Skip to main content
The Company of Biologists Open Access logoLink to The Company of Biologists Open Access
. 2026 Sep 1;139(16):jcs264524. doi: 10.1242/jcs.264524

Beadex modulates haematopoiesis and innate immune defence against microbial infection in Drosophila melanogaster

Sakshi Jain 1, Kashish Salian 1, Vrushti Shah 1, Upendra Nongthomba 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13615689  PMID: 42677945

ABSTRACT

LIM domain-only (LMO) proteins are associated with chromosomal translocations in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and are highly expressed in acute myeloid leukaemia, correlating with poor prognosis. However, their role in myeloid cell lineage specification and function remains poorly understood. Using Drosophila melanogaster, which has a single LMO protein homologue, Beadex (Bx or dLMO), and a conserved myeloid-like immune system, we investigated the in vivo role of Beadex in plasmatocytes, the macrophage-like blood cells of Drosophila. Loss of Beadex reduced lymph gland size and the area of mature plasmatocytes. RNA sequencing of Beadex knockdown haemocytes revealed transcriptional changes affecting actin cytoskeleton regulation, phagosome formation and immune response pathways. Accordingly, Beadex mutant and knockdown haemocytes exhibited reduced phagocytic index and lamellipodium area. Beadex regulates actin remodelling through transcriptional control of profilin (chickadee or chic), and profilin overexpression restored the phagocytic index to control levels. Haemocyte-specific Beadex overexpression increased susceptibility to Salmonella infection, which was associated with elevated eiger (TNF) signalling and immunopathology independent of bacterial burden. Overall, Beadex coordinates myeloid cell development, cytoskeletal dynamics and immune defence, with conserved parallels in vertebrate LMO2 biology.

Keywords: Beadex, LIM domain-only protein, Haematopoiesis, Phagocytosis, Transcriptional regulation, Profilin, Drosophila, Immunity


Summary: Beadex regulates Drosophila haematopoiesis and coordinates phagocytic actin remodelling via profilin, alongside cellular innate immune signalling in haemocytes.

INTRODUCTION

Transcription factors form highly regulated, tightly organised networks that regulate tissue development both spatially and temporally (Zerella et al., 2023). Haematopoiesis is a complex process, wherein haematopoietic stem cells differentiate into progenitor cells that give rise to mature cells of myeloid and lymphoid lineages (Chapman and Zhang, 2023). Identifying and studying the key transcriptional regulators of these cell fate decisions help us understand how normal haematopoiesis works and how genetic aberrations lead to haematological malignancies (Zerella et al., 2023).

One such critical regulator, identified in genome-wide binding assays as a key regulator of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, is LIM domain-only (LMO) protein 2 (LMO2), a member of the LIM domain family of proteins (Zerella et al., 2023). Aberrant expression of LMO2 is strongly linked to haematological cancers. In T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, LMO2 overexpression disrupts T-cell differentiation (Latchmansingh et al., 2022). Loss-of-function studies have indicated that LMO2 is essential for maintaining T-cell progenitors and for the progression of the T-cell differentiation programme (Hirano et al., 2021). It functions as part of a large transcriptional complex that includes TAL1 (also known as SCL), E2A (TCF3), GATA1 and LDB1 (Hirano et al., 2021). In acute myeloid leukaemia, LMO2 is highly expressed and promotes cell proliferation by preventing apoptosis through its interaction with the LIM domain-binding protein LDB1 (Latchmansingh et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2023). Despite these disease associations, the precise role of LMO2 in regulating myeloid cell specification and phagocytic immune function remains poorly understood.

Drosophila melanogaster provides a genetically tractable model to study immune cell function as it possesses a simplified yet conserved myeloid-like immune system (Zerella et al., 2023; Evans et al., 2003; Yu et al., 2022). Three major cell types perform cellular immune functions: plasmatocytes, which comprise 90–95% of circulating haemocytes and act as macrophage-like cells phagocytosing microbes and apoptotic debris (Melcarne et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2022); crystal cells, which comprise about 5% of haemocytes and mediate melanisation for wound healing and pathogen defence (Evans et al., 2003); and lamellocytes, which are induced during parasitic infections (Evans et al., 2003). Importantly, D. melanogaster expresses a single LMO homologue, Beadex (Bx or dLMO), thereby providing a simplified system for investigating LMO protein function in vivo (Shoresh et al., 1998).

Beadex is a classic D. melanogaster mutation discovered by Bridges in 1923 and described by Morgan, Bridges and Sturtevant in 1925 (Morgan et al., 1925). Beadex is a dominant mutation that maps to region 17C on the X chromosome (FlyBase Gene Report: Dmel\Bx). Beadex was later identified as a LMO protein, a member of the LIM domain protein family, that plays roles in transcriptional regulation (Milán et al., 1998; Smith et al., 2014; Zeng et al., 1998). Beyond its well-characterised role in wing development, Beadex has also been implicated in immune regulation. Its mRNA levels are reduced upon infection with a virulent strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Apidianakis et al., 2005). Beadex also regulates the immune deficiency (Imd) signalling pathway by controlling the expression of the Dredd caspase, thereby influencing antimicrobial peptide (AMP) production (Chatterjee et al., 2026 preprint), and it modulates crystal cell numbers through regulation of the Pannier–Ush complex (Chatterjee et al., 2019). In addition, a genome-wide screen in the Drosophila S2 cell line (derived from embryonic plasmatocytes or macrophages) identified Beadex as essential for phagocytosis. The study reported that over 90% of cells with Beadex knockdown failed to phagocytose Candida albicans. Importantly, over 60% failed to engulf non-pathogenic Escherichia coli or latex beads (Stroschein-Stevenson et al., 2005). However, the in vivo roles of Beadex in phagocytosis and host defence remain unexplored.

Phagocytosis requires rapid remodelling of the actin cytoskeleton to form protruding membrane structures, such as filopodia and lamellipodia, that help make contact with the target and facilitate its subsequent engulfment (Rougerie et al., 2013). The actin remodelling required for forming the phagocytic cup is regulated by actin-binding proteins, such as the Arp2/3 complex, myosin motor proteins, and formins (Barger et al., 2022). Importantly, Beadex interacts with BAP60 and Osa in Drosophila S2 cells, components of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complex (Guruharsha et al., 2012), suggesting that it acts as a transcriptional scaffold coordinating broad gene expression programmes.

Here, we investigate the in vivo role of Beadex in D. melanogaster haematopoiesis and innate immunity. In this study, using a D. melanogaster Beadex hypomorphic mutant and GAL4/UAS-driven RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated knockdown in plasmatocytes (Table S1), we propose that Beadex acts as a dual transcriptional regulator in haemocytes, controlling plasmatocyte differentiation in the lymph gland and regulating phagocytic machinery in mature plasmatocytes. In support of this model, we demonstrate that Beadex is required for normal lymph gland development, regulates profilin (chickadee or chic) expression to support actin remodelling and phagocytosis, and modulates the host immune response to bacterial infection in a pathogen-specific manner. These findings uncover a previously uncharacterised, conserved role for LMO proteins in coordinating transcriptional programmes with cytoskeletal dynamics in myeloid cell biology. In this study, we address three interconnected aspects of Beadex function. First, we characterise the requirement for Beadex in plasmatocyte differentiation and lymph gland haematopoiesis. Second, using bulk RNA-sequencing and functional assays, we identify the transcriptional programme controlled by Beadex in mature haemocytes and demonstrate that it regulates phagocytic capacity through transcriptional control of profilin. Third, we show that dysregulated Beadex expression in haemocytes results in pathogen-specific consequences for host immunity, associated with eiger (TNF) hyperactivation. Taken together, these findings establish Beadex as a transcriptional hub coordinating multiple aspects of myeloid cell biology, with conserved parallels to LMO2 function in vertebrate haematopoietic and immune cells.

RESULTS

Beadex is expressed in both circulating and lymph gland haemocyte populations

Haematopoiesis in Drosophila occurs in two phases (Evans et al., 2003). The first phase begins during embryogenesis, giving rise to haemocytes, the majority of which are plasmatocytes that persist through the larval stages. In the second phase, the lymph gland, a haematopoietic organ, develops during larval stages and gives rise to adult haemocytes. To assess Beadex expression in circulating and lymph gland plasmatocytes, we used the Bx-GAL4 driver, a FLAG-HA dual-tagged Beadex and a UAS-GFP reporter fly line.

In haemocytes expressing UAS-GFP under Bx-GAL4, GFP signal was detected in all observed circulating haemocytes when haemolymph was bled onto a glass coverslip and stained, indicating broad promoter level activity of the Beadex locus across the circulating haemocyte population (Fig. 1A). Consistent with its predicted role as a transcriptional regulator, FLAG-and HA-tagged Beadex showed predominant nuclear localisation in circulating haemocytes (Fig. 1B,C) and in lymph gland cells (Fig. 1E). In the lymph gland, Bx-GAL4>UAS-GFP expression was observed in all cells of both the primary and secondary lobes, suggesting broad Beadex promoter activity across the progenitor-containing medullary zone (MZ) and the differentiation zone compartments (Fig. 1D,E). We also confirmed the specificity of the FLAG-tagged Beadex fly line using He-GAL4 and Cg-GAL4 drivers by immunoblotting and observed a band at the predicted size of Beadex, i.e. 42 kDa (Fig. 1F).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Beadex is expressed and localises to the nucleus in Drosophila haemocytes. (A–E) Immunofluorescence images showing nuclear localisation of the tagged Beadex protein in wandering third instar larval haemocytes (A–C) and lymph glands (D,E). Haemocytes were stained with (A) anti-GFP (green) in Bx-GAL4>UAS-GFP and with (B) anti-HA or (C) anti-FLAG antibody (green) in overexpressed HA- and FLAG-tagged Beadex (Bx-GAL4>UAS-BxRB FLAG-HA). Cells are counterstained with phalloidin (red) and Hoechst (blue). Lymph glands were stained with (D) anti-GFP (green) in Bx-GAL4>UAS-GFP and with (E) anti-FLAG antibody (green) in overexpressed HA- and FLAG-tagged Beadex (Bx-GAL4>UAS-BxRB FLAG-HA). Images represent the multiple intensity projection of haemocytes and middle stack of the lymph gland. Images in A–E are representative of three biological repeats. Scale bars: 20 µm (main image in B); 10 µm (main image in A, inset in B, D, main image and inset in E); 5 µm (inset in C). (F) Western blot analysis of haemocyte lysates from wandering third instar larvae of He-GAL4>UAS-Bx-FLAG-HA and Cg-GAL4>UAS-Bx-FLAG-HA genotypes, confirming Beadex–FLAG at the predicted size of ∼42 kDa. Blot shown is representative of three biological repeats. (G,H) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot of single-cell RNA sequencing data showing different haemocyte cell clusters. (I,J) The dot plots below shows the expression of Beadex across the identified cell types, indicating high expression in the prohaemocyte cluster and several plasmatocyte populations (http://big.hanyang.ac.kr/flyscrna). PSC, posterior signaling centre; PH1, prohaemocytes; PH, prohaemocytes; PM, plasmatocytes (main population); PM 120, plasmatocytes (late third instar larval stage population; 120 hours after egg laying); CC, crystal cells; LM, lamellocytes; GST-rich, haemocytes.

To complement these findings with endogenous transcript-level resolution, we analysed a published single-cell RNA-sequencing database from the FlyscRNAseq portal (http://big.hanyang.ac.kr/flyscrna) (Yoon et al., 2023). Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plots of single-cell RNA sequencing data revealed distinct haemocyte clusters in the lymph gland (Fig. 1G) and in larval circulating haemocytes (Fig. 1H). At the endogenous transcript level, Beadex is highly enriched in the prohaemocyte cluster in the MZ of the lymph gland (Fig. 1I). In circulating larval haemocytes, Beadex transcripts are enriched in three defined plasmatocyte subpopulations: PL3 (approximately 9.11% of total haemocytes, expressing genes related to phagocytosis, defence response to bacteria, and extracellular matrix components), PL-ImpL2 (less than 0.3% of haemocytes, expressing transcription factors and markers related to glutathione metabolism) and PL-AMP (0.5% of haemocytes, expressing markers related to the Imd pathway) (Fig. 1J; Cattenoz et al., 2020).

Taken together, these data reveal two complementary patterns of Beadex expression. The Bx-GAL4 reporter shows broad promoter-level activity across circulating haemocytes and throughout both lobes of the lymph gland. In contrast, the single-cell RNA-sequencing data show endogenous Beadex transcript enrichment at higher resolution, identifying specific plasmatocyte subpopulations in circulation and the prohaemocyte cluster in the lymph gland. These observations are not contradictory, as GAL4-based reporters are well known to capture broader expression domains than what is detectable at the endogenous mRNA level by sequencing approaches. Consistent with its role as a transcriptional regulator, Beadex shows predominant nuclear localisation in both circulating haemocytes and lymph gland cells.

Beadex mutants have a reduced number of plasmatocytes in different developmental stages

To investigate the role of Beadex in plasmatocyte development, we analysed Bx7, a hypomorphic Beadex mutant generated in our laboratory (Kairamkonda and Nongthomba, 2014), which exhibits significantly reduced Beadex expression in haemocytes (Fig. 2A). We observed a significant reduction in plasmatocyte numbers in both third instar larval and 5-day-old adult flies in Bx7 mutants compared to those in w1118 controls (Fig. 2B,C).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Beadex is required for normal plasmatocyte development and differentiation. (A) Relative transcript levels of Beadex in w1118 control and Bx7 mutant larval haemocytes, confirming the reduced expression of Beadex in haemocytes (N=3 independent biological replicates). Data show mean±s.d. (B,C) Quantification of plasmatocyte number in (B) larvae (N=6 independent biological replicates) and (C) 5-day-old adult flies (N=5 independent biological replicates), showing a reduction. (D,Dʹ) Brightfield images of larval lymph glands from (D) w1118 and (D′) Bx7 mutants, showing a significant reduction in the primary lobe (demarcated by straight black line) area of the mutant. Scale bars: 100 μm. (E) The box plot quantifies this reduction (N=12 independent biological replicates). y-axis values are given in µm2. (F,Fʹ) Immunofluorescence images showing the progenitor cell population (marked by Domeless–GFP) in the lymph glands of (F) w1118 and (F′) Bx7 larvae. Primary lobes are demarcated by white dotted lines. Scale bars: 10 μm. (G) The box plot quantifies the percentage of the lymph gland area that is Domeless-positive, showing no significant change in the mutant (N=7 independent biological replicates). (H,Hʹ) Immunofluorescence images showing the differentiated plasmatocyte population (marked by P1-positive cells) in the lymph glands of (H) w1118 and (H′) Bx7 larvae. Scale bars: 10 μm. (I) The box plot quantifies the percentage of the lymph gland area that is P1-positive, showing a significant reduction in the mutant (N=6 independent biological replicates). For all box plots, the boxes show the interquartile range, the central line marks the median, and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum data values. Data were analysed using unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test. Asterisks denote statistical significance: *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.

To assess whether this reduction in circulating plasmatocytes reflects a developmental defect in the lymph gland, we examined the lymph gland. The area of the primary lobe was significantly reduced in Bx7 mutants compared to that in controls (Fig. 2D,E). Expression of GFP-tagged Domeless (Dome), a marker of progenitor cells in the MZ, was comparable between Bx7 mutant and control flies (Fig. 2F,G), suggesting that the progenitor pool is maintained. However, staining with P1 monoclonal antibody, which detects Nimrod C1 (NimC1), a transmembrane protein expressed on the surface of mature plasmatocytes, revealed a marked reduction in the cortical zone (CZ) in the Bx7 lymph gland (Fig. 2H,I).

To confirm these findings with cell type-specific knockdown, we depleted Beadex in the MZ, CZ and posterior signalling centre using the respective GAL4 drivers. Knockdown in each compartment resulted in a comparable reduction in P1-positive, differentiated plasmatocytes in the primary lobe (Fig. 3A–E). Interestingly, in the intermediate zone, we observed that Beadex knockdown increased plasmatocyte area, suggesting that Beadex prevents premature progenitor differentiation in this zone of the lymph gland (Fig. 3F,F′). Together, these results indicate that Beadex is required for normal plasmatocyte differentiation in the lymph gland and that its loss reduces the pool of mature plasmatocytes available for circulation.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Beadex regulates plasmatocytes differentiation in a zone-specific manner. (A–F) Confocal images of wandering third instar larval lymph gland primary lobe (demarcated by white dotted lines) following Beadex knockdown in the (A) whole lymph gland using Srp-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi (n=19), (B) cortical zone using Hml-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi (n=14), (C) mature plasmatocytes using Pxn-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi (n=23), (D) medullary zone using Domeless-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi (n=10), (E) posterior signalling centre using Antp-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi (n=14) and (F) intermediate zone using CHIZ-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi (n=38). Differentiated plasmatocytes are marked by P1 (green) and nuclei are marked with Hoechst (blue). Scale bars: 20 µm. (Aʹ–Fʹ) Box plots on the right show a significant reduction in the P1+ plasmatocyte area with respect to the total lymph gland area upon Beadex knockdown in the (Aʹ) whole lymph gland, (Bʹ) cortical zone, (Cʹ) mature plasmatocytes, (Dʹ) medullary zone and (Eʹ) posterior signalling centre. (Fʹ) Beadex knockdown in the intermediate zone showed a significant increase in P1+ area. Graphs show the mean of three independent biological replicates (N=3; n=number of third-instar larval lymph glands analysed). Boxes show the interquartile range, the central line marks the median, and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum data values. Data were analysed using unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test. Asterisks denote statistical significance: *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.

To further assess whether the lymph gland deficit is reflected in the circulating haemocyte pool, we quantified circulating haemocytes in adult and larval Hml-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi, Pxn-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi and Srp-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi flies. In adults, Hml-GAL4- and Pxn-GAL4-driven knockdown reduced circulating haemocyte counts specifically in females, consistent with the decrease in lymph gland plasmatocytes in Fig. 3 (and Fig. S1A,B), whereas no change was observed in flies with Srp-GAL4-driven Beadex knockdown (Fig. S1C). In larvae, Hml-GAL4 knockdown reduced circulating haemocytes in both sexes (Fig. S1D), whereas Srp-GAL4 knockdown produced no significant change, likely because the self-renewal capacity of embryonically derived haemocytes and the developmental delay can compensate for the haemocyte count at this stage (Fig. S1E). Together, these data suggest that the consequences of dysregulated Beadex-dependent progenitor specification fully manifest in the adult circulating haemocyte pool.

Beadex regulates a transcriptional network controlling cytoskeletal, immune and metabolic gene expression in haemocytes

Given that Beadex is a known transcriptional co-regulator with nuclear localisation and that its loss reduces plasmatocyte numbers and function, we sought to characterise the transcriptional programme it controls in mature haemocytes. We performed bulk RNA sequencing of third instar larval plasmatocytes from He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi knockdown and He-GAL4/+ control haemocytes. This approach recapitulates the transcriptional consequences of Beadex loss of function, as validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) results, which agree with the sequencing data (Fig. 4F).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Beadex knockdown perturbs a transcriptional network regulating the cytoskeleton and immune pathways. (A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes following Beadex knockdown (He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi) in wandering third instar larval haemocytes. Each dot represents a single gene, with colours highlighting specific enriched pathways. Genes with a log2(FC)>1 and P<0.05 are considered differentially expressed. (B) Bar chart showing the top significantly enriched pathways and gene sets, ranked by statistical significance (−log10P-value), including ‘cytoskeletal regulation by Rho GTPase’, ‘phagosome’ and ‘immune response’. (C) Tables listing a subset of differentially expressed genes within the most significantly enriched pathways, along with their corresponding log2FC and P-values. (D,E) Normalised RNA-sequencing read counts for a selected set of genes in control (He-GAL4>CS) and Beadex knockdown (He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi) haemocytes. (F) Validation of RNA-sequencing data by quantitative PCR (qPCR) for the selected gene set, confirming the differential gene expression observed in the transcriptome analysis (N=3 independent biological replicates). Data were analysed using an unpaired t-test with Welch's correction. Asterisks denote statistical significance: *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.

Among the 17,895 genes analysed, 1063 were differentially expressed at P<0.05 and log2[fold change (FC)]>1 between knockdown and control haemocytes: 595 genes were upregulated and 468 were downregulated. Principal component analysis revealed a clear separation between knockdown and control samples, confirming a distinct transcriptional response (Fig. 4A). The most significantly upregulated genes included PGRP-SC2, ImpL2, Drsl2, Dgp-1 (also known as Gtpbp1) and LpR1, whereas CecropinB (CecB), CG31343 and CG31233 were among the most downregulated.

Pathway-level analysis revealed that Beadex knockdown broadly affects immune signalling and metabolic regulation. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) highlighted significant downregulation of immune-related pathways, including ‘immune system’ [normalised enrichment score (NES)=−1.86, false discovery rate (FDR)=0.047] and ‘innate immune system’ (NES=−1.56, FDR=0.075). Strikingly, enrichment analysis identified significant downregulation of ‘phagosome’ (KEGG: dme04145) and ‘antibacterial humoral response’ (GO:0019731) pathways, directly linking Beadex to the transcriptional regulation of phagocytic machinery and vesicle trafficking (Fig. 4B). Pathway, network and gene-set enrichment analysis (PANGEA) confirmed significant enrichment of cytoskeletal regulation by Rho GTPase, V-type ATPase and voltage-gated potassium channel complexes, as well as metabolic modules, including amino acid biosynthesis and the citrate cycle (Fig. 4C). Consistent with these transcriptional data, qRT-PCR validation showed downregulation of profilin (chic), actin-regulatory genes (Rac2, ArpC1), and phagocytic receptors in haemocytes with knockdown (Fig. 4D–F).

The transcriptional downregulation of cytoskeletal and phagocytic genes upon Beadex knockdown predicts a defect in actin-based phagocytic activity, which is studied in the next section. The transcriptional changes over 1000 differentially expressed genes are consistent with Beadex acting as a broad transcriptional scaffold, potentially through interaction with the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complex proteins BAP60 and Osa identified in Drosophila S2 cell interactome studies (Guruharsha et al., 2012), although direct evidence for this mechanism in haemocytes needs further investigation. The transcriptional downregulation of phagosome-associated pathways and actin cytoskeletal regulators, particularly profilin, led us to hypothesise that Beadex loss would directly impair phagocytic capacity in mature plasmatocytes – a hypothesis we have investigated further.

Beadex loss impairs phagocytic efficiency and lamellipodium formation in plasmatocytes

The RNA-sequencing data indicated that Beadex controls the expression of genes encoding actin cytoskeleton regulators and phagocytic machinery. We therefore directly assessed the phagocytic capacity of plasmatocytes from the Bx7 mutant and from haemocyte-specific Beadex knockdown (He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi) larval haemocytes using an ex vivo phagocytosis assay with heat-killed GFP-tagged E. coli.

In Bx7 mutants, larval plasmatocytes exhibited a marked reduction in both the percentage of engulfing cells and the phagocytic index compared to those in w1118 controls (Fig. 5A–C). A similar reduction in phagocytic index was observed upon haemocyte-specific knockdown of Beadex by RNAi using He-GAL4 (Fig. 5F–I). Importantly, the UAS-BxRNAi/+ transgene-only control showed no significant difference from the He-GAL4/+ control, confirming that the phagocytosis defect is specifically due to GAL4-driven Beadex knockdown and not a background effect of the transgene (Fig. 5H,I).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Beadex regulates phagocytosis and actin cytoskeleton dynamics in larval haemocytes. Confocal images and quantitative analysis of haemocytes isolated from wandering third instar larvae. (A,A′) Confocal images of haemocytes from w1118 (control) and Bx7 mutant larvae engulfing E. coli bioparticles (red). Cells are stained for F-actin (green) and nuclei (blue); arrows indicate filopodia. Scale bars: 10 μm. (B–E) Quantifications of w1118 (control) and Bx7 mutant show a significant reduction in the (B) percentage of engulfing cells, (C) phagocytic index, (D) filopodia number per cell and (E) actin intensity in the lamellipodium. (F–H) 3D-rendered confocal images of haemocytes from He-GAL4/+ (control), He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi (knockdown) and UAS-BxRNAi/+ (UAS control). Cells are stained for F-actin (red), E. coli (green) and nuclei (blue). Insets show 4× magnified views of representative plasmatocytes; white arrows indicate engulfed GFP-tagged E. coli. Scale bars: 20 μm (F–H); 5 μm (insets). (I,J) Quantifications of reduced (I) phagocytosis index and (J) lamellipodium area upon Beadex knockdown compared to both genetic controls. Data represent the mean of N=3 independent biological replicates. For quantifications, n=60 cells (C–F) and n=70 cells (I,J) were analysed. Data are presented as box-and-whisker plots, with boxes showing the interquartile range, the central line showing the median, and whiskers showing minimum to maximum values. Plus symbols in I indicate mean. Data in C–F were analysed using unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test, and data in I,J were analysed using ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test. Asterisks denote statistical significance: ns, not significant; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ****P<0.0001.

To determine whether the phagocytic defect was accompanied by changes in actin-based membrane architecture, we examined the cortical actin cytoskeleton. Bx7 mutant plasmatocytes (Fig. 5D,E) and the haemocyte-specific Beadex knockdown plasmatocytes (He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi) (Fig. 5J) displayed a significant decrease in lamellipodium area compared to that in the He-GAL4/+ controls. The UAS-BxRNAi/+ transgene-only control showed no significant difference in lamellipodium area from He-Gal4/+ (Fig. 5I), confirming the specificity of the phenotype. Critically, cell area was not significantly different between He-Gal4>UAS-BxRNAi knockdown haemocytes and controls (Fig. S2A), confirming that the reduction in lamellipodium area reflects a genuine change in actin cytoskeletal architecture and is not attributable to differences in overall cell size. These results indicate that Beadex modulates phagocytosis by regulating actin dynamics required for lamellipodium formation and phagocytic cup extension.

Beadex regulates the expression of profilin, and Profilin is required for efficient phagocytosis

Phagocytosis begins with receptors on the cell membrane recognising foreign molecules, which activate various signalling pathways that lead to the activation of actin-regulatory proteins. These proteins, such as Ena, Fascin (also known as Singed or Sn), Rho1 and Profilin, facilitate the formation of lamellipodia (Hao et al., 2018; Davidson et al., 2019). The RNA-sequencing data show changes in the expression of many actin-regulatory genes. Therefore, we hypothesised that Beadex might directly affect the expression of these actin-associated genes and hence regulate phagocytosis.

To test this, we assessed the expression levels of actin regulators in Beadex loss-of-function mutants. The Beadex hypomorphic mutant (Bx7) showed a severe reduction in the levels of profilin, which encodes an actin monomer delivery protein, with no changes observed in the genes encoding bacterial recognition receptors (NimC1, Sr-CI, Dscam1) (Fig. 6A). Consistent with this, RNAi-mediated Beadex knockdown in haemocytes also resulted in a similar reduction in profilin expression (Fig. 6B). We also observed elevated ena mRNA levels, consistent with a compensatory upregulation of barbed-end capping activity in response to reduced Profilin-mediated actin monomer delivery (Fig. 6B). This was confirmed at the protein level by immunoblotting, which showed reduced Profilin levels upon Beadex knockdown (Fig. 6C,D). However, we observed a reduction in Profilin levels upon Beadex overexpression in haemocytes, which was unexpected and might reflect a dose-dependent qualitative switch in Beadex transcriptional activity, consistent with the known context-dependence of LMO family proteins, which can act as either activators or repressors depending on their interaction partners. This observation warrants further investigation.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Beadex regulates actin-regulated genes and protein expression. (A) Relative expression levels of receptor and downstream actin-regulatory genes in the larval haemocytes of w1118 and Bx7 mutants, showing a significant reduction in profilin expression levels. Bars show mean±s.d. (B) Relative gene expression levels of several actin regulators in He-GAL4/+ controls and Beadex knockdown (He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi) larval haemocytes, confirming the successful knockdown of Beadex and the downregulation of profilin. (C) Western blot analysis of Profilin (Chic) protein levels in haemocytes from He-GAL4/+ control, He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi knockdown and He-GAL4>UAS-Bx overexpression larvae. Note that bands below 20 kDa were not individually resolved on the gel, and the Profilin band (expected size of ∼15 kDa) corresponds to the unresolved 15, 10 and 5 kDa molecular mass markers. (D) Quantification of the western blot, showing a significant reduction in Profilin protein upon Beadex knockdown and overexpression in haemocytes. Band intensity was quantified from three independent biological replicates; full unprocessed membrane images for all three replicates are provided in Fig. S5. The graph represents the mean of three independent biological replicates (N=3). Data were analysed using ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test. Asterisks denote statistical significance: *P<0.05; **P<0.01.

We next assessed whether overexpression of profilin (chic) could rescue the phagocytosis defect observed upon Beadex knockdown in haemocytes (Cg-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi). Beadex knockdown using Cg-GAL4 resulted in a significant reduction in the phagocytic index compared to Cg-GAL4/+ controls, whereas the transgene-only control (UAS-BxRNAi/+) showed no significant difference from Cg-GAL4/+, confirming that the phagocytosis defect is GAL4-driven (Fig. S3A–C,H). To rule out concerns of GAL4 titration in the rescue genotype, we confirmed by qRT-PCR that Cg-GAL4>UAS-chic; UAS-BxRNAi haemocytes showed significant Beadex downregulation (<0.5-fold, P<0.05) and robust profilin overexpression (∼4.4-fold, P<0.01) compared to Beadex knockdown (Cg-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi) haemocytes (Fig. S3D,E).

Overexpression of profilin in the Beadex knockdown background restored the phagocytic index to control levels (no statistically significant difference versus Cg-GAL4/+) and a slight increase over Beadex knockdown (Cg-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi), confirming partial rescue and that the phagocytic defects might be because of reduced profilin levels upon Beadex knockdown in haemocytes (Fig. S3H). Notably, profilin overexpression alone (Cg-GAL4>UAS-chic) and profilin knockdown alone (Cg-GAL4>UAS-chicRNAi) significantly reduced the phagocytic index compared with Cg-GAL4/+ controls (Fig. S3F,H). This demonstrates that Profilin acts as a dosage-sensitive regulator of phagocytic efficiency, where both insufficient and excess Profilin disrupt the precise actin polymerisation dynamics required for phagocytic cup formation (Pernier et al., 2016). Too little Profilin limits actin monomer availability for filament elongation; too much Profilin sequesters G-actin from branching complexes such as Arp2/3, impairing the dendritic actin networks needed for lamellipodium extension and particle engulfment. Interestingly, chicRNAi also reduced Beadex transcript levels (Fig. S3G), suggesting the possibility of a feedback mechanism whereby the actin cytoskeletal state influences Beadex expression. This observation warrants future investigation.

Beadex overexpression in haemocytes produces pathogen-specific effects on host survival through immunopathological mechanisms

Having established that Beadex controls plasmatocyte differentiation and phagocytic capacity, we asked whether Beadex function in haemocytes influences host survival during bacterial infection. As Beadex knockdown did not significantly affect survival (addressed below), we also asked whether dysregulated Beadex expression, modelling the gain-of-function scenario analogous to LMO2 overexpression in haematological malignancies, alters the immune response to infection in a pathogen-specific manner. We assessed the infection susceptibility of He-GAL4/+, He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi and He-GAL4>UAS-Bx flies following septic injury with the Gram-negative extracellular pathogen E. coli and the facultative intracellular pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.

Strikingly, overexpression of Beadex in haemocytes (He-GAL4>UAS-Bx) produced opposing outcomes depending on the pathogen. Upon E. coli infection, He-GAL4>UAS-Bx flies showed significantly improved survival compared to that of He-GAL4/+ controls (Fig. 7A), suggesting that Beadex overexpression enhances the immune response against this extracellular pathogen. In striking contrast, He-GAL4>UAS-Bx flies showed dramatically reduced survival upon Salmonella infection, with a median survival of 7.5 days post infection compared to controls (log-rank test, P<0.0001; Fig. 7B). The survival data for He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi flies (Fig. 7A) showed no significant difference from controls upon either E. coli or Salmonella infection, despite the phagocytosis defect documented in these flies. We propose that this normal survival likely reflects the well-established redundancy between cellular and humoral immunity in Drosophila; a partial reduction in phagocytic capacity can be compensated by maintained AMP-mediated killing, particularly against extracellular pathogens. This interpretation is consistent with published work showing that phagocytosis and humoral immunity operate as parallel defence layers in Drosophila (Lemaitre and Hoffmann, 2007; Elrod-Erickson et al., 2000), and that survival after bacterial infection does not require fully intact phagocytosis when humoral responses are intact.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Beadex overexpression impairs host survival but not bacterial clearance. (A,B) Survival curve of 5- to 7-day-old adult control flies (He-GAL4/+) and Beadex knockdown (He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi) and overexpression (He-GAL4>UAS-Bx) genotypes following infection with (A) Escherichia coli and (B) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (n=100 adult flies, N=3 independent biological replicates). I, infected; UI, uninfected. The survival data for 100 flies were analysed for each genotype, and bar graphs show the mean of three independent biological replicates. Survival curves were analysed using log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. (C) Relative expression levels of genes encoding the antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) Drosocin and Cecropin (Cecropin A1, Cecropin A2 and Cecropin C) in whole flies 6 h after Salmonella infection. The data show significantly reduced levels of AMPs in the Beadex overexpression condition (N=3 independent biological replicates). (D) Relative gene expression levels of Drosocin and Cecropin in haemocytes from uninfected and infected He-GAL4/+ and He-GAL4>UAS-Bx flies at 6 h post Salmonella infection. (E) Relative gene expression levels of Drosocin and Cecropin in fat body from the same genotypes and conditions. Bars represent mean±s.d. of three biological replicates. Near-zero values in uninfected groups reflect baseline AMP expression and are shown on a log scale. Gene expression levels were analysed using unpaired t-test with Welch's correction. Asterisks denote statistical significance: ns, not significant; *P<0.05, **P<0.01. (F) Bacterial load (colony forming units, CFU) in control and Beadex-overexpressing flies measured at different time points after Salmonella infection, showing no significant difference between the two genotypes. n=10 adult flies, statistical significance was analysed using a two-way ANOVA with Sidak's multiple-comparison test.

Given the severe susceptibility of Beadex-overexpressing flies to Salmonella, we tested whether this reflected a failure to control bacterial infection. Contrary to this expectation, the expression levels of genes encoding AMPs in whole flies (Drosocin) were significantly reduced (Fig. 7C), whereas the haemocytes and the fat body produced AMPs at levels equivalent to controls (Fig. 7D,E). The discordance between reduced whole-animal Drosocin levels and normal haemocyte and fat body AMP levels is consistent with the model proposed by Bosch et al. (2019), in which haemocytes relay infection signals to respiratory epithelia to drive systemic Drosocin expression via Imd/Upd3 signalling. As Beadex regulates the Imd pathway via Dredd caspase (Chatterjee et al., 2026 preprint), its overexpression in haemocytes might disrupt this inter-tissue relay, reducing respiratory epithelial Drosocin expression while leaving fat body AMP production intact. Furthermore, colony-forming unit counts in Beadex-overexpressing flies at 6 days post infection were similar to those in control flies (Fig. 7F). Together, these data indicate that mortality in He-GAL4>UAS-Bx flies upon Salmonella infection is not due to failure of bacterial clearance.

To identify the immunopathological mechanism, we assessed haemocyte dynamics in circulation during infection. Haemocyte counts in He-GAL4>UAS-Bx, and He-GAL4/+ flies at baseline and at 24 and 48 h post Salmonella infection revealed a striking sex-specific response (Fig. S4A,B). In males, He-GAL4 UAS-Bx flies showed higher haemocyte counts at 48 h of infection than uninfected flies. In females, He-GAL4>UAS-Bx flies showed a dramatic and significant increase in circulating haemocyte numbers at both 24 h (P<0.0001) and 48 h (P<0.01) post infection compared to the uninfected He-GAL4>UAS-Bx flies, whereas infected control females showed a significant increase only at 48 h post infection (Fig. S4B). This infection-induced increase in circulating haemocytes suggests a massive mobilisation of sessile haemocytes in Beadex-overexpressing females, likely driven by exaggerated immune activation. Importantly, following 6 h of Salmonella infection, He-GAL4>UAS-Bx haemocytes did not show significant differences in phagocytic index or lamellipodium area compared to that in He-GAL4/+ controls (Fig. S4D,E), indicating that the immunopathological phenotype upon Salmonella infection is not a consequence of altered baseline haemocyte phagocytic activity.

We further assessed eiger expression, the Drosophila TNF homologue, as a marker of systemic immune activation. eiger transcript levels were significantly upregulated in He-GAL4>UAS-Bx flies at both 6 h (P<0.01) and 24 h (P<0.01) post-Salmonella infection compared to both uninfected controls and infected He-GAL4/+ flies (Fig. S3F). Notably, eiger was not significantly elevated in infected He-GAL4/+ flies at 6 h, confirming that the elevated eiger response is specifically driven by Beadex overexpression in haemocytes. Prophenoloxidase (PPO) enzymatic activity was not significantly different between genotypes at 6 h post infection, indicating that mortality is not mediated through the melanisation cascade (Fig. S4C). Together, these data support a model in which Beadex overexpression hyperactivates eiger signalling in haemocytes upon Salmonella infection, driving systemic immunopathology and host death, independent of bacterial burden.

DISCUSSION

This study identifies Beadex, encoding the D. melanogaster LMO2 homologue, as a key transcriptional regulator that regulates two aspects of haemocyte biology: plasmatocyte differentiation in the lymph gland and the regulation of phagocytic machinery in mature plasmatocytes through control of actin dynamics. At the level of host immunity, Beadex overexpression in haemocytes produces pathogen-specific outcomes beneficial reactions against an extracellular pathogen but immunopathological responses during intracellular infection, through a mechanism involving eiger hyperactivation. Together, these findings establish Beadex as a multifunctional transcriptional hub in myeloid cell biology with parallels to vertebrate LMO2 function.

Our lymph gland data demonstrate that Beadex is required for normal plasmatocyte differentiation. Loss of Beadex function in Bx7 mutants reduces lymph gland primary lobe size and P1-positive plasmatocyte area without affecting the Domeless-positive progenitor pool, indicating a specific requirement at the progenitor-to-plasmatocyte transition. The observation that Beadex knockdown in the intermediate zone increases plasmatocyte area, rather than the decrease seen in the CZ, suggests that Beadex plays a zone-specific role: suppressing premature differentiation of progenitors in the intermediate zone while promoting terminal differentiation in the CZ. The transcriptomic data, showing over 1000 differentially expressed genes upon Beadex knockdown in mature haemocytes, are consistent with Beadex acting as a broad transcriptional regulator. Protein–protein interaction data from Drosophila S2 cells show that Beadex interacts with BAP60 and Osa, components of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complex (Guruharsha et al., 2012), raising the possibility that Beadex coordinates differentiation-related gene programmes through SWI/SNF-mediated chromatin accessibility. Testing this model directly in lymph gland progenitors represents an important direction for future work. Additionally, our previous work demonstrated that Beadex regulates crystal cell numbers through regulation of the Pannier–Ush complex (Chatterjee et al., 2019); as STAT signalling regulates Pannier expression in the CZ to control plasmatocyte development (Minakhina et al., 2011), Beadex might act as a node linking STAT–Pannier signalling to broader chromatin-level control of lymph gland differentiation.

The RNA-sequencing data provide additional insight into how Beadex controls phagocytic function in mature haemocytes. Beadex knockdown downregulates a set of cytoskeletal regulators, including profilin, Rac2 and ArpC1, as well as phagosome-associated pathways. This transcriptional signature directly predicts the functional defects we observed: reduced lamellipodium area and impaired phagocytic efficiency. The downregulation of CecropinB, Croquemort (Crq) (Fig. 4C) and vesicle trafficking regulators further underscores the broad role of Beadex in coordinating multiple aspects of the phagocytic programme.

Our molecular experiments establish profilin as the key target of Beadex-dependent phagocytic regulation. Profilin facilitates actin polymerisation by replenishing the pool of ATP-bound actin monomers and regulates the balance between free G-actin and polymerised F-actin (Pernier et al., 2016). The bidirectional sensitivity of phagocytosis to Profilin levels is also seen in our results, wherein both profilin knockdown and profilin overexpression impair phagocytic index and lamellipodium area, and are consistent with Profilin acting as a dosage-sensitive regulator of the actin dynamics required for phagocytic cup formation (Davey and Moens, 2020; Pernier et al., 2016). Interestingly, although LMO2 in breast cancer cells has been reported to promote metastasis through cytoplasmic interactions with the Arp2/3 complex and Profilin (Liu et al., 2017), we find that Beadex in Drosophila haemocytes predominantly localises to the nucleus, pointing toward a transcriptional mode of action. This context-dependent subcellular localisation might reflect the functional versatility of LMO family proteins across cell types and disease contexts.

The infection data reveal a striking pathogen-specific duality in the consequences of Beadex overexpression, reflecting the fundamentally different infection strategies of E. coli and Salmonella. Against E. coli, an extracellular pathogen effectively controlled by haemocyte activation and AMP production, Beadex overexpression in haemocytes is protective, improving survival. Salmonella, a facultative intracellular pathogen that resides within haemocytes, the same overexpression is lethal, despite equivalent bacterial clearance. Our data show that Beadex-overexpressing flies exhibit significantly elevated eiger transcript levels at 6 and 24 h post Salmonella infection, whereas PPO activity remains unaffected, suggesting eiger/TNF-driven immunopathology rather than melanisation as the mechanism of death. This is consistent with the established model, in which host-produced eiger, rather than uncontrolled bacterial proliferation, drives mortality in Salmonella-infected flies (Brandt et al., 2004). The sex-specific increase in circulating haemocyte numbers in Beadex-overexpressing females at 24 and 48 h post infection is consistent with massive mobilisation of the sessile haemocyte compartment driven by exaggerated immune activation (Zettervall et al., 2004). Females are disproportionately affected owing to their larger sessile haemocyte reservoir, making them inherently more sensitive to perturbations in haemocyte pool dynamics (Vlisidou and Wood, 2015). The reduction in whole-fly Drosocin expression in Beadex-overexpressing flies, despite normal fat body AMP production, might be because of the disruption of the haemocyte-to-respiratory-epithelium immune signalling relay described by Bosch et al. (2019), further supporting the idea that Beadex overexpression dysregulates inter-tissue immune communication rather than simply abolishing AMP production.

Functional parallels with vertebrate haematopoiesis strengthen the translational relevance of these findings. LMO2 forms a complex with LDB1 that regulates haematopoietic stem cell maintenance and acute myeloid leukaemia cell proliferation (Cleveland et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2023). The Drosophila S2 interactome data show that Beadex interacts with Chip (Chi), the fly homologue of LDB1 (Guruharsha et al., 2012; Milán et al., 1998), suggesting a conserved LMO–LDB1 regulatory axis from flies to humans. Our preliminary observations of nuclear LMO2 localisation in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages and human THP-1 cells are consistent with a conserved, immune-specific nuclear function of LMO2 family proteins, distinct from their cytoplasmic motility-promoting roles in epithelial cancers (our unpublished data, Prof. Upendra Nongthomba's laboratory). A thorough characterisation of LMO2 in vertebrate macrophage function represents a compelling future direction informed by the mechanistic framework established here.

In conclusion, this study establishes Beadex as a key nuclear transcriptional regulator linking haemocyte differentiation, cytoskeletal gene expression, and host immune defence. By characterising the transcriptional programme downstream of Beadex, demonstrating its requirement for Profilin-dependent phagocytosis, and revealing pathogen-specific consequences of its dysregulation, our findings provide a mechanistic framework for understanding how LIM-only proteins coordinate myeloid cell biology with potential implications for understanding LMO2 function in human immune cells and haematological disease. Taken together, our data show that Beadex controls three distinct but interconnected outputs of haemocyte biology: cell fate (plasmatocyte differentiation in the lymph gland), cell function (phagocytic capacity via transcriptional control of profilin) and cell behaviour during infection (immune activation threshold via eiger signalling). These are not three independent roles, but they are three manifestations of a single transcriptional programme. In the absence of Beadex, progenitor differentiation is impaired, mature haemocytes lose cytoskeletal competence for phagocytosis and, when Beadex is overexpressed, the immune activation programme is dysregulated in a pathogen-specific manner. We propose that LMO2 performs an analogous tripartite function in vertebrate myeloid cells, coordinating differentiation, effector function and immune activation threshold, and that understanding this conserved programme will be important for deciphering how LMO2 dysregulation contributes to both haematological malignancy and myeloid immune dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Drosophila melanogaster strains and maintenance

Flies were reared on cornmeal agar medium, maintained on a 12-h/12-h day/night cycle at 25°C unless specified otherwise. All knockdown and overexpression crosses were performed at 29°C. The following fly lines were used: Canton-S [Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC) #1], Bx7 (Kairamkonda and Nongthomba, 2014), He-GAL4 (BDSC #8900), UAS-BxRNAi [Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC) #2917], UAS-Bx [a gift from Stephen M. Cohen, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany and Centro de Biologáa Molecular Severo Ochoa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (CSIC–UAM), Madrid, Spain], Cg-GAL4 (BDSC #7011), UAS-chic (kind gift from Prof. Stéphane Noselli, Institut de Biologie Valrose, France; originally described in Verheyen and Cooley, 1994), Domeless-GAL4; UAS-GFP (kind gift from Dr. Rohan J. Khadilkar, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Mumbai, India), HmlΔ-GAL>UAS-GFP (BDSC #30140), Pxn-GAL4 (BDSC #600223), Bx-GAL4 (BDSC #84280), UAS-chicRNAi (BDSC #34523), UAS-Bx-RB FLAG-HA (generated by site-specific PhiC31 integrase-mediated transgenesis at the attP40 landing site on chromosome 3, expressing the Beadex-RB isoform with a C-terminal FLAG–HA dual tag; generated at the National Centre for Biological Sciences Fly Facility, Bengaluru, India), UAS-GFP, Antp-GAL4, Srp-GAL4 and CHIZ-GAL4 (kind gift from Prof. Maneesha Inamdar, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bengaluru, India). A complete list of all transgenic lines, GAL4 drivers, their expression domains and the figures in which they appear is provided in Table S1.

Plasmatocyte counting

HmlΔ-GAL>UAS-GFP was used as a reporter to count larval plasmatocytes. Each larva was placed in a drop of Schneider's medium (SM) on a glass slide, and the cuticle was pinched to release the haemocytes. The dissected larvae were transferred to the second drop of SM and scraped to remove the sessile haemocytes (Petraki et al., 2015).

In 5-day-old adult flies, HmlΔ-GAL>UAS-GFP was used as a fluorescent reporter to mark plasmatocytes, and the number of GFP-positive cells in the thorax, three legs and head on one side of the fly was counted as described previously (Bosch et al., 2019).

In cases where haemocytes were not marked with the GFP reporter, a haemocytometer was used to count the number of circulating haemocytes present in the haemolymph of larval and adult flies, respectively.

Ex vivo phagocytosis assay

Haemolymph was collected from five third instar larvae of each strain – He-GAL4/+, He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi, w1118 and Bx7 – by making a slit on the posterior side of the larvae in SM containing 1 nM phenylthiourea (PTU) using sharp needles. The collected haemolymph was allowed to attach to the coverslips for 30 min, followed by a 1× PBS wash. Heat-killed E. coli (K-12) GFP-tagged bacterial pellet and heat-killed Salmonella were resuspended in SM, and 100 μl of the suspension was added to a coverslip kept on ice for 25 min for He-GAL4/+, He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi, w1118 and Bx7, followed by a 1× PBS wash. Warm SM containing PTU was added to the coverslip, which was then incubated at 29°C for 25 min for E. coli and 6 h for Salmonella, followed by a 1× PBS wash. The bacterial cell mixture was fixed by adding 4% paraformaldehyde onto the coverslip for 10 min at room temperature, followed by a 1× PBS wash. Cells were then preincubated in PBS containing 0.3% Triton-X 100 for 20 min and then incubated with phalloidin (1:250, Phalloidin Atto 565, 94072, Sigma-Aldrich) and Hoechst 33342 (1:1000; H3570 Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h. After two 1× PBS washes, the coverslip was mounted on a slide with a drop of mounting medium, and the edges of the coverslip were sealed. Images were obtained using the Leica SP8 confocal microscopy system. The phagocytic index was calculated by manually counting ingested bacteria per cell using three-dimensional (3D) rendering in Imaris Viewer (Oxford Instruments).

Dissection and staining of lymph glands

Wandering third instar larvae were staged properly by allowing the mated females to lay eggs on an egg-laying plate for 12 h. Following hatching, the synchronised larvae were collected every 3 h. The lymph gland was dissected by placing the larvae on a drop of PBS on a slide. Following dissection, the whole head complex containing brain and lymph gland attached to the mouth hook was taken and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 25 min, followed by three washes with 1× PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 for 15 min each. This was followed by blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), then incubation with primary antibodies – anti-P1 (1:150, kind gift from Prof. Istvan Ando, Hungarian Research Network, Hungary), anti-GFP (1:100, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, DHSB-1D2), anti-HA (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific-26183) and anti-FLAG (1:100, Cell Signalling Technology, CST-2368T). Following overnight incubation, tissues were washed three times and incubated with the secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Secondary antibodies used were goat anti-mouse-IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (1:250; Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11001), goat anti-mouse-IgG Alexa Fluor 568 (1:250; Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11004) and goat anti-rabbit-IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (1:250; Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11034). Following incubation, tissues were again washed, mounted in mounting medium (propyl gallate and glycerol), and imaged using a Leica Falcon confocal microscope.

Image analysis and quantification

Analysis was performed using ImageJ-win64 and Imaris Viewer (10.2.0). Cell area was calculated by creating a z-stack projection (maximum intensity), selecting the cell boundaries with the freehand selection tool, and measuring the area in ImageJ. The phagocytosis index was calculated by manually counting the ingested bacteria and viewing the cell in 3D in Imaris. The lamellipodium area was calculated by creating a z-stack projection (maximum intensity), then selecting the lamellipodium area using the freehand selection tool, and subtracting the non-lamellipodium area to obtain the net lamellipodium area. The lamellipodium was defined as the peripheral actin-rich protrusion surrounding the cell body, as demarcated by the outermost boundary of phalloidin fluorescence; the central cell body region was excluded from this selection. For quantification of F-actin fluorescence intensity within the lamellipodium, the mean grey value of phalloidin signal was measured from three to four regions of equal size within the demarcated lamellipodium area per cell using the rectangle selection tool in ImageJ. The average mean grey value across these regions was then corrected by subtracting the mean grey value of an equivalently sized background region outside the cell, to account for non-specific fluorescence.

Septic injury for infection

Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium were used for septic Gram-negative bacterial infections. Bacteria were cultured overnight in LB-ampicillin medium, pelleted and resuspended in 50 μl of sterile water. Flies were infected in the thorax using a sharpened tungsten needle dipped in the concentrated bacterial suspension or sterile water for control; survival rates of flies and colony-forming units (CFUs) after the treatment were measured under identical conditions for all test genotypes. One prick with the tungsten needle was approximately 200 CFU/fly for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and 292 CFU/fly for E. coli.

Prophenoloxidase enzyme activity assay

For the PPO assay, haemolymph was isolated from adult flies (described previously; Yadav et al., 2025) following 6 days of infection. Uninfected flies were used as controls. The collected haemolymph was transferred on ice, and 2.5× protease inhibitor (P8340, Sigma-Aldrich) was added, followed by estimation of protein concentration using the Bradford method. For setting up the PPO assay, 15 µg of haemolymph was mixed with 5 mM CaCl2 and 160 µl of L-DOPA solution (20 mM prepared in 1× PBS, pH 6.6). A solution with only L-DOPA was used as substrate control. The samples were incubated at 29°C for 30 minutes, and absorbance was measured using a plate reader at 492nm at 2-min intervals.

qRT-PCR

RNA was isolated using the TRIzol method of RNA isolation either from whole adult fly, adult fly fat body or haemocytes and from third instar larval haemocytes. Briefly, for isolating fat body from adult flies, flies were placed in a drop of PBS, the abdomens were removed from the upper part of the body, opened to remove the gut, ovaries and other organs, and the cuticles attached to the fat tissue were collected and stored in TRIzol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich).

For collecting haemocytes from adult flies, 20 flies were taken in a 0.6 ml Eppendorf tube in which a hole had been created at the bottom to collect the haemolymph and placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube. These flies were then covered in glass beads and centrifuged at 9000 g for 20 min at 4°C. This was repeated twice for a total of 40 flies, and the collected haemolymph was dissolved in 300 μl of TRIzol reagent.

For collecting haemocytes from larvae, they were placed in a drop of SM containing PTU and their cuticle was pinched using a needle to release the haemolymph. The collected haemolymph was centrifuged at 1000 g for 5 min at 4°C to pellet the haemocytes, which were then dissolved in 300 μl of TRIzol reagent.

RNA was isolated following the manufacturer's instructions, and the quantity and quality of the isolated RNA were assessed using the Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was treated with 1 U of DNase I (EN0521, Thermo Fisher Scientific) to remove DNA contamination and converted into cDNA using RevertAid reverse transcriptase (6110A-PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, Takara Bio). qRT-PCR was performed using New England Biolabs SYBR mix on an Applied Biosystem QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System. Expression values were normalised to control rp49.

The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S2.

Analysis of whole-genome mRNA expression in haemocytes by RNA sequencing

RNA-sequencing analysis was performed on two biological replicates of the test (He-GAL4>UAS-BxRNAi) and the control (He-GAL4/+) samples. The RNA was isolated from approximately 200 larval haemocytes as described above using TRIzol. The isolated total RNA was quantified using the Nanodrop spectrophotometer. The integrity of RNA was evaluated on a 1% agarose gel. Raw reads were checked for base quality and adapter content using FastQC (v0.12.1; https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Fastp (0.23.2; Chen et al., 2018) was used to remove adapter content and trim low-quality bases. The reads were mapped to the D. melanogaster BDGP6.46 reference genome using the STAR aligner (Dobin et al., 2013). The aligned genes were quantified using HTSeq (Anders et al., 2015). The genes showing differential expression between the RNAi samples and control samples were analysed using the R package DESeq (Love et al., 2014). A volcano plot was generated using the R package EnhancedVolcano (doi:10.18129/B9.bioc.EnhancedVolcano). GSEA of differentially expressed genes with P<0.05 and log2FC of 1 between Beadex knockdown and control haemocyte samples was performed using the PANGEA tool (Hu et al., 2023). The RNA-sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number PRJNA1338986.

Western blotting

Haemocytes were isolated from third instar Drosophila larvae as described previously. The isolated haemocytes were resuspended in 1× RIPA buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and 1 mM EDTA] containing protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 mM PMSF. The cells were mechanically lysed and cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 15 min. The protein concentration was estimated using the Bradford protein assay (786-012 CB Protein Assay, G-Biosciences). For western blot analysis, 50 μg of protein was denatured in 5× Laemmli buffer at 95°C for 5 min and separated on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. A PAGEmark Tricolour Plus Prestained Protein Ladder (5–245 kDa range; G-Biosciences) was run alongside samples for molecular mass estimation; under these conditions, the 25 kDa and 20 kDa marker bands were clearly resolved, whereas the 15, 10 and 5 kDa bands migrated close together and were not individually distinguishable. Following electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane at 200 mA constant current for 2 h. The membrane was stained with Ponceau S and then blocked in 5% BSA for 1 h. The membrane was then incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody anti-Profilin (Chi 1J, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, 1:100). After washing with TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, the membrane was incubated with the appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Protein bands were visualised using an enhanced chemiluminescence ECL reagent (1705061, Bio-Rad) and detected with the ChemiDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad). The Profilin band (∼15 kDa) was identified based on its expected molecular mass and its migration position immediately below the resolved 20 kDa marker, within this unresolved low-molecular-mass region. The mean grey value or intensity of bands was quantified in ImageJ and normalised with the total protein intensity observed following Ponceau S staining. Full unprocessed membrane images for the representative blot presented in Fig. 6C and for all additional biological replicate blots used for quantification in Fig. 6D are provided in Fig. S5.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10.0. For comparisons between exactly two groups, Student's unpaired two-tailed t-test was used. For comparisons among three or more groups, one-way ANOVA was used with an appropriate post-hoc test: Dunnett's multiple comparisons test, which compares each experimental group to a single control group, or Tukey's multiple comparisons test, which compares all pairwise group comparisons. Survival data were analysed using the log-Rank (Mantel–Cox) test. All tests were two-tailed, and a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. unless otherwise stated. The specific statistical test used for each dataset is indicated in the corresponding figure legend.

Use of artificial intelligence tools

Claude (Anthropic), a large language model, was used to assist with revising the manuscript for clarity, logical flow and readability. All experimental work, data analysis, interpretation of results and scientific conclusions are entirely the work of the authors. No artificial intelligence tools were used in data collection, analysis, figure generation or code writing.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary information
DOI: 10.1242/joces.264524_sup1

Acknowledgements

We thank the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru, for institutional support and research facilities. We are grateful to Prof. Stephen M. Cohen (European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany and Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain), Prof. Stéphane Noselli (Institut de Biologie Valrose, France), Dr Rohan J. Khadilkar (Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Mumbai), Dr Tina Mukherjee (Institute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, Bengaluru), Dr Sveta Chakrabarti (Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Bengaluru), Prof. Subhash Chandra Lakhotia (Banaras Hindu University) and Prof. Maneesha Inamdar (Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bengaluru) for generously providing fly lines used in this study. We thank Prof. Dipshikha Chakravortty (Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, IISc) for kindly sharing bacterial pathogens used in this study. We also thank the National Centre for Biological Sciences Fly Facility for generating transgenic lines, and all members of our laboratory for valuable discussions and technical assistance.

Footnotes

Author contributions

Conceptualization: S.J., U.N.; Data curation: S.J., K.S., V.S.; Formal analysis: S.J., K.S., V.S.; Funding acquisition: U.N.; Investigation: S.J.; Methodology: S.J.; Project administration: U.N.; Resources: S.J., U.N.; Software: S.J.; Supervision: U.N.; Validation: S.J.; Visualization: S.J.; Writing – original draft: S.J.; Writing – review & editing: S.J., U.N.

Funding

S.J. acknowledges the Prime Minister's Research Fellowship (PMRF), Government of India (PMRF ID: 0201055), for financial support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Open Access funding provided by Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. Deposited in PMC for immediate release.

Data and resource availability

The RNA-sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number PRJNA1338986. All other primary data generated in this study and details of resources can be found within the article and its supplementary information. Further inquiries or requests for additional information may be addressed to the corresponding author.

Peer review history

The peer review history is available online at https://journals.biologists.com/jcs/lookup/doi/10.1242/jcs.264524.reviewer-comments.pdf

References

  1. Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. and Huber, W. (2015). HTSeq- a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166-169. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Apidianakis, Y., Mindrinos, M. N., Xiao, W., Lau, G. W., Baldini, R. L., Davis, R. W. and Rahme, L. G. (2005). Profiling early infection responses: Pseudomonas aeruginosa eludes host defenses by suppressing antimocrobial peptide gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2573-2578. 10.1073/pnas.0409588102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barger, S. R., Vorselen, D., Gauthier, N. C., Theriot, J. A. and Krendel, M. (2022). F-actin organization and target constriction during primary macrophage phagocytosis is balanced by competing activity of myosin-I and myosin-II. Mol. Biol. Cell 33, br24. 10.1091/MBC.E22-06-0210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bosch, P., Makhijani, K., Herboso, L., Gold, K. S., Baginsky, R., Woodcock, K. J., Alexander, B., Kukar, K., Corcoran, S., Jacobs, T.et al. (2019). Adult Drosophila Lack Hematopoiesis but Rely on a Blood Cell Reservoir at the Respiratory Epithelia to Relay Infection Signals to Surrounding Tissues. Dev. Cell 51, 787-803.e5. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.10.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brandt, S. M., Dionne, M. S., Khush, R. S., Pham, L. N., Vigdal, T. J. and Schneider, D. S. (2004). Secreted bacterial effectors and host-produced Eiger/TNF drive death in a salmonella-infected fruit fly. PLoS Biol. 2, e418. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cattenoz, P. B., Sakr, R., Pavlidaki, A., Delaporte, C., Riba, A., Molina, N., Hariharan, N., Mukherjee, T. and Giangrande, A. (2020). Temporal specificity and heterogeneity of Drosophila immune cells. EMBO J. 39, e104486. 10.15252/embj.2020104486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapman, J. and Zhang, Y. (2023). Histology, Hematopoiesis. StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534246/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chatterjee, A., Aavula, K. and Nongthomba, U. (2019). Beadex, a homologue of the vertebrate LIM domain only protein, is a novel regulator of crystal cell development in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 98, 107. 10.1007/s12041-019-1154-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chatterjee, A., Jain, S., Pathak, D. and Nongthomba, U. (2026). Beadex regulates Dredd-dependent innate immune signalling in Drosophila melanogaster. Preprint available at SSRN. 10.2139/ssrn.5994530 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. and Gu, J. (2018). fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884-i890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cleveland, S. M., Smith, S., Tripathi, R., Mathias, E. M., Goodings, C., Elliott, N., Peng, D., El-Rifai, W., Yi, D., Chen, X.et al. (2013). Lmo2 induces hematopoietic stem cell like features in T-cell progenitor cells prior to leukemia. Stem Cells 31, 882. 10.1002/stem.1345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davey, R. J. and Moens, P. D. (2020). Profilin: many facets of a small protein. Biophys. Rev. 12, 827. 10.1007/s12551-020-00723-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davidson, A. J., Millard, T. H., Evans, I. R. and Wood, W. (2019). Ena orchestrates remodelling within the actin cytoskeleton to drive robust Drosophila macrophage chemotaxis. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs224618. 10.1242/jcs.224618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M. and Gingeras, T. R. (2013). STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15-21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elrod-Erickson, M., Mishra, S. and Schneider, D. (2000). Interactions between the cellular and humoral immune responses in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 10, 781-784. 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00569-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Evans, C. J., Hartenstein, V. and Banerjee, U. (2003). Thicker than blood: conserved mechanisms in drosophila and vertebrate hematopoiesis. Dev. Cell 5, 673-690. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00335-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guruharsha, K. G., Obar, R. A., Mintseris, J., Aishwarya, K., Krishnan, R. T., VijayRaghavan, K. and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (2012). Drosophila Protein interaction Map (DPiM): A paradigm for metazoan protein complex interactions. Fly 6, 246. 10.4161/fly.22108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hao, Y., Yu, S., Luo, F. and Jin, L. H. (2018). Jumu is required for circulating hemocyte differentiation and phagocytosis in Drosophila. Cell Commun Signal. 16, 95. 10.1186/s12964-018-0305-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hirano, K. I., Hosokawa, H., Koizumi, M., Endo, Y., Yahata, T., Ando, K. and Hozumi, K. (2021). LMO2 is essential to maintain the ability of progenitors to differentiate into T-cell lineage in mice. eLife 10, e68227. 10.7554/ELIFE.68227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hu, Y., Comjean, A., Attrill, H., Antonazzo, G., Thurmond, J., Chen, W., Li, F., Chao, T., Mohr, S. E., Brown, N. H.et al. (2023). PANGEA: a new gene set enrichment tool for Drosophila and common research organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, W419-W426. 10.1093/nar/gkad331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kairamkonda, S. and Nongthomba, U. (2014). Beadex function in the motor neurons is essential for female reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 9, e113003. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Latchmansingh, K. A., Wang, X., Verdun, R. E., Marques-Piubelli, M. L., Vega, F., You, M. J., Chapman, J. and Lossos, I. S. (2022). LMO2 expression is frequent in T-lymphoblastic leukemia and correlates with survival, regardless of T-cell stage. Mod. Pathol. 35, 1220-1226. 10.1038/s41379-022-01063-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lemaitre, B. and Hoffmann, J. (2007). The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 697-743. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, Y., Wu, C., Zhu, T. and Sun, W. (2017). LMO2 enhances Lamellipodia/Filopodia formation in basal-type breast cancer cells by mediating ARP3-profilin1 interaction. Med. Sci. Monit. 23, 695. 10.12659/MSM.903261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Love, M. I., Huber, W. and Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 1-21. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lu, L., Wang, J., Fang, F., Guo, A., Jiang, S., Tao, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, K., Zhang, Z.et al. (2023). LMO2 promotes the development of AML through interaction with transcription co-regulator LDB1. Cell Death Dis. 14, 1-15. 10.1038/s41419-023-06039-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Melcarne, C., Lemaitre, B. and Kurant, E. (2019). Phagocytosis in Drosophila: from molecules and cellular machinery to physiology. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 109, 1-12. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Milán, M., Diaz-Benjumea, F. J. and Cohen, S. M. (1998). Beadex encodes an LMO protein that regulates Apterous LIM–homeodomain activity in Drosophila wing development: a model for LMO oncogene function. Genes Dev. 12, 2912. 10.1101/gad.12.18.2912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Minakhina, S., Tan, W. and Steward, R. (2011). JAK/STAT and the GATA factor Pannier control hemocyte maturation and differentiation in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 352, 308-316. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.01.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Morgan, T. H., Bridges, C. B. and Sturtevant, A. H. (1925). The genetics of Drosophila. Bibliographia Genetica, 2 (ed. Lootsy & Kooiman). M. Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pernier, J., Shekhar, S., Jegou, A., Guichard, B. and Carlier, M. F. (2016). Profilin interaction with actin filament barbed end controls dynamic instability, capping, branching, and motility. Dev. Cell 36, 201. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.12.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Petraki, S., Alexander, B. and Brückner, K. (2015). Assaying blood cell populations of the Drosophila melanogaster larva. J. Vis. Exp. 2015, 52733. 10.3791/52733-v [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rougerie, P., Miskolci, V. and Cox, D. (2013). Generation of membrane structures during phagocytosis and chemotaxis of macrophages: role and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Immunol. Rev. 256, 222-239. 10.1111/imr.12118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shoresh, M., Orgad, S., Shmueli, O., Werczberger, R., Gelbaum, D., Abiri, S. and Segal, D. (1998). Overexpression Beadex mutations and loss-of-function heldup-a mutations in Drosophila affect the 3’ regulatory and coding components, respectively, of the Dlmo gene. Genetics 150, 283-299. 10.1093/genetics/150.1.283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith, M. A., Hoffman, L. M. and Beckerle, M. C. (2014). LIM proteins in actin cytoskeleton mechanoresponse. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 575. 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stroschein-Stevenson, S. L., Foley, E., O'Farrell, P. H. and Johnson, A. D. (2005). Identification of Drosophila gene products required for phagocytosis of Candida albicans. PLoS Biol. 4, e4. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Verheyen, E. M. and Cooley, L. (1994). Profilin mutations disrupt multiple actin-dependent processes during Drosophila development. Development 120, 717-728. 10.1242/dev.120.4.717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vlisidou, I. and Wood, W. (2015). Drosophila blood cells and their role in immune responses. FEBS J. 282, 1368-1382. 10.1111/febs.13235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yadav, M., Gupta, J., Chatterjee, D., Mittal, P., Shrivastava, A. and Agrawal, N. (2025). A high-throughput method for isolation of plasmatocytes from hemolymph of adult Drosophila. PloS One 20, e0322707. 10.1371/journal.pone.0322707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yoon, S. H., Cho, B., Lee, D., Kim, H., Shim, J. and Nam, J. W. (2023). Molecular traces of Drosophila hemocytes reveal transcriptomic conservation with vertebrate myeloid cells. PLoS Genet. 19, e1011077. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yu, S., Luo, F., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y. and Jin, L. H. (2022). Drosophila innate immunity involves multiple signaling pathways and coordinated communication between different tissues. Front. Immunol. 13, 905370. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.905370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zeng, C., Justice, N. J., Abdelilah, S., Chan, Y. M., Jan, L. Y. and Jan, Y. N. (1998). The Drosophila LIM-only gene, dLMO, is mutated in Beadex alleles and might represent an evolutionarily conserved function in appendage development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10637. 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zerella, J. R., Homan, C. C., Arts, P., Brown, A. L., Scott, H. S. and Hahn, C. N. (2023). Transcription factor genetics and biology in predisposition to bone marrow failure and hematological malignancy. Front. Oncol. 13, 1183318. 10.3389/fonc.2023.1183318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zettervall, C. J., Anderl, I., Williams, M. J., Palmer, R., Kurucz, E., Ando, I. and Hultmark, D. (2004). A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14192-14197. 10.1073/pnas.0403789101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information
DOI: 10.1242/joces.264524_sup1

Articles from Journal of Cell Science are provided here courtesy of Company of Biologists

RESOURCES