Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2026 Sep 24;123(39):e2610127123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2610127123

Downstream of β-catenin: A positive feedback loop between Goosecoid and Nodals in Spemann’s organizer

Yagmur Azbazdar a, Edward M De Robertis a,1
PMCID: PMC13624635  PMID: 42784507

Significance

The vertebrate embryo requires resilient mechanisms to generate a perfect body shape time after time. A homeobox gene called goosecoid (gsc) is expressed in the anterior of early embryos throughout the animal kingdom. Here, we report that microinjection of gsc mRNA can rescue a complete body axis in embryos that lack one due to the depletion of β-catenin. Other genes such as siamois and growth factors known as Nodals share this remarkable activity, indicating a redundant pathway leading to the expression of downstream genes such as chordin that mediate the differentiation of central nervous system and dorsal mesoderm. In this study, we identified a positive feedback loop between Goosecoid and Nodals that helps specify Spemann organizer tissue during early development.

Keywords: Goosecoid, Nodal, chordin, Siamois, β-catenin

Abstract

We report on the role of the homeobox gene goosecoid (gsc) within an epistatic pathway that mediates body axis formation in Xenopus. Embryos depleted of β-catenin form exclusively ventral structures and lack all traces of axial structures. Microinjection of gsc mRNA rescues an entire body axis with head and trunk-tail. This remarkable activity is shared with the homeobox gene siamois (sia) and growth factors of the Nodal family. Using a Gsc antisense morpholino, we showed that dorsalization by Xenopus nodal-related 6 mRNA has a strong requirement for Gsc in β-catenin depleted embryos. These experiments uncovered a positive feedback loop between Gsc and Nodal that is required downstream of β-catenin for the maintenance of dorsal and anterior tissues during gastrulation in endomesoderm. The Gsc-Xnr feedback loop leads to the expression of Spemann organizer genes that antagonize signals from ventral tissues. Similarly, rescue of β-catenin depletion by murine β-catenin mRNA also has a requirement for Gsc. Although gsc is a gene conserved throughout the animal kingdom during evolution, its loss-of-function during mouse gastrulation has only very weak phenotypic effects; perhaps the redundancy described here in Xenopus might be part of the explanation. The functional pathway defined here is self-organizing and robust as required to form a perfect embryo time after time.


The isolation of the Spemann organizer gene goosecoid (gsc) initiated a new era in the molecular dissection of embryonic induction (1, 2). This gene is expressed in a 60o arc of the dorsal side of the Xenopus embryo, the region that exhibits strong inducing activity when transplanted into the ventral side of a host embryo. gsc represents the archetypal organizer gene, and the descendants of gsc-expressing cells at the gastrula stage give rise to the foregut endomesoderm, prechordal plate, notochord, and chordoneural hinge (CNH) which classically mark the head and trunk-tail organizers (3). In gastrula stage, embryos, dorsal mesoderm plays a crucial inductive role in directing overlying ectodermal cells toward a neural fate (4, 5). Consistent with its expression in dorsal mesoderm, microinjection of gsc mRNA induces incomplete secondary body axes through the upregulation of organizer-associated genes such as chordin (chd) and noggin (4).

Goosecoid not only regulates fundamental developmental processes but is also deeply conserved throughout animal evolution, from Hydra to humans (6, 7). Therefore, it was a big surprise when knockout of mouse gsc resulted in a lack of gastrulation phenotypes, with pups dying at birth but with only small axial reductions in the base of the cranium (8–10). Gsc has a postgastrulation phase of expression in the craniofacial region, which is strongly affected in mice and human Gsc loss-of-function mutations but unrelated to its early phase of expression (10, 11). In Drosophila, loss-of-function of gsc also lacks gastrulation phenotypes but is an embryonic lethal affecting foregut development (12). In Xenopus embryos, antisense RNA or antimorphic gsc constructs interfere with head formation (13, 14). In Xenopus laevis, which has two copies of gsc resulting from allotetraploidy, an antisense morpholino targeting both pseudoalleles causes reductions in head structures that, interestingly, are rescued by knockdown of the ventral homeobox genes Vent1 and Vent2 which are targets of BMP4 (15). Why a highly conserved gastrulation gene with copious expression has only weak loss-of-function phenotypes remains an unsolved mystery.

Recently, a cytoplasmic determinant gene called huluwa (hwa) was discovered by the laboratory of Anming Meng (16). It encodes a transmembrane protein that stabilizes β-catenin on the dorsal side of zebrafish and Xenopus embryos by inhibiting Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK3) and promoting Axin1 degradation (16, 17). Hwa function requires membrane trafficking and lysosomal activity (18). Microinjected Xenopus hwa mRNA induces secondary axes complete with eyes with a penetrance of almost 100% of embryos, unlike other reagents in the β-catenin pathway. In previous studies, we took advantage of hwa mRNA microinjections to determine an epistatic molecular pathway for axial patterning by the Spemann organizer (19). Each step of this signaling pathway was established by gain- or loss-of-function experiments using coinjection of mRNAs, secreted antagonists, or antisense morpholino (MO) reagents. Using β-catenin depleted embryos, which provide a sensitized system that also has almost full penetrance (20), we found that Nodals could rescue a complete dorsal axis even at very low doses (19). In addition to Nodals, dorsal β-catenin independently induces Siamois (Sia), a homeobox gene that provides a double assurance for axial and neural development in Xenopus (21). Nodals are members of the Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-β) superfamily that function during gastrulation in most vertebrates and resemble the mesoderm inducer Activin in their biological activity (22). The rescue of β-catenin depletion by Nodals was partially mediated by the induction of chordin, such that

Hwa→βcatenin→Nodals→Chordin.

A player not addressed in previous studies was Goosecoid, a gene activated by Nodals, that was initially described as a primary response gene induced by Activin even when protein synthesis is blocked (1, 23). We had assumed that Gsc would function downstream of Nodal/Activin.

In the present study, we tested whether gsc mRNA could rescue the β-catenin depletion phenotype. We found that goosecoid mRNA was able to completely rescue the β-catenin knockdown ventralized phenotype. To our surprise, this rescue was blocked by coinjection of lefty1 or cerberus-Short (cerS) mRNAs, which are specific secreted antagonists of Activin/Nodal and Nodals, respectively (24, 25) suggesting a possible alternative pathway:

Hwa→βcatenin→Gsc→Nodals.

In addition, in double knockdown experiments targeting both β-catenin and gsc, the dorsalizing activity of Xnr6, as well as that of β-catenin, displayed a strong requirement for Goosecoid. These results imply that a positive signaling loop involving Nodal → Gsc and Gsc → Nodal plays an important role in early development in this sensitized system. Together with previous experiments, the present work suggests that the early dorsal β-catenin signal activates Goosecoid, Nodals, and Siamois in parallel to resiliently induce the Spemann organizer biochemical pathway during Xenopus development.

Results

Goosecoid Rescued Axial Development After β-Catenin Depletion and Was Blocked by Lefty.

Microinjection of 150 pg of mouse gsc mRNA (15) into a ventral blastomere induced weak incomplete secondary axes lacking head structures and cement glands in wild-type (wt) embryos (Fig. 1 A and B). However, in embryos ventralized by injecting β-catenin morpholino (β-cat MO) into each blastomere at the 4-cell stage, complete axial structures, including heads, were rescued after a single ventral (1xV) injection of gsc mRNA at 8-cell (Fig. 1 D and E). After 1x dorsal (1xD) injection, rescue was even more effective in terms of the frequency of cement gland with eye structures marked by rx2a (Fig. 1 J and K and SI Appendix, Fig. S1). β-catenin depleted embryos have normal cortical rotation, and the dorsal preference may indicate a currently unidentified dorsal component. For the rest of this study, we chose to use 1xD injections using mouse gsc mRNA, which is more active than Xenopus and can be used in morpholino rescue experiments (15).

Fig. 1.

Figure A through M showing embryonic samples under varying injection conditions and a signaling pathway flowchart.

Goosecoid rescued axis formation in β-catenin-depleted ventralized embryos, and this was blocked by the Nodal/Activin inhibitor Lefty. (A) Uninjected control embryo (the Inset shows lefty-injected embryo with small head and pigmented epidermis accumulation in the belly). (B) A single ventral injection of mouse gsc mRNA induced an incomplete secondary axis indicated by a star. (C) One-time ventral (1xV) injection of lefty mRNA suppressed the secondary axis induced by mouse gsc. (D) β-catenin-depleted embryo exhibiting complete ventralization. (E) A single injection of mouse gsc mRNA into a ventral blastomere at the 4-cell stage rescued primary axis formation in embryos ventralized by β-catenin MO injection (4×). (F) Coinjection of lefty mRNA completely inhibited dorsal axis rescue by gsc mRNA resulting in ventralized β-cat embryos; the Inset shows that CerS mRNA also blocked axial rescue by Gsc indicating a complete requirement for Nodals. (G) Uninjected control embryo. (H) Single dorsal injection (1xD) of mouse gsc mRNA together with lineage tracer rfp mRNA showing normal dorsal organizer fates extending from anterior endomesoderm to the tip of the tail. (I) lefty mRNA 1xD injection caused slight ventralization. (J) Embryo ventralized by β-catenin depletion. (K) One-time dorsal injection of mouse gsc mRNA rescued a complete primary axis extending from head to tail (the Inset shows RFP extending to the CNH); 1xD injection resulted in higher frequency of complete rescue with cement glands and was adopted for the rest of this study. (L) lefty mRNA blocked axis rescue by gsc mRNA. (M) Proposed pathway implicating Gsc downstream of β-catenin. Numbers of embryos were as follows: (A) n = 68, all normal (Inset, n = 17, all slightly ventralized). (B) n = 17, 11 with incomplete second axes and six normal. (C) n = 43, 33 ventralized with a dark patch in the belly, 10 normal. (D) n = 32, 24 completely ventralized. Five weak axes with no cement gland, three with weak axis with cement gland. (E) n = 47, all rescued, 34 with cement gland, 13 lacking cement glands. (F) n = 24, 22 completely ventralized, two with weak residual axes lacking cement glands; Inset n = 30, all ventralized. (G) n = 67, all normal. (H) n = 36, three with enlarged cement gland, rest of normal appearance. (I) n = 31, 30 completely ventralized, one escaper. (J) n = 24, 21 completely ventralized, three weak axes lacking cement gland. (K) n = 113, 109 with axial rescue, four with no rescue. (L) n = 29, 28 completely ventralized, one escaper. Scale bar lengths are indicated. Data from five independent experiments.

Coinjection of lefty mRNA (500 pg) inhibited Gsc secondary axes in wt embryos after one-time ventral injection (Fig. 1 B and C). Surprisingly, in β-catenin depleted embryos, all dorsal axial structures induced by gsc mRNA (150 pg) were blocked by coinjection of lefty mRNA (Fig. 1 D–F and J–L), indicating a complete requirement for Nodal/Activin. Similarly, coinjection of cerS mRNA (150 pg), a specific inhibitor of Nodals (25), also blocked Gsc rescue (Fig. 1 F, Inset). As cerS embryos tended to have blastopore closure problems lefty1, which results in better epiboly, was used for the rest of this study. In X. laevis, there are 11 Xenopus nodal-related genes (Xnrs), many of them derived from tandem duplications of Xnr5 and Xnr6 (22). Lefty/Antivin is a potent secreted antagonist (member of the TGF-β family of secreted proteins) that binds to Nodal/Activin receptors but does not activate them, blocking activity of Xnr6 (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 A–F) and of the other Xnrs (24). Mammals have a single Nodal gene, which is not only required for gastrulation but also for left–right asymmetry. In Xenopus, there are multiple Nodal-related genes, which are mostly expressed only during a brief window at late blastula/early gastrula likely representing gene duplications required for the rapid activation of mesoderm induction (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 G–O).

In lineage tracing studies using coinjection of red fluorescent protein (rfp mRNA), dorsal injection of gsc mRNA marked all organizer derivatives such as head endomesoderm and axial derivatives, extending all the way to the CNH in the tail tip, both in wt and rescued embryos (Fig. 1 H and K). Unlike ventral injection of gsc mRNA, 1xD injection did not induce axial structures since it is normally expressed in the dorsal organizer (Fig. 1 B and H). lefty mRNA on its own reduced head structures but did not affect the tail organizer (Fig. 1I). Although gsc and Brachyury repress each other at neurula stages (26, 27), Gsc overexpression did not appear to affect differentiation of the late tail organizer (Fig. 1 K, Inset).

We conclude that gsc mRNA efficiently rescued the ventralization caused by β-catenin depletion and that in order to activate organizer signals Goosecoid requires the activity of Nodals (Fig. 1M).

Endogenous Gsc Is Required for Dorsalization by Xnr6.

We next tested whether gsc is required for the activity of microinjected Xnr6 mRNA. Nodal mRNAs injected ventrally into the wt embryo induce only weak incomplete secondary axes (19), and when injected dorsally have almost no phenotypic effect (Fig. 2 A–B’). A specific antisense morpholino that targets both alleles of gsc (Gsc MO) has been characterized in previous work from our laboratory (15). When coinjected 4× at 4-cell together with β-cat MO embryos, Gsc-depleted embryos were completely ventralized without any axial structures (Fig. 2 D and D’). The β-cat MO background provides a sensitized system in which a single dorsal injection of 1 pg of Xnr6 mRNA induced robust axial formation, resulting in dorsalized embryos with very large heads including ectopic cement glands marked by xag2 (Fig. 2E) (28), and enlarged brains marked by the panneural marker sox2 (Fig. 2E’). When the same experiment was performed together with goosecoid depletion, a striking decrease of cement gland, forebrain, and eyes was observed (Fig. 2 F and F’, compared to Fig. 2 E and E’ and SI Appendix, Fig. S3). At tailbud stages, chd expression in posterior notochord and CNH was decreased by Gsc MO although to a lesser extent than anterior structures (Fig. 2, Insets in A’, E’, and F’). Conversely, in overexpression experiments RT-qPCR analyses showed that Xnr6 transcription was increased by gsc mRNA coinjection in β-catenin depleted embryos at mid-gastrula (SI Appendix, Fig. S4).

Fig. 2.

A 13 panel figure shows embryo staining in A-F and A’-F’ with a pathway diagram in G. Scale bars measure 500 μm.

Goosecoid function was required for the complete axial rescue of β-Catenin depletion by Xnr6. (A and A’) Uninjected embryo hybridized with the cement gland (CG) marker Xag2 or the central nervous system (CNS) marker Sox2. (B and B’) Single injection of Xnr6 mRNA into a dorsal blastomere at the 4-cell stage induced a slightly enlarged CG and anterior CNS. (C and C’) Depletion of β-catenin with MO resulted in complete ventralization of embryos, lacking CG and CNS tissues. (D and D’) Embryos double depleted of β-catenin and Goosecoid with MOs were completely ventralized. (E and E’) Xnr6 mRNA 1xD rescued and overdorsalized the primary axis in β-catenin depleted embryos marked by Xag2, Sox2 and chd; note ectopic cement glands. (F and F’) Depletion of Goosecoid strongly suppressed dorsalization induced by Xnr6 in β-catenin-depleted embryos. (G) Experimental design and proposed Spemann organizer pathway. Numbers of embryos were as follows: (A) n = 98, all normal. (B) n = 41, weakly dorsalized or normal. (C) n = 59, 57 completely ventralized. (D) n = 82, all completely ventralized. (E) n = 88, all with axial rescue. (F) n = 89, 75 with rescued axes but much weaker compared to β-catenin alone. Scale bars are indicated. Data from three independent experiments.

We conclude from these experiments that the dorsalizing effects of nodal mRNA in the embryo have a strong requirement for Gsc in the β-cat MO sensitized background and that Gsc can induce the expression of Xnr6.

A Positive Feedback Loop Between Gsc and Nodals Downstream of β-Catenin.

Next, we tested whether the dorsalizing effect of β-catenin had a requirement for Gsc function. To analyze this, we microinjected a stabilized form of murine β-catenin (mβ-catenin) mRNA that is not targeted by the β-cat MO (29). In wt embryos 1xD microinjection of 150 pg mβ-catenin mRNA resulted in only modest expansion of anterior brain structures marked by sox2 while 1xV injection induced secondary axes, including many complete ones (Fig. 3 A–B’). In β-catenin depleted embryos, the same amount of mβ-catenin mRNA microinjected 1× dorsal at 8-cell induced strongly dorsalized phenotypes with ectopic cement glands and enlarged brain structures marked by xag2 and sox2, while embryos also depleted of Goosecoid were rescued only to the level of wt embryos or less (Fig. 3 C–F’).

Fig. 3.

A 14-panel figure shows embryos A to F prime and Gsc pathways in G and H. Panels label Uninjected, MO treatments, and mRNA injections.

The rescue of ventralized Xenopus embryos by mouse β-catenin mRNA was attenuated by goosecoid depletion. (A and A’) Uninjected embryo with CG marked by Xag2 or CNS with Sox2; the Inset shows brightfield image. (B and B’) 1xD microinjection of β-catenin mRNA into a dorsal side caused moderately dorsalized phenotypes; Insets show that single injection into ventral blastomere caused twinned complete axes. (C and C’) β-catenin depletion (4× β-catMO) resulted in complete ventralization of embryos. (D and D’) Double depletion of β-catenin and Goosecoid resulted in ventralization lacking CG and CNS. (E and E’) β-catenin mRNA rescued axis induction resulting in ectopic CGs and strong dorsalized phenotypes with enlarged brains in β-cat MO embryos. (F and F’) Goosecoid is required for the robust dorsalization driven by β-catenin mRNA in β-catenin-depleted embryos. (G) Pathway of dorsal development in Xenopus suggested by this figure. (H) The main conclusion of this paper: A positive feedback loop between Goosecoid and Nodals exists in Spemann–Mangold organizer tissue. Number of embryos analyzed: (A) n = 78, all normal. (B) n = 51, seven dorsalized others mostly normal; Inset: n = 61, 30 complete second axis, 25 incomplete second axes. (C) n = 52, all completely ventralized. (D) n = 37, all completely ventralized. (E) n = 74, 64 strongly dorsalized with large CGs (12 with ectopic cement glands), seven rescued without CG, three ventralized escapers. (F) n = 52, 36 almost normal axes with CGs but not dorsalized, three with enlarged but no ectopic CGs, nine partially rescued but lacking CG, three completely ventralized. Scale bar length 500 µm; three independent experiments.

A developmental pathway in which endogenous β-catenin induces both Gsc and Nodal in parallel is proposed in Fig. 3G. The main conclusion from these experiments is that a positive feedback loop between Gsc and Nodals regulates Spemann organizer formation, particularly in anterior regions of the embryo (Fig. 3H).

Discussion

In this study, we asked whether Gsc played a role in the epistatic signaling pathway of dorsal development. To our surprise, gsc mRNA was able to completely rescue the ventralization caused by β-catenin depletion. As reported previously, and indicated in Fig. 4, complete dorsal axes can be rescued in β-cat MO embryos by single microinjections of sia, nodals, or chd mRNAs (19, 21). We expected Gsc to be downstream of Nodals, for these are the growth factors that mediate Gsc induction in mesoderm by Nieuwkoop center signals secreted by dorsal endoderm in the Xenopus blastula (30). We did not expect Gsc would rescue a complete Spemann organizer. Rescue by gsc mRNA was blocked by coinjection of lefty mRNA, a secreted inhibitor of Nodal/Activin receptors (24) and by CerS, a secreted antagonist that binds nodals in the extracellular space (25). In zebrafish, overexpression of the nodal-related genes cyclops and squint leads to goosecoid induction and, conversely, MO knockdown of these genes blocks chd expression (31). In addition, attenuation of Nodal signaling by increasing concentrations of the Nodal/Activin antagonist Lefty/Antivin results in the inhibition of goosecoid expression (32).

Fig. 4.

Flowchart A shows Hwa to β-cat, branching to Sia, Gsc, and Nodals. These lead to BCNE, Brain, Chordin, Dkk1, Frzb, Lefty, Cerberus, BMPs, and xWnt8.

Proposed signaling pathway for Xenopus axial development deduced from the present epistatic study and two previous ones (19, 21). (A) The maternal cytoplasmic determinant Huluwa (Hwa) protein stabilizes β-catenin-dependent transcription on the dorsal side. Dorsal β-catenin directly initiates two parallel signaling centers through the activation of Siamois and Nodal genes to induce the Blastula-Chordin-Noggin-Expression (BCNE) and Nieuwkoop centers, respectively. The present study uncovered a reciprocal positive feedback loop between Nodals and Goosecoid. Nodals are increased by Goosecoid in addition to β-catenin, and Nodals induce Goosecoid. This positive regulatory circuit ensures robust axis specification in Xenopus. Both the Nodal- and Siamois-dependent pathways converge to transcriptionally activate a largely overlapping set of Spemann–Mangold organizer genes that include multiple secreted factors in addition to the BMP antagonist Chordin shown here (21). The direct transcriptional activation of chordin by Goosecoid has been demonstrated recently (33). In the ventral side, BMP signaling restricts organizer activity. BMP signaling induces zygotic xWnt8, which further amplifies BMP signaling by inhibiting GSK3 and increasing Smad1/5/8 signaling (34), forming a ventral positive feedback loop that is inhibited by the organizer antagonists Dkk1 and Frzb. BMP also induces Sizzled (Szl), a secreted inhibitor of the Tolloid protease responsible for Chordin degradation, establishing a negative feedback mechanism that stabilizes Chordin levels.

In Xenopus and mouse, the gsc promoter contains a distal promoter element inducible by Nodal/Activin, and a proximal element activated by β-catenin (35). In the context of the wild-type Xenopus embryo gsc mRNA had only weak axis induction activity but caused strong dorsal induction in β-catenin depleted embryos (Fig. 1). Similarly, the dorsalizing activity of Xnr6 was weak in wt embryos, but very potent in the sensitized β-cat MO background. Experiments using Gsc MO revealed a strong requirement for both Xnr6 (Fig. 2 E–F’) and mouse β-catenin mRNA dorsalizing activities in the β-catenin sensitized system (Fig. 3 E–F’). As this study shows, a positive feedback loop between Gsc and Nodals exists downstream of β-catenin (Fig. 4).

Positive feedback is a fundamental biochemical mechanism to attain novel cell states, from bacteriophage lambda lysogeny to induced pluripotent stem cells (36). Gsc promotes anterior cell migration in Xenopus endomesoderm (3), is required for craniofacial development after gastrulation (11), and promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer metastases (37, 38). The Gsc/Nodal regulatory loop reported here functions in the establishment of an early Spemann organizer state (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 G–N). At the molecular level, this functional interaction is reflected in the ability of Gsc to induce downstream organizer genes such as Chordin and other organizer genes. Gsc is generally a transcriptional repressor (5, 39) and is able to directly bind to the chd promoter (33, 40). Gsc can also function as a transcriptional activator when monoubiquitinylated (41), and in the case of the chordin promoter increases transcription (5). As shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S4, Gsc upregulates Xnr6 transcription at gastrula. However, these results do not distinguish whether Gsc is a transcriptional activator or an inhibitor of ventral signals such as Vent1/2 (15). The chd promoter also contains multiple overlapping Smad4 binding sites that respond to Activin/Nodal signaling (42).

