Abstract
The coinfection of influenza A and Chlamydia psittaci pneumoniae is rarely described in China. However, the clinical features of these diseases pose a significant diagnostic challenge. Therefore, it is necessary to report and review such a potentially fatal case. We report an 89-year-old male patient requiring admission to the intensive care unit with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, shock and MODS. He presented with fever, fatigue, anorexia and dyspnea. The patient exhibited severe hypoxemia, shock, hepatic dysfunction (elevated liver enzymes and serum bilirubin), acute kidney injury and a SOFA score of 17. Mechanical ventilation (MV) and venous-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) were established for respiratory support. The initial diagnosis focused on influenza A for his positive influenza A nucleic acid. However, the patient's imaging presentation was not coupled with viral pneumonia, which raised suspicion for other pathogens. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) detected coinfection of C psittaci, influenza A H3N2 virus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Concurrent targeted NGS (tNGS) detected C. psittaci in blood. Omadacycline and baloxavir marboxil were prescribed. The patient's condition improved, and he was successfully weaned from VV-ECMO and MV. He was discharged and recovered on day 60 of the follow-up. This case underscores the diagnostic complexity of coinfection and the use of NGS testing in this severe condition and the role of omadacycline in psittacosis.
Keywords: Chlamydia psittacosis pneumonia, ECMO, influenza A, next-generation sequencing, omadacycline, severe pneumonia
Introduction
Chlamydia psittacosis (CP) is a zoonotic pathogen that can cause severe pneumonia, respiratory failure, and acute organ dysfunction. This infection mainly results from contact with aerosols of bird or poultry urine, feces and excrement (1). The clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic infection to severe atypical pneumonia. These nonspecific features often mimic viral and bacterial pneumonia, leading to diagnostic delays and inappropriate antimicrobial treatment during the influenza season. Meanwhile, the latest studies have shown that human-to-human transmission may occur (2, 3). The human-to-human situation is unclear, but close contact and infection severity may be risk factors according to the literature. The coinfection of Chlamydia psittaci and influenza A is extremely rare, and few cases have been reported. Here, we present a successfully cured case of severe pneumonia caused by C. psittaci and influenza A by VV ECMO with the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS).
Case presentation
An 89-year-old male patient was transferred to our ICU from another hospital on December 23, 2025, with a 4-day history of high fever (39.5 °C), fatigue, anorexia and dyspnea. The patient had a medical history of hypertension and atrial fibrillation. He had no history of direct avian exposure. There were no chills, muscle soreness or limb weakness. Three days before admission, the patient was sent to the local hospital with low oxygen saturation. Then, he received a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). Meropenem (1 g every 8 h) and moxifloxacin were administered. Laboratory studies were abnormal, including WBC count (15.05 × 109/L) with 96.1% neutrophils, high-sensitivity CRP (257.70 mg/L) and PCT (23.75 ng/mL). Biochemical tests revealed abnormal liver function: ALT 106.70 IU/L, AST 245.20 IU/L, and creatinine 112.00 µmol/L. Blood gas analysis indicated type I respiratory failure. Chest CT revealed multifocal inflammatory lesions in both lungs (prominent in the left lung). Tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation were performed before transmission. Therefore, he was transferred to our intensive care unit (ICU) for further treatment. Norepinephrine (NE) was administered to maintain blood pressure.
Upon admission, the patient's physical examination was recorded as follows:
The temperature was 37.0 °C, blood pressure was 96/47 mmHg with continuing norepinephrine at 0.56 µg/kg/min, pulse rate was 99 breaths/min, pulse oxygen saturation was 93% with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 100%, and lung auscultation was wet rales on both lungs. There was no audible murmur on cardiac auscultation. Tenderness and hepatosplenomegaly were not detected. He had no neck stiffness. No rash was observed.
Laboratory data upon admission revealed a white blood cell (WBC) count of 13.2 × 109/L with an elevated neutrophil ratio of 97.2% (Table 1). The concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) were 198.6 mg/L and 59.04 ng/mL, respectively. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was 213 U/L, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was 99 U/L. The albumin level was 28 g/L. The creatinine level was 141 μmol/L. Arterial blood gas analysis showed a pH of 7.358, PO2 of 66.7 mmHg, PCO2 of 32.2 mmHg, and oxygenation index of 67 (Table 2). Chest imaging showed inflammation in both lungs, predominantly in the left lung, with partial consolidation of the left lung, accompanied by small bilateral pleural effusions (Figure 1 Day 1).
Table 1.
Clinical laboratory results.
| Measure | Reference range |
D 1 (Dec 23) | D 2 (Dec 24) | D 3 (Dec 25) | D 4 (Dec 26) | D 5 (Dec 27) | D 6 (Dec 28) | D 7 (Dec 29) | D 9 (Dec 31) | D 11 (Jan 2) | D 13 (Jan 4) | D 15 (Jan 6) | D 17 (Jan 8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC count (×109/L) |
3.5–9.5 | 13.2 | 15.5 | 13 | 12.2 | 12.9 | 12.4 | 9.3 | 7 | 9.2 | 10.4 | 5.2 | 6.2 |
| Neutrophil count (×109/L) |
1.80–6.30 | 12.79 | 15.05 | 12.56 | 11.65 | 12.35 | 11.89 | 8.8 | 6.53 | 8.65 | 9.69 | 4.76 | 5.58 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 40.0–75.0 | 97.2 | 97.1 | 97 | 95.7 | 95.7 | 96.2 | 95.1 | 93.7 | 94 | 93.3 | 91.1 | 90.2 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 130–175 | 123 | 120 | 90 | 83 | 81 | 80 | 75 | 72 | 85 | 92 | 86 | 87 |
| Platelets (×109/L) | 125–350 | 90 | 81 | 68 | 53 | 47 | 38 | 37 | 52 | 72 | 76 | 85 | 106 |
| D-dimer (ug/mL) | 0–0.5 | 8.82 | 12.98 | 8.42 | 5.43 | 7.65 | 8.62 | 6.13 | 2.73 | 2.49 | 2.43 | 2.24 | 1.81 |
| Na (mmol/L) | 137–147 | 140 | 144 | 144 | 143 | 138 | 141 | 139 | 140 | 138 | 141 | 141 | 146 |
| SCr(μmol/L) | 57–111 | 141 | 124 | 96 | 80 | 83 | 82 | 67 | 55 | 102 | 83 | 70 | 67 |
| K(mmol/L) | 3.50–5.30 | 4.14 | 4.2 | 4.88 | 4.43 | 4.66 | 4.32 | 4.53 | 4.18 | 3.68 | 3.68 | 3.76 | 4.13 |
| AST (U/L) | 15–40 | 213 | 255 | 387 | 711 | 582 | 456 | 301 | 203 | 127 | 111 | 72 | 93 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 40–55 | 28 | 25.5 | 28.9 | 26.2 | 27.2 | 23.6 | 24.9 | 27.8 | 29 | 33.1 | 28.9 | 31.8 |
| PCT (ng/mL) | <0.05 | 59.04 | / | / | / | / | 6.49 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
| CRP (mg/L) | 0–6 | 198.6 | 309.8 | 270 | 233.5 | 189.9 | 143.2 | 87.6 | 35.9 | 22.7 | 15.7 | 32.8 | 19 |
WBC, white blood cell; SCr, Serum Creatinine; AST, aspartate; PCT, procalcitonin; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Table 2.
Ventilator and ECMO parameters.
| D 1 (Dec 23) | D 2 (Dec 24) | D 3 (Dec 25) | D 4 (Dec 26) | D 5 (Dec 27) | D 6 (Dec 28) | D 7 (Dec 29) | D 9 (Dec 31) | D 12 (Jan 2) | D 13 (Jan 4) | D 15 (Jan 6) | D 17 (Jan 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FiO2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 70% | 50% | 45% | 40% | 40% |
| PEEP (cmH2O) | 12–14 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 8–6 | / |
| Pplat | 27 | / | 24 | 23 | 27 | 27 | 21 | 20 | 20 | 22 | / | / |
| CL (mL/mmHg) | 61 | / | 29 | 27 | 31 | 33 | 37 | 37 | 35 | 53 | / | / |
| Vt (mL) | 500-600 | 300-600 | 250-350 | 250-350 | 300-400 | 400-450 | 400-500 | 350-450 | 350-500 | 400-600 | 400-550 | / |
| PCO2(mmHg) | 32.2 | 38.1 | 45.6 | 40.2 | 43.7 | 36.2 | 25.4 | 36.1 | 39.5 | 35.6 | 37.9 | 30.1 |
| PO2(mmHg) | 66.7 | 71.6 | 122 | 91.5 | 115 | 158 | 180 | 152 | 155 | 127 | 153 | 101 |
| P/F ratio (mmHg) | 67 | 72 | 122 | 92 | 115 | 158 | 180 | 217 | 310 | 282 | 383 | 253 |
| ECMOration rate(revolutions/min) | / | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,300 | / | / | / |
| ECMO flux (3 L/min) | / | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 2.7 | / | / | / |
| ECMO FiO2 | / | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 60%-40% | 40%-0 | / | / | / |
ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; Vt, tidal volume; Pplat, platform pressure; CL, lung compliance; PCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PO2, partial pressure of oxygen. P/F ratio,PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio.
Figure 1.

Serial chest CT imaging. (Day 1) Initial CT on Dec 23 demonstrating consolidation in both lungs, predominantly in the left lung, and small bilateral pleural effusions. (Day 9) CT on Dec 31 showing partial improvement in consolidation. (Day 14) CT on Jan 5 demonstrating significant interval resolution. (Day 34) CT on Jan 24 showing marked resolution.
The APACHE II and SOFA scores on admission were 16 and 17, respectively.
The patient was diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, and empirical intravenous antibiotic therapy was started with meropenem, omadacycline and caspofungin.
Prone positioning was initiated, but the patient's oxygenation did not improve. The patient received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for acute kidney injury. A Pulse index continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) catheter was placed for volumetric monitoring, and fluid balance was carefully adjusted based on the measurements. After these treatments, hemodynamics and oxygenation remained unchanged. The dosage of vasopressors was increased to NE 0.94 µg/kg/min plus epinephrine 0.07 µg/kg/min, and the repeated ABG demonstrated no improvement in oxygenation.
On day 2, refractory hypoxemia with PO2/FiO2 was 72, and none of the initial treatments could alleviate the patient's clinical condition. Therefore, VV ECMO was commenced. VV ECMO was quickly established through femoral artery-internal jugular vein catheterization to provide respiratory support. The rotational speed of ECMO was set at 2500 RPM with a flow rate of 3.0 L/min (Cardiohelp, MAQUET, Germany). Additionally, the prone position was performed after the establishment of VV ECMO. With the assistance of MV and VV ECMO (Table 2), the patient's oxygenation and circulation improved significantly, and a small dose of NE was required.
The patient was prescribed the antiviral medication baloxavir marboxil for positive influenza A nucleic acid testing. However, the patient's imaging presentation was not coupled with viral pneumonia, which raised suspicion for other pathogens. To clarify the pathogen, BALF was collected via flexible bronchoscopy on the 1st day of admission, and blood targeted NGS was performed. The mNGS and tNGS was performed by a professional, commercially available testing service (4). On the 3rd day of the ICU stay, the mNGS test revealed the presence of Chlamydia psittaci (Relative abundance: 77.08%), influenza A virus H3N2 subtype and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The blood tNGS results showed Chlamydia psittaci, and no other pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or fungi were detected (Table 3). The positive nucleic acid testing, BALF mNGS and blood tNGS confirming the etiological diagnosis. While concurrent sputum and blood cultures were negative in bacteria and fungi.
Table 3.
Next-generation sequencing results.
| Sample | List of Detected Pathogens Reads and Relative abundance(%) | |
|---|---|---|
| D3 | BALF | Chlamydia psittaci 61070 77.08 Influenza A virus H3N2 subtype 270 0.34 Klebsiella pneumoniae 14313 18.07 |
| D4 | Blood | Chlamydia psittaci 253 |
| D7 | BALF | Chlamydia psittaci 732 2.31 Klebsiella pneumoniae 10804 34.03 Candida albicans 925 2.91 |
BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
Simultaneously, antibiotic therapy was adjusted to intravenous ceftazidime-avibactam and omadacycline (Figure 2). The patient's clinical condition gradually improved. Repeated BALF mNGS tests on the 7nd day showed Chlamydia psittaci (Relative abundance: 2.31%), Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Candida albicans (Table 3).
Figure 2.

Antimicrobial treatment courses during hospitalization.
The patient's vasopressor dosage and ventilator and VA-ECMO settings gradually decreased. Furthermore, the patient's infection biomarkers gradually decreased (Table 1), and the lung CT scan demonstrated a gradual absorption of the infiltrative lesions (Figure 1).
On the 11th day of the ICU stay, VV-ECMO was successfully withdrawn. On the 15th day of the ICU stay, the patient's consciousness was clear, and he passed the spontaneous breathing test. MV and endotracheal tubes were successfully discontinued and removed, respectively. The patient's vital signs were stable, and the organ function had recovered. The patient was transferred to the ward for further rehabilitation. Omadacycline was stopped on the 17th day.
A telephone follow-up 60 days later confirmed sustained recovery without recurrence. Epidemiological investigation revealed that pet parrots were kept by residents in the same community, although the patient firmly denied any direct contact with these birds or their owners. No additional psittacosis cases were identified in the community.
Discussion
In this case, we report an 89-year-old male patient requiring admission to the intensive care unit with acute respiratory failure, septic shock, acute kidney injury and MODS. Mechanical ventilation (MV) and venous-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) were established for respiratory support. Although laboratory tests confirmed influenza A infection, from a clinical perspective, the severity of pneumonia suggested an alternative or additional pathogen. The mNGS test quickly identified CP gene fragment and influenza A gene fragment in BALF, and tNGS test identified CP gene fragment in blood, which strongly support the diagnosis of coinfection of influenza A and Chlamydia psittaci. Based on these results, targeted antimicrobial therapy (including omadacycline and baloxavir marboxil) was prescribed. After targeted antibiotics and organ support treatment, pneumonia and MODS gradually improved, and the patient was successfully weaned from VV-ECMO and MV. Finally, the elderly patient recovered well and was discharged.
This case highlights challenges in diagnosis of coinfection with psittacosis and influenza A: the absence of a typical exposure history, nonspecific initial manifestations during influenza season, and the limitations of conventional diagnostic techniques. The coinfection could not be distinguished from severe influenza pneumonia clinically. The symptoms of psittacosis and influenza A overlap substantially, making early differentiation impossible in clinical practice during influenza season. Moreover, conventional diagnostic tests were inadequate: the rapid antigen test for influenza A has limited sensitivity, and routine sputum culture failed to detect C. psittaci.
The coinfection of Chlamydia psittaci (C. psittaci) and other pathogens is unusual. Only cases have been reported (5, 6). One study found that more coinfecting pathogens were found in C. psittaci and had a higher risk of mixed infection, which in turn led to more severe clinical symptoms and a longer disease course cycle (7). One study found a higher coinfection rate of 91.7% (11/12) in the severe group (8). Several factors contributed to the delayed recognition of coinfection with Chlamydia psittaci.
Early identification of pathogens can significantly improve the prognosis. mNGS is advised to be applied to severe pneumonia patients as early as possible in addition to conventional methods to improve the prognosis and reduce the length of hospital stay (9). The use of mNGS can improve accuracy and reduce the delay in the diagnosis of psittacosis. Severe psittacosis pneumonia responds well to the timely use of appropriate antibiotics (10).
Treatment options for psittacosis include tetracyclines, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. Omadacycline, a novel 9-aminomethylcycline derivative of minocycline, belongs to the tetracycline family and exhibits broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, including against Chlamydia (11, 12). However, currently, there is a lack of extensive clinical data and systematic evaluation regarding the use of omadacycline in psittacosis treatment. The value of omadacycline in the treatment of severe psittacosis pneumonia has been proven by multiple case reports. Chen and colleagues reported a case of an 86-year-old man with severe psittacosis treated with intravenous omadacycline (200 mg as a loading dose, followed by 100 mg daily). The patient's symptoms and chest CT improved significantly (13). In another case report, omadacycline was successfully prescribed for patients with severe psittacosis pneumonia complicated by septic shock (14). Together, these cases provide further support for the efficacy and safety of omadacycline in the management of psittacosis. Wang and colleagues observed sixteen patients with severe psittacosis pneumonia and described omadacycline, providing a better understanding of effectiveness in severe psittacosis pneumonia with ARDS (15). This highlights the necessity for further research on the role of omadacycline in psittacosis treatment (15).
Conclusions
Severe coinfection of CP and influenza A is not common during the influenza season. Early diagnosis, targeted antibiotic therapy, and organ support contribute to facilitate disease recovery. This case provides a reminder that clinicians should suspect coinfection and emphasizes the importance of NGS and the role of omadacycline in psittacosis.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Footnotes
Edited by: Jozsef Soki, University of Szeged, Hungary
Reviewed by: Roshan Pais, CSI Lombard Memorial Hospital Udupi, India
Wei Liang, Ningbo First Hospital, China
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Sir RUN RUN Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The human samples used in this study were acquired from a by- product of routine care or industry. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants' legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
BF: Conceptualization, Software, Visualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Supervision. YiC: Validation, Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Resources, Data curation, Project administration, Funding acquisition. YuC: Resources, Software, Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Visualization, Validation. JF: Validation, Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. ZY: Visualization, Resources, Software, Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Validation. FG: Writing – original draft, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Software, Visualization, Data curation, Validation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Project administration, Formal analysis, Supervision. JR: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Software, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Conceptualization.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Wang J, Wang B, Xiao J, Chen Y, Wang C. Chlamydia psittaci: a zoonotic pathogen causing avian chlamydiosis and psittacosis. Virulence. (2024) 15:2428411. 10.1080/21505594.2024.2428411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang Z, Zhou H, Cao H, Ji J, Zhang R, Li W, et al. Human-to-human transmission of Chlamydia psittaci in China, 2020: an epidemiological and aetiological investigation. The Lancet Microbe. (2022) 3:e512–20. 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00064-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wallensten A, Fredlund H, Runehagen A. Multiple human-to-human transmission from a severe case of psittacosis, Sweden, January-February 2013. Euro Surveill. (2014) 19:1. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.42.20937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rodino KG, Simner PJ. Status check: next-generation sequencing for infectious-disease diagnostics. J Clin Invest. (2023) 134:e178003. 10.1172/JCI178003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Du Z, Chen P. Co-infection ofChlamydia psittaci andTropheryma whipplei: a case report. World J Clin Cases. (2023) 11:7144–9. 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i29.7144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang A, Lao X, Liang J, Xia X, Ma L, Liang J. Case report: pneumonia caused by chlamydia psittaci and cryptococcus co-infection. Infect Drug Resist. (2024) 17:845–9. 10.2147/IDR.S445920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xie G, Hu Q, Cao X, Wu W, Dai P, Guo W, et al. Clinical identification and microbiota analysis of Chlamydia psittaci- and Chlamydia abortus- pneumonia by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2023) 13:1157540. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1157540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liang Y, Dong T, Li M, Zhang P, Wei X, Chen H, et al. Clinical diagnosis and etiology of patients with Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2022) 12:1006117. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1006117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lv M, Zhu C, Zhu C, Yao J, Xie L, Zhang C, et al. Clinical values of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with severe pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2023) 13:1106859. 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1106859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen X, Cao K, Wei Y, Qian Y, Liang J, Dong D, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of severe pneumonias caused by Chlamydia psittaci. Infection. (2020) 48:535–42. 10.1007/s15010-020-01429-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhanel GG, Esquivel J, Zelenitsky S, Lawrence CK, Adam HJ, Golden A, et al. Omadacycline: a novel oral and intravenous aminomethylcycline antibiotic agent. Drugs. (2020) 80:285–313. 10.1007/s40265-020-01257-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kohlhoff SA, Huerta N, Hammerschlag MR. In Vitro activity of omadacycline against Chlamydia pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2019) 63:e1907–18. 10.1128/AAC.01907-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen Y, Tong J, Wang J. Case report of severe chlamydia psittaci pneumonia treated with omadacycline. Int Med Case Rep J. (2024) 17:659–63. 10.2147/IMCRJ.S473469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xu P, Huang Z. Omadacycline treatment of severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia with septic shock diagnosed via metagenomic next-generation sequencing. J Infect Dev Ctries. (2025) 19:1570–6. 10.3855/jidc.21299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang D, Xiao L, Deng X, Deng W. Omadacycline for the treatment of severe pneumonia caused by Chlamydia psittaci complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Med (Lausanne). (2024) 10:1207534. 10.3389/fmed.2023.1207534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
