Abstract
Mitochondrial complexes, such as the mitochondrial electron transport chain (mETC), the F1Fo-ATP synthase, the mitochondrial ribosome and the Translocase of the Outer Membrane (TOM) complex are centrally important for mitochondrial function and cell survival. Recently, an unexpected diversity in the composition of these complexes across unicellular eukaryotic lineages, with the apicomplexan parasites featuring prominently, has been revealed. However, whether the observed enlarged and divergent mitochondrial complexes are conserved across the wider lineages has not been investigated. Here, using a complexome profiling proteomic approach, we have characterised the composition of the mitochondrial complexes of the myzozoan parasite of oysters, Perkinsus marinus. We show that it shares new components of ATP synthase and the mETC complexes that in the deadly apicomplexan Plasmodium and Toxoplasma were shown to be important for growth. Moreover, the Perkinsus mitoribosome possesses many of the divergent features recently discovered in apicomplexans, including members of the ApiAP2 family that until recently were all considered to be transcription factors. Our study reveals that the divergent subunit composition of mitochondrial complexes is an ancestral and highly conserved feature of Myzozoa.
Author summary
Mitochondria are a unique feature of eukaryotes and, through the synthesis of ATP, play a key role in cell energy metabolism. Mitochondrial functions rely on the coordinated function of several large protein complexes, including the mitochondrial electron transport chain (mETC), F1Fo-ATP synthase, mitochondrial ribosomes and the Translocase of the Outer Membrane (TOM). Historically, most of our knowledge on the structure and function of these critical complexes comes from studies on mammals and yeast. Research over the last decade has started to reveal that mitochondrial complexes of understudied unicellular eukaryotic lineages display considerable diversity in their composition, with many novel lineage-specific subunits being uncovered. A striking example is the apicomplexans, a lineage of parasites including those causing malaria and toxoplasmosis. However, it remained an open question whether the divergent mitochondrial complexes in apicomplexans were conserved across the broader myzozoan lineage, which in addition to parasitic species, contains free-living algae and coral symbionts. Here, using a proteomic technique called complexome profiling, we report the composition of the mitochondrial complexes from the marine parasite of oysters Perkinsus marinus. Our study highlights the broad conservation of mitochondrial complex composition across the myzozoans.
Introduction
Mitochondria are double membrane bound organelles which are a unique feature of eukaryotes and, despite reduction or loss in some lineages, play an ever-increasing number of vital roles in their biology, ranging from energy metabolism to biosynthesis of key metabolites [1]. One critical mitochondrial function is oxidative phosphorylation, which requires the coordinated function of several large protein complexes. The mitochondrial electron transport chain (mETC) is a series of complexes embedded in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), named complex I (NADH dehydrogenase), complex II (succinate dehydrogenase), complex III (cytochrome bc1 complex) and complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase) (Fig 1A). These complexes are required to transfer electrons harvested from a variety of metabolic pathways to oxygen. This process is coupled with proton translocation across the inner mitochondrial membrane, creating an electrochemical gradient which is utilised by F1Fo-ATP synthase to generate ATP [2]. Most subunits of the mETC are encoded in the nucleus and require import into the organelle via the Translocase of the Outer Membrane (TOM) complex. Additionally, several key subunits are encoded by the mitochondrial genome and therefore require another complex, the mitochondrial ribosome (mitoribosome), for their translation. Mitochondrial complexes are thus necessary for many core cellular functions hosted in this organelle.
Fig 1. mETC and F1Fo-ATP synthase in Perkinsus marinus and other myzozoan lineages.

(A) Schematic of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (mETC) and ATP synthase in Homo sapiens (top) and Perkinsus marinus (bottom). Adapted from [10]. Numbers below the schematic indicate the number of protein subunits found in each complex in Homo sapiens (Hs), Perkinsus marinus (Pm) and Toxoplasma gondii (Tg). (B) Schematic depicting the relationship between the major myzozoan lineages (apicomplexans, chrompodellids, perkinsids and dinoflagellates), and the ciliates, as well as the complex composition of their mETCs.
Historically, most mitochondrial research was focused on a small group of model organisms that are closely related to one another, primarily mammals and yeast, resulting in an incomplete view of mitochondrial biology. However, recent research, particularly in unicellular eukaryotes, has started to reveal that mitochondrial biology displays considerable diversity [3].
The Myzozoa are a group of unicellular eukaryotes which contains both parasitic and free-living species (Fig 1B) [4,5]. Parasitic lineages include species that have a huge impact on global health, the economy and the environment. For example, the phylum Apicomplexa encompasses parasites responsible for global diseases of both humans and livestock, most notably malaria and toxoplasmosis caused by Plasmodium spp. and Toxoplasma gondii, respectively. Another example are the perkinsids, marine parasites that infect molluscs, including oysters, causing significant economic and environmental impact [6]. Myzozoans also include lineages that contain free-living algae and coral symbionts, such as the chrompodellids and dinoflagellates [4].
Recent studies showed that the apicomplexans display mETC and F1Fo-ATP synthase complexes that are highly divergent from previously studied systems, both in composition and structure. All members have lost complex I, and there have been multiple parallel losses of mETC complexes in numerous lineages (Fig 1B) [7,8]. Of those that retain mETC complexes, including Plasmodium and Toxoplasma, the individual complexes have inflated subunit compositions compared to canonical complexes and display unique structures [9–16]. A similar pattern is seen for F1Fo-ATP synthase [10,11,17–19]. These new subunits mediate novel features and functions of the corresponding complexes. For example, clade-specific subunits mediate ATP synthase hexamerisation which is important for cristae formation [17], and mETC supercomplex formation [9]. Likewise, apicomplexan mitoribosomes are substantially distinct from their homologs in other eukaryotes. While apicomplexan mitochondrial genomes encode only 3 protein-coding genes [20], their ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) are extremely fragmented [21,22]. In Toxoplasma numerous clade-specific proteins take part in mitigating the extreme rRNA fragmentation, many of which seem conserved across the Myzozoa [23,24].
Through proteomic and structural investigations, we now have a much clearer understanding of apicomplexan mitochondrial complexes. However, we know close to nothing about the other myzozoan lineages. Intriguingly, many of the apicomplexan-specific subunits have putative homologs in these other lineages, hinting at clade-wide conservation. To gain a fuller picture of myzozoan mitochondrial biology, here we investigate mitochondrial complexes in a new myzozoan group. We chose to examine the marine parasite Perkinsus marinus, the best-studied member of the perkinsids, which is a sister clade to the dinoflagellates [4]. Perkinsids diverged close to the split with the clade containing apicomplexans and chrompodellids, making it a suitable sampling point for myzozoan diversity (Fig 1B). Additionally, recent genetic and cell biology studies [25,26] make P. marinus a tractable model that will enable answering questions emerging from this work.
Here, we applied proteomic complexome profiling to P. marinus in order to gain a broad view of the protein composition of its mitochondrial complexes and understand the conservation of highly divergent organellar features across myzozoans.
Results
Isolation of Perkinsus mitochondria
Complexome profiling has proven a powerful proteomic technique for uncovering the composition of organellar protein complexes [27–29]. To study the mitochondrial complexes of P. marinus, we decided to take a dual approach, performing complexome profiling on both mitochondrially-enriched and whole-cell material.
To isolate material enriched in mitochondria, P. marinus cells (strain ATCC 50983) were lysed via mechanical disruption using glass beads, followed by differential centrifugation to enrich organellar material (see Materials and Methods). Immunoblot analysis of obtained fractions, using antibodies against the conserved ATP synthase beta subunit (ATPβ) (Fig 2A), confirmed mitochondrial enrichment. Antibodies against both a universally conserved cytosolic glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and a nuclear histone H3 showed a strong signal in the total fraction, but absence or a decreased intensity in the mitochondrial fraction (Fig 2A), in support of the removal of these cell compartments during purification. On the other hand, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein, the chaperone BiP, was also present in the mitochondrial fraction, indicating co-purification with other organelles (Fig 2A). These data suggest that the purification protocol was able to obtain material enriched in organellar proteins.
Fig 2. Complexome profiles of mETC complexes.

(A) Immunoblot analysis of total cell lysate (Total) and purification fractions using antibodies against marker proteins of various cell compartments. The pellet from the 3,500 x g centrifugation step contains unbroken cells and heavy cell components, from the 40,000 x g step the supernatant contains soluble cytosolic proteins, and the pellet mitochondrial and organellar material. 7.5 μg of protein was loaded per lane with equal loading confirmed by instant blue staining (bottom panel). The following antibodies were used: ATPβ (mitochondrion), BiP (ER), GAPDH (cytosol) and Histone H3 (nucleus). (B) Blue-native PAGE analysis of mitochondrially-enriched material treated with βDDM and separated on a 4–16% Bis-Tris gel. Total protein (TP) was visualised by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (CBB), complex II (CII) activity by an in-gel succinate: nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) activity stain, complex IV (CIV) activity by an in-gel cytochrome c: 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) activity stain and ATP synthase (AS) by immunoblot analysis using the anti-ATPβ antibody. (C) Heatmaps of the complexome profiles from mitochondrially-enriched material of mETC complex subunits from complex II, complex III and complex IV. Each row represents a gel slice, with the gel slice number indicated on the left and the molecular weight, based on the migration of mammalian mitochondrial complexes (black) and soluble proteins (blue), on the right. Subunit IDs are shown at the bottom of their corresponding profile, with mitochondrially-encoded subunits highlighted in red. Dark blue indicates the highest relative abundance (1) and white the lowest (0). Coomassie-stained Native PAGE gel on which the analysis was performed is depicted on the left of the profile. Data shown is from replicate 1. (D) Coulson plots depicting the composition of mETC complexes in key species from myzozoans and ciliates. Perkinsus subunits were used for homology searches using BLAST. T.t Tetrahymena thermophila; P.t Paramecium tetraurelia; T.g Toxoplasma gondii; P.f Plasmodium falciparum; C.p Cryptosporidium parvum; C.m Cryptosporidium muris; C.v Chromera velia; V.b Vitrella brassicaformis; P.g Polarella glacialis; S.m Symbiodinium microadriaticum. Full dataset in S6 Table. (E) Abundance profile of complex II subunit SDHG, complex III subunit RIP1 and complex IV subunit Cox2B across all gel slices. Protein abundance is displayed as iBAQ values. Data shown is from whole-cell complexome. (F) Abundance profile of ISPR1, ISPR2 and complex III subunit RIP1 across all slices. Protein abundance is displayed as iBAQ values. Data shown is from replicate 2. (G) Immunofluorescence assay of TgISPR. Samples labelled with anti-Ty to detect TgISPR-Ty (cyan) and anti-Tom40 (magenta) to detect the mitochondrial marker protein Tom40. Scale bar is 2 µm. Plot to the right displays fluorescence profiles of Ty (cyan) and Tom40 (magenta) labelling along the white dotted line on the merged image.
Next, to test whether we have isolated mitochondrial material suitable for complexome profiling, where intact complexes are required, we performed native-PAGE analysis. The mitochondrial material was solubilised in the non-ionic detergent n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside (βDDM) and complexes were separated by size via blue-native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE). Coomassie staining of the gel showed numerous, clear, high-molecular-weight bands representing large macromolecular complexes (Fig 2B). To screen for known mitochondrial complexes, we first performed in-gel histochemical stains to test for the activity of mETC complex II and complex IV. By applying the complexes II- and IV-specific stains, we observed activity bands at ~900 kDa and ~450 kDa, respectively (Fig 2B), suggesting that in P. marinus these complexes are significantly larger than those seen in mammalian or yeast systems and similar in size to those described from the best-studied apicomplexans, Plasmodium and Toxoplasma [10,11]. We next performed immunoblot analysis with the ATPβ antibody to detect the F1Fo-ATP synthase complex. We observed a high molecular weight band above 1 MDa (Fig 2B), suggesting a large complex of similar size to that seen in the apicomplexan parasites [10,17,30]. Additional low-molecular-weight bands were observed, perhaps reflecting monomeric ATPβ or assembly intermediates. Thus, BN-PAGE analysis indicates that the mitochondrially-enriched samples are suitable for further complexome analysis and suggests that Perkinsus possesses oxidative phosphorylation complexes that are divergent from commonly studied models and potentially similar to other myzozoans.
To investigate the composition of protein complexes within the whole-cell, P. marinus cells (strain PRA-240 (CB5D4; [31])) were lysed in a buffer containing the detergent IGEPAL via mechanical disruption with glass beads and the whole-cell protein content was separated in a BN-PAGE gel for complexome analysis (see Materials and Methods).
Complexome profiling of Perkinsus mitochondria
We then proceeded to perform complexome analysis on both the mitochondrially-enriched material and the whole-cell lysate. The mitochondrially-enriched fraction was treated with 1.75% βDDM to solubilise membrane complexes, which were then separated by BN-PAGE, stained with Coomassie, and the gel lane was cut into 60 gel slices (S1A Fig). Each gel slice was then analysed by mass spectrometry and proteins identified using the Uniprot UP000007800 proteome annotation, supplemented with the sequences of mitochondrially-encoded proteins [25] and additional amino acid sequences derived from a recent structural study of Perkinsus mETC complexes [32]. Abundance data for every protein for each of the remaining 60 gel slices was calculated using the iBAQ method, before normalisation and hierarchical clustering was performed to generate the complexome profile [33,34]. Two independent complexome profiles, performed with separate mitochondrial isolations, were generated (S1 Table). Between the two replicates, 4,174 individual proteins were detected, with 2,797 common to both datasets (S1B Fig; S1 Table). Further analysis was performed only on proteins detected in both datasets, unless stated otherwise. Two sets of molecular weight markers were run in parallel with the Perkinsus material: one composed of soluble proteins and the other containing bovine mitochondrial membrane complexes (S1A Fig). This allowed mass calibration based on the migration of both soluble and membrane-embedded proteins (S1A, S1C Fig; S3 Table).
For the whole-cell sample, proteins were solubilised in 0.1% IGEPAL, a milder non-ionic detergent, in order to detect weaker inter-complex interactions. Protein complexes were separated by BN-PAGE and the gel was excised into 48 slices (S1A Fig). Samples were analysed as above, with 3,537 proteins detected (S1B Fig; S2 Table). Between the three datasets 1,724 proteins were detected in common (S1B Fig; S1, S2 Tables), with 1,337 detected only in the whole-cell dataset, indicating differential cell component enrichment between the two sample types, as would be expected. A ladder composed of soluble proteins was run in parallel, allowing mass calibration (S1A, S1C Fig; S3 Table).
Next, we compared the coverage obtained in our complexome datasets to organellar datasets from other myzozoan species. We first compared our two mitochondrially-enriched complexome datasets to the hyperLOPIT spatial proteomics data from Toxoplasma [35]. Our datasets contained putative Perkinsus homologs, as determined by BLASTP, of 67 (replicate 1) and 65% (replicate 2) of the Toxoplasma proteins found in the mitochondrial clusters. This includes 71 and 67% of proteins belonging to the “mitochondrial membranes” cluster, a comparable proportion to that obtained in our previous complexome study of Toxoplasma mitochondrial complexes [10]. Our whole-cell sample contained putative homologs of 45% of proteins in the mitochondrial clusters. We next compared our complexome datasets to the recent hyperLOPIT spatial proteomics data from Plasmodium [36]. With our mitochondrially-enriched datasets we identified Perkinsus homologs of 73 and 74% of the Plasmodium proteins found in the mitochondrial clusters, while our whole-cell sample contained putative homologs of 65% of proteins in the mitochondrial clusters. Finally, comparisons to a curated mitochondrial proteome from Plasmodium falciparum [37] showed our mitochondrially-enriched complexome datasets contained homologs of between 60 and 56% of Plasmodium mitochondrial proteins, while the whole-cell dataset contained 38% of them. Overall, these comparisons suggest our complexome profiles have similar coverage of mitochondrial proteins with our previous Toxoplasma complexome studies.
Mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes
The multi-subunit complexes of the mETC show considerable compositional diversity across eukaryotes, and recent studies in apicomplexans suggest a much-expanded subunit repertoire compared to the commonly studied mammalian and yeast models [2,3]. In order to determine whether this expanded subunit repertoire extends to other myzozoans, we interrogated our Perkinsus complexome datasets for mETC complexes.
We first searched for complex II subunits. While canonically a 4-subunit complex in the bacterial ancestor and in well-studied models such as yeast and mammals, other lineages contain substantially enlarged complexes. For example, plants possess an 8-subunit complex [38], the kinetoplastid Trypanosoma cruzi has a 12-subunit complex [39], and in the ciliate Tetrahymena this complex consists of 15 subunits [40]. Recent studies in apicomplexans found an 8–9 subunit complex in Plasmodium and Toxoplasma, respectively [10–13], and its enlargement in Eimeria was also suggested [16]. All complex II compositions possess two conserved matrix-facing subunits, SDHA and SDHB, that form the soluble enzymatic domain that contains the FAD and Fe-S cofactors, as well as between 2 and 13 membrane-embedded subunits that anchor the complex to the IMM. In the “canonical” enzyme those subunits are named SDHC and SDHD and they further house the ubiquinone binding site. The amino acids involved in ubiquinone binding in eukaryotes with enlarged subunit number have not yet been experimentally characterised.
Searching our mitochondrially-enriched complexome dataset for the profiles of homologs of the highly conserved SDHA and SDHB subunits identified proteins with a peak at both high molecular weight (~900–990 kDa) and low molecular weight (between ~60 and 120 kDa) (Fig 2C, S4, S5 Tables). The low-molecular-weight peak likely reflects either an assembly intermediate of the soluble matrix domain or subunit monomer migration, while the one occurring at high molecular weight represents the mature complex. This size of complex II is consistent with the BN-PAGE in-gel stain (Fig 2B), which relies on dehydrogenase activity, suggesting the high molecular weight peak reflects an enzymatically complex II. The whole-cell complexome dataset also revealed evidence of a sub-assembly containing SDHA and SDHB migrating at ~320–350 kDa (S2A Fig). Compared to the mitochondrially-enriched datasets, a greater proportion of SDHA and SDHB are found in this sub-assembly, perhaps due to partial breakdown of the complex during sample preparation. Within the enriched mitochondrial dataset, 7 proteins that are homologs of the recently identified apicomplexan membrane-anchoring complex II subunits (Fig 2C) peak at ~900 kDa. In the whole-cell complexome, these subunits migrated at high molecular weight of ~1 MDa (S2A Fig). These findings provide support for an affiliation of these 7 proteins as subunits of complex II in Perkinsus. Their assignment to complex II is further supported by a recent structural study of the mETC supercomplex in Perkinsus that identified them as part of a 10-subunit complex II [32]. Notably, this structural analysis identified an additional subunit (named SDHC) not found in complex II of the apicomplexan studies. We also identified this subunit in our dataset co-migrating with other complex II subunits (Figs 2C and S2A).
To determine whether SDHC is a lineage-specific subunit in Perkinsus, or a more widespread myzozoan subunit, we performed homology searches in key species from the myzozoans and the sister ciliate lineage (Fig 2D, S6 Table). We found putative SDHC homologs in numerous other myzozoans, but none in the ciliates. A putative homolog in Toxoplasma, TGME49_207420, was not identified in our previous proteomic studies of complex II [10,13], where we used the GT1 annotation which does not contain a version of this gene. Re-interrogating proteomic data from an immunoprecipitation of complex II in this study, adding in the amino acid sequence of TGME49_207420 to the search database, allowed identification of this putative subunit, termed TgSDHC (S2B Fig). This data supports the conservation of SDHC across the myzozoans. More broadly our homology analysis suggests membrane-embedded complex II subunits found in Perkinsus are largely conserved across the myzozoans, but not in the ciliates (Fig 2D). The ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila also has an expanded complex II subunit composition compared to the “canonical” four-subunit enzyme [40], suggesting that different lineages evolved additional membrane-embedded subunits separately.
We next searched for complex III subunits. Similar to apicomplexans, the Perkinsus mitogenome encodes 3 proteins: the complex III subunit cytochrome b, and the complex IV subunits CoxI and CoxIII [25]. In the mitochondrially-enriched complexome dataset, the cytochrome b subunit was found with a peak at ~900 kDa (Fig 2C, S5 Table). Among other proteins with a peak in the same slice, we found 10 other putative complex III subunits identified based on the homology to known apicomplexan subunits and those identified in the recent mETC supercomplex structure [32]. Searching the whole-cell complexome dataset identified 8 of these subunits as migrating in the same gel slice providing additional support to their affiliation (S2A Fig). Notably, in both datasets we found subunits of both complexes II and III predominantly migrating in the same gel slice.
Complex IV has shown considerable variation in subunit number across the eukaryotes. Apicomplexans possess an enlarged complex with 25 subunits, compared to just 14 observed in mammals [9]. The recent Perkinsus mETC supercomplex structure suggests a 27-subunit complex [32]. We first searched for the mitochondrially-encoded CoxI and CoxIII subunits and found them with a peak in a gel slice representing ~420 kDa (Fig 2C; S5 Table). Moreover, this size of complex IV is consistent with the BN-PAGE in-gel stain (Fig 2B). We detected 24 of the expected subunits in the same gel slice, thereby confirming complex IV’s composition. Interestingly, we were not able to detect Cox2c, which was observed in the Perkinsus structure, and its homolog was found in a recent structural study from Toxoplasma [9]. However, this subunit has not been detected in numerous proteomic studies of the apicomplexan mETC [3,15,28], suggesting challenges in its detection by mass spectrometry. Searching the whole-cell complexome dataset identified CoxI and 21 further complex IV subunits, migrating at high molecular weights and with up to three peaks of abundance, likely relating to multimers or supercomplex formation (see below) (S2A Fig). Overall, our complexome dataset identified all 10 subunits from the complex II structure, 11 of the 12 subunits from complex III and 26 of 27 from complex IV [32].
Our complexome dataset, as well as the Perkinsus mETC supercomplex structure [32], has identified numerous novel subunits not seen in canonical models. Similar observations have been made in the apicomplexans Toxoplasma [10] and Plasmodium [11]. To investigate the extent of conservation versus lineage-specific repertoire of subunits, we performed homology searches, using the Perkinsus mETC subunits, on species from each of the main myzozoan lineages, as well as the sister ciliate group. Broadly, we found that the additional subunits observed in Perkinsus were identified in all myzozoan groups examined, but not in ciliates (Fig 2D, S6 Table). Notably, these extra subunits were not observed in species that had lost individual complexes, for example complex III in Chromera and complex III and IV in Cryptosporidium species, demonstrating species-specific losses. These observations suggest the additional subunits we observe in Perkinsus are myzozoan-specific. While we did not identify homologs of the myzozoan subunits in the ciliate Tetrahymena, structural studies described much enlarged mETC complexes in this species [40,41]. Therefore, while myzozoa and ciliates complexes are both expanded in subunit number, this is mediated by distinct, lineage-specific proteins.
Associations between individual mETC complexes, termed supercomplexes, have been observed in numerous systems, recently including Apicomplexa [9]. Likewise, the above-mentioned Perkinsus structural study described a supercomplex composed of complexes II, III and IV (II2-III2-IV2) [32]. We interrogated our datasets to see if we could detect any supercomplexes. In the complexome from mitochondrially-enriched samples, complexes II and III are found co-migrating, but subunits of complex IV are not present in this gel slice (Fig 2C). This is not unexpected, as the βDDM extraction does not typically retain weaker inter-complex associations. The association of complexes II and III could be due to the tight binding conferred by a long helical extension in SDHG observed in the structure [32]. We therefore interrogated our whole-cell dataset, extracted in 0.1% IGEPAL, which is more likely to retain weaker inter-complex interactions. Here we observed that subunits from complexes II, III and IV indeed appear together in multiple peaks of high abundance (Figs 2E and S2A). Moreover, the peaks from different respiratory complexes overlap, consistent with the detection of a supercomplex containing complexes II, III and IV.
Our complexome datasets allow identification of almost complete mETC complexes, validating their composition. Sequence-based homology searches suggest that this divergent composition is broadly conserved across the myzozoans but does not extend to in the ciliate lineage, where unrelated proteins contribute to complex composition expansion compared to yeast and mammals.
Evidence of interaction between complex III and putative inhibitors
A structural study of the Perkinsus mETC supercomplex [32] identified two novel proteins that interact with the RIP1 subunit of complex III. These proteins were proposed to act as inhibitors of the complex’s enzymatic activity due to their interaction site overlapping with the binding site for cytochrome c. These proteins were named ISPR1 and ISPR2 (for Iron-Sulfur Protein Related). To lend support to this observation we searched for them in our complexome datasets. Both proteins were detected in both replicates of our complexome on mitochondrially-enriched samples. Major peaks were identified at low molecular weight slices likely representing free monomers or dimers. However, in the second replicate of the mitochondrially-enriched complexome a secondary, smaller peak was detected in gel slices that contain complex III subunits (Fig 2F), consistent with an interaction between ISPR1, ISPR2 and this complex.
The identification of a novel complex III inhibitory factor in Perkinsus raises the question of whether it is a lineage-specific innovation, or if it is more widely conserved. It was noted that Toxoplasma contains a likely homolog, TGGT1_224932 [32]. Sequence alignments and structural predictions support this assignment (S2C, S2D Fig). To provide some evidence for this conservation we wished to localise and examine the essentiality of the Toxoplasma homolog. However, searches of available transcriptomic datasets [42,43], suggest that this gene has low expression levels in the tachyzoite life stage that is commonly used for these experiments, while highly expressed in the chronic bradyzoite life stage (S2E Fig). Due to the low levels of expression in tachyzoites, we reasoned that localisation examination will require ectopic expression under a constitutive promoter. Thus, to test if the mitochondrial localisation of this putative TgISPR is conserved, we introduced a second, C-terminally Ty epitope-tagged, version of the minigene in Toxoplasma under the tubulin promoter (S2F Fig) and performed immunofluorescence analysis. We observed signal with a characteristic mitochondrial “lasso-shape” morphology [44], which co-localised with the mitochondrial marker TOM40 [45], supporting mitochondrial localisation (Fig 2G). The change in expression levels of TgISPR, alongside the proposed role of PmISPRs based on structural work, raises the possibility that TgISPR could be an important bradyzoite respiratory inhibitor. Future functional studies in a cell line suitable for bradyzoite studies will be required to determine the role of TgISPR, and whether it performs an inhibitory role as proposed for Perkinsus. Overall, our results lend support to the observation that novel proteins interact with complex III in Perkinsus.
Detection of F1Fo-ATP synthase
In Toxoplasma F1Fo-ATP synthase complex is a huge 1.85 MDa complex consisting of 32 subunits [10,17–19], compared to ~15 canonical subunits of the yeast and mammalian systems. Immunoblot analysis (Fig 2B) provides hints that Perkinsus possesses a similarly enlarged ATP synthase. Searching for homologs of confirmed Toxoplasma ATP synthase subunits within the Perkinsus genome identified 27 putative homologs (S4 Table). Of these, 26 were present in our mitochondrially-enriched complexome dataset and 25 in the whole-cell dataset. The conserved subunit c is an expected exception, as it has previously proved recalcitrant to detection by mass spectrometry [18]. All 26 subunits peaked in relative abundance at ~1.9 MDa in the mitochondrial complexome (Fig 3A; S5 Table), and at above 1 MDa in the whole-cell complexome (S3A Fig), confirming an enlarged ATP synthase. As observed with mETC subunits, the composition of ATP synthase is largely conserved across myzozoan species that possess the complex, but not in the ciliates (Fig 3B). Conserved subunits include ATPTG8 and 9, which contain coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix (CHCH) domains. Subunits containing CHCH-domains have recently been shown to be essential for ATP synthase formation [46] and were previously only studied in apicomplexans. Their presence in Perkinsus suggests CHCH-domain-containing ATP synthase subunits are a myzozoan-wide feature. The ATP synthase inhibitor subunit IF1 was found also in a secondary low-molecular-weight peak, consistent in size with monomer or dimer migration, and providing evidence that the IF1 pool is not permanently engaged with the mature complex. Likewise, the conserved catalytic subunit ATPβ also has a low molecular weight peak, matching the secondary band seen by immunoblot analysis (Fig 2B).
Fig 3. Complexome profiles of the F1Fo ATP synthase complex.

(A) Heatmap of the complexome profile from mitochondrially-enriched material of ATP synthase. Each row represents a gel slice, with the gel slice number indicated on the left and the molecular weight, based on the migration of mammalian mitochondrial complexes (black) and soluble proteins (blue), on the right. Subunit IDs are shown at the bottom of their corresponding profile. Dark blue indicates the highest relative abundance (1) and white the lowest (0). Coomassie-stained Native PAGE gel on which the analysis was performed is depicted on the left of the profile. Data shown is from replicate 1. (B) Coulson plots depicting the composition of ATP synthase in key species from myzozoans and ciliates. Perkinsus subunits were used for homology searches using BLAST and jackhmmer. T.t Tetrahymena thermophila; P.t Paramecium tetraurelia; T.g Toxoplasma gondii; P.f Plasmodium falciparum; C.p Cryptosporidium parvum; C.m Cryptosporidium muris; C.v Chromera velia; V.b Vitrella brassicaformis; P.g Polarella glacialis; S.m Symbiodinium microadriaticum. Full dataset in S6 Table. (C) Structure of ATP Synthase dimer from Toxoplasma gondii (PDB 6TMK, [17]) with subunits conserved in Perkinsus coloured blue, and subunits not found coloured in pink. Visualised using ChimeraX [98].
Toxoplasma ATP synthase possess an expanded luminal domain and the subunits making it mediate hexamer formation [10,17–19]. We were unable to identify Perkinsus homologs of many of the corresponding lineage-specific subunits (ATPTG5,7,10,11 and 16) (Fig 3C; S4 table). Perkinsus may lack this domain or it may possess derived versions of the missing subunits, which we were not able to detect by homology searches due to sequence divergence. The identification of ATP synthase hexamers within the structural study [32] favours the latter hypothesis. To explore further we searched our complexome for co-migrating proteins which may be novel subunits that could replace the missing homologs. We noted that in all complexome datasets 2 other proteins (Pmar_PMAR021141 and Pmar_PMAR014495) consistently co-migrated with the other subunits of ATP synthase, with similar abundance to other myzozoan-specific ATP synthase subunits (Figs 3A, S3A, S3B). Similar to the missing subunits from Toxoplasma ATPTG10,11 and 16, Pmar_PMAR021141 is a short protein of 10 kDa. Pmar_PMAR014495 is a 19 kDa protein with a predicted thioredoxin domain. Both proteins are predicted to be mitochondrially localised using DeepLoc 2.1 prediction models [47] (S4 Table). To investigate further, we first purified ATP synthase by size exclusion chromatography and submitted it for mass spectrometry analysis (S3C, S3D Fig). In addition to detection of 22 expected ATP synthase subunits, both of these new proteins were also present (S7 Table). These data suggest that the association with ATP synthase is genuine, and they represent either novel ATP synthase subunits, or late-stage assembly factors, and we putatively assign them the names ATPPM1–2, although further experimental work would be required to confirm this. Combined, these data confirm that Perkinsus has an enlarged ATP synthase, and that this divergent complex is conserved across sampled myzozoans and reveals putative new species-specific subunits.
It was previously observed in Toxoplasma that the gene encoding ATP synthase subunit ATPTG1 also separately encodes the complex III subunit CytC1, suggesting post-translational cleavage [10] and potentially coupled assembly of the mETC and ATP synthase [48]. Homology analysis showed that this fusion was conserved across a subset of apicomplexans and that outside this group, as is observed in Perkinsus, ATPTG1 and CytC1 are encoded by separate genes [10] (S3E, S3F, S4 Figs, S8 Table). This suggests a scenario where gene fusion evolved after the initial radiation of apicomplexans. No sequence similarity is observed between the CytC1 leader sequence and ATPTG1 in Perkinsus. Our detection of ATPTG1 in complex with ATP synthase in Perkinsus strongly suggests that a role for this protein as an ATP synthase subunit existed prior to the fusion event with CytC1 in myzozoan evolution.
Mitochondrial ribosome
The mitoribosome is a macromolecular complex required to translate transcripts encoded by the mitochondrial genome, consisting of two large riboprotein subunits – the large (LSU) and small subunit (SSU). Both the LSU and SSU are composed of numerous proteins and rRNAs. In the myzozoan lineage, the mitochondrial genomes predict an unusually fragmented rRNA backbone [5,20,21,49], which would require the function of new proteins to support translation. Two recent structural studies of Toxoplasma confirmed this hypothesis and demonstrated that, similarly to mETC and ATP synthase, apicomplexans have mitoribosomes that diverge significantly from their better studied homologs in humans and yeast [23,24]. Notably, the Toxoplasma mitoribosome contains at least 124 subunits (73 in LSU and 51 in SSU), including 55 clade-specific ones [23]. In contrast, the yeast and human mitoribosomes contain in total only 75 and 80 subunits, respectively [50,51]. This difference supports the notion that the recruitment of this group of unorthodox mitoribosomal proteins acts to mitigate the highly fragmented rRNA.
To test if this divergent composition is conserved across myzozoans, we first searched for homologs of confirmed Toxoplasma mitoribosomal proteins within the Perkinsus genome, and identified 78 putative homologs (S4 table). Of these, 74 were identified in at least one complexome dataset. In the first replicate of the mitochondrial complexome, 70 subunits were detected, with 67 of them showing their highest abundance in the top gel slices (~ 2 MDa) (Fig 4). The LSU and SSU subunits were observed most prominently in the top two and three gel slices, respectively. This slight difference in migration could represent separate migration of the LSU and SSU, or a mixture between full monosomes and individual subunits. We observed 21 of the 55 clade-specific subunits co-migrating with the mitoribosome, suggesting partial conservation across myzozoans. In the whole-cell complexome, we detected 18 out of 74 putative subunits, 5 from the SSU and 13 from the LSU (S5 Table). The lower number of detected proteins potentially reflects different detergent extraction conditions used in the mitochondrial dataset, leading to the differential preservation of higher-order molecular interactions. As observed in the mitochondrial dataset, the LSU and SSU proteins possess slightly different migration profiles.
Fig 4. Complexome profile of mitoribosome.

Heatmap of the complexome profile from mitochondrially-enriched material of the mitochondrial ribosome, showing subunits of the LSU and SSU. Each row represents a gel slice, with the gel slice number indicated on the left and the molecular weight, based on the migration of soluble proteins (blue), on the right. Subunit IDs are shown at the bottom of their corresponding profile. Dark blue indicates the highest relative abundance (1) and white the lowest (0). Coomassie-stained Native PAGE gel on which the analysis was performed is depicted on the left of the profile. Data shown is from replicate 1.
Structural analyses of the Toxoplasma mitoribosome revealed the extent of rRNA fragmentation and provided insight into the mechanism through which lineage-specific proteins mitigate this fragmentation and promote ribosomal function through RNA-protein interactions [23]. For example, 11 Toxoplasma proteins interact each with multiple rRNAs and were suggested to aid their integration into the functional ribosome either by facilitating assembly, by providing stability or aiding folding. Since this role results in joining multiple rRNA molecules together into one ribosomal domain, these proteins were termed “joints”. Perkinsus is also thought to contain highly fragmented rRNAs [25]. We detected 8 of the 11 “joint” proteins whose homologs interact with multiple rRNAs in Toxoplasma, suggesting conservation in the architecture of protein scaffolds for supporting rRNA fragment stability and formation of critical mitoribosomal functional domains. This included a RAP (RNA-binding domain abundant in apicomplexans) domain-containing protein homologous to Toxoplasma mL138, which is essential for mitoribosome assembly or stability [23]. Five RAP domain proteins were found in the Toxoplasma mitoribosome, three of which (mL136, mL138 and mL147) are conserved in Perkinsus and migrate with the mitoribosome.
Myzozoan genomes encode proteins with the AP2 transcription factor domains. In the apicomplexans, numerous members of this family (called ApiAP2) are involved in controlling gene expression-dependent life cycle stage transitions [52]. Surprisingly, in Toxoplasma, 4 out of 67 ApiAP2 proteins have been incorporated into the mitoribosome [23,24]. Perkinsus has 25 predicted ApiAP2 proteins [53], 4 of which migrate with the mitoribosome (mS130, mL143, mL153, mL161) (Fig 4; S5 Table). This suggests that the unusual incorporation of AP2-like proteins in the mitoribosome is conserved across the myzozoans. Additionally, the Toxoplasma mitoribosome contains proteins with domains that may indicate repurposing from another function. Two examples include mL151, which has a BolA-like domain, commonly found in the iron-sulfur cluster assembly pathway proteins, and mS134, which has an acylphosphatase enzymatic domain. Both proteins appear conserved as mitoribosomal components in Perkinsus as their homologs peak together with the other mitoribosomal proteins. Moreover, another component of the large mitoribosomal subunit is mL105, a protein that belongs to the MAP67 family [54]. It is worth noting that this protein belongs to the ancestral eukaryotic mitoribosomal proteins, although it was lost from the mitoribosome of Opisthokonta.
Overall, several unusual features recently observed in Toxoplasma mitoribosome appear conserved in Perkinsus, suggesting that these innovations are Myzozoa-conserved. Future structural studies will be needed to unravel the full extent of conservation of these features, and any unique attributes of the Perkinsus mitoribosome.
TOM complex
Most nuclear encoded mitochondrial proteins enter the organelle via the TOM complex, which in S. cerevisiae is composed of a core complex, made up of the central pore protein Tom40, Tom22 and three small proteins under 10 kDa (Tom5, Tom6, Tom7), as well as two receptor proteins (Tom20 and Tom70) [55]. A recent study in the apicomplexan Toxoplasma identified homologs of Tom40, Tom22 and Tom7 [45]. Whether other homologs were not identifiable due to sequence divergence, whether lineage-specific subunits have been evolved, or whether apicomplexans, and myzozoans, contain a reduced TOM complex remains an open question [56].
To investigate we searched our mitochondrial complexome for the Perkinsus homologs of Toxoplasma Tom40, Tom22 and Tom7 (S4 Table). We were able to identify all three proteins co-migrating at ~180 kDa (Fig 5A). While smaller than the ~ 400 kDa complex observed in Toxoplasma [45], this may represent a monomeric rather than dimeric TOM complex resulting from harsher detergent extraction conditions. To identify other TOM subunits, we first curated a complexome dataset of proteins detected in both mitochondrial complexome replicates with a predicted mitochondrial localisation using the DeepLoc2.1 tool [47] (S9 Table). We then searched for proteins with a similar migration profile as Tom22. In the first replicate of the complexome we identified 2 small proteins (Pmar_PMAR024099 and Pmar_PMAR017696), under 10 kDa. Searching HHpred [57] with Pmar_PMAR024099 identified ScTom5. Structural predictions propose a single helix (S5A Fig), similar to the small Tom proteins, and alignments to the structure of the S. cerevisiae TOM complex [55], suggest similarity between Pmar_PMAR024099 and Tom6 and between Pmar_PMAR017696 and Tom5. We therefore assign Pmar_PMAR024099 and Pmar_PMAR017696 as putative TOM subunits, although further experimental evidence will be required to confirm this. Both Plasmodium and Toxoplasma possess a putative homolog of Pmar_PMAR024099 (PF3D7_1365200, BLAST e-value 1.66 e-9; TGME49_277920, BLAST e-value 3.32 e-10), although no other homologs were identified in other myzozoan species either by BLAST or HMM-based search strategies (S6 Table). Searches with Pmar_PMAR017696 did not identify any myzozoan homologs (S6 Table). Notably, in our recent Toxoplasma complexome study [10] a short, single-transmembrane protein (TGGT1_288245) was identified co-migrating with TOM40. Perkinsus marinus does not possess a clear homolog of TGGT1_288245. These data suggest that Perkinsus and apicomplexans possess potential homologs of Tom5 and Tom6, but that identifying clear homologs using sequence-based approaches can be challenging for small proteins.
Fig 5. Complexome profile of TOM40 and non-mitochondrial complexes.

(A) Heatmap of the complexome profile from mitochondrially-enriched material of the TOM complex. Each row represents a gel slice, with the gel slice number indicated on the left and the molecular weight, based on the migration of mammalian mitochondrial complexes (black), on the right. Subunit IDs are shown at the bottom of their corresponding profile. Dark blue indicates the highest relative abundance (1) and white the lowest (0). Coomassie-stained Native PAGE gel on which the analysis was performed is depicted on the left of the profile. Data shown is from replicate 1. (B) Heatmap of the complexome profile from mitochondrially-enriched material of the 26S proteasome, comprised of the 19S regulatory particle (RP) and the 20S core particle (CP) as in part (A). The molecular weight, based on the migration of soluble proteins (blue), is shown on the right. Data shown is from replicate 1. (C) Heatmap of the complexome profile from mitochondrially-enriched material of the Endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex (EMC), as in part (A). Molecular weight is based on the migration of mammalian mitochondrial complexes (black). Data shown is from replicate 2.
Overall, our data suggest Perkinsus contains a core TOM complex of at least 5 subunits. Conservation of the core TOM complex in Perkinsus and apicomplexans suggest it may have evolved early in eukaryotic evolution. Further investigations will be required to identify if additional TOM subunits exist, in particular divergent versions of the receptors Tom20 and Tom70.
Complexes from other cell compartments
Finally, we explored whether our complexome datasets could provide insight into other cell compartments. We reasoned that our whole-cell complexome would provide cell-wide coverage, and, as previously highlighted, immunoblot analysis of fractions from our mitochondrial purification protocol suggested co-purification of other organelles (Fig 2A). We first investigated the 26S proteasome complex. Homology searches identified Perkinsus homologs of 32 out of 33 subunits from the human complex [58]. We could identify 17 subunits of the 19S proteasome/ regulatory particle migrating at 1.4 MDa in our mitochondrial complexome, and 16 subunits migrating at 1.2 MDa in our whole-cell complexome (Figs 5B, S5B). Similarly, we could detect 14 subunits of the 20S proteasome/core particle migrating at 690 kDa in our mitochondrial complexome and 13 subunits migrating at 765 kDa in our whole-cell complexome. These observations are in line with previous studies whereby organellar purification pipelines introduce contamination from other cell compartments, for example in the mitochondrial complexome of Plasmodium numerous non-mitochondrial proteins, including the proteasome, were detected [11]. At the same time, the presence of these contaminants provides additional opportunities to assess the composition of non-mitochondrial protein complexes via complexome analysis.
Since immunoblot analysis suggested co-purification of the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig 2A), we searched our mitochondrial complexome for the endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex (EMC). The EMC plays an important role in the biogenesis of membrane proteins in the ER [59], and is found across every major eukaryotic lineage [60]. Although mainly studied in mammals and yeast, a recent study in the kinetoplastid Trypanosoma brucei [61], and homology searches [60], suggest a broadly conserved composition of this complex across divergent lineages. To assess whether EMC composition is conserved in Perkinsus we searched for homologs, and initially identified 6 of the 9 human subunits [62], which migrated at 330 kDa in our mitochondrial complexome (Fig 5C). We observed another protein consistently co-migrating with the EMC, namely Pmar_PMAR006250. Although not found in our initial BLAST searches, we noted Pmar_PMAR006250 is annotated as possessing an EMC10 domain (PFAM: PF21203), suggesting it is EMC subunit 10. Overall, we detected 7 of the 9 subunits of the human EMC. Recently, this complex was also identified in the Plasmodium complexome [11]. Interestingly, unlike in Plasmodium, we were able to detect the EMC6 subunit migrating with other EMC components. Previous detection in Plasmodium, and our data in this study provide further support that the overall conservation of EMC composition extends to the myzozoan lineage.
Detection of the proteasome and EMC suggests our datasets are suitable for exploring the composition of macro-molecular protein complex in other cellular compartments, and may provide extra insight and comparison to future spatial proteomic studies.
Discussion
Mitochondria are unique and defining features of the eukaryotic cell and play a variety of important roles in their function. However, our knowledge of how they operate is largely derived from a narrow set of model organisms that are often closely related. Indeed, the vast majority of eukaryotic diversity, especially in mitochondrial biology, is “hidden” in unicellular eukaryotes and, despite increased recent research efforts, we still know surprisingly little about their molecular features.
An example of the diversity of mitochondrial functions across the eukaryotes is in the variety of mitochondrial proteomes. The size of an organism’s mitochondrial proteome is often indicative of the organism’s mitochondrial capacity [63]. Unicellular eukaryotes offer examples from both ends of this spectrum. For example, the most complex mitochondrial proteomes to date come from the euglenozoans Euglena gracilis and Paradiplonema (alternatively referred to as Diplonema) papillatum with estimated ~1,800 and ~1,900 proteins respectively [64,65]. At the other end of the spectrum, the mitochondria of other protists have been subject to massive reduction [66], including some that have dispensed with mitochondria altogether [67]. Indeed, parasitic lineages are well known for streamlining their genomes [68], which likely provides spatial efficiency and energy conservation [69], with the mitochondria being a clear example of this trend. The greatest diversity of mitochondrial biology is therefore found in unicellular eukaryotes [70].
One area in which this diversity manifests itself is in the composition and features of the mitochondrial complexes involved in oxidative phosphorylation. Over the past few years, a number of studies in a variety of protist lineages have shown considerable divergence in the composition and features of these mitochondrial complexes in comparison to the “textbook” model systems, such as yeast and mammals. A stark example comes from recent structural studies of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila that demonstrated a respiratory chain composed of ~150 proteins compared to ~90 in humans [40,41,71,72]. Similar findings have been observed in the apicomplexans. The mitochondrial complexes of this lineage have been the subject of sustained research effort in the past decade, largely due to their global importance as pathogens of humans and livestock, and their development as powerful tractable model organisms. Through both proteomic and structural approaches, it has been shown that almost every mitochondrial complex is substantially larger than the corresponding mammalian or yeast version, contrary to the simplified yet prevailing notion that parasite pathways are reduced compared to their host. These observations span complex II [10–13], complex IV [9–11,15] and ATP synthase [10,11,17–19]. The larger size is an outcome of numerous species or clade-specific subunits, and the field is still exploring the driving forces for their recruitment [3].
Despite this progress, it was still unclear if the newly discovered subunits were specific to the apicomplexans, or more widely conserved across other related lineages within the Myzozoa. Here, we aimed to answer this question by characterising the mitochondrial complexes of an early-diverging myzozoan, P. marinus using proteomic methods, followed by sequence-based homology searches of key species in related lineages. Our focus on the Perkinsozoa clade, which is sister group to the dinoflagellates, and branched from the lineage that forms apicomplexans and chromerids early in myzozoan evolution, allows insight into the evolution of these features from the ancestral state. Shared mitochondrial features found here would suggest their emergence prior to the split and, importantly, prior to the shift to parasitism in Apicomplexa.
The divergent composition and structure of mitochondrial complexes found in evolutionary distant lineages means that homology searches using proteins of the commonly studied systems (primarily yeast and mammalians) are insufficient to study these complexes. Having knowledge from experimentally well-characterised complexes in an organism within an understudied lineage, and leveraging recent advances in sequence-based homology searches, makes it possible to study related organisms based on homology alone. For example, Toxoplasma ATP synthase, was studied by different proteomics and structural methods [10,17–19] and found to contain many additional subunits compared with mammals or yeast. With this knowledge in hand, it was possible through homology searches to provide evidence that other myzozoans possess homologs of these novel subunit genes. However, there are cases where laboratory-based experiments give insight not apparent from sequence-based searches alone, even when a model system has been studied in the target lineage. The current study provides several examples for this. First, two putative new ATP synthase subunits, ATPPM1 and ATPPM2, not detectable by homology searches as they were absent from the well characterised Toxoplasma complex (Figs 3A, S3A, S3B). Second, SDHC, which was first identified in the Perkinsus mETC supercomplex structure [32], and subsequently in our complexome data (Figs 2C, S2A). Re-examination of homology searches and existing experimental data of this complex in the apicomplexans, triggered by discovery of SDHC in Perkinsus, revealed they also possessed an SDHC subunit (S2B Fig). Third, complex IV in Perkinsus possesses 5 subunits with no clear homolog in Toxoplasma (Fig 2D); initiating a sequence-based homology search for complex IV in Perkinsus using Toxoplasma as a starting point would miss out identifying these subunits. Fourth, proteomics experiments provide direct evidence that a putative homolog is in fact part of a complex in cases of uncertainty. For example, after the discovery that ATP synthase subunit ATPTG1 and complex III subunit CytC1 were encoded by a single gene indicating gene fusion [10], the Perkinsus complexome revealed that a putative ATPTG1 homolog, encoded on a separate gene, is a bona fide ATP synthase subunit (Figs 3A, S3A), highlighting that ATPTG1 and CytC1 were separate subunits prior to the gene fusion event. In summary, taking a combined approach, integrating insights from laboratory-based experiments as well as homology searches remains the most powerful way to characterise the diversity of protein complexes across groups and understand composition-function relationships as well as the evolution of mitochondrial complexes.
Our findings broadly point to a conservation of mitochondrial complex composition both for the oxidative phosphorylation complexes (Figs 2D, 3B) and the mitoribosome (Fig 4). Novel innovations first observed in the apicomplexan parasites, for example the enlarged subunit composition of complexes II and IV, and ATP synthase, as well as the addition of novel proteins to the mitoribosome, are observed in Perkinsus, consistent with conservation across myzozoans. This suggests a scenario where the last common ancestor of the 4 diverging lineages, namely dinoflagellates, chromerids, apicomplexans and perkinsozoans, already possessed enlarged mitochondrial complexes consisting of many of the clade-conserved and -specific subunits seen in both parasites. Given the number of free-living species in these lineages, and the multiple independent origins of parasitism, this would also imply this feature is unrelated to a parasitic lifestyle.
A question that naturally arises is how these enlarged complexes in unicellular eukaryotes arose and what purpose the additional subunits play. We do not have definitive answers, but several reasons can be discussed. In some cases, numerous subunits with reduced hydrophobicity provide the structural features of a single more hydrophobic subunit, and it has been hypothesised that reduced mitochondrial genome content is a driving force for this outcome [9,17,32,73], as they allow transfer of subunit-encoding genes from the mitochondrial to the nuclear genome [74]. This process may be aided by the splitting up of large hydrophobic proteins, that would prove problematic for mitochondrial import, into more numerous, less hydrophobic subunits [10]. Another theory is that these extra subunits imbue the complex with additional functions. Structural studies revealed that, in many cases, species- or clade-specific subunits mediate interactions between complexes and multimerization of complexes, which seem to evolve in line with the shape of mitochondrial cristae [9,17,40]. An example of this is the additional subunits in Toxoplasma ATP synthase, which allow the formation of hexamers, with a role in shaping the cristae membrane [17]. Likewise, in the formation of Toxoplasma supercomplex, complexes III and IV interact in an alternate orientation from mammals, and this novel interaction interface is lined with the lineage-specific subunits [9]. In Perkinsus, the novel subunit, SDHG, appears to promote close associations between complexes II and III, perhaps aiding in supercomplex stability [32]. Extra subunits have also been proposed to play a role in maintaining complex stability in mitoribosomes [23,75,76]. The reason for a largely increased repertoire of accessory subunits may be a combination of (all of) the above.
Our study revealed a number of components conserved between the Perkinsus and Toxoplasma mitoribosomes, indicating that they potentially share many of the unusual features recently uncovered in the apicomplexans [23,24]. The unique mitoribosomal rRNA fragmentation is common to all myzozoans whose mitochondrial genomes have been sequenced [22,25,77] and, therefore, it is likely that features that evolved to “mend” the fragments, control assembly, and maintain stability are also shared. Structural observations derived from the Toxoplasma mitoribosome, the only one available for myzozoans, pointed out three main features that have the potential to mitigate the extreme rRNA fragmentations: i) proteins that bind several rRNA molecules and thus act as “joints”; ii) high abundance of short peptides that are enriched with aromatic residues capable of stacking with nucleobases and with charged residues able to interact with backbone rRNA, thus promoting association between rRNA molecules; and, iii) the addition of poly-A tails onto rRNA that are bound by proteins, which in return bind each other, promoting indirect association between rRNAs. The Perkinsus mitoribosome peak contains homologs of “joint” proteins, but we were unable to identify homologs of the short peptides which promote association of short rRNAs. This may imply a different mitigation solution for dealing with short rRNAs has evolved in Perkinsus. Alternatively, short peptides may be present that have extensively diverged from Toxoplasma making them hard to detect by homology searches. Likewise, homologs of the proteins that bind to poly-A tails migrate with other Perkinsus mitoribosomal proteins suggesting that this mechanism is also conserved. This is further supported by the identification of a homolog of TgmtPAP1, which is a mitochondrial poly-A polymerase important for the complete polyadenylation of mitoribosomal rRNA in Toxoplasma [23].
The observation that 4 members of the ApiAP2 transcription factor family are integral mitoribosome components in Toxoplasma [23,24] is extended here to Perkinsus. However, while Toxoplasma has an unusually expanded number of ApiAP2 family members, 67 in total, the Perkinsus genome encodes only 25 [53], and 4 of them are mitoribosomal. Homologs of those 4 ApiAP2 are found across the myzozoan clade including dinoflagellates, in which 5 have been detected. It is tempting to hypothesise that rRNA fragmentation and the acquisition of these 4 mitoribosomal proteins with ApiAP2 folds have co-evolved; however, this requires further investigation.
Recent studies on the Perkinsus mitochondrial genome highlighted its several specific features, including replacement of the canonical UGA stop codon to code for tryptophan, and an unusual programmed ribosomal frameshifting found in all genes, which seems to require 18–19 corrections across the encoded mitochondrial proteins [25]. These irregularities would necessitate adjustment in mitoribosome functional control and potentially result in the evolution and recruitment of Perkinsus-specific proteins and features. We found numerous proteins, annotated as uncharacterised, co-migrating with confirmed mitoribosomal proteins. Although we cannot currently provide support for their mitoribosome affiliation, as some may belong to other high molecular complexes, it is likely that many are bona fide Perkinsus-specific mitoribosome proteins. Structural studies would assist in assigning any new proteins and revealing any Perkinsus-specific mitoribosome features.
Perkinsus marinus has proved a versatile model organism for understanding myzozoan biology and is increasingly being utilised for investigations into divergent eukaryotic biology, of which this study is an example. We applied a proteomic complexome profiling approach [27], which has proved a powerful method for uncovering the composition of organellar complexes [28,29]. It has most frequently been used for studying organelles in more commonly studied organisms and significantly contributed to our understanding of pathologies in mitochondrial disease patients [78], mammalian [79] and yeast mitochondrial biology [80], and plant and algal organellar biology [81,82]. More recently, it has also been successfully used for exploring non-model lineages.
Recent complexome studies of unicellular eukaryotes include Plasmodium [11], Toxoplasma [10], the extremophile yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa [83] and this study. Both our current, and previous [10] complexome studies identified complexes for which cryo-EM structures now exist [9,17,32], allowing for comparison of the findings. In the present study we identified 47 out of 49 subunits from Perkinsus mETC supercomplex structure [32], while our previous study on Toxoplasma identified 30 out of 32 subunits from the Toxoplasma ATP synthase structure [17], and 33 out of 37 subunits from the Toxoplasma III2-IV supercomplex structure [9]. In both complexome studies the complex IV subunit Cox2c and the ATP synthase c subunit were not detected by mass spectrometry. These comparisons show that complexome profiling identifies the majority of protein subunits identified from structural studies. The complexome profiling technique is relatively straightforward to perform, requires less specialised equipment and skills than structural work, and covers a much wider range of complexes in a single experiment, and so retains significant utility for the study of novel mitochondrial complexes. We believe complexome profiling will be a powerful tool for future explorations of divergent mitochondrial biology.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Perkinsus marinus cells (strain ATCC 50983), used for the mitochondrially-enriched complexome, were grown in liquid culture in ATCC medium 1886 supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin. Perkinsus marinus strain PRA-240 (CB5D4; [31]), used for the whole-cell complexome, was grown in modified DME:Ham’s F12 (1:2) medium supplemented with 5% foetal bovine serum, 50 mM HEPES, 3.6 mM sodium bicarbonate, 15 g/L artificial sea salts, 100 U/mL penicillin G, and 100 U/mL streptomycin sulphate, pH 6.6. Cells were grown without agitation in the dark at 25–26 °C. For culture maintenance, 200 µL of stationary-phase culture were transferred to a T25 culture flask with 10 mL of fresh medium once a week.
Isolation of mitochondrial material
Enriched mitochondrial fractions were obtained by cell lysis followed by differential centrifugation. Perkinsus cells were grown in ~1.5 L of liquid culture and harvested at OD600 ~ 1. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 x g for 15 minutes at 4 °C and weighed. Per gram of cells, 2 g fine glass beads and 2 mL ice-cold mito-membrane buffer (0.6 M sucrose, 20 mM MOPS-NaOH, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA) containing protease inhibitors were added. Cells were disrupted by 8 rounds of 1-minute vortexing and 1-minute incubation on ice. Differential centrifugation was performed at 3,500 × g for 10 minutes at 4 °C followed by 40,000 × g for 120 minutes at 4 °C. Pellets containing mitochondrial membranes were stored at -80 °C before use.
Preparation of whole-cell samples
5 x 107 of cells (OD600 ~ 2) were harvested by centrifugation at 1,700 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 50 µl of solubilisation buffer (50 mM NaCl, 50 mM Bis-Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 2 mM 6-Aminocaproic acid (ACA), 1 mM EDTA) containing 0.1% IGEPAL CA-630 detergent and supplemented with 1x complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor and 12.5 µg of 0.1% (w/v) DNase. 1 g of fine glass beads were added, and cells were disrupted by vortexing for 3 minutes at 4°C. To remove unlysed cells and insoluble material, the cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined by the BCA protein quantification assay.
Blue native, SDS PAGE and immunoblot analysis
SDS-PAGE.
7.5 µg of protein lysate, measured using a Bradford assay, was resuspended in Laemmli buffer (2% (w/v) SDS, 125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% (w/v) glycerol, 0.04% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol, 0.002% (w/v) bromophenol blue) and heated at 95 °C for 5 min. Proteins were then separated on a 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. EZ-Run Prestained Rec protein ladder was used as a molecular weight marker. Proteins were transferred under semi-dry conditions to a nitrocellulose membrane and labelled with primary antibodies: anti-ATPβ (Agrisera AS05085, 1:5000), anti-histone H3 (Abcam ab1791, 1:1,000), anti-GAPDH (Abcam ab125247, 1:2,000), anti-BiP (a gift from James D. Bangs, 1:5,000). This was followed by labelling with secondary fluorescent antibodies IRDye 800CW, 680RD (1:10,000, LIC-COR) and detection with an Odyssey CLx. As a loading control, duplicate gels run in parallel were incubated for 1 hour in instant blue.
Blue native (BN) PAGE for mitochondrially-enriched samples.
Samples were resuspended in solubilisation buffer containing 1.75% βDDM, 750 mM aminocaproic acid, 50 mM Bis-Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 0.5 mM EDTA. This was followed by incubation on ice for 30 min followed by centrifugation at 16,000 × g at 4°C for 30 minutes to separate solubilised protein complexes from insoluble material. This supernatant was combined with sample buffer containing Coomassie G250, resulting in a final concentration of 0.4375% βDDM and 0.1% Coomassie G250 and a protein: detergent ratio of ~1: 5.8. 15–30 µg of sample was separated on a 4–16% Bis-Tris gel under native conditions. Bovine mitochondrial membranes, as well as NativeMark were used as a molecular weight marker.
To visualise total proteins, gels were incubated in a 0.1% (w/v) Coomassie R-250, 45% methanol (v/v), 10% acetic acid (v/v) solution, followed by de-staining and incubation in Milli-Q water. For immunoblot analysis protein was transferred to a PVDF membrane and probed with anti-ATPβ as above. In-gel histochemical stains were performed as in [84]. Briefly, for detection of succinate dehydrogenase the gel was incubated in 50 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4, 0.1 mM ATP, 0.2 mM phenazine methosulfate, 10 mM succinate and 0.2% (w/v) nitroblue tetrazolium until the stain was observed, and the reaction stopped and gel further destained by incubation in 45% methanol (v/v), 10% acetic acid (v/v). For detection of cytochrome c oxidase activity, the gel was incubated with 50 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.2, 1 mg ml−1 cytochrome c, 0.1% (w/v) and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride until the stain was observed, and the reaction stopped and gel further destained by incubation in 45% methanol (v/v), 10% acetic acid (v/v).
For complexome profiling of mitochondrial-enriched material, a gel lane was cut into 60 gel slices (S1A Fig), excluding the very top and bottom sections of the gel. These sections were processed separately as they may contain aggregated proteins that would confound complexome analysis. Each slice was further diced into small cubes to aid trypsin digestion.
Blue native (BN) page for whole-cell samples.
Two identical gels were run. For each of the two, 16.5 μL of cleared lysate containing 80 μg of protein was mixed with 1.5 μL loading dye (5 mM ACA, 5% (w/v) Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) R-250) and 2 μL 50% (v/v) glycerol and separated by BN PAGE in NativePAGE 3%-12% Bis-Tris gels. The electrophoresis was performed in 200 mL of Blue Cathode Buffer (15 mM Bis-Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 50 mM Tricine, 0.002% (w/v) CBB R-250) and 150 mL Anode Buffer (50 mM Bis-Tris-HCl pH 7.0) under the following running conditions: a first step was performed at 80V and 15 mA for 10 minutes, followed by a second one at 100V and 20 mA for 3 hours and 30 minutes, and finally a third one of additional 30 minutes at 130 V and 25mA. NativeMark was run along with the sample to estimate molecular weight sizes.
Gels were both fixed in 25% (v/v) methanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid on a shaker for 1 hour, at room temperature, and rinsed multiple times in Milli-Q water.
For complexome profiling of whole-cell material, a gel lane was excised into 48 1.5 mm slices (S1A Fig), and these were transferred into a 96-well filter plate for further processing.
In-gel trypsin digest
Mitochondrial samples.
In-gel tryptic digestion was carried out on each gel slice. Briefly, diced gel slices were washed in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate, followed by a wash in 50% acetonitrile and 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Cysteine reduction and alkylation were achieved via incubation in a solution of 45 mM DTT and 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate at 60 °C, followed by incubation in the dark with 100 mM iodoacetamide. Slices were washed again in 50% acetonitrile and 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate, followed by incubation in 100% acetonitrile. Trypsin digest was then performed overnight at 37 °C. Liquid was then removed from the gel slices and into to a 96-well microplate. The remaining gel slices were washed by incubation in 5% formic acid before the addition of acetonitrile, and the liquid transferred and pooled in the corresponding well of the microplate. Samples were then dried in a vacuum centrifuge, ready for MS analysis.
Whole-cell samples.
Prior to the LC-MS analysis, protein digestion was performed on each gel slice. Briefly, gels were cut into smaller pieces and bleached with mixture of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC) with acetonitrile (1:1 v/v). Gel was afterwards dried by pure acetonitrile and reduced with 10 mM DTT (dithiothreitol) in 100 mM ABC for 30 min at 60 °C. 55 mM chloroacetoamide in 100 mM ABC was added to the gel, incubated for 10 min at the room temperature and the gel was then washed twice with acetonitrile. Dry gel was mixed with trypsin that was resuspended in acetic acid, ABC and acetonitrile and incubated overnight at 37 °C. After digestion samples were mixed with 0.1% TFA in 60% acetonitrile and peptides were desalted using in-house made stage tips packed with C18 disks (Empore) according to [85].
Mass spectrometry
Mitochondrial samples.
Dried peptide residues were solubilized in 20 µL 5% acetonitrile with 0.5% formic acid using the auto-sampler of a nanoflow uHPLC system (Thermo Scientific RSLCnano). Online detection of peptide ions was by electrospray ionisation (ESI) mass spectrometry MS/MS with an Orbitrap Fusion MS (Thermo Scientific). Ionisation of LC eluent was performed by interfacing the LC coupling device to a NanoMate Triversa (Advion Bioscience) with an electrospray voltage of 1.7 kV. An injection volume of 5 µL of the reconstituted protein digest were desalted and concentrated for 10 minutes on trap column (0.3 × 5 mm) using a flow rate of 25 µl/min with 1% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Peptide separation was performed on a Pepmap C18 reversed-phase column (50 cm × 75 µm, particle size 3 µm, pore size 100 Å, Thermo Scientific) using a solvent gradient at a fixed solvent flow rate of 0.3 µl/min for the analytical column. The solvent composition was A) 0.1% formic acid in water, B) 0.08% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile 20% water. The solvent gradient was 4% B for 1.5 min, 4–60% for 50.5 min, 60–99% for 3 minutes, held at 99% for 7 min. A further 13 minutes at initial conditions for column re-equilibration was used before the next injection. The Orbitrap Fusion acquired full-scan MS in the range 310–2000 m/z for a high-resolution precursor scan at 120,000 RP (at 200 m/z), while simultaneously acquiring up to the top 15 precursors were isolated at 0.7 m/z width and subjected to CID fragmentation (35% NCE) in the linear ion trap using rapid scan mode. Singly charged ions are excluded from selection, while selected precursors are added to a dynamic exclusion list for 30 sec.
Whole-cell samples.
For LC/MS analysis, a Nano Reversed phase column (Ion Opticks, Aurora Ultimate XT C18 UHPLC column, 25 cm × 75 μm ID, 1.7 μm particles, 120 Å pore size, Ion Optics, Australia) was used for LC/MS analysis. Mobile phase buffer A was composed of water and 0.1% formic acid. Mobile phase B was composed of acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid. Samples were loaded onto the trap column (C18 PepMap100, 5 μm particle size, 300 μm x 5 mm, Thermo Scientific) for 4 minutes at 18 μl/min loading buffer was composed of water, 2% acetonitrile and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Peptides were eluted with mobile phase B gradient from 4% to 35% B in 15 minutes. Eluting peptide cations were converted to gas-phase ions by electrospray ionization and analysed on a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion (Thermo Scientific) by data dependent approach. Survey scans of peptide precursors from 350 to 1,400 m/z were performed in orbitrap at 120K resolution (at 200 m/z) with a 100% ion count target. Tandem MS was performed by isolation at 1.6 Da with the quadrupole, HCD fragmentation with normalized collision energy of 30% and 10 ms activation time. Fragmentation spectra were acquired in ion trap with scan rate set to Rapid. The MS2 ion count target was set to 150% and the max injection time was 100 ms. Only those precursors with charge state 2–6 were sampled for MS2. The dynamic exclusion duration was set to 30 s with a 10-ppm tolerance around the selected precursor and its isotopes. Monoisotopic precursor selection was turned on. Cycle time was set to 1.5 s.
Complexome profiling
Complexome profiling was performed as described in [33,34]. Briefly, RAW mass spectrometry data files for each individual gel slice were analysed using MaxQuant (v2.0.3.0 or v2.4.13.0) [86], accessed using the Galaxy server [87], using default settings. For protein identification, peptides were searched against a custom database containing the P. marinus proteome (Uniprot UP000007800), protein sequences for mitochondrial encoded proteins CoxI, CoxIII and CytB [25] and mETC subunits SDHC, SDHH, QCR9, QCR11 and QCR 12 derived from PDB 9FQ7. Protein abundance values were calculated using the iBAQ method and profiles analysed using Nova software (v0.5.8) [88]. Profiles were normalised using the maximum normalisation function and hierarchical clustering performed with the Pearson Correlation distance function. Heatmaps were visualised using GraphPad Prism software (v10.6.1). Proteomics datasets have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the MassIVE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD083014/ MSV000102983.
Phylogenetic analysis
The ATPTG1 protein sequence from P. marinus (Pmar_PMAR013021) was used as a query in BLASTp search against the dataset of 132 alveolate species from EukProt database v.3 [89] (S8 Table) with an e-value threshold of 1e-5. Retrieved sequences were aligned using MAFFT v.7.505 with the L-INS-i algorithm [90] and trimmed using trimAl v1.4.rev15 [91] with the -gt 0.8 option. Phylogenomic analysis was performed using IQ-TREE v.3.0.1 [92] with automatic model selection and branch support values estimated using Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like aLRT test. The resulting tree was visualised with Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) web server [93].
Homology searches
Homologs of mitochondrial mETC complexes, ATP synthase and TOM complex subunits from Perkinsus marinus were searched across representative myzozoan lineages using protein sequence datasets obtained from UniProt or lineage-specific databases (Toxoplasma gondii: ToxoDB.org, release 68; Plasmodium falciparum: PlasmoDB.org, release 68; Cryptosporidium muris and Cryptosporidium parvum: CryptoDB.org, release 68). Searches were performed against reference proteomes when available; for species lacking a reference proteome, all UniProt protein entries were used. Dataset accessions are listed in S6 Table.
Protein homology searches were performed locally using BLASTP (BLAST+ v2.17.0), using P. marinus protein sequences as queries. Candidate homologs were identified based on significant sequence similarity (E-value cut-off < 0.001) and validated by reciprocal BLAST searches. When no significant BLASTP hit was detected, iterative profile-HMM searches were performed using the EMBL-EBI jackhmmer server (E-value cut-off < 0.001) to improve detection of remote homologs.
Immunofluorescence assay in Toxoplasma gondii
Toxoplasma gondii (Type I, RH Δku80 TATi [94]) was cultured as described previously [10]. The sequence of TGGT1_224932 was synthesised with the addition of a 5’ EcoRI restriction site and expression sequence, a 3’ NsiI restriction site, as well as the removal of internal NsiI sites. This sequence was then inserted into the pTUB8mycGFPMyoATy expression vector [95]. The resulting plasmid was used to transfect Toxoplasma and stable transformants selected using xanthine and mycophenolic acid. TgISPR-Ty expressing parasites were then inoculated onto HFFs grown on glass coverslips. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde after 1 day. An immunofluorescence assay was performed as described previously [10], using primary antibodies against Ty (1:800, anti-mouse, [96]) and TgTom40 (1:1,000, anti-rabbit, [45]), and imaged on a Nikon inverted AX/ AX-R Laser-Scanning Confocal Microscope using 63x objective. Z-stacking was performed on Nikon’s NIS-Elements software using high-speed resonant scanner. The images were analysed using FIJI ImageJ X- 64 software [97].
Supporting information
(A) Coomassie-stained Native PAGE gels showing molecular weight markers (i- NativeMark, ii- Bovine mitochondrial membranes), Perkinsus mitochondrially-enriched material (iii) and Perkinsus whole-cell material (iv) used in generating the complexome. Molecular weight markers and Perkinsus material were run on the same gel and aligned, with corresponding gel slices numbers (1–48/60) shown on the right-hand side. For the mitochondrially-enriched material, gels from both replicate 1 and 2 are shown. (B) Comparison of proteins identified in each repetition of the mitochondrial and the whole-cell samples. (C) Mass calibration analysis using NativeMark and Bovine mitochondrial membrane molecular weight markers. Molecular weight and corresponding gel slice were plotted and a non-linear regression, semi-log line plotted. Full details of mass calibration are in S3 Table.
(TIF)
(A) Heatmaps of the complexome profiles from whole-cell complexome of mETC complex subunits from complex II, complex III and complex IV. Each row represents a gel slice, with the gel slice number indicated on the left and the molecular weight, based on the migration of soluble proteins (blue), on the right. Subunit IDs are shown at the bottom of their corresponding profile, with mitochondrially-encoded subunits highlighted in red. Dark blue indicates the highest relative abundance (1) and white the lowest (0). Coomassie-stained Native PAGE gel on which the analysis was performed is depicted on the left of the profile. (B) Re-analysis of Toxoplasma complex II immunoprecipitation from [13], with putative TgSDHC added to the search database. Confirmed Toxoplasma complex II subunits highlighted in blue and putative TgSHDC highlighted in purple. (C) Alignment of ISPR proteins from Perkinsus olensi (ISPR1, A0A7J6TKI1; ISPR2, A0A7J6PI35), Toxoplasma gondii (S7UWH3), Besnoitia besnoiti (A0A2A9M9Y8), Cystoisospora suis (A0A2C6LGZ5), Eimeria brunetti (U6LJF9) and Cyclospora cayetanensis (A0A1D3D252). Alignments were made using Clustal Omega and visualised using JalView (v10.0.7) [99]. (D) Structural predictions, generated using Alphafold3 [100], of P. olensi ISPR1 (pTM score 0.65) (left) and T. gondii ISPR (pTM score 0.69) (middle), coloured according to pIDDT score, as well as superimposition of the two structures (right; PoISPR1 in blue, TgISPR in purple). (RMSD = 0.73 Å between pruned atom pairs). Visualised using ChimeraX [92]. (E) Transcript levels of TGME49_224932 in tachyzoites and bradyzoites from [42] and [43]. (F) Immunoblot analysis of Toxoplasma gondii expressing a Ty-epitope tagged version of TgISPR using the anti-Ty antibody.
(TIF)
(A) Heatmap of the whole-cell complexome of ATP synthase. Each row represents a gel slice, with the gel slice number indicated on the left and the molecular weight, based on the migration of soluble proteins (blue), on the right. Subunit IDs are shown at the bottom of their corresponding profile. Dark blue indicates the highest relative abundance (1) and white the lowest (0). Coomassie-stained Native PAGE gel on which the analysis was performed is depicted on the left of the profile. (B) Abundance profiles of ATPPM1, ATPPM2, and the average abundance of all ATPTG subunits across all gel slices. Protein abundance is displayed as iBAQ values. Data shown is from replicate 1. (C) Chromatogram displaying UV 1_280 of gel filtration of purified ATP synthase using a Superose 6 increase 3.2/300 column. Left-most peak represents void-volume. The fractions highlighted in blue were combined and concentrated using a 100 kDa MWCO spin concentrator before analysis via immunoblot and mass spectrometry. (D) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified ATP synthase. Gel was either silver stained to visualise protein subunits or subjected to immunoblot analysis with the ATPβ antibody. (E) Structural prediction of P. marinus ATPTG1 (predicted using Alphafold3 [100]), pTM score 0.41, coloured according to pIDDT score (left), the structure of T. gondii ATPTG1 (PDB 6TMK; [17]) (center) and the superimposition of the two structures (RMSD = 1.246 Å) (right). Visualised using ChimeraX [98]. (F) Alignment of ATPTG1, CytC1 and fusion proteins from across the myzozoa. ATPTG1 proteins: Perkinsus marinus Pmar_PMAR013021; Chromera velia Cvel_13300; Vitrella brassicaformis Vbra_20035; Cryptosporidium muris CMU_009920. CytC1 proteins: Perkinsus marinus Pmar_PMAR028703; Vitrella brassicaformis Vbra_21749. Fusion proteins: TGGT1_246540 from Toxoplasma gondii; PF3D7_1462700 from Plasmodium falciparum. Alignments were made using Clustal Omega and visualised using JalView [99]. Colour coding depicts percent identity.
(TIF)
A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred with IQ-TREE v.3.0.1 on the trimmed protein alignment containing 170 amino acid positions. The tree was inferred with the LG + I + G4 model automatically selected according to Bayesian information criterion. Branch support values represent Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like aLRT (SH-aLRT) test scores; only values ≥60 are shown. The horizontal bar indicates number of substitutions per site.
(TIF)
(A) Structural prediction of putative Tom proteins PmTom5/6 (Pmar_PMAR024099) and PmTom5 (Pmar_PMAR017696) (predicted using Alphafold3 [100]). pTM score 0.47 and 0.42, respectively. Coloured according to pIDDT score. (B) Heatmap of the whole-cell complexome of the 26S proteasome comprised of the 19S regulatory particle (RP) and the 20S core particle (CP). Each row represents a gel slice, with the gel slice number indicated on the left and the molecular weight, based on the migration of soluble proteins (blue), is shown on the right. Subunit IDs are shown at the bottom of their corresponding profile. Dark blue indicates the highest relative abundance (1) and white the lowest (0). Coomassie-stained Native PAGE gel on which the analysis was performed is depicted on the left of the profile.
(TIF)
Abundance information is displayed as iBAQ values.
(XLSX)
Abundance information is displayed as iBAQ values.
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
Data from both mitochondrially-enriched samples and whole-cell material. Abundance information is displayed as normalised relative abundance values.
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
Deeploc 2.1 predictions of proteins found in mitochondrial complexome replicate 1 and 2, as well as complexome heatmap of mitochondrially predicted proteins from replicate 1. Abundance information is displayed as iBAQ values.
(XLSX)
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Hannah Bridges and Judy Hirst (University of Cambridge) for the gift of bovine mitochondrial membrane. The help of Anzhelika Butenko (Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre) with the phylogenetic analysis of ATPTG1 proteins is appreciated. We are grateful to Shikha Shikha (University of Glasgow) for discussion of the mitoribosomal subunits analysis. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Mass Spectrometry Facility, part of the MVLS Shared Research Facility and Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry at Biocev research center, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, for their support & assistance in this work.
Data Availability
Proteomics datasets have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the MassIVE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD083014/ MSV000102983.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship (grant number 221681/Z/20/Z), Wellcome ISSF feasibility award (grant number 204820/Z/16/Z) and a Medical Research Council Career Development Award UKRI325 (grant reference: UKRI/MR/B000325/1) (to A. E. M); by the Czech Science Foundation grant 23-06479X (to J.L.) and by Wellcome Trust’s Wellcome Investigator Award (grant number 217173/Z/19/Z), and Wellcome Discovery Award (grant number 310879/Z/24/Z) (to L.S.). The funders played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Roger AJ, Muñoz-Gómez SA, Kamikawa R. The Origin and Diversification of Mitochondria. Curr Biol. 2017;27:R1177–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hayward JA, van Dooren GG. Same same, but different: Uncovering unique features of the mitochondrial respiratory chain of apicomplexans. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2019;232:111204. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2019.111204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Maclean AE, Hayward JA, Huet D, van Dooren GG, Sheiner L. The mystery of massive mitochondrial complexes: the apicomplexan respiratory chain. Trends Parasitol. 2022;38(12):1041–52. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2022.09.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Waller RF, Carruthers VB. Adaptations and metabolic evolution of myzozoan protists across diverse lifestyles and environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2024;88(4):e0019722. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00197-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Flegontov P, Michálek J, Janouškovec J, Lai D-H, Jirků M, Hajdušková E, et al. Divergent mitochondrial respiratory chains in phototrophic relatives of apicomplexan parasites. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(5):1115–31. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Villalba A, Reece KS, Camino Ordás M, Casas SM, Figueras A. Perkinsosis in molluscs: A review. Aquat Living Resour. 2004;17(4):411–32. doi: 10.1051/alr:2004050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mathur V, Wakeman KC, Keeling PJ. Parallel functional reduction in the mitochondria of apicomplexan parasites. Curr Biol. 2021;31(13):2920-2928.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Salomaki ED, Terpis KX, Rueckert S, Kotyk M, Varadínová ZK, Čepička I, et al. Gregarine single-cell transcriptomics reveals differential mitochondrial remodeling and adaptation in apicomplexans. BMC Biol. 2021;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01007-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.MacLean AE, Shikha S, Ferreira Silva M, Gramelspacher MJ, Nilsen A, Liebman KM, et al. Structure, assembly and inhibition of the Toxoplasma gondii respiratory chain supercomplex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2025;32(8):1424–33. doi: 10.1038/s41594-025-01531-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maclean AE, Bridges HR, Silva MF, Ding S, Ovciarikova J, Hirst J, et al. Complexome profile of Toxoplasma gondii mitochondria identifies divergent subunits of respiratory chain complexes including new subunits of cytochrome bc1 complex. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(3):e1009301. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Evers F, Cabrera-Orefice A, Elurbe DM, Kea-Te Lindert M, Boltryk SD, Voss TS, et al. Composition and stage dynamics of mitochondrial complexes in Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3820. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23919-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zwahlen SM, Hayward JA, Maguire CS, Qin AR, van Dooren GG. A myzozoan-specific protein is an essential membrane-anchoring component of the succinate dehydrogenase complex in Toxoplasma parasites. Open Biol. 2024;14(6):230463. doi: 10.1098/rsob.230463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Silva MF, Douglas K, Sandalli S, Maclean AE, Sheiner L. Functional and biochemical characterization of the Toxoplasma gondii succinate dehydrogenase complex. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(12):e1011867. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hayward JA, Rajendran E, Zwahlen SM, Faou P, van Dooren GG. Divergent features of the coenzyme Q:cytochrome c oxidoreductase complex in Toxoplasma gondii parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(2):e1009211. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Seidi A, Muellner-Wong LS, Rajendran E, Tjhin ET, Dagley LF, Aw VY, et al. Elucidating the mitochondrial proteome of Toxoplasma gondii reveals the presence of a divergent cytochrome c oxidase. Elife. 2018;7:e38131. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Matsubayashi M, Inaoka DK, Komatsuya K, Hatta T, Kawahara F, Sakamoto K, et al. Novel Characteristics of Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain from Eimeria tenella. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(1):29. doi: 10.3390/genes10010029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mühleip A, Kock Flygaard R, Ovciarikova J, Lacombe A, Fernandes P, Sheiner L, et al. ATP synthase hexamer assemblies shape cristae of Toxoplasma mitochondria. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):120. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20381-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huet D, Rajendran E, van Dooren GG, Lourido S. Identification of cryptic subunits from an apicomplexan ATP synthase. Elife. 2018;7:e38097. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Salunke R, Mourier T, Banerjee M, Pain A, Shanmugam D. Highly diverged novel subunit composition of apicomplexan F-type ATP synthase identified from Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(7):e2006128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Oborník M, Lukeš J. The Organellar Genomes of Chromera and Vitrella, the Phototrophic Relatives of Apicomplexan Parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2015;69:129–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Namasivayam S, Baptista RP, Xiao W, Hall EM, Doggett JS, Troell K, et al. A novel fragmented mitochondrial genome in the protist pathogen Toxoplasma gondii and related tissue coccidia. Genome Res. 2021;31(5):852–65. doi: 10.1101/gr.266403.120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Berná L, Rego N, Francia ME. The elusive mitochondrial genomes of apicomplexa: where are we now?. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:751775. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.751775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shikha S, Tobiasson V, Ferreira Silva M, Ovciarikova J, Beraldi D, Mühleip A, et al. Numerous rRNA molecules form the apicomplexan mitoribosome via repurposed protein and RNA elements. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):817. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56057-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang C, Kassem S, Rocha REO, Sun P, Nguyen T-T, Kloehn J, et al. Apicomplexan mitoribosome from highly fragmented rRNAs to a functional machine. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):10689. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55033-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gornik SG, Flores V, Reinhardt F, Erber L, Salas-Leiva DE, Douvropoulou O, et al. Mitochondrial Genomes in Perkinsus Decode Conserved Frameshifts in All Genes. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39(10):msac191. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Einarsson E, Lassadi I, Zielinski J, Guan Q, Wyler T, Pain A, et al. Development of the Myzozoan Aquatic Parasite Perkinsus marinus as A Versatile Experimental Genetic Model Organism. Protist. 2021;172(4):125830. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2021.125830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Heide H, Bleier L, Steger M, Ackermann J, Dröse S, Schwamb B, et al. Complexome profiling identifies TMEM126B as a component of the mitochondrial complex I assembly complex. Cell Metab. 2012;16(4):538–49. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cabrera-Orefice A, Potter A, Evers F, Hevler JF, Guerrero-Castillo S. Complexome profiling - exploring mitochondrial protein complexes in health and disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:796128. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.796128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wittig I, Malacarne PF. Complexome Profiling: Assembly and Remodeling of Protein Complexes. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):7809. doi: 10.3390/ijms22157809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nina PB, Morrisey JM, Ganesan SM, Ke H, Pershing AM, Mather MW, et al. ATP synthase complex of Plasmodium falciparum: dimeric assembly in mitochondrial membranes and resistance to genetic disruption. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(48):41312–22. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.290973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fernández-Robledo JA, Lin Z, Vasta GR. Transfection of the protozoan parasite Perkinsus marinus. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2008;157(1):44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wú F, Mühleip A, Gruhl T, Sheiner L, Maréchal A, Amunts A. Structure of the II2-III2-IV2 mitochondrial supercomplex from the parasite Perkinsus marinus. 2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.25.595893 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schröder L, Eubel H, Braun H-P. Complexome Profiling of Plant Mitochondrial Fractions. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2363:101–10. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1653-6_9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Giese H, Meisterknecht J, Heidler J, Wittig I. Mitochondrial Complexome Profiling. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2192:269–85. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0834-0_19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Barylyuk K, Koreny L, Ke H, Butterworth S, Crook OM, Lassadi I, et al. A Comprehensive Subcellular Atlas of the Toxoplasma Proteome via hyperLOPIT Provides Spatial Context for Protein Functions. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(5):752-766.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.09.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chisholm SA, Flores V, Kemp A, Breckels LM, Koreny L, Dos Santos Pacheco N, et al. The spatial proteome of the Plasmodium falciparum schizont illuminates the composition and evolutionary trajectories of its organelles. Nat Commun. 2026;17(1):6192. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-73664-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van Esveld SL, Meerstein-Kessel L, Boshoven C, Baaij JF, Barylyuk K, Coolen JPM, et al. A Prioritized and Validated Resource of Mitochondrial Proteins in Plasmodium Identifies Unique Biology. mSphere. 2021;6:e0061421. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00614-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schikowsky C, Senkler J, Braun H-P. SDH6 and SDH7 Contribute to Anchoring Succinate Dehydrogenase to the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 2017;173(2):1094–108. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Morales J, Mogi T, Mineki S, Takashima E, Mineki R, Hirawake H, et al. Novel mitochondrial complex II isolated from Trypanosoma cruzi is composed of 12 peptides including a heterodimeric Ip subunit. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(11):7255–63. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806623200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mühleip A, Flygaard RK, Baradaran R, Haapanen O, Gruhl T, Tobiasson V, et al. Structural basis of mitochondrial membrane bending by the I-II-III2-IV2 supercomplex. Nature. 2023;615(7954):934–8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05817-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhou L, Maldonado M, Padavannil A, Guo F, Letts JA. Structures of Tetrahymena’s respiratory chain reveal the diversity of eukaryotic core metabolism. Science. 2022;376(6595):831–9. doi: 10.1126/science.abn7747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Waldman BS, Schwarz D, Wadsworth MH 2nd, Saeij JP, Shalek AK, Lourido S. Identification of a Master Regulator of Differentiation in Toxoplasma. Cell. 2020;180(2):359-372.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ramakrishnan C, Maier S, Walker RA, Rehrauer H, Joekel DE, Winiger RR, et al. An experimental genetically attenuated live vaccine to prevent transmission of Toxoplasma gondii by cats. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1474. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37671-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ovciarikova J, Lemgruber L, Stilger KL, Sullivan WJ, Sheiner L. Mitochondrial behaviour throughout the lytic cycle of Toxoplasma gondii. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42746. doi: 10.1038/srep42746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van Dooren GG, Yeoh LM, Striepen B, McFadden GI. The Import of Proteins into the Mitochondrion of Toxoplasma gondii. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(37):19335–50. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.725069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Usey MM, Huet D. ATP synthase-associated coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix (CHCH) domain-containing proteins are critical for mitochondrial function in Toxoplasma gondii. mBio. 2023;14(5):e0176923. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01769-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ødum MT, Teufel F, Thumuluri V, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Johansen AR, Winther O, et al. DeepLoc 2.1: multi-label membrane protein type prediction using protein language models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W215–20. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.García-Guerrero AE, Marvin RG, Blackwell AM, Sigala PA. Biogenesis of Cytochromes c and c1 in the Electron Transport Chain of Malaria Parasites. ACS Infect Dis. 2025;11(4):813–26. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Waller RF, Jackson CJ. Dinoflagellate mitochondrial genomes: stretching the rules of molecular biology. Bioessays. 2009;31(2):237–45. doi: 10.1002/bies.200800164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Desai N, Brown A, Amunts A, Ramakrishnan V. The structure of the yeast mitochondrial ribosome. Science. 2017;355(6324):528–31. doi: 10.1126/science.aal2415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Amunts A, Brown A, Toots J, Scheres SHW, Ramakrishnan V. Ribosome. The structure of the human mitochondrial ribosome. Science. 2015;348(6230):95–8. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jeninga MD, Quinn JE, Petter M. ApiAP2 Transcription Factors in Apicomplexan Parasites. Pathogens. 2019;8. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8020047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Oberstaller J, Pumpalova Y, Schieler A, Llinás M, Kissinger JC. The Cryptosporidium parvum ApiAP2 gene family: insights into the evolution of apicomplexan AP2 regulatory systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(13):8271–84. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pyrih J, Pánek T, Durante IM, Rašková V, Cimrhanzlová K, Kriegová E, et al. Vestiges of the Bacterial Signal Recognition Particle-Based Protein Targeting in Mitochondria. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(8):3170–87. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tucker K, Park E. Cryo-EM structure of the mitochondrial protein-import channel TOM complex at near-atomic resolution. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2019;26(12):1158–66. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0339-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mallo N, Fellows J, Johnson C, Sheiner L. Protein Import into the Endosymbiotic Organelles of Apicomplexan Parasites. Genes (Basel). 2018;9(8):412. doi: 10.3390/genes9080412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam S-Z, Rau D, Kübler J, Lozajic M, et al. A Completely Reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a New HHpred Server at its Core. J Mol Biol. 2018;430(15):2237–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Huang X, Luan B, Wu J, Shi Y. An atomic structure of the human 26S proteasome. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23(9):778–85. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chitwood PJ, Hegde RS. The Role of EMC during Membrane Protein Biogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29(5):371–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wideman JG. The ubiquitous and ancient ER membrane protein complex (EMC): tether or not?. F1000Res. 2015;4:624. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6944.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Iyer A, Niemann M, Serricchio M, Dewar CE, Oeljeklaus S, Farine L, et al. The endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex localizes to the mitochondrial - endoplasmic reticulum interface and its subunits modulate phospholipid biosynthesis in Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18(5):e1009717. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhu Q, Zhu X, Zhang L. ER membrane complex (EMC): Structure, functions, and roles in diseases. FASEB J. 2024;38(6):e23539. doi: 10.1096/fj.202302266R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hammond M, Dorrell RG, Speijer D, Lukeš J. Eukaryotic cellular intricacies shape mitochondrial proteomic complexity. Bioessays. 2022;44(5):e2100258. doi: 10.1002/bies.202100258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hammond MJ, Nenarokova A, Butenko A, Zoltner M, Dobáková EL, Field MC, et al. A Uniquely Complex Mitochondrial Proteome from Euglena gracilis. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37(8):2173–91. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gray MW, Valach M, Sarrasin M, Le Sieur F-A, Lukeš J, Burger G. The mitochondrial proteome of diplonemids: from conventional pathways to eccentric RNA editing and transcript processing. BMC Genomics. 2025;26(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-12233-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Santos HJ, Makiuchi T, Nozaki T. Reinventing an Organelle: The Reduced Mitochondrion in Parasitic Protists. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34(12):1038–55. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Karnkowska A, Vacek V, Zubáčová Z, Treitli SC, Petrželková R, Eme L, et al. A Eukaryote without a Mitochondrial Organelle. Curr Biol. 2016;26(10):1274–84. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bartošová-Sojková P, Butenko A, Richtová J, Fiala I, Oborník M, Lukeš J. Inside the Host: Understanding the Evolutionary Trajectories of Intracellular Parasitism. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2024;78(1):39–59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-041222-025305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Albalat R, Cañestro C. Evolution by gene loss. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17(7):379–91. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zíková A, Hampl V, Paris Z, Týč J, Lukeš J. Aerobic mitochondria of parasitic protists: Diverse genomes and complex functions. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2016;209(1–2):46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2016.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Han F, Hu Y, Wu M, He Z, Tian H, Zhou L. Structures of Tetrahymena thermophila respiratory megacomplexes on the tubular mitochondrial cristae. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2542. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38158-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Flygaard RK, Mühleip A, Tobiasson V, Amunts A. Type III ATP synthase is a symmetry-deviated dimer that induces membrane curvature through tetramerization. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5342. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18993-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Waller RF, Keeling PJ, van Dooren GG, McFadden GI. Comment on “A green algal apicoplast ancestor”. Science. 2003;301(5629):49; author reply 49. doi: 10.1126/science.1084684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Huynen MA, Elurbe DM. Mitochondrial complex complexification. Science. 2022;376(6595):794–5. doi: 10.1126/science.abq0368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Waltz F, Salinas-Giegé T, Englmeier R, Meichel H, Soufari H, Kuhn L, et al. How to build a ribosome from RNA fragments in Chlamydomonas mitochondria. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):7176. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27200-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ramrath DJF, Niemann M, Leibundgut M, Bieri P, Prange C, Horn EK, et al. Evolutionary shift toward protein-based architecture in trypanosomal mitochondrial ribosomes. Science. 2018;362(6413):eaau7735. doi: 10.1126/science.aau7735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Vaidya AB, Mather MW. Mitochondrial evolution and functions in malaria parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:249–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Alston CL, Compton AG, Formosa LE, Strecker V, Oláhová M, Haack TB, et al. Biallelic Mutations in TMEM126B Cause Severe Complex I Deficiency with a Variable Clinical Phenotype. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99(1):217–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.05.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Guerrero-Castillo S, Baertling F, Kownatzki D, Wessels HJ, Arnold S, Brandt U. The assembly pathway of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I. Cell Metab. 2017;25:128–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Flores-Mireles D, Camacho-Villasana Y, Lutikurti M, García-Guerrero AE, Lozano-Rosas G, Chagoya V, et al. The cytochrome b carboxyl terminal region is necessary for mitochondrial complex III assembly. Life Sci Alliance. 2023;6(7):e202201858. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202201858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Röhricht H, Schwartzmann J, Meyer EH. Complexome profiling reveals novel insights into the composition and assembly of the mitochondrial ATP synthase of Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2021;1862(7):148425. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2021.148425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lang J, König K, Venn B, Zeilfelder S, Ostermeier M, Spaniol B, et al. Complexome profiling of the Chlamydomonas psb28 mutant reveals TEF5 as an early PSII assembly factor. Plant Cell. 2025;37(6):koaf055. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaf055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Castañeda-Tamez P, Chiquete-Félix N, Uribe-Carvajal S, Cabrera-Orefice A. The mitochondrial respiratory chain from Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, an extremophile yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2024;1865(2):149035. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2024.149035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Sabar M, Balk J, Leaver CJ. Histochemical staining and quantification of plant mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes using blue-native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Plant J. 2005;44(5):893–901. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02577.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(8):1896–906. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367–72. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Galaxy Community. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W83–94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Giese H, Ackermann J, Heide H, Bleier L, Dröse S, Wittig I, et al. NOVA: a software to analyze complexome profiling data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(3):440–1. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Sobala ŁF. LukProt: A Database of Eukaryotic Predicted Proteins Designed for Investigations of Animal Origins. Genome Biol Evol. 2024;16(11):evae231. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evae231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1972–3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wong T, Ly-Trong N, Ren H, Baños H, Roger A, Susko E. IQ-TREE 3: Phylogenomic Inference Software using Complex Evolutionary Models. 2025. doi: 10.32942/X2P62N [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W78–82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sheiner L, Demerly JL, Poulsen N, Beatty WL, Lucas O, Behnke MS, et al. A systematic screen to discover and analyze apicoplast proteins identifies a conserved and essential protein import factor. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(12):e1002392. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Herm-Götz A, Weiss S, Stratmann R, Fujita-Becker S, Ruff C, Meyhöfer E, et al. Toxoplasma gondii myosin A and its light chain: a fast, single-headed, plus-end-directed motor. EMBO J. 2002;21(9):2149–58. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.9.2149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Bastin P, Bagherzadeh Z, Matthews KR, Gull K. A novel epitope tag system to study protein targeting and organelle biogenesis in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996;77(2):235–9. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(96)02598-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Meng EC, Goddard TD, Pettersen EF, Couch GS, Pearson ZJ, Morris JH. UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis. Protein Sci. 2023;32:e4792. doi: 10.1002/pro.4792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, Pritzel A, et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 2024;630(8016):493–500. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–91. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
