Abstract
Fungi in the family Chaetomiaceae are ubiquitous, colonizing diverse substrates and frequently occurring as endophytes in various plant species. Despite their prevalence, knowledge of their association with the Orchidaceae remains limited. In this study, we investigated the diversity of endophytic fungi associated with the roots of wild orchids. Based on comprehensive morphological and multigene phylogenetic analysis (ITS, LSU, tub2, and rpb2), 51 isolates were identified as belonging to six Chaetomiaceae genera: Arcopilus, Chaetomium, Collariella, Dichotomopilus, Humicola, and Pseudohumicola. Among these, 19 isolates represented ten new species, and 32 isolates were identified as belonging to 12 described species: Arcopilus amazonicus, A. aureus, and A. cupreus were recorded, and four new Arcopilus species were described: A. abbreviatussp. nov., A. endophyticussp. nov., A. kasuyaesp. nov., and A. singularissp. nov., for which a description of the asexual morph is provided, offering new insights into the morphological diversity of the genus. Five Chaetomium species were identified: C. coarctatum, C. cochliodes, C. globosum, C. pseudocochliodes, and C. tenue. Furthermore, Collariella fluminensissp. nov. and Dichotomopilus brasiliensissp. nov. were proposed, while D. variostiolatus was reported for the first time as an orchid root endophyte. Three new species of Humicola were discovered: H. capillatasp. nov., H. paraisoensissp. nov., and H. purpureasp. nov. Furthermore, Pseudohumicola crispatasp. nov. is described, alongside descriptions of the sexual morph of Ps. pulvericola and the acremonium-like synanamorph of Ps. cinnamomeobrunnea. Based on morphological analyses and the genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR) we propose the synonymization of A. albae under A. cupreus, and C. albiziae under C. cucumericola. These findings significantly expand the known diversity of Chaetomiaceae and highlight the complex fungal communities associated with wild orchids.
Key words: Arcopilus , Chaetomium , endophytes, new taxa, phylogeny, taxonomy
Introduction
The Orchidaceae family is considered one of the most species-rich groups of flowering plants, with 29,524 species distributed across all continents except Antarctica (Chase et al. 2015; Christenhusz and Byng 2016; Govaerts et al. 2021). Among the flowering plants in Brazil, the family Orchidaceae is the second most diverse group, behind Fabaceae, with terrestrial, lithophytic, and epiphytic habits. It is estimated that around 2,692 native species occur throughout the Brazilian biomes, with approximately 1,490 endemic species that remain poorly studied by science (The Brazil Flora Group et al. 2021). Nevertheless, habitat reduction and the collection of orchids for trade have been the main factors associated with species loss in nature (Mittermeier et al. 2004; Stehmann 2009; Martinelli and Moraes 2013; Fay 2018).
Owing to insufficient nutrients for complete seed germination, symbiotic associations between orchids and fungi are mandatory during their life cycle in the wild (Selosse and Martos 2014). Non-mycorrhizal fungi, mainly Ascomycota, often colonize the root tissues of orchids asymptomatically (Ma et al. 2015; Condé et al. 2025; Silva et al. 2026). Although their taxonomic diversity remains poorly studied, this ecological relationship can provide physiological benefits to the host plant, such as plant growth promotion and resistance to pathogens and abiotic stresses (Rodriguez et al. 2009; Ma et al. 2015; Pietro-Souza et al. 2019). In this interaction, the fungus benefits from the plant by obtaining nutrients for its survival and shelter within the tissues of the host.
Orchid roots harbor a highly diverse community of endophytic fungi. However, studies focused on identifying these fungi have mainly relied on the ITS (internal transcribed spacer) region of the rDNA, which is insufficient for accurate species identification (Miranda et al. 2021; Pereira et al. 2024). Several economically important genera have been reported as endophytes in orchids, such as Chaetomium, Penicillium, Talaromyces, and Trichoderma (Ma et al. 2015; Condé et al. 2025). Although the genus Chaetomium can be found as an endophyte in orchids, most studies have not clarified which specific taxa are involved.
The taxonomy of the Chaetomiaceae family has undergone significant changes in recent years with the use of molecular tools. The application of multi-gene molecular phylogeny enabled the correct delimitation of genera within the family that were previously assigned to Chaetomium. Furthermore, new genera and species have been described in indoor environments, soil, plant remains, and endophytic associations with different plant families (Wang et al. 2016a, 2019a, 2019b, 2022a). The morphology of sexual and asexual morphs is still an important tool in the taxonomy of chaetomium-like fungi; however, phylogenetic analyses using DNA sequences of the RNA polymerase II second-largest subunit (rpb2), β-tubulin (tub2), ITS, and 28S large subunit (LSU) regions are paramount for correctly delimiting genera and species in Chaetomiaceae (Wang et al. 2016a, 2019b, 2022b).
Although scarce in Brazil, studies involving the taxonomy and description of new Chaetomiaceae species have recently been conducted. New species in the genera Arcopilus and Achaetomium have been described from native Brazilian plants, such as A. eremanthi, an endophyte of Eremanthus erythropappus (Tavares et al. 2022), A. amazonicus associated with Paullinia cupana (Sousa et al. 2020), and Ach. lippiae, as an endophyte of Lippia gracilis (Crous et al. 2017). Other reports on Chaetomiaceae in Brazil include studies on coprophilous and saprobic fungi, such as Chaetomium species, which are most frequently found in animal dung, whereas Dichotomopilus, Humicola, and Staphylotrichum species can be found in plant debris (Barbosa et al. 2012; Melo et al. 2012, 2019). In addition, Brazilian caves have been shown to be a source of taxonomic discoveries within Chaetomiaceae, including new species in the genera Chaetomium (C. meridionalense), Humicola (H. cerradensis), and Pseudohumicola (Ps. alba, Ps. cecavii, and Ps. lutea), as well as the new genus Parahumicola (Pa. guana and Pa. amazonica) associated with bat dung (Alves et al. 2022; Condé et al. 2023; Nogueira et al. 2025).
As the taxonomic diversity of endophytic Chaetomiaceae is still poorly explored, only a few species in the genera Arcopilus, Dichotomopilus, Chaetomium, and Humicola have been reported to be endophytic in orchid roots (Currah et al. 1997; Ma et al. 2015). However, there is potential for the discovery of taxonomic and biotechnological novelties among endophytic fungi associated with Orchidaceae, as these plants harbor a diversity of fungi associated with their root tissues (Bhatti and Thakur 2022). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate Chaetomiaceae isolates obtained from healthy roots of wild orchids exhibiting epiphytic, lithophytic, and terrestrial habits. Using a polyphasic approach combining morphological data and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 markers, 19 root endophytic isolates were identified as ten new taxa, and new reports of endophytic Chaetomiaceae associated with wild Brazilian orchids were provided.
Material and methods
This study was conducted as part of the PROTAX research project (CNPq-PROTAX 441384/2020-0), which aimed to explore the taxonomic diversity of root endophytic fungi in wild Brazilian orchids and describe new taxa associated with these plants. During surveys across diverse habitats, fungal isolates exhibiting morphological characteristics typical of the Chaetomiaceae family were frequently encountered.
Sample collection and fungal isolation
Sample collections of wild orchid roots were performed in two Brazilian biomes, Atlantic Forest and Cerrado (Brazilian savanna), in four states: Distrito Federal, Goiás, Minas Gerais, and Rio de Janeiro (Fig. 1A). Endophytic Chaetomiaceae isolates were obtained from healthy wild orchid roots of Acianthera teres (Lindl.) Borba, Catasetum hookeri Lindl., Cattleya jongheana (Rchb.f.) Van den Berg, Cattleya locatellii (F.E.L.Miranda) Van den Berg, Cattleya nobilior Rchb.f., Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) Lindl., Cyclopogon congestus (Vell.) Hoehne, Eulophia maculata (Lindl.) Rchb.f., Habenaria petalodes Lindl., Gomesa recurva R.Br., Polystachya concreta (Jacq.) Garay & Sweet, and Zygopetalum mackayi Hook. (Fig. 1B–M). Orchid species were identified by a specialist in this taxonomic group. Two Cattleya species could not be identified at the species level, but they were identified as belonging to the series Parviflorae based on morphological analysis of the plant vegetative parts (van Den Berg 2014).
Figure 1.
Sampling sites and orchids sampled. A. Sampling sites where orchids were collected; B. Acianthera teres; C. Catasetum hookeri; D. Cattleya jongheana; E. Cattleya locatellii; F. Cattleya nobilior; G. Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) H. Cyclopogon congestus; I. Gomesa recurva; J. Habenaria petalodes; K. Eulophia maculata; L. Polystachya concreta; M. Zygopetalum mackayi.
Root endophytic fungi were isolated using the indirect isolation method described by Pereira and Zambolim (2012) and the dilution-to-extinction cultivation method described by Condé et al. (2025) and Oliveira et al. (2024). Additionally, direct isolation of Chaetomiaceae structures was performed for saprophytic isolates that were growing on the coconut shell substrate used for the cultivation of Cattleya aclandiae that exhibited fungal structures similar to those of members of the Chaetomiaceae family. Endophytic fungi with morphological characteristics of Chaetomiaceae were subcultured on Oatmeal Agar (OA), and monosporic cultures were obtained. Forty-four isolates were obtained as root endophytes of orchids, and three saprophytic isolates were obtained from the coconut shell substrate used for orchid cultivation. Although these isolates were not endophytic, they were included due to their proximity to orchid roots and their morphological similarity to Chaetomiaceae.
In addition, four other isolates were included in this study: two endophytic isolates previously identified as Chaetomium sp. from the roots of an unidentified Cattleya species collected in 2012 and deposited in the working fungal collection of the Laboratório de Micologia e Etiologia de Doenças Fúngicas at the Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), and two root endophytic isolates obtained from Musa sp. and Theobroma cacao were included in the analysis because of their high similarity with the orchid endophytic isolates. In total, 51 isolates were analyzed in this study. Representative isolates and ex-type cultures obtained in this study were deposited in the Coleção Octávio Almeida Drummond (COAD), and dried cultures representing the holotypes were deposited in Herbarium VIC, both hosted at the UFV.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from 4–7-day-old fungal cultures grown on OA, covered with a sterile cellophane membrane, at 25 °C in the dark, using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega) protocol, with modifications according to Pinho et al. (2013). PCR amplifications of the protein-coding genes β-tubulin (tub2) and RNA polymerase II (rpb2) were performed using the primers T1 (O’Donnell and Cigelnik 1997) and Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995) or Tub4RD (Groenewald et al. 2013) for tub2, and fRPB2-5F2 (Sung et al. 2007) and fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999) for rpb2. Initially, the protein-coding genes tub2 and rpb2 were amplified for all isolates, as they provide sufficient resolution to identify species in Chaetomiaceae (Wang et al. 2016b). Because the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and 28S large subunit (LSU) regions have limited species-level resolution in the family, they were amplified using the primers ITS5 and LR6 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; White et al. 1990) only for isolates representing potential novel species. This strategy allowed us to evaluate genealogical concordance across all four loci for candidate new taxa without unnecessary sequencing of known species. The PCR conditions were set as described by Condé et al. (2023). PCR products were visualized on a 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel stained with GelRed™ (Biotium) to verify purity and fragment size. PCR products were purified and sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (South Korea).
Phylogenetic analyses
The nucleotide sequences obtained were visualized and edited in FinchTV v.1.4.0 (Geospiza Inc.). DNA sequences were compared with those available in the GenBank database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank) using megaBLAST. Subsequently, sequence datasets of related genera were constructed using sequences of ex-type and representative isolates retrieved from GenBank (Suppl. material 1). First, individual datasets of tub2 and rpb2 were constructed, after which ITS and LSU were added for the new species. Datasets were concatenated using Sequence Matrix 1.8 (Vaidya et al. 2011). Individual and concatenated datasets were aligned using MAFFT v.7 (Katoh and Standley 2013), and manual adjustments were made in MEGA v.7 (Kumar et al. 2016). Bayesian Inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) were performed for phylogenetic analyses. BI analyses were carried out using MrBayes v.3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012) within the CIPRES Science Gateway Portal (Miller et al. 2010). The best-fit nucleotide substitution model was selected using jModelTest v. 2.1.10 (Darriba et al. 2012) based on the Akaike Information Criterion corrected (AICc). Four MCMC chains were conducted simultaneously, starting from random trees and running for up to 10,000,000 generations. Trees were sampled every 1,000 generations, resulting in 10,000 trees. The first 2,500 trees were discarded from the analyses. Posterior probability (pp) values (Rannala and Yang 1996) were determined from the consensus tree using the remaining 7,500 trees. Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using IQ-TREE v. 2.2.0 (Minh et al. 2020) with 10,000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFB) replicates (Hoang et al. 2018). Best-fit nucleotide substitution models for each region were determined using ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017); these selected models for both BI and ML analyses are listed in Table 2. The BI phylogenetic trees were chosen for final presentation, with support values (bs ≥ 80% and pp ≥ 0.8) mapped onto the nodes. Trees were visualized in FigTree v. 1.4.3 (Rambaut 2018) and further refined in Adobe Illustrator. All alignments and resulting phylogenetic trees were deposited in Figshare (doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31680244).
Table 2.
Alignment size and optimal nucleotide substitution models selected for Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum-Likelihood (ML) analyses.
| Partition | Arcopilus + Collariella | Chaetomium | Dichotomopilus | Humicola + Pseudohumicola | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Best model | Length | Best model | Length | Best model | Length | Best model | |||||
| BI | ML | BI | ML | BI | ML | BI | ML | |||||
| ITS | 639 | GTR+I+G | GTR+F+I+G4 | 531 | K80+I | TNe+G4 | 577 | GTR+G | TIM3e+G4 | 549 | GTR+I+G | TIM2e+I+G4 |
| LSU | 564 | GTR+I+G | TNe+I+G4 | 565 | HKY+I+G | TNe+I | 561 | GTR+I | K2P+I | 532 | GTR+G | TNe+I |
| TUB | 822 | HKY+I+G | HKY+F+I+G4 | 735 | HKY+I+G | K2P+G4 | 728 | HKY+G | K2P+G4 | 781 | GTR+I+G | HKY+F+I+G4 |
| RPB2 | 852 | GTR+I+G | TIM2+F+I+G4 | 600 | GTR+I+G | TIM3+F+I+G4 | 525 | HKY+I+G | TN+F+I+G4 | 852 | GTR+I+G | TIM2+F+I+G4 |
| Concatenated | 2877 | – | – | 2431 | – | – | 2391 | – | – | 2714 | – | – |
Morphological characterization
The morphological characteristics of the Chaetomiaceae isolates were analyzed according to the recommendations of Wang et al. (2022b). Fungal isolates were inoculated at three equidistant points on 90 mm Petri dishes. Colony diameter was measured in Corn Meal Agar (CMA), Malt Extract Agar (MEA), OA and Potato Carrot Agar (PCA) at 25 °C for 7 days in the dark (Crous et al. 2009; Samson et al. 2010). Fungal characters such as the color of mycelium and color reverse, texture of aerial mycelium, presence or absence of ascomata and asexual morphs, and soluble pigment and exudate production were evaluated and described after 3–4 weeks at the same conditions in the culture media mentioned above. Color names were used according to Rayner (1970).
For the description of asexual morphs, the slide culture method (Riddell 1950) and the inclined coverslip method (Kawato and Shinobu 1959; Nugent et al. 2006) were used. Slides were mounted in lactoglycerol or Shear’s solution from structures grown on OA and sometimes PCA. Sexual structures were evaluated after maturation, between 2–4 weeks. Fungal structures were observed with an Olympus BX 53, and images were captured with a Q-color 5 digital camera (Olympus). The morphometry of structures such as ascomata, ascomatal hairs, asci, ascospores, and asexual morphs were obtained using CellSens Dimension 1.9 software. Photographs of the colonies were taken using a Nikon 3400 camera. Close-up photographs of ascomata were taken under a stereomicroscope with a Leica EZ4 camera and a microscope with a Leica DM500 camera using a spotlight. At least 30 measurements were performed for each of the structures mentioned above. Nomenclatural novelties and descriptions were deposited in MycoBank (www.mycobank.org).
Species delimitation within Chaetomiaceae
The new species were delimited using a polyphasic approach that combined multi-locus phylogenetic evidence with detailed macro- and micromorphological characterization. For each putative new taxon, morphological features were compared with those of their closest phylogenetic relatives and descriptions of their respective ex-type strains. Macromorphological data included colony diameter, growth rate, and pigmentation after seven days of incubation on standardized media. Micromorphological analyses focused on the primary diagnostic characters of the Chaetomiaceae (Wang et al. 2022b), such as ascomata color; texture of ascomatal wall; morphology and arrangement of terminal and lateral hairs; and the precise shape and size of ascospores and conidia.
Species boundaries were determined following the Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) framework (Taylor et al. 2000). For this purpose, both concatenated and individual gene genealogies were evaluated and compared to identify topological congruence and detect potential phylogenetic conflicts. A clade was recognized as a distinct evolutionary lineage if it satisfied at least one of the following criteria: genealogical concordance, evidenced by the consistent recovery of a monophyletic group across multiple independent loci; or genealogical non-contradiction, where a clade is strongly supported in the concatenated analysis and one or more single-locus trees, without being significantly contradicted by any other individual locus. Branch lengths, lineage structure, and statistical support values (Bootstrap and Posterior Probability) were assessed to ensure the robustness of the delimited taxa. This integrative approach enabled the identification of cryptic diversity and ensured that species-level decisions were supported by evolutionary signals from multiple genomic regions.
Results
Root endophytic Chaetomiaceae isolates and phylogenetic analyses
Forty-four endophytic Chaetomiaceae isolates were obtained from the roots of Orchidaceae plants, two root endophytic isolates were retrieved from a working fungal collection, and three non-endophytic isolates were obtained from the coconut shell substrate where orchids were grown. In addition, two endophytic isolates obtained from Musa sp. and Theobroma cacao, which clustered together with the orchid isolates, were added to this study, totaling 51 Chaetomiaceae isolates (Table 1). Phylogenetic analyses of rpb2 and tub2 sequences revealed that the isolates represented six genera: Arcopilus, Chaetomium, Collariella, Dichotomopilus, Humicola, and Pseudohumicola (Figs 2, 3, 4, 5). However, 19 isolates could not be identified, representing ten new species in the family.
Table 1.
Chaetomiaceae cultures, GenBank accession numbers, orchid species and collection details obtained in this study.
| Species | Culture accession | Orchid species/Substrate | Orchid habit | Location | Genbank accession number | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | LSU | tub2 | rpb2 | |||||
| Arcopilus abbreviatus | COAD 3727T | Habenaria petalodes | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | PX712034 | PX712048 | PX699208 | PX705484 |
| Arcopilus amazonicus | COAD 3710 | Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | – | – | PX699190 | PX705486 |
| Arcopilus amazonicus | COAD 3711 | Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | – | – | PX699191 | PX705487 |
| Arcopilus amazonicus | COAD 3712 | Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | – | – | PX699192 | PX705488 |
| Arcopilus amazonicus | COAD 3713 | Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | – | – | PX699193 | PX705489 |
| Arcopilus amazonicus | COAD 3714 | Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | – | – | PX699194 | PX705490 |
| Arcopilus amazonicus | COAD 3715 | Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | – | – | PX699195 | PX705479 |
| Arcopilus amazonicus | COAD 3716 | Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | – | – | PX699196 | PX705491 |
| Arcopilus amazonicus | COAD 3717 | Cattleya jongheana | Epiphytic | Araponga-MG | – | – | PX699197 | PX705492 |
| Arcopilus aureus | COAD 3718 | Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | – | – | – | PX705493 |
| Arcopilus aureus | COAD 3719 | Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae) | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | – | – | PX699198 | PX705494 |
| Arcopilus aureus | COAD 3720 | Habenaria petalodes | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | – | – | PX699199 | PX705480 |
| Arcopilus aureus | COAD 3721 | Habenaria petalodes | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | – | – | PX699200 | PX705481 |
| Arcopilus cupreus | COAD 3722 | Cattleya sp. | Unknown | Viçosa-MG | – | – | PX699201 | PX705482 |
| Arcopilus endophyticus | COAD 3728T | Habenaria petalodes | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | PX712036 | PX712049 | PX699209 | PX705485 |
| Arcopilus kasuyae | COAD 3724T | Acianthera teres | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | PX712037 | PX712045 | PX699205 | PX705497 |
| Arcopilus kasuyae | COAD 3725 | Acianthera teres | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | PX712038 | PX712046 | PX699206 | PX705498 |
| Arcopilus kasuyae | COAD 3726 | Acianthera teres | Lithophytic | Conceição do Mato Dentro-MG | PX712039 | PX712047 | PX699207 | PX705499 |
| Arcopilus macrostiolatus | COAD 4168 | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Santana do Riacho-MG | PX712040 | – | PX699202 | PX705483 |
| Arcopilus macrostiolatus | COAD 4169 | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Santana do Riacho-MG | PX712041 | – | PX699203 | PX705495 |
| Arcopilus singularis | COAD 3723T | Cattleya locatellii | Lithophytic | Araponga-MG | PX712035 | PX712050 | PX699204 | PX705496 |
| Chaetomium coarctatum | COAD 3729 | Cyclopogon congestus | Terrestrial | Nova Friburgo-RJ | – | – | PX692805 | PX699189 |
| Chaetomium cochliodes | COAD 3730 | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Nova Friburgo-RJ | – | – | PX692795 | PX699182 |
| Chaetomium cochliodes | COAD 3731 | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Nova Friburgo-RJ | – | – | PX692794 | PX699183 |
| Chaetomium cochliodes | COAD 3760 | Zygopetalum mackayi | Terrestrial | Araponga-MG | – | – | PX692796 | PX699184 |
| Chaetomium cochliodes | COAD 3761 | Zygopetalum mackayi | Terrestrial | Araponga-MG | – | – | PX692797 | PX699185 |
| Chaetomium globosum | COAD 3732 | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | – | – | PX692802 | PX699179 |
| Chaetomium globosum | COAD 3759 | Polystachya concreta | Epiphytic | Viçosa-MG | – | – | PX692804 | PX699178 |
| Chaetomium globosum | COAD 3762 | Zygopetalum mackayi | Terrestrial | Araponga-MG | – | – | PX692803 | PX699180 |
| Chaetomium pseudocochliodes | COAD 3733 | Polystachya concreta | Epiphytic | Viçosa-MG | – | – | PX692798 | PX699186 |
| Chaetomium pseudocochliodes | COAD 3734 | Gomesa recurva | Epiphytic | Araponga-MG | – | – | PX692799 | PX699187 |
| Chaetomium pseudocochliodes | COAD 3735 | Gomesa recurva | Epiphytic | Araponga-MG | – | – | PX692800 | PX699188 |
| Chaetomium tenue | COAD 3736 | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | – | – | PX692801 | PX699181 |
| Collariella fluminensis | COAD 3737T | Cyclopogon congestus | Terrestrial | Nova Friburgo-RJ | PX712032 | PX712042 | PX699210 | PX705500 |
| Collariella fluminensis | COAD 3738 | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | PX712033 | PX712043 | PX699211 | PX705501 |
| Collariella fluminensis | COAD 3739 | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | PX712031 | PX712044 | PX699212 | PX705502 |
| Dichotomopilus brasiliensis | COAD 3741T | Zygopetalum mackayi | Terrestrial | Araponga-MG | PX710921 | PX715401 | PX724932 | PX724937 |
| Dichotomopilus brasiliensis | COAD 4294 | Theobroma cacao | – | Vale do Juliana-BA | – | – | PX724933 | PX724938 |
| Dichotomopilus brasiliensis | COAD 4293 | Musa sp. | – | Itinga do Maranhão-MA | – | – | PX724934 | PX724939 |
| Dichotomopilus variostiolatus | COAD 3740 | Cattleya nobilior | Epiphytic | Goiânia-GO | – | – | PX724935 | PX724940 |
| Dichotomopilus variostiolatus | COAD 3763 | Cattleya sp. | Unknown | Viçosa-MG | PX710922 | – | PX724936 | PX724941 |
| Humicola capillata | COAD 3744T | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Brasília-DF | PX712013 | PX712021 | PX705461 | PX705473 |
| Humicola paraisoensis | COAD 3743T | Catasetum hookeri | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | PX712012 | PX712020 | PX705460 | PX705470 |
| Humicola paraisoensis | COAD 3742 | Catasetum hookeri | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | PX712011 | PX712019 | PX705459 | PX705469 |
| Humicola purpurea | COAD 3745T | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | PX712014 | PX712022 | PX705462 | PX705471 |
| Humicola purpurea | COAD 3746 | Eulophia maculata | Terrestrial | Viçosa-MG | PX712015 | PX712023 | PX705463 | PX705472 |
| Pseudohumicola cinnamomeobrunnea | COAD 3747 | Substrate of Cattleya aclandiae | – | Viçosa-MG | PX712016 | PX712024 | PX705466 | PX705476 |
| Pseudohumicola crispata | COAD 4166T | Cattleya sp. | Lithophytic | Santana do Riacho-MG | PX712018 | PX712025 | PX705465 | PX705478 |
| Pseudohumicola crispata | COAD 4167 | Cattleya sp. | Lithophytic | Santana do Riacho-MG | PX712017 | PX712026 | PX705464 | PX705477 |
| Pseudohumicola pulvericola | COAD 3748 | Substrate of Cattleya aclandiae | – | Viçosa-MG | – | – | PX705467 | PX705475 |
| Pseudohumicola pulvericola | COAD 3749 | Substrate of Cattleya aclandiae | – | Viçosa-MG | – | – | PX705468 | PX705474 |
“T” = ex-type strains. New species are indicated in bold.
Figure 2.
Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Arcopilus, Collariella and related genera based on a concatenated dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are shown in bold and red. Ex-type isolates are indicated with” T”. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The branches that presented bs = 100% and pp = 1 are thickened. The tree is rooted with Stellatospora terricola CBS 811.95.
Figure 3.
Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Chaetomium based on a concatenated dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold and red. Ex-type isolates are indicated with” T”. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near the nodes. The branches that presented bs = 100% and pp = 1 are thickened. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83.
Figure 4.
Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Dichotomopilus based on a concatenated dataset of ITS, rpb2, and tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are shown in bold. Ex-type isolates are indicated with “T”. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The branches that presented bs = 100% and pp = 1 are thickened. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83.
Figure 5.
Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Humicola and Pseudohumicola based on a concatenated dataset of ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are shown in bold. Ex-type isolates are indicated with “T”. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The branches that presented bs = 100% and pp = 1 are thickened. The tree is rooted with Allobotryotrichum blastosporum CGMCC 3.1943.
In the genus Arcopilus, four previously described species were found as endophytes of orchids: A. amazonicus (eight isolates), A. aureus (four isolates), A. cupreus (one isolate), and A. macrostiolatus (two isolates). Six isolates did not cluster with any known species and represented four new species in the genus (Fig. 2). Arcopilus singularis sp. nov. was found in Cattleya locatellii and clustered in a well-supported lineage close to A. eremanthi, A. flavigenus, and A. fusiformis. Arcopilus kasuyae sp. nov. was isolated from Acianthera teres and formed a well-supported sister clade to A. hongheensis and A. navicularis. Arcopilus abbreviatus sp. nov. and A. endophyticus sp. nov. were isolated from Habenaria petalodes root samples. The first clustered in a sister lineage to A. cupreus, whereas the latter formed a basal lineage to A. singularis.
The phylogeny of Chaetomium revealed five species in endophytic associations with orchids (Fig. 3): C. coarctatum (one isolate), C. cochliodes (three isolates), C. globosum (three isolates), C. pseudocochliodes (three isolates), and C. tenue (one isolate). Additionally, three isolates belonging to the genus Collariella represent a novel species, described herein as Col. fluminensis sp. nov. This species was isolated from roots of Cyclopogon congestus and Eulophia maculata and formed a strongly supported clade with Col. hongheensis, Col. capillicompacta, Col. carteri, and Col. pachypodioides (Fig. 2). Moreover, five isolates were identified as belonging to Dichotomopilus. One isolate retrieved from the working fungal collection, and one obtained from Cattleya nobilior were identified as D. variostiolatus. Dichotomopilus brasiliensis sp. nov. was isolated from the roots of the orchid Zygopetalum mackayi and two other plants (Musa sp. and Theobroma cacao) and clustered in a well-supported sister lineage to D. subfunicola (Fig. 4).
In the phylogenetic tree containing Humicola and Pseudohumicola, six species were identified, of which four were novel (Fig. 5). Humicola purpurea sp. nov. was found in E. maculata and clustered in a clade sister to H. fuscoatra. Humicola capillata sp. nov. was isolated from Catasetum hookeri and H. paraisoensis sp. nov. from E. maculata, and both new species clustered together in a well-supported basal clade. Finally, Pseudohumicola crispata sp. nov. was obtained from the roots of Cattleya sp., and clustered as a sister species to Ps. subspiralis (Fig. 5). Three isolates obtained from the substrate used to cultivate Cattleya aclandiae were identified as Ps. cinnamomeobrunnea (one isolate) and Ps. pulvericola (two isolates).
Phylogenetic analyses of Chaetomium revealed two taxonomic inconsistencies. Chaetomium albiziae clustered with C. cucumericola, and C. microthecium was grouped within the C. globosum clade (Fig. 3). Chaetomium albiziae was originally described as an endophyte of Albizia lebbeck (Mehrabi-Koushki and Safi 2023). Pairwise sequence comparisons of ex-type specimens from C. cucumericola and C. albiziae exhibited a high sequence identity for ITS = 491/492(99%) with one gap, tub2 = 516/522(99%) without gaps, and rpb2 = 490/495(99%) without gaps. Furthermore, when we analyzed the two available sequences for each species, there were a negligible number of exclusive nucleotide differences (autapomorphies) across the three loci in our alignment: one transition in the tub2 alignment (C to T at position 314) and two in rpb2 (A to G at position 99; C to T at position 231). In all the individual phylogenies, C. albiziae was consistently nested within the C. cucumericola clade. Furthermore, the presence of sterile isolates and others producing a sexual phase in Chaetomiaceae is well documented e.g., Chaetomium fimeti, C. grande, C. rectangulare, C. subglobosum, C. undulatulum (Wang et al. 2016b), Parachaetomium hispanicum (Wang et al. 2022b), and Pseudohumicola pulvericola (this study). Therefore, as the original description of C. cucumericola (Wang et al. 2016b) was based on a sterile isolate, C. albiziae effectively provides a formal description of the sexual morph of this species. Given that C. albiziae was described after the most recent revision of accepted Chaetomiaceae species (Wang et al. 2022b), and considering the high genetic similarity observed, we propose C. albiziae as a heterotypic synonym of C. cucumericola.
A similar phylogenetic pattern was observed for C. microthecium, which nested within the C. globosum species complex in both concatenated and individual ITS and rpb2 phylogenies (Suppl. material 2: figs S5, S7). However, despite this proximity, a significant number of unique polymorphisms were identified in the tub2 and LSU alignments, distinguishing C. microthecium from the other clade members. According to the Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) framework, the lack of congruence across all analyzed loci suggests that these lineages may still be undergoing evolutionary divergence. Furthermore, given that C. globosum represents a broad species complex with high intra-clade variability, we consider it premature to propose a synonymization without a comprehensive taxonomic revision of the C. globosum species complex. Therefore, we chose to retain C. microthecium as a separate species, supported by the distinct molecular signal observed in the tub2, which is often more resolute for species delimitation in this genus.
Regarding the genus Arcopilus, our multi-locus phylogeny placed A. albae in a well-supported clade alongside A. cupreus (Fig. 2), with isolate COAD 3722 grouping specifically with the recently described A. albae (Xu et al. 2024). We consider that COAD 3722 and the ex-type MFLUCC 24–0064 represent intraspecific variation of A. cupreus, given the negligible phylogenetic distance between these lineages. When compared to the reference strain of A. cupreus (CBS 560.80), A. albae exhibited only two single-nucleotide mutations: a single apomorphy in the tub2 sequence (G to C at position 101) and one in the ITS region (A to G at position 367), whereas the LSU sequence remained identical. Morphologically, A. albae is indistinguishable from A. cupreus. Across all individual gene trees, A. albae failed to resolve as a distinct lineage from A. cupreus (Suppl. material 2: figs S1, S2, S4). Furthermore, the original description of A. albae lacked rpb2 sequence data, a highly informative marker essential for resolving species boundaries within this genus. Consequently, we conclude that A. albae was misinterpreted as a distinct taxon, and it is here formally synonymized under A. cupreus.
The best nucleotide substitution models for the BI and ML analyses are presented in Table 2.
Taxonomy
Arcopilus
X. Wei Wang & Samson, 2016
010E4A01-5A51-53F3-B96D-8672A7386990
Type species.
Arcopilus aureus (Chivers) X. Wei Wang & Samson, 2016.
Arcopilus abbreviatus
D.O. Ramos, P.T.S. Nogueira & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
7EEDC136-1EAD-5643-A308-48B0308BFB11
862440
Figure 6.
Arcopilus abbreviatusCOAD 3727, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 3 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata. D–F. Ascomata; G. Surface of ascomatal wall; H. Terminal ascomatal hairs; I. Asci; J. Ascospores. Scale bars: 50 μm (D–F); 20 μm (G, H, I); 10 μm (J).
Etymology.
The epithet refers to the small size of the ascomata produced by this species.
Typification.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Zona Rural, from roots of Habenaria petalodes, April 2023, O.L. Pereira, D.O. Ramos, and P.T.S. Nogueira (holotype VIC 49498 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-typeCOAD 3727).
Description.
Ascomata superficial, ostiolate, primrose in reflected light owing to ascomatal hairs, globose or subglobose, 108.5–140.5 μm high, 88.5–123 μm diam. Ascomatal wall brown with textura angularis. Terminal hairs slightly arcuate sometimes straight, brown, septate. Lateral hairs recurved, sometimes straight, brown. Asci fasciculate, clavate, spore-bearing portion 22.5–30 × 10–15.5 μm, stalks 9–14.5 μm long, with 8 biseriate ascospores, evanescent. Ascospores dark brown, navicular in side view and fusiform in top view, smooth, bilaterally flattened, (12.5–)13.5–14.5(–15.5) × (6–)6.5–7.5(–8) μm in face view, with one apical germ pore. Asexual morph not observed.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 40–43 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate, flat, circular shape; reverse gray olivaceous at the center, pale luteous at the margins of the colony and with vinaceous soluble pigment. Colonies on CMA attaining 38–40 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire margin, white aerial mycelium moderate, raised, circular, reverse olivaceous gray at the center of colonies and vinaceous at the edges owing to the presence of soluble pigment. Colonies on MEA attaining 40–42 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate to profuse, flat, circular; reverse dark brick at the center and rosy buff at the margins of colonies. Colonies on PCA attaining 43–46 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate, raised, circular; reverse greenish olivaceous, pale luteous at the margins of the colony and with little production of rosy vinaceous soluble pigment.
Distribution.
Brazil (Seasonal Semideciduous Forest within the Atlantic Forest domain in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
Based on phylogenetic analyses of a combined ITS-LSU-tub2-rpb2 alignment, Arcopilus abbreviatus clustered in a unique lineage in a clade containing A. cupreus. Morphologically, compared to the description of A. cupreus by Ames (1949), A. abbreviatus has primrose ascomatal hairs and less arcuate terminal ascomatal hairs, which differ from the bright copper-colored ascomata produced by A. cupreus. Furthermore, A. abbreviatus has larger, navicular to fusiform ascospores, while A. cupreus produces smaller, globose to ovoid ascospores ((12.5–)13.5–14.5(–15.5) × (6–)6.5–7.5(–8) μm vs. 8.5–11.5 × 5–5.5 μm). Compared to other species in the genus, A. abbreviatus produces slightly smaller ascomata and terminal ascomatal hairs less arcuate.
Arcopilus endophyticus
D.O. Ramos, P.T.S. Nogueira & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
1518CD4F-85EC-553C-961B-69184249E1A3
862441
Figure 7.
Arcopilus endophyticusCOAD 3728, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 4 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B, C. Top view of ascomata-like structures on OA; D, E. Ascomata-like structures; F. Coiled hyphae. Scale bars: 100 μm (D, E); 20 μm (F).
Etymology.
Name refers to the endophytic lifestyle of the fungus.
Typification.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Zona Rural, from roots of Habenaria petalodes, April 2023, O.L. Pereira and D.O. Ramos (holotype VIC 49499 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-typeCOAD 3728).
Description.
Mycelium sterile. Somatic hyphae hyaline, with melanized hyphae forming coiled structures. Structures of tangled, melanized and compact mycelium similar to ascomata initials were observed.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 45–50 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, aerial mycelium absent, flat, circular, no ascomata production; reverse brick to cinnamon due to the production of soluble pigment. Colonies on CMA attaining 38–44 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire margin, white aerial mycelium sparse, flat, circular, no ascomata production; reverse rosy buff; soluble pigments absent. Colonies on MEA attaining 40–47 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate with exudates above, flat, circular, no ascomata production; reverse scarlet to rust due to the production of soluble pigments. Colonies on PCA attaining 34–42 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire or slightly undulate, white aerial mycelium moderate at the center of colonies and sparse at the edges, flat, circular, no ascomata production; reverse buff; soluble pigments absent.
Distribution.
Brazil (Seasonal Semideciduous Forest within the Atlantic Forest domain in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
In the concatenated phylogeny, Arcopilus endophyticus clustered as a basal lineage within a clade containing A. singularis, A. eremanthi, A. flavigenus, and A. fusiformis (Fig. 2). Morphologically, this species is distinguished from all other members of the genus by the lack of both asexual and sexual morphs under the tested conditions. Compared to A. eremanthi, A. endophyticus exhibited significantly higher radial growth on OA (45–50 mm vs 30–31 mm), MEA (40–47 mm vs 41 mm), and PCA (34–42 mm vs 35 mm) (Tavares et al. 2022). Regarding individual gene genealogies, A. endophyticus clustered as a sister species to A. singularis in the LSU phylogeny (Suppl. material 2: fig. S2). However, in the tub2 tree, it formed a clade external to A. macrostiolatus, A. megasporus, and A. purpurascens (Suppl. material 2: fig. S4), whereas the rpb2 phylogeny recovered the same topology observed in the concatenated analysis (Suppl. material 2: fig. S3). Further comparative details are provided in the taxonomic notes for A. singularis.
Arcopilus kasuyae
D.O. Ramos, P.T.S. Nogueira & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
B3F21DB2-0811-5DA3-A41C-C0B238C9CB64
862442
Figure 8.
Arcopilus kasuyaeCOAD 3724, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 4 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D, E. Ascomata; F. Surface of ascomatal wall; G. Terminal ascomatal hair; H. Asci; I. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (D, E); 20 μm (F, G, I); 10 μm (J).
Etymology.
Named in honor of Maria Catarina Megumi Kasuya, a Brazilian microbiologist who pioneered studies on the interaction between orchids and fungi in Brazil.
Typification.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Conceição do Mato Dentro, Curral de Pedras, from roots of Acianthera teres, 10 April 2022, F.A. Custódio (holotype VIC 49506 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-type COAD 3724).
Description.
Ascomata superficial, ostiolate, saffron in reflected light owing to ascomatal hairs, globose to subglobose, 164–251.5 μm high, 128–214 μm diam., homothallic. Ascomatal wall surface brown with textura angularis. Terminal hairs arcuate, apically coiled, brown, septate, verrucose, 3–5.5 μm wide near the base. Lateral hairs arcuate or inequilaterally undulated. Asci clavate, spore-bearing portion 26.5–40 × 10.5–14.5(–17.5) μm, stalks 13.5–23.5 μm long, with eight biseriate ascospores, evanescent. Ascospores dark brown, navicular in side view and fusiform in top view, smooth, 11–12 (–13.5) × (7.5–) 7–8 (–9) μm in face view, with two germ pores. Asexual morph unknown.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 33–39 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge lobate, white aerial mycelium sparse to absent, flat, circular, no ascomata production; reverse honey to hazel due to the production soluble pigment. Colonies on CMA attaining 33–36 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire margin, white aerial mycelium moderate, flat, circular; reverse vinaceous to rust due to the production of soluble pigments. Colonies on MEA attaining 33–35 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate, with rosy vinaceous exudates above, flat, circular; reverse rosy buff to rosy vinaceous due to production of soluble pigments. Colonies on PCA attaining 38–40 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate at the center of colonies and sparse at the margins, raised, circular; reverse buff; soluble pigments absent.
Additional materials examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Conceição do Mato Dentro municipality, Curral de Pedras, from roots of Acianthera teres, 10 April 2022, F.A. Custódio (living cultures COAD 3725 and COAD 3726).
Distribution.
Brazil (Rupestrian Grasslands within the Atlantic Forest domain in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
Phylogenetically, Arcopilus kasuyae is clustered in a unique lineage in a clade related to the species A. hongheensis and A. navicularis (Fig. 2). A distinctive feature of A. kasuyae is the absence of pigmented exudate production in almost all the tested culture media and conditions. Vinaceous soluble pigments were only observed on CMA after 3–4 weeks. The production of exudates, typically yellow, orange, or red, is a cultural characteristic commonly observed in Arcopilus species and is present in all related species. Furthermore, compared to the descriptions of A. hongheensis by Yang et al. (2023), A. kasuyae exhibits larger ascomata (118.5–209.5 × 103–191.5 μm vs.100–140 × 80–95 μm), and two apical germ pores compared with one of A. hongheensis. The ascomata of A. kasuyae are globose or subglobose, whereas A. hongheensis produces ellipsoid or subglobose ascomata. Moreover, A. kasuyae also possesses larger ascospores when compared to A. navicularis (11–12(–13.5) × 7–8(–9) μm vs.7.2–8.8 × 4.5–5.5 μm), and saffron ascomatal hairs compared to pale green or greenish olivaceous of A. navicularis (Crous et al. 2021).
Arcopilus singularis
D.O. Ramos, P.T.S. Nogueira & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
B5E36B92-BDA0-5EA2-95AB-C591965DFB17
862443
Figure 9.
Arcopilus singularisCOAD 3723, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 4 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Ascomata initials; C. Chlamydospores; D. Hyaline coiled hyphae; E. Melanized hyphae; F–K. Acremonium-like conidiophores and conidia; L. Hyaline conidia. Scale bars: 20 μm (B–E); 10 μm (F); 5 μm (G–L).
Etymology.
Name refers to the unique and characteristic morphology of this species, due to the production of the asexual morph, which is being described for the first time for the genus Arcopilus.
Tyification.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Araponga municipality, Pedra Redonda, from roots of Cattleya locatellii, 21 November 2021, O.L. Pereira, D.O. Ramos and P.T.S. Nogueira (holotype VIC 49497 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-typeCOAD 3723).
Description.
Somatic hyphae hyaline, 1–5 μm wide. Chlamydospores produced intercalary or terminal on hyphae, occasionally solitary or most common moniliform shape or in clustering to form a microsclerotia, globose, subglobose, obovoid, pyriform, occasionally cylindrical or reniform, hyaline to dark brown when mature, smooth, thick-walled when mature, 5.5–15 × 3.5–8.5 μm. Acremonium-like conidiophores arising laterally from hyphae, reduced a phialidic conidiogenous cells, hyaline, smooth, (4–)7–20.5 × 2–2.5(–3.5) μm. Conidia borne in basipetal chains or held in false heads, aseptate, clavate, sometimes cylindrical, hyaline, smooth, 2.5–4 × 1.5–2 μm. Sexual morph unknown.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 34–37 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium sparse, flat, circular, no ascomata production; reverse orange to apricot due to the intense production of soluble pigment. Colonies on CMA attaining 48–50 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire margin, white aerial mycelium sparse, flat, circular, no ascomata production; reverse scarlet due to the production of soluble pigment. Colonies on MEA attaining 46–48 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate at the center of colonies and sparse at the margins, flat, circular, no ascomata production; reverse red to scarlet due to the production of soluble pigments. Colonies on PCA attaining 36–39 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate at the center of colonies and sparse at the margins, flat, circular, no ascomata production; reverse rosy buff at the center of the colonies and buff at the margins; soluble pigments absent.
Distribution.
Brazil (Rupestrian Grasslands within the Atlantic Forest domain in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Arcopilus singularis clustered in a well-supported lineage related to A. endophyticus, A. eremanthi, A. fusiformis, and A. flavigenus. However, A. singularis and A. endophyticus are morphologically aberrant compared to the other species, as they are the first in the genus in which the sexual morph has not been observed. Notably, A. singularis is, as far as it is known, the first species in the genus to produce an acremonium-like anamorph. The original descriptions of A. fusiformis (≡ Chaetomium fusiforme) by Chivers (1912) and A. flavigenus (≡ Chaetomium flavigenum) by van Warmelo (1966) included only the sexual morph and lacked cultural descriptions, which prevents a thorough comparison with A. singularis and A. endophyticus. Additionaly, A. singularis differs from A. eremanthi by exhibiting greater growth on culture media, including OA (34–37 vs. 30–31 mm), MEA (46–48 vs. 41 mm), and PCA (36–39 vs. 35 mm) (Tavares et al. 2022). Arcopilus singularis differs from A. endophyticus by the production of an acremonium-like anamorph, chlamydospores, reduced growth on OA (34–37 vs. 45–50 mm) and PCA (36–39 vs. 34–42 mm), and greater growth on CMA (48–50 vs. 38–44 mm) and MEA (46–48 vs. 40–47 mm).
Arcopilus amazonicus
T.F. Sousa & G.F. Silva, 2020
BC2368AD-8B96-5BD2-9F12-CE4E8D6DA0CF
Figure 10.
Arcopilus amazonicusCOAD 3717. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D. Ascomata; E. Asci; F. Ascospores; G. Terminal ascomatal hair; H. Surface of ascomatal wall. Scale bars: 100 μm (D); 20 μm (E, F); 10 μm (G, H).
Typification.
BRAZIL • Amazonas, in the leaves of Paullinia cupana, 24 December 2017, T.F. Sousa (holotype INPA2410).
Description.
See Sousa et al. (2020).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Araponga, from roots of Cattleya jongheana, Febuary 2018, collected and isolated by E.F.S. Freitas (living culture COAD 3717); Conceição do Mato Dentro municipality, Serra da Ferrugem, isolated from roots of Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae), 10 April 2022, T.O. Condé and D.O. Ramos (living cultures COAD 3710, COAD 3711, COAD 3712, COAD 3713, COAD 3714, COAD 3715, and COAD 3716).
Distribution.
Brazil (Amazon rainforest, Rupestrian Grasslands within the Atlantic Forest domain in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
Arcopilus amazonicus was described as an endophyte on the leaves of guarana (Paullinia cupana) plants in the Brazilian Amazon region (Sousa et al. 2020). This species is phylogenetically close to A. aureus and is distinct only by rpb2 sequences. The isolate COAD 3717 differs from the ex-type of A. amazonicus INPA2410 by colonies on OA, exhibiting an olivaceous black color at the center of colonies and absence of purple exudate diffused in the medium, ascomata subglobose, undulate lateral hairs, and undulate and apically coiled terminal hairs. In this study, A. amazonicus was identified in the roots of two orchids from the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado: Cattleya jongheana and Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae). We expanded the known distribution of this species in Brazil, which indicates that A. amazonicus may be widely distributed throughout the country. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of this species as a root endophyte in plants of the Orchidaceae family.
Arcopilus aureus
(Chivers) X. Wei Wang & Samson, 2016
DEBB1D6A-87DC-510E-BD33-5FBA965230D1
Figure 11.
Arcopilus aureusCOAD 3721. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D. Ascomata; E. Surface of ascomatal wall; F. Terminal ascomatal hairs; G. Asci; H. Ascospores. Scale bars: 50 μm (D); 10 μm (E, F); 20 μm (G, H).
Synonyms.
Chaetomium aureum Chivers, Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts 48 (4): 86 (1912).
Chaetomium confusum Van Warmelo, Mycologia 58 (6): 846 (1966).
Chaetomium humicola Van Warmelo, Mycologia 58 (6): 849 (1966).
Chaetomium rubrogenum Van Warmelo, Mycologia 58 (6): 852 (1966).
Arcopilus globulus Raza & L. Cai, Fungal Diversity 99: 75 (2019).
Typification.
USA • New England, from paper, 1912, Thaxter (holotype BPI 1100494). Representative strain (CBS 153.52) designated by Wang et al. (2016a).
Description.
See Wang et al. (2016a).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Zona Rural, from roots of Habenaria petalodes, April 2023, O.L. Pereira, D.O. Ramos, and P.T.S. Nogueira (living cultures COAD 3720 and COAD 3721); Conceição do Mato Dentro, Serra da Ferrugem, from roots of Cattleya sp., 10 April 2022, F.A. Custódio and D.O. Ramos (living cultures COAD 3718 and COAD 3719).
Distribution.
Brazil, Canada, China, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Europe, East Africa, India, Japan, Korea, USA.
Notes.
Arcopilus aureus is the type species of the genus and was originally described as Chaetomium aureum until Wang et al. (2016a) established the genus Arcopilus. This species presents superficial, ostiolate, and subglobose ascomata with arcuate terminal hairs and brown ascospores. Isolate COAD 3721 presented morphological characters similar to those of the type species. Arcopilus aureus has been reported as an endophyte in various plants, including Ardisia mamillata (Liang et al. 2024) and Vitis vinifera (Dwibedi and Saxena 2018), but it has never been isolated from orchids. Therefore, this is the first report of A. aureus as an endophyte of Orchidaceae.
Arcopilus cupreus
(Ames) X. Wei Wang & Samson, 2016
8D781ABD-E239-5EB5-A357-04A4F1BDAE71
Figure 12.
Arcopilus cupreusCOAD 3722. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D. Ascomata; E. Surface of ascomatal wall; F. Terminal ascomatal hair; G. Asci; H. Ascospores. Scale bars: 50 μm (D); 20 μm (E–G); 10 μm (H).
Synonyms.
Chaetomium cupreum L.M. Ames, Mycologia 41 (6): 642 (1949).
Arcopilus tangerinicapillus Raza & L. Cai, Fungal Diversity 99: 78 (2019).
Arcopilus albae Boonmee, Mapook & Phukhams, Phytotaxa 653 (2): 141 (2024), syn. nov.
Typification.
PANAMA • Canal Zone, from vegetable detritus, unknown date, Paul Marsh (holotype BPI 580275). Representative strain (CBS 560.80) designated by Wang et al. (2016a).
Description.
See Ames (1949).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, from roots of Cattleya sp., 26 September 2012, O.L. Pereira (living culture COAD 3722).
Distribution.
Brazil, Canada, China, Panama, USA, Thailand.
Notes.
Arcopilus cupreus was first described as Chaetomium cupreum but was later transferred to Arcopilus by Wang et al. (2016a). This species is characterized by superficial, globose to ovoid ascomata, covered with bright, red-colored hairs, asci clavate, and olive-brown ascospores. These morphological characters could be observed in the isolate COAD 3722. In Brazil, A. cupreus was reported associated with the plant tissue of Syagrus coronata, a palm native to the Brazilian biome Caatinga (Fortes and Vitória 2022). This is the first report of A. cupreus as a root endophyte in Orchidaceae worldwide.
Arcopilus macrostiolatus
(Stchigel, K. Rodr. & Guarro) X. Wei Wang & Houbraken, 2022
463F4034-78BA-5623-B999-C130CBBCAFE6
Typification.
NIGERIA • Ihenyi Eha-Amufu: Isi-uzo, Enugu state, from forest soil, 12 July 1997, A. M. Stchigel (holotype IMI 382896, isotype FMR 6780, culture ex type CBS 102435).
Description.
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Santana do Riacho municipality, from roots of Eulophia maculata, 11 March 2024, D.O. Ramos (living cultures COAD 4168 and COAD 4169).
Distribution.
Brazil and Nigeria.
Notes.
This species was originally described as Chaetomium macrostiolatum by Rodríguez et al. (2002) based on a strain isolated from forest soil in Nigeria and reclassified to the genus Arcopilus by Wang et al. (2022b). Our isolate was identified through morphological analysis, exhibiting the diagnostic characteristics of the species: subglobose to ovoid ascomata with a remarkably broad ostiole and pale to mid-brown, limoniform, asymmetrical ascospores. This study represents the first global record of the species as a root endophyte in the Orchidaceae family, specifically in E. maculata.
Chaetomium
Kunze, 1817
203F3F3C-4F0E-573A-A6C1-25DAACCBCDC0
Type species.
Chaetomium globosum Kunze, 1817.
Chaetomium coarctatum
Sergeeva, 1961
68E657FE-31A6-5C8C-84DE-9E70B1FD9BB5
Figure 13.
Chaetomium coarctatumCOAD 3729. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D. Ascomata; E. Surface of ascomatal wall; F. Terminal ascomatal hair; G. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (D); 20 μm (E, F); 10 μm (G).
Typification.
RUSSIA • St. Petersburg, from seed of Campanula medium, collector and collection date unknown, isolated by K.S. Sergejeva (culture ex-type CBS 162.62).
Description.
See Wang et al. (2016b).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Rio de Janeiro: Nova Friburgo, Córrego D’Antas, from roots of Cyclopogon congestus, 20 July 2023, D.O. Ramos (living culture COAD 3729).
Distribution.
Brazil, China, and Russia.
Notes.
Chaetomium coarctatum was first described on Campanula medium seeds. Subsequently, it was considered a synonym of Chaetomium globosum, but phylogenetic analyses confirmed it as a legitimate species (Wang et al. 2016b). Chaetomium coarctatum was reported as root endophyte in Avena fatua (Bouzouina et al. 2021). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an endophytic association between C. coarctatum and an Orchidaceae plant and the first report of this species in Brazil.
Chaetomium cochliodes
Palliser, 1910
506E0AEF-A35A-5626-B8CB-48D1099B7048
Figure 14.
Chaetomium cochliodesCOAD 3731. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C, D. Side view of mature ascomata; E, F. Ascomata; G. Surface of ascomatal wall; H. Terminal ascomatal hair; I. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (E, F); 20 μm (G, H); 10 μm (I).
Synonyms.
Chaetomium concavisporum Raza & L. Cai, Fungal Diversity 99: 80 (2019).
Chaetomium ovatoascomatis
Raza & L. Cai, Fungal Diversity 99: 82 (2019)
568D015B-25AD-5678-B9A5-5FD6FD2C26AE
Typification.
USA • Newfield: New Jersey, on old paper exposed to the weather, October 1880 (holotype New York Botanical Garden Specimen ID 01050405). Epitype HMAS 244354 and culture ex-epitype CBS 155.52 designated by Wang et al. (2016b) from the same country and locality as the holotype.
Description.
See Wang et al. (2016b).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Rio de Janeiro: Nova Friburgo, Córrego D’Antas, from roots of Eulophia maculata, 01 October 2022, D.O. Ramos (living cultures COAD 3730 and COAD 3731); Minas Gerais: Araponga, from roots of Zygopetalum mackayi, 21 November 2021, O.L. Pereira (living cultures COAD 3760 and COAD 3761).
Distribution.
Brazil, China, and USA.
Notes.
Chaetomium cochliodes was introduced by Palliser (1910) but was later treated as a synonym of C. globosum by von Arx et al. (1986). Chaetomium cochliodes differs from other Chaetomium species by its distinctive coiled ascomatal hairs. This species was reintroduced by Wang et al. (2016b) based on phylogenetic analyses. The isolate COAD 3731 produced pure yellow lateral hairs, in contrast to the greenish olivaceous terminal hairs and rosy vinaceous soluble pigment on OA produced by the ex-epitype CBS 155.52 (Wang et al. 2016b). This species can endophytically colonize the root tissues of barley, soybean, wheat, and other plants used in agriculture (Kopylov et al. 2021). Nonetheless, C. cochliodes has also been reported in goat dung in Brazil (Melo et al. 2019). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of C. cochliodes as an endophyte in Orchidaceae.
Chaetomium globosum
Kunze, 1817
6059BFA2-6057-5EC7-9D62-6C5A2EB252F0
Figure 15.
Chaetomium globosumCOAD 3732. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D. Ascomata; E. Surface of ascomatal wall; F. Terminal ascomatal hair; G. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (D); 20 μm (E, F); 10 μm (G).
Synonyms.
Chaetomium affine Corda, Icones fungorum hucusque cognitorum 4: 37, table 8, fig. 101 (1840).
Chaetomium anastomosans Raza & L. Cai, Fungal Diversity 99: 78 (2019).
Chaetomidium barbatum Traaen, Nytt Mag. Naturvidensk. 52: 19 (1914).
Chaetomium fibripilium L.M. Ames, Mycologia 42 (5): 642 (1950).
Chaetomium kunzeanumZopf (1881).
Chaetomium lusitanicum M.R.M. Gomes, Estudos e Informação: 3 (1953).
Chaetomium mollipilium L.M. Ames, Mycologia 42 (5): 644 (1950).
Chaetomium ochraceum Tschudy, Amer. J. Bot. 24: 472 (1937).
Chaetomium olivaceum Cooke & Ellis, Grevillea 6 (39): 96, Pl. 100, fig. 38 (1878).
Chaetomium rectum Sergeeva, Not. syst. Pl. non-vasc.: 143 (1961).
Chaetomium spirale Zopf, Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. 42 (5): 275 (1881).
Chaetomium subglobosum Sergeeva, Bot. Mater. Otd. Sporov. Rast. Bot. Inst. Komarova Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 13: 172 (1960).
Chaetomium subterraneum Swift & Povah, 1929.
Typification.
GERMANY • Leipzig, from a dry culture that was collected in the same locality as the holotype (neotype CBS H-22185, ex-neotype CBS 160.62, designated by Wang et al. (2016b)).
Description.
See Wang et al. (2016b).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Recanto das Cigarras-UFV, from roots of Eulophia maculata, 29 September 2019, D.O. Ramos (living culture COAD 3732); Araponga, from roots of Zygopetalum mackayi, 21 November 2021, O.L. Pereira (living culture COAD 3762); Viçosa, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, from roots of Polystachya concreta, 13 May 2022, D.O. Ramos and P.T.S. Nogueira (living culture COAD 3759).
Distribution.
Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, and South America.
Notes.
Chaetomium globosum is the type species of the genus and presents diverse morphological variations in exudate colors and ascomatal hairs among strains isolated from different substrates (Wang et al. 2016b). Isolates COAD 3732 and COAD 3762 were grouped next to the type of C. globosum, whereas COAD 3759 was grouped near to the isolates described as C. anastomosans but that were synonymized into C. globosum by Wang et al. (2022b).
The isolate COAD 3732 produced intense sporulation with salmon to apricot soluble pigment on OA and pale luteous to brick soluble pigment on CMA. In Brazil, C. globosum has been isolated from the leaf litter of Syagrus coronata and as a root endophyte of Musa acuminata (Fortes and Vitória 2022; dos Santos Santana et al. 2026). In addition, this species has already been reported as an endophyte of Orchidaceae (Adit et al. 2022). Nonetheless, this is the first report of C. globosum as an endophyte of E. maculata, Pol. concreta and Zygopetalum mackayi.
Chaetomium pseudocochliodes
X. Wei Wang, X.Z. Liu & Crous, 2016
E90C069E-DA6B-59E8-8633-C49B46AB2203
Figure 16.
Chaetomium pseudocochliodesCOAD 3733. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D. Ascomata; E. Surface of ascomatal wall; F. Terminal ascomatal hair; G. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (D); 20 μm (E, F); 10 μm (G).
Typification.
CHINA • Yunnan Province: Wenshan County, from fibrous root of Panax notoginseng, 10 April 2003, X.-Z Liu (holotype HMAS 244435, isotype CBS H-22197, culture ex-type CGMCC 3.9441).
Description.
See Wang et al. (2016b).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Recanto das Cigarras-UFV, from roots of Polystachya concreta, 13 May 2022, D.O. Ramos and P.T.S. Nogueira (living culture COAD 3733); Araponga, isolated from roots of Gomesa recurva, 10 August 2022, D.O. Ramos (living cultures COAD 3734 and COAD 3735).
Distribution.
Brazil and China.
Notes.
Chaetomium pseudocochliodes is phylogenetically related to C. cochliodes but differs from this species by the irregular ascomatal hairs and shape of ascospores with more protruding ends (Wang et al. 2016b). The isolate COAD 3733 differs from the ex-type culture C. cochliodes CGMCC 3.9441 in the absence of exudates, and terminal ascomatal hairs of type I were more abundant than type II. This is the first report of C. pseudocochliodes in Brazil and as an endophyte of Orchidaceae.
Chaetomium tenue
X. Wei Wang, Crous & L. Lombard, 2016
176AC334-9EC1-5D8D-A29D-22B313A4F1A0
Figure 17.
Chaetomium tenueCOAD 3736. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C, D. Side view of mature ascomata; E. Ascomata; F. Surface of ascomatal wall; G. Terminal ascomatal hair; H. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (E); 20 μm (F, G); 10 μm (H).
Typification.
Unknown, no collection information, deposited in CBS by A.L. McAulay, August 1938 (holotype CBS H-22195, culture ex-type CBS 139.38).
Description.
See Wang et al. (2016b).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Recanto das Cigarras-UFV, from roots of Eulophia maculata, 29 September 2019, D.O. Ramos (living culture COAD 3736).
Distribution.
As the location of the type specimen is unknown, the only exact location so far is in Brazil.
Notes.
Phylogenetic analyses grouped the isolate COAD 3736 with the ex-type (CBS 139.38) of the species. Chaetomium tenue is phylogenetically related to C. camelliae and C. pseudoglobosum. The isolate obtained in this study differs from the ex-type culture by abundant production of an orange soluble pigment on OA. Other morphological characters, such as ascomata, terminal hairs, asci, and ascospores are similar to those described by Wang et al. (2016b). This the first report of C. tenue in Brazil and as an endophyte in Orchidaceae worldwide.
Collariella
X. Wei Wang & Samson, 2016
4C404C56-CE09-582D-82BA-78A1B2DFE993
Type species.
Collariella bostrychodes (Zopf) X. Wei Wang & Samson, 2016.
Collariella fluminensis
D.O. Ramos, P.T.S. Nogueira & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
989C2ED1-F087-5B71-A2A7-4D36E393C4DC
862444
Figure 18.
Collariella fluminensisCOAD 3737, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 4 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D–F. Ascomata; G. Surface of ascomatal wall; H. Terminal ascomatal hair; I. Asci; J. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (D–F); 20 μm (G, H); 10 μm (I, J).
Etymology.
The name Fluminense refers to people born in the state of Rio de Janeiro, where the fungus was collected.
Typification.
BRAZIL • Rio de Janeiro: Nova Friburgo, Corrego D’antas, from roots of Cyclopogon congestus, 17 July 2023, D.O. Ramos (holotype VIC 49500 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-typeCOAD 3737).
Description.
Ascomata superficial, pale olivaceous gray in reflected light owing to the ascomatal hairs, ostiolate, ovoid to ellipsoid, 393–552 μm high, 205–252 μm diam. Ascomatal wall brown, textura angularis in surface view. Terminal hairs arising from the apical collar, conspicuously rough, dark brown, septate, erect in the lower part, spirally coiled in the upper part. Lateral hairs seta-like, tapering and fading towards the tips. Asci fasciculate, fusiform or clavate, spore-bearing portion 16.5–26 × 8–11 μm, stalks 8.5–18 μm long, with 8 irregularly-arranged ascospores, evanescent. Ascospores pale brown when mature, limoniform, bilaterally flattened, (5.5–)6–6.5 × (4.5–)5–5.5(–6) μm in face view, with one apical germ pore. Asexual morph unknown.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 32–36 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, aerial mycelium absent, flat, circular shape; reverse luteous due to the intense production of soluble pigment. Colonies on CMA attaining 23–27 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire margin, aerial mycelium absent, flat, circular to irregular shape; reverse pale luteous. Colonies on MEA attaining 26–30 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, aerial mycelium absent, flat, irregular shape; reverse pale luteous; soluble pigments absent. Colonies on PCA attaining 30–32 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, aerial mycelium absent, flat, circular; reverse buff; soluble pigments absent.
Additional specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Mata do Paraíso, from roots of Eulophia maculata, 31 August 2023, D.O. Ramos (living cultures COAD 3738 and COAD 3739).
Distribution.
Brazil (Atlantic rainforest in Rio de Janeiro state and Seasonal Semideciduous Forest within the Atlantic Forest domain in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
Collariella fluminensis clustered in a well-supported clade phylogenetically related to Col. capillicompacta, Col. carteri, Col. pachypodioides, and Col. hongheensis (Fig. 2). Morphologically, Col. fluminensis can be distinguished from Col. carteri by its larger ascomata (393–552 × 205–252 vs. 175–320 × 110–220 μm), terminal hairs (verrucose and spirally coiled vs. smooth and seta-like in Col. carteri), and smaller ascospores ((5.5–)6–6.5 × (4.5–)5–5.5(–6) vs. (6–)6.5–7.5(–8.5) × 5–6(–7.5) μm). Additionally, Col. fluminensis shows higher growth on OA (32–36 vs.24–30 mm in Col. carteri) and slightly reduced growth on MEA (26–30 vs.29–33 mm) (Wang et al. 2016a). In comparison to Col. capillicompacta, Col. fluminensis has larger ascomata (393–552 × 205–252 vs.198.9–303.6 × 146.6–230.3 μm), and slightly larger ascospores ((5.5–)6–6.5 × (4.5–)5–5.5(–6) vs. 5.2–6.2 × 4.2–5.2 μm) (Aghyl et al. 2021). Collariella fluminensis can be differentiated from Col. pachypodioides by its larger ascomata (393–552 μm vs. 350–460 μm) and spirally coiled and verrucose terminal hairs, whereas in Col. pachypodioides, its terminal hairs are smooth to slightly roughened (Ames 1961). Compared to Col. hongheensis, Col. fluminensis can be distinguished by its slightly larger ascomata (393–552 × 205–252 vs. 250–500 × 200–300), smaller asci (16.5–26 × 8–11 vs. 30–63.5 × 5–13 μm), and lacks hamathecium inside the ascomata (Manawasinghe et al. 2024).
Dichotomopilus
X. Wei Wang & Samson, 2016
71784974-DF15-5A9C-914C-3347632F29AE
Type species.
Dichotomopilus indicus (Corda) X. Wei Wang & Samson, 2016.
Dichotomopilus brasiliensis
D.O. Ramos, P.T.S. Nogueira & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
59E49011-9154-578F-862B-AFE5D3D3DC20
862445
Figure 19.
Dichotomopilus brasiliensisCOAD 3741, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 3 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D, E. Ascomata; F. Surface of ascomatal wall; G. Terminal ascomatal hairs; H. Asci; I. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (D, E); 20 μm (G); 10 μm (F, H, I).
Etymology.
Refers to Brazil, the country where the isolates used in the description were collected.
Typification.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Araponga, from roots of Zygopetalum mackayi, 21 November 2021, O.L. Pereira (holotype VIC 49501 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-typeCOAD 3741).
Description.
Ascomata superficial, ostiolate, dark gray in reflected light, subglobose to ellipsoid, 160–220 μm high, 131–201 μm diam. Ascomatal wall brown, textura intricata or angularis. Terminal hairs dark brown, septate, unbranched or dichotomously branched 1–3 times towards the apex. Lateral hairs seta-like, tapering and fading towards tips. Asci fasciculate, clavate, with 8 ascospores irregularly arranged, with spore-bearing portion 13–19 × 7–12 μm, stalks 6–15.5 μm long, evanescent. Ascospores brown, ovoid to slightly elongate-ovoid, bilaterally flattened, (4.5–) 5–6 × 3.5–4.5 (–5.5) μm in face view, with one apical germ. Asexual morph unknown.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 35–37 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire to undulate, white aerial mycelium sparse, flat, circular; reverse pale luteous to luteous owing to the presence of soluble pigment. Colonies on CMA attaining 47–60 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire to undulate, white aerial mycelium moderate, flat, circular; reverse buff; soluble pigment absent. Colonies on MEA reaching over 75 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium dense, flat, circular; reverse pale luteous due to the presence of soluble pigments. Colonies on PCA attaining 59–75 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium sparse to moderate, flat, circular; reverse buff to pale luteous due to production soluble pigment.
Additional specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Maranhão: Itinga do Maranhão municipality, from roots of Musa sp., 10 December 2021, F.A. Custódio (living culture COAD 4293); Bahia: Vale do Juliana, from roots of Theobroma cacao, 18 July 2025, J.S. Santana and F.A. Custódio (living culture COAD 4294).
Distribution.
Brazil (Atlantic rainforest in Bahia state, Amazon rainforest in Maranhão state, and Rupestrian grassland within the Atlantic forest in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
Dichotomopilus brasiliensis was clustered in a unique lineage that was phylogenetically sister to D. subfunicola (Fig. 4). When compared with the description by Wang et al. (2016a), ascospores are slightly shorter ((4.5–)5–6 vs. 5.5–6.5(–7.5) μm) and brown instead of olivaceous. The ascomatal wall of D. brasiliensis is composed of textura intricata or angularis, whereas that of D. subfunicola is composed of textura intricata or epidermoidea. Additionally, D. brasiliensis exhibited higher growth rates than D. subfunicola on different culture media: OA (35–37 vs. 25–28 mm), MEA (over 75 vs. 41–47 mm), and PCA (59–75 vs. 55–62 mm).
Dichotomopilus variostiolatus
(A. Carter) X. Wei Wang & Samson, 2016
2C244724-E899-5850-AF72-85B4F47065DB
Figure 20.
Dichotomopilus variostiolatusCOAD 3740. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 4 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C, D. Side view of mature ascomata; E. Ascomata; F. Surface of ascomatal wall; G. Terminal ascomatal hairs; H. Asci; I. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (E); 20 μm (F, G); 10 μm (H, I).
Synonym.
Chaetomium variostiolatum A. Carter, Canad. J. Bot. 61 (10): 2603 (1983).
Typification.
NEW GUINEA • from tarpaulin, 14 September 1944, E.T. Reese (holotype QM 36d) deposited as dried culture in the University of Toronto Cryptogamic Herbarium (TRTC). Wang et al. (2016a) designated the ex-type culture CBS 179.84 for molecular analysis.
Description.
See Carter (1983).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Goiás: Goiânia, from roots of Cattleya nobilior, 05 January 2023, P.T.S. Nogueira (living culture COAD 3740); Minas Gerais: Viçosa, isolated from roots of Cattleya sp., 2012, O.L. Pereira (living culture COAD 3763).
Distribution.
Brazil, New Guinea, USA, Thailand.
Notes.
This species was first introduced as Chaetomium variostiolatum by Carter (1983) and then combined with Dichotomopilus variostiolatus by Wang et al. (2016a) when the genus was established. This species produces unbranched seta-like or dichotomously branched terminal hairs. Both isolates in this study produced two types of terminal hairs, similar to those observed by Wang et al. (2016a). Recently, dos Santos Santana et al. (2026) isolated D. variostiolatus as a root endophyte of Musa acuminata in Brazil. In the present study, D. variostiolatus was found endophytically on roots of Cattleya nobilior and Cattleya sp., suggesting that this species may be a common endophyte in the roots of Brazilian plants. Moreover, this is the first report of D. variostiolatus as an endophyte in Orchidaceae.
Humicola
Traaen, 1914
33BAD679-2D33-5710-B16E-7F2D0334A717
Type species.
Humicola fuscoatra Traaen, 1914.
Humicola capillata
D.O. Ramos, P.T.S. Nogueira & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
99788E48-1375-58C8-94B1-AD2D8AB0D1D9
862446
Figure 21.
Humicola capillataCOAD 3744, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 4 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D. Ascomata; E. Surface of ascomatal wall; F. Terminal ascomatal hairs; G. Asci; H. Ascospores; I, J. Aleurioconidia-like and hyphae. Scale bars: 50 μm (D); 20 μm (E, F, I, J); 10 μm (G, H).
Etymology.
From the Latin capillatus, which means covered with hair, due to the abundance of ascomatal hairs.
Type.
BRAZIL • Distrito Federal: Brasília, isolated as root endophyte on Eulophia maculata, 08 August 2023, D.O. Ramos and P.T.S. Nogueira (holotype VIC 49507 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-typeCOAD 3744).
Description.
Ascomata superficial, ostiolate, luteous to amber in reflected light owing to ascomatal hairs, ovoid to elongate-obpyriform, apically attenuated to an elongate conical or short cylindrical neck, 273–339.5 μm high, 131.5–173 μm diam. at the widest part. Ascomatal wall brown, composed of textura angularis. Terminal hairs arising from the extension of the adjacent ostiolar cells, seta-like with delicate hamete tip, smooth. Lateral hairs are similar to terminal ones, tapering and fading towards the tips. Asci clavate, with spore-bearing portion 17–25.5 × 6.5–10.5 μm, stalks 8–12.5 μm long, with 8 biseriate ascospores, evanescent. Ascospores olivaceous, limoniform, umbonate at both ends, bilaterally flattened, (7.5–)8–8.5(–10) × (5.5–)6–6.5(–7) μm in face view, with one apical germ pore. Somatic hyphae hyaline. Aleurioconidia-like conidia produced laterally on hyphae or on branches, solitary or in small clusters of two or more, subglobose or occasionally pyriform, aseptate, brown to pale brown, thick-walled when mature, 7–8 × (6.5–)7–8(–8.5) μm.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 32–34 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, aerial mycelium absent, flat, circular; reverse ochreous at the center of the colony and pale vinaceous to livid vinaceous due to pigment production. Colonies on CMA attaining 28–32 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire margin, white aerial mycelium sparse, flat, irregular shape; reverse buff to pale luteous; soluble pigment absent. Colonies on MEA attaining 33–37 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium with hypha tuffs, flat, circular; reverse cinnamon at the center and buff at the margins; soluble pigments absent. Colonies on PCA attaining 30–33 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate with mycelial strands, flat, circular; reverse buff to honey; soluble pigments absent.
Distribution.
Brazil (Gallery Forest within the Cerrado biome in the Distrito Federal).
Notes.
Humicola capillata and H. paraisoensis clustered in a basal clade sister to a larger group comprising H. christenseniae, H. fuscoatra, H. fuscogrisea, H. homopilata, H. pinnata, H. purpurea, H. sphaeralis, and H. wallefii (Fig. 5). Morphologically, H. capillata and H. paraisoensis can be differentiated by ascomatal size (273–339.5 × 131.5–173 μm vs. 135.5–290 × 63–159 μm) and ascospores dimensions ((7.5–)8–8.5(–10) × (5.5–)6–6.5(–7) μm vs. (6.5–)7.5–8(–9) × 6.5–7(–8) μm). Additionally, H. capillata produces olivaceous ascospores and terminal hairs with a hamate tip, whereas H. paraisoensis produces brown ascospores and terminal hairs with undulate tips. Moreover, H. capillata exhibited a higher growth rate across culture media, including OA (32–34 vs.25–28 mm), CMA (28–32 vs.25–28 mm), MEA (33–37 vs.27–30 mm), and PCA (30–33 vs.25–28 mm). Humicola capillata produces a sexual morph similar to other species of the genus Humicola but differs from its close relatives (Wang et al. 2019b) by producing aseptate, subglobose, or occasionally pyriform aleurioconidia-like conidia. In contrast, while H. christenseniae produces subglobose to oblate conidia, sometimes with two cells in chains; Humicola fuscoatra produces aseptate, subglobose to oblate conidia, sometimes in chains and in small clusters. Humicola fuscogrisea produces subglobose to oblate conidia, solitary or forming chains of 2–3 or many clusters; Humicola homopilata produces globose to subglobose conidia, occasionally obovoid or obpyriform, solitary or forming chains of two or small clusters; Humicola pinnata produces globose to oblate conidia, sometimes ovoid, without conidiophore differentiation; Humicola sphaeralis produces solitary globose to oblate conidia, sometimes ovoid, in hyphae without conidiophore differentiation; Humicola wallefii produces solitary conidia, sometimes in pairs in chains or forming small clusters, usually slightly tuberculate, globose to subglobose. Finally, H. purpurea differs by producing aseptate, subglobose to ovoid aleurioconidia-like conidia, solitary or in pairs.
Humicola paraisoensis
D.O. Ramos, P.T.S. Nogueira & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
54B293CC-52C0-520D-A495-10E3D4F3C813
862448
Figure 22.
Humicola paraisoensisCOAD 3743, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 4 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C, D. Side view of mature ascomata; E, F. Ascomata; G. Surface of ascomatal wall; H. Terminal ascomatal hairs; I. Asci; J. Ascospores; K–M. Aleurioconidia-like and hyphae. Scale bars: 100 μm (E); 50 μm (F); 20 μm (H); 10 μm (G, I–M).
Etymology.
The name refers to a forest fragment named Mata do Paraíso, from which this fungus was isolated.
Typification.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Mata do Paraíso, from roots of Catasetum hookeri, 02 June 2023, D.O. Ramos and P.T.S. Nogueira (holotype VIC 49502 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-typeCOAD 3743).
Description.
Ascomata superficial, ostiolate, luteous to amber because of the ascomatal hairs in reflected light, elongate obpyriform or ampulliform bellow, apically attenuated to an elongate conical or short cylindrical neck, 135.5–290 μm high, 63–159 μm diam. at the widest part. Ascomatal wall brown, composed of textura angularis. Terminal hairs arising from the extension of the adjacent ostiolar cells, seta-like with a delicate undulate tip, smooth. Lateral hairs similar to terminal ones, tapering and fading towards the tips. Asci clavate to cylindrical, spore-bearing portion 18–27.5 × 6–11 μm, stalks 7–13.5 μm long, 8-spored, biseriate, evanescent. Ascospores brown, limoniform, umbonate at both ends, bilaterally flattened, (6.5–)7.5–8(–9) × 6.5–7(–8) μm in face view, with one apical germ pore. Somatic hyphae hyaline. Aleurioconidia-like conidia produced laterally on hyphae, rarely on branches, solitary, globose, subglobose or occasionally pyriform or ellipsoid, aseptate, subhyaline to pale brown, thick-walled when mature, 7–8.5(–10) × (6–)7–9 μm.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 25–28 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, aerial mycelium absent, flat, circular; reverse pale vinaceous owing to the presence of pigments. Colonies on CMA attaining 25–28 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire to fimbriate, white aerial mycelium sparse with little exudate at the center of the colony, flat, circular shape; reverse buff to pale luteous; soluble pigment absent. Colonies on MEA attaining 27–30 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire margin, white aerial mycelium thick, texture floccose, flat, circular; reverse dark vinaceous due to production of soluble pigments. Colonies on PCA attaining 25–28 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, aerial mycelium absent, flat, circular; reverse buff to saffron; soluble pigments absent.
Additional specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Mata do Paraíso, from roots of Catasetum hookeri, 02 June 2023, D.O. Ramos and P.T.S. Nogueira (living culture COAD 3742).
Distribution.
Brazil (Seasonal Semideciduous Forest within the Atlantic Forest domain in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
Humicola paraisoensis is phylogenetically related to H. capillata (Fig. 5). These two species have different hosts and geographical distributions, H. paraisoensis was isolated from the orchid Catasetum hookeri in a forest fragment of the Atlantic Forest biome in Minas Gerais state, whereas H. capillata was isolated from Eulophia maculata in the Cerrado biome in Distrito Federal. Humicola paraisoensis produces sexual structures similar to other members of the genus but differs from its close relatives (Wang et al. 2019b) by producing aseptate, solitary, globose, subglobose or occasionally pyriform or ellipsoid aleurioconidia-like conidia. In contrast, H. christenseniae produces subglobose to oblate conidia, sometimes occurring in 2-celled chains; Humicola fuscoatra produces 1-celled, subglobose to oblate conidia, sometimes in chains and in a few clusters; Humicola fuscogrisea produces subglobose to oblate conidia, solitary or forming chains of 2-3 or many clusters; and Humicola homopilata produces globose to subglobose conidia, occasionally obovoid or obpyriform, solitary or forming chains of two or small clusters. Humicola pinnata produces globose to oblate conidia, sometimes ovoid, without conidiophore differentiation. Humicola sphaeralis produces solitary globose to oblate conidia, sometimes ovoid, in hyphae without conidiophore differentiation. Humicola wallefii produces solitary conidia, sometimes in pairs in chains or forming small clusters, usually slightly tuberculate, globose to subglobose (Wang et al. 2019b). Finally, H. purpurea differs by producing 1-celled, subglobose to ovoid aleurioconidia-like conidia, solitary or in pairs.
Humicola purpurea
D.O. Ramos, P.T.S. Nogueira & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
E9887A18-5336-5E4D-B792-4D651CFDF5AB
862447
Figure 23.
Humicola purpureaCOAD 3745, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 4 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C. Side view of mature ascomata; D. Ascomata; E. Surface of ascomatal wall; F. Terminal ascomatal hairs; G. Asci; H. Ascospores; I–K. Aleurioconidia-like and hyphae. Scale bars: 50 μm (D); 20 μm (E, F, I); 10 μm (G, H, J, K).
Etymology.
Refers to the purple pigment produced by this fungus when cultivated on OA and MEA.
Typification.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Mata do Paraíso, from roots of Eulophia maculata, 02 July 2023, D.O. Ramos (holotype VIC 49503 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-typeCOAD 3745).
Description.
Ascomata superficial, ostiolate, amber in reflected light owing to ascomatal hairs, ovoid to obpyriform, apically attenuated to an elongate conical or short cylindrical neck, 208–280 μm high, 90.5–136 μm diam. at the widest part. Ascomatal wall brown, composed of textura angularis. Terminal hairs arising from the extension of the adjacent ostiolar cells, straight, smooth, flexuous to undulate towards the apex. Lateral hairs similar to terminal ones, tapering and fading towards the tips. Asci clavate to cylindrical, spore-bearing portion 21.5–29 × 7.5–12 μm, stalks 7.5–14 μm long, 8-spored, biseriate, evanescent. Ascospores brown, limoniform, umbonate at both ends, bilaterally flattened, (7–)8–8.5(–9.5) × (5.5–)6.5–7(–7.5) μm in face view, with one apical germ pore. Somatic hyphae hyaline. Aleurioconidia-like conidia produced laterally on hyphae, solitary or in pairs, subglobose to ovoid, aseptate, pale brown and thick-walled when mature, (8–)8.5–9.5(–11) × (7–)7.5–9(–9.5) μm.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 28–30 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, aerial mycelium absent, flat, circular; reverse dark vinaceous owing to soluble pigment. Colonies on CMA attaining 30–33 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire margin, white aerial mycelium sparse, flat, circular; reverse buff; soluble pigment absent. Colonies on MEA attaining 30–34 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium sparse, flat, circular, reverse dark vinaceous at the center and pale vinaceous at the margins of colonies due to the presence of pigments. Colonies on PCA attaining 28–32 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium sparse at the center of the colony and absent at the margins, flat, circular; reverse buff; soluble pigments absent.
Additional specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Mata do Paraíso, from roots of Eulophia maculata, 02 July 2023, D.O. Ramos (living culture COAD 3746).
Distribution.
Brazil (Seasonal Semideciduous Forest within the Atlantic Forest domain in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
Humicola purpurea clustered into a well-supported clade sister to H. fuscoatra (Fig. 5). Morphologically, H. purpurea produces a sexual morph in culture, which is not observed for H. fuscoatra (Wang et al. 2019b). Additionally, H. purpurea showed higher growth rates than H. fuscoatra on CMA (30–33 vs. 24–30 mm), MEA (30–34 vs. 18–24 mm), and PCA (28–32 vs. 17–23 mm). Humicola purpurea differs from other closely related species (Wang et al. 2019b) by producing aleurioconidia-like conidia that are solitary or in clusters of two, subglobose to ovoid, aseptate, while H. christenseniae produces subglobose to oblate conidia, sometimes with two cells in chains. Humicola fuscogrisea produces subglobose to oblate conidia, solitary or in chains of 2–3 or in larger clusters. Humicola homopilata produces globose to subglobose conidia, occasionally obovoid or obpyriform, solitary or in chains of two or small clusters. Humicola pinnata produces globose to oblate conidia, sometimes ovoid, without conidiophore differentiation. Humicola sphaeralis produces globose to oblate conidia, sometimes ovoid, solitary in hyphae without conidiophore differentiation. Humicola wallefii produces solitary conidia, sometimes in pairs, in chains or forming small clusters, usually slightly tuberculate, globose to subglobose.
Pseudohumicola
X. Wei Wang, P.J. Han, F.Y. Bai Houbraken, 2022
F226EBB6-107A-539E-97CC-73ACAC8F8169
Type species.
Pseudohumicola subspiralis (Chivers) X.Wei Wang, P.J. Han, F.Y. Bai & Houbraken, 2022.
Pseudohumicola crispata
D.O. Ramos & O.L. Pereira sp. nov.
23353E3E-8D61-58F4-B95B-69EE1DBA22DF
862637
Figure 24.
Pseudohumicola crispataCOAD 4166, ex-type. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 4 weeks at 25 °C in the dark; B. Top view of mature ascomata on OA; C, D. Side view of mature ascomata; E–G. Ascomata; H. Surface of ascomatal wall; I. Terminal ascomatal hair; J. Asci; K. Ascospores. Scale bars: 100 μm (E–G); 10 μm (H–K).
Etymology.
From the Latin crispatus, due to the presence of undulate to coiled ascomatal hairs.
Typification.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Santana do Riacho municipality, from roots of Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae), 13 March 2024, D. O. Ramos (holotype VIC 49703 preserved as dried culture, culture ex-typeCOAD 4166).
Description.
Ascomata superficial, ostiolate, olivaceous buff to greenish olivaceous because of the ascomatal hairs, ovoid to ellipsoid, 158–283.5 μm high, 90.5–163 μm diam. at the widest part. Ascomatal wall brown, composed of angular to irregular cells. Terminal hairs straight to flexuous near the base, undulate to coiled and attenuated towards the apex, septate. Lateral hairs shorter, otherwise similar to the terminal ones. Asci clavate, spore-bearing portion 12.5–18 × 4.5–8 μm and stalks 6.5–14(–17) μm long, 8 biseriate ascospores, evanescent. Ascospores gray-olivaceous, limoniform, umbonate at both ends, bilaterally flattened, 3.5–4(–4.5) × 3–3.5(–4) μm in face view, with one apical germ pore. Asexual morph unknown.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 38–43 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, white aerial mycelium moderate, flat, circular; reverse vinaceous to pale vinaceous at the center of colonies due to the production of soluble pigment and buff at the margins. Colonies on CMA attaining 38–40 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, undulate margin, white aerial mycelium moderate, flat; reverse pale luteous at the center due to the production of soluble pigment and buff at the margins of colonies. Colonies on MEA attaining 18–20 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, undulate to entire margin, white aerial mycelium moderate, raised, circular; reverse orange to luteous due to the production of soluble pigment. Colonies on PCA attaining 36–40 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire edge, with profuse white aerial mycelium, umbonate, circular; reverse buff to pale luteous; soluble pigments absent.
Additional specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Santana do Riacho municipality, from roots of Cattleya sp. (Parviflorae), 13 March 2024, D. O. Ramos (living culture COAD 4167).
Distribution.
Brazil (Rupestrian Grasslands within the Cerrado domain in Minas Gerais state).
Notes.
Pseudohumicola crispata is phylogenetically related to Ps. subspiralis and morphologically differs from it by the production of smaller ascomata (158–283.5 × 90.5–163 μm vs. 240–320 × 185–260 μm), asci (12.5–18 × 4.5–8 μm vs. 18–25 × 6–9 μm) and ascospores (3.5–4(–4.5) × 3–3.5(–4) μm vs. 5–6.5(–7) × 4.5–5.5(–6). In addition, the acremonium-like synanamorph was not observed in Ps. crispata as it was observed in the related species Ps. subspiralis by Wang et al. (2019b). Cultures of Ps. crispata showed similar growth rates to Ps. subspiralis on OA, CMA, and PCA, but were smaller on MEA (18–20 mm vs. 30–36 mm diam). The other related species, Ps. atrobrunnea, is known for producing only the aleurioconidia-like synanamorph. This is the first Pseudohumicola species described as an endophyte worldwide.
Pseudohumicola cinnamomeobrunnea
Sastoque, Cano & Stchigel, 2025
84DD70C4-3819-5B08-98F3-DF55E2D1BED0
Figure 25.
Pseudohumicola cinnamomeobrunneaCOAD 3747. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA, and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B–E. Aleurioconidia-like conidia and hyphae; F, G. Acremonium-like condiophores and conidia; H. Hyaline conidia. Scale bars: 50 μm (E, F, G); 10 μm (H, I, J, K).
Typification.
SPAIN • Canary Islands: La Palma, Fuencaliente (Los Canarios), isolated from soil of Teneguía volcano, 15 July 2008, M. Calduch and A.M. Stchigel, isolated by A.P. Sastoque (holotype CBS H-25248, culture ex-type CBS 150900).
Emended description.
Somatic hyphae hyaline. Aleurioconidia-like conidia produced laterally on hyphae, but more commonly continuous with the hyphae, solitary or in clusters of three or more, subglobose, occasionally cylindrical or pyriform, 1-celled, with a pale brown to brown, thick wall when mature, (7–)9–10(–15) × (7–)8–8.5(–9.5) μm. Acremonium-like conidiophores arising laterally from hyphae, branched, sometimes unbranched, aseptate, or sometimes septate, 23.5–42 μm long. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, 5–21 μm long, 1.5–3.5 μm wide at the base. Conidia hyaline, borne in basipetal chains or held in false heads, aseptate, clavate, occasionally cylindrical, (3–) 3.5–4.5 (–5) × (1–) 1.5–2 μm. Sexual morph unknown.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on OA attaining 42–46 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge entire, aerial mycelium sparse, raised, circular, moderate production of conidia; reverse buff with little production of pale luteous pigment. Colonies on CMA attaining 38–43 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, entire margin, white aerial mycelium sparse, flat, intense production of conidia at the center of colonies; reverse olivaceous at the center and buff at the margins of colonies; soluble pigment absent. Colonies on MEA attaining 45–48 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge slightly undulate, white aerial mycelium abundant, raised, circular, conidia production was not observed; reverse pale luteous; soluble pigments absent. Colonies on PCA attaining 34–37 mm diameter after 7 days at 25 °C, edge erose or dentate, white aerial mycelium moderate at the center and sparse at the edges, concave with raised margins, circular, intense production of conidia; reverse olivaceous buff; soluble pigments absent.
Specimen examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais, Viçosa, from coconut shell used as substrate for Cattleya aclandiae, 25 June 2022, P.T.S Nogueira (herbarium voucher VIC 49504 preserved as dried culture, living culture COAD 3747).
Distribution.
Brazil and Spain (Canary Islands).
Notes.
Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolate COAD 3747 clustered with Ps. cinnamomeobrunnea CBS 150900. Pseudohumicola cinnamomeobrunnea was described by Sastoque et al. (2025) as producing only aleurioconidia-like synanamorph. However, the isolate COAD 3747 produces an acremonium-like synanamorph, and here we provide its description, which was not observed in the related species, Ps. semispiralis and Ps. glauca. In addition, colonies of the isolate COAD 3747 showed similar growth rates on MEA and CMA but showed higher growth rates on OA (42–46 mm vs. 37–40 mm) and reduced growth on PCA (34–37 mm vs. 46–17 mm) when compared to the type CBS 150900. This is the first report of Ps. cinnamomeobrunnea outside the Canary Islands, where this species was originally described.
Pseudohumicola pulvericola
(X. Wei Wang, Houbraken & Seifert) X. Wei Wang, P.J. Han, F.Y. Bai & Houbraken, 2022
1183ACDB-E704-5404-84B1-170FA6E84DB8
Figure 26.
Pseudohumicola pulvericolaCOAD 3748. A. Colonies on OA, CMA, MEA and PCA from left to right after 7 days at 25 °C in the dark; B–D. Ascomata; E. Surface of ascomatal wall; F. Terminal ascomatal hairs; G. Asci; H. Ascospores; I, J. Aleurioconidia-like conidia and hyphae. Scale bars: 50 μm (B–D); 10 μm (E, G–J); 20 μm (F).
Synonym.
Humicola pulvericola X.Wei Wang, Houbraken & Seifert, Stud. Mycol. 93: 96 (2019).
Typification.
MEXICO • From house dust, K. Mwange and E. Whitfield (holotype CBS H-23486, culture ex-type CBS 144165).
Emended description.
Ascomata superficial, ostiolate, ellipsoid to ovoid, 260–408 μm high, 210–308 μm diam., growing under the aerial mycelium. Ascomatal wall dark brown, composed of textura angularis. Terminal hairs flexuous, septate, verrucose near the base. Lateral hairs straight or flexuous. Asci clavate, with spore-bearing portion 20–25 × 6–8.5 μm, with 8 biseriate ascospores, evanescent. Ascospores pale brown, limoniform, bilaterally flattened, (9–)10–10.5(–11.5) × (6.5–)8–8.5(–9.5) μm in face view, with one apical germ pore. Asexual morph described by Wang et al. (2019b).
Specimens examined.
BRAZIL • Minas Gerais: Viçosa, from the substrate of Cattleya aclandiae, 25 June 2022, P.T.S. Nogueira (living cultures COAD 3748 and COAD 3749).
Distribution.
Brazil, Mexico, and South Africa.
Notes.
Pseudohumicola pulvericola was known only for its asexual morph. In the present study, the sexual morph was observed and described. To induce the production of reproductive structures, isolate COAD 3748 was cultivated on OA using a sterile paper filter, indicating that this is a homothallic species; however, the conditions required to produce the sexual morph are not entirely clear. Ascomata production began after three weeks under the paper filter. This is the first report of this species in Brazil.
Discussion
Taxonomy of Chaetomiaceae
The taxonomy of the Chaetomiaceae family has been thoroughly explored in recent years with a total of 58 genera and approximately 320 species described (Wang et al. 2022b; Hyde et al. 2024; Sastoque et al. 2025, 2026; dos Santos Santana et al. 2026). This rapid increase in taxonomic breadth has been largely driven by the exploration of unconventional hosts and substrates, including volcanic soils, cave environments, and various plant groups. Through a polyphasic taxonomic approach, 22 species were identified in the analyses, almost half of which were new to science. This high proportion of novel lineages underscores the poorly documented fungal diversity associated with wild orchid roots in the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes.
Arcopilus was the most abundant genus in the Chaetomiaceae found in this study, comprising 21 isolates and eight species. The genus Arcopilus has received little attention, with most of its species described in older works and later transferred to the genus in taxonomic revisions (Wang et al. 2016a, 2022b). Our analysis expanded the knowledge of the genus, which now encompasses 16 species, four of which were described in the present study. The new species, A. endophyticus, formed a unique outer clade within the genus, near A. singularis and three other species that produce sexual morphs. Arcopilus endophyticus produces sterile colonies with aggregates of coiled and melanized hyphae, which have not been observed in the genus. In the genus Chaetomium, species such as C. capillare, C. cervicicola, and C. cucumericola were considered sterile due to the absence of reproductive structures (Wang et al. 2016b). Another species with atypical characteristics for the genus is A. singularis, which produces an acremonium-like synanamorph and lacks ascomata, both of which are unprecedented in the genus. Moreover, the species A. albae is here synonymized under A. cupreus based on sequence and morphological data. Similarly, Wang et al. (2022b) synonymized A. tangerinicapillus with A. cupreus and A. globulus with A. aureus in the most recent revision of the family.
The genus Chaetomium was introduced by Kunze and Schmidt (1817) and has since undergone constant changes. Over time, many studies on the genus Chaetomium have been conducted, and as a result, many fungi known as chaetomium-like have been revised in terms of their morphology and phylogeny. Consequently, numerous species have been synonymized, proposed within the genus, or reclassified into other genera within Chaetomiaceae (Wang et al. 2016a, 2016b; Manawasinghe et al. 2021; Sastoque et al. 2026). Owing to these changes and updates, Chaetomium is arguably the most speciose genus in Chaetomiaceae, with 46 species. In this study, 12 isolates were placed in five known species of Chaetomium: C. coarctatum, C. cochliodes, C. globosum, C. pseudocochliodes, and C. tenue. Chaetomium albiziae, previously considered a distinct species, was synonymized with C. cucumericola in this study. Some inconsistencies still appear in the genus when phylogenies are made, as in the case of C. microthecium, which in some phylogenies from regions such as ITS and rpb2 is grouped within C. globosum species complex. Further studies are needed to reassess the phylogenetic placement of C. microthecium within the genus.
The genus Collariella encompasses 13 species, characterized by superficial ascomata with truncated apices and a darkened collar around the ostiolar pore (Wang et al. 2016a). The genus was initially divided into two subclades, but subclade two was subsequently elevated to genus status as Achaetomiella (Wang et al. 2022b). Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses based on the tub2 and rpb2 loci, as well as the concatenated dataset, revealed that Col. fluminensis forms a well-supported clade sister to Col. capillicompacta, Col. carteri, Col. pachypodioides, and Col. hongheensis. The consistent topology observed across these individual gene trees, coupled with significant molecular divergence, provides robust evidence for its recognition as a distinct species. Furthermore, the novel species differs from its closest relatives by producing larger ascomata with fusiform to ovoid shape and slightly larger ascospores.
The Dichotomopilus isolates obtained in this study were grouped within the D. funicola species complex. This species complex, defined by Wang et al. (2016a), comprises D. finlandicus, D. funicola, D. pseudofunicola, D. subfunicola, and D. variostiolatus. In this study, we introduce D. brasiliensis to this complex. This species is closely related to D. subfunicola but was grouped separately from it in the individual phylogenies of tub2 and rpb2. Although ITS sequences showed no differences between these two species, this was expected because these sequences cannot be separated at the species level (Hambleton et al. 2005). Dichotomopilus brasiliensis is morphologically similar to other species in the D. funicola complex, with ovate to elongate-ovate ascospores, shorter terminal ascomatal hairs, which sometimes form a reticulate network to retain the ascospore mass. The other isolates clustered with the D. variostiolatus clade and were near the type strain of this species.
The genus Humicola was traditionally defined as an asexual lineage within Chaetomiaceae, but recent phylogenetic revisions have clarified its taxonomic position, currently encompassing 23 recognized species (Wang et al. 2019b; Nogueira et al. 2025; Kim et al. 2026; Sastoque et al. 2026). In this study, the identification of H. capillata, H. paraisoensis, and H. purpurea was supported by multi-locus phylogenetic analysis and by morphological characters. Although phylogenetic analysis revealed a close relationship between H. capillata and H. paraisoensis, grouping them as sister clades, the comparative analysis of four gene loci confirms their status as distinct species. This molecular divergence is further supported by clear diagnostic morphological differences; the two taxa exhibit significant variation in the morphology of the terminal hairs, ascomatal size, ascospore color, and colony morphology. Consequently, the integration of multi-locus phylogeny and micromorphological evidence validates H. capillata and H. paraisoensis as independent species within the genus Humicola.
Wang et al. (2022b) reclassified a few Humicola species into the new genus Pseudohumicola. Currently, this genus comprises 18 species, three of which have been described in Brazilian caves: Ps. cecavii, Ps. alba, and Ps. lutea (Alves et al. 2022; Condé et al. 2023; Sastoque et al. 2025, 2026; Kim et al. 2026). The taxonomy of Pseudohumicola has undergone several additions with description of new species and reclassification of strains previously assigned to Humicola (Sastoque et al. 2025, 2026). While most Pseudohumicola species are known to produce only an asexual morph with aleurioconidia-like conidia or acremonium-like conidiophores, Ps. crispata is the only species of the genus characterized by the production of only a sexual morph. Furthermore, this study provides supplementary morphological data for two previously described species. Pseudohumicola cinnamomeobrunnea, which is phylogenetically related to Ps. glauca and Ps. semispiralis, was originally described based on its aleurioconidia-like morphology; here, we provide the first description of its acremonium-like synanamorph. Similarly, Ps. pulvericola, initially described by Wang et al. (2019b) only in its asexual state, is here reported and described with its corresponding sexual morph.
Endophytic association of Chaetomiaceae in Brazil
Brazilian orchids harbor a great diversity of root endophytic fungi, which are still poorly explored by taxonomists. Recently, new fungal species have been described from roots of native orchids, such as Colletotrichum serranegrense in Cattleya jongheana (Silva et al. 2018), Trichoderma orchidacearum in Anacheilium allemanoides (Morgan et al. 2022), and Cladophialophora chlamydospora, Cl. fuscoatra, Purimyces orchidacearum, Pu. endophyticus, Penicillium endophyticum, Talaromyces cattleyae, and Toxicocladosporium atratum in Cattleya locatellii (Crous et al. 2024, 2025, 2026; Condé et al. 2025; Silva et al. 2026). However, fungi in Chaetomiaceae have not been studied or reported as endophytes in Brazilian Orchidaceae plants to date.
In the present study, Arcopilus was found in six native orchids with epiphytic, lithophytic, and terrestrial lifestyles. Other studies have reported new endophytic Arcopilus species, such as A. amazonicus, A. eremanthi, and A. hongheensis, the first two of which were discovered in native Brazilian plants (Sousa et al. 2020; Tavares et al. 2022; Yang et al. 2023). The biotechnological potential of endophytic Arcopilus isolates has been demonstrated in previous studies, including antifungal, antibacterial, and antioxidant activities (Dwibedi and Saxena 2018, 2020; Tavares et al. 2022) as well as pigment production (Silva et al. 2022). The production of soluble pigments in culture media by A. abbreviatus, A. endophyticus, and A. singularis requires further investigation to verify the putative biotechnological potential of these isolates.
The genus Chaetomium is widely distributed in various environments, including air, dung, soil, plants, and marine ecosystems (Wang et al. 2016a, 2016b). Species of this genus are well known for their ability to degrade cellulose-rich substrates and produce secondary metabolites with potential use in agricultural, pharmaceutical, and industrial applications (Wang et al. 2016a; Abdel-Azeem et al. 2021; Dwibedi et al. 2023). Chaetomium species identified in this study were found in five orchids with epiphytic and terrestrial lifestyles, suggesting the wide distribution of this genus in Brazilian orchids. Among the Chaetomium species identified, C. globosum was the only one found as a root endophyte on three different orchids: Eulophia maculata, Polystachya concreta, and Zygopetalum mackayi, which is consistent with previous studies that frequently reported this species as an endophyte in plants from different groups, including orchids (Adit et al. 2022; dos Santos Santana et al. 2026).
To date, the only Collariella species reported in Brazil is Col. bostrychodes, found in animal dung and in leaf litter from a cave (Melo et al. 2012; Condé et al. 2023). However, the genus Collariella was found to be endophytically associated with Melocactus ernestii, a cactus from the Brazilian Caatinga biome (Ferreira-Silva et al. 2021). Recently, Col. hongheensis was described as a leaf endophyte of Mangifera indica in China (Manawasinghe et al. 2024). Collariella fluminensis was isolated from the roots of two terrestrial orchids, Cyclopogon congestus and Eulophia maculata, in two Brazilian states. This is the only new species found in this study across two distinct plant species.
Dichotomopilus brasiliensis is introduced here as a root endophyte of the orchid Zygopetalum mackayi, as well as Musa sp. (banana) and Theobroma cacao (cocoa). Root-endophytic species of Dichotomopilus have been identified on different plants in Brazil, including the new endophytic species D. endophyticus from the roots of Musa acuminata (Oliveira et al. 2024; dos Santos Santana et al. 2026). In this study, two endophytic isolates were identified as D. variostiolatus in two Cattleya species. This species was also identified by dos Santos Santana et al. (2026) as a root endophyte of Musa acuminata and might be a common endophyte of plants in Brazil.
Members of the genus Humicola are frequently recovered from soil environments; for instance, H. leptodermospora, H. quadranculata, and H. cerradensis were all originally described from various Brazilian soil types (Wang et al. 2019b; Nogueira et al. 2025). In contrast, the novel species identified in this study were isolated as endophytes from orchids inhabiting distinct biomes and forest fragments. Specifically, H. capillata was obtained from the Cerrado (dry forest), whereas H. paraisoensis and H. purpurea were isolated from orchids in wet forest environments. The endophytic nature of Humicola has been increasingly recognized and the potential applicability of these fungi has been explored. Hosseyni Moghaddam et al. (2020) reported H. fuscoatra from halophytic plants, noting its capacity to produce metabolites with significant antiproliferative, antifungal, and antibacterial properties against diverse agricultural pathogens. Similarly, H. wallefii was recorded as an endophyte from the leaves of Mangifera indica (Yang et al. 2023). These findings reinforce that the ecological range of Humicola extends significantly beyond soil saprophytism, encompassing complex symbiotic associations within diverse plant tissues.
The species Pseudohumicola crispata, introduced here as an endophyte of a lithophytic Cattleya sp., is the first species of the genus reported in an endophytic association worldwide. Pseudohumicola cinnamomeobrunnea was originally described from volcanic soil (Sastoque et al. 2025), and Ps. pulvericola was described from house dust (Wang et al. 2019b). Both species are reported here growing near the roots of the same plant, Cattleya aclandiae, on the substrate. Unlike Ps. crispata, these isolates were not recovered from within the plant tissues, but rather as decomposers on the substrate. This saprophytic habit aligns with previous reports for most species in the genus, which have been documented in diverse environments such as air, soil, dust, paper, and leaf litter (Wang et al. 2019b, 2022b; Condé et al. 2023).
Conclusion
This study examined 51 specimens of Chaetomiaceae, of which 48 were endophytic and three were from coconut substrates used for orchid cultivation. Here, we present ten new taxonomic findings: four in the genus Arcopilus, one new species in Collariella, one new species in Dichotomopilus, three new species in Humicola, and one new species in Pseudohumicola. Two new synonyms are also proposed: one in Arcopilus and one in Chaetomium. In total, 32 isolates represented 12 known species in Chaetomiaceae, of which six had not yet been recorded in Brazil, and here we contribute to the geographic expansion of these species. This study contributes to knowledge of geographic distribution, hosts, and substrates on which these fungi occur.
Despite the potential for diverse functions attributed to Chaetomiaceae, the ecological role of the association between Chaetomiaceae species and orchids or other plants remains unclear. Furthermore, Brazil still has a remarkably low number of described fungal species relative to its estimated diversity. This study exemplifies that even with a limited sampling of orchid species and specimens, significant taxonomic novelties can be uncovered, highlighting the vast unexplored fungal diversity in the country.
Furthermore, the taxonomic study of fungi associated with orchids may be the first step in understanding the fungus-host relationship, and future studies aimed at investigating biotechnological applications associated with these isolates are crucial, given that fungi with the potential to act as biological control agents against plant diseases and promote plant growth have already been reported in Chaetomiaceae.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Fábio Alex Custódio and Emiliane Fernanda Silva Freitas for their collaboration during the orchid samples. We thank Konstanze Bensch for commenting on nomenclatural issues. This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Finance Code 001), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG). The authors are also thankful to the Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) for providing additional resources to this research, and to the Sítio Barreiras Fruticultura LTDA for support in field work, transit, and use of facilities.
Citation
Ramos DO, Nogueira PTS, Condé TO, dos Santos Santana J, Pereira OL (2026) Diversity and taxonomy of endophytic Chaetomiaceae (Sordariales) associated with roots of wild Orchidaceae in Brazil. IMA Fungus 17: e192047. https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.192047
Additional information
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ethical statement
No ethical statement was reported.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) use
The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.
Regarding the use of AI in the preparation of this manuscript, the authors declare the following: Paperpal.
Used for: Language, style and writing.
The authors used Paperpal (an AI-based writing assistant) to improve the language and grammar of this manuscript. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the final version of the manuscript.
Adherence to national and international regulations
All the fungal strains used in this study have been legally obtained, respecting the Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio Convention).
Funding
This study was funded by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, process numbers CNPq-PROTAX 441384/2020-0); the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG); and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES – Finance code 001). T. O. Condé was supported by a post-doctoral grant from Fundação Arthur Bernardes (FUNARDOC).
Author contributions
D.O. Ramos was responsible for conceptualization, investigation, methodology, formal analysis, and writing of the original draft. P.T.S. Nogueira contributed for investigation, methodology, formal analysis, review, and editing of the final manuscript. T.O. Condé contributed to formal analysis, review, and editing of the final manuscript. J. dos Santos Santana assisted with phylogenetic analyses, review, and editing of the final manuscript. O.L. Pereira was responsible for supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, review, and editing of the final manuscript.
Author ORCIDs
D.O. Ramos https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1868-0350
P.T.S. Nogueira https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4139-8630
T.O. Condé https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8614-6649
J. dos Santos Santana https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6270-4512
O.L. Pereira https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-4623
Data availability
Fungal isolates are deposited in public culture collections in Brazil, DNA sequences are available in GenBank, and alignments were deposited in Figshare.
Supplementary materials
GenBank accession numbers of the Chaetomiaceae used in the phylogenetic analyses
This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Danilo Oliveira Ramos, Pedro Thiago Santos Nogueira, Thiago Oliveira Condé, Jaciara dos Santos Santana, Olinto Liparini Pereira
Data type
docx
Supplementary images
This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Danilo Oliveira Ramos, Pedro Thiago Santos Nogueira, Thiago Oliveira Condé, Jaciara dos Santos Santana, Olinto Liparini Pereira
Data type
zip
Explanation note
figure S1. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Arcopilus, Collariella and related genera based on dataset of ITS sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Stellatospora terricola CBS 811.95. figure S2. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Arcopilus, Collariella and related genera based on dataset of LSU sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Stellatospora terricola CBS 811.95. figure S3. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Arcopilus, Collariella and related genera based on dataset of rpb2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Stellatospora terricola CBS 811.95. figure S4. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Arcopilus, Collariella and related genera based on dataset of tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Stellatospora terricola CBS 811.95. figure S5. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Chaetomium based on dataset of ITS sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S6. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Chaetomium based on dataset of LSU sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S7. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Chaetomium based on dataset of rpb2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S8. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Chaetomium based on dataset of tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S9. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Dichotomopilus based on dataset of ITS sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S10. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Dichotomopilus based on dataset of LSU sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S11. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Dichotomopilus based on dataset of rpb2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S12. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Dichotomopilus based on dataset of tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S13. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Humicola and Pseudohumicola based on dataset of ITS sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Allobotryotrichum blastosporum CGMCC 3.1943. figure S14. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Humicola and Pseudohumicola based on dataset of LSU sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Allobotryotrichum blastosporum CGMCC 3.1943. figure S15. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Humicola and Pseudohumicola based on dataset of rpb2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Allobotryotrichum blastosporum CGMCC 3.1943. figure S16. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Humicola and Pseudohumicola based on dataset of tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Allobotryotrichum blastosporum CGMCC 3.1943.
Concatenated alignment of Arcopilus and Collariella, Chaetomium, Dichotomopilus, Humicola and Pseudohumicola
This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Danilo Oliveira Ramos, Pedro Thiago Santos Nogueira, Thiago Oliveira Condé, Jaciara dos Santos Santana, Olinto Liparini Pereira
Data type
zip
References
- Abdel-Azeem AM, Abu-Elsaoud AM, Abo Nahas HH et al. (2021) Biodiversity and Industrial Applications of Genus Chaetomium. In: Abdel-Azeem AM, Yadav AN, Yadav N, Usmani Z (Eds) Industrially Important Fungi for Sustainable Development. Springer International Publishing, 147–206. 10.1007/978-3-030-67561-5_5 [DOI]
- Adit A, Koul M, Kapoor R et al. (2022) Topological analysis of orchid-fungal endophyte interaction shows lack of phylogenetic preference. South African Journal of Botany 149. 10.1016/j.sajb.2022.06.025 [DOI]
- Aghyl H, Mehrabi-Koushki M, Esfandiari M (2021) Chaetomium iranicum and Collariella capillicompacta spp. nov. and notes to new hosts of Amesia species in Iran. Sydowia 72: 26–33. 10.12905/0380.sydowia72-2020-0021 [DOI]
- Alves VCS, Lira RA, Lima JMS et al. (2022) Unravelling the fungal darkness in a tropical cave: richness and the description of one new genus and six new specie. Fungal Systematic and Evolution 10: 139–167(29). 10.3114/fuse.2022.10.06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ames LM (1949) New cellulose destroying fungi isolated from military material and equipment. Mycologia 41: 637–648. 10.1080/00275514.1949.12017807 [DOI]
- Ames LM (1961) A monograph of the Chaetomiaceae. Army Research Office. https://books.google.com.br/books/about/A_Monograph_of_the_Chaetomiaceae.html?id=_2Q_AAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y
- Barbosa FR, Raja HA, Shearer CA et al. (2012) Three Chaetomium species (Chaetomiaceae, Ascomycota) from the semiarid region of Brazil. Sitientibus série Ciências Biológicas 12(1): 1–4. 10.13102/scb111 [DOI]
- Bhatti SK, Thakur M (2022) An overview on orchids and their interaction with endophytes. Botanical Reviews 88: 485–504. 10.1007/s12229-022-09275-5 [DOI]
- Bouzouina M, Kouadria R, Lotmani B (2021) Fungal endophytes alleviate salt stress in wheat in terms of growth, ion homeostasis and osmoregulation. Journal of Applied Microbiology 130: 913–925. 10.1111/jam.14804 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Carter A (1983) Three new species in the genus Chaetomium. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 2603–2607. 10.1139/b83-286 [DOI]
- Chase MW, Cameron KM, Freudenstein JV et al. (2015) An updated classification of Orchidaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 177: 151–174. 10.1111/boj.12234 [DOI]
- Chivers AH (1912) Preliminary diagnoses of new species of Chaetomium. In: Proceedings of the American academy of arts and sciences. American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 83–88. 10.2307/20022812 [DOI]
- Christenhusz MJM, Byng JW (2016) The number of known plant species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa 261: 201–217. 10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1 [DOI]
- Condé TO, Leão AF, Dutra YLG et al. (2023) Shedding light on the darkness: a new genus and four new species in the family Chaetomiaceae from Brazilian neotropical caves revealed by multi-gene phylogenetic analyses. Mycological Progress 22: 49. 10.1007/s11557-023-01899-0 [DOI]
- Condé TO, Ramos DO, Nogueira PTS et al. (2025) Inside out: New root endophytic Penicillium and Talaromyces species isolated from Cattleya orchids (Orchidaceae) in Brazil. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 15: 179–200. 10.3114/fuse.2025.15.08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Crous PW, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ et al. (2009) Fungal Biodiversity CBS Laboratory Manual Series, vol 1. CBSKNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, pp 1269.
- Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI et al. (2017) Fungal Planet description sheets: 625–715. Persoonia 39: 270–467. 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Crous PW, Cowan DA, Maggs‐Kölling G et al. (2021) Fungal Planet description sheets: 1182–1283. Persoonia 46: 416–417. 10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Crous PW, Jurjević Ž, Balashov S et al. (2024) Fungal Planet description sheets: 1614–1696. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 13: 183–440. 10.3114/fuse.2024.13.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Crous PW, Catcheside DEA, Catcheside PS et al. (2025) Fungal Planet description sheets: 1781–1866. Persoonia 54: 327–587. 10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Crous PW, Akram W, Albuquerque GMR et al. (2026) Fungal Planet description sheets: 1868–1920. Persoonia 56: 1–173. 10.3114/persoonia.2026.56.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Currah RS, Zelmer CD, Hambleton S et al. (1997) Fungi from orchid mycorrhizas. In: Arditti J, Pridgeon AM (Eds) Orchid Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978-94-017-2498-2_4 [DOI]
- Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R et al. (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772. 10.1038/nmeth.2109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- dos Santos Santana J, Custódio FA, Ramos DO et al. (2026) Root endophytic Chaetomiaceae (Sordariales) from Musa acuminata (Musaceae) in Brazil, including Intraradix grisea gen. et sp. nov. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 17: 1–18. 10.15761/fuse.2026.17.01 [DOI]
- Dwibedi V, Saxena S (2018) Arcopilus aureus, a resveratrol-producing endophyte from Vitis vinifera. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 186: 476–495. 10.1007/s12010-018-2755-x [DOI] [PubMed]
- Dwibedi V, Saxena S (2020) In vitro anti-oxidant, anti-fungal and anti-staphylococcal activity of resveratrol-producing endophytic fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 90: 207–219. 10.1007/s40011-019-01098-6 [DOI]
- Dwibedi V, Rath SK, Jain S et al. (2023) Key insights into secondary metabolites from various Chaetomium species. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 107: 1077–1093. 10.1007/s00253-023-12365-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Fay MF (2018) Orchid conservation: how can we meet the challenges in the twenty-first century? Botanical Studies 59: 16. 10.1186/s40529-018-0232-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ferreira-Silva A, Hughes FM, Rosa CA et al. (2021) Higher turnover of endophytic fungal assemblages in the tissues of globose cactus Melocactus ernestii from Brazilian semi-arid biome. Symbiosis 85: 79–91. 10.1007/s13199-021-00795-z [DOI]
- Fortes NGS, Vitória ND (2022) New records of Chaetomium and Chaetomium-like species (Ascomycota, Chaetomiaceae) on Syagrus coronata from the Raso da Catarina Ecological Station (ESEC), Caatinga, Bahia, Brazil. Mycotaxon 137: 137–171. 10.5248/137.171 [DOI]
- Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323–1330. 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Govaerts R, Nic Lughadha E, Black N et al. (2021) The world checklist of vascular plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Scientific Data 8: 215. 10.1038/s41597-021-00997-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Groenewald JZ, Nakashima C, Nishikawa J et al. (2013) Species concepts in Cercospora: spotting the weeds among the roses. Studies in Mycology 75: 115–170. 10.3114/sim0012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Hambleton S, Nickerson NL, Seifert KA (2005) Leohumicola, a new genus of heat-resistant hyphomycetes. Studies in Mycology 53: 29–52. 10.3114/sim.53.1.29 [DOI]
- Hyde KD, Noorabadi MT, Thiyagaraja V et al. (2024) The 2024 Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 15: 1. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25 [DOI]
- Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A et al. (2018) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 518–522. 10.1093/molbev/msx281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Hosseyni Moghaddam MS, Safaie N, Soltani J et al. (2020) Endophytic association of bioactive and halotolerant Humicola fuscoatra with halophytic plants, and its capability of producing anthraquinone and anthranol derivatives. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113: 279–291. 10.1007/s10482-019-01336-x [DOI] [PubMed]
- Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF et al. (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14: 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Kawato M, Shinobu R (1959) On Streptomyces herbaricolor sp. nov., supplement: a single technique for microscopical observation. Memoirs of the Osaka University of the Liberal Arts and Education. Series B Natural Science 8: 114–119. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:88705749
- Kim HD, Azmi MH, Lim SK et al. (2026) Humicola ovoideum sp. nov. and Pseudohumicola obscura sp. nov., two novel Chaetomiaceae species reported in Korea. Mycobiology 54: 440–451. 10.1080/12298093.2026.2696652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Kopylov E, Kyslynska A, Nadkernychna O et al. (2021) Histological examination of endophytic Chaetomium cochliodes Palliser fungus localization in healthy tissues of agricultural crop roots. Agriculture and Natural Resources 55: 507–514. 10.34044/j.anres.2021.55.4.01 [DOI]
- Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870–1874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Kunze G, Schmidt JC (1817) Mykologische Hefte: nebst einem allgemein-botanischen Anzeiger. G. Voss.
- Liang LQ, He XH, Wei CY et al. (2024) Antimicrobial polyketides from an endophytic fungus Arcopilus aureus HJ-7 from Ardisia mamillata Hance. Natural Product Research 1–8. 10.1080/14786419.2024.2429119 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1799–1808. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Ma X, Kang J, Nontachaiyapoom S et al. (2015) Non-mycorrhizal endophytic fungi from orchids. Current Science 109: 72–87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24905693
- Manawasinghe IS, Jayawardena RS, Li HL et al. (2021) Microfungi associated with Camellia sinensis: A case study of leaf and shoot necrosis on tea in Fujian, China. Mycosphere 12: 430–518. 10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/6 [DOI]
- Manawasinghe IS, Hyde KD, Wanasinghe DN et al. (2024) Fungal diversity notes 1818–1918: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Diversity 130: 1–261. 10.1007/s13225-024-00541-y [DOI]
- Martinelli G, Moraes MA (2013) Livro vermelho da flora do Brasil, 1st edn., Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 749–818.
- Mehrabi-Koushki M, Sadi A (2023) Chaetomium albiziae, a new endophytic species from Albizia lebbeck in Iran. Phytotaxa 591: 137–146. 10.11646/phytotaxa.591.2.5 [DOI]
- Melo RFR, Bezerra JL, Cavalcanti MAQ (2012) Diversity of coprophilous ascomycetes from captive wild animals in Dois Irmãos State Park, Brazil. Nova Hedwigia Band 94: 153–162. 10.1127/0029-5035/2012/0094-0153 [DOI]
- Melo RFR, Monte DBP, Gondim NHB, Maia LC, Miller AN (2019) Coprophilous fungi from Brazil: new records for the Neotropics. Mycotaxon 134: 335–352. 10.5248/134.335 [DOI]
- Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA: 1–8. 10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129 [DOI]
- Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O et al. (2020) IQ-TREE. 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37: 1530–1534. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Miranda L, Pereira MC, Veloso TGR et al. (2021) Endophytic fungi in roots of native orchids of rupestrian grasslands (campos rupestres) in Serra do Cipó, Brazil. Iheringia, Série Botânica 76: e2021021. 10.21826/2446-82312021v76e2021021 [DOI]
- Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffmann M et al. (2004) In. Hotspots revisited. Mexico City: CEMEX, 392–392.
- Morgan T, Custódio FA, Tavares MP et al. (2022) Genome sequencing and evolutionary analysis of a new endophytic Trichoderma species isolated from orchid roots with reduced repertoire of protein-coding genes. Mycological Progress 21: 60. 10.1007/s11557-022-01811-2 [DOI]
- Nogueira PTS, Oliveira PHF, Silva PGL et al. (2025) New species of Humicola and Parahumicola (Chaetomiaceae) from caves in Brazil. Mycological Progress 24: 50. 10.1007/s11557-025-02070-7 [DOI]
- Nugent LK, Sangvichen E, Sihanonth P et al. (2006) A revised method for the observation of conidiogenous structures in fungi. Mycologist 20: 111–114. 10.1016/j.mycol.2006.06.003 [DOI]
- O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E (1997) Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 Types within a Monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetic Evolution 7: 103–116. 10.1006/mpev.1996.0376 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Oliveira JA, Custódio FA, Pereira OL (2024) Cultivable root endophytic fungi associated with Acrocomia aculeata and its antagonistic activity against phytopathogenic oomycetes. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 55: 4077–4090. 10.1007/s42770-024-01482-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Palliser HL (1910) Chaetomiaceae. North American Flora 3: 59–64. 10.5962/p.450501 [DOI]
- Pereira OL, Zambolim L (2012) Isolamento de fungos. In: Zambolim L, Jesus Júnior WC, Pereira OL (Eds) O essencial da Fitopatologia. Suprema Gráfica e Editora Ltda., Visconde do Rio Branco: Suprema Gráfica e Editora Ltda, 253–286.
- Pereira MC, Cunha PC, Teixeira AFS et al. (2024) Narrow mycorrhizae and large non-mycorrhizal fungal diversity associated with roots of Cattleya milleri, an endemic and endangered orchid from a rupestrian hotspot in the “Quadrilátero Ferrífero” of Minas Gerais – Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 38: e20230196. 10.1590/1677-941X-ABB-2023-0196 [DOI]
- Pietro-Souza W, de Campos Pereira F, Mello IS et al. (2019) Mercury resistance and bioremediation mediated by endophytic fungi. Chemosphere. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124874 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Pinho DB, Firmino AL, Ferreira-Junior WG et al. (2013) An efficient protocol for DNA extraction from Meliolales and the description of Meliola centellae sp. nov. Mycotaxon 122: 333–345. 10.5248/122.333 [DOI]
- Rambaut A (2018) FigTree v1.4.4. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
- Rannala B, Yang Z (1996) Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Mololecular Evolution 43: 304–311. 10.1007/BF02338839 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Rayner RW (1970) A mycological colour chart. CMI and British Mycological Society. Kew, Surrey, UK. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19701103669
- Raza M, Zhang Z-F, Hyde KD et al. (2019) Culturable plant pathogenic fungi associated with sugarcane in southern China. Fungal Diversity 99: 1–104. 10.1007/s13225-019-00434-5 [DOI]
- Riddell RW (1950) Permanent stained mycological preparations obtained by slide culture. Mycologia 42: 265–270. 10.1080/00275514.1950.12017830 [DOI]
- Rodríguez K, Stchigel A, Guarro J (2002) Three new species of Chaetomium from soil. Mycologia 94: 116–126. 10.1080/15572536.2003.11833254 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Rodriguez RJ, White Jr JF, Arnold AE et al. (2009) Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytologist 182: 314–330. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x [DOI] [PubMed]
- Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Samson RA, Houbraken J, Thrane U et al. (2010) Food and indoor fungi. Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht.
- Sastoque AP, Cano-Lira JF, Stchigel AM (2025) Soil ascomycetes from Spain. XIV. The Chaetomiaceae of La Palma (Canary Islands). Persoonia 54: 93–117. 10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.03 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Sastoque AP, Stchigel AM, Cano-Lira JF (2026) Soil ascomycetes from Spain. XV. New and noteworthy fungi from Gran Canaria Island (Canary Islands archipelago). Studies in Mycology 113: 72–114. 10.3114/sim.2026.113.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Selosse MA, Martos F (2014) Do chlorophyllous orchids heterotrophically use mycorrhizal fungal carbon? Trends in Plant Science 19: 683–685. 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Silva M, Cruz ES, Velozo TGR et al. (2018) Colletorichum serranegrense sp. nov., a new endophytic species from the roots of the endangered Brazilian epiphytic orchid Cattleya jongheana. Phytotaxa 351: 163–170. 10.11646/phytotaxa.351.2.4 [DOI]
- Silva LADF, Alves MF, Filho DF et al. (2022) Pigment produced from Arcopilus aureus isolated from grapevines: Promising natural yellow colorants for the food industry. Food Chemistry 389: 132967. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132967 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Silva LG, Ramos DO, Oliveira JA et al. (2026) Dark septate endophytes on the spotlight: Two new Cladophialophora species associated with roots of the orchid Cattleya locatellii (Orchidaceae) in Brazil. New Zealand Journal of Botany 64: 1–16. 10.1002/nzb2.70027 [DOI]
- Sousa TF, Santos AOD, Silva FMAD et al. (2020) Arcopilus amazonicus (Chaetomiaceae), a new fungal species from the Amazon rainforest native plant Paullinia cupana. Phytotaxa 456: 145–156. 10.11646/phytotaxa.456.2.2 [DOI]
- Stehmann JR (2009) Plantas da floresta Atlântica. Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro.
- Sung G-H, Sung J-M, Hywel-Jones NL et al. (2007) A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, Fungi): Identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 1204–1223. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Tavares DG, Guimarães SdSC, Piccoli RH et al. (2022) Arcopilus eremanthusum sp. nov. as sources of antibacterial and antioxidant metabolites. Archives of Microbiology 204: 156. 10.1007/s00203-022-02764-6 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S et al. (2000) Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in Fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology 31: 21–32. 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1228 [DOI] [PubMed]
- The Brazil Flora Group, Gomes‐da‐Silva J, Filardi FLR et al. (2021) Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network. Taxon 71: 178–198. 10.1002/tax.12640 [DOI]
- Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R (2011) SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27: 171–180. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x [DOI] [PubMed]
- van den Berg C (2014) Reaching a compromise between conflicting nuclear and plastid phylogenetic trees: a new classification for the genus Cattleya (Epidendreae; Epidendroideae; Orchidaceae). Phytotaxa 186: 75–86. 10.11646/phytotaxa.186.2.2 [DOI]
- van Warmelo KT (1966) New species of Chaetomium from South African soil. Mycologia 58: 846–854. 10.1080/00275514.1966.12018376 [DOI]
- Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- von Arx JA, Guarro J, Figueras MJ (1986) The ascomycete genus Chaetomium. Nova Hedwigia 84: 1–162.
- Wang XW, Houbraken J, Groenewald JZ et al. (2016a) Diversity and taxonomy of Chaetomium and chaetomium-like fungi from indoor environments. Studies in Mycology 84: 145–224. 10.1016/j.simyco.2016.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wang XW, Lombard L, Groenewald JZ et al. (2016b) Phylogenetic reassessment of the Chaetomium globosum species complex. Persoonia 36: 83–133. 10.3767/003158516X689657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wang XW, Bai FY, Bensch K et al. (2019a) Phylogenetic reevaluation of Thielavia with the introduction of a new family Podosporaceae. Studies in Mycology 93: 155–252. 10.1016/j.simyco.2019.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wang XW, Yang FY, Meijer M et al. (2019b) Redefining Humicola sensu stricto and related genera in the Chaetomiaceae. Studies in Mycology 93: 65–153. 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wang S, Chen S, Wang B et al. (2022a) Screening of endophytic fungi from Cremastra appendiculata and their potential for plant growth promotion and biological control. Folia Microbiologica 68: 121–133. 10.1007/s12223-022-00995-0 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Wang XW, Han PJ, Bai FY et al. (2022b) Taxonomy, phylogeny and identification of Chaetomiaceae with emphasis on thermophilic species. Studies in Mycology 101: 121–243. 10.3114/sim.2022.101.03 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee SB et al. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, et al. (Eds) PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications, Academic Press Inc., London, UK: 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
- Xu RJ, Huanraluek N, Mapook A et al. (2024) Identification of a new species and three new records of Chaetomiaceae associated with commercial herbal teas in northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 653: 134–154. 10.11646/phytotaxa.653.2.3 [DOI]
- Yang E-F, Karunarathna SC, Dai D-Q et al. (2023) Taxonomy and phylogeny of endophytic fungi (Chaetomiaceae) associated with healthy leaves of Mangifera indica in Yunnan, China. Diversity 15: 1094. 10.3390/d15101094 [DOI]
- Zopf W (1881) Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Ascomyceten: Chaetomium (No. 5). Für die Akademie in Commission bei W. Engelmann in Leipzig. https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=wqrvAAAAMAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=info:SbT3ecHOSwcJ:scholargoogle.com/&ots=e4mD0KypMB&sig=I2W3LjYLB51lKKwT8mhLr9ve-YE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
GenBank accession numbers of the Chaetomiaceae used in the phylogenetic analyses
This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Danilo Oliveira Ramos, Pedro Thiago Santos Nogueira, Thiago Oliveira Condé, Jaciara dos Santos Santana, Olinto Liparini Pereira
Data type
docx
Supplementary images
This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Danilo Oliveira Ramos, Pedro Thiago Santos Nogueira, Thiago Oliveira Condé, Jaciara dos Santos Santana, Olinto Liparini Pereira
Data type
zip
Explanation note
figure S1. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Arcopilus, Collariella and related genera based on dataset of ITS sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Stellatospora terricola CBS 811.95. figure S2. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Arcopilus, Collariella and related genera based on dataset of LSU sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Stellatospora terricola CBS 811.95. figure S3. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Arcopilus, Collariella and related genera based on dataset of rpb2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Stellatospora terricola CBS 811.95. figure S4. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Arcopilus, Collariella and related genera based on dataset of tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Stellatospora terricola CBS 811.95. figure S5. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Chaetomium based on dataset of ITS sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S6. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Chaetomium based on dataset of LSU sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S7. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Chaetomium based on dataset of rpb2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S8. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Chaetomium based on dataset of tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S9. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Dichotomopilus based on dataset of ITS sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S10. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Dichotomopilus based on dataset of LSU sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S11. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Dichotomopilus based on dataset of rpb2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S12. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Dichotomopilus based on dataset of tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Xanthiomyces spinosus CBS 789.71 and CBS 796.83. figure S13. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Humicola and Pseudohumicola based on dataset of ITS sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Allobotryotrichum blastosporum CGMCC 3.1943. figure S14. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Humicola and Pseudohumicola based on dataset of LSU sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Allobotryotrichum blastosporum CGMCC 3.1943. figure S15. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Humicola and Pseudohumicola based on dataset of rpb2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Allobotryotrichum blastosporum CGMCC 3.1943. figure S16. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of Humicola and Pseudohumicola based on dataset of tub2 sequences. The isolates obtained in this study are highlighted in bold. Ex-type isolates are marked with ‘‘T’’. Only values above 80%, for bootstrap (bs), and above 0.80 for posterior probabilities (pp), are shown near nodes. The tree is rooted with Allobotryotrichum blastosporum CGMCC 3.1943.
Concatenated alignment of Arcopilus and Collariella, Chaetomium, Dichotomopilus, Humicola and Pseudohumicola
This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Danilo Oliveira Ramos, Pedro Thiago Santos Nogueira, Thiago Oliveira Condé, Jaciara dos Santos Santana, Olinto Liparini Pereira
Data type
zip
Data Availability Statement
Fungal isolates are deposited in public culture collections in Brazil, DNA sequences are available in GenBank, and alignments were deposited in Figshare.