Introduction
We read with great interest the case reported by Shen et al. (1), in which a 57-year-old woman developed shock, dark-brown urine, and a precipitous fall in hemoglobin shortly after ceftriaxone administration. A strongly positive direct antiglobulin test and ceftriaxone-dependent IgG and IgM antibodies supported the diagnosis of ceftriaxone-induced drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA). Following ceftriaxone withdrawal, intensive supportive care, transfusion, glucocorticoids, two sessions of whole blood exchange-lymphoplasmapheresis combined transfusion (WLCT), and subsequent dual plasma molecular adsorption, the patient recovered. Because DIIHA is rare but may cause fulminant intravascular hemolysis and organ injury within hours, the report addresses an important rescue-treatment gap (2–4, 6).
Mechanistic rationale and evidentiary boundaries
The principal value of this report is its mechanism-oriented treatment concept. Ceftriaxone withdrawal prevents renewed drug exposure, whereas WLCT is intended to reduce circulating drug-dependent antibodies, sensitized or damaged red blood cells (RBCs), and a cellular fraction that may contain antibody-producing cells. This integrated target is biologically attractive because therapeutic plasma exchange mainly removes soluble plasma constituents, while RBC exchange mainly replaces circulating RBCs. Drug-dependent antibody testing also provides stronger causal support than temporal association alone.
However, the phrase “restoring immune homeostasis” should be interpreted cautiously. Falling antibody titers, resolution of hemolysis, and conversion of the direct antiglobulin test to negative demonstrate improvement in the intravascular immune-hematologic state, but do not establish systemic immune reprogramming. Removal of antibody-producing cells was not directly quantified, and changes after WLCT may reflect a combination of cell removal, plasma dilution, transfusion, natural antibody clearance, and cessation of ceftriaxone exposure. Pre- and post-procedure measurements of recovered cell subsets, circulating plasmablasts, complement activation, and standardized drug-dependent antibody titers would clarify which components WLCT actually modifies.
Clinical positioning, safety, and reproducibility
The therapeutic contribution of WLCT cannot be isolated from this single case. Drug withdrawal, anti-shock care, glucocorticoids, RBC and plasma transfusion, two WLCT procedures, and dual plasma molecular adsorption were delivered within a short interval. The favorable outcome therefore supports feasibility and a temporal association, not comparative efficacy. Immediate and permanent ceftriaxone withdrawal, transfusion support, and organ-directed critical care remain the foundation of management; WLCT should be presented as an investigational rescue option for selected patients with ongoing life-threatening hemolysis, shock, or evolving organ injury despite initial measures.
Reproducibility and safety also require attention. The reported procedure depended on manual separator adjustment and visual assessment of collection-line color. A transferable protocol should specify patient selection, exchange volume, replacement fluid and blood-component ratios, anticoagulation and calcium management, device settings, stopping rules, and surveillance for hemodynamic instability, citrate toxicity, bleeding, vascular-access complications, and transfusion reactions (5). A multicenter registry could use harmonized diagnostic criteria and fixed-time-point measurements of hemoglobin, bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, haptoglobin, plasma-free hemoglobin, renal function, complement, antibody titers, vasopressor exposure, transfusion requirements, and adverse events.
Discussion
Shen et al. should be commended for describing a creative, pathophysiology-oriented intervention for an immediately life-threatening immune adverse drug reaction. The report does not establish WLCT as standard therapy, but it generates a clinically relevant hypothesis: combined removal of soluble antibodies and sensitized cellular components may offer rapid control when conventional supportive measures are insufficient. Standardized procedures, direct mechanistic measurements, and multicenter comparative data are now needed to determine whether this promising rescue concept is safe, reproducible, and associated with better patient-centered outcomes.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Shanghai Key Discipline of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Clinical Type) Project (Grant No. shzyyzdxk-2024208) and the Shanghai Baoshan District Key Medical Discipline Construction Project (Grant No. BSZK-2023-Z01).
Footnotes
Edited by: Mourad Aribi, University of Abou Bekr Belkaïd, Algeria
Reviewed by: Yashik Bansal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
Author contributions
JB: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. XZ: Writing – review & editing. AC: Writing – review & editing. LS: Writing – review & editing. ML: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1. Shen N, Zhang M, Li J, Chen H, Xing Y, Que W, et al. First application of whole blood exchange-lymphoplasmapheresis combined transfusion for restoring immune homeostasis of ceftriaxone-induced hemolytic crisis: a case report. Front Immunol. (2026) 17:1821127. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1821127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Maquet J, Lafaurie M, Michel M, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Moulis G. Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia: detection of new signals and risk assessment in a nationwide cohort study. Blood Adv. (2024) 8:817–26. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hansen DL, Frederiksen H. A leap in recognizing drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia. Blood Adv. (2024) 8:815–6. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wang L, Jiang Y, Li G, Zhang L, Qin B, Li A. Ceftriaxone-induced immune hemolytic anemia: a case report. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1476563. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1476563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Connelly-Smith L, Alquist CR, Aqui NA, Hofmann JC, Klingel R, Onwuemene OA, et al. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice-evidence-based approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: the ninth special issue. J Clin Apher. (2023) 38:77–278. doi: 10.1002/jca.22043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Seltsam A, Salama A. Ceftriaxone-induced immune haemolysis: two case reports and a concise review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. (2000) 26:1390–4. doi: 10.1007/s001340000598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
