Abstract
Exposure to the potassium channel blocker barium chloride (BaCl2) causes head degeneration in Dugesia japonica flatworms, followed by regeneration of BaCl2-insensitive heads, offering a unique model for studying transcriptional resilience to novel stress. We performed RNA sequencing on individual planaria to investigate different transcriptional solutions to the BaCl2 challenge, and how regeneration history and social environment shape transcriptomic responses to BaCl2. We identified a robust transcriptional strategy and a potential sub-strategy for enabling BaCl2-insensitive head formation. Moreover, we observed pronounced transcriptional differences between untreated worms regenerating from tail fission fragments (tail-regenerated), and untreated full-sized worms that did not fission during the experiment (intact controls), highlighting the lasting impact of regeneration history. Relative to controls, tail-regenerated worms upregulated neurodevelopmental and morphogenetic programs, while downregulating mitochondrial transport and stress-response pathways. Relative to intact controls, BaCl2-exposed regenerates upregulated ion transport, metabolic, cell cycle, and inflammatory pathways, while downregulating neuronal signaling, ion homeostasis, morphogenesis, and tissue repair programs. Comparison of BaCl2-exposed isolated and BaCl2-exposed group-housed worms revealed minimal transcriptional divergence between social conditions. These findings underscore the complex interplay between regeneration, chemical stress, and social context in shaping gene expression.
Keywords: bioelectrics, gene expression, transcriptomics, social environment, group-living, flatworm regeneration, barium chloride, transcriptional problem-solving, planaria
Introduction
Throughout history, organisms have faced inevitable stressors that challenge their survival. Resilience — the ability to recover from damage—is a key adaptive trait that shaped the evolutionary trajectories of life. How do cells and tissues determine which of immensely many possible physiological, transcriptional, behavioral, and other actions would enable adaptive response? Understanding this capacity is not only important for evolutionary biology and the study of problem-solving in pre-neural contexts [1, 2], but also a potentially rich source of inspiration for bio-inspired AI, bioengineering, and regenerative medicine approaches [3].
We are interested in how living systems select responses in the space of transcriptional possibilities to solve specific physiological problems – a difficult inverse problem [4, 5]. Barium chloride (BaCl2), a nonspecific potassium channel blocker, disrupts potassium ion flow and downstream cellular processes [6], which are highly disruptive to tissue because of the importance of potassium flux to neurophysiology and cellular bioelectric signaling more generally [7-10]. We used this reagent as an opportunity to study how living systems adapt to novel challenges.
Planaria are an important model system for studies of responses to severe perturbations, as they are highly regenerative and widely used as model systems for toxicology, stem cell biology, and neuroscience [11-36]. In prior work [6], we showed that planaria experience acute loss of their heads when exposed to BaCl2, but remarkably, regenerate BaCl2-insensitive heads. We studied the transcriptomic changes of this BaCl2 adaptation and found a relatively small number of differentially-expressed genes, including upregulation of TRPMa channels, dampening of cellular communication, and other changes that restore electrical balance offering a unique model for studying transcriptional resilience [37-41]. However, in that study our RNAseq data were generated from pooled worms, revealing a consensus response but leaving open the question of whether individual animals found different (unique) transcriptional solutions to the BaCl2 challenge.
Moreover, given recent work on inter-individual assistance in morphogenesis of embryos challenged by teratogens [42], we were interested in possible group dynamics of the response in planaria. Recent [43] and classical data (reviewed in [44]) revealed that large groups can be more resilient to stressors than small groups or individuals due to a fascinating horizontal interaction between conspecifics. In many species, group living buffers individuals against environmental stressors [45]. For example, clustering behavior in D. dorotocephala provides protection from ultraviolet radiation [46]. Planaria are also known to exhibit positive thigmotaxis [47], and it is unknown whether the presence of other animals solving the same problem could provide some sort of collective dynamic that alters the course of individual navigation of the transcriptional landscape [48-51]. Would planaria find the same transcriptional responses to regeneration in BaCl2 when they are alone versus in a group? We thus compared the transcriptomes of isolated versus group-living regenerating planaria.
Understanding individual variability in response to challenges is critical. Studies in humans and other animals show that stress alters gene expression, but population-level averages obscure individual differences [6, 52]. Some individuals may be more resilient, or may achieve resilience via distinct transcriptional pathways; for example, when rats are exposed to severe stress, specifically fox urine, individuals vary in their transcriptional response to the stressor [53]. Thus, characterization of resilience of a population based on averages is insufficient. In the face of major morphogenetic and physiological disruption, there may be huge diversity in the response across the population. Identifying diversity of successful responses within a population can reveal algorithms by which living material navigates high-dimensional, difficult problem spaces, which in turn can inform personalized approaches in regenerative medicine and bioelectric modulation [54, 55], as well as driving bio-inspired algorithms for solving challenging problems [56, 57].
When planaria are exposed to gap junction blockers, two fundamentally different morphogenetic responses are found in each cohort [58]. Moreover, regeneration of BaCl2-insensitive heads in planaria provides an opportunity to understand individual variability as well as to control for regeneration-related transcriptional changes – another important aspect of understanding transcriptional responses to physiological challenges, and the specificity of solutions versus general stress response. Thus, we performed individual-level RNA sequencing in a number of conditions to address these open questions. In this study, we investigate: (1) transcriptional diversity among individual planaria with and without BaCl2 exposure; (2) differences in gene expression between non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces vs. long-established individuals; (3) degree to which planaria converge on a common transcriptional solution to head regeneration in BaCl2; and (4) effects of isolation versus group living on transcriptional adaptation to BaCl2.
Methods
Planaria maintenance
Planaria were maintained following Emmons-Bell's et al. [6] planaria maintenance protocol. Specifically, we maintained clonal D. japonica in dark incubators in Poland Spring water at 13°C. We fed the planaria liver paste once a week, cleaned the colonies approximately two to three hours after feeding, and approximately three days after feeding. In the experiments, we used planaria that we did not feed for seven days and were approximately 0.8-1 cm in length.
BaCl2 experiments
We used two experimental setups to assess the effects of BaCl2 exposure on: (1) isolated worms (Figure 1a) and (2) isolated versus group-living worms (Figure S2a). We placed isolated worms individually in dishes containing 30 mL of 1 mM BaCl2, while groups of 30 worms together under identical conditions. We maintained all dishes in the dark at 13°C. In all conditions, we only collected fully regenerated worms for RNA extraction.
Figure 1. The worms from the three experimental conditions vary in their gene expression.

a. Design of experiment testing for transcriptomic differences between isolated versus group-living planaria with regenerated heads in BaCl2.
b. Principal component analysis (PCA) plot based on normalized gene expression data from planarian samples. The first principal component (PC1) explains 28% of the variance, and the second component (PC2) explains 15% of the variance. Each point represents a biological replicate, colored by experimental condition. Control (blue): non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms. Tail regenerate (green): non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces. BaCl2 resistant (red): BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates.
c. Per-sample average transcriptomic distance among the different conditions. There is higher within-group variability in gene expression in BaCl2-resistant worms compared to non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Dunn’s test, adjusted p-value=0.043), but not in comparison to controls (adjusted p-value=0.13).
Isolated worms with and without BaCl2
We transferred a worm in 30 mL of Poland Spring water in a non-cell-culture-treated dish (size: 100 x 15 mm) in the dark at 13°C (35 replicates). We also transferred a worm in 30 mL of 1 mM BaCl2 in Poland Spring water in a non-cell-culture-treated dish (size: 100 x 15 mm) in the dark at 13°C (50 replicates). Some planaria divided in both conditions, and some planaria in BaCl2 died during the experiment. The majority of planaria in BaCl2 lost their heads and then regenerated their heads. We replaced the liquid in the dishes 8 days after the beginning of the experiment. When a planaria from the condition with Poland Spring water had fissioned, we removed the tail piece and placed it in a non-cell-culture-treated dish (size: 100 x 15 mm) in the dark with 30 mL Poland Spring water. After 23 days, we collected six non-fissioned worms that were growing in Poland Spring water, six regenerated worms that were from tail pieces growing in Poland Spring water, and 12 non-fissioned worms that had regenerated their head in BaCl2. We placed one planaria per Eppendorf tube in preparation for the RNA extraction (Figure 1a).
Isolated versus group-living worms in BaCl2
We exposed planaria living on their own to 30 mL of 1 mM BaCl2 in Poland Spring water (10 replicates) in non-cell-culture-treated dishes (size: 100 x 15 mm) in the dark at 13°C. We also exposed groups of planaria (30 planaria per group) to 30 mL of 1 mM BaCl2 in Poland Spring water (three replicates) in non-cell-culture-treated dishes (size: 100 x 15 mm) in the dark at 13°C (Figure S2). The planaria lost their heads and some died during the experiment. We replaced the liquid in the dishes every day. After 16 days, we collected each of the fully regenerated worms and placed one planaria per tube in preparation for RNA extraction. We refer to fully regenerated worms as worms that have an indistinguishable phenotype from the non-exposed full-body worms. We extracted RNA from three different worms from the isolated replicates, and extracted RNA from four different worms from each of the group conditions (four worms per dish and extracted RNA from each worm separately).
RNA extraction
We extracted RNA from each worm based on this protocol (https://www.mrcgene.com/wp-content/uploads/mrc-prot/TRI-Reagent.pdf). Below we provide specifics about each step. We added 100 μL TRI reagent in each Eppendorf (Bio Plas Pestle in 1.5mL G-Tube™ Blue/Natural) that had a planaria. We homogenized each planaria using a pestle. We then added 400 μL TRI reagent in each Eppendorf and waited approximately 30 min. Then, we added 50 μL BCP in each Eppendorf. We shook the Eppendorfs for 30 seconds according to the above protocol. We left the Eppendorf tubes for approximately 10 min at room temperature. We centrifuged the Eppendorf tubes at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. Then, we transferred the aqueous solution from each Eppendorf to a fresh Eppendorf. We added 250 μL isopropanol in each new Eppendorf. Then, we left the samples at room temperature for around 10 min. Then, we centrifuged the Eppendorf tubes at 12,000 g for 8 min at 4°C. Then, we removed the supernatant. We added 75% ethanol (i.e., 125 μL nuclease-free water and 375 μL ethanol) in each Eppendorf. We centrifuged the Eppendorf tubes at 7,500 g for 5 min at 4°C. Then, we removed the ethanol solution and briefly air-dried the Eppendorf tubes for around 5 min. We resuspended the RNA pellets in 10 μL nuclease-free water, incubated the samples for 5 min at 1,400 rpm at 34°C, and tracked their A260/A280 ratios using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. For one experiment, RNA from a single BaCl2-treated worm was split into three tubes for technical replication.
RNA-Seq Data Analysis
Quality Control and Preprocessing
We performed quality control of raw single-end RNA-seq reads using FastQC to assess the quality of the sequencing data. Following QC, we trimmed adapter sequences and low-quality bases using Trimmomatic with the following parameters: ILLUMINACLIP:TruSeq3-SE.fa:2:30:10 LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15 MINLEN:36. We then subjected the trimmed reads to a second round of quality assessment using FastQC. This ensured the effectiveness of the trimming process.
Read Alignment and Quantification
We pseudo-aligned the trimmed reads to the D. japonica dd_Djap_v4 transcriptome reference (Rink lab) from PlanMine v3.0 using Kallisto with default parameters. We used Kallisto to estimate transcript abundances.
Functional Annotation with eggNOG and BLASTx
We performed functional annotation of the transcriptome using eggNOG-mapper. We annotated the translated coding sequences (CDS) from the dd_Djap_v4 transcriptome to obtain homologous genes, functional descriptions, gene ontology (GO) terms, and pathway information. Gene names throughout the text refer to annotations assigned via eggNOG-mapper, based on best-matching orthologs from model organisms. Additionally, we performed BLASTx searches against the Swiss-Prot database to identify homologous genes and obtain functional information. We integrated the resulting annotations into the tx2gene mapping to enhance the gene-level data.
Transcript-to-Gene Mapping
We converted transcript counts to gene counts using the tximport library in R. We prepared a custom tx2gene mapping file containing transcript IDs and corresponding gene symbols. For entries where gene symbols were missing, we used the gene ID as the identifier. We used the tximport function with the parameters ignoreTxVersion=TRUE and countsFromAbundance=“no”.
Differential Expression Analysis
We conducted differential expression analysis using DESeq2, constructed a DESeqDataSet object from the count matrix, and summed the technical replicates. We normalized the counts using DESeq2's method to account for differences in sequencing depth. We performed the Wald test for differential expression analysis with default parameters. We shrunk the log2 fold changes using the "apeglm" method to moderate large-fold changes from lowly expressed genes and to stabilize variance. We considered genes with an adjusted p-value (FDR) < 0.05 and an absolute log2 fold change > log2(1.5) as statistically significantly differentially expressed.
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)
We performed a Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) using the clusterProfiler R package on the log2 fold change values from the differential expression analysis. The analysis utilized the Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process (BP) database (org.Hs.eg.db) with the following parameters: minimum gene set size of 20, maximum gene set size of 500.
We performed GSEA using the topGO package in R, leveraging Gene Ontology (GO) annotations derived from eggNOG. The GO terms assigned by eggNOG to each gene in the dd_Djap_v4 transcriptome provided the basis for the enrichment analysis. For each gene set, we evaluated the statistically significant enrichment in specific GO terms to identify overrepresented biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components associated with the experimental conditions.
We created a custom topGOdata object with the Biological Process (BP) ontology, and defined a list of statistically significant genes based on differential expression results. We used Fisher's exact test, along with the "classic" algorithm in topGO, to determine enrichment, allowing the identification of GO terms that are statistically significantly associated with the gene set. The analysis incorporated a hierarchical structure of GO terms, capturing both specific and broad biological functions. We further processed the results to reduce redundancy and highlight key GO terms, providing a clearer picture of the main biological themes represented in the data.
Visualization
We generated plots with the RNAseq results using the ggplot2, EnhancedVolcano, and pheatmap R libraries.
Results
Recent regeneration drives stronger global transcriptional separation than BaCl2 exposure
We investigated how BaCl2 exposure and regeneration from tail fragments shape global transcriptional profiles and inter-individual expression variability. We tested three groups: control non-BaCl2-exposed intact (non-fissioned nor perturbed) worms (henceforward controls), non-BaCl2-exposed worms recently regenerated from tail fragments of spontaneous fissioning events (henceforward tails-regenerated), and BaCl2-exposed worms that regenerated their heads (henceforward BaCl2-exposed). Read counts varied within and between these conditions (Figure S1). Principal component analysis (PCA) of normalized RNA-seq data revealed two distinct transcriptomic clusters corresponding to the tails-regenerated worms and to control worms mixed with BaCl2-exposed worms (Figure 1b). The separation is mainly along the first principal component (PC1, 28% of variance), while the second component (PC2, 15% of variance) does not clearly separate BaCl2-exposed worms from controls. Importantly, this separation suggests that recent regenerative history has a stronger effect on global gene expression than exposure to BaCl2 alone but that barium chloride exposure does induce a distinct effect.
Increased within-group transcriptomic variability in controls and BaCl2-exposed worms compared to tail-regenerated worms
Next, we examined intra-group transcriptional variation. We hypothesized that regeneration of BaCl2-adapted worms may proceed through divergent transcriptional programs, resulting in increased within-group variability compared to controls. To test this, we quantified transcriptomic dissimilarity by calculating, for each worm, the average expression distance to all others in its group (Figure 1b). A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed significant differences in within-group transcriptomic distances across groups (p=0.005). Post-hoc Dunn’s tests showed that both intact controls and BaCl2-exposed worms exhibited greater variability than tail-regenerated worms (adjusted p=0.043 for BaCl2-exposed vs tail-regenerated). However, the difference in interindividual transcriptional variability between intact controls and BaCl2-exposed worms was not statistically significant (adjusted p=0.13). This suggests that no recent regeneration and regeneration under ionic stress may involve more transcriptomic inter-individual variability than canonical regeneration from a tail piece to a full-sized worm.
Anatomical recovery does not erase the transcriptome of recent regeneration
Barium-insensitive heads arise via regeneration. Thus, in order to individually assess the contributions of regeneration per se, we first compared the transcriptomes of tails-regenerated worms to controls (which had fissioned in the more distant past). PCA clearly separates the groups (Figure 2a). Differential expression analysis between tails-regenerated and controls identified significant transcriptional divergence (Figure 2b). Out of 39,708 genes analyzed, 647 (1.6%) were significantly upregulated (s-value < 0.05, log2 fold change [LFC] > 0.41) and 1,206 (3%) were significantly downregulated (Figure 2b). Among the strongly upregulated genes, a homolog of human SPTBN5, encoding spectrin repeats (LFC=8.97), indicated major cytoskeletal reorganization potentially linked to morphogenetic processes. Isoforms annotated as homologs of NUDT18, involved in oxidative DNA damage repair, were also substantially elevated (LFC=6.70 and 6.18), suggesting enhanced management of oxidative stress during regeneration. Additionally, increased expression of the D. japonica homolog of KIAA1279 (LFC=5.35), a KIF1-binding protein, suggested altered intracellular trafficking associated with neuronal regeneration and structural reorganization. Conversely, genes strongly downregulated in tails-regenerated included genes annotated as homologs of FAM115C (peptidase M60 family, LFC range: −3.11 to −3.85), potentially reflecting reduced extracellular matrix remodeling or altered proteolytic activity. Other highly downregulated genes, such as PI15 (CRISP family, LFC=−3.82) and SLC47A2 (drug-proton antiporter, LFC=−3.10), further indicated shifts in secretion and membrane transport dynamics. Notably, these transcriptional differences persist more than 10 days after the onset of regeneration, indicating that recent regenerative history leaves molecular signatures despite apparent anatomical recovery. Functional enrichment analysis supported these interpretations, revealing enrichment of developmental processes such as morphogenesis, neuron projection guidance, and visual system development among upregulated genes, while metabolic and stress-response functions characterized genes upregulated in control worms (Figure 2c).
Figure 2. Transcriptional variation among non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control) and non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate).

a. PCA plot based on normalized gene expression data from planarian samples. Each point represents a biological replicate, colored by experimental condition. Control (blue): non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms. Tail regenerate (green): non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces.
b. 1,853 genes are differentially expressed in non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control) versus non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate). The volcano plot shows that more genes are upregulated (left) than downregulated (right) in non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control) versus non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate). More genes are downregulated (left) than upregulated (right) in non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate) versus non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control). The x-axis represents the shrunken log2 fold change, and the y-axis shows the −log10 of the s-value. Orange dots denote genes passing both statistical significance and fold change thresholds; blue dots indicate statistically significant fold change without statistical significance in s-value; gray dots indicate no statistically significant fold change.
c. Gene ontology (GO) groups of example upregulated (left) and downregulated (right) genes in the non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate) versus non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control). Dot size refers to the number of associated genes, and the x-axis shows the −log10(p-value) of each GO term.
BaCl2 resistance activates bioelectric and immune responses distinct from canonical regeneration
Next, we sought to analyze the transcriptional signature of BaCl2 resistance. PCA of BaCl2-exposed worms and controls separates the groups (Figure 3a). This comparison revealed fewer differentially regulated genes compared to tail-regenerated: out of 39,721 genes, 69 (0.17%) were upregulated and 63 (0.16%) were downregulated (Figure 3b). Despite fewer overall changes, specific genes strongly indicated targeted bioelectric and immune responses. Among the top upregulated genes, the immune signaling regulator traf3 (LFC=6.29) underscored robust innate immune activation in response to BaCl2 exposure. Notably, the intracellular trafficking-related gene KIAA1279 was significantly elevated again (LFC=4.80), indicating that altered intracellular transport is a shared aspect of both regeneration scenarios (Figure 3b). Downregulated genes in BaCl2-exposed worms included protease-related genes (TMPRSS6, LFC=−1.73; KLK13, LFC=−1.65), mitochondrial dynamics regulators (e.g., Rapunzel proteins, LFC ~−1.5), and lipid metabolism transporters (NPC2, LFC=−1.44) (Figure 3b).
Figure 3. Transcriptional variation among BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates (BaCl2 resistant) and non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control).

a. Not all non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control: blue) and BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates (BaCl2 resistant: orange) express the same levels of genes. PCA based on normalized gene expression from control and BaCl2-resistant samples. Each point represents a biological replicate.
b. The volcano plot shows that 132 genes are differentially expressed in the BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates (BaCl2 resistant) versus the non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control). The x-axis represents the shrunken log2 fold change, and the y-axis shows the −log10 of the s-value. Orange dots denote genes passing both statistical significance and fold change thresholds; blue dots indicate statistically significant fold change without statistical significance in s-value; gray dots indicate no statistically significant fold change.
c. The normalized expression (y axis) of some ion-channel-related genes (x axis) shows that these genes are differentially expressed between BaCl2-resistant versus control worms. Each point represents a biological replicate colored by condition.
d. 42 genes are differentially expressed in both the BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates (B) and in the non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate), in comparison to the non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control). Out of those 42 genes, 32 genes are both downregulated in both the BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates (B) and in the non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate), in comparison to the non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control). The remaining 10 genes are upregulated in both the BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates (B) and in the non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate), in comparison to the non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (C). P-values from hypergeometric tests indicate enrichment significance.
e. Gene ontology (GO) groups of sample upregulated (left) and downregulated (right) genes in the BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates versus non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms excluding genes shared with the non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces versus control comparison. Dot size represents the number of genes annotated with each term. The x-axis shows the −log10(p-value).
Several genes directly involved in ion homeostasis and bioelectric regulation were prominently upregulated in the BaCl2-exposed worms. These included CLCA1 (chloride channel regulator, LFC=3.23), HVCN1 (voltage-gated proton channel, LFC=2.76), UNC79 (NALCN sodium leak channel complex, LFC=2.75), and ATP4B (Na+/K+-ATPase subunit, LFC=0.90) (Figure 3c). These findings strongly suggest that a coordinated bioelectric adaptation underlies acquired resilience to BaCl2-induced ion channel blockade. These bioelectric adaptations may further influence tissue specification and regenerative outcomes by selectively modulating morphogenetic and ion transport programs during head reconstruction. Downregulated genes included planarian homologs of PKD2 (LFC=−0.68, s-value=0.0049), a calcium-permeable cation channel involved in bioelectric signaling and membrane excitability, and SLC26A2 (LFC=−0.54, s-value=0.0316), an anion transporter that regulates sulfate ion homeostasis and contributes to extracellular matrix organization. Taken together, these gene-level changes indicate a physiological reprogramming centered on ion transport resilience, immune defenses against microbes, and stress-buffering.
To determine whether the BaCl2-induced transcriptome recapitulates the program of canonical regeneration from tail fragments or represents a distinct transcriptional adaptation, we examined gene overlap between the two regeneration scenarios (Figure 3d). A modest yet statistically significant overlap existed. However, the majority of differentially expressed genes in BaCl2-exposed worms were unique. This indicates that BaCl2 adaptation constitutes a distinct response rather than a simple extension of the canonical regeneration program.
Functional enrichment analysis of BaCl2-specific upregulated genes (i.e., excluding the regeneration-specific genes, Figure 2) revealed increased expression in pathways related to type II interferon response, response to bacterial molecules, adipose tissue development, skeletal muscle and connective tissue growth, regulation of anion channel activity, and proton and monoatomic ion transmembrane transport. Additional enriched categories included mitochondrial electron transport, purine biosynthesis, and hormonal signaling, suggesting a shift toward metabolic stabilization and immune readiness (Figure 3e).
Conversely, downregulated genes were enriched for myelination regulation, animal organ regeneration, calcium ion import, calcium ion transmembrane transport, intracellular pH elevation, S-shaped body morphogenesis, regulation of wound healing, transepithelial chloride transport, determination of left/right asymmetry, neural signal transduction, response to hydrostatic pressure, and iodide transport (Figure 3e).
BaCl2 Resistance Resolves into Two Transcriptional States
Planaria exhibit considerable individuality in behavior [59-61] and genetics [62]. PCA revealed a separation within the BaCl2-exposed group, forming two transcriptionally defined subclusters, B1 and B2, consisting of 10 and 2 worms, respectively (Figure 4a). Although the separation between these subclusters was statistically supported, the small size of B2 (n=2) limits confidence in defining it as a discrete transcriptional state; the distinction should therefore be considered suggestive rather than conclusive. Differential expression analysis between B1 and B2 revealed distinct transcriptional profiles (Figure 4b). The B2 subgroup, consisting of 2 worms, exhibited a set of genes strongly upregulated relative to group B1, including CFAP43, ND4, SETMAR, and HIST1H3D, suggestive of increased mitochondrial activity and chromatin remodeling. Conversely, B1 showed elevated expression of genes such as SLC47A2, PKD2, UNC79, and RAG1, pointing toward enhanced ion transport and immune-associated signaling (Figure 4b). Functional enrichment analysis further supported these divergent profiles. Genes upregulated in B1 (left panel, Figure 4c) were enriched for pathways involved in mitochondrial electron transport, proton transmembrane transport, oxidative and heavy metal stress responses (including copper and cadmium), and regulation of synaptic transmission and myelination. In contrast, genes upregulated in B2 (right panel, Figure 4c) were enriched for pathways related to immune modulation and cell fate regulation, including mucosal immune response, germ cell development, neurogenesis, vesicle docking, and negative regulation of potassium ion transport. These findings reveal that BaCl2 exposure response in D. japonica may emerge through just two distinct transcriptional programs; one dominated by bioelectric and oxidative stabilization mechanisms, and another centered on immune modulation and developmental reprogramming. These data are not consistent with a large number of possible solutions that could be individually found by each animal, but point to two attractors in the space of solutions.
Figure 4. Two distinct transcriptional programs of BaCl2 adaptation in planaria.

a. PCA plot based on normalized gene expression data from planarian samples. Each point represents a biological replicate. Transcriptional program B1: BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates with some similarities in gene expression. Transcriptional program B2: BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates with gene expression patterns not as similar to B1 worms.
b. Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes between putative BaCl2-resistant subgroups. The x-axis represents the shrunken log2 fold change, and the y-axis shows the −log10 of the s-value. Orange dots denote genes passing both statistical significance and fold change thresholds; blue dots indicate statistically significant fold change without statistical significance in s-value; gray dots indicate no statistically significant fold change.
c. Gene ontology (GO) groups of sample upregulated (left) and downregulated (right) genes in B2 versus B1. Dot size corresponds to the number of associated genes, and the x-axis represents the −log10(p-value) of each GO term.
Isolated versus group-living worms in BaCl2 consistently differentially express two genes
To determine whether isolated D. japonica worms exhibit distinct transcriptomic profiles compared to those maintained in groups, we performed RNAseq on planaria that had regenerated their heads in BaCl2 while living in isolation versus together with 29 worms. We found that the isolated and group-living D. japonica worms do not differ in the majority of their transcripts (Figure S2b-e). Transcript dd_Djap_v4_66395_1_1 was upregulated in all comparisons of isolates versus each replicate of the group-living worms (Figure S2c-e; Table S1). A homolog of this gene plays a role in regulating the activity of choline O-acetyltransferase. Another transcript (dd_Djap_v4_56151_2_1) was downregulated in isolated versus group-living worms (Figure S2c-e; Table S1). A homolog of this gene encodes for the enzyme leishmanolysin. Under BaCl2 exposure, social isolation produced only minimal transcriptomic differences, with two transcripts consistently differing between conditions. These results suggest that cohort size has limited impact on the global transcriptional response in head-regenerated worms. The small number of differentially expressed transcripts precludes broader functional interpretation.
Discussion
Our transcriptomic analysis reveals that D. japonica employs distinct molecular programs depending on the regenerative context, with head regeneration under BaCl2 stress diverging from the canonical regeneration of head from tail pieces. We observe that recent regenerative history has a stronger effect on global gene expression than exposure to BaCl2 alone, however, no recent regeneration and regeneration in BaCl2 may involve more transcriptomic flexibility than canonical anterior regeneration. Note that both barium-treated and untreated regenerating worms have to rebuild their heads. The fact that BaCl2-treated worms do so without involving most of the generic regeneration response genes suggests the possibility that the process of finding a BaCl2-compatible gene expression profile also allowed them to avoid expression default regeneration genes that are not actually necessary to produce a functioning head. It is also possible however that the generic genes were indeed activated but with a novel timing that allowed them to escape detection by our sampling strategy.
While both regeneration scenarios share common transcriptional features like intracellular (e.g., upregulation of KIAA1279) and stress management, they diverge in their dominant biological strategies. Tail-regenerated worms are characterized by robust activation of developmental, cytoskeletal, and oxidative pathways, supporting structural rebuilding. In contrast, response to BaCl2-exposure prioritizes bioelectric homeostasis, immune activation, and selective metabolic adaptation, reflecting a distinct transcriptional solution to an environmental ion channel blockade. In this dataset, BaCl2-exposed head-regenerating worms segregated into one dominant transcriptional cluster and a small secondary cluster. While this pattern indicates structured heterogeneity within the population, much larger sample sizes in future work could better delineate the possible number of distinct solutions that might be available overall.
Selective upregulation of head morphogenesis programs in tail-regenerated worms
Recent tail-regenerated worms living in isolation downregulate a broad set of genes while selectively upregulating head-related morphogenesis genes. This could reflect an energy-conserving strategy [63, 64] that prioritizes head reconstruction over general maintenance. These findings align with previous studies in Schmidtea mediterranea and reinforce the notion that regeneration induces long-lasting molecular changes. The upregulation of genes related to morphogenesis of head structures in the tail-regenerated worms is similar to previous findings of tail-regenerated S. mediterranea [65].
Differential regulation of mitochondrial quality control pathways in controls
Comparative transcriptomic analysis revealed enrichment of genes associated with mitochondrial depolarization, mitophagy, and mitochondrial fusion in controls relative to tail-regenerated worms. Given that mitochondrial depolarization is a known precursor to mitophagic clearance [66-68], these findings are consistent with active mitochondrial turnover. Similar enrichment of autophagy-related pathways has been reported in D. japonica tissues [69]. While functional validation is required, the data are compatible with differential regulation of mitochondrial quality control processes across groups. Mitophagy may be an additional component, together with other known planarian mechanisms (e.g., telomere maintenance, efficient DNA repair, silencing of transposable elements) [70], contributing to planarian immortality.
BaCl2 exposure affects flatworm bioelectrics and the flatworm-microbial interactome
Compared to prior studies focusing on head tissue [6], our whole-worm transcriptomic analysis—controlled for regeneration effects—reveals downregulation of chloride and calcium transport pathways, likely mitigating ionic imbalance caused by BaCl2. Emmons-Bell et al. [6] had seen an upregulation of an ion channel called TRPMa in BaCl2-exposed heads suggesting that these additional TRPMa channels may be helping the planaria adapt in BaCl2. However, Emmons-Bell et al. [6] did not control for transcriptomic changes that could be due to regeneration. The upregulation of the beta subunit of the gastric H+/K+ ATPase pump in BaCl2-exposed worms (barium non-specifically blocks potassium channels) is related to previous findings in rabbits that in the absence of K+ the H+/K+ ATPase pump is linked with the bariumsensitive pathway [71], and consistent with prior data showing the H+/K+ ATPase pump being involved in planarian regenerative polarity [72].
In this study, we were able to control for regeneration-related transcriptomic changes due to our experimental design including tail-regenerated worms in the absence of BaCl2. Thus, by excluding the differentially expressed genes that were related to regeneration and using whole worms in our transcriptomic analysis, we also found downregulation of iodide transport and downregulation of transepithelial chloride transport, similar to the downregulation of innexin [6]. The latter observation reinforces that worms are limiting the spread of chloride ions to other cells, thus limiting the effect of BaCl2 on their tissues, and enabling planarian survival and head regeneration in BaCl2. Previous studies in sympathetic neurons of chick embryos and murine Bal17 B cell lymphoma cells have shown that Ba+2 prevents Ca+2 from exiting the cell and triggers the release of Ca+2 from intracellular locations to the cytoplasm [73, 74]. Therefore, the downregulation of genes related to calcium import and calcium transmembrane transport in BaCl2-exposed worms may be a response of the worms to minimize the accumulation of Ca+2 in the cytoplasm.
Concurrent upregulation of immune genes may reflect microbial proliferation in the medium due to head degradation. Our analysis also showed upregulation of many genes related to immunity against microbes. Williams et al. had found that bacteria, specifically the endogenous commensal Aquitalea sp. bacteria of D. japonica planaria, not only affect the regeneration of planaria, such as how many heads or eyes they develop, but also the patterning of the planarian nervous system [75]. Therefore, BaCl2 may be altering the interaction between bacteria and the worms’ nervous system. Also, debris from the degraded planarian head may be allowing increased bacterial growth in the medium and thus the upregulation of antimicrobial genes in the planaria may be a response against an increased concentration of microbes in the medium. Concurrent upregulation of immune genes may reflect microbial proliferation in the medium due to head degradation
Regeneration under BaCl2 exposure occurs largely independently of social context
Isolated planaria regenerated heads under BaCl2 exposure and exhibited transcriptional states comparable to those observed in group-housed worms. This indicates that successful regeneration under ionic stress does not require communal signaling or social buffering. The presence of similar transcriptional programs in independently living worms suggests that successful regenerative response to BaCl2 may be intrinsically encoded rather than socially coordinated. However, it is also possible that group dynamics occur at levels other than transcriptional, and would require other assays to be observed.
Limitations of our study
Transcript-level expression was quantified using a reference transcriptome for D. japonica, followed by aggregation to gene-level counts using a functionally annotated transcript-to-gene mapping (see Methods). While this enabled robust gene-level quantification across samples, many transcripts remained unmapped or unannotated, reflecting the incomplete characterization of the D. japonica transcriptome. Another fundamental limitation, of the fact that transcriptomics is destructive, is that it is not yet possible to characterize the time-dependent transcriptional course of the same worm in transcriptional space. Future advances in technology will allow determination of whether the paths of different worms toward the same solution to BaCl2 challenge are the same or differ.
Conclusion
In conclusion, planaria possess a remarkable capacity for transcriptional problem-solving in response to physiological stress and regenerative demands. Tail-regenerated worms prioritize morphogenesis, and downregulate mitochondrial recycling, suggesting distinct strategies for tissue renewal and longevity. Exposure to BaCl2 elicits at least two divergent transcriptional programs, highlighting variability in stress adaptation. These insights are a stepping-stone for future studies investigating the exact mechanism by which planaria find one transcriptomic solution to the BaCl2 challenge in the absence of others, and the social structure of chemical resilience in other organisms beyond planaria. The results underscore the autonomous and flexible nature of planarian regeneration and resilience, positioning this model organism as a powerful system for exploring the molecular foundations of adaptation, longevity, and environmental response.
Supplementary Material
Table S1. Functional and organismal information of two differentially expressed genes in isolated versus group-living planaria that lost and regenerated their heads in BaCl2.
Figure S1. Read counts from the transcriptomes of each worm vary within and among the different conditions. Non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control); non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate); BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates (BaCl2–exposed regenerate). Each number on the x axis represents a different worm. B8, B8.2, and B8.3 are samples from the same worm.
Figure S2. BaCl2-exposed regenerated worms living on their own versus in groups do not differ statistically significantly in their transcriptome, apart from two genes.
a. Design of experiment testing for interindividual differences in the transcriptome of non-BaCl2-exposed non-fissioned planaria, non-BaCl2-exposed planaria that recently developed from tail pieces of fissioned planaria, and regenerated planaria that had lost their head in BaCl2.
b. Group-living (G) and isolated (S) BaCl2-exposed regenerates show minimal transcriptomic differences. G: group-living BaCl2-exposed regenerates. S: isolated BaCl2-exposed regenerates. a. G1: 4 worms, G2: 4 worms, G3: 4 worms; G: 12 worms; S: 3 worms. c-e. The genes in red with a positive log2 fold change are overexpressed in isolated versus group-living worms, whereas the genes in red with a negative log2 fold change are underexpressed in isolated versus group-living worms.
c. Comparison of gene expression levels in group living worms (4 worms living in a single Petri dish: G1) versus isolated worms (3 isolated worms, each living in a different Petri dish). The x-axis represents the shrunken log2 fold change, and the y-axis shows the −log10 of the s-value. Red dots denote genes passing both statistical significance and fold change thresholds; green dots indicate statistically significant fold change without statistical significance in s-value; gray dots indicate no statistically significant fold change.
d. Comparison of gene expression levels in group living worms (4 worms living in a single Petri dish: G2) versus isolated worms (3 isolated worms, each living in a different Petri dish). e. Comparison of gene expression levels in group living worms (4 worms living in a single Petri dish: G3) versus isolated worms (3 isolated worms, each living in a different Petri dish). There are only two differentially expressed genes between the group-living (G) versus isolated (S) worms that lost and then regenerated their heads in BaCl2 (c-e). Large red circles highlight the genes that are statistically differentially expressed in groups-living versus isolated worms.
Acknowledgements
We thank Angela Tung for advice in performing the barium chloride experiments, Vaibhav Pai for advice on extracting RNA from individual planaria, Albert Tai, Rakela Colon, and Jayati Mandal for helping arrange the process of RNA sequencing, and Robert Brucker for many helpful comments on the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by a sponsored research agreement from Astonishing Labs. The next-generation sequencing support was provided by S10OD032203 via the Tufts University Core Facility Genomics Core.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
M.L. is a co-founder and shareholder of Astonishing Labs. Astonishing Labs has certain rights to any inventions associated with this research.
Data and code availability
The data and code used in the manuscript are available in NCBI (GEO Accession number GSE341203; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE341203).
References
- 1.Lyon P., Of what is “minimal cognition” the half-baked version? Adaptive Behavior, 2020. 28(6): p. 407–424. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lyon P., The biogenic approach to cognition. Cogn Process, 2006. 7(1): p. 11–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Levin M., The Multiscale Wisdom of the Body: Collective Intelligence as a Tractable Interface for Next-Generation Biomedicine. Bioessays, 2024: p. e202400196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lobo D., Solano M., Bubenik G.A., and Levin M., A linear-encoding model explains the variability of the target morphology in regeneration. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface / the Royal Society, 2014. 11(92): p. 20130918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fields C. and Levin M., Competency in Navigating Arbitrary Spaces as an Invariant for Analyzing Cognition in Diverse Embodiments. Entropy (Basel), 2022. 24(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Emmons-Bell M., Durant F., Tung A., Pietak A., Miller K., Kane A., Martyniuk C.J., Davidian D., Morokuma J., and Levin M., Regenerative Adaptation to Electrochemical Perturbation in Planaria: A Molecular Analysis of Physiological Plasticity. iScience, 2019. 22: p. 147–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Funk R.H.W. and Scholkmann F., The significance of bioelectricity on all levels of organization of an organism. Part 1: From the subcellular level to cells. Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 2023. 177: p. 185–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Funk R., Ion Gradients in Tissue and Organ Biology. Biological Systems, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Levin M., Bioelectric signaling: Reprogrammable circuits underlying embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer. Cell, 2021. 184(4): p. 1971–1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bates E., Ion Channels in Development and Cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2015. 31: p. 231–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pagan O.R., Baker D., Deats S., Montgomery E., Tenaglia M., Randolph C., Kotturu D., Tallarida C., Bach D., Wilk G., Rawls S., and Raffa R.B., Planarians in pharmacology: parthenolide is a specific behavioral antagonist of cocaine in the planarian Girardia tigrina. The International journal of developmental biology, 2012. 56(1-3): p. 193–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rawls S.M., Patil T., Tallarida C.S., Baron S., Kim M., Song K., Ward S., and Raffa R.B., Nicotine behavioral pharmacology: clues from planarians. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2011. 118(2-3): p. 274–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rawls S.M., Patil T., Yuvasheva E., and Raffa R.B., First evidence that drugs of abuse produce behavioral sensitization and cross sensitization in planarians. Behav Pharmacol, 2010. 21(4): p. 301–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sacavage S., Patel H., Zielinski M., Acker J., Phillips A.G., Raffa R.B., and Rawls S.M., Withdrawal like behavior in planarians is dependent on drug exposure duration. Neuroscience Letters, 2008. 439(1): p. 84–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ruble M., Simpson N., Smith B., Adeshina W., Snyder E., and Pagan O.R., Cotinine influences the effect of high and low nicotine concentrations on planarian motility differently. Neurosci Lett, 2024. 841: p. 137955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pagan O.R., The complexities of ligand/receptor interactions: Exploring the role of molecular vibrations and quantum tunnelling. Bioessays, 2024. 46(5): p. e2300195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pagan O.R., Baker D.L., Deats S., O'Brien M., Dymond R., and DeMichele G., Measuring functional brain recovery in regenerating planarians by assessing the behavioral response to the cholinergic compound cytisine. Int J Dev Biol, 2020. 64(7-8-9): p. 445–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu J.P. and Li M.H., The use of freshwater planarians in environmental toxicology studies: Advantages and potential. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2018. 161: p. 45–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Van Roten A., Barakat A.Z.A., Wouters A., Tran T.A., Mouton S., Noben J.P., Gentile L., and Smeets K., A carcinogenic trigger to study the function of tumor suppressor genes in Schmidtea mediterranea. Dis Model Mech, 2018. 11(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stevens A.S., Wouters A., Ploem J.P., Pirotte N., Van Roten A., Willems M., Hellings N., Franken C., Koppen G., Artois T., Plusquin M., and Smeets K., Planarians Customize Their Stem Cell Responses Following Genotoxic Stress as a Function of Exposure Time and Regenerative State. Toxicol Sci, 2018. 162(1): p. 251–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Briner W., The Toxic Effect of Lanthanum on Planaria Is Mediated by a Variety of Ion Channels. Toxics, 2018. 6(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thume I.S. and Frizzo M.E., Sertraline Induces Toxicity and Behavioral Alterations in Planarians. Biomed Res Int, 2017. 2017: p. 5792621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stevens A.S., Pirotte N., Plusquin M., Willems M., Neyens T., Artois T., and Smeets K., Toxicity profiles and solvent-toxicant interference in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea after dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) exposure. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 2015. 35(3): p. 319–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hagstrom D., Cochet-Escartin O., Zhang S., Khuu C., and Collins E.S., Freshwater planarians as an alternative animal model for neurotoxicology. Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2015. 147(1): p. 270–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stevens A.S., Pirotte N., Plusquin M., Willems M., Neyens T., Artois T., and Smeets K., Toxicity profiles and solvent-toxicant interference in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea after dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) exposure. Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2014. 35(3): p. 319–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Buttarelli F.R., Pellicano C., and Pontieri F.E., Neuropharmacology and behavior in planarians: translations to mammals. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol, 2008. 147(4): p. 399–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rojas S. and Oviedo N.J., Can neural signals override cellular decisions in the presence of DNA damage? DNA Repair (Amst), 2021. 103: p. 103127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cebrià F., Adell T., and Saló E., Rebuilding a planarian: from early signaling to final shape. Int J Dev Biol, 2018. 62(6-7-8): p. 537–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Adell T., Salo E., van Loon J.J., and Auletta G., Planarians sense simulated microgravity and hypergravity. Biomed Res Int, 2014. 2014: p. 679672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Molina M.D., Salo E., and Cebria F., Organizing the DV axis during planarian regeneration. Communicative & integrative biology, 2011. 4(4): p. 498–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Iglesias M., Almuedo-Castillo M., Aboobaker A.A., and Salo E., Early planarian brain regeneration is independent of blastema polarity mediated by the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Developmental biology, 2011. 358(1): p. 68–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Almuedo-Castillo M., Salo E., and Adell T., Dishevelled is essential for neural connectivity and planar cell polarity in planarians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011. 108(7): p. 2813–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gonzalez-Estevez C. and Salo E., Autophagy and apoptosis in planarians. Apoptosis, 2010. 15(3): p. 279–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Adell T., Cebria F., and Salo E., Gradients in planarian regeneration and homeostasis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2010. 2(1): p. a000505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Swapna L.S., Molinaro A.M., Lindsay-Mosher N., Pearson B.J., and Parkinson J., Comparative transcriptomic analyses and single-cell RNA sequencing of the freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea identify major cell types and pathway conservation. Genome Biol, 2018. 19(1): p. 124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ross K.G., Currie K.W., Pearson B.J., and Zayas R.M., Nervous system development and regeneration in freshwater planarians. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol, 2017. 6(3). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pai V.P., Martyniuk C.J., Echeverri K., Sundelacruz S., Kaplan D.L., and Levin M., Genome-wide analysis reveals conserved transcriptional responses downstream of resting potential change in Xenopus embryos, axolotl regeneration, and human mesenchymal cell differentiation. Regeneration (Oxf), 2016. 3(1): p. 3–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fukumoto T., Kema I.P., and Levin M., Serotonin signaling is a very early step in patterning of the left-right axis in chick and frog embryos. Curr Biol, 2005. 15(9): p. 794–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vandenberg L.N., Morrie R.D., and Adams D.S., V-ATPase-dependent ectodermal voltage and pH regionalization are required for craniofacial morphogenesis. Dev Dyn, 2011. 240(8): p. 1889–904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Levin M., Large-scale biophysics: ion flows and regeneration. Trends Cell Biol, 2007. 17(6): p. 261–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Levin M., Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: Unique aspects and future perspectives. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2009. 20(5): p. 543–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tung A., Sperry M.M., Clawson W., Pavuluri A., Bulatao S., Yue M., Flores R.M., Pai V.P., McMillen P., Kuchling F., and Levin M., Embryos assist morphogenesis of others through calcium and ATP signaling mechanisms in collective teratogen resistance. Nat Commun, 2024. 15(1): p. 535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tung A., Sperry M., Clawson W., Pavuluri A., Bulatao S., Yue M., and Levin M., Embryos Assist Each Other’s Morphogenesis: calcium and ATP signaling mechanisms in collective resistance to teratogens. in review, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tung A. and Levin M., Extra-genomic instructive influences in morphogenesis: A review of external signals that regulate growth and form. Dev Biol, 2020. 461(1): p. 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gilmour K.M. and Bard B., Social buffering of the stress response: insights from fishes. Biol Lett, 2022. 18(10): p. 20220332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Allee W.C.W. J., Group protection for Euplanaria dorotocephala from ultra-violet radiation. Physiological Zoology, 1939: p. 110–135. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Carpenter K.E., On the tropisms of some freshwater planarians. Journal of Experimental Biology 1928: p. 196–203. [Google Scholar]
- 48.McMillen P. and Levin M., Collective intelligence: A unifying concept for integrating biology across scales and substrates. Commun Biol, 2024. 7(1): p. 378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pinero J. and Sole R., Statistical physics of liquid brains. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2019. 374(1774): p. 20180376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Guayasamin O.L., Couzin I.D., and Miller N.Y., Behavioural plasticity across social contexts is regulated by the directionality of inter-individual differences. Behav Processes, 2016. 141(Pt 2): p. 196–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hills T.T., Todd P.M., Lazer D., Redish A.D., Couzin I.D., and Cognitive Search Research G., Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends Cogn Sci, 2015. 19(1): p. 46–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Privitera M., Floriou-Servou A., and Bohacek J., Dissecting stress with transcriptomics. Oncotarget, 2017. 8(7): p. 10783–10784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Long K.L.P., Muroy S.E., Sorooshyari S.K., Ko M.J., Jaques Y., Mohan K., Sudmant P., and Kaufer D., Transcriptomic profiles of susceptibility and resilience to stress in the amygdala and hippocampus of male rats. Neurobiol Stress, 2025. 38: p. 100754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lagasse E. and Levin M., Future medicine: from molecular pathways to the collective intelligence of the body. Trends Mol Med, 2023. 29(9): p. 687–710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mathews J., Chang A.J., Devlin L., and Levin M., Cellular signaling pathways as plastic, proto-cognitive systems: Implications for biomedicine. Patterns (N Y), 2023. 4(5): p. 100737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Guo J., Zhou G., Yan K., Sato Y., and Di Y., Pair barracuda swarm optimization algorithm: a natural-inspired metaheuristic method for high dimensional optimization problems. Sci Rep, 2023. 13(1): p. 18314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chiong R., Nature-inspired algorithms for optimisation. Vol. 193. 2009: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Durant F., Morokuma J., Fields C., Williams K., Adams D.S., and Levin M., Long-Term, Stochastic Editing of Regenerative Anatomy via Targeting Endogenous Bioelectric Gradients. Biophysical Journal, 2017. 112(10): p. 2231–2243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tiras K.P. and Aslanidi K.B., Device for the graphic recording of planaria behavior. Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatelnosti Imeni I P Pavlova, 1981. 31(4): p. 874–877. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Best J. and Rubenstein I., Maze leaning and associated behavior in Planaria. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 1962: p. 560–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pearl R., The movements and reactions of fresh-water planarians: a study in animal behavior. The quarterly journal of microscopical science, 1903. 46(v): p. 509–714. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tamura S., Oki I., and Kawakatsu M., A Review of Chromosomal Variation in Dugesia-Japonica and D-Ryukyuensis in the Far-East. Hydrobiologia, 1995. 305(1-3): p. 79–84. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wagner A., Energy constraints on the evolution of gene expression. Mol Biol Evol, 2005. 22(6): p. 1365–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Weisse A.Y., Oyarzun D.A., Danos V., and Swain P.S., Mechanistic links between cellular trade-offs, gene expression, and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2015. 112(9): p. E1038–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kao D., Felix D., and Aboobaker A., The planarian regeneration transcriptome reveals a shared but temporally shifted regulatory program between opposing head and tail scenarios. BMC genomics, 2013. 14(1): p. 797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Elmore S.P., Qian T., Grissom S.F., and Lemasters J.J., The mitochondrial permeability transition initiates autophagy in rat hepatocytes. FASEB J, 2001. 15(12): p. 2286–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Priault M., Salin B., Schaeffer J., Vallette F.M., di Rago J.P., and Martinou J.C., Impairing the bioenergetic status and the biogenesis of mitochondria triggers mitophagy in yeast. Cell Death Differ, 2005. 12(12): p. 1613–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Twig G., Elorza A., Molina A.J., Mohamed H., Wikstrom J.D., Walzer G., Stiles L., Haigh S.E., Katz S., Las G., Alroy J., Wu M., Py B.F., Yuan J., Deeney J.T., Corkey B.E., and Shirihai O.S., Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. EMBO J, 2008. 27(2): p. 433–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ma K., Zhang Y., Song G., Wu M., and Chen G., Identification of Autophagy-Related Gene 7 and Autophagic Cell Death in the Planarian Dugesia japonica. Front Physiol, 2018. 9: p. 1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sahu S., Dattani A., and Aboobaker A.A., Secrets from immortal worms: What can we learn about biological ageing from the planarian model system? Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2017. 70: p. 108–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhou X. and Wingo C.S., Stimulation of total CO2 flux by 10% CO2 in rabbit CCD: role of an apical Sch-28080- and Ba-sensitive mechanism. Am J Physiol, 1994. 267(1 Pt 2): p. F114–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Beane W.S., Morokuma J., Adams D.S., and Levin M., A Chemical genetics approach reveals H,K-ATPase-mediated membrane voltage is required for planarian head regeneration. Chemistry & Biology, 2011. 18(1): p. 77–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Przywara D.A., Chowdhury P.S., Bhave S.V., Wakade T.D., and Wakade A.R., Barium-induced exocytosis is due to internal calcium release and block of calcium efflux. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1993. 90(2): p. 557–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Owen C.S. and Dever S., Indo-1 can simultaneously detect Ba2+ entry and Ca2+ blockade at a plasma membrane calcium channel. Mol Cell Biochem, 1995. 151(2): p. 91–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Williams K.B., Bischof J., Lee F.J., Miller K.A., LaPalme J.V., Wolfe B.E., and Levin M., Regulation of axial and head patterning during planarian regeneration by a commensal bacterium. Mech Dev, 2020. 163: p. 103614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. Functional and organismal information of two differentially expressed genes in isolated versus group-living planaria that lost and regenerated their heads in BaCl2.
Figure S1. Read counts from the transcriptomes of each worm vary within and among the different conditions. Non-BaCl2-exposed isolated worms (Control); non-BaCl2-exposed worms that recently developed from tail pieces (Tail regenerate); BaCl2-exposed isolated regenerates (BaCl2–exposed regenerate). Each number on the x axis represents a different worm. B8, B8.2, and B8.3 are samples from the same worm.
Figure S2. BaCl2-exposed regenerated worms living on their own versus in groups do not differ statistically significantly in their transcriptome, apart from two genes.
a. Design of experiment testing for interindividual differences in the transcriptome of non-BaCl2-exposed non-fissioned planaria, non-BaCl2-exposed planaria that recently developed from tail pieces of fissioned planaria, and regenerated planaria that had lost their head in BaCl2.
b. Group-living (G) and isolated (S) BaCl2-exposed regenerates show minimal transcriptomic differences. G: group-living BaCl2-exposed regenerates. S: isolated BaCl2-exposed regenerates. a. G1: 4 worms, G2: 4 worms, G3: 4 worms; G: 12 worms; S: 3 worms. c-e. The genes in red with a positive log2 fold change are overexpressed in isolated versus group-living worms, whereas the genes in red with a negative log2 fold change are underexpressed in isolated versus group-living worms.
c. Comparison of gene expression levels in group living worms (4 worms living in a single Petri dish: G1) versus isolated worms (3 isolated worms, each living in a different Petri dish). The x-axis represents the shrunken log2 fold change, and the y-axis shows the −log10 of the s-value. Red dots denote genes passing both statistical significance and fold change thresholds; green dots indicate statistically significant fold change without statistical significance in s-value; gray dots indicate no statistically significant fold change.
d. Comparison of gene expression levels in group living worms (4 worms living in a single Petri dish: G2) versus isolated worms (3 isolated worms, each living in a different Petri dish). e. Comparison of gene expression levels in group living worms (4 worms living in a single Petri dish: G3) versus isolated worms (3 isolated worms, each living in a different Petri dish). There are only two differentially expressed genes between the group-living (G) versus isolated (S) worms that lost and then regenerated their heads in BaCl2 (c-e). Large red circles highlight the genes that are statistically differentially expressed in groups-living versus isolated worms.
