Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Sep 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Thromb Haemost. 2026 Feb;24(2):372–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2025.09.045

Racing toward a common biology of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: the small interfering RNA fibrinogen knockdown strategy

Annie M Apffel 1, Emily Mosher 1, Matthew D Neal 1
PMCID: PMC13622935  NIHMSID: NIHMS2204823  PMID: 41644234

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a vexing problem in the care of postsurgical and injured patients. Although prophylaxis utilizing low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is common, there is an art to the science of best practice to prevent VTE. Ideal prophylaxis strategies balance the risk of bleeding complications [1] with the incidence of VTE, which varies widely depending on surgery, injury severity, and patient comorbidities [2]. Despite prophylaxis with LMWH, VTE events remain high in certain populations [2], and traumatically injured patients may manifest resistance to LMWH due to acute antithrombin III deficiency [3]. Further, thrombotic complications vary in the timing of presentation, including hyperacute and unpreventable pulmonary thrombosis [4] and acute postsurgical and traumatic VTE in the early days of hospitalization [5]. Importantly, VTE can also be a late event, occurring well after discharge in trauma, emergency general surgery, and medically ill and oncology patients, which makes the duration of prophylaxis a persistent topic of debate [6–12]. Given the wide range of timing of events and types of patients, there may be multiple mechanistic pathways at play, leading to an elevated risk of VTE; however, the race to find a common biology among these varying clinical presentations is critical to identify therapeutic targets.

In the present issue of the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Seadler et al. [13] present results from a novel strategy for VTE prophylaxis in a large animal model. Citing limitations of LMWH, including its short half-life, risk of hemorrhage, and narrow therapeutic window, the authors chose to target decreasing a portion of the conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin utilizing the delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle. The authors previously described this approach and demonstrated its efficacy against thrombosis in mice without impairment of hemostasis [14]. The present work extends these observations to a large animal model utilizing female Yorkshire/cross swine and an established model of hemorrhagic shock. The siRNA fibrinogen knockdown strategy (siFibrinogen) was found to reduce circulating fibrinogen levels for over a week without impairment of hemostasis. Importantly, this knockdown was acutely reversible with fibrinogen concentrate, which presents a major advance to present VTE prophylaxis with LMWH, which is poorly responsive to available reversal agents.

Postinjury and postsurgery hyperfibrinogenemia represents one very promising target for the common biology of VTE. Although fibrinogen levels vary widely, elevated fibrinogen is especially common in the days following acute injury and sepsis [15,16]. A VTE prophylaxis strategy targeting this late pathway mediator of thrombosis is appealing for multiple reasons. The authors nicely demonstrate in their prior work [14] that this approach is effective in reducing thrombosis, while the present large animal model further characterizes the safety of this approach. The long-duration effect, coupled with a feasible reversal strategy, creates a highly favorable profile that might provide both acute and sustained benefit for patients whose excess fibrinogen is a key mediator of VTE.

The study has several important limitations that will provide opportunities for the authors as they expand this exciting technology. This study utilizes healthy animals with normal fibrinogen levels. Postsurgical and injury patients have dynamic changes in fibrinogen, including a subset of patients presenting with hypofibrinogenemia [17]. Validation of a relevant injury or postsurgical model across a wide range of fibrinogen values is a critical next step. Not only will the presenting fibrinogen level be relevant, but the dynamic progression of patients through stages of pathologic and physiologic fibrinolysis will be critical to assess [18]. Particularly relevant and presenting one of the greatest challenges to this approach is the reported 1- to 2-day delay in the onset of action of siFibrinogen. As previously mentioned, many VTE events occur early after trauma and surgical stress, and the delayed onset may leave a vulnerable period, rendering prophylaxis insufficient. Although this delay may mitigate concerns about acute hypofibrinogenemia and prevent rebound hyperfibrinogenemia, the time to a VTE event in patients with acute hypofibrinogenemia is not known with certainty to fall within that rebound period. These patients may still be at risk of early VTE events, which may be independent of the fibrinogen level and/or may fail prevention with this approach. Much work remains to define the timing and therapeutic window of the siFibrinogen approach, and it will be fascinating to learn whether VTE persists despite fibrinogen knockdown (suggesting a fibrinogen-independent mechanism).

In sum, Seadler et al. [13] have provided an important iterative advancement and a critical safety description of their novel nanoparticle- and siRNA-focused approach to inhibiting fibrinogen. A long-acting, effective, safe, and easy-to-administer (avoiding painful subcutaneous injections) prophylaxis strategy will resonate with clinicians and patients alike. Further, although unexplored in the present or prior work, this strategy may mitigate microvascular thrombosis related to fibrin(ogen) accumulation after injury or major surgery. Microvascular thrombosis is hypothesized to be a major driver of organ injury, particularly after trauma [19], and the potential of this strategy to attenuate the consequences of microvascular injury is a potential exciting area of future investigation. Although the complexity of fibrinogen dynamics and the pharmacokinetics of this approach pose significant hurdles to advancing it, the preclinical efficacy in mice and the present convincing safety data from a large animal model are key leaps in the race toward optimal VTE prophylaxis.

Footnotes

DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTERESTS

A.M.A. and E.M. report no conflicts of interest. M.D.N. is the Chief Medical Officer of Haima Therapeutics and reports honoraria from advisory roles with Takeda, Haemonetics, Octapharma, and Cellphire.

REFERENCES

  • [1].Leonardi MJ, McGory ML, Ko CY. The rate of bleeding complications after pharmacologic deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis: a systematic review of 33 randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2006;141:790–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Heit JA. Venous thromboembolism: disease burden, outcomes and risk factors. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1611–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Vincent LE, Talanker MM, Butler DD, Zhang X, Podbielski JM, Wang YW, Chen-Goodspeed A, Hernandez Gonzalez SL, Fox EE, Cotton BA, Wade CE, Cardenas JC. Association of changes in antithrombin activity over time with responsiveness to enoxaparin prophylaxis and risk of trauma-related venous thromboembolism. JAMA Surg. 2022;157:713–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Knudson MM, Moore EE, Kornblith LZ, Shui AM, Brakenridge S, Bruns BR, Cipolle MD, Costantini TW, Crookes BA, Haut ER, Kerwin AJ, Kiraly LN, Knowlton LM, Martin MJ, McNutt MK, Milia DJ, Mohr A, Nirula R, Rogers FB, Scalea TM, et al. Challenging traditional paradigms in posttraumatic pulmonary thromboembolism. JAMA Surg. 2022;157:e216356. 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Rattan R, Parreco J, Eidelson SA, Gold J, Dharmaraja A, Zakrison TL, Dante Yeh D, Ginzburg E, Namias N. Hidden burden of venous thromboembolism after trauma: a national analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85:899–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Myers SP, Brown JB, Leeper CM, Kutcher ME, Chen X, Wade CE, Holcomb JB, Schreiber MA, Cardenas JC, Rosengart MR, Neal MD, PROPPR study group. Early versus late venous thromboembolism: a secondary analysis of data from the PROPPR trial. Surgery. 2019;166:416–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Van Haren RM, Valle EJ, Thorson CM, Jouria JM, Busko AM, Guarch GA, Namias N, Livingstone AS, Proctor KG. Hypercoagulability and other risk factors in trauma intensive care unit patients with venous thromboembolism. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:443–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Geerts WH, Code KI, Jay RM, Chen E, Szalai JP. A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1601–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].DeWane MP, Davis KA, Schuster KM, Maung AA, Becher RD. Venous thromboembolism-related readmission in emergency general surgery patients: a role for prophylaxis on discharge? J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226: 1072–7.e3. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Bergqvist D, Agnelli G, Cohen AT, Eldor A, Nilsson PE, Le Moigne-Amrani A, Dietrich-Neto F, ENOXACAN II Investigators. Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin after surgery for cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:975–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Spyropoulos AC, Ageno W, Albers GW, Elliott CG, Halperin JL, Hiatt WR, Maynard GA, Steg PG, Weitz JI, Suh E, Spiro TE, Barnathan ES, Raskob GE, MARINER Investigators. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after hospitalization for medical illness. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1118–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Nicholson KJ, Rosengart MR, Smith KJ, Neal MD, Myers SP. Investigation into the cost-effectiveness of extended posttraumatic thromboprophylaxis. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;234:86–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Seadler MS, Ferraresso F, Turner HM, Ketelboeter LM, Zhang Y, Badior K, Hayssen WG, Chen T, Haugen AL, Cau MF, Robertson M, Skaer C, Bansal M, Murphy PB, de Moya M, Dyer MR, Kastrup CJ. Preclinical safety and bleeding evaluation in swine for an siRNA-lipid nanoparticle that prevents excess fibrinogen synthesis. J Thromb Haemost. 2026;24:508–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Juang LJ, Hur WS, Silva LM, Strilchuk AW, Francisco B, Leung J, Robertson MK, Groeneveld DJ, La Prairie B, Chun EM, Cap AP, Luyendyk JP, Palumbo JS, Cullis PR, Bugge TH, Flick MJ, Kastrup CJ. Suppression of fibrin(ogen)-driven pathologies in disease models through controlled knockdown by lipid nanoparticle delivery of siRNA. Blood. 2022;139:1302–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Harr JN, Moore EE, Chin TL, Ghasabyan A, Gonzalez E, Wohlauer MV, Sauaia A, Banerjee A, Silliman CC. Postinjury hyperfibrinogenemia compromises efficacy of heparin-based venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Shock. 2014;41:33–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Omiya K, Sato H, Sato T, Wykes L, Hong M, Hatzakorzian R, Kristof AS, Schricker T. Albumin and fibrinogen kinetics in sepsis: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2021;25:436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Meizoso JP, Moore EE, Pieracci FM, Saberi RA, Ghasabyan A, Chandler J, Namias N, Sauaia A. Role of fibrinogen in traumainduced coagulopathy. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;234:465–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Moore HB, Barrett CD, Moore EE, Pieracci FM, Sauaia A. Differentiating pathologic from physiologic fibrinolysis: not as simple as conventional thrombelastography. J Am Coll Surg. 2024;239:30–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Moore EE, Moore HB, Kornblith LZ, Neal MD, Hoffman M, Mutch NJ, Schöchl H, Hunt BJ, Sauaia A. Trauma-induced coagulopathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES