Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Sep 28;50(6):601. doi: 10.1007/s11259-026-11540-6

Genomic features of mecA-harboring Staphylococcus epidermidis infecting an illegally traded rufous-bellied thrush (T. rufiventris)

Bianca Alvarenga Anti Pompeu 1, Gabriel Siqueira dos Santos 1,✉, Ticiana Zwarg 2, Mayra Hespanhol Frediani 2, Amanda Haisi 3, João Pessoa Araújo Jr 3, José Soares Ferreira Neto 1, Marcos Bryan Heinemann 1
PMCID: PMC13619737  PMID: 42804045

Abstract

Staphylococcus epidermidis is an opportunistic bacterium frequently involved in healthcare-associated infections and has become increasingly relevant in One Health when associated with methicillin resistance profile. Despite its significance in human medicine, the circulation of S. epidermidis in wildlife still poorly reported. In this study, we communicate the isolation and genomic characterization of a multidrug-resistant S. epidermidis Sequence Type 280 isolated from a skin lesion in an illegally traded wild rufous-bellied thrush (Turdus rufiventris). Antimicrobial susceptibility tests and genome sequencing revealed extensive multidrug resistance, including resistance to methicillin, related to the presence of antimicrobial resistance (mecA; blaZ; aadD; aac(6′) − aph(2′′); fosB; erm(C) and rpoB (D471E/I527M)). This finding provides compelling evidence for the global dissemination and ecological plasticity of this clone. Ultimately, the detection of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis in a wild bird highlights the potential for urban environments to harbor and disseminate antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, highlighting the need to incorporate wildlife monitoring into One Health surveillance models.

Keywords: Methicillin resistant, One Health, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Antibiotic resistance

Background

The fragmentation of natural habitats caused by the rapid pace of urbanization has intensified the interaction between humans, domestic animals, and wildlife, facilitating the transmission of resistance genes because of the creation of ecological corridors (Doyle et al. 2025). In urbanized environments, synanthropic birds are considered vital epidemiological sentinels, as they reflect the antimicrobial selection pressure existing in shared ecosystems. The presence of antimicrobial-resistant strains in wild animals indicates that, while these animals may serve as sentinels, they also may play a role as mobile reservoirs that facilitate the dissemination of multidrug-resistant lineages across ecological boundaries (Vittecoq et al. 2016).

The Rufous-bellied Thrush (Turdus rufiventris) is a non-migratory resident species widely distributed across South America, occurring in southern Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, central and coastal Argentina, and southern Brazil (Collar 2020). Although it inhabits a variety of natural environments, including gallery forests, Cerrado woodlands, and the Pampas, this species is highly tolerant of urbanized landscapes, which provide favorable conditions for colonization and population growth (Vazquez et al. 2024).

In human-animal-environment, methicillin-resistant non-aureus staphylococci species are becoming increasingly important as well(Nemeghaire et al. 2014; Schauer et al. 2021) as Staphylococcus aureus, which has been historically prioritized. The rise of these resistant strains, particularly Staphylococcus epidermidis, demonstrates the need for surveillance across diverse ecological niches, given that these are important reservoirs and vectors for bacterial resistance determinants (Dolejska and Literak 2019).

Among the non-aureus staphylococci, S. epidermidis has emerged as a significant opportunistic pathogen, distinguished by its genomic plasticity and ability to acquire several antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes (Edslev et al. 2025b). While this bacterium is usually associated with infectious processes in humans, the circulation of high-risk lineages (Kellgren et al. 2024), such as Sequence Type 280 (ST280), in non-humans remains understudied.

This study reports the isolation and genomic characterization of an S. epidermidis ST280 strain with multiple antimicrobial resistance genes found in a skin lesion of an rufous-bellied thrush (T. rufiventris) at a wildlife rehabilitation center in São Paulo, Brazil. The identification of the resistance mechanisms presents in this strain, including genes conferring resistance to beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, rifampicin and macrolides, highlights the threat that bacterial clones pose to urban-wildlife interactions and underscores the urgent need for genomic surveillance in free-living species.

Case presentation

On September 2024, an illegally traded rufous-bellied thrush (Turdus rufiventris) was rescued by the municipal guard and admitted in a wild animal medical care and rehabilitation center in São Paulo State, Brazil. The animal presented skin lesions in cephalic region and a swab sample was collected for microbiological diagnostic. The swab was later streaked on Blood Agar (5% v/v) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. White circular colonies were identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis by MALDI-TOF (scores 2.36 and 2.32). After unsuccessful treatment with cefalexin (0.08 mg/g of body weight) and ketoconazole (0.02 mg/g of body), and worsening of its clinical status, the animal was euthanized.

For the tested strain designated as SL01, antimicrobial resistance profile was assessed by the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the antimicrobials, which were determined by the broth microdilution method and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S36 guidelines (CLSI, 2026). The antimicrobial concentration range tested is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile and corresponding antimicrobial resistance genes for Staphylococcus epidermidis SL01 strain results and respective antimicrobial resistance genes associated

Antimicrobial Minimum inhibitory concentration (µg/mL) Minimal concentration tested (µg/mL) Maximum concentration tested (µg/mL) Result
(CLSI, 2026)
Antimicrobial resistance gene related
Oxacillin 1 0.25 2 Resistant mecA
Penicillin 0.5 0.0625 1 Resistant mecA; blaZ
Gentamicin 16 2 32 Resistant aadD; aac(6′) − aph(2′′)
Chloramphenicol 2 2 64 Susceptible -
Ciprofloxacin 1 0.5 8 Susceptible -
Clindamycin 8 0.25 8 Resistant erm(C)
Rifampicin 8 0.5 8 Resistant rpoB (D471E/I527M)
Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim 38/2 19/1 152/8 Susceptible -
Vancomycin 2 2 64 Susceptible -
Tetracycline 2 2 32 Susceptible -

The genomic library was prepared with 300 ng of dsDNA using a modified protocol of Illumina COVIDSeq (Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA), starting from the tagmentation step, and all subsequent procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Library quality was assessed using the TapeStation High Sensitivity D1000 ScreenTape Assay (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). The whole genome sequencing of the SL01 isolate (Genbank Accession: JBWXTE000000000) was performed using the MiSeq i100 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) with 150 bp single-end reads. The quality of the reads was assessed by FastQC (v.0.12.1) (https://github.com/s-andrews/FastQC), and the reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic (v.0.39) (https://github.com/usadellab/Trimmomatic).

Unicycler (v.0.5.1) (https://github.com/rrwick/Unicycler) was used to assemble the draft genome, which was later annotated with Prokka (v.1.14.6) (https://github.com/tseemann/prokka). Genomic data were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

Antimicrobial resistance genes were screened by the ABRicate v1.0.1 platform (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) with ResFinder 4.6.0 (http://genepi.food.dtu.dk/resfinder). Later, bacterial typing tools were used to identify Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) (MLST v.2.0) (https://github.com/tseemann/mlst).

All Staphylococcus epidermidis genomes available in NCBI’s Genome platform (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/home/genomes/) were compared to SL01 genome using FastANI v1.32 (https://github.com/ParBLiSS/FastANI). The 50 genomes with the highest ANI were selected for phylogenetic analysis. The genome annotation was performed using Prokka v1.14.6 (https://github.com/tseemann/prokka), the core orthologous genes of these genomes were concatenated and aligned using Roary (v3.13.0) (https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/Roary), and a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed with IQ-TREE (v2.4.0) (https://iqtree.github.io/) (ultrafast bootstrap 1000 x). For comparative analysis, a phylogenomic tree and a heatmap with antimicrobial resistance genes were constructed with R software (R Core Team 2021) by RStudio (RStudio Team 2020) using the ggplot2 (Wickham 2009) and ggtreeExtra (Xu et al. 2021) packages for graphing.

The isolate obtained from the skin lesion found in a rufous-bellied thrush was identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) test found that the SL01 strain exhibited resistance to multiple antimicrobial classes (Table 1). The isolate showed elevated resistance to beta-lactams, specifically penicillin (MIC = 0.5 µg/mL) and oxacillin (MIC = 1 µg/mL), as well as to gentamicin (MIC = 16 µg/mL). Additionally, resistance was observed for rifampicin (MIC = 8 µg/mL), and clindamycin (MIC = 8 µg/mL).

