Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2026 Sep 16;17:1957880. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1957880

Genome-wide identification and analysis of the Universal Stress Protein (USP) family in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

Li Chen 1,2, Zhixue Dong 1,2, Xuewei Wang 1,2, Zhuqing Zhang 1,2, Sha Yang 1,2, Xuefeng Li 1,2, Xuexiao Zou 1,2, Chengliang Liang 1,2,*, Wenchao Chen 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC13623846  PMID: 42818712

Abstract

Introduction

Members of the Universal Stress Protein (USP) family are crucial for plant abiotic stress responses and growth regulation.

Methods

In this study, we identified 30 CaUSP genes in the pepper genome. These genes were distributed across all 12 chromosomes and phylogenetically classified into eight distinct subgroups. Collinearity analysis revealed evolutionary relationships between the USP families of pepper and Arabidopsis. Cis-acting element analysis indicated that CaUSP gene promoters harbour multiple stress-, hormone-, and development-related motifs. Expression profiling showed that CaUSP19 is highly expressed in floral organs, with a marked increase during the late bud development stage, suggesting a potential role in reproductive development. Using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), we demonstrated that knockdown of CaUSP19 significantly reduced pollen viability and germination.

Results and Discussion:

Collectively, this study provides a systematic genome-wide overview of the pepper CaUSP family and reveals a novel role for CaUSP19 in regulating pollen viability, thereby laying a foundation for further investigation of USP functions in plant reproduction.

Keywords: Capsicum annuum (pepper), CaUSP gene family, genome- wide analysis, pollen fertility, reproductive development

1. Introduction

Biotic and abiotic stresses are major constraints on the yield and quality of economic crops. Plants perceive stress signals through receptors, which activate stress-responsive genes and transduce external signals to downstream effectors, enabling adaptation to adverse conditions (Dan et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024). Universal Stress Proteins (USPs) constitute a class of small proteins defined by the presence of one or more conserved USP domains (Sylvain et al., 2011). Originally identified in Escherichia coli as responders to multiple stressors (VanBogelen et al., 1990), USPs are markedly induced in bacteria under diverse stress conditions, such as extreme temperatures, nutrient limitation, oxidative stress, and ion toxicity (Kristian et al., 2003). Subsequent studies have revealed their widespread distribution across archaea, fungi, protists, plants, and animals (Kristian et al., 2003; Shatil et al., 2021; Xiaoyue et al., 2021), linking them to nearly all types of stress responses and to resistance against both abiotic and biotic challenges (Ralf et al., 2008; Rachid et al., 2012; Shatil et al., 2021; Kieu Anh Thi et al., 2022; Sirui et al., 2025).

In plants, USPs were first described in rice (Margret et al., 2002). Higher plant USPs display considerable structural and functional diversity: in addition to the core USP domain, some members possess kinase, U-box, zinc finger, or other functional domains (Young Jun et al., 2016). In Arabidopsis, AtUSP acts as a molecular chaperone under heat or cold stress, maintaining the activity of target proteins or RNAs and thereby enhancing stress tolerance (Hunseung et al., 2012; Silvia et al., 2015; Young Jun et al., 2016; Sarah Mae Boyles et al., 2017). In tobacco, USPs recognize phosphorylation signals triggered by salt and osmotic stress to promote downstream gene expression and osmolyte accumulation (Pushpika et al., 2016). Systematic bioinformatics analyses across 13 Solanaceae materials have identified 438 USP members, including cultivated tomato and its wild relatives; the stress-tolerant wild species S. pennellii harbors five unique USPs (Ruiqiang et al., 2025). In Populus trichocarpa, 46 PtrUSP genes were identified, with their promoters enriched in cis-acting elements related to hormone and stress responses (Jian et al., 2023). In Gossypium arboreum, two USPs are strongly induced by drought and help regulate cellular water content (Maqbool et al., 2009). Similarly, in potato, StUSP13, StUSP14, StUSP15, and StUSP41 have been proposed as key candidates involved in stress responses (Tianshuai et al., 2024). while in grapevine, VyUSPA3 positively regulates drought resistance in Chinese wild grape (Vitis yeshanensis) (Xiaoyue et al., 2022). A genome-wide survey in Vaccinium identified 72 VcUSP genes, of which 21 and 7 were differentially expressed under UV-B radiation and exogenous ABA treatment, respectively (Yan et al., 2023).

Beyond stress adaptation, USPs participate in various aspects of plant growth and development. In Arabidopsis, the USP encoded by At3g58450 promotes seed germination through an abscisic acid-independent pathway (Gorshkova et al., 2018). While another USP (At3g53990) regulates the circadian rhythms of central oscillator genes (Kieu Anh Thi et al., 2022). GRUSP, a member of the USP family, is involved in gibberellin-dependent flowering induction (Gorshkova et al., 2018). In sweet potato, the nucleus-localized IbUSP17 is highly expressed in high-starch varieties and during storage root expansion; its overexpression significantly increases starch content without yield penalty (Jian et al., 2023).

Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is an economically important vegetable and a key member of the Solanaceae family, which also includes tomato, tobacco, potato, and petunia (Seungill et al., 2014). Pepper is a diploid species with a somatic chromosome number of 2n = 2x = 24, although karyotype analyses have revealed variations in chromosome morphology and total haploid chromatin length among different cultivated varieties (Cheema and Pant, 2013). Although USP genes have been studied in several solanaceous crops, they remain largely unexplored in pepper, especially in the context of reproductive development. In this study, we identified 30 CaUSP genes in the pepper genome and systematically characterized their chromosomal distribution, phylogenetic relationships, promoter cis-elements, and expression profiles. We found that CaUSP19 is highly expressed during late bud development, and its silencing severely impairs pollen viability and fertility. These results expand the functional understanding of the CaUSP family and provide a foundation for elucidating the mechanisms by which USPs regulate fertility in plants.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of the CaUSP family

We identified 30 CaUSP genes in the pepper genome (Supplementary Table S1). The encoded proteins vary in length from 145 to 849 amino acids, with predicted molecular weights ranging from 16.05 to 95.15 kDa and theoretical isoelectric points (pI) between 4.72 and 9.80 (Supplementary Table S2). Subcellular localization prediction indicated that the 30 CaUSP proteins were mainly localized in the nucleus (18 members), cytoplasm (9 members), and chloroplast (3 members), with the nucleus being the most frequently predicted localization (Supplementary Table S2). These predictions provide preliminary information on the potential subcellular distribution of CaUSP proteins and require further experimental validation. Using the published pepper genome sequence (BioProject accession no. PRJCA025503; the raw sequencing data have been deposited at the Genome Sequence Archive (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/), we mapped all CaUSP genes to their chromosomal locations. These genes are distributed across all 12 chromosomes (Figure 1A). Based on their chromosomal order, they were designated CaUSP1 through CaUSP30 (Supplementary Table S3).

Figure 1.

Panel A displays a graphic of twelve chromosomes with gene names labeled in red, chromosome numbers labeled in yellow, physical positions indicated in megabases, and colored bands representing genomic features. Panel B is a bar chart comparing Ka/Ks ratios for gene pairs, distinguishing segmental/WGD duplications in blue and tandem duplications in orange, with gene pairs labeled on the x-axis and Ka/Ks ratio on the y-axis.

Chromosomal distribution and selective pressure analysis of duplicated CaUSP genes. (A) Chromosomal distribution of CaUSP genes across the 12 chromosomes of pepper. The y-axis indicates chromosome length (Mb). (B) Ka/Ks ratios of eight duplicated CaUSP gene pairs, including three tandem duplicated pairs and five segmental/WGD duplicated pairs. The x-axis indicates the duplicated gene pairs, and the y-axis represents the Ka/Ks ratio. Blue and orange bars represent segmental/WGD and tandem duplicated gene pairs, respectively. The dashed horizontal line indicates Ka/Ks = 1.

To investigate the evolutionary constraints acting on duplicated CaUSP genes, Ka/Ks ratios were calculated for eight duplicated gene pairs. The Ka/Ks values ranged from approximately 0.07 to 0.39, and all were below 1 (Figure 1B). This pattern was consistently observed for gene pairs derived from both tandem and segmental/WGD duplication events, indicating that duplicated CaUSP genes have predominantly undergone purifying selection. These findings suggest that evolutionary constraints have contributed to the conservation of CaUSP genes following duplication.

2.2. Phylogenetic analysis and classification of CaUSP family members

To investigate the evolutionary relationships of CaUSP proteins, a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using USP proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa as references. Based on the tree topology and nodal support values, the CaUSP proteins were classified into five major groups (Groups I–V), whereas members with isolated or unresolved phylogenetic positions were provisionally assigned to Group VI (Figure 2). Group I contained nine members (CaUSP19, CaUSP1, CaUSP11, CaUSP5, CaUSP13, CaUSP29, CaUSP30, CaUSP10, and CaUSP14); Group II contained six (CaUSP25, CaUSP18, CaUSP8, CaUSP3, CaUSP17, and CaUSP16); Group III contained six (CaUSP26, CaUSP23, CaUSP24, CaUSP22, CaUSP2, and CaUSP9); Group IV contained two (CaUSP15 and CaUSP12); Group V contained CaUSP27 and CaUSP28; and Group VI contained the remaining members with isolated or unresolved positions, including CaUSP4, CaUSP6, CaUSP7, CaUSP20, and CaUSP21.

Figure 2.

Phylogenetic tree diagram presenting USP gene family relationships among Capsicum annuum (red), Arabidopsis thaliana (green), and Oryza sativa (blue), with gene groups labeled I through VI and genetic distance indicated below.

Phylogenetic analysis of USP proteins from pepper (C. annuum), Arabidopsis (A. thaliana), and rice (O. sativa).

2.3. Structural and motif analysis of the CaUSP family

Analysis of gene structures showed that the number of introns in CaUSP genes ranges from zero to nine, with CaUSP10 containing the maximum (nine introns). We identified ten conserved motifs across the CaUSP family. Individual members harbored three to nine motifs, and proteins within the same phylogenetic subgroup shared highly similar motif compositions. Notably, Motif 1, which constitutes the core of the conserved USP domain, was present in all members. Unique motifs (Motifs 4–8) were found in a few subgroup-specific members, implying potential functional diversification among these genes (Figure 3). Domain architecture analysis showed that all 30 CaUSP proteins were predicted to contain a single USP domain, with no tandem USP domains identified. Several longer CaUSP proteins were predicted to contain additional domains, including protein kinase domains in CaUSP5, CaUSP10, CaUSP11, CaUSP13, CaUSP29, and CaUSP30, and U-box domains in CaUSP5 and CaUSP11. Based on the Walker-type ATP-binding signature, 13 CaUSPs were classified as ATP-binding-type candidates and 17 as non-ATP-binding-type candidates. Notably, this signature was not detected in CaUSP19, suggesting that CaUSP19 may represent a non-ATP-binding-type candidate (Supplementary Table S4).

Figure 3.

Figure showing two panels. Panel A displays gene structure diagrams for thirty CaUSP genes, with colored boxes indicating ten different conserved motifs and regions labeled as CDS and UTR, referenced by a legend. Panel B presents sequence logos for each motif, along with E-values, number of sites, motif widths, and download options in a tabular format, visualizing the conservation and frequency of amino acids in each motif.

Conserved motifs and gene structure of CaUSP members. (A) Left panel: motif distribution among CaUSP members. Right panel: yellow boxes represent the untranslated 5′ and 3′ regions, green boxes represent exons, and black lines represent introns. (B) Ten conserved motif patterns of CaUSP members are shown.

2.4. Analysis of cis-acting elements in the CaUSP family

The 2-kb promoter regions upstream of the CaUSP genes were extracted, and cis-regulatory elements (CREs) were predicted using the online database PLANTCARE. In total, 32 types of CREs were identified. These elements could be classified into three major functional categories: (1) stress-related (10 types), including ARE, DRE-core, LTR, MBS, and MYB motifs; (2) hormone-responsive (10 types), such as ABRE, as-1, CARE, and CGTCA-motif; and (3) development-associated (12 types), covering A-box, AE-box, Bos-4, and CAT-box (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Heatmap chart displaying the distribution and frequency of cis-acting regulatory elements in thirty CaUSP genes. Columns represent types of elements grouped by function: abiotic and biotic stresses, phytohormone responsive, and plant growth and development. Rows list CaUSP gene names. Cells are shaded from light to dark orange, with darker color indicating higher frequency, and contain numbers representing count values in each gene for each element type.

Analysis of cis-acting elements in the CaUSP Family, the numbers indicate the quantity of the elements.

2.5. Genome-wide collinearity analysis of CaUSP family members

To assess evolutionary conservation, we performed a genome-wide collinearity analysis of the CaUSP family between pepper and two representative species: rice (a monocot) and Arabidopsis (a eudicot). The analysis identified 13 and 16 collinear gene pairs between pepper and rice and between pepper and Arabidopsis, respectively (Figure 5). These syntenic relationships suggest that the CaUSP gene family is evolutionarily conserved and likely maintains consistent functions across divergent plant lineages.

Figure 5.

Synteny diagram illustrating conserved gene blocks among rice, pepper, and Arabidopsis chromosomes. Colored lines and boxes indicate relationships between specific chromosomes labeled for each plant species.

Evolutionary analyses of CaUSP gene family members. Gray lines in the background indicate the collinear blocks within Arabidopsis, rice and pepper, while red lines highlight the syntenic CaUSP gene pairs.

2.6. Expression patterns of CaUSP genes in flower

To explore the potential functions of CaUSP genes, we first analyzed their expression profiles across nine floral developmental stages using a public transcriptome database (PepperHub; http://lifenglab.hzau.edu.cn/PepperHub/) (Feng et al., 2017). Based on the FPKM values (Figure 6A), CaUSP19 showed markedly higher transcript abundance compared to other family members, with low expression in early stages but sharp up-regulation in later stages (Figure 6A; Supplementary Table S5). We then performed quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) to validate the expression patterns of all 30 CaUSP genes (Figure 6B; Supplementary Figure S1). The qPCR results confirmed that nine genes—CaUSP19, CaUSP1, CaUSP4, CaUSP12, CaUSP10, CaUSP13, CaUSP14, CaUSP29, and CaUSP30—were up-regulated during late floral development. Among these, CaUSP19 showed the highest transcript levels from stages F7 to F9 (Figure 6B). Given its exceptionally high expression during late flower bud development (Figure 6; Supplementary Table S5), we selected CaUSP19 for further functional analysis. This pronounced expression pattern implies a potentially important role for CaUSP19 in floral development.

Figure 6.

Panel A shows a heatmap comparing expression levels of thirty CaUSP genes across different samples, with color gradients indicating expression values from low (green) to high (pink). Panel B contains nine bar charts, each displaying expression levels for a specific CaUSP gene across nine conditions labeled F1 to F9, illustrating variation in expression among conditions.

Expression pattern of CaUSP genes across 9 floral developmental stages in pepper. (A) Expression of 30 USP genes across nine developmental stages, derived from transcriptomic data in PepperHub. (B) Expression analysis of the 9 USP genes across the same nine developmental stages by qPCR. Different letters indicate significant differences (one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s test, P < 0.05).

2.7. Silencing CaUSP19 reduces pollen viability in pepper

To validate the role of CaUSP19 in floral development, we employed virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) to knock down its expression in pepper. Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) confirmed that CaUSP19 transcript levels were significantly reduced in silenced plants compared with controls (Figure 7A). Consistent with this molecular phenotype, potassium iodide staining of pollen collected at anthesis showed a substantial decrease in pollen viability upon CaUSP19 silencing (Figures 7B, D). We further performed pollen germination assays on pollen from plants with silenced CaUSP19, and the results showed that the pollen germination rate was significantly reduced following CaUSP19 silencing (Figures 7C, E). Together, these results demonstrate that CaUSP19 is essential for normal pollen development and function in pepper.

Figure 7.

Panel A presents a bar graph comparing CaUSP19 gene expression levels, with TRV- showing higher expression than TRV-CaUSP19. Panel D displays a bar graph indicating pollen fertility percentage is greater in TRV- than TRV-CaUSP19. Panel E shows a bar graph with pollen germination percentage markedly higher in TRV- than TRV-CaUSP19. Panel B contains microscopy images of pollen grains for TRV- and TRV-CaUSP19, with TRV-CaUSP19 showing fewer circled viable grains. Panel C displays germinated pollen under magnification, with fewer germinated grains circled in TRV-CaUSP19 than TRV-.

Reduced pollen viability and germination rates upon CaUSP19 silencing. (A) CaUSP19 expression in silenced plants. (B) Representative images of KI/I2-stained pollen grains from control (TRV-) and CaUSP19-silenced (TRV-CaUSP19) plants. Red circles indicate representative non-viable (unstained/aborted) pollen grains. (C) CaUSP19 silencing impairs pollen germination in pepper. Red circles indicate representative germinated pollen grains. (D) Statistical analysis of pollen viability (percentage of viable pollen grains). (E) Statistical analysis of pollen germination rates. (n = 3 biological replicates, with at least 300 pollen grains counted per replicate). RT-qPCR analyses were performed with three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences by Student’s t-test (P < 0.001***).

3. Discussion

The USP family comprises stress-responsive proteins conserved across diverse organisms. Although USP genes have been characterized in several plants—including Arabidopsis, tobacco, rice, and potato (Margret et al., 2002; Silvia et al., 2015; Pushpika et al., 2016; Tianshuai et al., 2024)—a systematic investigation of this family in the economically important solanaceous crop pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) was absent. Here, we identified 30 CaUSP genes in the pepper genome and performed a comprehensive analysis of their phylogeny, expression, and function, thereby establishing a foundation for understanding USP roles in pepper growth, development, and environmental adaptation.

Phylogenetic analysis grouped the 30 CaUSP genes into eight distinct subgroups (Figure 2), reflecting possible evolutionary and functional divergence. Collinearity analysis revealed 16 syntenic pairs between pepper and Arabidopsis and 13 between pepper and rice, supporting the ancient origin of this gene family. Cis-acting element screening revealed that CaUSP promoters are enriched with motifs responsive to light, abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), and drought (e.g., ABRE, CGTCA-motif, ARE, DRE-core). This is consistent with previous reports that USPs in Arabidopsis and rice are induced by salinity, dehydration, and oxidative stress. The presence of multiple hormone-related elements suggests that CaUSP genes may integrate stress and developmental signals. For example, CaUSP19 contains both ABRE (ABA-responsive) and CGTCA-motif (JA-responsive) elements in its promoter. While ABA and JA are known to play important roles in pollen development and fertility, the presence of these motifs is not unique to CaUSP19. Therefore, our observation that CaUSP19 may act downstream of these phytohormones in influencing pollen viability remains a hypothesis that requires future experimental validation through hormone-treatment time courses and promoter-reporter assays.

Consistent with the well-established involvement of USPs in stress responses (Hunseung et al., 2012; Silvia et al., 2015; Young Jun et al., 2016; Sarah Mae Boyles et al., 2017), we found that promoters of several CaUSP genes contain stress-related elements such as ARE, DRE-core, and MYB, implying a broad role for this family in abiotic stress adaptation in pepper, as similarly revealed by integrated promoter and expression analyses of heat-shock protein families in tropical crops (Alam et al., 2024). One of the most striking findings of this study is the stage-specific expression of CaUSP19 during late-stage flower development and its positive association with pollen viability. Most previous studies focused on USPs as stress-inducible proteins involved in cellular homeostasis and energy management under adverse conditions. Plant USPs show diverse domain structures and function both in stress responses and development: they act as chaperones (Arabidopsis), mediate osmotic/ABA signaling (tobacco, grapevine), and are widely induced by drought, UV-B, or exogenous ABA across multiple species (Margret et al., 2002; Maqbool et al., 2009; Hunseung et al., 2012; Silvia et al., 2015; Pushpika et al., 2016; Young Jun et al., 2016; Sarah Mae Boyles et al., 2017; Xiaoyue et al., 2022; Jian et al., 2023; Yan et al., 2023; Tianshuai et al., 2024; Ruiqiang et al., 2025); additionally, specific USPs regulate seed germination, circadian rhythms, flowering (Arabidopsis, GRUSP), and starch accumulation in sweet potato (Gorshkova et al., 2018; Kieu Anh Thi et al., 2022; Jian et al., 2023).

Notably, CaUSP19 displayed a stage-specific and strongly up-regulated expression pattern during late bud development (Figure 6), pointing to a potential function in floral organ formation. Functional validation using VIGS-mediated silencing confirmed that knockdown of CaUSP19 significantly impairs pollen viability (Figure 7), establishing CaUSP19 as a key regulator of male reproductive development in pepper, extending the functional scope of USP genes beyond classical stress responses.

In summary, this study provides the first genome-wide identification and characterization of the USP gene family in pepper, and uncovers a previously unknown role for CaUSP19 in controlling pollen viability. These findings expand the functional repertoire of plant USPs canonical stress adaptation and establish a critical link between stress-related USP genes and reproductive development. Moreover, the stage-specific expression and promoter architecture of CaUSP19 suggest potential crosstalk between hormonal signaling and floral development, offering a fresh perspective on the multifunctional nature of USP proteins. Note that the subcellular localization analysis was entirely based on bioinformatic predictions, and transient expression verification of CaUSP19 is warranted in future work. Future work should focus on generating stable mutant lines to definitively establish the causal role of CaUSP19 in pollen fertility, as well as investigating the functions of other CaUSP members in both floral development and abiotic stress tolerance. Additionally, exploring the natural variation of CaUSP genes across pepper germplasm may facilitate their breeding utility for improving abiotic resilience and reproductive stability in this economically important crop.

4. Materials and methods

4.1. Plant materials and growth conditions

For the VIGS experiments, the cultivar ‘S8’ (Capsicum annuum) was used. All plants were cultivated in a greenhouse at the Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Changsha, China) under strictly controlled conditions: a 16-h photoperiod at 24 °C/an 8-h dark period at 19 °C, with the relative humidity maintained at 65%.

4.2. Identification of USP genes

The pepper genome sequence and annotation files were retrieved from PepperBase (http://www.bioinformaticslab.cn/PepperBase/download/). The reference genome was derived from the Capsicum annuum accession ‘Zunla-1’. The published pepper genome assembly of the cultivar ‘Zunla-1’ (Zunla-1_v3.0, BioProject accession no. PRJCA025503), retrieved from PepperBase. Putative USP genes were initially screened by homology search against the NCBI RefSeq database using BLASTP. Candidate coding sequences (CDS) and their corresponding protein sequences were then extracted using TBtools (Chen et al., 2023). To validate conserved domains, candidate protein sequences were analyzed with HMMER 3.0 against the SMART database, using an E-value threshold of 0.01. Redundant sequences were manually removed. A subsequent BLAST conserved domain search was performed to confirm the presence of the target USP domain. Finally, the molecular weight and theoretical isoelectric point (pI) of each non-redundant protein were predicted using the ExPASy ProtParam online tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/).

4.3. Chromosomal location, duplication, and homology analysis of USP genes

Based on the PepperBase genome assembly, the chromosomal locations of CaUSP genes were mapped. Gene duplication events within the pepper genome were investigated, and a duplication map was generated to illustrate tandem and segmental duplication patterns. To examine evolutionary conservation, we performed a comparative synteny analysis between pepper and two reference species, Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. Genome and annotation files for both species were retrieved from public databases. Synteny diagrams were constructed and visualized using TBtools (Chen et al., 2023).

4.4. Phylogenetic analysis and classification of USP proteins

To reconstruct the evolutionary relationships of USP proteins, sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, and Capsicum annuum were aligned using MEGA software (Sudhir et al., 2016). Evolutionary distances were estimated under the Poisson model, and gaps were handled with the pairwise deletion method. A phylogenetic tree was then constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (Sudhir et al., 2016). The resulting topology was visualized and refined using FigTree v1.4.3, and final graphical adjustments were made in Adobe Illustrator CC 2019 for clarity and presentation.

4.5. Analysis of Cis-Regulatory Elements in CaUSP Gene Promoters

To identify putative cis-regulatory elements (CREs), genomic DNA sequences spanning 2 kb upstream of the transcription start site of each CaUSP gene were extracted (Chen et al., 2023). This promoter length was chosen in accordance with common practice in plant promoter analysis to ensure coverage of major regulatory motifs. The extracted sequences were submitted to the PlantCARE online database for in silico prediction of CREs. Using PlantCARE (Magali et al., 2002), the type, precise location, and copy number of each predicted cis-acting element were determined. The putative regulatory functions of these elements were inferred based on their previously annotated roles in plant hormone response, stress signaling, or development.

4.6. Analysis of USP protein structure, conserved motifs, gene structure, and phylogenetic tree

Gene structures (exon–intron organizations) of the identified CaUSP genes were extracted from the genome annotation and visualized using TBtools. Conserved protein motifs were predicted with the online tool MEME v5.1.1 (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme) under default parameters (Bailey et al., 2006). Phylogenetic analysis was conducted as described above.

4.7. Virus-induced gene silencing experiment

A virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) vector targeting CaUSP19 was constructed. A 300-bp gene-specific fragment corresponding to nucleotides 524–823 of the CaUSP19 coding sequence (CDS), designed using the SGN VIGS tool (https://vigs.solgenomics.net/), was cloned into the TRV2 vector. The resulting recombinant plasmid (TRV2-CaUSP19) was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by electroporation. For agroinfiltration, plants were separated into two treatment groups: empty-vector control (TRV2-), and CaUSP19-silenced (TRV2-CaUSP19). Agroinfiltration was carried out following an established protocol (Yi et al., 2022).

4.8. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was isolated from all samples using TransZol reagent (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China), with three biological replicates per treatment group. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from the extracted RNA using HiScript® II Q RT SuperMix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was then performed on a LightCycler® 96 system (Roche) with ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme). The pepper actin gene (CaActin) was used as the internal control for normalization. Gene expression levels were normalized using the 2−ΔΔCT method (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008).

4.9. Iodide staining assay

Pollen viability was assessed using potassium iodide–iodine (KI/I2) staining. Fresh pollen grains were collected from newly opened flowers and incubated in I2-KI solution for 10 min at room temperature. After rinsing with distilled water, stained pollen grains were immediately observed under a light microscope. Viable pollen grains stained dark blue, while non-viable (aborted) pollen grains remained unstained or light yellow. At least 300 pollen grains were counted per replicate, and the percentage of viable pollen grains was calculated. The staining procedure followed a previously described protocol (Wang et al., 2015).

4.10. Pollen germination assay

Pollen germination was evaluated using an in vitro liquid culture method. Pollen grains were collected from freshly opened flowers of Capsicum annuum L. and suspended in a germination medium containing 10% sucrose, 0.1 mM H3BO3, and 1 mM CaCl2. The suspension was spread on glass slides and incubated at 25 °C in a humid dark chamber for 3–4 h. A pollen grain was considered germinated when the pollen tube length exceeded the grain diameter (Mercado et al., 1994).

5. Conclusions

We systematically identified 30 CaUSP genes in pepper and demonstrated that CaUSP19 is associated with pollen fertility by affecting pollen viability. These findings provide a foundation for further functional studies of USP family members in pepper reproduction.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research received funding from the Yuelushan Laboratory Talent Program (2024RC2074) and the Changsha Natural Science Foundation (kq2502200).

Footnotes

Edited by: Fan Xu, Southwest University, China

Reviewed by: James Godwin, Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, United States

Osama Alam, Zhejiang University Institute of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, China

Kazuo Ishii, Suwa University of Science, Japan

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.

Author contributions

LC: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ZD: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. XW: Validation, Writing – original draft. ZZ: Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft. SY: Data curation, Resources, Writing – original draft. XL: Data curation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Resources, Writing – review & editing. CL: Data curation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. WC: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1957880/full#supplementary-material

Image1.jpeg (3.9MB, jpeg)
Table1.xlsx (25.4KB, xlsx)
Table2.xls (1.7KB, xls)
Table3.xlsx (9.9KB, xlsx)
Table4.xlsx (12.6KB, xlsx)
Table5.xlsx (25.6KB, xlsx)

References

  1. Alam O., Khan A., Khan W. U., Khan W. A., Ahmad M., Khan L. U. (2024). Improving heat tolerance in betel palm (Areca catechu) by characterisation and expression analyses of heat shock proteins under thermal stress. Crop Pasture Sci. 75, CP24025. doi:  10.1071/cp2402538477348 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey T. L., Williams N., Misleh C., Li W. W. (2006). MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W369–W373. doi:  10.1093/nar/gkl198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheema S. K., Pant M. R. (2013). Karyotype analysis of seven cultivated varieties of Capsicum annuum L. Caryologia 66, 70–75. doi:  10.1080/00087114.2013.78720437339054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen C., Wu Y., Li J., Wang X., Zeng Z., Xu J., et al. (2023). TBtools-II: A "one for all, all for one" bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. Mol. Plant 16, 1733–1742. doi:  10.1016/j.molp.2023.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dan L., Zilin W., Qian B., Yong Z., Min H., Yajiao H., et al. (2023). Universal stress proteins: from gene to function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 4725. doi:  10.3390/ijms24054725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feng L., Huiyang Y., Yingtian D., Jingyuan Z., Minglei L., Lijun O., et al. (2017). PepperHub, an informatics hub for the chili pepper research community. Mol. Plant 10, 1129–1132. doi:  10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gorshkova D. S., Getman I. A., Voronkov A. S., Chizhova S. I., Kuznetsov V., Pojidaeva E. S. (2018). The gene encoding the universal stress protein AtUSP is regulated by phytohormones and involved in seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana. Dokl. Biochem. Biophys. 479, 105–107. doi:  10.1134/S1607672918020151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hunseung K., Su Jung P., Kyung Jin K. (2012). Plant RNA chaperones in stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 100–106. doi:  10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jian D., Wei G., Zhehui J., Jiaqi W., Hongfei Z., Cheng Z., et al. (2023). Comprehensive analysis of universal stress protein family genes and their expression in Fusarium oxysporum response of Populus davidiana × P. alba var. pyramidalis Louche based on the transcriptome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 5405. doi:  10.3390/ijms24065405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kieu Anh Thi P., Seol Ki P., Ho Byoung C., Joung Hun P., Eun Seon L., Seong Dong W., et al. (2022). Universal stress protein regulates the circadian rhythm of central oscillator genes in Arabidopsis. FEBS Lett. 596, 1871–1880. doi:  10.1002/1873-3468.14410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kristian K., Laurence N., Alfredo D., Thomas N. (2003). The bacterial universal stress protein: function and regulation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6, 140–145. doi:  10.1016/s1369-5274(03)00025-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Magali L., Patrice D., Gert T., Kathleen M., Yves M., Yves V. D. P., et al. (2002). PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 325–327. doi:  10.1093/nar/30.1.325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maqbool A., Zahur M., Husnain T., Riazuddin S. (2009). GUSP1 and GUSP2, two drought-responsive genes in Gossypium arboreum have homology to universal stress proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 27, 109–114. doi:  10.1007/s11105-008-0049-030311153 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Margret S., Guillaume R., Tanja M., René L. (2002). The novel ethylene-regulated gene OsUsp1 from rice encodes a member of a plant protein family related to prokaryotic universal stress proteins. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 2325–2331. doi:  10.1093/jxb/erf096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mercado J. A., Mar Trigo M., Reid M. S., Valpuesta V., Quesada M. A. (1994). In vitro germination of pepper pollen in liquid medium. Sci. Hortic. 57, 273–281. doi:  10.1016/0304-4238(94)90110-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pushpika U., Rajesh K. J., Dinkar S., Avinash M., Bhavanath J. (2016). Overexpression of a cytosolic abiotic stress responsive universal stress protein (SbUSP) mitigates salt and osmotic stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Front. Plant Sci. 7. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2016.00518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rachid L., Taotao W., Bo O., Khurram Z., Hanxia L., Junhong Z., et al. (2012). SpUSP, an annexin-interacting universal stress protein, enhances drought tolerance in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 5593–5606. doi:  10.1093/jxb/ers220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ralf H., Arnim W., Bettina M., Melanie O., Elisabeth H., Günther G., et al. (2008). The universal stress protein UspC scaffolds the KdpD/KdpE signaling cascade of Escherichia coli under salt stress. J. Mol. Biol. 386, 134–148. doi:  10.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ruiqiang X., Zhongyu W., Zhaolong C., Zepeng W., Qingyuan M., Ning L., et al. (2025). The evolution and expression analysis of USP gene family in Solanum. Front. Plant Sci. 16. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2025.1546640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sarah Mae Boyles M., Yong Hun C., Thuy Thi P., Seol Ki P., Seong Dong W., Changyu L., et al. (2017). RNA chaperone function of a universal stress protein in Arabidopsis confers enhanced cold stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 2546. doi:  10.3390/ijms18122546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schmittgen T. D., Livak K. J. (2008). Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1101–1108. doi:  10.1038/nprot.2008.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Seungill K., Minkyu P., Seon-In Y., Yong-Min K., Min L. J., Hyun-Ah L., et al. (2014). Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nat. Genet. 46, 270–278. doi:  10.1038/ng.2877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shatil A., Ahmed S. A., Saima A., Hari S. R., Tahmina I. (2021). Comprehensive in silico characterization of universal stress proteins in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with insight into their stress-specific transcriptional modulation. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 712607. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2021.712607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Silvia G., Elena L., Francesco C., Giacomo N., Sandro P., Chiara P., et al. (2015). Universal stress protein HRU1 mediates ROS homeostasis under anoxia. Nat. Plants 1, 15151. doi:  10.1038/nplants.2015.151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sirui Z., Jingdan W., Rong Y., Haiping L., Shuyan L., Kai L., et al. (2025). The role of universal stress protein Usp1413 in meropenem adaptive resistance and environmental stress responses in Acinetobacter baumannii. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 8, 100332. doi:  10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sudhir K., Glen S., Koichiro T. (2016). MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874. doi:  10.1093/molbev/msw054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sylvain F., François S., Danielle D. J., Annette B., Georg H., Rene A., et al. (2011). Phylogenomics reveals an anomalous distribution of USP genes in metazoans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 153–161. doi:  10.1093/molbev/msq183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tianshuai Q., Fumeng H., Xinqi Z., Jiaqi W., Zengli Z., Heran J., et al. (2024). Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) universal stress proteins reveal essential roles in mechanical damage and deoxynivalenol stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 1341. doi:  10.3390/ijms25021341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. VanBogelen R. A., Hutton M. E., Neidhardt F. C. (1990). Gene-protein database of Escherichia coli K-12: edition 3. Electrophoresis 11, 1131–1166. doi:  10.1002/elps.1150111205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang W., Yang S. P., Cui G. L., Zhang X., Liu Y., Chen Y. (2015). Study on pollen viability and stigma receptivity of Artemisia annua. J. Southwest. Univ. (Natural Sci. Edition) 37, 1–7. doi:  10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2015.02.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang Z. M., Tian M., Hou L. L., Jin X., Zhang G. D., Yang J. W., et al. (2024). Identification and stress expression pattern analysis of the universal stress protein (StUSP) gene family in potato. Agric. Res. Arid Areas 42, 32–42. doi:  10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2024.01.04 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xiaoyue C., Pingying Z., Chengcheng C., Jianxia Z. (2022). VyUSPA3, a universal stress protein from the Chinese wild grape Vitis yeshanensis, confers drought tolerance to transgenic V. vinifera. Plant Cell Rep. 42, 181–196. doi:  10.1007/s00299-022-02943-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Xiaoyue C., Pingying Z., Yafan H., Chengcheng C., Qiying L., Pingyin G., et al. (2021). Genome-wide analysis of the universal stress protein A gene family in Vitis and expression in response to abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 165, 57–70. doi:  10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.04.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yan S., Bin M., Xinghua F., Qingxun G., Lianxia Z., Xinsheng Z., et al. (2023). Genome-wide analysis of the universal stress protein gene family in blueberry and their transcriptional responses to UV-B irradiation and abscisic acid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 16819. doi:  10.3390/ijms242316819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yi L., Zhishuo Z., Ke F., Qingyun S., Lun H., Xiongze D., et al. (2022). Genome-wide analysis of the MYB-related transcription factor family in pepper and functional studies of CaMYB37 involvement in capsaicin biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 11667. doi:  10.3390/ijms231911667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Young Jun J., Sarah Mae Boyles M., Eun Seon L., Joung Hun P., Cresilda Vergara A., Hun Taek O., et al. (2016). Universal stress protein exhibits a redox-dependent chaperone function in Arabidopsis and enhances plant tolerance to heat shock and oxidative stress. Front. Plant Sci. 6. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2015.01141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Image1.jpeg (3.9MB, jpeg)
Table1.xlsx (25.4KB, xlsx)
Table2.xls (1.7KB, xls)
Table3.xlsx (9.9KB, xlsx)
Table4.xlsx (12.6KB, xlsx)
Table5.xlsx (25.6KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES