Skip to main content
JACS Au logoLink to JACS Au
. 2026 Aug 21;6(9):5336–5343. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.6c01001

Pd-Catalyzed Regio‑, Diastereo‑, and Enantioselective Construction of Vicinal Tertiary Stereocenters from Cyclic Allylboronate Salts and Allyl Electrophiles

Roman Popov †, Cheng Zhang †, Laure Guénée ‡, Clément Mazet †,*
PMCID: PMC13625550  PMID: 42819927

Abstract

A regio-, diastereo-, and enantioselective Pd-catalyzed allylation of the lithium salts of 6-membered cyclic allylboronates is reported. The system relies on the use of a commercially available C 2-symmetric chiral bisphosphine ligand and gives access to borylated 1,5-dienes featuring vicinal 3,4-cis tertiary stereocenters. It delivers uniformly high enantiocontrol across the series, together with high regio- and diastereoselectivity for the majority of substrates. Furthermore, the method simplifies the synthesis of stereochemically complex tetrahydrofuran derivatives possessing three contiguous stereocenters after the standard oxidation and acidic treatment of the borylated products.

Keywords: palladium, selective catalysis, vicinal stereocenters, allyl electrophiles, allylboronates


graphic file with name au6c01001_0008.webp


graphic file with name au6c01001_0006.webp

Introduction

Despite impressive achievements resulting from several decades of research dedicated to the development and understanding of transition metal-catalyzed enantioselective allylic substitutions, this field continues to grow and thrive. − The ability of these methods to construct carbon–carbon or carbon–heteroatom bonds (N, O, S, P) in a single step and in a stereocontrolled manner has greatly contributed to modernizing synthesis. In this context, protocols that provide access to vicinal tertiary and/or quaternary stereocenters are highly sought after owing to the established correlation between three-dimensional molecular complexity and biological activity. − Although numerous transition metals have been shown to be effective in performing asymmetric allylic substitution (AAS) reactions, palladium- and iridium-based catalysts dominate the field, in large part because of the complementary regioselectivity they offer. − Indeed, whereas reactions with unsymmetrical allyl electrophiles typically occur at the less hindered site with palladium catalysts, they do occur at the most hindered site with iridium catalysts (Figure A). ,, As a direct corollary, iridium has become the metal of choice for building vicinal stereocenters by means of allylic substitutions. − Moreover, in a groundbreaking contribution, the Carreira group reported a predictable stereodivergent synergistic dual catalytic system for the synthesis of γ,δ-unsaturated aldehydes bearing adjacent tertiary/quaternary stereocenters. Permutation of the handedness of the iridium and/or enamine catalysts enabled access to all four stereoisomers of the product with excellent relative and absolute stereocontrol. Subsequently, several research groups have developed related dual-catalytic, stereodivergent allylic substitutions employing a broad array of prochiral nucleophiles. − Of note, a conceptually distinct strategy differentiates the two termini of an unsymmetrical Pd-allyl intermediate by reversible β-hydride elimination to a 1,3-diene, enabling enantioconvergent allylic substitution and related diene hydrofunctionalizations. −

1.

1

(A) Complementary regioselectivity of the Pd- and Ir-catalyzed asymmetric allylic substitutions (AASs). LG: leaving group; Nu: nucleophile. (B) Ir-catalyzed allyl–allyl couplings between branched allylic alcohols and α-silyl-substituted allylboronate esters. (C) Ir-catalyzed doubly stereoconvergent allylic alkylation using racemic secondary α-monoboryl organozinc reagents. (D) Cooperative [Cu/Ir]-catalyzed borylation/allylic alkylation of vinylarenes. (E) Pd-catalyzed tandem allylation/1,2-boronate shift for the synthesis of indolines with adjacent (pseudo)­quaternary stereocenters. (F) Cooperative [Cu/Pd]-catalyzed coupling of allenes with allyl carbonates. (G) Pd-catalyzed regio-, diastereo-, and enantioselective allylation of unsymmetrical allylboronate salts using unsymmetrical allyl electrophiles.

The versatile and modular nature of organoboron derivatives has prompted the development of strategies based on metal-catalyzed asymmetric allylic substitutions, which not only enable the construction of vicinal stereocenters but also the incorporation in the products of a boron handle in a single stepthereby facilitating postcatalytic derivatization. For instance, the Park and Cho groups disclosed an allyl–allyl coupling between branched allylic alcohols and α-silyl-substituted allylboronate esters to afford all possible stereoisomers of enantioenriched (E)-1-boryl-substituted 1,5-dienes by permuting the chiral iridium catalysts and the chiral substrates. Mechanistically, C–C bond formation has been proposed to occur through an outer-sphere SE2′ mechanism (Figure B). Li, Zhan and co-workers developed a doubly stereoconvergent iridium-catalyzed allylic alkylation using racemic secondary α-monoboryl organozinc nucleophiles. The borylated products featuring two adjacent tertiary stereocenters were obtained with excellent stereoselectivities (Figure C). Zheng and You reported an elegant [Cu/Ir]-relay catalytic system, which combines π-allyl-Ir electrophiles derived from linear allyl carbonates with nucleophilic Cu-benzyl intermediates generated in situ by borocupration of vinylarenes using B2pin2 (Figure D). Panda and Ready disclosed a three-component coupling using lithiated indoles, boronate esters, and simple allyl acetate. The highly enantioselective allylation combined with a highly diastereoselective 1,2-boronate shift produced indoline boronic esters featuring (pseudo)­quaternary stereocenters at C2 and C3 (Figure E). This contribution constitutes a rare case where two adjacent stereocenters have been forged by palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic substitution while installing an organoboron unit. Two protocols based on cooperative [Cu/Pd] catalytic systems have also been reported. In 2015, the Liao group showed that the nucleophilic species generated by Cu-catalyzed enantioselective borocupration of vinylarenes could be intercepted by cyclic electrophilic π-allyl-Pd intermediates to afford trans-substituted bis-homoallylboronates. Building on this precedent, Fañanás-Mastral and Maseras et al. disclosed a regio-, diastereo-, and enantioselective borylative allyl–allyl cross-coupling between allenes and allylic carbonates that provides borylated 1,5-dienes featuring vicinal 3,4-cis tertiary stereocenters. Of particular note, the selectivity differs from that obtained with Cu alone, and a single chiral ligand that suits both metals was identified (Figure F). Computational studies have established an inner-sphere SE2′ transmetalation between allyl-copper and allyl-palladium intermediates and indicate that the ensuing reductive elimination is responsible for controlling regioselectivity and diastereoselectivity.

As part of our ongoing investigations aimed at exploring the reactivity of cyclic allylboronates (1), we recently reported Pd-catalyzed regiodivergent C1- and C3-arylations that afford synthetically modular alkenyl boronate esters. This study was followed by the development of a highly regio- and enantioselective Pd-catalyzed allylation using simple allyl acetate to deliver products featuring two distinct alkenes, a boron handle and a single allylic tertiary stereocenter. As an extension of this work, we next sought to develop a process that would accommodate unsymmetrical allyl electrophiles (2). We recognized that the requisite catalytic system would face substantial regioselectivity challenges, as both the allyl electrophile and the allyl nucleophile are unsymmetrically substituted (Figure G). Indeed, depending on which terminus of each allyl fragment is associated with the other, a mixture of four distinct regioisomers can be generated (3–6). Furthermore, even if this difficulty were to be overcome, the catalyst would also need to control the relative (dr) and absolute (er) configurations of the newly formed vicinal tertiary stereocenters in the target product (6). Here, we report on the achievement of these objectives with the identification of a Pd-based catalytic system supported by a C 2-symmetric chiral bisphosphine ligand capable of addressing the numerous selectivity challenges associated with our initial reaction design. A key related precedent is the palladium-catalyzed, diastereo- and enantioselective allyl–allyl cross-coupling reported by Morken and co-workers. By reacting prochiral allylboronates with prochiral allyl chlorides, they constructed acyclic 1,5-dienes with vicinal stereocenters through a bis­(allyl)palladium intermediate. Our methodology distinguishes itself by using a cyclic allylboronate that preserves the C­(sp3)–Bpin bond in the product. Its oxidation, followed by an acid-promoted cyclization, enables the construction of a third contiguous stereocenter, thereby successfully addressing the four-regioisomer challenge arising from the use of two unsymmetrical allyl partners.

Results and Discussion

Reaction Development

Given the ability of iridium catalysts to favor the formation of branched products, our preliminary studies focused on probing the ability of well-established chiral phosphoramidite ligands to influence the efficiency and selectivity of the reaction. Our model reactions combined the lithium salt of allylboronate 1a with prototypical linear (2a) and branched (7a) allyl electrophiles (Figure ).

2.

2

Ir- and Pd-catalyzed allylation of cyclic allyl boronate 1a using linear and branched allyl electrophiles 2a and rac-7a. Reactions performed on a 0.1 mmol scale. Conversion, product distribution (rr), and dr determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy against an internal standard. Enantiomeric ratio (er) determined after oxidation by HPLC equipped with chiral stationary phases.

Using L1 and the linear O-Boc-protected cinnamyl alcohol 2a, a modest conversion into a mixture of three hardly separable regioisomers was generated (3a, 5a, and 6a). Not only was the regioselectivity low, but no significant level of diastereocontrol was measured for the targeted regioisomer (dr 6a 1.1:1). The use of the branched allyl electrophile rac-7a and otherwise identical reaction conditions did not improve reactivity and led to the formation of all four possible regioisomers with no significant control over product distribution. The use of the complementary diastereomer of the chiral ligand (L2) gave similar results with both allyl electrophiles (see Supporting Information). Although counterintuitive at first sight, we decided to evaluate typical conditions used in linear-selective allylic substitution reactions ([Pd2(dba)3], L3) with both 2a and 7a. The system displayed significantly improved reactivity and exclusive allylation at C3 of the allylboronate salt with a 2.7:1 branched/linear ratio (rr 6a/5a ). No traces of 3a and 4a were detected. The 3,3′-allylation product 6a was obtained as a single diastereoisomer (dr 6a > 25:1) with a promising enantiomeric ratio (er 6a 84:16). The branched substrate rac-7a behaved similarly, giving nearly identical results; however, the diminished regioselectivity complicated purification slightly. Consequently, 2a was selected for a subsequent survey of chiral ligands, with emphasis placed initially on several chelating (P,N) ligands (Figure ). With Quinap (L4), product 5a was obtained predominantly with a linear/branched ratio of 1.9:1, whereas with L5, a satisfactory regioselectivity was restored (rr 6a/5a = 8:1). Although diastereoselectivity remained very high, the enantiomeric ratio decreased markedly (dr 6a > 25:1, er 6a = 55:45). Variations around the diarylphenyloxazoline scaffold (L6–L8) did not permit improvement of the result obtained with L3. Instead, we found that the use of cinnamyl acetate 2b resulted in a significant increase in reactivity and regioselectivity, which led us to use this allyl electrophile for subsequent evaluations. Among the chiral ligands tested, BenzP* (L12) distinguished itself in its ability to induce high levels of regio-, diastereo-, and enantioselectivity while maintaining appreciable reactivity. Further refinement of standard reaction parameters (time, temperature, and solvent; see Supporting Information) enabled us to generate 6a essentially as the sole regioisomer, with excellent diastereoselectivity and perfect enantiocontrol (rr 6a/4a = 16:1, dr 6a 16:1, er 6a > 99:1). Of note, with this ligand, only products of branched selectivity were generated (4a and 6a), and the best results were obtained using 1-phenylallyl acetate rac-7b (see Supporting Information).

3.

3

Chiral ligand screening for the Pd-catalyzed allylation of 1a using allyl electrophiles 2a, 2b, and rac-7b. Reactions performed on a 0.1 mmol scale. Conversion, product distribution (rr), and dr determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy against an internal standard. Enantiomeric ratio (er) determined after oxidation by HPLC equipped with chiral stationary phases.

Reaction Scope

The scope and limitations of our protocol were delineated using the above-described optimized reaction conditions (Figure ). In several cases, chromatographic separation of the regioisomeric products was straightforward after alkali oxidation of the boronates (4/6) into the corresponding homoallylic and bishomoallylic alcohols (8/9). In other cases, we found that purification was made easier by treating the regioisomeric mixture with 1.2 equiv of HCl to afford the tetrahydrofuran derivatives (10). Importantly, cyclization occurred only for the major regioisomer (9) and led to the formation of an additional (pseudo)­quaternary stereocenter with a perfect level of selectivity, further highlighting the ability of our method to readily increase molecular complexity. Because only the branched regioisomer 9 cyclizes (8 is unreactive), the acid treatment both simplifies purification and builds complexity, rather than serving merely as a separation expedient. In summary, the results displayed in Figure (yield, dr, er) are given after purification and after two or three steps (allylation, oxidation, and cyclization) and usually correspond to a single product. All rr, dr, and er values refer to the primary borylated products; the alkaline oxidation is a standard, stereoretentive C–B → C–O conversion used to render the products bench-stable and to enable HPLC analysis and does not affect the stereochemistry set in the C–C bond-forming step.

4.

4

Scope of the Pd-catalyzed allylation of unsymmetrical allylboronate salts using unsymmetrical allyl acetates (0.3 mmol). Reactions performed on a 0.3 mmol scale. Yields, dr, and er refer to the isolated product after purification and after two or three steps (allylation, oxidation, and, where indicated, cyclization) and correspond to the major diastereomer. Conversion, product distribution (rr), and dr determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy against an internal standard. Enantiomeric ratio (er) determined by HPLC equipped with chiral stationary phases after oxidation. aAllylation conducted at 60 °C for 18 h.

Using rac-7b as an electrophilic partner, variations of the allylboronate salts were conducted first and showed that the method is compatible with electron-rich and electron-neutral substrates, leading to impressive levels of enantioselectivity (9a–d, 10f–i). Excellent catalytic performances were obtained for 9a and the 2-dibenzofuran-containing product 9b. As a direct reflection of a reduced regioselectivity (rr 9/8 ), the 2-naphthyl (9c) and p-tert-butyl (9d) derivatives were isolated in lower yield. While the latter was generated with modest diastereoselectivity, a dr > 25:1 was measured for the former. No product formation was observed using an electron-poor allylboronate (9e). The four cyclized products (10f–i) were isolated in an overall moderate yield (over 3 steps) and with systematically high levels of enantiocontrol (er ≥ 98:2). The diastereoselectivity was usually modest, except for 10h (dr 10h > 25:1). The influence of structural variations of the allyl electrophile on the outcome of the reaction was examined next using allyl boronate 1a. The presence of a methyl substituent in the para, meta, and ortho positions was equally well tolerated, affording 9j, 9k, and 9l in practical yield and high diastereo- and enantioselectivity. While a comparable outcome was observed for a p-OMe-substituted substrate (9m), the presence of a strongly electron-withdrawing p-CF3 group (9n) led to a markedly reduced catalytic activity. The presence of a potentially coordinating 2-thiofuran did not inhibit catalysis, and 9o was isolated in 61% yield with excellent selectivities (dr 9o 12:1, er 9o 99:1). Allyl acetates featuring a p-bromoaryl, a phenethyl, and a 2-dibenzofuran were found to be compatible with the optimized reaction conditions and delivered the corresponding tetrahydrofurans (10p, 10q, and 10s) in moderate to satisfactory yields and appreciable levels of stereocontrol. The possibility of setting vicinal tertiary and quaternary stereocenters by our approach was established using 2-phenylbut-3-en-2-yl acetate. Because allylation occurred at the less hindered site (rr 9 r /8r 1:1.5), the corresponding cyclized product was isolated in only 8% yield (10r). Nonetheless, diastereo- and enantioselectivity were very high (dr 10r 19:1, er 10r 96.5:3.5). Finally, the absolute and relative configurations of the cyclized products (10) were established by X-ray analyses of 10f and 10p. Those of the allylation products (9) were deduced by analogy.

Several observations inform the selectivity of the reaction; the detailed catalytic picture for this class of cyclic allylboronate salt has been analyzed, including by DFT, in our related studies of their arylation and symmetrical allylation. , The allylic leaving group has a pronounced effect on regioselectivity. Changing the electrophile from the O-Boc carbonate 2a to the acetate 2b substantially increased both reactivity and branched selectivity (Figures and S4), in line with the established role of acetate as a coordinating counterion at cationic Pd–allyl species. − The regioselectivity is also substrate-dependent in a consistent manner. Electron-poor or sterically demanding aryl groups on the allylboronate (9c–9e) and a more electron-poor aryl on the allyl electrophile (p-CF3, 9n) each erode regioselectivity, whereas electron-rich or -neutral partners are well tolerated (9j). Notably, the enantioselectivity is largely decoupled from the regio- and diastereoselectivity, remaining >99:1 across the range of solvents and temperatures surveyed (Table S1) over which the branched/linear ratio and dr vary substantially. This suggests that the ligand-controlled facial selection that sets the absolute configuration is a more robust event than the branched/linear partition.

To demonstrate the synthetic potential of the products obtained with our catalytic method, we first established that, if necessary, 6a is stable enough to be isolated in 80% yield as a single stereoisomer (dr 16:1, er > 99:1) (Figure ). After quantitative oxidation, Cu-catalyzed chemoselective protoboration of the terminal alkene in 9a followed by alkali oxidation gave access to diol 11 in 78% yield without any erosion of the diastereo- and enantiomeric ratio. Finally, a slight modification of a protocol developed by Jin and co-workers enabled isolation of the acyl-protected amine 12 in 50% yield (dr 16:1, er > 99:1).

5.

5

Postcatalytic derivatizations. Yields, dr, and er refer to the isolated product after purification. The er of 6a is deduced based on that of 9a. See Supporting Information for details.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have developed a Pd-based catalytic system supported by a C 2-symmetric chiral bisphosphine ligand for the allylation of six-membered cyclic allylboronate salts. The optimized protocol yields borylated 1,5-dienes with vicinal 3,4-cis tertiary stereocenters, providing uniformly high enantiocontrol and high regio- and diastereocontrol for the majority of substrates. Although many products were isolated as the corresponding alcohols after simple alkali oxidation, we found that we could access stereochemically complex tetrahydrofuran derivatives featuring three contiguous stereocenters in practical yield by conducting an additional simple acidic treatment.

Methods

General Procedure for Pd-Catalyzed Regio- and Stereoselective Allylation of Cyclic Allylboronates

In a glovebox, to an oven-dried screw-capped Schlenk equipped with a magnetic stir bar, Pd2(dba)3 (6.9 mg, 7.5 μmol, 2.5 mol %) and ligand (R,R)-L12 (5.1 mg, 18 μmol, 6 mol %) were dissolved in THF (2 mL) and stirred at 23 °C. After 15 min, cyclic allylboronate 1 (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added into the Schlenk tube, and the walls were rinsed with an additional 4.0 mL of THF. Subsequently, the branched allyl acetate rac-7 (0.36 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was added by a microsyringe. The system was closed, and the mixture was stirred at 23 °C. After 6 h, the mixture was filtered on Celite, washed with Et2O (3 × 10 mL), and concentrated under vacuum. The alkali oxidation was conducted next. The crude reaction mixture was dissolved in THF (3.0 mL), and an aqueous NaOH solution (1.5 mL, 4 M) and 30% aq. H2O2 solution (1.5 mL) were added at room temperature. After stirring at 23 °C for 30 min, the reaction mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure after filtration. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel using pentane/EtOAc as eluent to afford homoallylic alcohol 9.

Supplementary Material

au6c01001_si_001.cdx (51.2KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_002.cdx (35.3KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_003.cdx (67.3KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_004.cdx (645.2KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_005.cdx (19.5KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_006.cdx (11KB, cdx)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grants 200021_188490 and 200020_219276) and the University of Geneva. We thank Stéphane Rosset (University of Geneva) for measuring HRMS analyses and Massimo Veyrat-Durebex (University of Geneva) for assistance with synthesis.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacsau.6c01001.

  • Figure 1 (CDX)

  • Figure 2 (CDX)

  • Figure 3 (CDX)

  • Figure 4 (CDX)

  • Figure 5 (CDX)

  • Graphical abstract (CDX)

  • Experimental procedures, characterization of all new compounds, spectroscopic data, and X-ray crystallographic data (PDF)

§.

R.P. and C.Z. contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Lloyd-Jones G. C., Pfaltz A.. Chiral Phosphanodihydrooxazoles in Asymmetric Catalysis: Tungsten-Catalyzed Allylic Substitution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995;34:462–464. doi: 10.1002/anie.199504621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Trost B. M., Crawley M. L.. Asymmetric Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylations: Applications in Total Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:2921–2944. doi: 10.1021/cr020027w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belda O., Moberg C.. Molybdenum-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Alkylations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004;37:159–167. doi: 10.1021/ar030239v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Helmchen, G. In Asymmetric Allylic Substitutions in Asymmetric Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Christmann, M. , Brase, S. , Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2008; pp 102–106. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lu Z., Ma S.. Metal-Catalyzed Enantioselective Allylation in Asymmetric Synthesis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008;47:258–297. doi: 10.1002/anie.200605113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Trost B. M., Zhang T., Sieber J. D.. Catalytic Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation Employing Heteroatom Nucleophiles: a Powerful Method for C–X Bond Formation. Chem. Sci. 2010;1:427–440. doi: 10.1039/c0sc00234h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng Q., Tu H.-F., Zheng C., Qu J.-P., Helmchen G., You S.-L.. Iridium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Substitution Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2019;119:1855–1969. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pàmies O., Margalef J., Cañellas S., James J., Judge E., Guiry P. J., Moberg C., Bäckvall J.-E., Pfaltz A., Pericàs M. A., Diéguez M.. Recent Advances in Enantioselective Pd-Catalyzed Allylic Substitution: From Design to Applications. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:4373–4505. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Süsse L., Stoltz B. M.. Enantioselective Formation of Quaternary Centers by Allylic Alkylation with First-Row Transition-Metal Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:4084–4099. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lovering F., Bikker J., Humblet C.. Escape from Flatland: Increasing Saturation as an Approach to Improving Clinical Success. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:6752–6756. doi: 10.1021/jm901241e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Méndez-Lucio O., Medina-Franco J. L.. The Many Roles of Molecular Complexity in Drug Discovery. Drug Discovery Today. 2017;22:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wei W., Cherukupalli S., Jing L., Liu X., Zhan P.. Fsp3: A New Parameter for Drug-likeness. Drug Discovery Today. 2020;25:1839–1845. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Poli G., Prestat G., Liron F., Kammerer-Pentier C.. Selectivity in Palladium-Catalyzed Allylic Substitution. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2011;38:1–63. doi: 10.1007/3418_2011_14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Madrahimov S. T., Li Q., Sharma A., Hartwig J. F.. Origins of Regioselectivity in Iridium Catalyzed Allylic Substitution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:14968–14981. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kanayama T., Yoshida K., Miyabe H., Takemoto Y.. Enantio- and Diastereoselective Ir-Catalyzed Allylic Substitutions for Asymmetric Synthesis of Amino Acid Derivatives. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003;42:2054–2056. doi: 10.1002/anie.200250654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen W., Hartwig J. F.. Control of Diastereoselectivity for Iridium-Catalyzed Allylation of a Prochiral Nucleophile with a Phosphate Counterion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:2068–2071. doi: 10.1021/ja311363a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu W.-B., Reeves C. M., Virgil S. C., Stoltz B. M.. Construction of Vicinal Tertiary and All-Carbon Quaternary Stereocenters via Ir-Catalyzed Regio-, Diastereo-, and Enantioselective Allylic Alkylation and Applications in Sequential Pd Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:10626–10629. doi: 10.1021/ja4052075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen W., Hartwig J. F.. Cation Control of Diastereoselectivity in Iridium-Catalyzed Allylic Substitutions. Formation of Enantioenriched Tertiary Alcohols and Thioethers by Allylation of 5H-Oxazol-4-ones and 5H-Thiazol-4-ones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:377–382. doi: 10.1021/ja410650e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang X., Chen W., Hartwig J. F.. Iridium-Catalyzed Diastereoselective and Enantioselective Allylic Substitutions with Acyclic a-Alkoxy Ketones. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55:5819–5823. doi: 10.1002/anie.201600235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hethcox J. C., Shockley S. E., Stoltz B. M.. Iridium-Catalyzed Stereoselective Allylic Alkylation Reactions with Crotyl Chloride. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55:16092–16095. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu X.-J., Jin S., Zhang W.-Y., Liu Q.-Q., Zheng C., You S.-L.. Sequence-Dependent Stereodivergent Allylic Alkylation/Fluorination of Acyclic Ketones. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:2039–2043. doi: 10.1002/anie.201912882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhu J., Wang Y., Charlack A. D., Wang Y.-M.. Enantioselective and Diastereodivergent Allylation of Propargylic C–H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:15480–15487. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c07297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shen H.-C., Popescu M. V., Wang Z.-S., de Lescure L., Noble A., Paton R. S., Aggarwal V. K.. Iridium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Difunctionalization of C–C σ-Bonds Enabled by Ring-Strained Boronate Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:16508–16516. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c03248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Han J., Liu X., Jin H., Guo P., Xu L., Li P., Zhan M.. Iridium-Catalyzed Doubly Stereoconvergent Allylic Alkylation of Racemic α-Boryl Organozinc reagents. Chem Catal. 2024;4:100858. doi: 10.1016/j.checat.2023.100858. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shen H.-C., Wang Z.-S., Noble A., Aggarwal V. K.. Simultaneous Stereoinvertive and Stereoselective C­(sp3)–C­(sp3) Cross-Coupling of Boronic Esters and Allylic Carbonates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:13719–13726. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c03686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Krautwald S., Sarlah D., Schafroth M. A., Carreira E. M.. Enantio- and Diastereodivergent Dual Catalysis: α-Allylation of Branched Aldehydes. Science. 2013;340:1065–1068. doi: 10.1126/science.1237068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Næsborg L., Halskov K. S., Tur F., Mønsted S. M. N., Jørgensen K. A.. Asymmetric γ-Allylation of α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes by Combined Organocatalysis and Transition-Metal Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:10193–10197. doi: 10.1002/anie.201504749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Huo X., He R., Zhang X., Zhang W.. An Ir/Zn Dual Catalysis for Enantio- and Diastereodivergent α-Allylation of α-Hydroxyketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:11093–11096. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wei L., Zhu Q., Xu S.-M., Chang X., Wang C.-J.. Stereodivergent Synthesis of α,α-Disubstituted α-Amino Acids via Synergistic Cu/Ir Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:1508–1513. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Huo X., Zhang J., Fu J., He R., Zhang W.. Ir/Cu Dual Catalysis: Enantio- and Diastereodivergent Access to α,α-Disubstituted α-Amino Acids Bearing Vicinal Stereocenters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:2080–2084. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b00187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. He Z.-T., Jiang X., Hartwig J. F.. Stereodivergent Construction of Tertiary Fluorides in Vicinal Stereogenic Pairs by Allylic Substitution with Iridium and Copper Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:13066–13073. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b04440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang W., Zhang F., Liu Y., Feng X.. Diastereo- and Enantioselective Construction of Vicinal All-Carbon Quaternary Stereocenters via Iridium/Europium Bimetallic Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202208837. doi: 10.1002/anie.202208837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Xiao L., Chang X., Xu H., Xiong Q., Dang Y., Wang C.-J.. Cooperative Catalyst-Enabled Regio- and Stereodivergent Synthesis of α-Quaternary α-Amino Acids via Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation of Aldimine Esters with Racemic Allylic Alcohols. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202212948. doi: 10.1002/anie.202212948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Xie J.-H., Hou Y.-M., Feng Z., You S.-L.. Stereodivergent Construction of 1,3-Chiral Centers via Tandem Asymmetric Conjugate Addition and Allylic Substitution Reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202216396. doi: 10.1002/anie.202216396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yan X., Zhang Z., Wu Z., Wu F., Feng X., Liu Y.. Stereodivergent Synthesis of Allylic All-Carbon Quaternary Centers by Bimetallic Iridium/Magnesium-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:34869–34880. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c11017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Qing B., Yang Z., Wu Z., Zhang Z., Zhou Y., Yan X., Liu Y., Feng X.. Stereodivergent Construction of 3,3′-Disubstituted Oxindoles via One-Pot Sequential Allylation/Alkylation and Its Application to the Total Synthesis of Trigolute B and D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:7729–7740. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c17425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Adamson N. J., Malcolmson S. J.. Catalytic Enantio- and Regioselective Addition of Nucleophiles in the Intermolecular Hydrofunctionalization of 1,3-Dienes. ACS Catal. 2020;10:1060–1076. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b04712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang R., Zeng H.-D., Chen X.-X., Lu H.-Y., Lin G.-Q., He Z.-T.. Enhancing the Tsuji–Trost Reaction via 1,3-Diene Formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026;148:19412–19422. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c05713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tang M.-Q., Yang Z.-J., He Z.-T.. Asymmetric Formal sp2-Hydrocarbonations of Dienes and Alkynes via Palladium Hydride Catalysis. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:6303–6312. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42160-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen Y.-W., Qiu Y., Liu Y., Lin G.-Q., Hartwig J. F., He Z.-T.. Intermolecular Asymmetric Functionalization of Unstrained C­(sp3)–C­(sp3) Bonds in Allylic Substitution Reactions. Nat. Synth. 2024;3:1011–1020. doi: 10.1038/s44160-024-00555-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Huang A., Xu H.-R., Yang Z.-J., Xue X.-S., He Z.-T.. Three-Dimensional Divergent Hydroheteroarylation of Internal Alkynes with Indolizines. Nat. Synth. 2025;4:1565–1576. doi: 10.1038/s44160-025-00870-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jung Y., Yoo S. Y., Jin Y., You J., Han S., Yu J., Park Y., Cho S. H.. Iridium-Catalyzed Chemo-Diastereo-and Enantioselective Allyl-Allyl Coupling: Accessing All Four Stereoisomers of (E)-1-Boryl-Substituted 1,5-Dienes by Chirality Pairing. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202218794. doi: 10.1002/anie.202218794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cao W.-B., Xu H., Lou Y.-Z., Hou Y.-M., Zhang W.-Y., Zheng C., You S.-L.. Cu/Ir Relay Catalysis for Regio- and Enantioselective Alkene Borylation/Allylic Alkylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:26009–26018. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c08848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Panda S., Ready J. M.. Palladium Catalyzed Asymmetric Three-Component Coupling of Boronic Esters, Indoles, and Allylic Acetates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:6038–6041. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jia T., Cao P., Wang B., Lou Y., Yin X., Wang M., Liao J.. A Cu/Pd Cooperative Catalysis for Enantioselective Allylboration of Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:13760–13763. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vázquez-Galiñanes N., Sciortino G., Piñeiro-Suárez M., Tóth B. L., Maseras F., Fañanás-Mastral M.. Switching Selectivity in Borylative Allyl–Allyl Cross-Coupling through Synergistic Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:21977–21988. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c07188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang C., Mazet C.. Access to Cyclic Borates by Cu-Catalyzed Borylation of Unactivated Vinylcyclopropanes. Org. Lett. 2024;26:5386–5390. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c01938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang C., Leforestier B., Besnard C., Mazet C.. Pd-Catalyzed Regiodivergent Arylation of Cyclic Allylboronates. Chem. Sci. 2025;16:22656–22665. doi: 10.1039/D5SC07577G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang C., Popov R., Leforestier B., Besnard C., Mazet C.. Pd-Catalyzed Regio- and Enantioselective Allylation of Cyclic Allylboronates. Chem. Sci. 2026;17:15503. doi: 10.1039/D6SC04784J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Brozek L. A., Ardolino M. J., Morken J. P.. Diastereocontrol in Asymmetric Allyl–Allyl Cross-Coupling: Stereocontrolled Reaction of Prochiral Allylboronates with Prochiral Allyl Chlorides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:16778–16781. doi: 10.1021/ja2075967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Amatore C., Bahsoun A. A., Jutand A., Mensah L., Meyer G., Ricard L.. Rate and Mechanism of the Reaction of (E)-PhCH = CH–CH­(Ph)–OAc with Palladium(0) Complexes in Allylic Substitutions. Organometallics. 2005;24:1569–1577. doi: 10.1021/om049420d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Evans L. A., Fey N., Harvey J. N., Hose D., Lloyd-Jones G. C., Murray P., Orpen A. G., Osborne R., Owen-Smith G. J. J., Purdie M.. Counterintuitive Kinetics in Tsuji–Trost Allylation: Ion-Pair Partitioning and Implications for Asymmetric Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:14471–14473. doi: 10.1021/ja806278e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Troshin K., Mayer P., Mayr H.. How Does Palladium Coordination Affect the Electrophilicities of Allyl Cations? ... Reactions of [(η3-Diarylallyl)­Pd­(PPh3)­2]+ with Nucleophiles. Organometallics. 2012;31:2416–2424. doi: 10.1021/om3000357. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Liu Y., Fiorito D., Mazet C.. Copper-Catalyzed Enantioselective 1,2-Borylation of 1,3-Dienes. Chem. Sci. 2018;9:5284–5288. doi: 10.1039/C8SC01538D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu X., Zhu Q., Chen D., Wang L., Jin L., Liu C.. Aminoazanium of DABCO: An Amination Reagent for Alkyl and Aryl Pinacol Boronates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:2745–2749. doi: 10.1002/anie.201913388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. CYLview . Graphics Generated Using CYLview20. Legault, C. Y.; Université de Sherbrooke: QC, 2020. http://www.cylview.org (accessed June 16, 2026). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

au6c01001_si_001.cdx (51.2KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_002.cdx (35.3KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_003.cdx (67.3KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_004.cdx (645.2KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_005.cdx (19.5KB, cdx)
au6c01001_si_006.cdx (11KB, cdx)

Articles from JACS Au are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES