Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Jul 25;17:10355. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-75920-x

Synergy between reactive manganese species and enzymes drives litter decomposition hotspots

Nathan A Chin 1, Luiz A Domeignoz-Horta 2, Xiao Jun A Liu 3, Morris E Jones 4, Ravi Ranjan 5,8, Malak Tfaily 6, Kristen M DeAngelis 7, Marco Keiluweit 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13623943  PMID: 42811019

Abstract

Oxidative decomposition of plant litter is a central control on carbon storage and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Although this process is commonly assumed to be greatest under oxic conditions, recent findings highlight redox-sensitive metals as potent, but poorly understood, mediators. Using controlled soil reactors, we show that stimulating microbial production of reactive manganese(III) at oxic–anoxic interfaces simultaneously increased the expression of diverse litter-decomposing enzymes; together, these metal and enzyme catalysts acted synergistically to accelerate litter decomposition. This 29% increase in decomposition was best predicted by multi-fold increases in the expression of putative Mn(III)-forming and litter-degrading enzymes at the interface, rather than by patterns in strictly oxic or anoxic zones. These results provide evidence to the growing body of research challenging the assumption that oxidative decomposition is maximized under fully oxic conditions. Instead, they reveal a tight interplay among oxygen supply, reactive metal regeneration, and enzyme activity that renders oxic–anoxic interfaces hotspots of litter decomposition in soils.

Subject terms: Carbon cycle, Ecosystem ecology, Geochemistry


Oxic–anoxic interfaces promote microbial production of reactive manganese species that enhance expression of diverse litter-degrading enzymes and accelerate decomposition, yielding rates far exceeding those in fully oxic or anoxic environments.

Introduction

Oxidative decomposition of plant litter in soils is a key ecosystem process regulating nutrient cycling, carbon storage, and greenhouse gas emissions1,2. A critical rate-limiting step is the breakdown of intact lignocellulose within litter, with lignin content often predicting decomposition rates3,4. The depolymerization of lignin has traditionally been attributed to highly specialized oxidative enzymes5,6 that require molecular oxygen, leading to the assumption that oxic conditions universally favor more rapid lignin decomposition due to greater oxidative enzyme activity7. Yet, soils frequently experience dynamic transitions between oxic and anoxic states, generating decomposition hot spots and hot moments that have been linked to the cycling and regeneration of redox-active metal catalysts, such as iron or manganese (Mn)8,9. The mechanism underlying the interplay between enzymatic activity and redox-active metals—acting as active centers, co-factors and reactive intermediates in the Earth system—remains a major scientific challenge10, particularly in the context of litter decomposition11,12. Without a mechanistic understanding of these synergies, predictive models will struggle to capture how litter decomposition responds to alterations of soil redox conditions, as expected with climate change13.

Mn is an abundant and redox-active metal that consistently predicts litter decomposition rates across diverse ecosystems, including coniferous14,15 and deciduous forests16,17, peatlands18, aquatic systems19, and agroecosystems20, thereby influencing long-term soil carbon storage21,22. This effect is often attributed to Mn(III)–ligand complexes, among the most potent oxidants in the environment23. In soils, lignolytic fungi are thought to produce these transient yet highly reactive Mn(III) species via enzymatic oxidation of dissolved Mn(II)24,25, though support has also been shown for bacterially-mediated oxidation to potentially play a role in soils as well26. When stabilized by organic chelators, Mn(III) not only oxidizes a broad range of organic and inorganic substrates27,28, but is also considered particularly effective at lignin depolymerization29. Its small molecular size is thought to allow it to penetrate intact lignocellulosic structures, conferring an advantage over larger extracellular oxidative enzymes24. Using spectroscopic and microscopic tools, we recently demonstrated a link between Mn(II) oxidation and long-term litter decomposition in soils30. Yet, attempts to directly test the positive effect of Mn availability on decomposition have yielded ambiguous or even contradictory results31,32, despite growing evidence that Mn(II) availability is coupled to Mn oxidation and lignin decomposition33,34, likely because experimental conditions did not sufficiently favor, or even suppressed, microbial Mn(III) formation35. A mechanistic understanding of the environmental controls on and microbial drivers of Mn(III) formation is therefore essential to resolve the Mn-dependence of litter decomposition at ecosystem scales.

Until recently, the presence of transient and reactive Mn(III) species in the environment was only speculative, but oxic-anoxic interfaces in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems have emerged as hotspots for their formation. Using a spectrophotometric approach, Luther and co-authors36 detected the greatest Mn(III) concentrations at the oxic-anoxic interfaces in aquatic37 and sedimentary environments38, a general pattern confirmed in soil ecosystems39. Using soil reactors, which establish and maintain stable oxygen gradients to identify biogeochemical hotspots, an experimental study demonstrated extensive biological Mn(II) oxidation at oxic-anoxic interfaces40. Although Mn(III) was not measured, soil-borne Mn(II)-oxidizing fungi preferentially colonized the interface. These fungi seemingly harnessed Mn(II) generated through Mn(III,IV) oxide reduction in the anoxic zone while maintaining access to O2 from the oxic zone34. Similar soil reactor experiments combined with X-ray absorption spectroscopy previously demonstrated that Mn(III) indeed forms at oxic-anoxic interfaces41, but the underlying microbial drivers of Mn(III) formation and its impact on decomposition remained inconclusive. Oxic-anoxic interfaces are prevalent in soil environmnents40,42,43, including aboveground litter44, and are increasingly regarded as decomposition hotspots45,46. However, it remains unclear to what extent litter decomposition across these interfaces might respond to accelerated Mn redox cycling, including the formation of reactive Mn(III) species.

While Mn(III) in soils can also arise from Mn(IV) reduction47 or abiotic Mn(II) oxidation48, mounting evidence points to microbial Mn(II) oxidation as the dominant pathway49. Extensive work with bacterial and fungal isolates has identified two groups of oxygen-dependent enzymes as direct catalysts of Mn(II) oxidation—class II peroxidases (e.g., manganese peroxidase, or MnP) and laccases24,50—alongside indirect pathways mediated by ubiquitous enzymatically generated reactive oxygen species51,52. However, previous efforts to resolve the interactive effect between enzymes and metal catalysts in soils have been hindered by the non-specific nature of bioassays used to assess oxidative enzyme activities8,53, which, at best, can only provide an estimate of the cumulative potential oxidative effect of these intricate reactions. Recent proteomics studies have demonstrated that Mn(II)-oxidizing activity in fungal isolates correlates with the presence of specific enzymes54,55, raising the possibility that in situ Mn(III) formation rates in soil systems can be quantitatively linked to the expression of select enzymes using advanced molecular techniques. To date, however, the mechanistic link between enzymatic Mn(II) oxidation and the formation of the potent oxidant Mn(III), as well as its role in litter decomposition, remains unresolved.

Here, we aim to resolve the role of Mn availability in regulating microbially mediated Mn(III) formation across oxic–anoxic interfaces and its consequences for litter decomposition. We hypothesize that enhanced Mn cycling across oxic-anoxic interfaces would stimulate enzymatic Mn(III) formation, creating “hotspots” of litter decomposition. To test this, we establish soil diffusion reactors41 (Fig. 1) that generate stable, opposing diffusive gradients of O2 and Mn(II) gradients across well-defined oxic-anoxic interfaces (Fig. 1a), while allowing precise manipulation of Mn(II) supply. We vary Mn(II) supply towards the interface by adding different amounts of Mn oxide-coated sand (birnessite, a mixed-valence Mn(III/IV) oxide56) to the anoxic zone at the bottom of the reactors (Fig. 1b). Reductive dissolution of Mn(III/IV) oxides in the anoxic zone are intended to create a diffusive gradient of Mn(II) towards the interface. Reactors containing forest broadleaf litter mixed with sand are incubated over a 90-day period with no, low, or high Mn oxide additions. Destructive sampling after 7, 30, and 90 days allows us to spatiotemporally resolve Mn(III) dynamics and associated changes in litter decomposition and microbial activity across the oxic–anoxic gradients (Fig. 1c) using a combination of spectroscopic, molecular biology, and mass spectrometry approaches. The resulting findings highlight the complex interplay between oxygen supply, regeneration of reactive Mn(III) species, and enzyme activities that govern the emergence of “hotspots” of litter decomposition along oxic-anoxic interfaces in soils.

Fig. 1. Resolving manganese(III)-mediated litter decomposition at oxic-anoxic interfaces within diffusion reactors.

Fig. 1

a Ubiquitous oxic-anoxic gradients in soils result in opposing diffusive gradients of Mn(II) and O2, with both overlapping only at the interface. b We recreated these oxic-anoxic interfaces within soil diffusion reactors and manipulated Mn(II) supply towards the interface via the reductive dissolution of Mn(III/IV) oxides added to the bottom layer (grey zone). During the experiment, Mn(III/IV) oxides in the anoxic layer were reductively reduced, allowing for diffusion and provision of Mn(II) to the interface. c The subsequent oxidation of Mn(II) to reactive Mn(III) species was hypothesized to facilitate the decomposition of fresh litter at these oxic-anoxic interfaces. We expected acceleration of litter decomposition with increased Mn(III) formation at the interface. Particulate organic carbon (POC) denotes insoluble structural components of the litter that needs to be depolymerized prior to facilitate microbial conversion to CO2. The brown leaf icon used in (b) is reprinted from Creazilla, “autumn leaf brown fall color,” public domain (CC0).

Results

Transient hotspots of Mn(III) formation across oxic-anoxic interfaces

Across all Mn treatments, X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy in combination with wet-chemical extractions showed that the greatest Mn(III) concentrations occurred at the oxic-anoxic interface on day 30 of the experiment (Fig. 2). This spatial peak in Mn(III) concentrations was significant for the high Mn treatment (p < 0.001), and resulted in a visually distinct dark band of oxidized Mn at the oxic-anoxic interface (Fig. 1c). This peak in Mn(III) concentrations after 30 days was consistent with a maxima in pyrophosphate extractable Mn (Supplementary Fig. 3) and dissolved Mn in the pore water (Supplementary Fig. 4), which generally is well-correlated to the presence of Mn(III)30,53. Conversely, we found no significant differences in total Mn(III) and pyrophosphate extractable Mn across the oxic-anoxic interface at day 7 and day 90 in the high Mn treatment. Combined, these results show that the oxic-anoxic interface developed into a transient hotspot of Mn(III) formation after 30 days, particularly under high Mn availability.

Fig. 2. Manganese(III) formation across the oxic-anoxic interface as a function of Mn supply.

Fig. 2

Absolute Mn(III) concentrations were calculated by multiplying the fraction of Mn(III) as determined by XANES with the total extractable Mn as determined by sequential extractions (Supplementary Table 6). Error bars denote the standard error of the mean (n = 4), while differing letters within each timepoint represent statistical differences between treatment and location at the p < 0.05 level (2-way ANOVA, Tukey test).

Enhanced Mn(III) formation increased aromatic compound decomposition and CO2 production

Enhanced Mn(III) formation in Mn-amended reactors coincided with significantly greater CO2 production (Fig. 3a). After around 30 days, CO2 production rates in the high Mn treatment accelerated, resulting in a 29% increase in cumulative CO2 production at the end of the experiment compared to the control (Fig. 3a, inset). This acceleration in CO2 production at day 30 coincided with shifts in the microbial community, specifically a significant increase in bacterial abundance as measured by qPCR within the low Mn (approx. +450%, p < 0.001, Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 5a) and high Mn treatments (+270%, p < 0.001), both of which were significantly enhanced by Mn addition relative to the control (+290% and +520%, respectively, p < 0.001). In contrast, fungal abundance showed a significant decline at day 30 for the control and high Mn treatment (−620% and −710%, respectively, p < 0.001, Supplementary Fig. 5b). Because Mn(III) formation (Fig. 2), CO2 production rates (Fig. 3a), and microbial community shifts (Fig. 3b) in our high Mn treatment peaked at day 30, we focused our detailed molecular analyses on this time point.

Fig. 3. Effect of manganese availability on litter decomposition and microbial growth.

Fig. 3

a Cumulative CO2 production as a measure of microbial decomposition of litter over the course of the experiment. Shaded regions represent the calculated propagated standard error of the mean (n = 4). The insert represents the difference (%) in total cumulative CO2 production between low and high Mn treatments and the control treatment at the end of the experiment. Dotted lines denote days at which reactors were harvested for subsequent analyses. Letters denote statistical differences between treatments at p < 0.05 on models used to fit the respiration data (F-test). b Changes in bacterial abundance averaged across all sampling zones for each treatment were determined using qPCR. Error bars denote the standard error of the mean (n = 4), while letters denote statistical differences between treatment and timepoint at the p < 0.05 level (2-way ANOVA, Tukey test). Full data for qPCR results can be found in Supplementary Fig. 5. Dashed lines denote destructive harvest points.

High-resolution mass spectrometry analysis of extracted organic matter showed that enhanced Mn availability significantly diminished abundances of aromatic or ring-like compound classes. Both low and high Mn additions significantly decreased the relative abundance of compounds classified as condensed hydrocarbon-like (−26 to −64%, p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 1a) and tannin-like (−50 to −69%, p < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 1b) compounds compared to the control. At day 30, the abundances of condensed hydrocarbon-like (Supplementary Fig. 2a; p < 0.001) and tannin-like (Supplementary Fig. 2b; p < 0.0001) compounds were significantly and negatively correlated with Mn(III) concentrations. Because tannins and condensed hydrocarbons contain extensive aromatic moieties, these trends indicate that enhanced Mn(III) formation promoted the oxidative depolymerization of aromatic compounds within litter.

Elevated Mn availability enhanced gene expression at the oxic-anoxic interface

Enhanced Mn availability increased the expression of genes transcribed from a broad suite of enzyme categories as determined by metatranscriptomics, particularly at the oxic-anoxic interface (Fig. 4a). Principal component analysis showed that gene expression profiles at day 30 clearly separated across the oxic-anoxic transition (PC1) and Mn treatments (PC2). While gene expression profiles in the anoxic zone remained the most similar, expression profiles in the oxic zone and at the interface showed the largest separation. An ANOSIM of gene expression profiles showed the greatest dissimilarity for the interface under high Mn availability compared to control treatments (p = 0.029, Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 4. Manganese-dependent gene expression across the oxic-anoxic interface (day 30).

Fig. 4

a Principal component analysis of enzymatic gene expression libraries within sample reactors showing a distinct clustering by Mn treatments and sampling zone. The distance between sampling points represents their (dis)similarities, where samples closer together are similar, while samples further apart or not similar. ANOSIM analysis conducted on the gene expression libraries to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05) between different groups are found in Supplementary Table 1. b Differential expression of functional enzyme classes based on treatment and location along the oxygen gradient. The relative expression of identified genes were categorized between oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases, lyases, isomerases, ligases, and translocases. Error bars denote the propagated standard error of the mean (n = 4), while letters denote statistical differences between Mn treatment and location (2-way ANOVA, Tukey test).

Total expression of assigned genes was consistently lowest in the anoxic zone, and expression gradually increased from anoxic to the oxic zones in the control treatment, as expected with greater aerobic microbial activity (Fig. 4b). In contrast, however, enhanced Mn availability caused a dramatic increase in gene expression at the interface. Not only did total gene expression at the interface in the high Mn treatment exceed that of the control treatment by a factor of four, but it was also twice as high as in the oxic zone. This significant increase in total gene expression at the interface in response to enhanced Mn availability was primarily driven by increased expression of oxidoreductases (+300%, p < 0.001), transferases (+395%, p < 0.001), and hydrolases (+300%, p = 0.008) (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Table 2c).

Linking Mn(III) formation, gene expression, and decomposition

Linear regressions between expressed genes and Mn(III) concentrations identified potential enzymatic drivers of Mn(III) formation (Fig. 5a). Mn(III) concentration was most strongly correlated to oxidoreductases (R2 = 0.198, p = 0.004) and transferases (R2 = 0.287, p < 0.001). We found no significant correlations between Mn(III) concentrations and single enzymes with known capacity to directly oxidize Mn(II) (e.g., Mn peroxidase). In contrast, however, Mn(III) concentrations were strongly correlated to the expression of enzymes with putative roles in direct or indirect Mn(II) oxidation (R2 = 0.205, p = 0.004), for example, via ROS or other intermediates (see Supplementary Table 4 for a curated list) (Fig. 5a). Regression analyses for each zone individually revealed that this strong relationship between Mn(III) concentration and the expression of oxidoreductases, transferases and putatively Mn-oxidizing enzymes was exclusive to the interface, and not found within either the oxic or anoxic zones (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5. Covariation of reactive manganese(III) species and CO2 production with key enzyme classes across the oxic-anoxic interface.

Fig. 5

Correlation matrix between the relative expression of principal enzyme categories (ECs) to a measured Mn(III) concentrations and b cumulative CO2 production at the end of the incubation period. Correlations for both matrices were conducted across all zones sampled from the reactor (“overall”), and then for each zone (“oxic,” “interface,” and “anoxic”) individually. Coloration corresponds to the adjusted R2, while * denotes statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) and ^ denotes marginally significant correlations (p < 0.10) determined using the F-statistic on the fitted regression line.

Finally, to examine if the upregulation of specific genes is related to enhanced litter decomposition, we conducted linear regressions between enzymatic gene expression patterns to cumulative CO2 production at the conclusion of the experiment (Fig. 5b). Notably, only the expression of oxidoreductases, transferases, ligases and putatively Mn-oxidizing enzymes at the interface was significantly and positively correlated to CO2 production. Apart from hydrolases in the oxic zone, gene expression within the oxic and anoxic zones was not significantly correlated to CO2 production (Fig. 5b). In sum, these results directly link Mn(III) formation and the activity of putative Mn-oxidizing and litter-degrading enzymes at the oxic-anoxic interface with overall CO2 production.

Discussion

Our results demonstrate a mechanistic linkage between Mn(III) formation, potential enzyme activity, and litter decomposition at oxic–anoxic interfaces. On the one hand, they provide strong support for our hypothesis that enhanced Mn(III) production across these interfaces stimulates litter decomposition. On the other hand, they uncover an unexpected enzymatic response: elevated Mn(III) formation markedly amplified microbial gene expression at the oxic–anoxic interface, driving oxidative and other litter-degrading enzymes to levels of expression far exceeding those observed in the oxic zone alone. This dual outcome highlights the direct role of Mn(III) in accelerating decomposition and its capacity to reshape microbial functions that enhance enzymatic litter decomposition. Taken together, our findings underscore how reactive Mn(III) species and litter-degrading enzymes act synergistically to transform oxic–anoxic interfaces into critical hotspots of litter decomposition.

Enhanced Mn(III) formation at oxic-anoxic interfaces drives litter decomposition

Our results reveal the transient yet impactful nature of Mn(III) formation at oxic-anoxic interfaces. These oxic-anoxic interfaces—where opposing diffusive gradients continuously supply O2 and Mn(II)—act as hotspots for the formation of reactive Mn(III) species and is consistent with those naturally occurring in marine waters37,57, marine sediments57, soil reactor41 and soil profiles32,39,53. The emergent Mn(III) hotspot was rather short-lived, arising after approximately 30 days and vanishing subsequently (Fig. 2). Porewater analyses (Supplementary Fig. 4) indicate that Mn(II) supply was limited by Mn oxide reduction in the anoxic zone and by diffusive transport to the interface, while concurrent changes in microbial respiration (Fig. 3a) and community composition (Fig. 3b) indicate a functional adjustment among the microbial community. Supplying more Mn(II) to the interface not only increased Mn(III) formation but also altered microbial growth and composition. These observations suggest that preferential Mn(III) formation at the oxic-interface necessitates sufficient Mn(II) supply and a functional shift of the microbial community.

Creating hotspots of Mn(III) formation at the oxic-anoxic interface by increasing Mn availability increases litter decomposition. Enhanced Mn(II) availability not only resulted in greater overall litter decomposition (Fig. 3a), but the subsequent Mn(III) formation also coincided with a dramatic increase in bacterial growth (Fig. 3b). High-resolution mass spectrometry further confirmed that Mn additions selectively depleted aromatic compound classes (e.g., condensed hydrocarbon- and tannin-like compound classes) (Supplementary Fig. 1), consistent with oxidative depolymerization of complex litter structures. These molecular patterns provide chemical evidence that enhanced Mn(III) formation at the oxic-anoxic interface initiated depolymerization of aromatic litter components, fueling microbial growth and subsequent mineralization of the resulting products to CO2.

Previous experiments testing the effect of Mn(II) availability on decomposition rates have provided inconsistent outcomes, showing both decreasing31,32 and increasing decomposition rates14,58. These discrepancies are likely due to excluding oxic-anoxic transitions from conventional experimental setups used to study litter decomposition31,32, which are often conducted at relatively low or constant moisture, ignoring the variable nature of soil redox in forest59,60, grassland61,62 and agricultural soils43,63. Without some degree of redox heterogeneity and associated oxic-anoxic transitions, which is expected in most soil ecosystems42,64, conditions favoring reactive Mn(III) species may be lacking, and hence no Mn-dependence of decomposition is found. In other words, the observed Mn-dependence of litter decomposition across various ecosystems14,15,22 is not merely a function of Mn availability—it is also strongly reliant on suitable soil redox conditions and associated microbially-driven enzymatic capacity for the formation and regeneration of reactive Mn(III) species driving the decomposition.

Enzymatic drivers of Mn(III)-mediated litter decomposition

Our transcriptomic analyses confirm the enzymatic drivers of Mn(III) formation and litter decomposition. We found that increased Mn(III)-mediated decomposition coincided with a doubling of gene expression of enzymes at the oxic-anoxic interface compared to the oxic zone, which is conventionally assumed to have the highest decomposing activity. Was Mn(III) formation at the interface linked to the upregulation of specific Mn(II)-oxidizing genes? We initially expected that enhanced Mn(III) formation would be linked to enhanced expression of specific fungal peroxides that use Mn(II) as co-factor, directly oxidizing Mn(II) to reactive Mn(III) species (e.g., MnP)65,66. However, we found no evidence that Mn(III) formation (or decomposition) was directly linked to the individual expression of these specific enzymes in our system. Individual expression patterns of enzymes with Mn as an active center to mitigate oxidative stress (e.g., Mn-superoxide dismutase, Mn-SOD, or Mn-catalase)67 also showed no relationship with Mn(III) formation. Instead, Mn(III) formation was best predicted by the combined total expression of a broad suite of putatively Mn-oxidizing oxidoreductases (Supplementary Table 2) that were mostly attributed to bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 10). This broader suite of oxidoreductases includes enzymes that either directly or indirectly oxidize Mn(II) via the production of reactive intermediates51,52,67. The formation of reactive Mn(III) species at oxic-anoxic interfaces thus appears to be driven by a broad suite of ubiquitous oxidative enzymes in our system, rather than highly specialized Mn(III)-forming enzymes unique to litter-decomposing fungi, as originally assumed.

The pronounced effect of increased Mn(II) supply on the upregulation of gene expression at the oxic-interface was not limited to specific lignolytic oxidative enzymes (e.g., MnP, LiP, etc), but was apparent for a broad suite of oxidases, hydrolases, and transferases (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Table 2c). What might have caused this broad upregulation in gene expression? Litter decomposition is a complex process in which lignin and other biopolymers of the lignocellulose complex (e.g., (hemi)cellulose) must be degraded simultaneously68,69. Reactive Mn(III) intermediates penetrate the lignocellulose structures within litter24,30, selectively depleting tannin-like and condensed hydrocarbon-like compounds with peak Mn(III) concentrations (Supplementary Fig. 2), suggesting that reactive Mn(III) species primarily target aromatic compounds, such as lignin or tannin, during litter decomposition24,29,70. Thus, our study supports the notion that oxidative depolymerization of lignin structures by small reactive Mn(III) species represents the initial attack, creating sufficient porosity for larger oxidative and hydrolytic enzymes to enter. The resulting oxidative and hydrolytic depolymerization products may further support the growth and activity of the microbial community as a whole and explain the broad upregulation of other enzymes (e.g., transferases and ligases) at the oxic-anoxic interface. This explanation points to a strong interplay of Mn(III)-mediated initial attack and subsequent broader enzymatic decomposition of complex litter at oxic-anoxic interfaces.

Synergistic effects of Mn cycling and enzymatic activity in litter decomposition

Our findings expand our conception of the molecular processes underpinning the decomposition of complex litter in soils by explicitly considering the synergies between redox-active metal catalysts, such as Mn and litter-decomposing enzymes (Fig. 6): under fully oxic conditions, where redox cycling is limited, decomposition is traditionally viewed as being controlled by extracellular enzymes secreted by fungi and bacteria (Fig. 6a). In this model, oxidative ligninolytic enzymes catalyze the rate-limiting step: the depolymerization of complex lignocellulose into smaller dissolved organic compounds that microbes can assimilate and metabolize. This oxidative step is often seen as the bottleneck of decomposition, as it is needed to enable subsequent hydrolytic enzymes to further degrade lignocellulose. However, under these conditions, decomposition is constrained by the relatively large size of enzymes, which prevents them from penetrating intact plant cell walls. Our results demonstrate that oxic–anoxic interfaces are critical for the formation of reactive intermediates, such as Mn(III) by supplying both Mn(II) and O2 through opposing diffusive gradients (Fig. 6b). Unlike ligninolytic enzymes—nanometer-scale globular proteins, such as manganese peroxidase (MnP, ~40–50 kDa)–Mn(III)–ligand complexes are much smaller and more highly diffusible24 (e.g., the Mn(III)–oxalate 1:3 complex, 319 Da). These reactive species can penetrate intact litter more readily than bulky enzymes, initiating oxidative depolymerization of lignocellulose and increasing litter porosity. This initial Mn(III)-mediated attack renders litter more accessible to subsequent enzymatic depolymerization, resulting in more comprehensive decomposition and enhances microbial activity downstream (Fig. 6c). While our study used broadleaf litter incubations, both ecosystem scale studies15,22 and mechanistic laboratory observations30 show a strong relationship between Mn availability and the decomposition of coniferous litter, suggesting that our observations are independent of litter type. Our findings therefore support the view that oxic–anoxic interfaces act as hotspots of litter decomposition more broadly because they facilitate a synergistic process: Mn(III) initiates oxidative attack of intact litter, which allows subsequent extracellular enzymatic depolymerization, together enabling faster and more complete litter decomposition.

Fig. 6. Synergistic interaction between manganese and enzymes that render oxic–anoxic interfaces hotspots of litter decomposition.

Fig. 6

Under fully oxic conditions (a), litter decomposition is traditionally viewed as being controlled by O2-dependent extracellular enzymes that catalyze the rate-limiting oxidative depolymerization of lignocellulose. This process is constrained by the large size of enzymes, which limits their ability to penetrate intact plant cell walls. At oxic–anoxic interfaces (b), however, opposing O2 and Mn(II) gradients promote the formation of reactive Mn(III)–ligand complexes by Mn(II)-oxidizing enzymes. Because these Mn(III)–ligand complexes are far smaller and more diffusible than bulky enzymes, they can more readily infiltrate intact litter and initiate oxidative depolymerization. This Mn(III)-mediated attack increases litter porosity, making structural polymers accessible to enzymatic depolymerization and thereby accelerating downstream microbial activity and overall decomposition. Our findings therefore support the view that oxic–anoxic interfaces act as hotspots of litter decomposition because they facilitate a synergistic process (c): reactive Mn(III) species initiate oxidative attack of intact litter, enabling oxidative and hydrolytic enzymes to further depolymerize it, together promoting faster and more complete decomposition. Note that particulate organic carbon (POC) denotes solid-phase structural components in the litter, while dissolved organic carbon (DOC) denotes the soluble products arising from POC depolymerization. The brown leaf icon is modified from Creazilla, “autumn leaf brown fall color,” public domain (CC0) (the shape was redrawn to indicate degradation). The fungi and bacteria icons were adapted from Creazilla, “tree roots” and “bacteria,” Creazilla Open License (both icons were recolored to match).

Implications for litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems

Oxidative depolymerization is a fundamental rate-limiting step in litter decomposition within soil ecosystems. Current conceptual5,71,72 and numerical models73,74 assume that this process, and by extension decomposition itself, is maximized under oxic conditions and suppressed under anoxic conditions74. This paradigm is grounded in the idea that oxidative enzymes require abundant O2 to remain active72, thus their activity would diminish sharply when O2 is limited. However, a growing body of research has begun to highlight the catalytic role of redox-active metal intermediates, such as Mn, Fe, and Co8,10,30, particularly in soils subject to dynamic redox transitions9,75. Our results challenge the traditional view that oxidative enzymatic decomposition is inherently strongest within oxic soil spaces. Instead, we show that the synergistic interplay between redox-active metals and microbial enzymes generates pronounced hotspots of oxidative decomposition at oxic–anoxic interfaces. These interfaces are rather widespread in soils: they arise in forest floor litter layers76, soil aggregates42,77, rhizospheres78, and capillary fringes79 and occur across ecosystems as diverse as agricultural43, grassland62, forest40,80, and wetland soils81. By demonstrating that oxic–anoxic interfaces act as critical regulators of litter decomposition, our findings highlight the significance of these microenvironments as underappreciated “ecosystem control points”82 that govern rates of litter decomposition in many soils. Most importantly, recognizing that decomposition is facilitated by the coupled action of metal-mediated and enzyme-mediated pathways requires a fundamental shift in how decomposition is conceptualized in ecosystem-scale models. The conventional equation of oxic conditions with “fast” decomposition and anoxic conditions with “slow” decomposition74 is no longer tenable. To improve predictions of litter decomposition rates under changing environmental conditions, ecosystem models must explicitly account for the catalytic potential of oxic–anoxic boundaries and associated synergistic interactions between redox-active metals and microbial enzymes. Incorporating these mechanisms will be critical for capturing the spatial and temporal complexity of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems.

Methods

Diffusion reactors

To establish a stable oxic-anoxic interface in soil across which we could manipulate Mn availability, we adopted an established design of diffusion reactors41. Specifically, to accommodate increased sampling volume, the modified reactors were constructed with a larger polypropylene shell (20 × 11 × 3 cm) with openings at the top to allow oxygen to diffuse within the soil matrix (Supplementary Fig. 11). An inlet at the bottom of the reactor allowed us to regulate the water table height and establish stable oxic-anoxic interfaces. To determine changes in dissolved Mn concentrations across the soil column, we installed MicroRhizon pore water samplers (Rhizosphere Research Products, Wageningen, Netherlands) in 5 mm increments across the oxic-anoxic interface for periodic sampling. Reactors could be periodically sealed airtight to measure CO2 production as a quantification of overall litter oxidation during the experiment.

Reactor experiment

To follow the decomposition of naturally occurring complex litter while manipulating Mn availability, all reactors were packed with a 5:95 wt% litter to sand ratio. Fresh deciduous litter composed of red oak (Quercus rubra), red maple (Acer rubrum), paper birch (Betula papyrifera), striped maple (Acer pennsylvanicum), and white ash (Fraxinus americana) leaves were collected during the Fall of 2020 at an established and well-characterized field site53,83 (Harvard Forest, Petersham, MA). Litter was collected at this site because previous work provided a thorough assessment of litter quality and Mn speciation and demonstrated a strong relationship between Mn(III) and potential for litter decomposition53,83,84. Litter was gently washed with tap water of loose soil and debris, air dried, and homogenized by gently grinding to a particle size of less than 2 mm. To provide the necessary porosity for sufficient fungal growth40, and measurable diffusive gradients, the litter was then mixed at a 5:95 wt% ratio with acid-washed quartz sand (sieved to <0.3 mm) (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH). This sand/litter mixture represented the upper 2/3 of the overall reactor.

To manipulate Mn(II) supply towards the oxic-anoxic interface, we added Mn oxides to the bottom layer of the reactors. We established three different treatments: a “control” in which the bottom layer consisted of sand and litter (at the mixing ratio indicated above), containing only the Mn naturally contained in the litter; as well as “low Mn” and “high Mn” treatments, in which the sand—prior to packing, was coated with Mn(III,IV) oxides to a level reflecting soil Mn concentrations at the site; and a “high Mn” treatment, in which the sand was coated with Mn(III,IV) oxides to represent commonly observed ranges of total Mn concentrations in forest litter and soil (400 and 4000 µg/g, respectively)15,85. Mn(III/IV) oxides were composed of acid birnessite synthesized according to an established protocol56. A slurry of Mn oxides was coated onto acid-washed sand to achieve the desired concentration. The Mn oxide-coated sand was air-dried for 96 h and mixed with litter at the aforementioned ratio. The resulting mixture was then filled into the bottom of the reactor. The bottom layer of the “high” and “low” Mn treatments received the Mn oxide-coated sand/litter mixture, while the “control” treatment received only the sand/litter mixture without additional Mn oxides. This bottom layer represented 1/3 of the overall mass in the reactor. This bottom layer containing Mn oxides was added to the reactors first, followed by the addition of the layer only containing the litter/sand mixture. Both layers were partially wetted before packing to avoid separation of the lighter litter and the heavier sand. The resulting “soil” column within the reactor had an approximate height of 75 mm.

To create a stable water table, an inlet at the bottom of the reactor was connected to a reservoir containing an artificial groundwater soil solution (3.8 mM KCl, 3.5 mM MgSO4, 3.7 mM CaSO4·2H2O, 0.009 mM KH2PO4, 3.7 mM NaHCO3, 0.064 mM KNO3, adjusted to a pH of 5.5)40,41, establishing a hydrostatic equilibrium between the two. The water table was maintained 15 mm below the top of the soil surface. The oxic-anoxic boundary was defined by periodically profiling the dissolved oxygen concentrations in select reactors using microelectrodes41. Based on water table position and dissolved oxygen profiles, we designated 0–10 mm below the soil surface as the oxic zone, 10–15 mm as the oxic-anoxic interface, and 15–50 mm as the anoxic interface. Depths of 50–75 mm below the surface marked the bottom layer receiving Mn(III/IV) additions. Reactors were incubated in the dark at 23 °C. Quadruplicate reactors for each treatment (control as well as Low and High Mn) were set up for destructive harvest at three time points.

CO2 and dissolved Mn measurements

CO2 measurements were conducted throughout the experiment to quantify differences in CO2 production due to treatment effects. To quantify CO2 production over time, openings on top of the reactors were sealed with silicon stoppers for 30 min before measurement. Headspace air was sampled through the septa using an airtight syringe and quantified on a Quantek infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) model 90686 (Quantek Instrument Inc., Grafton, MA). Measured concentrations were converted to CO2 measurements for each time point to calculate cumulative CO2 production over the course of the experiment. Sealants were then removed after measurement. Duplicate gas sampling for each reactor occurred weekly for the duration of the experiment. To quantify Mn in the reactor solution, pore water was collected from MicroRhizon samplers. Depth-resolved collection of pore water samples through rhizon samplers occurred every 3 days during the first 30 days of the incubation, and then decreased in frequency until the end of the experiment. Pore water samples were immediately acidified and subsequently analyses by ICP-MS (Shimadzu ICPMS-2030, Kyoto, Japan).

Reactor sampling

Based on monitoring of CO2 production and pore water Mn chemistry, the three sets of reactors were destructively harvested after 7, 30, and 90 days to further determine Mn and litter transformations, as well as microbial dynamics. Reactors were harvested in an anoxic atmosphere (97% N2 and 3% H2) within an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products Inc., Ann Arbor, MI) to minimize sample oxidation due to exposure to ambient air. The soil profile was then sampled at the 0–10 mm (oxic), 10–15 (interface), 15–50 (anoxic), and 50–75 mm (Mn treatment zone) depths. Reactor samples were carefully drained of liquid first before being dismantled. Samples marked for sequential extractions, solid-phase characterization, and microbial analysis were subdivided and then removed from the anaerobic chamber. Samples were immediately flash frozen with liquid nitrogen. Samples that were designated for geochemical assays were then freeze-dried using a FreeZone lyophilizer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO) for 72 h before being stored in an anaerobic chamber until further processing. Samples designated for microbial assays were immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

Mn characterization

Mn transformations in general and Mn(III) formation in particular were tracked through a combination of selective wet-chemical extractions and Mn K-edge XANES. Reactive Mn phases and total abundance of Mn phases of different crystallinity were determined using sequential extractions, following a modified protocol adopted from Jones et al.53. Sequential extractions were done using a sequence of ultrapure H2O (representing water-soluble Mn), ammonium acetate (representing exchangeable Mn87), sodium pyrophosphate (representing organically complexed Mn), and dithionite-HCl (representing total reducible Mn87) as the extractants. This extraction sequence allowed us to quantify not only potentially bioavailable Mn (H2O and ammonium acetate), but also crystalline and total Mn (dithionite-HCl) within the soil. Sodium pyrophosphate was used due to its high affinity for Mn(III)41, allowing us to quantify Mn(III) after accounting for water-soluble and exchangeable Mn. Approximately 0.33 g of sample was extracted with 10 mL Milli-Q ultrapure H2O with shaking for 1 h (120 rpm), followed by centrifugation for 1 h (4000 × g RCF) and filtration through 0.22 µm syringe filters. The extraction supernatant was collected, and the remaining pellet was resuspended with 10 mL of 1 M ammonium acetate (pH = 7), shaken for 4 h, centrifuged for 1 h, and then filtered again. The ammonium acetate supernatant was removed, and the remaining pellet was resuspended with 10 mL of 0.1 M sodium pyrophosphate (pH = 10), shaken for 1 h before centrifugation for 1 h, and filtering and collecting the supernatant. The remaining pellet was resuspended with 10 mL of 0.05 M sodium dithionite, with 16 h of shaking before centrifugation for 1 h and filtering. The remaining pellet was then washed with 0.05 M HCl, shaken for 1 h, centrifuged for 1 h, before filtering and combining with the dithionite extract. Extracts were diluted and immediately analyzed by ICP-MS (Shimadzu ICPMS-2030, Kyoto, Japan).

To determine the average Mn oxidation state of the solid samples, Mn K-edge XANES spectra of all samples were collected at the soft X-ray micro-characterization beamline at the Canadian Light Source (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada). Homogenized samples from quadruplicate reactors were mounted on carbon tape, sealed with X-ray transparent Kapton tape, and spectra were collected around the Mn K-edge (6539 eV) at a range of 6510–6700 eV with 0.3 eV step sizes. Spectra were calibrated, background collected and normalized, and then linear combination fitting in Athena under the Demeter package was used to quantify the relative abundance of Mn(II), Mn(III), and Mn(IV)88,89 and to determine the average Mn oxidation state. Changes in the relative abundance of the Mn oxidation states were normalized to total extractable Mn to obtain absolute concentrations of Mn(II), Mn(III), and Mn(IV).

Litter decomposition

To quantify changes in extractable organic compounds, we utilized Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS). Approximately 100 mg of freeze-dried soil from each sample was extracted with 2 mL of 80:20 methanol:water (v/v)90 using HPLC-grade solvents. Samples were sonicated for 2 h at room temperature, then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and purified using solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges (Agilent Bond Elut PPL, 100 mg) to remove salts and other contaminants. Extracts were eluted with 1.5 mL of HPLC-grade methanol and stored at −20 °C until analysis.

High-resolution mass spectra were collected using a 9.4-Tesla Bruker SolariX FT-ICR mass spectrometer at the University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ). Samples were directly infused into the instrument at 3 μL/min using a syringe pump. The FT-ICR MS was equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source operated in negative mode with needle voltage set to −4.2 kV. Ion accumulation time was optimized at 0.08 s, and data were collected from 100 to 900 m/z with a resolution of 300,000 at m/z 400. A total of 144 scans were co-added for each sample and internally calibrated using organic matter homologous series separated by 14 Da (–CH2 groups). Mass measurement accuracy was <1 ppm across the measured m/z range.

Raw spectra were processed using Bruker DataAnalysis (version 4.2) with the FTMS peak picker module, applying a signal-to-noise ratio threshold of 7 and a minimum absolute intensity of 100. Molecular formulas were assigned using Formularity91, allowing for C, H, O, N, S, and P, with mass measurement error <1 ppm. Afterwards, data was preprocessed by removing all compounds with detection in less than half of the replicates within each unique treatment to focus on differences within the predominant compounds making up the samples. Peaks were also filtered to only include masses between 300 and 900 m/z, which ultimately retained a total of 3599 peaks (from the initial 25,627) for analysis. We then analyzed compounds using MetaboDirect92 to determine the relative abundance of amino sugars, lignin, tannin, proteins, lipids, condensed hydrocarbons, and unsaturated hydrocarbons. Compound classes were assigned based on H/C and O/C ratios following standard van Krevelen regions.

RNA extractions and purification

Total RNA was extracted from 2 g flash-frozen soils using the RNeasy Power Soil Total RNA kit using the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). RNA was quantified using Qubit and quality measured using a BioAnalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Genomics service and sequencing was performed at the Genomics Resource Laboratory (University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA). The RNA was quantified using Qubit RNA HS assay (Life Technologies Corp), and quality was assessed on a 2100 Bioanalyzer using RNA 6000 Nano or Pico Assay (Agilent Technologies Inc). Total RNA (~100 ng) was used for RNAseq library preparation using the NEBNext UltraII Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs) following manufacturer instructions. The libraries were quantified using Qubit DNA HS assay (Life Technologies Corp), and 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc). Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 500 platform using NextSeq 500/550 High Output v2.5 kit (300 cycles) with 151 bp paired-end sequencing chemistry. The RNA quality assessment, library preparation and Illumina Next-Generation Sequencing was performed at Genomics Resource Laboratory, Institute for Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA.

Sequence data processing and annotation

We used metatranscriptomics to quantify shifts in microbial enzymatic gene expression and their link to Mn(II) oxidation and Mn(III) formation as a function of treatment and sampling location. Initial data curation based on base scores and adapter trimming were performed in BaseSpace (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States), where samples were demultiplexed based on barcode prefix. Sequenced libraries were quality controlled using FastQC (v. 0.11.5)93. Filtered reads were then trimmed via adapter removal with Trimmomatic94 using Q < 33 (v. 0.32) using ILLUMINA TrueSeq3-SE adapters and dropping reads below a minimum length of 70 bases. The paired forward and reverse reads were then merged using Pandaseq95 (v. 2.11). Merged sequence reads were filtered to exclude ribosomal RNA (rRNA) using sortmeRNA (v. 3.0.2)96, and referenced against eukaryote 18S and 20S, bacteria 16S and 23S, and archaea 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes based on the SILVA databases97. Compiled non-rRNA sequences were then queried using blastx within DIAMOND (v. 2.0.4)98 referencing the NCBI-nr database for both taxonomic and functional assignment. Annotated sequences were mapped to both taxonomic classifications using NCBI taxonomy and functional classification using EC numbers based on KEGG analysis in MEGAN (parameters: minimum bit score, 50; top percent 10; minimum support, 0.05; LCA, Naive) (v. 6.23.2)99. Additional annotation using the CAZy database100 using HMMER101 was used to focus on enzymes associated with the degradation of litter compounds like cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin.

Functional and taxonomic analysis of RNA transcripts

The relative abundance of putative Mn-oxidizing enzymes in our samples were normalized using total mRNA reads per individual sample. Treatments were then averaged (n = 4) to determine changes in the relative abundance of genes related to Mn oxidation between treatments across the oxygen gradient. To determine the microbial response to enhanced Mn availability, target genes associated with enzymes that oxidize Mn (Supplementary Table 4) were quantified. These enzymes contain those that facilitate direct enzymatic oxidation, including multicopper oxidases and peroxidases, as well as enzymes producing reactive oxygen species to facilitate indirect Mn(II) oxidation.

To determine the microbes associated with Mn oxidation, EC assignments via KEGG analysis in MEGAN6 were linked with transcripts’ taxonomic annotations. We then examined changes in the relative abundance of all putative Mn-oxidizing enzymes associated with bacteria versus fungi, as well as enzyme categories of oxidoreductases, hydrolases, transferases, translocases, isomerases, ligases, and lyases. Analyses to determine differences in gene expression libraries of our samples were performed in RStudio using the edgeR package102.

Statistical analysis

To compare differences both between treatments and the spatial dynamics of our Mn, C, and metatranscriptome analysis, we conducted 2-way ANOVAs using the Tukey test with a significance threshold of p < 0.05, accounting for interactions. For CO2 measurements, a model respiration curve fitted to the data was created for each treatment, and then the models were compared to each other using an F-statistic to determine if treatments were statistically different from each other. For comparisons between two variables using linear correlations, an F-test was conducted with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Correlation analyses were done using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Microbial abundance via qPCR was analyzed using 3-way ANOVA, with treatment, sampling location, and timepoint as the variables. ANOVAs were conducted using OriginPro 9.95 (OriginLab). For determining expression profiles were different among treatments, we conducted an ANOSIM analysis on a Bray-Curtis dissimilarity ran using transformed normalized gene expression profiles (log (x + 1)) to minimize the effect of genes with 0 counts. Pair-wise comparisons of combinations of treatment and sampling location were used for ANOSIM analysis to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (720.7KB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (679.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. The authors would like to thank Canadian Light Source beamline scientists Yongfeng Hu and Mohsen Shakouri for their assistance and support at the soft X-ray micro-characterization beamline at the Canadian Light Source (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada).

Author contributions

Nathan A. Chin: conceptualization, methodology, analysis, and manuscript writing. Luiz A. Domeignoz-Horta: methodology, manuscript review and editing. Xiao-Jun A. Liu: methodology, analysis, manuscript review and editing. Morris Jones: conceptualization, methodology. Ravi Ranjan: methodology, analysis. Malak Tfaily: analysis, manuscript review and editing. Kristen M. DeAngelis: conceptualization, methodology, manuscript review and editing, funding acquisition, and supervision. Maco Keiluweit: conceptualization, methodology, manuscript review and editing, funding acquisition, and supervision.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Funding

This research was funded by the NSF Geobiology & Low-temperature Geochemistry program (Award No. EAR-1852754 to Marco Keiluweit and Kristen M. DeAngelis) and the Simons Foundation (Award No. LS-Project-01248024 to Marco Keiluweit). Open access funding provided by University of Lausanne.

Data availability

Code and data from this study are available on GitHub at https://github.com/mkeiluweit/manganese. Supporting information include Mn wet-chemical extraction data, pore water Mn measurements, Mn(III) quantification, qPCR data, FT-ICR MS data, FTIR measurements, ANOSIM pair-wise comparisons between gene expression profiles, regression fits, gene expression profiles, and a table of selected Mn-oxidizing enzymes.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains Supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-75920-x.

References

  • 1.Meentemeyer, V. Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology59, 465–472 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davidson, E. A. & Janssens, I. A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature440, 165–173 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Talbot, J. M., Yelle, D. J., Nowick, J. & Treseder, K. K. Litter decay rates are determined by lignin chemistry. Biogeochemistry108, 279–295 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang, D., Hui, D., Luo, Y. & Zhou, G. Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J. Plant Ecol.1, 85–93 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sinsabaugh, R. L. Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biol. Biochem.42, 391–404 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lehmann, J. & Kleber, M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature528, 60–68 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang, C., Blagodatskaya, E., Dippold, M. A. & Dorodnikov, M. Keep oxygen in check: contrasting effects of short-term aeration on hydrolytic versus oxidative enzymes in paddy soils. Soil Biol. Biochem.169, 108690 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hall, S. J. & Silver, W. L. Iron oxidation stimulates organic matter decomposition in humid tropical forest soils. Glob. Change Biol.19, 2804–2813 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang, Y., Wang, H., He, J. S. & Feng, X. Iron-mediated soil carbon response to water-table decline in an alpine wetland. Nat. Commun.8, 1–9 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hay Mele, B. et al. Oxidoreductases and metal cofactors in the functioning of the Earth. Essays Biochem.67, 653–670 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li, H., Santos, F., Butler, K. & Herndon, E. A critical review on the multiple roles of manganese in stabilizing and destabilizing soil organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol.55, 12136–12152 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dong, H. et al. Coupled iron cycling and organic matter transformation across redox interfaces. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ.4, 659–673 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., O’Gorman, P. A. & Maher, N. More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nat. Clim. Change6, 508–513 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Berg, B., Steffen, K. T. & McClaugherty, C. Litter decomposition rate is dependent on litter Mn concentrations. Biogeochemistry, 10.1007/s10533-006-9050-6 (2007). [DOI]
  • 15.Berg, B. et al. Manganese in the litter fall-forest floor continuum of boreal and temperate pine and spruce forest ecosystems—a review. For. Ecol. Manag.358, 248–260 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davey, M. P., Berg, B., Emmett, B. A. & Rowland, P. Decomposition of oak leaf litter is related to initial litter Mn concentrations. Can. J. Bot.85, 16–24 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trum, F., Titeux, H., Ponette, Q. & Berg, B. Influence of manganese on decomposition of common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) leaf litter during field incubation. Biogeochemistry, 10.1007/s10533-015-0129-9 (2015). [DOI]
  • 18.Dhandapani, S., Evers, S., Ritz, K. & Sjögersten, S. Nutrient and trace element concentrations influence greenhouse gas emissions from Malaysian tropical peatlands. Soil Use Manag.37, 138–150 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yue, K. et al. Dynamics of calcium, magnesium, and manganese during litter decomposition in alpine forest aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecosystems24, 516–529 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sun, T. et al. A test of manganese effects on decomposition in forest and cropland sites. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.11.018 (2019). [DOI]
  • 21.Stendahl, J., Berg, B. & Lindahl, B. D. Manganese availability is negatively associated with carbon storage in northern coniferous forest humus layers. Sci. Rep. 7, 15487 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Zhang, Y. et al. Exchangeable manganese regulates carbon storage in the humus layer of the boreal forest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA121, e2318382121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bartlett, R. J. Manganese redox reactions and organic interactions in soils. Manganese Soils Plants 59–73, 10.1007/978-94-009-2817-6_5 (1988). [DOI]
  • 24.Hofrichter, M. Review: lignin conversion by manganese peroxidase (MnP). Enzyme Microb. Technol. 10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00528-2 (2002). [DOI]
  • 25.Tang, Y., Zeiner, C. A., Santelli, C. M. & Hansel, C. M. Fungal oxidative dissolution of the Mn(II)-bearing mineral rhodochrosite and the role of metabolites in manganese oxide formation. Environ. Microbiol.15, 1063–1077 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang, Z. et al. Surface Mn(II) oxidation actuated by a multicopper oxidase in a soil bacterium leads to the formation of manganese oxide minerals. Sci. Rep.5, 1–13 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang, Z., Xiong, W., Tebo, B. M. & Giammar, D. E. Oxidative UO2 dissolution induced by soluble Mn(III). Environ. Sci. Technol.48, 289–298 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu, E. et al. Role of dissolved Mn(III) in transformation of organic contaminants: non-oxidative versus oxidative mechanisms. Water Res.111, 234–243 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Perez, J. & Jeffries, T. W. Roles of manganese and organic acid chelators in regulating lignin degradation and biosynthesis of peroxidases by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.58, 2402–2409 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Keiluweit, M. et al. Long-term litter decomposition controlled by manganese redox cycling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.1508945112 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Trum, F., Titeux, H., Cornelis, J. T. & Delvaux, B. Effects of manganese addition on carbon release from forest floor horizons. Can. J. For. Res.41, 643–648 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Paulus, E. L. & Vitousek, P. M. Does manganese influence grass litter decomposition on a Hawaiian rainfall gradient? Oecologia207, 10 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kirker, G. et al. Synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy enables multiscale spatial visualization of ions involved in fungal lignocellulose deconstruction. Sci. Rep. 10.1038/srep41798 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Pinzari, F., Cuadros, J., Migliore, M., Napoli, R. & Najorka, J. Manganese translocation and concentration on Quercus cerris decomposing leaf and wood litter by an ascomycetous fungus: an active process with ecosystem consequences? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94, fiy111 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 35.Kranabetter, J. M., Philpott, T. J. & Dunn, D. E. Manganese limitations and the enhanced soil carbon sequestration of temperate rainforests. Biogeochem156, 195–209 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Madison, A. S., Tebo, B. M. & Luther, G. W. Simultaneous determination of soluble manganese(III), manganese(II) and total manganese in natural (pore)waters. Talanta, 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.01.025 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 37.Trouwborst, R. E., Clement, B. G., Tebo, B. M., Glazer, B. T. & Luther, G. W. Soluble Mn(III) in suboxic zones. Science, 10.1126/science.1132876 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Madison, A. S., Tebo, B. M., Mucci, A., Sundby, B. & Luther, G. W. Abundant porewater Mn(III) is a major component of the sedimentary redox system. Science, 10.1126/science.1241396 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Wen, K. et al. Manganese oxidation states in volcanic soils across annual rainfall gradients. Environ. Sci. Technol.57, 730–740 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thompson, I. A., Huber, D. M., Guest, C. A. & Schulze, D. G. Fungal manganese oxidation in a reduced soil. Environ. Microbiol. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00842.x (2005). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 41.Jones, M. E. et al. Manganese-driven carbon oxidation at oxic-anoxic interfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10.1021/acs.est.8b03791 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 42.Lacroix, E. M. et al. Consider the anoxic microsite: acknowledging and appreciating spatiotemporal redox heterogeneity in soils and sediments. ACS Earth Space Chem.7, 1592–1609 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Husson, O. Redox potential (Eh) and pH as drivers of soil/plant/microorganism systems: a transdisciplinary overview pointing to integrative opportunities for agronomy. Plant Soil362, 389–417 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Van Der Lee, G. E. M., De Winder, B., Bouten, W. & Tietema, A. Anoxic microsites in Douglas fir litter. Soil Biol. Biochem.31, 1295–1301 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rezanezhad, F., Couture, R. M., Kovac, R., O’Connell, D. & Van Cappellen, P. Water table fluctuations and soil biogeochemistry: an experimental approach using an automated soil column system. J. Hydrol.509, 245–256 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu, T. et al. Iron-driven fast decomposition of soil carbon under periodic anoxia. Glob. Change Biol.31, e70184 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lin, H., Szeinbaum, N. H., DiChristina, T. J. & Taillefert, M. Microbial Mn(IV) reduction requires an initial one-electron reductive solubilization step. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta99, 179–192 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Duckworth, O. W. & Sposito, G. Siderophore-manganese (III) interactions. I. Air-oxidation of manganese(II) promoted by desferrioxamine B. Environ. Sci. Technol.39, 6037–6044 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sparrow, L. A., Uren, N. C., Sparrow, L. A. & Uren, N. C. Manganese oxidation and reduction in soils: effects of temperature, water potential, pH and their interactions. Soil Res.52, 483–494 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Butterfield, C. N., Soldatova, A. V., Lee, S.-W., Spiro, T. G. & Tebo, B. M. Mn(II,III) oxidation and MnO2 mineralization by an expressed bacterial multicopper oxidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA110, 11731–11735 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Learman, D. R., Voelker, B. M., Vazquez-Rodriguez, A. I. & Hansel, C. M. Formation of manganese oxides by bacterially generated superoxide. Nat. Geosci.4, 95–98 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hansel, C. M., Zeiner, C. A., Santelli, C. M. & Webb, S. M. Mn(II) oxidation by an ascomycete fungus is linked to superoxide production during asexual reproduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA109, 12621–12625 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jones, M. E. et al. Enzymes, manganese, or iron? Drivers of oxidative organic matter decomposition in soils. Environ. Sci. Technol.54, 14114–14123 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zeiner, C. A. et al. Comparative analysis of secretome profiles of manganese(II)-oxidizing ascomycete fungi. PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0157844 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 55.Zeiner, C. A. et al. Quantitative iTRAQ-based secretome analysis reveals species-specific and temporal shifts in carbon utilization strategies among manganese(II)-oxidizing ascomycete fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol.106, 61–75 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Villalobos, M., Toner, B., Bargar, J. & Sposito, G. Characterization of the manganese oxide produced by Pseudomonas putida strain MnB1. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta67, 2649–2662 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Oldham, V. E., Jones, M. R., Tebo, B. M. & Luther, G. W. Oxidative and reductive processes contributing to manganese cycling at oxic-anoxic interfaces. Mar. Chem. 10.1016/j.marchem.2017.06.002 (2017). [DOI]
  • 58.Neupane, A., Herndon, E. M., Whitman, T., Faiia, A. M. & Jagadamma, S. Manganese effects on plant residue decomposition and carbon distribution in soil fractions depend on soil nitrogen availability. Soil Biol. Biochem.178, 108964 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hall, S. J., Silver, W. L., Timokhin, V. I. & Hammel, K. E. Lignin decomposition is sustained under fluctuating redox conditions in humid tropical forest soils. Glob. Change Biol.21, 2818–2828 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liptzin, D. & Silver, W. L. Spatial patterns in oxygen and redox sensitive biogeochemistry in tropical forest soils. Ecosphere6, art211 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tano, B. F. et al. Spatial and temporal variability of soil redox potential, pH and electrical conductivity across a toposequence in the Savanna of West Africa. Agronomy10, 1787 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kravchenko, A. N., Richardson, J. A., Lee, J. H. & Guber, A. K. Distribution of Mn oxidation states in grassland soils and their relationships with soil pores. Environ. Sci. Technol.56, 16462–16472 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chen, N. et al. Active iron phases regulate the abiotic transformation of organic carbon during redox fluctuation cycles of paddy soil. Environ. Sci. Technol.55, 14281–14293 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Keiluweit, M., Nico, P. S., Kleber, M. & Fendorf, S. Are oxygen limitations under recognized regulators of organic carbon turnover in upland soils? Biogeochemistry127, 157–171 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cohen, R., Hadar, Y. & Yarden, O. Transcript and activity levels of different Pleurotus ostreatus peroxidases are differentially affected by Mn2+. Environ. Microbiol.3, 312–322 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Johansson, T., Nyman, P. O. & Cullen, D. Differential regulation of mnp2, a new manganese peroxidase-encoding gene from the ligninolytic fungus Trametes versicolor PRL 572. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.68, 2077–2080 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jofré, I., Matus, F., Mendoza, D., Nájera, F. & Merino, C. Manganese-oxidizing Antarctic bacteria (Mn-Oxb) release reactive oxygen species (ROS) as secondary Mn(II) oxidation mechanisms to avoid toxicity. Biology10, 1004 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 68.Schneider, T. et al. Who is who in litter decomposition? Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions. ISME J.6, 1749–1762 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bhatnagar, J. M., Peay, K. G. & Treseder, K. K. Litter chemistry influences decomposition through activity of specific microbial functional guilds. Ecol. Monogr.88, 429–444 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bonnarme, P. & Jeffries, T. W. Mn(II) regulation of lignin peroxidases and manganese-dependent peroxidases from lignin-degrading white rot fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 210–217 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 71.Sinsabaugh, R. L. et al. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol. Lett.11, 1252–1264 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Freeman, C., Ostle, N. & Kang, H. An enzymic ‘latch’ on a global carbon store. Nature409, 149 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bonan, G. B., Hartman, M. D., Parton, W. J. & Wieder, W. R. Evaluating litter decomposition in earth system models with long-term litterbag experiments: an example using the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4). Glob. Change Biol.19, 957–974 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sierra, C. A., Malghani, S. & Loescher, H. W. Interactions among temperature, moisture, and oxygen concentrations in controlling decomposition rates in a boreal forest soil. Biogeosciences14, 703–710 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Huang, W. et al. High carbon losses from oxygen-limited soils challenge biogeochemical theory and model assumptions. Glob. Change Biol.27, 6166–6180 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lee, G. E. M. et al. Anoxic microsites in Douglas fir litter. Soil Biol. Biochem.31, 1295–1301 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sexstone, A. J., Revsbech, N. P., Parkin, T. B. & Tiedje, J. M. Direct measurement of oxygen profiles and denitrification rates in soil aggregates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.49, 645–651 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Fimmen, R. L., Richter, D. DeB., Vasudevan, D., Williams, M. A. & West, L. T. Rhizogenic Fe–C redox cycling: a hypothetical biogeochemical mechanism that drives crustal weathering in upland soils. Biogeochemistry87, 127–141 (2008).
  • 79.Haberer, C. M., Rolle, M., Cirpka, O. A. & Grathwohl, P. Oxygen transfer in a fluctuating capillary fringe. Vadose Zone J.11, vzj2011.0056 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Miller, A. J., Schuur, E. A. G. & Chadwick, O. A. Redox control of phosphorus pools in Hawaiian montane forest soils. Geoderma102, 219–237 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Seybold, C. A., Mersie, W., Huang, J. & McNamee, C. Soil redox, pH, temperature, and water-table patterns of a freshwater tidal wetland. Wetlands22, 149–158 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bernhardt, E. S. et al. Control points in ecosystems: moving beyond the hot spot hot moment concept. Ecosystems20, 665–682 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Phillips, S. C. et al. Interannual, seasonal, and diel variation in soil respiration relative to ecosystem respiration at a wetland to upland slope at Harvard Forest. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci.115, G02019 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lacroix, R. E. et al. Shifting mineral and redox controls on carbon cycling in seasonally flooded mineral soils. Biogeosciences16, 2573–2589 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Blume, H. P. et al. Chemical properties and processes. Scheffer Schachtschabel Soil Sci. 123–174, 10.1007/978-3-642-30942-7 (2015). [DOI]
  • 86.Liu, X. J. A., Frey, S. D., Melillo, J. M. & DeAngelis, K. M. Physical protection regulates microbial thermal responses to chronic soil warming. Soil Biol. Biochem.159, 108298 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Guest, C. A., Schulze, D. G., Thompson, I. A. & Huber, D. M. Correlating manganese X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectra with extractable soil manganese. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.66, 1172–1181 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat.12, 537–541 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Manceau, A., Marcus, M. A. & Grangeon, S. Determination of Mn valence states in mixed-valent manganates by XANES spectroscopy. Am. Mineral.97, 816–827 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Duchesneau, K. et al. Northern peatland microbial communities exhibit resistance to warming and acquire electron acceptors from soil organic matter. Nat. Commun. 16, 6869 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 91.Tolić, N. et al. Formularity: software for automated formula assignment of natural and other organic matter from ultrahigh-resolution mass spectra. Anal. Chem.89, 12659–12665 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ayala-Ortiz, C. et al. MetaboDirect: an analytical pipeline for the processing of FT-ICR MS-based metabolomic data. Microbiome11, 1–14 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Andrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data, https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).
  • 94.Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics30, 2114–2120 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Masella, A. P., Bartram, A. K., Truszkowski, J. M., Brown, D. G. & Neufeld, J. D. PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences. BMC Bioinform.13, 1–7 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kopylova, E., Noé, L. & Touzet, H. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics28, 3211–3217 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res.41, D590–D596 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods12, 59–60 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Huson, D. H., Auch, A. F., Qi, J. & Schuster, S. C. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res.17, 377–386 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Lombard, V., Golaconda Ramulu, H., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M. & Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res.42, D490–D495 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Finn, R. D., Clements, J. & Eddy, S. R. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res.39, W29–W37 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics26, 139–140 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (720.7KB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (679.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Code and data from this study are available on GitHub at https://github.com/mkeiluweit/manganese. Supporting information include Mn wet-chemical extraction data, pore water Mn measurements, Mn(III) quantification, qPCR data, FT-ICR MS data, FTIR measurements, ANOSIM pair-wise comparisons between gene expression profiles, regression fits, gene expression profiles, and a table of selected Mn-oxidizing enzymes.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES