCA biplot showing the distribution of bacterial isolates based on morphological and biochemical characteristics, with the first two components explaining 55.4% of the total variance. Principal component analysis (PCA) biplot showing the distribution of bacterial isolates according to their morphological and biochemical characteristics. The horizontal and vertical axes represent the first and second principal components, respectively. Together, principal components 1 and 2 explain 55.4% of the total variance in the dataset. Individual points represent bacterial isolates, while vectors represent the contribution and direction of the morphological and biochemical test variables to the principal components. The length and direction of each vector indicate its relative contribution and association with the corresponding principal component. The biplot illustrates the overall variation and distribution of the bacterial isolates based on their measured characteristics.

Principal component analysis (PCA) biplot showing the distribution of isolates based on morphological and biochemical characteristics. The first two principal components explain 55.4 % of the total variance. Vectors indicate the contribution of each test variable to the principal components.

Table 8:

Variable loadings on principal components.

Component Eigenvalue % Variance Key variables (loading)
PC1 4.82 34.4 Gram (0.82), motility (0.76), glucose (0.72), catalase (0.70), lactose (0.69)
PC2 2.94 21.0 Urease (0.68), indole (0.65), spore (0.60)
PC3 1.67 11.9 Citrate (0.66), oxidase (0.64)

The first principal component was strongly associated with Gram reaction (loading = 0.82) and motility (loading = 0.76), indicating that these characteristics contributed substantially to differentiation among the bacterial isolates. The second component was mainly influenced by catalase activity (loading = 0.70) and urease activity (loading = 0.68). The third component was associated primarily with indole production (loading = 0.65) and spore formation (loading = 0.60). The fourth component showed high contributions from sugar fermentation characteristics, including glucose fermentation (loading = 0.72) and lactose fermentation (loading = 0.69), while the fifth component was mainly explained by citrate utilization (loading = 0.66) and oxidase activity (loading = 0.64) (Table 8).

4. Discussion

A total of 104 culturable bacterial isolates representing nine genera were identified across all sampling sites. In the present study, the diversity of culturable bacterial isolates varied considerably among soil types, with waste-impacted soils exhibiting the highest Shannon and Simpson diversity indices. This increased diversity may be associated with the heterogeneous environmental conditions, nutrient inputs, and selective pressures present in waste-affected habitats. Similar observations have been reported by [43], who suggested that disturbed soils may support diverse bacterial communities due to enhanced nutrient availability and microbial adaptation to environmental stress.

The observed distribution pattern was also consistent with findings reported by [44], who documented the predominance of Gram-positive rod-shaped bacteria in forest and sediment soils, suggesting their adaptation to relatively stable environments with high organic matter availability. Furthermore [45], reported that agricultural management practices can reduce microbial diversity by promoting specific microbial groups, which agrees with the comparatively lower bacterial diversity observed in agricultural soils in the present study.

The diversity indices obtained in this study (Shannon diversity index, H′ = 1.68; Simpson’s diversity index, 1 − D = 0.72) indicated a moderate level of culturable bacterial diversity with a relatively even distribution among bacterial taxa. These findings are consistent with previous studies conducted under comparable agricultural soil conditions. Similar diversity values were reported by [46] in agricultural soils of Saraburi, Thailand, where the Simpson’s diversity index was 0.74 and the Shannon diversity index was 1.77. The similarity between these findings suggests that moderate bacterial diversity may be characteristic of agricultural ecosystems influenced by human activities, where repeated management practices, such as tillage and fertilizer application, may shape microbial communities by maintaining a balance between microbial richness and environmental selection pressures.

The predominance of Bacillus spp. (49 %) across the sampling sites is noteworthy and is consistent with previous studies investigating soil bacterial communities [10], 22]. Members of the genus Bacillus are well adapted to soil environments due to their ability to form endospores, which provide resistance to desiccation, heat, and other environmental stresses. In addition, their metabolic versatility, including the production of extracellular enzymes and diverse secondary metabolites with antimicrobial activity, contributes to their ecological success in various soil habitats [47]. The detection of Bacillus spp. across all sampling sites (100 % occurrence) indicates that this genus was the most widely distributed culturable bacterial group in the studied environments. This widespread distribution highlights the ecological adaptability of Bacillus spp. and their potential importance as target organisms for further investigation of antimicrobial compound production.

The high prevalence of Bacillus spp. and P. spp. in waste-impacted soils (SW, AH, and TF) is particularly relevant for bioprospecting, as members of these genera are widely recognized producers of antimicrobial compounds and other bioactive secondary metabolites [10], 12]. The occurrence of these genera in tannery effluent and municipal solid waste environments suggests that they may possess adaptive traits that enable survival under contaminated conditions, including possible tolerance to heavy metals and other environmental stresses [11]. Therefore, these isolates represent promising candidates for further investigation of antimicrobial activity and potential biotechnological applications, including bioremediation.

The culturable soil bacterial community demonstrated considerable metabolic versatility, as indicated by the high proportion of sugar-fermenting isolates (75.9 %) and catalase-positive isolates (91 %). These traits suggest that many of the recovered bacteria possess diverse metabolic capabilities that may facilitate survival under changing environmental conditions. Similar observations were reported by [48], who noted that soil bacteria exposed to reactive oxygen species frequently produce catalase as a protective physiological response. Likewise [49], highlighted that catalase activity and carbohydrate utilization are important physiological characteristics that enhance bacterial survival and ecological fitness in terrestrial environments.

The ability of bacteria to utilize and ferment a range of carbohydrate substrates enables them to exploit diverse organic carbon sources and may contribute to organic matter decomposition and carbon cycling in soil ecosystems. Furthermore, catalase activity provides protection against oxidative stress by converting hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen, thereby supporting the survival of aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria in oxygen-exposed soil environments.

A considerable proportion of the culturable bacterial isolates demonstrated starch-hydrolyzing activity (43.2 %), indicating their potential ability to produce extracellular amylases involved in the degradation of complex polysaccharides. Similar findings were reported by [50], who identified extracellular enzyme production, including amylases, as an important mechanism through which soil bacteria contribute to the decomposition of organic matter. Likewise [51], emphasized the essential role of microbial extracellular enzymes in regulating carbon turnover and supporting ecosystem processes, which is consistent with the observations of the present study.

In contrast, indole production was detected in only 30.7 % of the isolates, while hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production was observed in 12.5 % of isolates, suggesting that these metabolic traits were less frequently distributed among the recovered bacterial groups. Similar patterns were reported by [6], who noted that indole and H2S production are generally restricted to specific bacterial taxa and may occur at lower frequencies depending on environmental conditions and microbial community composition.

Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that Gram reaction and motility contributed most strongly to the first principal component, indicating that these characteristics were important variables for differentiating the phenotypic profiles of the bacterial isolates. Differences in cell wall structure between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria influence various physiological properties, including environmental adaptation, nutrient acquisition, and tolerance to external stresses. Similarly, bacterial motility may enhance the ability of microorganisms to colonize heterogeneous soil microsites and respond to favorable nutrient gradients.

Previous studies have reported that bacterial functional traits, including cell wall characteristics and physiological adaptations, contribute significantly to ecological strategies and community composition in soil environments [52]. Furthermore [53], emphasized that motility represents an important adaptive trait that enables soil bacteria to respond to environmental fluctuations and changes in nutrient availability. Overall, the PCA findings suggest that the observed organization of culturable bacterial isolates was associated with both structural characteristics (Gram reaction and motility) and metabolic traits (enzyme activities and substrate utilization patterns).

The present study demonstrated that culturable bacterial diversity was significantly and positively correlated with soil pH, total nitrogen (TN), and available phosphorus (AP). In contrast, organic carbon (OC), soil moisture content, and soil temperature showed no significant correlations with bacterial diversity. These findings are consistent with numerous studies indicating that soil pH is one of the most important environmental factors shaping bacterial community composition and diversity across diverse ecosystems.

At a continental scale in North American ecosystems [54], reported a strong relationship between soil pH and bacterial diversity, highlighting the importance of pH as a major determinant of bacterial community patterns. Similarly [55], demonstrated that soil pH explained greater variation in bacterial community structure than other measured soil properties across different land-use systems. Furthermore [56], reported that acidic soil conditions can restrict the distribution of many bacterial groups, whereas bacterial diversity generally increases as soil pH approaches neutral conditions.

Additionally, total nitrogen (TN) showed a significant positive correlation with both the Shannon and Simpson diversity indices. Higher nitrogen availability may reduce nutrient limitations and support greater bacterial biomass and diversity by providing essential resources for microbial growth. Similar findings were reported by [2], who identified soil nutrient availability, particularly nitrogen, as an important factor influencing microbial diversity across global ecosystems. Likewise [57], demonstrated that increased soil nitrogen content in agricultural soils was associated with changes in bacterial community composition and enhanced bacterial diversity.

Available phosphorus (AP) showed the strongest positive correlation with Simpson’s diversity index, suggesting that phosphorus availability may play an important role in shaping the structure and evenness of culturable bacterial communities in the studied environments. These findings are consistent with reports by [58], who demonstrated that nutrient availability influences bacterial diversity across tropical ecosystems, and by [59], who found that phosphorus enrichment significantly affected soil bacterial community composition. Increased phosphorus availability may promote microbial growth and support the persistence of diverse bacterial groups by providing additional resources for metabolically distinct microorganisms.

Bacterial diversity showed a moderate positive correlation with soil organic carbon (OC); however, this relationship was not statistically significant. Since organic carbon represents an important energy source for heterotrophic microorganisms, higher OC availability is often expected to support greater microbial abundance and diversity. However, the absence of a significant correlation in the present study may be related to several factors, including the relatively small number of sampling sites (n = 11), spatial variability among sampling locations, and the influence of other environmental variables not considered in this analysis. Similar findings were reported by [60], who suggested that the relationship between soil organic carbon and bacterial diversity is often influenced by additional factors, including vegetation type, soil management practices, nutrient availability, and interactions among soil properties, rather than carbon content alone.

Neither soil moisture content nor temperature showed a significant correlation with culturable bacterial diversity in the present study. Although both factors are known to influence microbial activity and physiological processes, the limited variation in soil temperature during the sampling period and spatial differences in soil moisture among sampling sites may have reduced their detectable relationships with bacterial diversity. Similar observations were reported by [17], who found that short-term temperature fluctuations often have a weaker influence on bacterial community composition than soil chemical properties. Likewise [61], reported that soil moisture primarily affects temporal variations in microbial activity rather than long-term patterns of bacterial diversity.

Overall, the findings of the present study suggest that soil chemical properties, particularly pH, nitrogen, and phosphorus availability, were the major environmental variables associated with variations in culturable bacterial diversity across the studied habitats. These results agree with previous ecological studies indicating that soil chemical characteristics often play a stronger role in shaping bacterial diversity patterns than short-term variations in physical factors such as moisture and temperature.

5. Study limitations

This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, bacterial identification was based exclusively on morphological and biochemical characterization. The application of molecular approaches, such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing, would provide more accurate taxonomic identification and allow confirmation of bacterial identities. These analyses, together with antimicrobial activity screening and secondary metabolite characterization, will be addressed in the subsequent objectives of this research.

Second, because sampling was conducted only during the dry season (March–June 2024), seasonal variations in bacterial abundance, diversity, and community composition may not have been captured. Third, the use of a single culture medium (nutrient agar) may have limited the recovery of bacteria with different nutritional requirements. Future studies should incorporate sampling across different seasons and employ multiple selective and differential media to improve the recovery and characterization of a broader range of culturable bacterial diversity.

6. Conclusions

This study characterized 104 culturable bacterial isolates recovered from 11 contrasting soil habitats in the Amhara region of Ethiopia. The findings indicate that soil pH, total nitrogen, and available phosphorus were the major environmental variables associated with variations in bacterial diversity. Gram-positive, rod-shaped, and catalase-positive bacteria predominated across the sampling sites, with Bacillus spp. being the most frequently recovered genus (49 %), based on morphological and biochemical characterization.

The diversity indices (Shannon diversity index, H′ = 1.68; Simpson’s diversity index, 1 − D = 0.72) indicated moderate culturable bacterial diversity with a relatively even distribution among bacterial genera. The frequent occurrence of Bacillus spp. and P. spp., which are recognized producers of diverse antimicrobial secondary metabolites, highlights the potential of these soil environments as valuable sources for future antimicrobial compound discovery. Furthermore, the high enzymatic activity and metabolic versatility observed among the isolates suggest their potential applications in biotechnology, including bioremediation, enzyme production, and agricultural biofertilization.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

We sincerely acknowledge Bahir Dar University for providing the laboratory facilities and logistical support necessary to conduct this study. We also gratefully acknowledge Dr. Bizuayehu Kerisew for his valuable support in providing laboratory materials. Our sincere thanks also go to the Amhara Public Health Institute for providing the reference bacterial strains used in this study.

Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2025-1379).

Footnotes

Research ethics: Not applicable.

Informed consent: Not applicable.

Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. T.S.K. conducted the laboratory experiments under the supervision of D.D. and M.K. D.D. contributed to the identification of the bacterial isolates and supervised the overall research process. T.S.K. and D.D. prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. A.B., M.A., and F.M. contributed to soil sample collection and laboratory experiments.

Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

Research funding: None declared.

Data availability: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

References

  • 1.Nannipieri P, Ascher-Jenull J, Ceccherini MT, Pietramellara G, Renella G, Schloter M. Beyond microbial diversity for predicting soil functions: a mini review. Pedosphere. 2020;30:5–17. doi: 10.1016/s1002-0160(19)60824-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Reich PB, Jeffries TC, Gaitán JJ, Encinar D, et al. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10541. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu D, Yang Y, An S, Wang H, Wang Y. The biogeographical distribution of soil bacterial communities in the loess plateau as revealed by high-throughput sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2456. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen Y, Wang X, Li Z. Environmental factors shaping soil microbial communities. Environ Res. 2024;240:117–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bochner BR. Global phenotypic characterization of bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33:191–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00149.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cappuccino JG, Welsh C. Microbiology: a laboratory manual. 11th ed. New York (NY): Pearson; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hafezi A, Khamar Z. The method and analysis of some biochemical tests commonly used for microbial identification: a review. Compr Health Biomed Stud. 2024;3:e160199. doi: 10.5812/chbs-160199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang B, Pang X, Hu B, Bao W, Tian G. Does thinning-induced gap size result in altered soil microbial community in pine plantation in eastern Tibetan Plateau? Ecol Evol. 2017;7:2986–93. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ahn JH, Song J, Kim BY, Kim MS, Joa JH, Weon HY. Characterization of the bacterial and archaeal communities in rice field soils subjected to long-term fertilization practices. J Microbiol. 2012;50:754–65. doi: 10.1007/s12275-012-2409-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou Y, Wang X, Liu J. Antibiotic-producing bacteria in landfill soils. J Hazard Mater. 2020;389:122–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mahmud S, Ahmed R, Rahman M. Heavy metal resistance in bacteria from tannery waste. Bioresour Technol. 2024;385:128–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gufe C, Chari TA, Jambwa P, Dinginya L, Mahlangu P, Marowero ST, et al. A review on the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria found in abattoir effluent from resource-limited settings: the necessity of a robust One Health framework. Sustain Environ. 2025;11:2464419. doi: 10.1080/27658511.2025.2464419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Imhoff JF. Natural products from marine bacteria – extremophiles and their potential applications. Mar Drugs. 2016;14:143. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yitaferu B. Agricultural climatic zones of the Amhara region. Ethiop J Agric Sci. 2011;21:23–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Molla E, Gebrekidan H, Mamo T, Assen M. Effects of land use change on selected soil properties in the Tara Gedam catchment and adjacent agro-ecosystems, northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Nat Resour. 2009;11:35–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baker KL, Langenheder S, Nicol GW, Ricketts D, Killham K, Campbell CD, et al. Environmental and spatial characterisation of bacterial community composition in soil to inform sampling strategies. Soil Biol Biochem. 2009;41:2292–8. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fierer N, Schimel JP, Holden PA. Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles. Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35:167–76. doi: 10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00251-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ahmed SR, Roy R, Romi IJ, Hasan M, Bhuiyan MKH, Khan MMH. Phytochemical screening, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of some medicinal plants grown in Sylhet region. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2019;14:26–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brooks JP. Soil sampling for microbial analyses. In: Yates MV, Nakatsu CH, Miller RV, Pillai SD, editors. Manual of environmental microbiology. 4th ed. Washington (DC): ASM Press; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. Microbiology: a laboratory manual. 10th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Collins CH, Lyne PM, Grange JM. Microbiological methods. 6th ed. London: Butterworths; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Paulsen IT, Holmes AJ, editors. Environmental microbiology: methods and protocols. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zaved HK, Rahman MM, Rahman MM, Rahman A, Arafat SMY, Rahman MS. Isolation and characterization of effective bacteria for solid waste degradation for organic manure. KMITL Sci Technol J. 2008;8:44–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mosley LM, Rengasamy P, Fitzpatrick RW. Soil pH: techniques, challenges and insights from a global dataset. Eur J Soil Sci. 2024;75:e70021. doi: 10.1111/ejss.70021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bouyoucos GJ. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agron J. 1962;54:464–5. doi: 10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle-size analysis by hydrometer: a simplified method for routine textural analysis and a sensitivity test of measurement parameters. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1979;43:1004–7. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300050038x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jha P, Biswas AK, Lakaria BL, Saha R, Singh M, Rao AS. Predicting total organic carbon content of soils from Walkley and Black analysis. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2014;45:713–25. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2013.874023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McGeehan SL, Naylor DV. Automated instrumental analysis of carbon and nitrogen in plant and soil samples. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1988;19:493–505. doi: 10.1080/00103628809367953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington (DC): United States Department of Agriculture; 1954. (USDA Circular No. 939) [Google Scholar]
  • 30.R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27:379–423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jolliffe IT. Principal component analysis. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol. 1904;15:72–101. doi: 10.2307/1412159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kumari K, Kumar P, Shweta S, Rajnish S, Singh P. Molecular characterization and in-depth genome analysis of Enterobacter sp. S-16. Funct Integr Genomics. 2023;23:165. doi: 10.1007/s10142-023-01161-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Koilybayeva M, Shynykul Z, Ustenova G, Abzaliyeva S, Alimzhanova M, Amirkhanova A, et al. Molecular characterization of some Bacillus species from vegetables and evaluation of their antimicrobial and antibiotic potency. Molecules. 2023;28:3210. doi: 10.3390/molecules28073210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Leimbach A, Hacker J, Dobrindt U. Escherichia coli as an all-rounder: the thin line between commensalism and pathogenicity. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013;303:336–47. doi: 10.1007/82_2012_303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Peix A, Ramírez-Bahena MH, Velázquez E. Historical evolution and current status of the taxonomy of genus Pseudomonas. Infect Genet Evol. 2009;9:1132–47. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brenner DJ, Grimont PAD, Steigerwalt AG, Fanning GR, Ageron E, Riddle CF, et al. Classification of citrobacter species by DNA hybridization and biochemical characteristics. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993;43:645–58. doi: 10.1099/00207713-43-4-645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bergogne-Bérézin E, Towner KJ. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:148–65. doi: 10.1128/cmr.9.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Facklam RR, Collins MD. Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:731–4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.4.731-734.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.O’Hara CM, Brenner FW, Miller JM. Classification, identification, and clinical significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:534–46. doi: 10.1128/cmr.13.4.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bannerman TL. Manual of clinical microbiology. 8th ed. Washington (DC): ASM Press; 2003. Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and other catalase-positive cocci that grow aerobically; pp. 384–404. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jangid K, Williams MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Sanderlin JS, Reeves JH, Jenkins MB, et al. Relative impacts of land-use, management intensity and fertilization upon soil microbial community structure in agricultural systems. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40:2843–53. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.07.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Andrews JH, Carroll GC. Microbial communities in forest soils. Mycologia. 2001;93:1087–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Osburn ED, McBride SG, Strickland MS. Agricultural management effects on soil bacterial diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2023;345:108–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pakdee P. The relationships between microbial communities and environmental factors in agricultural soils in Saraburi [bachelor’s senior project] Bangkok (Thailand): Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University; 2020. p. 32. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fira D, Dimkić I, Berić T, Lozo J, Stanković S. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J Biotechnol. 2018;285:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Madigan MT, Bender KS, Buckley DH, Sattley WM, Stahl DA. Brock biology of microorganisms. 16th ed. New York (NY): Pearson; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Atlas RM, Bartha R. Microbial ecology: fundamentals and applications. 4th ed. Menlo Park (CA): Benjamin/Cummings; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Das SK, Varma A. Role of enzymes in maintaining soil health. In: Shukla G, Varma A, editors. Soil enzymology. Soil biology. Vol. 22. Berlin (Germany): Springer; 2011. pp. 25–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J, Sinsabaugh RL, Stromberger ME, Wallenstein MD, et al. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;58:216–34. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology. 2007;88:1354–64. doi: 10.1890/05-1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.De Bruijn FJ, editor. Biological nitrogen fixation. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fierer N, Jackson RB. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:626–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507535103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:5111–20. doi: 10.1128/aem.00335-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rousk J, Bååth E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG, et al. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. 2010;4:1340–51. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang J, Shi X, Zheng C, Suter H, Huang Z. Different responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to nitrogen deposition in a subtropical forest. Sci Total Environ. 2021;755:142449. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tripathi BM, Stegen JC, Kim M, Dong K, Adams JM, Lee YK. Soil pH mediates the balance between stochastic and deterministic assembly of bacteria. ISME J. 2018;12:1072–83. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0082-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Leff JW, Jones SE, Prober SM, Barberán A, Borer ET, Firn JL, et al. Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands worldwide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:10967–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508382112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fierer N, Leff JW, Adams BJ, Nielsen UN, Bates ST, Lauber CL, et al. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:21390–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215210110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Brockett BFT, Prescott CE, Grayston SJ. Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada. Soil Biol Biochem. 2012;44:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material


Articles from Open Life Sciences are provided here courtesy of De Gruyter

RESOURCES