In Fig. 4 only Chordin is indicated downstream of Sia, Gsc, and Nodals, but many other secreted factors are also expressed in Spemann organizer and collectively contribute to dorsal patterning (43). In agreement with this functional redundancy, knockdown of chd using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (Chd MO) has strong but partial effects on dorsal development, indicating that Chd acts as an important but not exclusive regulator of the organizer pathway (19, 21). In zebrafish, gsc mRNA microinjection induces complete secondary axes, and this activity is only slightly reduced in chordino mutant embryos and Gsc secondary axes are induced even when Noggin1 and Follistatin-like 1b were inhibited with MOs (44). While the positive feedback loop between Gsc and Nodals could explain in part the mild loss-of-function phenotype of Gsc, parallel pathways, including other homeobox genes, probably also cooperate (45, 46). Definitive evidence would require double and triple MO knockdowns for gsc, sia, Xnr5, and Xnr6, which are difficult because these genes are present in multiple copies in the Xenopus genome (21).

The function of Chordin is to antagonize ventral differentiation driven by BMP4 signaling (Fig. 4). The rate-limiting step in the D-V pathway is the proteolytic cleavage of Chordin by the Tolloid metalloproteinase resulting in the shuttling of active BMPs (47, 48). In the ventral side, Sizzled, a BMP4-induced secreted factor induced at high levels of BMP4, functions as a competitive inhibitor of Tolloid, forming a negative feedback loop that stabilizes BMP4/pSmad1/5/8 signaling levels (19, 49). BMP4 also induces xWnt8 expression, which enhances Smad1/5/8 activity by inhibiting GSK3 in ventrolateral regions (34). Dorsal signals mediated by the secreted Wnt antagonists Dickkopf1 (Dkk1) and Frzb limit ventral xWnt8 signals (19). This self-organizing molecular signaling network provides a robust dorsoventral patterning system during early embryogenesis.

While the regulatory interactions in Fig. 4 are supported by Xenopus epistatic studies, organizer-associated transcriptional programs have also undergone evolutionary specialization. In zebrafish, the bozozok/dharma homeobox gene plays a crucial role during gastrulation and is expressed in the yolk cell and deep endoderm (50, 51). Bozozok opposes the activity of the ventral vent (vega) homeobox genes in zebrafish (52). Interestingly, the bozozok/dahrma transcriptional repressor evolved from a Goosecoid homeodomain protein ancestor that became independent of Nodal signaling but maintained activation by dorsal β-catenin (21). In bozozok mutants, expression of zebrafish nodals is greatly reduced, resulting in head defects (53). In Xenopus, another homeobox gene, siamois, is a transcriptional activator induced solely by β-catenin and independent of Nodal/Activin signaling. Siamois evolved from sebox (skin-embryonic-brain-oocyte-specific-homeobox), a different homeodomain protein branch derived from the Mix1 family of Activin primary response genes (54, 55). The siamois gene is initially expressed in the dorsal animal cap region where it directs the formation of the Blastula-Chordin-Noggin-expression (BCNE) center (4, 56). Sia, which exists in seven copies in X. laevis, may represent an evolutionary adaptation for rapid brain induction in frogs. It is interesting that both Siamois and Bozozok lost the ability to be induced by Nodal/Activin possessed by their ancestors (Mix1 and Gsc) but retained the entire spectrum of downstream organizer target genes (21).

In the chick embryo, gsc expression is initially detected in Koller’s sickle at the posterior of the unincubated egg (57), while chd expression is detectable in a central population of epiblast cells just anterior to the sickle that later contributes to brain formation like Xenopus Sia (58, 59). This central population might be functionally analogous to the Xenopus Siamois-induced Blastula Chordin and Noggin Expression (BCNE) center in prospective brain ectoderm, but no specific chick homeobox gene has yet been associated with it (4). The mouse organizer, despite normal embryonic gastrulation, has impaired neural inductive activity when goosecoid−/− mouse nodes (anterior primitive streak at day 7) are transplanted into early chick embryos; even gsc+/− nodes showed decreased Sox2 induction (60). Taken together, these findings highlight the evolutionary flexibility and functional conservation of homeobox genes in gastrulation. While different species have recruited the expression of homeobox genes like bozozok and sia for species-specific patterning, the role of Goosecoid as a core organizer gene has remained remarkably conserved from Hydra through annelids to vertebrates (7, 61).

In summary, recent epistatic studies in Xenopus have defined a signaling pathway governing dorsal axis formation (19, 21) (Fig. 4). The present study placed Goosecoid, the archetypal organizer marker, within this pathway and revealed a positive feedback loop between Nodal and Goosecoid acting downstream of Hwa and β-catenin. Functional redundancy within this network may help explain the mild phenotypes observed by gsc loss-of-function despite its remarkable evolutionary conservation. Developmental robustness requires resilient, self-organizing signaling circuits to ensure reproducible axial embryonic patterning.

Materials and Methods

Xenopus Ethic Statements.

All experiments involving Xenopus were performed in compliance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of California, Los Angeles, Medical School (Permit No. ARC-1995-129). Adult pigmented female and albino male X. laevis specimens were obtained from Xenopus-1 Inc. (Dexter, MI).

mRNA Synthesis.

pCS2-HA-RFP, pCS2-antivin/lefty1, and pCS2-Xnr6 plasmids were linearized with NotI, whereas pCS2-mouseGsc was digested using XhoI. Capped mRNAs were synthesized using the mMessage mMachine SP6 kit containing SP6 RNA polymerase (Invitrogen, MA), followed by purification with the MegaClear kit (Invitrogen, MA). The synthesized mRNAs were injected either ventrally or dorsally into a single blastomere at the 4- or 8-cell stage in a final volume of 4 nL. Microinjected mRNAs were titrated in embryos and used in the following amounts: Xnr6 mRNA 1 pg, gsc mRNA 150 pg (15), lefty mRNA 250 pg (62), mouse β-catenin 150 pg (29), and HA-RFP 100 pg (29).

Morpholinos.

Antisense morpholino oligonucleotides against X. laevis β-catenin (5′-TTTCAACCGTTTCCAAAGAACCAGG-3′) and gsc (5′-GCTGAACATGCCAGAAGGCATCACC-3′) were obtained from Gene Tools, LLC (Philomath, OR) (13, 20). For knockdown experiments, 10 ng of β-cat MO or 20 ng of Gsc MO were injected into each blastomere at 4-cell (resulting in total amounts of 40 ng and 80 ng per embryo, respectively) at the 2- to 4-cell stage.

Xenopus Embryo Manipulations and Whole Mount In Situ Hybridization.

Eggs were fertilized as in vitro using freshly dissected testis in 1× MMR (Marc’s Modified Ringer’s solution: 58.44 g/L NaCl, 1.49 g/L KCl, 2.94 g/L CaCl2/2H2O, 0.95 g/L MgCl2, 11.94 g/L HEPES, pH = 7.4 adjusted using NaOH). Following fertilization, eggs were incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Subsequently, 0.1× MMR was added, and the dishes were maintained at RT for an additional 70 min. To remove the jelly coat, fertilized embryos were treated with 2% cysteine in 0.1× MMR (pH 8.0) for 10 min at RT and rinsed with 0.1× MMR three times. Embryos were then microinjected in 1× MMR on 2% agar-H2O coated Petri dishes. After injection, embryos were transferred to agar-coated dishes containing 0.1× MMR and were incubated at room temperature until fixation. Embryos were fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (1x PBS diluted from 10x PBS: Biotech, PD8117) in 1 dram glass vials (Fisherbrand, FS60940d-1). Whole-mount in situ hybridizations used a modification of the original Richard Harland protocol. Following fixation, embryos were dehydrated through a methanol series and stored in 100% methanol at -20°C overnight. Embryos were bleached in 2:1 MeOH:H2O2 (30% w/w Sigma) overnight under bright fluorescent light above aluminum foil. For rehydration, embryos were sequentially incubated in 75%, 50%, and 25% methanol series in PBS for 5 min each at room temperature (RT). Embryos were then washed three times for 5 min each in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBSw) at room temperature (RT). Subsequently, embryos were incubated for 5 min at RT in a 1:1 mixture of hybridization buffer (10g Blocking reagent from Roche/Sigma cat# 11 096 176 001, 500mL Formamide, 250mL 20x SSC (175.3g NaCl, 77.4g Sodium citrate in autoclaved dH2O pH:7.0), 120mL autoclaved dH2O, 100mL 1g/100mL torula RNA from Roche/Sigma cat# 10109509001, 2mL Heparin (50mg/mL in 1xSSC), 5mL 20% Tween20, 10 ml 10% CHAPS detergent,10mL 0.5M EDTA) and PBSw, followed by incubation in 100% hybridization buffer for 3 h at 70°C. Embryos were then incubated overnight in a water bath at 70°C with 1 mL antisense RNA probes diluted to 1 ng/µL in hybridization buffer. The following day, the probe solution was removed and stored, and embryos were washed in hybridization buffer, followed by three washes in 2x SSC buffer for 5 min each at 70°C. Embryos were then washed twice for 30 min each at 70°C in 2x SSC containing 0.1% CHAPS, followed by two washes in 1x MAB (maleic acid buffer diluted from 5x solution: 58g Maleic acid, 43.65g NaCl, pH to 7.5 with NaOH, dH2O up to 1L) for 30 min each at 70°C. Embryos were subsequently washed twice in PBSw for 10 min at RT. Following washing, embryos were incubated in blocking solution (Roche cat# 11096176001 in 1x MAB) for 1 h at 4°C with gentle shaking. The antibody solution was replaced with fresh antibody solution prepared in blocking buffer as 1:10,000 dilution, and embryos were incubated overnight at 4°C with gentle shaking. Following antibody incubation, embryos were washed five times for 1 h each at RT in PBSw containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Embryos were then washed twice in PBSw for 30 min each at RT. Subsequently, embryos were incubated twice in AP1 buffer (0.1M NaCl, 0.1M Tris-HCl pH 9.5, 50mM MgCI2) for 10 min each at RT. For color development, embryos were incubated overnight at 4°C in 1 mL BM purple substrate (Roche/Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. No. 11442074001). The staining reaction was terminated by washing embryos with stop solution (100mM Tris-HCI pH 7.4 5mL, 1mM EDTA), after which the embryos were again dehydrated stepwise in methanol, stored at -20°C, rehydrated, and imaged. Imaging was conducted using a ZEISS Axio Zoom.V16 stereomicroscope equipped with Z-stack functionality to obtain three-dimensional image data.

qRT-PCR.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) was conducted at stages 10 and 11.5 using a previously established protocol (63). The primer sequences utilized for the qRT-PCR analysis were

Gene Forward primer Reverse primer
odc CAGCTAGCTGTGGTGTGG CAACATGGAAACTCAC ACC
chordin CCTCCAATCCAAGACTCC AGCAG GGAGGAGGAGGAGCTT TGGGACAAG
xnr6 AGATTGAGGAAAGTACC AGTTT GCTTTCCATTATCCTTT GGC

Supplementary Material

Appendix 01 (PDF)

pnas.2610127123.sapp.pdf (770.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Asashima for the Xnr6 construct, Guadalupe Villicana for help with embryo preparation, and Mustafa Karabicici, Grace Binder, and Julia Monka for valuable comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Norman Sprague Endowment for Molecular Oncology (UCLA BD-55).

Author contributions

Y.A. and E.M.D.R. designed research; performed research; analyzed data; and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

All data in this study are included in the article and/or SI Appendix. No new software was generated in the present study.

Supporting Information

References

  • 1.Cho K. W., Blumberg B., Steinbeisser H., De Robertis E. M., Molecular nature of Spemann’s organizer: The role of the Xenopus homeobox gene goosecoid. Cell 67, 1111–1120 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Blumberg B., Wright C. V., De Robertis E. M., Cho K. W., Organizer-specific homeobox genes in Xenopus laevis embryos. Science 253, 194–196 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Niehrs C., Keller R., Cho K. W., De Robertis E. M., The homeobox gene goosecoid controls cell migration in Xenopus embryos. Cell 72, 491–503 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kuroda H., Wessely O., De Robertis E. M., Neural induction in Xenopus: Requirement for ectodermal and endomesodermal signals via Chordin, Noggin, β-catenin, and cerberus. PLoS Biol. 2, e92 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Umair Z., et al. , Goosecoid controls neuroectoderm specification via dual circuits of direct repression and indirect stimulation in Xenopus embryos. Mol. Cells 44, 723–735 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Robertis E. M., “Goosecoid and gastrulation” in Gastrulation: From Cells to Embryo, Stern C. D., Ed. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, 2004), vol. 1, pp. 581–589. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nielsen C., Brunet T., Arendt D., Evolution of the bilaterian mouth and anus. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1358–1376 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rivera-Pérez J. A., Mallo M., Gendron-Maguire M., Gridley T., Behringer R. R., Goosecoid is not an essential component of the mouse gastrula organizer but is required for craniofacial and rib development. Development 121, 3005–3012 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yamada G., et al. , Targeted mutation of the murine goosecoid gene results in craniofacial defects and neonatal death. Development 121, 2917–2922 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Belo J. A., Leyns L., Yamada G., De Robertis E. M., The prechordal midline of the chondrocranium is defective in Goosecoid-1 mouse mutants. Mech. Dev. 72, 15–25 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Parry D. A., et al. , SAMS, a syndrome of short stature, auditory-canal atresia, mandibular hypoplasia, and skeletal abnormalities is a unique neurocristopathy caused by mutations in Goosecoid. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 1135–1142 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goriely A., et al. , functional homologue of goosecoid in Drosophila. Development 122, 1641–1650 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Steinbeisser H., Fainsod A., Niehrs C., Sasai Y., De Robertis E. M., The role of gsc and BMP-4 in dorsal-ventral patterning of the marginal zone in Xenopus: A loss-of-function study using antisense RNA. EMBO J. 14, 5230–5243 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ferreiro B., Artinger M., Cho K. W., Niehrs C., Antimorphic goosecoids. Development 125, 1347–1359 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sander V., Reversade B., De Robertis E. M., The opposing homeobox genes Goosecoid and Vent1/2 self-regulate Xenopus patterning. EMBO J. 26, 2955–2965 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yan L., et al. , Maternal Huluwa dictates the embryonic body axis through β-catenin in vertebrates. Science 362, eaat1045 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ji L., et al. , Dorsal determinant Hwa stabilizes β-catenin through direct inhibition of GSK3. Genes Dev. 40, 56–69 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tejeda-Muñoz N., De Robertis E. M., Lysosomes are required for early dorsal signaling in the Xenopus embryo. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2201008119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Azbazdar Y., De Robertis E. M., Molecular analysis of a self-organizing signaling pathway for Xenopus axial patterning from egg to tailbud. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2408346121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Heasman J., Kofron M., Wylie C., β-catenin signaling activity dissected in the early Xenopus embryo: A novel antisense approach. Dev. Biol. 222, 124–134 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Azbazdar Y., De Robertis E. M., Double assurance in the induction of axial development by egg dorsal determinants in Xenopus embryos. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122, e2421772122 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Takahashi S., et al. , Two novel nodal-related genes initiate early inductive events in Xenopus Nieuwkoop center. Development 127, 5319–5329 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thisse C., Thisse B., Halpern M. E., Postlethwait J. H., Goosecoid expression in neurectoderm and mesendoderm is disrupted in zebrafish cyclops gastrulas. Dev. Biol. 164, 420–429 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Thisse C., Thisse B., Antivin, a novel and divergent member of the TGFbeta superfamily, negatively regulates mesoderm induction. Development 126, 229–240 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Piccolo S., et al. , The head inducer Cerberus is a multifunctional antagonist of Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals. Nature 397, 707–710 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Artinger M., Blitz I., Inoue K., Tran U., Cho K. W., Interaction of goosecoid and brachyury in Xenopus mesoderm patterning. Mech. Dev. 65, 187–196 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Latinkić B. V., Smith J. C., Goosecoid and mix. 1 repress Brachyury expression and are required for head formation in Xenopus. Development 126, 1769–1779 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aberger F., Weidinger G., Grunz H., Richter K., Anterior specification of embryonic ectoderm: The role of the Xenopus cement gland-specific gene XAG-2. Mech. Dev. 72, 115–130 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Taelman V. F., et al. , Wnt signaling requires sequestration of glycogen synthase kinase 3 inside multivesicular endosomes. Cell 143, 1136–1148 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Agius E., Oelgeschläger M., Wessely O., Kemp C., Robertis E. D., Endodermal Nodal-related signals and mesoderm induction in Xenopus. Development 127, 1173–1183 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Varga M., Maegawa S., Bellipanni G., Weinberg E. S., Chordin expression, mediated by Nodal and FGF signaling, is restricted by redundant function of two β-catenins in the zebrafish embryo. Mech. Dev. 124, 775–791 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gritsman K., Talbot W. S., Schier A. F., Nodal signaling patterns the organizer. Development 127, 921–932 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kumar V., Umair Z., Lee U., Kim J., Two homeobox transcription factors, goosecoid and Ventx1. 1, oppositely regulate chordin transcription in Xenopus gastrula embryos. Cells 12, 874 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fuentealba L. C., et al. , Integrating patterning signals: Wnt/GSK3 regulates the duration of the BMP/Smad1 signal. Cell 131, 980–993 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Watabe T., et al. , Molecular mechanisms of Spemann’s organizer formation: Conserved growth factor synergy between Xenopus and mouse. Genes Dev. 9, 3038–3050 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ptashne M., Epigenetics: Core misconcept. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 7101–7103 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hartwell K. A., et al. , The Spemann organizer gene, Goosecoid, promotes tumor metastasis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 18969–18974 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meng Y., et al. , Goosecoid facilitates the metastasis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by enhancing EMT and stemness via regulating TGF-β/SMAD2/3 signaling. Cell Cycle 25, 1–17 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yao J., Kessler D. S., Goosecoid promotes head organizer activity by direct repression of Xwnt8 in Spemann’s organizer. Development 128, 2975–2987 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kumar V., Umair Z., Kumar S., Lee U., Kim J., Smad2 and Smad3 differentially modulate chordin transcription via direct binding on the distal elements in gastrula Xenopus embryos. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 559, 168–175 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zou W., et al. , The E3 ubiquitin ligase Wwp2 regulates craniofacial development through mono-ubiquitylation of Goosecoid. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 59–65 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Demagny H., Araki T., De Robertis E. M., The tumor suppressor Smad4/DPC4 is regulated by phosphorylations that integrate FGF, Wnt, and TGF-β signaling. Cell Rep. 9, 688–700 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.De Robertis E. M., Tejeda-Munoz N., Evo-Devo of Urbilateria and its larval forms. Dev. Biol. 487, 10–20 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dixon Fox M., Bruce A. E. E., Short-and long-range functions of Goosecoid in zebrafish axis formation are independent of Chordin, Noggin 1 and Follistatin-like 1b. Development 136, 1675–1685 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chang W. Y., KhosrowShahian F., Chang R., Crawford M. J., xPitx1 plays a role in specifying cement gland and head during early Xenopus development. Genesis 29, 78–90 (2001). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pannese M., et al. , The Xenopus homologue of Otx2 is a maternal homeobox gene that demarcates and specifies anterior body regions. Development 121, 707–720 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Piccolo S., et al. , Cleavage of Chordin by Xolloid metalloprotease suggests a role for proteolytic processing in the regulation of Spemann organizer activity. Cell 91, 407–416 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bier E., De Robertis E. M., BMP gradients: A paradigm for morphogen-mediated developmental patterning. Science 348, aaa5838 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lee H. X., Ambrosio A. L., Reversade B., De Robertis E. M., Embryonic dorsal-ventral signaling: Secreted frizzled-related proteins as inhibitors of tolloid proteinases. Cell 124, 147–159 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fekany K., et al. , The zebrafish bozozok locus encodes Dharma, a homeodomain protein essential for induction of gastrula organizer and dorsoanterior embryonic structures. Development 126, 1427–1438 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yamanaka Y., et al. , A novel homeobox gene, dharma, can induce the organizer in a non-cell-autonomous manner. Genes Dev. 12, 2345–2353 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Imai Y., et al. , The homeobox genes vox and vent are redundant repressors of dorsal fates in zebrafish. Development 128, 2407–2420 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Solnica-Krezel L., Driever W., The role of the homeodomain protein Bozozok in zebrafish axis formation. Int. J. Dev. Bio. 45, 299–310 (2001). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rosa F. M., Mix. 1, a homeobox mRNA inducible by mesoderm inducers, is expressed mostly in the presumptive endodermal cells of Xenopus embryos. Cell 57, 965–974 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pereira L. A., Wong M. S., Lim S. M., Stanley E. G., Elefanty A. G., The Mix family of homeobox genes-key regulators of mesendoderm formation during vertebrate development. Dev. Biol. 367, 163–177 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ishibashi H., et al. , Expression of Siamois and Twin in the blastula Chordin/Noggin signaling center is required for brain formation in Xenopus laevis embryos. Mech. Dev. 125, 58–66 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Izpisúa-Belmonte J. C., De Robertis E. M., Storey K. G., Stern C. D., The homeobox gene goosecoid and the origin of organizer cells in the early chick blastoderm. Cell 74, 645–659 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Streit A., et al. , Chordin regulates primitive streak development and the stability of induced neural cells, but is not sufficient for neural induction in the chick embryo. Development 125, 507–519 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Stern C. D., Cell biology of the chick organizer: Origins, composition, population dynamics and fate. Cells Dev. 184, 204017 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhu L., Belo J. A., De Robertis E. M., Stern C. D., Goosecoid regulates the neural inducing strength of the mouse node. Dev. Biol. 216, 276–281 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Harmoush B., Viebahn C., Tsikolia N., Development of node architecture and emergence of molecular organizer characteristics in the pig embryo. Dev. Dyn. 254, 916–934 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pera E. M., Hou S., Strate I., Wessely O., De Robertis E. M., Exploration of the extracellular space by a large-scale secretion screen in the early Xenopus embryo. Int. J. Dev. Bio. 49, 781–796 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Colozza G., De Robertis E. M., Maternal syntabulin is required for dorsal axis formation and is a germ plasm component in Xenopus. Differentiation 88, 17–26 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 01 (PDF)

pnas.2610127123.sapp.pdf (770.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data in this study are included in the article and/or SI Appendix. No new software was generated in the present study.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES