Abstract
Objective
Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) is a common condition characterized by pain and progressive restriction of shoulder mobility, often requiring imaging for differential diagnosis. While bone scintigraphy is occasionally performed, the diagnostic potential of bloodpool SPECT/CT has never been evaluated.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 18 affected shoulders in 17 patients who underwent standardized bone scintigraphy with both bloodpool and late-phase SPECT/CT. Uptake was visually assessed in four predefined capsular regions.
Results
Bloodpool SPECT/CT revealed increased uptake in the rotator cuff interval in 100% of pathological shoulders, followed by the axillary recess (72%), anterior joint capsule (67%), and posterior joint capsule (44%). Late-phase diffuse uptake was present in 78% of cases. In three pathological shoulders, uptake in the rotator cuff interval was the only abnormality at the bloodpool phase.
Conclusion
This study suggests that increased uptake in the rotator cuff interval on bloodpool SPECT/CT may be associated with adhesive capsulitis and could represent a sensitive imaging pattern. Further prospective studies are required to determine the diagnostic value of blood-pool SPECT/CT in patients with shoulder pain.
Keywords: Bloodpool SPECT/CT, Shoulder pain, Adhesive capsulitis
Introduction
Frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis) is a common joint disorder affecting 2 to 5% of the population [1, 2]. It is characterized by pain and a gradual loss of both active and passive shoulder mobility, resulting from inflammation and adhesions within the glenohumeral joint capsule, significantly impacting daily life [1–6]. Early diagnosis is essential to initiate timely and appropriate multidisciplinary management [1, 7, 8]. Despite treatment, stiffness may persist in approximately 10% of patients [1].
The primary form, which has no apparent cause, contrasts with the secondary form, which is associated with general or local causes [2, 9, 10]. The latter raises challenges in distinguishing between differential or overlapping diagnoses with adhesive capsulitis. This is why imaging examinations are frequently used, including standard Xrays, ultrasound, arthrography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [2, 11–16], particularly in cases of therapeutic failure. These techniques help identify capsular and peri-capsular areas affected by inflammation and capsular retraction due to fibrosis. Such findings have also been observed in studies using [18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-2- D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) [17–19], although this modality is not usually recommended for diagnosing adhesive capsulitis. Even if many imaging modalities can help the clinician, clinical examination remains the reference standard for diagnosis [11].
Bone scintigraphy is one of the imaging techniques commonly used in clinical practice [20–22], although scientific evidence supporting its use in this indication is limited. However, no studies have yet evaluated the impact of recent procedures, such as the addition of bloodpool single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to the standard bone scintigraphy protocol, for this indication. This early imaging phase allows the assessment of inflammatory processes in soft tissues, while the CT component enables anatomical localization. and characterization of pathological structures [23, 24]. This approach has demonstrated its relevance in various fields, such as the assessment of ankle and foot pain [25, 26], total knee prostheses [27], and osteomyelitis [28]. Drawing an analogy with these various techniques, our working hypothesis is that bloodpool SPECT/CT could more accurately identify inflammation of the shoulder synovial capsule.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity of bone scintigraphy, including bloodpool SPECT/CT, for diagnosing adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, and to identify the most sensitive patterns.
Materials and methods
Study population
In this monocentric study, we retrospectively included consecutive patients from March 2023 to December 2024 who were referred to our center for bone scintigraphy and met the following inclusion criteria: minimum age of 18 years old, diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis within 6 months before or after the bone scintigraphy, and no prosthetic material of the affected shoulder. All patients included in the study were informed and did not object to their participation in this study. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Reference standard
The diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis was defined based on the following criteria: shoulder pain and stiffness for at least four weeks, severe pain impacting daily activities, nocturnal pain, limitation of both active and passive range of motion (anterior elevation 50°), and a normal radiographic appearance (for primary forms) [1].
SPECT/CT protocol and analysis
The examinations were performed using two SPECT/CT systems: the Symbia Intevo 6 (Siemens) or the Discovery 870 DR (GE Healthcare). A standard activity of 8 MBq/kg of [99mTc] hydroxydiphosphonate was injected according to European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines [29]. Each patient underwent imaging in two phases: (1) at the bloodpool phase, acquired 3 min after radiotracer injection, including SPECT/CT imaging of the shoulders, and (2) at the late-phase, acquired 3 h after injection, including whole-body static imaging and SPECT/CT of the shoulders. The bloodpool and late acquisitions were performed in 8 and 13 s per projection, respectively, for a total of 60 projections and a 180-degree rotation for each of the two detectors. The CT scans were performed with a slice thickness of 3 mm and without contrast agent. Additional acquisitions could have been performed at the physician’s discretion on the day of the examination. Images were analyzed simultaneously and consensually by two nuclear medicine physicians using Syngo.Via VB60 workstations (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany).
Images analysis
The analysis of each shoulder diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis was performed as follows. On the bloodpool SPECT/CT, four anatomical regions of the glenohumeral joint capsule were systematically evaluated for each patient: the rotator cuff interval (RI), the anterior joint capsule (AJC), the posterior joint capsule (PJC), and the axillary recess (AR) (Fig. 1). The retrospective image analysis was based on the findings from Kim et al., who studied metabolic patterns on [18F]FDG PET/CT in adhesive capsulitis [18]. A “diffuse uptake” was defined as the involvement of the four capsular regions (RI, AJC, AR, PJC) and extending beyond them to encompass the entire capsule. This clarification has now been added to the manuscript. On the late-phase SPECT/CT, image analysis focused on identifying a diffuse uptake pattern of the radiotracer within and/or around the humeral head [20]. Image interpretation was based solely on visual analysis by a consensus of two senior nuclear medicine physicians, assessing whether there was an increase in radiotracer uptake within each predefined location. The CT acquisitions coupled with the SPECT images allowed localization and morphological assessment of any underlying changes associated with the scintigraphic anomalies.
Fig. 1.

Capsular anatomy of the glenohumeral joint presented on an arthroscanner. RI, rotator cuff interval; AJC, anterior joint capsule; PJC, posterior joint capsule; AR, axillary recess
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests and graphical representations were performed using MedCalc® version 12.5.0.0 (Medcalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). The descriptive statistics of the population were reported according to their frequencies, their means accompanied by their standard deviations (SD), or their medians with interquartile interval [Q1,Q3]. The descriptive statistics of images were reported by proportions and 95% confidence interval (95%CI).
Results
Patients
A total of 18 shoulders were analyzed from 17 patients (9 men, median age of 54.9 years [51.5, 59.9]). The shoulder pains lasted for a median duration of 5.0 months [3.9, 10.9] when SPECT/CT were performed. Patients’ characteristics are detailed in Table 1. Only one out of 17 patients (6%) was referred by his general practitioner, while all the others (94%) were referred by rheumatologists or orthopedists. All imaging examinations were performed after the clinical diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis had been established, with a median delay of 2.4 months [1.4, 2.8]. No patients underwent multiple SPECT/CT analyses.
Table 1.
Patients’ characteristics
| Number (%) or median [Q1, Q3] | |
|---|---|
| Patients | n = 17 |
| Sex (male) | 9 (53%) |
| Sex (female) | 8 (47%) |
| Age (years) | 54.9 [51.5, 59.9] |
| Shoulders | n = 18 |
| Laterality (right) | 9 (50%) |
| Age of symptoms (months) | 5.0 [3.9, 10.9] |
| Previous surgery | 7 (41%) |
| Previous injury | 9 (53%) |
| Delay between SPECT/CT and clinical diagnosis (months) | 2.4 [1.4, 2.8] |
Scintigraphic patterns
Based on the standard late-phase SPECT/CT 14 out of 17 patients (78% [52%, 94%]) presented an increased uptake, as a diffuse articular or peri-articular uptake.
On the bloodpool SPECT/CT images, all the patients presented an increased uptake in the RI (100% [95%CI: 81%, 100%]). Additionally, 12 (67% [95%CI: 41%, 87%]) presented an increased uptake on the AJC, 13 (72% [95%CI: 47%, 90%]) on the AR, and 8(44% [95%CI: 22%, 69%]) on the PJC (Table 2, Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). No significant uptake was observed in pain-free shoulders.
Table 2.
Scintigraphic patterns
| Bloodpool SPECT/CT | Late-phase SPECT/CT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RI | AJC | AR | PJC | Diffuse uptake | Diffuse uptake | |
| 01L | + | - | - | - | - | - |
| 02L | + | + | - | - | - | - |
| 03R | + | - | + | - | - | + |
| 04R | + | + | + | + | - | + |
| 05R | + | - | + | - | - | + |
| 06R | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 07L | + | + | + | - | - | + |
| 08R | + | - | - | - | - | + |
| 09L | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 10R | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 11L | + | + | + | - | - | - |
| 12L | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 13L | + | + | + | - | - | - |
| 14R | + | - | + | - | - | + |
| 15R | + | - | - | - | - | + |
| 16R | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 16L | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 17L | + | + | - | + | - | + |
| TOTAL | 18 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 6 | 14 |
|
Sensitivity [95%CI] |
100% [81%, 100%] |
67% [41%, 87%] |
72% [47%, 90%] |
44% [22%, 69%] |
33% [13%, 59%] |
78% [52%, 94%] |
RI, rotator cuff interval; AJC, anterior joint capsule; PJC, posterior joint capsule; AR, axillary recess
Fig. 2.

A fifty-three-year-old man presenting with clinical right frozen shoulder (patient 04R). Bloodpool phase SPECT/CT revealed an increased uptake in RI (blue arrow head) and AR (red arrow head) on the MIP (A) and fused images (B and D), while no significant uptake was observed in the AJC and the PJC (C). The late phase SPECT/CT, revealed symmetrical physiological uptake in the shoulders (E and F). RI, rotator cuff interval; AJC, anterior joint capsule; PJC, posterior joint capsule; AR, axillary recess; MIP, maximum intensity projection
Fig. 3.

A forty-two-year-old man presenting with clinical left frozen shoulder (patient 01L). Bloodpool phase SPECT/CT showed an increased uptake in RI (blue arrow head) on the MIP (A) and fused images (B), while no significant uptake was observed on the AJC, PJC, and AR (C and D). The late phase SPECT/CT, revealed symmetrical physiological uptake in the shoulders (E and F). RI, rotator cuff interval; AJC, anterior joint capsule; PJC, posterior joint capsule; AR, axillary recess; MIP, maximum intensity projection
Discussion
The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the sensitivity of bone scintigraphy, including the bloodpool SPECT/CT, for the positive diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, and to identify the most sensitive patterns. Eighteen clinically pathological shoulders were analyzed in 17 patients. During the bloodpool phase, increased uptake within the RI was observed in all clinically pathological shoulders, providing a sensitivity of 100% in our sample. As a comparison, the sensitivity of the increased uptake in the AR, AJC, and PJC during the bloodpool phase, were 72%, 67%, and 44%, respectively, and 78% regarding the diffuse uptake in the delayed phase. Overall, among all the 18 pathological shoulders, three showed increased uptake exclusively in the RI at the bloodpool phase (two of which also showed diffuse increased uptake in the delayed phase).
This study leads to two main findings. First, the absence of diffuse delayed uptake in a pathological shoulder does not definitively rule out the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis. Second, the absence of increased uptake in the RI during the early phase was associated with a lower likelihood of adhesive capsulitis. The design of this study does not allow for the assessment of specificity of such patterns.
To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has been published investigating the usefulness of bloodpool SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis.
Studied capsular areas are easily identifiable on CT scans, even without contrast agent. The RI is a triangular anatomical space located on the anterior aspect of the shoulder, bounded superiorly by the tendon of the supraspinatus muscle, inferiorly by the tendon of the subscapularis muscle, laterally by the long head of the biceps brachii muscle, and medially by the coracoid process. It is closed superiorly by the coracohumeral ligament and deeply by the superior glenohumeral ligament [30, 31]. Its inflammation in adhesive capsulitis is explained by synovitis, followed by fibrous collagen proliferation with synovial hypertrophy and deposits [30]. On MRI and MR arthrography, this fibrous tissue replaces the fatty signal on T1, thickens the capsule of the interval, as well as the superior glenohumeral and coracohumeral ligaments [14]. A T2 hypersignal is possible, as well as enhancement after gadolinium injection [32]. Thickening of the coracohumeral ligament is also found on ultrasound, where the tendon appears hypoechoic with Doppler hyperemia [33]. Involvement of the AR is also described, with it appearing underdeveloped and retracted [32].
The role of nuclear medicine in the assessment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder has been scarcely studied. Kim et al. studied the metabolic patterns in [18F]FDG PET/CT of the glenohumeral joint in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder [18]. Twenty-two shoulders were studied in 21 patients affected by this condition. Sixteen shoulders showed enhanced uptake of the RI, the AJC, and the AR (pattern type I). Two exhibited increased uptake of the AJC and the AR (pattern type II), 2 had involvement only of the RI and AJC (pattern type III), and 2 had focal involvement of the RI or the AJC (pattern type IV). The uptake intensity was significantly higher in the RI, the AR, and the AJC compared to the non-pathological shoulder or the control group (40 shoulders in 20 patients without shoulder pain). Sridharan et al. showed that among 15 patients with focal uptake with [18F]FDG PET/CT of the RI or the inferior AR, 9 had a diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis [19]. The sensitivity and specificity of [18F]FDG PET/CT for detecting adhesive capsulitis were 56% and 87%, respectively, with a likelihood ratio of 6.3 (95% CI: 2.8 – 14.6). Finally, Won KS et al. demonstrated a correlation between [18F]FDG PET/CT metabolic patterns and clinical involvement in 35 patients with adhesive capsulitis [17]. The uptake intensity value in the RI, AR, and AJC was negatively correlated respectively with external and internal rotation, abduction and elevation, and all movements.
The presence of increased uptake in the tissue phase of SPECT/CT thus seems to reflect, in our study, this inflammatory environment, mainly found in the RI, then the AR.
Some limitations have to be considered in our study. First, it was a monocentric study with a limited sample size that hampered the statistical power. Second, due to the imperfect spatial resolution of SPECT, the analysis of subcentimetric anatomical structures may be imprecise as a consequence of the partial volume effect. Third, due to the retrospective nature of the study, the diagnostic assessment was based on a review of consultation reports written by orthopedic specialists, rather than standardized reassessment, which did not consistently provide detailed descriptions of the extent or severity of the condition. Consequently, it was not possible to establish a precise correlation between imaging findings and clinical severity, and heterogeneity in the reference diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis may have been introduced. Prospective studies using standardized clinical criteria are needed to confirm these findings. Finally, the specificity and positive predictive value of RI uptake could not be assessed in this study, as no control group—including shoulders without adhesive capsulitis or with alternative diagnoses—was included. Therefore, although all confirmed cases showed increased uptake, we cannot conclude that RI uptake is specific to adhesive capsulitis or that its presence reliably confirms the diagnosis.
While bone scintigraphy has not traditionally been considered in the evaluation of adhesive capsulitis, our study indicates that bloodpool SPECT/CT may offer valuable diagnostic support. Additional studies are required to complete this pilot study, first to validate our findings and clarify the specificity of the described patterns in larger cohorts including other pathologies of the shoulder, as well as to determine its role in therapeutic decision-making and its correlation with patient outcomes. Its position among other imaging techniques should also still needs to be clarified. The clinical impact of the bloodpool SPECT/CT, that has been demonstrated in several clinical settings [25–28, 34] could be enhanced through the use of more advanced systems such as full-ring 360° cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) technology [35].
Conclusion
Bloodpool SPECT/CT may represent a promising imaging modality for the evaluation of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. In this preliminary study, increased uptake in the RI on bloodpool SPECT/CT was observed in all shoulders diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in larger prospective controlled studies.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille. This study did not benefit from any funding.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Georgiannos D, Markopoulos G, Devetzi E, et al. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Is there consensus regarding the treatment? a comprehensive review. Open Orthop J. 2017;11:65–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pandey V, Madi S. Clinical guidelines in the management of frozen shoulder: an update! Indian J Orthop. 2021;55:299–309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neviaser AS, Hannafin JA. Adhesive capsulitis: a review of current treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2346–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mohamed AA, Jan YK, El Sayed WH, et al. Dynamic scapular recognition exercise improves scapular upward rotation and shoulder pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2020;28:146–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Page MJ, Green S, Kramer S, et al. Electrotherapy modalities for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. 10.1002/14651858.cd011324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ricci M. Adhesive capsulitis: a review for clinicians. JAAPA. 2021;34:12–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Redler LH, Dennis ER. Treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27:e544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cho CH, Bae KC, Kim DH. Treatment strategy for frozen shoulder. Clin Orthop Surg. 2019;11:24957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ramirez J. Adhesive capsulitis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99:297–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Neviaser AS, Neviaser RJ. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:536–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chi AS, Kim J, Long SS, et al. Non-contrast MRI diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Clin Imaging. 2017;44:46–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ryu KN, Lee SW, Rhee YG, et al. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: usefulness of dynamic sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 1993;12:445–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pessis E, Mihoubi F, Feydy A, et al. Usefulness of intravenous contrast-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:5981–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CWA, Gerber C, et al. Frozen shoulder: MR arthrographic findings. Radiology. 2004;233:486–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lowry V, Lavigne P, Zidarov D, et al. A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of various shoulder disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;105:411–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Picasso R, Pistoia F, Zaottini F, et al. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: current concepts on the diagnostic work-up and evidence-based protocol for radiological evaluation. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13:3410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Won KS, Kim DH, Sung DH, et al. Clinical correlation of metabolic parameters on 18F-FDG PET/CT in idiopathic frozen shoulder. Ann Nucl Med. 2017;31:211–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim DH, Sung DH, Ga HY, et al. Metabolic patterns of the shoulder joint on 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in adhesive capsulitis. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:136–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sridharan R, Engle MP, Garg N, et al. Focal uptake at the rotator interval or inferior capsule of shoulder on 18F-FDG PET/CT is associated with adhesive capsulitis. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:533–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clunie G, Bomanji J, Ell PJ. Technetium-99m-MDP patterns in patients with painful shoulder lesions. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1491–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Senocak O, Degirmenci B, Ozdogan O, et al. Technetium-99m human immunoglobulin scintigraphy in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a correlative study with bone scintigraphy. Ann Nucl Med. 2002;16:243–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tran G, Cowling P, Smith T, et al. What imaging-detected pathologies are associated with shoulder symptoms and their persistence? a systematic literature review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018;70:1169–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Morland D, Antunovic L. Blood pool phase SPECT: the missing link of bone scintigraphy. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;67:181–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang-Yin J, Icard N, Attia E, et al. Blood pool SPECT: rheumatological and orthopedic focus, a pictorial essay. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;67:191–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cuvilliers C, Icard N, Meneret P, et al. Blood-pool SPECT/CT in chronic ankle tendinopathy. Clin Nucl Med. 2020;45:e457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cuvilliers C, Palard-Novello X, Pontoizeau C, et al. The added value of bloodpool SPECT/CT in painful non-operated foot and ankle undiagnosed with standard three-phase bone scintigraphy. Front Med. 2021;8:634419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Verschueren J, Albert A, Carp L, et al. Bloodpool SPECT as part of bone SPECT/CT in painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA): validation and potential biomarker of prosthesis biomechanics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1009–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee SJ, Won KS, Choi HJ, et al. Early-phase SPECT/CT for diagnosing osteomyelitis: a retrospective pilot study. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22:604–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Van den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU, et al. The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1723–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Petchprapa CN, Beltran LS, Jazrawi LM, et al. The rotator interval: a review of anatomy, function, and normal and abnormal MRI appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:567–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee JC, Guy S, Connell D, et al. MRI of the rotator interval of the shoulder. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:416–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Carrillon Y, Noel E, Fantino O, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1999;66:201–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Homsi C, Bordalo-Rodrigues M, da Silva JJ, et al. Ultrasound in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: is assessment of the coracohumeral ligament a valuable diagnostic tool? Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:673–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Icard N, Zhang-Yin J, Morland D. Added value of early-phase SPECT over planar acquisition in bone imaging. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;67:202–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Graham R, Morland D, Cade S, et al. EANM position paper on challenges and opportunities of full ring 360° CZT bone imaging: it’s time to let go of planar whole-body bone imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025;52:1200–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
