Skip to main content
Tissue Engineering. Part A logoLink to Tissue Engineering. Part A
. 2025 Apr 14;31(7-8):285–302. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2024.0112

From Promise to Practice: Recent Growth in 30 Years of Tissue Engineering Commercialization

Ryan B Felix 1,2,3, Amal Shabazz 1,2, William Pieper Holeman 1,2, Sarang Han 1,2, Matthew Wyble 1,2, Marylyn Uzoukwu 1,2, Lauren Audrey Gomes 1,2, Laena Nho 1,2, Mark Zachary Litman 1,2, Peter Hu 3, John P Fisher 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13626157  PMID: 38818800

Abstract

This perspective, marking the 30th anniversary of the Tissue Engineering journal, discusses the exciting trends in the global commercialization of tissue engineering technology. Within a historical context, we present an evolution of challenges and a discussion of the last 5 years of global commercial successes and emerging market trends, highlighting the continued expansion of the field in the northeastern United States. This leads to an overview of the last 5 years’ progress in clinical trials for tissue-engineered therapeutics, including an analysis of trends in success and failure. Finally, we provide a broad overview of preclinical research and a perspective on where the state-of-the-art lies on the horizon.

Impact Statement

This perspective, marking the 30th anniversary of the Tissue Engineering journal, discusses the exciting trends in the global commercialization of tissue engineering technology.

Keywords: tissue engineering, industry, market, company, stem cells, biomaterials, clinical translation, regenerative medicine

Introduction: A Historical Perspective

In the mid-20th century surgical advances made organ allotransplantation possible for kidneys, liver, lungs, hearts, and other major organs. 1 –4 These strides represented a considerable bound in modern medicine, one where collaborative effort between physicians, surgeons, and scientists partially mitigated challenges with transplant rejection that plagued progress. In the present day, the success of allotransplantations has continued to prevent deaths and prolong lives globally.

Unfortunately, allotransplantation is an imperfect solution. Donor matching can prove challenging or impossible, and transplant recipients who avoid rejection still require lifelong reliance on immunosuppressants. 5,6 Furthermore, allotransplantation remains entirely dependent on qualifying recently deceased or charitable living donors, the deficit of which expands annually. 7,8 By the early 1990s, the recognition of this new class of challenges had set the stage for the birth of a new field, aiming to pioneer the development of autologously sourced and manufactured tissues. Autologous cell sources would resolve the need for immunosuppression, and manufacturing organs could alleviate organ supply shortages. In this era, clinical trials of autologous chondrocyte implantation had just generated positive results on follow-up, 9 and a patient with Poland’s syndrome received the first engineered implant—a cell-laden synthetic polymer sternum. 10

Fittingly, researchers began to pursue ‘tissue engineering’; 11 many early investigations are attributable to the research partnership of Robert Langer, an engineer at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Joseph P. Vacanti, a surgical physician at Boston Children’s Hospital. The two, alongside a global cohort of prominent researchers, were among the first to investigate the methods required to realize engineered tissue constructs. 12 Their early and guiding definitions of the field defined it as an “interdisciplinary field that applies the principles of engineering and the life sciences toward the development of biological substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue or whole organ function” (Fig. 1).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Three perspectives on the 30-year evolution of tissue engineering (A) Timeline of historical milestones in tissue engineering. (B) Tissue engineering paradigm incorporating the process of cell isolation from patient source; cell, material, or signal selection for the fabrication of tissue engineered construct; and maturation of the construct in vitro prior to implantation. (C) Volume of tissue engineering, biomaterials, and stem cell publications from 1994 to 2022 demonstrating parallel growth in the field. [data from pubmed.gov, PubMed database keyword search: tissue engineering, biomaterials, and stem cell, filtering for years 1994 to 2022].

However, despite the great promise of the field, progress to clinical translation has been slow, hindered by gaps in knowledge related to autologous stem cell harvest and directed differentiation to somatic cell phenotypes, difficulties in precise manufacturing of tissue constructs, and challenges with maintaining cellular viability and function in large tissue constructs. 13 –16 Irrespective of these fundamental biology and biomedical engineering gaps, the field has maintained a record of clinical advances alongside major preclinical achievements (Fig. 1a). 1 –4,9,10,17 –27 For example, in 2001, a 4-year-old girl received an engineered pulmonary artery that demonstrated impressive postoperative performance at a 7-month follow-up22. Only 5 years later came the discovery of stem cells with inducible pluripotency (iPSCs), 23,24,28 which were used less than a decade later to fabricate a retinal sheet implanted in a woman with macular degeneration. 27

Now, 30 years from its inception, the field of tissue engineering has several therapeutic products on the market for applications in the regeneration of articular cartilage, bone, and burn wounds. 29,30 Furthermore, the field has evolved from its original definition and purpose, now encompassing ex-vivo tissue constructs that aim to recapitulate native tissue structure and function (Fig. 1b). These constructions are becoming increasingly popular as performance assessment platforms, so much so that they now play a role in regulatory approval of therapeutics beyond tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. These changes have arisen since the latest review on the tissue engineering industry. 31 In this study, we plan to discuss in detail the expansion of tissue engineering as an industry within the last five years of growth.

In this review, we discuss the following three key elements of the field of tissue engineering: 1) commercialized technology and approved therapeutics that have reached patients’ bedside, 2) ongoing clinical trials to investigate the safety and efficacy of therapies, and 3) preclinical directions at the industry and academic level. While discussing these topics, we aim to highlight key historical events in the last 30 years of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, provide the reader with detailed discussions of the most contemporary trends in the field, and finally, predict the discipline’s overall future.

Methods

Herein we pursue an evolution of methodologies, choosing best practices from previous iterations of reviewing the tissue engineering discipline, including the first set of reviews by Lysaght. 31 –34

Identification of potential tissue engineering companies

Potential tissue engineering companies were identified (Fig. 2) through the following: 1) abstraction from prior reviews, 32,34,35 2) a PubMed search of peer-reviewed literature for abstracting companies listed in affiliation and conflict of interest statements, 3) the most current list of FDA-approved cellular & gene therapies, and 4) a ClinicalTrials.gov search for trials listing companies as sponsors or collaborators. We limited all database searches to results from 2019 to September 2023, such that we only include data since the last review. Specific documentation of search terms and data scope are described in the next section of the methods. We defined search terms based on previous reviews, in-laboratory discussions, and consultation with our university’s specialist librarian in bioengineering. The consolidated dataset consisted of 6,259 companies and was deduplicated and cleaned to remove names of individuals, hospitals, government agencies, universities, foundations, and trusts. The finalized list of potential TERM companies included 3,324 entries.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Methods for Identifying Active Tissue Engineering Companies. Tissue engineering companies were identified from author affiliations and conflict of interest statements in the last 5 years of PubMed searchable literature, listings of sponsors and collaborators of trials indexed by ClinicalTrials.gov, and FDA approved cell and gene therapies. An inclusion/exclusion criterion narrowed the list to currently active tissue engineering and regenerative medicine companies.

Companies were further classified by stage based on the stage of their leading product as commercial, clinical, or preclinical stage. Commercial products were defined as products that were commercially available to customers, clinical products were defined as potential products currently undergoing clinical trial investigation, and preclinical products were defined as products that are still in the in vitro or in vivo experimental testing phase. Furthermore, companies were categorized by their product sector as stem cell companies, biomaterial companies, or cells and biomaterial companies. Stem cell companies were defined as companies whose leading product used a cell therapeutic as its primary mode of action, biomaterial companies were defined as those whose leading product used a biomaterial or hydrogel technology as its primary mode of action, and cell and biomaterial companies were defined as companies whose leading product used a combination of a cell and biomaterial or hydrogel technology for therapeutic purposes. The authors acknowledge that these categorizations comprise company views at a snapshot in time which can evolve quickly as products change and are based on the author’s interpretation of openly available company information.

Search criteria

The PubMed literature search identified 2,180 publications from 2019 to 2023 that included the terms tissue engineer* or regenerative medicine, any of the terms compan*, LLC, or corporation within the author affiliations, or compan*, LLC, corporation, or owner* within the conflict-of-interest statements. The ClinicalTrials.gov database search identified 3,401 clinical trials from 2019 to 2023 that included any of the terms tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, stem cell, biomaterials, scaffold, hydrogel, or bioprinting; however, it excluded trials including the term cord.

FDA Approved Therapeutics: Consisted of the 32 approved therapeutics in the Cell & Gene Therapies category as of June 30th, 2023.

For analysis of publication volume in the field of tissue engineering a PubMed search was performed for publications from 1994 to 2022 using the keywords tissue engineering, biomaterials, and stem cells independently.

Inclusion–exclusion criteria

We identified a total of 3,324 potential tissue engineering companies through the described methods. We built upon criteria in prior reviews to narrow these companies to include only those performing tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. We defined a tissue engineering company as one that utilizes cells, biomaterials, and signals individually or together for recapitulating or regenerating native tissues. Specifically, we included cell and stem cell therapies, biomaterials, and scaffold or hydrogel technologies. We excluded companies performing gene therapies, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, cord and stem cell blood banks or storage, drug-eluting stents, unmodified allo/xeno-transplantation, bone marrow therapies, classical orthopedic biomaterials, antibody therapies, and cosmetics. After exclusion of the inactive companies, we identified 347 international tissue engineering companies.

Financial data abstraction

We obtained relevant financial data on each of the 347 included companies through abstraction from the Mergent Intellect international business directory 36 and from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K or 10-Q filings obtained through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. Finally, the cumulative sales from companies identified from the Mergent Intellect data abstracted for this review were compared with that reported in past iterations of the review. 34,35

International Tissue Engineering Commercialization

Our investigations have identified 347 tissue engineering companies internationally, 87% being private companies (Table 1). Notably, our selection criteria are more conservative by exclusion of blood and tissue banks, which made up a substantial portion of all companies in past iterations of this review. 34,35 Despite this, 347 companies represent a 71% growth in the number of companies since the figure was last reported by Jaklenec et al. in 2012 (Fig. 3b). 35 Furthermore, an estimated quarter of these companies originated in the last five years, indicating healthy expansion of the field.

Table 1.

List of Identified Tissue Engineering Companies, Their Locations, Stages, Product Sectors, and Website Link

Company Location Stage Ownership Sector Sales (USD) Employees Website
3-D matrix Newton, MA Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $17,441,244 108 https://3dmatrix.com/us/
3DBio therapeutics Long Island city, NY Clinical trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $410,137 4 https://3dbiocorp.com/
4D Biomaterials Nottingham, England Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,816,584 9 https://4dbiomaterials.co.uk/
Accurate International Biotechnology Co Guangzhou, China Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $182,612 4 https://en.bio-accurate.com/
Acell Columbia, MD Commercial Private Biomaterials $100,794,336 438 https://marketing.integralife.com/acell
Acera Surgical St. Louis, MO Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $4,875,411 41 https://acera-surgical.com/
Aesculap Biologics Breinigsville, PA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $2,222,917 25 https://www.aesculapbiologics.com/
Akan Biosciences Gaithersburg, MD Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $102,915 2 https://akanbio.com/
Allevi Philadelphia, PA Commercial Private Biomaterials $1,151,243 6 https://www.allevi3d.com/
AlloSource Centennial, CO Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $155,893,092 160 https://allosource.org/
AMASA Therapeutics Boston, MA Preclinical Private Stem Cells https://www.amasatx.com/
American CryoStem Corporation Eatontown, NJ Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $20,590 6 https://www.americancryostem.com/
Angiocrine Bioscience San Diego, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $4,057,719 22 https://angiocrinebioscience.com/
Angiograft Amherst, NY Preclinical Private Biomaterials $172,593 3 https://angio-graft.com/
Anika Therapeutics Bredford, MA Commercial Public Biomaterials $156,236,000 277 https://anika.com/
Anterogen Co Seoul, South Korea Commercial Private Stem Cells $4,930,068 42 http://anterogen.com/
AntiCancer San Diego, CA Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $4,271,708 29 http://www.anticancer.com/
APIE Therapeutics Research Triangle Park, NC Preclinical Private Stem Cells $284,009 3 https://apie-therapeutics.com/
Appia Bio Culver City, CA Preclinical Private Stem Cells $9,857,989 24 https://www.appiabio.com/
Aracari Biosciences Irvine, CA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $466,741 4 https://aracaribio.com/
Aran Biomedical Galway, Ireland Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $14,847,137 10 https://www.aranbiomedical.com/
Aroa Biosurgery Limited Auckland, New Zealand Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $14,344,650 150 https://aroa.com/
Arthro Kinetics Germany Commercial Private Biomaterials $310,536 16 https://www.arthro-kinetics.com/
Artivion (formerly Cryolife) Atlanta, GA Commercial Public Biomaterials $313,789,000 1,200 https://artivion.com
Asia Cell Therapeutics Co Hong Kong SAR, China Commercial Private Stem Cells https://asiacelltherapy.com/
Aspect Biosystems Vancouver, Canada Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $796,290 5 https://www.aspectbiosystems.com/
Astellas Tokyo, Japan Preclinical Public Stem Cells $11,263,597,123 14,484 https://www.astellas.com/
Athersys Cleveland, OH Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells $5,325,000 97 https://www.athersys.com/
Atreon Orthopedics Dublin, OH Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $247,767 8 https://www.atreonortho.com/
Auto Tissue Berlin Berlin, Germany Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $3,404,682 30 https://autotissue.de/
Avery Therapeutics Tucson, AZ Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $889,363 5 https://averythera.com/
Avita Medical Santa Clarita, CA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $34,421,000 114 https://ir.avitamedical.com/
Avobis Bio Newark, DE Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $100,267 6 https://www.avobisbio.com/
Axcelon Biopolymers Canada Commercial Private Biomaterials $3,273,440 10 https://axcelonbp.com/
Axogen Alachua, FL Commercial Public Biomaterials $138,584,000 199 https://ir.axogeninc.com/
Axolotl Biosciences Victoria, Canada Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,433,322 9 https://www.axolotlbiosciences.com/
Axonova Medical Philadelphia, PA Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $29,465 1 https://axonovamed.com/
Baxter Deerfield, IL Commercial Public Biomaterials $15,113,000,000 60,000 http://baxter.com
Baylx Irvine, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $418,748 8 https://www.baylxinc.com/
Beike Biotechnology China Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $33,103,200 600 https://beikebiotech.com/
BellaSeno Leipzig, Germany Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $535,000 19 https://www.bellaseno.com/
BetaCell Belgium Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $20,027,840 70 https://www.beta-cell.com/
BHI Therapeutic Sciences Hackensack, NJ Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $256,338 8 https://bhisciences.com/
Bioactive Surfaces Madrid, Spain Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $33,443 2 https://www.bioactivesurfaces.com/
BioAesthetics Corporation Durham, NC Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $352,545 2 https://bio-aesthetics.com/
Biocardia Sunnyvale, CA Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells $1,352,000 36 https://www.biocardia.com/
Biocomposites England Commercial Private Biomaterials $51,994,519 88 https://biocomposites.com/
BIOFABICS Lda Porto, Portugal Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $46 7 https://biofabics.com/
BioGend Therapeutics Co Taipei, Taiwan Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,014,857 31 https://www.biogend.com/
BioIntegrate New York, NY Commercial Private Stem Cells $76,543 6 https://biointegrate.com/
BioLife4D Buffalo Grove, IL Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $199,958 7 https://biolife4d.com/
BiomeSense Chicago, IL Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $418,752 1 https://www.biomesense.com/
BioRestorative Therapies Melville, NY Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells $119,800 10 https://www.biorestorative.com/
Biorez Utica, NY Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $615,553 7 https://www.conmed.com/
Biorg Winston-Salem, NC Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $258,977 7 https://www.biorg.com/
BioTissue AG Miami, FL Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $38,430,099 270 https://biotissue.com/
Biotissue Technologies Germany Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $316,000 7 https://biotissue.ch/
BioXcellerator Antioquia, Colombia Commercial Private Stem Cells $97,505 42 https://www.bioxcellerator.com/
Blue Cell Therapeutics Copenhagen, Denmark Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $245,064 15 https://blue-cell.com/
BlueRock Therapeutics Cambridge, MA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $26,120,907 168 https://www.bluerocktx.com/
Body Organ Biomedical Corporation Taipei City, Taiwan Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $785,822 53 https://aeonastron.com/
Bonalive Biomaterials Turku, Finland Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $4,452,431 44 https://www.bonalive.com/
Boston Sight Needham, MA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $8,192,679 45 https://www.bostonsight.org/
BrachyFoam Charlottesville, VA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $90,969 1 https://www.advaray.com/
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics New York City, NY Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells 17 https://brainstorm-cell.com/
Brightlands Chemelot Campus B.V. L.F. Geleen, Netherlands Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $35,490 71 https://www.brightlands.com/
BTI Biotechnology Institute Alava, Spain Preclinical Private Biomaterials $24,559,991 49 https://bti-biotechnologyinstitute.com/
CAM Bioceramics Leiden, Netherlands Commercial Private Biomaterials $310,536 4 https://cambioceramics.com/
Capricor Therapeutics San Diego, CA Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells $2,551,469 48 https://www.capricor.com
Cardioplant Pensa, Russia Commercial Private Biomaterials $1,476,648 30 https://cardioplant.ru/en
Cell Reprogramming and Therapeutics Wauwatosa, WI Preclinical Private Stem Cells $230,898 2 https://cellrtherapeutics.com/
Cell Therapy Sciences Coventry, England Commercial Private Stem Cells $403,742 5 https://www.celltherapysciences.co.uk/
Cellatoz Therapeutics Gyeonggi-do, Korea Preclinical Private Stem Cells $18,261,200 400 https://cellatozrx.com/
Cellatrix St. Louis, MO Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $130,622 2 https://cellatrix.com/
Cellf Bio Winston-Salem, NC Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $283,242 3 http://www.cellfbio.com/
Cellfiber Tokyo, Japan Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $510,727 16 https://cellfiber.jp/
CellGenix Technologie Transfer GmbH Germany Commercial Private Stem Cells $11,024,028 142 https://cellgenix.com/
CellGro Technologies Lincoln, NE Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $86,457 4 https://cellgrotechnologies.com/
CELLINK Gothenburg, Sweden Commercial Private Biomaterials $5,197,902 45 https://www.cellink.com/
Cells for Cells Santiago, Chile Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,529,000 40 https://c4c.cl/
CellSeed Tokyo, Japan Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $911,665 30 https://www.cellseed.com/
Cellular Logistics Madison, WI Commercial Private Stem Cells $660,350 4 https://cellogistics.com/
Celluminova AB Linköping, Sweden Commercial Private Stem Cells 2 https://celluminova.se/
Cellus Medicina Regenerativa Santiago, Chile Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $542,000 7 https://www.cellus.cl/
CHA Biotech Co Seongnam, South Korea Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $994,000 6 http://en.chabio.com/
