Abstract
Large to massive rotator cuff tears are frequently associated with poor tendon quality and high rates of structural failure after repair. Acellular human dermal matrix patch augmentation combined with rotator cuff repair has been introduced to enhance bone‐to‐tendon healing by providing early postoperative mechanical strength. However, fully arthroscopic patch augmentation techniques are technically demanding and associated with increased operative complexity. The described technique combines arthroscopic evaluation and subacromial decompression with an anterolateral miniopen triple‐row repair and onlay acellular human dermal matrix patch augmentation. This approach simplifies patch handling while providing strong fixation and may represent a practical alternative to fully arthroscopic patch augmentation techniques.

Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a commonly performed procedure in orthopaedic fields. 1 , 2 Despite advances in surgical techniques and instrumentation, high retear rates after RCR have been reported, particularly in patients with large to massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs). 3 , 4 Although structural failure does not always correlate with poor clinical outcomes, several studies have shown that intact tendon healing is generally associated with superior long‐term results. 5 , 6
Patch augmentation using acellular human dermal matrix (AHDM) has been introduced to reinforce RCR by improving load sharing, increasing repair strength, and providing a biologic scaffold for tendon healing. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 Previous studies have reported improved structural integrity and reduced retear rates in patients with large or massive RCTs. 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 However, most full arthroscopic techniques are technically demanding, requiring advanced arthroscopic skills and prolonged operative time with intraoperative complexity.
Miniopen RCR remains a valuable option for large tears, offering direct visualization, reliable tendon mobilization, and secure suture management, while minimizing deltoid morbidity when performed through a limited incision. 14 , 15 , 16 This Technical Note describes a practical and reproducible anterolateral miniopen triple‐row RCR augmented with an AHDM patch for the treatment of large to massive RCTs. A detailed step‐by‐step description and accompanying video are provided.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
The complete surgical technique is shown in Video 1.
VIDEO 1.
Step‐by‐step presentation of an anterolateral miniopen triple‐row rotator cuff repair with acellular human dermal matrix patch augmentation. Video content can be viewed at https://doi.org/10.1002/atn2.70266.
Diagnostic Arthroscopy and Subacromial Decompression
Under general anesthesia, the patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position with a posterior tilt of 20° to 30°. Standard diagnostic arthroscopy of the glenohumeral joint is performed using anterior and posterior portals. The arthroscope is then advanced into the subacromial space through the posterior portal, and a lateral portal is established.
Using a probe, the size, configuration, and mobility of the RCT are carefully assessed. Careful debridement of the margin of the torn rotator cuff and adhesiolysis are performed to improve tendon mobility (Figure 1). Subacromial spurs and acromial wear are evaluated, and arthroscopic acromioplasty is performed using a burr when signs of impingement are present.
FIGURE 1.

Arthroscopic view from the lateral viewing portal showing a massive rotator cuff tear in the right shoulder (full arrow, torn rotator cuff; empty arrow, greater tuberosity; *, biceps tension).
Anterolateral Miniopen RCR
Miniopen RCR is performed via an anterolateral approach as previously described. 14 , 15 A 3‐ to 4‐cm skin incision is made from the anterolateral edge of the acromion distally. The raphe between the anterior and middle deltoid is carefully dissected, and adequate exposure is obtained using a deltoid retractor. The subacromial bursa is excised to expose the torn rotator cuff.
Traction sutures are placed in the torn tendons, and the tear configuration and tendon involvement are confirmed by rotating the arm. After complete tendon mobilization, reduction to the footprint of the greater tuberosity is attempted. Then, footprint preparation is performed using the crimson duvet procedure.
Two medial‐row suture anchors (4.75 mm HEALICOIL, Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) are placed at the articular margin of the greater tuberosity. Sutures are passed through the medial portion of the torn tendons at a depth of approximately 10 to 12 mm. One or 2 intermediate‐row suture anchors (2.8 mm Y‐Knot, CONMED, Utica, NY) are then inserted into the lateral aspect of the greater tuberosity. Sutures are passed through the tendon and secured using a sliding knot‐tying technique (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2.

Right shoulder, lateral decubitus position, posterosuperior viewing portal. After the miniopen approach, medial‐row suturing (full arrow) and intermediate‐row fixation (empty arrow) of the torn rotator cuff tendon.
AHDM Patch Augmentation
An AHDM patch (3‐mm thickness, 3 × 4 cm; ConPatch, MSBIO, Seongnam, Republic of Korea) is applied in an onlay fashion to reinforce the repair. Medial‐row suture limbs are passed through the patch (Figure 3) and tied using a sliding knot‐tying technique. These sutures are then secured laterally using knotless anchors (Kinex Fix2Lock; OSTEONIC, Seoul, Republic of Korea) (Figure 4). A schematic illustration and magnetic resonance imaging of the triple‐row repair with AHDM patch augmentation are shown in Figures 5 and 6.
FIGURE 3.

Right shoulder, lateral decubitus position, posterosuperior viewing portal. Passing of medial‐row sutures through the acellular human dermal matrix patch (*).
FIGURE 4.

Right shoulder, lateral decubitus position, posterosuperior viewing portal. Lateral‐row fixation (empty arrow) after medial knot tying (full arrow) with the application of acellular human dermal matrix patch.
FIGURE 5.

Schematic illustrations of triple‐row repair with patch augmentation. (IRA, intermediate row anchor; LRA, lateral row anchor; MRA, medial row anchor.)
FIGURE 6.

(a) Preoperative and (b) postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the right shoulder showing patch augmentation combined with rotator cuff repair (full arrow).
To prevent deltoid detachment, a No. 1 absorbable suture is passed through a bone tunnel created in the acromion for secure deltoid reattachment. Additional sutures are placed 3 to 4 times to repair the anterior and middle deltoid.
Postoperative Rehabilitation
Patients are immobilized in an abduction brace for 6 weeks postoperatively. Passive range‐of‐motion exercises are initiated at 4 to 6 weeks after surgery depending on tear size and repair quality. Active range‐of‐motion exercises begin at 8 weeks, followed by strengthening exercises at 3 months. Return to sports or occupational activities is permitted approximately 6 months after surgery.
Ethical Approval
Institutional Review Board approval was waived because this article describes a surgical technique without patient‐specific data. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for use of images and video.
DISCUSSION
The key finding of this Technical Note is that an anterolateral miniopen triple‐row RCR with AHDM patch augmentation provides strong fixation while simplifying patch handling and suture management. This technique may serve as a practical and reproducible alternative to fully arthroscopic patch augmentation.
This approach may be particularly beneficial in patients with large or massive RCTs, which are associated with high failure rates because of excessive repair tension and poor tendon quality. Triple‐row constructs incorporating medial, intermediate, and lateral fixation with onlay patch augmentation distribute load more evenly across the footprint and reduce gap formation compared with nonaugmented single‐ or double‐row repairs. In addition, AHDM patch augmentation may enhance early postoperative repair strength and promote tendon healing by serving as a biologic scaffold for cellular ingrowth.
Compared with fully arthroscopic techniques, the miniopen approach offers several advantages. Direct visualization facilitates precise tendon mobilization, accurate footprint preparation, and secure suture handling, particularly in retracted or delaminated tears (Table 1). Patch handling and fixation are simplified, potentially reducing operative time and technical complexity (Table 2).
TABLE 1.
Indications and Contraindications
| Indications | Contraindications |
|---|---|
| Large or massive rotator cuff tears (>3 cm) | Irreparable rotator cuff tears |
| Poor tendon quality requiring reinforcement | Advanced fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles (Goutallier grade 3 or 4) |
| Retracted tears requiring extensive mobilization | Moderate to severe glenohumeral arthritis |
| Revision rotator cuff repair | Suspicious infection |
| Patients with high functional demand | Deltoid dysfunction or prior deltoid detachment |
| Incomplete footprint coverage (>50%) after conventional repair | Inability to comply with postoperative rehabilitation |
TABLE 2.
Advantages and Disadvantages
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Strong biomechanical fixation with improved footprint compression | More invasive than fully arthroscopic techniques |
| AHDM patch augmentation enhances repair strength and biologic healing | Increased cost because of graft and implants |
| Direct visualization facilitates tendon mobilization and footprint preparation | Risk of deltoid injury if not properly handled |
| Simplified graft handling compared with arthroscopic patch techniques | Requires familiarity with both arthroscopic and open techniques |
| Particularly useful for large or poor‐quality rotator cuff tears | Limited applicability in irreparable tears or advanced fatty degeneration |
AHDM, acellular human dermal matrix.
Nevertheless, several limitations should be considered. Visualization may be limited in obese or muscular patients, and there is a potential risk of deltoid injury if the procedure is not performed carefully (Table 3). However, deltoid integrity can be preserved through meticulous splitting along the deltoid raphe and secure reattachment.
TABLE 3.
Pearls and Pitfalls
| Pearls | Pitfalls |
|---|---|
| Perform thorough diagnostic arthroscopy to assess tear configuration and reparability | Inadequate tear mobilization leading to excessive repair tension |
| Preserve the deltoid by splitting along the raphe between anterior and middle deltoid | Excessive deltoid detachment or insufficient reattachment to the acromion |
| If necessary (i.e., in cases with limited cuff mobility), the surgeon can medialize the footprint 3‐5 mm to reduce tension on the repair | Inadequate footprint preparation compromising tendon healing |
| Achieve complete footprint preparation using the crimson duvet technique | |
| Use traction sutures to facilitate tendon mobilization and orientation | Malpositioned sutures causing tendon strangulation |
| Apply the AHDM patch in an onlay fashion after completion of tendon repair | Overtensioning the patch, which may restrict tendon motion |
| Secure medial‐row sutures through both tendon and patch for reinforcement | |
| Confirm stable fixation through full passive range of motion before closure |
AHDM, acellular human dermal matrix.
Anterolateral miniopen triple‐row RCR with AHDM patch augmentation is a practical and reproducible technique for the treatment of large to massive RCTs. This approach may represent a valuable alternative to fully arthroscopic patch‐augmented repairs in appropriately selected patients.
DISCLOSURES
The authors (C‐H.C., B‐C.C., H‐J.S., D‐H.K.) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Eun‐Ji Jeon for support with video editing.
REFERENCES
- 1. Lee KS, Kim DH, Chung SW, Yoon JP. Current concepts in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025;28:103‐112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Morya VK, Lang J, Lee YB, Kim JW, Lee KU, Noh KC. A narrative review on the double pulley‐triple row technique for large to massive rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Surg. 2025;17:359‐371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Jo CH, Kim K, Ahn EM. Antegrade supraspinatus advancement yields promising clinical and structural outcomes for retracted irreducible rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Surg. 2025;17:460‐469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kim HB, Kim SH. Outcomes of footprint medialization and bone marrow stimulation in chronic retracted rotator cuff tears. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025;28:60‐67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair single‐row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:664‐671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cobb TE, Dimock RAC, Memon SD, et al. Rotator cuff repair with patch augmentation: What do we know? Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2022;10:833‐846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Adams JE, Zobitz ME, Reach JS Jr, An KN, Steinmann SP. Rotator cuff repair using an acellular dermal matrix graft: An in vivo study in a canine model. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:700‐709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Omae H, Steinmann SP, Zhao C, et al. Biomechanical effect of rotator cuff augmentation with an acellular dermal matrix graft: A cadaver study. Clin Biomech. 2012;27:789‐792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Snyder SJ, Arnoczky SP, Bond JL, Dopirak R. Histologic evaluation of a biopsy specimen obtained 3 months after rotator cuff augmentation with GraftJacket Matrix. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:329‐333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Barber FA, Burns JP, Deutsch A, Labbé MR, Litchfield RB. A prospective, randomized evaluation of acellular human dermal matrix augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:8‐15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gilot GJ, Alvarez‐Pinzon AM, Barcksdale L, Westerdahl D, Krill M, Peck E. Outcome of large to massive rotator cuff tears repaired with and without extracellular matrix augmentation: A prospective comparative study. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:1459‐1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lee GW, Kim JY, Lee HW, Yoon JH, Noh KC. Clinical and anatomical outcomes of arthroscopic repair of large rotator cuff tears with allograft patch augmentation: A prospective, single‐blinded, randomized controlled trial with a long‐term follow‐up. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022;14:263‐271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yoon JP, Chung SW, Kim JY, et al. Outcomes of combined bone marrow stimulation and patch augmentation for massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:963‐971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Cho CH, Lee SM, Lee YK, Shin HK. Mini‐open suture bridge repair with porcine dermal patch augmentation for massive rotator cuff tear: Surgical technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6:329‐335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cho CH, Song KS, Min BW, Jung GH, Lee YK, Sin HK. Anterolateral approach for mini‐open rotator cuff repair. Int Orthop. 2012;36:95‐100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Vaishya R, Saiyed A, Patralekh MK, Vaish A, Migliorini F. Patient‐reported outcomes (PROMs) of arthroscopic versus mini‐open rotator cuff repair‐an overview of meta‐analysis. J Orthop. 2026;73:1‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
