Skip to main content
Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies logoLink to Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies
. 2026 Aug 6;41(2):131–134. doi: 10.15605/jafes.041.02.6165

VIPoma Presenting With Obstructive Jaundice: A Case Report

Sim Yin Ng 1,✉, Ken Seng Chiew 1
PMCID: PMC13616065  PMID: 42802744

Abstract

VIPoma is a rare pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor characterized by the overproduction of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), typically manifesting as watery diarrhea, hypokalaemia and metabolic acidosis. Its presentation can be atypical, complicating diagnosis. We report the case of a 30-year-old male who initially presented with obstructive jaundice and fatigue, with imaging revealing a pancreatic head mass and liver metastases. Histopathological analysis confirmed a lowgrade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. The clinical course was complicated by portal vein thrombosis and metastatic spread. Six months later, the patient developed persistent, refractory watery diarrhea with associated hypokalaemia. Elevated serum VIP levels and Gallium-68 DOTATATE positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) supported the diagnosis of VIPoma. Symptom resolution was achieved with subcutaneous octreotide, followed by transition to monthly long-acting release (LAR) octreotide. Approximately 60% of VIPoma cases are metastatic at the time of diagnosis, as demonstrated in this patient. The case highlighted the diagnostic challenges of VIPoma in the presence of atypical symptoms such as jaundice and absence of initial diarrhea. It also underscores the need for close multidisciplinary collaboration to determine the best course of action and to optimize patient outcomes.

Keywords: VIPoma, diarrhea, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

INTRODUCTION

VIPoma is a rare neuroendocrine tumor (NET) that arises primarily in the pancreas but may also occur elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract. It is most frequently associated with Verner-Morrison syndrome, characterized by the triad of profuse watery diarrhea, hypokalaemia and metabolic acidosis resulting from the overproduction of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP).1 Although chronic diarrhea is the hallmark manifestation, presentation may be subtle or atypical, creating a diagnostic challenge.

We report a 30-year-old male who initially presented with obstructive jaundice and fatigue, suggestive of a primary hepatobiliary or gastrointestinal pathology. However, further investigation revealed a pancreatic mass, which was subsequently diagnosed as a VIP-secreting neuroendocrine tumor. His course was complicated by liver metastases and portal vein thrombosis. The case highlights the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach, including advanced imaging modalities and biochemical testing in patients with atypical presentations of pancreatic NETs. Early recognition and intervention in these complex cases significantly influence therapeutic strategies and patient prognosis.

CASE

A 30-year-old male presented with a 1-week history of progressive jaundice accompanied by dark-colored urine and pale stools. He denied any history of abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting. He had no recent travel, alcohol use, or known liver disease, and his medical history was otherwise unremarkable. Laboratory results showed cholestatic jaundice (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of investigations during first presentation

Investigations Results Unit Normal range
Renal profile
 Urea 2.4 mmol/L 3.2-8.2
 Creatinine 57 mmol/L 49-90
 Sodium 136 mmol/L 136-145
 Potassium 4.2 mmol/L 3.4-4.5
 Calcium 2.4 mmol/L 1.5-3.0
 Phosphate 0.9 mmol/L 0.8-1.7
 Magnesium 1.0 mmol/L 0.66-1.07
 Chloride 103 mmol/L 98-107

Liver function tests
 Total bilirubin 277.9 μmol/L 3-19
 Direct bilirubin 205 μmol/L 0-5
 Alkaline phosphatase 742 U/L 46-116
 Gamma-glutamyl transferase 612 U/L 12-73
 Alanine transaminase 69 U/L 10-49
 Aspartate transaminase 51 U/L 0-34
 Albumin 50 g/L 32-48

Tumor markers
 Carbohydrate Antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) 4.0 U/mL 0-37
 Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) 1.0 ng/mL <5

Hepatobiliary ultrasonography showed a well-defined hypoechoic lesion at the periportal region measuring 3.9 x 4.9 x 4.0 cm, with dilatation of the common bile duct and bilateral intrahepatic ducts. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed a suspected pancreatic carcinoma causing biliary obstruction, with abdominal lymph node and liver metastasis and portal vein thrombosis (Figure 1). Endoscopic ultrasound of the pancreas showed a hypoechoic lesion at the head of pancreas measuring 38 x 35 mm, causing upstream dilatation of the pancreatic duct and common bile duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and metal stenting was performed. Fine-needle biopsy demonstrated a low grade neuroendocrine tumor with mitosis rarely seen and a Ki67 index of 1% - 2% (Figure 2). The patient was referred to oncology to discuss further management but was lost to follow-up.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CT abdomen showed an ill-defined hypodense mass at pancreatic head measuring about 3.0 × 3.5 × 4.2 cm (blue arrow) with distended gallbladder (green arrow) and dilated intrahepatic duct (red arrow).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

FNB head of pancreas: Scanty tumor tissue with neuroendocrine differentiation (A) cytokeratin stain (ck ae1/ae3, 400x); (B) H&E stain (400x); (C) Chromogranin A stain (400x); (D) Synaptophysin stain (400x).

Six months later, he was readmitted with a 2-week history of diarrhea. He reported frequent episodes of watery stools (5-6 times a day) over the past week, accompanied by muscle weakness, fatigue, and unintentional weight loss of approximately 8 kg over the past month. His diarrhea was continuous and had worsened over the past several days. He denied fever, abdominal pain, or intake of any new medications. On examination, he was mildly dehydrated, with dry mucous membranes and a reduced skin turgor. There was mild epigastric tenderness but no palpable masses.

Laboratory testing showed resolution of cholestasis but severe refractory hypokalaemia despite 3 days of intravenous potassium replacement (Table 2). There were normal calcium levels and a mildly elevated chloride level which is atypical as VIPomas are often associated with hypochloraemia due to bicarbonate loss. Stool studies excluded infectious causes, and 24-hour urine 5-hydroxyindoleaceticacid (5-HIAA) was normal. Following endocrinology referral, subcutaneous octreotide was initiated and titrated up to 100 mcg thrice a day, resulting in resolution of symptoms and hypokalaemia within 24 hours.

Table 2.

Summary of investigations during second admission

Investigations Results Unit Normal range
Renal profile
 Urea 4.1 mmolL 3.2-8.2
 Creatinine 74 mmol/L 49-90
 Sodium 144 mmol/L 136-145
 Potassium 1.5 mmol/L 3.4-4.5
 Calcium 2.3 mmol/L 1.5-3.0
 Phosphate 0.8 mmol/L 0.8-1.7
 Magnesium 1.0 mmol/L 0.66-1.07
 Chloride 108 mmol/L 98-107

Liver function tests
 Total bilirubin 19.4 μmol/L 3-19
 Alkaline phosphatase 126 U/L 46-116
 Alanine transaminase 15 U/L 10-49
 Aspartate transaminase 27 U/L 0-34

Others
 Serum VIP 211 pg/mL <86
 24-hour urine 5 HIAA 12.96 μmol/L/day 3.66-42.89
 Serum chromogranin A 96 ug/L <101
 Stool Ova and cyst Negative
 Stool culture and sensitivity No growth

A fasting serum VIP sample obtained before treatment was elevated at 211 pg/mL (normal range <86 pg/mL). PET-CT with Gallium-68 DOTATATE showed a large focal DOTA-octreotide uptake over an ill-defined hypodense lesion at the pancreatic head and portal hepatic lymph node (maximum standardized uptake value, 19.09) measuring 3.34 x 3.06 x 5.51 cm with multifocal uptake in abdomino-pelvic lymph nodes and both hepatic lobes (Figure 3). In the setting of watery diarrhea, hypokalaemia, elevated VIP level, the PET CT results supported the diagnosis of VIPoma.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET-CT images show somatostatin receptor–expressing lesions: (A) adjacent porta hepatis lymph nodes (white arrows); (A, B and C) multiple lesions in both hepatic lobes (red arrows); and (A and C) a large focal lesion in the pancreatic head (blue arrow).

He was then transitioned to long-acting release (LAR) octreotide 20 mg monthly, with an overlap period for symptom control. A multidisciplinary team comprising hepatobiliary surgeons, oncologists, and endocrinologists concluded that curative surgery was not feasible due to metastases and vascular involvement. He remains clinically stable and asymptomatic on octreotide LAR, at subsequent clinic visits and reports satisfaction with the current treatment outcome.

DISCUSSION

VIPoma, a rare pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET), presents a diagnostic challenge due to its often atypical and subtle clinical presentation. The classic syndrome associated with VIPoma, Verner-Morrison syndrome, is characterized by severe watery diarrhea, hypokalaemia, and metabolic acidosis caused by the excessive secretion of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP).¹ Symptoms at diagnosis are often varied and dependent in part on the site of tumors and also on whether the tumors are functioning in nature, which may cause significant delays in diagnosis.2

A recent systematic review of 65 patients with VIPoma reported that watery diarrhea was present in only 54.5% of cases at initial presentation, indicating that a substantial proportion of patients may lack the classic symptoms early in the disease course.3 Furthermore, despite advanced disease, our patient’s serum vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) concentration was only modestly elevated at 211 pg/mL when diarrhea developed, compared with the median serum VIP level of 636 pg/mL reported in the systematic review.3 It is therefore plausible that the patient’s VIP concentration was even lower at initial presentation and below the threshold required to induce clinically significant secretory diarrhea. The subsequent onset of diarrhea may have reflected progressive tumor growth and/or increased hormonal secretory activity over time. Although serial VIP measurements were unavailable to confirm this hypothesis, this explanation is consistent with the patient’s clinical course and highlights the potential variability in the timing and severity of symptom development in VIPoma.

In approximately 60 to 80% of all VIPoma cases described to date, the patient presented with metastases at the initial VIPoma diagnosis.4 The propensity for early metastasis underscores the importance of careful staging and imaging techniques. The metastases most commonly occur in the liver, lymph nodes, bones, and kidney.5 Additionally, the presence of portal vein thrombosis in advanced cases can significantly complicate the clinical picture, leading to further diagnostic uncertainty. Portal vein involvement may contribute to worsening prognosis by causing portal hypertension, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites.6

Radiologic imaging plays a critical role in both the diagnosis and management of VIPomas.7 Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), a sensitive imaging modality for neuroendocrine tumors, has become a cornerstone in localizing the primary tumor and identifying metastatic sites.8 Somatostatin analogues, such as octreotide, bind to the somatostatin receptors on the tumor cells, allowing for detailed visualization of the tumor’s location and metastatic spread. In combination with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, these imaging modalities offer a comprehensive assessment of the tumor’s extent, guiding both surgical and non-surgical treatment strategies. In this case, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy confirmed the presence of a pancreatic mass and liver metastases, confirming the diagnosis of a metastatic VIPoma.

Surgical resection remains the mainstay of therapy for localized VIPomas.9 However, metastatic disease requires a multidisciplinary approach. Somatostatin analogues, particularly octreotide, effectively control diarrhea and electrolyte disturbances by inhibiting VIP secretion, which can improve the quality of life in patients with advanced disease.10 Octreotide has also been shown to reduce tumor burden in some cases. Long-acting formulations of octreotide provide sustained symptom relief and improve treatment adherence, making them a preferred treatment option for many patients.

Overall, the diagnosis and management of VIPomas require a high degree of clinical suspicion, especially in patients with atypical presentations. Elevated serum VIP levels, in conjunction with imaging techniques such as somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, are crucial for confirming the diagnosis and guiding treatment decisions. Early diagnosis, combined with appropriate imaging and treatment, can dramatically enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates VIPoma presenting with obstructive jaundice prior to the usual presentation of watery diarrhea and hypokalaemia. The delayed onset of diarrhea reinforces the need to consider functioning NETs in patients with pancreatic masses, even when characteristic symptoms are initially absent.

Management can be additionally challenging with metastatic disease. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to optimize care and therapeutic decision-making.

Funding Statement

Funding Source None.

Ethical Consideration

Patient’s consent was obtained before submission of the manuscript.

Statement of Authorship

All authors certified fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria.

CRediT Author Statement

SYN: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft preparation, Visualization, Project administration; KSC: Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing, Visualization, Supervision.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed for this study.

Author Disclosure

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Karele EN. All you need to know about VIPoma: Review on the latest studies. Presse Med. 2024;53(2):104222. PMID: DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2023.104222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Basuroy R, Bouvier C, Ramage J, Sissons M, Srirajaskanthan R. Delays and routes to diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1122. PMID: PMCID: DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5057-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schizas D, Mastoraki A, Bagias G, et al. Clinicopathological data and treatment modalities for pancreatic VIPomas: A systematic review. J BUON. 2019;24(2):415–23. PMID: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Azizian A, König A, Ghadimi M.. Treatment options of metastatic and nonmetastatic VIPoma: A review. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407(7):2629–36. PMID: PMCID: DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02620-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Helbing A, Menon G, Sandhu S, et al. VIPoma. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Updated February 23, 2025. Bookshelf ID: NBK507698 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boccatonda A, Gentilini S, Zanata E, Simion C, Serra C, Simioni P, et al. Portal vein thrombosis: State-of-the-art review. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5):1517. PMID: PMCID: DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bicci E, Cozzi D, Ferrari R, Grazzini G, Pradella S, Miele V. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Spectrum of imaging findings. Gland Surg. 2020;9(6):2215–24. PMID: PMCID: DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Park S, Parihar AS, Bodei L, Hope TA, Mallak N, Millo C, et al. Somatostatin receptor imaging and theranostics: Current practice and future prospects. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(10):1323–29. PMID: PMCID: DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brugel M, Walter T, Goichot B, et al. Efficacy of treatments for VIPoma: A GTE multicentric series. Pancreatology. 2021;21(8):1531–9. PMID: DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.de Herder WW, Hofland J.. Vasoactive intestinal peptide-secreting tumor (VIPoma). In: Feingold KR, Adler RA, Ahmed SF, et al., eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000. –. Bookshelf ID: NBK278960/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed for this study.


Articles from Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies are provided here courtesy of ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies

RESOURCES