Abstract
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM), a central kinase in the DNA damage response, is recurrently altered across these disorders, including myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), yet its clinical significance remains underrecognized. We conducted a PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD420251142673) to evaluate the prognostic and biological impact of ATM alterations in MDS, AML, and MPN. Ten studies met inclusion criteria. In MDS, ATM alterations showed consistent downregulation, hypermethylation, and a predominance of oncogenic missense mutations, with methylation significantly enriched in cases progressing to AML. In AML, reduced ATM gene expression, often driven by miR-100 or miR-181a, was associated with increased blast proliferation, while the ATM genetic variant rs3092856 correlated with chemoresistance and inferior survival. Evidence in MPN/CML, although limited, suggests that ATM polymorphisms, such as rs228593, rs3092856 (C4138T), −5144A>T (rs228589), c.5753G>C, c.346A>G, c.4060C>A, and the germline variant L2307F, contribute to disease susceptibility and adverse prognostic stratification. Collectively, current evidence supports ATM alterations as clinically relevant biomarkers in myeloid malignancies, although their functional role in disease pathogenesis remains incompletely understood.. Rather than establishing ATM merely as a prognostic marker, future efforts should prioritize the characterization of ATM-related therapeutic vulnerabilities and integrate ATM status into treatment-oriented molecular panels to guide precision-based interventions in myeloid diseases.
Keywords: ATM mutations, Myeloid neoplasms, DNA damage, Genomic instability
Introduction
The DNA is constantly affected by different types of damage from both endogenous and exogenous sources. The former includes reactive oxygen species [1], replication errors [2], hydrolysis and cellular aging [3, 4], while the latter comprises environmental factors such as chemical exposure [5, 6] and ultraviolet radiation [7]. Once DNA damage is detected, cells act like an orchestra composed of complex DNA repair mechanisms and checkpoint signaling pathways over the cell cycle phases to completely repair the lesion, whenever possible [8]. Among DNA repair systems in mammals, homologous recombination represents a main source of double strand breaks’ recovery. If not properly corrected, these lesions may induce genomic instability, resulting in chromosomal abnormalities and mutagenic events [9–11].
In this scenario, the Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) gene, located on chromosome 11q23.3 [12, 13], comprises 66 exons, encodes a serine/threonine protein active monomeric form of 370 kDa, and exerts a key role on DNA damage repair (DDR) and genomic stability [14]. In response to DNA lesions, especially in cases of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), a protein complex called MRN (composed by MRE11, RAD50 and NBS1 genes) identifies the insults, then recruits and activates the ATM protein at the damage site. Once activated, ATM signals and phosphorylate several downstream effectors such as BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2, among others [14, 15] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

Activation mechanism of ATM kinase in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Upon DDSBs induced by exogenous or endogenous stimuli, the MRN complex (MRE11–RAD50–NBS1) recognizes the insults and recruits ATM protein to the damage site. ATM protein then undergoes autophosphorylation, leading to its activation, and further phosphorylates multiple downstream targets. Among these, CHEK2 protein promotes inhibition of CDC25A, thereby suppressing CDK2 activity and inducing a transient cell cycle arrest, which in turn facilitates DNA repair. ATM protein also phosphorylates and stabilizes p53, both directly and through degradation of MDMX, enabling its tumor suppressor function. Activated p53 upregulates p21, which inhibits CDKs and enforces a cell cycle arrest at the G1/S or G2/M checkpoints, thereby preventing the transmission of unrepaired mutations. However, in cases of irreparable damage, p53 induces the transcription of pro-apoptotic genes such as BID, BAX, and PUMA, triggering programmed cell death. Image created using BioRender
The role of ATM in cancer is multifaceted with germline and somatic mutations. Germline mutations in the ATM gene are classically associated with ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) syndrome, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by genomic instability, immunodeficiency and increased predisposition to cancer. Still, several types of cancer have been associated with germline mutations in ATM, independent of AT syndrome, such as pancreatic, esophageal, lung, melanoma, breast, ovarian, prostate, and bladder malignant tumors [16], as well as in some lymphoma subtypes [17–19].
Regarding somatic mutations, ATM gene is usually a second hit after unrelated germline mutations in breast, ovary, pancreas, prostate and other tissues, but sometimes have been reported sporadically. More often, ATM somatic mutations are found amid hematological cancers, mostly on lymphoid malignancies, in which their frequency varies from 5–45% of cases. Among myeloid clonal disorders, incidence is much lower: less than 5% in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 0.4% in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) [20], the most common bone marrow cancer, and rarely between the chronic myeloproliferative subsets.
Overall, myeloid neoplasms represent a heterogeneous group of clonal hematologic disorders originating from genetic and epigenetic alterations in hematopoietic stem cells, that combined result in impaired hematopoiesis with a variable, but increased, risk of leukemic transformation, and protean clinical outcomes [21, 22]. Within the spectrum of these malignancies, MDS and AML are particularly prevalent, along with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), which include chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) [23].
ATM somatic and germline mutations, encompassing other gene deletions and/or epigenetic silencing, can disrupt DNA repair mechanisms, eventually promoting genomic instability that may lead to chromosomal aberrations—a common marker of clonal myeloid disorders—and disease pathogenesis. Moreover, ATM mutations can facilitate clonal evolution, inflict on adverse prognostic outcomes, leverage therapeutic resistance, and ultimately reduce survival. Therefore, investigating the clinical impact of ATM profile in myeloid disorders is of great relevance, not only for understanding the biological mechanisms underlying genomic instability, but also for identification of prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets. The characterization of these alterations may contribute to risk stratification in patients, guide personalized clinical decisions and open new perspectives in the field of precision medicine applied to hematology.
Methodology
Search strategy
This systematic review was submitted and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD420251142673). We guided this study based on the PICO strategy (P-Population/Patient; I-Intervention; C-Comparison; O-Outcome/Result) [24] interested in answering the following question: “What is the relationship between genetic alterations in the ATM gene—including mutations, expression changes, and epigenetic modifications—and the prognosis in myeloid neoplasms (such as MDS, AML, CML, MPN)?”.
Search database
We based this systematic review on the items in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) to establish the minimum evidence required to conduct a systematic review of the role of the ATM gene in the evolution of pathogenesis, prognosis, and therapy among myeloid malignancies [25]. A search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, and LILACS databases to identify peer-reviewed, high-impact studies published between January 2010 and August 2025.
Studies written in Portuguese and English were included based on the following search terms and Boolean operators: "ATM gene" OR "ataxia telangiectasia mutated" AND "myelodysplastic syndrome" OR "MDS" OR "myeloproliferative neoplasms" OR "MPN" OR "polycythemia vera" OR "essential thrombocythemia" OR "primary myelofibrosis" OR "acute myeloid leukemia" OR "AML" OR "chronic myeloid leukemia" OR "CML".
The inclusion criteria for this study encompassed publications conducted in humans with hematological diseases that investigated the influence of the ATM gene on pathogenesis and outcomes. Only original research articles, including clinical, observational, cohort, and case–control studies were considered eligible.
Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed qualitatively for each included study. The evaluation considered study design, sample size, major limitations and risk of bias. Studies were subsequently classified as low or moderate risk of bias according to their overall methodological robustness. Factors as small cohort size, lack of external validation, single-center recruitment, retrospective design, and heterogeneity in the assessment of ATM alterations, including gene expression, methylation, germline variants, somatic mutations, and polymorphisms were considered.
In addition, the search was restricted to articles published within the last 15 years. Reviews, meta-analyses, comments, perspectives, editorials, or other studies that did not provide original results or were unpublished were excluded. Two independent researchers reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full texts, with any conflicts resolved by a third researcher.
Results
This systematic review identified 80 records (PubMed: 79; LILACS: 1; SciELO: 0). After removal of 8 duplicates (Fig. 2), 72 records remained for the first screening stage. Titles and abstracts were assessed to identify studies mentioning either the ATM gene or its description, resulting in the exclusion of 25 articles. During the second screening stage, following the PRISMA guidelines, 37 additional records were excluded: 2 preclinical murine studies, 12 preclinical in vitro studies, 4 preclinical studies conducted both in vitro and in murine models, 5 case reports, 3 letters to the editor, 5 reviews, 1 thesis, and 5 studies addressing other diseases. Ultimately, 10 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review, with the study design, disease, sample size, population, outcome measures, mais findings and risk of bias summarized in Table 1.
Fig. 2.

Flowchart of data obtained from the search of PUBMED/LILACS/SciELO records based on the PRISMA methodology
Table 1.
Summary of the selected studies investigating the role of ATM in myeloid malignancies
| Study design | Disease | Sample size | Population | Outcome measures | Main findings | Risk of bias | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analytical cross-sectional | MDS | 232 patients (Cohorts A: 56, B: 100, C: 76) and healthy controls | Adult patients with Myelodysplastic Neoplasm (MDS) | Methylation/mutation status of DNA repair genes, ATM expression, and evolution to AML | Higher ATM methylation in MDS patients progressing to AML; reduced ATM expression in MDS regardless of IPSS-R risk; predominance of missense, likely oncogenic ATM mutations; ATM frequently silenced/downregulated | Moderate | Pinheiro et al. [20] |
| Prospective cohort | MDS | 31 patients | Younger adult patients (aged 18–60 years) with de novo MDS | Frequency of germline predisposing variants via Exome Sequencing and Targeted NGS | Germline heterozygous ATM variants (all VUS) detected in low-risk MDS; no associations with survival, transfusion needs, or marrow features | Moderate | Attardi et al. [27] |
| Analytical cross-sectional | MDS | 47 patients | Adult patients with MDS | mRNA expression levels of HR and NHEJ genes (ATM, XRCC6, LIG4) and associations with polymorphisms | Functional polymorphisms (rs228593, rs2267437, rs1805388) significantly alter the expression levels of ATM, XRCC6, and LIG4, driving genomic instability in MDS | Moderate | Ribeiro et al. [28] |
| Analytical cross-sectional | MDS | 51 patients | Adult de novo MDS patients | Expression of NER, HR, and NHEJ genes (ATM, BRCA1, LIG4, XPA) related to bone marrow cellularity and survival | Hypocellular MDS patients have decreased expression of ATM, BRCA1/2, LIG4, and ERCC8 | Moderate | Ribeiro et al. [29] |
| Retrospective cohort | MDS | 109 cases (74 MDS, 15 AML, 20 controls) | Adult de novo MDS, de novo AML patients, and reactive bone marrow controls | Expression of DDR proteins (pNBS1, pATM, γH2AX, p53) and overall survival (OS) | DDR proteins (pNBS1, pATM, γH2AX) were significantly increased in MDS and AML | Moderate | Kefala et al. [30] |
| Analytical cross-sectional with in vitro analysis | AML | 53 clinical subjects (30 AML, 23 controls) and cell lines | Pediatric AML patients and myeloid leukemia cell lines (Kasumi-1 and MV-4-11) | miR-100/ATM expression, cell viability (MTT assay), and apoptosis |
mRNA level of ATM was lower in AML group than that of normal group. Moreover, a notable downregulation of ATM was also observed in AML cells |
Moderate | Sun et al. [31] |
| Analytical cross-sectional with in vitro analysis | AML | 75 subjects (57 pediatric AML, 18 controls) and cell lines | Pediatric AML patients and myeloid leukemia cell lines (NB4, HL60, MV-4-11, THP1, K562, CCRF-CEM, Jurkat, and SUP-B15) | miR-181a/ATM expression, cell proliferation, and cell cycle (G1/S transition) | ATM expression was reduced in pediatric AML and inversely correlated with miR-181a levels. ATM was as a direct target of miR-181a, and its suppression promoted cell proliferation and G1/S cell cycle progression | Moderate | Liu et al. [32] |
| Case–control | AML | 867 subjects (307 AML, 560 controls) | Chinese patients with newly diagnosed AML and healthy controls | 42 genetic variations in 15 DNA repair genes; chemotherapy response and OS | ATM 4138C>T (rs3092856) variant linked to higher chemotherapy refractoriness; associated with reduced overall survival (median 7 vs. 11 months); CT genotype showed OS <2 years, while CC genotype had better survival | Low | Shi et al. [33] |
| Case–control | CML | 925 subjects (476 CML, 449 controls) | Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients from India | ATM gene polymorphisms (− 5144A>T and C4138T), EUTOS score, and event-free survival | The A allele of − 5144A>T (rs228589) and T allele of C4138T (rs3092856) are significantly associated with enhanced risk for CML development and progression, correlating with high-risk prognostic EUTOS scores | Low | Gorre et al. [34] |
| Case–control with in vitro analysis | MPN | 848 patients (64 familial, 218 unselected, from a registry of 630) and cell lines | Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs) and myeloid cell line TF1 | Recurrent germline variants, structural ATM modeling, and downstream CHEK2 phosphorylation | Identified a recurrent ATM L2307F germline variant in ~8% of familial MPNs. The variant stabilizes inactive ATM and decreases CHEK2 phosphorylation, increasing MPN predisposition | Moderate | Braunstein et al. [35] |
The Table 1 included studies demonstrated low to moderate risk of bias. Two studies were classified as having low risk of bias due to their large sample sizes and robust observational designs, whereas the remaining studies were considered to have moderate risk of bias, mainly because of limited cohort sizes, single-center recruitment, lack of validation cohorts, and methodological heterogeneity.
Most investigations evaluated ATM alterations through distinct methodologies, including gene expression analyses, DNA methylation profiling, polymorphism screening, germline variant identification, and next-generation sequencing approaches. This diversity limited direct comparisons across studies and precluded quantitative synthesis of the available data. Overall, the current evidence should be interpreted as low-to-moderate quality and primarily hypothesis-generating.
Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS)
Five articles qualified for the MDS subset, the most frequently reported clonal myeloid disorder associated with ATM:
Pinheiro et al. [20] evaluated ATM role in MDS regarding its methylation status, gene expression and mutational profile in 232 patients with MDS distributed into three different cohorts, using a wide methodology, including pyrosequencing, real-time PCR, immunohistochemistry, and NGS-Sanger. Among all genes involved with DSBs repair, ATM displayed higher methylation patterns among patients that evolved to acute myeloid leukemia: those who progressed exhibited twice the methylation rate when compared to those who did not progress to AML (median 4.97 versus 2.45; p = 0.016). Likewise, MDS patients presented downregulation of ATM, including significant reductions of ATM expression when compared to elderly (non-MDS) controls, regardless of the disease risk classification (according to the IPSS-R score).
Regarding the mutational profile of ATM, the same authors [20] investigated 7583 MDS cases from cBioportal, composed of three datasets: Myelodysplasia (UTokyu, Nature 2011, n = 29), Myelodysplastic (MSK, 2020, n = 4231), and the most recent 3323 cases from the Molecular International Prognostic Score System (Molecular IPSS). A great number of mutations was detected on ATM, with frameshifts and missenses standing out above other types, while being mostly categorized as likely oncogenic/oncogenic according to the gold-standards for classification of somatic variations in cancer [26]. The authors eventually concluded that ATM is frequently silenced or downregulated in MDS either due to methylation or mutations, what underscores its potential role as a future target for therapeutic intentions.
In another recent study, Attardi et al. [27] investigated an unusual cohort of 31 young (< 60 years old) low-risk MDS patients presenting with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and also a recent disease onset, using next generation sequencing (NGS) on samples obtained from peripheral blood and saliva. The authors explored the profile of 344 genes, including ATM, looking for germline variants linked to clonal and non-clonal cytopenia and encountered only heterozygous variants in ATM (c.5753G>C, c.346A>G, c.4060C>A), all classified as variants of undetermined significance (VUS). No significant associations were detected in respect of survival, mortality, transfusion requirements, or bone marrow morphological features.
Ribeiro et al. evaluated ATM polymorphisms and expression on 47 and 51 MDS patients, respectively [28, 29] Authors first reported [28] that SNP rs228593 (genotypes AA or AG + AA) was associated with increased ATM expression, particularly among patients classified as high- or very-high-risk leukemic progression by the IPSS-R. Among genotypes, AA patients displayed the highest expression levels when compared to GG cases (wild-type). In the next study [29], authors found that ATM expression was significantly reduced in the group of patients with hypocellular MDS, yet no relevant correlations could be observed in terms of survival, mortality, transfusion needs, or other hematological parameters. Both findings indicate that: 1) rs228593 is a functional ATM polymorphism in MDS, and 2) AA genotype may be linked to adverse prognosis.
Similarly, Kefala et al. [30] evaluated the expression of DDR proteins, including ATM (pNBS1, γH2AX, and pATM) by immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry in 74 patients with MDS, but no significant differences showed up in terms of survival or hematological parameters regarding pATM.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Three articles qualified for AML analysis, two on pediatric and one on adult cohorts:
Sun et al. [31] studied the expression of miR-100 and ATM by qRT-PCR in 30 pediatric AML patients (0–14 years). The authors reported that reduction of ATM expression was associated with increased G1/S transition on the cell cycle, resulting in greater proliferation of myeloblasts.
Liu et al. [32] also evaluated the expression of miR-181a and ATM by qRT-PCR in 57 pediatric AML cases (mean age 7 years) and detected a very similar underexpression of ATM among patients.
Shi et al. [33] studied 307 AML patients (mean age 42 years), including primary and secondary AML. DNA from bone marrow (patients) and peripheral blood (controls) was genotyped using MALDI-TOF MS for 42 SNPs in 15 DNA repair and damage response genes. The ATM 4138C>T (rs3092856) variant was associated with higher chemotherapy refractoriness (7/8 cases) and lower overall survival (median 7 vs. 11 months). The CT genotype was associated with reduced overall survival of less than two years, while for the CC genotype 38% showed superior outcome. So far, this is the largest cohort studied about the influence of ATM polymorphisms in AML.
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (CML, PV, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis)
Research on the ATM in the context of CML and MPN is scarce. Our review identified two studies:
Gorre et al. [34] analyzed 476 CML patients (mean age 51) for ATM polymorphisms (− 5144A>T, rs228589, and C4138T, rs3092856), assessing genotype/allele frequencies, haplotypes and risk models; and correlating with traditional prognostic scores (like Sokal, Hasford and EUTOS), survival and response to imatinib. ATM variants were associated with higher CML risk and correlated EUTOS scores.
In the remaining study, Braunstein et al. [35] evaluated familial myeloproliferative neoplasms (ET, PV, PMF) in 64 individuals (mean age 49.7) using whole-genome sequencing of peripheral blood to identify recurrent germline predisposition variants. The authors detected a VUS in ATM (L2307F) among some cases, but with no genomic instability amid the disease subtypes.
Discussion
This review depicts that research is still limited in the field of ATM pathogenesis among clonal myeloid disorders. Encoding a PI3/PI4-kinase family protein that regulates multiple downstream steps involved in cell regulation/fate, this analysis of only 10 eligible studies could still unveil divergent findings within the different myeloid neoplasms, reflecting both the complexity of ATM biology and, of utmost importance, the very limited number of clinical studies addressing its role and/or prognostic impact in these malignancies.
Most studies in MDS depict reduced ATM expression or hypermethylation, pointing towards a downregulated ATM pathway in its pathogenesis. However, the prognostic significance of these alterations remains controversial, since several studies failed to demonstrate clear correlations with survival, association to classic cytogenetic risk factors, or interplay within the DDR machinery.
In AML, particularly on pediatric cohorts, studies indicated that ATM downregulation promoted cell proliferation and impaired differentiation, often regulated through miRNAs such as miR-181a and miR-100 [36]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally and play critical roles in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. In AML, dysregulated miRNA expression profiles have been associated with disease classification, therapeutic response, and prognosis.
According to Bräuer-Hartmann et al. [37, 38], the miR-181a/b microRNA cluster, which is triggered by the PML/RARα fusion, suppresses the tumor suppressor RASSF1A, thereby preventing granulocytic differentiation and promoting cell proliferation in acute promyelocytic leukemia (an AML unique subtype). Treatment with all-trans-retinoic acid lowers miR-181a/b levels, restores RASSF1A expression, and leads to cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and differentiation. These findings highlight the importance of miRNAs as post-transcriptional regulators of tumor suppressor genes and as potential therapeutic targets in myeloid, suggesting that ATM is subject to multiple layers of regulation, each with distinct implications for AML pathogenesis.
Data on CML and MPN are very limited. One study found that ATM polymorphisms (− 5144A>T, rs228589 and C4138T, rs3092856) were linked to higher CML risk and worse prognostic scores, while another found an ATM variant of uncertain significance (L2307F). The SNP 4138C>T, previously linked to CML prognosis, was also found to be significantly associated with chemotherapy resistance and reduced survival in AML [33].
While studies on ATM remain scarce in the hematology field, intragenic methylation of ATM has been identified in peripheral white blood cells from breast cancer patients, supporting the hypothesis that epigenetic alterations may precede genetic mutations during malignant transformation [39]. In the same way, hypermethylation of ATM has been linked to oncogenesis and prognosis in solid tumors, such as breast cancer [40].
This review has limitations, including the restricted number of eligible articles, heterogeneity among studies regarding design, sample size and laboratory methods, as well as the lack of functional analyses for many ATM mutations or polymorphisms. Publication biases, reliance on retrospective studies, and population variability also limit inferences and projections. Thus, ATM warrants further investigation in myeloid malignancies, to demystify its putative role in regulating chromosomal abnormalities, a hallmark of conditions like MDS, AML, CML, and PV.
The heterogeneity of findings likely reflects methodological differences among studies. MDS studies evaluated distinct ATM-related alterations, including methylation, gene expression, protein expression, germline variants, and somatic mutations. Furthermore, sample sizes ranged from 31 to 232 patients, and outcomes varied from leukemic transformation to survival and transfusion dependence. Similarly, AML studies included both pediatric and adult populations and assessed either ATM expression or genetic polymorphisms. These differences limit direct comparisons and may explain the inconsistent prognostic associations observed across studies.
Future research should prioritize multicenter studies with standardized methods, include ATM status in molecular panels, and conduct functional analyses to clarify its role in leukemogenesis. Furthermore, assessing ATM from a therapeutic perspective might also be relevant, especially with novel DNA repair inhibitors and synthetic lethality approaches.
Author contribution
Lucas Oliveira Laurindo and Marjori Lima Boblitz Parente wrote the manuscript and performed the database mining. João Vitor Caetano Goes and Letícia Rodrigues Sampaio contributed to article evaluation and the bibliographic review. Yuri Vasconcelos Pinheiro, Greyce Luri Sasahara, and Ronald Feitosa Pinheiro contributed to the study conception, supervision, and final revision of the work.
Funding
The Article Processing Charge (APC) for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614).
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lucas Oliveira Laurindo and Marjori Lima Boblitz Parente have contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Greyce Luri Sasahara, Email: luri.sasahara@gmail.com.
Ronald Feitosa Pinheiro, Email: pinheirorfeitosa@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Cadet J, Davies KJA, Medeiros MH, Di Mascio P, Wagner JR. Formation and repair of oxidatively generated damage in cellular DNA. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;107:13–34. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.12.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Willemsen M, Staels F, Gerbaux M, Neumann J, Schrijvers R, Meyts I, et al. DNA replication-associated inborn errors of immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;151(2):345–60. 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moehrle BM, Geiger H. Aging of hematopoietic stem cells: DNA damage and mutations? Exp Hematol. 2016;44(10):895–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Teixeira IN, Guariento ME. Biologia do envelhecimento: teorias, mecanismos e perspectivas [Biology of aging: theories, mechanisms, and perspectives]. Cien Saude Colet. 2010. 10.1590/s1413-81232010000600022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Costa MB, Farias IR, da Silva Monte C, Filho LIPF, de Paula Borges D, de Oliveira RTG, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and dysregulated DNA repair gene expression in farmers exposed to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021;82:103564. 10.1016/j.etap.2020.103564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roque CR, Sampaio LR, Ito MN, Pinto DV, Caminha JSR, Nunes PIG, et al. Methylmercury chronic exposure affects the expression of DNA single-strand break repair genes, induces oxidative stress, and chromosomal abnormalities in young dyslipidemic APOE knockout mice. Toxicology. 2021;464:152992. 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vechtomova YL, Telegina TA, Buglak AA, Kritsky MS. UV radiation in DNA damage and repair involving DNA-photolyases and cryptochromes. Biomedicines. 2021;9(11):1564. 10.3390/biomedicines9111564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Waterman DP, Haber JE, Smolka MB. Checkpoint Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Annu Rev Biochem. 2020. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-011520-104722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Poetsch AR. The genomics of oxidative DNA damage, repair, and resulting mutagenesis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:207–19. 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chang HL, Su KY, Goodman SD, Chou NA, Lin KC, Cheng WC, et al. Proofreading of single nucleotide insertion/deletion replication errors analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry assay. DNA Repair (Amst). 2020;88:102810. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stilgenbauer S, Schaffner C, Litterst A, Liebisch P, Gilad S, Bar-Shira A, et al. Biallelic mutations in the ATM gene in T-prolymphocytic leukemia. Nat Med. 1997;3(10):1155–9. 10.1038/nm1097-1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ambrose M, Gatti RA. Pathogenesis of ataxia-telangiectasia: the next generation of ATM functions. Blood. 2013;121(20):4036–45. 10.1182/blood-2012-09-456897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Phan LM, Rezaeian AH. ATM: Main Features, Signaling Pathways, and Its Diverse Roles in DNA Damage Response, Tumor Suppression, and Cancer Development. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(6):845. 10.3390/genes12060845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sharma R, Mishra A, Bhardwaj M, Singh G, Indira Harahap LV, Vanjani S, et al. Medicinal chemistry breakthroughs on ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK inhibitors as prospective cancer therapeutics. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2025;40(1):2489720. 10.1080/14756366.2025.2489720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ueno S, Sudo T, Hirasawa A. ATM: Functions of ATM Kinase and Its Relevance to Hereditary Tumors. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(1):523. 10.3390/ijms23010523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mukhtar TK, Wilcox N, Dennis J, Yang X, Naven M, Mavaddat N, et al. Protein-truncating and rare missense variants in ATM and CHEK2 and associations with cancer in UK Biobank whole-exome sequence data. J Med Genet. 2024;61(11):1016–22. 10.1136/jmg-2024-110127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reiman A, Srinivasan V, Barone G, Last JI, Wootton LL, Davies EG, et al. Lymphoid tumours and breast cancer in ataxia telangiectasia; substantial protective effect of residual ATM kinase activity against childhood tumours. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(4):586–91. 10.1038/bjc.2011.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Suarez F, Mahlaoui N, Canioni D, Andriamanga C, Dubois d’Enghien C, Brousse N, et al. Incidence, presentation, and prognosis of malignancies in ataxia-telangiectasia: a report from the French national registry of primary immune deficiencies. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(2):202–8. 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pinheiro RF, Goes JVC, Sampaio LR, Germano de Oliveira RT, Lima SCS, Furtado CLM, et al. The Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is the most important gene for repairing the DNA in Myelodysplastic Neoplasm. DNA Repair (Amst). 2025. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hartmann L, Metzeler KH. Clonal hematopoiesis and preleukemia-Genetics, biology, and clinical implications. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019;58(12):828–38. 10.1002/gcc.22756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tavares RS, Nonino A, Pagnano KBB, Nascimento ACKVD, Conchon M, Fogliatto LM, et al. Guideline on myeloproliferative neoplasms: Associacão Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Cellular: Project guidelines: Associação Médica Brasileira - 2019. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2019. 10.1016/j.htct.2019.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, Akkari Y, Alaggio R, Apperley JF, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36(7):1703–19. 10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brignardello-Petersen R, Santesso N, Guyatt GH. Systematic reviews of the literature: an introduction to current methods. Am J Epidemiol. 2025;194(2):536–42. 10.1093/aje/kwae232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;29(372):n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Horak P, Griffith M, Danos AM, Pitel BA, Madhavan S, Liu X, et al. Standards for the classification of pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer (oncogenicity): joint recommendations of Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC). Genet Med. 2022;24(5):986–98. 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Attardi E, Tiberi L, Mattiuz G, Formicola D, Dirupo E, Raddi MG, et al. Prospective genetic germline evaluation in a consecutive group of adult patients aged <60 years with myelodysplastic syndromes. Hemasphere. 2024;8(7):e112. 10.1002/hem3.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Junior RHL, Soares Maia AR, Costa MB, Farias IR, de Paula BD, de Oliveira RT, et al. Influence of functional polymorphisms in DNA repair genes of myelodysplastic syndrome. Leuk Res. 2016. 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ribeiro HL Jr, Maia ARS, de Oliveira RTG, Costa MB, Farias IR, de Paula BD, et al. DNA repair gene expressions are related to bone marrow cellularity in myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Pathol. 2017;70(11):970–80. 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kefala M, Papageorgiou SG, Kontos CK, Economopoulou P, Tsanas A, Pappa V, et al. Increased expression of phosphorylated NBS1, a key molecule of the DNA damage response machinery, is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Res. 2013;37(11):1576–82. 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sun Y, Wang H, Luo C. MiR-100 regulates cell viability and apoptosis by targeting ATM in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;522(4):855–61. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.11.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu X, Liao W, Peng H, Luo X, Luo Z, Jiang H, et al. MiR-181a promotes G1/S transition and cell proliferation in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia by targeting ATM. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142(1):77–87. 10.1007/s00432-015-1995-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shi JY, Ren ZH, Jiao B, Xiao R, Yun HY, Chen B, et al. Genetic variations of DNA repair genes and their prognostic significance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(1):233–8. 10.1002/ijc.25318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gorre M, Mohandas PE, Kagita S, Cingeetham A, Vuree S, Jarjapu S, et al. Significance of ATM gene polymorphisms in chronic myeloid leukemia - a case control study from India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(2):815–21. 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.2.815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Braunstein EM, Imada E, Pasca S, Wang S, Chen H, Alba C, et al. Recurrent germline variant in ATM associated with familial myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia. 2023;37(3):627–35. 10.1038/s41375-022-01797-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Marcucci G, Radmacher MD, Maharry K, Mrózek K, Ruppert AS, Paschka P, et al. MicroRNA expression in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(18):1919–28. 10.1056/NEJMoa074256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bräuer-Hartmann D, Hartmann JU, Wurm AA, Gerloff D, Katzerke C, Verga Falzacappa MV, et al. PML/RARα-regulated miR-181a/b cluster targets the tumor suppressor RASSF1A in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Cancer Res. 2015;75(3):494–505. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Neaga A, Bagacean C, Tempescul A, Jimbu L, Mesaros O, Blag C, et al. MicroRNAs associated with a good prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia and their effect on macrophage polarization. Front Immunol. 2021;11:582915. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.582915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brennan K, Garcia-Closas M, Orr N, Fletcher O, Jones M, Ashworth A, et al. ATM methylation in peripheral blood DNA as a biomarker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Res. 2012;72(9):2304–13. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Begam N, Jamil K, Raju SG. Promoter hypermethylation of the ATM gene as a novel biomarker for breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(11):3003–9. 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.11.3003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
