Abstract
Three-dimensional imaging of live Caenorhabditis elegans commonly relies on sequential z-stack acquisition, which can be slow and susceptible to movement and photobleaching. Here, we used light-field microscopy to capture dye and delivery-dependent fluorescence patterns across intact adult worms in a single exposure per channel. With a 40×/1.20 NA water-immersion objective, each reconstructed dataset contained 121 axial slices spanning 109 μm at 0.91 μm spacing. In a representative adult, nematode signal extended from 40.88 to 85.4 μm, corresponding to approximately 44.5 μm of captured axial depth without sequential z scanning. Three fluorescence channels were acquired with a summed exposure time of 112 ms across a 685 × 1010 μm field of view. FM1–43 labelled intestinal, cuticular and vesicular structures, FM4–64 highlighted ingested bacteria and intestinal compartments, and Nile Red revealed vesicular and broader whole-organism fluorescence. Intrinsic blue and green autofluorescence signals were also resolved. These observations demonstrate rapid single-shot acquisition of whole-organism three-dimensional fluorescence information and show how delivery route influences the spatial distribution of commonly used fluorescent probes in C. elegans.
Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans, Light-field microscopy, Volumetric imaging, Fluorescence imaging, Whole-organism imaging, Autofluorescence
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Volumetric imaging of live Caenorhabditis elegans is typically conducted through sequential optical sectioning followed by reconstruction of a z-stack. Although effective, this workflow is relatively slow and is vulnerable to motion artefacts, photobleaching and practical limits on throughput. A method capable of capturing biologically meaningful three-dimensional information from a single exposure would therefore be useful for rapid assessment of live nematodes, particularly when multiple fluorescent signals or delivery conditions are being compared.
Results and Discussion
Light-field microscopy addresses these constraints by reconstructing volumetric information from a single camera exposure, thereby reducing acquisition time, motion distortion and overall light dose [1–3]. In the ZEISS Lightfield 4D implementation used here, the optical module simultaneously records multiple views containing spatial, angular and optically shifted focal information. Axial information is therefore encoded during acquisition and reconstructed afterwards, without mechanically stepping the objective through sequential z positions. To assess this capability in a simple live-imaging workflow, three commonly used dyes, FM1–43 [4], FM4–64 [10] and Nile Red [5], were delivered to adult wild-type nematodes by two methods. For the first method dye was soaked into an E. coli OP50 lawn and nematodes were allowed to feed on the labelled bacteria [6]. In the second method, nematodes were fully suspended in dye solution in M9 buffer. An identical treatment structure was used for all dyes within each delivery route, enabling direct comparison of staining behaviour across conditions. Due to the high sensitivity of the camera, endogenous blue fluorescence was also readily detected, consistent with previously described death-associated autofluorescence in C. elegans [7].
Complete volumetric datasets were reconstructed from single light-field exposures of 12–50 ms per channel (112 ms across all three channels), followed by offline reconstruction (~59 s per dataset). With the 40×/1.20 NA water-immersion objective, each rendered volume contained 121 axial slices spanning 109 μm at 0.91 μm spacing. In a representative adult nematode, fluorescence signal extended from 40.88 to 85.4 μm of the rendered volume, corresponding to approximately 44.5 μm of axial worm depth encoded within each single-channel exposure. The z information is reconstructed from the simultaneously acquired light-field views rather than collected by mechanically stepping the focal plane through the specimen. By comparison, an equivalent tiled confocal z-stack covering the same field would take of the order of 18 min per worm (see Methods), approximately four orders of magnitude longer than the summed exposure time of 112 ms across three channels.
Collectively, these observations show that light-field microscopy captures biologically interpretable, dye-dependent volumetric patterns in live C. elegans using simple sample preparation. The differences between FM1–43, FM4–64 and Nile Red, as well as the differences between feeding and direct exposure, were retained in the reconstructed volumes. This indicates that the methods are well suited to rapid exploratory imaging where staining route, signal localisation and whole-worm context are all important. In addition to dye-derived fluorescence, endogenous autofluorescence was monitored. Blue autofluorescence was used to visualise signal associated with non-viable or compromised animals [7,8], while green autofluorescence was recorded as a distinct endogenous signal. These endogenous signals were resolved alongside dye fluorescence in the reconstructed volumetric datasets, extending the information obtained from a single acquisition. Representative reconstructed volumes and dye-specific patterns are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Principle of light-field volumetric imaging and dye- and delivery-dependent staining patterns in C. elegans. (A) Schematic of light-field image formation, adapted from Carl Zeiss Microscopy [13]. (i, ii) A specimen is imaged through a microlens array positioned between the objective and camera. (iii–v) The camera records 37 simultaneous views containing spatial and angular information, which (vi) are reconstructed by deconvolution into a three-dimensional z-stack. With the 40×/1.20 NA objective used here, the rendered stack contained 121 axial slices spanning 109 μm at 0.91 μm spacing. (B) Excitation and emission spectra of FM1–43, FM4–64 and Nile Red, plotted using FPbase [14]. (C) Representative reconstructed volumes following feeding on dye-treated E. coli OP50 or direct exposure in M9 buffer, showing dye- and delivery-dependent staining patterns. Grid spacing 100 μm (FM4–64, M9 alone, 50 μm).
FM1–43 - Distinct dye and delivery-dependent volumetric patterns were observed. FM1–43 produced combined intestinal, cuticular and vesicular labelling, with signal detected in both the green and red fluorescent channels [4]. Following feeding, the dominant signal was intestinal, consistent with uptake through ingestion of dye-labelled OP50 [9], although occasional cuticle-associated signal was also present. Following direct exposure to the FM1–43 dye, labelling was broader and included prominent vesicular structures in addition to intestinal and subtle cuticular regions. Under these conditions, FM1–43 therefore reported both internal uptake and external membrane-associated features.
FM4–64 -
FM4–64 produced a related but more distinct pattern [10]. Following feeding on dyed bacteria, labelled bacterial mass was more clearly evident within the worm and intestinal signal was more readily resolved, with less cuticle staining than observed for FM1–43. By contrast, direct exposure to the FM4–64 dye produced less specific labelling dominated by vesicular and tissue-associated structures, with some lower intestinal material also visible. Under these conditions, FM4–64 therefore provided clearer visual separation between bacterial ingestion-associated signal and the broader fluorescence observed after liquid exposure.
Nile Red -
Nile Red showed a further distinct profile. Signal was distributed more broadly across nematode anatomy than with the FM dyes, including surface-associated [11] and internal regions, but remained enriched in vesicular structures [5,12]. Bacteria-fed nematodes showed relatively stronger intestinal signal, whereas direct exposure to Nile Red dye produced broader whole-worm fluorescence with less obvious intestinal enrichment. Embryos displayed reduced Nile Red signal relative to the rest of the worm. Under these conditions, Nile Red highlighted vesicular staining while retaining whole-animal context.
Conclusions
This exploratory study was designed to compare representative volumetric staining patterns rather than quantify uptake kinetics or absolute fluorescence intensity, and no inferential statistical analysis was performed. Importantly, the acquisition is volumetric in all three spatial dimensions: with the 40× objective, 109 μm of axial range was encoded in each single-channel exposure and rendered as 121 slices at 0.91 μm spacing. The ability to capture distinct delivery-dependent whole-worm fluorescence patterns together with substantial axial depth in milliseconds highlights light-field microscopy as a rapid platform for whole-organism fluorescence mapping. Future studies can build on this workflow through targeted reporters, quantitative segmentation and time-resolved acquisition.
Methods
Dye delivery by feeding
For bacterial delivery, 100 μL of a 1 mM dye solution (FM1–43, FM4–64 or Nile Red; Invitrogen) was soaked onto an E. coli OP50 lawn and incubated overnight. Approximately 20–30 adult C. elegans were placed on the dyed lawn for 24 h. Nematodes were washed three times with M9 buffer and stored on ice until imaging.
Direct dye exposure
For direct exposure, nematodes were fully suspended in the corresponding dye solution for 24 h. Nematodes were washed three times with M9 buffer and stored on ice until imaging.
Slide preparation
Nematodes were mounted on agar pads, excess liquid removed and 5 μL of 10 mM levamisole added for immobilisation. Samples were covered with a ZEISS No. 1.5 thickness coverslip.
Light-field imaging
Live nematodes were imaged on a ZEISS Axio Observer.Z1/7 inverted microscope fitted with a ZEISS Lightfield 4D module, using a PCO camera coupled through a ZEISS Lightfield 4D adapter. Volumetric information was captured in a single exposure per channel and reconstructed using the ZEISS Lightfield 4D processing function in ZEN (~59 s per dataset). Imaging used a C-Apochromat 40×/1.20 W Korr FCS water-immersion objective (effective NA 1.20, 1× tube lens) with a 90 HE DAPI/GFP/Cy3/Cy5 quad-band reflector (beam splitter 405/493/575/653). Three channels were acquired per experiment, where either red fluorescence emission was used for FM1–43 and Nile Red or far-red emission range was used for the FM4–64-stained samples. Fluorescence settings: (i) blue — LED 385 nm at 15%, excitation 375–395 nm, emission 410–440 nm, 50 ms; (ii) green (FM1–43) — LED 475 nm at 5%, excitation 455–483 nm, emission 499–529 nm and 579–604 nm (due to wide emission of FM1–43), 12 ms; (iii) red (Nile Red) — LED 564 nm at 20%, excitation 545–564 nm, emission 579–604 nm, 50 ms; and (iv) far-red (FM4–64) — LED 475 nm at 10%, excitation 455–483 nm, emission 659–759 nm, 50 ms. Images were recorded at 16-bit depth, 1×1 binning and 0.704 μm/pixel over a 685 μm × 1010 μm field of view (973 × 1433 pixels). With this optical configuration, each rendered dataset comprised 121 axial slices spanning 109 μm, corresponding to a reconstructed axial spacing of 0.91 μm. In a representative adult, nematode signal occupied the volume from 40.88 to 85.4 μm, an axial extent of approximately 44.5 μm. These values describe the reconstructed axial dataset generated from simultaneously acquired light-field information rather than a mechanically stepped z-stack. Reconstructed volumes are shown without further segmentation; individual worms were cropped for display only.
Simulated confocal
Equivalent confocal acquisition times were estimated using a ZEISS Cell Discoverer 7 (Plan-Apochromat 20×/0.7) operating over a comparable cropped field of view. A single volumetric z-stack covering ~400 × 400 μm of comparable tissue required ~3 min. Tiling to cover the ~700 × 1000 μm field occupied by a single nematode required a 2 × 3 raster of six such stacks, giving an estimated ~18 min per worm. This is approximately four orders of magnitude (~10,000-fold) slower than the summed exposure time of 112 ms across three channels used here. Estimates are provided for comparison only, matched to the field of view, channel number and axial range of the light-field acquisition, but not acquired as confocal data.
Statistical analysis
No statistical analyses were performed.
Reagents
Strains
| Strain | Genotype | Available from |
|---|---|---|
| N2 | Caenorhabditis elegans wild type | CGC |
Dyes
| Reagent | Supplier | Use |
|---|---|---|
| FM1-43 | Invitrogen | Membrane / vesicle labelling |
| FM4-64 | Invitrogen | Membrane / bacterial ingestion |
| Nile Red | Invitrogen | Lipid vesicular staining |
Highlights.
Light-field microscopy captures whole-worm 3D fluorescence in a single exposure
A 109 μm axial range is rendered as 121 slices at 0.91 μm spacing
FM1–43, FM4–64 and Nile Red show distinct volumetric staining patterns
Delivery route alters fluorescence distribution across intact C. elegans
Three-channel volumetric imaging uses a summed exposure time of 112 ms
Acknowledgements
We thank the University of Nottingham School of Life Sciences Imaging (SLIM) facility for imaging support and for hosting ZEISS’s demonstration of the ZEISS Lightfield 4D microscope. Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).
Funding
This work was supported by the UKRI Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Nottingham DTP (BB/T008369/1, NAB, VT, VMC). This was also supported by a Nottingham Research Fellowship (VMC).
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the UKRI Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Nottingham DTP (BB/T008369/1, NAB, VT, VMC). This was also supported by a Nottingham Research Fellowship (VMC).
Footnotes
Declaration of generative AI in manuscript
During the preparation of this work, the authors used large language models to support the organisation, language and readability of the manuscript. The authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.
Competing interests
E.R., C.H. and D.R.A.W. are employees of ZEISS (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). The Lightfield 4D system used in this study is a ZEISS product. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability
Representative reconstructed volumes are shown in Figure 1. Source and reconstructed data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
- [1].Levoy M., Ng R., Adams A., Footer M., Horowitz M., Light field microscopy, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 25 (2006) 924–934. 10.1145/1141911.1141976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Broxton M., Grosenick L., Yang S., Cohen N., Andalman A., Deisseroth K., Levoy M., Wave optics theory and 3-D deconvolution for the light field microscope, Optics Express, 21 (2013) 25418–25439. 10.1364/OE.21.025418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Prevedel R., Yoon Y.G., Hoffmann M., Pak N., Wetzstein G., Kato S., et al. , Simultaneous whole-animal 3D imaging of neuronal activity using light-field microscopy, Nature Methods, 11 (2014) 727–730. 10.1038/nmeth.2964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Betz W.J., Mao F., Bewick G.S., Activity-dependent fluorescent staining and destaining of living vertebrate motor nerve terminals, Journal of Neuroscience, 12 (1992) 363–375. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-02-00363.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].O’Rourke E.J., Soukas A.A., Carr C.E., Ruvkun G., elegans C. major fats are stored in vesicles distinct from lysosome-related organelles, Cell Metabolism, 10 (2009) 430–435. 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Brenner S., The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 77 (1974) 71–94. 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Coburn C., Allman E., Mahanti P., Benedetto A., Cabreiro F., Pincus Z., et al. , Anthranilate fluorescence marks a calcium-propagated necrotic wave that promotes organismal death in C. elegans, PLOS Biology, 11 (2013) e1001613. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Pincus Z., Mazer T.C., Slack F.J., Autofluorescence as a measure of senescence in C. elegans: look to red, not blue or green, Aging (Albany NY), 8 (2016) 889–898. 10.18632/aging.100936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Kay A.R., Alfonso A., Alford S., Cline H.T., Holgado A.M., Sakmann B., et al. , Imaging synaptic activity in intact brain and slices with FM1–43 in C. elegans, lamprey, and rat, Neuron, 24 (1999) 809–817. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81029-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Vida T.A., Emr S.D., A new vital stain for visualizing vacuolar membrane dynamics and endocytosis in yeast, Journal of Cell Biology, 128 (1995) 779–792. 10.1083/jcb.128.5.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].La Cavera III S., Chauhan V.M., Hardiman W., Yao M., Fuentes-Domínguez R., Setchfield K., et al. , Label-free Brillouin endo-microscopy for the quantitative 3D imaging of sub-micrometre biology, Communications Biology, 7 (2024) 451. 10.1038/s42003-024-06126-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Zhang S.O., Box A.C., Xu N., Le Men J., Yu J., Guo F., Trimble R., Mak H.Y., Genetic and dietary regulation of lipid droplet expansion in Caenorhabditis elegans, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107 (2010) 4640–4645. 10.1073/pnas.0912308107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, ZEISS Lightfield 4D: instant volume acquisition for high-speed and gentle imaging, 2025. Available at: https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/en/products/light-microscopes/confocal-microscopes/lightfield-4d.html (accessed 6 August 2026).
- [14].Lambert T.J., FPbase: a community-editable fluorescent protein database, Nature Methods, 16 (2019) 277–278. 10.1038/s41592-019-0352-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Representative reconstructed volumes are shown in Figure 1. Source and reconstructed data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