The multi-locus sequencing typing analysis revealed that the S. epidermidis isolate belonged to ST280. Annotation analysis revealed D471E/I527M substitutions in subunit of bacterial beta-subunit RNA polymerase. The ABRicate screening identified the presence of genes conferring resistance to β-lactams (mecA; blaZ), aminoglycosides (aadD; aac(6´)-aph(2′′)), fosfomycin (fosB), and macrolides (erm(C)).

Phylogenomic and epidemiological analysis reveals that S. epidermidis ST280 is distributed worldwide. Most of S. epidermidis strains (90.2%; 46/51) were reported in humans and showed antimicrobial resistance encoding genes for aminoglycosides (74.5%; 38/51), beta-lactams (94.1%; 48/51) and fosfomycin (100%) (Fig. 1). All studied samples carried the fosfomycin resistance gene fosB, 46 samples (90.2%; 46/51) were positive for mecA and 26 (51.0%; 26/51) positive for blaZ. SL01 isolate did not cluster with any specific pattern of strains (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic and comparative genomic analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the core genome (concatenated orthologous genes) of S. epidermidis SL01 and the 50 genomes with the highest average nucleotide identity (ANI) from the NCBI database. The tree was constructed using IQ-TREE with 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates. The associated heatmap displays the presence (filled) and absence (empty) of antimicrobial resistance genes identified via Prokka annotation. The analysis was visualized using R software with ggplot2 and ggtreeExtra packages

Discussion

In this study we reported the isolation of a multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus epidermidis ST280 from a skin lesion in a rufous-bellied thrush (Turdus rufiventris). This finding is particularly significant as S. epidermidis is a well-documented opportunistic pathogen associated with hospital environments and healthcare-associated infections in humans (Rupp 2014; Dong et al. 2018; Chabi and Momtaz 2019; Martínez-Santos et al. 2022; Demiselle et al. 2023) and demonstrates the strong impact that anthropogenic pressure has on wildlife health.

SL01 isolate genomic profile reveals a strict relation to the animal outcome, considering its difficulty in its pharmacological treatment. The presence of the mecA and blaZ genes are related to the lack of susceptibility to beta-lactams. In addition, the identification of erm(C), aadD, and aac(6’)-aph(2’’) genes highlights the strain’s ability to resist multiple classes of antimicrobials, including macrolides and aminoglycosides. In a healthcare context, the multiple antimicrobial resistance demonstrated in this strain shows a clinical challenge in treatment (Kalın et al. 2023), which may have contributed to treatment failure.

The identification of the SL01 isolate in a wild bird in Brazil provides compelling evidence for the global dissemination of ST280 S. epidermidis lineages (Miragaia et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2018). This finding suggests that wild birds may act as environmental sentinels, bringing together clinical settings, livestock production, and natural ecosystems (Dalazen et al. 2023; Mbuthia and Hoza 2025). The genomic resemblance between SL01 and isolates recovered over a decade ago in different countries (Fig. 1) indicates a successful clone with remarkable ecological plasticity (Pitout and DeVinney 2017). In addition, this intercontinental and multi-host connectivity points towards human-to-animal transmission, a condition where human-associated pathogens spill over into wildlife because of environmental contamination (Ellwanger et al. 2022). From a One Health perspective, our results highlight that the virulence potential of S. epidermidis is not confined to hospitals, but is actively circulating across the human-animal-environment interface, regardless of geographical borders (Persson Waller et al. 2025).

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case linked to an MDR S. epidermidis infection to a wild animal’s demise, marking a significant turning point in wildlife pathology. The skin lesion in T. rufiventris with a methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis shows that these human-associated lineages can transcend species boundaries and may exhibit pathogenic potential in susceptible wild hosts, in contrast to earlier research that classified non-aureus staphylococci in wildlife as commensals or asymptomatic carriage (González-Martín et al. 2020). Since fosfomycin and rifampicin are frequently used as a last resort for MDR staphylococcal infections (Dinh et al. 2012; Bodmann et al. 2025), the presence of rpoB (D471E/I527M) mutation, substitution frequently associated with rifampicin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis (Edslev et al. 2025a) and fosfomycin resistance (fosB) further complicates the resistance landscape. Therefore, these findings support the need to incorporate wildlife monitoring into One Health models (Barroso et al. 2023).

The detection of a synanthropic sentinel harboring an MDR clone such as ST280 provides a stark indicator of “antimicrobial pollution” in urban centers such as São Paulo (Laborda et al. 2022). Future surveillance must focus not only on the presence of these bacteria but also on their pathological impact, as the transmission of hospital-associated resistance determinants to wildlife may lead to localized biodiversity losses and create permanent environmental reservoirs of high-risk pathogens. Since the spread of hospital-associated resistance determinants to wildlife may result in localized biodiversity losses and establish permanent environmental reservoirs of high-risk pathogens (Laborda et al. 2022; Silva et al. 2025), future surveillance must concentrate on both the presence of these bacteria and their pathological impact.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Centro de Manejo e Conservação de Animais Silvestres, Divisão de Fauna Silvestre, Prefeitura de São Paulo, for their valuable collaboration in this research.

Author contributions

BAAP: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Writing– original draft, Visualization . GSS: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. TZ: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Formal analysis. MHF: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Formal analysis. AH: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Formal analysis. JPAJ: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources JSFN: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition. MBH: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Funding

The Article Processing Charge (APC) for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614). GSS is grateful to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de São Paulo – FAPESP (24/17243-8) for his scholarship. MBH and JSFN are grateful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico for their fellowships (grant: 310462/2021; 302899/2022, respectively).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Barroso P, Relimpio D, Zearra JA et al (2023) Using integrated wildlife monitoring to prevent future pandemics through one health approach. One Health 16:100479. 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodmann K-F, Hagel S, Oliva A et al (2025) Real-World Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Intravenous Fosfomycin: The FORTRESS Study. Infect Dis Ther 14:765–791. 10.1007/s40121-025-01125-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chabi R, Momtaz H (2019) Virulence factors and antibiotic resistance properties of the Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from hospital infections in Ahvaz, Iran. Trop Med Health 47:56. 10.1186/s41182-019-0180-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2026) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility. M100-S36 edn.
  5. Collar N (2020) Rufous-bellied thrush (Turdus rufiventris). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J et al (eds) Birds of the world. Cornell Lab Ornithol
  6. Dalazen G, Fuentes-Castillo D, Pedroso LG et al (2023) CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli ST602 carrying a wide resistome in South American wild birds: Another pandemic clone of One Health concern. One Health 17:100586. 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Demiselle J, Meyer P, Lavigne T et al (2023) Staphylococcus epidermidis bloodstream infections are a cause of septic shock in intensive care unit patients. Int J Infect Dis 135:45–48. 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dinh A, Salomon J, Bru JP, Bernard L (2012) Fosfomycin: Efficacy against infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Scand J Infect Dis 44:182–189. 10.3109/00365548.2011.616221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dolejska M, Literak I (2019) Wildlife Is overlooked in the epidemiology of medically important antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother vol 63. 10.1128/AAC.01167-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Dong Y, Speer CP, Glaser K (2018) Beyond sepsis: Staphylococcus epidermidis is an underestimated but significant contributor to neonatal morbidity. Virulence 9:621–633. 10.1080/21505594.2017.1419117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Doyle C, Wall K, Fanning S, McMahon BJ (2025) Making sense of sentinels: wildlife as the One Health bridge for environmental antimicrobial resistance surveillance. J Appl Microbiol vol 136. 10.1093/jambio/lxaf017 [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Edslev SM, Aarris M, Nielsen KL et al (2025a) rpoB mutations and their association with rifampicin resistance in clinical Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Antimicrob Chemother 80:1067–1071. 10.1093/jac/dkaf035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Edslev SM, Laurent F, Månsson E et al (2025b) Antibiotic resistance and population structure of Staphylococcus epidermidis from prosthetic joint infections in Sweden and France. J Antimicrob Chemother 80:2007–2015. 10.1093/jac/dkaf166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellwanger JH, Fearnside PM, Ziliotto M et al (2022) Synthesizing the connections between environmental disturbances and zoonotic spillover. Acad Bras Cienc vol 94. 10.1590/0001-3765202220211530 [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. González-Martín M, Corbera JA, Suárez-Bonnet A, Tejedor-Junco MT (2020) Virulence factors in coagulase-positive staphylococci of veterinary interest other than Staphylococcus aureus. Veterinary Q 40:118–131. 10.1080/01652176.2020.1748253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalın G, Alp E, Chouaikhi A, Roger C (2023) Antimicrobial Multidrug Resistance: Clinical Implications for Infection Management in Critically Ill Patients. Microorganisms 11:2575. 10.3390/microorganisms11102575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kellgren T, Dwibedi C, Widerström M et al (2024) Completed genome and emergence scenario of the multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogen Staphylococcus epidermidis ST215. BMC Microbiol 24:215. 10.1186/s12866-024-03367-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Laborda P, Sanz-García F, Ochoa-Sánchez LE et al (2022) Wildlife and antibiotic resistance. Front Cell Infect Microbiol vol 12. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.873989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Lee JYH, Monk IR, Gonçalves da Silva A et al (2018) Global spread of three multidrug-resistant lineages of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Nat Microbiol 3:1175–1185. 10.1038/s41564-018-0230-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Martínez-Santos VI, Torres-Añorve DA, Echániz-Aviles G et al (2022) Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates from hospitalized patients with bloodstream infection obtained in two time periods. PeerJ 10:e14030. 10.7717/peerj.14030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mbuthia CW, Hoza AS (2025) Wild birds as potential reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli: a systematic review. Front Microbiol vol 16. 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1615826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Miragaia M, Carriço JA, Thomas JC et al (2008) Comparison of Molecular Typing Methods for Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis: Proposal for Clone Definition. J Clin Microbiol 46:118–129. 10.1128/JCM.01685-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nemeghaire S, Argudín MA, Feßler AT et al (2014) The ecological importance of the Staphylococcus sciuri species group as a reservoir for resistance and virulence genes. Vet Microbiol 171:342–356. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Persson Waller K, Myrenås M, Kim H et al (2025) Dissemination of Staphylococcus epidermidis in Swedish bovine dairy herds: minimal overlap with human isolates. Front Microbiol vol 16. 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1512461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  25. Pitout JDD, DeVinney R (2017) Escherichia coli ST131: a multidrug-resistant clone primed for global domination. F1000Res 6:195. 10.12688/f1000research.10609.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  26. R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
  27. RStudio T (2020) RStudio: integrated development for R.
  28. Rupp ME (2014) Clinical characteristics of infections in humans due to Staphylococcus epidermidis. pp 1–16 [DOI] [PubMed]
  29. Schauer B, Szostak MP, Ehricht R et al (2021) Diversity of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. and methicillin-resistant Mammaliicoccus spp. isolated from ruminants and New World camelids. Vet Microbiol 254:109005. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Silva V, Araújo S, Caniça M et al (2025) Caught in the ESKAPE: Wildlife as Key Players in the Ecology of Resistant Pathogens in a One Health Context. Divers (Basel) 17:220. 10.3390/d17040220 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vazquez MS, La Sala LF, Scorolli AL et al (2024) Pushing the boundaries: actual and potential distribution of thrushes expanding their ranges in South America. Sci Rep 14:17587. 10.1038/s41598-024-68611-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vittecoq M, Godreuil S, Prugnolle F et al (2016) Antimicrobial resistance in wildlife. J Appl Ecol 53:519–529. 10.1111/1365-2664.12596 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2. Springer New York, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  34. Xu S, Dai Z, Guo P et al (2021) ggtreeExtra: Compact Visualization of Richly Annotated Phylogenetic Data. Mol Biol Evol 38:4039–4042. 10.1093/molbev/msab166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Veterinary Research Communications are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES