Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

Research Square logoLink to Research Square
[Preprint]. 2026 Sep 9:rs.3.rs-10974327. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10974327/v1

Genetic associations with alcohol drinking initiation and cessation in sub-Saharan African and African ancestry populations

Jean-Tristan Brandenburg 1, Ritah Nabunje 2, Opeyemi Soremekun 3, Wenlong Carl Chen 4, Dylan Kerrigan 5, Christopher G Mathew 6, Martin D Tobin 7, Tinashe Chikowore 8, Segun Fatumo 9, Michèle Ramsay 10, Chiara Batini 11, Palwendé Romuald Boua 12
PMCID: PMC13622846  PMID: 42818985

Abstract

Alcohol misuse is a major global health concern with significant genetic contributions, yet studies in African populations remain limited. We conducted genome-wide association meta-analyses for alcohol drinking initiation and cessation across multiple cohorts comprising individuals from sub-Saharan Africa (N = 20,936) and those with African ancestry from UK Biobank (N = 7,726). Our analyses identified two genome-wide significant loci associated with drinking cessation (FYB2 and FTO regions) and several suggestive associations overlapping with genes implicated in alcohol metabolism, behavioral traits, and neurodevelopment. These findings provide insights into the genetic architecture of alcohol use behaviors in diverse African populations. By focusing on alcohol drinking initiation and cessation phenotypes, this study complements prior research on alcohol dependence and consumption, highlighting genetic factors influencing vulnerability and resilience. Our results underscore the importance of including diverse ancestries in genetic studies to enhance understanding of alcohol-related behaviors and inform future investigations into prevention and intervention strategies.

Keywords: Alcohol use, Alcohol drinking initiation, Alcohol drinking cessation, Genome-wide association study (GWAS), African ancestry, Sub-Saharan Africa

Background

Alcohol use is an integral part of many cultural and social practices, and worldwide ~ 2.3 billion adults are current drinkers1, with significant variation in consumption levels across countries and regions2,3. However, alcohol consumption is the third leading risk factor for disease and disability in the world, contributing to cancer, cardiovascular diseases, digestive disorders, accidents and violence, and HIV infection4.

In Sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence of alcohol use differs widely by region, age group, and context. Prevalence of lifetime exposure among adults has been reported to range from 34.9% to 86.4%5. Factors influencing alcohol use are multifaceted and include social, cultural, demographic, and economic determinants. For example, urbanization, familial context, social stress, and cultural norms are particularly relevant in shaping consumption patterns across countries and regions5–8.

Alcohol behaviors and alcohol consumption patterns in sub-Saharan Africa are shaped by complex cultural, socio-economic, and institutional factors. Therefore, we examined alcohol use and alcoholism through a cultural lens, by analyzing literature from the year 2000 onward. Focusing on socio-economic, institutional, and individual cultural influences on drinking behaviors, we noticed significant variation across countries, with religious beliefs, poverty, urbanization, gender norms, and traditional practices influencing consumption and alcohol-related harms. Studies have reported particularly high levels of alcohol use disorders in South Africa, while high levels of abstention in some Burkina Faso populations have been associated with religious sanctions. We highlighted alcohol use as a culturally embedded behavior shaped by broader social and economic contexts9–13.

Genetic factors also contribute substantially to alcohol use and dependence. Twin studies, such as FinnTwin and the Virginia Adult Twin Study of Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders, have demonstrated a strong heritable component in alcohol-related behaviors, pointing to a complex genetic architecture14,15. These studies highlight polygenic inheritance and gene–environment interactions, particularly involving familial and social influences16.

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have emerged as powerful tools for identifying common genetic variants associated with traits and diseases17,18. Genetic associations with alcohol dependence have been mostly observed in genes involved in alcohol metabolism, including ADH1B, ADH1C, and ALDH2, as well as in genes affecting neurotransmission pathways, such as GABA receptor genes19.

A GWAS using data from 112,117 White British participants in the UK Biobank identified 14 loci associated with self-reported weekly alcohol consumption, including variants in the ADH1B, ADH1C, ADH5 and KLB genes20. Genetic correlations were also observed between alcohol use and traits such as educational attainment, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, smoking, and body size measures20. A more recent meta-analysis conducted by the GSCAN consortium leveraged data from up to 3.4 million individuals from four major ancestries, notably improving fine-mapping resolution and locus discovery, and identifying a novel association between number of drinks per week with ECE221. The Million Veteran Program (MVP) has demonstrated that multi-trait GWAS approaches can increase discovery power, revealing novel pleiotropic variants associated with both alcohol use disorder (AUD) and smoking behavior22. Despite these advancements, most GWAS on alcohol consumption have been conducted predominantly in populations of European ancestry, with some notable exceptions. For example, a GWAS involving 3,132 African Americans (including 1,315 cases) identified significant associations on chromosome 3 related to alcohol dependence, including eQTLs for Nephrocystin 3 (NPHP3) in the sigmoid colon23.

In this study, we combined analyses from biobanks and population cohorts in Africa to expand investigations into the genetic determinants of alcohol use among underrepresented populations24–27. Here we explore and characterize genetic associations with alcohol drinking initiation and cessation among individuals of African ancestry, including both residents within the African continent and members of the African diaspora. By focusing on these two distinct yet complementary behavioral phenotypes, we aimed to identify genetic variants that may contribute to vulnerability or resilience in alcohol-related behaviors.

Methods

Studies and participants

The overall study design and analytical workflow are presented in Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2.

AWI-Gen

The Africa Wits-INDEPTH Partnership for Genomic Studies (AWI-Gen), an H3Africa Collaborative Centre, is a population-based study with two waves of data collection24,25,28. AWI-Gen seeks to identify genetic and environmental factors that affect the changing disease burden and that contribute to cardio-metabolic disease in six African study sites in four countries24. The population-based study recruited ~ 12,000 participants from Ghana, Burkina Faso, Kenya and South Africa aged 40 to 60 years at baseline, collected blood and urine biomarkers, and captured extensive participant data, including patterns of alcohol consumption.

JCS cancer

The Johannesburg Cancer Study (JCS) began in 1995 and concluded in 2016. Over the 20-year period, the JCS enrolled over 25,000 treatment-naive African cancer patients from the Greater Johannesburg region. Enrolled patients provided a blood sample and completed an in-depth lifestyle risk factors questionnaire, which included an assessment of drinking behavior26.

UK Biobank

UK Biobank (UKB) is a longitudinal study in the United Kingdom including over 500,000 volunteers aged 40–69 years at baseline. Since 2006, it has collected extensive phenotypic and biological data to allow approved researchers to investigate the genetic and environmental determinants of a wide range of diseases and health-related phenotypes. We identified ~ 7,800 individuals of African ancestry in UKB using genotyped data and a clustering approach as described elsewhere29.

Uganda Genome Resource

The Uganda Genome Resource (UGR) includes ~ 6,400 individuals and is a subset of the General Population Cohort (GPC), a population-based open cohort aimed at understanding HIV infections in Uganda. The UGR was built with the aim of improving local resources for public health and to allow large genetic epidemiology studies30,31.

Genotyping and imputation quality control

The AWI-Gen and JCS participants were genotyped for ~ 2.2 M SNPs using the Illumina Infinium H3Africa SNP array, which is designed to capture common variants in African populations. Imputation resulted in ~ 17 M autosomal variants and was performed using the African Genome Resources reference panel (EAGLE2 + PBWT pipeline) through the Sanger Imputation Server. Details of quality control (QC) and imputation settings are presented elsewhere32–34.

Participants from UGR were in part genotyped for ~ 2.2 million autosomal markers using the Illumina HumanOmni2.5-8 BeadChip array (N = 4,778) and in part sequenced at low coverage (N = 1,978)27,35. Genotype imputation was conducted for ~ 98 million variants using a combined reference panel integrating whole-genome sequence data from the African Genome Variation Project31, the Uganda 2000 Genomes, and the 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3 (1000GP)36. Details on QC procedures and imputation settings are described elsewhere35.

Participants from UKB were genotyped at approximately 800,000 variants using the UK Biobank Axiom Array37. Genotype imputation was performed for ~ 93 million autosomal variants using a combined reference panel that included the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC)38, UK1039, and the 1000GP Phase 336. Comprehensive details regarding QC procedures and imputation settings are available elsewhere37.

Phenotype definitions

Two binary alcohol drinking traits were examined: Drinking Initiation (DI) and Drinking Cessation (DC). These traits were defined using relevant responses from questionnaire data available in each cohort. DI compares ‘never’ drinkers (controls) versus ‘ever’ drinkers (cases). ‘Never’ drinkers are individuals who have never consumed alcohol, while ‘ever’ drinkers currently drink alcohol or drank in the past. DC, on the other hand, includes only ‘ever’ drinkers and compares ‘current’ drinkers (cases), who were drinking every day or occasionally at the time of the questionnaire, to ‘previous’ drinkers (controls), who were not drinking at that time. Association testing for the DI phenotype was performed on AWI-Gen, UKB-AFR, UGR and JCS. DC could not be defined in JCS and in one of the sites in AWI-Gen South, and association analyses for DC included AWI-Gen, UKB and UGR. The number of cases and controls for each phenotype in each cohort is presented in Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2.

Table 1. Characteristics of participants included in the drinking initiation (DI) and drinking cessation(DC) genome-wide association analyses.

Values represent sample size, percentage of females, and mean age (years) for cases (value 1) and controls (value 0) in each cohort. For DI, cases were defined as ever drinkers and controls as never drinkers. For DC, cases were defined as current drinkers and controls as previous drinkers.

Cohorts Drinking Initiation Drinking Cessation
Never (0) Ever (1) Current (1) Previous (0)
AWI-Gen East 899 (75.3%, 48.6) 819 (31.6%, 49.3) 309 (17.2%, 48.5) 510 (40.4%, 49.8)
South 1,950 (71.1%, 54.6) 1,936 (25.6%, 54.5) 718 (27.9%, 56.5) 609 (48.6%, 57.3)
West 747 (58.6%, 49.4) 2,786 (49.5%, 50.6) 2,267 (45.3%, 50.5) 519 (67.6%, 51.1)
JCS Soweto 3,254 (94.8%, 45.9) 2,138 (76%, 48.5) NA NA
UGR Uganda 4,261 (59.61%, 29.17) 2,146 (52.19%, 43.9) 1,659 (49.37%, 43.25) 487 (61.81%, 46.16)
UKB African ancestry individuals 1,386 (68.04%, 51.56) 6,340 (55.88%, 51.91) 5,899 (56.43%, 51.87) 441 (48.53%, 52.43)
Total 12,497 (72.6%, 42.6) 16,165 (52.1%, 50.3) 10,852 (50.0%, 50.5) 2,566 (53.3%, 51.6)

Abbreviations: AWI-Gen, Africa Wits-INDEPTH Partnership for Genomic Studies; JCS, Johannesburg Cancer Study; UGR, Uganda Genome Resource; UKB, UK Biobank.

Association testing

Genome-wide association analyses for JCS, UKB-AFR, and AWI-Gen were performed using a generalized mixed model, and significance was evaluated using SAIGE, which accounts for case-control imbalance40. Analyses for JCS and AWI-Gen were conducted using the H3A GWAS pipeline41. For UGR, associations were tested using a univariate linear mixed model (LMM), and significance was evaluated with a likelihood ratio test as implemented in GEMMA v0.98.142.

Covariates included sex, age, age squared, and dataset-specific numbers of principal components (PCs): AWI-East, AWI-South and JCS (5 PCs), AWI-West (11 PCs), UGR (10 PCs), and UKB-AFR (9 PCs). PCs were computed separately for each dataset using principal component analysis of independent genotyped SNPs.

Meta-Analysis

For each phenotype (DI and DC), a two-step meta-analysis was performed. In Step 1, we included all individuals from continental Africa, including AWI-East, AWI-South, AWI-West, JCS (stratified by cancer status), and UGR, resulting in two meta-analyses (DISSA and DCSSA). In Step 2, we meta-analyzed the results from Step 1 with data from non-continental African individuals, including UKB-AFR, resulting in two additional meta-analyses (DIAA and DCAA). In each step, we used METAL to perform association analyses, following the H3AGWAS pipeline41.

Meta-analyses included variants found in at least two datasets, and genome-wide significance was considered at p < 5 x 10− 8 and suggestive significance at p < 5 x 10− 6. Sentinel variants were defined as those with the lowest p-value in a 1Mb region.

LD reference panel

The linkage disequilibrium (LD) reference panel was constructed to capture the broad genetic diversity of the study population by combining data from 100 individuals from the AWI-Gen study (representing Southern African ancestry), the African Genome Variation Project (AGVP)31, and the AFR populations in the 1000GP36.

Conditional analysis and Fine-mapping

Independence of sentinel variants was defined by using GCTA and performing a stepwise model selection of independently associated variants within ± 500 kb of each sentinel variant using the LD reference panel described above43. For each independent sentinel variant, we defined 99% credible sets with FINEMAP v1.4 using a shotgun stochastic algorithm assuming a single causal variant in a 1Mb window centered on the sentinel44.

Variant annotation

Sentinel SNPs defined using the suggestive threshold, and their corresponding credible sets, were functionally annotated using ANNOVAR45. Gene-based annotations were performed with the refGene and ensGene databases to determine the functional context of each variant. Additional annotations were obtained by predicting functional impact from multiple algorithms (dbnsfp42c)46, clinical significance (clinvar_20221231), deleteriousness scores (cadd13)47, and allele frequencies from multiple population databases (popfreq_all_20150413), including 1000GP36, ESP650048 and ExAC49.

Phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS)

For the sentinel SNPs defined using the genome-wide and suggestive thresholds and their corresponding credible sets, we queried associations in the OpenGWAS database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/, March 2025 release) using the phewas function from the ieugwasr R package50. Phenotypes were classified into categories using a semi-automated approach based on pattern matching. PheWAS plots were generated using ggplot2 (https://ggplot2-book.org/). A Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold of 5% was applied, adjusting for the number of sentinel SNPs identified at the suggestive threshold and the number of phenotypes retrieved from the OpenGWAS database (p < 0.05, Nsentinel SNPs × Nphenotypes).

Lookup in public datasets

Sentinel variants and their credible set defined at suggestive significance for all four meta-analyses (DISSA, DIAA, DCSSA, and DCAA) were extracted from: (i) three datasets from the Million Veteran Program cohort, including alcohol use disorder (AUC [datasets pha004840.1 and pha004841.1]), Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption scores (AUDIT-C [datasets pha004844.1 and pha004845.1]) and Maximum Habitual Alcohol Intake (MaxAlc [datasets pha004848.1 and pha004849.1]) phenotypes in both African and European ancestries51,52; and (ii) one dataset from the GWAS & Sequencing Consortium of Alcohol and Nicotine use consortium, including Drinks per Week in both African and European ancestries21. Significance was evaluated by applying a Bonferroni correction on the number of variants tested for replication.

Visualization results

Results were visualized using Manhattan and qq-plots using the fastman library53. Regional plots were created using LocusZoom standalone54.

Mapping variants to genes and tofunctions

The Functional Mapping and Annotation of Genome-Wide Association Studies (FUMA) was used to annotate, prioritize, visualize, and interpret GWAS results55. GWAS summary statistics (p < 5 x 10−5) from our study were used as inputs. FUMA provided extensive functional annotation for all variants in genomic areas identified by lead variants in a biological context. We selected all candidate variants in the associated genomic region having r2 ≥ 0.6 (in 1000GP AFR populations) and MAF > 0.01 for annotation. Additionally, eQTL analyses were performed using publicly available datasets from several resources, including GTEx56 and PsychENCODE57.

Genes implicated by mapping of significant GWAS variants were further investigated using the GENE2FUNC option in FUMA, which provides hypergeometric tests of enrichment of the list of mapped genes in GTEx tissue-specific gene expression sets, MSigDB gene-sets, and chromatin states.

Multi-marker analysis of genomic annotation (MAGMA, v1.6) gene analysis was performed using LD in 1000GP AFR populations. Gene-based analysis enabled summarizing SNP associations at the gene level and association of the set of genes to biological pathways.

Southern African Map of Blood Regulatory Variation (SABR)

We queried expression data from the South African Blood eQTL Resource (SABR) project. SABR is a map of blood regulatory variation derived from three South Eastern Bantu-speaking populations58. Using paired whole-genome sequencing and blood transcriptome data from over 600 individuals, we performed a two-step analysis. First, we screened all loci located within the 99% credible set of sentinel loci showing suggestive significance. Second, for loci reaching genome-wide significance, we analyzed the surrounding regions within a 150 kb window of each credible set; we used a p-adjusted FDR to determine significance at 0.05.

Results

We present here the results of a genome-wide association study of two alcohol consumption phenotypes: drinking initiation (DI), comparing ever vs never drinkers, and drinking cessation (DC), comparing current vs past drinkers (Supplementary Fig. 2). The association analyses were conducted in two steps, first including only individuals living in continental Africa (DISSA, DCSSA), and then including individuals of African ancestry from the UK Biobank (DIAA, DCAA), for a total of four meta-analyses (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Manhattan plots showing the association results for DCAA (A), and DIAA (B). Lead SNPs reaching genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) are highlighted. The red line indicates the genome-wide significance threshold at p = 5 × 10−8, and the blue line marks the suggestive threshold at p = 5 × 10−6.

Genome-wide significant loci

Two genomic variants reached genome-wide significance (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 4). The first sentinel variant was observed on chromosome 1 (rs17114386, p = 4.49E-08), located in an intron of the FYB2 gene, and was significant in the DCSSA analysis. Previous GWAS have reported associations in the 1Mb region around this variant with behavioral traits such as smoking initiation, educational attainment, cognitive performance, medication use, and cardiovascular or kidney-related phenotypes, including coronary artery disease and kidney function (Supplementary Fig. 4a and Supplementary Table 1).

Table 2. Genome-wide significant associations with drinking cessation.

Association results for the genome-wide significant loci identified in the meta-analyses of drinking cessation in sub-Saharan African populations (DCSSA) and individuals of African ancestry from the UK Biobank (DCAA). The table reports the chromosome (CHR), genomic position (BP, GRCh38), annotated gene or genomic context, lead variant (SNP), effect and other alleles, effect allele frequency, effect estimate, association P-value, and expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) evidence from the Southern African Blood Regulatory Variation (SABR) resource. For SABR eQTL analysis, variants located within a ± 500 kb window around each genome-wide significant sentinel locus were evaluated. Genome-wide significance was defined as P < 5 × 10−8.

CHR BP (hg19) Genes BP (hg38) SNP Effect allele Other Allele Effect allele frequency P-value eQTL – Windows (SABR)
DCSSA
1 57272376 FYB2, intronic 56806703 rs17114386 C T 0.0752 −0.1289 4.49E-08 -
DCAA
16 54210274 FTO 54176362 rs376814793 C CTTAT 0.2517 0.081 1.90E-08 FTO

DCSSA, drinking cessation in sub-Saharan African populations; DCAA, drinking cessation in African ancestry populations; SABR, Southern African Blood Regulatory Variation.

The second variant was associated with DCAA and it is located on chromosome 16 near the FTO gene ( rs376814793, p = 1E-08). Variants in the 1Mb region around this sentinel have been previously described as associated with alcohol-related traits, obesity, body fat and body size measurements, body mass index, and metabolic syndrome (Supplementary Fig. 4b and Supplementary Table 1).

Suggestive associations

A total of 165 sentinel variants showed suggestive associations (p < 5E-06) including 46 in the DCSSA phenotype, 39 in DISSA, 39 in DCAA, and 41 in DIAA (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3), distributed across 121 distinct genomic loci. Among 1,013 credible set SNPs, 717 unique variants were defined as part of the 99% credible sets of the suggestive sentinel variants across the four meta-analyses.

Genes mapped to suggestive signals for drinking initiation included CSMD1, GRIA2, PLCL2, PTPRD, and DCDC2. For drinking cessation, mapped genes included ADGRB1, AUTS2, CAMKK1, CPNE3, FAIM2, GJA1, KCNQ1, RORA, SLC6A17, and TSNARE.

Among the SNPs within the credible sets, 28 variants had CADD PHRED scores greater than 13, including five sentinel SNPs (rs116196160 p = 1.2E-7, rs16892629 p = 2.8E-6, rs4943939 p = 4.7E-7, rs1152488325 4.9E-6, rs17646883 1.0E-6). These variants are predicted to have a potentially deleterious impact on protein function and may represent putative causal variants (see Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

Expression analysis

Among the variants in the credible sets of the suggestive lead SNPs, 63 were associated with at least one significant eQTL in the SABR dataset after FDR correction. These loci implicated a total of 63 genes, including 36 genes at 26 drinking initiation loci and 29 genes at 27 drinking cessation loci (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4).

Comparison with additional GTEx56 and PsychENCODE57 resources identified 81 significantly regulated genes in whole blood and 23 in PsychENCODE. Most genes identified through the SABR analysis were also identified in GTEx, while these additional resources identified 74 genes that were not detected in SABR.

Among the genes identified through eQTL analysis using FUMA we found CRTC3, ALDH5A1 or ASIC1.

Lookup in MVP

After lookups in the MVP cohort GWAS for alcohol traits, we observed that approximately 45% of the suggestive sentinel variants and their corresponding credible sets in our study were present in the MVP dataset, encompassing 84 genomic regions with at least one overlapping variant between our dataset and MVP summary statistics. No regions reached genome-wide significance after Bonferroni correction (p < 0.00059). However, when applying a more lenient significance threshold (p < 0.01), we identified several suggestive associations. A genomic region at chr1:213060204, initially identified in the DCSSA, showed association with the Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD) phenotype in the MVP dataset. Another region at chr3:24625546, also from DCSSA, was associated with AUDIT-C (p-min = 0.00164). In addition, regions at chr17:78075647 (from DISSA) and chr12:12217076 (from DIAA) were associated with the MaxAlc phenotype at the same significance threshold (Supplementary Table 5).

PheWAS

Using the 121 genomic loci identified through the suggestive significant SNPs, 40 credible set regions contained variants associated with traits in previous GWAS (p < 9.x10−7), including studies related to drinking initiation (Supplementary Table 6). For instance, rs75775827 has been linked to educational attainment, while rs75775827 and rs16900662 have been associated with dietary habits. Variants rs75636393, rs779381, and rs7118119 were previously associated with traits like impedance measures (waist-hip ratio), age at menarche, and related anthropometric traits (Supplementary Table 6).

Several windows included loci that were also linked to hematological traits. For example, rs79787369 and rs12536178 was associated with eosinophil count, rs80020206 with reticulocyte count, and rs12497413 with hemoglobin levels. Notably, rs33995115 is a highly pleiotropic SNP associated with a broad range of traits, including anthropometric, cardiovascular, hematological, and metabolic phenotypes (Supplementary Table 6).

In the context of drinking cessation, rs13258495 was found to have a strong pleiotropic effect, being associated with behavioral traits such as neuroticism, worry, sleeplessness, and irritability, as well as anthropometric traits like impedance and biomarkers such as alkaline phosphatase and systolic blood pressure. Additionally, rs116708028, rs4930651, and rs77213242 were associated with hematological, anthropometric, and metabolic traits respectively. In total, 18 credible sets were previously associated with more than one phenotype category, including neurological, behavioural, haematological, metabolic, cardiovascular, and anthropometric phenotypes (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 6).

Mapping variants to genes and to functions

In a gene-based analysis of DI (using a MAGMA threshold p < 2.6x10− 06), we found a significant enrichment of olfactory and sensory pathways (Supplementary Fig. 6). Our analysis also revealed a substantial overlap of gene sets with gene sets related to dietary habits such as macronutrient intake, pork consumption, oily fish consumption, response to cognitive-behavioral therapy in anxiety disorder, cooked vegetable consumption, non-oily fish consumption and processed meat consumption. For DC, the ethanol oxidation pathway was significantly enriched (Supplementary Fig. 7). DC also overlapped with gene sets related to general factor of neuroticism.

Discussion

This study investigates genetic factors associated with alcohol drinking initiation and drinking cessation, two behavioral phenotypes that remain underexplored, particularly in populations of African ancestry. Prior genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have focused largely on alcohol consumption and dependence using phenotypes such as alcohol use disorder (AUD), alcohol use disorder identification test-consumption (AUDIT-C), maximum habitual alcohol intake51,52 and drinks per week21. These measures capture patterns of use and addiction but do not specifically address the behavioral and genetic factors underlying the decision to begin or stop alcohol use. By focusing on initiation and cessation, our study complements prior work and enables the exploration of genetic variants linked to behavioral resilience and recovery, which may be associated with different aspects of alcohol use behavior.

We investigated genetic associations with alcohol drinking initiation and cessation in sub-Saharan African populations and individuals of African ancestry in the UK. Our analyses identified two genome-wide significant loci associated with drinking cessation in sub-Saharan Africa and African ancestry individuals, and suggestive associations overlapping with loci previously reported for alcohol dependence, and hematological, anthropometric, and metabolic traits in global studies.

Our findings provide insights into the genetic architecture of both alcohol drinking initiation and cessation, incorporating evidence from previous GWAS, phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS), and gene expression analyses. The two genome-wide significant loci for drinking cessation were located on chromosome 1, in an intronic region of the FYB2 gene, and on chromosome 16 near the FTO gene. While FYB2 is not a known contributor to alcohol consumption or dependence, it has been reported as a potential prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma, a disease in which alcohol is a major risk factor59. This locus is also in proximity to PLPP3, a gene implicated in cardiovascular conditions such as atherosclerosis60. The FTO gene plays a critical role in obesity and metabolic disorders61 and, in addition to its metabolic functions, has been associated with binge and problematic drinking, where its effects are modulated by sex, smoking status, and ADH1B polymorphic variants, particularly in individuals of European ancestry62. Furthermore, FTO has been linked to neuroticism and shows indirect effects on subjective well-being and problematic alcohol use63.

Several loci showing suggestive associations with drinking initiation have been previously implicated in alcohol-related and neurodevelopmental traits. These include CSMD1, PLCL2, and PTRD that have been associated with alcohol disorder. The NRG1 gene shows suggestive significance and has been previously identified as a susceptibility factor for substance dependence64. Similarly, DCDC2, a gene involved in neural development, has been linked to reading disorders and cognitive functions65. For drinking cessation, AUTS2 had been found previously to be associated with alcohol dependence66, while RORA or GPM6A were previously associated with smoking21.

Using SNPs from our four analyses, 40 SNPs were identified with CADD > 13, indicating that they may influence protein structure or gene regulation (Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Table 4). Among the variants included in the credible sets, 40 had CADD PHRED scores > 13, suggesting potentially deleterious functional effects. In the SABR)58 analysis, 43 genomic windows contained variants associated with significant eQTLs, involving 61 genes (Supplementary Table 4). These eQTL associations provide additional functional evidence for the interpretation of the identified loci. Among the 43 suggestive regions identified with SABR, we identified notable genes including GSTM4 and GPM6A, both linked to alcohol dependence67. Other genes include SGO1-AS1, associated with psychiatric disorders, and DZIP1L, involved in kidney-related traits68, and CCDC171 which has previously been linked to smoking behavior21. Using FUMA, genes with a change of expression relevant to alcohol used included ALDH5A1 a coactivator of CREB-dependent transcription that participates in molecular pathways underlying reward learning and long-term neuroadaptations induced by alcohol exposure. ALDH5A1, which encodes succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase, is involved in GABA metabolism, a neurotransmitter system central to the acute and chronic effects of alcohol69. Furthermore, ASIC1 encodes an acid-sensing ion channel implicated in anxiety, reward processing, and responses to addictive substances70.

PheWAS analysis showed that 40 loci overlapped with previously reported associations, of which 18 were in pleiotropic regions where associations with multiple phenotype categories had been reported previously. For example, rs13258495 in the MSRA gene has been associated with blood regulation, neurological and behavioral traits and cardiovascular disease. Similarly, previous GWAS have found that rs77213242 has been linked to both cardiovascular and metabolic traits. The integration of genetic associations, gene expression, and PheWAS results provide additional context for the loci in the credible sets.

It has been reported that craving in alcohol drinkers was often triggered by chemosensory cues, such as taste and smell, which are linked to brain network connectivity. Our study showed significant enrichment of sensory and taste pathways. Data from the Human Connectome Project suggests that specific patterns of brain connectivity associated with taste and olfactory perception may serve as predictors of alcohol consumption behaviors in young adults71.

Multiple lines of downstream analyses provided evidence that some of the identified genetic signals may have broader biological effects beyond alcohol-related behaviours. The PheWAS identified associations across neurological, behavioural, haematological, metabolic, cardiovascular, and anthropometric traits, with 18 credible sets showing associations across more than one phenotype category. In addition, eQTL analyses identified regulatory associations for variants within several credible-set regions across multiple genes and expression resources. Together, these findings suggest that some of the loci identified in our study may have pleiotropic effects across biological and behavioural traits, providing additional context for the interpretation of their associations with drinking initiation and cessation.

The limited availability of large, harmonized datasets from different African regions hinders robust replication of findings. The Million Veteran Program (MVP), despite its scale, may not offer an ideal replication sample due to key differences in ancestry composition (primarily African American individuals with West African and European admixture), phenotype definition, and imputation coverage. The lack of dense representation of African genomic diversity in some imputation panels could further reduce the overlap of informative variants.

Future research with larger sample sizes, more granular phenotyping and contextual cultural and behavioral data, including expanded representation across understudied African populations will provide additional insights. Collaborative efforts that leverage unified protocols and cross-regional designs will be critical to strengthen the replicability and generalizability of findings. The incorporation of multi-omics data, environmental risk factors, and longitudinal designs will also enhance the biological interpretation of associations and clarify the causal pathways underlying alcohol initiation and cessation.

In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of investigating alcohol-related behavioral phenotypes beyond consumption and addiction, especially in diverse global populations. Our findings provide a foundation for future discovery and underscore the need for inclusive, well-powered studies to elucidate the genetic architecture of alcohol use behaviors in African populations.

Supplementary Material

This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the sterling contributions of our field workers, phlebotomists, laboratory scientists, administrators, data personnel, and all other staff who contributed to the AWI-Gen, JCS, UKB, and UGR data and sample collection, processing, storage, and shipping, and the participants who generously agreed to be part of the studies. We acknowledge prof Scott Hazelhurst for access to the Wits Computer cluster. UGR analyses were performed with computational support from the Uganda Medical Informatics Centre (UMIC). This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application 4892. This study used the ALICE and SPECTRE High Performance Computing Facilities at the University of Leicester and the ZA-Wits-Core Cluster at University of the Witwatersrand. This research includes the use of data from the Million Veteran Program72, Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, and was supported by the Veterans Administration (VA) Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) award #G002. The authors thank Million Veteran Program staff, researchers, and volunteers, who have contributed to MVP, and especially participants who previously served their country in the military and now generously agreed to enroll in the study (see https://www.research.va.gov/mvp/ for more details).

Funding Statement

The ERICA-SA Study and the Johannesburg Cancer Study (JCS) were supported by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) with funds received from the South African National Department of Health and the UK Medical Research Council (UKMRC) through the Newton Fund (MRCRFA-SHIP 01-2015 to C.G.M, W.C.C). Additional support was provided by the Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA to C.G.M.). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the SAMRC or the South African National Department of Health.

The UGR study was conducted at the MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit which is jointly funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) under the MRC/FCDO Concordat agreement and is also part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union. This study was supported by the UKRI/MRC grant MR/Z504853/1 and the Wellcome Fellowship (220740/Z/20/Z) awarded to Segun Fatumo.

This work was further supported in part by the German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR; grant 01KA2220B) through the RHISSA Programme for the NORA Consortium, and by the Science for Africa Foundation (grant DEL-22-008), with support from the Wellcome Trust, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, and the EDCTP2 Programme supported by the European Union (to W.C.C., C.G.M. and J.-T.B.).

The AWI-Gen Collaborative Centre was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number U54HG006938 and its supplements as part of the H3Africa Consortium, and by the South African Department of Science and Innovation (DST/CON 0056/2014).

CB, RPB and DK acknowledge support from a visiting fellowship from the Leicester Institute of Advanced Studies (LIAS).

Footnotes

Additional Declarations: No competing interests reported.

Contributor Information

Jean-Tristan Brandenburg, Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand.

Ritah Nabunje, Genomic Epidemiology and Public Health / Genomic Diversity Research Group, MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit.

Opeyemi Soremekun, Genomic Epidemiology and Public Health / Genomic Diversity Research Group, MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit.

Wenlong Carl Chen, Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand.

Dylan Kerrigan, School of Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leicester.

Christopher G. Mathew, Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand

Martin D. Tobin, Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester

Tinashe Chikowore, Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand.

Segun Fatumo, Genomic Epidemiology and Public Health / Genomic Diversity Research Group, MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit.

Michèle Ramsay, Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand.

Chiara Batini, Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester.

Palwendé Romuald Boua, Clinical Research Unit Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé.

Data Availability

The GWAS summary statistics generated in this study will be deposited in the GWAS Catalog and will be made publicly available upon publication. Controlled-access individual-level genotype and phenotype data are available through the European Genome-Phenome Archive and other managed-access repositories, subject to approval by the relevant data access committees, as described below. JCS datasets are available through EGA under accession numbers EGAS00001007477 and EGAS00001008032. AWI-Gen genotype and phenotype datasets are available through EGA under accession numbers EGAD00010001996 and EGAD00001006425. Code and pipelines used for quality control and analysis are available at https://github.com/h3abionet/h3agwas/ and archived at Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.14907702. Additional analysis scripts are available from the corresponding authors.

References

  • 1.WHO. (2018). Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shield KD, Rehm M, Patra J, Sornpaisarn B, Rehm J. (2011). Global and country specific adult per capita consumption of alcohol, 2008. SUCHT 57, 99–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Monteiro MG, Rehm J, Shield KD, Stockwell T. Alcohol Consumption: An Overview of International Trends. In: Quah SR, editor. International Encyclopedia of Public Health (Second Edition). Oxford: Academic; 2017. pp. 45–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, AlMazroa MA, Amann M, Anderson HR, Andrews KG, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Belete H, Yimer TM, Dawson D, Espinosa DC, Ambaw F, Connor JP, Chan G, Hides L, Leung J. Alcohol use and alcohol use disorders in sub-saharan africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2024;119:1527–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Addo J, Cook S, Galbete C, Agyemang C, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Nicolaou M, Danquah I, Schulze MB, Brathwaite R, Mockenhaupt FP, et al. Differences in alcohol consumption and drinking patterns in ghanaians in europe and africa: The RODAM study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0206286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gitatui M, Kimani S, Muniu S, Okube O. Determinants of harmful use of alcohol among urban slum dwelling adults in kenya. Afr H Sci. 2020;19:2906–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takahashi R, Wilunda C, Magutah K, Mwaura-Tenambergen W, Wilunda B, Perngparn U. Correlates of alcohol consumption in rural western kenya: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nass e. AlcoholconΣption and conflicts ∈ develoπngcountries : Aqualitative and aquantitativeresearchconcern ∈ gchristianconΣ. African Journal of Business Management; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peltzer K, Davids A, Njuho P. Alcohol use and problem drinking in south africa: Findings from a national population-based survey. Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2011;14:30–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Setlalentoa BMP, Pisa PT, Thekisho G, Ryke E, Du TL. The social aspects of alcohol misuse/abuse in south africa. South Afr J Clin Nutr. 2010;23:11. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Minicuci N, Biritwum RB, Mensah G, Yawson AE, Naidoo N, Chatterji S, Kowal P. Sociodemographic and socioeconomic patterns of chronic non-communicable disease among the older adult population in ghana. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:21292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kendagor A, Gathecha G, Ntakuka MW, Nyakundi P, Gathere S, Kiptui D, Abubakar H, Ombiro O, Juma P, Ngaruiya C. Prevalence and determinants of heavy episodic drinking among adults in kenya: Analysis of the STEPwise survey, 2015. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ball D. Ebrii gignunt ebrios—one drunkard begets another: The genetics of alcohol dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2005;7:138–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dick DM. Developmental changes in genetic influences on alcohol use and dependence. Child Dev Perspect. 2011;5:223–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Whitfield JB. (2005). Alcohol and gene interactions. 43, 480–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Uffelmann E, Huang QQ, Munung NS, de Vries J, Okada Y, Martin AR, Martin HC, Lappalainen T, Posthuma D. Genome-wide association studies. Nat Reviews Methods Primers. 2021;1:59. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ishigaki K. Beyond GWAS: From simple associations to functional insights. Semin Immunopathol. 2022;44:3–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tawa EA, Hall SD, Lohoff FW. Overview of the genetics of alcohol use disorder. Alcohol Alcohol. 2016;51:507–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Clarke T, Adams MJ, Davies G, Howard DM, Hall LS, Padmanabhan S, Murray AD, Smith BH, Campbell A, Hayward C, et al. Genome-wide association study of alcohol consumption and genetic overlap with other health-related traits in UK biobank (N = 112 117). Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22:1376–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saunders GRB, Wang X, Chen F, Jang S, Liu M, Wang C, Gao S, Jiang Y, Khunsriraksakul C, Otto JM, et al. Genetic diversity fuels gene discovery for tobacco and alcohol use. Nature. 2022;612:720–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cheng Y, Dao C, Zhou H, Li B, Kember RL, Toikumo S, Zhao H, Gelernter J, Kranzler HR, Justice AC, et al. Multi-trait genome-wide association analyses leveraging alcohol use disorder findings identify novel loci for smoking behaviors in the million veteran program. Translational Psychiatry. 2023;13:148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wetherill L, Lai D, Johnson EC, Anokhin A, Bauer L, Bucholz KK, Dick DM, Hariri AR, Hesselbrock V, Kamarajan C et al. (2019). Genome-wide association study identifies loci associated with liability to alcohol and drug dependence that is associated with variability in reward-related ventral striatum activity in african- and european-americans. Genes, Brain and Behavior 18, e12580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ramsay M, Crowther N, Tambo E, Agongo G, Baloyi V, Dikotope S, Gómez-Olivé X, Jaff N, Sorgho H, Wagner R, et al. H3Africa AWI-gen collaborative centre: A resource to study the interplay between genomic and environmental risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases in four sub-saharan african countries. Global Health Epidemiol Genomics. 2016;1:e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ali SA, Soo C, Agongo G, Alberts M, Amenga-Etego L, Boua RP, Choudhury A, Crowther NJ, Depuur C, Gómez-Olivé FX, et al. Genomic and environmental risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases in africa: Methods used for phase 1 of the AWI-gen population cross-sectional study. Global Health Action. 2018;11:1507133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen WC, Singh E, Muchengeti M, Bradshaw D, Mathew CG, Babb de Villiers C, Lewis CM, Waterboer T, Newton R, Sitas F. Johannesburg cancer study (JCS): Contribution to knowledge and opportunities arising from 20 years of data collection in an african setting. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;65:101701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fatumo S, Mugisha J, Soremekun OS, Kalungi A, Mayanja R, Kintu C, Makanga R, Kakande A, Abaasa A, Asiki G, et al. Uganda genome resource: A rich research database for genomic studies of communicable and non-communicable diseases in africa. Cell Genomics. 2022;2:100209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tluway F, Agongo G, Baloyi V, Boua PR, Kisiangani I, Lingani M, Mashaba RG, Mohamed SF, Nonterah EA, Ntimana CB, et al. Cohort profile: Africa wits-INDEPTH partnership for genomic studies (AWI-gen) in four sub-saharan african countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2025;54:dyae173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shrine N, Guyatt AL, Erzurumluoglu AM, Jackson VE, Hobbs BD, Melbourne CA, Batini C, Fawcett KA, Song K, Sakornsakolpat P, et al. New genetic signals for lung function highlight pathways and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease associations across multiple ancestries. Nat Genet. 2019;51:481–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Asiki G, Murphy G, Nakiyingi-Miiro J, Seeley J, Nsubuga RN, Karabarinde A, Waswa L, Biraro S, Kasamba I, Pomilla C, et al. The general population cohort in rural south-western uganda: A platform for communicable and non-communicable disease studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:129–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gurdasani D, Carstensen T, Tekola-Ayele F, Pagani L, Tachmazidou I, Hatzikotoulas K, Karthikeyan S, Iles L, Pollard MO, Choudhury A, et al. The african genome variation project shapes medical genetics in africa. Nature. 2015;517:327–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen WC, Brandenburg J, Choudhury A, Hayat M, Sengupta D, Swiel Y, Babb de Villiers C, Ferndale L, Aldous C, Soo CC, et al. Genome-wide association study of esophageal squamous cell cancer identifies shared and distinct risk variants in african and chinese populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2023;110:1690–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hayat M, Chen WC, Babb de Villiers C, Lee H, Curtis S, Newton C, Waterboer R, Sitas T, Bradshaw F, Muchengeti D, M.,et al. Genome-wide association study identifies common variants associated with breast cancer in south african black women. Nat Commun. 2025;16:3542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Choudhury A, Brandenburg J, Chikowore T, Sengupta D, Boua PR, Crowther NJ, Agongo G, Asiki G, Gómez-Olivé FX, Kisiangani I, et al. Meta-analysis of sub-saharan african studies provides insights into genetic architecture of lipid traits. Nat Commun. 2022;13:2578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gurdasani D, Carstensen T, Fatumo S, Chen G, Franklin CS, Prado-Martinez J, Bouman H, Abascal F, Haber M, Tachmazidou I, et al. Uganda genome resource enables insights into population history and genomic discovery in africa. Cell. 2019;179:984–e100236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT, Sharp K, Motyer A, Vukcevic D, Delaneau O, O’Connell J, et al. The UK biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nat (London). 2018;562:203–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.McCarthy S, Das S, Kretzschmar W, Delaneau O, Wood AR, Teumer A, Kang HM, Fuchsberger C, Danecek P, Sharp K, et al. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1279–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Walter K, Min JL, Huang J, Crooks L, Memari Y, McCarthy S, Perry JRB, Xu C, Futema M, Lawson D, et al. The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease. Nature. 2015;526:82–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou W, Nielsen JB, Fritsche LG, Dey R, Gabrielsen ME, Wolford BN, LeFaive J, VandeHaar P, Gagliano SA, Gifford A, et al. Efficiently controlling for case-control imbalance and sample relatedness in large-scale genetic association studies. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1335–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brandenburg J, Clark L, Botha G, Panji S, Baichoo S, Fields C, Hazelhurst S. H3AGWAS: A portable workflow for genome wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022;23:498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhou X, Stephen M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat Genet. 2012;44:821–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: A tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:76–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Benner C, Spencer CCA, Havulinna AS, Salomaa V, Ripatti S, Pirinen M. FINEMAP: Efficient variable selection using summary data from genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:1493–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu X, Jian X, Boerwinkle E. dbNSFP: A lightweight database of human nonsynonymous SNPs and their functional predictions. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:894–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rentzsch P, Witten D, Cooper GM, Shendure J, Kircher M. CADD: Predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D886–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fu W, O’Connor TD, Jun G, Kang HM, Abecasis G, Leal SM, Gabriel S, Rieder MJ, Altshuler D, Shendure J, et al. Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants. Nature. 2013;493:216–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Karczewski KJ, Weisburd B, Thomas B, Solomonson M, Ruderfer DM, Kavanagh D, Hamamsy T, Lek M, Samocha KE, Cummings BB, et al. The ExAC browser: Displaying reference data information from over 60 000 exomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D840–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hemani G, Elsworth B, Palmer T, Rasteiro R. (2025). ieugwasr: Interface to the ‘OpenGWAS’ Database API. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kranzler HR, Zhou H, Kember RL, Vickers Smith R, Justice AC, Damrauer S, Tsao PS, Klarin D, Baras A, Reid J, et al. Genome-wide association study of alcohol consumption and use disorder in 274,424 individuals from multiple populations. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gelernter J, Sun N, Polimanti R, Pietrzak RH, Levey DF, Lu Q, Hu Y, Li B, Radhakrishnan K, Aslan M, et al. Genome-wide association study of maximum habitual alcohol intake in > 140,000 U.S. european and african american veterans yields novel risk loci. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;86:365–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Paria SS, Rahman SR, Adhikari K. (2026). Fastman: A fast algorithm for visualising GWAS results using manhattan and Q-Q plots in R. bioRxiv, 2022.04.19.488738. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pruim RJ, Welch RP, Sanna S, Teslovich TM, Chines PS, Gliedt TP, Boehnke M, Abecasis GR, Willer CJ. LocusZoom: Regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2336–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.GTEx Consortium. The genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45:580–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang D, Liu S, Warrell J, Won H, Shi X, Navarro FCP, Clarke D, Gu M, Emani P, Yang YT, et al. Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science. 2018;362:eaat8464. 10.1126/science.aat8464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Castel SE, Tluway FD, Emde A, Smyth N, Karim M, Sengupta D, Gray OA, Hendershott M, von LeBaron S, Burke EE, et al. A map of blood regulatory variation in south africans enables GWAS interpretation. Nat Genet. 2025;57:1628–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Qu Y, Shen X, Yuan X, Lu B. FYB2 is a potential prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Livers. 2022;2:371. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mueller PA, Yang L, Ubele M, Mao G, Brandon J, Vandra J, Nichols TC, Escalante-Alcalde D, Morris AJ, Smyth SS. Coronary artery disease risk-associated Plpp3 gene and its product lipid phosphate phosphatase 3 regulate experimental atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39:2261–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Loos RJF, Yeo GSH. The bigger picture of FTO—the first GWAS-identified obesity gene. Nat Reviews Endocrinol. 2014;10:51–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hubacek JA, Pikhart H, Peasey A, Malyutina S, Pajak A, Tamosiunas A, Voevoda M, Holmes MV, Bobak M. The association between the FTO gene variant and alcohol consumption and binge and problem drinking in different gene-environment background: The HAPIEE study. Gene. 2019;707:30–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cai W, Forsell Y, Lavebratt C, Melas PA. Examining the association between the FTO gene and neuroticism reveals indirect effects on subjective well-being and problematic alcohol use. Sci Rep. 2024;14:17566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Vaht M, Laas K, Kiive E, Parik J, Veidebaum T, Harro J. A functional neuregulin-1 gene variant and stressful life events: Effect on drug use in a longitudinal population-representative cohort study. J Psychopharmacol. 2017;31:54–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Meng H, Smith SD, Hager K, Held M, Liu J, Olson RK, Pennington BF, DeFries JC, Gelernter J, O’Reilly-Pol T et al. (2005). DCDC2 is associated with reading disability and modulates neuronal development in the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, 17053–17058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Narita S, Nagahori K, Nishizawa D, Yoshihara E, Kawai A, Ikeda K, Iwahashi K. Association between AUTS2 haplotypes and alcohol dependence in a japanese population. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2016;28:214–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pignataro L, Varodayan FP, Tannenholz LE, Harrison NL. The regulation of neuronal gene expression by alcohol. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;124:324–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Palaz F. Assessing the potential of DZIP1L gene in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease gene therapy. Pediatr Discovery. 2024;2:e44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Edenberg HJ. The genetics of alcohol metabolism: Role of alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase variants. Alcohol Res Health. 2007;30:5–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Harmata GIS, Chan AC, Merfeld MJ, Taugher-Hebl RJ, Harijan AK, Hardie JB, Fan R, Long JD, Wang GZ, Dlouhy BJ, et al. Intoxicating effects of alcohol depend on acid-sensing ion channels. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023;48:806–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Agarwal K, Chaudhary S, Tomasi D, Volkow ND, Joseph PV. Prediction of alcohol intake patterns with olfactory and gustatory brain connectivity networks. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025;50:1167–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gaziano JM, Concato J, Brophy M, Fiore L, Pyarajan S, Breeling J, Whitbourne S, Deen J, Shannon C, Humphries D, et al. Million veteran program: A mega-biobank to study genetic influences on health and disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;70:214–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The GWAS summary statistics generated in this study will be deposited in the GWAS Catalog and will be made publicly available upon publication. Controlled-access individual-level genotype and phenotype data are available through the European Genome-Phenome Archive and other managed-access repositories, subject to approval by the relevant data access committees, as described below. JCS datasets are available through EGA under accession numbers EGAS00001007477 and EGAS00001008032. AWI-Gen genotype and phenotype datasets are available through EGA under accession numbers EGAD00010001996 and EGAD00001006425. Code and pipelines used for quality control and analysis are available at https://github.com/h3abionet/h3agwas/ and archived at Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.14907702. Additional analysis scripts are available from the corresponding authors.


Articles from Research Square are provided here courtesy of American Journal Experts

RESOURCES