Abstract
Historically, the taxonomic classification and phylogenetic position of Sclerophytum querciforme, which is primarily delineated by morphological characteristics, have long remained controversial and undergone repeated revisions. In this study, we sequenced and systematically analyzed the complete mitochondrial genome of S. querciforme. The genome is 18,743 bp in length, containing 14 protein-coding genes, two ribosomal RNA genes, and one transfer RNA gene, with the same gene content and order as other species in the genus. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed that Sclerophytum forms a well-supported monophyletic clade, and S. querciforme is closely related to S. flexibile as sister taxa.
Keywords: Mitogenome, Sclerophytum, Sclerophytum querciforme, phylogenetic analysis
1. Introduction
Sclerophytum querciforme Pratt 1903 is a common soft coral in Indo-Pacific tropical reefs, distributed in the Maldives, Malay Archipelago, New Caledonia, and South China Sea (Pratt 1903; Verseveldt 1980; Benayahu et al. 2018).
This species has experienced repeated generic revisions. It was originally described as Sclerophytum querciforme Pratt 1903, and later transferred to Sinularia as Sinularia querciformis by Thomson and Dean (1931) based on colony morphology and sclerite characteristics. Verseveldt (1980) placed S. querciformis in Group IV of Sinularia, characterized by clubs longer than 0.12 mm, non-leptoclados-type, and without a central wart. Within this group, S. querciformis can be distinguished by loosely arranged lobes and lobules, spiny club heads, and coenenchymal sclerites up to 6 mm long.
However, Sinularia shows high morphological plasticity, and intraspecific variation often leads to taxonomic errors (Alderslade and Shirwaiker 1991; Benayahu et al. 1998). For example, Sinularia elegans was described based on minor sclerite differences (Tixier-Durivault 1970), but was later synonymized with S. querciformis after reevaluation of the holotype (Verseveldt 1974).
Molecular markers such as mt-mutS and COI have improved the systematics of Sinularia (McFadden et al. 2009; Benayahu et al. 2012). Based on recent phylogenomic evidence, Sinularia is now restricted to Sinularia brassica, and most species, including S. querciformis, are restored to Sclerophytum, since the valid name of this species is Sclerophytum querciforme (McFadden et al. 2022).
Molecular data for S. querciforme are still limited to short gene sequences. Mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) provide richer phylogenetic data than single genes (Kress et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2009; Yuan et al. 2012), a pattern also seen in cnidarians including corals (Figueroa and Baco 2014; Colin et al. 2021; Feng et al. 2023). This study sequenced the mitogenome of S. querciforme to clarify its phylogenetic position and support future taxonomic and evolutionary studies of octocorals.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sample collection
Specimens of S. querciforme were collected by scuba diving from the coast of West Island, Sanya, Hainan Province, China (18°14′5.93″N, 109°22′46.46″E) by Alireza Asem from Hainan Tropical Ocean University. Species identification was based on morphological characteristics, particularly the detailed morphology and size of sclerites, following the descriptions provided by McFadden et al. (2009) and Verseveldt (1980). The colony morphology and sclerite features were illustrated in Figure 1. The voucher specimen is deposited in the Museum of Zoology, Hainan Tropical Ocean University (specimen voucher number: 0058-SQ; Contact: Alireza Asem, asem.alireza@gmail.com).
Figure 1.

Morphological features of Sclerophytum querciforme. (A) Live colony photograph; scale bar = 5 cm. (B) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of sclerites from polyps and the colony surface; scale bars = 50 or 100 μm as indicated.
2.2. DNA extraction and sequencing
Genomic DNA of the sample was extracted using the Rapid Animal Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China; Cat. No. B518221) following the manufacturer’s standard protocols. A total of 0.2 μg genomic DNA was used for library construction. Genomic DNA was fragmented to 350 bp by sonication, and libraries were prepared using the NEB Next® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA; Cat. No. E7370L). Qualified libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq X platform, generating approximately 10.3 Gb of 2 × 150 bp paired-end clean reads.
2.3. Genome assembly and annotation
Raw reads were quality-controlled with FastQC (Andrews, 2010), showing high Phred scores (> Q35) and low error rates (< 0.05%) across all read positions (Figure S1). Reads were filtered with Trimmomatic v0.36 (Bolger et al. 2014) to remove adapters and low-quality reads, yielding clean reads with a 97.92% retention rate. Using the Sclerophytum ceramense mitogenome (GenBank: MK292119) as a reference, de novo assembly was performed with GetOrganelle v1.7.7.0 (Jin et al. 2020). Sequencing coverage was quantified after mitogenome assembly, with an average of 771.24×, maximum of 1214×, and minimum of 482× (Figure S2).
Positions of protein-coding genes (PCGs) and ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs) were determined using the NCBI ORF Finder online server, and manually verified by alignment with homologous genes from related species. Annotation of transfer RNA genes (tRNAs) was performed using tRNAscan-SE Search Server (Chan and Lowe 2019). The mitogenome map was visualized using Proksee (Grant et al. 2023) (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Circular map of the complete mitochondrial genome of Sclerophytum querciforme, showing gene locations and types. Genes on the outer track are on the heavy strand, and those on the inner track are on the light strand. Colors indicate gene types (CDS, tRNA, rRNA) as shown in the legend.
2.4. Phylogenetic analysis
Phylogenetic analyses included 13 mitogenomes from the genus Sclerophytum, with two taxa (Sarcophyton trocheliophorum and Lateothela grandiflora) chosen as outgroups in accordance with the octocoral phylogenetic framework (McFadden et al. 2022). Nucleotide sequences of 14 PCGs and two rRNAs were individually aligned in MEGA7 (Kumar et al. 2016) and concatenated into a final 17,755 bp alignment using SequenceMatrix (Vaidya et al. 2011).
Maximum-likelihood phylogeny was constructed using IQ-TREE 2.4.0 (Minh et al. 2020), with all sequences passing the nucleotide composition chi-square test (p > 0.05). ModelFinder Plus embedded within IQ-TREE selected GTR+F + I + G4 as the best-fit substitution model according to BIC (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). Nodal support was quantified using 1000 replicates of UFBoot2 ultrafast bootstrap (Hoang et al. 2018).
3. Results
3.1. Mitochondrial genome characteristics
The complete mitogenome of S. querciforme is 18,743 bp long (GenBank accession: PZ377454). Its nucleotide composition comprises 30.31% A, 16.52% C, 19.30% G, and 33.87% T.
The S. querciforme mitogenome encodes 14 PCGs, two rRNAs, and one tRNA. The trnM together with COX3, ATP6, ATP8, and COX2 is encoded on the light strand, whereas all other PCGs (COX1, CYTB, ND1–6, ND4L, mutS) are distributed on the heavy strand (Figure 2). A total of 15 intergenic spacers are detected, ranging from 4 to 154 bp in length. All PCGs initiate with the ATG start codon. Six PCGs (ND4L, mutS, ND4, COX2, ATP6, ATP8) terminate with TAA, whereas the remaining eight genes end with TAG.
3.2. Phylogenetic tree
The phylogenetic tree (Figure 3) exhibited high bootstrap support values for most branches. The outgroup taxa form a well-supported, distinct clade that is clearly separated from all ingroup species of the genus Sclerophytum.
Figure 3.

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Sclerophytum inferred from the concatenated sequences of 14 protein-coding genes and two ribosomal RNA genes. Numbers on branches represent ultrafast bootstrap support values. The scale bar indicates 0.004 nucleotide substitutions per site. The species sequenced in this study, Sclerophytum querciforme (PZ377454), is highlighted in bold. Other ingroup species included in the phylogenetic analysis are Sclerophytum grandilobatum (PX856750; Shen et al. 2026), Sclerophytum peculiare (JX023274; Kayal et al. 2015), Sclerophytum ceramense (MK292119; Asem et al. 2019), Sclerophytum humile (OK641586; Yang et al. 2022), Sclerophytum flexibile (OL616272; Muthye et al. 2022), Sclerophytum cf. cruciatum (KY462727; Shimpi et al. 2017), Sclerophytum acutum (MW987591; Yang et al. 2023), Sclerophytum wanannense (OL616277; Muthye et al. 2022), Sclerophytum slieringsi (OL616276; Muthye et al. 2022), Sclerophytum penghuense (MW256412; Shen et al. 2021), Sclerophytum lochmodes (OL616273; Muthye et al. 2022) and Sclerophytum maximum (MN485891; Chen et al. 2019). Sarcophyton trocheliophorum (MK994517; Shen et al. 2019) and Lateothela grandiflora (PX070533; Quattrini et al. 2024) were used as outgroups for rooting the tree.
4. Discussion and conclusions
Gene content and gene order comparisons, including the newly sequenced S. querciforme, revealed extreme conservation across the genus Sclerophytum (Kayal et al. 2015; Shimpi et al. 2017; Asem et al. 2019; Chen et al. 2019; Shen et al. 2021; Muthye et al. 2022; Yang et al. 2022; Quattrini et al. 2024; Shen et al. 2026). This conserved pattern accords with the ancestral gene arrangement of Octocorallia and represents the predominant genomic architecture conserved throughout Octocorallia and its largest order Malacalcyonacea (Brockman and McFadden 2012; Yoshioka et al. 2025).
The phylogenetic tree revealed that the genus Sclerophytum formed a strongly supported monophyletic clade, which was divided into three phylogenetic lineages. McFadden et al. (2009) subdivided Sclerophytum into five clades (Clades 1–5) using the muts gene. Subsequently, Yoshioka et al. (2025) grouped sampled Sclerophytum species into two lineages based on available mitochondrial genome data, and assigned them to Clade 4 and Clade 5 following the classification framework of McFadden et al. (2009). Our phylogenetic results are consistent with these previous studies, and the species composition of Clade 4 and Clade 5 perfectly matches the circumscription reported by Yoshioka et al. (2025). Therefore, the three lineages recovered in the present ML tree were designated Clade 2, Clade 4, and Clade 5, respectively.
Sclerophytum grandilobatum represented the earliest diverging lineage within the genus, while the remaining species clustered into two well-supported subclades. One subclade comprised S. querciforme, S. flexibile, S. humile, S. ceramense, and S. peculiare, among which S. querciforme was recovered as the sister species of S. flexibile.
Mitogenome length within Sclerophytum is highly conserved, ranging narrowly from 18,713 bp to 18,752 bp. The mitogenome of S. querciforme determined in this study (18,743 bp) falls well within this range. Interestingly, S. flexibile—the closest phylogenetic relative of S. querciforme—also shares an identical mitogenome length of 18,743 bp, further supporting their close evolutionary affinity.
This study presents the first complete mitogenome of S. querciforme. Our results confirm the monophyly of Sclerophytum, stabilize its taxonomic status, and reveal highly conserved mitogenomic features within the genus. These findings highlight the value of mitogenome for resolving taxonomic and phylogenetic uncertainties in Malacalcyonacea and provide valuable genomic resources for future studies on soft coral evolution and systematics.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Prof. McFadden and Prof. Benayahu for their valuable advice on sample identification and data analysis. We also express our gratitude to Dr. Alireza Asem for kindly providing the specimens utilized in this study.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the [Research Project of Chengde Medical University] under Grant [number 202419] and [Open project supported by Hebei (Chengde) Industrial Technology Institute of Chinese Medicinal Materials] under Grant [number CYKF202305].
Ethical approval
The specimen collection and experimental procedures in this study were approved by the Ethical Review Department of Science and Technology of Hainan Province, China (reference number ZDYF2019154). All protocols adhered to the guidelines set forth by the Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Data availability statement
The mitogenome sequence data that support the findings of this study are available in GenBank of NCBI under the accession no. PZ377454. The associated BioSample, BioProject, and SRA numbers are SAMN57369155, PRJNA1455540 and SRR38205899, respectively.
References
- Alderslade P, Shirwaiker P.. 1991. New species of soft corals (Coelenterata: Octocorallia) from the Laccadive Archipelago. The Beagle: Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory. 8(1):189–233. 10.5962/p.262820 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Andrews, S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed 4 Oct 2018). [Google Scholar]
- Asem A, Lu H, Wang P-Z, Li W.. 2019. The complete mitochondrial genome of Sinularia ceramensis Verseveldt, 1977 (Octocorallia: Alcyonacea) using next-generation sequencing. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 4(1):815–816. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1574678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benayahu Y, van Ofwegen LP, Alderslade P.. 1998. A case study of variation in two nominal species of Sinularia (Coelenterata: Octocorallia): S. brassica May, 1898, and S. dura (Pratt, 1903), with a proposal for their synonymy. Zoological Verhandelingen. 323:277–309. [Google Scholar]
- Benayahu Y, et al. 2018. The octocorals of Dongsha Atoll (South China Sea): an iterative approach to species identification using classical taxonomy and molecular barcodes. Zool Stud. 57:50. 10.6620/ZS.2018.57-50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benayahu Y, et al. 2012. Diversity, distribution, and molecular systematics of octocorals (Coelenterata: Anthozoa) of the Penghu Archipelago, Taiwan. Zool Stud. 51(8):1529–1548. [Google Scholar]
- Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B.. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30(15):2114–2120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brockman SA, McFadden CS.. 2012. The mitochondrial genome of Paraminabea aldersladei (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Octocorallia) supports intramolecular recombination as the primary mechanism of gene rearrangement in octocoral mitochondrial genomes. Genome Biol Evol. 4(9):994–1006. 10.1093/gbe/evs074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colin L, Yesson C, Head CEI.. 2021. Complete mitochondrial genomes of three reef forming Acropora corals (Acroporidae, Scleractinia) from Chagos Archipelago, Indian Ocean. Biodivers Data J. 9:e72762. 10.3897/BDJ.9.e72762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chan PP, Lowe TM.. 2019. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol Biol. 1962:1–14. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y, et al. 2019. The complete mitochondrial genome of Sinularia maxima Verseveldt (Octocorallia: Alcyonacea) using next-generation sequencing. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 4(2):3425–3426. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1674740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng H, et al. 2023. Mitochondrial genome comparison reveals the evolution of cnidarians. Ecol Evol. 13(6):e10157. 10.1002/ece3.10157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Figueroa DF, Baco AR.. 2014. Octocoral mitochondrial genomes provide insights into the phylogenetic history of gene order rearrangements, order reversals, and cnidarian phylogenetics. Genome Biol Evol. 7(1):391–409. 10.1093/gbe/evu286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grant JR, Enns Eet al. 2023. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51(W1):W484–W492. 10.1093/nar/gkad326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS.. 2018. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol. 35(2):518–522. 10.1093/molbev/msx281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin JJ, et al. 2020. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 21(1):241. 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS.. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 14(6):587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kayal E, et al. 2015. Phylogenetic analysis of higher-level relationships within Hydroidolina (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) using mitochondrial genome data and insight into their mitochondrial transcription. PeerJ. 3:e1403. 10.7717/peerj.1403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH.. 2005. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(23):8369–8374. 10.1073/pnas.0503123102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K.. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 33(7):1870–1874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McFadden CS, van Ofwegen LP, Beckman EJ, Benayahu Y, Alderslade P.. 2009. Molecular systematics of the speciose Indo-Pacific soft coral genus, Sinularia (Anthozoa: Octocorallia). Invertebr Biol. 128(4):303–323. 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2009.00179.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- McFadden CS, van Ofwegen LP, Quattrini AM.. 2022. Revisionary systematics of Octocorallia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) guided by phylogenomics. Syst Biol. 71(3):520–541. [Google Scholar]
- Minh BQ, et al. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 37(5):1530–1534. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muthye V, Mackereth CD, Stewart JB, Lavrov DV.. 2022. Large dataset of octocoral mitochondrial genomes provides new insights into mt-mutS evolution and function. DNA Repair. 110:103273. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pratt EM. 1903. The Alcyonaria of the Maldives. Part II. The genera Sarcophytum, Lobophytum, Sclerophytum and Alcyonium. The Fauna and Geography of the Maldive and Laccadive Archipelagos. 2(1):503–539. [Google Scholar]
- Quattrini AM, et al. 2024. Skimming genomes for systematics and DNA barcodes of corals. Ecol Evol. 14(5):e11254. 10.1002/ece3.11254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen C-Y, et al. 2019. The complete mitochondrial genome of soft coral Sarcophyton trocheliophorum (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) using next-generation sequencing. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 4(2):3734–3735. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1679677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen C-Y, et al. 2021. The complete mitochondrial genome of soft coral Sinularia penghuensis Ofwegen and Benayahu, 2012 (Octocorallia: Alcyonacea): the analysis of mitogenome organization and phylogeny. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 6(4):1348–1350. 10.1080/23802359.2021.1906174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen C-Y, et al. 2026. The complete mitochondrial genome of Sclerophytum grandilobatum (Verseveldt, 1980) (Anthozoa: Octocorallia: Sarcophytidae) and its phylogenetic position. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 11(6):708–711. 10.1080/23802359.2026.2664910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimpi GG, Vargas S, Poliseno A, Worheide G.. 2017. Mitochondrial RNA processing in absence of tRNA punctuations in octocorals. BMC Mol Biol. 18(1):16. 10.1186/s12867-017-0093-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomson JA, Dean LR.. 1931. The alcyonacea of the siboga expedition. Siboga Expeditie Monografie. 19:1–168. [Google Scholar]
- Tixier-Durivault A. 1970. Octocorallia de l’île de la Réunion. Mémoires du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, Série A, Zoologie. 62:1–176. [Google Scholar]
- Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R.. 2011. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics. 27(2):171–180. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verseveldt J. 1974. Alcyonacea (Octocorallia) from the Red Sea, with a discussion of a new Sinularia species from Ceylon. Israel J Zool. 23:1–37. [Google Scholar]
- Verseveldt J. 1980. A revision of the genus Sinularia May (Octocorallia, Alcyonacea). Zoologische Verhandelingen. 179:1–128. [Google Scholar]
- Yang C, Wu Z, Huang Y.. 2022. The complete mitochondrial genome of Sinularia humilis van Ofwegen, 2008 (Octocorallia: Alcyonacea). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 7(7):1299–1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang C, Shikhsarmast FM, Fu C, Shen CY.. 2023. The complete mitochondrial genome of Indo-Pacific soft coral Sinularia acuta Manuputty and van Ofwegen, 2007 (Octocorallia: Alcyonacea). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 8(3):371–374. 10.1080/23802359.2023.2184658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshioka Y, et al. 2025. Extensive mitochondrial genomic analyses reveal dynamic gene order rearrangements in the class Octocorallia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Gene Rep. 38:102111. 10.1016/j.genrep.2024.102111 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan Y, et al. 2012. The complete mitochondrial genomes of six heterodont bivalves (Tellinoidea and Solenoidea): variable gene arrangements and phylogenetic implications. PLoS One. 7(2):e32085. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X, et al. 2009. The complete mitochondrial genome of rock carp Procypris rabaudi (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) and phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Rep. 36(5):981–991. 10.1007/s11033-008-9271-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The mitogenome sequence data that support the findings of this study are available in GenBank of NCBI under the accession no. PZ377454. The associated BioSample, BioProject, and SRA numbers are SAMN57369155, PRJNA1455540 and SRR38205899, respectively.
