Skip to main content
Conservation Physiology logoLink to Conservation Physiology
. 2026 Sep 28;14(1):coag073. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coag073

A migratory herbivore responds to rapid changes in food supply: diet and body condition of an arctic caribou herd at onset of green-up

Cecelia J Giesen 1,✉, Joelle Hepler 2, Shawna A Karpovich 3, Christopher S Swingley 4, Perry S Barboza 5
PMCID: PMC13617160  PMID: 42807606

Abstract

Annual migration of ungulates is often correlated with regional and seasonal plant growth, but are smaller scale movements of individuals related to fitness? We investigated the response of wild caribou to variation in plant phenology. We used faecal transects to evaluate spatial differences in diet in one growing season after the onset of spring plant growth had occurred (green-up). We captured 110 females (1–15 years) from the Teshekpuk Caribou herd over three years (14–28 June 2022–2024). We measured diet and corresponding indices of body condition of captured caribou at various stages of green-up. Plant growth (normalized differentiation vegetation index) at capture locations was greatest in 2023 when captures followed the onset of green-up. We sampled faeces and blood to measure concentrations of albumin and urea N in serum, and to measure δ15N and δ13C to track N and C from diet. Faecal concentrations of N (crude protein) indicated that diet quality was highest in 2023 (20.3%) after onset of green-up when caribou were closest to the coast and lowest in 2022 (5.6%) before onset of green-up when caribou were furthest inland. Serum albumin (4.4 g/dL) and urea N (9.9 mmol/L) concentrations were greatest in 2023, which was consistent with high N supplies after onset of green-up. Faecal δ15N values were lowest in 2022 and highest in 2024, which suggests diets dominated by lichens and graminoids, respectively. In 2023, even though some samples were from later into green-up, intermediate values for δ15N and low values for δ13C in blood and faeces were consistent with browsing near the coast. Changes in diet that can influence gain of body protein and thus the growth and reproductive potential of females were related to locations of caribou in the 14d window of green-up.

Keywords: Forage quality; functional response; isotopes; phenological progression, Rangifer tarandus granti

Abbreviations

AIC,

Akaike information criteria

ASIF,

Alaska Stable Isotope Facility

C,

Carbon

BCG,

Bromocresol green

DTM,

Digital terrain model

DOY,

Day of year

GEBCO,

General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans

GPS,

Global positioning system

IFSAR,

Interferometric synthetic aperture radar

N,

Nitrogen

NDVI,

Normalized differentiation vegetation index

OLS,

Ordinary least squares

PET,

Polyethylene terephthalate

RCF,

Relative centrifugal force

TCH,

Teshekpuk caribou herd

VHF,

Very high frequency

Introduction

Ungulates provide ecosystem services including sustaining plant communities and promoting biodiversity (Hobbs, 1996; Augustine and McNaughton, 1998) while also provisioning human communities (Naranjo et al., 2004; Borish et al., 2022). Migrating ungulates extend these services to various plant, animal and human communities across ecoregions and political boundaries. Ungulate migrations have been associated with food, water, terrain, weather, predators, pests and humans (Wolfe et al., 2000; Aikens et al., 2017; Leclerc et al., 2019; Abrahms et al., 2021; Atmeh et al., 2024). However, studies have highlighted the importance of resource tracking as a foundational element of migration for ungulates in which movements correlate with patterns of plant growth (Mysterud et al., 2001; Hebblewhite et al., 2008; Monteith et al., 2014; Aikens et al., 2017; Abrahms et al., 2021).

Resource tracking of herbivores has been described in relation to patterns of plant growth (i.e. green-up) by the forage maturation (Fryxell, 1990) and green wave hypotheses (Drent et al., 1978). These hypotheses provide the framework for why and how herbivores move in relation to phenological progression to maximize their access to feeding on the highest quality forage (Drent et al., 1978; Fryxell, 1990; Aikens et al., 2017). Studies using GPS collars have correlated animal movements and plant phenology using satellite derived metrics such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) (Pettorelli et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2018). Though it has long been inferred that resource tracking along migratory routes will affect individuals and therefore population dynamics, current research has lacked the fine scale physiological data to support it. Seasonal physiological responses have been well studied, including metabolic rates (Parker et al., 2009; Arnold, 2020), reproductive investments (Barboza and Parker, 2008; Taillon et al., 2013) and daily activity patterns (Arnold et al., 2018; Barboza et al., 2024). Large-scale benefits of resource tracking have been documented in elk (Cervus elaphus) (Proffitt et al., 2016; Middleton et al., 2018) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) over the scale of a season (Ortega, 2023). Finer scale physiological responses to shifts in phenology (e.g. spring green-up) have not been investigated in large ungulates.

Generally, ungulates migrate to areas with consistent patterns of forage availability to maximize foraging returns while also reducing risks to fitness from terrain, weather, predators, pests and people (Monteith et al., 2018; Kauffman et al., 2021). Barren-ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti) migrate as far as 1200 km each year (Joly et al., 2019) and must contend with a short window of plant growth when food quality and quantity provide sufficient energy, nitrogen (N), and minerals for growth and reproduction (Barboza et al., 2018; Oster et al., 2018). Migratory caribou move to calving grounds where the availability and duration of forage is likely to provide consistent returns (Bischof et al., 2012; Cameron et al., 2020). Consequently, migratory caribou and other arctic ungulates use photoperiod and other environmental cues to modulate daily activity and reproductive cycles (Arnold et al., 2018). The strong pulse of food availability at the start of plant growth in spring would be expected to stimulate a pronounced response in body condition and thus physiological evidence for actively following resources among years.

Seasonal and annual changes in body condition of ungulates have been evaluated with body mass (Taillon et al., 2011), body size (Buntgen et al., 2020), and metrics of lean mass and fat mass (Cook et al., 2021). Body mass has been used in conjunction with morphological measurements of the limbs, thorax and the jaw to account for differences in frame size (Taillon et al., 2011). More acute responses in body condition rely on blood parameters to track mobilization of energy and protein from body stores, or net uptake from the diet into tissues (Barboza and Parker, 2006; Soppela et al., 2008; Johnson et al., 2010; Daleo et al., 2025). Serum albumin, urea N and creatinine have been used as indicators of changes in body protein balance (Franzmann, 1985).

Albumin, urea N and creatinine are associated with changes in live mass rather than subcutaneous fat on the rump of reindeer (R. tarandus) over winter, indicating a response to loss of lean mass (Milner et al., 2003). Serum concentrations of albumin reflect changes in integration of amino acid supply from the diet and recirculation of amino acids in the body by the liver (Barboza et al., 2009; Parker et al., 2009). Albumin concentrations can therefore decline when dietary supplies of N fall below the requirement (Soppela et al., 2008; Parker et al., 2009).

Likewise, urea N also reflects supplies of amino acids to the liver from diet and body tissue (Barboza et al., 2009; Parker et al., 2009). Urea N therefore increases when amino acids are oxidized from either the diet or the body stores (Soppela et al., 2008; Parker et al., 2009). Before green-up, high urea N reflects mobilization of body protein whereas after green-up, high urea N is associated with increasing N intake (Barboza et al., 2009; Parker et al., 2009). Creatinine provides an indicator of renal clearance that qualifies changes in urea N (Barboza et al., 2009; Parker et al., 2009). High urea N accompanied by elevated creatinine indicates low clearance from the kidneys rather than an increase in urea N production (Barboza et al., 2009; Parker et al., 2009). Conversely, increases in urea N at low concentrations of creatinine reflect changes in urea formation from either the diet or body stores (Barboza et al., 2009; Parker et al., 2009).

Stable isotopes can be used to track dietary and endogenous sources of C and N (Gustine et al., 2014b). Isotopic changes in serum protein track changes in diet over 10 days whereas urea responds to fasting and diet within 2 days in reindeer and caribou (Barboza and Parker, 2008; Barboza et al., 2020; Meier et al., 2024). Total N and its stable isotope δ15N in faecal and blood fractions may also indicate diet quality, plant functional groups and body protein dynamics (Gustine et al., 2012; Gustine et al., 2014a). Isotopic pools of C and N in body tissues are a mixture of dietary input (exogenous substrates) and the material in the body (endogenous pools). Fibre particles probably reflect diet ingested within the last 4–5 days, which is the mean retention time for reindeer consuming browse in summer (Singer et al., 2024). In comparison, blood cells typically mature over ~100 days with an isotopic signature similar to lean mass gained prior to green-up in female caribou and reindeer (Barboza and Parker, 2008; Barboza et al., 2020). Serum proteins reflect diet and metabolism over the previous 10–25 days (Prinsen and de Sain-van der Velden, 2004; Levitt and Levitt, 2016).

We investigated the response of wild caribou to variation in plant phenology using two hypotheses: (i) We predict the diet of caribou will vary to reflect their geographical location within the calving grounds, and (ii) we predict body condition will respond to phenological changes in diet quality. To test hypothesis 1, we collected faecal samples in mid-July within the calving grounds of the Teshekpuk Caribou Herd (TCH). Sampling occurred on the eastern and western sides of Teshekpuk Lake due to the high use of these areas by the TCH. We used total rinsed faecal N, C and ash as indicators of diet quality with 1%N identified as the threshold for lean mass gain in female caribou (Barboza et al., 2024). This sampling was done to assess spatial variation of diet quality within one growing season after green-up had occurred. We also assessed landscape attributes to further evaluate spatial variability. To test hypothesis 2, we captured migratory caribou to compare indices of body condition in relation to temporal and spatial variation of green-up over the three years of caribou capture. We used the natural variation in year-to-year phenology to measure body condition in relation to phenology. We used sera chemistries, notably albumin and urea N as indices of body condition due to their ability to reflect short-term nutritional status of both protein and energy when animals are at the lowest point in their fat reserves (Cook et al., 2021; Barboza et al., 2024). We also included body mass and size in our evaluation of condition. Morphological measurements were evaluated for best-fit as covariates of body mass. Body condition indices were paired with faecal samples to establish recent diet quality. We used δ13C and δ15N as isotopic markers to track dietary changes from indigested diet items in faeces into body tissues. Timing of captures and landscape attributes of capture locations were again used to assess spatial and temporal variability of plant phenology.

Materials and methods

All procedures for care, handling and experimentation were approved by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #0035-2023-007, #0035-2024-023, and #0035-2025-020) and Texas A&M AgriLife Research Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (AUP# 2025-017A).

Study system

The TCH is one of four migratory herds on the North Slope of Alaska, monitored by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. The TCH calves in the wetlands around Teshekpuk Lake (70.591637°N, 153.577881°W) while also occupying adjacent areas designated for oil and gas development, including the ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. Willow Project area (Fig. 1) (Parrett, 2021; ConocoPhillips, 2025). Annual ranges may span a large portion of the North Slope and into the Brooks Range resulting in overlap with the Western Arctic, Central Arctic and Porcupine caribou herds (Prichard et al., 2022).

Figure 1.

Four maps of the North Slope of Alaska with inset of entire state denoting relative location. Caribou capture locations are denoted by heat map of Kernel Density Estimates: panel A for, 2022, B for 2023 and C for 2024. Transect sampling sites collected in 2025 are indicated by red pinpoints with dark outlines in panel D.

Kernel density estimate of capture locations of caribou in 2022 (A), 2023 (B) and 2024 (C). Transect sampling sites collected in 2025, indicated by pinpoints for sampling faeces in the summer range of the Teshekpuk Caribou Herd (D) (Esri, 2025)

Animal capture

We captured female caribou between 14 and 28 June in three consecutive years from 2022 to 2024 to collect samples, measure body condition and affix GPS collars (Table 1). The period of capture coincides with the post-calving period for the TCH (Carroll et al., 2005; Welch et al., 2022) when movement rates are low and food intakes are also low (Barboza et al., 2024).

Table 1.

Attributes of sampling sites (n = 5) per transect (n = 2) in the range of the TCH on 11 and 12 July 2025 with corresponding composition of faeces collected along transects (n = 25 samples/eastern transects and n = 28 samples/western transect)

West of Lake East of Lake
Median ordinal day 192 ± 1 192 ± 0
Avg latitude (°N)* 70.72426 ± 0.02 70.40598 ± 0.02
Avg longitude (°W)* 154.3016 ± 0.04 152.7937 ± 0.04
Elevation (m) 2.98 ± 1.36b 20.07 ± 1.36a
Distance to coast (km) 8.83 ± 2.22b 26.78 ± 2.22a
Cumulative degree days (°C) 252 ± 15.0b 331 ± 15.0a
Snow cover 0.02 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00
Wind speed (m/s) 7.79 ± 0.29 8.44 ± 0.29
Daily NDVI 0.46 ± 0.01b 0.54 ± 0.01a
NDVIpre9 0.43 ± 0.01b 0.51 ± 0.01a
Graminoid cover (%) 31.55 ± 2.25 35.37 ± 2.25
Willow cover (%) 1.60 ± 0.99b 5.16 ± 0.99a
Lichen cover (%) 0.75 ± 0.89 2.61 ± 0.89
Ash (%DM) 7.03 ± 0.26 7.06 ± 0.26
N (crude protein %DM) 22.94 ± 0.50b 25.54 ± 0.50a
C (%DM) 52.76 ± 0.24b 54.57 ± 0.24a
δ15N (‰) 0.26 ± 0.15b 1.63 ± 0.15a
δ13C (‰) −29.91 ± 0.05 −29.81 ± 0.05

Values are margins predicted from ANOVA ± standard errors. Letters indicate significant differences among margins within each row (P < 0.05).

*Latitude and longitude were not included in the ANOVA analysis, raw values reported.

Captures included sub-adults that had not been previously collared as well as adult recaptures for resampling and re-collaring. All sub-adult females were classified as non-reproductive/non-lactating due to lack of calf at heel. We used a small, fixed-wing aircraft to locate groups of caribou that were distributed across their summer range around Teshekpuk Lake (Fig. 1). Recaptured animals were located via telemetry from very high-frequency (VHF) signals from collars. Animals were pursued by an R-44 helicopter for less than five minutes and captured by a net gun without use of chemical immobilization. Restrained animals were promptly blindfolded and hobbled to minimize stress and injury. We estimated the age of newly captured animals based on body size and tooth eruption. We fitted each animal with a global positioning system (GPS) collar before recording body mass and morphometrics. Caribou were weighed (±0.1 kg) using a digital scale and weigh poles. Morphometric measurements included lower jaw length (cm; mandible length to first incisor), ½ heart girth (cm; surface distance from spine to sternum at the distal edge of the scapula) and metatarsal length (cm) (Cattet, 2018). Faeces were collected from the rectum or the ground if voided during restraint. Blood was collected from the jugular, cephalic or saphenous veins into trace element serum polyethylene terephthalate (PET) tubes (BD Vacutainer®, REF 368380, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Whole blood was allowed to clot at room temperature. We separated serum from the clot by centrifugation at 1500 RCF for 5 minutes. Blood fractions and faeces were stored frozen at −18°C until analysis.

Faecal transects

To assess diet quality across the summer range, we flew two helicopter transects to locate caribou on 11 to 12 July of 2025. The first transect was on the eastern side of Teshekpuk Lake (152.7736 to 152.8062°W, 70.3846 to 70.4386°N) spanning 58 km long and 65 km wide. The second was on the western side of the lake (154.0572 to 154.6082°W, 70.6161 to 70.7835°N) spanning 18 km long and 3 km wide (Fig. 1). Sampling sites were identified by the presence of three or more caribou, and each transect (one on either side of the lake) had five sampling sites with at least 1 km between each site. After locating groups of animals, we observed their movements and landed to collect freshly voided samples where they were most recently observed. At each sampling site, we collected one to fifteen samples depending on how many animals were present. To minimize resampling of individuals, the number of samples collected did not exceed the estimated number of animals present at each location. Fresh samples were distinguishable from previously deposited material that was frozen and dry.

Sample processing

Blood clots and faecal samples were freeze-dried for analysis of total N and total C (%), and their respective stable isotopes (δ15N and δ13C (‰)) at the Alaska Stable Isotope Facility (ASIF, University of Alaska Fairbanks) (Gustine et al., 2014b). Serum proteins were precipitated with sodium tungstate (Barboza et al., 2020) and freeze-dried for isotope analysis. Sera were also analysed for concentrations of creatinine (mg/dL), blood urea N (mg/dL), total protein (g/dL), sodium (mEq/L), potassium (mEq/L) and albumin (g/dL) (dyed with Bromocresol Green (BCG)) using a DxC 700 AU Chemistry Analyser (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) at the Texas A&M Preclinical Phenotyping Core (TPPC; RRID: SCR_023263), a facility within the Institute for Genome Sciences and Society at Texas A&M University.

Dried faecal samples were homogenized and milled in a mortar and pestle for determination of analytical dry matter at 80°C and ash content by combustion at 500°C (Barboza et al., 2020). Ground samples were individually rinsed six times in hot water using the methods described by Gustine et al. (2014b) to isolate dietary residues from faeces. Rinsed faecal samples were then analysed for N, C and stable isotopes as above at ASIF. Faecal N concentrations are reported as crude protein (Robbins, 2012).

Landscape attributes

We recorded locations of capture and faecal sampling to a 10-m radius using a GPS unit (Model Aero 660, Garmin, Olathe, KS). Each of the capture (n = 110) and transect sampling site locations (n = 10) were intersected with raster data to assess landscape attributes at the day of capture or sample collection. Distance to coast (km) was determined using the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO, 2024) at a 15 arc-second interval. Elevation (m) was assigned using interferometric synthetic aperture radar (IFSAR) to generate a digital terrain model (DTM) (EROS Center, 2018) aggregated from a 5 to 30 m resolution. NDVI values were derived from MODIS MCD43A4 Version 6.1 at a resolution of 500 × 500 m (Schaaf and Wang, 2021) to measure greenness. We used daily NDVI and the average daily NDVI for the nine days prior to each sample day (NDVIpre9). We used the weather records from ERA5-Land (Muñoz Sabater, 2019) at a resolution of 11 km averaged for each day of collection as follows: air temperature at 2 m above ground (K converted to °C), snow cover as a fraction of the pixel occupied by snow, southern and western wind components (m/s) at 10 m above the ground, and cumulative degree days, which is the cumulative average daily temperature above 0°C from January first to the observation date. Wind speeds were calculated by combining southern and western wind components. Cumulative degree days provide a time weighted measure of plant growing conditions outside of ambient temperature among years. We used estimates of plant functional type top cover with graminoids, willow shrubs and lichen at a resolution of 30 m from Macander et al. (2022) to assess available forages for caribou.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were conducted in StataBE (version 19.5; StataCorp, 2025). We censored data for errors and assessed normality (Shapiro–Wilk) prior to analysis. We used ANOVA to evaluate differences in forage quality and landscape attributes between sampling locations on either side of Teshekpuk Lake. We did not include the average latitude and longitude of transect or capture locations in the ANOVAs due to violation of the assumption of independence of observations. We also used ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustments for pairwise comparisons to assess faecal compositions of captured animals and the attributes of capture locations among years. Five recaptured adults were not included in the ANOVAs for elevation and distance to coast for capture locations as they were in the Brooks Range. We then used ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions to model the variation in faecal N content and faecal stable isotopes of captured animals. Full models include ordinal day, landscape attributes and age groups. Landscape variables were evaluated for correlation using a correlation matrix. Competing models were compared for their fit using Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) corrected for small sample sizes.

Caribou that had not been previously captured were estimated to be ~13 months of age and are referred to as sub-adults at time of capture. Two animals captured in 2023 were reclassified as two year olds after evaluating tooth eruption and body mass. All animals two years of age and younger were referred to as sub-adults. Recaptured animals were adults with known records of collar deployment and age. Analyses of captured animal body size and stable isotopes were separated by age groups. We evaluated lower jaw length, ½ heart girth and metatarsal length as covariates for body mass. The body size measurement that had the best fit was used to account for structural size when comparing body mass across years. We used ANOVA and Bonferroni adjustments for pairwise comparisons among years for body mass and body size.

Using methods described by Agostinho et al. (2021), we used the Euclidean distance and angle between δ13C and δ15N tissue values plotted in isotopic space to compare C and N sourcing and recycling from diet and body stores. Isotopic discrimination between serum protein, blood clots and rinsed faeces were calculated for δ13C and δ15N, respectively, as described by Gustine et al. (2014b). We used ANOVA and Bonferroni adjustments for pairwise comparisons among years for Euclidean distances, angles and discrimination factors.

We used ANOVA to compare serum chemistries among age classes and years (Tothova et al., 2018). Creatinine and urea N concentrations were transformed to logarithms to satisfy assumptions of normality for ANOVA. Albumin, creatinine and urea N values were converted to match units used by Milner et al. (2003). We used ANOVA and Bonferroni adjustments for pairwise comparisons among years and age classes of data from blood clots and sera.

Results

Exp 1. Diet quality and location

We collected 25 faecal samples at 5 different sampling sites on the eastern transect and 28 samples at 5 different sites on the western transect. Within the calving grounds of the TCH, eastern faecal collection sites were at a higher elevation (ANOVA, F1,8 = 79.43, P = 0.0000) and farther from the coast (ANOVA, F1,8 = 32.62, P = 0.0004) than the western sites (Table 1).

Eastern sites were warmer (cumulative degree days ANOVA, F1,8 = 13.88, P = 0.0058), and vegetation cover was dominated by graminoids with significantly more willows on the eastern side (ANOVA, F1,8 = 6.46, P = 0.0346) (Table 1). Increased plant growth on the eastern side was indicated by daily NDVI values (ANOVA, F1,8 = 12.05, P = 0.0084) and NDVIpre9 (ANOVA, F1,8 = 16.22, P = 0.0038) (Table 1).

Caribou diets differed between eastern and western sites within the calving grounds. Faecal ash and analytical dry matter content did not differ between transect locations but faecal N (ANOVA, F1,48 = 13.54, P = 0.0006) and faecal C (ANOVA, F1,48 = 27.37, P = 0.0000) were highest for the eastern sites (Table 1). Faecal δ13C did not differ between sites, but faecal δ15N was greater at eastern sites (ANOVA, F1,48 = 41.91, P = 0.0000) (Table 1).

Exp 2. Body condition and diet quality

Captures occurred for 3–4 days each year over a 14-day window across years with the earliest captures in 2022 and latest in 2023 (Table 2). We captured 30 sub-adults and 5 adults in 2022, 25 sub-adults and 11 adults in 2023, and 26 sub-adults and 13 adults in 2024. We could not assign reproductive state to adult females because captures occurred one to two weeks after the peak calving period. Although eight adults were lactating and had calves at heel, the remaining 21 animals may have given birth and lost those calves. Not all samples were able to be collected during each capture resulting in variable sample sizes for each analysis. We were able to collect 60 faecal samples and 110 blood samples total. Captures in 2023 occurred at the lowest elevations (ANOVA, F2,102 = 20.45, P = 0.0000) and closest to the coast (ANOVA, F2,102 = 42.51, P = 0.0000; Table 2). Plant cover types were not significantly different between capture locations among years. However, greenness rates on date of capture and prior to capture were greatest in 2023 (NDVI ANOVA, F2,95 = 14.23, P = 0.0000; NDVIpre9 ANOVA, F2,98 = 209.99, P = 0.0000; Table 2). Conversely, air temperature (ANOVA, F2,98 = 209.99, P = 0.0000) on date of capture was lowest in 2023, but cumulative degree days (ANOVA, F2,107 = 394.14, P = 0.0000) was greatest in 2023 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Attributes of capture locations (n = 110) of the TCH from 2022 to 2024 with corresponding composition of faeces collected from captured animals (n = 60)

2022 2023 2024
Ordinal day 165.7 ± 0.14c 178.5 ± 0.14a 167.5 ± 0.13b
Avg latitude (°N)* 70.36699 ± 0.10 70.44834 ± 0.10 70.17447 ± 0.10
Avg longitude (°W)* 153.755 ± 0.17 154.3045 ± 0.17 153.2354 ± 0.17
Elevation (m)+ 26.4 ± 4.76b 4.40 ± 4.98c 47.59 ± 4.57a
Distance to coast (km)+ 40.7 ± 3.16a 7.45 ± 3.30b 46.27 ± 3.03a
Temperature (°C) 7.29 ± 0.44b 6.01 ± 0.46b 10.84 ± 0.42a
Cumulative degree days (°C) 53.6 ± 3.01c 160 ± 2.97a 64.1 ± 2.85b
Snow cover 0.22 ± 0.07 0.00 ± 0.07 0.10 ± 0.06
Wind speed (m/s) 5.52 ± 0.38 5.04 ± 0.40 4.35 ± 0.36
Daily NDVI 0.29 ± 0.03b 0.46 ± 0.03a 0.24 ± 0.03b
NDVIpre9 −0.02 ± 0.02b 0.35 ± 0.02a −0.06 ± 0.01b
Graminoid cover (%) 22.3 ± 1.72 27.21 ± 1.70 23.83 ± 1.63
Willow cover (%) 4.02 ± 0.46 3.33 ± 0.45 4.72 ± 0.43
Lichen cover (%) 3.45 ± 0.53 2.43 ± 0.52 3.29 ± 0.50
Ash (%DM) 14.5 ± 1.00a 8.58 ± 1.00b 7.57 ± 1.06b
N (crude protein %DM) 5.61 ± 0.56b 20.3 ± 0.40a 7.20 ± 0.62b
C (%DM) 41.9 ± 0.56c 53.4 ± 0.40a 46.0 ± 0.62b
δ15N (‰) −1.10 ± 0.22c 0.33 ± 0.16b 1.25 ± 0.24a
δ13C (‰) −28.4 ± 0.09a −30.4 ± 0.06b −28.6 ± 0.10a

Values are margins predicted from ANOVA ± standard errors. Letters indicate significant pairwise differences among margins within each row (P < 0.05).

*Latitude and longitude were not included in the ANOVA analysis, raw values reported.

+

+Results exclude five adults recaptured in Gates of the Arctic National Park.

Concentrations of faecal N were greatest in 2023 at 3.3% (20.3 crude protein %DM) but only 0.9% (5.61 crude protein %DM) in 2022, which is below the threshold of 1%N (Barboza et al., 2024) (ANOVA, F2,57 = 297.23, P = 0.0000; ANOVA, F2,57 = 153.01, P = 0.0000) (Table 2).

Conversely, high concentrations of ash and low concentrations of C in faeces indicate the lowest diet quality in 2022. Faecal δ15N values were lowest in 2022 but increased by approximately 1‰ each year (Table 2).

We were able to collect 60 faecal samples from caribou captured over three years. Only, 49 of those samples had landscape attribute data that could be associated with their collection locations. Faecal N concentration and δ15N were best described by season (DOY) and plant growth (NDVI) confirming the strong phenological effect on diet (Table 3 and Tables  S1 and S2). Faecal δ15N was also best described by cumulative degree days and wind speeds. Faecal δ13C was best described by season (DOY), distance to coast, elevation (Table 3 and Table  S3). Air temperature was also included in all top models with a significant confidence interval for both faecal N and faecal δ13C (Table 3 and Tables  S1 and S3).

Table 3.

Ordinary least-squares regression models for composition (crude protein (N%), δ15N and δ13C) of faeces collected from captured caribou (n = 49)

Model ∆AIC Weight K R  2 Deviance
Top N% ~ DOY*, air temperature*, NDVI*, NDVIpre9 0 0.5623 4 0.9271 21.8096
Full N% ~ DOY, age group, distance to coast, elevation, 12.96552 0.0009 13 0.9474 5.817516
air temperature, cumulative degree days, snow cover,
wind speed, willow%, graminoid%, lichen%,
NDVI, NDVIpre9
Top δ15N ~ DOY*, cum dd*, NDVI*, NDVIpre9*, air 0 0.7898 5 0.3440 126.81316
Full Temperature δ15N ~ DOY, age group, distance to coast, elevation 16.7111 0.0002 13 0.4612 117.17134
Air temperature, cumulative degree days, snow cover,
wind speed, willow%, graminoid%, lichen%
NDVI, NDVIpre9
Top δ13C ~ DOY*, distance to coast*, elevation*, air 0 0.5895 5 0.9056 31.80072
Full Temperature* δ13C ~ DOY, age group, distance to coast, elevation 12.54019 0.0011 13 0.9269 15.164436
Air temperature, cumulative degree days, snow cover,
wind speed, willow%, graminoid%, lichen%
NDVI, NDVIpre9

Asterisks indicate terms with 85% confidence intervals that do not overlap zero.

We were able to weigh and measure metatarsal length of 80 sub-adults across all three years of capture. Body mass (Y) was directly related to body size measured as jaw length (J), ½ of heart girth (G) and metatarsal length (M) by the following equations (Fig. S1):

Y = 2.08J—0.31; R2 = 0.33; F1,93 = 46.54; P < 0.0000.

Y = 1.05G—1.47; R2 = 0.28; F1,93 = 36.16; P < 0.0000.

Y = 3.63M—78.38; R2 = 0.43; F1,93 = 70.76; P < 0.0000.

We chose metatarsal length as a metric of frame size for sub-adults (Fig. 2). Sub-adult body mass was significantly affected by metatarsal length and year of capture. Sub-adult body mass was 5 kg heavier in 2023 (47.2 ± 0.9 kg) than either 2022 (41.2 ± 0.9 kg) or 2024 (42.0 ± 1.0 kg) after adjusting for frame size (ANOVA, F1,2,76 = 12.44, P = 0.0000) (Fig. S2D) (Taillon et al., 2011). Hereafter, body mass refers to values adjusted by metatarsal lengths.

Figure 2.

Graph of the linear relationship between subadult body mass and metatarsal lengths denoted by grey squares (2022), circles (2023) and triangles (2024) with dark outlines.

Relationship of sub-adult body mass and metatarsal length (n = 80) in 2022 (squares), 2023 (circles) and 2024 (triangles).

We were able to collect 38 faecal and 81 blood samples from sub-adults across all years to compare isotopically. Among sub-adults, diet from faecal samples was isotopically distinct in all three years with a similar pattern among blood clots albeit with less separation between years (Fig. 3, Table S4, see Fig. S3 for adult plot). δ15N values of serum protein were greater than those of blood clots in all years, but δ13C values varied with year. Serum proteins followed a similar pattern to diet and clots, but separation between blood fractions varied among years (Table S4).

Figure 3.

Plotted δ15N and δ13C isotopic values of subadult caribou rinsed faeces in black, blood clots in red, and serum in blue. Mean values are denoted by circles with error bars extending horizontally and vertically. There are three of each corresponding with each year of collection.

Plotted δ15N and δ13C isotopic space of rinsed faeces (n = 38; black symbols), blood clots (n = 81; red symbols) and serum proteins (n = 81; blue symbols) of sub-adult captured caribou. Circles denote average values with error bars extending to maximum and minimum values.

Euclidean distances between blood clot (average of previous ~100 days) and serum protein (average of previous ~25 days) did not vary by year for adults (Table S5) but separation between blood fractions for sub-adults was significantly larger in 2023 (1.0‰; Table S4) compared to 2022 (0.6‰) and 2024 (0.8‰) (ANOVA, F2,78 = 8.96, P = 0.0003).

Serum chemistries were not different between adults and sub-adults but did vary among years. Serum albumin (44.1 g/L) and urea N (9.9 mmol/L) were highest in 2023 when creatinine concentrations were lowest (69.5 μmol/L) (ANOVA, F2,107 = 8.6, P = 0.0003; ANOVA, F2,107 = 28.59, P = 0.0000; ANOVA, F2,107 = 50.61, P = 0.0000) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Concentration of protein indices in sera from captured caribou across sampling years (n = 110)

2022 2023 2024
Albumin (g/L) 36.6 ± 1.6b 44.1 ± 1.5a 36.0 ± 1.5b
Creatinine (μmol/L) 120.5 ± 4.9a 69.5 ± 4.8c 101.1 ± 4.6b
Urea N (mmol/L) 5.2 ± 0.3b 9.9 ± 0.3a 5.9 ± 0.3b

Values are margins predicted from ANOVA ± standard errors. Letters indicate significant pairwise differences among years within each measure (P < 0.05).

Consequently, urea N concentrations were even higher in 2023 (11 mmol/L) after accounting for creatinine concentrations that vary with renal function (ANOVA, F1,2106 = 103.13, P = 0.0000).

Discussion

We supported both of our hypotheses that diet and body condition of arctic migratory caribou respond to variation in plant cover and plant phenology (green-up). We confirmed that spatial variation in plant quality corresponded with changes in dietary N within the calving grounds of the TCH (2025; Table 1). Values of δ15N in faeces suggests diets dominated by lichens in 2022, browse in 2023 and graminoids in 2024 (Barboza et al., 2018). We found that serum albumin and urea N were positively associated with onset of green-up in 2023 (NDVI; Table 4), which indicates a positive effect on body protein balance of both adults and sub-adults. Likely as a result of higher quality diet, body mass of sub-adults was also positively associated with onset of green-up.

Short-term cues from daily foraging returns to energy and nutrient balance would reinforce and refine movements associated with active resource tracking (Stevenson, 2023). Long-term cues of photoperiod integrate physiological responses to life history outcomes such as reproductive onset and success and growth (Arnold et al., 2018). The sensitivity of caribou to shifts in phenological growth and therefore forage quality reflects individual fine-scale responses that therefore drive responses at the level of the herd and the population (i.e. resource tracking) (Gurarie et al., 2024; Tyler et al., 2024; Clark-Wolf et al., 2025). This responsiveness is asymmetrical—selection favours fast gains and slow losses in a system where the window of opportunity to make nutritive gains is short and temporally inconsistent (Barboza et al., 2018; Johnson et al., 2021). Alaskan arctic caribou have demonstrated a robust response to temporal inconsistencies in forage growth (Gustine et al., 2017; Mallory et al., 2020). Arctic caribou are limited by both energy and N, but the window for gaining body protein is earlier and shorter than the window for gaining energy (Barboza et al., 2018). Caribou therefore select for forage quality in early summer when forage levels are suitable for protein gain, but favour forage abundance in late summer for fat gain when forage N declines with senescence (Johnson et al., 2021).

The transition towards high N forages at onset of green-up is evident in the positive trend of faecal δ15N from 2022 to 2024, which is consistent with a progression from lichen (low δ15N) to browse (intermediate δ15N) to graminoids (high δ15N) (VanSomeren et al., 2017). At the beginning of green-up, caribou select newly flowered cottongrass, which is rich in digestible N and energy, before switching to browse (Thompson and McCourt, 1981; Jorgenson et al., 2002). Intermediate faecal δ15N in 2023 likely indicates caribou had begun selecting browse since green-up had occurred whereas in 2024 high faecal δ15N suggests the beginning of green-up (VanSomeren et al., 2017; Hiltunen et al., 2025). Pre-green-up diets were probably similar among years for adult and sub-adult caribou because values for δ15N and δ13C in red blood cells overlapped (Fig. 3).

Caribou captured in locations with higher NDVI (2023) after the onset of green-up were apparently able to gain body protein quickly as indicated by greater sub-adult body mass, high serum albumin and high urea N. These results are consistent with changes in blood parameters of wild reindeer and caribou from winter to spring (Milner et al., 2003; Johnson et al., 2010; Daleo et al., 2025). The incorporation of dietary protein was also reflected isotopically in the increased Euclidean distances between blood fraction δ15N. The enrichment of δ15N of serum proteins suggests rebuilding of body stores from an influx of dietary N (Barboza et al., 2020). In this study, high body mass of sub-adult caribou after onset of green-up (2023) was not related to differences in body size, measured as jaw length, ½ of heart girth or metatarsal length. We did not measure body fat but most differences among years in live mass are probably associated with lean mass because caribou do not gain body fat until the later part of summer (Barboza et al., 2024). Caribou can gain lean mass in spring even when body fat is lost (Barboza and Parker, 2008; Barboza et al., 2024). Mass gain has also been reported over winter for both growing and adult caribou (Dale et al., 2008; Couturier et al., 2010; Denryter and Crouse, 2025). We cannot evaluate winter conditions experienced by these animals prior to capture. However, National Weather service weather station data from the Barrow area suggest similar average winter (December to February) temperatures among years (Table S6; Diamond et al., 2013; NOAA, n.d.).

Migratory caribou can move long distances to arrive at foraging grounds where plant growth is likely but fine scale phenological variation (i.e. multiple ‘green waves’) results in variable foraging returns, especially when movement is constrained or increased by endogenous (e.g. parturition), environmental (e.g. deep snow, insects, predators) and anthropogenic (e.g. industrial development) factors (Severson et al., 2021). We found significant variation in dietary N (crude protein) within the calving grounds of the TCH after green-up had occurred (Tables 1 and 2). All samples collected via transect in 2025 and captures in 2023 were above 2%N, while samples collected during captures in 2022 and 2024 were below and at the 1%N threshold of lean mass gains, respectively, (Barboza et al., 2024). Our comparisons among year are consistent with observations of wild cervids harvested throughout the year in which seasonal changes in plant N (green-up) are associated with changes in protein content of the ruminal digesta, kidney mass, liver mass and whole-body mass (Arnold, 2020). Our data confirm that caribou respond to changes within a 14-day window of spring green-up. Further comparisons among age classes, years and herds will be required to refine the sensitivity of caribou to phenological changes in diet quality and quantity.

Supplementary Material

Web_Material_coag073
web_material_coag073.zip (329.5KB, zip)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the extensive work put in by the field crew including Rick Swisher (Quicksilver Air), Marty Webb (Tundra Air), Mark Stott (Backcountry Helicopters), Paul Zaczkowski (Papa Zulu Air Service), Eric Sieh (Arctic Backcountry Flying Service), Mark Keech (Swift Fork Aviation), Lindsey Dreese (ADFG), Carmen Dagget (ADFG) and Brian Person (North Slope Borough). Additional funding for collars was provided by the North Slope Borrough and ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. We are grateful to Joe Welch for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Cecelia J Giesen, Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Ecological Sciences Building, 534 John Kimbrough Blvd, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Joelle Hepler, Department of Wildlife Conservation, Department of Wildlife Conservation, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, 1300 College Rd, Fairbanks, AK 99701, USA.

Shawna A Karpovich, Department of Wildlife Conservation, Department of Wildlife Conservation, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, 1300 College Rd, Fairbanks, AK 99701, USA.

Christopher S Swingley, ABR, Inc.—Environmental Research & Services, 2842 Goldstream Road, Fairbanks, AK 99709, USA.

Perry S Barboza, Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Ecological Sciences Building, 534 John Kimbrough Blvd, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Author contributions

Cecelia J. Giesen–lab work, data curation, analysis, writing–original draft, writing–review & editing. Shawna A. Karpovich–project administration, funding acquisition, supervision, fieldwork and capture, lab work, writing–review & editing. Joelle Hepler—funding acquisition, fieldwork and capture, lab work, writing–review & editing. Christopher S. Swingley–data curation. Perry S. Barboza–conceptualization, funding acquisition, analysis, validation, methodology, writing–original draft, writing–review & editing.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

This work was funded under award F22AF01664 from the US Fish and Wildlife Service Pittman-Robertson Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Grant, administered by ADF&G Division of Wildlife Conservation.

Data availability

Requests to use the capture location data can be made to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, as those data are protected under Alaska state statute (AS 16.05.815(d)). All other data will be made available on request.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Conservation Physiology online.

References

  1. Abrahms  B, Aikens  EO, Armstrong  JB, Deacy  WW, Kauffman  MJ, Merkle  JA (2021) Emerging perspectives on resource tracking and animal movement ecology. Trends Ecol and Evol  36: 308–320. 10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agostinho  KFF, Monteiro  LR, Beneditto  APMD (2021) Individual niche trajectories in nesting green turtles on Rocas Atoll, Brazil: an isotopic tool to assess diet shifts over time. Biota Neotrop  21: e20201099. 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2020-1099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aikens  EO, Kauffman  MJ, Merkle  JA, Dwinnell  SPH, Fralick  GL, Monteith  KL (2017) The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in large migratory herbivore. Ecol Lett  20: 741–750. 10.1111/ele.12772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnold  W (2020) Review: seasonal differences in the physiology of wild northern ruminants. Animal  14: s124–s132. 10.1017/S1751731119003240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnold  W, Ruf  T, Loe  LE, Irvine  RJ, Ropstad  E, Veiberg  V, Albon  SD (2018) Circadian rhythmicity persists through the Polar night and midnight sun in Svalbard reindeer. Sci Rep  8: 14466. 10.1038/s41598-018-32778-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Atmeh  K, Bonenfant  C, Gaillard  JM, Garel  M, Hewison  AJM, Marchand  P, Morellet  N, Anderwald  P, Buuveibaatar  B, Beck  JL  et al. (2024) Neonatal antipredator tactics shape female movement patterns in large herbivores. Nat Ecol Evol  9: 142–152. 10.1038/s41559-024-02565-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Augustine  DJ, McNaughton  SJ (1998) Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J Wild Mgmt  62: 1165–1183. 10.2307/3801981. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barboza  PS, Parker  KL (2006) Body protein stores and isotopic indicators of N balance in femal reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) during winter. Physiol Biochem Zool  79: 628–644. 10.1086/502811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barboza  PS, Parker  KL (2008) Allocating protein to reproduction in arctic reindeer and caribou. Physiol Biochem Zool  81: 835–855. 10.1086/590414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barboza  PS, Parker  KL, Hume  ID (2009) Integrative Wildlife Nutrition. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg [Google Scholar]
  11. Barboza  PS, Shively  RD, Gustine  DD, Addison  JA (2020) Winter is coming: conserving body protein in female reindeer, caribou, and muskoxen. Front Ecol Evol  8: 150. 10.3389/fevo.2020.00150. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Barboza  PS, Shively  RD, Thompson  DP (2024) Robust responses of female caribou to changes in food supply. Ecol Evol Physiol  97: 29–52. 10.1086/729668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Barboza  PS, Van Someren  LL, Gustine  DD, Bret-Harte  MS (2018) The nitrogen window for arctic herbivores: plant phenology and protein gain of migratory caribou (Rangifer tarandus). Ecosphere  9: e02073. 10.1002/ecs2.2073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bischof  R, Loe  LE, Meisingset  EL, Zimmermann  B, Van Moorter  B, Mysterud  A (2012) A migratory northern ungulate in the pursuit of spring: jumping or surfing the green wave?  Am Nat  180: 407–424. 10.1086/667590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Borish  D, Cunsolo  A, Snook  J, Dewey  C, Mauro  I, Harper  SL (2022) Relationships between Rangifer and indigenous well-being in the north American arctic and subarctic. Arctic  75: 86–104. 10.14430/arctic74870. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Buntgen  U, Jenny  H, Galvan  JD, Piermattei  A, Krusic  PJ, Bollmann  K (2020) Stable body size of Alpine ungulates. R Soc Open Sci  7: 200196. 10.1098/rsos.200196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cameron  MD, Joly  K, Breed  GA, Mulder  CPH, Kielland  K (2020) Pronounced fidelity and selection for average conditions of calving area suggestive of spatial memory in a highly migratory ungulate. Front Ecol Evol  8: 564567. 10.3389/fevo.2020.564567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Carroll  GM, Parrett  LS, George  JC, Yokel  DA (2005) Calving distribution of the Teshekpuk caribou herd, 1994-2003. Rangifer  25: 27–35. 10.7557/2.25.4.1767. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cattet  M (2018) Handling and Release of Caribou Standard Operating Procedure. Wildlife Care Committee, Government of the Northwest Territories [Google Scholar]
  20. Clark-Wolf  TJ, St John  J, Rajesh  CA, Hebblewhite  M (2025) Caribou and reindeer population cycles are driven by top-down and bottom-up mechanisms across space and time. Ecol Evol  15: e71348. 10.1002/ece3.71348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. ConocoPhillips . 2025.  Willow Project. https://www.conocophillips.com/operations/alaska/willow-project/ (18 December 2025, date accessed).
  22. Cook  JG, Kelly  AP, Cook  RC, Culling  B, Culling  D, McLaren  A, Larter  NC, Watters  M (2021) Season patterns in nutritional condition of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in the southern Northwest Territories and northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Can J Zoo  99: 845–858. 10.1139/cjz-2021-0057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Couturier  S, Otto  RD, Cote  SD, Luther  G, Mahoney  SP (2010) Body size variations in Caribou ecotypes and relationships with demography. J Wildl Manag  74: 395–404. 10.2193/2008-384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dale  BW, Adams  LG, Collins  WB, Joly  K, Valkenburg  P, Tobey  R (2008) Stochastic and compensatory effects limit persistence of variation in body mass of young Caribou. J Mammal  89: 1130–1135. 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-137.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Daleo  MJ, Lieske  C, Cray  C, Beckmen  KB (2025) Establishing serum protein electrophoresis reference intervals in free-ranging barren-ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti). Front Vet Sci  12: 1717426. 10.3389/fvets.2025.1717426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Denryter  K, Crouse  JA (2025) Overwinter gains in body fat challenge assumptions about winter nutrition in northern ungulates. Ecosphere  16: e70507. 10.1002/ecs2.70507. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Diamond  HJ, Karl  TR, Palecki  MA, Baker  CB, Bell  JE, Leeper  RD, Easterling  DR, Lawrimore  JH, Meyers  TP, Helfert  MR  et al. (2013) U.S. climate reference network after one decade of operations: status and assessment. Bull Amer Meteor Soc  94: 485–498. 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00170.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Drent  R, Ebbinge  B, Weijand  B (1978) Balancing the energy budgets of arctic-breeding geese throughout the annual cycle: a progress report. Verh Orn Ges Bayern  23: 239–264. [Google Scholar]
  29. Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center (2018) USGS EROS Archive - Digital Elevation - Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (IFSAR) – Alaska. doi: 10.24381/cds.68d2bb30 (03 November 2025, date accessed). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. ESRI (2025) USA states generalized boundaries. Item id: 8c2d6d7df8fa4142b0a1211c8dd66903. https://services.arcgis.com/P3ePLMYs2RVChkJx/arcgis/rest/services/USA_States_Generalized_Boundaries/FeatureServer (05 December 2025, date accessed).
  31. Franzmann  AW (1985) Assessment of Nutritional Status. In RJ  Hudson, RG  White, eds, Bioenergetics of Wild Herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 239–260 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fryxell  JM (1990) Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. Am Nat  138: 478–498. 10.1086/285227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. GEBCO Compilation Group (2024) GEBCO 2024 Grid. 10.5285/37c52e96-24ea-67ce-e063-7086abc05f29 (03 November 2025, date accessed). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gurarie  E, Beaupre  C, Couriot  OH, Cameron  MD, Fagan  WF, Joly  K (2024) Evidence for an adaptive, large-scale range shift in a long-distance terrestrial migrant. Glob Change Biol  30: e17589. 10.1111/gcb.17589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gustine  D, Barboza  PS, Adams  LG, Griffith  B, Cameron  R, Whitten  K (2017) Advancing the match-mismatch framework for large herbivores in the Arctic: evaluating the evidence for a trophic mismatch in caribou. PloS One  12: e0171807. 10.1371/journal.pone.0171807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gustine  D, Barboza  PS, Adams  LG, Wolf  NB (2014a) Environmental and physiological influences to isotopic ratios of N and protein status in a montane ungulate in winter. PloS One  9: e103471. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gustine  D, Barboza  PS, Addison  J, Shively  R, Oliver  L (2014b) Isotopic nitrogen in fecal fiber as an indicator of winter diet in caribou and muskoxen. Rapid Comm Mass Spectrometry  28: 625–634. 10.1002/rcm.6825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gustine  D, Barboza  PS, Lawler  JP, Adams  LG, Parker  KL, Arthur  SM, Shults  BS (2012) Diversity of nitrogen isotopes and protein status in caribou: implications for monitoring northern ungulates. J Mammal  93: 778–790. 10.1644/11-MAMM-A-164.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hebblewhite  M, Merrill  E, McDermid  G (2008) A multi-scale test of the forage maturation hypothesis in a partially migratory ungulate population. Ecological monographs  78: 141–166. 10.1890/06-1708.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hiltunen  TA, Kivelä  SM, Kumpula  J, Aspi  JO, Welker  JM (2025) Delineating seasonal shifts in reindeer habitat and diet selection by integrating GPS telemetry and stable isotope analysis. Wildl Biol  2026: e01570. 10.1002/wlb3.01570. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hobbs  NT (1996) Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. J of Wild Mgmt  60: 695–713. 10.2307/3802368. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnson  D, Harms  NJ, Larter  NC, Elkin  BT, Tabel  H, Wei  G (2010) Serum biochemistry, serology, and parasitology of boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in the northwest territories, Canada. J Wildl Dis  46: 1096–1107. 10.7589/0090-3558-46.4.1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Johnson  HE, Golden  TS, Adams  LG, Gustine  DD, Lenart  EA, Barboza  PS (2021) Dynamic selection for forage quality and quantity in response to phenology and insects in an Arctic ungulate. Ecol Evol  11: 11664–11688. 10.1002/ece3.7852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Johnson  HE, Gustine  DD, Golden  TS, Adams  LG, Parrett  LS, Lenart  EA, Barboza  PS (2018) NDVI exhibits mixed success in predicating spatiotemporal variation in caribou summer forage quality and quantity. Ecosphere  9: e02461. 10.1002/ecs2.2461. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Joly  K, Gurarie  E, Sorum  MS, Kaczensky  P, Cameron  MD, Jakes  AF, Borg  BL, Nandintsetseg  D, Hopcraft  JGC, Buuveibaatar  B  et al. (2019) Longest terrestrial migrations and movements around the world. Sci Rep  9: 15333. 10.1038/s41598-019-51884-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jorgenson  JC, Udevitz  MS, Felix  NA (2002) Forage quantity and quality. United States Geological Service, Federla Government Series, Biological Science Report 2002–0001. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/forage-quantity-and-quality.
  47. Kauffman  MJ, Aikens  EO, Esmaeili  S, Kaczensky  P, Middleton  A, Monteith  KL, Morrison  TA, Mueller  T, Sawyer  H, Goheen  JR (2021) Causes, consequences, and conservation of ungulate migration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst  52: 453–478. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-012021-011516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Leclerc  M, Tarroux  A, Fauchald  P, Stien  A, Tveraa  T, St-Laurent  MH (2019) Effects of human-induced disturbances and weather on herbivore movement. J Mammal  100: 1490–1500. 10.1093/jmammal/gyz101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Levitt  DG, Levitt  MD (2016) Human serum albumin homeostasis: a new look at the roles of synthesis, catabolism, renal and gastrointestinal excretion, and the clinical value of serum albumin measurements. Int J Gen Med  Volume 9: 229–255. 10.2147/IJGM.S102819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Macander  MJ, Nelson  PR, Nawrocki  TW, Frost  GV, Orndahl  KM, Palm  EC, Wells  AF, Goetz  SJ (2022) Time-series maps reveal widespread change in plant functional type cover across Arctic and boreal Alaska and Yukon. Environ Res Lett  17: 054042. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mallory  CD, Williamson  SN, Campbell  MW, Boyce  MS (2020) Response of barren-ground caribou to advancing spring phenology. Oecologia  192: 837–852. 10.1007/s00442-020-04604-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Meier  SA, Furrer  M, Nowak  N, Zenobi  R, Sundset  MA, Huber  R, Brown  SA, Wagner  G (2024) Uncoupling of behavioral and metabolic 24-h rhythms in reindeer. Curr Biol  34: 1596–1603.e4. 10.1016/j.cub.2024.02.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Middleton  AD, Merkle  JA, McWhirter  DE, Cook  JG, Cook  RC, White  PJ, Kauffman  MJ (2018) Green-wave surfing increases fat gain in a migratory ungulate. Oikos  127: 1060–1068. 10.1111/oik.05227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Milner  JM, Stien  A, Irvin  RJ, Albon  SD, Langvatn  R, Ropstad  E (2003) Body condition in Svalbard reindeer and the use of blood parameters as indicators of condition and fitness. Can J Zool  81: 1566–1578. 10.1139/Z03-152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Monteith  KL, Bleich  VC, Stephenson  TR, Pierce  BM, Conner  MM, Kie  JG, Bowyer  RT (2014) Life-history characteristics of mule deer: effects of nutrition in a variable environment. Wildl Monogr  186: 1–62. 10.1002/wmon.1011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Monteith  KL, Hayes  MM, Kauffman  MJ, Copeland  HE, Sawyer  H (2018) Functional attributes of ungulate migration: landscape features facilitate movement and access to forage. Ecol Appl  28: 2153–2164. 10.1002/eap.1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Muñoz Sabater  J (2019) ERA5-Land monthly averaged data from 1981 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). 10.24381/cds.68d2bb30 (03 November 2025, date accessed). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mysterud  A, Langvatn  R, Yoccoz  NG, Stenseth  NC (2001) Plant phenology, migration and geographical variation in body weight of a large herbivore: the effect of a variable topography. J Anim Ecol  70: 915–923. 10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00559.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Naranjo  EJ, Guerra  MM, Bodmer  RE, Bolaños  JE (2004) Subsistence hunting by three ethnic groups of the Lacandon forest, Mexico. J Ethnobiol  24: 233–253. [Google Scholar]
  60. NOAA (n.d.) Daily Temperature Data – Barrow, AK (ThreadEX). NOWdata – NOAA Online Weather Data. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Weather Service, https://www.weather.gov/wrh/Climate?wfo=afg (04 February 2026, date accessed). [Google Scholar]
  61. Ortega  AC (2023) Evaluating resource tracking and the benefit of migration for a temperate ungulate. Doctoral dissertation. University of Wyoming ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 30487454. [Google Scholar]
  62. Oster  KW, Barboza  PS, Gustine  DD, Joly  K, Shively  RD (2018) Mineral constraints on arctic caribou (Rangifer tarandus): a spatial and phenological perspective. Ecosphere  9: e02160. 10.1002/ecs2.2160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Parker  KL, Barboza  PS, Gillingham  MP (2009) Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates. Funct Ecol  23: 57–69. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01528.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Parrett  LS (2021) Teshekpuk caribou herd management report and plan, Game Management Units 23, 24, and 26: Report period 1 July 2012–30 June 2017, and plan period 1 July 2017–30 June 2022. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Species Management Report and Plan ADF&G/DWC/SMR&P-2021-43, Juneau.
  65. Pettorelli  N, Ryan  S, Mueller  T, Bunnefeld  N, Jedrzejewska  B, Lima  M, Kausrud  K (2011) The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology. Climate Res  46: 15–27. 10.3354/cr00936. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Prichard  AK, Parrett  LS, Lenart  EA, Caikoski  JR, Joly  K, Person  BT (2022) Interchange and overlap among four adjacent arctic caribou herds. J Wildl Mgmt  84: 1500–1514. 10.1002/jwmg.21934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Prinsen  BH, de Sain-van der Velden  MGM (2004) Albumin turnover: experimental approach and its application in health and renal diseases. Clin Chim Acta  347: 1–14. 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Proffitt  KM, Hebblewhite  M, Peters  W, Hupp  N, Shamhart  J (2016) Linking landscape-scale differences in forage to ungulate nutritional ecology. Ecol App  26: 2156–2174. 10.1002/eap.1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Robbins  CT (2012) Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition, Ed 2nd. Elsevier, San Diego, p. 15 [Google Scholar]
  70. Schaaf  C, Wang  Z (2021) MODIS/Terra+aqua BRDF/albedo nadir BRDF adjusted reflectance daily L3 global - 500m V061 [data set]. NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center. 10.5067/MODIS/MCD43A4.061  15 November 2025, date accessed. [DOI]
  71. Severson  JP, Johnson  HE, Arthur  SM, Leacock  WB, Suitor  MJ (2021) Spring phenology drives range shifts in a migratory Arctic ungulate with key implications for the future. Glob Change Biol  27: 4546–4563. 10.1111/gcb.15682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Singer  M, Codron  D, Lechner  I, Rudnik  R, Barboza  P, Hummel  J, Clauss  M (2024) The effect of size and density on the mean retention time of particles in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol  292: 111621. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.111621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Soppela  P, Seppo  S, Heiskari  U, Nieminen  M (2008) The effects of wintertime undernutrition on plasma leptin and insulin levels in an arctic ruminant, the reindeer. Comp Biochem Physiol, Part B  149: 613–621. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. StataCorp (2025) Stata Statistical Software: Release 19.5. StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX [Google Scholar]
  75. Stevenson  TJ (2023) On Rheostasis: The Hierarchical Organization of Physiological Stability. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  76. Taillon  J, Barboza  PS, Cote  SD (2013) Nitrogen allocation to offspring and milk production in a capital breeder. Ecology  94: 1815–1827. 10.1890/12-1424.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Taillon  J, Festa-Bianchet  M, Cote  SD (2011) Variation in body condition of migratory caribou at calving and weaning: which measures should we use?  Ecoscience  18: 295–303. 10.2980/18-3-3447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Thompson  DC, McCourt  KH (1981) Seasonal diets of the porcupine Caribou herd. Am Midl Nat  105: 70–76. 10.2307/2425011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Tothova  C, Mihajlovicova  X, Nagy  O (2018) The use of serum proteins in the laboratory diagnosis of health disorders in ruminants. In Abubakar, M, ed.,  Ruminants – The Husbandry, Economic and Health Aspects .  IntechOpen, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  80. Tyler  NJC, Post  E, Hazlerigg  DG (2024) Weak coupling between energetic status and the timing of reproduction in an Arctic ungulate. Sci Rep  14: 6352. 10.1038/s41598-024-56550-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. VanSomeren  LL, Barboza  PS, Gustine  DD, Bret-Harte  MM (2017) Variation in δ15N and δ13C values of forages for arctic caribou: effects of location, phenology and simulated digestion. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom  31: 813–820. 10.1002/rcm.7849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Welch  JH, Prichard  AK, Macander  MJ (2022) Caribou Monitoring Study for the Alpine Satellite Development Program and Greater Moose’s Tooth Unit, 2021. Prepared for Conocophillips Alaksa, INC. Prepared by ABR, INC. – Environmental Research And Services, Fairbanks, AK. [Google Scholar]
  83. Wolfe  SA, Griffith  B, Gray Wolfe  CA (2000) Response of reindeer and caribou to human activities. Polar Res  19: 63–73. 10.1111/j.1751-8369.2000.tb00329.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Web_Material_coag073
web_material_coag073.zip (329.5KB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

Requests to use the capture location data can be made to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, as those data are protected under Alaska state statute (AS 16.05.815(d)). All other data will be made available on request.


Articles from Conservation Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES