Abstract
Key message
AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 make distinct, partially overlapping contributions to mitochondrial metabolism, influencing germination performance, carbon allocation, and redox balance in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Abstract
The mitochondrial dicarboxylate carrier (DIC) is essential for the exchange of dicarboxylic acids across the inner mitochondrial membrane. Although three DIC homologues (AtDIC1–3) are present in Arabidopsis thaliana, the functional roles of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 remain poorly understood. In this study, we characterized atdic1 and atdic3 single and double mutants to elucidate their physiological significance. Loss of either isoform delayed seed germination under both control and abiotic stress conditions. This delay was more pronounced in atdic1, particularly on sucrose-free medium, suggesting a requirement for AtDIC1 in the mobilization of endogenous carbon reserves. During vegetative development, the atdic3 mutant showed reduced primary root elongation under salt and osmotic stress, whereas atdic1 displayed normal or enhanced root growth under salinity, revealing distinct stress-response roles. Notably, all mutant lines exhibited increased shoot biomass compared to the wild type, supported by enhanced photosynthetic efficiency, improved chlorophyll re-oxidation, and a shift in carbon allocation toward starch at the expense of sucrose. Double mutant analysis showed no additive effects, suggesting that these isoforms do not act synergistically. Metabolomic and redox profiling demonstrated that atdic3 disruption specifically decreased the NADH/NAD+ ratio and increased NADPH/NADP+ levels, coupled with amino acid accumulation. Conversely, atdic1 mutants showed more substantial disruptions in sugar and ascorbate metabolism. Although AtDIC2 was upregulated in all mutant backgrounds, it provided only partial functional compensation. Our findings indicate that AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 fulfill distinct yet partially overlapping roles in coordinating mitochondrial metabolism with plant growth and environmental adaptation.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-026-04000-7.
Keywords: Mitochondrial Dicarboxylate Carrier (DIC), Mitochondrial Carrier Family, Organic acid transport, Plant mitochondria, T-DNA insertion mutants
Introduction
Dicarboxylates are essential components of various metabolic pathways in plants, acting as intermediates and precursors in processes critical for plant growth, development, and survival (Wiskich 1977). Beyond their involvement in fatty acid metabolism, amino acid synthesis, and gluconeogenesis, dicarboxylates are also implicated in photorespiration, particularly through the transfer of reducing equivalents (Wiskich 1977; Palmieri et al. 2008). Different members of the mitochondrial carrier family (SLC25), including the Mitochondrial Dicarboxylate Carrier (DIC), can mediate the transport of dicarboxylic acids across the inner mitochondrial membrane (Palmieri 2013; Fernie et al. 2020). In the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, three DIC homologues with distinct substrate specificities, compared to their yeast and animal counterparts, have been identified (Palmieri et al. 2008). AtDIC1 and AtDIC2 share 70% of identical amino acid residues and are presumed to be ubiquitously expressed. In contrast, AtDIC3, which shares 55–60% aa identity with the other isoforms, is considered an early genome acquisition exclusively found in Brassicaceae and displays a more restricted expression pattern (Palmieri et al. 2008; Barreto et al. 2022).
In proteoliposomes, recombinant DIC proteins can exchange sulfate with malate, oxaloacetate, phosphate, and succinate, as well as, to a lesser extent, with 2-oxoglutarate (Palmieri et al. 2008). In vivo, however, AtDIC2 has been shown to facilitate the export of cytosolic malate in exchange for mitochondrial citrate, a crucial function for maintaining metabolic homeostasis, especially under stress conditions (Lee et al. 2021). Consequently, AtDIC2 is proposed to play a pivotal role in regulating anaplerotic metabolism, effectively linking assimilatory and catabolic pathways between mitochondria and other cellular compartments (Lee et al. 2021). The knockout of AtDIC2 in A. thaliana led to impaired vegetative growth. Notably, despite the high amino acid similarity among the three isoforms, neither AtDIC1 nor AtDIC3 could functionally compensate for the loss of AtDIC2 (Lee et al. 2021). This finding indicates that these isoforms have distinct, non-redundant functions critical to their specific physiological roles in plants.
Gene ontology enrichment analysis indicates roles for AtDIC1 and AtDIC2 in general stress responses, whereas AtDIC3 appears to be involved in phosphate starvation (Nunes-Nesi et al. 2020; Barreto et al. 2022). In line with this, environmental stressors have been shown to markedly upregulate the expression of AtDIC1 and AtDIC2 (Van Aken et al. 2009). Moreover, all three Arabidopsis DICs exhibit strong upregulation in response to touch-induced mechanical stimulation (Lee et al. 2005; Van Aken et al. 2016), a response considered an integral part of intrinsic physiological adjustments. Interestingly, overexpression of AtDIC2 in Arabidopsis provided evidence of its involvement in the adaptive response to hypoxia (Barreto et al. 2022). Hypoxia significantly impacts the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, leading to altered levels of its intermediates, most notably the accumulation of succinate and malate (van Veen et al. 2025). Given their role in transporting these metabolites, DICs may contribute to the metabolic adjustments required for plant adaptation to low-oxygen conditions. Collectively, these findings suggest that modulation of DIC activity and expression constitutes a key component of the metabolic reprogramming strategy employed by plants to cope with adverse growth conditions.
In contrast to the functional data available for AtDIC2, the physiological roles of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 remain largely unexplored. In this study, by employing single and double insertion mutants of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3, we demonstrate that the reduced expression of these genes leads to delayed germination and diminished seed yield. Intriguingly, we observed an unexpected increase in leaf area and plant biomass, indicative of enhanced vegetative growth of the mutant lines. These phenotypic alterations were accompanied by improved photosynthetic capacity, altered levels of carbohydrates, organic acids, and amino acids, and a concomitant upregulation of AtDIC2 expression.
Materials and methods
Plant material and growth conditions
Single A. thaliana mutants carrying T-DNA insertions in the AtDIC1 (At2g22500; SALK_090789 and SALK_067118) and AtDIC3 (At5g09470; SALK_001547 and SALK_087822C) genes were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. All mutants were in the Columbia (Col-0) ecotype background. Plants were grown in plastic pots containing a soil-vermiculite mixture (2:1) and maintained in a growth chamber (Model CPM6050, Conviron, Pembina, ND, USA) under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod, with day/night temperatures of 21/18 ± 1 °C and a light intensity of 100 µE m−2 s−1. Samples from various organs/tissues at different developmental stages were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent RNA extraction and relative expression analysis via RT-qPCR. The sampled organs/tissues included germinating seeds, 14-day-old seedlings, vegetative rosette leaves (growth stage 3.5; Boyes et al. 2001), stems, flowers at stages 9 and 15 (as classified by Smyth et al. 1990), and siliques.
For the germination assays, wild type (WT) and mutant seeds (n=30/genotype/dish) were surface-sterilized and sown on Petri dishes containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium (1/2 MS; Murashige & Skoog 1962) plus Phytagel (0.8%) and sucrose (30 g·L−1), supplemented or not with 100 mM NaCl or 200 mM mannitol (Arcuri et al. 2021). A second assay was performed to evaluate the influence of a carbon source on germination by using the same 1/2 MS-Phytagel dishes without sucrose. After 4 days of stratification (DAS) at 4 °C in the dark, the dishes were transferred to the growth chamber, and seed germination (determined by radicle protrusion) was scored daily for 4 to 8 days. Three independent experiments, each with a separate seed lot, were conducted. Germination assays for gene expression analysis were conducted using three biological replicates essentially as described (Matiolli et al. 2011). Briefly, seeds (50 mg) from WT Col-0 and mutant lines were surface-sterilized and incubated in 50 ml of 1/2 MS medium, with or without sucrose (30 g·L−1), for 3 days at 4 °C in the dark to break dormancy. Afterward, the germinating seeds were kept under a long-day photoperiod with constant agitation (67 rpm) and collected at different time points (1, 2, 3 and 4 DAS) for total RNA extraction and subsequent RT-qPCR analysis.
For primary root elongation measurements, 10-day-old seedlings (n = 5/genotype) were grown vertically on Petri dishes (three per treatment) containing 1/2 MS–0.8% Phytagel medium supplemented or not with 100 mM NaCl or 200 mM mannitol (Arcuri et al. 2021). After 10 days under the described growth conditions, digital images were captured, and the primary root length was determined using ImageJ software.
Molecular characterization of atdic mutants and phenotyping
Homozygous lines for each mutant were screened via genomic PCR using a combination of AtDIC1- or AtDIC3-specific primers and the T-DNA left border primer (SALK LBb1.3) (Primers listed in Supplementary Table S1) essentially as described (Arcuri et al. 2021). The identity of the mutated genes and T-DNA insertion sites was confirmed by sequencing the PCR products encompassing the T-DNA flanking regions. During phenotypic analysis, homozygous mutant lines and WT plants (n=15/genotype) were photographed prior to flowering, and the following parameters were evaluated: rosette area over time, fresh and dry weights of the aerial parts, time to flowering, silique length, and seed yield. Rosette area was determined using the ImageJ software. To calculate average silique length, 10 siliques per plant were measured. Seed yield was determined by weighing the seeds harvested from 60 siliques per plant (n=3 plants/genotype). Average seed weight was determined by weighing 100 mature dry seeds using a microbalance, with three biological replicates (independent seed lots). To generate the double mutant atdic1/atdic3, crosses were performed between the homozygous single lines with the greatest reductions in AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 transcript levels (specifically, atdic1-1 and atdic3-1). Double mutant homozygous plants in the F2 generation were confirmed via PCR and target gene expression verified using RT-qPCR.
RNA extraction, cDNA preparation and expression analysis
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was assessed via agarose–formaldehyde gel electrophoresis, and its concentration was measured using a UV spectrophotometer. To remove genomic DNA contamination, the extracted RNA was treated with RQ1 RNase-Free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) before complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were then treated with RNase A (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Transcript levels of target genes were quantified using quantitative PCR (qPCR) on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The cycling parameters were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and an extension at 72 °C for 30 s. Each 10 µl reaction contained 5 µl of GoTaq Colorless qPCR Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 1 µl of cDNA (1:10 dilution), and 0.3 µM each of forward and reverse primers (Supplementary Table S1). All reactions were performed in triplicate. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001) and analyzed with DataAssist software v3.01 (Applied Biosystems). GAPDH and 40S ribosomal protein S16 (Czechowski et al. 2005) were used as reference genes for normalization (Supplementary Table S1).
Measurements of gas-exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence
Gas-exchange parameters were measured in entire plants (35 DAS) from WT and single mutant lines (n = 6/genotype), simultaneously with chlorophyll a fluorescence measurement, using an infrared gas analyzer (GSF 3000, Walz, GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) with air flow of 300 mL min−1 and 1200 µmol m−2∙s−1 coupled light source. All measurements were performed between 9 and 10 o’clock (3 h after lights on) under the following conditions: ambient CO2 concentration of 398 ± 6 μmol mol−1, temperature of 26 ± 2 °C and 58% relative humidity. The following parameters were measured: net photosynthetic rate (An; µmol m−2∙s−1), stomatal conductance (gs; mmol m−2∙s−1) and transpiration rate (E; mmol m−2∙s−1). Chlorophyll a fluorescence was recorded with a coupled modulated light fluorometer (LED-Array/PAM-Fluorometer 3055-FL, Walz, GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). The following parameters were calculated: PSII maximum efficiency in the light-adapted state (Fv′/Fm′), the effective quantum efficiency of PSII [Y(II) or ΦPSII = (Fm′ − F)/Fm′ = qP × (Fv′/Fm′)], and photochemical quenching [qP = (Fm′ − F)/(Fm′ − Fo′)]. Chlorophyll a fluorescence light-response curves were measured using a pulse-amplitude-modulated fluorometer (JUNIOR-PAM, Walz, Germany) under eight increasing photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD: 125, 190, 285, 420, 625, 845, 1150, and 1500 µmol photons m⁻2∙s⁻1). Three biological replicates were analyzed per genotype. Measurements were performed at the end of the dark period, prior to the onset of the photoperiod. Minimal fluorescence of dark-adapted leaves (F₀) was recorded, followed by a 0.6-s saturating pulse (10,000 µmol photons m⁻2∙s⁻1) to determine maximal fluorescence (Fm). Each PPFD level was then applied for 40 s to reach steady-state fluorescence (Fs), after which a saturating pulse was used to determine maximal fluorescence in the light-adapted state (Fm′), and a brief far-red pulse to obtain minimal fluorescence (Fo′). This procedure was repeated sequentially for all PPFD levels.
Metabolic profiling
Metabolites were extracted from whole plant rosettes (35 DAS) harvested at the midpoint of the photoperiod. Frozen tissue (50 mg) was ground in liquid nitrogen and incubated with 1 mL of extraction solution (90% methanol supplemented with 2 mg/mL ribitol and 6 mg/mL adipic acid as internal standards) for 20 min at 75 °C. The samples were then shaken for 15 min. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 12.000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was filtered through 0.2 µm filters, and 900 µL of the filtered extract was transferred to 1.5 mL amber glass vials. Samples were dried and derivatized in two steps as described (Budzinski et al. 2019). Metabolite analysis was performed using an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) coupled to a Leco Pegasus BT GC-TOF/MS (Pegasus 4D, Leco Corp., St. Joseph, USA). Statistical analyses of relative metabolite intensities and metabolic deviations were conducted using MetaboAnalyst 8.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/home.xhtml). For global metabolite analysis, no filters or normalization were applied; data were log-transformed (log2) and scaled using Pareto scaling. For pathway analysis of altered metabolic processes, default settings were used. Input metabolites included those identified as differentially abundant in the ANOVA from the prior analysis. Five biological replicates were analyzed per genotype.
Redox state, quantification of carbohydrates and photosynthetic pigments
Assays were performed using entire rosettes (35-DAS) from WT and mutant lines harvested at the middle of the light period to ensure a representative state of active photosynthetic metabolism and stable carbon partitioning. Redox status was determined by quantifying total NAD⁺, NADH, NADP⁺, and NADPH using the NAD/NADH-Glo™ and NADP/NADPH-Glo™ luminescence assays according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). Total carbohydrates were extracted as described by Garcia et al. (2006). Soluble sugars were analyzed by HPAEC–PAD using a Dionex ICS-5000+ system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the method of Suksom et al. (2015), and starch content was determined from the insoluble fraction as described by Morris (1948) and Yemm and Willis (1954). Chlorophyll was extracted from frozen leaf tissue (100 mg) in 92% acetone, and absorbance was measured at 663 and 645 nm to calculate chlorophyll concentrations according to Arnon (1949). Total carotenoids were quantified at 470 nm using the same extracts.
O2 consumption and ATP measurement
Oxygen consumption was measured using a high-resolution respirometry system (Oroboros O2k, Oroboros Instruments). Leaves from the same rosette position were collected from 35-day-old plants maintained in the dark for at least 1 h at room temperature. Four independent biological replicates were analyzed per genotype (n=4). Approximately 5 mg of fresh leaf tissue was excised, immersed in PBS, and transferred to the respirometry chamber. Measurements were performed in the dark to prevent photosynthetic O₂ evolution. Following signal stabilization, oxygen consumption was determined from the slope of a stable, approximately linear 3-min decrease in oxygen concentration. Rates were normalized to the actual fresh mass of each sample and expressed as [pmol/(s*mg FW)]. Leaf ATP content in 35-day-old plants was determined using an ATP assay kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and a GloMax-Multi Detection System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) essentially as described by Arcuri et al. (2021). Briefly, 50 mg of homogenized tissue powder was used for the extraction and assay.
Statistical analysis
The data distribution and homogeneity of variances were assessed using Shapiro–Wilk and Levene's tests, respectively. For datasets that did not meet the normality assumption, Box–Cox transformation was applied to approximate a normal distribution. Once these assumptions were verified, statistical analyses were conducted using one-way or two-way ANOVA, depending on the experimental design, to assess the effects of genotype, treatment, and their interaction when applicable. When significant effects were observed, Dunnett's post hoc test was used to compare the mutant groups with the WT control group. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM), as indicated in the figure legends. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The graphs were designed using GraphPad Prism. The Holm-Sidak method for multiple comparisons against control was used to access interaction between genotype and light irradiance.
Results
To address the functional roles of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 publicly available T-DNA insertion lines for each gene i.e. SALK_090789 and SALK_067118 for AtDIC1, and SALK_001547 and SALK_087822 for AtDIC3, were employed. Lines SALK_090789 (named atdic1-1) and SALK_067118 (atdic1-2) contained T-DNA insertions in the promoter [− 289 base pairs (bp) from the transcription start site (TSS)] and 3´untranslated region (+ 1542 bp from TSS) of AtDIC1, respectively (Fig. 1A). Lines SALK_001547 (atdic3-1) and SALK_087822 (atdic3-2) have annotated insertions in the proximal promoter (− 167 pb from TSS) and in the terminal portion of the coding region (+ 1390 pb from TSS) of AtDIC3, respectively (Fig. 1A). Insertion sites were confirmed by sequencing and homozygous individuals for each line were selected using PCR genotyping (Fig. S1).
Fig. 1.

Molecular characterization of atdic1 and atdic3 T-DNA insertion mutants. (A) Gene structure of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3, showing exons (boxes), introns (lines), and T-DNA insertion sites (arrows). (B) Relative expression of AtDIC1 (using total RNA from seedlings) and AtDIC3 (using total RNA from flowers) in homozygous mutant lines. Wild type Col-0 (WT) expression was used as a calibrator (set to 1). Asterisks indicate significant differences from WT expression as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (****p<0.0001)
Before checking the impact of the T-DNA insertions in target gene expression, we first examined the expression pattern of AtDIC1, AtDIC2 and AtDIC3 in different organ/tissues of Arabidopsis using RT-qPCR. As shown in Fig. S2A, AtDIC1 displayed a ubiquitous expression pattern with high transcripts levels being detected in rosette, floral buds at an early stage of development (stage 9; Boyes et al. 2001) and in flowers at the post-anthesis stage (stage 15; Boyes et al. 2001). AtDIC2 was also ubiquitously expressed but at lower levels compared to AtDIC1 and predominantly detected in stems, which corroborates previous transcriptome data (Klepikova et al. 2016). On the other hand, AtDIC3 transcripts were detected at low levels and were relatively more abundant in post-anthesis flowers and in siliques, which suggest a more specialized function during the reproductive phase. Due to the proposed role of DIC in heterotrophic tissues (Palmieri et al. 2008), we also examined the expression of AtDIC1-3 in germinating WT Col-0 seeds. To achieve this, seeds were collected at 1, 2, 3, and 4 DAS, concurrent with the light-mediated reactivation of seed metabolism (Rosental et al. 2014). As depicted in Fig. S2B, while AtDIC1 and AtDIC2 exhibited a steady increase in expression over the four time points analyzed, AtDIC3 remained nearly unchanged until 4 DAS, when it reached its peak expression.
Transcript levels in each single mutant were then evaluated using total RNA extracted from the organ/tissues with the highest expression levels of the target genes i.e. AtDIC1 in seedlings and AtDIC3 in flowers. Compared to the WT (Col-0), the atdic1-1 and atdic3-1 lines showed a 97.9% and 99.9% reduction in the transcript levels of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3, respectively, indicating an almost complete gene knockout (Fig. 1B). In contrast, atdic1-2 and atdic3-2 mutant lines exhibited a less pronounced reduction in the transcript levels of the genes targeted by T-DNA insertion, with decreases of approximately 73% for AtDIC1 and 71% for AtDIC3, respectively (Fig. 1B). This likely reflects differences in the T-DNA insertion positions among these lines, which results in less severe transcriptional disruption.
The germination of atdic mutant seeds is delayed at early stages
A potential role for DICs, particularly AtDIC1, in lipid reserve mobilization during seed germination has been proposed (Palmieri et al. 2008). To investigate whether the reduced expression of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 would affect this process, we assessed the germination rate of WT and single mutant seeds (n=30/genotype) under control conditions (1/2 MS). Given the reported induction of DIC expression under various abiotic stresses (Barreto et al. 2022), we also evaluated seed germination in media supplemented with NaCl or mannitol to impose salt and osmotic stress, respectively. In the early stages following stratification (0–4 DAS), all mutant seeds exhibited delayed radicle emission under control conditions compared to WT, except for atdic3-2 seeds at 4 DAS (Fig. 2A). These initial differences in germination rates diminished over time, with all mutant lines (except atdic1-1) approaching WT germination. Under osmotic stress, mutant seeds generally exhibited slower germination than WT at 2 DAS, except for atdic3-2 (Fig. 2B). At subsequent time points, a significant delay in radicle emergence was observed only in atdic1-1, suggesting that impairment of AtDIC1 had a more pronounced effect on germination kinetics under osmotic stress (Fig. 2B). Under salt stress, germination was delayed in the mutant lines relative to WT, although the magnitude and persistence of this delay varied among genotypes and over time (Fig. 2C). At 2 DAS, atdic3-1 showed the most pronounced reduction in radicle emergence relative to WT, whereas the other mutant lines exhibited emergence rates closer to those of WT. At 4 DAS, all mutant lines showed lower or comparable radicle emergence relative to WT, with the strongest delay observed in the atdic1 lines. By 6 DAS, the differences among genotypes were further reduced, with most mutant lines approaching WT germination. By 8 DAS, germination was high across all genotypes, and the differences were largely diminished, although a significant delay persisted in the atdic1 lines (Fig. 2C). Overall, the differences among genotypes under salt stress were less pronounced than those observed under osmotic stress and were largely transient.
Fig. 2.

Impact of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 downregulation on early Arabidopsis development. Germination rates (%) of wild type Col-0 (WT) and mutant seeds were assessed on 1/2 MS medium (with sucrose) under control condition (A) or supplemented with 200 mM mannitol (B) or 100 mM NaCl (C). Data represents the means of three independent assays (30 seeds per genotype per plate) measured over an 8-day period. (D) Primary root length of WT and mutant seedlings measured after 10 days of growth under control and stress conditions. Data are means ± SD of three independent assays (5 seedlings per genotype). Asterisks indicate significant differences from WT as determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple-comparisons test (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 and ****p<0.0001)
To assess the impact of carbon source availability on the germination of single mutant seeds, we evaluated their germination rate in 1/2 MS medium without sucrose. In the sucrose-free medium, the seeds of atdic1-1 and atdic1-2 exhibited both delayed germination and a lower final germination percentage compared to the WT (Fig. S3A), indicating limitations when no soluble sugar is supplied. When supplemented with mannitol or NaCl, delayed germination was observed exclusively in the atdic1-1 mutant line, with no differences seen in the other mutants (Fig. S3B, S3C). Intriguingly, atdic3-2 seeds displayed a mild improvement in germination rate under osmotic stress at 1 DAS relative to the WT (Fig. S3B). Overall, these results support the hypothesis that these carriers, particularly AtDIC1, play a relevant role in the early stages of seed germination, especially under stress conditions.
Single mutants exhibit changes in root growth under stress
The potential impacts of the reduced expression of the target genes on initial seedling growth were assessed by determining primary root growth under normal and stressful conditions. Interestingly, despite the delayed seed germination rate noticed in the mutant lines (Fig. 2), the roots of all tested lines developed normally under control growth conditions and no significant effect on primary root length compared to the WT was observed (Fig. 2D). Under osmotic or salt stress conditions, both the atdic3-1 and atdic3-2 lines exhibited a significant reduction in primary root length, indicating that AtDIC3, despite its unique expression pattern, may play a relevant role in the stress response during this developmental stage (Fig. 2D). Meanwhile, primary roots of atdic1 mutants were significantly longer than those of the WT under salt stress, whereas no significant differences were observed under mannitol treatment, despite a trend toward decreased root length in the mutants (Fig. 2D).
Single mutant plants display increased biomass accumulation
The vegetative development of the atdic1 and atdic3 mutant lines was assessed by measuring the rosette area over time and the aboveground biomass (fresh and dry). Surprisingly, the mutant plants exhibited increased growth compared to WT plants (Fig. 3A). This improved growth was accompanied by significant increases in rosette area over time, which became noticeable by 30 DAS and was particularly pronounced at 40 DAS (Fig. 3B). At this time point, plants from the atdic1-1 and atdic3-1 lines, which exhibited the greatest reduction in target gene expression, accumulated significantly more biomass, both fresh and dry weight, than the WT (Fig. 3C and D). Although not statistically significant, a similar trend of increased fresh weight was observed in the atdic1-2 and atdic3-2 lines, likely due to the lower levels of gene knockdown in these lines. Subsequently, the differences observed gradually diminished and were no longer perceptible. Of note, the same whole-plant phenotypes were observed in short-day growth conditions (not shown). During the reproductive phase, all mutant lines, except atdic3-2, exhibited an early-flowering phenotype, flowering 3 and 4 days earlier, respectively, compared to WT plants (Fig. 3E). Additionally, while producing normal siliques (Fig. 3F), a significant reduction in total seed yield was observed in all mutant lines compared to the WT (Fig. 3G). These results suggest a metabolic role for these carriers during seed production.
Fig. 3.

Phenotypic analysis of atdic1 and atdic3 plants. (A) Representative images of long-day grown plants (40 DAS) from wild type Col-0 (WT) and mutant lines. (B-D) Rosette-related parameters: rosette area over time (B) and mean rosette fresh (C) and dry (D) weights per plant at 40 DAS; (E–G) Reproductive parameters: flowering time (E), silique length (F), and seed yield per plant (G). Asterisks indicate significant differences from WT as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 and ****p<0.0001)
To further investigate the functional consequences of reduced DIC expression, we concentrated our efforts on the lines exhibiting the highest levels of gene knockdown, specifically atdic1-1 and atdic3-1, which are likely null alleles. These lines will hereafter be referred to as atdic1 and atdic3, respectively.
Net photosynthesis is increased in the atdic single mutants
Given that photosynthesis accounts for the majority of plant biomass, we investigated whether gene knockout influenced the photosynthetic efficiency of the single mutant plants (35 DAS). As shown in Fig. 4, significant differences in gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were observed between the WT and the single mutants. Mutants exhibited a trend toward increased transpiration rates (E) compared with the WT; however, this increase was statistically significant only in atdic1 (Fig. 4A). In contrast, stomatal conductance (gs) did not differ among genotypes (Fig. 4B). Consistent with improved photosynthetic capacity, both mutants showed significantly higher net CO₂ assimilation rates (An), with the strongest increase observed in atdic3 (Fig. 4C). Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis showed that only atdic1 exhibited an increase in Fv′/Fm′ compared with the WT, whereas no differences were observed in qP among genotypes (Fig. 4D, E). Notably, both mutants displayed significantly higher Y(II) (or ΦPSII) relative to the WT (Fig. 4F), which was accompanied by increased electron transport rates (ETR; data not shown). These results indicate that the enhanced photosynthetic performance of atdic1 and atdic3 is primarily associated with improved photochemical efficiency and increased electron transport activity, rather than changes in stomatal conductance. The increased biomass observed in these mutants (Fig. 3) coincides with higher photosynthetic capacity and increased An, particularly in atdic3, suggesting a link between photosynthetic performance and biomass accumulation.
Fig. 4.

Photosynthetic parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence in atdic1 and atdic3 mutant plants. (A) transpiration rate (E); (B) stomatal conductance (gs); (C) net CO₂ assimilation rate (A); (D) PSII maximum efficiency in the light-adapted state (Fv’/Fm’); (E) photochemical quenching (qP) and (F) effective quantum efficiency of PSII (Y). Asterisks indicate significant differences from wild type Col-0 as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (*p<0.05; ***p<0.001 and ****p<0.0001)
AtDIC2 expression is highly induced in the atdic1 and atdic3 mutants
To assess whether the reduced expression of the target genes in the mutant lines could be compensated at the transcriptional level by the other isoforms, we initially measured the transcript levels of the three AtDIC genes in 35-day-old plants of each mutant background. In parallel, we evaluated the relative expression of other members of the Mitochondrial Carrier Family (MCF) capable of transporting dicarboxylates, namely the succinate/fumarate transporter (SFC; At5g01340) and the di-tricarboxylate transporter (DTC; At5g19760) (Nunes-Nesi et al. 2020). In both atdic1 and atdic3 mutants, AtDIC2 transcript levels were significantly increased compared to the WT, consistent with a potential compensatory response (Fig. 5A). This induction was particularly pronounced in the atdic3 mutant (approximately 6–7-fold relative to Col-0). Interestingly, the transcriptional response was divergent: while AtDIC2 was induced, the transcript levels of the other isoforms (AtDIC3 in atdic1, and AtDIC1 in atdic3) remained low (Fig. 5A). These results suggest that, under normal growth conditions, the increased expression of AtDIC2 may act as a primary compensatory mechanism in these single mutants. Complementary analysis showed that the transcript levels of AtSCF remained unchanged in mutants compared to the WT, whereas a sharp increase in AtDTC transcript levels was observed exclusively in atdic1 (Fig. 5A). Because their expression was not consistently affected across both single mutants, unlike the robust response of AtDIC2, these other MCF members are unlikely to play a central role in a generalized compensatory mechanism.
Fig. 5.

Relative gene expression analysis. (A) AtDIC1, AtDIC2, AtDIC3, AtSFC and AtDTC expression in wild type Col-0 (WT) and single mutant plants; (B) AtDIC2 expression in WT and single mutant seeds at 2 and 4 days after stratification (DAS); (C) Expression of mitochondrial dysfunction marker genes (AtAOX1a, AtCOX15 and AtVDAC1) in WT and single mutant plants; (D) AtDIC2 expression in WT, single and double mutant plants. WT expression was used as a calibrator (set to 1). Asterisks indicate significant differences from WT as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (*** p<0.001 and ****p<0.0001)
Given the observed delay in germination phenotype (Fig. 2), we also investigated whether AtDIC2 expression is altered during seed germination. Consistent with the results observed during the vegetative stage, AtDIC2 transcript levels were significantly higher at 4 DAS in both mutant seeds compared to WT, regardless of whether seeds were sown on 1/2 MS medium with or without sucrose (Fig. 5B). In addition, a non-significant trend toward increased AtDIC2 transcript accumulation was observed at 2 DAS in atdic1 seeds germinated on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with sucrose. However, unlike the hypothesized compensatory complementation during vegetative development, the observed upregulation appears insufficient to offset the germination defects associated with the reduced expression of the target genes, particularly AtDIC1.
Impacts on mitochondrial function
To investigate the impact of reduced AtDIC1 or AtDIC3 expression on mitochondrial function, we examined the expression levels of marker genes indicative of the mitochondrial status, including AOX1a (Alternative oxidase 1a; At3g22370), COX15 (Cytochrome C oxidase 15; At5g56090), and VDAC1 (Voltage-dependent anion channel 1; At3g01280; Pan et al. 2014), in the tested single mutant lines. Both atdic1 and atdic3 mutants showed increased transcript levels of VDAC1 and COX15 (Fig. 5C). It is worth mentioning that COX15 is upregulated (3.2-fold) in response to rotenone treatment, a well-established inhibitor of the electron transport chain (Lister et al. 2004). In contrast, AOX1a expression in the mutants was not significantly altered compared to WT (Fig. 5C), indicating that the alternative respiratory pathway was not induced at the transcriptional level. Although not exhaustive, these results suggest that while the expression of certain components involved in cellular energy regulation and mitochondrial function, such as VDAC1 and COX15, is affected by the reduced expression of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3, AOX1a appears to be only minimally impacted under these conditions. However, we cannot exclude the possibility of AOX1a activation via post-translational modifications or protein stabilization, which are common regulatory mechanisms for the alternative respiratory pathway (Maxwell et al. 1999; Vanlerberghe et al. 2013).
Metabolic changes associated with the reduced expression of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3
To identify metabolic changes associated with reduced expression of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3, a non-targeted metabolomic analysis was performed. Considering the unexpected increase in biomass observed in the mutant plants, rosettes from 35 DAS plants were selected for analysis. After data normalization, a total of 102 metabolites were detected across the sample set. Carbohydrates and their derivatives represented the largest class (37.6%), followed by lipids (13.4%), organic acids (11.8%), organometallic compounds (11.0%), and amino acids (10.5%). Of these, 86 metabolites were differentially accumulated in the single mutants compared with the WT (Table S2). Figure S4 presents a heatmap of the 50 most significantly altered rosette metabolites, with the most abundant compounds highlighted in red. Hierarchical clustering revealed genotype-specific metabolic profiles: atdic1 displayed higher sugar accumulation, whereas atdic3 was characterized by increased amino acid levels. Noteworthy, atdic3 displayed approximately 3-fold higher levels of serine, alanine, and proline compared with atdic1. Pathway enrichment analysis identified linoleic acid metabolism, alkaloid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, and amino acid biosynthesis as the most significantly affected pathways, with impact scores of 0.66, 0.50, 0.25, 0.23, and 0.22, respectively (Fig. 6). Disruption of key metabolites within the phenylalanine metabolism pathway was observed in both atdic1 and atdic3, whereas alterations in ascorbate and aldarate metabolism were primarily associated with atdic1. In this context, ascorbate levels increased by 2.33-fold in atdic1 and 1.90-fold in atdic3 relative to the WT (Table S2). In contrast, changes in arginine and proline metabolism were specific to atdic3.
Fig. 6.

Altered metabolic pathways between WT Col-0 and single mutants. The metabolic pathways are depicted as circles according to their scores from enrichment (y-axis) and topological (x-axis) analyses. The size of the circle corresponds to the pathway impact score and is associated with the centrality of the implicated metabolites; the color displays the significance (darker circles indicate more significant changes). Only the metabolic pathways with p < 0.05 are depicted
Analysis of the double mutant atdic1/atdic3
To investigate the effect of combined mutations at AtDIC1 and AtDIC3, a double mutant (termed atdic1/atdic3) was generated. The growth parameters of double mutant plants were evaluated at 40 DAS, the developmental stage at which the single mutant phenotypes were more pronounced (Fig. 7). Consistent with the single mutant phenotypes (Fig. 3), the double mutant exhibited a larger rosette area relative to the WT (Fig. 7A, B). The observed difference in rosette area was further supported by significantly higher fresh and dry biomass in the double mutant compared to the WT (Fig. 7C, D). In contrast, no significant differences in 100-seed weight were detected between the mutants and the WT, except for atdic3, which showed a significantly higher seed weight (Fig. 7E). Overall, the growth phenotype of the double mutant closely resembled that of the single mutants, with no statistically significant differences observed for the analyzed parameters, except for 100-seed weight, in which atdic3 differed from the others (Table S3). These findings indicate that under the tested growth conditions, the simultaneous mutation of both genes did not result in a clear additive effect. Noteworthy, the double mutant also exhibited a significant increase in AtDIC2 transcript levels relative to the WT, mirroring the pattern observed in the single mutants (Fig. 5D).
Fig. 7.

Phenotypic analysis of atdic1/atdic3 double mutant plants. (A) Representative images of 40-day-old wild type Col-0 (WT), atdic1, atdic3, and atdic1/atdic3 plants; (B) Rosette area; mean rosette fresh (C) and dry (D) weights per plant at 40 DAS and (E) 100-seed weight. Asterisks indicate significant differences from WT as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (*p-<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.001)
To determine whether the AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 double mutation also affects early development, we assessed the germination rate (scored as radicle emergence) and primary root growth of the single and double mutants. Under control conditions, atdic1 and atdic1/atdic3 mutant seeds exhibited delayed radicle emission from 2 to 4 DAS, whereas atdic3 remained comparable to the WT (Fig. 8A). By 5 DAS, however, only atdic1 displayed a statistically significant delay compared to WT (Fig. 8A). Mutant seed germination was also consistently delayed under both salt and osmotic stress conditions. Under osmotic stress, all mutants exhibited a significantly lower germination percentage compared to WT across all examined time points, except for atdic3 at 5 DAS (Fig. 8B). A similar pattern was also observed under salt stress (Fig. 8C). Taken together, and consistent with the results obtained for the single mutants (Fig. 2), these findings indicate that atdic1 seeds exhibit the most pronounced delay in germination, with the atdic1/atdic3 double mutant showing a broadly similar phenotype, whereas atdic3 displays a milder, intermediate response. In agreement with our previous observations (Fig. 2D), primary root length under control conditions did not differ significantly between WT and any of the single or double mutants (Fig. 8D; Fig. S5A). In contrast, salt stress significantly reduced root length in the atdic3 and atdic1/atdic3 mutants compared with WT plants, whereas atdic1 showed no significant difference from WT (Fig. 8D; Fig. S5B). Under osmotic stress, all mutants displayed a significant decrease in primary root length compared with WT (Fig. 8D; Fig.S5C).
Fig. 8.

Effects of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 double mutation on early Arabidopsis development. Germination rates (%) of mutant and wild type Col-0 (WT) seeds sown on 1/2 MS medium under control condition (A) or supplemented with 200 mM mannitol (B) or with 100 mM NaCl (C). Data represents the means of three independent assays (30 seeds per genotype per plate) measured over a 5-day period. (D) Primary root length of WT and mutant seedlings measured after 10 days of growth under control and stress conditions. Data are means ± SD of three independent assays (5 seedlings per genotype). Asterisks indicate significant from WT as determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple-comparisons test (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 and ****p<0.0001
Single and double mutants exhibit enhanced photosynthetic pigment accumulation and increased PSII efficiency
To explore the factors contributing to the increased biomass accumulation observed in the mutants, we quantified photosynthetic pigment contents in leaves of the single and double mutants, given the central role of these pigments in light harvesting. On a fresh weight basis, total chlorophyll and chlorophyll a contents were significantly higher in all mutants compared with the WT (Fig. S6A, B). Distinct patterns were observed for the other pigments: chlorophyll b levels increased specifically in atdic1 and the atdic1/atdic3 double mutant (Fig. S6C), resulting in a higher chlorophyll a/b ratio in these lines (Fig. S6D). Conversely, carotenoid levels were significantly increased in atdic3 and atdic1/atdic3 (Fig. S6E).
To further assess the photosynthetic light reactions, we analyzed light-response curves for ΦPSII, qP, and ETR in the single and double mutants (Table S4). Compared to WT, all atdic mutants exhibited significantly higher ΦPSII and ETR, indicating enhanced photochemical performance. The atdic1 mutant also showed increased qP, whereas the double mutant displayed reduced NPQ. In addition, atdic3 and atdic1/atdic3 exhibited higher Fv′/Fm′ values and lower heat dissipation (D), consistent with improved PSII efficiency under light-adapted conditions. No significant differences among genotypes were observed for excitation pressure (Ex). All genotypes followed a characteristic light-response pattern, where increasing PPFD significantly affected all fluorescence parameters: ΦPSII and qP decreased, whereas ETR increased steadily across the entire light range. At higher PPFDs, NPQ (from 625 µmol photons m⁻2∙s⁻1 onward) and D (from 845 µmol photons m⁻2∙s⁻1 onward) increased, while Fv′/Fm′ (from 845 µmol photons m⁻2∙s⁻1 onward) decreased, reflecting enhanced photoprotective energy dissipation under excess light. In contrast, no significant Genotype × PPFD interaction was observed for any of the fluorescence parameters, indicating that genotypes differed mainly in baseline photosynthetic performance rather than in their response to increasing light intensity.
Redox status and carbohydrate metabolism are perturbed in mutants
To determine if cellular redox balance is affected by single and double mutations in AtDIC1 and AtDIC3, we quantified dinucleotide pools and their respective redox ratios. A significant reduction in the NADH/NAD⁺ ratio, indicative of a more oxidized mitochondrial redox state, was observed in atdic3 and atdic1/atdic3 mutants compared to the WT, whereas no change was detected in atdic1 (Fig. S7A). Conversely, the NADPH/NADP⁺ ratio was significantly increased in both atdic3 and atdic1/atdic3 mutants compared with the WT, while atdic1 exhibited a non-significant increase (Fig. S7B). The elevated NADPH/NADP⁺ ratio is consistent with enhanced photosynthetic electron supply and increased reductive capacity to support biosynthetic processes and antioxidant systems. Collectively, these findings indicate that cellular redox homeostasis is specifically altered upon loss of AtDIC3, supporting a prominent role for this isoform in maintaining redox balance and suggesting that it is epistatic to AtDIC1 in this context.
Given these redox alterations, we subsequently analyzed primary carbon metabolism by measuring representative carbohydrate levels in leaves harvested mid-light period (Fig. S7). Sucrose levels were markedly reduced in all single and double mutants compared to the WT (Fig. S7C). In contrast, all mutant lines consistently accumulated significantly higher starch levels than the WT (Fig. S7D). These results demonstrate that the loss of DIC function leads to clear disturbances in carbon partitioning.
Impacts on O2 consumption and ATP content
To assess potential alterations in respiratory metabolism, O2 consumption by leaf samples from WT and mutant plants was monitored in the dark using high-resolution respirometry. Oxygen flux showed a progressive increase in the mutant lines compared to WT, reaching statistical significance in atdic3 and atdic1/atdic3 (Fig. S8A). Consistent with the enhanced respiratory flux, cellular ATP content was significantly higher in atdic3 leaves than in WT (Figure S8B). Although the atdic1/atdic3 double mutant also showed an increase in ATP levels, this difference did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, ATP content in atdic1 remained comparable to that of WT (Figure S8B). Thus, atdic3 uniquely combined enhanced respiratory activity with increased ATP accumulation, suggesting a distinct adjustment of mitochondrial energy metabolism.
Discussion
Dicarboxylate transport plays a critical role in multiple aspects of plant metabolism, growth, and stress responses. Among the Arabidopsis DIC family members, AtDIC2 has been functionally characterized and shown to be essential for mitochondrial malate–citrate exchange in vivo (Lee et al. 2021). In contrast, direct functional evidence for the other isoforms has remained limited. Among these, AtDIC1 is the most abundant, with approximately 59 protein copies per mitochondrion compared to 29 copies of AtDIC2 (Fuchs et al. 2020). AtDIC3, by contrast, is less abundant and exhibits a more restricted expression pattern, suggesting a more specialized physiological role. Supporting functional divergence among DIC isoforms, a recent study demonstrated that neither AtDIC1 nor AtDIC3 can compensate for the loss of AtDIC2 in a dic2 knockout background (Lee et al. 2021).
Early studies proposed that DICs may contribute to storage lipid mobilization during seed germination and/or gluconeogenesis (Palmieri et al. 2008). Here, we provide evidence that reduced expression of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 impairs seed germination under both control and stress conditions. This phenotype, however, was most pronounced in atdic1 seeds, particularly when germinated on sucrose-free medium, indicating a compromised capacity to mobilize endogenous carbon reserves. These results identify AtDIC1 as a key component in maintaining metabolic flexibility during germination, a stage characterized by rapidly shifting energy and biosynthetic demands (Rosental et al. 2014). During this transition, mitochondria are rapidly reactivated prior to the establishment of photosynthetic competence, requiring tight coordination between reserve mobilization, respiratory metabolism, and redox balance. In this context, impaired dicarboxylate transport may limit metabolic flexibility during germination, particularly under stress conditions that impose additional energetic demands. Consistent with this, our expression analyses revealed a high AtDIC1 transcript accumulation during early germination (1–4 DAS), coinciding with the reactivation of seed metabolism (Rosental et al. 2014), whereas AtDIC3 expression increased only at later stages. The absence of a stronger germination defect in the atdic1/atdic3 double mutant further supports a dominant contribution of AtDIC1 during this developmental window. In this regard, the inability of AtDIC2 upregulation to fully rescue the observed germination defects suggests that, despite transcriptional compensation, AtDIC2 is unable to fully replace AtDIC1 during early seed development. Consistent with the broader role of mitochondrial function in developmental regulation, several studies have shown that mitochondrial dysfunction can influence hormone homeostasis and signaling (Welchen et al. 2021). For example, Cytochrome c mutants exhibit delayed seed germination and, in at least one reported case, altered abscisic acid sensitivity (Meyer et al. 2009; Racca et al. 2022; Chen et al. 2024). Conversely, overexpression of the transcription factor ERF1, a central component of the canonical ethylene signaling pathway, was shown to promote seed germination by enhancing mitochondrial function (Chen et al. 2026). Together, these findings highlight a close interplay between mitochondrial activity and hormonal regulation during germination. Investigating whether similar regulatory crosstalk occurs in atdic mutants could therefore provide important insights into how mitochondrial transporters integrate metabolic and hormonal cues during early seed development.
Primary root growth analyses revealed a divergence between AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 under stress conditions. The atdic3 mutant consistently exhibited reduced root elongation under both salt and osmotic stress, indicating a clear stress-sensitive phenotype. In contrast, atdic1 showed normal or even enhanced root growth under salt stress, whereas under osmotic stress, a significant reduction in root growth was observed in only one of the two independent experiments. Thus, the variable response of atdic1 across stress conditions and independent experiments precluded a clear conclusion regarding its stress sensitivity. A contrasting stress-dependent response was also observed in the mitochondrial ndufs4 mutant, which lacks the 18-kDa subunit of Complex I (Meyer et al. 2009). Despite exhibiting an overall delayed growth phenotype, this mutant showed enhanced root growth tolerance relative to the WT plants under cold, osmotic, and moderate salt stress conditions (Meyer et al. 2009). Collectively, our findings suggest that AtDIC3 plays a predominant role in sustaining root growth under adverse conditions, potentially by preserving mitochondrial metabolic flexibility and redox homeostasis in actively dividing root cells. Although AtDIC3 is predominantly expressed in reproductive tissues, it is also highly responsive to abiotic stress and has been identified as the most consistently induced DIC isoform under stress conditions (Kilian et al. 2007). In addition, AtDIC3 expression is tightly regulated by inorganic phosphate availability, being strongly induced under phosphate starvation and repressed in mutants defective in phosphate homeostasis regulators (Bari et al. 2006; Barreto et al. 2022). Thus, despite its relatively low basal expression, AtDIC3 may be selectively recruited under stress conditions to enhance metabolic flexibility. As a putative malate–citrate antiporter, AtDIC3 may facilitate cytosolic malate import into mitochondria, thereby supporting inter-organellar malate circulation and stress mitigation, as proposed previously (Zhao et al. 2020).
One of the most unexpected findings of this study was the increased biomass accumulation observed in both single and double mutant plants. This result contrasts sharply with previous observations in a dic2-1 mutant, which exhibit reduced vegetative growth that cannot be rescued by AtDIC1 or AtDIC3 (Lee et al. 2021). Intriguingly, photosynthetic performance remained largely unaffected in dic2-1 plants, whereas in the present study, enhanced biomass accumulation was accompanied by increased photosynthetic efficiency and elevated chlorophyll re-oxidation capacity, providing strong evidence for improved photosynthetic performance in single and double mutants. The observed accumulation of photosynthetic pigments in the mutants is likely to support their higher photosynthetic capacity. Interestingly, discrepant phenotypes have also been reported for independent DIC2 mutant lines. Unlike the phenotype described by Lee et al. (2021), Arabidopsis dic2 knockout lines generated using CRISPR/Cas9 did not display any detectable developmental defects under standard growth conditions (Lv et al. 2026). Together, these observations suggest that the phenotypic manifestation of DIC2 dysfunction may be strongly influenced by genetic background, growth conditions, or the nature of the mutation itself.
Impaired growth is generally considered a hallmark of mitochondrial dysfunction in plants, particularly in mutants affecting the composition or assembly of electron transport chain complexes (Schwarzländer and Finkemeier 2013). For example, plants lacking the respiratory chain component cytochrome c (CYTc) display delayed germination, altered developmental progression, and ultimately reduced seed yield (Racca et al. 2018). These phenotypes are associated with metabolic imbalances, including daytime accumulation of starch and glucose, and are further modulated by a pronounced crosstalk between respiratory activity and gibberellin signaling. In contrast, the enhanced biomass accumulation observed in the atdic mutants suggests that perturbations in mitochondrial metabolite transport may elicit distinct compensatory metabolic and signaling responses, leading to developmental outcomes that differ substantially from those typically associated with respiratory chain dysfunction. Supporting this interpretation, the atdic mutants failed to induce AOX1a, a classical marker of mitochondrial stress and respiratory perturbation (Maxwell et al. 1999; Vanlerberghe et al. 2013). Furthermore, dic2-1 mitochondria showed no significant alterations in ETC activity, TCA cycle enzymes, or enzyme kinetics, indicating that the mutant phenotype does not stem from respiratory or TCA cycle defects, but rather by altered mitochondrial metabolite exchange resulting from DIC2 loss, potentially accompanied by compensatory metabolic adjustments (Lee et al. 2021). In this context, the increased respiratory O₂ consumption observed in atdic3 and atdic1/atdic3 indicates enhanced respiratory flux and was accompanied by a lower NADH/NAD⁺ ratio, consistent with a more oxidized cellular redox state. In atdic3, this increased respiratory flux was also accompanied by higher ATP levels, suggesting a greater contribution of mitochondrial respiration to cellular energy supply. In contrast, despite displaying the highest respiratory activity, the double mutant did not accumulate significantly more ATP, indicating that increased respiratory flux does not necessarily translate into higher ATP accumulation. Together, these results suggest that loss of DIC function alters mitochondrial metabolic flux and redox balance, with genotype-dependent consequences for cellular energy homeostasis.
Remarkably, the observed increase in shoot biomass was not paralleled by enhanced primary root elongation, a phenotype reminiscent of loss-of-function mutants affecting the E1 and E2 subunits of the mitochondrial 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (2-OGDH; Condori-Apfata et al. 2019; 2021). A plausible explanation is that this increase in shoot biomass reflects a reallocation of carbon and energy toward shoot growth, rather than a uniform stimulation of whole-plant growth. In this context, all atdic mutant lines displayed an intriguing shift in carbon partitioning in the middle of the light period, characterized by reduced sucrose levels and increased starch accumulation. Conversely, the 2-OGDH mutant plants accumulated both sugars simultaneously at this stage of the photoperiod, likely reflecting a global reduction in the demand for carbon skeletons. Collectively, these observations suggest that alterations in mitochondrial metabolism can substantially impact photoassimilate utilization and carbon allocation, potentially through altered demand for carbon skeletons or changes in cytosolic redox status. In our case, the accumulation of starch despite enhanced photosynthesis further supports the idea that downstream carbon utilization is constrained, favoring storage over transport. Such disturbances in carbon allocation likely contribute to the observed phenotypes, including enhanced vegetative growth, early flowering, and reduced seed yield.
As mentioned, redox analyses further demonstrated that AtDIC3 disruption, but not AtDIC1, results in a significant reduction in the NADH/NAD⁺ ratio accompanied by an increase in the NADPH/NADP⁺ ratio, identifying AtDIC3 as an important regulator of cellular redox balance. Consistent with this role, metabolomic profiling revealed preferential accumulation of amino acids, including serine, alanine, and proline, in the atdic3 mutant, together with specific alterations in arginine and proline metabolism. Proline accumulation is particularly noteworthy given its established function in redox buffering and stress tolerance (Szabados and Savouré 2010). These metabolic adjustments may contribute to the enhanced photosynthetic efficiency and altered stress responses observed in atdic3 plants. In contrast, the atdic1 mutant exhibited stronger perturbations in sugar metabolism and ascorbate-related pathways, suggesting distinct contributions of AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 to the coordination of carbon and redox metabolism. In agreement with our findings, ascorbate accumulation has been reported in tomato plants with reduced mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase activity, which also display increased aerial biomass, early flowering, and enhanced photosynthetic performance (Nunes-Nesi et al. 2005). Ascorbate plays a central role in regulating photosynthetic redox balance through its involvement in the Mehler–peroxidase reaction and associated antioxidant systems (Smirnoff and Wheeler 2000). Interestingly, Lee et al. (2021) reported that disruption of DIC2 results in increased nighttime sucrose consumption and enhanced TCA cycle–driven respiration as a compensatory response to disrupted organic acid oxidation. Such adjustments align with the established role of malate and citrate shuttles in maintaining cellular redox balance in photosynthetic tissues (Igamberdiev 2020; Zhao et al. 2020).
Our data further revealed a strong transcriptional induction of AtDIC2 in both single and double mutants, suggesting the activation of compensatory mechanisms. Although the functional consequences of this upregulation remain unclear, it may contribute to the enhanced biomass phenotype, potentially through an increased transport capacity. This compensatory response may also explain the relatively limited number of metabolites showing differential accumulation between mutants and WT plants, as AtDIC2 activity could partially mask metabolic alterations arising from the loss of AtDIC1 or AtDIC3. Within this context, although we did not detect significant changes in the expression of other predicted dicarboxylate transporters, additional compensatory mechanisms, as proposed by Lee et al. (2021), may still contribute to buffering metabolic perturbations. However, the persistence of specific phenotypes in the mutants indicates that AtDIC2 cannot fully compensate for the functions of the other isoforms, particularly during seed germination and in the regulation of cellular redox homeostasis. Together, these observations support the notion that individual DICs function within partially distinct metabolic contexts. Consistent with this interpretation, Lv et al. (2026) reported that the overexpression of an apple DIC2 homolog in both A. thaliana and Micro-Tom tomato enhanced salt tolerance without causing detectable growth phenotypes under standard growth conditions. These findings support the idea that elevated DIC2 expression alone appears insufficient to trigger major developmental shifts in the absence of environmental stress.
Together, our results suggest that AtDIC1 predominantly contributes to early heterotrophic growth and carbon mobilization, whereas AtDIC3 appears to be involved in maintaining mitochondrial redox balance and amino acid metabolism during vegetative development. The partial loss of either function triggers compensatory enhancement of photosynthesis and metabolic reprogramming, leading to increased biomass and modest reduction in reproductive performance. These findings are consistent with the involvement of DICs in process linking carbon flux, redox homeostasis, and plant developmental transitions. The absence of a clear additive phenotype in the double mutant suggests that AtDIC1 and AtDIC3 operate within overlapping or interconnected metabolic pathways. In this context, compensatory metabolic adjustments may partially buffer the combined loss of function, potentially involving altered carbon fluxes through the TCA cycle and associated metabolic shuttles, thereby contributing to the maintenance of overall metabolic balance. Despite these insights, further work will be required to assess whether the transcriptional upregulation of AtDIC2 is accompanied by changes at the protein and transport activity levels, and whether this potential compensatory response contributes to the physiological phenotypes observed in the atdic1 and atdic3 mutants.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Pierre Carol (Sorbonne University) for his constructive comments on the manuscript.
Author contributions
M.L.C.A. conducted most of the experiments and data analysis; P.B. and A.N.M. generated and performed the characterization of the double mutant line. F.G.C. and L.P.B.M. carried out the gas exchange experiments; I.G.F.B. analyzed the metabolomics data; I.G.M. designed and supervised the research; M.L.C.A. and I.G.M. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.
Funding
The Article Processing Charge (APC) for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614). This work was funded by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Grant number 2017/25139). P.B. was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ) through a postdoctoral fellowship (Project number 200385/2022–4).
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Arcuri MDLC, Nunes-Laitz AV, Lima RPM, Barreto P, Marinho AN, Arruda P, Maia IG (2021) Knockdown of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins 1 and 2 (AtUCP1 and 2) in Arabidopsis thaliana impacts vegetative development and fertility. Plant Cell Physiol 62:1630–1644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bari R, Datt Pant B, Stitt M, Scheible WR (2006) PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants. Plant Physiol 141:988–999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barreto P, Arcuri MLC, Lima RPM, Marino CL, Maia IG (2022) Comprehensive in silico analysis and transcriptional profiles highlight the importance of mitochondrial dicarboxylate carriers (DICs) on hypoxia response in both Arabidopsis thaliana and Eucalyptus grandis. Plants 11:181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyes DC, Zayed AM, Ascenzi R, McCaskill AJ, Hoffman NE, Davis KR, Görlach J (2001) Growth stage-based phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis: a model for high throughput functional genomics in plants. Plant Cell 13:1499–1510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Budzinski IGF, De Moraes FE, Cataldi TR, Franceschini LM, Labate CA (2019) Network analyses and data integration of proteomics and metabolomics from leaves of two contrasting varieties of sugarcane in response to drought. Front Plant Sci 10:1524. 10.3389/fpls.2019.01524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen B, Wang J, Huang M, Gui Y, Wei Q, Wang L, Tan B (2024) C1-FDX is required for the assembly of mitochondrial complex I and subcomplexes of complex V in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 20:e1011419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen C, Cao Y, Kai W, Wu Y, Yan Y, Wu W (2026) Over-expression transcription factor ERF1 promotes seed germination by enhancing mitochondrial function. Plant Cell Rep 45:142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Condori-Apfata JA, Batista-Silva W, Medeiros DB, Vargas JR, Valente LML, Heyneke E, Pérez-Diaz JL, Fernie AR, Araújo WL, Nunes-Nesi A (2019) The Arabidopsis E1 subunit of the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex modulates plant growth and seed production. Plant Mol Biol 101:183–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Condori-Apfata JA, Batista-Silva W, Medeiros DB, Vargas JR, Valente LML, Pérez-Díaz JL, Fernie AR, Araújo WL, Nunes-Nesi A (2021) Downregulation of the E2 subunit of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase modulates plant growth by impacting carbon-nitrogen metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 62:798–814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Czechowski T, Stitt M, Altmann T, Udvardi MK, Scheible W-R (2005) Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139:5–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernie A, Cavalcanti J, Nunes-Nesi A (2020) Metabolic roles of plant mitochondrial carriers. Biomolecules 10:1013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs P, Rugen N, Carrie C et al (2020) Single organelle function and organization as estimated from Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteomics. Plant J 101:420–441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia IS, Souza A, Barbedo CJ, Dietrich SMC, Figueiredo-Ribeiro RCL (2006) Changes in soluble carbohydrates during storage of Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Brazilwood) seeds, an endangered leguminous tree from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Braz J Biol 66:739–745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Igamberdiev AU (2020) Citrate valve integrates mitochondria into photosynthetic metabolism. Mitochondrion 52:218–230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kilian J, Whitehead D, Horak J, Wanke D, Weinl S, Batistic O, D’Angelo C, Bornberg-Bauer E, Kudla J, Harter K (2007) The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J 50:347–363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klepikova AV, Kasianov AS, Gerasimov ES, Logacheva MD, Penin AA (2016) A high resolution map of the Arabidopsis thaliana developmental transcriptome based on RNA-seq profiling. Plant J 88:1058–1070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee D, Polisensky DH, Braam J (2005) Genome-wide identification of touch and darkness regulated Arabidopsis genes: a focus on calmodulin-like and XTH genes. New Phytol 165:429–444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee CP, Elsässer M, Fuchs P, Fenske R, Schwarzländer M, Millar AH (2021) The versatility of plant organic acid metabolism in leaves is underpinned by mitochondrial malate–citrate exchange. Plant Cell 33:3700–3720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lister R, Chew O, Lee M-N, Heazlewood JL, Clifton R, Parker KL, Millar AH, Whelan J (2004) A transcriptomic and proteomic characterization of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial protein import apparatus and its response to mitochondrial dysfunction. Plant Physiol 134:777–789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lv Y, Liu R, Li S et al (2026) MdDIC2 contributes to salt tolerance by citric acid efflux from mitochondria to the cytoplasm in apple plants. Planta 263:129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matiolli CC, Tomaz JP, Duarte GT et al (2011) The Arabidopsis bZIP gene AtbZIP63 is a sensitive integrator of transient abscisic acid and glucose signals. Plant Physiol 157:692–705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maxwell DP, Wang Y, McIntosh L (1999) The alternative oxidase lowers mitochondrial reactive oxygen production in plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:8271–8276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer EH, Tomaz T, Carroll AJ, Estavillo G, Delannoy E, Tanz SK, Small ID, Pogson BJ, Millar AH (2009) Remodeled respiration in ndufs4 with low phosphorylation efficiency suppresses Arabidopsis germination and growth and alters control of metabolism at night. Plant Physiol 151:603–619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris DL (1948) Quantitative determination of carbohydrates with Dreywood’s anthrone reagent. Science 107:254–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497 [Google Scholar]
- Nunes-Nesi A, Carrari F, Lytovchenko A, Smith AMO, Ehlers Loureiro M, Ratcliffe RG, Sweetlove LJ, Fernie AR (2005) Enhanced photosynthetic performance and growth as a consequence of decreasing mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase activity in transgenic tomato plants. Plant Physiol 137:611–622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nunes-Nesi A, Cavalcanti J, Fernie A (2020) Characterization of in vivo function(s) of members of the plant mitochondrial carrier family. Biomolecules 10:1226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmieri F (2013) The mitochondrial transporter family SLC25: identification, properties and physiopathology. Mol Aspects Med 34:465–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmieri L, Picault N, Arrigoni R, Besin E, Palmieri F, Hodges M (2008) Molecular identification of three Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondrial dicarboxylate carrier isoforms: organ distribution, bacterial expression, reconstitution into liposomes and functional characterization. Biochem J 410:621–629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan X, Chen Z, Yang X, Liu G (2014) Arabidopsis voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (AtVDAC1) is required for female development and maintenance of mitochondrial functions related to energy-transaction. PLoS ONE 9:e106941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Racca S, Welchen E, Gras DE, Tarkowská D, Turečková V, Maurino VG, Gonzalez DH (2018) Interplay between cytochrome c and gibberellins during Arabidopsis vegetative development. Plant J 94:105–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Racca S, Gras DE, Canal MV, Ferrero LV, Rojas BE, Figueroa CM, Ariel FD, Welchen E, Gonzalez DH (2022) Cytochrome c and the transcription factor ABI4 establish a molecular link between mitochondria and ABA-dependent seed germination. New Phytol 235:1780–1795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosental L, Nonogaki H, Fait A (2014) Activation and regulation of primary metabolism during seed germination. Seed Sci Res 24:1–15 [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzländer M, Finkemeier I (2013) Mitochondrial energy and redox signaling in plants. Antioxid Redox Signal 18:2122–2144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smirnoff N, Wheeler GL (2000) Ascorbic acid in plants: biosynthesis and function. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 35:291–314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smyth DR, Bowman JL, Meyerowitz EM (1990) Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2:755–767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suksom W, Wannachai W, Boonchiangma S, Chanthai S, Srijaranai S (2015) Ion chromatographic analysis of monosaccharides and disaccharides in raw sugar. Chromatographia 78:873–879 [Google Scholar]
- Szabados L, Savouré A (2010) Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci 15:89–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Aken O, Zhang B, Carrie C, Uggalla V, Paynter E, Giraud E, Whelan J (2009) Defining the mitochondrial stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant 2:1310–1324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Aken O, De Clercq I, Ivanova A, Law SR, Van Breusegem F, Millar AH, Whelan J (2016) Mitochondrial and chloroplast stress responses are modulated in distinct touch and chemical inhibition phases. Plant Physiol 171:2150–2165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Veen H, Triozzi PM, Loreti E (2025) Metabolic strategies in hypoxic plants. Plant Physiol 197:kiae564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vanlerberghe G (2013) Alternative oxidase: a mitochondrial respiratory pathway to maintain metabolic and signaling homeostasis during abiotic and biotic stress in plants. Int J Mol Sci 14:6805–6847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Welchen E, Canal MV, Gras DE, Gonzalez DH (2021) Cross-talk between mitochondrial function, growth, and stress signalling pathways in plants. J Exp Bot 72:4102–4118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiskich JT (1977) Mitochondrial metabolite transport. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 28:45–69 [Google Scholar]
- Yemm EW, Willis AJ (1954) The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J 57:508–514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Y, Yu H, Zhou J-M, Smith SM, Li J (2020) Malate circulation: linking chloroplast metabolism to mitochondrial ROS. Trends Plant Sci 25:446–454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
