Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2026 Sep 10:2026.09.08.750250. [Version 1] doi: 10.64898/2026.09.08.750250

ALS-associated exitron splicing produces UBQLN2 isoforms with distinct properties

Adenine Si-Hui Koo 1,2, Jingjing Zhou 2,3,4, Natasha M Méndez-Albelo 5,6,7, Yuchun Wei 8, Wei Xu 3,4, Xinyu Zhao 5,6, Colin Dewey 9, Randal S Tibbetts 1,*
PMCID: PMC13622671  PMID: 42818787

Abstract

X-linked amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) implicated Ubiquilin 2 (UBQLN2) is expressed from a single exon. Here, we show that human UBQLN2 mRNA is alternatively spliced by virtue of a cryptic exonic intron (exitron) spanning the 5’ untranslated region and the 5’ end of UBQLN2 coding sequence. Splice-out of this exitron generates a spliced UBQLN2 (UBQLN2-Sp) transcript that is translated from codon M243 to produce an N-terminally truncated UBQLN2 isoform (UBQLN2-M243) with reduced stability, diminished proteasome targeting, and altered aggregation behavior following the introduction of ALS mutations. The RNA-binding proteins SRSF1 and PTBP1 control UBQLN2 splicing through binding to splice donor-proximal motifs, while TDP-43 was implicated as an indirect splicing repressor. UBQLN2 splicing was elevated and inversely correlated with UBQLN2 gene expression in the medial motor cortex of male ALS patients. These findings suggest that alternative splicing regulates UBQLN2 gene dosage and function, which may impact UBQLN2-ALS proteinopathy.

Graphical Abstract

Created in https://BioRender.com

graphic file with name nihpp-2026.09.08.750250v1-f0001.webp

INTRODUCTION

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease (ND) that affects upper and lower motor neurons with a wide range of clinical manifestations. Current treatment options are limited, and patients generally succumb to the disease within three to five years from symptom onset1. Despite rigorous research, the causation and pathogenesis of ALS fail to be delineated. As reviewed in2, ALS involves complex interplay between genetic components and environmental factors. Rare allelic variants from more than 40 genes have been identified as major risk factors, rendering ALS a polygenic disease which is further complicated by pleiotropic genes and incomplete penetrance (https://www.als.org/).

Approximately 5–10% of ALS patients have a known family history of the disease3–6. Mutations in four genes account for ~70% of these familial ALS cases2,3: chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72)7,8; superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1)9, TARDBP which encodes for transactive response DNA/RNA binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43)10, and fused in sarcoma (FUS)11,12. Both TDP-43 and FUS are RNA binding proteins (RBPs) which are involved in RNA processing predominantly within cell nuclei as reviewed in13,14. ALS-associated mutations in TDP-43 and FUS interfere with their nuclear localization and phase separation dynamics, leading to the formation of cytosolic aggregates and splicing dysregulation of their target genes4,11,12,15. In fact, TDP-43 sequestration into cytoplasmic inclusions is observed in 97% of sporadic ALS and 45% of sporadic frontotemporal dementia (FTD)16,17. As a member of the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), TDP-43 acts as a crucial repressor of cryptic exon splice-in16. TDP-43 loss of function either through null mutation or cytoplasmic retention leads to the inclusion of cryptic exons in mature mRNA transcripts which may contain premature termination codons (UNC13A-CE)18,19 or alternative polyadenylation signals (Stathmin-2-Ex2a)20,21 that lead to truncation of full-length protein coding sequences and loss of function of the target protein. FUS, on the other hand, associates with minor spliceosomes involved in the splicing of U12-dependent introns22.

Splicing dysregulation has emerged as an important hallmark in ALS as well as other NDs15,23. For instance, mis-splicing of MAPT gene is associated with tauopathy24–26, while misplicing of amyloid precursor protein (APP)27,28, presenilin-1 and presenilin-2 (PSEN1 and PSEN2)29,30, Apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4)28 and its receptor APOE2R31 were found to either directly or indirectly contribute to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In Parkinson’s patients, alternative α-synuclein (SNCA) splicing produced shorter translational products with altered aggregation characteristics compared to full-length α-synuclein32. Finally, the incomplete splicing of huntingtin (HTT) Exon 1, which encodes the pathogenic CAG repeats, leads to the production of the highly toxic Exon 1-polyglutamine peptide in Huntington’s Disease (HD) patients33. Owing to these causal links between splicing dysregulation and NDs, RBPs have come into the spotlight as potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets.

Repressor and enhancer RBPs play an important role in establishing and maintaining a steady pool of mature mRNAs specific for each cell lineage and in different stages of development34,35. Polypyrimidine tract binding protein 1 (PTBP1) – also a member of the hnRNP family prevalently known for its repressor role in alternative splicing – is a ubiquitously expressed splicing regulator that binds to polypyrimidine-rich regions, either exonic or intronic, to influence splice site selection through steric blockage of spliceosome assembly or RNA looping36–40. In the developing brain, downregulation of PTBP1 and corresponding upregulation of neural PTBP2 accounts for ~25% of neuron-specific alternative splicing and critically contributes to neural differentiation and synaptogenesis35,41–44. The importance of PTBPs in NDs is exemplified by PTBP1 downregulation in Parkinson’s disease45 and its upregulation in AD, which is associated with enhanced Exons 7 and 8 inclusion in APP mRNA46. On the other hand, sequestration of serine and arginine-rich splicing factor 1 (SRSF1), on Intron-1 retained C9ORF72 transcripts, was linked to enhanced nuclear export47,48. SRSF1 depletion prevented the cytoplasmic translation of C9ORF72 repeats into dipeptide-repeat proteins, which in turn conferred neuroprotection47,48. A more recent study has demonstrated that SRSF1 plays a role in the selection of a downstream splice donor (SD) of C9ORF72-Intron 1 to exonize the expanded repeats and promote the nuclear export of the repeat-containing transcripts49. Nonetheless, SRSF1’s role in NDs is emerging.

Ubiquilin 2 (UBQLN2) is a monoexonic gene arising from retroposition of UBQLN1 reverse-transcribed mRNA into the X chromosome of eutherians50. UBQLN2 – a 624 aa member of the ubiquilin family of Ub chaperone proteins – is unique to placental mammals. Ubiquilins are organizationally defined by the presence of N-terminal ubiquitin-like (UBL), and a C-terminal ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain flanking an array of centrally located, low complexity, STI1-like repeats that mediate liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and binding to hydrophobic client proteins51–53. A generic model for ubiquilin function holds that they engage polyubiquitylated substrates through their UBA domain and deliver them for degradation via UBL-dependent interactions with the 26S proteasome in the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS)54–56. UBQLN2 and its related paralogs, UBQLN1 and UBQLN4 are thought to function semi redundantly in mislocalized membrane protein triage, autophagy, and protein degradation (reviewed by57), however, neurological and proteostasis phenotypes seen in Ubqln2 knockout mice and UBQLN2-deficient cells indicate that it executes non-redundant functions as well58.

Missense mutations clustered in a proline-rich repeat (PRR) that is unique to UBQLN2 cause dominant X-linked ALS, FTD, and/or spastic paraplegia59–63. ALS-associated mutations in UBQLN2 promote its aggregation64 and have been linked to UPS dysfunction through impaired HSP70 binding54, stress granule (SG) formation anomalies53,65, autophagy defects66–70, endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) defects71–73, lipid droplet dysregulation74, reduced NF-kB activation75, axon guidance anomalies76–78, and other defects as reviewed in Ref.79,80. Both pathogenic UBQLN2 and TDP-43 inclusions are rarely coincident in post-mortem ALS/FTD-UBQLN2 patient brain and spinal cord81,82. However, WT UBQLN2 co-aggregated with poly-GA (C9ORF72 dipeptide-repeat) with low phosphorylated TDP-43 and p62 signals in human hippocampus, whereas UBQLN2-ALS mutants are more prone to co-aggregation with phosphorylated TDP-43 and p6281. Interestingly, clinical disease is more strongly correlated to the pattern of TDP-43 inclusion pathology than UBQLN2 pathology, suggesting that UBQLN2 macroinclusions are insufficient for disease manifestation82.

Here, we show that human UBQLN2 (HsUBQLN2) contains an unannotated exitron – a protein coding intron – whose removal generates N-terminally-truncated isoforms which alter the stability, aggregation propensity, and proteosome association of full-length UBQLN2. UBQLN2 exitron splicing is primate-specific and regulated by cis-acting splicing elements which are bound by trans-acting RBPs, including but not defined solely by the splice sites and a series of polypyrimidine (Py) tracts in the UBQLN2 5’ untranslated region (5’UTR). Our finding suggests that regulated exitron removal has the potential to modulate UBQLN2 gene dosage and function, with potential impacts on UBQLN2-mediated proteostasis, as demonstrated by higher incidence of exitron splicing in ALS patient transcriptomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RNA sequencing analysis and alignment

PacBio-UHRR (Universal Human Reference RNA) dataset was accessed from Pacific Biosciences Datasets at https://www.pacb.com/connect/datasets. ONT-SGNex-HepG2 data set was accessed from The Singapore Nanopore Expression Data Set at https://registry.opendata.aws/sgnex. The bam files of interest were viewed on UCSC genome browser against UCSC hg38 reference. Illumina-TargetALS dataset was obtained from the Target ALS Foundation as fastq files (Sample Source = Cortex_Motor_Medial; C9orf72 Repeat Expansion (Data from CUMC) = No/Unknown). The splice junctions, SA1 and SA2, detected from the long-read data were annotated manually and appended to the GENCODE v48 genome annotation file. The reads were aligned to UCSC hg38 reference genome (https://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg38/bigZips/hg38.fa.gz) by the splice aware aligner – STAR (Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference)83. STAR-aligned bam files (--quantMode TranscriptomeSAM) were used as inputs for UBQLN2 spliced isoform expression estimation by RSEM (RNA-Seq by Expectation Maximization) algorithm84. Because RNA degradation and 3’ read bias can confound the analysis of splicing events occurring at the 5’ end of the UBQLN2 transcript, only sequencing samples with an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) ≥ 5.5 were included in downstream analysis. For samples with missing RIN, its RIN was imputed from a linear regression model which was trained on the samples with known RIN using the read start position distribution (RSPD) and fragment length statistics estimated by RSEM. The model was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) which resulted in an r2 of 0.64 for predicted vs. observed RIN values. See Sup. Table 1 for the ExternalSampleID of the samples which passed the filtering criteria. UBQLN2-Spliced isoform expression was quantified by the sum of the estimated RSEM Isoform Percentage (IsoPct) of SA1 and SA2 transcripts. The samples were grouped by Sex (Female vs Male) and Subject/Clinical Group (ALS Spectrum MND vs Non-Neurological Control). Wilcoxon tests were performed which agreed with the results from linear modeling of logit transformed spliced isoform expression values. UBQLN2 gene expression was quantified as transcripts per million (TPM) from RSEM and a linear regression analysis was performed on the relationship between UBQLN2 TPM and spliced isoform expression.

For sequence alignment, reference mRNA sequences of UBQLN2 from Homo sapiens (NM_013444.4), Mus musculus (NM_018798.2), Pan troglodytes (XM_001148687.7), Pongo abelii (XM_002831718.6), and Pongo pygmaeus (XM_054472304.2) were downloaded from NCBI on 15-Sep-2025. Sequences between the 5’ untranslated region (5’ UTR) and the translational start site (TSS, Met-1) were aligned manually. The UBQLN2 mRNA sequences at the selected region were identical for all primates and hence not shown in the alignment figure to omit redundancy.

Cell culture and treatment

HeLa, HEK293T, and U-2 OS cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). HeLa and HEK293T cells were grown in DMEM medium (Corning, 10-013-CV) whereas U-2 OS were grown in McCoy’s 5A medium (Corning, 10-050-CV). Murine 4T1 (BALB/cfC3H) and MC38 (C57BL/6) cells were originally obtained from ATCC. 4T1 was maintained in DMEM whereas MC38 was maintained in RPMI medium. All growing medium was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GeminiBio 900-108-500) and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Corning, 30-002-CI). The cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 unless otherwise stated.

For heat shock exposure, HeLa cells were placed in 42°C incubator supplemented with 5% CO2 for two hours followed by recovery at 37°C before being harvested. Where indicated, 50 μM MG132 or 100 nM bafilomycin A1 (reconstituted in DMSO), was added to transfected HeLa cells or CRISPR-generated UBQLN2-mNeon clones. Cells were harvested for Western blot analysis in modified RIPA buffer 4 h post-treatment.

Lentiviral shRNA knockdown

Lentiviral vectors targeting the following genes were purchased from Sigma: UBQLN2 (cat# TRCN0000004377); SRSF1 (cat# TRCN0000001095), PTBP1 (cat# TRCN0000231420). The lentiviral TDP-43 plasmid was homemade by the following primers: TDP-43-pLKO.1-F: 5’-CCGGGCTCTAATTCTGGTGCAGCAACTCGAGTTGCTGCACCAGAATTAGAGCTTTTTG-3’ and TDP-43-pLKO.1-R: 5’-AATTCAAAAAGCTCTAATTCTGGTGCAGCAACTCGAGTTGCTGCACCAGAATTAGAGC-3’). The lentiviral FUS-3’UTR and FUS-CDS shRNA vectors were prepared as previously described85. Non-targeting (shNT) vector (Addgene Plasmid #1864) was included as negative control. Lentiviral particles were produced by transient transfection of HEK293T cells with shRNA vectors, psPAX2 (Addgene plasmid #12260) and pCMV-VSV-G (Addgene plasmid #8454) in a ratio of 4:3:3 by jetPRIME® as described85,86. Lentiviral-infiltrating media harvested at 24 h and 52 h post-transfection were combined and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. Viral supernatant was aliquoted 1 mL per tube before freezing at −80°C. HeLa cells were plated in 6-wells plate and transduced with 1 mL lentiviral supernatant per well at 70–80% confluency for 24 h, followed by selection with 2 μg/ml puromycin for 48–72 h. Cells were harvested in TRIzol reagent for splicing assays or modified RIPA buffer for Western blotting of proteins of interest.

RNA extraction, cDNA syntheses, splicing assay, and Sanger sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from human cell lines (HeLa, HEK293T, and U-2 OS), mouse 4T1 and MC38 cells, as well as C57BL/6J mouse brain tissues by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen 15596018) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using iScript™ gDNA Clear cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, 1725035) according to manufacturer’s protocols. RT-PCR was performed with GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega M7123) with primers designed to amplify both full-length (FL) and spliced (Sp) UBQLN2 transcripts in human (Hs) or mouse (Mm). HsUBQLN2-F: 5’-AACCGCAGTCTTCATCACAG-3’; HsUBQLN2-Nter-R: 5’-CATGGATGCCATGCTGGATCAAGG-3’; HsUBQLN2-Sp-R2: 5’-ATTGGGTAGTGGATCGCGAT-3’; MmUBQLN2-F: 5’-GGAGGAGCCGCAGCCTTCAACTCTG-3’; MmUBQLN2-Nter-R: 5’-CGGACGGTTCTGGCTTTTGATAAC-3’; MmUBQLN2-Sp-R2: 5’-CGCCGCAGAGCATTGTAG-3’. Splicing primers amplified both UBQLN2-FL and UBQLN2-Sp amplicons which differ by 763 nt (Hs) and 781 nt (Mm) that were resolved by 2% w/v agarose gel electrophoresis. Gel images were acquired by Odyssey Fc/XF (LI-COR Biosciences). Five percent v/v DMSO was included to amplify MmUBQLN2 splice products owing to high GC content.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) of human samples was performed using HsUBQLN2-F and the following reverse primers: (HsUBQLN2-Nter-R4: 5’-AGAGCGCGAGGGAAGGAGGAAGG-3’; HsUBQLN2-Sp-R5: 5’-CTGGCAATTTCGAGTGTCTGCCTC-3’) with iTaq Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, 1725124) according to manufacturer’s protocols. GAPDH was included as loading control (GAPDH-F: 5’-AATCCCATCACCATCTTCCA-3’; GAPDH-R: 5’-TGGACTCCACGACGTACTCA-3’). For mouse samples, qRT-PCR was performed using MmUBQLN2-F and the following reverse primers (MmUBQLN2-Nter-R5: 5’-AAGAGGGCGCGAGGGAAGGAGGT-3’; MmUBQLN2-Sp-R6: 5’-CAGCGTCTGCCTCATTATATCTGG-3’). GAPDH was included as loading control (MmGAPDH-F: 5’-ACCTGCCAAGTATGATGA-3’; GAPDH-R: 5’-GGAGTTGCTGTTGAAGTC-3’).

For RT-PCR analysis of human and mouse UBQLN2 splicing reporters, the forward primer was located within the multiple cloning site of the peGFP-N1 backbone to specifically amplify transcripts from the reporters (peGFPN1-MCS-F: 5’-TCAGATCTCGAGCTCAAGCTTCG-3’). For qRT-PCR splicing assay involving mutated HsUBQLN2 reporter, a new set of reverse primers was designed to avoid the polypyrimidine tracts (HsUBQLN2-Nter-R6: 5’-AAGGAGGCACCGCCGCAGCG-3’; and HsUBQLN2-SA2-R8: 5’-CTGGGTTGTTGAGCAGGTGACTGA-3’). Additional reverse primer targeting region between SA1 and SA2 was included: HsUBQLN2-SA1-R9: 5’-GATTAGCCATAATGAGCTGCCTCA-3’.

Sanger sequencing was performed using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Obtained from UWBC) with the following reverse sequencing primer 5’-CTAGATTGCTAAGAGCCAGGTC-3’ to verify the sequence identity of the amplicons. The PCR libraries were purified by using Axygen® AxyPrep MAG DyeClean Up Kit (Axygen MAG-DYECL-5) following manufacturer’s protocol. The sequencing products were resolved by capillary electrophoresis for reads by UWBC. The ab1 files were viewed in SnapGene Viewer.

RNA immunoprecipitation (RNA-IP)

RNA-IP was performed essentially as described87. Approximately 50 million cells were lysed in 1 mL ice-cold NET-2 buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% v/v NP40) supplemented with 2 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol, 0.2 U/μL RNasin Plus (Promega, N2611), 20 mM sodium fluoride, 20 mM β-glycerophosphate and 2X protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, P8340–5ml; Thermo Scientific, 78438). The lysate was sonicated in five pulses of 3 s ON, 30 s OFF followed by three pulses of 10 s ON and 30 s OFF at an amplitude of 30% (Fisher Scientific, FB120). The lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 x g for 10 min, 4°C. The supernatant was incubated with 5 μg of either the targeted antibodies (PTBP1: ThermoFisher 32–4800; SRSF1-M: Santa Cruz sc33652; TDP-43: Proteintech 10782–2-AP) or normal mouse or rabbit IgG controls (Millipore 12–371; 12–370) for 1 h on a nutator mixer at 4°C before Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose bead suspension (Santa Cruz, sc-2003) was added (20 μl/μg of antibody) for overnight incubation. The beads were washed with NET-2 buffer five times. The immunoprecipitated RNA was extracted by TRIzol reagent and reverse transcribed into cDNA by iScript™ gDNA Clear cDNA Synthesis Kit. Log2 fold enrichment of UBQLN2 mRNA in the target RNA-IP sample versus the control IgG sample was quantified by qRT-PCR assay with primers flanking the 5’ splice site (HsUBQLN2-F and HsUBQLN2-Nter-R4). For TDP-43 RNA-IP, log2 fold enrichment of STMN2 was included as a positive control: STMN2-Ex2a-F: 5’-TTTGGCTCTCTGTGTGAGCA-3’; STMN2-Ex2a-R: 5’-CACAAGCCGCATTCACATTCA-3’).

iPSC-ExN differentiation and transcriptomic analysis

Human iPSCs were derived from healthy control male donors as in previous publications: GM00498–488 and WC032i-6007–189. Human iPSCs were maintained and the differentiation process was carried out according to the established protocols in90. Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) were thawed onto MEF feeder plates in hESC media supplemented with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632 dihydrochloride, Tocris #1254), passaged weekly onto new MEF plates by using 1 mg/ml collagenase Type IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific #17104019) in DMEM/F12. Human iPSCs were fed every day with hESC media (DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 11330032), KnockOut™ Serum Replacement (KOSR) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 10828028), L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 25030081) and 2x FGF2 (Waisman Biomanufacturing, 8 ng/mL).

Neural differentiation of hPSCs was carried out using previously established dual SMAD inhibition-based protocol88–90. hPSCs neural differentiation was induced 5 days after passaging of hPSCs onto MEFs by switching hESC medium to neural induction medium (NIM), consisting of 1:1 mixture of DMEM/F12:Neurobasal (Thermo Fisher Scientific 21103049), 1X N2 (Waisman Center), 1X L-glutamine, 1X Antibiotic-Antimyotic (Anti-Anti) (Thermo Fisher Scientific 15240062), 10 μM SB432542 (Biogems #3014193), 100 nM LDN193189 (Selleck Chemicals #S7507), and 5 μM XAV-939 (Selleck #3748). Cells were cultured in NIM for 9 days with a daily medium change with freshly added small molecules.

Cells were dissociated with TrypLE Express (Thermo Fisher Scientific #12605010) and replated in a 1:1 ratio onto Cultrex (R&D Systems) -coated plates in neural progenitor cell (NPC) medium (Neurobasal medium, 1X L-glutamine, 1X N2, 0.5X B27 without vitamin A (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1X Anti-Anti), supplemented with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor. Cells were maintained for 6 days with daily change of NPC medium to transition from neuroepithelia to NPCs and reorganize into neural rosettes. At this stage, the NPCs could be dissociated with Accutase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), frozen in NPC freeze medium (90% FBS and 10% DMSO), and stored in liquid nitrogen.

The NPCs were thawed onto Cultrex-coated plates in the NPC media containing 10 μM ROCK inhibitor. For differentiation into excitatory neurons (ExNs), NPCs were plated at low cell density in the NPC medium supplemented with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor and 0.2 μM γ-Secretase Inhibitor XXI, Compound E (Calbiochem). On the next day, the media was changed into neuronal differentiation medium (NDM) (Neurobasal medium, 1X GlutaMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1X Anti-Anti, 1X N2, 0.5X B27 without vitamin A, 0.3% glucose, 20 ng/ml BDNF (Peprotech), 20 ng/ml GDNF (Peprotech), 500 ng/ml cAMP (Millipore-Sigma), and 200 μM ascorbic acid (Millipore-Sigma), supplemented with 0.2 μM Compound E. Post-mitotic neurons were maintained in NDM, with 0.5 vol of the medium change performed every 3 days. For RNA isolation and RT-qPCR analysis, NPCs were collected at 1 day after thawing and neurons were collected at 1 week or 4 weeks of differentiation. Cells were collected in TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), then RNA was extracted using Direct-zol RNA Microprep Plus kit (ZYMON RESEARCH #R2062) following the manufacturer’s instructions. First strand cDNAs were synthesized with both oligo dT and random primers using PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (Takara #RR037A), following manufacturer’s protocols. qRT-PCR was performed as described earlier with 15 ng cDNA template per reaction.

Lipofectamine-mediated transfection

HeLa or HEK293T cells were seeded into 6-well plates, 38 mm glass bottom dishes, or 6 cm plates and transfected at 60–80% confluency using 3 μg (6-well plate, 38 mm glass bottom dishes) or 7.5 μg (6-cm plate) of plasmid DNA and the Lipofectamine 3000 reagent kit (Invitrogen L3000015) using the manufacturer’s recommendations. The culture medium was changed prior to the addition of transfection mixture, and the cells were incubated for 24 h for transgene expression. Cells were then harvested for splicing assays, Western blot analysis, immunofluorescence or live-cell imaging.

SRSF1 and PTBP1 overexpression was performed by co-transfecting the corresponding plasmids (pcDNA3.1-FLAG-SF2, Addgene Plasmid #99021; Myc-PTBP1, Addgene Plasmid #23024) with HsUBQLN2 splicing reporter in a 5:1 mass ratio. Western blot and RIF1 splicing assay87 were used to assess the efficiency of overexpression.

Cloning and QuikChange mutagenesis

The coding sequence of full-length UBQLN2 (UBQLN2-M1) and two of its isoforms (UBQLN2-M243 and UBQLN2-M446) were amplified from HEK293T cells using attB-flanked primers (UBQLN2-M1-F: 5’- GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTAatggctgagaatggcgag-3’; UBQLN2-M243-F: 5’- GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTAatgatgcaagagatgatgag-3’; UBQLN2-M446-F: 5’- GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTAatgtcaaacccaagagcaatg-3’; and UBQLN2-CDS-R: 5’- GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTTttacgatggctgggagcc-3’) by using Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix with HF Buffer (Thermo Scientific F530L). The attB-PCR products were purified after being resolved on 1% w/v agarose gel by Zymoclean™ Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research Corporation D4007) following manufacturer’s protocol. The purified attB-PCR products were subsequently cloned into pcDNA5-eGFP-FRT/TO plasmid vector (Addgene plasmid #19444) by Gateway recombination (Invitrogen 11789020 and 11791020) following manufacturer’s one-tube protocol with overnight 25°C incubation in thermocycler for both BP and LR reactions. After Proteinase K digestion, the reaction mixtures were transformed into DH5α competent cells (ccdB sensitive) and plated. After overnight incubation at 37°C, colonies were selected and purified plasmids were sequenced in entirety.

For splicing reporters, human and mouse UBQLN2 gene sequences were amplified from HEK293T and C57BL/6J mouse genomic DNA respectively with an EcoRI-flanked forward primer and a BamH1-flanked reverse primer (HsReporter-F: 5’-GCGTGACGAATTCcagagttgctgggagtgcgcgc-3’; HsReporter-R: 5’-CGATCGATGGATCCgatggctgggagcccagcagcctt-3’; MmReporter-F: 5’-GCGTGACGAATTCggagacggcctgcaggacctgc-3’; MmReporter-R: 5’-CGATCGATGGATCCgatggctgagagcccagcagcctc-3’). The amplified gene fragments were purified as described above and eluted in 16 μL of nuclease-free water. The purified fragments and peGFP-N1 vector (Clontech 6085–1) were subjected to EcoR1-HF (NEB R3101S) and BamH1-HF (NEB R3136S) digestion for 1 h at 37°C in 10X rCutSmart Buffer (B6004S). The fragments of the correct size were excised, gel purified and ligated by T4 ligase (NEB M0202) in a molar ratio of 1:3 vector to insert (100 ng of vector to 140 ng of insert as calculated by NEBioCalculator) in a 10 μL ligation reaction. The ligation reactions were incubated at 16°C overnight, transformed into DH5α competent cells and plated. After overnight incubation at 37°C, colonies were selected and purified plasmids were sequenced in entirety.

To swap the 5’UTR of HsUBQLN2 and MmUBQLN2 splicing reporters, one microgram of each of the reporter plasmids was subjected to digestion with NotI (NEB R3189S), which cleaved at a conserved GCGGCCGC motif immediately upstream of the start codon and immediately downstream of the GFP cassette. The resulting HsUBQLN2CDS-GFP and MmUBQLN2CDS-GFP fragments and their corresponding vector-5’UTR fragments were resolved on 1% agarose gel, excised, and purified. We then ligated the heterologous UBQLN2CDS-GFP (insert) and vector-5’UTR-containing fragments in a molar ratio of 1:2 vector to insert (100 ng of vector to 125 ng of insert as calculated by NEBioCalculator) in a 20 μL ligation reaction. The ligated product was resolved on a 1% agarose gel. Fragments of the correct size were excised and purified before being transformed into DH5α competent cells and plated. Colonies were selected after overnight incubation at 37°C for plasmid purification. Purified plasmids were sequenced in entirety to screen for the correct insert orientation. The MmUTR-HsCDS reporter is 6800 bp in size, encoding a 57 nt shorter HsUBQLN2 transcript than WT. The HsUTR-MmCDS reporter is 6899 bp in size, encoding a 57 nt longer MmUBQLN2 transcript than WT, due to the difference in 5’UTR length.

For QuikChange Mutagenesis, primers containing the desired mutations (Sup. Table 2) were employed to amplify the target sequence using Phusion™ Hot Start II DNA Polymerases (2 U/μL) (Thermo Scientific F549L) following manufacturer’s recommendations. For primers targeting regions with high GC content (with melting temperature ≥ 65°C, 4% v/v DMSO was added into the reaction. Template plasmids were removed from the reaction mixture by Dpn1 digestion (Thermo Scientific ER1702) at 37°C for 4 h. Dpn1-digested mixture was transformed into DH5α or Stbl3 competent cells and plated for colony selection. All purified plasmids were sequenced by University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center (UWBC) using the Oxford Nanopore platform. Guppy basecaller with the Super accurate (SUP) model was used for basecalling. pLannotate map which was provided by UWBC was subsequently screened for the desired mutations in SnapGene Viewer (version 6.0.2) for clone selection and plasmid amplification.

Protein extraction and Western blotting

Cells were washed with 1X PBS and lysed on plate in 200 μL modified RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8), 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and 1% v/v Triton X-100) supplemented with 1X Halt™ Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Scientific 78446). The lysate was incubated on ice for 10 min, collected in 1.5 mL tubes, and sonicated in 5 pulses of 3 s ON, 5 s OFF at an amplitude of 30% (Fisher Scientific, FB120). The lysate was then mixed with 4X SDS sample buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 40% glycerol, 8% SDS, 0.5% bromophenol blue and 10% beta-mercaptoethanol) at a ratio of 1:3. The samples were heated at 95°C for 5 min prior to freezing at −20°C for storage or loading directly for Western blotting.

For Western blotting, samples were separated by 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE). Proteins were transferred to 0.45 μm Immobilon®-FL PVDF Membrane (Millipore, IPFL00010) in Tris-glycine transfer buffer. The membranes were blocked with blocking solution (5% w/v milk in Tris-buffered saline, 0.1% v/v Tween 20 (TBST)) for 1 h before blotting with target primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. For UBQLN2-HPA antibody (Sigma HPA006431), the blocking reagent was replaced with 1% w/v bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBST or 1X RapidBlock™ solution (VWR 97064–124). The source and the dilution of the primary antibodies used were listed as followed: UBQLN2-CST (Cell Signaling Technology 85509S, 1:1000); SRSF1 (Santa Cruz sc33652, 1:100); alpha-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich T6199, 1:1000); vinculin (Santa Cruz sc73614, 1:1000); MCM2 (Abcam ab4461, 1:2000); PTBP1 (ThermoFisher 32–4800, 1:1000); TDP43 (Proteintech 10782–2-AP, 1:1000); GFP (Santa Cruz sc9996, 1:100); UBQLN2-HPA (Sigma HPA006431, 1:250); mNeonGreen-Tag (Cell Signaling Technology 55074, 1:1000), HA-Tag (Cell Signaling Technology 3724S, 1:1000). After primary antibody incubation, the membranes were washed 3 × 5 min with TBST and incubated with LI-COR IRDye secondary antibodies (IRDye 800CW goat anti-rabbit or IRDye 680RD goat anti-mouse) at a dilution of 1:10000 in blocking solution for 45 min at room temperature. Membranes were washed 3 × 5 min with TBST, and images were acquired using Odyssey XF (LI-COR Biosciences). The exported images were then analyzed and organized with ImageStudio software (v5.2, LI-COR Biosciences).

CRISPR-Cas9 nucleofection

Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cas9 crRNA (Hs.HC9.FFFH5766.AA) and Alt-R™ CRISPR-Cas9 tracrRNA (IDT 1077024) were resuspended in IDTE buffer to a final concentration of 200 μM. Alt-R™ HDR Donor Block (CD.HC9.SJTY5528+) was resuspended in IDTE buffer to a final concentration of 500 ng/μL according to IDT recommendations. Equimolar concentrations of crRNA and tracrRNA were mixed in a sterile tube to a final duplex concentration of 100 μM. The crRNA:tracrRNA duplex mixture was incubated at 95°C for 5 min and cooled down to room temperature on benchtop. The ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex was prepared by mixing 120 pmol of crRNA:tracrRNA duplex and 104 pmol of Alt-R™ S.p. HiFi Cas9 Nuclease V3 (IDT 1081060) in 1X PBS to a total volume of 5 μL, followed by 20 min incubation at room temperature.

Amaxa™ 4D-Nucleofector™ protocol for MCF7 for 4D-Nucleofector™ in suspension was used. Ten million HeLa cells were harvested by trypsinization. 4D-Nucleofector™ solution for the 20 μL Nucleocuvette™ Strip was prepared according to manufacturer’s protocol by mixing 16.4 μL of Nucleofector™ Solution and 3.6 μL of supplement. HeLa cell pellet was resuspended carefully at room temperature with the 4D-Nucleofector™ solution. RNP complex and 1 μg of the Alt-R™ HDR Donor Block was added into the cell suspension before the whole mixture was transferred into the 20 μL Nucleocuvette™ Strip. Nucleofection was performed on LONZA 4D-Nucleofector by using the default specification for HeLa cells. After nucleofection, 75 μL of pre-warmed complete DMEM medium was used to gently resuspend the cells. Resuspended cells were added to a well on 24-wells plate containing 1 mL pre-warmed medium which was pre-equilibrated in a humidified 37°C/5% CO2 incubator. The cells were allowed for recovery for 2 days before being transferred to a larger vessel. At 5–7 days after nucleofection, mNeon positive cells were single-cell sorted into 96-wells plate by BD FACSDiscover S8 “Sparky”. The cells were expanded to 6-wells before being harvested. Genomic DNA from the clones were extracted in QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution (Biosearch Technologies) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Genotyping of the clones were performed with the following primers whose relative positions were shown in Sup. Fig. 3A. HsUBQLN2-Cter-F2: 5’-CAGCAACAACTGGAACAGCTC-3’; HsUBQLN2-Cter-R2: 5’-GCATCATATTAGACTTACAACTAGAC-3’; mNeon-R: 5’-CCATCATTTGGATTGCCGGTGC-3’. Insertion of mNeon upshifted the amplicon from HsUBQLN2-Cter-R2 by 753 nt which was resolved by 2% w/v agarose gel electrophoresis. Gel images were acquired by Odyssey Fc/XF (LI-COR Biosciences).

Immunofluorescence staining, live-cell Imaging, aggregates quantification

Cover slips (Fisher Scientific 12-545-83) were placed in each well of a 12-well plate, rinsed once with 75% ethanol and twice with 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were seeded onto cover glass in each well, fixed with 4% w/v paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.2% v/v Triton X-100 for 10 min and then blocked with 3% w/v BSA for an hour at room temperature. The cover slips were then transferred to an improvised humidity chamber for primary antibodies incubation at 37°C for 1 h or at 4°C overnight. The source and the dilution factor of the antibodies used were indicated here: alpha-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich T6199, 1:500); proteasome 19S S5A/ASF antibody (Abcam ab154935, 1:100). The cover glasses were washed 5 × 1 min with 0.05% v/v PBST (PBS, 0.05% v/v Tween-20) before incubating with Alexa Fluor™ secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher #A11032, #A32733) at a dilution of 1:1,000 for 45 min at room temperature. The cover slips were washed with 0.05% PBST for 3 × 1 min followed by 1X PBS for 2 × 1 min before being mounted on glass slides with DAPI-containing mounting medium (Vector H-1200). Images were acquired by Nikon AX confocal microscopes under the desired objectives and organized using NIS-Elements Advanced Research. For live-cell imaging, the cells were plated into 38 mm glass bottom dishes and stained with 1 μg/mL of Hoechst 33342 for 15 min before being imaged in humidified CO2 chamber supplemented with 5% CO2 throughout the experiment.

For aggregate quantification, GFP channel of the confocal images were retrieved and converted into a mask in Fiji. Aggregates were segmented and quantified by Analyze Particles-Shape Descriptors. Aggregates smaller than 0.2 μm2 were excluded for roundness quantification as they give a constant roundness value. Roundness of the aggregates were estimated by the following equation:

4*Areaπ*majoraxis2

The results were tabulated by a custom script in MATLAB and plotted in Prism (version 10.6.1). For S5A colocalization, S5A signal mask was generated in Fiji. For each image, the Pearson correlation coefficient of S5A and its corresponding GFP mask was calculated by a custom script in MATLAB.

Statistics

All statistical calculations were performed by Prism (version 10.6.1) following the recommended parameters. The sample sizes and tests performed were listed in the figure legends. The resulting p-values were printed on the figures.

RESULTS

Human UBQLN2 contains an unannotated exitron

Homo sapiens UBQLN2 (HsUBQLN2) is annotated as an intronless gene (hg38 coordinates chrX:56,563,627–56,567,868) that produces a single 624 amino acid (aa) translational product from the first AUG codon (UBQLN2-M1). We queried several long-read sequencing databases derived from two major long-read sequencing platforms (the Universal Human Reference RNA/UHRR sequenced on Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) Sequel II and Revio systems, as well as HepG2 cell RNA sequenced on Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION (FLO-MIN106D)91. These analyses identified an exitron spanning the 5’ UTR and the coding sequence (CDS) of HsUBQLN2. We adopted the exitron nomenclature (exonic intron) which involves alternative splicing within a protein-coding exon through the activation of cryptic splice sites as originally described by Marquez et al. in 201592. The putative HsUBQLN2 exitron starts at a consensus SD sequence at genomic position chrX:56,563,741 and ends with two alternative SAs at chrX:56,564,449 (SA1) or chrX:56,564,503 (SA2) of the HsUBQLN2 gene (Fig. 1A, annotated by red and black arrows respectively). Splicing out of this exitron results in the production of at least two 5’-truncated UBQLN2 transcript variants depending on SA usage: UBQLN2-SA1 (Fig. 1A, red arrow) and UBQLN2-SA2 (Fig. 1A, black arrows) that lack much of the 5’ UTR and the sequences encoding for either the first 193 (SA1) or 210 (SA2) amino acids of the UBQLN2 CDS. In both transcripts, the first available AUG codon is in-frame with the full-length UBQLN2 CDS. Any translation products produced from these transcripts lack the proteosome-targeting UBL domain and the first chaperone-binding STI1 domain, likely leading to altered functional properties relative to UBQLN2-M1 (Fig. 1A, protein domains). Screening of the short-read RNA-sequencing data from TargetALS RNA sequencing datasets based on Illumina sequencing system (HiSeq 2500) also detected reads that mapped across the splice junctions of both UBQLN2-SA1 and UBQLN2-SA2 transcripts (Fig. 1A, ExternalSampleID: CGND-HRA-00013; ExternalSubjectID: NEUEL133AK6), suggesting that the identified variants were not artefacts resulting from a particular sequencing approach/platform.

Fig. 1. UBQLN2 contains an unannotated exitron.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(A) PacBio-UHRR and ONT-SGNex-HepG2 data as viewed on UCSC genome browser. Selected full-length reads were presented as horizontal bars when aligned to UBQLN2 reference sequence (RefSeq). Lines represent regions that are missing in the reads of spliced UBQLN2 mRNAs. Spliced reads share the same SD and were annotated with red (SA1) and black arrows (SA2). OMIM alleles track indicates the positions of the four codons within the PRR domain (P497, P506, P509, and P525) that are linked to ALS15. UBQLN2 protein domains as translated from the UBQLN2 RefSeq were shown in the alignment. Both spliced UBQLN2 transcripts were also identified from Illumina-based short-read RNA sequencing datasets from TargetALS (ExternalSampleID: CGND-HRA-00013; ExternalSubjectID: NEUEL133AK6) by reads spanning the respective splice junctions and annotated with red and black arrows.

(B) PCR and qPCR primer designs with a shared 5’ primer (dark blue) and two alternative 3’ primers to amplify only the full-length (dark blue) or both the full-length and spliced UBQLN2 transcripts (magenta).

(C) Spliced UBQLN2 mRNA (UBQLN2-Sp) was detected in three immortalized human cell lines (U-2 OS, HeLa, and HEK293T) as well as a commercially acquired human brain (HsBrain) RNA sample (Invitrogen AM7962). Note that full-length UBQLN2 (UBQLN2-FL) amplification by the magenta splicing primer is inefficient due to competition from the smaller UBQLN2-Sp amplicons (top panel). The bottom panel shows selective amplification of UBQLN2-FL using dark blue reverse primer.

(D) Percent Spliced Out (PSO) of HsUBQLN2 exitron in U-2 OS, HeLa, HEK293T, and HsBrain samples as estimated by qPCR splicing assay. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4 for U2-OS; N = 5 for HeLa; and N = 3 for HEK293T.

(E) DNA sequencing chromatogram from the indicated UBQLN2-Sp RT-PCR amplicons demonstrating the removal of the exitron at the SD-SA2 splice junction marked by the magenta inverted arrow.

(F) Representative agarose gel image of UBQLN2 splicing assay from C57BL/6J mouse brain tissues suggests MmUBQLN2 splicing occurs less frequently.

(G) PSO of MmUBQLN2 exitron estimated from qPCR assay. Four brain regions (right cortex, left cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum) were harvested and processed from three males (M1, M2, and M3) as well as a female mouse (M4). Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a brain region from an individual mouse as listed above.

(H) UBQLN2-Sp transcript was not detected in murine mammary carcinoma 4T1 and colon adenocarcinoma MC38 cells, suggesting that UBQLN2 exitron splicing is not specific for cancer cells.

We designed an RT-PCR and a qRT-PCR splicing assay using the primer design illustrated in Fig. 1B: a shared forward primer and two different reverse primers to amplify both the full-length (UBQLN2-FL) and spliced UBQLN2 (UBQLN2-Sp) transcripts in human and mouse samples. In all three immortalized human cell lines that we screened, namely U-2 OS, HeLa, and HEK293T, we identified the presence of UBQLN2-Sp transcript from the usage of SA2 (Fig. 1C–E). UBQLN2-SA2 transcript was also detected in a commercially available human total brain RNA sample (Invitrogen AM7962, 30 years old female Caucasian) (Fig. 1C,D; HsBrain), and human spinal cord RNA from both control and ALS patients (not shown). The percent spliced out (PSO) of HsUBQLN2 exitron in human samples was estimated to be ~10% by qRT-PCR (Fig. 1D). The identity of the UBQLN2-Sp amplicon from Fig. 1C was validated with Sanger sequencing to be UBQLN2-SA2 (Fig. 1E). UBQLN2-SA1 was not detected in any of the human samples we screened by PCR or qPCR amplification.

Based on protein sequence alignment, the corresponding mm10 coordinates for mouse UBQLN2 (Mus musculus UBQLN2/MmUBQLN2) exitron are chrX:153,498,336–153,499,116. Interestingly, we failed to identify any UBQLN2-Sp transcript variants from mouse long-read sequencing data or mouse brain RNA extracted in-house from different brain regions (cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus) of C57BL/6J strain by a similar PCR and qPCR strategy (Fig. 1F), suggesting the exitron splicing of MmUBQLN2 is rare. Consistent with this, the PSO of MmUBQLN2 was estimated to be less than 0.1% by qRT-PCR splicing assay from four mice (M1 – M4) (Fig. 1G). We also screened two immortalized murine cell lines, namely 4T1 (mammary carcinoma) and MC38 (colon adenocarcinoma), which did not show detectable UBQLN2-Sp transcripts (Fig. 1H). These results suggest that UBQLN2 splicing occurs at very low levels in the mouse.

PTBP1 and SRSF1 bind to HsUBQLN2 pre-mRNA to inhibit splicing

The annotated HsUBQLN2 5’UTR (NM_013444.4) contains four polypyrimidine tracts (Py 1–4), that are only partially conserved in MmUBQLN2 (NM_018798.2) (Fig. 2A), despite an overall homology of greater than 60%57,93. These Py tracts constitute putative binding sites for PTBP1 and PTBP2 – RBPs that are well known to regulate alternative splicing in neurons during differentiation (Fig. 2A). We also identified two (purine-rich tracts; Pu1 and Pu2) representing putative SRSF1 binding motifs in the HsUBQLN2 5’UTR (Fig. 2A). Pu1 (CCGGAGGACC)94 is disrupted by two G insertions flanking the GGAGGA motif whereas Pu2 (CGGAGGAGGCCC) has two point mutations from AGGA to AGAC in MmUBQLN2 (Fig. 2A). Py and Pu motifs are also present in the primate UBQLN2 mRNA sequences (Pan troglodytes (XM_001148687.7), Pongo abelii (XM_002831718.6), and Pongo pygmaeus (XM_054472304.2) (data not shown).

Fig. 2. HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing is inhibited by PTBP1 and SRSF1.

Fig. 2.

(A) Alignment of UBQLN2 mRNA sequence around the SD (inverted magenta arrow) in the 5’ UTR and the translational start site (TSS) of Homo sapiens (NM_013444.4) and Mus musculus (NM_018798.2) downloaded from NCBI on 15-Sep-2025. Four polypyrimidine tracts (Py1, chrX:56563793–56563815; Py2, chrX:56563819–56563829; Py3: chrX:56563841–56563848; Py4: 56563695–56563703) and two purine-rich SRSF1 binding sites (Pu1, chrX:56563705–56563714; Pu2: chrX:56563639–56563650) on HsUBQLN2 are highlighted. All elements are unique to HsUBQLN2 except Py3.

(B) HeLa cells were transduced with lentiviral shRNA vectors targeting the indicated RBPs and expression of UBQLN2-FL and UBQLN2-Sp transcripts measured by RT-PCR.

(C) Quantification of UBQLN2 exitron PSO from samples analyzed in panel (B) by qRT-PCR assay. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 6. Significant p-values from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Geisser-Greenhouse correction and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

(D) Western blotting of the protein lysates harvested from lentiviral shRNA-transduced HeLa cells from (B) verifying the knockdown of the PTBP1, SRSF1, and TDP43. α-tubulin, vinculin, and MCM2 were included as loading controls for each gel.

(E) SRSF1 expression was quantified based on densitometry from (D) and normalized to α-tubulin. Note that shPTBP1 caused an increase in SRSF1 expression. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 3.

(F) Log2 fold enrichment of UBQLN2 pre-mRNA immunoprecipitated from the indicated antibody after normalized to normal IgG control from native RNA immunoprecipitation assays in HeLa cells. Median and interquartile range were shown as dotted lines. Each dot represents an individual biological replicate, N = 6 for PTBP1 RNA-IP, N = 5 for SRSF1 RNA-IP, and N = 3 for TDP43 RNA-IP. The p-values from two-tailed one sample t-test were listed.

(G) Transcript per million (TPM) of UBQLN2 from neural progenitor cells (NPC), 1-week differentiating excitatory neurons (1-week ExN), and 4-week differentiating ExN (4-week ExN). Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 2 for a total of two cell lines: GM00498–4 and WC032i-6007–1; n = 4 differentiation batches. Significant p-values from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Geisser-Greenhouse correction and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

(H) PSO of HsUBQLN2 from (G) as estimated by qRT-PCR. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 3 for a total of two cell lines: GM00498–4 and WC032i-6007–1, n = 6 differentiation batches. Significant p-values from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Geisser-Greenhouse correction and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

(I) HeLa cells were exposed to a 42°C heat shock for 2 h and then immediately harvested or allowed to recover for 1–2 h before cell harvest and RT-PCR analysis of UBQLN2 splicing. Control cells were kept at 37°C throughout the experiment and harvested at the last timepoint. Representative gel images from two biological replicates were shown.

(J) Line graphs showing the changes in PSO as estimated by qRT-PCR over the time course of two hours of heat shock at 42°C followed by two hours of recovery at 37°C. Each line represents a biological replicate, N = 4. Significant p-value from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Geisser-Greenhouse correction and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was listed.

Given the presence of consensus PTBP and SRSF1 binding sites, we tested the effects of shRNA-mediated silencing of either SRSF1, PTBP1 or ALS-associated TDP-43 and FUS on HsUBQLN2 splicing. Knockdown of PTBP1 and TDP-43 significantly increased the PSO of UBQLN2 exitron in HeLa cells, while knockdown of SRSF1 caused a trend toward increased PSO that was just short of statistical significance (Fig. 2B,C, Sup. Fig. 1A). FUS knockdown did not change the PSO (Fig. 2B,C, Sup. Fig. 1A). The knockdown efficiencies of PTBP1, SRSF1, and TDP-43 shRNAs were confirmed by Western blot (Fig. 2D), where it was also observed that PTBP1 knockdown mildly increased SRSF1 expression (Fig. 2D,E).

In light of these splicing results, we employed native RNA-IP to determine if PTBP1, SRSF1, TDP-43, associated with UBQLN2 pre-mRNA. As shown in Fig. 2F, both PTBP1 and SRSF1 were significantly enriched on UBQLN2 pre-mRNA while TDP-43 was not. STMN2 amplification was included as a positive control for TDP-43 enrichment (Sup. Fig. 1B). These findings suggest that PTBP1 and SRSF1 suppress UBQLN2 exitron splicing through direct binding, whereas TDP-43 indirectly suppresses UBQLN2 splicing.

As PTBPs are involved in alternative splicing regulations in response to neuronal differentiation35,41–43, and Ubqln2 expression is upregulated during mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation into neurons95, we examined the total UBQLN2 gene expression (transcript per million/TPM, Fig. 2G)90 as well as the PSO of UBQLN2 exitron in human neural progenitor cells (NPC), immature excitatory neurons (ExNs) at 1-week differentiation (1-week ExN), and at 4-week differentiation (4-week ExN) (Fig. 2H). The upregulation in UBQLN2 gene expression in 1-week neurons compared to NPCs (Fig. 2G) was associated with higher expression of PTBP296 and lower PSO (Fig. 2H). To determine whether UBQLN2 splicing was responsive to proteotoxic stress, we performed RT-PCR splicing assay in HeLa cells exposed to a transient heat shock. We found that heat shock significantly suppressed UBQLN2 splicing and led to an increase in UBQLN2-FL transcripts (Fig. 2I,J). These findings suggest that UBQLN2 exitron splicing is regulated and that suppression of exitron splicing may provide a mechanism to upregulate UBQLN2 gene dosage in response to neuronal differentiation signal and heat-shock.

Minigenes recapitulate endogenous UBQLN2 splicing in cell lines

To better understand regulation of UBQLN2 exitron splicing in human and mouse, we cloned the 5’UTR and the CDS of HsUBQLN2 and MmUBQLN2 into a peGFP-N1 vector to generate a UBQLN2 minigene splicing reporter transcribed from a CMV promoter that produces transcripts and proteins which are tagged with eGFP at the 3’ end and C-terminus, respectively (Fig. 3A). The splicing reporters were transfected into either HeLa or HEK293T cells and RT-PCR splicing analysis was carried out using UBQLN2 reverse primers (Fig. 1B) in conjunction with a vector-specific forward primer to selectively amplify the minigene-derived transcripts (Fig. 3A). The HsUBQLN2 minigene showed robust exitron splicing (Fig. 3B,C) with UBQLN2-Sp accounting for 35.8% and 26.8% of total UBQLN2 mRNA in HeLa and HEK293T cells, respectively (Fig. 3F). By contrast, the mean PSO for MmUBQLN2 was only 3.9% and 0.8% in these cell lines (Fig. 3D–F). These data establish UBQLN2 minigenes as reporters of UBQLN2 splicing activity and are consistent with the finding of dramatically reduced endogenous MmUBQLN2 splicing in C57BL/6J mouse samples relative to HsUBQLN2 splicing in human samples (Fig. 1).

Fig. 3. Development of UBQLN2 minigene splicing reporters.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(A, top panel) Schematic of the UBQLN2 splicing reporters. Transcription start site (TSS) from CMV promoter was marked by green arrow. Forward RT-PCR primer is located in the multiple cloning site of the vector. Reverse primer between SA1 and SA2 that amplifies mRNAs that are spliced upstream of SA2 is shown in light blue. Locations of selected splicing elements and their respective mutants are shown.

(A, bottom panel) Approximate locations of the TSSs that were mutated in the HsUBQLN2 splicing reporter. All primers used for mutagenesis are listed in Sup. Table 2.

(B) HsUBQLN2 splicing reporters were transfected into either HeLa or HEK293T cells. UBQLN2 splicing assay was performed.

(C) The expression of UBQLN2-FL and UBQLN2-Sp transcripts in HsUBQLN2 transfected cells were quantified by qRT-PCR and normalized to GAPDH. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4 for HeLa and N = 3 for HEK293T.

(D) MmUBQLN2 splicing reporters were transfected into either HeLa or HEK293T cells. UBQLN2 splicing assay was performed. Note that MmUBQLN2 splicing reporter has negligible UBQLN2-Sp amplicons in both HeLa and HEK293T compared to HsUBQLN2 as shown in panel (B).

(E) The expression of UBQLN2-FL and UBQLN2-Sp transcripts in MmUBQLN2 transfected cells were quantified by qRT-PCR and normalized to GAPDH. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4 for HeLa and N = 3 for HEK293T.

(F) PSO of HsUBQLN2 and MmUBQLN2 reporters in HeLa and HEK293T cells as estimated by qPCR splicing assay. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4 for HeLa and N = 3 for HEK293T.

(G) The 5’UTR of HsUBQLN2 reporter was replaced with the annotated 5’UTR from MmUBQLN2 (MmUTR-HsCDS). Splicing assay of both Hs-WT and MmUTR-HsCDS reporter-transfected cells was shown.

(H) MmUTR replacement reduced the relative expression of UBQLN2-Sp transcripts, as quantified by qRT-PCR. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4. p-value from two-tailed paired t-test was listed.

(I) Western blot of UBQLN2-GFP and MCM2 (loading control) from the protein lysates of the transfected cells used in Panel (G).

(J) UBQLN2-GFP signal intensity was quantified by densitometry and normalized to MCM2. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4. p-value from two-tailed paired t-test was listed.

(K) The 5’UTR of MmUBQLN2 reporter was replaced with the annotated 5’UTR from HsUBQLN2 (HsUTR-MmCDS). Splicing assay of both Mm-WT and HsUTR-MmCDS reporter-transfected cells was shown.

(L) HsUTR replacement increased the relative expression of UBQLN2-Sp transcripts as quantified by qRT-PCR. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4. p-value from two-tailed paired t-test was listed.

(M) Western blot of UBQLN2-GFP and MCM2 (loading control) from the protein lysates of the transfected cells listed in Panel (K).

(N) UBQLN2-GFP signal intensity was quantified by densitometry and normalized to MCM2. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4. p-value from two-tailed paired t-test was listed.

The relative absence of exitron splicing of MmUBQLN2 in human cells suggests the presence of unique cis-acting splicing elements between HsUBQLN2 and MmUBQLN2 genes. Consistent with this idea, substitution of the HsUBQLN2 5’UTR (HsUTR) with the MmUBQLN2 5’UTR (MmUTR) (see Materials and Methods) decreased splicing of the HsUBQLN2 minigene reporter approximately three-fold (Fig. 3G,H). The decrease in splicing of the MmUTR-HsUBQLN2 chimera correlated with a small but statistically significant increase in HsUBQLN2-M1 protein expression (Fig. 3I,J). We also performed the converse experiment where the effect of the HsUTR on the splicing of the MmUBQLN2 reporter was measured. The HsUTR-MmUBQLN2 chimeric construct exhibited a complex splicing pattern characterized by the presence of multiple spliced products that were shorter than the canonical MmUBQLN2-FL transcript (Fig. 3K). We postulate that these transcripts are produced through usage of the stronger SD site located within the HsUTR which has the tendency to be spliced with multiple weaker downstream SA sites in MmUBQLN2. In support of the idea that the HsUTR contains elements that enhance splicing, the HsUTR-MmUBQLN2 chimera showed ~5-fold increased relative expression of spliced MmUBQLN2 transcript (Fig. 3K,L). However, the fraction of HsUTR-MmUBQLN2-Sp (Fig. 3L) was still 5–10-fold less than what was observed for HsUBQLN2-Sp (Fig. 3H). MmUBQLN2-M1 protein expression showed a slight reduction correlating with the increase in HsUTR-MmUBQLN2 splicing (Fig. 3M,N). These findings suggest the presence of cis-acting splicing elements unique to the HsUBQLN2 5’UTR to regulate its exitron splicing and expression. However, cis-acting elements outside the 5’UTR also contribute to splicing differences between MmUBQLN2 and HsUBQLN2.

Identification of cis-acting elements that modulate UBQLN2 splicing

We next sought to identify cis-acting elements that specify HsUBQLN2 exitron removal by introducing silent mutations into the SD (GU to AU) and the two alternative SAs (AG to AA) (Fig. 3A). We also deleted four Py tracts and two purine-rich, putative SRFS1 binding motifs (Pu1-2), or introduced point mutations within these motifs, to investigate the roles PTBP1 and SRSF1 in HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing (Fig. 3A,4A). Mutation of the putative SD (mean PSO: 0.2%) completely inhibited HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing (WT mean PSO: 31.6%) while mutation of SA2 inhibited most splicing events with a residual mean PSO of ~2% (Fig. 4B,C, Sup. Fig. 1C). To test whether residual splicing of the SA2 mutant was due to usage of upstream SA1, we measured splicing of a HsUBQLN2 SA1/SA2 double mutant. Splicing was still detected in this mutant with a mean PSO of 2.4%, suggesting that an alternative upstream SA can be used in the absence of SA1 and SA2 (Fig. 4B,C). To detect transcripts using an upstream SA other than SA2, we further designed an additional splicing primer between SA1 and SA2 (Fig. 3A, light blue reverse primer) which produced a significantly higher mean PSO in the SA mutants (~1% for both mutants versus 0.35% in WT) (Fig. 4D), confirming the residual exitron splicing was a result from the usage of an unidentified upstream SA. We also investigated the effects of mutating the canonical translation start codon (M1) and several candidate start codons downstream from SA2 that may be used to translate UBQLN2-Sp transcripts (Fig.3A). In general, mutating the AUG codons did not change the PSO of HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing, except a M1/243I double mutant which showed a significant reduction in mean PSO (15.4%) compared to WT (Fig. 4C). Because MmUBQLN2 splicing reporter produced several rare, spliced transcripts in human cells (Fig. 3D), we decided to also mutate the SD of MmUBQLN2 to examine its effect on exitron splicing. MmUBQLN2-SD mutant was found to eliminate the rare MmUBQLN2-Sp amplicons and reduced the PSO from 5.76% in WT to 0.9% in the SD mutants (Fig. 4E,F).

Fig. 4. HsUBQLN2 is spliced from an essential SD and at least two alternative SAs.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

(A) Py1-4 and Pu1-2 tracts were either deleted or mutated by nucleotide substitutions as shown in bold.

(B) RT-PCR splicing assay of HeLa cells transfected with wild-type or mutant UBQLN2 splicing reporters using primers shown in Fig. 3A. Note the absence of the UBQLN2-Sp amplicons in the SD mutant and an upward shift of the UBQLN2-Sp amplicons in the SA2 and SA1+SA2 double mutants, suggesting the usage of an upstream unidentified SA.

(C, D) Quantification of UBQLN2 PSO-SA2 and PSO-SA1 in HeLa cells expressing the indicated UBQLN2 minigenes by qRT-PCR. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4, significant p-values from one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

(E) RT-PCR splicing assay of HeLa cells transfected with wild-type or mutant MmUBQLN2-WT or MmUBQLN2-SD minigenes. Note the disappearance of the UBQLN2-Sp amplicons and the increase in intensity of the UBQLN2-FL amplicons, N = 4.

(F) Quantification of the PSO from (E) by qRT-PCR. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4, p-value from two-tailed one sample t-test was listed.

(G) RT-PCR splicing assay of HeLa cells transfected with splicing reporters harboring mutations in Py motifs shown in Fig. 4A.

(H) Quantification of PSO-SA2 of panel (G) by qRT-PCR. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, 6 ≥ N ≥ 4, significant p-values from one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test were listed. Note that the delPy1 mutation disrupted primer binding and levels of UBQLN2-FL products harboring this mutation could not be determined by qPCR.

(I) RT-PCR splicing assay of HeLa cells transfected with splicing reporters harboring mutation in Pu tracts as shown in Fig. 4A.

(J) Quantification of PSO-SA2 of panel (I) by qRT-PCR. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4, significant p-values from one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

(K) UBQLN2 splicing assay from HeLa cells co-transfected with HsUBQLN2 splicing reporter and SRSF1 (SRSF1 o/e) or PTBP1 plasmids (PTBP1 o/e).

(L) PSO of HsUBQLN2 from (K) as estimated by qRT-PCR. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4. Significant p-values from one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test are shown.

(M) Western blot showing expression of PTBP1 and SRSF1 in transfected HeLa cells used in panel (K). Note the reduction of full-length UBQLN2-GFP and SRSF1 expression in PTBP1 o/e cell lysates. TDP-43 and MCM2 were included as loading controls.

(N) UBQLN2-GFP signal intensity was quantified by densitometry and normalized to MCM2. Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4. Significant p-values from one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

Given that PTBP1 and SRSF1 occupied HsUBQLN2 mRNA (Fig. 2F) and their knockdown suppressed HsUBQLN2 splicing (Fig. 2B,C), we tested the effects of deleting the putative PTBP1 (Py1-4) and SRSF1 (Pu1-2) binding motifs in the 5’UTR of the HsUBQLN2 minigene (Fig. 2A,3A,4A). HsUBQLN2 Py1 contains a tandem CCTCCTTCC motif that is present as a single copy in MmUBQLN2 (Fig. 2A). Deletion of the 3’ CCTCCTTCC repeat in Py1 (delPy1-3’) (Fig. 4A) did not significantly affect HsUBQLN2 splicing, however, a deletion of the entire Py1 motif (delPy1) and a double deletion of Py1 and Py2 (delPy1/2) both resulted in an increase in the UBQLN2-FL transcripts accompanied by a reduction in UBQLN2-Sp transcripts (Fig. 4A,G, Sup. Fig. 1D), suggesting that the presence of Py1 promotes UBQLN2 splicing.

On the other hand, deletion of Py2 phenocopied the enhancing effect of PTBP1 knockdown on endogenous HsUBQLN2 splicing (Fig. 2B,C), suggesting that PTBP1 binding through Py2 inhibits HsUBQLN2 splicing (Fig. 4B,C,G,H). By contrast, point mutations in Py2 inhibited UBQLN2 splicing roughly proportional to the number of mutations introduced (Fig. 4A,G,H). Deletion of Py3 (delPy3), which is fully conserved between mouse and human, as well as a double deletion of Py2 and Py3 (delPy3/2) significantly reduced the mean PSO (Fig. 4A,G,H). Deletion of Py4 (delPy4) did not alter the PSO; whereas double deletion of Py4 and Py2 (delPy4/2) slightly increased the PSO (Fig. 4A,G,H). These combined findings suggest that Py2 and Py1/Py3 act antagonistically in UBQLN2 splicing regulation, with Py2 inhibiting splicing and Py1/Py3 promoting splicing. The net effect of PTBP1 on UBQLN2 splicing may therefore depend on which sites are occupied and how occupied sites interact with each other.

Deletion (delPu1) and point substitution (Pu1G7T) within the putative SRSF1 binding purine track (delPu1) inhibited HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing, each with lower mean PSO (23.1% and 27.6% respectively) compared to WT (34.1%) (Fig. 4A,I,J). In contrast, deletion of Pu2 track (delPu2) slightly increased the PSO (45.1%) compared to the WT (38.8%) and the trend was reversed with a double deletion of Pu1 and Pu2 (delPu1/2) (Fig. 4A,I,J). These results suggest that the enhancer Pu1 is epistatic to the repressor Pu2. Pu2 might serve as the intronic splicing silencer which is bound by SRSF1 to repress exitron splicing.

We also investigated the effects of overexpressing PTBP1 and SRSF1 on HsUBQLN2 splicing. SRSF1 overexpression inhibited HsUBQLN2 exitron splice out (Fig. 4K,L, Sup. Fig. 1E), further establishing SRSF1 as an inhibitor of HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing in addition to its knockdown (Fig. 2B,C). Surprisingly, overexpression of PTBP1 also increased UBQLN2 exitron splice out (Fig. 4K,L, Sup. Fig. 1E). Increased splicing correlated with a reduction in HsUBQLN2-M1 protein (Fig. 4M,N). We also observed a slight decrease in SRSF1 expression associated with PTBP1 overexpression (Fig. 4M, Sup. Fig. 1F,G). The fact that both knockdown and overexpression of PTBP1 increased HsUBQLN2 splicing suggests that HsUBQLN2 splicing is highly sensitive to PTBP1 gene dosage and/or that PTBP1 influences networks of other RBPs, such as SRSF1, which are direct/indirect regulators of HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing.

Alternatively spliced UBQLN2 transcripts produce truncated protein isoforms

Multiple AUG codons downstream of SA2 are in-frame with the HsUBQLN2-FL CDS, raising the possibility that UBQLN2-Sp transcripts could produce N-terminally truncated UBQLN2 proteins (Fig. 5A). Consistent with this, Western blotting of HeLa extracts expressing the HsUBQLN2 minigene with α-GFP antibodies detected a ~70 kDa protein (p70) and several lower molecular weight species in addition to ~100 kDa, full-length UBQLN2-GFP. Fig. 5B, WT). Abundance of the p70 species was reduced by mutation of SA2 or SD (Fig. 3A), suggesting it is produced from the UBQLN2-Sp transcript (Fig. 5B,C). Furthermore, mutation of the canonical UBQLN2 start codon from AUG to AUA (Met to Ile, M1I), increased the expression of p70, suggesting a downstream AUG codon can be used for translation initiation (Fig. 5B,D). We noted that the AUG triplet at codon 243 (M243I) occurred in a more favorable Kozak sequence context compared to the AUG triplet at codon 211 – the first Met downstream of SA2 (Fig. 5A). Indeed, an M243I mutation abolished expression of p70 either with or without the M1I mutation (Fig. 5B,D). Mutation of codon 446 (M446I) had no effect on p70 abundance whereas the M1/446I double mutant showed significantly higher expression of p70, suggesting competitive binding of ribosomes to these suboptimal RBSs (Fig. 5B,D). Finally, we also noticed higher production of a 35 kDa species (p35) in the M1I mutants that could be consistent with translation initiation from Met-446; however, an M446I mutation did not eliminate p35 production (Fig. 5B). These findings suggest that, in addition to UBQLN2-M1, HsUBQLN2 minigene produces at least one truncated, splicing-dependent, isoform that is initiated at Met-243 (UBQLN2-M243).

Fig. 5. Spliced HsUBQLN2 is translated from Met-243.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

(A, left panel) Alignment of UBQLN2 start codons downstream of SA2 (underlined and in bold) with Kozak consensus.

(A, right panel) Schematic depiction of translational products produced from the indicated AUG codons.

(B) Western blotting of the whole cell lysates extracted from HeLa cells transfected with the corresponding mutated HsUBQLN2 minigene reporters as shown in Fig. 4B with GFP antibody. p70 expression (black arrow) is upregulated in M1I mutants and absent in splice site mutants as well as the M243I mutants, indicating it corresponds to UBQLN2-M243. α-UBQLN2-CST (Cell Signaling Technologies 85509S) that detects endogenous UBQLN2 (lower band of the two 70-kDa species) and overexpressed full-length UBQLN2-GFP, but not the N-terminally truncated UBQLN2 species.

(C, D) Quantification of the M243/M1 species ratio from (B). Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 4, significant p-values from one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

(E) UBQLN2-M243 accumulates upon proteasome inhibition. HeLa cells were transfected with wild-type HsUBQLN2 or MmUBQLN2 reporters or their corresponding M1I mutants. Cells were treated with 100 nM bafA1 or 50 μM MG132 for 4 h and cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. p70 species was selectively induced by MG132 treatment. α-UBQLN2-HPA (Sigma HPA006431) that recognizes the C-terminal epitope L443-N590 showed overlapping signal with α-GFP.

(F) Quantification of the M243/M1 species ratio from (E). Bar height corresponds to mean ± SEM. Each dot represents a biological replicate, N = 7, significant p-values from two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test with a single pooled variances were listed.

(G) Western blot analysis of unedited HeLa cells and three selected UBQLN2-mNeon CRISPR HeLa clones with α-mNeon-Green antibody. Clones #1 and #2 are positive for mNeon knock-in on at least one allele (Sup. Fig. 3) whereas clones #9 is negative. Vinculin was included as loading control.

The UBQLN2-M243 isoform was expressed at ~2% of the level of the UBQLN2-M1 isoform in HeLa cells expressing the WT HsUBQLN2 splicing reporter (Fig. 5C). This relatively low abundance likely reflects the imperfect RBS spanning codon 243 (Fig. 5A). However, reduced stability of UBQLN2-M243 could also contribute to its reduced steady state levels relative to UBQLN2-M1. To explore this, we tested the effects of bafilomycin A1 (BafA, autophagy inhibitor) or MG132 (proteasome inhibitor) on steady state levels of HsUBQLN2-M1 and HsUBQLN2-M243 in HeLa cells expressing either the HsUBQLN2 WT or M1I minigenes (Fig. 5E,F). Treatment with MG132 stabilized UBQLN2-M243 and doubled the M243/M1 species ratio in cells transfected with either HsUBQLN2-WT or HsUBQLN2-M1I minigenes (Fig. 5E,F). Consistent with the notion that MmUBQLN2 is weakly spliced, MG132 treatment did not induce a p70-related protein in HeLa cells expressing the MmUBQLN2-WT minigene (Fig. 5E); however, we did detect a ~75 kDa species in the MmUBQLN2-M1I mutant that likely reflects downstream translation initiation from M254 (equivalent to M243 in HsUBQLN2) (Fig. 5E). However, efforts trying to identify the lower molecular weight translation products from MmUBQLN2-M1I mutant failed, as none of the selected Met double mutants (M88, M192, M205, M254, M368, M496, and M606) eliminated the smaller species produced in the MmUBQLN2-M1I mutant (Sup. Fig. 2). Finally, to investigate endogenous UBQLN2 isoform production, we used CRISPR-Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) to knock-in an in-frame, C-terminal mNeonGreen fluorescent tag into the UBQLN2 gene locus in HeLa cells (Sup. Fig. 3). The ~70 kDa species produced from UBQLN2-M243 was detected by mNeon antibody from two independent CRISPR clones (Fig. 5G, mNeon clone #1 and #2). From the combined findings, we conclude that N-terminally truncated HsUBQLN2-M243 isoform can be expressed from both the minigene reporter as well as from the endogenous locus.

UBQLN2-M243 exhibits altered inclusion dynamics

To investigate potential functional differences amongst UBQLN2 isoforms, we generated N-terminal GFP-tagged HsUBQLN2 expression vectors corresponding to the M1, M211, M243, and M446 isoforms (Fig. 6A). UBQLN2-M211 and UBQLN2-M446 were omitted from downstream studies either owing to their poor Kozak consensus or undetectable expression levels (Fig. 5A,B). Consistent with previous work from our group and others, overexpressed GFP-UBQLN2-M1 formed large, spherical cytosolic inclusions that may reflect liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and/or endolysosomal localization (Fig. 6B)97–100. By contrast, GFP-UBQLN2-M243 exhibited irregularly shaped structures that were frequently clustered around the nucleus (Fig. 6B). GFP-UBQLN2-M243 inclusions were significantly less round than those formed by GFP-UBQLN2-M1 (Fig. 4C, Sup. Fig. 4A–C), suggesting altered phase separation characteristics. Those spherical inclusions that formed in GFP-UBQLN2-M243-expressing cells tended to be significantly smaller than aggregates formed by GFP-UBQLN2-M1 (Fig. 6B,D). Irregular aggregates formed by GFP-UBQLN2-M243 could be a direct effect of N-terminal truncation on UBQLN2 protein structure or may reflect changes in the UBQLN2 protein-protein interaction landscape.

Fig. 6. Relative expression and localization of GFP-UBQLN2 isoforms and their ALS-associated mutants.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

(A) Representative Western blot images of HeLa cells transiently transfected with pcDNA5-eGFP plasmids expressing the corresponding UBQLN2 isoforms.

(B) HeLa cells expressing GFP-tagged UBQLN2-M1 and M243 isoforms were fixed and stained with α-tubulin. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar = 10 μm.

(C) Quantification of the roundness of the aggregates (larger than 0.2 μm2) formed by cells in (B). Full-length UBQLN2 (M1) forms spherical cytosolic aggregates compared to the irregular aggregates formed by M243 isoforms. Mean ± SEM were shown. Each dot represents measurement from an aggregate tabulated from one biological replicate, number of aggregates for M1 = 852 and M243 = 1205. p-value from two-tailed unpaired t-test was listed. The experiment was repeated four times in HeLa cells which reproduced similar observations; aggregate roundness quantification from three other replicates were shown in Sup. Fig. 4A–C.

(D) Tabulation of the aggregate size from cells expressing indicated UBQLN2 constructs. Mean ± SEM were shown. Each dot represents measurement from an aggregate tabulated from one biological replicate, number of aggregates for M1 = 1429 and M243 = 2454. p-value from two-tailed unpaired t-test was listed.

(E) Representative Western blot images of HeLa cells transiently transfected with pcDNA5-eGFP plasmids expressing the GFP-tagged UBQLN2-M1 and M243 isoforms with the indicated ALS mutations.

(F) HeLa cells expressing indicated UBQLN2 isoforms and their corresponding ALS mutants were fixed and stained with α-tubulin and proteosome marker S5A. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar = 10 μm.

(G) Quantification of the mean roundness of the aggregates (larger than 0.2 μm2) formed by cells in (F). P506T mutants were more prone to irregular aggregate formation. Mean ± SEM were shown. Each dot represents mean aggregate roundness value from one biological replicate, N = 4. Plots for individual biological replicates were shown in Sup. Fig. 4D–G. Significant p-values from two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

(H) Tabulation of the mean aggregate size formed by cells in (F). Mean ± SEM were shown. Each dot represents mean aggregate size from one biological replicate, N = 4. Plots for individual biological replicates were shown in Sup. Fig. 4H–K. Significant p-values from two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

(I) Pearson correlation coefficient of the GFP and S5A masks was calculated for each image taken from a total of three biological replicates. Mean ± SEM were shown. Each dot represents an image, 19 ≤ N ≤ 21. Significant p-values from two-way ANOVA and Šidák’s multiple comparisons test were listed.

We next compared the expression and localization patterns of GFP-UBQLN2-M1 and GFP-UBQLN2-M243 proteins harboring ALS-associated P497H and P506T mutations (Fig. 6E,F). UBQLN2-M1P506T and UBQLN2-M243P506T formed aggregates with a significant reduction in roundness compared to the corresponding wild-type constructs (Fig. 6F,G, Sup. Fig. 4D–G). By contrast, P497H mutations on both UBQLN2-M1 and UBQLN2-M243 backgrounds did not have a significant effect on roundness. Both P497H and P506T mutations also significantly reduced the aggregate size of the UBQLN2-M243 isoform compared to the corresponding mutant in UBQLN2-M1 (Fig. 6F,H, Sup. Fig. 4H–K).

As UBQLN2-M243 lacks the UBL proteosome-targeting domain, we examined the colocalization of UBQLN2-M243 aggregates with the proteasome marker, S5A (Fig. 6F,I). Pearson correlation coefficient analysis demonstrated reduced colocalization of UBQLN2-M243WT and UBQLN2-M243P506T with S5A relative to their UBQLN2-MI counterparts (Fig. 6I). These findings suggest that the UBQLN2-M243 isoform produced from the spliced UBQLN2 transcripts has altered functional characteristics that may be differentially impacted by ALS-associated mutations.

UBQLN2 splicing is upregulated in male ALS patients

Altered exitron splicing has the potential to impact UBQLN2 gene expression and, potentially, proteostasis, in ALS/FTD. To investigate this, we queried a subset of TargetALS transcriptomic data from postmortem medial motor cortices (Sup. Table 1) for an estimation of the UBQLN2-Sp isoform expression. This analysis revealed a significant increase in the mean UBQLN2-Sp isoform percentage from ~6% in non-neurological controls to ~10% in the medial motor cortex of male ALS patients, with some patient samples exhibiting ~25–30% UBQLN2-Sp isoform percentage (Fig. 7A). UBQLN2-Sp isoform levels were also significantly higher in male ALS patients versus female ALS patients, but there was not significantly different between female ALS patients and the non-neurological controls (Fig. 7A). Higher UBQLN2-Sp isoform expression was weakly correlated to lower UBQLN2 gene expression in males (Fig. 7B,C). Combined with the finding that TDP-43 knockdown increased UBQLN2 splicing in cell culture (Fig. 2B,C), these results suggest that UBQLN2 exitron splicing is increased during the clinical course of neurodegeneration in male ALS/FTD patients and that exitron splicing may be inversely correlated to UBQLN2 gene dosage.

Fig. 7. UBQLN2 exitron splicing is elevated in ALS.

Fig. 7.

(A) Transcriptomes of ALS patients (medial motor cortex, female = 45; male = 49) and non-neurological controls (female = 8; male = 6) were retrieved from the TargetALS database (see Sup. Table 1 for ExternalSampleIDs). UBQLN2-Spliced Isoform Expression (%) was estimated by RSEM. p-values from Wilcoxon test were listed.

(B) UBQLN2 gene expression (TPM) from ALS transcriptomes. p-values from Wilcoxon test were listed.

(C) Correlation between UBQLN2-Spliced Isoform Expression (%) (A) and UBQLN2 gene expression (TPM) (B).

DISCUSSION

UBQLN2-ALS pathogenesis likely involves multiple pathways related to both toxic gain of function (GOF) and loss of function (LOF) mechanisms101. Furthermore, because both UBQLN2 overexpression and silencing cause neurological phenotypes in rodents58,98,102, perturbation of wild-type UBQLN2 expression levels may have implications for neuronal proteostasis and neurodegeneration. Here we demonstrate that the expression of full-length UBQLN2 is influenced by an unannotated exitron whose splice out produces an N-terminally truncated UBQLN2-M243 isoform lacking the UBL domain which is unstable and showed distinct aggregation phenotypes when overexpressed. HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing is inhibited by heat shock (Fig. 2I,J) and in differentiating neurons (Fig. 2G,H) which may have a strong requirement for UBQLN2-mediated proteostasis. UBQLN2 splicing was also elevated in ALS medial motor cortex in males (Fig. 7). These findings suggest the possibility that alternative splicing regulates functional HsUBQLN2 gene dosage and that truncated UBQLN2 isoforms may uniquely contribute to the neuropathogenesis of ALS/FTD-UBQLN2.

Exitrons were first discovered in Arabidopsis and can arise from the activation of cryptic splice sites within protein-coding exons92,103,104. While originally estimated to affect ~5–10% of coding genes, recent studies suggest that exitron splicing is more extensive than previously thought, occurring in ~63% of genes from cancer-derived cell lines105. Individual exitron splicing events showed strong tumor specificity and may be related to global RBP dysregulation in cancer105. In gastric cancers driven by ALS-related splicing factors such as FUS and TAF15, UBQLN2 was one of the more than 1,500 significantly spliced genes detected106. Exitron regulation in ALS/FTD has not been explored; however, given the centrality of RNA splicing defects in these diseases, it is possible that alterations in exitron removal contribute to gene expression changes, protein aggregation, and neurodegeneration.

Using minigene reporters, we identified a single SD and two SAs that mediate HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing. SA2 is the major SA used in human cells, but SA1 and other upstream unidentified SAs could be used when SA2 was mutated (Fig. 4B–D). Interestingly, despite the fact that both SD and SA sequences are conserved between MmUBQLN2 and HsUBQLN2, the PSO of UBQLN2 exitron was ~100-fold higher in human cells versus mouse cells (Fig. 1) and ~10–50-fold higher for the HsUBQLN2 reporter versus the MmUBQLN2 reporter in HeLa cells (Fig. 3B–F). suggesting that exitron splicing arose after the evolutionary divergence of primates and mice from their common ancestor.

Experiments using chimeric minigenes revealed that sequence elements in the 5’UTR contribute to the different splicing efficiencies of HsUBQLN2 and MmUBQLN2 in human cells. Knockdown, mutagenesis, overexpression, and RNA-IP studies further suggest that PTBP1 (and potentially PTBP2 in differentiating neurons) can both activate and repress HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing through binding to Py motifs located in the 5’UTR (Fig. 2A–F, Fig. 4). PTBPs fulfill complex roles in alternative splicing depending on splice site usage frequency and positional context. In general, binding of PTBPs near a constitutive/strong splice site promotes exon inclusion whereas binding near an alternative splice site often causes exon skipping40. While PTBP1 often binds to intronic region upstream of SAs, binding to sequence downstream of an SD has been observed, such as PTBP2-Exon 10, whose splicing is repressed by PTBP140. The human-specific Py2 (CUCUCUCUUUC) contains a known binding consensus which is shared amongst PTBP paralogs: UCUC/UUCU (Fig. 2A). Consistent with our PTBP1 RNA-IP in HeLa cells, Dawicki-McKenna et al. detected a PTBP2 CLIP-seq peak (chrX:56563827–56563877) in human iPSC-derived neurons41, overlapping Py2 and Py3 tracts. Deletion of Py2 enhanced HsUBQLN2 splicing efficiency (Fig. 4A–C), supporting its role as a major PTBP binding site that suppresses exitron removal. Remarkably, deletion of the adjacent Py1 motif, which contains a tandemly duplicated CCTCCTTCC motif in HsUBQLN2 versus a single CCTCCTTCC motif in MmUBQLN2, reduced exitron splicing (Fig. 4A,G,H), as did a Py1/2 double mutant. Deletion of Py3, which is conserved between HsUBQLN2 and MmUBQLN2, also diminished splicing, suggesting this element may be important for the low levels of MmUBQLN2 splicing that we observed (Fig. 3A–F).

The fact that Py motifs upstream and downstream of the SD in the 5’UTR have opposing impacts on UBQLN2 splicing raises the question as to how these sites interact to control UBQLN2 splicing efficiency. One possibility is that the overall impact of PTBPs on UBQLN2 exitron splicing is determined by combinatorial effects of Py tracts that are occupied with distinct stoichiometries and, perhaps under distinct cellular conditions. For instance, low levels of PTBP1 may result in selective occupancy of high affinity sites (putatively Py2) to inhibit SD recognition, while high levels of PTBP1 during overexpression (Fig. 4K,L) may promote occupancy of both high affinity and low affinity (putatively Py1 and Py3) sites which enhance splicing. In the latter case, the established multimerization activities of PTBP138 may alter the secondary structure of HsUBQLN2 5’UTR. Alternatively, multiple engagement of its four RNA recognition motifs which are structurally heterogeneous107 with different affinities to Py2 and Py1/3 may control the stoichiometries of bound PTBP1 to influence splicing outcome. Future studies will be needed to define structural features of the UBQLN2 5’UTR and its combinatorial regulation by PTBPs.

The implication of SRSF1 as a UBQLN2 splicing repressor (Fig. 2A–E; Fig. 4K,L) which bound to Pu2 (Fig. 4A,I,J) is supported by the detection of an SRSF1 eCLIP peak in the 5’UTR of UBQLN2 in a previous study in K562 cells108. Mutations of another downstream putative SRSF1 binding site, Pu1, inhibited UBQLN2 splicing (Fig. 4A,I,J), suggesting this element function as a splicing enhancer and could be occupied by either SRSF1 or other splicing enhancers. Finally, we also observed that PTBP1 expression level is inversely correlated with SRSF1 expression (Fig. 2D, 4M), suggesting that HsUBQLN2 exitron splicing is regulated through complex interplay of PTBP1, SRSF1, and other RBPs, with TDP-43 being of particular interest. We note that in HeLa cells, the expression of TDP-43 stays relatively constant, therefore, further studies are needed to investigate the contributions of PTBP1, PTBP2, SRSF1, and TDP-43 to UBQLN2 splicing regulation in neurons.

Spliced HsUBQLN2 transcripts express UBQLN2-M243 and potentially other N-terminally truncated isoforms (Fig. 5A–D,G). Consistent with the absence of a UBL domain, UBQLN2-M243 showed reduced colocalization with proteasome markers (Fig. 6F,I), suggesting its function in UPS is substantially altered relative to full-length UBQLN2. UBQLN2 STI1 domains are the main driver for its LLPS propensity, and the removal of the UBL domain has been shown to reduce the saturation concentration for UBQLN2 LLPS53,109. Indeed, UBQLN2-M243 formed smaller and more irregular aggregates versus UBQLN2-M1, suggesting altered phase separation characteristics (Fig. 6, Sup. Fig. 4). Amongst all ALS mutations, UBQLN2P506T was found to have the highest propensity in intrinsic self-assembly to form amyloid-like aggregate through LLPS110,111. UBQLN2 exitron splicing can potentially exacerbate UBQLN2P506T LLPS characteristics in UBQLN2-M243 compared to UBQLN2-M1 (Fig. 6F–H). Although comprising less than 2% of total UBQLN2 expressed from the HsUBQLN2 minigene at steady state (Fig. 5B,C) due to rapid degradation by proteasome (Fig. 5E,F), the altered phase separation and function of UBQLN2-M243 may be relevant to the regulation of cellular proteostasis and the neuropathogenesis of ALS/FTD-UBQLN2, especially in the case where protein clearance pathways are impaired in NDs.

While the contribution of UBQLN2 isoforms to ALS/FTD-UBQLN2 and sporadic ALS is still uncertain, we observed elevated levels of splicing in motor cortices of male ALS patients (Fig. 7). This is interesting given the X-linkage of UBQLN2 and a recent metaanalysis showing that males harboring a pathogenic UBQLN2 variant developed ALS on average 18.15 years prior to female carriers (29.54 ± 11.9 versus 47.69 ± 13.4 years, p < 0.0001)112. In our analysis, increased UBQLN2 splicing in male ALS patients was also associated with reduced UBQLN2 gene expression, raising the possibility that UBQLN2 exitron splicing dysregulation contributes to proteostasis failure through LOF effects. A consequence of proteostasis failure—the accumulation of cytosolic TDP-43—may further exacerbate UBQLN2 splicing dysregulation, leading to feed-forward toxicities that drive disease progression in ALS/FTD.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (11.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (12.7KB, xlsx)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Ong Swee Hoe (Wellcome Sanger Institute) for suggestions to improve our RNA sequencing analysis pipeline, Dr. Stephen Turner (Pacific Biosciences) and Dr. Paola Florez de Sessions (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) for assistance in sourcing publicly available long-read RNA sequencing datasets. We acknowledge Jeremy Niece from UWBC for speedy processing of our sequencing samples.

FUNDING

This work is supported by National Institutes of Health grants (1RF1AG069483 and 2R01AG069483 to R.S.T.; R01MH136152 and R01NS138268 to X.Z.; P50HD105353 to Waisman Center; R01CA268183 and R01CA236356 to W.X.; P30CA014520 to The University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Laboratory), American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship (25PRE1374149) to A.S.H.K.; SciMed scholarship and T32 GM141013 Molecular Pharmacology Training Grant to N.M-A.; Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center (SCRMC) to N.M-A. and J.Z.. Funding for open access charge: National Institutes of Health.

Funding Statement

This work is supported by National Institutes of Health grants (1RF1AG069483 and 2R01AG069483 to R.S.T.; R01MH136152 and R01NS138268 to X.Z.; P50HD105353 to Waisman Center; R01CA268183 and R01CA236356 to W.X.; P30CA014520 to The University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Laboratory), American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship (25PRE1374149) to A.S.H.K.; SciMed scholarship and T32 GM141013 Molecular Pharmacology Training Grant to N.M-A.; Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center (SCRMC) to N.M-A. and J.Z.. Funding for open access charge: National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rowland L.P., and Shneider N.A. (2001). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine 344, 1688–1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hardiman O., Al-Chalabi A., Chio A., Corr E.M., Logroscino G., Robberecht W., Shaw P.J., Simmons Z., and Van Den Berg L.H. (2017). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature reviews Disease primers 3, 1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Renton A.E., Chiò A., and Traynor B.J. (2014). State of play in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genetics. Nature neuroscience 17, 17–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aksoy Y.A., Deng W., Stoddart J., Chung R., Guillemin G., Cole N.J., Neely G.G., and Hesselson D. (2020). “STRESSED OUT”: The role of FUS and TDP-43 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology 126, 105821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Emery A., and Holloway S. (1982). Familial motor neuron diseases. Advances in neurology 36, 139–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rabin B.A., Griffin J.W., Crain B.J., Scavina M., Chance P.F., and Cornblath D.R. (1999). Autosomal dominant juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 122, 1539–1550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.DeJesus-Hernandez M., Mackenzie I.R., Boeve B.F., Boxer A.L., Baker M., Rutherford N.J., Nicholson A.M., Finch N.A., Flynn H., and Adamson J. (2011). Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 72, 245–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Renton A.E., Majounie E., Waite A., Simón-Sánchez J., Rollinson S., Gibbs J.R., Schymick J.C., Laaksovirta H., Van Swieten J.C., and Myllykangas L. (2011). A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 72, 257–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rosen D.R., Siddique T., Patterson D., Figlewicz D.A., Sapp P., Hentati A., Donaldson D., Goto J., O’Regan J.P., and Deng H.-X. (1993). Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 362, 59–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sreedharan J., Blair I.P., Tripathi V.B., Hu X., Vance C., Rogelj B., Ackerley S., Durnall J.C., Williams K.L., and Buratti E. (2008). TDP-43 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 319, 1668–1672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kwiatkowski T. Jr, Bosco D., Leclerc A., Tamrazian E., Vanderburg C., Russ C., Davis A., Gilchrist J., Kasarskis E., and Munsat T. (2009). Mutations in the FUS/TLS gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 323, 1205–1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vance C., Rogelj B., Hortobágyi T., De Vos K.J., Nishimura A.L., Sreedharan J., Hu X., Smith B., Ruddy D., and Wright P. (2009). Mutations in FUS, an RNA processing protein, cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 6. Science 323, 1208–1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moens T.G., Da Cruz S., Neumann M., Shelkovnikova T.A., Shneider N.A., and Van Den Bosch L. (2025). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis caused by FUS mutations: advances with broad implications. Lancet Neurol 24, 166–178. 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00517-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Scotter E.L., Chen H.J., and Shaw C.E. (2015). TDP-43 Proteinopathy and ALS: Insights into Disease Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets. Neurotherapeutics 12, 352–363. 10.1007/s13311-015-0338-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Butti Z., and Patten S.A. (2019). RNA Dysregulation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Frontiers in Genetics Volume 9 - 2018. 10.3389/fgene.2018.00712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ling J.P., Pletnikova O., Troncoso J.C., and Wong P.C. (2015). TDP-43 repression of nonconserved cryptic exons is compromised in ALS-FTD. Science 349, 650–655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ling S.-C., Polymenidou M., and Cleveland D.W. (2013). Converging mechanisms in ALS and FTD: disrupted RNA and protein homeostasis. Neuron 79, 416–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brown A.-L., Wilkins O.G., Keuss M.J., Kargbo-Hill S.E., Zanovello M., Lee W.C., Bampton A., Lee F.C., Masino L., and Qi Y.A. (2022). TDP-43 loss and ALS-risk SNPs drive mis-splicing and depletion of UNC13A. Nature 603, 131–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ma X.R., Prudencio M., Koike Y., Vatsavayai S.C., Kim G., Harbinski F., Briner A., Rodriguez C.M., Guo C., and Akiyama T. (2022). TDP-43 represses cryptic exon inclusion in the FTD–ALS gene UNC13A. Nature 603, 124–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klim J.R., Williams L.A., Limone F., Guerra San Juan I., Davis-Dusenbery B.N., Mordes D.A., Burberry A., Steinbaugh M.J., Gamage K.K., and Kirchner R. (2019). ALS-implicated protein TDP-43 sustains levels of STMN2, a mediator of motor neuron growth and repair. Nature neuroscience 22, 167–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Melamed Z.e., López-Erauskin J., Baughn M.W., Zhang O., Drenner K., Sun Y., Freyermuth F., McMahon M.A., Beccari M.S., and Artates J.W. (2019). Premature polyadenylation-mediated loss of stathmin-2 is a hallmark of TDP-43-dependent neurodegeneration. Nature neuroscience 22, 180–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reber S., Stettler J., Filosa G., Colombo M., Jutzi D., Lenzken S.C., Schweingruber C., Bruggmann R., Bachi A., and Barabino S.M. (2016). Minor intron splicing is regulated by FUS and affected by ALS-associated FUS mutants. The EMBO journal 35, 1504–1521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nikom D., and Zheng S. (2023). Alternative splicing in neurodegenerative disease and the promise of RNA therapies. Nat Rev Neurosci 24, 457–473. 10.1038/s41583-023-00717-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hutton M., Lendon C.L., Rizzu P., Baker M., Froelich S., Houlden H., Pickering-Brown S., Chakraverty S., Isaacs A., Grover A., et al. (1998). Association of missense and 5′-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 393, 702–705. 10.1038/31508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Spillantini M.G., Murrell J.R., Goedert M., Farlow M.R., Klug A., and Ghetti B. (1998). Mutation in the tau gene in familial multiple system tauopathy with presenile dementia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95, 7737–7741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Niblock M., and Gallo J.-M. (2012). Tau alternative splicing in familial and sporadic tauopathies. Biochemical Society Transactions 40, 677–680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Neve R.L., Finch E.A., and Dawes L.R. (1988). Expression of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor gene transcripts in the human brain. Neuron 1, 669–677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tanzi R.E., McClatchey A.I., Lamperti E.D., Villa-Komaroff L., Gusella J.F., and Neve R.L. (1988). Protease inhibitor domain encoded by an amyloid protein precursor mRNA associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 331, 528–530. 10.1038/331528a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.De Jonghe C., MarcCruts, Rogaeva E.A., Tysoe C., Singleton A., Vanderstichele H., Meschino W., Dermaut B., Vanderhoeven I., Backhovens H., et al. (1999). Aberrant Splicing in the Presenilin-1 Intron 4 Mutation Causes Presenile Alzheimer’s Disease by Increased Aβ42 Secretion. Human Molecular Genetics 8, 1529–1540. 10.1093/hmg/8.8.1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Braggin J.E., Bucks S.A., Course M.M., Smith C.L., Sopher B., Osnis L., Shuey K.D., Domoto-Reilly K., Caso C., and Kinoshita C. (2019). Alternative splicing in a presenilin 2 variant associated with Alzheimer disease. Annals of clinical and translational neurology 6, 762–777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hinrich A.J., Jodelka F.M., Chang J.L., Brutman D., Bruno A.M., Briggs C.A., James B.D., Stutzmann G.E., Bennett D.A., and Miller S.A. (2016). Therapeutic correction of ApoER2 splicing in Alzheimer’s disease mice using antisense oligonucleotides. EMBO molecular medicine 8, 328–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McLean J.R., Hallett P.J., Cooper O., Stanley M., and Isacson O. (2012). Transcript expression levels of full-length alpha-synuclein and its three alternatively spliced variants in Parkinson’s disease brain regions and in a transgenic mouse model of alpha-synuclein overexpression. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 49, 230–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sathasivam K., Neueder A., Gipson T.A., Landles C., Benjamin A.C., Bondulich M.K., Smith D.L., Faull R.L., Roos R.A., and Howland D. (2013). Aberrant splicing of HTT generates the pathogenic exon 1 protein in Huntington disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 2366–2370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang E.T., Sandberg R., Luo S., Khrebtukova I., Zhang L., Mayr C., Kingsmore S.F., Schroth G.P., and Burge C.B. (2008). Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 456, 470–476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yap K., Lim Z.Q., Khandelia P., Friedman B., and Makeyev E.V. (2012). Coordinated regulation of neuronal mRNA steady-state levels through developmentally controlled intron retention. Genes & development 26, 1209–1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wagner E.J., Carstens R.P., and Garcia-Blanco M.A. (1999). A novel isoform ratio switch of the polypyrimidine tract binding protein. ELECTROPHORESIS: An International Journal 20, 1082–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhu W., Zhou B. l., Rong L. j., Ye L., Xu H. j., Zhou Y., Yan X. j., Liu W. d., Zhu B., and Wang L. (2020). Roles of PTBP1 in alternative splicing, glycolysis, and oncogensis. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B 21, 122–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Oberstrass F.C., Auweter S.D., Erat M., Hargous Y., Henning A., Wenter P., Reymond L., Amir-Ahmady B., Pitsch S., and Black D.L. (2005). Structure of PTB bound to RNA: specific binding and implications for splicing regulation. Science 309, 2054–2057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Izquierdo J.M., Majós N., Bonnal S., Martínez C., Castelo R., Guigó R., Bilbao D., and Valcárcel J. (2005). Regulation of Fas Alternative Splicing by Antagonistic Effects of TIA-1 and PTB on Exon Definition. Molecular Cell 19, 475–484. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xue Y., Zhou Y., Wu T., Zhu T., Ji X., Kwon Y.-S., Zhang C., Yeo G., Black D.L., and Sun H. (2009). Genome-wide analysis of PTB-RNA interactions reveals a strategy used by the general splicing repressor to modulate exon inclusion or skipping. Molecular cell 36, 996–1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dawicki-McKenna J.M., Felix A.J., Waxman E.A., Cheng C., Amado D.A., Ranum P.T., Bogush A., Dungan L.V., Maguire J.A., and Gagne A.L. (2023). Mapping PTBP2 binding in human brain identifies SYNGAP1 as a target for therapeutic splice switching. Nature Communications 14, 2628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Boutz P.L., Stoilov P., Li Q., Lin C.-H., Chawla G., Ostrow K., Shiue L., Ares M., and Black D.L. (2007). A post-transcriptional regulatory switch in polypyrimidine tract-binding proteins reprograms alternative splicing in developing neurons. Genes & development 21, 1636–1652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Corrionero A., and Valcárcel J. (2009). RNA processing: Redrawing the map of charted territory. Molecular cell 36, 918–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Keppetipola N., Sharma S., Li Q., and Black D.L. (2012). Neuronal regulation of pre-mRNA splicing by polypyrimidine tract binding proteins, PTBP1 and PTBP2. Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology 47, 360–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Santiago J.A., and Potashkin J.A. (2015). Network-based metaanalysis identifies HNF4A and PTBP1 as longitudinally dynamic biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 2257–2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Smith P., Al Hashimi A., Girard J., Delay C., and Hébert S.S. (2011). In vivo regulation of amyloid precursor protein neuronal splicing by microRNAs. Journal of neurochemistry 116, 240–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Castelli L.M., Cutillo L., Souza C.D.S., Sanchez-Martinez A., Granata I., Lin Y.-H., Myszczynska M.A., Heath P.R., Livesey M.R., and Ning K. (2021). SRSF1-dependent inhibition of C9ORF72-repeat RNA nuclear export: genome-wide mechanisms for neuroprotection in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Molecular neurodegeneration 16, 53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hautbergue G.M., Castelli L.M., Ferraiuolo L., Sanchez-Martinez A., Cooper-Knock J., Higginbottom A., Lin Y.-H., Bauer C.S., Dodd J.E., and Myszczynska M.A. (2017). SRSF1-dependent nuclear export inhibition of C9ORF72 repeat transcripts prevents neurodegeneration and associated motor deficits. Nature communications 8, 16063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yang S., Wijegunawardana D., Sheth U., Veire A.M., Salgado J.M.S., Arab T., Agrawal M., Zhou J., Pereira J.D., Gendron T.F., and Guo J.U. (2025). Aberrant splicing exonizes C9orf72 repeat expansion in ALS/FTD. Nature Neuroscience 28, 2034–2043. 10.1038/s41593-025-02039-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Marín I. (2014). The ubiquilin gene family: evolutionary patterns and functional insights. BMC evolutionary biology 14, 63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kaye F.J., and Shows T.B. (2000). Assignment of ubiquilin2 (UBQLN2) to human chromosome xp11. 23-->p11.1 by GeneBridge radiation hybrids. Cytogenet Cell Genet 89, 116–117. 10.1159/000015588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Onwunma J., Binsabaan S., Allen S.P., Thanthirige S.R., Gaur D., Sankaran B., and Wohlever M.L. (2026). ALS mutations disrupt self-association between the ubiquilin STI1 hydrophobic groove and internal placeholder sequences. Embo j 45, 2694–2711. 10.1038/s44318-026-00745-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dao T.P., Kolaitis R.-M., Kim H.J., O’Donovan K., Martyniak B., Colicino E., Hehnly H., Taylor J.P., and Castañeda C.A. (2018). Ubiquitin modulates liquid-liquid phase separation of UBQLN2 via disruption of multivalent interactions. Molecular cell 69, 965–978. e966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hjerpe R., Bett J.S., Keuss M.J., Solovyova A., McWilliams T.G., Johnson C., Sahu I., Varghese J., Wood N., and Wightman M. (2016). UBQLN2 mediates autophagy-independent protein aggregate clearance by the proteasome. Cell 166, 935–949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kleijnen M.F., Shih A.H., Zhou P., Kumar S., Soccio R.E., Kedersha N.L., Gill G., and Howley P.M. (2000). The hPLIC proteins may provide a link between the ubiquitination machinery and the proteasome. Molecular cell 6, 409–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Walters K.J., Kleijnen M.F., Goh A.M., Wagner G., and Howley P.M. (2002). Structural studies of the interaction between ubiquitin family proteins and proteasome subunit S5a. Biochemistry 41, 1767–1777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zheng T., Yang Y., and Castañeda C.A. (2020). Structure, dynamics and functions of UBQLNs: at the crossroads of protein quality control machinery. Biochemical Journal 477, 3471–3497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Whiteley A.M., Prado M.A., de Poot S.A.H., Paulo J.A., Ashton M., Dominguez S., Weber M., Ngu H., Szpyt J., Jedrychowski M.P., et al. (2021). Global proteomics of Ubqln2-based murine models of ALS. J Biol Chem 296, 100153. 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Deng H.-X., Chen W., Hong S.-T., Boycott K.M., Gorrie G.H., Siddique N., Yang Y., Fecto F., Shi Y., and Zhai H. (2011). Mutations in UBQLN2 cause dominant X-linked juvenile and adult-onset ALS and ALS/dementia. Nature 477, 211–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Teyssou E., Chartier L., Amador M.-D.-M., Lam R., Lautrette G., Nicol M., Machat S., Da Barroca S., Moigneu C., Mairey M., et al. (2017). Novel UBQLN2 mutations linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and atypical hereditary spastic paraplegia phenotype through defective HSP70-mediated proteolysis. Neurobiology of Aging 58, 239.e211–239.e220. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Daoud H., Suhail H., Szuto A., Camu W., Salachas F., Meininger V., Bouchard J.P., Dupre N., Dion P.A., and Rouleau G.A. (2012). UBQLN2 mutations are rare in French and French-Canadian amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging 33, 2230 e2231–2230 e2235. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Synofzik M., Maetzler W., Grehl T., Prudlo J., Vom Hagen J.M., Haack T., Rebassoo P., Munz M., Schols L., and Biskup S. (2012). Screening in ALS and FTD patients reveals 3 novel UBQLN2 mutations outside the PXX domain and a pure FTD phenotype. Neurobiol Aging 33, 2949 e2913–2947. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Williams K.L., Warraich S.T., Yang S., Solski J.A., Fernando R., Rouleau G.A., Nicholson G.A., and Blair I.P. (2012). UBQLN2/ubiquilin 2 mutation and pathology in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Aging 33, 2527 e2523–2510. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sharkey L.M., Safren N., Pithadia A.S., Gerson J.E., Dulchavsky M., Fischer S., Patel R., Lantis G., Ashraf N., and Kim J.H. (2018). Mutant UBQLN2 promotes toxicity by modulating intrinsic self-assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, E10495–E10504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dao T.P., Martyniak B., Canning A.J., Lei Y., Colicino E.G., Cosgrove M.S., Hehnly H., and Castañeda C.A. (2019). ALS-linked mutations affect UBQLN2 oligomerization and phase separation in a position-and amino acid-dependent manner. Structure 27, 937–951. e935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.N’Diaye E.N., Kajihara K.K., Hsieh I., Morisaki H., Debnath J., and Brown E.J. (2009). PLIC proteins or ubiquilins regulate autophagy-dependent cell survival during nutrient starvation. EMBO reports 10, 173–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Osaka M., Ito D., Yagi T., Nihei Y., and Suzuki N. (2015). Evidence of a link between ubiquilin 2 and optineurin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Human molecular genetics 24, 1617–1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rothenberg C., Srinivasan D., Mah L., Kaushik S., Peterhoff C.M., Ugolino J., Fang S., Cuervo A.M., Nixon R.A., and Monteiro M.J. (2010). Ubiquilin functions in autophagy and is degraded by chaperone-mediated autophagy. Human molecular genetics 19, 3219–3232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wu J.J., Cai A., Greenslade J.E., Higgins N.R., Fan C., Le N.T.T., Tatman M., Whiteley A.M., Prado M.A., Dieriks B.V., et al. (2020). ALS/FTD mutations in UBQLN2 impede autophagy by reducing autophagosome acidification through loss of function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117, 15230–15241. 10.1073/pnas.1917371117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Peng G., Gu A., Niu H., Chen L., Chen Y., Zhou M., Zhang Y., Liu J., Cai L., Liang D., et al. (2022). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) linked mutation in Ubiquilin 2 affects stress granule assembly via TIA-1. CNS Neurosci Ther 28, 105–115. 10.1111/cns.13757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Halloran M., Ragagnin A.M.G., Vidal M., Parakh S., Yang S., Heng B., Grima N., Shahheydari H., Soo K.Y., Blair I., et al. (2020). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-linked UBQLN2 mutants inhibit endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport, leading to Golgi fragmentation and ER stress. Cell Mol Life Sci 77, 3859–3873. 10.1007/s00018-019-03394-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Xia Y., Yan L.H., Huang B., Liu M., Liu X., and Huang C. (2014). Pathogenic mutation of UBQLN2 impairs its interaction with UBXD8 and disrupts endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation. J Neurochem 129, 99–106. 10.1111/jnc.12606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Xu Y., Liu Y., Lee J. g., and Ye Y. (2013). A Ubiquitin-like Domain Recruits an Oligomeric Chaperone to a Retrotranslocation Complex in Endoplasmic Reticulum-associated Degradation*. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288, 18068–18076. 10.1074/jbc.M112.449199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Liu Y., Huang Z., Hsu Y.W., Deme P., Frankenfield A.M., Wu S., Zhao X., Liu H., Zhang T., Alexander E.J., et al. (2026). UBQLN2 links proteotoxicity with lipid metabolism in neurodegeneration. Nat Neurosci 29, 782–795. 10.1038/s41593-026-02226-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Picher-Martel V., Dutta K., Phaneuf D., Sobue G., and Julien J.-P. (2015). Ubiquilin-2 drives NF-κB activity and cytosolic TDP-43 aggregation in neuronal cells. Molecular brain 8, 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kim S.H., Nichols K.D., Anderson E.N., Liu Y., Ramesh N., Jia W., Kuerbis C.J., Scalf M., Smith L.M., Pandey U.B., and Tibbetts R.S. (2023). Axon guidance genes modulate neurotoxicity of ALS-associated UBQLN2. Elife 12. 10.7554/eLife.84382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gu A., Zhang Y., He J., Zhao M., Ding L., Liu W., Xiao J., Huang J., Liu M., and Liu X. (2024). Chronic Oxidative Stress and Stress Granule Formation in UBQLN2 ALS Neurons: Insights into Neuronal Degeneration and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Int J Mol Sci 25. 10.3390/ijms252413448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zhang Y., Zeng B., Gu A., Kang Q., Zhao M., Peng G., Zhou M., Liu W., Liu M., Ding L., et al. (2022). Damaged DNA Is an Early Event of Neurodegeneration in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Motoneurons with UBQLN2(P497H) Mutation. Int J Mol Sci 23. 10.3390/ijms231911333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Renaud L., Picher-Martel V., Codron P., and Julien J.-P. (2019). Key role of UBQLN2 in pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Acta neuropathologica communications 7, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Matthews A.M., and Whiteley A.M. (2025). UBQLN2 in neurodegenerative disease: mechanistic insights and emerging therapeutic potential. Biochem Soc Trans. 10.1042/BST20253053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Thumbadoo K.M., Dieriks B.V., Murray H.C., Swanson M.E.V., Yoo J.H., Mehrabi N.F., Turner C., Dragunow M., Faull R.L.M., Curtis M.A., et al. (2024). Hippocampal aggregation signatures of pathogenic UBQLN2 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 10.1093/brain/awae140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nementzik L.R., Thumbadoo K.M., Murray H.C., Gordon D., Yang S., Blair I.P., Turner C., Faull R.L.M., Curtis M.A., McLean C., et al. (2024). Distribution of ubiquilin 2 and TDP-43 aggregates throughout the CNS in UBQLN2 p.T487I-linked amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Brain Pathol 34, e13230. 10.1111/bpa.13230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson M., and Gingeras T.R. (2013). STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Li B., and Dewey C.N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Mastrocola A.S., Kim S.H., Trinh A.T., Rodenkirch L.A., and Tibbetts R.S. (2013). The RNA-binding protein fused in sarcoma (FUS) functions downstream of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem 288, 24731–24741. M113.497974 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M113.497974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Jia W., Kim S.H., Scalf M.A., Tonzi P., Millikin R.J., Guns W.M., Liu L., Mastrocola A.S., Smith L.M., Huang T.T., and Tibbetts R.S. (2021). Fused in sarcoma regulates DNA replication timing and kinetics. J Biol Chem 297, 101049. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Koo A.S.-H., Jia W., Kim S.H., Scalf M., Boos C.E., Chen Y., Wang D., Voter A.F., Bajaj A., Smith L.M., et al. (2025). DNA-damage dependent isoform switching modulates RIF1 DNA repair complex assembly and phase separation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 301, 110857. 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Li M., Shin J., Risgaard R.D., Parries M.J., Wang J., Chasman D., Liu S., Roy S., Bhattacharyya A., and Zhao X. (2020). Identification of FMR1-regulated molecular networks in human neurodevelopment. Genome Res 30, 361–374. 10.1101/gr.251405.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Yin Y., Petersen A.J., Soref C., Richards W.D., Ludwig T., Taapken S., Berndt E., Zhang S.C., and Bhattacharyya A. (2019). Generation of seven induced pluripotent stem cell lines from neonates of different ethnic backgrounds. Stem Cell Res 34, 101365. 10.1016/j.scr.2018.101365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Shen M., Sirois C.L., Guo Y., Li M., Dong Q., Méndez-Albelo N.M., Gao Y., Khullar S., Kissel L., Sandoval S.O., et al. (2023). Species-specific FMRP regulation of RACK1 is critical for prenatal cortical development. Neuron 111, 3988–4005.e3911. 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chen Y., Davidson N.M., Wan Y.K., Patel H., Yao F., Low H.M., Hendra C., Watten L., Sim A., and Sawyer C. (2021). A systematic benchmark of Nanopore long read RNA sequencing for transcript level analysis in human cell lines. BioRxiv, 2021.2004. 2021.440736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Marquez Y., Höpfler M., Ayatollahi Z., Barta A., and Kalyna M. (2015). Unmasking alternative splicing inside protein-coding exons defines exitrons and their role in proteome plasticity. Genome research 25, 995–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lin B.C., Higgins N.R., Phung T.H., and Monteiro M.J. (2022). UBQLN proteins in health and disease with a focus on UBQLN2 in ALS/FTD. The FEBS journal 289, 6132–6153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cléry A., Krepl M., Nguyen C.K., Moursy A., Jorjani H., Katsantoni M., Okoniewski M., Mittal N., Zavolan M., and Sponer J. (2021). Structure of SRSF1 RRM1 bound to RNA reveals an unexpected bimodal mode of interaction and explains its involvement in SMN1 exon7 splicing. Nature Communications 12, 428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Suzuki N., Ando S., Sumida K., Horie N., and Saito K. (2011). Analysis of altered gene expression specific to embryotoxic chemical treatment during embryonic stem cell differentiation into myocardiac and neural cells. J Toxicol Sci 36, 569–585. 10.2131/jts.36.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Li Q., Zheng S., Han A., Lin C.H., Stoilov P., Fu X.D., and Black D.L. (2014). The splicing regulator PTBP2 controls a program of embryonic splicing required for neuronal maturation. Elife 3, e01201. 10.7554/eLife.01201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kim S.H., Stiles S.G., Feichtmeier J.M., Ramesh N., Zhan L., Scalf M.A., Smith L.M., Pandey U.B., and Tibbetts R.S. (2018). Mutation-dependent aggregation and toxicity in a Drosophila model for UBQLN2-associated ALS. Hum Mol Genet 27, 322–337. 10.1093/hmg/ddx403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Sharkey L.M., Sandoval-Pistorius S.S., Moore S.J., Gerson J.E., Komlo R., Fischer S., Negron-Rios K.Y., Crowley E.V., Padron F., Patel R., et al. (2020). Modeling UBQLN2-mediated neurodegenerative disease in mice: Shared and divergent properties of wild type and mutant UBQLN2 in phase separation, subcellular localization, altered proteostasis pathways, and selective cytotoxicity. Neurobiol Dis 143, 105016. 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Şentürk M., Lin G., Zuo Z., Mao D., Watson E., Mikos A.G., and Bellen H.J. (2019). Ubiquilins regulate autophagic flux through mTOR signalling and lysosomal acidification. Nat Cell Biol 21, 384–396. 10.1038/s41556-019-0281-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Dao T.P., Kolaitis R.M., Kim H.J., O’Donovan K., Martyniak B., Colicino E., Hehnly H., Taylor J.P., and Castaneda C.A. (2018). Ubiquitin Modulates Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of UBQLN2 via Disruption of Multivalent Interactions. Mol Cell 69, 965–978 e966. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Matthews A.M., and Whiteley A.M. (2025). UBQLN2 in neurodegenerative disease: mechanistic insights and emerging therapeutic potential. Biochem Soc Trans 53, 823–833. 10.1042/bst20253053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wu Q., Liu M., Huang C., Liu X., Huang B., Li N., Zhou H., and Xia X.G. (2015). Pathogenic Ubqln2 gains toxic properties to induce neuron death. Acta Neuropathol 129, 417–428. 10.1007/s00401-014-1367-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Shamnas v M., Singh A., Kumar A., Mishra G.P., and Sinha S.K. (2024). Exitrons: offering new roles to retained introns—the novel regulators of protein diversity and utility. AoB PLANTS 16. 10.1093/aobpla/plae014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.de Faria Poloni J., and Feltes B.C. (2023). Potential role of exitron-containing homeobox genes in cancer. WIREs Mechanisms of Disease 15, e1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wang T.-Y., Liu Q., Ren Y., Alam S.K., Wang L., Zhu Z., Hoeppner L.H., Dehm S.M., Cao Q., and Yang R. (2021). A pan-cancer transcriptome analysis of exitron splicing identifies novel cancer driver genes and neoepitopes. Molecular Cell 81, 2246–2260.e2212. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zhang Y., Ye G., Yang Q., Zheng B., Zhang G., Hu Y., Yu J., and Li G. (2022). Landscape of exitrons in gastric cancer. EBioMedicine 84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Carico C., and Placzek W.J. (2023). Reviewing PTBP1 Domain Modularity in the Pre-Genomic Era: A Foundation to Guide the Next Generation of Exploring PTBP1 Structure-Function Relationships. Int J Mol Sci 24. 10.3390/ijms241311218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.ENCODE Project Consortium, a. (2012). An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Zheng T., Galagedera S.K.K., and Castañeda C.A. (2021). Previously uncharacterized interactions between the folded and intrinsically disordered domains impart asymmetric effects on UBQLN2 phase separation. Protein Sci 30, 1467–1481. 10.1002/pro.4128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sharkey L.M., Safren N., Pithadia A.S., Gerson J.E., Dulchavsky M., Fischer S., Patel R., Lantis G., Ashraf N., Kim J.H., et al. (2018). Mutant UBQLN2 promotes toxicity by modulating intrinsic self-assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, E10495–e10504. 10.1073/pnas.1810522115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Safren N., Dao T.P., Mohan H.M., Huang C., Trotter B., Castañeda C.A., Paulson H., Barmada S., and Sharkey L.M. (2024). Pathogenic mutations in UBQLN2 exhibit diverse aggregation propensity and neurotoxicity. Scientific reports 14, 6049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Thumbadoo K.M., Nementzik L.R., Swanson M.E.V., Dieriks B.V., Dragunow M., Faull R.L.M., Curtis M.A., Blair I.P., Nicholson G.A., Williams K.L., and Scotter E.L. (2025). A meta-analysis of genetic variant pathogenicity and sex differences in UBQLN2-linked amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Neurobiol Dis 216, 107127. 10.1016/j.nbd.2025.107127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplement 2
media-2.xlsx (11.3KB, xlsx)
Supplement 3
media-3.xlsx (12.7KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES