Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2026 Jun 25;13(18):nwag393. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwag393

Bulk-to-interphase polybromide confinement and electric-field-responsive recovery enable Ah-level aqueous zinc-bromine batteries at room/low temperatures

Qilong Wu 1, Peiyao Wang 2, Hong Lin 3, Fanxiang Meng 4, Chenxi Sun 5, Jinbao Zhao 6, Yang Yang 7,✉
PMCID: PMC13622346  PMID: 42812816

ABSTRACT

Aqueous zinc-bromine (Zn-Br2) batteries are promising candidates for grid-scale energy storage owing to their low cost and inherent safety. However, their areal capacity and cycling stability are severely limited by detrimental polybromide shuttling, which arises from concentration-gradient-driven diffusion and often overlooked internal-electric-field-accelerated electromigration. Herein, a bulk-to-interphase synergistic regulation strategy is proposed integrating electrostatic micropore confinement in the cathode bulk with additional interfacial anchoring and electric-field-responsive recovery at the cathode/electrolyte interphase. Poly(quaternary ammonium)-functionalized activated carbon (N+-AC) hosts are rationally designed to trap polybromide anions within positively charged micropores of cathode bulk, thereby suppressing concentration-gradient-driven leakage while maintaining fast conversion kinetics. Simultaneously, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (1,3-MI) electrolyte additive adsorbed on the cathode surface provides additional polybromide anchoring at the interphase. Importantly, theoretical calculations and in situ characterizations demonstrate that an electric-field-responsive 1,3-MI accumulation layer forms spontaneously during discharge, dynamically attracting polybromides and inhibiting their electromigration toward the anode, thus promoting their recovery to the cathode for reversible redox conversion. Consequently, the N+-AC||Zn full cell with 1,3-MI achieves stable cycling over 1000 cycles at an ultrahigh areal capacity of 10 mAh cm−2. Furthermore, Ah-level Zn-Br2 pouch cells operate stably at both room and subzero temperatures, validating the practical potential of this electric-field-aware bulk-to-interphase regulation strategy under complex climatic conditions.

Keywords: aqueous Zn-Br2 batteries, bulk-to-interphase synergistic regulation, polybromide shuttling suppression, low-temperature energy storage, high areal capacity


A bulk-to-interphase regulation strategy enables full-cycle management of active bromine species, unlocking durable, high-capacity Zn-Br2 batteries across a wide temperature range.

INTRODUCTION

With the rapid advancement of renewable energy technologies such as wind and solar power, the demand for electrochemical energy storage systems that combine high energy density, inherent safety and cost-effectiveness has intensified [1–8]. Aqueous zinc-bromine (Zn-Br2) batteries have emerged as promising candidates owing to their intrinsic merits, including high redox potential (∼1.84 V vs. Zn2+/Zn), abundant and low-cost zinc/bromine resources, non-flammable aqueous electrolytes and high theoretical energy density (∼440 Wh kg−1) [9–12]. Nevertheless, the widespread commercialization of aqueous Zn-Br static batteries remains hindered by limited achievable areal capacity and rapid performance degradation, primarily caused by the formation and shuttling of polybromide species (e.g. Br3− and Br5−) during cycling [13–19].

Current strategies for immobilizing polybromide species can be broadly categorized into two classes. The first involves the use of porous carbon-based materials as physical hosts to confine polybromides, providing high bromine-loading capacity and conductive pathways for electron transfer [20,21]. However, the inherently weak interaction between polar polybromide anions and non-polar carbon surface severely limits immobilization efficiency, rendering this approach insufficient for long-term stable cycling [22–24]. The second strategy employs positively charged quaternary ammonium salts to chemically complex polybromide anions via strong electrostatic interactions [2,25–30]. Despite effective anchoring, this approach typically requires large quantities of quaternary ammonium salts, which significantly increase inactive mass and deteriorate electronic conductivity, compromising redox efficiency and rate performance, particularly under high loading conditions.

Importantly, polybromide-induced battery degradation is not solely a consequence of dissolution or shuttling; rather, it is intrinsically coupled to the dynamic evolution of the internal electric field during charge–discharge processes, an aspect that is often overlooked. The fundamental equilibrium governing polybromide formation is

graphic file with name TM0001.gif (1)

This equilibrium indicates that Br3− formation requires the coexistence of sufficient Br− and Br2. During the charging process, Br− ions migrate under the internal electric field and accumulate at the cathode, where they are oxidized to Br2. At the cathode/electrolyte interphase, a portion of generated Br2 reacts with locally enriched Br− to form Br3−, explaining why polybromide formation is predominantly observed during charging [14,26]. The transport behavior of Br3− from the cathode interphase into the bulk electrolyte (J) is governed by two fluxes: diffusion driven by concentration gradients (Jd) and electromigration driven by electric field (Jm):

graphic file with name TM0002.gif (2)
graphic file with name TM0003.gif (3)
graphic file with name TM0004.gif (4)

where J is the ionic flux, D is the diffusion coefficient, R is the gas constant, F is the Faraday constant and z is the charge number; ∂C(x)/∂x and ∂ϕ(x)/∂x represent the concentration and potential gradient, respectively. During charging, diffusion tends to push Br3− away from the cathode, but this flux is partially counteracted by oppositely directed electromigration, leading to substantial Br3− accumulation at the cathode/electrolyte interphase and only minimal leakage into the bulk electrolyte (Fig. 1a). However, upon discharge, the internal electric field reverses. Although a fraction of interfacial polybromide species can be directly reduced back to Br−, and thus reutilized in the redox cycle, another fraction is driven outward by the combined effects of diffusion and the reversed electric field. This co-driven transport promotes directional Br3− migration toward the zinc anode, where parasitic redox reactions induce severe Zn corrosion and pronounced self-discharge (Fig. 1b). Therefore, while enhancing bromine affinity and redox efficiency within the bulk cathode can mitigate concentration-gradient-driven leakage, a more critical and less-explored strategy is to actively inhibit the electric-field-driven electromigration of polybromide anions during discharge.

Figure 1.

Schematic illustrations depicting polybromide generation, migration, and the bulk-to-interphase synergistic regulation mechanism for suppressing polybromide shuttling in aqueous zinc-bromine batteries.

Schematic illustration of (a) polybromide generation and diffusion during charging, (b) electric-field-driven polybromide migration during discharging and the bulk-to-interphase synergistic regulation mechanism for suppressing polybromide shuttling during (c) charge and (d) discharge.

In this work, we develop a bulk-to-interphase synergistic regulation strategy to suppress polybromide dissolution and shuttling throughout the entire charge–discharge process by integrating electrostatic micropore confinement in the cathode bulk with interface anchoring and electric-field-responsive recovery at the cathode/electrolyte interphase. Specifically, activated carbon (AC) is functionalized with poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) to introduce abundant cationic sites within its micropores (N+-AC). This modification strengthens electrostatic confinement of polybromide species inside AC micropores, thereby suppressing their diffusion from the cathode bulk to the electrolyte interface during charging. Meanwhile, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (1,3-MI) is adopted as an electrolyte additive to provide additional polybromide anchoring at the interface via strong electrostatic interactions, effectively capturing polybromide species that escape the cathode bulk (Fig. 1c). More importantly, during discharge, 1,3-MI cations accumulate at the cathode/electrolyte interphase following the internal electric field direction, forming a positively charged interfacial layer. This field-assembled layer dynamically attracts polybromide species and inhibits their electric-field-driven migration toward the anode, thereby promoting their recovery to the cathode for reversible redox conversion (Fig. 1d). Consequently, this bulk-to-interphase synergistic regulation enables the Zn-Br2 battery to achieve a high areal capacity of 10 mAh cm−2 over 1000 cycles. Furthermore, owing to the fast redox kinetics and intrinsic low-temperature tolerance of the ZnBr2-based electrolyte, this strategy is further extended to Ah-level pouch cells that operate reliably at subzero temperatures (−20°C). This study highlights the importance of targeted, electric-field-aware interphase manipulation in mitigating polybromide shuttling across the full charge–discharge cycle, providing practical guidelines for high-areal-capacity aqueous Zn-Br2 batteries.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Theoretical validation for suppressing polybromide leaching

To suppress polybromide diffusion from the cathode bulk to the electrode/electrolyte interphase, high-specific-surface-area AC (2286 m2 g−1; Fig. S1) was functionalized with poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (denoted as N+) and fabricated into a dry-processed cathode (Fig. S2) to realize high areal capacity [31]. As illustrated in Fig. 2a, the resulting self-standing N+-AC electrode exhibits good mechanical robustness and can be manufactured as a continuous electrode roll, indicating compatibility with scalable production. Tensile testing further verifies this merit, with a maximum elongation of over 100% and a gradually increased stress up to 0.12 MPa (Fig. S3). As the N+ concentration in the treatment solution increases from 0 wt% to 1 wt%, the zeta potential of AC shifts from −34.9 mV to +48.8 mV (Fig. 2b), reversing the surface charge nature to enable electrostatic confinement of polybromide anions. Considering that excessive N+ content reduces the specific surface area of AC (Fig. S4) and can compromise adsorption capability, the treatment concentration was finally optimized to be 0.05 wt%, corresponding to a N+ loading of ∼3.9 wt% in N+-AC with a considerable positive zeta potential of 36.2 mV (Fig. S5). Meanwhile, the electronic conductivity of N+-AC (1.52 S cm−1) remains comparable to that of pristine AC (1.65 S cm−1) (Table S1). Elemental mapping reveals homogeneous distributions of N and Cl, confirming uniform incorporation of N+ species (Fig. S6). Notably, no N+-related signals are detected in the Raman spectra of N+-AC (Fig. S7), suggesting that N+ species are not present as surface-exposed aggregates. In addition, ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectra of the supernatant collected after soaking N+-AC in water for 12 h show no discernible N+-associated absorption peaks, whereas the recovered N+-AC powder after drying retains a strongly positive zeta potential of +32.3 mV (Figs S8 and S9). Collectively, these results indicate that N+ species are predominantly fixed within the microporous AC framework and exhibit negligible solubility in aqueous media.

Figure 2.

Electrode characterization, theoretical calculations, and molecular simulations illustrating electrostatic microporous polybromide confinement in N+-AC and dynamic polybromide anchoring by 1,3-MI.

(a) Optical images of dry electrodes in different states. (b) Zeta potentials of AC treated with N+ solutions at different concentrations. MD simulations of (c) N+-AC and (d) AC in the Br3− and 3 m ZnBr2 mixed solution, and (e, f) corresponding density distribution map of Br3− anions. (g) Binding energies of 1,3-MI with Br−, Br3−, Br5− and Br2. (h) The differential charge density diagrams of 1,3-MI with Br3−, Br5− and Br2 (yellow and blue represent electron accumulation and electron depletion, respectively). (i) MD simulations of the 1,3-MI electrolyte during discharge. (j) A free Br3− anion and a 1,3-MI+ cation gradually approach each other spontaneously.

To validate the polybromide-trapping ability of N+-AC, theoretical calculations were initially carried out. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that polybromide anions preferentially accumulate at the N+-containing interface relative to the N+-free counterpart (Fig. 2c–f), and the strongly negative binding energies between N+ molecules and polybromides further confirm their robust interactions (Fig. S10). Accordingly, N+ functionalization strengthens the micropore confinement effect of AC and suppresses polybromide leaching from the cathode bulk to the cathode/electrolyte interphase during charge. This enhanced polybromide adsorption capability is further supported by a straightforward adsorption experiment (Fig. S11). Nevertheless, under high areal capacity conditions (>5 mAh cm−2), completely preventing polybromide escape from the cathode over prolonged cycling is hard to achieve. We therefore introduce 1,3-MI as an electrolyte additive to anchor polybromide anions at the interphase, suppress their diffusion into the bulk electrolyte and thereby achieve synergistic inhibition of polybromide shuttling. Simultaneously, the introduction of 1,3-MI also decreases the charge transfer resistance, further enhancing electrochemical kinetics (Fig. S12). A simple adsorption test confirms that 1,3-MI can coordinate with polybromides to form an oily, insoluble complex (Fig. S13). Furthermore, the calculated binding energies of 1,3-MI with Br−, Br3−, Br5− and Br2 are −2.2, −2.6, −3.0 and −0.61 eV, respectively (Fig. 2g). Charge density difference maps for 1,3-MI complexed with Br3−, Br5− and Br2 further visualize the intensive charge redistribution upon binding (Fig. 2h), corroborating the interaction between 1,3-MI and bromine species. Notably, the binding strength of the small-molecule 1,3-MI toward polybromides is weaker than that of the polymeric N+ molecule in the N+-AC cathode, which is advantageous for dynamic adsorption/desorption and polybromide reutilization during cycling. Moreover, MD simulations reveal the migration and enrichment of 1,3-MI toward the cathode during discharge (Fig. 2i). In addition, spontaneous approaching between a free 1,3-MI+ ion and a free Br3− ion in the electrolyte is observed within 0.6 ns (Fig. 2j), further supporting its favorable affinity for polybromides. Collectively, these results indicate that 1,3-MI can spontaneously anchor polybromides at the cathode interphase, thereby effectively mitigating their outward diffusion into the bulk electrolyte.

Electrochemical performance at room temperature

To verify the efficacy of the bulk-to-interphase synergistic regulation strategy in Zn-Br2 batteries, comprehensive electrochemical performance tests were conducted at room temperature. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were first performed on AC||Zn, N+-AC||Zn and N+-AC||Zn cells with 1,3-MI within a voltage window of 0.5–1.9 V at 1 mV s−1 (Fig. S14). The AC||Zn and N+-AC||Zn cells show similar oxidation behavior, indicating unaffected electron/ion transport upon N+ modification. During the reduction process, N+-AC||Zn cell delivers a larger peak area and lower polarization compared to AC||Zn cell, suggesting improved bromide/polybromide conversion reversibility. Notably, further incorporation of 1,3-MI leads to the highest peak current response and the lowest polarization, indicative of accelerated redox kinetics and suppressed polybromide shuttling. Consistent with the CV results, as shown in Fig. 3a, the N+-AC||Zn cell delivers discharge areal capacities of 9.3 mAh cm−2 at 5 mA cm−2 and 9.7 mAh cm−2 at 50 mA cm−2, both higher than those of the bare AC||Zn cell (9.0 and 9.4 mAh cm−2, respectively). Upon introducing 1,3-MI into the electrolyte, the discharge capacities of the N+-AC||Zn cell are further improved to 9.7 mAh cm−2 at 5 mA cm−2 and 9.9 mAh cm−2 at 50 mA cm−2. As demonstrated in Fig. 3b, the optimized N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI achieves a high average Coulombic efficiency (ACE) of 98.6% over 1000 cycles for a high areal capacity of 10 mAh cm−2 at 20 mA cm−2. In contrast, the N+-AC||Zn cell remains stable for 181 cycles with a slightly lower ACE of 96.0%, whereas the unmodified AC||Zn cell fails after only 30 cycles, accompanied by a pronounced drop in ACE to 94.3%. Even at an ultrahigh current density of 50 mA cm−2, the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI still maintains stable cycling for over 800 cycles (Fig. S15). As summarized in Fig. 3c and Table S2, this electrochemical performance surpasses most previously reported static Zn-Br2 battery systems in terms of combined areal capacity and cycling durability [1,3,4,11,25,32–39]. To further enhance the energy density, we also assembled an anode-free configuration (N+-AC||Ti) with 1,3-MI. This cell can also sustain long-term cycling for >2000 cycles with a considerable ACE of 96.7% at 10 mAh cm−2 (Fig. 3d and Fig. S16), indicating robust reversibility even under Zn-free conditions. In addition, self-discharge behavior was also assessed by resting the cells for 6 h after charging to 10 mAh cm−2. As presented in Fig. 3e, the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI achieves a markedly higher capacity retention of 83.9%, compared with 65.4% for N+-AC||Zn and 60.6% for AC||Zn cells, confirming effective suppression of the polybromide shuttle in the optimized system. To demonstrate practical viability, a large-format (10 cm × 10 cm) N+-AC||Zn pouch cell with 1,3-MI corresponding to a cell-level capacity of ∼1 Ah was fabricated. It exhibits stable cycling over 145 cycles with a high CE of 97.0%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported Ah-level Zn-Br2 pouch cell to achieve operation exceeding 140 cycles (Fig. 3f and Table S3) [1–4,11,25,34,38–40]. Impressively, the 1 Ah pouch cell exhibits no smoke or fire during nail penetration tests (Fig. S17). Moreover, a smaller pouch cell (3 cm × 3 cm) remains capable of lighting a 2.0 V LED after bending, cutting and needle penetration, highlighting outstanding mechanical tolerance and safety (Fig. 3g). Notably, three pouch cells connected in series provide a stacked voltage as high as 5.1 V and can power a toy car traveling over 478 m after charging to 45 mAh (Fig. 3h).

Figure 3.

Electrochemical measurements, comparative analyses, and pouch-cell demonstrations illustrating the enhanced room-temperature performance and practical applicability of aqueous zinc-bromine batteries.

Electrochemical performance of ZBBs at room temperature. (a) Rate capability of AC||Zn, N+-AC||Zn and N+-AC||Zn cells with 1,3-MI at a constant charge areal capacity of 10 mAh cm−2 and discharge to 0.5 V. (b) Cycling performance of AC||Zn, N+-AC||Zn and N+-AC||Zn cells with 1,3-MI (50 µm Zn foil) at 10 mAh cm−2 and 20 mA cm−2. (c) Comparison of the work with previously reported Zn-Br2 batteries. (d) Cycling performance of N+-AC||Ti anode-free cell with 1,3-MI at 10 mAh cm−2 and 20 mA cm−2. (e) Self-discharge time–voltage profiles of AC||Zn, N+-AC||Zn and N+-AC||Zn cells with 1,3-MI. (f) Cycling performance of N+-AC||Zn pouch cell with 1,3-MI (the inset is the configuration of the pouch cell). Images of pouch cells (g) powering 2.0 V LED lights and (h) driving trajectories of toy cars propelled by series-connected pouch cells.

Mechanistic investigation of polybromide shuttle suppression

The remarkable electrochemical improvement described above originates from effective suppression of polybromide shuttling throughout the full charge–discharge process. To elucidate this mechanism, in situ UV-vis and in situ Raman spectroscopy were performed (Fig. 4a and Fig. S18). For the bare AC||Zn cell, intensified polybromide absorption bands (∼244–349 nm) appear in the UV-vis spectra during the cycling (Fig. 4b). In contrast, these signals weaken in the N+-AC||Zn cell and are further minimized in the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI (Fig. 4c and d), indicating stepwise suppression of polybromide dissolution and diffusion along its transport pathway. This conclusion is further supported by in situ Raman measurements using a home-made electrochemical cell. Distinct characteristic peaks of Br5− at ∼257 cm−1 emerge during charging for the AC||Zn cell (Fig. 4e and f), decrease substantially for the N+-AC||Zn cell (Fig. 4g) and become nearly undetectable for the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI (Fig. 4h). Collectively, these spectroscopic results provide direct evidence that the proposed bulk-to-interphase synergistic regulation strategy effectively mitigates polybromide shuttling by simultaneously manipulating dissolution and diffusion processes.

Figure 4.

In situ UV-vis spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance measurements illustrating the polybromide shuttle inhibition mechanism and electric-field responsive behavior of 1,3-MI.

Inhibition mechanism of polybromide shuttling. (a) Optical images of quartz cells for in situ UV-vis spectroscopy measurements. (b–d) In situ UV-vis spectra of AC||Zn, N+-AC||Zn and N+-AC||Zn cells with 1,3-MI during charge–discharge process. In situ Raman spectra of (f) AC||Zn, (g) N+-AC||Zn and (h) N+-AC||Zn cells with 1,3-MI, and (e) corresponding charging curve. (i) Schematic diagram of EQCM device and (j) EQCM measurement of 2 wt% 1,3-MI aqueous solution (without ZnBr2), with the inset showing the CV curve scanned anodically to 0.5 V and cathodically to −0.15 V.

To further probe the electric-field-responsive adsorption/desorption behavior of 1,3-MI at the cathode/electrolyte interface, electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) measurements were performed (Fig. 4i). As shown in Fig. 4j, applying an anodic electric field (scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1; inset in Fig. 4j) induces a gradual frequency increase of 22 Hz, corresponding to an apparent mass loss of 102 ng. In contrast, cathodic scanning causes a 61 Hz frequency reduction and a 282 ng apparent mass gain, revealing distinct potential-governed interfacial mass evolution. To exclude solvent contributions, blank EQCM tests conducted in pure water reveal only minimal frequency shifts (−3.2 Hz) under cathodic polarization, verifying that solvent-side interfacial effects are negligible (Fig. S19). In comparison, the pronounced, potential-dependent response in 1,3-MI solution confirms that the observed frequency–mass variations originate from specific interfacial interactions of 1,3-MI. Accordingly, the anodic mass loss and cathodic mass gain are primarily ascribed to desorption and electric-field-driven adsorption/accumulation of 1,3-MI, respectively, accompanied by partial displacement of interfacial water molecules. Notably, the final frequency remains much lower than the initial value before polarization, directly confirming considerable net accumulation of 1,3-MI at the electrode/electrolyte interphase during discharge under practical full-cell conditions.

Electrolyte anti-freezing mechanism and electrochemical performance at −20°C

Electrochemical energy-storage systems must tolerate diverse climatic conditions, and low-temperature stability is therefore a key metric for practical deployment. Accordingly, the low-temperature applicability of this system was further evaluated, with an emphasis on the anti-freezing capability of the electrolyte. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, Fig. 5a) shows that both the 3 m ZnBr2 electrolyte and 3 m ZnBr2 + 2 wt% 1,3-MI electrolyte exhibit ultralow freezing points of −36.8°C and −35.9°C, respectively, indicating that the anti-freezing behavior is primarily governed by the ZnBr2 salt. To elucidate the mechanism, the O–H microenvironment of water was probed by Raman and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. As depicted in Fig. S20, adding 3 m ZnBr2 to water induces a clear blue shift of the broad O–H stretching band (∼3000–3800 cm−1). Deconvolution results reveal a decreased fraction of hydrogen-bonded water (strong + weak) and an increased fraction of non-hydrogen-bonded water, evidencing disruption of the native H-bond network and thus suppressing freezing. Consistently, the 1H NMR signal of water also shifts upfield upon ZnBr2 addition (Fig. S21), indicative of enhanced proton shielding and increased electron density around hydrogen nuclei, further supporting weakened hydrogen bonding. To rationalize these observations, theoretical calculations were performed. As shown in Fig. 5b, the binding energies of H2O···Br− and H2O···Zn2+ are significantly higher than that of H2O···H2O, favoring ion–water interactions and destabilizing intermolecular water–water hydrogen bonds. MD simulations further confirm a reduced total number of hydrogen bonds in the presence of 3 m ZnBr2 (Fig. 5c), consistent with disruption of the water H-bond network. In the 3 m ZnBr2 electrolyte, populations associated with H2O–H2O, H2O–Br− and H2O–Zn2+ are 51.5%, 11.0% and 37.4%, respectively (Fig. S22), indicating that both Zn2+ and Br− participate in restructuring the hydrogen-bond network away from water–water associations.

Figure 5.

Thermal analyses, theoretical calculations, electrochemical measurements, and pouch-cell demonstrations illustrating the enhanced low-temperature performance of aqueous zinc-bromine batteries at -20°C.

Characterization and electrochemical performance measurements at −20°C. (a) DSC tests of 3 m ZnBr2 and 1,3-MI. (b) Binding energy calculations. (c) H-bond counts between H2O–H2O in pure water and 3 m ZnBr2 electrolytes. (d) Images of ZBBs for low-temperature energy storage applications. Self-discharge time–voltage profiles of (e) AC||Zn cell and (f) N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI. (g) Charge–discharge curves of N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI at various areal capacities. (h) Cycling performance of AC||Zn and N+-AC||Zn cells with 1,3-MI at 10 mAh cm−2 and 5 mA cm−2. (i) Comparison with previous studies on aqueous Zn-based battery systems at −20°C. (j) Cycling test of N+-AC||Zn pouch cell with 1,3-MI at 5 mA cm−2.

Encouraged by the strong anti-freezing capability and the absence of pronounced ionic conductivity loss at −20°C (Table S4), electrochemical tests were also conducted under subzero conditions (Fig. 5d). Low-temperature self-discharge tests demonstrate that the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI exhibits superior performance compared to the control AC||Zn cell. After a 24 h rest at −20°C, the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI retains a high CE of 91.8% (Fig. 5e), markedly outperforming the AC||Zn battery (71.2%, Fig. 5f), and even exceeding its room-temperature CE. Subsequent rate performance tests further reveal that the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI maintains a high CE of 98.4% at 2 mA cm−2, outperforming that of the control AC||Zn cell (93.9%). Upon increasing the current density from 2 to 20 mA cm−2, the CE remains highly stable with fluctuations of only 0.6%, reflecting excellent rate stability at low temperature (Fig. S23). Long-term cycling tests indicate that the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI maintains stable operation for over 3988 h with a high areal capacity of 10 mAh cm−2 (Fig. 5h), accompanied by nearly overlapping voltage-capacity profiles across cycles (Fig. S24), evidencing a highly stable reaction interface even at subzero temperatures. In contrast, the AC||Zn cell suffers from rapid capacity fading and fails after 500 cycles. As compiled in Fig. 5i and Table S5, the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI outperforms most state-of-the-art aqueous Zn-based battery systems at −20°C with respect to areal capacity [41–55]. Moreover, even at a low current density of 1 mA cm−2 and an areal capacity of 10 mAh cm−2, the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI maintains robust operation for over 780 h (Fig. S25). Notably, it delivers an ultrahigh areal discharge capacity of up to 28 mAh cm−2 at −20°C and sustains durable cycling for >70 cycles (Fig. 5g and Fig. S26). Encouragingly, 1 Ah-scale pouch cells incorporating this strategy also demonstrate stable cycling at −20°C, representing one of the highest reported cell-level capacities for aqueous Zn-Br2 batteries under low-temperature conditions (Fig. 5j).

Enhanced suppression of polybromide shuttling at −20°C

Interestingly, the N+-AC||Zn (with 1,3-MI) cell exhibits improved cycling stability and higher CE under subzero temperatures than at room temperature, motivating a closer examination of the temperature dependence of polybromide shuttling. First, in situ electrochemical optical microscopy measurements were employed. As shown in Fig. 6a, with a Pt wire cathode, Zn anode and 3 m ZnBr2 electrolyte at room temperature, the region surrounding the Pt wire gradually turned yellow during charging. Notably, the yellow zone at room temperature was lighter in color yet spread over a broader area than that observed at −20°C (Fig. 6b), providing direct visual evidence that low temperature markedly suppresses polybromide diffusion. This trend is consistent with Br3− diffusion experiments conducted in an H-type electrolytic cell and the temperature-dependent viscosity change of the electrolyte (Fig. S27 and Table S6). In contrast, in the presence of 1,3-MI at −20°C, a distinct oily complex forms and adheres to the Pt-wire surface during charging, effectively blocking polybromide transport from the interphase into the bulk electrolyte (Fig. 6c). The corresponding enhanced discharge time in time–voltage profiles further corroborates this observation (Fig. 6d). To clarify the difference in the complexation ability of 1,3-MI toward polybromides between room and low temperatures, UV-vis spectroscopy was used to compare the solubility characteristics of 1,3-MIBr3 at room temperature and at −20°C. After introducing 0.45 wt% 1,3-MIBr3 into 3 m ZnBr2 electrolyte, Br3− absorption intensity in the supernatant is higher at room temperature than at −20°C (Fig. 6e), directly indicating reduced solubility of 1,3-MIBr3 and thus enhanced effective complexation/precipitation at low temperature. MD simulations further support the above interpretation. Compared with room temperature (Fig. 6f and Fig. S28a), Br3− exhibits more pronounced aggregation at −20°C (Fig. 6g and Fig. S28b), along with markedly suppressed diffusion kinetics (Fig. 6h and Fig. S28c).

Figure 6.

In situ optical microscopy, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations revealing enhanced polybromide shuttle inhibition at -20°C.

Mechanistic characterization of enhanced polybromide shuttle inhibition at −20°C. In situ optical microscopy observation of polybromide evolution around Pt electrode in 3 m ZnBr2 electrolyte during charge–discharge at (a) room temperature and (b) −20°C, and in (c) 1,3-MI electrolyte at −20°C, along with (d) corresponding time–voltage curves. (e) UV-vis spectra of 1,3-MIBr3 solution at different temperatures (the inset is its optical picture). MD simulations of 1,3-MI electrolyte containing Br3− anions at (f) room temperature and (g) −20°C. (h) Mean square displacement of Br3− anions at different temperatures. (i) Discharge curves of Br3− at −20°C. (j) Device diagram of low-temperature in situ Raman measurement. In situ Raman spectra of bromine species near the Pt wire electrode in 1,3-MI electrolyte at (l) −20°C and (m) room temperature during charging, along with (k) the corresponding charging curve at −20°C. MSD, mean square displacement.

To investigate the interphase reutilization enhancement effect of Br3− by 1,3-MI additive at low temperature, a Br3− discharge experiment was designed by using non-porous conductive carbon cloth (CC) as the current collector and 10 mM Br3− + 3 m ZnBr2 as the blank active material/electrolyte (Fig. 6i). It can be seen that the CC electrode with the 1,3-MI additive achieves a substantially longer discharge time (9.2 min) than that in the blank electrolyte (1.6 min). The results indicate that the dynamic migration and accumulation of 1,3-MI at cathode interphase will generate an ionic electric field (E1,3-MI), facilitating the recovery and conversion of interfacial polybromide species (Fig. S29). More detailed conversion behaviors of polybromide species promoted by the 1,3-MI additive at −20°C are assessed by in situ Raman spectroscopy measurements of Pt wire electrode using a home-made low-temperature electrochemical cell (Fig. 6j). The results indicate that the polybromide species generated are dominated by Br3− (167 cm−1) at −20°C (Fig. 6k and l), whereas higher-order Br5− (257 cm−1) are predominant at room temperature (Fig. 6m), demonstrating that low-temperature conditions can enhance the anchoring ability of 1,3-MI toward polybromides, which not only reduces the solubility of polybromide but also effectively inhibits the formation of higher-order polybromides (e.g. Br5−), and facilitates a unique polybromide transformation mechanism, ultimately ensuring the excellent electrochemical performance of the battery at low temperatures.

CONCLUSION

In summary, a bulk-to-interphase synergistic regulation strategy is rationally designed to precisely suppress polybromide shuttling during both charge and discharge. In the cathode bulk, an N+-AC host rich in cationic sites strengthens micropore electrostatic confinement of polybromide anions, thereby inhibiting their leaching from the cathode interior to the cathode/electrolyte interface during charging. At the interphase, the 1,3-MI additive not only anchors polybromides at the interface to impede diffusion into the bulk electrolyte, but also accumulates at the interface during discharge to form an ionic electric field (E1,3-MI) opposite to the electrode electric field (Eelectrode). This electric-field-responsive 1,3-MI accumulation layer promotes the recovery and reduction of polybromide anions in the interphase, mitigating anode-directed electromigration. Theoretical calculations and in situ characterizations collectively substantiate the effectiveness of this field-aware, spatially resolved design. Notably, at −20°C, the strengthened complexation of 1,3-MI with polybromides together with the intrinsically slowed polybromide diffusion kinetics further enhances shuttle suppression. Consequently, the anode-free N+-AC||Ti cell with 1,3-MI sustains stable cycling for over 2000 cycles at 10 mAh cm−2. In addition, the N+-AC||Zn cell with 1,3-MI can deliver an ultrahigh discharge areal capacity of 28 mAh cm−2 at −20°C and exhibits negligible capacity decay over 1000 cycles at 10 mAh cm−2. Impressively, an Ah-level N+-AC||Zn pouch cell with 1,3-MI operates stably at both room temperature and −20°C, underscoring the practical feasibility of this strategy under complex climatic conditions. More broadly, this bulk-to-interphase, electric-field-aware regulation concept may be extendable to other static halide-based chemistries limited by active-species shuttling, offering a general pathway toward high-performance, low-cost energy-storage systems for grid-scale deployment.

Supplementary Material

nwag393_Supplemental_File

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the Hefei Advanced Computing Center for numerical calculations.

Contributor Information

Qilong Wu, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Power Source Technology for New Energy Vehicle, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.

Peiyao Wang, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Power Source Technology for New Energy Vehicle, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.

Hong Lin, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Power Source Technology for New Energy Vehicle, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.

Fanxiang Meng, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Power Source Technology for New Energy Vehicle, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.

Chenxi Sun, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Power Source Technology for New Energy Vehicle, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.

Jinbao Zhao, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Power Source Technology for New Energy Vehicle, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.

Yang Yang, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Power Source Technology for New Energy Vehicle, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22579141 and 22379125) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20720250114).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Q.L.W., J.B.Z. and Y.Y. conceived the concept and supervised the project. Q.L.W. performed experiments. P.Y.W. conducted the calculations. H.L. conducted EQCM and the data analysis. F.X.M. and C.X.S. did some measurements and data analysis. Q.L.W. wrote the manuscript, and Y.Y. revised the paper. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wu  Y, Xu  C, Lei  C  et al.  Optimizing bromine complexation and kinetics: a bisimidazole strategy for high-performance Zn-Br static batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed  2025; 64: e202509293. 10.1002/anie.202509293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zheng  X, Wu  S, Luo  R  et al.  An inter-locking quasi-solid cathode for zinc-bromine batteries with stable 32000 cycles. Adv Mater  2026; 38: e17292. 10.1002/adma.202517292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Xu  C, Lei  C, Jiang  P  et al.  Practical high-energy aqueous zinc-bromine static batteries enabled by synergistic exclusion-complexation chemistry. Joule  2024; 8: 461–81. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.12.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Li  W, Xu  H, Ke  S  et al.  Integrating electric ambipolar effect for high-performance zinc bromide batteries. Nano-Micro Lett  2025; 17: 143. 10.1007/s40820-024-01636-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Alghamdi  NS, Peng  X, Yang  X  et al.  High-performance zinc–bromine rechargeable batteries enabled by in-situ formed solid electrolyte interphase. Adv Sci  2025; 12: e08646. 10.1002/advs.202508646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang  L, Ding  H, Gao  H  et al.  An integrated design for high-energy, durable zinc–iodine batteries with ultra-high recycling efficiency. Energy Environ Sci  2025; 18: 2462–73. 10.1039/D4EE05873A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jiang  T, Shen  D, Zhang  Z  et al.  Battery technologies for grid-scale energy storage. Nat Rev Clean Technol  2025; 1: 474–92. 10.1038/s44359-025-00067-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhu  Z, Jiang  T, Ali  M  et al.  Rechargeable batteries for grid scale energy storage. Chem Rev  2022; 122: 16610–751. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Guo  J, Ma  G, Liu  G  et al.  Ti2CTx MXene cathode host for enhanced zinc-bromine battery performance. Adv Energy Mater  2024; 14: 2304516. 10.1002/aenm.202304516 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chen  S, Peng  C, Zhu  D  et al.  Bifunctionally electrocatalytic bromine redox reaction by single-atom catalysts for high-performance zinc batteries. Adv Mater  2024; 36: 2409810. 10.1002/adma.202409810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Wang  S, Wang  Y, Wei  Z  et al.  Halide exchange in perovskites enables bromine/iodine hybrid cathodes for highly durable zinc ion batteries. Adv Mater  2024; 36: 2401924. 10.1002/adma.202401924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Li  Y, Zhu  Z, Wei  L  et al.  Recent advances of aqueous zinc-bromine batteries: electrochemistry, challenges and perspectives. Energy Storage Mater  2025; 80: 104422. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104422 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yang  H, Lin  S, Qu  Y  et al.  An ultra-low self-discharge aqueous|organic membraneless battery with minimized Br2 cross-over. Adv Sci  2024; 11: 2307780. 10.1002/advs.202307780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wei  H, Qu  G, Zhang  X  et al.  Boosting aqueous non-flow zinc–bromine batteries with a two-dimensional metal–organic framework host: an adsorption-catalysis approach. Energy Environ Sci  2023; 16: 4073–83. 10.1039/D3EE01639K [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lin  X, Li  J, Jin  J  et al.  A sulfonated cellulose separator for high-areal-capacity and long-lifespan Zn–Br2 batteries. J Mater Chem A  2026; 14: 3308–17. 10.1039/D5TA08863A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wang  M, Ma  J, Meng  Y  et al.  In situ formation of solid electrolyte interphase facilitates anode-free aqueous zinc battery. eScience  2025; 5: 100397. 10.1016/j.esci.2025.100397 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Yang  J, Dai  Q, Hou  S  et al.  Anti-self-discharge capability of Zn-halogen batteries through an entrapment-adsorption-catalysis strategy built upon separator. Adv Mater  2025; 37: 2418258. 10.1002/adma.202418258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Guo  J, Hu  L, Wang  R  et al.  Enabling low-temperature zinc–bromine microbatteries with an additive-free electrolyte design. ACS Nano  2025; 19: 9340–50. 10.1021/acsnano.5c00988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jin  J, Liu  C, Lei  C  et al.  Efficient aqueous static zinc-bromine batteries enabled by hydrophobic organic bromide design. Small Methods  2025; 9: e01045. 10.1002/smtd.202501045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhao  J, Qi  Y, Chen  Y  et al.  High-performance zinc halogen aqueous battery exploiting [BrCl2]− storage in ketjenblack by reconstructing electrolyte structure. Angew Chem Int Ed  2025; 64: e202421905. 10.1002/anie.202421905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wang  C, Lai  Q, Xu  P  et al.  Cage-like porous carbon with superhigh activity and Br2-complex-entrapping capability for bromine-based flow batteries. Adv Mater  2017; 29: 1605815. 10.1002/adma.201605815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Li  X, Wang  S, Wang  T  et al.  Bis-ammonium salts with strong chemisorption to halide ions for fast and durable aqueous redox Zn ion batteries. Nano Energy  2022; 98: 107278. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107278 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhang  L, Gong  J, Guo  H  et al.  Dual-zone chloride to enable ultra-stable two-electron zinc-iodine batteries. Adv Mater  2026; 38: e14117. 10.1002/adma.202514117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zhang  L, Luo  K, Gong  J  et al.  Unlocking durable and sustainable zinc–iodine batteries via molecularly engineered polyiodide reservoirs. Angew Chem Int Ed  2025; 64: e202506822. 10.1002/anie.202506822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wu  W, Xu  S, Lin  Z  et al.  A polybromide confiner with selective bromide conduction for high performance aqueous zinc-bromine batteries. Energy Storage Mater  2022; 49: 11–8. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.052 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhao  X, Hao  J, Chen  Q  et al.  Aqueous zinc-bromine battery with highly reversible bromine conversion chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed  2025; 64: e202502386. 10.1002/anie.202502386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Zheng  X, Luo  R, Liu  Z  et al.  A practical zinc-bromine pouch cell enabled by electrolyte dynamic stabilizer. Mater Today  2024; 80: 353–64. 10.1016/j.mattod.2024.09.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Miao  X, Chen  J, Zheng  X  et al.  Bifunctional cationic polyelectrolyte additive enables dendrite-free and shuttle-suppressed zinc-bromine batteries. Energy Storage Mater  2025; 82: 104620. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104620 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lim  Y, Lee  G, Kim  JH  et al.  Tetrabutylammonium bromide incorporated hydrated deep eutectic solvents: simultaneously addressing anode stability and cathode efficiency in zinc-bromine batteries. Energy Storage Mater  2024; 68: 103331. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.103331 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Deng  H, Wang  X, Wei  Z  et al.  Improved static membrane-free zinc‑bromine batteries by an efficient bromine complexing agent. J Energy Storage  2024; 81: 110449. 10.1016/j.est.2024.110449 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wu  H, Zhang  SJ, Vongsvivut  J  et al.  Aqueous zinc-iodine batteries with ultra-high loading and advanced performance. Joule  2025; 9: 102000. 10.1016/j.joule.2025.102000 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zhang  Y, Wei  C, Wu  MX  et al.  A high-performance COF-based aqueous zinc-bromine battery. Chem Eng J  2023; 451: 138915. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138915 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Liu  C, Dong  W, Zhou  H  et al.  Achievement of efficient and stable nonflow zinc–bromine batteries assisted by rational decoration upon the two electrodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces  2024; 16: 23278–87. 10.1021/acsami.4c01815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zheng  X, Liu  Z, Sun  J  et al.  Constructing robust heterostructured interface for anode-free zinc batteries with ultrahigh capacities. Nat Commun  2023; 14: 76. 10.1038/s41467-022-35630-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Shi  M, Lei  C, Wang  H  et al.  Molecule engineering of sugar derivatives as electrolyte additives for deep-reversible Zn metal anode. Angew Chem Int Ed  2024; 63: e202407261. 10.1002/anie.202407261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Sun  J, Zheng  X, Zhu  Z  et al.  Engineering artificial protrusions of Zn anodes for aqueous zinc batteries. Nano Lett  2025; 25: 7266–75. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Xu  C, Wang  H, Lei  C  et al.  Fast single metal cation conduction in ion-water aggregated aqueous battery electrolytes. Nat Commun  2025; 16: 4574. 10.1038/s41467-025-59958-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Heo  J, Shin  K, Kim  H. A zinc–bromine battery with deep eutectic electrolytes. Adv Sci  2022; 9: 2204908. 10.1002/advs.202204908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Han  B, Zheng  X, Liu  S  et al.  Anode-free zinc–bromine batteries enabled by a simple prenucleation strategy. Small  2025; 21: 2408982. 10.1002/smll.202408982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Luo  R, Zheng  X, Jiang  T  et al.  Reshaping electrical double layer via synergistic dual additives for ah-level zinc battery. Adv Energy Mater  2025; 15: 2501658. 10.1002/aenm.202501658 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Xing  Z, Ye  P, Shi  X  et al.  Design of cryogenic electrolyte with organic-free solvation structure for wide-temperature zinc metal batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed  2025; 64: e202516974. 10.1002/anie.202516974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zhang  Y, Zhang  Z, Dou  H  et al.  Engineering nanoscale interfacial solvation inner-outer configuration via multi-group synergy for practical zinc batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed  2025; 64: e202518035. 10.1002/anie.202518035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Liu  Z, Sun  J, Li  X  et al.  Constructing eutectic solvation sheath by weak solvation effect for stabilizing Zn-ion batteries with low-temperature adaptability. Energy Storage Mater  2025; 83: 104727. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104727 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wang  S, Chen  Y, Donkor  S  et al.  Zwitterionic electrolyte additives empowered robust Zn–I2 batteries enduring a low temperature of −40°C. Adv Sci  2026; 13: e18135. 10.1002/advs.202518135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Chang  N, Li  T, Li  R  et al.  An aqueous hybrid electrolyte for low-temperature zinc-based energy storage devices. Energy Environ Sci  2020; 13: 3527–35. 10.1039/D0EE01538E [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Chen  Y, Zhao  J, Wang  Y. Quasi-solid-state zinc ion rechargeable batteries for subzero temperature applications. ACS Appl Energy Mater  2020; 3: 9058–65. 10.1021/acsaem.0c01452 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mo  F, Liang  G, Meng  Q  et al.  A flexible rechargeable aqueous zinc manganese-dioxide battery working at −20°C. Energy Environ Sci  2019; 12: 706–15. 10.1039/C8EE02892C [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Chen  M, Zhou  W, Wang  A  et al.  Anti-freezing flexible aqueous Zn–MnO2 batteries working at −35°C enabled by a borax-crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol/glycerol gel electrolyte. J Mater Chem A  2020; 8: 6828–41. 10.1039/D0TA01553A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Geng  H, Cheng  M, Wang  B  et al.  Electronic structure regulation of layered vanadium oxide via interlayer doping strategy toward superior high-rate and low-temperature zinc-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater  2020; 30: 1907684. 10.1002/adfm.201907684 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zhu  M, Wang  X, Tang  H  et al.  Antifreezing hydrogel with high zinc reversibility for flexible and durable aqueous batteries by cooperative hydrated cations. Adv Funct Mater  2020; 30: 1907218. 10.1002/adfm.201907218 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Huang  S, He  S, Li  Y  et al.  Hydrogen bond acceptor lined hydrogel electrolyte toward dendrite-free aqueous Zn ion batteries with low temperature adaptability. Chem Eng J  2023; 464: 142607. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.142607 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wang  C, Wang  D, Lv  D  et al.  Interface engineering by hydrophilic and zincophilic aluminum hydroxide fluoride for anode-free zinc metal batteries at low temperature. Adv Energy Mater  2023; 13: 2204388. 10.1002/aenm.202204388 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Geng  L, Meng  J, Wang  X  et al.  Organic-solvent-free primary solvation shell for low-temperature aqueous zinc batteries. Chem  2025; 11: 102302. 10.1016/j.chempr.2024.09.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Wei  X, Guan  J, Mu  Y  et al.  Decoding hydrogen-bond network of electrolyte for cryogenic durable aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett  2026; 18: 127. 10.1007/s40820-025-01970-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Xu  M, Zhang  B, Sang  Y  et al.  Bicontinuous-phase electrolyte for a highly reversible Zn metal anode working at ultralow temperature. Energy Environ Sci  2024; 17: 8966–77. 10.1039/D4EE02815E [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nwag393_Supplemental_File

Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES