Skip to main content
Nano-Micro Letters logoLink to Nano-Micro Letters
. 2026 Sep 30;19:71. doi: 10.1007/s40820-026-02338-x

Correction: Dual-Wavelength Photosensitive Nano-in-Micro Scaffold Regulates Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses for Osteogenesis

Qin Zhao 1, Miusi Shi 1, Chengcheng Yin 1, Zifan Zhao 1, Jinglun Zhang 1, Jinyang Wang 1, Kailun Shen 1, Lingling Zhang 1,2, Hua Tang 3, Yin Xiao 4, Yufeng Zhang 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13624250  PMID: 42811226

Correction to: Nano-Micro Letters (2021) 13:28 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00540-z

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified several inadvertent errors in Figs. 1 and 3.

In Fig. 1c, due to an oversight during the final assembly of the figures, the authors mistakenly used a photograph from another group for the BCP-8W-CD146 panel. The original and correct photograph has now been provided. This error was purely layout-related; it does not affect the quantitative data, statistical analyses, or the scientific conclusions of the study.

In Fig. 3, three minor graphical errors occurred during the final typesetting and vector-formatting phase, which were unfortunately missed by the authors during proofreading. In Fig. 3i, the y-axis label for the β-TCP + DC2.4 group should read "1.5 K" instead of "1.5". In Fig. 3j, a minor column misalignment occurred in the BCP + 2.4 group. In Fig. 3l, the maximum value of the y-axis should be "20" instead of "25".

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a Schematic diagram of biomaterial-mediated DC maturation and T cell activation. b FACS of all DCs (CD11c + , IA/IE +) and mature DCs (CD11c + , IA/IE + , CD86 +) recruitment at 2 weeks after biomaterials implantation in vivo. c Semiquantification of gating strategy cells in (B). n = 6, ****P < 0.0001. d IHC staining of CD11c—DC marker and CD83/CD40—mature DC markers at 4 weeks after biomaterials implantation in vivo. Red arrow, positive cell. Scale bar = 100 μm. M, material. e Semiquantification of positively stained cells in (d). n = 5, ****P < 0.0001. f Immunofluorescent (IF) staining of CD83 (red), CD40 (green) and nuclei (blue) after DCs seeded on the BCP or β-TCP for 24 h. Scale bar = 5 μm. g Semiquantification of positively stained cells in (f). n = 5, ****P < 0.0001, ns: not significant. h Relative mRNA expressions of DC maturation genes (MHC II, CD86, CD40, IL-12). n = 3, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. i-l FACS of T cell proliferation (Ki67 +) and activation (IFN-γ) and semiquantification of positive cell rate. n = 6, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns: not significant

The correct Figs. 1 and 3 have been provided in this Correction.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Schematic diagram of BCP and β-TCP implantation and new bone formation. b Scheme, morphology and nanostructure of BCP and β-TCP observed by SEM. c Masson staining and IHC staining (CD146, Runx2 and Col1a1: MSC and osteoblast markers, red arrow) of implant area of BCP and β-TCP in vivo after 4 weeks (4 W) and 8 weeks (8 W) (the red dash line shows the new bone formation area; NB, new bone; M, material. Scale bar = 100 μm). d–f Semiquantification of new bone area and positively stained cells in (d). n = 5, ****P < 0.0001

The incorrect Fig. 1 is:

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Schematic diagram of BCP and β-TCP implantation and new bone formation. b Scheme, morphology and nanostructure of BCP and β-TCP observed by SEM. c Masson staining and IHC staining (CD146, Runx2 and Col1a1: MSC and osteoblast markers, red arrow) of implant area of BCP and β-TCP in vivo after 4 weeks (4 W) and 8 weeks (8 W) (the red dash line shows the new bone formation area; NB, new bone; M, material. Scale bar = 100 μm). d–f Semiquantification of new bone area and positively stained cells in (d). n = 5, ****P < 0.0001

The correct Fig. 1 is:

The incorrect Fig. 3 is:

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a Schematic diagram of biomaterial-mediated DC maturation and T cell activation. b FACS of all DCs (CD11c + , IA/IE +) and mature DCs (CD11c + , IA/IE + , CD86 +) recruitment at 2 weeks after biomaterials implantation in vivo. c Semiquantification of gating strategy cells in (B). n = 6, ****P < 0.0001. d IHC staining of CD11c—DC marker and CD83/CD40—mature DC markers at 4 weeks after biomaterials implantation in vivo. Red arrow, positive cell. Scale bar = 100 μm. M, material. e Semiquantification of positively stained cells in (d). n = 5, ****P < 0.0001. f Immunofluorescent (IF) staining of CD83 (red), CD40 (green) and nuclei (blue) after DCs seeded on the BCP or β-TCP for 24 h. Scale bar = 5 μm. g Semiquantification of positively stained cells in (f). n = 5, ****P < 0.0001, ns: not significant. h Relative mRNA expressions of DC maturation genes (MHC II, CD86, CD40, IL-12). n = 3, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. i-l FACS of T cell proliferation (Ki67 +) and activation (IFN-γ) and semiquantification of positive cell rate. n = 6, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns: not significant

The correct Fig. 3 is:

The original article [1] has been corrected.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Q. Zhao, M. Shi, C. Yin et al., Dual-wavelength photosensitive nano-in-micro scaffold regulates innate and adaptive immune responses for osteogenesis. Nano-Micro Lett. 13, 28 (2021). 10.1007/s40820-020-00540-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nano-Micro Letters are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES