Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Sep 30.
Published before final editing as: Neurosci Lett. 2026 Aug 27;886:138713. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2026.138713

Assessment of GABAA α1, α4, and α5 Receptor Subunit Protein Expression in Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampus of Adult Male and Female Long-Evans Rats after Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure

Gabriela Acosta 1, Suzy Davies 2, Chloe Ruddle 1, Bethany Brundage 1, Benjamin J Clark 1, Daniel D Savage 1,2
PMCID: PMC13622653  NIHMSID: NIHMS2210005  PMID: 42660276

Abstract

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) describe a range of neurobiological and behavioral changes following prenatal alcohol exposure. Previous work has shown that moderate prenatal alcohol exposure (mPAE) can produce alterations to GABAergic neurotransmission in the hippocampal formation (HPF) as well as morphological alterations in GABAergic interneuron expression in adult rats. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that mPAE differentially alters GABAA subunit protein expression in dorsal and ventral HPF of naïve adult male and female Long-Evans control and mPAE rats. We focused our attention on the α1, α4, and α5 subunits as they have relatively high densities within the hippocampus and have been linked to hippocampal-dependent learning and memory. Membrane fractions were collected from dorsal and ventral HPF, and western blots were performed to detect levels of GABAA α1, α4, and α5 subunit protein expression. Overall, we did not detect prenatal treatment group differences suggesting that mPAE does not result in differential GABAA subunit protein expression in dorsal or ventral HPF of male and female rats. However, the results revealed significantly greater protein expression for α4 and α5 subunits in the dorsal HPF. GABAA α1 protein expression did not vary significantly across the dorsal and ventral HPF. Our findings support the general conclusion that GABAA subunit protein expression in the HPF reflects intrinsic regional specialization of GABAergic signaling rather than effects of mPAE.

Keywords: fetal ethanol, GABAA subunit, protein, dorsal hippocampus, ventral hippocampus

Introduction

FASD is a multifaceted neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by alcohol exposure during gestation causing aberrant fetal brain development (Felicicchia et al., 2025; Popova et al., 2023) and cognitive impairments involving executive functions, memory, and affective behaviors (Marquardt & Brigman, 2016). The clinical presentation of FASD overlaps with other neurodevelopmental disorders which makes accurate diagnosis challenging. The global prevalence, which is between 1%–5% of children (Waite & Burd, 2023), is likely underestimated in moderate cases of exposure (e.g., mPAE) due to clinical under-recognition.

Previous research has shown that mPAE (~30–100 mg/dL) has been associated with impairments in HPF-dependent memory, alterations to synaptic plasticity neurogenesis, and memory related neural activity (place cells) in the HPF (Choi et al., 2005 Clark et al., 2025; Harvey et al., 2020; Marquardt & Brigman, 2016; Savage et al., 2002; 2010; Takahashi et al., 2021). Developmental ethanol exposure can also cause widespread disruptions in GABAergic circuit development and function in HPF and related regions (Barber et al., 2022; Bird et al., 2018; 2021; Kenton et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2022; Licheri et al., 2023; Madden et al., 2020). Alcohol exposure has been linked to abnormal GABAergic interneuron migration and reductions in parvalbumin-positive interneurons (Delatour et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2022; Marguet et al, 2020; Licheri et al. 2023) and enhanced or diminished GABAergic signaling (Bird et al., 2021; Kenton et al., 2020; Cuzon Carlson et al., 2020; Delatour et al., 2020). The effects of mPAE show sexually dimorphic effects with females demonstrating more variable changes such as enhanced GABAergic signaling (Winchester & Diaz, 2025; Tousley et al., 2025).

It is currently unclear whether mPAE produces modifications to GABA receptor structure. GABA receptors are classified into GABAA and GABAB subtypes (Sigel & Steinmann, 2012). GABAA receptors are ligand gated ion channels that underlie fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the HPF and likely have a role in generating rhythmic oscillations associated with memory (Farrant & Nusser, 2005). GABAA receptors, which are the primary targets for alcohol in the nervous system (Olsen & Liang, 2017), are assembled from a pool of 19 different subunits, with a majority comprised of α, β, and γ subtypes (Farrant & Nusser, 2005; Sigel & Steinmann, 2012). HPF GABAA receptors contain a high density of the α subunit, particularly the α5 subunit, and are speculated to play a role in memory functions (Collinson et al., 2002; Serwanski et al., 2006). For instance, reductions in α5 expression have been associated with improved spatial memory in mice (Collinson et al., 2002). Alcohol-induced spatial memory dysfunction has been associated with increases in α5 mRNA expression (Zeng et al., 2019). Similar observations have been made for α1 and α4 GABAA subunits, as disruptions to these subtypes alter synaptic plasticity and memory (Berry et al., 2008; Shen et al., 2010; Wiltgen et al., 2009). Previous work has also shown that α4 and α5 subunits are found in extrasynaptic receptor assemblies contributing to tonic inhibition and maintaining sparse activity, which are essential to memory related computations by the HPF (Nagarajan et al., 2026).

There is some evidence that alcohol exposure during early development can affect GABAA subunit expression. For instance, chronic alcohol exposure in young adult rats over a period of 40 days, but not 14 days, increases α4 subunit expression in the HPF (Matthews et al., 1998). Liang et al (2014) reported functional disruptions to α1 subunit containing GABAA receptors in the HPF of adolescent rats (PND25–35) after prenatal gavage exposure to alcohol. Lastly, Allan et al (1998) reported that neuromodulatory effects on GABAA receptor-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission were enhanced in the HPF after mPAE, which may be attributable to differences in GABAA α subunit expression, and may ultimately contribute to synaptic plasticity deficits observed after mPAE.

Here, we tested the hypothesis that HPF GABAA receptor subunit protein would be elevated after mPAE. We performed western blots to investigate GABAA α1, α4, and α5 subunit protein expression within the HPF of a rat model of mPAE in which previous studies have characterized impairments in spatial memory, hippocampal synaptic plasticity, and neural representations associated with learning and memory in adult rats (Davies et al., 2023a; Harvey et al., 2020; Sanchez et al., 2025). Although previous work in adult rats has reported that mPAE can produce reductions in parvalbumin-positive GABA interneuron expression in the dorsal HPF (Madden et al., 2020), behavioral studies report deficits in affective behaviors dependent on the integrity of the vHPF (Acosta et al., 2024). We therefore designed our study to investigate whether expression of GABAA α1, α4, and α5 subunit protein expression in the dHPF and vHPF would be impaired in adult rats after mPAE.

Methods

Breeding Colony and Ethanol Consumption Procedures

The breeding and ethanol drinking paradigm used in the present study were identical to recent studies from our group (Fig. 1) (Acosta et al., 2024; Davies et al., 2023b; Osterlund Oltmanns et al., 2022; Schaeffer et al., 2025). Briefly, adult female Long-Evans rat breeders (Envigo Corporation, Indianapolis, IN) were single-housed at 22°C and maintained on a reverse 12h dark/12h light schedule and were provided PMI Picolab 5L0D laboratory rodent diet (LabDiet Incorporated, St Louis, MS) and tap water ad libitum. Female Long-Evans rat breeders were acclimated to ethanol by providing a solution of 0.067% saccharin in tap water with 0% ethanol on day 1 and 2, saccharin water with 2.5% ethanol on days 3 and 4, and saccharin water with 5% ethanol on day 5 and thereafter. The saccharin and ethanol mixtures were provided for 4h each day from 10:00–14:00 h for at least two weeks. Daily ethanol consumption was measured for each female rat breeder. Following two weeks, females who drank at levels less than one standard deviation below the entire group mean were removed from the study. The remaining breeders were assigned to either a saccharin (Control) or 5% ethanol (Ethanol) drinking group. Females were weighed to obtain a pre-pregnancy weight, then housed with male breeders until a vaginal plug was present to confirm pregnancy. Ethanol consumption did not occur during breeding. Once pregnant, dams were given access to saccharin water containing either 0% (v/v) or 5% (v/v) ethanol for four hours each day (10:00–14:00). The volume of saccharin water provided to the Control group was matched to the mean volume of ethanol saccharin water consumed by the Ethanol group. The volume of ethanol consumed was recorded for each rat dam as grams of ethanol per kilogram of body weight per day. At birth, daily ethanol consumption was discontinued, and the litters were weighed and culled to 10 pups. Offspring were weaned at postnatal (PD)21–24 and pair-housed (see section below). To minimize potential litter effects in the present study, only one or two female or male rats were used from each litter.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Experimental timeline for mPAE and tissue collection. Adult female rats were acclimated to a voluntary ethanol drinking paradigm (increasing concentrations of ethanol) during the pre-pregnancy phase. Following mating, pregnant dams were assigned to either saccharin (Control) or 5% ethanol (EtOH) groups and maintained on their assigned solution for throughout gestation (GD1–GD21). HPF tissue was collected at postnatal day 217–229 for fluorescent western blot analysis.

Subjects

A total of 24 Long-Evans rats (Control: n=12; 6 male and 6 female; Ethanol: n=12; 6 male and 6 female) were obtained from the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (UNMHSC) Animal Resource Facility (ARF) (see breeding protocol above). Following weaning (PD21–24), all rats were pair-housed in standard plastic cages on a reverse 12h dark/12h light schedule at a room temperature of 22 °C with the PMI Picolab 5L0D laboratory rodent diet (LabDiet Incorporated, St Louis, MS) and water provided ad libitum. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the UNMHSC approved all experimental procedures for the current study.

Membrane preparation and GABAA western blotting

The experimenters conducting the membrane preparations and western blot analyses were blinded to the experimental condition of the tissues processed. Adult male and female offspring (PND217–229) were anesthetized with 250 mg/kg ketamine intraperitoneal injections, sacrificed, and the hippocampal formation (HPF) removed and was separated into two approximately equal dorsal (dHPF) and ventral (vHPF) halves. The tissue was weighed and homogenized in a glass Dounce homogenizer in homogenization buffer (320 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris HCl, 1 mM Na3VO4, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 × phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 3 (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. St Louis, MO) and 1 × SigmaFast protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.) with six up and down strokes each of a loose-fitting and then a tight-fitting pestle. The homogenate was centrifuged at 1000g for 6 min at 4°C and then the S1 supernatant was collected into a second tube and centrifuged at 10,000g for 15 min at 4°C to collect the P2 pellet. The P2 pellet was resuspended in homogenization buffer and aliquoted. Samples were then flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until assay. Proteins were quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IN) according to manufacturer's instructions. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-GABA A α1 (ab33299, Abcam Inc. Waltham, MA; diluted 1:1000), rabbit anti-GABA A α4 (NB300–193, Novus Biologicals, LLC, Centennial, CO; diluted 1:1000), rabbit anti-GABA A α5 (224–503, SYSY antibodies, Germany; diluted 1:1000) and the reference protein, mouse anti-Na+/K+ ATPase (A5-s, DSHB, Iowa City, IA; diluted 1:10,000 or 1:20,000).

Based on preliminary tissue concentration studies to confirm linear optical density measures for each protein of interest in untreated control rats (data not shown), 30 or 40 μg of total protein were loaded per lane on a NuPAGE™ 4–12% Bis-Tris 12-well mini protein gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) in triplicate lanes and were run at 150–155 V for 2.5 h. Protein samples were denatured at 70°C and samples run with MOPS SDS buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The proteins were transferred onto methanol-activated PVDF membranes using NuPAGE™ transfer buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with methanol and NuPAGE™ antioxidant (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and run at 100 V for 1 h. The membranes were blocked using LI-COR Intercept™ blocking buffer (PBS) (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE) at room temperature for 1 h, then incubated with the primary antibodies at 1:1000 dilution, overnight at 4°C in the LICOR Intercept blocking buffer (PBS) plus 0.1% Tween-20. Membranes were then washed three times for 10 min in PBS-Tween 20 (PBS-T), incubated in secondary antibodies (LI-COR 680RD goat anti-mouse, 1:40,000; and 800CW donkey anti-rabbit, 1:15,000;) in LI-COR Intercept blocking buffer (PBS) plus 0.1% Tween-20 and 0.01% SDS for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were washed three times for 10 min in PBS-T and an additional 5 min in PBS before scanning. Membranes were scanned and analyzed using the LI-COR Odyssey Infrared Imaging System and quantified in Image Studio™ 5.1. Briefly, after setting a blot’s background intensity in an area with no fluorescence, boxes were drawn around each fluorescent band and the background intensity subtracted from each band of interest to provide an integrated signal intensity.

With the blots, we used a ratio of GABA subunit/ATPase to control for inter-blot variability. Once all blots are normalized to a housekeeping protein (here ATPase), you can directly compare the values across different membranes. We also looked at the mean integrated intensity for ATPase which was similar across groups (Table 2). Subsequently, the optical densities of each GABAA subunit were normalized to the reference protein, Na+/K+ ATPase.

Statistical Analysis

A mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted for each GABAA subunit (α1, α4, and α5), comparing dHPF and vHPF (within-subjects), with treatment (Control and Ethanol) and sex as between-subjects factors. Partial eta squared (η2p) values are reported as a measure of effect size. Analyses were conducted using jamovi (The jamovi project, 2025).

Results

Paradigm Outcome Measures

Supplemental Table 1 presents a summary of the mPAE paradigm outcome measures for the rat dams in control and mPAE groups. The mean ethanol consumption by the mPAE group was 2.32 g/kg which, when coupled with the 5L0D diet, produces a maternal blood ethanol concentration (BEC) of 46.0 + 3.2 mg/dL (Davies et al., 2023b). There were no significant effects on maternal weight gain, litter size or offspring birthweight (Supp Table 1).

ATPase Expression in the Hippocampus

Figure 2 shows representative western blots from dHPF or vHPF for GABAA α1, α4, and α5 subunits. The apparent kD values for each of the four proteins analyzed was consistent with published molecular weights for each protein. Each blot contained triplicate samples of either dHPF or vHPF from three of the four experimental conditions. The three conditions selected for each blot was balanced across the total of eight blots required to analyze all 24 samples for a given protein in each region.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Representative fluorescent western blot images of GABAA α1 (A), α4 (B), and α5 (C) subunits in dHPF) and vHPF) homogenates (green band). ATPase was used as the reference protein (red band). The x-axis corresponds to the treatment group and sex of the animals. CF = Control Female; CM = Control Male; EF = Ethanol Female; EM = Ethanol Male.

Supplemental Table 2 summarizes the mean and standard error for ATPase measures (averaged across α1, α4, and α5 subunits) for treatment, sex, and HPF region. Inspection of the means indicate that ATPase measures were generally similar across dHPF and vHPF regions but were slightly higher in vHPF. A mixed-design ANOVA comparing ATPase across dHPF and vHPF regions did not indicate group differences (ps > 0.51), but detected a significant dHPF versus vHPF difference (F(1, 20) = 5.94, p = .024, η2p = .229). The ANOVA did not detect significant interactions (ps > 0.40).

GABAA Receptor Subunit Expression

Figure 3 shows ratios of GABAA subunit expression relative to the reference protein, ATPase, across the dHPF and vHPF for Control and Ethanol rats. A mixed-design ANOVA determined that α1 subunit expression (Fig. 3A) did not significantly differ by region (F(1, 20) = 0.63, p = .437, η2p = .030), treatment (F(1, 20) = 0.28, p = .606, η2p = .014), or sex (F(1, 20) = 1.05, p = .317, η2p = .050). None of the two-way interactions were significant: sex × treatment (F(1, 20) = 0.07, p = .788, η2p = .004), sex × region (F(1, 20) = 0.19, p = .666, η2p = .010), treatment × region (F(1, 20) = 0.31, p = .581, η2p = .015), or the three-way interaction (F(1, 20) = 0.69, p = .416, η2p = .033). In contrast, α4 subunit expression (Fig. 3B) exhibited a significant main effect of region (F(1, 20) = 62.20, p < .001, η2p = .757), with higher expression in dHPF compared to vHPF. However, neither treatment (F(1, 20) = 0.01, p = .923, η2p < .000) nor sex (F(1, 20) = 0.42, p = .523, η2p = .021) had a significant effect, and all interactions were non-significant: sex × treatment (F(1, 20) = 0.06, p = .815, η2p = .003), sex × region (F(1, 20) = 0.59, p = .450, η2p = .029), treatment × region (F(1, 20) = 0.09, p = .770, η2p = .004), and the three-way interaction (F(1, 20) = 0.15, p = .706, η2p = .007).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The effect of mPAE on the ratios of GABAA α1 (A), α4 (B), and α5 (C) subunit expression in dHPF versus vHPF. Bars represent the mean ± SEM of normalized fluorescent western blot signal intensity, with values expressed relative to the reference protein, ATPase. Control (cyan) and Ethanol (magenta) groups are shown separately for female and male offspring. Each white circle represents one animal (n = 6 per group). (***p < 0.001).

Regional differences in GABAA subunit expression were independent of prenatal alcohol exposure and sex. The findings support intrinsic regional specialization of hippocampal GABAergic signaling.

A similar pattern was observed in α5 subunit expression (Fig. 3C), which showed a strong regional effect (F(1, 20) = 104.36, p < .001, η2p = .839), with significantly higher levels in dHPF compared to vHPF. No main effects were found for sex (F(1, 20) = 0.003, p = .959, η2p =.000) or treatment (F(1, 20) = 0.45, p = .511, η2p = .022), and all interaction terms were non-significant: sex × treatment (F(1, 20) = 0.56, p = .465, η2p = .027), sex × region (F(1, 20) = 0.44, p = .514, η2p = .022), treatment × region (F(1, 20) = 0.02, p = .903, η2p = .001), and sex × treatment × region (F(1, 20) = 0.43, p = .520, η2p = .021).

Discussion

The results of the present study point to two general conclusions. First, Control and mPAE rats expressed similar levels of GABAA α1, α4, and α5 protein within dHPF and vHPF. It is important to note that while GABAA α1, α4, and α5 subunit expression remained intact in dHPF and vHPF after mPAE, other work has reported that mPAE in male rats can cause high levels of stress hormones in utero, leading to overexpression of GABAA α1 subunit mRNA in the vHPF (Ardi et al., 2016; 2019) and subsequent upregulation of the β1 and β2 GABAA subunits in the hypothalamus (Lu et al., 2020). These findings may appear paradoxical; however, they can be reconciled by considering a model of presynaptic dysfunction. Cuzon Carlson et al. (2020) investigated the effects of mPAE on goal-oriented behavior and memory and found that upregulation of endocannabinoid expression chronically weakened parvalbumin interneuron synaptic projections with medium spiny neurons in the dorsolateral striatum, suggesting a presynaptic mechanism underlying cognitive dysfunction. Similarly, a study by Delatour et al. (2020) found increased frequency of spontaneous and miniature IPSCs and EPSCs, with an enduring amplitude across control and ethanol-exposed groups. These findings point to alterations in presynaptic release probability or synapse number, rather than postsynaptic receptor function.

The present study employed adult offspring in an age range similar to our prior studies reporting alterations in parvalbumin-positive GABAergic interneurons (Madden et al., 2020) and spatial memory impairments (Sanchez et al., 2025; Savage et al., 2002). While we did not observe changes in expression in adult offspring after mPAE, it is possible that changes may have occurred earlier in development followed by some compensatory alterations that normalized receptor subunit expression with maturation. Alternatively, changes in GABAA subunit expression in dHPF or vHPF may require higher levels of alcohol exposure (current study: ~46 mg/dL; Supp Table 1) or extended exposure during development. Matthews et al (1998) exposed young adult rats to 40 days of a chronic liquid ethanol diet and reported increases in α4 subunit expression in the HPF. However, changes in α4 expression were not observed if rats were exposed for 14 days. Interestingly, α1, α2, α3, β2/3, or γ2 subunit expression in the HPF were unaffected by 40- or 14-day exposure durations. Thus, this previous work suggests that the duration and/or the dose of alcohol used in the present study is likely insufficient to induce GABAA α1, α4, and α5 subunit expression changes, but also unlikely to induce changes to other GABAA receptor subunits. Further, an additional factor that may have impacted GABA receptor protein expression was the maternal daily four-hour consumption of 0.067% saccharin water during gestation. While both prenatal treatment groups consumed equal quantities of saccharin, a recent study (Pacheco-Sánchez et. al., 2026) reports that prenatal saccharin exposure altered the mRNA expression of some glutamate and GABAA receptor subunits in frontal cortex, though GABA α1 expression was not affected.

It is also important to consider that findings of mPAE effects can vary considerably across HPF subregion (CA subfield and/or dentate gyrus). Madden et al (2020) reported a sex-specific reduction in CA3 and dentate gyrus parvalbumin neurons after mPAE. In addition, α4 subunit expression is prominent in the dentate gyrus while α5 is found in CA pyramidal cell layers (Farrant & Nusser, 2005). Thus, it is possible that analyses sampling from all hippocampal subfields may have masked alterations is specific subregions. Related limbic regions may also be affected. For instance, studies have reported excessive inhibition in the dorsolateral striatum (Delatour et al., 2020; Cuzon Carlson et al., 2020), while other studies have shown hyperexcitation in areas such as the paraventricular nucleus after PAE (Lu et al., 2020). Further research would benefit from exploring alterations to GABAA subunits within HPF subregions and in related limbic circuits.

This absence of sex-specific PAE differences in GABAA α1, α4, and α5 protein expression within dHPF and vHPF contrasts with a substantial body of research demonstrating sexually dimorphic outcomes of PAE at both the behavioral and physiological level. Mouse and rat-model PAE studies have reported sex-specific alterations in neuronal excitability, striatal GABAergic signaling, and interneuron composition (Cuzon Carlson et al., 2020; Tousley et al., 2025, Licheri et al., 2023; Madden et al., 2020; Kenton et al., 2020; Takahashi et al., 2021). The absence of sex-specific differences in our study suggests that sex-based effects may be context-dependent, influenced by factors such as exposure paradigms, alcohol dosage which is relatively lower in the present study, or the developmental stage at which animals were exposed and/or tested. For instance, a study by Winchester and Diaz (2025) exploring neurobiological changes to the amygdala following mPAE, exposed mPAE neurons to ethanol in vitro and electrophysiological responses were recorded. Winchester and Diaz found that mPAE male central amygdala neurons showed blunted responses to acute ethanol application, whereas mPAE female neurons were largely unresponsive at lower concentrations (44mM and 66mM). However, female central amygdala neurons exhibited significantly enhanced GABAA-mediated sIPSCs at the highest concentration tested (88mM), indicating a sex- and dose-dependent sensitivity to ethanol following prenatal exposure. It is important to note that Winchester and Diaz (2025) peak BECs of 108.3 mg/dL while the procedures in the present study produce lower BECs at ~46 mg/dL (Davies et al., 2023b). These findings suggest that sex-specific effects are more pronounced at higher concentrations of ethanol and absent or present more subtly at lower doses.

A second conclusion is that α4 and α5 protein expression was significantly higher in the dHPF relative to the vHPF. In contrast, expression of α1 protein was similar across dHPF and vHPF in each group. There was also an appreciable difference in ATPase measures across the two HPF regions with slightly higher measures in vHPF compared to dHPF (Supp Table 2). The findings are consistent with previous observations of distinct anatomical, physiology, and gene markers between dHPF and vHPF (Fanselow & Dong, 2010). While dHPF has been linked to spatial learning and memory, vHPF has been associated with affective behaviors (Fanselow & Dong, 2010). Further, studies of the firing characteristics of place cells have shown that neurons in the dHPF exhibit greater spatially selective firing compared to vHPF (Kjelstrup et al., 2008; Jung et al., 1994). Few studies have investigated GABAA α1, α4, and α5 protein expression across dHPF and vHPF, however, it is noteworthy that α4 and α5 subunits are almost exclusively found in extrasynaptic receptor assemblies which contribute to tonic inhibition and are critical to preserving sparse activity in the HPF (Nagarajan et al., 2026). The greater α4 and α5 protein expression in dHPF may therefore contribute to the selective spatial firing by place cells in dHPF. Consistent with the present study, a previous report using male Wistar rats (PND35–45) showed a similar decrease in CA1 and dentate gyrus α4 mRNA in vHPF (Sotiriou et al., 2005). However, this same study reported that CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus α1 mRNA was reduced in vHPF while CA1 α5 mRNA was increased in vHPF. The study also found that α1 protein expression was reduced in vHPF. It is important to note that other work has reported increases in expression of vHPF α1 mRNA only after stress, but with similar mRNA expression across dHPF and vHPF in unstressed animals (Ardi et al., 2019). Thus, more work is needed to understand the underlying mechanism of the current and previous findings.

In summary, we report that GABAA α1, α4, and α5 subunit protein did not vary between Control and mPAE rats and did not vary with sex. However, we identified higher levels of GABAA α4 and α5 subunit protein in the dHPF when compared to vHPF. These results suggest that mPAE does not alter the distribution of GABAA α1, α4, and α5 subunit protein expression in the HPF, but reflects intrinsic dorsal-ventral specialization.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments:

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number R01 AA029700, T32 AA014127 and P50 AA022534. The alpha 5 monoclonal antibody developed by Johns Hopkins University (Fambrough D.M) was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, created by the NICHD of the NIH and maintained at The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Acosta G, Rico KT, Madden JT, LaCour A, Wang E, Sanchez LM, Davies S, Maestas-Olguin C, Cox KB, Reyna NC, Hogeveen J, Savage DD, Pentkowski NS, & Clark BJ (2024). The effects of moderate prenatal alcohol exposure on performance in hippocampal-sensitive spatial memory and anxiety tasks by adult male and female rat offspring. Alcohol, 121, 75–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan AM, Wu H, Paxton LL, & Savage DD (1998). Prenatal ethanol exposure alters the modulation of the gamma-aminobutyric acidA1 receptor-gated chloride ion channel in adult rat offspring. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 284(1), 250–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ardi Z, Albrecht A, Richter-Levin A, Saha R, & Richter-Levin G (2016). Behavioral profiling as a translational approach in an animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Neurobiology of disease, 88, 139–147. 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ardi Z, Richter-Levin A, Xu L, Cao X, Volkmer H, Stork O, & Richter-Levin G (2019). The role of the GABAA receptor Alpha 1 subunit in the ventral hippocampus in stress resilience. Scientific reports, 9(1), 13513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berry RB, Werner DF, Wang X, Jablonski MM, Homanics GE, Mittleman G, & Matthews DB (2008). Mice with targeted genetic reduction of GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subunits display performance differences in Morris water maze tasks. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 90(3), 580–583. 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barber MJ, McDonald CD, Chavez GJ, Bird CW, & Valenzuela CF (2022). Experimental data on developmental elimination of retrosplenial cortex GABAergic interneurons in a mouse model of ethanol exposure during the last trimester of human pregnancy. Data in brief, 43, 108355. 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bird CW, Taylor DH, Pinkowski NJ, Chavez GJ, & Valenzuela CF (2018). Long-term Reductions in the Population of GABAergic Interneurons in the Mouse Hippocampus following Developmental Ethanol Exposure. Neuroscience, 383, 60–73. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bird CW, Chavez GJ, Barber MJ, & Valenzuela CF (2021). Enhancement of parvalbumin interneuron-mediated neurotransmission in the retrosplenial cortex of adolescent mice following third trimester-equivalent ethanol exposure. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81173-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Choi IY, Allan AM, Cunningham LA (2005). Moderate fetal alcohol exposure impairs the neurogenic response to an enriched environment in adult mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 29, 2053–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark BJ, Acosta G, Sanchez L, & Rico KT (2025). The Neurobiology of Learning and Memory in Rodent Models of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 1473, 41–65. 10.1007/978-3-031-81908-7_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Collinson N, Kuenzi FM, Jarolimek W, Maubach KA, Cothliff R, Sur C, Smith A, Otu FM, Howell O, Atack JR, McKernan RM, Seabrook GR, Dawson GR, Whiting PJ, & Rosahl TW (2002). Enhanced learning and memory and altered GABAergic synaptic transmission in mice lacking the alpha 5 subunit of the GABAA receptor. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 22(13), 5572–5580. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05572.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cuzon Carlson VC, Gremel CM, & Lovinger DM (2020). Gestational alcohol exposure disrupts cognitive function and striatal circuits in adult offspring. Nature Communications, 11, 2555. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16385-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davies S, Lujan KS, Rappaport EJ, Valenzuela CF, & Savage DD (2023a). Effect of moderate prenatal ethanol exposure on the differential expression of two histamine H3 receptor isoforms in different brain regions of adult rat offspring. Frontiers in neuroscience, 17, 1192096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Davies S, Nelson DE, Shrestha S, & Savage DD (2023b). Impact of two different rodent diets on maternal ethanol consumption, serum ethanol concentration and pregnancy outcome measures. Alcohol. 111, 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2023.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Delatour LC, Yeh PWL, & Yeh HH (2020). Prenatal exposure to ethanol alters synaptic activity in layer V/VI pyramidal neurons of the somatosensory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 30(3), 1735–1751. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fanselow MS, & Dong HW (2010). Are the dorsal and ventral hippocampus functionally distinct structures?. Neuron, 65(1), 7–19. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Farrant M, & Nusser Z (2005). Variations on an inhibitory theme: phasic and tonic activation of GABA(A) receptors. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 6(3), 215–229. 10.1038/nrn1625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Felicicchia RJ, Hyland MT, Roesch SC, & Mattson SN (2025). Identifying family environment profiles in families of children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 49(4), 771–782. 10.1111/acer.70016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Harvey RE, Berkowitz LE, Savage DD, Hamilton DA, & Clark BJ (2020). Altered Hippocampal Place Cell Representation and Theta Rhythmicity following Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure. Current biology: CB, 30(18), 3556–3569.e5. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. The jamovi project (2025). jamovi (Version 2.6) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
  21. Jung MW, Wiener SI, & McNaughton BL (1994). Comparison of spatial firing characteristics of units in dorsal and ventral hippocampus of the rat. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 14(12), 7347–7356. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-12-07347.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kenton JA, Ontiveros T, Bird CW, Valenzuela CF, & Brigman JL (2020). Moderate prenatal alcohol exposure alters the number and function of GABAergic interneurons in the murine orbitofrontal cortex. Alcohol, 88, 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2020.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kjelstrup KB, Solstad T, Brun VH, Hafting T, Leutgeb S, Witter MP, Moser EI, & Moser MB (2008). Finite scale of spatial representation in the hippocampus. Science (New York, N.Y.), 321(5885), 140–143. 10.1126/science.1157086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee SM, Yeh PWL, & Yeh HH (2022). L-type calcium channels contribute to ethanol-induced aberrant tangential migration of primordial cortical GABAergic interneurons in the embryonic medial prefrontal cortex. eNeuro, 9(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0359-21.2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liang J, Shen Y, Shao XM, Scott MB, Ly E, Wong S, Nguyen A, Tan K, Kwon B, Olsen RW, & Spigelman I (2014). Dihydromyricetin prevents fetal alcohol exposure-induced behavioral and physiological deficits: the roles of GABAA receptors in adolescence. Neurochemical research, 39(6), 1147–1161. 10.1007/s11064-014-1291-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Licheri V, Jacquez BJ, Castillo VK, Sainz DB, Valenzuela CF, & Brigman JL (2023). Long-term effects of low prenatal alcohol exposure on GABAergic interneurons of the murine posterior parietal cortex. Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research, 47(12), 2248–2261. doi: 10.1111/acer.15210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lu J, Li Q, Ma G, Hong C, Zhang W, Wang Y, & Wang H (2020). Prenatal ethanol exposure-induced hypothalamic an imbalance of glutamatergic/GABAergic projections and low functional expression in male offspring rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 141, 111419. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Madden JT, Thompson SM, Magcalas CM, Wagner JL, Hamilton DA, Savage DD, Clark BJ, & Pentowski NS (2020). Moderate prenatal alcohol exposure reduces parvalbumin expressing GABAergic interneurons in the dorsal hippocampus of adult male and female rat offspring. Neuroscience Letter, 718. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Marguet F, Friocourt G, Brosolo M, Sauvestre F, Marcorelles P, Lesueur C, Marret S, Gonzalez BJ, & Laquerriére A (2020). Prenatal alcohol exposure is a leading cause of interneuronopathy in humans. Acta Neuropathologica Communications, 8(1), 208. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01089-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Marquardt K, & Brigman JL (2016). The impact of prenatal alcohol exposure on social, cognitive and affective behavioral domains: Insights from rodent models. Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 51, 1–15. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Matthews DB, Devaud LL, Fritschy JM, Sieghart W, & Morrow AL (1998). Differential regulation of GABA(A) receptor gene expression by ethanol in the rat hippocampus versus cerebral cortex. Journal of neurochemistry, 70(3), 1160–1166. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70031160.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nagarajan R, Lyu J, George JC, Rudolph U, & Engin E (2026). The role of GABAA receptors in hippocampus-dependent cognitive functions. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 186, 106659. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Olsen RW, & Liang J (2017). Role of GABAAreceptors in alcohol use disorders suggested by chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) rodent model. Molecular brain, 10(1), 45. 10.1186/s13041-017-0325-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Osterlund Oltmanns JR, Schaeffer EA, Goncalves Garcia M, Donaldson TN, Acosta G, Sanchez LM, Davies S, Savage DD, Wallace DG, & Clark BJ (2022). Sexually dimorphic organization of open field behavior following moderate prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 46(5), 861–875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pacheco-Sánchez B, López-Merchán R, Rubio P, García-Martos P, Suárez J, Sanjuan C, Rubio L, Martín-de-Las-Heras S, Rodríguez de Fonseca F, Alén F, de Ceglia M, and Rivera P Long-term consequences of prenatal saccharin exposure: Evidence of sex-specific molecular programing in the prefrontal cortex and behavior of adolescent rats. Front Behav Neurosci. 2026. Apr 30:20:1815692. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1815692. eCollection 2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Popova S, Charness ME, Burd L, Crawford A, Hoyme HE, Mukherjee RAS, Riley EP, & Elliott EJ (2023). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Nature reviews. Disease primers, 9(1), 11. 10.1038/s41572-023-00420-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanchez LM, Acosta G, Cushing SD, Johnson SA, Turner SM, Davies S, Savage DD, Burke SN, & Clark BJ (2025). The effects of moderate prenatal alcohol exposure on performance in object and spatial discrimination tasks by adult male rats. Behavioural brain research, 478, 115324. 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Savage DD, Becher M, Torre AJ, Sutherland RJ (2002). Dose-dependent effects of prenatal ethanol exposure on synaptic plasticity and learning in mature offspring. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 26, 1752–1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Savage DD, Rosenberg MJ, Wolff CR, Akers KG, El-Emawy A, Staples MC, Varaschin RK, Wright CA, Seidel JL, Caldwell KK, et al. , (2010). Effects of a novel cognition-enhancing agent on fetal ethanol-induced learning deficits. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 34, 1793–1802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schaeffer EA, LaCour A, Donaldson TN, Linsenbardt DN, Davies S, Savage DD, Wallace DG, & Clark BJ (2025). Organization of spontaneous spatial behaviors under dark conditions is unaffected in adult male and female long-Evans rats after moderate prenatal alcohol exposure. Behavioral neuroscience, 139(1), 44–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Serwanski DR, Miralles CP, Christie SB, Mehta AK, Li X, & De Blas AL (2006). Synaptic and nonsynaptic localization of GABAA receptors containing the alpha5 subunit in the rat brain. The Journal of comparative neurology, 499(3), 458–470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shen H, Sabaliauskas N, Sherpa A, Fenton AA, Stelzer A, Aoki C, & Smith SS (2010). A critical role for alpha4betadelta GABAA receptors in shaping learning deficits at puberty in mice. Science (New York, N.Y.), 327(5972), 1515–1518. 10.1126/science.1184245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sigel E, & Steinmann ME (2012). Structure, function, and modulation of GABA(A) receptors. The Journal of biological chemistry, 287(48), 40224–40231. 10.1074/jbc.R112.386664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sotiriou E, Papatheodoropoulos C, & Angelatou F (2005). Differential expression of gamma-aminobutyric acid--a receptor subunits in rat dorsal and ventral hippocampus. Journal of neuroscience research, 82(5), 690–700. 10.1002/jnr.20670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Takahashi Y, Yamashita R, Okano H, Takashima K, Ogawa B, Ojiro R, Tang Q, Ozawa S, Woo G-H, Yoshida T, & Shibutani M (2021). Aberrant neurogenesis and late onset suppression of synaptic plasticity as well as sustained neuroinflammation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus after developmental exposure to ethanol in rats. Toxicology, 462, 152958. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tousley AR, Deykin I, Koc B, Yeh PWL, & Yeh HH (2025). Prenatal ethanol exposure results in cell type, age, and sex-dependent differences in the neonatal striatum that coincide with early motor deficits. eNeuro, 12(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0448-24.2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Waite D & Burd L (2023). Common developmental trajectories and clinical identification of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: A synthesis of the literature. Advances in Drug and Alcohol Research, 3, 10877. doi: 10.3389/adar.2023.10877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wiltgen BJ, Godsil BP, Peng Z, Saab F, June HL, Linn ML, Cook JM, Houser CR, O'Dell TJ, Homanics GE, & Fanselow MS (2009). The alpha1 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor modulates fear learning and plasticity in the lateral amygdala. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 3, 37. 10.3389/neuro.08.037.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Winchester SE, & Diaz MR (2025). Moderate prenatal alcohol exposure alters GABAergic transmission and the actions of acute alcohol in the medial central amygdala of adolescent rats. Neuropharmacology, 266, 110283. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zeng K, Xie A, Dong X, Jiang J, Hao W, Jiang M, & Liu X (2019). GABA-Aα5 Might Be Involved in Learning-Memory Dysfunction in the Offsprings of Chronic Ethanol-Treated Rats via GABA-Aα5 Histone H3K9 Acetylation. Frontiers in neuroscience, 13, 1076. 10.3389/fnins.2019.01076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES