Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

Research Square logoLink to Research Square
[Preprint]. 2026 Sep 10:rs.3.rs-10737115. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10737115/v1

Coronary artery disease and neurocognitive performance among older adults in Uganda

Richard Migisha 1, Jolina Lombardi 2, Pauline Byakika-Kibwika 3, Noeline Nakasujja 4, Samuel Maling 5, Peter Kangwagye 6, Abraham Muhwezi 7, Christopher T Longenecker 8, Samson Okello 9, Moses Acan 10, Flavia Atwiine 11, Edna Tindimwebwa 12, Zahra Reynolds 13, Robert Paul 14, Brian Ghoshhajra 15, Eliza Passell 16, Deanna Saylor 17, Miria Kyokusiima 18, Geoffrey Erem 19, Alexander C Tsai 20, Jeremy A Tanner 21, Stephen Asiimwe 22, Mark J Siedner 23
PMCID: PMC13622840  PMID: 42818917

Abstract

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) has been linked with poorer cognitive function, potentially through shared risk factors and vascular pathways linking atherosclerotic disease to cerebral vascular injury. However, the association between CAD and neurocognitive performance remains poorly characterized in African populations.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Uganda Aging and Dementia Cohort Study among participants with coronary computed tomography imaging and neurocognitive testing data. The primary exposure was imaging-defined CAD, and cognitive performance was evaluated at the global-composite, domain-composite, and individual-test levels. Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, and HIV status. HIV-stratified models adjusted for age and sex, and CAD-by-HIV interaction terms assessed effect modification. We examined predicted 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk > 5% as an alternative cardiovascular-risk exposure. Higher b coefficients indicated poorer performance. Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction was applied within outcome tiers.

Results

Among 512 participants, mean age was 57.9 years (SD, 6.3), 252 (49.2%) were female, 238 (46.5%) were people with HIV (PWH), 42 (8.2%) had CAD, and 203 (39.6%) had ASCVD risk > 5%. CAD was not associated with global cognition (b = 0.093 SD units; 95% CI, – 0.122 to 0.308; P = 0.397). At individual-test level, CAD was associated with poorer performance on Color Trails 2 (a measure of executive function) (b = 0.502; 95% CI, 0.184 to 0.821; P = 0.002; q = 0.026) and nominally associated with poorer performance on Digits Forward (a measure of attention and immediate verbal span) (b = 0.386; 95% CI, 0.028 to 0.744; P = 0.035; q = 0.210). In HIV-stratified analyses, CAD was nominally associated with poorer Digits Forward performance among PWOH (b = 0.552; P = 0.006; q = 0.070) and poorer Color Trails 2 performance among PWH (b = 0.646; P = 0.010; q = 0.121), but neither survived FDR correction and interaction tests did not support effect modification. ASCVD risk > 5% was nominally associated with poorer learning-and-memory domain performance (b = 0.188; 95% CI, 0.026 to 0.350; P = 0.023; q = 0.116) and poorer WHO/UCLA AVLT total recall (b = 0.231; 95% CI, 0.048 to 0.414; P = 0.014; q = 0.162); neither survived FDR correction.

Conclusion

CAD was not associated with global or domain-level neurocognitive performance. Its association with poorer Color Trails 2 performance may suggest selective vulnerability in executive control, but requires confirmation in larger longitudinal studies.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease, cognitive function, neurocognitive performance, HIV, ageing, Uganda

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and cognitive decline are major age-related conditions with overlapping vascular and inflammatory pathways (1). Among older adults in the global North, coronary heart disease has been associated with higher risk of cognitive impairment or dementia, with meta-analytic evidence suggesting approximately 45% higher odds of subsequent cognitive impairment among persons with coronary heart disease (1). Cognitive deficits in patients with CAD may reflect cerebral hypoperfusion, impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, endothelial dysfunction, microvascular injury, systemic inflammation, and shared cardiometabolic risk factors (2, 3). Because vascular brain injury often affects frontal–subcortical circuitry, CAD-related cognitive changes may be more evident in processing speed, attention, and executive control than in global cognition or all domains uniformly (4, 5). Domain- and test-level measures may therefore be particularly informative for detecting selective neurocognitive vulnerabilities associated with CAD. Yet, there are limited data on CAD–cognition association in sub-Saharan Africa where the population is rapidly aging and the burden of cognitive impairment is projected to rise (6, 7).

People with HIV (PWH) on antiretroviral therapy may be at particular risk for both vascular disease and neurocognitive impairment (8, 9), due to a combination of traditional cardiometabolic risk factors, direct viral pathology, persistent immune activation, endothelial dysfunction, and chronic inflammation despite viral suppression (10, 11). Vascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease have also been associated with worse cognitive performance and neurocognitive impairment among PWH in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy (12). In many areas of sub-Saharan Africa, where the HIV prevalence remains high and the population of older PWH is growing, most studies have focused on HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders without detailed evaluation of objectively measured vascular disease (13, 14). Evidence from Uganda suggests that CAD epidemiology among older PWH and people without HIV (PWOH) may differ from that in high-income settings, underscoring the need for locally generated evidence (15, 16).

Despite biological plausibility, few studies have directly examined whether CAD is associated with cognitive functioning among older PWH and PWOH in rural sub-Saharan Africa. Vascular cognitive impairment may be preventable or modifiable through cardiovascular risk reduction, earlier detection of coronary disease, and integration of cognitive screening into chronic HIV and non-communicable disease care. Using data from a longitudinal cohort study of older adults in southwestern Uganda, we assessed the association between imaging-defined CAD and neurocognitive performance across global, domain-level, and individual-test outcomes. In secondary analyses, we examined associations between high predicted atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk and neurocognitive performance.

Methods

Study design, setting and population

We conducted an analysis of data from older adults (aged > 40 years) enrolled in the Uganda Aging and Dementia Cohort Study (17) and the affiliated Epidemiology of Coronary Artery Disease in Uganda study in southwestern Uganda (16). The parent studies enrolled a shared cohort of people with HIV (PWH) on ART for a minimum of three years, and age- and sex-similar, population-based participants without HIV (PWOH) enrolled from the same communities.

Study participants

Participants were followed annually and underwent standardized clinical and neurocognitive assessments at each study visit. Cohort participants were invited to participate in a cardiovascular disease sub-study, which included coronary computed tomography angiography and coronary artery calcium scoring (16). For the present analysis, we included participants with a valid global cognitive composite score and at least one normalized individual test score contributing to each of the prespecified non-motor domains most relevant to vascular cognitive vulnerability: attention/processing speed, learning/memory, and executive function/working memory. Because coronary imaging and neurocognitive testing were not performed on the same day, each imaging assessment was paired with the neurocognitive assessment from the closest annual cohort visit, which occurred within 12 months of CAD imaging. Participants with missing data for an outcome or covariate required for a specific model were excluded from that model only. To assess potential selection bias from complete-case modelling, we compared characteristics of participants included in the primary multivariable CAD model with those not included because of missing outcome, exposure, or covariate data.

Coronary artery disease assessments

The primary exposure was imaging-defined CAD, categorized as present or absent. Full details of the scanning procedures and image interpretation have been reported previously (16). In brief, CAD was defined as either calcified or noncalcified plaque identified on coronary computed tomography angiography in at least one major coronary artery or branch, or an Agatston coronary artery calcium score greater than 0 (18). Coronary images in the parent study were interpreted by cardiovascular imaging specialists who were blinded to participants’ HIV status and clinical characteristics.

Neurocognitive assessments

Neurocognitive testing followed the Uganda Aging and Dementia Cohort Study cognitive protocol(17). Participants completed the Runyankore-language Uganda Neuropsychological Battery under the administration of trained research staff. The battery included cross-culturally adapted tests previously used in Ugandan HIV neurocognitive studies (19-21).

The battery assessed five cognitive domains. Attention and processing speed were assessed using Color Trails 1 and Digits Forward. Learning and memory were assessed using total recall and 30-minute delayed recall scores from the World Health Organization–University of California, Los Angeles Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Executive functions and working memory were assessed using Symbol Digit, Color Trails 2 and Backward Digit Span. Language was assessed using animal fluency. Motor function was assessed using timed gait, finger tapping, and Grooved Pegboard tests, with pegboard performance measured separately for the participant’s dominant and non-dominant hands. Additional details on test administration and score construction are provided in Supplementary Table S1.

Neurocognitive performance outcomes

Neurocognitive outcomes were continuous normalized scores. The global cognitive composite was the primary outcome, domain-specific composites and individual-test scores were secondary outcomes. We examined a global cognitive composite score, five domain-specific composite scores—attention, learning and memory, executive function, language, and motor function—and normalized individual test scores. The global cognitive composite score was calculated as the mean of the normalized nonmotor test scores. Domain-specific composite scores were calculated as the mean of the normalized tests assigned to each domain.

Normalized scores were generated using a regression-based approach derived from a subset of PWoH without cognitive impairment. The normalization models were stratified by sex and adjusted for age, education, literacy, and study site. Timed tests, including Color Trails 1, Color Trails 2, timed gait, and dominant- and non-dominant-hand grooved pegboard tests, were reverse-coded so that higher normalized scores consistently represented better performance. For the present analysis, all normalized outcomes were multiplied by – 1 so that higher values consistently indicated poorer neurocognitive performance. Accordingly, a positive b coefficient represents poorer performance associated with CAD or predicted ASCVD risk.

Covariates and other characteristics of study participants

Sociodemographic, behavioral, and cardiometabolic characteristics were obtained using standardized parent-study procedures. Age was recorded in years, and educational attainment was categorized according to the highest level completed. Smoking and alcohol use were classified as never, past, or current use. Physical activity was assessed from the reported frequency and duration of walking and moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity during a typical week, summarized as metabolic-equivalent minutes per week (22). Body-mass index was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. The parent study also profiled systolic and diastolic blood pressure and laboratory measures, including glycated hemoglobin and lipid levels.

Ten-year predicted atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk was estimated using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equations. The score incorporates age, sex, race, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment, diabetes status, and smoking status (23). In analyses, ASCVD risk was categorized as greater than 5% versus 5% or lower, consistent with the highest-risk category used in the parent CAD study (16).

Statistical analysis

Participant characteristics were summarized using means with standard deviations (for normally-distributed) or medians with interquartile ranges (for skewed variables) for continuous variables, and frequencies with percentages for categorical variables. Analyses were conducted using complete-case data for each outcome-specific model; missing values were not imputed.

The primary exposure was imaging-defined CAD. The primary outcome was the global cognitive composite. Secondary outcomes were domain-level composite scores, and individual neurocognitive test scores. All neurocognitive outcomes were standardized and oriented so that higher scores indicated poorer performance; therefore, regression coefficients are interpretable as adjusted differences in standard-deviation units.

We used linear regression models to estimate associations between CAD and neurocognitive outcomes. Overall CAD models were adjusted for age, sex, and HIV status. Because HIV status was central to the cohort design and may influence neurocognitive performance, we also conducted HIV-stratified analyses among PWH and PWOH, with stratum-specific CAD models adjusted for age and sex. Formal CAD-by-HIV interaction terms were fitted in the overall cohort to assess whether CAD–cognition associations differed by HIV status.

As an alternative cardiovascular-risk exposure, we examined predicted 10-year ASCVD risk > 5%. Overall ASCVD-risk models were adjusted for HIV status only because age and sex are components of the ASCVD risk score. We also conducted exploratory HIV-stratified analyses of ASCVD risk > 5%; these stratum-specific models were not additionally adjusted for age or sex because these variables are incorporated into the ASCVD risk score. ASCVD-risk-by-HIV interaction terms were fitted in the overall cohort to assess whether associations differed by HIV status.

To account for multiple comparisons, we used the Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate (FDR) procedure within prespecified outcome tiers and model families(24). The global cognitive composite was treated as the single primary outcome. FDR correction was applied across domain-level composites for secondary analyses and across individual neurocognitive tests for exploratory analyses. We report nominal P values and FDR-adjusted q values, with q < 0.05 considered evidence of statistical significance after correction. Participants with missing data for a specific outcome or covariate were excluded from that model only. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.3.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), with heteroskedasticity-consistent robust standard errors.

Results

Analytic cohort

The analytic cohort included 512 older adults. The mean age was 57.9 years (SD, 6.3), 252 participants (49.2%) were female, 274 (53.5%) were PWOH, and 238 (46.5%) were PWH. Overall, 42 participants (8.2%) had imaging-defined CAD, and 203 (39.6%) had a predicted 10-year ASCVD risk score greater than 5% (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic, behavioral, cardiometabolic, and coronary imaging characteristics of the analytic cohort, overall and by HIV status

Characteristic Overall cohort
(N = 512)
PWOH
(n = 274)
PWH
(n = 238)
P value
Sociodemographic characteristics
Age, years 57.9 ± 6.3 58.6 ± 6.7 57.2 ± 5.8 0.012
Female sex, no. (%) 252 (49.2) 133 (48.5) 119 (50.0) 0.790
Education level, no. (%) 0.227
No formal education 75 (14.6) 47 (17.2) 28 (11.8) —
Primary school, P1–P6 186 (36.3) 105 (38.3) 81 (34.0) —
Primary school, P7 116 (22.7) 57 (20.8) 59 (24.8) —
Secondary school, S1–S4 76 (14.8) 37 (13.5) 39 (16.4) —
S5 or above 59 (11.5) 28 (10.2) 31 (13.0) —
Behavioral characteristics
Smoking status, no. (%) 0.181
Never smoker 297 (58.0) 153 (55.8) 144 (60.5) —
Past smoker 173 (33.8) 93 (33.9) 80 (33.6) —
Current smoker 42 (8.2) 28 (10.2) 14 (5.9) —
Alcohol use status, no. (%) 0.002
Never drinker 156 (30.5) 98 (35.8) 58 (24.4) —
Past drinker 203 (39.6) 90 (32.8) 113 (47.5) —
Current drinker 153 (29.9) 86 (31.4) 67 (28.2) —
Cardiometabolic characteristics
Body-mass index, kg/m2 24.2 ± 5.1 24.6 ± 5.5 23.8 ± 4.5 0.095
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 124.1 ± 19.4 126.1 ± 19.9 121.8 ± 18.6 0.013
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 78.5 ± 11.7 78.8 ± 11.3 78.2 ± 12.2 0.536
Glycated hemoglobin, % 5.8 ± 1.2 5.8 ± 1.0 5.8 ± 1.3 0.944
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 4.2 ± 1.0 4.3 ± 0.9 4.1 ± 1.0 0.073
LDL cholesterol, mmol/L 2.1 ± 0.9 2.2 ± 0.9 2.1 ± 0.8 0.154
Sociodemographic characteristics
HDL cholesterol, mmol/L 1.3 ± 0.5 1.3 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.6 0.584
Predicted 10-year ASCVD risk, % 6.1 ± 7.3 6.7 ± 8.0 5.3 ± 6.4 0.027
Predicted 10-year ASCVD risk, no. (%) 0.004
≤5% 309 (60.4) 149 (54.4) 160 (67.2) —
>5% 203 (39.6) 125 (45.6) 78 (32.8) —
Coronary imaging characteristics
CAD* present, no. (%) 42 (8.2) 19 (6.9) 23 (9.7) 0.333
CAD-RADS score, no. (%) 0.204
0 449 (93.2) 248 (94.7) 201 (91.4) —
1–2 33 (6.8) 14 (5.3) 19 (8.6) —
Agatston calcium score, no. (%) 0.153
0 483 (94.3) 260 (94.9) 223 (93.7) —
1–99 26 (5.1) 11 (4.0) 15 (6.3) —
≥100 3 (0.6) 3 (1.1) 0 (0.0) —
*

CAD was defined as the presence of calcified or non-calcified plaque on coronary computed tomography angiography or an Agatston coronary artery calcium score greater than 0. ASCVD denotes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CAD, coronary artery disease; CAD-RADS, Coronary Artery Disease–Reporting and Data System; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; PWH, people with HIV; and PWOH, people without HIV.

In descriptive comparisons by HIV status, PWH were slightly younger than PWOH (57.2 vs 58.6 years; P = 0.012), while sex distribution, education, body-mass index, and smoking status were broadly similar between groups. Alcohol-use patterns differed by HIV status (P = 0.002), with past alcohol use more common among PWH. Predicted 10-year ASCVD risk scores differed by HIV status, with lower mean scores among PWH than PWOH (5.3% vs 6.7%; P = 0.027) and a smaller proportion of PWH classified as having ASCVD risk > 5% (32.8% vs 45.6%; P = 0.004) (Table 1).

Participants excluded from the primary multivariable CAD model were older, more likely to be living with HIV, had higher predicted ASCVD risk, and had lower educational attainment than those included, although few participants were excluded overall (Supplementary Table S3).

CAD and neurocognitive performance in the overall cohort

In the primary analysis adjusted for age, sex, and HIV status, imaging-defined CAD was not associated with the global cognitive composite (b, 0.093 SD units; 95% CI, – 0.122 to 0.308; P = 0.397; within-tier FDR q = 0.397) (Fig. 1). In analyses of domain-level composite outcomes, CAD was not associated with attention and processing speed, learning and memory executive function and working memory, language or motor skills.

Figure 1. Association between imaging-defined coronary artery disease and neurocognitive performance among older adults with and without HIV in southwestern Uganda, in the overall cohort.

Figure 1

CAD denotes coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; and HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.

In individual-test analyses, CAD was associated with poorer Color Trails 2 performance, a task that reflects processing speed, visual attention, cognitive flexibility, and set shifting (b, 0.502 SD units; 95% CI, 0.184 to 0.821; P = 0.002; within-tier FDR q = 0.026). CAD was nominally associated with poorer Digits Forward performance, a measure of attention and immediate verbal span (b, 0.386; 95% CI, 0.028 to 0.744; P = 0.035), but this association did not remain significant after within-tier FDR correction (q = 0.210). Other test-level outcomes, overall domain-level outcomes, and global cognitive performance were not associated with CAD (Fig. 1).

Predicted ASCVD risk and neurocognitive performance

In analyses adjusted for HIV status, predicted 10-year ASCVD risk greater than 5% was not associated with the global cognitive composite (b = 0.049 SD units; 95% CI, – 0.060 to 0.158; P = 0.379; within-tier FDR q = 0.379) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Association between predicted 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk greater than 5% and neurocognitive performance among older adults with and without HIV in southwestern Uganda. Positive beta coefficients indicate poorer performance. AVLT, Auditory Verbal Learning Test; CI, confidence interval; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles; WHO, World Health Organization.

In domain-level analyses, ASCVD risk greater than 5% was nominally associated with poorer learning- and-memory domain performance (b = 0.188; 95% CI, 0.026 to 0.350; P = 0.023), but this association did not remain significant after within-tier FDR correction (q = 0.116). ASCVD risk was not associated with attention and processing speed, executive function and working memory, language, or motor skills after correction for multiple comparisons (Fig. 2).

In individual-test analyses, ASCVD risk greater than 5% was nominally associated with poorer WHO/UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test total-recall performance (b = 0.231; 95% CI, 0.048 to 0.414; P = 0.014), but this association did not survive within-tier FDR correction (q = 0.162). No other individual-test level, domain-level, or global cognitive outcomes were associated with predicted ASCVD risk (Fig. 2).

HIV-stratified analyses

At individual test-level analyses stratified by HIV status, CAD was not associated with the global cognitive composite among either PWOH (b = 0.016; 95% CI, – 0.266 to 0.298; P = 0.910; q = 0.910) or PWH (b = 0.150; 95% CI, – 0.180 to 0.479; P = 0.375; q = 0.375) (Fig. 3). Among PWH, CAD was nominally associated with poorer Color Trails 2 performance (b = 0.646; 95% CI, 0.159 to 1.133; P = 0.010), but this association did not remain significant after within-tier FDR correction (q = 0.121). CAD was not associated with the global cognitive composite, domain-level composites, or other individual-test outcomes after FDR correction among PWH (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Association between imaging-defined coronary artery disease and neurocognitive performance, stratified by HIV status in southwestern Uganda. Shown are b coefficients and 95% confidence intervals for the association between coronary artery disease (CAD) and neurocognitive performance, estimated separately among people without HIV (PWOH) and people with HIV (PWH).

Among PWOH, CAD was nominally associated with poorer Digits Forward performance (b = 0.552; 95% CI, 0.163 to 0.940; P = 0.006), but this association did not meet the within-tier FDR threshold (q = 0.070). CAD was not associated with domain-level composites or other individual-test outcomes after FDR correction among PWOH (Fig. 3B).

Formal CAD-by-HIV interaction testing did not provide evidence that HIV status modified these associations, including for Digits Forward (P = 0.354) and Color Trails 2 (P = 0.575) (Supplementary Table S2).

Discussion

In this cohort of older adults with and without HIV in southwestern Uganda, imaging-defined CAD was associated with poorer performance on tests of executive function. The estimated associations were small to moderate in magnitude when translated into effect sizes. Higher predicted 10-year ASCVD risk was also nominally associated with poorer verbal learning and memory performance, but neither remained significant after FDR correction. In contrast, CAD was not associated with poorer global cognitive performance or with domain-level performance.

Test-level associations between CAD and cognitive function were observed for Digits Forward and Color Trails; the test-specific pattern was most evident for Color Trails 2, with a weaker nominal signal for Digits Forward. Color Trails 2 places substantial demands on set-shifting, cognitive flexibility, visual attention, and psychomotor speed. This pattern is biologically plausible because CAD is a marker of vascular disease burden, characterized by endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and microvascular injury (25). These pathophysiologic mechanisms can similarly disrupt frontal–subcortical networks supporting attention and executive function (2, 4, 26). Higher coronary artery calcium has likewise been associated with poorer cognitive performance, greater white-matter lesion burden, and reduced brain volumes (27, 28).

Our finding that CAD was not associated with the global cognitive composite is notable. Prior studies and reviews have linked cardiac disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular risk factors to worse cognition, but the reported effects are heterogeneous and vary by population, cognitive outcome, CAD definition, and severity of vascular disease (2, 26-28). The absence of an association between CAD and global cognition may partly reflect the low coronary disease burden in this cohort. Most participants had no detectable coronary calcium or angiographic disease, and nearly all identified abnormalities were mild; only three participants had an Agatston score ≥ 100. Predominantly low-burden, imaging-detected CAD may be insufficient to produce broad cognitive differences and also reduces power to assess dose–response relationships. In addition, global composites may dilute subtle effects concentrated in selected cognitive processes. Early or subcortical vascular injury typically affects attention, processing speed, executive control, and verbal learning efficiency or retrieval, whereas a predominantly amnestic storage profile is less common except with strategic lesions involving medial temporal or related memory structures (29-31).

In HIV-stratified analyses, CAD was nominally associated with poorer Digits Forward performance, reflecting attention and immediate auditory span, among PWOH, and poorer Color Trails 2 performance, reflecting executive function and set-shifting, among PWH; however, neither survived FDR correction, and interaction tests did not support effect modification. Therefore, the stratum-specific findings should not be taken as evidence of distinct CAD–cognition patterns in PWH and PWOH. This finding is notable because earlier pre-ART and early-ART literature reported substantial HIV-related cognitive vulnerability, including HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders and frontostriatal cognitive patterns (32, 33). However, more recent ART-era literature suggests that severe HIV-associated dementia has declined and that cognitive outcomes among treated PWH are increasingly shaped by ageing, vascular risk, and other comorbidities (12, 34, 35). Our findings are also consistent with recent data from Uganda, in which older PWH well-treated on ART had cognitive performance broadly comparable to demographically matched PWOH(36).

The ASCVD-risk models provide a complementary perspective. Unlike direct measurement of CAD, ASCVD risk scores compile data on age, CVD risk factors (e.g., cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, smoking), which may be risk factors for vascular disease even in the absence of CAD. A predicted 10-year ASCVD risk score > 5% was nominally associated with poorer verbal learning and memory performance, but not with global cognition. These exploratory signals are consistent with the possibility that cumulative vascular risk reflects broader cerebrovascular vulnerability, including small-vessel and neurovascular-unit injury (25, 37, 38). Similar associations between cardiovascular-risk scores and subsequent cognitive decline have been reported in other ageing populations, including older PWH (38-41). These findings support further evaluation of simple cardiovascular-risk assessment to identify older adults who may benefit from intensified vascular-risk management and targeted cognitive monitoring.

Our findings have implications for ageing HIV and non-communicable disease (NCD) care in sub-Saharan Africa. CAD was not associated with poorer global cognitive performance, but its association with selected attention and executive-function tasks suggests that brief multidomain screening tools may not capture subtle deficits in visual attention, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, set-shifting, and immediate auditory attention. These functions may influence medication use, appointment adherence, and ability to complete other activities of daily living (42, 43). Older adults with HIV and known vascular disease or higher cardiovascular risk may benefit from cognitive function screening. For those with deficits, follow-up within integrated HIV–NCD care may provide benefit. The results do not support routine coronary computed tomography or extensive neuropsychological testing in resource-limited clinics; rather, they justify further research into the benefits of targeted cognitive screening.

This study has several limitations. CAD and neurocognitive performance were assessed at single time points, precluding causal inference and evaluation of cognitive change over time. In addition, coronary imaging and neurocognitive testing were not always concurrent and could be separated by up to 12 months. Although coronary atherosclerosis is unlikely to change substantially over such a period, cognitive performance and intervening health events may have changed, potentially attenuating or otherwise distorting the observed associations. A key limitation concerns the definition and severity of CAD. Although classified as imaging-defined CAD, detected disease was almost exclusively low burden and non-obstructive: positive CAD-RADS findings were limited to grades 1–2, no participant had grades 3–5, and only three had an Agatston score ≥ 100. The study therefore provides evidence mainly about mild imaging-detected CAD rather than advanced, obstructive, or symptomatic CAD. This narrow exposure range may have attenuated observable differences, prevented assessment of severity gradients, and limits generalizability to patients with clinically manifest disease. Although the primary CAD models adjusted for age, sex, and HIV status, and ASCVD-risk models adjusted for HIV status only, residual confounding from unmeasured vascular, socioeconomic, and life-course exposures remains possible. In addition, the study population was drawn from parent cohorts in southwestern Uganda, which may limit generalizability to other settings and to populations with more advanced symptomatic CAD. Finally, complete-case modelling may have biased associations toward the null because participants excluded from multivariable models appeared to have higher vascular and cognitive-risk profiles, including older age, higher ASCVD risk, greater representation of PWH, and lower educational attainment.

The study also has notable strengths. CAD was assessed using imaging-based measures, including CAD-RADS and Agatston calcium score, rather than self-reported cardiovascular history alone. Neurocognitive performance was examined at global, domain, and individual-test levels, allowing more granular characterization of cognitive vulnerability. The inclusion of people with and without HIV within the same analytic framework is especially relevant in settings where HIV and cardiometabolic disease increasingly overlap. Finally, the study addresses an important evidence gap, as most research on CAD-related cognitive vulnerability has been conducted in high-income settings.

Conclusion

In this cohort of older adults with and without HIV in southwestern Uganda, Imaging-defined CAD was associated with poorer Color Trails 2 performance, reflecting executive function and processing speed. Higher predicted 10-year ASCVD risk showed nominal associations with verbal learning and memory measures, but these did not remain significant after FDR correction. In contrast, CAD was not associated with poorer global cognitive performance or with domain-level performance. These findings suggest that CAD and elevated cardiovascular risk may be linked to selective cognitive vulnerabilities rather than generalized cognitive impairment. Larger longitudinal studies, spanning a broader range of coronary disease severity, are needed to corroborate these associations, and determine whether cardiovascular risk reduction can help preserve cognitive function in ageing African populations.

Supplementary Material

This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.

• SupplementaryTableS1-S3.docx

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants of the Uganda Aging and Dementia Cohort Study and the Epidemiology of Coronary Artery Disease in Uganda study for their contribution to this research. We acknowledge the study staff and collaborating scientists who contributed to participant recruitment and follow-up, clinical assessments, coronary imaging, neurocognitive testing, data management, and quality assurance. We also acknowledge the investigators and methods team who developed the Uganda Neuropsychological Battery and the regression-based normalization procedures used in this analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by the Alzheimer’s Association (24CBIDR-1188506) and the National Institutes of Health (R01 AG059504, R01 AG087790, R01 HL141053). MJS acknowledges additional NIH support (K24 HL166024). Neurocognitive data collection and related methods development were additionally supported by NIH award K08 AG090815. The funders had no role in the design of the present secondary analysis, data analysis, interpretation of the findings, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Abbreviations

ACC/AHA

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association

ASCVD

atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

AVLT

Auditory Verbal Learning Test

BMI

body-mass index

CAC

coronary artery calcium

CAD

coronary artery disease

CAD-RADS

Coronary Artery Disease–Reporting and Data System

CCTA

coronary computed tomography angiography

CI

confidence interval

CT

computed tomography

CVD

cardiovascular disease

HbA1c

glycated hemoglobin

HDL

high-density lipoprotein

HIV

human immunodeficiency virus

IQR

interquartile range

LDL

low-density lipoprotein

MET

metabolic equivalent of task

NCD

noncommunicable disease

PCE

Pooled Cohort Equations

PWH

people with HIV

PWOH

people without HIV

SD

standard deviation

SE

standard error

UCLA

University of California,Los Angeles

WHO

World Health Organization

Footnotes

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Mbarara University of Science and Technology Research Ethics Committee (MUST-REC) under the protocol for secondary analysis of existing de-identified data on coronary artery disease, systemic inflammation, and neurocognitive performance among older adults with and without HIV in Uganda. The analysis used data originally collected under the South Western Uganda Aging Cohort Study and the Epidemiology of Coronary Artery Disease in Uganda study, including the parent protocols “Quality of Life and Aging with HIV in Rural Uganda” (MUST Ref. 12/01–19) and “Epidemiology of Coronary Artery Disease among People with HIV in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa” (MUST Ref. 05/06–18). All participants in the parent studies provided informed consent for data collection and future research use. The present analysis involved secondary analysis of de-identified data only; no new participant contact, procedures, interventions, or biological specimen collection were undertaken.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, or any affiliated institution.

Contributor Information

Richard Migisha, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Jolina Lombardi, University of California, San Francisco.

Pauline Byakika-Kibwika, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Noeline Nakasujja, Makerere University.

Samuel Maling, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Peter Kangwagye, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Abraham Muhwezi, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Christopher T. Longenecker, University of Washington.

Samson Okello, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Moses Acan, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Flavia Atwiine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Edna Tindimwebwa, Kabwohe Clinical Research Center.

Zahra Reynolds, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Robert Paul, University of Missouri-St. Louis.

Brian Ghoshhajra, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Eliza Passell, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Deanna Saylor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Miria Kyokusiima, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Geoffrey Erem, Makerere University.

Alexander C. Tsai, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Jeremy A. Tanner, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

Stephen Asiimwe, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Mark J. Siedner, Mbarara University of Science and Technology.

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed for this manuscript are not publicly available because they contain sensitive health information, including HIV status, cardiovascular measurements, neurocognitive performance data, and behavioral characteristics, even though the analytic files were de-identified. Data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author and with permission from the relevant parent study investigators, institutional data custodians, and ethics/regulatory authorities, subject to applicable data-sharing agreements.

References

  • 1.Deckers K, Schievink SH, Rodriquez MM, van Oostenbrugge RJ, van Boxtel MP, Verhey FR, et al. Coronary heart disease and risk for cognitive impairment or dementia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0184244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burkauskas J, Lang P, Bunevičius A, Neverauskas J, Bučiūtė-Jankauskienė M, Mickuvienė N. Cognitive function in patients with coronary artery disease: A literature review. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(10):4019–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mejia-Renteria H, Travieso A, Matías-Guiu JA, Yus M, Espejo-Paeres C, Finocchiaro F, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with impaired cognitive function: the Cerebral-Coronary Connection study (C3 study). Eur Heart J. 2023;44(2):113–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang Y, Zhang H, Liu L, Li Z, Zhou Y, Wei J, et al. Cognitive function and cardiovascular health in the elderly: network analysis based on hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, and coronary heart disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1229559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mworozi K, Ameda F, Byanyima RK, Nakasujja N. Carotid artery plaque detected on ultrasound is associated with impaired cognitive state in the elderly: a population-based study in Wakiso district, Uganda. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;68:194–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nichols E, Steinmetz JD, Vollset SE, Fukutaki K, Chalek J, Abd-Allah F, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(2):e105–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Akinyemi RO, Yaria J, Ojagbemi A, Guerchet M, Okubadejo N, Njamnshi AK, et al. Dementia in Africa: Current evidence, knowledge gaps, and future directions. Alzheimer's Dement J Alzheimer's Assoc. 2022;18(4):790–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McCutcheon K, Nqebelele U, Murray L, Thomas TS, Mpanya D, Tsabedze N. Cardiac and renal comorbidities in aging people living with HIV. Circul Res. 2024;134(11):1636–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yitbarek GY, Ayehu GW, Ayele BA, Bayih WA, Gebremariam AD, Tiruneh SA. Cognitive impairment and its associated factors among HIV/AIDS patients on anti retro-viral therapy in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2020;38:83–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shah AS, Stelzle D, Lee KK, Beck EJ, Alam S, Clifford S, et al. Global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2018;138(11):1100–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.So-Armah K, Benjamin LA, Bloomfield GS, Feinstein MJ, Hsue P, Njuguna B, et al. HIV and cardiovascular disease. lancet HIV. 2020;7(4):e279–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McIntosh EC, Tureson K, Rotblatt LJ, Singer EJ, Thames AD. HIV, vascular risk factors, and cognition in the combination antiretroviral therapy era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2021;27(4):365–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Olajide T, Ogungbemi E, Olajide G, Ogundijo D, Osakuade O, Moshood F. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders in Africa: challenges, peculiarities, and future directions. AIDS Res Therapy. 2024;21(1):88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zenebe Y, Necho M, Yimam W, Akele B. Worldwide occurrence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders and its associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:814362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Longenecker CT, Bogorodskaya M, Margevicius S, Nazzinda R, Bittencourt MS, Erem G, et al. Sex modifies the association between HIV and coronary artery disease among older adults in Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(1):e25868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Siedner MJ, Ghoshhajra B, Erem G, Nassanga R, Randhawa M, Ochieng A, et al. Epidemiology of coronary atherosclerosis among people living with HIV in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med. 2025;178(4):468–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Asiimwe S, Acan M, Maling S, Nakasujja N, Atwine F, Tindimwebwa E et al. The Uganda Aging Cohort Study: Current Lessons and Future Opportunities. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2025;21:e100054. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M et al. CAD-RADS™ 2.0–2022 coronary artery disease–Reporting and data system an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. 2022;4(5):e220183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Robertson KR, Nakasujja N, Wong M, Musisi S, Katabira E, Parsons TD, et al. Pattern of neuropsychological performance among HIV positive patients in Uganda. BMC Neurol. 2007;7(1):8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sacktor N, Nakasujja N, Okonkwo O, Skolasky RL, Robertson K, Musisi S, et al. Longitudinal neuropsychological test performance among HIV seropositive individuals in Uganda. J Neurovirol. 2013;19(1):48–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maj M, D'Elia L, Satz P, Janssen R, Zaudig M, Uchiyama C, et al. Evaluation of two new neuropsychological tests designed to minimize cultural bias in the assessment of HIV-1 seropositive persons: a WHO study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1993;8(2):123–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mendes MA, Da Silva I, Ramires V, Reichert F, Martins R, Ferreira R, et al. Metabolic equivalent of task (METs) thresholds as an indicator of physical activity intensity. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0200701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rout A, Duhan S, Umer M, Li M, Kalra D. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction: current state-of-the-art. Heart. 2024;110(15):1005–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57(1):289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gorelick PB, Scuteri A, Black SE, DeCarli C, Greenberg SM, Iadecola C et al. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. stroke. 2011;42(9):2672–713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eggermont LH, De Boer K, Muller M, Jaschke AC, Kamp O, Scherder EJ. Cardiac disease and cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Heart. 2012;98(18):1334–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vidal J-S, Sigurdsson S, Jonsdottir MK, Eiriksdottir G, Thorgeirsson G, Kjartansson O, et al. Coronary artery calcium, brain function and structure: the AGES-Reykjavik Study. Stroke. 2010;41(5):891–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xia C, Vonder M, Sidorenkov G, Oudkerk M, de Groot JC, van der Harst P, et al. The relationship of coronary artery calcium and clinical coronary artery disease with cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020;27(9):934–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Markus HS, Joutel A. The pathogenesis of cerebral small vessel disease and vascular cognitive impairment. Physiol Rev. 2025;105(3):1075–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jokinen H, Laakso HM, Arola A, Paajanen TI, Virkkala J, Särkämö T, et al. Executive functions and processing speed in covert cerebral small vessel disease. Eur J Neurol. 2025;32(1):e16533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barbosa BJAP, Siqueira Neto JI, Alves GS, Sudo FK, Suemoto CK, Tovar-Moll F, et al. Diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment: recommendations of the scientific department of cognitive neurology and aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. Dement Neuropsychologia. 2022;16:53–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker J, Brew B, Byrd D, Cherner M, et al. Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology. 2007;69(18):1789–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Heaton R, Clifford D, Franklin D Jr, Woods S, Ake C, Vaida F, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study. Neurology. 2010;75(23):2087–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Deng L, Zhang X, Gao Y, Turner D, Qian F, Lu H, et al. Association of HIV infection and cognitive impairment in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;68:101310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang Y, Liu M, Lu Q, Farrell M, Lappin JM, Shi J, et al. Global prevalence and burden of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: a meta-analysis. Neurology. 2020;95(19):e2610–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tanner JA, Valdespino R, Kautz TF, Masette G, Hromas G, Wang CP, et al. Chronic HIV Infection Association with Cognition and ADRD Plasma Biomarkers in Uganda. Alzheimer's Dement. 2025;21:e098870. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Smith EE, Aparicio HJ, Gottesman RF, Goyal MS, Greenberg SM, Schneider JA, et al. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia in the United States: prevalence and incidence: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2025;56(10):e317–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jia R, Wang Q, Huang H, Yang Y, Chung YF, Liang T. Cardiovascular disease risk models and dementia or cognitive decline: a systematic review. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1257367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kaffashian S, Dugravot A, Nabi H, Batty GD, Brunner E, Kivimäki M, et al. Predictive utility of the Framingham general cardiovascular disease risk profile for cognitive function: evidence from the Whitehall II study. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(18):2326–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chow FC, Lyass A, Mahoney TF, Massaro JM, Triant VA, Wu K, et al. Baseline 10-year cardiovascular risk scores predict cognitive function in older persons, and particularly women, living with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(12):3079–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schaich CL, Yeboah J, Espeland MA, Baker LD, Ding J, Hayden KM, et al. Association of vascular risk scores and cognitive performance in a diverse cohort: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Journals Gerontology: Ser A. 2022;77(6):1208–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Insel K, Morrow D, Brewer B, Figueredo A. Executive function, working memory, and medication adherence among older adults. Journals Gerontol Ser B: Psychol Sci Social Sci. 2006;61(2):P102–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ettenhofer ML, Hinkin CH, Castellon SA, Durvasula R, Ullman J, Lam M, et al. Aging, neurocognition, and medication adherence in HIV infection. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2009;17(4):281–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Supplementary Table. S1. Neurocognitive assessments and normalized outcomes included in the analysis.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed for this manuscript are not publicly available because they contain sensitive health information, including HIV status, cardiovascular measurements, neurocognitive performance data, and behavioral characteristics, even though the analytic files were de-identified. Data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author and with permission from the relevant parent study investigators, institutional data custodians, and ethics/regulatory authorities, subject to applicable data-sharing agreements.


Articles from Research Square are provided here courtesy of American Journal Experts

RESOURCES