Abstract
Background:
Thoracic aortic aneurysms enlarge silently and can cause fatal aortic dissection without timely surgical repair, underscoring the need for improved approaches to identify individuals at high risk. Rare pathogenic variants in established heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD) genes explain only a subset of familial and fewer nonfamilial thoracic aortic disease (TAD) cases.
Methods:
We performed phenotype-stratified, genome-wide, gene-based rare-variant burden analyses of ultrarare damaging missense and predicted loss-of-function variants. Primary analyses focused on aortic dissection, thoracic aortic aneurysm requiring surgical repair, and their combined phenotype. Broader thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) was evaluated as a secondary phenotype. Discovery analyses were conducted in the UK Biobank and All of Us, followed by independent replication in the Penn Medicine BioBank, Mass General Brigham Biobank, and Million Veteran Program. Discovery and replication results were subsequently combined in an overall fixed-effect, inverse-variance-weighted meta-analysis across up to five biobanks. Implicated genes were further evaluated in additional clinically ascertained TAD cohorts and using single-cell transcriptomic data from human thoracic aortic tissue.
Results:
Discovery analyses identified 80 genes reaching study-wide significance across the prespecified TAD phenotypes. These included six established and two putative HTAD genes. Fourteen genes demonstrated independent replication support and reached study-wide significance in the overall meta-analysis across up to five biobanks, which included more than 10,000 cases and 880,000 controls. The eight novel candidate genes among these were FNDC3B, ROCK1, URM1, SLFN11, ENPP1, CLEC16A, CREM, and VCAN. Associations were strongest for dissection and TAA requiring surgical repair. Four novel associations were driven exclusively by missense variants. FNDC3B was observed in a family with HTAD, while additional variants were identified primarily in sporadic dissection or aortic surgery cohorts, suggesting that other genetic or physiologic factors may influence penetrance. The implicated genes showed cell-type-specific expression patterns in human thoracic aortic tissue.
Conclusions:
These findings expand the genetic architecture of TAD by identifying eight novel candidate genes and demonstrate the utility of phenotype-stratified rare variant burden analyses across large biobanks for gene discovery.
Introduction
Thoracic aortic disease (TAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality1. Thoracic aortic aneurysms involving the proximal aorta enlarge asymptomatically over time and may progress to acute type A aortic dissection, a frequently fatal event if not promptly treated2. Less common type B dissections initiate in the descending thoracic aorta with little to no prior aortic enlargement2. Surgical repair of a proximal aneurysm is typically recommended when the aortic diameter reaches ≥5 cm2; however, 60% of patients presenting with acute type A dissections have diameters smaller than 5.5 cm, including cases with no enlargement3. These observations underscore the limitations of diameter-based risk stratification and highlight the need for improved approaches to identify individuals at high risk for dissection.
Hypertension and genetic variants are major risk factors for TAD, and genetic risk varies across allele frequencies. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified common variants associated with TAD at multiple risk loci, including variants in FBN1 (MIM: 134797), the gene associated with Marfan syndrome (MIM: 154700)2,4. At the other end of the spectrum, rare variants that disrupt the coding regions of genes can confer a highly penetrant risk for TAD, with up to 20% of patients having a similarly affected family member, termed heritable TAD (HTAD)5. While Mendelian approaches have identified 11 confirmed and additional putative HTAD genes, including FBN1, pathogenic variants (PVs) in these genes account for only 30% of HTAD families and 10% of early-onset dissections, indicating that additional high-risk genetic variants remain to be discovered5,6. Recent work shows that genetic testing achieves high diagnostic yield in selected patients using clinical criteria, including early age of onset, syndromic features, family history, and absence of hypertension, but may not explain the broader population in whom genetic variants still contribute to disease risk7. Similar gaps have been observed in other cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure, where common variants identified by GWAS and rare variants in established cardiomyopathy genes account for only a fraction of heritability, suggesting that additional high-risk genetic contributors remain to be identified8.
Single-variant tests commonly used in GWAS are underpowered to detect associations of rare alleles, but aggregating rare variants across a gene can overcome this limitation9,10. While such methods have successfully identified genes enriched for loss-of-function (LOF) variants, detecting disease associations driven by rare missense variation has proven more challenging11,12. Improving the genome-wide detection of high-impact rare variants across the mutational spectrum is therefore critical for advancing genetic discovery in TAD and other cardiovascular diseases.
In this study, we developed and applied a phenotype-stratified framework for gene-based rare variant burden testing. This approach complements common-variant GWAS and family-based gene discovery by testing whether distinct ultrarare damaging variants within the same gene are enriched across unrelated individuals with a shared phenotype. Primary analyses focused on severe TAD phenotypes, including dissection and thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) requiring surgical repair, based on prior work suggesting greater enrichment for high-risk rare variants than in broader TAA13. The framework incorporated gnomAD frequency, REVEL, and AlphaMissense thresholds that we previously derived and validated across independent cohorts to identify rare, damaging variants that increase aortic dissection risk13–16. Using harmonized data from five biobanks comprising more than 10,000 TAD cases and 880,000 controls, we performed discovery analyses in the UK Biobank and All of Us, followed by independent replication in the Penn Medicine Biobank, Mass General Brigham Biobank, and Million Veteran Program. Results were then combined in an overall meta-analysis across up to five biobanks. Implicated genes were further assessed using single-cell transcriptomic data from normal and diseased human thoracic aortas, as well as additional clinically ascertained cohorts. This approach identified established HTAD genes and eight novel candidate genes, including associations driven solely by damaging missense variants.
Methods
Biobank Cohorts
This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston (UTHealth) in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. Discovery analyses were performed in the UK Biobank (UKB) and the All of Us (AoU) Research Program17,18. Across these cohorts, 4,889 individuals had a diagnosis of dissection or TAA, and 757,960 individuals were classified as controls. The prespecified primary phenotypes included 1,063 dissection cases, 418 cases of thoracic aortic aneurysm undergoing surgical repair (TAA-surgery), and 1,481 individuals with either dissection or TAA-surgery. Replication analyses were conducted in three independent cohorts: the Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB), Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB), and the VA Million Veteran Program (MVP), contributing an additional 5,412 TAD cases and 123,004 controls4,19,20. Cohort characteristics are detailed in the Supplemental Methods and Table S1.
TAD Phenotype Definitions
TAD phenotypes were defined using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and procedure codes (Table S2), adapted from Klarin et al.4. For the discovery analyses in UKB and AoU, we prespecified primary and secondary TAD phenotypes. Primary phenotypes comprised clinically severe presentations, including aortic dissection (Dissection), TAA-surgery, and a combined phenotype including all individuals with either dissection or TAA-surgery (Dissection + TAA-surgery). Dissection and TAA-surgery cases were mutually exclusive. Secondary analyses were performed in individuals with thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) to assess the burden of rare variants across the broader spectrum of aneurysm presentations.
Controls were defined as individuals without any TAD case codes and without diagnostic codes for aortic disease, congenital malformations, deformations, or chromosomal abnormalities, or established HTAD (e.g., Marfan syndrome). To ensure consistent phenotype definitions across cohorts, all ICD codes were harmonized to the UKB format, which omits decimal subcodes.
Additional Clinically Ascertained Cohorts
Independent clinically ascertained cohorts were evaluated to assess candidate genes: the UTHealth HTAD cohort (437 probands from families with ≥2 members with TAD), the Early-Onset Sporadic Thoracic Aortic Dissection (ESTAD) cohort (551 individuals aged ≤60 years), and the Yale aortic surgery cohort (1,750 adults undergoing thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection repair). Exome or genome sequencing was performed in each cohort. A clinically ascertained trio identified through physician-ordered sequencing was also included. Additional details are provided in the Supplemental Methods.
Variant Annotation and Filtering
Sequencing data were processed using standardized pipelines with rigorous quality control measures, as detailed in the Supplemental Methods. For missense variant burden analyses, we applied previously derived thresholds for gnomAD minor allele frequency (MAF), REVEL, and AlphaMissense14–16. These thresholds were derived in the PMBB using a data-driven cutpoint approach based on the Youden index, internally validated by bootstrapping, and subsequently validated in independent cohorts13. Missense variants were therefore restricted to MAF < 8.16 × 10−6, REVEL > 0.649, and AlphaMissense > 0.2543 across 19,252 protein-coding genes13. Predicted loss-of-function (LOF) variant analyses were similarly restricted to rare variants (MAF < 8.16 × 10−6) with stop-gain, canonical splice-site, or frameshift consequences in 3,951 genes defined as having a Probability of Loss-of-function Intolerance (pLI) score ≥ 0.9 or high arterial expression and ≤ 30 LOF alleles in gnomAD. The combined burden of missense and predicted LOF variants was also evaluated in these 3,951 genes14.
Rare Variant Burden Analysis
Gene-based rare-variant burden testing was performed separately in UKB and AoU using Firth’s penalized logistic regression, modeling case-control status as a function of rare-variant carrier status with covariates for age, sex, and the first four (UKB) or five (AoU) genetic principal components21. Related individuals (kinship coefficient Φ > 0.1) and individuals with missing covariates or sex discordance were excluded, with cases preferentially retained. For autosomal genes, heterozygous and homozygous carriers were treated equivalently, and for X-linked genes, hemizygous males and heterozygous or homozygous females were considered carriers. For each gene, logistic regression was performed separately for each combination of variant class (missense, LOF, or combined missense + LOF) and TAD phenotype group (e.g., aortic dissection). Only gene–variant class–phenotype combinations with at least one case carrier in both UKB and AoU were included in the discovery meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis results from UKB and AoU were combined using an inverse-variance-weighted fixed-effects model to obtain an overall estimate under the assumption of a common genetic effect across cohorts, with heterogeneity assessed using Cochran’s Q test22,23. Study-wide significance thresholds were defined using a Bonferroni correction for the number of genes tested (α = 0.05 / 19,252 = 2.6 × 10−6 for missense; α = 0.05 / 3,951 = 1.3 × 10−5 for LOF and combined analyses) using two-sided P values. For each gene, only the most significant variant class–TAD group association reaching study-wide significance was carried forward for replication testing. Because of data-use and disclosure-control policies across the contributing biobanks, cohort-specific numbers of qualifying variants, carrier counts, case-control carrier breakdowns, and allele-level summaries that could disclose or permit derivation of restricted participant counts were not publicly reported. Aggregate carrier and non-carrier counts are provided in the supplemental tables where permitted.
Independent Replication and Five-Cohort Meta-Analysis
Genes that reached study-wide significance in the UKB + AoU discovery meta-analysis were carried forward for replication in three independent biobank cohorts (PMBB, MGBB, and MVP). Analyses were performed using the same statistical framework as in the discovery phase. For replication cohorts, analyses were conducted using a harmonized thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or dissection (“TAD”) case definition to ensure consistent phenotype application, using the same diagnostic and procedure codes as in discovery (Table S2). Replication cohorts without any case carriers for a given gene were excluded. Independent replication support was defined as (i) nominal significance (P < 0.05) in at least one replication cohort and (ii) directional consistency of the effect estimate with the discovery association.
Logistic regression results from up to five biobanks were combined using inversevariance-weighted fixed-effects meta-analysis to obtain overall summary estimates, as in the discovery phase. Because cohort-specific differences in phenotype definitions, ancestry, and other factors could introduce heterogeneity, a DerSimonian–Laird random-effects meta-analysis was also performed as a sensitivity analysis24. Genes were considered to meet the prespecified cross-cohort validation criteria if they demonstrated independent replication support and reached Bonferroni significance in the combined five-cohort meta-analysis.
As an additional sensitivity analysis, hypertension was defined using ICD code I10 and included as a covariate in the UKB and AoU discovery analyses for genes meeting the cross-cohort validation criteria. Diagnosis-based hypertension was used because measured systolic and diastolic blood pressure and antihypertensive medication exposure were not uniformly available or harmonized across cohorts. To assess potential effect modification by sex, sex-stratified burden analyses and gene-by-sex interaction testing were also performed in UKB and AoU for these genes.
Results
UK Biobank and All of Us Discovery Analysis
In the UKB and AoU discovery meta-analysis, comprising 4,889 TAD cases and 757,960 controls, genome-wide rare variant burden testing identified 80 genes with a study-wide significant association with one or more TAD phenotypes (Table S3; Figure 2). These associations had large estimated effect sizes, with a geometric mean odds ratio (OR) of approximately 25. Six of the 11 established HTAD genes were identified: FBN1, ACTA2 (MIM: 102620), SMAD3 (MIM: 603109), TGFBR2 (MIM: 190182), COL3A1 (MIM: 120180), and MYLK (MIM: 600922), as well as putative genes FLNA (MIM: 300017) and PKD1 (MIM: 601313), supporting the validity of this approach6. Burden of only missense variants in FBN1 was significantly increased in dissection + TAA-surgery cases (P = 4.1 × 10−22; OR 8.9, 95% CI 5.7–13.8), with LOF variants showing an even greater burden (P = 3.5 × 10−71; OR = 413.0, 95% CI 213.1–800.6)25,26. Missense variants in ACTA2 cause non-syndromic HTAD (MIM: 611788), and the burden of both missense variants only (P = 3.0 × 10−23; OR = 28.3, 95% CI 14.6–54.7) and missense + LOF rare variants (P = 4.1 × 10−25; OR = 27.6, 95% CI 14.7–51.6) were also significantly increased among dissection + TAA-surgery cases27,28. Rare variants in TGFBR2, SMAD3, COL3A1, and MYLK likewise achieved study-wide significance, consistent with their established TAD risk in Loeys–Dietz syndrome 2 and 3 (MIM: 603109, 610168), vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (MIM: 130050), and non-syndromic HTAD (MIM: 613780), respectively5,29,30. PKD1 and FLNA also reached study-wide significance, strengthening evidence for their proposed role in TAD5,6. Notably, all established and putative HTAD genes showed a significantly increased burden of rare variants in genome-wide analyses, despite these associations being driven by relatively few affected carriers per gene. Other HTAD genes showed an increased burden of rare variants in TAD cases but did not reach significance, including LOX (MIM: 153455) and LTBP3 (MIM: 602090)31,32.
Figure 2. Discovery meta-analysis of rare variant burden across TAD phenotype groups.

A–D UK Biobank + All of Us discovery meta-analysis results for Dissection, TAA-surgery, Dissection + TAA-surgery, and TAA. Panels A–C correspond to primary analyses of dissection and TAA-surgery phenotypes, including their combined analysis, whereas panel D shows the secondary analysis of TAA cases alone. For genes reaching study-wide significance, significant missense and loss-of-function (LOF) associations are shown separately; the combined missense + LOF association is shown only when it is the sole variant class reaching study-wide significance for that gene. Shapes indicate LOF (squares), missense (circles), or combined missense + LOF (triangles). Colors denote established HTAD genes (orange), putative HTAD genes (purple), and candidate genes (green). Dashed lines indicate Bonferroni-corrected significance thresholds (grey, P = 2.6 × 10−6 for missense; purple, P = 1.3 × 10−5 for LOF and combined missense + LOF analyses). Candidate gene labels are shown only for associations that met the cross-cohort validation criteria. Full results are provided in Table S3.
Seventy-two additional candidate genes reached study-wide significance in the discovery burden meta-analyses, with the majority having the greatest burden of rare variants in either the dissection or dissection + TAA-surgery phenotypes. The burden analyses were significant for only missense variants in 46 genes, LOF in 16 genes, and missense + LOF in 10 genes (Table S3).
Independent Replication and Five-Biobank Meta-Analysis
Genes reaching study-wide significance in discovery were further assessed in the PMBB (1,657 cases and 40,231 controls), MGBB (426 cases and 8,980 controls), and MVP (3,329 cases and 73,793 controls) using the same variant filters and analytical framework (Figure 1). For each gene, the burden model corresponding to the variant class with the strongest discovery-phase association was carried forward. Replication analyses evaluated the corresponding variant class using a harmonized case definition that captured thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or dissection (“TAD”) to ensure consistent case definitions across replication biobanks, and used the same diagnostic and procedure codes as in discovery (Table S2). Results from these cohorts were combined with those from the UKB and AoU in a meta-analysis of up to five biobanks using an inverse-variance-weighted fixed-effects model23.
Figure 1. Study design and meta-analytic framework for rare variant burden testing in TAD.

Rare variant burden testing was performed in the UK Biobank and All of Us cohorts across missense, loss-of-function (LOF), and combined missense + LOF models, followed by fixed-effect meta-analysis. Eighty genes reached study-wide significance (6 established and 2 putative HTAD genes and 72 novel candidates) and were carried forward for independent replication in the Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB), Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB), and Million Veteran Program (MVP). Independent replication support was defined as nominal significance (P < 0.05) in at least one replication dataset with a concordant effect direction. Results from the discovery and replication cohorts were subsequently combined in a five-cohort meta-analysis. Fourteen genes met the cross-cohort validation criteria in the combined meta-analysis of up to five cohorts, including eight novel candidate genes, five established HTAD genes, and one putative HTAD gene. Superscript symbols indicate the variant class for each gene’s most significant discovery-phase phenotype–variant class association: loss-of-function (squares), missense (circles), or combined missense + loss-of-function (triangles).
Of the 80 genes significant in the discovery-phase meta-analysis, 14 demonstrated independent replication support and reached study-wide significance after Bonferroni correction in the combined five-biobank meta-analysis (Table 1, Table S4). Of these, eight were novel candidate genes: FNDC3B, ROCK1, URM1, SLFN11, ENPP1, CLEC16A, CREM, and VCAN (Figure 3). The remaining six were established or putative HTAD genes, FBN1, ACTA2, SMAD3, COL3A1, TGFBR2, and FLNA, three of which showed study-wide significant associations in missense-only analyses (Figure S1). Moderate between-cohort heterogeneity was observed for some genes, most likely due to variation in sample sizes, phenotype distributions, and the stochastic presence of ultra-rare variants across biobanks. However, the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects estimates were broadly consistent with the fixed-effect results, supporting the robustness of these signals and indicating that the associations persisted after accounting for cohort-specific differences (Table S5)23,24. Sensitivity analyses additionally adjusting for hypertension produced broadly similar effect estimates for the 14 genes meeting cross-cohort validation criteria (Table S6). Sex-specific burden estimates were available in UKB and AoU for 7 genes in females and 8 genes in males. The available estimates were generally directionally consistent with the primary associations, but sparse carrier counts precluded definitive conclusions regarding sex-specific effects (Table S7). FBN1 showed nominal evidence of a stronger burden association in females than males in the meta-analysis (interaction OR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.05–0.87]; P = 0.032), although the interaction was significant only in UKB. No significant interactions were observed for SMAD3, FLNA, or VCAN, whereas low carrier counts limited analyses of the remaining genes.
Table 1.
Discovery and cross-cohort validation of rare variant associations with TAD.
| Gene | Category | Phenotype | Variant Class | Discovery OR (95% CI)* | Discovery P | Combined OR (95% CI)† | Combined P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBN1 | Established | Dissection + TAA-surgery (primary) | LOF | 413.0 (213.1–800.6) | 3.53 × 10−71 | 138.9 (86.8–222.3) | 5.29 × 10−94 |
| ACTA2 | Established | Dissection + TAA-surgery (primary) | Missense+LOF | 27.6 (14.7–51.6) | 4.12 × 10−25 | 12.6 (8.4–18.8) | 3.16 × 10−34 |
| SMAD3 | Established | Dissection (primary) | Missense+LOF | 25.8 (12.4–53.7) | 4.24 × 10−18 | 8.4 (5.2–13.6) | 2.45 × 10−18 |
| COL3A1 | Established | Dissection (primary) | Missense+LOF | 13.8 (6.3–30.1) | 3.65 × 10−11 | 4.4 (2.8–6.9) | 1.87 × 10−10 |
| TGFBR2 | Established | Dissection (primary) | Missense+LOF | 16.8 (6.6–42.8) | 3.09 × 10−9 | 4.3 (2.7–6.9) | 1.30 × 10−9 |
| FLNA | Putative | TAA-surgery (primary) | Missense+LOF | 11.3 (4.5–28.6) | 2.72 × 10−7 | 2.8 (1.8–4.4) | 1.15 × 10−5 |
| FNDC3B | Candidate | Dissection + TAA-surgery (primary) | Missense+LOF | 21.1 (8.2–54.3) | 2.55 × 10−10 | 11.0 (5.2–23.0) | 2.65 × 10−10 |
| URM1 | Candidate | Dissection + TAA-surgery (primary) | Missense | 42.0 (11.6–151.5) | 1.17 × 10−8 | 17.5 (6.6–46.4) | 8.06 × 10−9 |
| CLEC16A | Candidate | Dissection (primary) | Missense | 20.5 (5.9–70.8) | 1.83 × 10−6 | 13.3 (5.4–32.8) | 1.77 × 10−6 |
| VCAN | Candidate | TAA (secondary) | LOF | 8.4 (3.3–21.8) | 1.01 × 10−5 | 8.4 (4.0–17.8) | 1.89 × 10−8 |
| ROCK1 | Candidate | TAA-surgery (primary) | Missense+LOF | 46.2 (13.3–160.4) | 1.64 × 10−9 | 5.9 (3.1–11.4) | 8.44 × 10−8 |
| CREM | Candidate | Dissection + TAA-surgery (primary) | Missense+LOF | 18.5 (5.3–64.4) | 4.81 × 10−6 | 6.5 (3.3–13.1) | 1.05 × 10−7 |
| ENPP1 | Candidate | TAA-surgery (primary) | Missense | 21.6 (6.3–74.0) | 9.49 × 10−7 | 6.8 (3.2–14.5) | 7.13 × 10−7 |
| SLFN11 | Candidate | Dissection (primary) | Missense | 37.3 (10.4–134.0) | 2.83 × 10−8 | 4.9 (2.6–9.3) | 1.04 × 10−6 |
Fixed-effect inverse-variance weighted meta-analytic odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P values are shown for the 14 genes that met the prespecified cross-cohort validation criteria by demonstrating independent replication support and reaching Bonferroni significance in the combined five-cohort meta-analysis. Discovery results reflect a fixed-effect meta-analysis of the UK Biobank (UKB) and All of Us (AoU) cohorts. Combined results reflect fixed-effect meta-analyses across up to five cohorts: UKB, AoU, Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB), Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB), and Million Veteran Program (MVP). “Category” denotes whether each gene is previously established, putative, or newly identified as a candidate in the current study. “Phenotype” and “Variant Class” correspond to the discovery burden mask with the strongest association in UKB + AoU, with phenotypes labeled as primary or secondary. Parenthetical labels indicate whether the phenotype was part of the prespecified primary analysis (dissection and TAA-surgery, including the combined phenotype) or a secondary phenotype (TAA). Random-effects sensitivity estimates are provided in Table S5.
Abbreviations: TAA, thoracic aortic aneurysm; TAA-surgery, TAA requiring surgical repair; Dissection, acute aortic dissection; Dissection + TAA-surgery, combined phenotype.
Figure 3. Cross-cohort validation of novel candidate genes associated with TAD.

Cohort-specific and fixed-effect inverse-variance weighted meta-analytic odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals and P values are shown for the eight novel candidate genes that met the cross-cohort validation criteria. Meta-analyses included up to five cohorts: UK Biobank (UKB), All of Us (AoU), Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB), Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB), and Million Veteran Program (MVP). Cohorts without case carriers for a given gene–variant class association were excluded from the corresponding meta-analysis. For each gene, the TAD phenotype(s) and variant class (missense, LOF, or missense + LOF) that reached study-wide significance in the UKB + AoU discovery meta-analysis are indicated. The phenotype–variant class combination carried forward for cross-cohort validation is indicated in bold. Primary analyses focused on dissection and TAA-surgery phenotypes, including their combined analysis. VCAN was the only gene for which the association was restricted to the secondary TAA phenotype. LOF, loss-of-function. Full results are provided in Table S9.
For the novel genes, both the variant type and the associated TAD phenotype varied. The most significant burden was identified for FNDC3B, URM1, and CLEC16A, in dissection cases or combined dissection + TAA-surgery cases. In the discovery-phase analysis, these genes showed effect sizes comparable to those of established HTAD genes, with ORs of approximately 20–40 (Table 1, Tables S8–S9). The reduced ORs in the extended meta-analysis are consistent with inflated effect sizes in discovery analyses (i.e., the Winner’s Curse) and are further influenced by the inclusion of smaller, more heterogeneous replication cohorts33–35. Four genes (URM1, CLEC16A, ENPP1, and SLFN11) showed an increased burden restricted to missense variants, primarily in dissection or dissection + TAA-surgery cases, with ENPP1 showing a missense-specific association limited to TAA-surgery. ROCK1 and CREM showed increased burden of combined missense and LOF variants, with ROCK1 associated with TAA and TAA-surgery and CREM with dissection + TAA-surgery. VCAN showed a LOF-specific burden restricted to TAA cases. Thus, the methods used for these analyses identified novel genes with an increased burden of missense variants, LOF variants, or both.
Assessment of Novel Genes in Additional TAD Cohorts
We evaluated the eight novel genes for rare variants in unsolved cases in independent TAD cohorts (Table S10). In the UTHealth ESTAD cohort, four LOF variants in FNDC3B were identified, and a Fisher’s exact test of burden in age/sex-matched and sequencing-batch-matched controls demonstrated significant enrichment (4/442 cases vs. 0/760 controls; P = 0.018). Three additional FNDC3B LOF variants were observed in the Yale TAD cohort of surgically repaired TAA cases and dissections, including a recurrent nonsense variant, c.1453C>T (p.Arg485*), identified in an unrelated ESTAD case. A heterozygous FNDC3B frameshift variant, c.3004_3005del (p.Lys1002Glufs*69), was also identified by GeneDx in a family with HTAD; the proband was a child with mild aortic root dilation (z = 2.4), and his father had negative genetic testing and an aortic root replacement in his twenties. A LOF VCAN variant, c.221dup (p.Asn74Lysfs*51), was also identified in a Yale TAD case, and an ESTAD case had a SLFN11 variant, c.2310_2311del (p.Gln771Glyfs*9), that disrupted the C-terminus of the protein.
Aortic Cell-type Expression of HTAD and Novel TAD-associated Genes
We sought to characterize the expression of genes with an increased burden of rare variants across cell types in the aorta using publicly available human single-cell RNA sequencing data from ascending thoracic aortas (Supplemental Methods)36,37. The dataset included transcriptomic data from 5 normal aortas, 8 aortas from patients with TAA undergoing surgical repair, and 6 aortas from patients presenting with type A dissections. Definitive and putative HTAD genes showed distinct cell-type patterns (Figure 4a–c). ACTA2 was highly expressed in smooth muscle and microvascular populations, and FLNA in SMCs, whereas FBN1 and COL3A1 were more prominent in fibroblast and mesenchymal progenitor populations, with intermediate levels in SMCs. SMAD3 showed low-to-moderate abundance across stromal, endothelial, and immune cell populations, while TGFBR2 was more prominent in endothelial, fibroblast, and mesenchymal progenitor populations, with intermediate levels in SMCs. Among the novel genes, FNDC3B was highest in monocytes, with additional signal in macrophages, fibroblasts, and mesenchymal progenitors. ROCK1 was broadly expressed across mural and immune cell populations, with greater abundance in microvascular mural cells, while CREM was highest in T-cells and also detected in NK and myeloid populations. VCAN was more abundant in monocytes, with similar levels in SMCs, fibroblasts, and mesenchymal progenitors, whereas ENPP1 showed low overall abundance with greater expression in SMCs. URM1, CLEC16A, and SLFN11 were expressed at generally low levels, with distinct patterns across endothelial, immune, stromal, or Schwann/glial populations. These cell-type patterns were generally similar across control, TAA, and dissection samples, with VCAN showing higher expression in TAD aortas.
Figure 4. Single-cell expression profiling of novel candidate genes in human aortic tissue.

A Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization showing the major cell populations identified in human aortic tissue, including smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cell subsets. B Feature plots illustrating the expression distribution of the eight novel candidate genes across the UMAP embedding. The color gradient indicates relative expression level (blue: low; red: high). C Dot plot summarizing expression of the novel candidate genes and selected established HTAD genes across cell types and disease states (control, aneurysm, and dissection). Dot size represents the percentage of cells expressing each gene, and color represents the average scaled expression level (blue: low; red: high).
Discussion
Discovery of rare variants in novel genes by gene-based burden analyses has lagged behind the success of GWAS for common variants, in part because highly penetrant pathogenic alleles are ultrarare and available cohorts are often underpowered to detect them. As large biobanks increasingly provide genomic-level data, the aggregation of rare variants across genes has enabled the detection of high-effect associations, although prior successes have largely focused on LOF variants, with missense-driven associations proving more difficult to identify11,12. We therefore applied previously validated thresholds for ultrarare damaging variants to phenotype-stratified gene burden testing across multiple biobanks. This framework recovered established HTAD genes and identified novel high-effect candidates, expanding the genetic architecture of TAD and implicating relevant disease pathways.
The recovery of recognized HTAD genes, including FBN1, ACTA2, COL3A1, SMAD3, TGFBR2, and FLNA, supports this framework’s ability to identify genes harboring high-impact rare variants associated with TAD5,6. Notably, FBN1, ACTA2, and SMAD3 remained study-wide significant when analyses were restricted to missense variants, demonstrating that stringent prioritization of ultrarare missense variants can identify disease genes without incorporating LOF alleles. MYLK and PKD1 were also identified in the UKB–AoU discovery analysis but did not meet cross-cohort validation criteria. For MYLK, pathogenic variants are restricted to the short isoform expressed in aortic tissues, which may reduce the number of informative variants and limit replication across cohorts38. The absence of several other established HTAD genes from the discovery results is consistent with gene-specific molecular constraints: PRKG1 disease risk is driven by a single, recurrent gain-of-function variant39; MYH11 pathogenic variants cluster in a limited region of the coiled-coil domain40; and TGFBR1 pathogenic variants are less frequently observed in population biobanks than TGFBR213.
The objective of this study was to identify novel genes harboring variants that increased the risk for TAD, and eight such genes were identified. URM1, CLEC16A, ENPP1, and SLFN11 showed significance exclusively for missense variant burden. FNDC3B, ROCK1, and CREM were identified through combined missense + LOF burden analyses. VCAN was identified only in the LOF analysis. Only rare variants in FNDC3B were observed in HTAD families, suggesting that the newly implicated genes may influence TAD risk through mechanisms distinct from those of highly penetrant HTAD genes, despite comparable effect sizes. Possible explanations include limited power to detect familial segregation or false-positive associations, stochastic factors, and gene-specific mechanisms in which disease risk depends on the genetic or physiological context. Another possibility is that these genes may also increase susceptibility to TAD in the presence of a second “hit”, such as hypertension, the major clinical risk factor for TAD, which is present in >80% of dissection cases41. This hypothesis could not be formally evaluated here because the rarity of these variants limited the number of carriers available for stratified analyses by hypertension status. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for hypertension yielded broadly similar effect estimates, but they do not determine whether hypertension modifies penetrance or contributes to disease expression. Notably, individuals with HTAD pathogenic variants develop disease in the absence of hypertension, indicating that elevated blood pressure is not required for TAD onset. Additionally, the rare-variant burden in known and novel genes is higher in dissection cases than in TAA cases, based on our results, suggesting that rare variants in these genes may contribute more to dissection risk than to aneurysm formation alone13. Finally, sex-stratified analyses were exploratory because few carriers were available, and the nominal FBN1 interaction was significant only in UKB.
An important analytic feature of this study is the variant selection strategy. Rather than applying broad rare-variant masks, we restricted analyses to ultrarare alleles enriched for deleteriousness, using thresholds optimized in known HTAD genes13. Because these variants are expected to act consistently in a risk-increasing direction, Firth penalized logistic regression provides robust type I error control and interpretable effect-size estimates, whereas kernel-based (e.g., SKAT or Meta-SAIGE) approaches are better suited for mixed-direction effects21,42–44. Although this approach is less sensitive to modest or heterogeneous effects, it improves the detection of highly penetrant missense and LOF variants in biobank-scale data. This strategy may also be applicable to other genetically heterogeneous cardiovascular disorders in which rare, deleterious coding variants contribute to disease risk but validated genes explain only a subset of cases, such as dilated cardiomyopathy and Brugada syndrome45,46.
Single-cell transcriptomic analyses showed that the novel candidate genes, like definitive and putative HTAD genes, were distributed across multiple aortic cell populations. Several definitive HTAD genes likewise showed substantial expression outside SMCs, underscoring the diverse cellular distribution of genes implicated in TAD. Among the novel candidates, FNDC3B and ROCK1 showed relatively broad cellular distributions, whereas others were more prominent in specific populations, including CREM in lymphoid cells and ENPP1 in SMCs. VCAN was the only candidate showing higher expression in TAD aortas. Together, these findings provide cellular context for the genetic associations and suggest that the newly implicated genes may influence TAD through multiple cellular compartments within the aortic wall.
Unlike GWAS, burden analyses of rare variants in genes assess variants that disrupt the corresponding gene function, thereby providing a direct connection between the disrupted gene and TAD. Consequently, these analyses can be evaluated in terms of the possible mechanisms by which they cause the disease. HTAD genes harboring pathogenic variants that alter extracellular matrix proteins (FBN1, LOX) or SMC intracellular contractile proteins (ACTA2, MYH11, MYLK, PRKG1) disrupt the structure of the aortic medial layer termed the elastin-contractile unit. Disease-causing variants in these genes reduce force generation by aortic SMCs, thereby impairing mechanosensing. Two mechanosensing pathways implicated in TAD progression are YAP and focal adhesion kinase (FAK)57,58. YAP in SMCs protects the aorta from TAD progression, whereas FAK signaling drives both protective pathways, such as Rho/ROCK kinase signaling, and pathogenic pathways, including mTOR signaling. Thus, LOF and damaging missense rare variants in ROCK1, which is highly and selectively expressed in vascular SMCs, would be predicted to augment TAD [Box]. In contrast, mTOR inhibitors prevent TAD in multiple mouse models58,77, and since SLFN11 limits mTOR signaling, the loss of SLFN11 would potentially increase pathogenic mTOR signaling76. Downstream of these mechano-sensing pathways are stressed mitochondria, and CLEC16A regulates mitochondrial autophagy, which is critical for mitochondrial function and quality control. Stressed mitochondria increase ROS production and oxidative damage, and lowering ROS levels slows aneurysm growth in multiple TAD mouse models78–80. Thus, rare variants in URM1 that prevent urmylation of AHP1 and thiolation of tRNA may increase ROS-driven cellular damage. Mitochondrial damage releases mitochondrial DNA into the cytosol, activating the cGAS-STING pathway, which has been shown to contribute to TAD progression69,70. ENPP1 hydrolyzes cGAMP, thus suppressing cGAS-STING activation, and loss of this suppression would promote TAD progression. Thus, the novel genes encode proteins involved in mechanosensing pathways, mitochondrial function, or signaling, and rare damaging missense variants in these genes are predicted to contribute to TAD by either disrupting protective pathways (e.g., ROCK1) or augmenting pathogenic pathways (e.g., SLFN11, CLEC16A, URM1, ENPP1).
Box |. Biological Context for Novel Candidate Genes Implicated in TAD.
FNDC3B encodes a 132-kDa protein that contains an amino-terminal proline-rich motif, nine fibronectin type III domains, and a transmembrane domain, and is expressed in many tissues. FNDC3B suppresses TGFβ signaling to promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by cancer cells and adipocyte differentiation47–50. Fndc3b−/− mice die shortly after birth of pulmonary disease and have craniosynostosis-like premature ossification of the calvarial bone, similar to cranial abnormalities associated with severe TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 pathogenic variants48,51,52; 3q26.31 microdeletions involving FNDC3B have also been associated with craniofacial anomalies53. FNDC3B negatively regulates both differentiation and BMP/Smad signaling pathways that are required for proper calvarial bone development54. These observations suggest that loss of FNDC3B may alter TGF-β signaling networks relevant to TAD. Further support for FNDC3B as a disease-causing gene is based on the identification of FNDC3B LOF variants that segregate with disease in HTAD pedigrees and are de novo in affected probands from trios (Caluseriu, personal communication).
VCAN (MIM: 118661) encodes versican, a large chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan of the extracellular matrix55. VCAN has four major isoforms generated by alternative splicing of exons 7 and 8: V0 contains both exons, V1 lacks exon 7, V2 lacks exon 8, and V3 lacks both exons. Three VCAN variants identified here in TAD cases occur in exon 7 and are predicted to eliminate V0- and V2-containing transcripts via nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), thereby shifting the isoform balance toward V1 and V3. A variant in an additional case is predicted to disrupt exon 2 splicing and potentially affect all major VCAN isoforms via NMD. VCAN has been identified as a marker of a fibroblast-like, proliferative SMC population in human TAA, and such SMC phenotypic remodeling may contribute to adaptive responses that maintain aortic wall integrity56,57. Importantly, VCAN pathogenic variants cause Wagner vitreoretinopathy (MIM: 143200) through isoform imbalance, specifically increased levels of V2 and V3, underscoring the importance of VCAN isoform balance in tissue maintenance55.
ROCK1 encodes Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase and is highly and selectively expressed in vascular SMCs49. ROCK1 is activated by the small GTPase RhoA, forming the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway, which regulates actin-myosin contractility, stress fiber formation, and focal adhesion assembly. RhoA/ROCK activity is increased early during TAA formation in a mouse model of TAD, and blocking RhoA/ROCK activity increases the incidence of type A aortic dissections, suggesting that this signaling is protective58.
CLEC16A contains common variants that have been associated with several autoimmune disorders on GWAS, including juvenile-onset diabetes, lupus, alopecia, and multiple sclerosis59–62. The gene encodes an endosomal protein that is critical for mitochondrial function through its regulation of mitophagy63,64. Excessive mitochondrial energy workload in aortic SMCs has emerged as a contributor to TAD, and mitophagy is essential for mitochondrial quality control65,66.
ENPP1, an ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1, hydrolyzes extracellular ATP to generate pyrophosphate, an inhibitor of calcification67. Biallelic ENPP1 LOF variants cause generalized arterial calcification of infancy, characterized by calcification by SMCs in the medial layer of arteries67,68. ENPP1 is also responsible for the hydrolysis of cGAMP, which suppresses the cGAS-STING pathway, and this activation of this pathway in SMCs contributes to TAD progression69,70. Variants decreasing ENPP1 activity may therefore increase TAD risk by augmenting cGAS-STING signaling in SMCs.
URM1 functions in the post-translational urmylation of proteins together with its E1-activating enzyme UBA4 and also participates in the thiolation of wobble uridines in tRNA71. Thioredoxin peroxidase AHP1 detoxifies ROS to maintain redox homeostasis and is a target of URM1. Both AHP1 and tRNA thiolation contribute to URM1’s role in the oxidative stress response, and many TAD mouse models confirm that ROS levels increase in SMCs with TAD progression.
CREM (cAMP Response Element Modulator) is structurally similar to the transcription factor CREB and can switch between activator and repressor states, thereby blocking CREB binding and fine-tuning cAMP signaling72. In the aorta, CREM expression is restricted to immune cells (Figure 4). However, a role for CREM in SMC phenotypic modulation is supported by the observation that Crem−/− SMCs exhibit increased proliferation and Crem−/− mice show increased neointimal formation following carotid artery injury73.
SLFN11 encodes a multifunctional protein that irreversibly blocks DNA replication under stress and inhibits viral replication74. SLFN11 has been extensively studied in cancer cells since its inactivation in 50% of cancer cell lines leads to chemoresistance. SLFN11-deficient cells have highlighted the protein’s diverse cellular functions, including roles in global ubiquitylation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and protein aggregation75. SLFN11 also blocks mTOR signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma76, a signaling pathway shown in multiple mouse models to contribute to TAD pathogenesis58.
Pathogenic variants in the genes for proteins involved in canonical TGFβ signaling also predispose to HTAD. Disease-causing variants lead to haploinsufficiency or missense variants that disrupt TGFβ signaling, implicating loss of canonical TGFβ signaling as a primary driver of TAD. TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 variants associated with early-onset and severe TAD also affect craniofacial development, leading to variable degrees of craniosynostosis, cleft palate, bifid uvula, and hypertelorism29. The function of FNDC3B is not clearly defined. However, loss of FNDC3B expression disrupts the TGFβ signaling network in multiple cell types and alters craniofacial development [Box], and therefore may predispose to TAD in a manner similar to that of pathogenic variants in TGFBR1 and TGFBR2. While these craniofacial features were not observed in FNDC3B variant carriers in the biobanks, they have been described in individuals with microdeletions involving FNDC3B53.
Limitations of these results include that rare-variant burden testing is inherently constrained by the low frequency of ultra-rare alleles, which limits replication power and the precision of effect-size estimates. Consistent with this, some genes identified in the discovery analysis did not replicate in smaller biobank cohorts despite strong mechanistic plausibility, indicating that larger cohorts with genomic data will be required to resolve these signals. The independent replication cohorts were used to assess external support for the discovery-phase associations, while the subsequent five-biobank meta-analysis combined discovery and replication cohorts to maximize statistical power and estimate overall associations. Second, most of the participants analyzed were of European ancestry, limiting generalizability and underscoring the need for broader ancestral representation. We have also shown that a polygenic risk score for TAA modifies the penetrance of HTAD pathogenic variants in biobanks, and future work should integrate common and rare variants to refine risk prediction81. Larger sequencing cohorts will therefore be required to evaluate interactions between rare variants and potential modifiers of penetrance, including hypertension and polygenic risk.
If validated, these candidate genes could expand clinical genetic testing panels and improve the identification of individuals at increased risk for aortic dissection. As gene-specific risk increasingly informs surveillance and prophylactic surgery in HTAD2, defining the penetrance and natural history of these newly implicated genes may ultimately refine surgical thresholds and other individualized management strategies.
In summary, genome-wide aggregation of ultrarare, damaging missense and LOF variants across harmonized biobank datasets identifies established HTAD genes and novel candidate genes with large effect sizes. Because these associations involve protein-altering variants with predicted functional consequences, they offer more direct biological interpretability than common-variant GWAS findings and are broadly consistent with established TAD molecular pathways. Rare damaging variants in these novel candidate genes showed large-effect associations with TAD, with independent replication support and study-wide significance in the combined five-biobank meta-analysis, highlighting potential new contributors to clinically meaningful aortic disease risk. These findings refine the genetic architecture of TAD by identifying rare, high-risk variants in genes that may contribute to disease beyond familial HTAD. This study demonstrates a scalable framework for rare-variant burden testing in population-scale sequencing data and for uncovering high-impact genetic contributors to TAD and other genetically heterogeneous cardiovascular conditions.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the participants of the UK Biobank, All of Us Research Program, Penn Medicine BioBank, Mass General Brigham Biobank, and VA Million Veteran Program, without whom this research would not have been possible. A large language model (ChatGPT, OpenAI) was used to assist with language editing and improving readability and with the preparation of the study design schematic shown in Figure 1. All scientific content and interpretations were provided and verified by the authors.
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants R01HL109942 (D.M.M.) and K08HL173697 (D.R.M.); the Remebrin’ Benjamin and John Ritter Foundation (D.M.M.); and American Heart Association grant 23POST1011251 (J.S.D.). Sequencing and data analysis were performed by the University of Washington Center for Rare Disease Research (UW-CRDR), supported by National Human Genome Research Institute grants U01HG011744 and U24HG011746. The PMBB is approved under IRB protocol #813913 and supported by the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, a gift from the Smilow family, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under CTSA award number UL1TR001878. This research is based in part on data from the Million Veteran Program, Office of Research and Development, and Veterans Health Administration, with support from MVP000 and VA Merit Award I01BX003362 (K.M.C., P.S.T.). Support for VA/CMS data provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Information Resource Center (Project Numbers SDR 02-237 and 98-004). This publication does not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
Disclosures
S.M.D. receives in-kind research support to his institution from Amgen and Novo Nordisk and personal consulting fees from Tourmaline Bio. Penn Medicine BioBank genetic data were generated in collaboration with Regeneron Genetics Center. B.M. and K.Mc. are employees of and may own stock in GeneDx. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Non-standard Abbreviations and Acronyms
- AoU
All of Us Research Program
- ESTAD
Early-Onset Sporadic Thoracic Aortic Dissection
- GWAS
genome-wide association study
- HTAD
heritable thoracic aortic disease
- LOF
loss-of-function
- MAF
minor allele frequency
- MGBB
Mass General Brigham Biobank
- MVP
Million Veteran Program
- PMBB
Penn Medicine Biobank
- PV
pathogenic variant
- scRNA-seq
single-cell RNA sequencing
- SMC
smooth muscle cell
- TAA
thoracic aortic aneurysm
- TAD
thoracic aortic disease
- UKB
UK Biobank
Data and Code Availability
The UKB and AoU data are available to researchers upon approval by their respective access committees. The UTHealth datasets are available in dbGaP Study Accession: phs000693.v7.p3. The PMBB, MGBB, and MVP datasets are not publicly available due to IRB restrictions requiring a collaboration with an associated investigator.
References
- 1.Palaniappan LP, Allen NB, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, Baker-Smith CM, Bansal N, Currie ME, Earlie RS, et al. 2026 Heart Disease and stroke statistics: A report of US and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2026;Available from: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J 3rd, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, Braverman AC, Bray BE, Brown-Zimmerman MM, Chen EP, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;146:e334–e482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pape LA, Tsai TT, Isselbacher EM, Oh JK, O’gara PT, Evangelista A, Fattori R, Meinhardt G, Trimarchi S, Bossone E, et al. Aortic diameter >or = 5.5 cm is not a good predictor of type A aortic dissection: observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation. 2007;116:1120–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Klarin D, Devineni P, Sendamarai AK, Angueira AR, Graham SE, Shen YH, Levin MG, Pirruccello JP, Surakka I, Karnam PR, et al. Genome-wide association study of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection in the Million Veteran Program. Nat. Genet. 2023;55:1106–1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Milewicz DM, Guo D, Hostetler E, Marin I, Pinard AC, Cecchi AC. Update on the genetic risk for thoracic aortic aneurysms and acute aortic dissections: implications for clinical care. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. . 2021;62:203–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Renard M, Francis C, Ghosh R, Scott AF, Witmer PD, Adès LC, Andelfinger GU, Arnaud P, Boileau C, Callewaert BL, et al. Clinical Validity of Genes for Heritable Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018;72:605–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.von Kodolitsch Y, Olfe J, Debus ES, Kirchhof P, Mir TS, Preuss M, Gehle P, Kutsche K, Kubisch C, Robinson PN, et al. Genetic testing in thoracic aortic disease: diagnostic performance of the 2024 ESC algorithm. Eur. Heart J. [Internet]. 2026;Available from: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee DSM, Cardone KM, Zhang DY, Tsao NL, Abramowitz S, Sharma P, DePaolo JS, Conery M, Aragam KG, Biddinger K, et al. Common-variant and rare-variant genetic architecture of heart failure across the allele-frequency spectrum. Nat. Genet. 2025;57:829–838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Morgenthaler S, Thilly WG. A strategy to discover genes that carry multi-allelic or mono-allelic risk for common diseases: a cohort allelic sums test (CAST). Mutat. Res. 2006;615:28–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Madsen BE, Browning SR. A groupwise association test for rare mutations using a weighted sum statistic. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ivarsdottir EV, Gudmundsson J, Tragante V, Sveinbjornsson G, Kristmundsdottir S, Stacey SN, Halldorsson GH, Magnusson MI, Oddsson A, Walters GB, et al. Gene-based burden tests of rare germline variants identify six cancer susceptibility genes. Nat. Genet. 2024;56:2422–2433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Spargo TP, Sands CF, Juan IR, Mitchell J, Ravanmehr V, Butts JC, De-Paula RB, Kim Y, Hu F, Wang Q, et al. Haploinsufficiency of ITSN1 is associated with a substantial increased risk of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Rep. 2025;44:115355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.DePaolo J, Guo D-C, Murdock DR, Cecchi AC, LeMaire SA, Shen HY, Estrera AL, Safi HJ, Coselli JS, Smith J, et al. Employing bioinformatic tools to identify high-risk variants of uncertain significance in aortopathy genes that increase aortic dissection risk. Genet. Med. 2026;102571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, Collins RL, Laricchia KM, Ganna A, Birnbaum DP, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581:434–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, Middha S, McDonnell SK, Baheti S, Musolf A, Li Q, Holzinger E, Karyadi D, et al. REVEL: An ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016;99:877–885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cheng J, Novati G, Pan J, Bycroft C, Žemgulytė A, Applebaum T, Pritzel A, Wong LH, Zielinski M, Sargeant T, et al. Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense. Science. 2023;381:eadg7492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J, Downey P, Elliott P, Green J, Landray M, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.All of Us Research Program Genomics Investigators. Genomic data in the All of Us Research Program. Nature. 2024;627:340–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Verma A, Damrauer SM, Naseer N, Weaver J, Kripke CM, Guare L, Sirugo G, Kember RL, Drivas TG, Dudek SM, et al. The Penn Medicine BioBank: Towards a genomics-enabled learning healthcare system to accelerate precision medicine in a diverse population. J. Pers. Med. 2022;12:1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Boutin NT, Schecter SB, Perez EF, Tchamitchian NS, Cerretani XR, Gainer VS, Lebo MS, Mahanta LM, Karlson EW, Smoller JW. The evolution of a large Biobank at mass general Brigham. J. Pers. Med. 2022;12:1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80:27–38. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002;21:1539–1558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods. 2010;1:97–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp. Clin. Trials. 2015;45:139–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Milewicz DM, Braverman AC, De Backer J, Morris SA, Boileau C, Maumenee IH, Jondeau G, Evangelista A, Pyeritz RE. Marfan syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2021;7:64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Franken R, Teixido-Tura G, Brion M, Forteza A, Rodriguez-Palomares J, Gutierrez L, Garcia Dorado D, Pals G, Mulder BJ, Evangelista A. Relationship between fibrillin-1 genotype and severity of cardiovascular involvement in Marfan syndrome. Heart. 2017;103:1795–1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guo D-C, Pannu H, Tran-Fadulu V, Papke CL, Yu RK, Avidan N, Bourgeois S, Estrera AL, Safi HJ, Sparks E, et al. Mutations in smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2) lead to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Nat. Genet. 2007;39:1488–1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guo D-C, Papke CL, Tran-Fadulu V, Regalado ES, Avidan N, Johnson RJ, Kim DH, Pannu H, Willing MC, Sparks E, et al. Mutations in smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2) cause coronary artery disease, stroke, and Moyamoya disease, along with thoracic aortic disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009;84:617–627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Loeys BL, Chen J, Neptune ER, Judge DP, Podowski M, Holm T, Meyers J, Leitch CC, Katsanis N, Sharifi N, et al. A syndrome of altered cardiovascular, craniofacial, neurocognitive and skeletal development caused by mutations in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2. Nat. Genet. 2005;37:275–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pepin M, Schwarze U, Superti-Furga A, Byers PH. Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;342:673–680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Guo D-C, Regalado ES, Gong L, Duan X, Santos-Cortez RLP, Arnaud P, Ren Z, Cai B, Hostetler EM, Moran R, et al. LOX mutations predispose to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Circ. Res. 2016;118:928–934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Guo D-C, Regalado ES, Pinard A, Chen J, Lee K, Rigelsky C, Zilberberg L, Hostetler EM, Aldred M, Wallace SE, et al. LTBP3 pathogenic variants predispose individuals to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018;102:706–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zollner S, Pritchard JK. Overcoming the winner’s curse: estimating penetrance parameters from case-control data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007;80:605–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Munafò MR. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013;14:365–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Palmer C, Pe’er I. Statistical correction of the Winner’s Curse explains replication variability in quantitative trait genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li Y, Ren P, Dawson A, Vasquez HG, Ageedi W, Zhang C, Luo W, Chen R, Li Y, Kim S, et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic cell populations and differential gene expression patterns in control and aneurysmal human aortic tissue. Circulation. 2020;142:1374–1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang B, Zeng K, Guan R-C, Jiang H-Q, Qiang Y-J, Zhang Q, Yang M, Deng B-P, Yang Y-Q. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals macrophages are involved in the pathogenesis of human sporadic acute type A aortic dissection. Biomolecules. 2023;13:399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wallace SE, Regalado ES, Gong L, Janda AL, Guo D-C, Russo CF, Kulmacz RJ, Hanna N, Jondeau G, Boileau C, et al. MYLK pathogenic variants aortic disease presentation, pregnancy risk, and characterization of pathogenic missense variants. Genet. Med. 2019;21:144–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guo D-C, Regalado E, Casteel DE, Santos-Cortez RL, Gong L, Kim JJ, Dyack S, Horne SG, Chang G, Jondeau G, et al. Recurrent gain-of-function mutation in PRKG1 causes thoracic aortic aneurysms and acute aortic dissections. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013;93:398–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pannu H, Tran-Fadulu V, Papke CL, Scherer S, Liu Y, Presley C, Guo D, Estrera AL, Safi HJ, Brasier AR, et al. MYH11 mutations result in a distinct vascular pathology driven by insulin-like growth factor 1 and angiotensin II. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007;16:2453–2462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.LeMaire SA, Russell L. Epidemiology of thoracic aortic dissection. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2010;8:103–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu MC, Lee S, Cai T, Li Y, Boehnke M, Lin X. Rare-variant association testing for sequencing data with the sequence kernel association test. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011;89:82–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lee S, Emond MJ, Bamshad MJ, Barnes KC, Rieder MJ, Nickerson DA, NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project-ESP Lung Project Team, Christiani DC, Wurfel MM, Lin X. Optimal unified approach for rare-variant association testing with application to small-sample case-control whole-exome sequencing studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;91:224–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Park E, Nam K, Jeong S, Keat K, Kim D, Bansal V, Zhou W, Lee S. Scalable and accurate rare variant meta-analysis with Meta-SAIGE. Nat. Genet. 2025;57:3185–3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mazzarotto F, Tayal U, Buchan RJ, Midwinter W, Wilk A, Whiffin N, Govind R, Mazaika E, de Marvao A, Dawes TJW, et al. Reevaluating the genetic contribution of monogenic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2020;141:387–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hosseini SM, Kim R, Udupa S, Costain G, Jobling R, Liston E, Jamal SM, Szybowska M, Morel CF, Bowdin S, et al. Reappraisal of reported genes for sudden arrhythmic death: Evidence-based evaluation of gene validity for Brugada syndrome. Circulation. 2018;138:1195–1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tominaga K, Kondo C, Johmura Y, Nishizuka M, Imagawa M. The novel gene fad104, containing a fibronectin type III domain, has a significant role in adipogenesis. FEBS Lett. 2004;577:49–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kishimoto K, Kato A, Osada S, Nishizuka M, Imagawa M. Fad104, a positive regulator of adipogenesis, negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;397:187–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lonsdale J, Thomas J, Salvatore M, Phillips R, Lo E, Shad S, Hasz R, Walters G, Garcia F, Young N, et al. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:580–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wada N, Sakai S, Inoue Y, Nishizuka M. Silencing of fibronectin type III domain-containing protein 3A (FNDC3A) attenuates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer invasion, and stemness in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2025;1872:119935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kishimoto K, Nishizuka M, Ueda T, Kajita K, Ugawa S, Shimada S, Osada S, Imagawa M. Indispensable role of factor for adipocyte differentiation 104 (fad104) in lung maturation. Exp. Cell Res. 2011;317:2110–2123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Loeys BL, Schwarze U, Holm T, Callewaert BL, Thomas GH, Pannu H, De Backer JF, Oswald GL, Symoens S, Manouvrier S, et al. Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-beta receptor. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;355:788–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cao Y, Mitchell EB, Gorski JL, Hollinger C, Hoppman NL. Two cases with de novo 3q26.31 microdeletion suggest a role for FNDC3B in human craniofacial development. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2016;170:3276–3281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kishimoto K, Nishizuka M, Katoh D, Kato A, Osada S, Imagawa M. FAD104, a regulatory factor of adipogenesis, acts as a novel regulator of calvarial bone formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:31772–31783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Neidhardt J, Magyar I, Plauchu H, Zech J-C, Morlé L, Palmer-Smith SM, Macdonald MJ, Nas V, Fry AE, et al. Novel VCAN mutations and evidence for unbalanced alternative splicing in the pathogenesis of Wagner syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;21:352–356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Song W, Qin L, Chen Y, Chen J, Wei L. Single-cell transcriptome analysis identifies Versican(+) myofibroblast as a hallmark for thoracic aortic aneurysm marked by activation of PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2023;643:175–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang C, Li Y, Chakraborty A, Li Y, Rebello KR, Ren P, Luo W, Zhang L, Lu HS, Cassis LA, et al. Aortic stress activates an adaptive program in thoracic aortic smooth muscle cells that maintains aortic strength and protects against aneurysm and dissection in mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2023;43:234–252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhou Z, Guan P, Sarkar R, Yu Y, Richard A, Weiss D, Kawamura Y, Zhang C, Li Y, Vaisar T, et al. Focal adhesion kinase drives Rho/ROCK and mTOR signaling to protect and augment aortic dissections. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2025;10:101353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bradfield JP, Qu H-Q, Wang K, Zhang H, Sleiman PM, Kim CE, Mentch FD, Qiu H, Glessner JT, Thomas KA, et al. A genome-wide meta-analysis of six type 1 diabetes cohorts identifies multiple associated loci. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mero I-L, Ban M, Lorentzen ÅR, Smestad C, Celius EG, Sæther H, Saeedi H, Viken MK, Skinningsrud B, Undlien DE, et al. Exploring the CLEC16A gene reveals a MS-associated variant with correlation to the relative expression of CLEC16A isoforms in thymus. Genes Immun. 2011;12:191–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Betz RC, Petukhova L, Ripke S, Huang H, Menelaou A, Redler S, Becker T, Heilmann S, Yamany T, Duvic M, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis in alopecia areata resolves HLA associations and reveals two new susceptibility loci. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:5966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schuster C, Gerold KD, Schober K, Probst L, Boerner K, Kim M-J, Ruckdeschel A, Serwold T, Kissler S. The autoimmunity-associated gene CLEC16A modulates thymic epithelial cell autophagy and alters T cell selection. Immunity. 2015;42:942–952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gingerich MA, Liu X, Chai B, Pearson GL, Vincent MP, Stromer T, Zhu J, Sidarala V, Renberg A, Sahu D, et al. An intrinsically disordered protein region encoded by the human disease gene CLEC16A regulates mitophagy. Autophagy. 2023;19:525–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Levi-D’Ancona E, Stendahl AM, Henry-Kanarek BA, Davidson RK, Walker EM, Soleimanpour SA. Mitophagy in the adaptation to pancreatic β cell stress in diabetes. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. [Internet]. 2025;Available from: 10.1016/j.tem.2025.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Oller J, Gabandé-Rodríguez E, Ruiz-Rodríguez MJ, Desdín-Micó G, Aranda JF, Rodrigues-Diez R, Ballesteros-Martínez C, Blanco EM, Roldan-Montero R, Acuña P, et al. Extracellular tuning of mitochondrial respiration leads to aortic aneurysm. Circulation. 2021;143:2091–2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhou Z, Sarkar R, Esparza Pinelo JE, Richard A, Dunn J, Ren Z, Kwartler CS, Milewicz DM. Measurement of oxygen consumption rate in mouse aortic tissue. Biol. Methods Protoc. 2025;10:bpaf031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nitschke Y, Baujat G, Botschen U, Wittkampf T, du Moulin M, Stella J, Le Merrer M, Guest G, Lambot K, Tazarourte-Pinturier M-F, et al. Generalized arterial calcification of infancy and pseudoxanthoma elasticum can be caused by mutations in either ENPP1 or ABCC6. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;90:25–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nitschke Y, Weissen-Plenz G, Terkeltaub R, Rutsch F. Npp1 promotes atherosclerosis in ApoE knockout mice. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011;15:2273–2283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kato K, Nishimasu H, Oikawa D, Hirano S, Hirano H, Kasuya G, Ishitani R, Tokunaga F, Nureki O. Structural insights into cGAMP degradation by Ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase phosphodiesterase 1. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Luo W, Wang Y, Zhang L, Ren P, Zhang C, Li Y, Azares AR, Zhang M, Guo J, Ghaghada KB, et al. Critical role of cytosolic DNA and its sensing adaptor STING in aortic degeneration, dissection, and rupture. Circulation. 2019;141:42–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sokołowski M, Kwasna D, Ravichandran KE, Eggers C, Krutyhołowa R, Kaczmarczyk M, Skupien-Rabian B, Jaciuk M, Walczak M, Dahate P, et al. Molecular basis for thiocarboxylation and release of Urm1 by its E1-activating enzyme Uba4. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:13980–13995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rauen T, Hedrich CM, Tenbrock K, Tsokos GC. cAMP responsive element modulator: a critical regulator of cytokine production. Trends Mol. Med. 2013;19:262–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Seidl MD, Steingräber AK, Wolf CT, Sur TMH, Hildebrandt I, Witten A, Stoll M, Fischer JW, Schmitz W, Müller FU. Transcription factor cAMP response element modulator (Crem) restrains Pdgf-dependent proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in mice. Pflugers Arch. 2014;467:2165–2177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mu A, Okamoto Y, Katsuki Y, Takata M. The role of SLFN11 in DNA replication stress response and its implications for the Fanconi anemia pathway. DNA Repair (Amst.). 2024;141:103733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Murai Y, Jo U, Murai J, Jenkins LM, Huang S-YN, Chakka S, Chen L, Cheng K, Fukuda S, Takebe N, et al. SLFN11 inactivation induces proteotoxic stress and sensitizes cancer cells to ubiquitin activating enzyme inhibitor TAK-243. Cancer Res. 2021;81:3067–3078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhou C, Liu C, Liu W, Chen W, Yin Y, Li C-W, Hsu JL, Sun J, Zhou Q, Li H, et al. SLFN11 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis and metastasis by targeting RPS4X via mTOR pathway. Theranostics. 2020;10:4627–4643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zaradzki M, Mohr F, Lont S, Soethoff J, Remes A, Arif R, Müller OJ, Karck M, Hecker M, Wagner AH. Short-term rapamycin treatment increases life span and attenuates aortic aneurysm in a murine model of Marfan-Syndrome. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2022;205:115280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Chen J, Peters A, Papke CL, Villamizar C, Ringuette L-J, Cao J, Wang S, Ma S, Gong L, Byanova KL, et al. Loss of smooth muscle α-actin leads to NF-κB-dependent increased sensitivity to angiotensin II in smooth muscle cells and aortic enlargement. Circ. Res. 2017;120:1903–1915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Schwaerzer GK, Kalyanaraman H, Casteel DE, Dalton ND, Gu Y, Lee S, Zhuang S, Wahwah N, Schilling JM, Patel HH, et al. Aortic pathology from protein kinase G activation is prevented by an antioxidant vitamin B(12) analog. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kalyanaraman H, Casteel DE, Cabriales JA, Tat J, Zhuang S, Chan A, Dretchen KL, Boss GR, Pilz RB. The antioxidant/nitric oxide-quenching agent cobinamide prevents aortic disease in a mouse model of Marfan Syndrome. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2024;9:46–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Depaolo J, Biagetti GM, Judy R, Abramowitz S, Desai N, Szeto WY, Bavaria JE, Levin M, Guo D, Milewicz DM, et al. Genome-first approach to rare and common variant risk of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. JVS Vasc. Sci. 2024;5:100243. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mudge JM, Carbonell-Sala S, Diekhans M, Martinez JG, Hunt T, Jungreis I, Loveland JE, Arnan C, Barnes I, Bennett R, et al. GENCODE 2025: reference gene annotation for human and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:D966–D975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Morales J, Pujar S, Loveland JE, Astashyn A, Bennett R, Berry A, Cox E, Davidson C, Ermolaeva O, Farrell CM, et al. A joint NCBI and EMBL-EBI transcript set for clinical genomics and research. Nature. 2022;604:310–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, Whitwham A, Keane T, McCarthy SA, Davies RM, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience [Internet]. 2021;10. Available from: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 2012;6:80–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Cingolani P, Patel VM, Coon M, Nguyen T, Land SJ, Ruden DM, Lu X. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model for genotoxic chemical mutational studies with a new program, SnpSift. Front. Genet. 2012;3:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Liu X, Li C, Mou C, Dong Y, Tu Y. dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs. Genome Med. 2020;12:103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Stromberg M, Roy R, Lajugie J, Jiang Y, Li H, Margulies E. Nirvana. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2017. p. 596–596. [Google Scholar]
- 89.La Manno G, Soldatov R, Zeisel A, Braun E, Hochgerner H, Petukhov V, Lidschreiber K, Kastriti ME, Lönnerberg P, Furlan A, et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature. 2018;560:494–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Fleming SJ, Chaffin MD, Arduini A, Akkad A-D, Banks E, Marioni JC, Philippakis AA, Ellinor PT, Babadi M. Unsupervised removal of systematic background noise from droplet-based single-cell experiments using CellBender. Nat. Methods. 2023;20:1323–1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.McGinnis CS, Murrow LM, Gartner ZJ. DoubletFinder: Doublet detection in single-cell RNA sequencing data using artificial nearest neighbors. Cell Syst. 2019;8:329–337.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bais AS, Kostka D. scds: computational annotation of doublets in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:1150–1158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Germain P-L, Lun A, Macnair W, Robinson MD. Doublet identification in single-cell sequencing data using scDblFinder. F1000Res. 2021;10:979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Hao Y, Stuart T, Kowalski MH, Choudhary S, Hoffman P, Hartman A, Srivastava A, Molla G, Madad S, Fernandez-Granda C, et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024;42:293–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The UKB and AoU data are available to researchers upon approval by their respective access committees. The UTHealth datasets are available in dbGaP Study Accession: phs000693.v7.p3. The PMBB, MGBB, and MVP datasets are not publicly available due to IRB restrictions requiring a collaboration with an associated investigator.
