Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Aug 5;65(40):e2425823. doi: 10.1002/anie.2425823

Mitigating Stress‐Induced Nonphotoactive Phase Transition Through Sodium Sulfonate Engineering for Stable and Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells

Zhihuan Tang 1, Mingzi Sun 2, Jinghao Ge 1, Ying Wang 1, Yunfan Wang 3, Yiran Tao 4, Lu Zhang 1, Xinhui Lu 4, Sai‐Wing Tsang 3, Weizhong Tian 5, Rui Wang 5, Hao‐Chung Kuo 6, Bolong Huang 2,✉, Shengzhong (Frank) Liu 1,7,8,✉, Jiaxue You 3,✉, Alex K Y Jen 2,3
PMCID: PMC13618294  PMID: 42555145

ABSTRACT

Formamidinium lead triiodide (FAPbI3) perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have attracted significant attention due to their outstanding optoelectronic properties. However, their long‐term stability remains limited by lattice strain‐induced transition from the photoactive α‐phase to the nonphotoactive δ‐phase. In this work, first‐principles calculations reveal that the incorporation of Na+ into interstitial sites between adjacent FA+ cations significantly reduces the formation energy of the α‐phase, thereby promoting its thermodynamic stabilization. Then, experimental results confirm that the introduction of 2 mol% Na+ effectively alleviates lattice strain while simultaneously suppressing δ phase. Moreover, the accompanying sulfonate groups interacting with PbI2 can regulate the crystallization and improve film quality. As a result, the optimized PSC achieved power conversion efficiency (PCE) as high as 26.67% (certificated 26.44%), ranking among the highest reported for the n‐i‐p structured devices. Notably, the bare device without encapsulation retained over 90% of its initial efficiency after continuous heating at 85°C for 1200 h and maintained 80% after 800 h continuous illumination. This study demonstrates that metal cation doping is an effective strategy for stabilizing the perovskite lattice and enhancing long‐term operational stability of perovskite‐based optoelectronic devices.

Keywords: crystallization kinetics, high efficiency, lattice geometry, perovskite solar cells, thermal and light stability


To address the phase stability issue of α‐FAPbI3, we employed a cation doping strategy using 1‐decanesulfonate (C10H21NaO3S). This doping releases lattice strain and suppresses the formation of the δ‐phase, enabling breakthrough performance in perovskite solar cells with a power conversion efficiency of 26.67% and excellent thermal and photostability.

graphic file with name ANIE-65-e2425823-g001.webp

1. Introduction

In recent years, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have garnered considerable attention as promising next‐generation photovoltaic devices owing to their remarkable properties [1]. So far, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs has reached over 27% [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. The structure of lead halide perovskite is represented by the general formula ABX3, where A represents organic ammonium or inorganic cation, B metal cation, and X halides [10]. At present, high‐efficiency PSCs are mainly manufactured using FAPbI3 [11]. However, due to lattice expansion triggered by the FA+ cation, the stability of α‐FAPbI3 is diminished, leading to a spontaneous degradation into the nonphotoactive yellow δ‐phase [12]. One of the most common strain compensation strategies is to simultaneously introduce smaller ions to reduce local strains in the perovskite lattice [13].

The strain in the FAPbI3 perovskite can be reduced by replacing some FA+ ions with small‐sized cations [14]. Zhu et al. [15] found that reducing the effective tolerance factor of FAPbI3 by adding the smaller‐size Cs+ cation can stabilize the α‐phase perovskite structure. He et al., [16] observed that Rb+ ions can fill the cation vacancies caused by MA volatilization during the annealing stage, reducing the shrinkage strain of perovskite crystals. Park at al [17] observed that partially replacing FA+ with MA+ in FAPbI3 can enhance the stability of the α‐phase of FAPbI3. Cs+ is the common cation used to regulate lattice strain in FAPbI3 perovskite [18]. Also, K+ and Rb+ were used to adjust the lattice strain in FAPbI3 perovskite [19]. Guo at al [20] observed that low concentration doping of K+ in CsPbBr3 can replace some A‐site cations, leading to a decrease in lattice strain of perovskite. The radii of K+, Rb+, and Cs+ are 138, 152, and 167 pm, respectively [21]. The radius of FA+ is around 253 pm and MA+ is around 217 pm [22]. Goldschmidt tolerance factor (t) is an empirical index for predicting stable crystal structures of perovskite materials. Equation (1) is the calculation formula for the Goldschmidt tolerance factor (t):

t=RA+RB2RB+RX (1)

where t is the Goldschmidt tolerance factor, R A is the radius of A cation, R B is the radius of B cation and R X is the radius of the anion. In inorganic–organic hybrid perovskites, the organic cation usually has a nonspherical geometry and rotates constantly in the lattice [23, 24]. A t value between 0.8 and 1.1 is favorable for cubic perovskite structure, and larger (>1.1) or smaller (<0.8) values of tolerance factor usually result in nonperovskite structures [25]. The alloying compositions have smaller tolerance factors than pure FAPbI3. The effective tolerance factor is reduced to relax local lattice strain, and to improve both efficiency and stability in solar cells [12].

On the other hand, FAPbI3 undergoes a complex phase transition from its precursor solution to the solid‐phase alpha (α) phase. In this phase transition process, the nucleation control is crucial for the final film quality. Ge et al. [26]. demonstrated that aminoguanidine hydrochloride could form an intermediate phase and modulate nucleation in the FAPbI3 system. Satoshi Uchida et al. [27] investigated the effect of chloride integration on the nucleation of perovskite films. Therefore, crystallization optimization is also crucial for preparing high‐quality PSCs. Tao et al. [28] introduced 2‐aniline‐4‐sulfonic acid containing sulfonic acid groups into the perovskite system, delayed the crystallization kinetics, and prepared high crystallinity, large grain perovskite films.

In this study, we employed first‐principles calculations to investigate whether sodium ions (Na+) can incorporate into the formamidinium (FA) perovskite lattice to stabilize the α‐phase. The calculations have revealed that Na+ doping significantly impacts the phase stability and electronic structures of FAPbI3 perovskite with distinct preferences for doping sites and energy characteristics. Interstitial sites are more favored than substitutional sites for α‐FAPbI3 during the Na+ doping. Notably, α‐FAPbI3 exhibits much lower formation energies of Na+ doping than δ‐FAPbI3 across all possible doping sites, enabling the stabilization of the α phase over the δ phase. The sulfonic acid ions (C10H21O3S−) were used to balance the charge of Na+ cations (Figure S1) and interacted with PbI2 to regulate the crystallization process, effectively suppressing the precipitation of PbI2. Finally, optimized PSCs achieved a champion efficiency of 26.67%. In addition, the optimized devices exhibit excellent thermal stability and light stability, with an initial efficiency of over 90% after storage at 85°C for 1200 h. And after 800 h of illumination in an N2 atmosphere, it maintained at 80% of the initial efficiency.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. First‐Principles Calculations Design

To investigate the influences of Na+ doping on the perovskite lattice, we have performed theoretical calculations based on the FAPbI3 lattice. After introducing the Na+ doping, we have considered three different interstitial sites and one substitutional site for both α‐FAPbI3 and δ‐FAPbI3 (Figure 1a–d, Figure S3). IntNa‐1 is the interstitial site between FA molecules arranged in parallel with Na+ in α‐FAPbI3 (Figure 1a). IntNa‐2 is located in the interstitial site of the Pb‐I octahedral inorganic framework, near the position of the I atom (Figure 1b). IntNa‐3 is an interstitial site formed by the aggregation of multiple FA molecules, with Na+ located near the edge of the Pb‐I octahedral skeleton (Figure 1c). SubNa is a substitutional doping, where Na+ ions directly replace the lattice sites of Pb2+ in the α‐FAPbI3 crystal, rather than occupying interstitial positions (Figure 1d). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis reveals that the lattice spacing decreased from 3.28to 3.15 Å after doping with Na+, providing evidence for the incorporation of Na+ within the perovskite crystal lattice (Figure S4). According to Bragg's law, the shift of the diffraction peak to higher angles (Figure 2b) is caused by a decrease in the interplanar crystal spacing. The decrease in lattice spacing indicates the introduction of some compressive stress. Lan et al. [29]. indicated that the introduced compressive stress, attributed to sodium interstitial doping, clamps the perovskite lattice from all directions, thereby raising the activation barrier for the transition from α‐to‐δ phase.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The relaxed structures of the α‐FAPbI3 with different doping sites. (a) IntNa‐1, (b) IntNa‐2, (c) IntNa‐3, and (d) SubNa. Dark grey balls = Pb, brown balls = I, purple balls = Na, grey balls = C, blue balls = N, and white balls = H. The lattice parameter changes in (e) α‐FAPbI3 and (f) δ‐FAPbI3. a, b, and c refer to the unit cell axes. The comparisons of (g) Pb‐6p and (h) I‐5p in the α‐FAPbI3. The comparisons of (i) Pb‐6p and (j) I‐5p in the δ‐FAPbI3. The formation energy of Na+ doping in (k) α‐FAPbI3 and (l) δ‐FAPbI3. The bond length changes of Pb‐I induced by Na+ doping in the α‐FAPbI3.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Lattice geometry optimization in perovskites. (a) XRD reflections of fresh perovskite films and single crystal. (b) XRD reflections of the (200) plane of perovskite films containing different amounts of Na+. GIXRD spectra of (c) the Control perovskite film, (d) the NaCl‐modified perovskite film and (e) the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film measured at different grazing‐incidence angles. (f) The d‐spacing value of the (100) plane as a function of grazing‐incidence angle for the Control, NaCl‐modified and C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films.

The lattice parameters after full geometry relaxations have shown that the α‐FAPbI3 is more sensitive to the Na+ doping, where a stronger structural distortion is noted, especially the shrinkage in the c‐axis (Figure 1e). Among different sites, the interstitial Na+ ions between the aligned FA+ (IntNa‐1 and IntNa‐2) display the smallest influence on the lattice structure with the lowest distortion level. The lattice parameter c exhibits the most evident decrease when compared to other axes a and b, leading to the reduced volume after Na+ doping. For the δ‐FAPbI3, the overall lattice volume also displays a shrinkage trend, which also reveals the evident decreasing trend of the c‐axis (Figure 1f). Compared to the α‐FAPbI3, the overall distortion level in the δ‐FAPbI3 is smaller due to the much larger void space in the δ‐FAPbI3. Different from the α‐FAPbI3, the substitution of Na+ in the δ‐FAPbI3 induces a smaller distortion than the interstitial doping. With the lattice structures, we have also compared their electronic structure changes. For the α‐FAPbI3, both Pb‐6p orbitals and I‐5p orbitals show the upshifting trend, where the stronger distortions result in more shifting of the p orbitals (Figure 1 g,h). In comparison, the doping of Na+ shows very limited influences on the electronic structures of δ‐FAPbI3, where the Pb‐6p and I‐5p orbitals remain unchanged (Figure 1i,j).

Although the δ‐FAPbI3 displays higher structural tolerance to the Na+ doping, the introduction of Na+ doping meets much higher energy costs. Apparently, the formation energies of Na+ doped α‐FAPbI3 are much lower than those of δ‐FAPbI3 in all different sites, supporting that the Na+ doping facilitates the stabilization of the α phase of perovskite (Figure 1k,l). The interstitial Na+ doping is more preferred than the substitutional Na+ doping for both α‐FAPbI3 and δ‐FAPbI3. Among the three possible interstitial sites in the α‐FAPbI3, IntNa‐1 shows the lowest formation energy as the most favored doping site. For the δ‐FAPbI3, the energy costs for interstitial doping are similar. In addition, the Pb─I bond length distributions are compared with those after Na+ doping in the α‐FAPbI3 (Figure 1m). Notably, the overall bond length distributions for pristine α‐FAPbI3 are mainly located in ∼3.3 and ∼3.5 Å, which downshift to ∼3.0 and ∼3.3 Å, respectively, after the introduction of Na+ doping, accounting for the overall volume changes. To further evaluate the influences of Na+ doping, we compared the transition barriers for the α‐to‐δ phase conversion with and without Na+ doping (Figure S5). Although the δ‐FAPbI3 remains thermodynamically more stable than the α phase with a lower free energy of −0.31 eV, the Na+ doping substantially increases the kinetic barrier from 0.63 to 1.06 eV for the α‐to‐δ phase transformation. This indicates that Na+ doping effectively suppresses the spontaneous α‐to‐δ conversion via kinetic inhibition of the phase transition.

To confirm that Na+ doping can suppress the phase transition from α‐FAPbI3 to δ‐FAPbI3, we subjected the pristine control perovskite film and Na+‐doped perovskite film to continuous one‐sun illumination for 158 h (Figure S6). After the illumination test, a yellow phase (δ‐FAPbI3) was clearly observed on the pristine control film, whereas the Na+‐doped perovskite film remained in the black α‐FAPbI3 phase without obvious phase degradation.

2.2. Stress Regulation

We performed energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis on perovskite using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to display the distribution of Na and S elements (Figure S7). We observed that Na and S elements were uniformly distributed in the perovskite. We conducted a full x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization (Figure S8). It confirmed the existence of Na element over FAPbI3 with a Na 1s peak (1071 eV), which is consistent with the previously reported. According to DFT calculations, the interstitial sites are preferred over substitutional ones for Na+ doping. We conducted x‐ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of fresh film and single crystals (Figure 2a). Compared to the control perovskite film, the Na+‐doped perovskite film and single crystal exhibit new peaks at 4.5°. And we conducted XRD measurements of perovskite films with different concentrations of Na+ (0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 mol%) (Figure 2b). The addition of Na+ ions caused a shift in the XRD peaks toward higher angles. The shift of diffraction peaks toward higher angles indicates lattice contraction, resulting compressive stress which can effectively stabilize α‐FAPbI3 [30, 31].The same result is observed for the (100) crystal plane (Figure S9). According to Bragg's law, the shift of the diffraction peak to lower angles is caused by an increase in the interplanar crystal spacing, resulting in lattice expansion, which is manifested as pressure and strain [32]. When the peak position is converted into the lattice constant, we can infer an isotropic decrease in the unit cell size by using Equation (2).

a=dhklh2+k2+l2, (2)

where a is the lattice constant, d hkl is the interplanar spacing of the (hkl) plane, and h, k, and l are the Miller indices.

To investigate the lattice strain distribution in the depth direction of the perovskite film, we selected the (100) crystal plane for grazing incidence x‐ray diffraction (GIXRD) analysis with variable incident angles (Figure 2c–e). When the incident angle (ω) increases from 0.1° to 1.5°, the diffraction peak of the Control perovskite film at 2θ = 13.95° gradually shifts to lower angles. And the diffraction peak of the NaCl‐modified perovskite film shifts less, which is attributed to the contraction of the c‐axis induced by Na+ doping, accompanied by the introduction of appropriate compressive strain. Besides, the diffraction peak of the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film shows almost no change, regardless of ω. This is because the sulfonate group participates in regulating the crystallization process, thereby promoting stress relaxation. Moreover, when the ω increased from 0.1° to 1.5°, a significant increase in the d‐spacing of the Control perovskite film was observed. And the d‐spacing of the NaCl‐modified perovskite film changed less than that of the Control perovskite film. Besides, the d‐spacing of the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film hardly changed (Figure 2f). This indicates that the residual stress in the perovskite film is almost completely relieved after the addition of Na+.

2.3. Crystallization Optimization

To understand which component of the compound (Na+ or C10H21O3S−) is important for improving the film quality during crystallization, we compare the Control perovskite film, NaCl‐modified perovskite film and C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film. To gain insights into the remarkably enhanced film quality, we adopted in situ photoluminescence (PL) spectrometry to understand the role of Na+ and C10H21O3S− during crystallization. In the initial stage of spin coating (∼0‐5 s), the precursor wet film did not form an ordered crystal phase due to the solvation effect, so no obvious PL signal was detected. When an antisolvent is introduced, the solution quickly reaches a supersaturated state, triggering nucleation [33, 34], at which point the initial PL emission of nanocrystalline nuclei can be observed (Figure S10). As the crystallization continues, a systematic red shift of the PL peak is observed [35, 36]. In the Control perovskite film, it shifts from 704.14 to 765.71 nm; in the NaCl‐modified perovskite film, from 707.16 to 770.94 nm; but in the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film, the PL peak shifts from 651.18 to 765.47 nm (Figure 3a–c and Figure S11). The initial PL peak of C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film is located at 651.18 nm, different from the Control perovskite film and the NaCl‐modified perovskite film. Although all three samples showed a red shift in the PL peak, the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film exhibited a larger shift compared to the Control perovskite film and NaCl‐modified perovskite film. Meanwhile, the evolution of the PL full‐width at half‐maximum (FWHM) indicates that the nanocrystalline nuclei gradually grew and tended to homogenize. The FWHM of the Control perovskite film (70 nm → 50 nm), the NaCl‐modified perovskite film (83 nm → 50 nm), and the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film (115 nm → 50 nm) all shrink significantly, indicating that the nanocrystalline nuclei gradually grew and tended to homogenize [37] (Figure S11). The initial FWHM of the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film is relatively large, which implies that there is a strong interaction between sulfonic acid groups and perovskite (Figure S11). These results suggest the coexistence of multiscale grains in the early nucleation stage, which may be the interaction between C10H21NaO3S and perovskite nanocolloids [26, 38, 39].

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Shift of PL peak positions of (a) Control, (b) NaCl‐modified, and (c) C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films when anti solvent is added dropwise. In situ PL during annealing of (d) Control, (e) NaCl‐modified and (f) C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films. Changes in PL intensity of (g) Control, (h) NaCl‐modified, and (i) C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films at different times during the annealing stage.

In situ photoluminescence (in situ PL) spectra acquired during the annealing process were systematically analyzed (Figure 3d–f). There are significant differences in the crystallization triggering times of the Control perovskite film, the NaCl‐modified perovskite film, and the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film. The PL intensity of the Control perovskite film jumps immediately after the start of annealing, indicating a rapid nucleation‐growth process. The PL intensity of the NaCl‐modified perovskite film increases with a delay of 6 s, while the PL intensity of the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film rises only after a delay of 8 s. This is because as the solvent volatilizes, more and more crystal nuclei are exposed. The nucleation rate of the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film is slightly slower than that of the Control perovskite film. The addition of C10H21NaO3S has the effect of delaying crystallization because of the interaction between the sulfonate ions and Pb2+, confirming that C10H21O3S− delays nucleation through the chelating effect with Pb2+ [36]. The Control perovskite film and the NaCl‐modified perovskite film show a typical four‐stage ‘up–down–up–down’ process with two states [40] (Figure 3g–i and Figure S12). First, perovskite nanoparticles crystallize during the growth process, resulting in an increase of PL intensity. Then the solvent evaporates, exposing the surfaces of perovskite microcrystals to the surrounding environment, leading to the formation of grain boundaries and rapid quenching of PL. During the annealing process, smaller grains further grow and merge into larger grains, reducing the number of grain boundaries and leading to a further increase in PL intensity. Finally, the film is fragile under ambient conditions and easily decomposes. This leads to a stable PL intensity, but it is lower than the maximum PL [41]. Compared with the Control perovskite film and the NaCl‐modified perovskite film, the introduction of C10H21NaO3S induces a precrystallization process, which is manifested as an increase in PL intensity after the typical four‐stage ‘up–down–up–down’ process with two states. (Figure 3g–i and Figure S12) [40, 42]. After the PL intensity of C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film decreased at 20s, the PL intensity increased again at 25.5 s (Figure 3i). This phenomenon is attributed to the coordination of C10H21O3S− with Pb2 + [38, 43, 44], which prolongs the survival time of the precursor complex and promotes the ordered orientation growth. Compared with the Control and NaCl‐modified perovskite films, the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film exhibits a lower PL peak position and a larger FWHM in the first 8 s of the annealing stage, which indicates that there is a strong interaction between sulfonic acid groups and perovskite, which regulates the crystallization of perovskite (Figure S12). To better illustrate the role of sulfonic acid groups, we performed in‐situ PL on C6H14O3S‐modified perovskite film during annealing. Compared with the control perovskite film, the sulfonic acid group‐containing additive delays the crystallization process and optimizes crystallization kinetics. To study the interaction between C10H21NaO3S and PbI2, we monitored the changes in the absorption spectra of a PbI2 solution (Figure S13). After adding C10H21NaO3S, the concentration of PbI3 − increases more than adding DMSO. This implies that the interaction between C10H21NaO3S and PbI2 is stronger than that between DMSO and PbI2. The addition of C10H21NaO3S can disrupt the DMSO‐PbI2 solvated phase [45, 46]. These results indicate that the addition of C10H21O3S− can improve film quality by regulating crystallization kinetics, which is consistent with the improved open‐circuit voltage (V OC) and fill factor (FF) of the corresponding device.

2.4. Characterization of Perovskite Films

The interaction between the perovskite film and C10H21NaO3S was further confirmed by performing XPS. Two characteristic peaks of Pb 4f (at 143and 138.1 eV) were observed for the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film; these peaks shifted toward lower binding energies by 0.45 and 0.4 eV, respectively (Figure 4a). Two characteristic peaks of S 2P were observed at 167.98 and 169.24 eV, corresponding to the binding energies of S 2P3/2 and S 2P1/2, respectively. After treatment with C10H21NaO3S, these characteristic peaks shifted towards the lower binding energy direction by 0.23 and 0.36 eV, respectively (Figure 4b). These suggest that the functional sulfonic acid group can interact with under‐coordination Pb2+. This interaction provides a strong passivation effect on defects in the perovskite film, effectively suppressing the nonradiative recombination. Similar low‐energy transitions were also observed in I 3d (Figure S14). After modification with C10H21NaO3S, the characteristic peaks I 3d3/2 and I 3d5/2 shifted toward lower binding energies by 0.3 eV. This confirms the strong hydrogen bond between C10H21NaO3S and I−, thereby inhibiting the migration of I− [47]. In addition, the N 1s spectrum shifted by 0.32 eV, indicating the formation of S═O⋯ N between the organic cations of perovskite and the sulfonic acid groups of C10H21NaO3S [48]. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) results show the characteristic stretching vibration peak of S═O in the full spectrum (Figure S15). This indicates a significant interaction between C10H21NaO3S and perovskite. This interaction originates from the undercoordinated Pb2+ and electron‐rich S═O groups [49].

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

XPS spectra of Pb 4f (a) and S 2f (b) obtained from the surfaces of Control and C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films. (c) TOF‐SIMS depth profile of perovskite with C10H21NaO3S. GIWAXS patterns of (d) Control, (e) NaCl‐modified and (f) C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films. KPFM images of (g) Control, (h) NaCl‐modified and (i) C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films.

We confirmed the spatial distribution of C10H21NaO3S in perovskite films through Time‐of‐Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS). The sulfonate groups are mainly distributed on the surface of the perovskite film, while Na+ is uniformly distributed within the perovskite film (Figure 4c). The in‐plane homogenization of perovskite films by Na+ doping motivated us to also probe the out‐of‐plane direction by evaluating the PL collected from both the front side (glass‐perovskite interface) and back side (perovskite‐air interface) of the sample. We plotted the normalized PL spectra for each sample, comparing measurements taken from the glass and air sides, and calculated the respective difference spectra (Figure S16). Additionally, PL mapping provides a direct analysis of the perovskite film's surface and reveals the distribution of PL intensity (Figure S17). The film with Na distribution shows a higher PL intensity and a more uniform PL distribution than the Control perovskite film. The PL intensity difference of perovskite film doped with 2% Na+ is reduced, indicating that the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film is more uniform.

To explore the influence of C10H21NaO3S on the crystallization of the perovskite film, we conducted grazing incidence wide‐angle x‐ray scattering (GIWAXS) analysis (Figure 4d–f). The perovskite displayed characteristic diffraction rings at scatter vector (q) values of 1, 1.37, 1.65, and 1.85 nm−1, related to the (100), (110), (111), and (200) crystal planes of perovskite films, respectively. With the addition of 2% Na+, the previously observed PbI2 signal weakened, and stronger reflections of the (100) and (200) planes were observed. This orientation regulation is beneficial for the transport of carriers, thereby improving the device performance. The XRD patterns of Control and C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films at different annealing temperatures indicate that C10H21NaO3S significantly inhibits the precipitation of PbI2 (Figure S18). It reveals the regulatory effect of the C10H21NaO3S on the crystallization kinetics and orientation behavior of the perovskite film. This is attributed to the strain relaxation of the perovskite film caused by Na+ doping, the coordination effect between C10H21O3S− and the Pb2+ octahedron, thus optimizing the stability of the perovskite lattice.

Next, the carrier dynamics of perovskite films were measured before and after optimization. Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) measurements were performed (Figure 4g–i). The C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films exhibit higher surface potentials than the Control and NaCl‐modified perovskite films, which is beneficial to the photogenerated carrier transport [50]. The steady‐state and time‐resolved photoluminescence (PL and TRPL) with and without the carrier transport layer demonstrate the enhancement of carrier extraction in C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films (Figure S19). The PL intensity of the target (C10H21NaO3S‐modified) perovskite film increased compared to the Control perovskite film, suggesting that the addition of C10H21NaO3S significantly suppressed nonradiative recombination [51]. Subsequently, a hole transport layer (HTL) is deposited on the surface and perovskite is deposited on the electron transport layer (ETL) separately. The decrease in peak intensity is attributed to effective hole and electron extraction, leading to quenching of the fluorescence peak [52, 53, 54]. This indicates accelerated electron extraction and collection from perovskite to electron transport layer in C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite films [55, 56]. Besides, C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film with a carrier transport layer shows faster decay of TRPL, which confirms more efficient charge transfer to the transport layer. We investigated the role of C10H21NaO3S in determining the carrier extraction process at the perovskite/HTL and ETL/perovskite interfaces with Transient Absorption Spectroscopy (TAS) decay dynamics [57, 58] (Figure S20). The kinetic decay curve of the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film decrease faster than that of the Control perovskite film for the ETL/perovskite interface. Therefore, after modification with C10H21NaO3S, it can accelerate the extraction of electrons without affecting the extraction of holes.

Ionic migration has been proven to be one of the key factors affecting the stability of PSCs [59], and alkali metal ions can effectively inhibit ion migration [60, 61]. Under illumination and electric field, mobile ions such as I− migrate and accumulate in the bulk. Ions migrating to the interfaces damage the carrier transport layers, cause band bending and slow down the carrier transport. These effects ultimately lead to the continuous decay of the photoelectric conversion efficiency of the solar cell and a substantial reduction in its operational stability [59]. Ion migration within perovskite films can result in the formation of point defects. These defects destroy the perovskite film's electrical properties. Furthermore, under an applied electric field, the directional movement of ions and charged defects impairs the transport of photogenerated carriers and induces hysteresis [62]. We conducted in situ monitoring of the changes in perovskite thin films under external electric fields using PL mapping measurements (Figure S21). We observed photoluminescence quenching of the control film from the positive electrode to the negative electrode. This indicates that photoluminescence is suppressed by ion migration, resulting in the accumulation of high‐density defects in the dark region of the film [63]. After applying a 10 V electric field, the Control perovskite film exhibited a significant decrease in fluorescence intensity at the positive electrode side within the red circle, directly reflecting the ions migration. In contrast, the Na+‐doped perovskite film showed no obvious change in fluorescence intensity in the same region, indicating that the additive can effectively suppress ion migration at the positive electrode, thereby significantly improving the stability of the perovskite under an electric field. Therefore, we tested the activation energy of ion migration (Figure S22). The ion migration activation energy increases from 67.53 meV (Control perovskite film) to 84.39 meV (C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film). This is attributed to the strong interaction between C10H21NaO3S and PbI2. A high ion migration activation energy can effectively inhibit the migration of Pb2+ and I− ions and prevent the deterioration of device performance [64].

2.5. Application in Solar Cells

The optimized perovskite films were further fabricated as solar cell devices. To determine the optimal Na+ doping concentration that maximizes performance, systematic experiments were conducted on different sodium molar concentrations (Figure S23). The results indicate that the optimal performance is achieved when the sodium doping concentration is set to 2 mol%. This work stands out among its counterparts fabricated with an n‐i‐p architecture, demonstrating the reliability and competitiveness of our approach (Figure 5 and Table S1). The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the Control device is 24.16%, the short‐circuit current density (J SC) is 25.74 mA/cm2, the open‐circuit voltage (V OC) is 1.16 V, and the fill factor (FF) is 80.83%. The device with the addition of NaCl (at the optimal concentration of 1 mg mL−1) yields a PCE of 25.06%. The device with the addition of C10H21NaO3S (at the optimal concentration of 1 mg mL−1) achieves the highest PCE of 26.67% (Figure 5a), mainly due to the increases in V OC (1.19 V), FF (83.87%), and the current density (26.87 mA/cm2). The certificated efficiency is 26.44% (Figure S24). The statistical data of the performance parameters of the PSCs confirm the overall performance improvement of the C10H21NaO3S‐modified PSCs and demonstrate their excellent reproducibility (Figure 5b). The reliability of J SC is verified by the external quantum efficiency (EQE) (Figure 5c). By analyzing the external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectrum of the target device, the bandgap of the target device is determined to be 1.53 eV, and this spectrum exhibits an inflection point at approximately 810 nm (Figure S25) [65].

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

(a) J‐V curves of the champion solar cells under reverse scan. (b) PCE statistics of 20 PSCs. (c) External quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra and integrated photocurrent, integrated over the AM1.5 (100 mW cm−2) solar spectrum. (d) Linear relationship of Voc with the natural logarithm of light intensity. (e) The J‐V curves of the three devices are scanned forward and backward. (f) Dark J‐V curves. (g) Thermal stability of Control and C10H21NaO3S PSCs @85 °C. (h) Stabilized MPP tracking of N2‐encapsulated devices exposed to continuous 1‐sun illumination for 800 h at ambient temperature.

To understand the reason for the improvement of the fill factor (FF) in the C10H21NaO3S‐modified device, we conducted experiments on the open‐circuit voltage (V OC) under different light intensities to evaluate the charge carrier recombination mechanism of the device based on the ideality factor (n) (Figure 5d). Our results show that, as depicted in Figure 4d, the C10H21NaO3S‐modified device exhibits a lower n value of 1.15 kBT/q, while the Control device shows an n value of 1.42 kBT/q. This finding implies that the trap‐assisted Shockley–Read–Hall recombination in the C10H21NaO3S‐modified perovskite film is negligible and contributes to the increase in the fill factor [66, 67, 68]. In addition, we found that the incorporation of C10H21NaO3S significantly weakens the hysteresis phenomenon in the device (Figure 5e), attributed to the reduction of trap states and effective charge extraction [15, 69].

To further understand the reason for the observed higher V OC, we carried out capacitance‐voltage (C‐V) measurements (Figure S26) [70, 71]. The results indicate that the V bi increases from 1.13 to 1.18 V. The increased V bi confirms optimized carrier separation and transport pathways, contributing to achieve a higher V OC. The Shockley Equation is used to evaluate the device carrier transport and complex dynamics characteristics:

VOC=n(KT/q)lnPlight+C

where n is the ideal factor, K is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, q is the elementary charge. C is a fitting parameter. As illustrated in the light‐intensity‐dependent V OC curves, the linear extrapolation to zero light intensity yields a higher intercept for the target device (C = 1.12 V) compared to the control device (C = 1.08 V). This elevated intercept implies suppressed nonradiative recombination and minimized leakage current under low‐illumination limits.

The dark current is also a key factor to reflect the quality of PSCs. We performed the dark‐state J‐V curves of the Control, NaCl‐modified, and C10H21NaO3S‐modified devices, where the C10H21NaO3S‐modified device exhibits the smallest dark current density (1.05 × 10−5 mA/cm2) (Figure 5f). This further confirms that the interface defects/traps are effectively suppressed in the C10H21NaO3S‐modified device, enabling the efficient extraction of carriers without the formation of leakage currents, which is consistent with the higher open‐circuit voltage (V OC) [72]. To validate the defect reduction, the trap density in perovskite was comprehensively evaluated by fabricating electron‐only devices using the Space‐Charge Limited Current (SCLC) method (Figure S27) [73, 74, 75]. Compared to Control device, the V TFL and n trap of the NaCl‐modified and C10H21NaO3S‐modified devices were reduced. For electron‐only devices, V TFL decreased from 0.30 to 0.225 V and 0.174 V, and n trap decreased from 7.56 × 1015 to 5.67 × 1015 and 4.39 × 1015 cm−3. That suggests the composite additive‐modified perovskite devices have a reduced charge trap density. The current‐time (I‐T) curve of the PSC under continuous light irradiation for 600 s at the maximum power point (Figure S28). The stable output of the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the C10H21NaO3S‐modified device within 600 s basically remains unchanged, indicating an improvement in stability. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) showed smaller series resistance (R s) and larger composite resistance (R rec) for the optimized device, signifying efficient carrier transmission (Figure S29) [76, 77]. As shown in Table S2, the C10H21NaO3S‐modified device exhibits a significantly higher combination resistance (Rrec = 457.3 Ω) than the control device (Rrec = 74.65 Ω), demonstrating a suppressed nonradiative recombination in the target device.

To study the stability of the device under accelerated aging conditions, the unencapsulated devices were aged under continuous heating at 85 ± 5°C in a N2‐filled glovebox (ISOS‐D‐2I, 85°C, N2). The target device shows a very small PCE decay (<10%) after 1,200 h, while the PCE decay of the Control device drops by nearly 40% (Figure 5g). We also examined the operational stability of the N2‐encapsulated devices under maximum power point (MPP) tracking at standard illumination according to ISOS‐L‐1 (with a room temperature of 30°C and a relative humidity of 30%–35%). After 800 h, the device treated with C10H21NaO3S still maintained 80% of its initial efficiency, while the efficiency of the Control device dropped below 40% (Figure 5h).

3. Conclusions

In this study, first‐principles calculations have been successfully used to design the Na+ doping for both α‐FAPbI3 and δ‐FAPbI3. The formation energies of Na+‐doped α‐FAPbI3 are much lower than those of δ‐FAPbI3 across all sites, enabling Na+ doping to effectively stabilize the α phase with higher stability.

As validated by experimental results, Na+ doping effectively relieves the residual strain of FAPbI3, lowers intrinsic defect density, and inhibits the unfavorable α to δ phase transition. Meanwhile, sulfonic acid groups optimize perovskite crystallization. Consequently, the thermal and photostability of the perovskite films are greatly improved.

The optimized film delivers a champion PCE of 26.67% in solar cells, with 80% efficiency retention after 800 h light soaking and 90% retention after 1200 h aging at 85°C. This work offers a new strategy of lattice engineering in perovskite crystals and devices.

Author Contributions

Zhihuan Tang: writing – original draft, visualization, data curation, investigation, methodology. Mingzi Sun: investigation, validation. Jinghao Ge: supervision, investigation. Ying Wang: investigation, validation. Yunfan Wang: investigation, validation, formal analysis. Yiran Tao: investigation, validation. Lu Zhang: writing – review and editing, formal analysis, supervision. Xinhui Lu: supervision, investigation. Sai‐Wing Tsang: supervision, investigation. Weizhong Tian: investigation. Rui Wang: validation. Hao‐Chung Kuo: resources. Bolong Huang: supervision, investigation, software, validation. Shengzhong (Frank) Liu: writing – review and editing, resources, project administration. Jiaxue You: supervision, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, conceptualization, methodology, project administration. Alex K.Y. Jen: supervision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting File: anie73967‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

Acknowledgments

S.L. thanks the support from Key project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20102); National Natural Science Foundation of China (62174103); the 111 project (B21005). J.Y. thanks the support from Hon Hai (AC‐202403‐02‐9) and Baosteel (BHK2502‐03). A.K.Y.J. thanks the sponsorship of the Lee Shau‐Kee Chair Professor (Materials Science) and the support from the APRC Grants (9380086, 9610419, 9610440, 9610492, 9610508) of the City University of Hong Kong, the TCFS grant (GHP/121/22SZ) from the Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong, the GRF grants (11304424, 11308625, 11316422) and CRS grants (CRS_CityU104/23, CRS_HKUST203/23) from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong, and Grant Number. T2541160284 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China. This work was financially supported by City University of Hong Kong for the project ‘Fostering Innovation for Resilience and Sustainable Transformation’ (FIRST), officially endorsed by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) under the International Decade of Sciences for Sustainable Development (IDSSD) (2024‐2033) via the internal City University of Hong Kong account of 9610739.

Contributor Information

Bolong Huang, Email: b.h@cityu.edu.hk.

Shengzhong (Frank) Liu, Email: szliu@dicp.ac.cn.

Jiaxue You, Email: jiaxuyou@cityu.edu.hk.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Liu Y., Collins L., Proksch R., et al., “Chemical Nature of Ferroelastic Twin Domains in CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite,” Nature Materials 17 (2018): 1013–1019, 10.1038/s41563-018-0152-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Noman M., Shahzaib M., Jan S. T., Shah S. N., and Khan A. D., “26.48% Efficient and Stable FAPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells Employing SrCu2O2 as Hole Transport Layer,” RSC Advances 13 (2023): 1892–1905, 10.1039/D2RA06535E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhou J., Tan L., Liu Y., et al., “Highly Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells Via a Multifunctional Hole Transporting Material,” Joule 8 (2024): 1691–1706, 10.1016/j.joule.2024.02.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zhan L., Zhang S., Gao W., et al., “Reinforced Perovskite‐Substrate Interfaces Via Multi‐Sited and Dual‐Sided Anchoring,” Advanced Materials (2025): 2506048, 10.1002/adma.202506048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zhang T., Ding J., You G., et al., “On the Role of Molecular Conformation of the Passivating Agents for High‐performance Perovskite Solar Cells,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2025): e202505667, 10.1002/anie.202505667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tang Y., Zhang Z., Li G., et al., “Heat‐Triggered Dynamic Self‐Healing Framework for Variable‐Temperature Stable Perovskite Solar Cells,” Advanced Materials 37 (2025): 2420378, 10.1002/adma.202420378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jiao B., Tan L., Ye Y., et al., “One‐stone‐two‐birds: Over 26% Efficiency in Perovskite Solar Cells Via Synergistic Crystallization & Interface Regulation,” Energy & Environmental Science 18 (2025): 5437–5447, 10.1039/D5EE00189G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Xu P., Chen X., Hui W., et al., “Retarding the Growth Kinetics of Chemical Bath Deposited Nickel Oxide Films for Efficient Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells and Minimodules,” Advanced Materials 37 (2025): 2505087, 10.1002/adma.202505087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cai Q., Tan Q., He J., et al., “Enhancing Electron Transport for Efficiency‐Recorded HTL‐Free Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells by Molecular Complementary Passivation,” Joule 9 (2025): 101880, 10.1016/j.joule.2025.101880. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lee M. M., Teuscher J., Miyasaka T., Murakami T. N., and Snaith H. J., “Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso‐Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites,” Science 338 (2012): 643–647, 10.1126/science.1228604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhang T., Xu Q., Xu F., et al., “Spontaneous Low‐temperature Crystallization of α‐FAPbI3 for Highly Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells,” Science Bulletin 64 (2019): 1608–1616, 10.1016/j.scib.2019.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kim G., Min H., Lee K. S., Lee D. Y., Yoon S. M., and Seok S. I., “Impact of Strain Relaxation on Performance of α‐formamidinium Lead Iodide Perovskite Solar Cells,” Science 370 (2020): 108–112, 10.1126/science.abc4417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Singh P., Soffer Y., Ceratti D. R., et al., “A‐Site Cation Dependence of Self‐Healing in Polycrystalline APbI3 Perovskite Films,” ACS Energy Letters 8 (2023): 2447–2455, 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Myung C. W., Yun J., Lee G., and Kim K. S., “A New Perspective on the Role of A‐Site Cations in Perovskite Solar Cells,” Advanced Energy Materials 8 (2018): 1702898, 10.1002/aenm.201702898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Li Z., Xiao C., Yang Y., et al., “Extrinsic Ion Migration in Perovskite Solar Cells,” Energy & Environmental Science 10 (2017): 1234–1242, 10.1039/C7EE00358G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Li X., Li Y., Feng Y., et al., “Strain Regulation of Mixed‐Halide Perovskites Enables High‐Performance Wide‐Bandgap Photovoltaics,” Advanced Materials 36 (2024): 2401103, 10.1002/adma.202401103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Choi D., Kim H., Bae Y., Lim S., and Park T., “Perovskite Colloidal Quantum Dots With Tailored Properties: Synthesis Strategies and Photovoltaic Applications,” ACS Energy Letters 9 (2024): 2633–2658, 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c00632. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang X., Ren X., Liu B., et al., “Stable High Efficiency Two‐dimensional Perovskite Solar Cells Via Cesium Doping,” Energy & Environmental Science 10 (2017): 2095–2102, 10.1039/C7EE01145H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhao P., Yin W., Kim M., et al., “Improved Carriers Injection Capacity in Perovskite Solar Cells by Introducing A‐site Interstitial Defects,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 5 (2017): 7905–7911, 10.1039/C7TA01203A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Guo Q., Zhang J.‐D., Liu J.‐M., et al., “Promoting Charge‐Carriers Dynamics by Relaxed Lattice Strain in a‐Site‐Doped Halide Perovskite for Photocatalytic H2 Evolution,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202419082, 10.1002/anie.202419082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Shannon R. D., “Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides,” Acta Cryst A 32 (1976): 751–767, 10.1107/S0567739476001551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kieslich G., Sun S., and Cheetham A. K., “Solid‐state Principles Applied to Organic–inorganic Perovskites: New Tricks for an Old Dog,” Chemical Science 5 (2014): 4712–4715, 10.1039/C4SC02211D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bakulin A. A., Selig O., Bakker H. J., et al., “Real‐Time Observation of Organic Cation Reorientation in Methylammonium Lead Iodide Perovskites,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 6 (2015): 3663–3669, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Frost J. M., Butler K. T., Brivio F., Hendon C. H., van Schilfgaarde M., and Walsh A., “Atomistic Origins of High‐Performance in Hybrid Halide Perovskite Solar Cells,” Nano Letters 14 (2014): 2584–2590, 10.1021/nl500390f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hidalgo J., Breternitz J., Többens D. M., et al., “Br‐Induced Suppression of Low‐Temperature Phase Transitions in Mixed‐Cation Mixed‐Halide Perovskites,” Chemistry of Materials 36 (2024): 10167–10175, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ge J., Huang Y., Chen X., et al., “An Intermediate‐Aided Perovskite Phase Purification for High‐Performance Solar Cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147 (2025): 1980–1990, 10.1021/jacs.4c14955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Takahashi S., Uchida S., and Segawa H., “Effect of Chloride Incorporation on the Intermediate Phase and Film Morphology of Methylammonium Lead Halide Perovskites,” ACS Omega 8 (2023): 42711–42721, 10.1021/acsomega.3c05463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Li Y., Song X., Deng F., et al., “Synergistic Defect Passivation and Crystallization Modulation in Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells: The Case of Multifunctional 2‐Anisidine‐4‐Sulfonic Acid,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15 (2023): 48207–48215, 10.1021/acsami.3c10423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lan Y., Huang S., Zhang W., et al., “Synergistic Molecular Locking Through Sodium‐Integrated Cross‐Linkable Scaffold Enables Durable Perovskite Solar Cells and Modules,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 65 (2026): e25815, 10.1002/anie.202525815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chen Y., Lei Y., Li Y., et al., “Strain Engineering and Epitaxial Stabilization of Halide Perovskites,” Nature 577 (2020): 209–215, 10.1038/s41586-019-1868-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kim H.‐S. and Park N.‐G., “Soft Lattice and Phase Stability of α‐FAPbI3 ,” Advanced Energy Materials 15 (2025): 2400089, 10.1002/aenm.202400089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Bi H., Liu B., He D., et al., “Interfacial Defect Passivation and Stress Release by Multifunctional KPF6 Modification for Planar Perovskite Solar Cells With Enhanced Efficiency and Stability,” Chemical Engineering Journal 418 (2021): 129375, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pratap S., Babbe F., Barchi N. S., et al., “Out‐of‐equilibrium Processes in Crystallization of Organic‐inorganic Perovskites During Spin Coating,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 5624, 10.1038/s41467-021-25898-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yang T., Gao L., Lu J., et al., “One‐Stone‐for‐Two‐Birds Strategy to Attain Beyond 25% Perovskite Solar Cells,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 839, 10.1038/s41467-023-36229-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tan S., Huang T., Yavuz I., et al., “Surface Reconstruction of Halide Perovskites During Post‐treatment,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 143 (2021): 6781–6786, 10.1021/jacs.1c00757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Shi P., Ding Y., Ding B., et al., “Oriented Nucleation in Formamidinium Perovskite for Photovoltaics,” Nature 620 (2023): 323–327, 10.1038/s41586-023-06208-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Pashaei Adl H., Gorji S., Muñoz‐Matutano G., et al., “Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Broadening in Single Perovskite Nanocrystals Investigated by Micro‐photoluminescence,” Journal of Luminescence 240 (2021): 118453, 10.1016/j.jlumin.2021.118453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Li F., Deng X., Shi Z., et al., “Hydrogen‐bond‐bridged Intermediate for Perovskite Solar Cells With Enhanced Efficiency and Stability,” Nature Photonics 17 (2023): 478–484, 10.1038/s41566-023-01180-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ge J., Chen R., Ma Y., et al., “Kinetics Controlled Perovskite Crystallization for High Performance Solar Cells,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 136 (2024): e202319282, 10.1002/ange.202319282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Mrkyvkova N., Held V., Nádaždy P., et al., “Combined in Situ Photoluminescence and X‐ray Scattering Reveals Defect Formation in Lead‐Halide Perovskite Films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 12 (2021): 10156–10162, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kheraj V., Simonds B. J., Toshniwal A., et al., “Using Photoluminescence to Monitor the Optoelectronic Properties of Methylammonium Lead Halide Perovskites in Light and Dark Over Periods of Days,” Journal of Luminescence 194 (2018): 353–358, 10.1016/j.jlumin.2017.10.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Song T.‐B., Yuan Z., Babbe F., et al., “Dynamics of Antisolvent Processed Hybrid Metal Halide Perovskites Studied by In Situ Photoluminescence and Its Influence on Optoelectronic Properties,” ACS Applied Energy Materials 3 (2020): 2386–2393, 10.1021/acsaem.9b02052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hu X., Meng X., Yang X., et al., “Cementitious Grain‐boundary Passivation for Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells With Superior Environmental Stability and Mechanical Robustness,” Science Bulletin 66 (2021): 527–535, 10.1016/j.scib.2020.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wang Y., Lu C., Liu M., et al., “Solvent‐assisted Reaction for Spontaneous Defect Passivation in Perovskite Solar Cells,” Nature Photonics 19 (2025): 985–991, 10.1038/s41566-025-01704-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Stamplecoskie K. G., Manser J. S., and Kamat P. V., “Dual Nature of the Excited state in Organic–inorganic Lead Halide Perovskites,” Energy & Environmental Science 8 (2015): 208–215, 10.1039/C4EE02988G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Radicchi E., Mosconi E., Elisei F., Nunzi F., and De Angelis F., “Understanding the Solution Chemistry of Lead Halide Perovskites Precursors,” ACS Applied Energy Materials 2 (2019): 3400–3409, 10.1021/acsaem.9b00206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Feng X., Tan M., Li M., Wei H., and Yang B., “Polyhydroxy Ester Stabilized Perovskite for Low Noise and Large Linear Dynamic Range of Self‐Powered Photodetectors,” Nano Letters 21 (2021): 1500–1507, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Li F., Deng X., Qi F., et al., “Regulating Surface Termination for Efficient Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells With Greater than 23% Efficiency,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (2020): 20134–20142, 10.1021/jacs.0c09845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Jiang X., Zhang B., Yang G., et al., “Molecular Dipole Engineering of Carbonyl Additives for Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (2023): e202302462, 10.1002/anie.202302462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Peng F. P., Lin J. Y., Li H. Z., et al., “Design of Piezoelectric ZnO Based Catalysts for Ammonia Production From N2 and H2O Under Ultrasound Sonication,” Nano Energy 95 (2022): 107020, 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Han Q., Bai Y., Liu J., et al., “Additive Engineering for High‐performance Room‐temperature‐processed Perovskite Absorbers With Micron‐size Grains and Microsecond‐range Carrier Lifetimes,” Energy & Environmental Science 10 (2017): 2365–2371, 10.1039/C7EE02272G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Khan J. I., Isikgor F. H., Ugur E., et al., “Charge Carrier Recombination at Perovskite/Hole Transport Layer Interfaces Monitored by Time‐Resolved Spectroscopy,” ACS Energy Letters 6 (2021): 4155–4164, 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01931. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Arora N., Dar M. I., Hinderhofer A., et al., “Perovskite Solar Cells With CuSCN Hole Extraction Layers Yield Stabilized Efficiencies Greater Than 20%,” Science 358 (2017): 768–771, 10.1126/science.aam5655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Al‐Ashouri A., Köhnen E., Li B., et al., “Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cell With >29% Efficiency by Enhanced Hole Extraction,” Science 370 (2020): 1300–1309, 10.1126/science.abd4016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Du X., Zhang L., Chen R., et al., “Spontaneous Interface Healing by a Dynamic Liquid‐Crystal Transition for High‐Performance Perovskite Solar Cells,” Advanced Materials 34 (2022): 2207362, 10.1002/adma.202207362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Zhuang R., Wang P., Wang L., et al., “Highly Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells by Introducing a Multifunctional Surface Modulator,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202413660, 10.1002/anie.202413660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Su H., Zhang L., Liu Y., et al., “Polarity Regulation for Stable 2D‐perovskite‐encapsulated High‐efficiency 3D‐perovskite Solar Cells,” Nano Energy 95 (2022): 106965, 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.106965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Zhu Y., Zhang J., Su H., et al., “Dynamic Passivation of Perovskite Films Via Gradual Additive Release for Enhanced Solar Cell Efficiency,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202421637, 10.1002/anie.202421637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Zhu W., Wang S., Zhang X., Wang A., Wu C., and Hao F., “Ion Migration in Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells: Current Understanding and Perspectives,” Small 18 (2022): 2105783, 10.1002/smll.202105783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Li C., Wang A., Xie L., et al., “Emerging Alkali Metal Ion (Li+, Na+, K+ and Rb+) Doped Perovskite Films for Efficient Solar Cells: Recent Advances and Prospects,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 7 (2019): 24150–24163, 10.1039/C9TA08130E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Abdi‐Jalebi M., Andaji‐Garmaroudi Z., Cacovich S., et al., “Maximizing and Stabilizing Luminescence From Halide Perovskites With Potassium Passivation,” Nature 555 (2018): 497–501, 10.1038/nature25989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Wali Q., Aamir M., Ullah A., et al., “Fundamentals of Hysteresis in Perovskite Solar Cells: From Structure‐Property Relationship to Neoteric Breakthroughs,” Chemical Record 22 (2022): e202100150, 10.1002/tcr.202100150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Li C., Guerrero A., Huettner S., and Bisquert J., “Unravelling the Role of Vacancies in Lead Halide Perovskite Through Electrical Switching of Photoluminescence,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 5113, 10.1038/s41467-018-07571-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Zhao Y., Ma F., Qu Z., et al., “Inactive (PbI2)2 RbCl Stabilizes Perovskite Films for Efficient Solar Cells,” Science 377 (2022): 531–534, 10.1126/science.abp8873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Krückemeier L., Rau U., Stolterfoht M., and Kirchartz T., “How to Report Record Open‐Circuit Voltages in Lead‐Halide Perovskite Solar Cells,” Advanced Energy Materials 10 (2020): 1902573, 10.1002/aenm.201902573. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Wang X., Lu H., Liu Y., et al., “Simple Nonfused Ring Electron Acceptors With 3D Network Packing Structure Boosting the Efficiency of Organic Solar Cells to 15.44%,” Advanced Energy Materials 11 (2021): 2102591, 10.1002/aenm.202102591. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Almora O., Cho K. T., Aghazada S., et al., “Discerning Recombination Mechanisms and Ideality Factors Through Impedance Analysis of High‐efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells,” Nano Energy 48 (2018): 63–72, 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Tress W., Yavari M., Domanski K., et al., “Interpretation and Evolution of Open‐circuit Voltage, Recombination, Ideality Factor and Subgap Defect States During Reversible Light‐soaking and Irreversible Degradation of Perovskite Solar Cells,” Energy & Environmental Science 11 (2018): 151–165, 10.1039/C7EE02415K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Tress W., Correa Baena J. P., Saliba M., Abate A., and Graetzel M., “Inverted Current–Voltage Hysteresis in Mixed Perovskite Solar Cells: Polarization, Energy Barriers, and Defect Recombination,” Advanced Energy Materials 6 (2016): 1600396, 10.1002/aenm.201600396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Yang L., Ma X., Shang X., et al., “Zwitterionic Ionic Liquid Confer Defect Tolerance, High Conductivity, and Hydrophobicity Toward Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells Exceeding 22% Efficiency,” Sol RRL 5 (2021): 2100352, 10.1002/solr.202100352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Mahmud M. A., Elumalai N. K., Upama M. B., et al., “Controlled Nucleation Assisted Restricted Volume Solvent Annealing for Stable Perovskite Solar Cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 167 (2017): 70–86, 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Wu F., Mabrouk S., Han M., et al., “Effects of Electron‐ and Hole‐current Hysteresis on Trap Characterization in Organo‐Inorganic Halide Perovskite,” Journal of Energy Chemistry 76 (2023): 414–420, 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.10.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Liu L., Zheng C., Xu Z., et al., “Manipulating Electron Density Distribution of Nicotinamide Derivatives Toward Defect Passivation in Perovskite Solar Cells,” Advanced Energy Materials 13 (2023): 2300610, 10.1002/aenm.202300610. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Ma Y., You J., Zhang L., et al., “High Thermal Conductivity of Liquid Crystal Elastomer for Stress‐Less Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells,” Advanced Functional Materials 34 (2024): 2405250, 10.1002/adfm.202405250. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Ma Y., Chen R., Tao Y., et al., “Enhanced Interfacial Modification by Ordered Discotic Liquid Crystals for Thermotolerance Perovskite Solar Cells,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63 (2024): e202411121, 10.1002/anie.202411121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Contreras‐Bernal L., Ramos‐Terrón S., Riquelme A., et al., “Impedance Analysis of Perovskite Solar Cells: A Case Study,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 7 (2019): 12191–12200, 10.1039/C9TA02808K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Zhao W., Lin H., Li Y., et al., “Symmetrical Acceptor–Donor–Acceptor Molecule as a Versatile Defect Passivation Agent Toward Efficient FA0.85MA0.15PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells,” Advanced Functional Materials 32 (2022): 2112032, 10.1002/adfm.202112032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File: anie73967‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES