Abstract
Fibroblast migration contributes to the spatial organization of tissue repair and extracellular matrix remodeling, but the transcriptional mechanisms regulating this process under physiologically relevant mechanical conditions remain incompletely understood. We investigated whether GATA4 regulates fibroblast migration in a tissue-of-origin-dependent manner. Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), lung fibroblasts (LFs), and tail-tip fibroblasts (TTFs) were isolated from neonatal male and female Gata4fl/fl mice and cultured on 8-kPa polydimethylsiloxane substrates. CF behavior on 8-kPa substrates was first compared with that on conventional tissue-culture plastic. Gata4 was subsequently deleted by adenoviral Cre transduction, and multiple features of steady-state migration were quantified by live-cell imaging. CFs cultured on 8-kPa substrates exhibited a smaller cell area and greater migration speed, displacement, and directional persistence than cells cultured on plastic, establishing a physiologically relevant mechanical baseline. Baseline Gata4 expression was highest in CFs, intermediate in LFs, and lowest in TTFs, whereas adenoviral Cre reduced Gata4 expression by more than 90% in all three populations. Gata4 deletion produced distinct migratory responses according to fibroblast source. In CFs, Gata4 loss reduced instantaneous speed, line speed, segment length, and directional persistence while increasing cell area. LFs showed modest increases in instantaneous speed, path speed, normalized 1-h path distance, and segment length without a clear change in directional persistence, whereas TTF migration was comparatively insensitive to Gata4 loss. Integrated effect-size analysis confirmed that the coordinated alteration of migration rate and directionality was most pronounced in CFs. RNA-seq analysis of adult CFs further showed enrichment of general motility and actin-remodeling programs following Gata4 deletion, without coordinated enrichment of lamellipodium and focal-adhesion programs. Together, these findings indicate that GATA4 supports efficient and persistent fibroblast migration in a fibroblast-source-dependent manner under physiologically relevant mechanical conditions.
Keywords: cardiac fibroblast, fibroblast migration, GATA4, mechanobiology, substrate stiffness
Introduction
Cardiac fibrosis is a common pathological response to myocardial injury and chronic stress and is characterized by excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins within the myocardial interstitium (1, 2). This remodeling process contributes to ventricular stiffening, impaired diastolic filling, and progression to heart failure (3). Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) are the primary source of structural collagens in the heart and play a central role in both physiological matrix maintenance and pathological fibrotic remodeling (4, 5). Under homeostatic conditions, resident CFs, marked by expression of transcription factor 21 (Tcf21), maintain a relatively quiescent phenotype and support the structural integrity of the myocardial interstitium (6). In response to injury or sustained mechanical stress, CFs become activated, expend, and redistribute within the damaged myocardium (7–10) Their intrinsic migratory capacity influences how fibroblasts move through and spatially organize within the evolving injury environment. Efficient movement requires coordinated actin remodeling, protrusion formation, adhesion turnover, and cellular contractility (11–13) Although the mechanisms controlling myofibroblast activation and matrix production have been extensively studied (7, 8), the transcriptional mechanisms that regulate CF migration remain poorly defined.
The mechanical environment is a major determinant of fibroblast morphology and migration. Reported myocardial stiffness estimates depend on the measurement method. The Young's modulus of diastolic adult human myocardium has been summarized as approximately 8–15 kPa, and cardiac magnetic resonance elastography measured values of 7.2–11.8 kPa, with a median of 8.2 kPa, in healthy volunteers (14, 15).Conventional tissue culture plastic has a modulus on the order of gigapascals—several orders of magnitude stiffer. This supraphysiological stiffness promotes cell spreading, α-smooth muscle actin incorporation into stress fibers, and focal-adhesion maturation (16, 17) independently of exogenous stimulation (18, 19). These cytoskeletal and adhesive changes can also alter the balance between cellular contractility and translocation (20), complicating the interpretation of experiments performed on rigid culture surfaces. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates tuned to 8 kPa have been validated as an effective platform for maintaining CFs in a more physiologically relevant, quiescent state in vitro (18, 21). Culturing on these substrates limits stiffness-induced activation and preserves fibroblast morphology compared with conventional plastic (21, 22). This system therefore provides an appropriate baseline for distinguishing fibroblast-intrinsic regulation of migration from changes imposed by the culture substrate.
GATA4 is a zinc-finger transcription factor with well-established roles in cardiac development and cardiomyocyte (CM) biology, including regulation of the hypertrophic response, sarcomeric gene expression, and CM survival following pressure overload (23–25) During embryogenesis, GATA4 contributes to proepicardial formation and the specification of cardiac progenitor lineages that give rise to resident CFs in the adult heart (26). In CM, cardiac-specific Gata4 deletion causes progressive ventricular dysfunction, an impaired hypertrophic response, and increased apoptosis under pressure overload (27, 28). More recently, conditional deletion of Gata4 in Tcf21-lineage CFs disrupted CF homeostasis and worsened cardiac outcomes following myocardial infarction (29). These findings support a fibroblast-autonomous role for GATA4 but do not define whether GATA4 directly regulates the cytoskeletal and migratory behavior of CFs. Moreover, fibroblasts derived from different tissues retain distinct transcriptional and mechanosensory properties. Whether GATA4 regulates migration through a broadly conserved fibroblast mechanism or has a preferential role in the cardiac lineage therefore remains unknown.
In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that GATA4 supports efficient fibroblast migration under physiologically relevant matrix stiffness and that this function depends on tissue of origin. We first compared the morphology and intrinsic migratory capacity of primary CFs cultured on 8-kPa PDMS substrates or conventional tissue-culture plastic. We then deleted Gata4 in CFs, lung fibroblasts (LFs), and tail-tip fibroblasts (TTFs) isolated from Gata4fl/fl mice and quantified multiple features of steady-state migration by live-cell imaging. Selected ECM-related transcripts were examined to determine whether the migratory response occurred alongside changes in matrix-remodeling gene expression. Finally, RNA-seq analysis of adult CFs following Gata4 deletion was used to evaluate associated motility, actin-cytoskeletal, and cell-adhesion programs. This design allowed us to distinguish shared and cardiac-enriched responses to Gata4 loss and to relate the observed migratory phenotypes to associated transcriptional changes.
Materials and methods
Animals
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of The Ohio State University. Gata4fl/fl mice (STOCK Gata4tm1.1Sad/J; JAX Stock #008194), in which loxP sites flank exons 3–5 of the Gata4 locus, were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory and maintained on a mixed genetic background. Neonatal mice (postnatal day 0–3) were used for fibroblast isolation. Both sexes were included.
Cell isolation
Primary CFs, LFs, and TTFs were isolated from neonatal Gata4fl/fl mice (postnatal day 0–3). All cells were cultured on gelatin-coated 8 kPa PDMS substrates in DMEM (Gibco, cat# 11965118) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich, cat# F2442) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Gibco, cat# 15-140-163) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂. Cardiac fibroblasts were isolated using the Neomyts Neonatal Cardiomyocyte Isolation Kit (Cellutron, cat# nc-6031) following the manufacturer's protocol. Dissociated cardiac cells were seeded onto gelatin-coated 8 kPa PDMS dishes and allowed to attach for 40 min, after which non-adherent cardiomyocytes were removed by aspiration. LFs and TTFs were isolated by tissue explant. All three fibroblast populations were used at passage 0.
PDMS substrate preparation
8-kPa PDMS substrates were prepared as previously described (30) with minor modifications. Briefly, Sylgard 184 (base and curing agent at 10:1 w/w) and Sylgard 527 (Part A and Part B at 1:1 w/w) were prepared separately and combined at a ratio of 0.102:9.90 (w/w). The mixture was vortexed, centrifuged at 3,200 × g for 3 min, and 500 µL was pipetted onto each 35 mm dish. Dishes were degassed under vacuum for 30–45 min and cured overnight at 50°C. Cured PDMS surfaces were sterilized with 70% ethanol under UV for 20–30 min, then coated with 0.1% gelatin solution (STEMCELL Technologies, cat# NC1620050) for 1 h at 37°C.
Adenoviral transduction
GATA4 deletion was achieved by transduction with Ad-Cre-GFP adenovirus (University of Iowa Viral Vector Core). Ad-GFP was used as a control. Adenovirus was added at MOI 100 for 12 h, after which media was replaced. Experiments were performed 48 h post-transduction. Transduction efficiency was verified by GFP fluorescence (≥90%) and by measurement of Gata4 mRNA levels by qRT-PCR.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.05% Triton X-100 for 5 min, and blocked with Universal Blocking Buffer (BiogeneX) for 15 min. Primary antibodies: anti-α-SMA (Sigma, cat# A2547, 1:500) and anti-Vimentin (Novus Biologicals, cat# NB300-223, 1:500). Secondary antibodies: Donkey anti-Mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 555 (Thermo Fisher, cat# A-31570, 1:500) and Donkey anti-Chicken IgY Alexa Fluor 647 (Thermo Fisher, cat# A78952, 1:500). Cells were mounted with Fluoroshield Mounting Medium with DAPI (Abcam, cat# 502585553). Images were acquired on a Nikon A1 confocal microscope. Secondary-only controls showed no detectable fluorescence in the corresponding channels (data not shown). Enlarged views in Figure 1 were obtained from representative regions of the original whole-dish images. Cytoskeletal activation was identified by increased α-SMA intensity, stress-fiber-like organization, and increased cell spreading. Vimentin was used to visualize the intermediate-filament cytoskeleton and was not used alone as an activation marker.
Figure 1.

Matrix stiffness alters the baseline cytoskeletal state of cardiac fibroblasts. (A, B) Schematic comparison of an 8 kPa PDMS substrate and conventional tissue-culture plastic (∼GPa). (C) Experimental timeline. Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) were isolated from neonatal Gata4fl/fl mice and cultured on either substrate for 3–5 days before fixation and immunofluorescence staining. (D, E) Representative α-SMA images and quantification of fluorescence intensity per cell. (F, G) Representative Vimentin images and quantification. The outer images in panels D and F are enlarged views of the boxed regions in the corresponding whole-dish images. Images are stitched composites acquired at 10× magnification; fluorescence intensity per cell was quantified using ImageJ. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 5 biological preparations per group. Unpaired Student's t-tests; **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Scale bar, 1000 µm. Both sexes were included.
RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher, cat# 15-596-018). Complementary DNA was synthesized using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, cat# 4368814). Quantitative PCR was performed using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, cat# 1725275) on a Quantagene q225 Real-Time PCR System. Gene expression was normalized to Gapdh using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Primer sequences are provided in Table 1.
Table 1.
qRT-PCR primer sequences.
| Gene | Forward Primer (5′→3′) | Reverse Primer (5′→3′) |
|---|---|---|
| Gata4 | GCCGAGGGAGCCGCCTACAC | TGGGGTGTCTTCCAGGGTTGG |
| Col1a1 | CCTCAGGGTATTGCTGGACAAC | CAGAAGGACCTTGTTTGCCAGG |
| Col1a2 | TTCTGTGGGTCCTGCTGGGAAA | TTGTCACCTCGGATGCCTTGAG |
| Col3a1 | GACCAAAAGGTGATGCTGGACAG | CAAGACCTCGTGCTCCAGTTAG |
| Gapdh | CATCACTGCCACCCAGAAGACTG | ATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCAG |
Live-cell migration assay
Migratory behavior was assessed by time-lapse phase-contrast microscopy. Cells were seeded at low density (2 × 103 cells/dish) on 8 kPa PDMS dishes. Images were acquired every 10 min over 12–16 h using a Nikon Eclipse Ti2 live-cell imaging system. Cell trajectories were analyzed using AI-assisted binary segmentation (NIS-Elements AR). Per-cell outputs included instantaneous speed, path speed, line speed, mean cell area, segment length, and directional persistence. In NIS-Elements, Speed is calculated for each trajectory segment as the segment length divided by the elapsed time since the preceding frame. In this manuscript, instantaneous speed refers to the per-cell mean of these stepwise Speed values; therefore, Speed and instantaneous speed are not separate measurements. Path speed was calculated as cumulative path length divided by total tracking duration, whereas line speed was calculated as the straight-line displacement from the initial to the final position divided by total tracking duration. Directional persistence was calculated as line length divided by cumulative path length. Values approaching 1 indicate persistent directional movement, whereas values approaching 0 indicate a less direct trajectory with little net displacement. Segment length was the distance between two consecutive centroid positions. Path distance and net displacement were standardized to a common 1-h interval using the corresponding path speed and line speed, respectively. Normalized path distance was calculated as path speed × 3,600 s, and normalized net displacement was calculated as line speed × 3,600 s. Only cells tracked for at least 36 consecutive time points (≥6 h) without division were included. Raw cumulative path length and line length were not used for biological interpretation because cells were retained after a minimum rather than identical tracking interval.
RNA-seq data analysis
Adult mouse cardiac fibroblast RNA-seq data were obtained from GSE155358 (29). Only the three control and three single-Gata4-knockout samples were included. Author-provided gene-level fold changes were reoriented as Gata4 knockout versus control. Twenty-four prespecified GO Biological Process 2023 gene sets were grouped into four migration domains: motility, actin remodeling, polarity/protrusion, and adhesion coupling. Preranked gene-set enrichment analysis was performed using the Gata4-knockout-versus-control fold-change ranking, 4,000 random gene-set permutations, and Benjamini–Hochberg correction across the 24 tested terms (31, 32). Normalized enrichment scores (NES) and false-discovery rates (FDR) are reported. Sample-level rank scores were calculated by ranking genes within each sample, averaging ranks for genes in each set, centering the result, and standardizing scores within each domain for visualization. Selected actin assembly, turnover, contractility, adhesion-coupling, and polarity genes were examined descriptively using Gata4-knockout-versus-control log2 fold changes; individual genes were not assigned significance from fold change alone.
Migration effect-size integration
For the cross-source migration experiment, each metric was extracted directly from the Prism grouped-data tables, retaining the available number of cell observations for each metric. To compare migration parameters expressed in different units, standardized mean differences between Gata4 KO and Control cells were calculated separately for each fibroblast source and metric using Hedges’ g, based on the pooled within-group standard deviation with a small-sample correction. The contrast was defined as Gata4 KO minus Control; therefore, negative values indicated a reduction and positive values indicated an increase following Gata4 deletion. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were estimated by resampling Control and Gata4 KO cells within each fibroblast source and metric 10,000 times using a fixed random seed. Effect sizes were used descriptively to summarize the direction and relative magnitude of changes across migration parameters and did not replace the primary groupwise statistical comparisons. Rate, distance, directional-persistence, and cell-geometry measurements were displayed together, with cumulative path and line lengths interpreted alongside time-normalized migration parameters (33).
Statistical analysis
qRT-PCR expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method with Gapdh as the reference gene. Two-group comparisons used unpaired Student's t-tests, whereas experiments involving multiple fibroblast sources and treatments used two-way ANOVA with Sidak's multiple-comparisons test. For migration analyses, each dot represents one tracked cell, with biological replicate numbers provided in the figure legends. The relationship between mean cell area and instantaneous speed was analyzed separately in Control and Gata4-knockout CFs using Spearman rank correlation. Hedges’ g and 10,000 bootstrap resamples were used to descriptively compare effects across migration parameters. RNA-seq FDR values were adjusted across the 24 tested gene sets using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. P or FDR < 0.05 was considered significant. Experimental analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 10.
Results
8 kPa PDMS substrates limit stiffness-induced cytoskeletal activation in cardiac fibroblasts
To establish a physiologically relevant culture system, we compared CF phenotype on 8 kPa PDMS substrates versus conventional tissue culture plastic (∼GPa; Figures 1A,B). Reported myocardial stiffness values depend on the measurement method. The Young's modulus of diastolic adult human myocardium has been reported to be approximately 8–15 kPa, while cardiac magnetic resonance elastography measured values of 7.2–11.8 kPa, with a median of 8.2 kPa, in healthy volunteers (14, 15), whereas standard tissue culture plastic is several orders of magnitude stiffer, a discrepancy known to drive spontaneous MF activation in vitro. CFs were isolated from neonatal Gata4fl/fl mice, cultured on either substrate for 3–5 days prior to fixation and immunofluorescence staining for markers of fibroblast activation and identity (Figure 1C). CFs cultured on plastic exhibited significantly higher α-SMA expression, a canonical marker of MF activation and stress fiber assembly, compared with CFs maintained on 8 kPa PDMS (p < 0.001, Figures 1D,E). Conversely, Vimentin, a fibroblast intermediate-filament protein, was significantly elevated in CFs on 8 kPa substrates relative to plastic (p < 0.01, Figures 1F,G). Increased α-SMA intensity, filamentous stress-fiber-like organization, and increased cell spreading were interpreted as features of a more activated, myofibroblast-like cytoskeletal state. Vimentin was used to visualize the intermediate-filament cytoskeleton and was not used alone as an activation marker. These data indicate that 8 kPa PDMS substrates limit spontaneous CF activation in vitro.
8 kPa substrate stiffness preserves cardiac fibroblast migratory capacity
To determine whether substrate stiffness influences CF migratory behavior, we compared CFs cultured on 8 kPa PDMS substrates with those on standard tissue culture plastic. Cell trajectories were tracked by live-cell time-lapse imaging. Instantaneous speed represents the per-cell mean of the stepwise Speed values between consecutive frames. Path speed is the cumulative path length divided by total tracking duration, whereas line speed is the straight-line displacement from the initial to the final position divided by total tracking duration. Directional persistence is the ratio of line length to cumulative path length, with values approaching 1 indicating persistent directional movement and values approaching 0 indicating a less direct trajectory. CFs on 8 kPa substrates exhibited significantly higher instantaneous speed (Figure 2A, p < 0.0001), path speed (Figure 2B, p < 0.0001), line speed (Figure 2D, p < 0.0001), and segment length (Figure 2G, p < 0.0001) compared to cells on plastic. Directional persistence was also greater on 8 kPa substrates (Figure 2H, p < 0.001), and net displacement (line length) was significantly increased (Figure 2C, p < 0.01). Total path length did not differ significantly between conditions (Figure 2E, ns). In contrast, CFs on plastic displayed markedly larger cell area (Figure 2F, p < 0.0001), consistent with the MF-like morphology induced by supraphysiological stiffness. Together, these data indicate that plastic-activated CFs adopt a spread, MF-like phenotype and exhibit reduced migration speed and directional persistence relative to CFs maintained on 8-kPa PDMS substrates.
Figure 2.

8-kPa PDMS substrates preserve cardiac fibroblast migratory capacity. Cardiac fibroblasts isolated from neonatal Gata4fl/fl mice were cultured on 8 kPa PDMS or conventional tissue-culture plastic and imaged for 12–16 h. (A) Instantaneous speed, (B) path speed, (C) net displacement (line length), (D) line speed, (E) cumulative path length, (F) cell area, (G) segment length, and (H) directional persistence. Bars are mean ± SEM; dots are tracked cells from five biological preparations per condition. Unpaired Student's t-tests; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Both sexes were included.
GATA4 is differentially expressed across fibroblast subtypes and efficiently deleted by Ad-Cre
We next characterized baseline GATA4 expression across the three fibroblast populations and examined the transcriptional consequences of its deletion. qRT-PCR analysis revealed a striking tissue-specific gradient: CFs expressed markedly higher levels of Gata4 mRNA than LFs (p < 0.001, Figure 3A), which in turn expressed significantly higher levels than TTFs (p < 0.01, Figure 3A), and both were significantly higher than TTFs relative to CFs (p < 0.0001, Figure 3A). This gradient demonstrates tissue-source-dependent differences in baseline Gata4 expression and suggests that the contribution of GATA4 may differ among fibroblast populations. To achieve cell-autonomous GATA4 deletion, fibroblasts were transduced with adenoviral Cre recombinase (Ad-Cre-GFP) or control vector (Ad-GFP). Adenoviral Cre-mediated deletion reduced Gata4 mRNA expression by >90% in all three fibroblast sources (CF: p < 0.0001; LF: p < 0.0001; TTF: p < 0.001; Figure 3B), confirming efficient deletion across fibroblast subtypes regardless of baseline expression level.
Figure 3.

GATA4 abundance differs among fibroblast sources and is efficiently reduced by Ad-Cre. CFs, LFs, and TTFs isolated from neonatal Gata4fl/fl mice were cultured on 8 kPa PDMS. (A) Baseline Gata4 mRNA expression across fibroblast sources, normalized to CFs. (B) Gata4 mRNA expression after Ad-GFP (Control) or Ad-Cre-GFP (Gata4 KO) transduction. Gene expression was measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to Gapdh. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 5 biological preparations per group. Unpaired Student's t-tests; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Both sexes were included.
Gata4 deletion increases collagen gene expression across fibroblast subtypes
Fibroblast migration during tissue repair occurs alongside remodeling of the surrounding extracellular matrix. To determine whether the effects of GATA4 loss extended beyond cell behavior to matrix-related gene expression, we examined selected structural collagen genes following GATA4 deletion in CFs, LFs, and TTFs. qRT-PCR showed that Gata4 deletion significantly increased Col1a1, Col1a2, and Col3a1 mRNA levels across CFs, LFs, and TTFs (Figures 4A–C). Despite their distinct tissue origins and different baseline levels of GATA4, all three fibroblast populations showed a consistent increase in the selected collagen transcripts following GATA4 deletion. These findings suggest that GATA4 contributes to the regulation of matrix-related gene expression across fibroblast populations and provide ECM-remodeling context for the cell migration analyses described below. However, changes in these selected transcripts alone do not establish a global pro-fibrotic state or a causal relationship between collagen expression and migration.
Figure 4.

Gata4 deletion increases selected collagen mRNA levels across fibroblast sources. CFs, LFs, and TTFs were cultured on 8 kPa PDMS and transduced with Ad-GFP (Control) or Ad-Cre-GFP (Gata4 KO). qRT-PCR measurement of (A) Col1a1, (B) Col1a2, and (C) Col3a1 mRNA, normalized to Gapdh. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 5 biological preparations per group. Unpaired Student's t-tests; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Both sexes were included.
GATA4 deletion alters fibroblast migration in a fibroblast-source-dependent manner
To determine whether GATA4 regulates fibroblast migration in a fibroblast-source-dependent manner, we performed live-cell tracking of CFs, LFs, and TTFs following Ad-Cre or Ad-GFP transduction on 8 kPa PDMS substrates (Figure 5). To permit direct comparison of distance-based outcomes across trajectories, path distance and net displacement were standardized to a common 1-h interval using the corresponding path speed and line speed, respectively. GATA4 deletion produced distinct migratory phenotypes across the three fibroblast subtypes.
Figure 5.

Gata4 deletion remodels fibroblast migration in a fibroblast-source-dependent manner. CFs, LFs, and TTFs isolated from neonatal Gata4fl/fl mice were cultured on 8 kPa PDMS and transduced with Ad-Cre-GFP (Gata4 KO) or Ad-GFP (Control). (A) Instantaneous speed, (B) path speed, (C) path distance, (D) line speed, (E) net displacement, (F) cell area, (G) segment length, and (H) directional persistence. Points are individual tracked cells; black bars show the interquartile range and white ticks the median. Metric-specific n values are displayed beneath each cell source as Control/KO. Statistical significance from two-way ANOVA with Sidak's multiple-comparisons test is indicated by *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01; ns, not significant. Standardized effects and bootstrap confidence intervals are summarized in Figure 6. Both sexes were included.
In CFs, Gata4 KO significantly reduced instantaneous speed (Figure 5A, p < 0.01), line speed (Figure 5D, p < 0.05), normalized net displacement (Figure 5E, p < 0.05), segment length (Figure 5G, p < 0.01), and directional persistence (Figure 5H, p < 0.01), indicating slower and less persistent movement. Path speed and normalized path distance were not significantly altered. Instantaneous speed summarizes local movement between consecutive frames, whereas path speed represents cumulative movement over the complete trajectory. Line speed measures net directional advance and equals path speed multiplied by directional persistence. Therefore, reduced directional persistence can decrease line speed even when path speed is not significantly altered. These results indicate reduced local movement and less efficient conversion of cumulative movement into net displacement, rather than a uniform reduction in all measures of movement. Cell area was significantly increased following Gata4 deletion (Figure 5F, P < 0.01). Track-matched analysis showed that cell area was positively correlated with instantaneous speed in Control CFs (ρ = 0.45, P = 0.047, n = 20) and Gata4-knockout CFs (ρ = 0.65, P = 0.0015, n = 21; Figure 6E). Thus, GATA4-deficient CFs exhibited slower movement, reduced directional advance, and lower migratory persistence while adopting a more spread morphology.
Figure 6.

Integrated effect-size analysis highlights fibroblast-source-dependent migration responses. (A) Heatmap of Hedges’ g calculated as Gata4 KO minus control for duration-comparable migration measurements and cell area. Negative values indicate lower measurements after Gata4 deletion; positive values indicate higher measurements. (B–D) Forest plots show Hedges’ g and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals for CFs, LFs, and TTFs. The vertical line at g = 0 indicates no difference. Cumulative path and line lengths were excluded from the integrated analysis because of their sensitivity to effective tracking duration. Effect sizes are descriptive summaries of cell-level distributions. (E) Track-matched relationship between mean cell area and instantaneous speed in Control and Gata4-knockout CFs. Each point represents one tracked cell. Spearman rank correlations were calculated separately for Control (n = 20) and Gata4-knockout CFs (n = 21).
In LFs, GATA4 deletion produced a more modest phenotype, with significant increases in instantaneous speed (Figure 5A, p < 0.05), path speed (Figure 5B, p < 0.05), normalized path distance (Figure 5C, p < 0.05), segment length (Figure 5G, p < 0.05), and cell area (Figure 5F, p < 0.05). Line speed, normalized net displacement, and directional persistence were not significantly altered, indicating that GATA4 loss primarily increased local migration rate and cell spreading in LFs without improving directional efficiency.
In TTFs, Gata4 deletion did not significantly alter instantaneous speed, path speed, normalized path distance, line speed, normalized net displacement, segment length, or directional persistence. Thus, TTF migration was comparatively insensitive to Gata4 loss under these experimental conditions.
Collectively, these results reveal that GATA4 deletion produces distinct migratory responses depending on fibroblast source, with the most coordinated reduction in migration rate, directional advance, and persistence observed in CFs.
Integrated effect-size analysis highlights fibroblast-source-dependent migration responses
Because the migration parameters were measured in different units, we calculated Hedges’ g to compare the direction and magnitude of the GATA4-dependent effects across metrics (Figure 6). Hedges’ g was calculated as Gata4 KO minus Control; therefore, negative values indicate lower measurements after Gata4 deletion, whereas positive values indicate higher measurements. The effect-size heatmap summarizes the response patterns across the three fibroblast sources (Figure 6A), while the corresponding forest plots show the effect-size estimates and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals for CFs, LFs, and TTFs, respectively (Figures 6B–D). In the forest plots, the vertical line at Hedges’ g = 0 represents no difference between groups. Values to the left indicate lower measurements in Gata4 KO cells, whereas values to the right indicate higher measurements. The integrated analysis focused on duration-comparable migration parameters, including instantaneous speed, path speed, line speed, segment length, and directional persistence, together with cell area as a morphological measurement. Cumulative path and line lengths were not included because these measurements are sensitive to effective trajectory duration. In CFs, Gata4 deletion produced relatively large reductions in instantaneous speed (g = −0.85), line speed (g = −0.62), segment length (g = −0.95), and directional persistence (g = −1.14), together with a marked increase in cell area (g = + 1.14; Figure 6B). This pattern indicates that GATA4-deficient CFs moved more slowly, formed shorter migration segments, and migrated with lower directional persistence while adopting a more spread morphology. LFs exhibited a different response. Gata4 deletion increased instantaneous speed and path speed (both g = + 0.72) and segment length (g = + 0.62; Figure 6C). However, the effect on directional persistence was smaller, and its bootstrap confidence interval included zero, indicating no clear improvement in directional migration. In TTFs, the effects on instantaneous speed (g = −0.20), path speed (g = −0.20), line speed (g = −0.37), segment length (g = −0.20), and directional persistence (g = −0.23) were small (Figure 6D). In contrast, the effect-size estimate for cell area was positive (g = + 0.96), suggesting that the morphological response was greater than the migration response. Together, the effect-size analysis demonstrates that Gata4 deletion produces fibroblast-source-dependent responses. CFs showed the most coordinated reduction in migration rate and directional persistence, LFs primarily exhibited increased local movement without a clear improvement in directionality, and TTFs showed little change in duration-normalized migration parameters.
Gata4 loss induces non-uniform remodeling of migration-related transcriptional programs in adult cardiac fibroblasts
To determine whether the altered CF migration phenotype was accompanied by coordinated transcriptional remodeling, we analyzed publicly available adult cardiac fibroblast RNA-seq data from GSE155358, restricting the comparison to control and single-Gata4-knockout samples (n = 3 per group). A focused panel of 24 migration-related Gene Ontology Biological Process gene sets was examined across four functional domains: motility/migration, actin remodeling, polarity/protrusion, and adhesion coupling. Positive normalized enrichment scores (NES) indicate enrichment toward genes increased after Gata4 loss. Positive regulation of cell motility (NES = 1.89, FDR = 0.0029), positive regulation of cell migration (NES = 1.88, FDR = 0.0029), and regulation of cell migration (NES = 1.70, FDR = 0.0029) were significantly enriched after Gata4 deletion (Figure 7A). Actomyosin structure organization (NES = 1.82, FDR = 0.0049), actin cytoskeleton reorganization (NES = 1.66, FDR = 0.021), and actin filament organization (NES = 1.55, FDR = 0.021) were also enriched. In contrast, none of the polarity/protrusion or adhesion-coupling gene sets reached statistical significance at FDR < 0.05. Domain-level integration therefore showed stronger and more coordinated transcriptional changes in the motility/migration and actin-remodeling domains than in the polarity/protrusion and adhesion-coupling domains (Figure 7B). Consistent with this result, rank-based domain scores showed higher expression scores for motility-associated and actin-remodeling gene sets in the Gata4-knockout samples, whereas polarity/protrusion scores were modestly lower and adhesion-coupling scores remained comparatively similar between groups (Figure 7C). These sample-level scores are presented descriptively because of the limited number of biological replicates. Collectively, these results indicate that Gata4 loss induces non-uniform remodeling of migration-related transcriptional programs rather than a coordinated pro-migratory state. Actin- and motility-associated genes were enriched without corresponding activation of the polarity, protrusion, and adhesion-turnover processes required for efficient directional migration, consistent with the experimentally observed reduction in CF migration speed and directional persistence.
Figure 7.

Gata4 loss produces non-uniform remodeling of migration-related transcriptional programs. Publicly available adult cardiac fibroblast RNA-Seq data from GSE155358 were analyzed using control and single-Gata4-knockout samples (n = 3 per group). (A) NES values for 24 focused GO Biological Process gene sets grouped into motility/migration, actin remodeling, polarity/protrusion, and adhesion coupling. FDR values are labeled for terms with FDR < 0.05. (B) Distribution of NES values within each functional domain; black lines and numbers indicate domain medians. (C) Rank-based domain scores across individual control (C1–C3) and knockout (KO1–KO3) samples. Cell colors show within-domain standardized values; numbers show the underlying rank-based scores. Absence of significant enrichment is not interpreted as pathway suppression.
Gata4 loss differentially remodels actin cytoskeletal submodules
Gene-level analysis further demonstrated that the transcriptional response involved multiple components of the actin and migration machinery (Figure 8). Core actin genes, including Acta2, Actg1, and Actb, showed positive log2 fold changes after Gata4 deletion (Figure 8A). Genes associated with actin polymerization and branching, including Enah, Vasp, Actr3, and Pfn1, also showed positive changes. Actin-turnover genes changed in different directions: Dstn and Cfl1 increased, whereas Gsn decreased. Contractile and stress-fiber-associated genes, including Tagln, Tpm1, Tpm2, and Mylk, were increased, together with positive changes in several individual adhesion-associated genes. In contrast, the polarity-related small GTPases Cdc42, Rac1, and Rhoa showed only small negative changes. The individual-sample heatmap showed that the overall expression patterns of these actin submodules were generally consistent across samples within each group rather than being confined to a single sample (Figure 8B). Individual-gene fold changes are interpreted descriptively; however, their combined pattern indicates extensive remodeling of actin assembly, turnover, and contractile machinery, with changes in selected adhesion components but without a coordinated polarity response. This pattern is consistent with the increased cell area and reduced migration speed and directional persistence observed in Gata4-deficient CFs.
Figure 8.

Gata4 loss differentially remodels actin cytoskeletal submodules. (A) Gata4-knockout-versus-control log2 fold changes for selected genes grouped into core actins, polymerization/branching, severing/turnover, contractility/stress fibers, adhesion coupling, and polarity/protrusion. (B) Gene-wise z-score heatmap across the three control (C1–C3) and three Gata4-knockout (KO1–KO3) samples. Individual-gene fold changes are displayed descriptively and are not assigned statistical significance from fold change alone.
Discussion
The present study identifies GATA4 as a fibroblast-source-dependent regulator of fibroblast migration under physiologically relevant mechanical conditions. Using 8 kPa PDMS substrates, we found that Gata4 expression was substantially higher in CFs than in LFs or TTFs. Gata4 deletion increased selected collagen transcripts across all three fibroblast populations but produced distinct migratory responses depending on tissue of origin. The most coordinated reductions in migration speed and directional persistence occurred in CFs. Analysis of an independent adult CF RNA-seq dataset further associated Gata4 loss with actomyosin- and actin-remodeling-biased transcriptional changes without coordinated activation of polarity and adhesion-turnover programs. Together, these findings suggest that GATA4 helps coordinate cytoskeletal remodeling with efficient and persistent fibroblast migration, with a particularly important role in the cardiac lineage. Recent studies have highlighted KLF1/Wnt/β-catenin signaling and the myocardial microenvironment as broader regulators of cardiac repair (34, 35). In cardiomyocytes, KLF1 overexpression increased chromatin accessibility at regions enriched for GATA4 motifs (35). However, KLF1 was reported to be expressed predominantly in cardiomyocytes, and these data do not establish KLF1 as a direct upstream regulator of GATA4 in fibroblasts (35). Whether signals from this broader cardiac transcriptional network regulate GATA4 expression or activity in CFs remains to be determined.
The use of 8-kPa PDMS substrates is a critical methodological feature of this study. As demonstrated in Figure 1, standard tissue culture plastic induced a more spread, α-SMA-rich cytoskeletal phenotype, whereas Vimentin staining demonstrated additional substrate-dependent remodeling of the intermediate-filament network, confounding the interpretation of experiments aimed at understanding CF-intrinsic regulatory mechanisms. By culturing cells on 8 kPa PDMS, we were able to isolate the effects of GATA4 deletion from the background of substrate-induced activation. This is further supported by the migration data in Figure 2, which reveal that plastic-cultured CFs, despite their activated morphology and markedly enlarged cell area, exhibit significantly reduced instantaneous speed, path speed, line speed, segment length, and directional persistence compared with CFs on 8 kPa substrates. This paradox—whereby MF activation is associated with reduced rather than enhanced motility—is consistent with the well-established role of mature focal adhesions and prominent stress fiber networks in restraining random cell motility (10, 20). Activated MFs are optimized for contractile force generation rather than translocation, and the supraphysiological stiffness of plastic may further reinforce this phenotype through mechanotransductive feedback (16, 20). Together, Figures 1, 2 validate our experimental platform and establish that 8 kPa PDMS substrates preserve a less activated cytoskeletal state and greater intrinsic migratory capacity of CFs in vitro.
Gata4 deletion increased Col1a1, Col1a2, and Col3a1 mRNA levels expression across CFs, LFs, and TTFs (Figure 4). However, the migratory effects of Gata4 deletion differed substantially among the three cell sources despite their shared collagen response. Therefore, changes in migration and ECM-related gene expression should not be considered equivalent consequences of Gata4 loss. Moreover, changes in these selected collagen transcripts alone do not establish a global pro-fibrotic state or demonstrate that altered collagen expression directly causes the migration phenotype. The migration analyses revealed clear fibroblast-source-dependent responses to Gata4 deletion (Figures 5, 6). In CFs, Gata4 loss reduced instantaneous speed, line speed, segment length, and directional persistence while increasing cell area. Path speed and normalized 1-h path distance were not significantly altered. The integrated effect-size analysis confirmed that CFs showed the most coordinated reduction in migration rate and directionality. LFs exhibited increases in instantaneous speed, path speed, normalized 1-h path distance, and segment length, but no clear improvement in line speed, normalized net displacement, or directional persistence. TTFs showed little change across the time-normalized migration parameters. Standardizing the distance measurements to a common 1-h interval removed the apparent inconsistency between speed and cumulative distance in the original analysis. Overall, increased cell area co-occurred with reduced speed and persistence in Gata4-deficient CFs at the group level. However, track-matched analysis showed a positive relationship between cell area and instantaneous speed within both Control and Gata4-deficient CFs. Thus, increased cell area and altered migration are interpreted as parallel consequences of Gata4 loss rather than evidence that greater cell spreading causes the migration defect. The adult CF RNA-seq analysis provides a transcriptional framework for interpreting the CF migration phenotype. Gene sets annotated as positive regulation of motility and migration were enriched after Gata4 loss, but this enrichment should not be interpreted as evidence of increased functional migration. These broad annotations include genes involved in cytoskeletal remodeling and contractility. Consistent with this interpretation, actomyosin organization, actin cytoskeleton reorganization, and actin filament organization were enriched, whereas polarity/protrusion and adhesion-coupling programs were not comparably enriched (Figure 7). Gene-level analysis further showed positive changes in core actins and polymerization-associated genes, together with increased expression of several contractile and stress-fiber-associated genes (Figure 8). In contrast, the polarity-related small GTPases Cdc42, Rac1, and Rhoa did not show a corresponding positive response. Together, the RNA-seq and live-cell migration data support a model in which GATA4 coordinates actomyosin remodeling with cell polarity and adhesion turnover to sustain efficient and persistent CF migration. Gata4 loss did not globally suppress migration-related transcription; instead, it shifted the transcriptional program toward actomyosin assembly and contractility without parallel engagement of polarity/protrusion and adhesion-turnover modules. This imbalance provides a plausible explanation for the enlarged, spread morphology and reduced migration speed and directional persistence of GATA4-deficient CFs. Thus, the principal consequence of Gata4 loss may not be a simple reduction in the migration machinery, but rather a loss of coordination between force-generating cytoskeletal remodeling and directional cell translocation. The direct GATA4 targets and causal intermediates responsible for this coupling remain to be established.
It is important to note that the migration assay employed here measures random motility under steady-state conditions, rather than directed migration in response to chemotactic or haptotactic gradients. In the context of myocardial infarction, CF recruitment to the infarct zone is driven by soluble signals, ECM composition, and spatial changes in tissue stiffness. Whether the alterations in random migratory capacity observed following GATA4 deletion reflect a parallel impairment in directed migration remains to be determined. Future studies employing chemotactic gradient assays or transwell migration in the presence of defined growth factor gradients will be necessary to fully evaluate the functional consequences of GATA4 loss on CF recruitment in vivo.
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, the experimental migration studies used neonatal fibroblasts, whereas the public RNA-seq dataset was generated from adult CFs in an independent study. The transcriptomic results therefore provide cardiac-lineage-relevant support but are not a direct molecular readout of the tracked cells. Second, individual tracked cells were derived from a limited number of biological preparations and therefore should not be considered fully independent biological replicates. The cell-level comparisons and Hedges’ g estimates are interpreted as descriptive summaries of the observed distributions. Additional biological replicates and replicate-aware statistical models will be required to confirm the magnitude of these effects. Third, although PDMS substrates reproduce physiological stiffness, they do not reproduce the complete ligand composition, architecture, or spatial heterogeneity of native cardiac ECM. Finally, the RNA-seq analysis identifies associations between Gata4 loss and cytoskeletal programs but does not establish whether these genes are direct GATA4 targets. Additional studies will be required to define the direct transcriptional mechanisms connecting GATA4 to actin organization, cell polarity, and adhesion dynamics.
Overall, our findings support a model in which GATA4 helps maintain coordination among actomyosin remodeling, cell geometry, and persistent fibroblast migration under physiological matrix stiffness. Loss of GATA4 shifts CFs toward an actomyosin-biased, spread state accompanied by slower and less persistent movement, whereas LFs and TTFs show distinct responses. GATA4 therefore regulates fibroblast migration in a fibroblast-source-dependent manner, with a preferential role in maintaining migratory coordination in cardiac fibroblasts.
Conclusions
These findings support a model in which GATA4 helps maintain coordination between actomyosin remodeling, cell geometry, and persistent fibroblast migration under physiological matrix stiffness. Gata4 loss produced an actomyosin-biased, spread cytoskeletal state in CFs that was accompanied by slower and less persistent movement, whereas LFs and TTFs showed distinct responses. GATA4 therefore regulates fibroblast migration in a fibroblast-source-dependent manner, with the most prominent effects observed in CFs under the present experimental conditions.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01AG071676, R01AR067766, and R01HL153876 to H.Z.) and the American Heart Association (23CDA1045959 to Z.Z.; 23TPA1142638 to H.Z.).
Footnotes
Edited by: George Alexander Truskey, Duke University, United States
Reviewed by: Xi Zhang, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Rita Alonaizan, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Saudi Arabia
Data availability statement
The publicly available RNA-seq data analyzed in this study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE155358.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of The Ohio State University. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
ZZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review & editing. JZ-S: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft. PC: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. YX: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. ZY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. QZ: Formal analysis and Writing – review & editing. XW: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. UA: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. TI: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. BW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. TP: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. HZ: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During the preparation of this work the author(s) used Claude (Anthropic) in order to assist with language editing, and structural revision of the text. After using this tool, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Frangogiannis NG. Cardiac fibrosis. Cardiovasc Res. (2021) 117(6):1450–1488. 10.1093/cvr/cvaa324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Travers JG, Kamal FA, Robbins J, Yutzey KE, Blaxall BC. Cardiac fibrosis: the fibroblast awakens. Circ Res. (2016) 118(6):1021–40. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hinderer S, Schenke-Layland K. Cardiac fibrosis—a short review of causes and therapeutic strategies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. (2019) 146:77–82. 10.1016/j.addr.2019.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tallquist MD, Molkentin JD. Redefining the identity of cardiac fibroblasts. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2017) 14(8):484–491. 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Humeres C, Frangogiannis NG. Fibroblasts in the infarcted, remodeling, and failing heart. JACC Basic Transl Sci. (2019) 4(3):449–467. 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.02.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pinto AR, Ilinykh A, Ivey MJ, Kuwabara JT, D’Antoni ML, Debuque R, et al. Revisiting cardiac cellular composition. Circ Res. (2016) 118(3):400–9. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kanisicak O, Khalil H, Ivey MJ, Karch J, Maliken BD, Correll RN, et al. Genetic lineage tracing defines myofibroblast origin and function in the injured heart. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:12260. 10.1038/ncomms12260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kong P, Christia P, Frangogiannis NG. The pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2014) 71(4):549–74. 10.1007/s00018-013-1349-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu RX, Laser M, Han H, Varadarajulu J, Schuh K, Hallhuber M, et al. Fibroblast migration after myocardial infarction is regulated by transient SPARC expression. J Mol Med (Berl). (2006) 84(3):241–52. 10.1007/s00109-005-0026-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manso AM, Kang S-M, Plotnikov SV, Thievessen I, Oh J, Beggs HE, et al. Cardiac fibroblasts require focal adhesion kinase for normal proliferation and migration. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2009) 296(3):H627–38. 10.1152/ajpheart.00444.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, Firtel RA, Ginsberg MH, Borisy G, et al. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science. (2003) 302(5651):1704–9. 10.1126/science.1092053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Petrie RJ, Doyle AD, Yamada KM. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2009) 10(8):538–49. 10.1038/nrm2729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Blanchoin L, Boujemaa-Paterski R, Sykes C, Plastino J. Actin dynamics, architecture, and mechanics in cell motility. Physiol Rev. (2014) 94(1):235–63. 10.1152/physrev.00018.2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Emig R, Zgierski-Johnston CM, Timmermann V, Taberner AJ, Nash MP, Kohl P, et al. Passive myocardial mechanical properties: meaning, measurement, models. Biophys Rev. (2021) 13(5):587–610. 10.1007/s12551-021-00838-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arani A, Arunachalam SP, Chang ICY, Baffour F, Rossman PJ, Glaser KJ, et al. Cardiac MR elastography for quantitative assessment of elevated myocardial stiffness in cardiac amyloidosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. (2017) 46(5):1361–1367. 10.1002/jmri.25678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu F, Lagares D, Choi KM, Stopfer L, Marinković A, Vrbanac V, et al. Mechanosignaling through YAP and TAZ drives fibroblast activation and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2015) 308(4):L344–57. 10.1152/ajplung.00300.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Niu L, Cheng B, Huang G, Nan K, Han S, Ren H, et al. A positive mechanobiological feedback loop controls bistable switching of cardiac fibroblast phenotype. Cell Discov. (2022) 8(1):84. 10.1038/s41421-022-00427-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bhana B, Iyer RK, Chen WLK, Zhao R, Sider KL, Likhitpanichkul M, et al. Influence of substrate stiffness on the phenotype of heart cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. (2010) 105(6):1148–60. 10.1002/bit.22647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yong KW, Li YH, Huang GY, Lu TJ, Safwani WKZW, Pingguan-Murphy B, et al. Mechanoregulation of cardiac myofibroblast differentiation: implications for cardiac fibrosis and therapy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2015) 309(4):H532–42. 10.1152/ajpheart.00299.2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.D'Urso M, Van Den Bersselaar P, Pragnere S, Maiuri P, Bouten CVC, Kurniawan NA. Substrate stiffness modulates phenotype-dependent fibroblast contractility and migration independent of TGF-β stimulation. Mechanobiol Med. (2025) 3(4):100158. 10.1016/j.mbm.2025.100158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Felisbino MB, Rubino M, Travers JG, Schuetze KB, Lemieux ME, Anseth KS, et al. Substrate stiffness modulates cardiac fibroblast activation, senescence, and proinflammatory secretory phenotype. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2023) 326(1):H61–H73. 10.1152/ajpheart.00483.2023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goldsmith RS, Tsan Y-C, Scissors RE, Helms AS, Brody MJ. In Vitro assessment of cardiac fibroblast activation at physiologic stiffness. Curr Protoc. (2024) 4(4):e1025. 10.1002/cpz1.1025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Molkentin JD, Lu J-R, Antos CL, Markham B, Richardson J, Robbins J, et al. A calcineurin-dependent transcriptional pathway for cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. (1998) 93(2):215–28. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81573-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Oka T, Maillet M, Watt AJ, Schwartz RJ, Aronow BJ, Duncan SA, et al. Cardiac-specific deletion of Gata4 reveals its requirement for hypertrophy, compensation, and myocyte viability. Circ Res. (2006) 98(6):837–45. 10.1161/01.RES.0000215985.18538.c4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pikkarainen S. Gata transcription factors in the developing and adult heart. Cardiovasc Res. (2004) 63(2):196–207. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.03.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Watt AJ, Battle MA, Li J, Duncan SA. Gata4 is essential for formation of the proepicardium and regulates cardiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2004) 101(34):12573–8. 10.1073/pnas.0400752101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lother A, Bergemann S, Deng L, Moser M, Bode C, Hein L. Cardiac endothelial cell transcriptome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2018) 38(3):566–574. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.310549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Van Berlo JH, Maillet M, Molkentin JD. Signaling effectors underlying pathologic growth and remodeling of the heart. J Clin Invest. (2013) 123(1):37–45. 10.1172/JCI62839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang Z, Shayani G, Xu Y, Kim A, Hong Y, Feng H, et al. Induction of senescence by loss of Gata4 in cardiac fibroblasts. Cells. (2023) 12(12):1652. 10.3390/cells12121652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Herum KM, Choppe J, Kumar A, Engler AJ, Garcia AJ. Mechanical regulation of cardiac fibroblast profibrotic phenotypes. Mol Biol Cell. (2017) 28(14):1871–1882. 10.1091/mbc.e17-01-0014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2005) 102(43):15545–50. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kuleshov MV, Jones MR, Rouillard AD, Fernandez NF, Duan Q, Wang Z, et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. (2016) 44(W1):W90–7. 10.1093/nar/gkw377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ho J, Tumkaya T, Aryal S, Choi H, Claridge-Chang A. Moving beyond P values: data analysis with estimation graphics. Nat Methods. (2019) 16(7):565–566. 10.1038/s41592-019-0470-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zheng K, Hao Y, Xia C, Cheng S, Yu J, Chen Z, et al. Effects and mechanisms of the myocardial microenvironment on cardiomyocyte proliferation and regeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2024) 12:1429020. 10.3389/fcell.2024.1429020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hao Y, Zhang X, Ran S, Li Y, Ye W, Wang S, et al. Klf1 promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration through regulation of wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Adv Sci (Weinh. (2025) 12(21):e2413964. 10.1002/advs.202413964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The publicly available RNA-seq data analyzed in this study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE155358.
