ABSTRACT
Candidiasis is caused by Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis emerges due to antifungal resistance and limited therapies. We aim to assess the antifungal activity of Hedychium spicatum essential oil (HSEO), followed by computational analyses to identify potential lead phytochemicals, targeting lanosterol 14α‐demethylase (CYP51), a key enzyme in ergosterol biosynthesis. GC‐MS identified 29 phytoconstituents, with τ‐cadinol (17.94%) as the major component. Disc diffusion demonstrated concentration‐dependent antifungal activity against C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, with inhibition zones of 11.00 ± 0.53 and 10.40 ± 0.36 mm, respectively, at 100% (v/v). Homology models of CYP51 exhibited structural reliability based on Ramachandran and validation metrics. Molecular docking identified cis‐γ‐bisabolene with the lowest binding energies (−7.6 and −7.9 kcal/mol) against haem‐free CYP51 models of C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, respectively, through hydrophobic interactions. ADMET predictions indicated favorable oral absorption, Lipinski compliance, minimal CYP450 inhibition risk, and no hepatotoxicity or mutagenicity. MD simulations confirmed stable complexes using RMSD, RMSF, Rg, and SASA profiles. MM‐PBSA showed favorable binding energies of −6.02 and −8.05 kJ/mol compared to fluconazole (0.98 and 0.66 kJ/mol). DFT showed comparable HOMO–LUMO gaps (6.216 and 6.176 eV) and global hardness (3.108 and 3.088 eV). Overall, HSEO shows promising antifungal potential, with cis‐γ‐bisabolene as a lead candidate.
Keywords: Hedychium spicatum, CYP51 inhibition, ergosterol biosynthesis pathway, essential oil, zone of inhibition
Hedychium spicatum essential oil (HSEO) exhibited concentration‐dependent antifungal activity against Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis. GC‐MS identified 29 phytoconstituents, with τ‐cadinol as the major component. Computational analysis identified cis‐γ‐bisabolene as a promising CYP51 inhibitor, showing favorable binding, ADMET properties, molecular stability, MM‐PBSA, and DFT profiles, supporting its potential as an antifungal lead.

Abbreviations
- DFT
Density functional theory
- HOMO
Highest occupied molecular orbital
- LUMO
Lowest unoccupied molecular orbital
- MDS
Molecular dynamics simulation
- MM/PBSA
Molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area
- RMSD
Root mean square deviation
- RMSF
Root mean square fluctuation
- SASA
Solvent accessible surface area
1. Introduction
Invasive fungal infections represent a significant public health concern, substantially increasing morbidity and mortality, particularly among hospitalized and immunocompromised individuals [1]. Among these, candidiasis caused by Candida spp. remains one of the most prevalent and potentially life‐threatening mycoses worldwide [2]. Although Candida albicans remains the most common species, the prevalence of other Candida species, particularly Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis, has risen significantly; these species are now increasingly associated with invasive candidiasis worldwide [3]. Candida parapsilosis is a prominent cause of catheter‐associated bloodstream infections, largely due to its robust biofilm‐forming capacity on indwelling medical devices, and is often linked to neonatal sepsis and infective endocarditis [4]. Candida tropicalis is predominantly reported in immunocompromised individuals, especially patients with haematological malignancies and neutropenia, and is known for causing disseminated infections [5]. In addition to bloodstream infections, both species contribute to a wide range of mucosal and systemic manifestations, including oral candidiasis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, and urinary tract infections, especially in immunocompromised patients [6, 7]. The rising incidence and evolving antifungal resistance among these non‐C. albicans species (NCAC) highlight the pressing need to explore alternative natural therapeutic interventions.
Lanosterol 14α‐demethylase (CYP51), an essential enzyme involved in ergosterol biosynthesis in fungi, represents a major molecular target in antifungal treatment strategies [8]. The enzyme belongs to the cytochrome P450 superfamily, a large and highly conserved group of heme‐containing monooxygenases [9]. Lanosterol serves as the substrate for CYP51, which mediates the oxidative demethylation of the 14α‐methyl group, a critical step in ergosterol biosynthesis required for preserving fungal membrane integrity [10]. Ergosterol plays a crucial role in maintaining membrane fluidity, structural integrity, membrane dynamics, and cellular responses to environmental stress [11]. Due to its central role in ergosterol biosynthesis and fungal viability, CYP51 serves as the primary molecular target of azole antifungal agents, including fluconazole. Inhibition of this enzyme disrupts cell membrane integrity, ultimately resulting in growth arrest and fungal cell death [10, 12].
Medicinal plants have long been recognized as rich sources of therapeutic compounds, and their bioactive constituents continue to provide promising strategies for the control of diverse pathogenic microorganisms. Studies on the plant Hedychium spicatum Sm., a medicinally important species of the Zingiberaceae family, which is traditionally referred to as Shati (Sanskrit) and is popularly known as Van Haldi or Kapoor Kachari in Hindi [13]. H. spicatum is a rhizomatous perennial herb that grows up to 1–2 m in height, characterized by long oblong‐lanceolate green leaves and dense terminal spikes of orange‐white hermaphroditic flowers [14]. The plant H. spicatum has been traditionally employed for the management of diabetes due to its reported antidiabetic activity [15]. The rhizomes of the plant are a reservoir of bioactive constituents, including essential oils, diarylheptanoids, starch, resins, organic acids, glycosides, albumen, and saccharides, has been historically recommended for blood purification [15]. Essential oils are volatile secondary metabolites of plant origin that contribute to defence mechanisms against pathogens and herbivores, while also participating in pollinator attraction and broader ecological signaling processes [16]. present study was undertaken to assess the antifungal efficacy of the essential oil using in vitro disc diffusion assays, followed by computational investigations to explore its molecular mechanism of action. The antifungal activity of the essential oil was preliminarily assessed using the disc diffusion assay by measuring the zone of inhibition, a widely accepted screening method for evaluating antimicrobial efficacy [17]. Advances in computational methodologies, particularly molecular docking, have significantly contributed to antifungal drug discovery by facilitating the prediction and analysis of interactions between bioactive ligands and defined molecular targets [18]. These computational approaches provide valuable mechanistic insights into ligand–enzyme interactions and enable the validation of potential inhibitory effects at the molecular level prior to extensive experimental investigations.
Despite the reported medicinal and antimicrobial potential of H. spicatum, limited information is available on the antifungal activity of its essential oil against Candida species and its underlying molecular basis. The potential interactions of its essential oil constituents with CYP51 of C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis also remain insufficiently explored. We hypothesized that H. spicatum essential oil may exhibit antifungal activity against these species and interact with CYP51. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the essential oil by GC‐MS, evaluate its preliminary antifungal activity against C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, and investigate potential CYP51–ligand interactions using molecular docking, ADMET prediction, molecular dynamics, MM‐PBSA, and DFT. The novelty of this study lies in integrating experimental evaluation with multi‐level computational analysis against CYP51 from two clinically relevant Candida species. These findings will provide preliminary evidence for potential CYP51‐ligand interactions and identify constituents for further experimental investigation.
2. Results
The findings obtained from the experimental and computational analyses are presented below.
2.1. GC and GC‐MS
GC‐MS analysis of the essential oil revealed retention times ranging from 5.133 min for α‐pinene to 33.427 min for 8‐cedren‐13‐ol, reflecting the chemical diversity of the volatile constituents (Figures 1 and S1, and Table S1). A total of 29 compounds were identified based on their retention index and mass spectral comparison with standard libraries. τ‐Cadinol (17.94%) was the predominant constituent, followed by 1,8‐cineole (17.54%). Other notable components included γ‐eudesmol (8.26%), germacra 4(15),5,10(14)‐trien‐1‐α‐ol (7.96%), cis‐γ‐bisabolene (5.24%), linalool (4.23%), sabinene (3.38%), germacrene D (1.94%), and δ‐cadinene (1.92%), while the remaining constituents were present in lower proportions and are listed in Table 1. The identified compounds were classified into four major chemical groups: oxygenated monoterpenes (OM), oxygenated sesquiterpenes (OS), monoterpene hydrocarbons (MH), and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (SH). OS constituted the dominant fraction of the oil, followed by OM, SH, and MH. In terms of distribution, 11 compounds belonged to OS, 7 to SH, 6 to OM, and 5 to MH. Among these, 1,8‐cineole (17.54%) was the most abundant OM constituent, sabinene (3.38%) was the predominant MH, τ‐cadinol (17.94%) was the major OS compound, and cis‐γ‐bisabolene (5.24%) represented the most abundant SH. The molecular weights of the detected constituents ranged from 136.23 g/mol (limonene) to 222.37 g/mol (cubebol, elemol, ledol, α‐cadinol, α‐eudesmol, γ‐eudesmol, and τ‐cadinol). The number of rotatable bonds varied from 0 to 4 (maximum observed in linalool), while one hydrogen‐bond acceptor and one hydrogen‐bond donor were observed among the compounds. The topological polar surface area (TPSA) ranged from 0 to 20.2 Å2. These parameters indicate limited molecular flexibility and moderate hydrogen‐bonding capacity, suggesting favorable membrane permeability and potential target interaction. The detailed physicochemical properties of all identified compounds are summarized in Table 2.
FIGURE 1.

GC2‐13MS chromatogram of HSEO, with selected identified phytoconstituents indicated. The x‐axis represents retention time (min), and the y‐axis represents detector response (pA).
TABLE 1.
GC‐MS analysis of HSEO showing the identified chemical constituents, their retention times, calculated retention indices, literature retention indices, and relative abundance.
| S. no. | Compound | Class composition | RT* (Min) | RIa, * | RIb, * | % of compound |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,8‐cineole | OM | 7.453 | 1038 | 1031 | 17.54 |
| 2 | 14‐hydroxy‐(Z) Caryophyllene | OS | 29.357 | 1670 | 1667 | 0.66 |
| 3 | 8‐Cedren‐13‐ol | OS | 33.427 | 1690 | 1689 | 0.19 |
| 4 | cis‐Sabinene hydrate | OM | 8.728 | 1074 | 1070 | 0.03 |
| 5 | cis‐γ‐Bisabolene | SH | 21.762 | 1517 | 1515 | 5.24 |
| 6 | Cubebol | OS | 22.578 | 1517 | 1515 | 0.95 |
| 7 | Elemol | OS | 24.662 | 1555 | 1549 | 1.20 |
| 8 | Germacra 4(15),5,10(14) trien‐1‐α‐ol | OS | 32.012 | 1687 | 1686 | 7.96 |
| 9 | Germacrene D | SH | 20.97 | 1481 | 1481 | 1.94 |
| 10 | Isolongifelene | SH | 18.718 | 1396 | 1390 | 0.81 |
| 11 | Ledol | OS | 24.922 | 1608 | 1602 | 1.20 |
| 12 | Limonene | MH | 6.852 | 1034 | 1029 | 1.26 |
| 13 | Linalool | OM | 9.043 | 1101 | 1096 | 4.23 |
| 14 | Sabinene | MH | 6.013 | 978 | 975 | 3.38 |
| 15 | Terpinen‐4‐ol | OM | 11.33 | 1180 | 1177 | 0.77 |
| 16 | Trans‐Sabinene hydrate | OM | 11.012 | 1104 | 1098 | 0.03 |
| 17 | α‐Cadinol | OS | 28.453 | 1655 | 1654 | 0.10 |
| 18 | α‐Eudesmol | OS | 27.922 | 1653 | 1653 | 0.13 |
| 19 | α‐Pinene | MH | 5.133 | 941 | 939 | 1.05 |
| 20 | α‐Terpineol | OM | 11.75 | 1192 | 1188 | 0.86 |
| 21 | β‐Acoradiene | SH | 19.96 | 1473 | 1470 | 0.70 |
| 22 | β‐Caryophyllene | SH | 19.652 | 1418 | 1408 | 0.77 |
| 23 | β‐Guaiene | SH | 21.603 | 1495 | 1493 | 1.09 |
| 24 | β‐Pinene | MH | 6.238 | 982 | 979 | 0.13 |
| 25 | γ‐Eudesmol | OS | 25.233 | 1637 | 1632 | 8.26 |
| 26 | γ‐Muurolene | SH | 20.543 | 1479 | 1479 | 0.30 |
| 27 | γ‐Terpinene | MH | 7.888 | 1063 | 1059 | 0.15 |
| 28 | δ‐Cadinene | OS | 23.355 | 1525 | 1523 | 1.92 |
| 29 | τ‐Cadinol | OS | 25.693 | 1645 | 1640 | 17.94 |
Abbreviations: MH, monoterpene hydrocarbon; OM, oxygenated monoterpene; SH, sesquiterpene hydrocarbon; OS, oxygenated sesquiterpene.
RT: Retention time.
RI: Experimental retention indices (calculated).
RI: Retention indices according to literature (Adams, 2017).
TABLE 2.
Physicochemical properties of the compounds identified by GC‐MS analysis of H. spicatum essential oil.
| S. no. | Compound | PubChem ID | MF* | MW* (g/mol) | nRB* | HBD* | HBA* | TPSA* (Å2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,8‐cineole | 2758 | C10H18O | 154.25 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9.2 |
| 2 | 14‐hydroxy‐(Z) Caryophyllene | 12300116 | C15H24O | 220.35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 3 | 8‐Cedren‐13‐ol | 519545 | C15H24O | 220.35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 4 | cis‐Sabinene hydrate | 11744854 | C10H18O | 154.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 5 | cis‐γ‐Bisabolene | 3033866 | C15H24 | 204.35 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Cubebol | 11276107 | C15H26O | 222.37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 7 | Elemol | 92138 | C15H26O | 222.37 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 8 | Germacra 4(15),5,10(14) trien‐1‐α‐ol | 13304977 | C15H24O | 220.35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 9 | Germacrene D | 5317570 | C15H24 | 204.35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Isolongifelene | 11127402 | C15H24 | 204.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Ledol | 11074994 | C15H26O | 222.37 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 12 | Limonene | 22311 | C10H16 | 136.23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | Linalool | 6549 | C10H18O | 154.25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 14 | Sabinene | 18818 | C10H16 | 136.23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | Terpinen‐4‐ol | 11230 | C10H18O | 154.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 16 | Trans‐Sabinene hydrate | 6431628 | C10H18O | 154.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 17 | α‐Cadinol | 10398656 | C15H26O | 222.37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 18 | α‐Eudesmol | 92762 | C15H26O | 222.37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 19 | α‐Pinene | 6654 | C10H16 | 136.23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | α‐Terpineol | 17100 | C10H18O | 154.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 21 | β‐Acoradiene | 20055537 | C15H24 | 204.35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | β‐Caryophyllene | 5281515 | C15H24 | 204.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | β‐Guaiene | 15560252 | C15H24 | 204.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | β‐Pinene | 14896 | C10H16 | 136.23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | γ‐Eudesmol | 6432005 | C15H26O | 222.37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
| 26 | γ‐Muurolene | 6432308 | C15H24 | 204.35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | γ‐Terpinene | 7461 | C10H16 | 136.23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | δ‐Cadinene | 441005 | C15H24 | 204.35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | τ‐Cadinol | 160799 | C15H26O | 222.37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20.2 |
*MF: Molecular Formula; MW: Molecular Weight; nRB: No. of Rotatable Bonds; HBD: Hydrogen Bond Donor; HBA: Hydrogen Bond Acceptor; TPSA: Topological Polar Surface Area.
2.2. Anti‐Fungal Activity
The antifungal activity of H. spicatum essential oil (HSEO) against C. parapsilosis demonstrated a clear and well‐defined concentration‐dependent pattern (Table 3). All experiments were conducted in triplicate (n = 3), and the results are presented as mean ± standard deviation to ensure accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of the experimental findings. No inhibition was observed in the negative control (0.00 ± 0.00 mm), confirming the absence of any solvent‐related antifungal effect and validating the integrity of the assay conditions. At 6.25% (v/v), HSEO produced an inhibition zone of 5.20 ± 0.10 mm, indicating the Lowest tested concentration producing inhibition. The antifungal activity increased progressively and consistently with increasing concentration, reaching 6.40 ± 0.17 mm at 12.5%, 7.80 ± 0.26 mm at 25%, and 9.20 ± 0.35 mm at 50%. The maximum inhibition was recorded at 100% (v/v), with a zone diameter of 11.00 ± 0.53 mm, reflecting the strongest antifungal response under the tested conditions (Table S2). In comparison, the reference drug fluconazole (20 µg/disc) produced a significantly larger inhibition zone of 15.50 ± 0.46 mm (Figure 2A). One‐way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among treatments (p < 0.0001).
TABLE 3.
Antifungal activity of HSEO against C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, expressed as zones of inhibition (mm; mean ± SD; n = 3).
| S. no. | Treatment | Concentration | C. parapsilosis (mm) | C. tropicalis (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negative control | — | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 2 | HSEO | 6.25% (v/v) | 5.20 ± 0.10 | 4.80 ± 0.17 |
| 3 | HSEO | 12.5% (v/v) | 6.40 ± 0.17 | 5.90 ± 0.35 |
| 4 | HSEO | 25% (v/v) | 7.80 ± 0.26 | 7.10 ± 0.26 |
| 5 | HSEO | 50% (v/v) | 9.20 ± 0.35 | 8.60 ± 0.40 |
| 6 | HSEO | 100% (v/v) | 11.00 ± 0.53 | 10.40 ± 0.36 |
| 7 | Fluconazole (positive control) | 20 µg/disc | 15.50 ± 0.46 | 16.53 ± 0.15 |
| 8 | Lowest tested concentration producing inhibition | 6.25% (v/v) | 6.25% (v/v) | |
| 9 | ANOVA | F value | 566.84 | 235.1 |
| 10 | p value | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| 11 | Remark | Highly significant | Highly significant | |
*HSEO: H. spicatum essential oil.
FIGURE 2.

Zones of inhibition produced by HSEO against (A). C. parapsilosis and (B). C. tropicalis, showing HSEO concentrations of 6.25%, 12.5%, 25%, 50%, and 100% (v/v), along with positive (+ve) and negative (−ve) controls. Each panel represents three experimental replicates.
Similarly, HSEO showed a clear concentration‐dependent antifungal activity against C. tropicalis under identical experimental conditions. The negative control showed no inhibition (0.00 ± 0.00 mm), further confirming the absence of any background interference. At 6.25% (v/v), the inhibition zone measured 4.80 ± 0.17 mm, which increased steadily to 5.90 ± 0.35 mm at 12.5%, 7.10 ± 0.26 mm at 25%, and 8.60 ± 0.40 mm at 50%, demonstrating a gradual enhancement in antifungal potency with increasing concentration. The highest concentration (100% v/v) resulted in a zone of 10.40 ± 0.36 mm, representing the maximum observed inhibition for this strain (Table S3). Fluconazole demonstrated a stronger antifungal effect, producing a zone of 16.53 ± 0.15 mm under the same assay conditions. Statistical analysis using one‐way ANOVA again indicated highly significant differences among treatments (p < 0.0001). Overall, HSEO displayed marked and concentration‐responsive antifungal activity against both Candida strains, with comparatively greater relative activity observed against C. parapsilosis than C. tropicalis, particularly at the highest tested concentration.
2.3. Homology Modeling
The target proteins of C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis were constructed using homology modelling based on the C. albicans CYP‐51 crystal structure (PDB ID 5TZ1) as the template. The sequence identity between the template and target proteins was 76.53% and 82.73%, respectively, indicating a high level of homology suitable for reliable model generation. Ramachandran plot analysis revealed that over 99% of residues were located in favored and additionally allowed regions, with only 0.2% in disallowed regions, indicating excellent stereochemical quality of the predicted structures. As shown in Figure 3A, most residues were distributed within the α‐helical region, followed by β‐sheet conformations, with only a small fraction located in the left‐handed α‐helix region. The QMEAN4 scores were −0.98 and −0.51 for C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, respectively. These values, being close to zero, suggest that the overall model quality is comparable to experimentally resolved structures of similar size (Figure 3B). The GMQE scores for both models were 0.83, indicating high expected modelling accuracy. Verify3D analysis demonstrated that 89.24% (C. parapsilosis) and 89.77% (C. tropicalis) of residues had an averaged 3D‐1D score ≥ 0.2, exceeding the acceptable threshold of 80%, thereby supporting the structural plausibility of the models (Figure 3C). The ERRAT quality factors were 93.819% and 92.979%, respectively, indicating satisfactory non‐bonded interaction profiles. Furthermore, the MolProbity scores of 1.36 and 1.53 suggest good overall geometry with minimal steric clashes. All validation parameters are summarized in Table 4.
FIGURE 3.

Validation of homology‐modeled CYP51 from C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis. (A) Ramachandran plots showing residues predominantly in favored regions. (B) QMEAN4 comparison with non‐redundant PDB structures (red star indicates the model). (C) Verify3D profile.
TABLE 4.
Homology models of CYP51 from C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis generated for subsequent analyses.
| S. no. | Parameters | CYP‐51 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| C. parapsilosis | C. tropicalis | ||
| 1 | Template (PDB ID) | CYP‐51 C. albicans (5TZ1) | CYP‐51 C. albicans (5TZ1) |
| 2 | No. of amino acids | 523 | 527 |
| 3 | Sequence identity (%) | 76.53 | 83.72 |
| 4 | Residue sequence coverage | 49–522 | 49–527 |
| 5 | GMQE | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| 6 | QMEAN Z‐score | −0.98 | −0.51 |
| 7 | ERRAT (%) | 93.819 | 92.979 |
| 8 | Verify3D (%) | 89.24 | 89.77 |
| 9 | MolProbity Score | 1.36 | 1.53 |
| 10 | Ramachandran favored (%) | 91.3 | 89.4 |
| 11 | Ramachandran allowed (%) | 8.4 | 9.7 |
| 12 | Ramachandran disallowed (%) | 0.2 | 0.2 |
2.4. Molecular Docking and Redocking
All 29 essential oil compounds were docked against the haem‐free CYP51 of C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis; the docking scores ranged from −7.6 to −5.7 kcal/mol and from −7.9 to −5.5 kcal/mol, respectively, suggesting strong interactions between active site residues and essential oil compounds. The top five compounds with the lowest docking score, with their interacting amino acids, were provided in Table 5. The redocking study revealed that the RMSD values between the native ligand and the corresponding docked poses were 1.56 and 1.78 Å for the C. parapsilosis haem‐free CYP51 and C. tropicalis haem‐free CYP51 ligands, respectively.
TABLE 5.
Binding interactions of H. spicatum essential oil compounds with haem‐free CYP51 from C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis obtained through molecular docking.
| S. no. | Compound | C. parapsilosis haem‐free CYP51 | Compound | With C. tropicalis haem‐free CYP51 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Docking score (kcal/mol) | Interacting amino acid | Docking score (kcal/mol) | Interacting amino acid | |||
| 1 | cis‐γ‐Bisabolene | −7.6 | Ser502, Met503, Pro231, Phe381, His378, Tyr64, Phe234, Ser379, Leu121, Leu377, Tyr118, Phe132, Ile380, Thr122 | cis‐γ‐Bisabolene | −7.9 | Leu376, Tyr118, Leu121, Phe380, Phe233, Tyr64, Leu87, His377, Pro230, Ser378, Met508, Thr122, Tyr132 |
| 2 | γ‐Eudesmol | −7.4 | Val504, Phe229, Met503, Leu377, Ser379, Phe381, Pro231, Phe234, Leu121, Tyr118, Thr122, Phe132, Phe126 | γ‐Muurolene | −7.5 | Met508, Tyr118, Pro230, His377, Ser378, Leu376, Phe228, Val509, Tyr132, Thr122, Leu121 |
| 3 | γ‐Muurolene | −7.2 | Phe132, Ala114, His463, Arg382, Ile380, Leu377, Leu121, Tyr118, Met503, Thr122, Phe229, Phe126, Ile131 | δ‐Cadinene | −7.4 | Tyr118, Thr122, Leu121, Thr311, His310, Val509, Leu376, Phe228, Gly307, Phe126, Met508, Tyr132, Ile131 |
| 4 | β‐Guaiene | −7.1 | Phe132, Tyr118, Leu377, Thr122, Phe229, Phe126, Gly308, Ile131 | α‐Eudesmol | −7.2 | Phe228, Ser378, Ile379, Phe380, Met508, Leu121, Tyr118, Tyr132, Leu376, Thr122, Phe126, Gly307, Val509 |
| 5 | Caryophyllene | −7.1 | Leu121, Tyr118, Met503, Leu377, Phe229, Thr312, Gly308, Ile131, Phe126, Phe132, Thr122, Phe234 | Caryophyllene | −7.1 | Ser378, Leu121, Tyr118, Tyr132, Thr122, Met508, Phe228, Leu376 |
| 6 | Fluconazole (reference drug) | −6.7 | Leu121, Phe234, Leu377, Tyr118, Met503, Phe132, Thr122, Ile131, Phe126, Phe229, Ile380, His468, Ser379, Phe381 | Fluconazole (Reference drug) | −7.1 | Tyr132, Arg381, His468, Ile379, Tyr118, Arg469, Cys470 |
Molecular docking analysis of C. parapsilosis haem‐free CYP51 revealed that cis‐γ‐Bisabolene exhibited the lowest docking score (−7.6 kcal/mol), interacting with 14 active site residues, including Ser503, Leu121, and Phe132. The observed interaction distances (3.92–5.06 Å) suggest predominantly hydrophobic contacts such as π–sigma, alkyl, and π‒alkyl interactions (Figure 4A). γ‐Eudesmol showed a docking energy of −7.4 kcal/mol and interacted with 13 active site residues, mainly Ser503, Phe234, Leu121, and Tyr118, with an average interaction distance of 3.70 Å, indicating π‐alkyl interactions. γ‐Muurolene demonstrated a docking score of −7.2 kcal/mol and formed interactions with 13 residues, primarily through π–alkyl and π–sigma contacts (Figure 4B). Both β‐Guaiene and Caryophyllene exhibited docking scores of −7.1 kcal/mol, interacting with 8 and 12 amino acid residues, respectively, with interaction distances ranging from 4.68 to 5.24 Å, predominantly through π–alkyl interactions (Figure 4C,D). The ligand cis‐γ‐Bisabolene exhibited stable binding within the active pocket through multiple hydrophobic and π–alkyl interactions with residues such as Phe381, Phe234, Leu121, Tyr118, and Phe132. These interactions, observed at distances of approximately 3.9–5.2 Å, suggest favorable stabilization of the ligand within the protein binding site (Figure 4E). The reference drug Fluconazole also showed a docking score of −7.1 kcal/mol, interacting with 14 active site residues within 4.40–5.40 Å, involving π–π stacked, π–alkyl, and π–π T‐shaped interactions (Figure 4F).
FIGURE 4.
Molecular docking of H. spicatum essential oil compounds with haem‐free CYP51 of C. parapsilosis. Left (3D binding pose); Right (2D interaction diagram). (A) β‐guaiene, (B) δ‐cadinene, (C) Ledol, (D) Cubebol, (E) cis‐γ‐bisabolene, and (F) fluconazole (reference drug).


Docking analysis against C. tropicalis haem‐free CYP51 showed that cis‐γ‐Bisabolene exhibited the highest binding affinity with a docking score of −7.9 kcal/mol, interacting with 13 active site residues, including Leu376, Tyr118, Phe380, and Phe233. The interaction distances ranged from 3.69 to 5.42 Å (Figure 5A). γ‐Muurolene demonstrated a docking score of −7.5 kcal/mol and interacted with 11 amino acid residues, including Met508, Pro230, and Leu121, primarily through π–alkyl interactions with distances between 4.30 and 5.35 Å (Figure 5B). δ‐Cadinene showed a docking score of −7.4 kcal/mol, forming interactions with 13 residues such as Leu121, Phe125, Met508, and Phe228. The interactions included π–sigma, π–alkyl, and alkyl contacts with bond lengths ranging from 3.87 to 5.38 Å (Figure 5C). α‐Eudesmol exhibited a docking score of −7.2 kcal/mol and interacted with 13 residues, including Phe228, Phe126, Gly307, and Val509, predominantly through alkyl and π–alkyl interactions (5.04–5.44 Å) (Figure 5D). Caryophyllene showed a docking score of −7.1 kcal/mol, interacting with eight active site residues such as Ser378, Tyr132, and Met508, mainly through alkyl interactions (4.98–5.14 Å) (Figure 5E). The reference drug Fluconazole also demonstrated a docking score of −7.1 kcal/mol and interacted with seven amino acid residues, including Arg469, Tyr132, and Cys470. The interaction distances ranged from 2.50 to 5.54 Å and involved hydrogen‐bonding, π–alkyl, and carbon–hydrogen bond interactions (Figure 5F).
FIGURE 5.
Molecular docking of H. spicatum essential oil compounds with haem‐free CYP51 of C. tropicalis. Left (3D binding pose); Right (2D interaction diagram). (A) β‐Guaiene, (B) caryophyllene, (C) Ledol, (D) cis‐γ‐bisabolene, (E) γ‐muurolene, and (F) fluconazole (reference drug).


2.5. ADMET
The ADMET predictions provided a preliminary assessment of the pharmacokinetic and toxicity‐related properties of cis‐γ‐bisabolene in comparison with fluconazole (Table 6). Although its predicted aqueous solubility was lower, the predicted intestinal absorption value (> 94%) suggests favorable absorption potential. The absence of predicted P‐glycoprotein substrate behavior suggests a lower likelihood of efflux‐mediated transport. cis‐γ‐Bisabolene was also predicted to have limited inhibitory activity toward the evaluated CYP450 isoforms, suggesting a potentially lower risk of CYP‐mediated drug interactions than fluconazole. Compliance with Lipinski's Rule of Five further supports its predicted drug‐like properties. The predicted absence of hepatotoxicity and AMES mutagenicity provides preliminary computational evidence of a favorable safety profile. However, these predictions do not establish clinical safety, oral suitability, or suitability for human consumption and require experimental validation.
TABLE 6.
Predicted ADMET properties of the computationally prioritized compound and reference drugs.
| S. no. | Parameters | cis‐γ‐Bisabolene | Fluconazole (reference drug) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Water solubility (log mol/L) | −6.188 | −3.293 |
| 2 | Intestinal absorption human (%) | 94.493 | 94.960 |
| 3 | P‐gp substrate | No | No |
| 4 | CYP1A2 inhibitor | No | Yes |
| 5 | CYP2C19 inhibitor | No | No |
| 6 | CYP2C9 inhibitor | No | No |
| 7 | CYP2D6 inhibitor | No | No |
| 8 | CYP3A4 inhibitor | No | No |
| 9 | Lipinski | Yes | Yes |
| 10 | Hepatotoxicity | No | Yes |
| 11 | AMES Toxicity | No | No |
2.6. MD Simulation
The molecular dynamics simulation of C. parapsilosis haem‐free CYP51 complexes demonstrated stable structural behavior for both ligands. The RMSD values of the backbone atoms stabilized after the initial equilibration phase and remained within ∼1.20–1.35 nm for the cis‐γ‐bisabolene complex and ∼0.6–0.7 nm for the fluconazole complex, indicating overall conformational stability throughout the trajectory. RMSF analysis showed that most residues fluctuated below ∼0.15–0.25 nm, with comparatively higher deviations observed in flexible loop regions, while active‐site residues remained relatively stable in both systems. Hydrogen bond analysis revealed that the fluconazole‐haem‐free CYP51 complex consistently maintained 1–2 hydrogen bonds during the simulation, whereas cis‐γ‐bisabolene did not form hydrogen bonds due to the absence of hydrogen‐bond donor and acceptor groups in its structure. The radius of gyration (R g) for the cis‐γ‐bisabolene complex ranged between ∼2.26–2.32 nm, whereas the fluconazole complex fluctuated between ∼2.30–2.33 nm, indicating comparatively greater compactness in the cis‐γ‐bisabolene‐bound system. Similarly, SASA values for cis‐γ‐bisabolene varied from ∼225–245 nm2, while fluconazole exhibited slightly higher values of ∼235–245 nm2, reflecting relatively reduced solvent exposure and maintained structural compactness in the cis‐γ‐bisabolene complex. Collectively, these results indicate stable complex formation of cis‐γ‐bisabolene with C. parapsilosis haem‐free CYP51, predominantly stabilized through hydrophobic interactions. All values were presented in Figure 6A–E.
FIGURE 6.

Molecular dynamics simulation analysis of C. parapsilosis haem‐free CYP51 in complex with cis‐γ‐bisabolene and fluconazole. (A) RMSD, (B) RMSF, (C) hydrogen bond analysis, (D) radius of gyration (R g), and (E) SASA.
The molecular dynamics simulation of C. tropicalis haem‐free CYP51 complexes demonstrated stable structural behavior for both ligands. The RMSD values of the backbone atoms stabilized after the initial equilibration phase and remained within ∼1.00–1.20 nm for the cis‐γ‐bisabolene complex and ∼0.8–1.10 nm for the fluconazole complex, indicating overall conformational stability throughout the trajectory. RMSF analysis showed that most residues fluctuated below ∼0.15–0.25 nm, with comparatively higher deviations observed in flexible loop regions. Hydrogen bond analysis revealed that the fluconazole CYP51 complex consistently maintained 1–5 hydrogen bonds during the simulation, whereas cis‐γ‐bisabolene did not form hydrogen bonds due to the absence of hydrogen bond donor and acceptor groups in its structure. The radius of gyration (R g) for the cis‐γ‐bisabolene complex ranged between ∼2.29 and 2.34 nm, whereas the fluconazole complex fluctuated between ∼2.30 and 2.40 nm, indicating comparatively greater compactness in the cis‐γ‐bisabolene‐bound system. Similarly, SASA values for cis‐γ‐bisabolene varied from ∼225 to 250 nm2, while fluconazole exhibited slightly higher values of ∼235–260 nm2, reflecting relatively reduced solvent exposure and maintained structural compactness in the cis‐γ‐bisabolene complex. Collectively, these results indicate stable complex formation of cis‐γ‐bisabolene with C. tropicalis haem‐free CYP51, predominantly stabilized through hydrophobic interactions. All values were presented in Figure 7A–E.
FIGURE 7.

Molecular dynamics simulation analysis of C. tropicalis haem‐free CYP51 in complex with cis‐γ‐bisabolene and fluconazole. (A) RMSD, (B) RMSF, (C) hydrogen bond analysis, (D) radius of gyration (R g), and (E) SASA.
2.7. Binding Free Energy Analysis (MM‐PBSA)
The binding free energy components of cis‐γ‐bisabolene and fluconazole with haem‐free CYP51 of C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis were calculated using MM‐PBSA analysis (Table 7). For haem‐free CYP51 of C. parapsilosis, cis‐γ‐bisabolene exhibited a van der Waals energy (ΔE_vdW) of −27.63 kJ/mol, while fluconazole showed −28.76 kJ/mol. The electrostatic energy (ΔE_elec) was minimal for cis‐γ‐bisabolene (−0.27 kJ/mol) compared to fluconazole (−2.69 kJ/mol). The polar solvation energy (ΔG_polar) contributed unfavorably for both ligands, with values of 5.64 kJ/mol for cis‐γ‐bisabolene and 12.59 kJ/mol for fluconazole. The nonpolar solvation energy (ΔG_nonpolar) was −21.82 kJ/mol for cis‐γ‐bisabolene and −19.93 kJ/mol for fluconazole. The total binding free energy (ΔG_bind) was −6.02 kJ/mol for cis‐γ‐bisabolene, whereas fluconazole showed a slightly positive value of 0.98 kJ/mol.
TABLE 7.
MM/PBSA binding free‐energy components of haem‐free CYP51–Cis‐γ‐bisabolene and CYP51–Fluconazole complexes.
| Haem‐free CYP51 of C. parapsilosis | Haem‐free CYP51 of C. tropicalis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. no. | Parameters | cis‐γ‐Bisabolene | Fluconazole (Reference drug) | cis‐γ‐Bisabolene | Fluconazole (Reference drug) |
| 1 | △E_vdW | −27.63 | −28.76 | −29.60 | −30.11 |
| 2 | △E_elec | −0.27 | −2.69 | −0.60 | −4.34 |
| 3 | △G_polar | 5.64 | 12.59 | 7.52 | 15.72 |
| 4 | △G_nonpolar | −21.82 | −19.93 | −24.18 | −21.09 |
| 5 | △G_bind | −6.02 | 0.98 | −8.05 | 0.66 |
*△E_vdW: van der Waals Energy; △E_elec: Electrostatic energy; △G_polar: Polar Solvatoin Energy; △G_nonpolar: Non‐polar Solvation Energy; △G_bind: Binding Free Energy.
For haem‐free CYP51 of C. tropicalis, cis‐γ‐bisabolene demonstrated a ΔE_vdW of −29.60 kJ/mol, while fluconazole exhibited −30.11 kJ/mol. The electrostatic contribution was −0.60 kJ/mol for cis‐γ‐bisabolene and −4.34 kJ/mol for fluconazole. The polar solvation energy was 7.52 kJ/mol for cis‐γ‐bisabolene and 15.72 kJ/mol for fluconazole. The ΔG_nonpolar values were −24.18 and −21.09 kJ/mol for cis‐γ‐bisabolene and fluconazole, respectively. Notably, the overall binding free energy (ΔG_bind) was −8.05 kJ/mol for cis‐γ‐bisabolene, while fluconazole again showed a slightly positive value of 0.66 kJ/mol.
2.8. DFT Analysis
The frontier molecular orbital (FMO) energies and global reactivity descriptors of cis‐γ‐bisabolene (final hit compound) were compared with the reference drug fluconazole (Table 8). The calculated HOMO and LUMO energies of cis‐γ‐bisabolene were −5.746 and 0.470 eV, respectively, yielding an energy gap (ΔE) of 6.216 eV (Figure 8A). Fluconazole exhibited a very similar energy gap of 6.176 eV. The extremely small difference in ΔE (0.040 eV) indicates that both compounds possess nearly identical kinetic stability (Figure 8B). However, cis‐γ‐bisabolene shows a marginally higher energy gap. A comparable observation was noted for global hardness (η), where cis‐γ‐bisabolene (3.108 eV) displayed a slightly higher value than fluconazole (3.088 eV). However, the difference (0.020 eV) is minimal, suggesting that both molecules exhibit similar resistance to charge transfer and comparable electronic rigidity. More noticeable variation was observed in electronegativity (χ) and chemical potential (μ). Fluconazole (χ = 3.725 eV) showed higher electronegativity than cis‐γ‐bisabolene (χ = 2.638 eV). Similarly, the electrophilicity index (ω) demonstrated a clearer distinction between the two compounds. Fluconazole exhibited a higher electrophilicity value (2.247 eV), suggesting stronger electron‐accepting (electrophilic) character, whereas cis‐γ‐bisabolene showed a lower electrophilicity index (1.119 eV), indicating comparatively weaker electrophilic behavior.
TABLE 8.
HOMO–LUMO energies and calculated global reactivity descriptors of cis‐γ‐bisabolene and fluconazole.
| S. no. | Parameters | cis‐γ‐Bisabolene | Fluconazole | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HOMO (eV) | −5.746 | −6.813 | Higher HOMO indicates better electron‐donating ability (cis‐γ‐bisabolene is slightly higher) |
| 2 | LUMO (eV) | 0.470 | −0.637 | Lower LUMO suggests stronger electron‐accepting ability (fluconazole is lower) |
| 3 | Energy gap △E (eV) | 6.216 | 6.176 | Comparable energy gap indicating similar kinetic stability |
| 4 | Global hardness η (eV) | 3.108 | 3.088 | Similar resistance to charge transfer |
| 5 | Global softness S (eV−1) | 0.161 | 0.324 | Fluconazole shows higher electron density flexibility |
| 6 | Electronegativity χ (eV) | 2.638 | 3.725 | Fluconazole has a stronger electron‐attracting tendency |
| 7 | Chemical potential μ (eV) | −2.638 | −3.725 | More negative value indicates greater stability (fluconazole) |
| 8 | Electrophilic index ω (eV) | 1.119 | 2.247 | Fluconazole exhibits stronger electrophilic character |
FIGURE 8.

HOMO and LUMO molecular orbitals of (A) cis‐γ‐bisabolene and (B) fluconazole (reference drug).
3. Discussion
The increasing incidence of invasive candidiasis caused by C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis poses a significant clinical challenge, particularly due to the rising emergence of antifungal resistance [19]. These non‐albicans Candida species are increasingly associated with bloodstream infections and immunocompromised conditions, thereby necessitating the exploration of alternative and plant‐derived natural therapeutic strategies [1]. Among plant‐based products, essential oils have attracted considerable attention owing to their diverse volatile bioactive constituents and well‐documented antimicrobial properties. In the present study, GC‐MS analysis of H. spicatum essential oil revealed the presence of 29 phytoconstituents belonging to monoterpene and sesquiterpene classes. τ‐Cadinol was identified as the predominant constituent, followed by 1,8‐cineole and other OS. Similar chemical profiles have been reported previously, indicating consistency in the phytochemical composition of the species across studies [20]. OS such as τ‐cadinol are known to exhibit antifungal activity, potentially through disruption of fungal cell membrane integrity, alteration of permeability, and interference with essential metabolic processes [21, 22].
The antifungal evaluation of HSEO demonstrated a clear concentration‐dependent response against both Candida species. The lowest tested concentration producing inhibition was observed at 6.25% (v/v), indicating the lowest concentration capable of producing measurable inhibition. At 100% (v/v), inhibition zones of 11.00 ± 0.53 mm for C. parapsilosis and 10.40 ± 0.36 mm for C. tropicalis were recorded. Although these values were lower than those obtained for fluconazole, they reflect moderate antifungal activity of the essential oil. Comparable inhibition zones (∼10 mm) have been reported in previous studies evaluating plant essential oils against C. albicans, supporting the reproducibility of such antifungal effects [23]. The comparatively reduced inhibition relative to fluconazole may be attributed to the lack of structural optimization for specific enzyme targeting [16]. Unlike synthetic azoles, which are designed to selectively inhibit CYP51, essential oils exert their effects through multi‐component, multi‐target mechanisms [12].
CYP51 is a validated antifungal target, as its inhibition disrupts ergosterol synthesis and fungal membrane integrity [10]. The three‐dimensional structure of CYP51 was generated using the SWISS‐MODEL server based on a suitable template with high sequence identity. The constructed model demonstrated satisfactory stereochemical quality, as 89% of residues were positioned in the favored regions, 9.7% in the allowed regions, and fewer than 0.2% in the disallowed regions of the Ramachandran plot, indicating its suitability for subsequent molecular docking studies. The QMEAN Z‐Score was also in an acceptable range [24], which means the quality of the model is good. The ERRAT score was also between 90+%, suggesting overall non‐bonded interactions as reported [25]. The Verify3D score is also above the threshold value of 80%, indicating good compatibility between the amino acid sequence and the modelled three‐dimensional structure [26]. All 29 phytoconstituents were docked against haem‐free CYP51 of C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis. cis‐γ‐Bisabolene exhibited the lowest binding energy against both enzymes, interacting with 13 active‐site residues through predominantly hydrophobic contacts, indicating stable binding. Fluconazole showed slightly lower binding energies (−7.1 and −6.7 kcal/mol) compared to cis‐γ‐bisabolene. All the ligands are mainly interacting with van der Waals, pi–alkyl, alkyl bonds, which suggesting ligand binding is majorly dominated by hydrophobic interaction. The redocking RMSD values were below the widely accepted cutoff of 2.0 Å, thereby validating the accuracy and reliability of the employed docking protocol [27].
The ADMET analysis suggests that cis‐γ‐bisabolene possesses a favorable pharmacokinetic profile comparable to fluconazole. Although its predicted aqueous solubility was lower, the high intestinal absorption value (>94%) indicates good oral bioavailability potential [28]. The absence of P‐glycoprotein substrate behavior further suggests reduced susceptibility to efflux‐mediated elimination [29]. Notably, cis‐γ‐bisabolene was predicted to be non‐inhibitory toward major CYP450 isoforms, a lower risk of drug–drug interactions compared to fluconazole, particularly with respect to CYP1A2 inhibition [30]. Compliance with Lipinski's Rule of Five supports its drug‐likeness characteristics. Importantly, the compound was predicted to be non‐hepatotoxic and AMES‐negative, indicating a favorable preliminary safety profile. Collectively, these predictions highlight the potential of cis‐γ‐bisabolene as a pharmacologically viable antifungal candidate.
MD simulation was conducted to evaluate the dynamic behavior of the protein–ligand complex under near‐physiological conditions. RMSD, RMSF, hydrogen bonds, Rg, and SASA were analyzed to assess stability, compactness, and flexibility. Both CYP51‐ligand complexes showed an initial RMSD increase (20–30 ns) followed by stabilization. Cis‐γ‐bisabolene remained within the active‐site cavity and showed movement toward the deeper hydrophobic region during the simulation. This positional adjustment may reflect conformational adaptation of the ligand within the binding cavity [31]. RMSF analysis did not reveal any unusual fluctuation patterns. Higher flexibility was primarily observed at the N‐ and C‐terminal regions, which is typical for proteins, along with moderate fluctuations in a few residues that may be involved in ligand binding or local conformational adjustments [32]. Hydrogen bond analysis showed that fluconazole maintained 3–5 stable hydrogen bonds throughout the simulation, indicating persistent polar interactions within the active site of Lanosterol 14‐alpha demethylase. In contrast, cis‐γ‐bisabolene, lacking hydrogen‐bond donor and acceptor groups, did not form classical hydrogen bonds and is likely stabilized primarily through hydrophobic and van der Waals interactions [33]. The Rg and SASA remained stable for both complexes throughout the simulation, with average Rg values around ∼2.3 nm and SASA ranging between 220–260 nm2; similar values of SASA and Rg were also observed in the study of a 496 amino‐acid protein [34]. These values fall within the expected range for a moderately sized protein, indicating the absence of significant structural compaction or unfolding during the simulation [34, 35].
MM‐PBSA offers valuable quantitative insight into receptor‐ligand binding affinity, while also decomposing the total binding energy into its major contributing components, including van der Waals, polar (electrostatic), and nonpolar interactions [36]. Previous studies have indicated that MM‐PBSA‐derived binding free energies may range from negative to slightly positive values depending on solvation effects and methodological limitations; one study also found MM‐PBSA energy ranging from −187 to +62 kJ/mol [36]. Therefore, the slightly positive ΔG_bind values observed for fluconazole should be interpreted comparatively rather than absolutely. Energy decomposition analysis revealed that binding in both haem‐free CYP51 systems was primarily driven by van der Waals and nonpolar contributions, whereas electrostatic interactions were comparatively minor. Notably, fluconazole exhibited substantially higher polar solvation penalties, which offset its favorable electrostatic interactions. These findings support the structural characteristic of CYP51 possessing a predominantly hydrophobic active‐site cavity, where ligand stabilization appears to be largely governed by hydrophobic interactions. Structural studies on human CYP51 demonstrated that inhibitors primarily occupy a hydrophobic binding pocket and are stabilized mainly through van der Waals and hydrophobic interactions [37]. The stronger nonpolar contribution observed for cis‐γ‐bisabolene further suggests that nonpolar ligands may be favorably accommodated within the CYP51 binding pocket.
Quantum chemical calculations were performed at 310 K in the presence of water (implicit solvent model) to mimic biological conditions and to evaluate the intrinsic chemical reactivity, kinetic stability, and electronegativity of the individual compounds [38]. The calculated HOMO–LUMO energy gaps of cis‐γ‐bisabolene (6.216 eV) and fluconazole (6.176 eV) fall within the typical range reported for stable drug‐like organic molecules (generally ∼4–8 eV) [39]. The calculated global hardness (η ≈ 3.1 eV) is consistent with a chemically stable framework. According to conceptual DFT principles, increased hardness reflects resistance to charge transfer and structural perturbation [40]. Such hardness values suggest resistance to abrupt charge redistribution while still permitting controlled interaction with biological targets. The electronegativity (χ) values observed for both compounds (2.6–3.7 eV) also lie within the typical range reported for pharmacologically active heterocyclic and hydrocarbon‐based drugs [41], indicating a relatively stronger tendency to attract electrons during molecular interactions. Fluconazole's higher electronegativity indicates a stronger tendency to attract electrons, which may enhance polar and coordinate interactions within the CYP51 active site. Similarly, electrophilicity index (ω) values between ∼1–3 eV are generally associated with moderate electrophilic character suitable for biological interactions without excessive reactivity; a similar range was also observed in the study of [42]. Overall, the descriptor ranges for cis‐γ‐bisabolene align well with those of established drug‐like compounds, indicating appropriate electronic stability and reactivity for potential biological activity.
Although cis‐γ‐bisabolene was identified as a major computationally prioritized constituent with potential haem‐free CYP51‐binding activity, its specific contribution to the antifungal activity of H. spicatum essential oil remains computationally predicted, as the purified compound was not isolated or independently evaluated in the present study. Experimental assessment of purified cis‐γ‐bisabolene is therefore necessary to determine its individual antifungal activity and validate its proposed contribution to CYP51 inhibition. The present study also addresses an existing gap in the literature by providing experimental evidence of the antifungal activity of H. spicatum essential oil against Candida species. Furthermore, the computational analysis identified cis‐γ‐bisabolene as a putative bioactive constituent that exhibited favorable interactions with the fungal target CYP51, providing a basis for its further experimental investigation.
4. Conclusion
The present study provides an integrated experimental and computational evaluation of the essential oil derived from the rhizomes of H. spicatum. GC‐MS analysis identified 29 phytochemical constituents, highlighting its chemical complexity. In vitro antifungal assays showed good to moderate activity against Candida species, with inhibition zones of ∼10–11 mm, supporting its biological relevance. High‐quality homology models of CYP51 were developed and used for docking and simulation studies. Docking revealed that cis‐γ‐bisabolene exhibited the lowest binding energy against C. parapsilosis haem‐free CYP51 and showed stronger predicted affinity toward C. tropicalis haem‐free CYP51. ADMET analysis provided preliminary predictions of its pharmacokinetic and toxicity‐related properties. MD simulations confirmed structural stability of the complexes, and MM‐PBSA analysis supported comparatively stronger binding of cis‐γ‐bisabolene. DFT results suggested comparable kinetic stability to fluconazole, although the reference drug showed relatively stronger electrophilic character. Overall, H. spicatum essential oil demonstrates promising antifungal potential against Candida species, likely involving CYP51 inhibition. Future studies may explore cis‐γ‐bisabolene as a potential lead compound for the development of therapeutic agents against Candida species, including antifungal‐resistant strains.
5. Experimental Section
The experimental and analytical procedures carried out in this study are described in detail below.
5.1. Plant Collection and Sample Preparation
A wild sample of H. spicatum rhizome was collected from Pithoragarh (29°35′ N, 80°13′ E), Uttarakhand, India, in December, 2025. The plant material was authenticated at the Botanical Survey of India (BSI), Dehradun, India, and a voucher specimen was submitted (Voucher No. 1862). For further study, freshly collected rhizomes were washed thoroughly with running water to remove soil and debris.
5.2. Essential Oil Extraction
Freshly obtained rhizomes were hydro‐distilled to extract essential oil using a Clevenger‐type apparatus in accordance with method [43]. The rhizomes were precisely weighed and then hydro‐distilled for 5 h. Then the essential oil was purified by redistillation. The collected essential oil was dehydrated using anhydrous sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) and stored in sealed vials at 4°C until further analysis [44]. The weight of the fresh rhizomes was used to determine the percentage content of the essential oils that were recovered.
5.3. GC and GC‐MS
Gas chromatography (GC) analysis of the essential oil was performed using a Nucon 5765 gas chromatograph equipped with a dual flame ionization detector (FID) and Rtx‐5 and CP‐Wax 52 CB fused silica columns. Nitrogen and hydrogen were used as carrier gases at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The oven temperature was programmed from 60 to 230°C at 4°C/min. Injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 210°C and 220°C, respectively, with a split ratio of 1:30. GC‐MS analysis was carried out using an Agilent 8890/5977B system fitted with a DB‐5MS column. The oven temperature was programmed from 50°C to 300°C at 5°C/min using helium as the carrier gas. Mass spectra were recorded in electron impact (EI) mode at 70 eV over a mass range of 30–550 amu. Identification of compounds was based on comparison of retention index (RI), calculated relative to a homologous series of n‐alkanes (C9–C24), and matching with NIST (20.L) and literature [45]. GC‐MS analysis was performed as a single analytical run without replicates.
5.4. Fungus Culture and Maintenance
Cultures of two pathogenic fungi, C. parapsilosis (MTCC 998) and C. tropicalis (MTCC 1000), were obtained from the Microbial Type Culture Collection and Gene Bank (MTCC), Chandigarh, India. The strains were maintained on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) and subcultured periodically at 37°C. For antifungal assays, inoculum was prepared in Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) and adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard, corresponding to approximately 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL [46].
5.5. Antifungal Activity
Antifungal activity of HSEO was evaluated using the agar disc diffusion (Kirby–Bauer) method following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [47, 48]. Sterile discs (5 mm) prepared from Whatman No. 1 filter paper were impregnated with 5 µL of different concentrations (0%–100%) of HSEO. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as the solvent and served as the vehicle control. Fluconazole (20 µg/disc) was used as the positive control. SDA plates were inoculated by spreading 100 µL of standardized fungal suspension, followed by placement of the prepared discs. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The diameter of the inhibition zones (ZOI) around the discs was measured and recorded in millimeters (mm). All experiments were performed in triplicate to ensure reliability, precision, and reproducibility of results.
5.6. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using PAST 4.03 software. One‐way ANOVA was used to assess differences among the experimental groups, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Three experimental replicates were used for the antifungal activity measurements.
5.7. Homology Modelling
The amino acid sequences of lanosterol 14α‐demethylase (CYP51) from C. parapsilosis (NCBI accession no. XNX61098.1) and C. tropicalis (NCBI accession no. ATO93827.1) were retrieved in FASTA format from the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) protein database. Homology modeling was performed using the SWISS‐MODEL (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/) server under default parameters. Template structures were automatically selected based on sequence identity, query coverage, and Global Model Quality Estimation (GMQE) scores. The best‐predicted models were selected for further analysis based on template similarity and the QMEAN scoring function to ensure structural reliability. Model validation was conducted to assess stereochemical quality and structural consistency. The reliability of the predicted models was evaluated using Ramachandran plot analysis, ERRAT score, and the VERIFY3D program using the SAVESv6.1 server (https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu/).
5.8. Molecular Docking and Redocking
The three‐dimensional structures of selected phytochemicals were retrieved from the PubChem database in SDF format (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Ligand structures were retrieved from the PubChem database in SDF format and converted to PDBQT format using Open Babel. Hydrogen atoms were added during ligand preparation, followed by energy minimization using the Universal Force Field (UFF) with 100 optimization steps [49]. The minimized structures were then converted to PDBQT format using AutoDock Tools. The receptor protein was energy‐minimized using the steepest descent algorithm for 500 steps in UCSF Chimera to relieve steric clashes (https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimerax/). The receptor proteins were prepared using AutoDock Tools by adding polar hydrogen atoms and assigning Gasteiger charges, followed by conversion to PDBQT format. The active site of the receptor was taken as the same as that occupied by the native ligand. The grid centers were set at x = 3.5239, y = 0.7412, z = −0.4850 for C. parapsilosis haem‐free CYP51 and x = 3.3997, y = 0.9008, z = −0.5623 for C. tropicalis haem‐free CYP51, with a grid size of 20 Å along the x, y, and z axes. Molecular docking was performed using the Linux version of AutoDock Vina (version 1.2) [50]. Molecular docking was performed using AutoDock Vina with an exhaustiveness value of 16 and an energy range of 4 kcal/mol, generating a maximum of nine binding poses for each ligand. The pose with the most negative predicted binding affinity was selected for subsequent interaction analysis and molecular dynamics simulations. The protocol was validated by redocking the native ligand into the active site and comparing the predicted pose with its original crystallographic orientation. During homology modelling of both CYP51 proteins using SWISS‐MODEL, oteseconazole was retained in the generated models as the co‐crystallized ligand. The ligand was subsequently re‐docked at its original binding position to validate the docking protocol.
5.9. ADMET
The ADMET predictions were used to evaluate the drug‐likeness, safety, and potential toxicity risks associated with the selected phytocompounds. The pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles of the selected phytocompounds were evaluated using the online servers pkCSM and ADMETlab 3.0 [51, 52]. The canonical SMILES of each compound were used as input for prediction. The assessed parameters included water solubility, human intestinal absorption (HIA), P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp) substrate prediction, cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme interactions, Lipinski's rule of five compliance [53], hepatotoxicity, and AMES toxicity. The predicted ADMET properties were analyzed to evaluate the drug‐likeness and safety profile of the compounds for human oral use.
5.10. Molecular Dynamics Simulation
MD simulations were performed using GROMACS version 2025.3 (https://www.gromacs.org/). All molecular dynamics simulations were performed using the CHARMM36 force field implemented in GROMACS [54]. The ligand parametrization was carried out using the SwissParam web (https://www.swissparam.ch/). The protein–ligand complexes were solvated in a triclinic simulation box using the TIP3P water model [55]. Appropriate counterions were added to neutralize the system. Energy minimization was carried out prior to equilibration. Following energy minimization, the systems were equilibrated under NVT and NPT ensembles for 100 ps each at 300 K, with NPT equilibration performed at 1 bar. Long‐range electrostatic interactions were treated using the Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) method, with 1.0 nm cutoffs for short‐range interactions. Production MD simulations were then conducted for 100 ns with a time step of 2 fs. A single independent MD simulation was performed for each protein–ligand complex. Post‐simulation trajectory analyses were performed to evaluate structural stability and dynamics, including root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), hydrogen‐bond analysis (H‐bond), radius of gyration (Rg), and solvent‐accessible surface area (SASA) [38].
5.11. MMPBSA Binding Free Energy Calculation
The binding free energy of the protein–ligand complexes was calculated using the gmx_MMPBSA tool based on the Molecular Mechanics/Poisson–Boltzmann Surface Area (MM‐PBSA) method [56]. The analysis was performed on the last 30 ns of the MD trajectory from 70–100 ns, from which 300 uniformly distributed frames were extracted for calculation. The calculations used an ionic strength of 0.150 M, with solute and solvent dielectric constants of 2.0 and 80.0, respectively. Formal uncertainty and convergence analyses were not performed.
5.12. DFT Calculations
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using ORCA 6.0 [57]. Geometry optimization and frequency calculations were carried out using the B3LYP functional with D3BJ dispersion correction and the def2‐SVP basis set [58, 59]. Calculations were performed at 310 K to mimic physiological temperature [38]. The solvent effect of water was included using the CPCM model (dielectric constant ε = 78.3553). Global reactivity descriptors including chemical hardness (η), softness (S), electronegativity (χ), chemical potential (μ), and electrophilicity index (ω) were calculated [60].
6. Limitations
The CYP51 homology models generated using SWISS‐MODEL lacked the haem cofactor, which may affect predicted ligand orientation, interaction patterns, binding energies, molecular dynamics behavior, and MM‐PBSA estimates. Thus, the computational findings should be considered exploratory predictions of potential binding within a haem‐free model rather than evidence of physiological CYP51 inhibition. Additionally, GC–MS was performed as a single analytical run; therefore, the reproducibility of the essential‐oil chemical profile and relative abundance of constituents, including cis‐γ‐bisabolene, could not be assessed. Experimental validation using haem‐containing CYP51 models, replicate GC–MS analyses, and standardized MIC/MFC assays would strengthen these findings.
Author Contributions
Preeti Verma: Sample collection, GC‐MS analysis, antifungal activity assessment, and research design. Devesh Singh Baral: Manuscript drafting, formal analysis, in silico pipeline execution, methodology, and research design. Rakesh Verma: Supervision, methodology, statistical analysis, review, and editing.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting File 1: cbdv71742‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx
Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere gratitude to the respective institutions and laboratories for providing the necessary facilities and support to carry out this research work. The authors also acknowledge the Botanical Survey of India (BSI), Dehradun, for plant authentication, and the Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Chandigarh, for providing the fungal strains used in this study. The authors are thankful to all individuals who have contributed to the completion of this work.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.
References
- 1. Firacative C., “Invasive Fungal Disease in Humans: Are We Aware of the Real Impact?,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 115 (2020): e200430, 10.1590/0074-02760200430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cabrera‐Guerrero J. P., García‐Salazar E., Hernandez Silva G., et al., “Candidemia: An Update on Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Susceptibility, and Treatment,” Pathogens 14 (2025): 806, 10.3390/pathogens14080806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Xiao M., Fan X., Chen S. C.‐A., et al., “Antifungal Susceptibilities of Candida glabrata Species Complex, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis Species Complex and Candida tropicalis Causing Invasive Candidiasis in China: 3 Year National Surveillance,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 70 (2015): 802–810, 10.1093/jac/dku460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Trofa D., Gácser A., and Nosanchuk J. D., “ Candida parapsilosis, an Emerging Fungal Pathogen,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews 21 (2008): 606–625, 10.1128/CMR.00013-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kothavade R. J., Kura M. M., Valand A. G., and Panthaki M. H., “ Candida tropicalis: Its Prevalence, Pathogenicity and Increasing Resistance to Fluconazole,” Journal of Medical Microbiology 59 (2010): 873–880, 10.1099/jmm.0.013227-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pappas P. G., Kauffman C. A., Andes D. R., et al., “Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 62 (2016): e1–e50, 10.1093/cid/civ933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Guinea J., “Global Trends in the Distribution of Candida Species Causing Candidemia,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20 (2014): 5–10, 10.1111/1469-0691.12539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rabelo V. W., Santos T. F., Terra L., et al., “Targeting CYP 51 for Drug Design by the Contributions of Molecular Modeling,” Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 31 (2017): 37–53, 10.1111/fcp.12230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zhang J., Li L., Lv Q., Yan L., Wang Y., and Jiang Y., “The Fungal CYP51s: Their Functions, Structures, Related Drug Resistance, and Inhibitors,” Frontiers in Microbiology 10 (2019): 691, 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Singh A., Singh K., Sharma A., Kaur K., Chadha R., and Bedi P. M. S., “Recent Advances in Antifungal Drug Development Targeting Lanosterol 14α‐Demethylase ( CYP51 ): A Comprehensive Review With Structural and Molecular Insights,” Chemical Biology & Drug Design 102 (2023): 606–639, 10.1111/cbdd.14266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Song L., Wang S., Zou H., et al., “Regulation of Ergosterol Biosynthesis in Pathogenic Fungi: Opportunities for Therapeutic Development,” Microorganisms 13 (2025): 862, 10.3390/microorganisms13040862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hoekstra W. J., Garvey E. P., Moore W. R., Rafferty S. W., Yates C. M., and Schotzinger R. J., “Design and Optimization of Highly‐Selective Fungal CYP51 Inhibitors,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 24 (2014): 3455–3458, 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.05.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Singh M., Kumar R., Sharma S., et al., “ Hedychium spicatum: A Comprehensive Insight Into Its Ethnobotany, Phytochemistry, Pharmacological and Therapeutic Attributes,” South African Journal of Botany 161 (2023): 638–647, 10.1016/j.sajb.2023.08.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rasool S. and Maqbool M., “An Overview About Hedychium spicatum: A Review,” Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 9 (2019): 476–480, 10.22270/jddt.v9i1-s.2429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mittal R. and Beniwal A., “Antidiabetic and Nephroprotective Activity of Hedychium spicatum in Streptozotocin‐Induced Diabetic Rats,” International Journal of Pharma Research and Health Sciences 8 (2020): 3256–3261, 10.21276/ijprhs.2020.06.04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bakkali F., Averbeck S., Averbeck D., and Idaomar M., “Biological Effects of Essential Oils—A Review,” Food and Chemical Toxicology 46 (2008): 446–475, 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Balouiri M., Sadiki M., and Ibnsouda S. K., “Methods for In Vitro Evaluating Antimicrobial Activity: A Review,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 6 (2016): 71–79, 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lionta E., Spyrou G., Vassilatis D. K., and Cournia Z., “Structure‐Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: Principles, Applications and Recent Advances,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 14 (2014): 1923–1938, 10.2174/1568026614666140929124445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Silva S., Negri M., Henriques M., Oliveira R., Williams D. W., and Azeredo J., “ Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: Biology, Epidemiology, Pathogenicity and Antifungal Resistance,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews 36 (2012): 288–305, 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kalagatur N. K., Kamasani J. R., Siddaiah C., Gupta V. K., Krishna K., and Mudili V., “Combinational Inhibitory Action of Hedychium spicatum L. essential Oil and γ‐radiation on Growth Rate and Mycotoxins Content of Fusarium Graminearum in Maize: Response Surface Methodology,” Frontiers in Microbiology 9 (2018): 1511, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Aljaafari M. N., AlAli A. O., Baqais L., et al., “An Overview of the Potential Therapeutic Applications of Essential Oils,” Molecules 26 (2021): 628, 10.3390/molecules26030628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Su Y. C. and Ho C. L., “Composition of the Leaf Essential Oil of Phoebe Formosana From Taiwan and Its In Vitro Cytotoxic, Antibacterial, and Antifungal Activities,” Natural Product Communications 11 (2016): 1934578×1601100637, 10.1177/1934578X1601100637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Tyagi A. K. and Malik A., “Liquid and Vapour‐phase Antifungal Activities of Selected Essential Oils Against Candida albicans: Microscopic Observations and Chemical Characterization of Cymbopogon Citratus,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 10 (2010): 65, 10.1186/1472-6882-10-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Benkert P., Biasini M., and Schwede T., “Toward the Estimation of the Absolute Quality of Individual Protein Structure Models,” Bioinformatics 27 (2011): 343–350, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Binbay F. A., Rathod D. C., George A. A. P., and Imhof D., “Quality Assessment of Selected Protein Structures Derived From Homology Modeling and AlphaFold,” Pharmaceuticals 16 (2023): 1662, 10.3390/ph16121662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Maia R. T., de Araujo Campos M., and Maraes Filho R. M., “Introductory Chapter: Homology Modeling,” Homology Molecular Modeling Perspectives and Applications 1(2021): 1–7, 10.5772/intechopen.95446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Rana N., Solanki P., Mehra R., and Manhas A., “Identification of Natural Compound Inhibitors for Substrate‐Binding Site of MTHFD2 Enzyme: Insights From Structure‐Based Drug Design and Biomolecular Simulations,” Chemical Physics Impact 10 (2025): 100809, 10.1016/j.chphi.2024.100809. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hou T., Wang J., Zhang W., and Xu X., “ADME Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 7. Prediction of Oral Absorption by Correlation and Classification,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 47 (2007): 208–218, 10.1021/ci600343x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lin J. H. and Yamazaki M., “Role of P‐Glycoprotein in Pharmacokinetics,” Clinical Pharmacokinetics 42 (2003): 59–98, 10.2165/00003088-200342010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Guengerich F. P., “Cytochrome P450 and Chemical Toxicology,” Chemical Research in Toxicology 21 (2008): 70–83, 10.1021/tx700079z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Siqueira T. H. and Martinez L., “Molecular Simulations of Fluconazole‐Mediated Inhibition of Sterol Biosynthesis,” Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 38 (2020): 1659–1669, 10.1080/07391102.2019.1614998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Spyrakis F., BidonChanal A., Barril X., and Javier Luque F., “Protein Flexibility and Ligand Recognition: Challenges for Molecular Modeling,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 11 (2011): 192–210, 10.2174/156802611794863571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bissantz C., Kuhn B., and Stahl M., “A Medicinal Chemist's Guide to Molecular Interactions,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 53 (2010): 5061–5084, 10.1021/jm100112j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Bekkar Y., Lanez E., Lanez T., et al., “Antidiabetic Potential of Synthesized Ferrocenylmethylaniline Derivatives: Insights From In Vitro Studies, Molecular Docking, ADMET, DFT Calculations, and Molecular Dynamics Simulation,” Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 73 (2025): 198–211, 10.1002/bab.70014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lobanov M. Y., Bogatyreva N. S., and Galzitskaya O. V., “Radius of Gyration as an Indicator of Protein Structure Compactness,” Molecular Biology 42 (2008): 623–628, 10.1134/S0026893308040195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Genheden S. and Ryde U., “The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods to Estimate Ligand‐Binding Affinities,” Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 10 (2015): 449–461, 10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Strushkevich N., Usanov S. A., and Park H. W., “Structural Basis of Human CYP51 Inhibition by Antifungal Azoles,” Journal of Molecular Biology 397 (2010): 1067–1078, 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.01.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Baral D. S. and Verma R., “Discovery and Identification of Bioactive Organic Compounds from Callistemon citrinus (Bottlebrush) as Natural Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) Enzyme via the Cholinergic Pathway for the Management of Alzheimer's Disease,” ChemistrySelect 10 (2025): e04550, 10.1002/slct.202504550. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Akash S., Aovi F. I., Azad M. A. K., et al., “A Drug Design Strategy Based on Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Applied to Development of Inhibitor Against Triple‐Negative Breast Cancer by Scutellarein Derivatives,” PLoS ONE 18 (2023): e0283271, 10.1371/journal.pone.0283271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Parr R. G. and Pearson R. G., “Absolute Hardness: Companion Parameter to Absolute Electronegativity,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 105 (1983): 7512–7516, 10.1021/ja00364a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Radhi A. H., “HOMO‐LUMO Energies and Geometrical Structures Effecton Corrosion Inhibition for Organic Compounds Predict by DFT and PM3 Methods,” NeuroQuantology 18 (2020): 37–45, 10.14704/nq.2020.18.1.NQ20105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Li Y., Lin M., Tian M., Ye G., and Zhao X., “DFT Computational and Spectroscopic Studies on Andrographolide From Different Solvent Effect,” Journal of Molecular Liquids 390 (2023): 123059, 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Clevenger J. F., “Apparatus for the Determination of Volatile Oil,” Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association 17 (1928): 345–349, 10.1002/jps.3080170407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Dziri S., Casabianca H., Hanchi B., and Hosni K., “Composition of Garlic Essential Oil (Allium sativum L.) as Influenced by Drying Method,” Journal of Essential Oil Research 26 (2014): 91–96, 10.1080/10412905.2013.868329. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Adams R. P., Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (Allured Publishing, 2017). [Google Scholar]
- 46. Nussbaumer‐Pröll A., Matzneller P., Eberl S., and Zeitlinger M., “Pulmonary Surfactant Impacts In Vitro Activity of Selected Antifungal Drugs Against Candida krusei and Candida albicans,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 43 (2024): 927–936, 10.1007/s10096-024-04799-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. CLSI Performance Standard for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guideline (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2024). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Hudzicki J., “Kirby‐Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol,” American Society for Microbiology 15 (2009): 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- 49. O'Boyle N. M., Banck M., James C. A., Morley C., Vandermeersch T., and Hutchison G. R., “Open Babel: An Open Chemical Toolbox,” Journal of Cheminformatics 3 (2011): 33, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Eberhardt J., Santos‐Martins D., Tillack A. F., and Forli S., “AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 61 (2021): 3891–3898, 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Fu L., Shi S., Yi J., et al., “ADMETlab 3.0: An Updated Comprehensive Online ADMET Prediction Platform Enhanced With Broader Coverage, Improved Performance, API Functionality and Decision Support,” Nucleic Acids Research 52 (2024): W422–W431, 10.1093/nar/gkae236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Pires D. E. V., Blundell T. L., and Ascher D. B., “pkCSM: Predicting Small‐Molecule Pharmacokinetic and Toxicity Properties Using Graph‐based Signatures,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 58 (2015): 4066–4072, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Lipinski C. A., Lombardo F., Dominy B. W., and Feeney P. J., “Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 23 (1997): 3–25, 10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Huang J. and MacKerell A. D. Jr., “CHARMM36 all‐atom Additive Protein Force Field: Validation Based on Comparison to NMR Data,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 34 (2013): 2135–2145, 10.1002/jcc.23354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Mark P. and Nilsson L., “Structure and Dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E Water Models at 298 K,” Journal of Physical Chemistry A 105 (2001): 9954–9960, 10.1021/jp003020w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Miller B. R., McGee T. D., Swails J. M., Homeyer N., Gohlke H., and Roitberg A. E., “MMPBSA.Py: An Efficient Program for End‐State Free Energy Calculations,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 8 (2012): 3314–3321, 10.1021/ct300418h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Neese F., “Software Update: The ORCA Program System—Version 5.0,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 12 (2022): e1606, 10.1002/wcms.1606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Gaus M., Goez A., and Elstner M., “Parametrization and Benchmark of DFTB3 for Organic Molecules,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 9 (2013): 338–354, 10.1021/ct300849w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Tirado‐Rives J. and Jorgensen W. L., “Performance of B3LYP Density Functional Methods for a Large Set of Organic Molecules,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 4 (2008): 297–306, 10.1021/ct700248k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Geerlings P., De Proft F., and Langenaeker W., “Conceptual Density Functional Theory,” Chemical Reviews 103 (2003): 1793–1874, 10.1021/cr990029p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting File 1: cbdv71742‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.