Changchun SinoBiomaterials Co Changchun, China Preclinical Private Biomaterials $3,647,775 131 http://sinobiom.globalchemmade.com/
Citospin Valladolid, Spain Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,519,787 16 https://www.citospin.com/
Co.don Germany Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $11,645,100 150 https://www.codon.de/
Cognate BioServices Inc Baltimore, MD Commercial Private Stem Cells $12,548,567 30 https://www.cognatebioservices.com/
CollaMedix Inc Cleveland, OH Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $282,130 4 https://collamedixinc.com/
CONMED Corporation Utica, NY Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $1,045,472,000 4,100 https://www.conmed.com/
Contura London, England Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $11,515,443 33 https://contura.com/
Convelo Therapeutics Cleveland, OH Preclinical Private Stem Cells $508,869 3 https://www.convelotx.com/
Cook Biotech West Lafayette, IN Commercial Private Biomaterials $33,823,989 120 https://www.cookbiotech.com/
Cook MyoSite Pittsburgh, PA Commercial Private Stem Cells $22,945,023 160 https://www.cookmyosite.com/
CorestemChemon Inc. Gyeonggi, South Korea Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $34,627,164 394 https://www.corestemchemon.com/
CTM Medical Palm Beach, FL Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $797,839 16 https://www.ctmbiomedical.com/
Curasan Wake Forest, NC Commercial Private Biomaterials $373,520 1 https://curasaninc.com/
Curi Bio Seattle, WA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $3,028,329 23 https://www.curibio.com/
Cyfuse Biomedical KK Tokyo, Japan Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $2,700,354 26 https://en.cyfusebio.com/
Cynata Therapeutics Limited Victoria, Australia Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $45,975 100 https://www.cynata.com/
CytoMed Therapeutics Pte Johor, Malaysia Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $182,612 4 https://w2.cytomed.sg/
Cytopeutics Sdn. Bhd. Cyberjaya, Malaysia Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $4,101,696 36 https://www.cytopeutics.com/
Cytori Therapeutics Raffles Quay, Singapore Commercial Private Stem Cells $2,872,500 54 https://www.cytori.com/
Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables Charlotte, NC Commercial Public Biomaterials $3,922,000,000 600 https://www.dentsplysirona.com/
Depuy (J&J) New Brunswick, NJ Commercial Private Biomaterials $1,808,333,277 12,000 https://www.jnjmedtech.com
Deverra Therapeutics Seattle, WA Commercial Private Stem Cells $1,108,930 7 https://www.deverratx.com/
Dimension Inx Chicago, IL Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $2,443,404 14 https://www.dimensioninx.com/
Dome Therapeutics Woodstock, MD Preclinical Private Stem Cells https://liew76.wixsite.com/mysite-1
Dynomics San Francisco, CA Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $182,612 4 https://www.dynomics.com/
ECM-Therapeutics Warrendale, PA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $811,240 6 https://ecmtherapeutics.com/
Educell Slovenia Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $1,441,562 19 https://www.educell.si/
EHL Bio Co. Seoul, South Korea Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $11,913,396 34 https://www.ehlbio.co.kr/
Elevate Bio Waltham, MA Commercial Private Stem Cells $30,151,394 204 https://elevate.bio/
Emanate Biomedical New York, NY Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $63,798 5 https://www.emanatebiomedical.com/
Endomimetics Birmingham, AL Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $157,465 2 https://endomimetics.com/
EpiBone Jersey City, NJ Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $2,755,189 30 https://www.epibone.com/
Epirium Bio San Diego, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $1,011,261 1 https://epirium.com/
EpiSkin France Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $14,171,129 58 https://www.episkin.com/
eQcell Ontario, Canada Commercial Private Stem Cells $474,890 2 https://www.eqcell.com/
Escape Therapeutics Inc San Jose, CA Preclinical Private Stem Cells $78,949 6 http://escapetherapeutics.com/
ExacTech Gainesville, FL Commercial Public Biomaterials $313,397,000 1,000 https://www.exac.com/
ExCellThera Montreal, Quebec Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $546,432 6 https://excellthera.com/
Fate Therapeutics San Diego, CA Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells $96,300,000 80 https://fatetherapeutics.com/
Fibr align Corporation Union City, CA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $628,046 2 https://www.fibralignbio.com/
FibroBiologics Houston, TX Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $226,538 6 https://fibrobiologics.com/
Fidia Farmaceutici Italy Commercial Private Biomaterials $427,975,524 1,022 http://www.fidiapharma.it
Fluicell AB Mölndal, Sweden Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $284,164 20 https://www.fluicell.com/
FluidForm Waltham, MA Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,149,673 8 https://www.fluidformbio.com/
Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics Madison, WI Preclinical Public Stem Cells $74,513,073 150 https://www.fujifilmcdi.com/
FuturaMedical Surrey, United Kingdom Commercial Public Biomaterials $527,118 12 https://www.futuramedical.com/
Gamida Cell Boston, MA Commercial Private Stem Cells $5,836,119 35 https://www.gamida-cell.com/
Gelesis Boston, MA Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $25,767,000 103 https://www.gelesis.com/
Gelmetix Cheshire, United Kingdom Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $679,692 8 https://www.gelmetix.com/
GELOMICS PTY Queensland, Australia Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $19,286 22 https://www.gelomics.com/
GenAssist Greenwood Village, CO Preclinical Private Biomaterials https://genassist.co/
GeniPhys Indianapolis, IN Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $68,631 1 https://www.geniphys.com/
GID Bio Louisville, CO Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $69,382 5 https://gidbio.com/
Gli align London, England Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $60,060 2 https://glialign.com/
Greenstone Biosciences Palo Alto, CA Commercial Private Stem Cells $693,660 10 https://greenstonebio.com/
Grigory Karmy Ontario, Canada Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $383,520 2 https://karmyclinic.com/
Guidon Pharmaceutics Beijing, China Commercial Private Stem Cells $1,083,000 28 http://www.guidonpharmaceutics.com/
Gunze Limited Kyoto, Japan Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,008,934,510 5,214 https://www.gunze.co.jp/
Gwo Xi Stem Cell Applied Technology Co. Hsinchu County, Taiwan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $5,830,666 49 https://en.gwoxi.com.tw/
H-CYTE Tampa, FL Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $453,460 8 https://hcyte.com/
HEALIOS K.K. Tokyo, Japan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $648,990 71 https://www.healios.co.jp/
Heart Cells Company Edenbridge, England Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $454,314 9 https://www.heartcellsfoundation.com/
HeartBeat.bio Vienna, Austria Preclinical Private Stem Cells 7 https://heartbeat.bio/
Heartseed Tokyo, Japan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $9,298,944 43 https://heartseed.jp/
Help Therapeutics Jiangsu, China Preclinical Private Stem Cells $42,808 45 https://en.helptherapeutics.com/
Histocell Derio, Spain Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $2,484,758 32 https://histocell.com
Histogenics Corporation Malvern, PA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $163,814 8 https://ocugen.com/
Hologenix Pacific Palisades, CA Clinical Trials Private Biomaterials $521,929 5 https://hologenixllc.com/
Holostem Terapie Avanzate S.r.l. Modena, Italy Commercial Private Stem Cells $1,532,524 81 https://www.holostem.com/
Honya Medical Tainan, Taiwan Commercial Private Stem Cells $615,976 8 https://www.honya-m.com/
HUB Organoids Utrecht, Netherlands Commercial Private Stem Cells $772,518 4 https://www.huborganoids.nl/
Humabiologics Phoenix, Arizona Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $2,250,265 13 https://humabiologics.com/
Humacyte Research Triangle, NC Preclinical Public Biomaterials $1,565,000 137 https://humacyte.com/
Hy2Care BV Enschede, Netherlands Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $26,331 8 https://www.hy2care.com/
Hybrid Organ GMBH Germany Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $892,636 10 https://www.hybrid-organ.com/
Hyperstem SA Lugano, Switzerland Preclinical Private Stem Cells $1,269,272 10 https://hyperstems.wordpress.com/
Hyundai Bioland Co. Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea Preclinical Private Biomaterials $83,662,920 320 https://www.hyundaibioland.co.kr/
IBSA Pharma Inc France Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $711,354 5 https://www.ibsa-pharma.fr/
iCamuno Biotherapeutics Jiangsu, China Preclinical Private Stem Cells $1,734,814 38 https://www.icamunobio.com/
iHeart Japan Corporation Kyoto, Japan Commercial Private Stem Cells $987,946 13 http://www.iheartjapan.jp/
Ilaya Medical Company Kiev, Ukraine Preclinical Private Stem Cells https://ae.ilaya.com/
IMEL Waltham, MA Preclinical Private Stem Cells $102,217 3 https://imelbiotx.com/
Immusoft Seattle, WA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $1,014,419 1 https://www.immusoft.com/
ImStem Biotechnology Farmington, CT Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $531,317 3 https://www.imstem.com/
INDUSTRIE BIOMEDICHE INSUBRI SA Ticino, Switzerland Commercial Private Biomaterials $310,536 4 https://www.ibi-sa.com/
InGeneron Houston, TX Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $1,878,537 8 https://ingeneron.com/
Inion Ltd Finland Commercial Private Biomaterials $5,730,227 16 https://www.inion.com/
Innervace New York, NY Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $41,517 1 https://www.innervace.com/
Innovacell Innsbruck, Austria Commercial Private Stem Cells $278,240 14 https://innovacell.at/en/
Integra LifeSciences Princeton, NJ Commercial Public Biomaterials $1,557,666,000 3,700 https://www.integralife.com/
International Stem Cell Corporation Carlsbad, CA Preclinical Public Stem Cells $8,180,000 35 https://www.internationalstemcell.com/
InVivo Therapeutics Burlington, MA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $4,281,758 7 https://www.invivotherapeutics.com/
Japan Tissue Engineering Co. Aichi, Japan Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $15,074,667 215 https://www.jpte.co.jp/
jCyte Newport Beach, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $883,172 2 https://www.jcyte.com/
Jiuzhitang Maker (Beijing) Cell Technology Co. Beijing, China Clinical Trials Stem Cells https://en.jztmaker.com/
Juventas Cell Therapy Beijing, China Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $11,586,120 230 http://www.juventas.cn/
Kang Stem Biotech Co. Seoul, South Korea Commercial Private Stem Cells $12,193,148 688 https://kangstem.com/
Karis Bio Seoul, South Korea Preclinical Private Stem Cells $182,612 9 https://karisbio.com/
KeraNetics Winston-Salem, NC Commercial Private Biomaterials $4,321,838 28 https://www.keranetics.com/
Kerecis Reykjavik, Iceland Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $15,433,220 58 https://www.kerecis.com/
KLISBio Milan, Italy Preclinical Private Biomaterials https://www.klis.bio/
Kolon TissueGene Rockville, MD Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $4,826,189 20 https://www.tissuegene.com/
K-Pharma Tokyo, Japan Preclinical Private Stem Cells $15,697,024 18 https://en.kpharma.co.jp/
Kuros Biosurgery Switzerland Clinical Trials Private Biomaterials $310,536 4 https://kurosbio.com/
Lattice Medical Loos, France Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $31,158 10 https://www.lattice-medical.com/
Lavior Pharma Miami, FL Commercial Private Biomaterials $2,588,820 13 https://lavior.com/
LifeNet Health Virginia Beach, VA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $455,372,311 500 https://www.lifenethealth.org/
LifeSprout Baltimore, MD Clinical Trials Private Biomaterials $573,767 4 https://www.lifesproutbio.com/
Likarda Kansas City, MO Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $508,667 4 https://likarda.com/
LinkoCare Life Sciences AB Linköping, Sweden Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials 2 https://www.linkocare.com/
Longeveron Miami, FL Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells $1,222,000 24 https://longeveron.com/
LyGenesis Pittsburgh, PA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells https://www.lygenesis.com/
MatTek Corporation Ashland, MA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $19,378,610 80 https://www.mattek.com/
Medeor Therapeutics San Francisco, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $2,812,903 27 https://www.medeortx.com/
Medi Whitsett, NC Commercial Private Biomaterials $32,626,188 130 https://www.mediusa.com/
Medicem Technology SRO Prague, Czech Republic Preclinical Private Biomaterials $4,539,826 17 https://www.medicem.com/
Medipost Co Gyeonggi, South Korea Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells $48,022,348 294 https://www.medi-post.co.kr/
Medtronic Minneapolis, MN Commercial Public Biomaterials $3,981,465,304 57,711 https://www.medtronic.com/
Meluha Life Sciences SDN BHD Putrajaya, Malaysia Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $878,440 10 https://meluhatx.com/
Mepsgenlab Seoul, South Korea Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $133,144 18 https://www.mepsgen.com/
Meridigen Biotech Co. Taipei City, Taiwan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $15,908,456 92 http://www.meridigen.com/
Mesoblast Melbourne, Australia Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $13,300,687 8 https://www.mesoblast.com/
MIACH Orthopedics Westborough, MA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,137,453 7 https://www.miachortho.com/
Mimedx Marietta, GA Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $267,841,000 735 https://www.mimedx.com/
MIMETAS Oegstgeest, Netherlands Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $4,752,085 94 https://www.mimetas.com/
Mimetis Biomaterials Barcelona, Spain Commercial Private Biomaterials $39,188 10 https://mimetis.com/
Minovia Therapeutics Tirat Carmel, Israel Preclinical Private Stem Cells $519,806 28 https://minoviatx.com/
MIRAE CELL BIO Seoul, South Korea Clinical Trials Stem Cells http://miraecellbio.com/
Miromatrix Medical Silver Spring, MD Clinical Trials Public Cells and Biomaterials $953,470 36 https://www.unither.com/
Morphocell Technologies Laval, Canada Preclinical Private Stem Cells $3,600,784 11 https://www.morphocell.com/
Nadir s.r.l Venice, Italy Commercial Private Biomaterials $30,074 3 https://nadir-tech.it/
Nanofiber Solutions Dublin, Ohio Preclinical Private Biomaterials $1,049,827 12 https://nanofibersolutions.com/
NanoRegMed London, England Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $63,417 2 https://www.nanoregmed.com/
NC Biomatrix BV Eindhoven, Netherlands Preclinical Private Biomaterials $110,000 3 https://ncbiomatrix.com/
NeoBiosis Gainesville, FL Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $3,121,696 16 https://www.neobiosis.com/
Neotherix United Kingdom Clinical Trials Private Biomaterials $157,364 4 https://www.neotherix.com/
Neuralstem Rockville, MD Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $110,000 4 https://www.neuralstem.com/
Neurona Therapeutics South San Francisco, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $9,134,995 17 https://www.neuronatherapeutics.com/
Neurotech Lincoln, RI Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $3,691,533 15 http://www.neurotechusa.com/
NextCell Pharma Ab Huddinge, Sweden Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $544,525 20 https://www.nextcellpharma.com/
Northern Therapeutics Quebec, Canada Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells https://www.northernther.com/
Novadip Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials 36 https://novadip.com/
Noveome Biotherapeutics Pittsburgh, PA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $5,273,561 35 https://noveome.com/
Novo Nordisk Bagsværd, Denmark Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $114,802,345 390 https://www.novonordisk.com/
NovoHeart Boston, MA Commercial Private Stem Cells $72,291 5 https://www.novoheart.com/
NS Pharma Paramus, NJ Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $11,228,715 45 https://www.nspharma.com/
Nuo Therapeutics Houston, TX Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $547,402 3 https://www.nuot.com/
Nuwacell Biotechnologies Co. Hefei, China Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $5,419,200 100 https://en.nuwacell.com/
Obatala Sciences New Orleans, LA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $457,925 2 https://www.obatalasciences.com/
Oligo Medic Quebec, Canada Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $2,581,656 11 https://www.oligomedic.com/
Opexa Therapeutics The Woodlands, TX Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells $97,000 2 https://www.opexatherapeutics.com/
Opsis Therapeutics Madison, WI Preclinical Private Stem Cells https://opsistx.com/
Orbsen Therapeutics Galway, Ireland Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $310,536 9 https://orbsentherapeutics.com/
Orca Biosystems Menlo Park, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $12,266,373 101 https://orcabio.com/
OrganaBio South Miami, FL Commercial Private Stem Cells $2,433,887 15 https://www.organabio.com/
Organogenesis Canton, MA Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $450,893,000 910 https://organogenesis.com/
Organovo San Diego, CA Clinical Trials Public Cells and Biomaterials $370,000 24 https://organovo.com/
Osiris Therapeutics London, England Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $142,824,000 360 https://www.smith-nephew.com/
Osteopore International MedTech Park, Singapore Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $214,575 5 https://www.osteopore.com/
Pandorum International Bangalore, India Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $64,156 6 https://pandorum.com/
Paragen Technologies Dublin, OH Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $77,860 6 https://www.paragentechnologies.com/
PharmaBio Corporation Kanagawa, Japan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $1,270,004 28 https://www.pharmabio.co.jp/
PharmaExceed Pavia, Italy Commercial Private Stem Cells 4 https://www.pharmaexceed.com/
Pharmicell Co. Seoul, South Korea Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $45,016,136 1,395 http://www.pharmicell.com/
PhoenixSongs Biologicals Branford, CT Commercial Private Stem Cells $477,843 4 http://www.phoenixsongsbio.com/
PolarityTE Salt Lake City, UT Clinical Trials Public Cells and Biomaterials $814,000 80 https://www.polarityte.com/
Polymedics Denkendorf, Germany Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,009,829 9 https://polymedics.com/
PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Victoria, Australia Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $17,208,733 250 https://polynovo.com/
PrimeGen US Irvine, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $2,667,280 20 https://primegenus.com
ProKidney Winston-Salem, NC Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $3,518,161 20 https://prokidney.com/
Propagenix Gaithersburg, MD Commercial Private Stem Cells $724,893 4 https://propagenix.com/
PT. Prodia Stem Cell Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia Preclinical Private Stem Cells https://prostem.co.id/
PuREC Co. Tokyo, Japan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $817,549 12 https://www.purec-global.com/
Q Therapeutics Salt Lake City, UT Commercial Private Stem Cells $1,731,598 14 https://www.qthera.com/
Quthero Miami, FL Preclinical Private Biomaterials $73,490 3 https://quthero.com/
R3 Stem Cell Phoenix, AZ Commercial Private Stem Cells $237,935 8 https://r3stemcell.com/
R3 Vascular Mountain View, CA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $565,876 4 https://www.r3vascular.com/
ReGelTec Baltimore, MD Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $499,256 10 https://regeltec.com/
ReGen Theranostics Rochester, MN Preclinical Private Stem Cells $293,669 3 https://regentheranostics.com/
REGENERA SA Lugano, Switzerland Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $310,536 4 https://regenera.at/
Regeneration Biomedical Newport Beach, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $920,266 11 https://www.regenerationbiomedical.com/
Regenerative Patch Technologies San Francisco, CA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $244,857 8 https://regenerativepatch.com/
Regeneris Medical North Attleboro, MA Commercial Private Stem Cells $736,404 6 https://www.regenerismedical.com/
Regeneus Paddington, Australia Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $1,917,426 42 https://regeneus.com.au/
Regenics A/S Norway Preclinical Private Biomaterials $271,989 3 https://www.regenics.no/
Regenosca SA Lausanne, Switzerland Clinical Trials Private Biomaterials $388,170 5 https://www.regenosca.com/
Regulaxis Romainville, Italy Preclinical Private Stem Cells $34,345 3 http://www.regulaxis.com/
Rejoni Bedford, MA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $392,150 2 https://rejoni.com/
RenovoDerm Dublin, OH Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $134,364 5 https://www.renovoderm.tech/
Replication Medical Monmouth Junction, NJ Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $270,815 4 http://www.replicationmedical.com/
ReproCELL Yokohama, Japan Commercial Private Stem Cells $5,938,185 20 https://www.reprocell.com/
REVA Medical San Diego, CA Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $7,876,802 51 https://www.revamedical.com/
Revivicor Blacksburg, VA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $2,756,835 25 https://www.revivicor.com/
RHEACELL & Co. Heidelberg, Germany Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $1,552,680 20 https://www.rheacell.com/
Ronawk Overland Park, KS Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $678,537 10 https://ronawk.com/
RoosterBio Frederick, MD Commercial Private Stem Cells $2,557,396 7 https://www.roosterbio.com/
Rousselot B.V. Gent Ghent, Belgium Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $711,656 4 https://www.rousselot.com/
RTI Surgical Gainesville, FL Commercial Private Biomaterials $33,367,586 200 https://www.rtix.com/
Sana Biotechnology Seattle, WA Preclinical Private Stem Cells $4,632,719 18 https://sana.com/
SanBio Company Limited Tokyo, Japan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $46,738,688 65 https://www.sanbio.com/
Satellite Biosciences Watertown, MA Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,072,266 4 https://satellite.bio/
Sclnow Biotechnology Co. Beijing, China Commercial Private Stem Cells $34,108,740 180 http://en.sclnow.com/
SeaSpine Carlsbad, CA Commercial Private Biomaterials $28,046,502 100 https://www.seaspine.com/
Secant Group Telford, PA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $64,205,040 150 https://secant.com/
Sentien Biotechnologies Lexington, MA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $804,122 4 https://sentienbiotech.com/
SEWON Cellontech Korea Commercial Private Biomaterials $10,586,444 100 http://www.cellontech.com
Shanghai Celliver Biotechnology Co. Shanghai, China Commercial Cells and Biomaterials http://www.celliverbio.com/
Shiningbiotek Company Limited Taipei City, Taiwan Preclinical Private Stem Cells $3,652,000 200 https://www.shining-biotech.com/
Shoreline Biosciences San Diego, CA Preclinical Private Stem Cells $2,074,662 25 https://shorelinebio.com/
SILTISS Saint-Viance, France Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $33,954 4 https://www.siltiss.fr
Skin2NeuronPty Surry Hills, Australia Preclinical Private Stem Cells $456,303 11 https://www.skin2neuron.org/
SkinAxis Cedar Knolls, NJ Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $266,835 6 https://www.skinaxis.com/
Skye Biologics El Segundo, CA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,016,527 40 https://www.skyebiologics.com/
Smith & Nephew Memphis, Tennessee Commercial Private Biomaterials $694,350,396 1,849 https://www.smith-nephew.com/
Soft Tissue Regeneration/Biorez Utica, NY Commercial Public Biomaterials $1,045,472,000 4,100 https://www.conmed.com/
SolasCure Limited Cambridge, England Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $3,826,444 11 https://solascure.com/
Stemedica Cell Technologies San Diego, CA Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $9,794,582 48 https://www.stemedica.com/
Stempeutics Bangalore, India Commercial Private Stem Cells $394,330 28 https://www.stempeutics.com/
StimLabs Roswell, GA Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $2,664,738 15 https://stimlabs.com/
Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Osaka, Japan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $2,363,174 24 https://www.sumitomo-pharma.com/
SweetBio Memphis, TN Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $9,821,973 10 https://www.sweetbio.com/
Swiss Medica XXI Century St. Gallen, Switzerland Preclinical Private Stem Cells https://www.startstemcells.com/
SymbiOx Macul, Chile Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials https://www.symbiox.org/
Taiwan Bio Therapeutics Co. Tapei City, Taiwan Preclinical Private Stem Cells $1,444,055 20 https://twbio-thera.com/
Taiwan Mitochondrion Applied Technology Co Zhubei, Taiwan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $913,060 20 https://en.mitobiomed.com/
Tarian Medical Dublin, OH Preclinical Private Biomaterials $71,608 5 https://www.paragentechnologies.com/tarian-medical
Tenpoint Therapeutics Limited London, England Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $647,497 68 https://www.tenpointtherapeutics.com/
Tepha Cambridge, MA Preclinical Private Biomaterials $11,350,946 63 http://www.tepha.com
Tetec Tissue Engineering Technologies AG Reutlingen, Germany Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $13,100,540 13 https://www.tetec-ag.de/en.html
The Electrospinning Company Oxfordshire, United Kingdom Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,447,269 23 https://www.electrospinning.co.uk/
Thomas Advanced Medical Los Angeles, CA Preclinical Private Stem Cells $210,580 5 https://thomasadvancedmedical.com/
Throne Biotechnologies Paramus, NJ Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $187,065 10 https://thronebio.com/
Thymmune Therapeutics Cambridge, MA Preclinical Private Stem Cells $41,517 1 https://www.thymmune.com/
Tianjin Weikai Bioengineering Tianjin, China Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $5,803,000 30 http://www.tj.xinhuanet.com/web/uninova/en/index.htm
TiGenix SAU Madrid, Spain Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $54,138,711 4 https://www.asebio.com/en/members/directory/tigenix
TISSIUM Paris, France Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $7,920,498 76 https://tissium.com/
Tissue Click Hove, United Kingdom Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $501,170 4 https://www.tissueclick.com/
Tissue Regenix United Kingdom Commercial Private Biomaterials $24,476,000 85 https://www.tissueregenixus.com
TissueByNet Corp Tokyo, Japan Commercial Cells and Biomaterials https://en.tissuebynet.com/
TissueTech Miami, FL Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $18,738,094 150 https://biotissue.com/
Titan Pharma San Francisco, CA Clinical Trials Public Biomaterials $557,000 11 http://www.titanpharm.com
TransTissue Technologies Berlin, Germany Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,086,876 14 https://transtissue.com/
Tristem Limited United Kingdom Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $76,459 4 http://www.tristemcorp.com
Trustem Lake Forest, IL Commercial Private Stem Cells $342,221 5 https://trustemcell.com/
Tuohua Biological Technology Co. Jilin, China Commercial Private Stem Cells $5,425,400 62 http://www.tuohuashengwu.com/
Typeone Srl Lecce, Italy Preclinical Private Cells and Biomaterials $359,121 19 https://www.typeone.it/
U.S. Stem Cell Inc Sunrise, FL Clinical Trials Public Stem Cells $82,049 2 https://us-stemcell.com/
UnicoCell Biomed CO. Taipei City, Taiwan Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells $464,634 30 https://www.unicocell.com/
Ventrix San Diego, CA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $486,226 1 https://ventrixbio.com/
Vericel Corporation Cambridge, MA Commercial Public Cells and Biomaterials $164,365,000 273 https://www.vcel.com/
Vetherapy San Francisco, CA Commercial Private Stem Cells $297,770 5 https://www.vetherapy.co/
VetStem Poway, CA Commercial Private Stem Cells $988,605 11 http://www.vet-stem.com
Videregen Limited Leeds, United Kingdom Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $363,759 13 https://www.videregen.com/
Viscus Biologics Cleveland, OH Commercial Private Cells and Biomaterials $3,466,663 15 https://viscusbiologics.com/
Vitro Biopharma Golden, CO Preclinical Public Stem Cells $3,293,293 10 https://www.vitrobiopharma.com/
Vycellix Tampa, FL Preclinical Private Stem Cells $98,366 8 https://vycellix.com/
Wright Medical Group Memphis, TN Commercial Public Biomaterials $356,923,899 898 https://www.wright.com/
Xeltis Eindhoven, Netherlands Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $1,009,242 13 https://xeltis.com/
XenoTherapeutics Boston, MA Clinical Trials Private Cells and Biomaterials $990,086 1 https://www.xenotx.org/
Xintela AB Lund, Sweden Clinical Trials Private Stem Cells 10 https://www.xintela.se/
Xtant Medical Belgrade, MT Commercial Private Biomaterials $349,228 3 https://xtantmedical.com/
Zimmer Biomet Warsaw, IN Commercial Public Biomaterials $6,939,900,000 1,842 https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

(A) Heatmap of tissue engineering companies included in our review. Each point represents a single company, while the intensity is determined by their reported sales in USD. (B) Trend in number of tissue engineering companies identified over the last 3 decades of reviews. (C) Estimated sales volume from the tissue engineering industry. (D) Breakdown of identified tissue engineering company stages, product sectors, and attributed sales estimates.

The largest volume of companies, employees, and sales resides most heavily in the northeastern United States, continuing with historical trends (Fig. 3a). Nevertheless, there is a great deal of activity internationally as the industry has expanded to form large hubs worldwide. Of these, additional hotspots exist on the United States’ west coast, in the Asian Pacific (particularly in Japan and the Republic of Korea), and in Western Europe (specifically the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy).

These 347 international companies made an estimated 53.7 billion USD in cumulative sales, 15 times the amount from a decade prior (Fig. 3c). The majority (77%) of all sales come from commercial-stage companies (41.4 bn USD), which represent about 47% of all companies (Fig. 3d). The extraordinary sales of commercial-stage tissue engineering companies are trailed by preclinical stage companies which have net about 11.6 bn USD, constituting 20% of all sales and representing 20% of all companies. Finally, about a third of companies are in the clinical trials phase and yield a small subset of the estimated cumulative sales totaling less than 1 bn USD.

The distribution of companies by product sector varies based on stage. Commercial companies are dominated by the ‘Cells and Biomaterials’ product sector, followed by ‘Stem Cell’ products and then ‘Biomaterials’ (Fig. 3d). In contrast, both preclinical and clinical trials are primarily dominated by companies pursuing stem cell products as their primary offering. We interpret this distribution to suggest that precommercial investigations are primarily interested in the capabilities and efficacies of cellular therapies, which are newer from a historical perspective. In this line of thinking, commercialized companies leverage well-studied and established biomaterials alongside novel understanding of cell behavior to produce their products.

Overall, the commercialization of tissue engineering technologies has continued its healthy expansion.

Ongoing Clinical Trials

The advancement of tissue engineered therapies to commercial translation unsurprisingly relies on the performance of safety and efficacy assessed through clinical trials. In this study, we focus briefly on the U.S. clinical trial landscape to provide one perspective of the advancement of the field. This subpopulation is of interest due to the heightened overall activity of tissue engineering within the United States and the abundant information that is readily available and openly shared.

We searched the ClinicalTrials.gov database for tissue engineering trial entries between 2019 and 2023, representing the previous five years since the last review. There were 3,388 clinical trial entries that satisfied our search criteria. Most studies were in trial phase 1 or 2 or combination trials performing investigations qualifying as both phase 1 and 2 (Fig. 4). These also represented the largest rates of clinical trial failure (e.g., withdrawal, termination, or suspension), as was evidenced by the decreased rate of failure for trials in phase 3. Most trials were interventional, to develop tissue engineered or regenerative medicine therapeutics.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Ongoing tissue engineering clinical trials from 2019 to 2023. Clinical trials are stratified by trial phase and status, with a representation of what subset of trials are interventional or observational.

Relative to the preclinical and commercial product sectors, companies in clinical trials make up a small fraction of sales which is to be expected. Interestingly, most of the companies we identified that were in clinical trials were investigating stem cell therapies (68%), followed by therapies involving both cells and biomaterials (27%) and those utilizing only biomaterials (5%) (Fig. 3d). The product sector distribution for clinical trial stage companies in juxtaposition with commercial companies is an interesting one, particularly because clinical trials stage companies immediately precede commercial ones. Nonetheless, the fraction of commercial companies is greatest for cell and biomaterial products. These differences may be clinically driven due to the likelihood of improvement for clinical efficacy when combining cell and biomaterials into a therapeutic or alternatively it may be a conscious business decision and an indication that multimodality approaches incur lower risk due to greater ease in defense of intellectual property. Nonetheless, the volume of companies involved in tissue engineering clinical trials is substantial and harbors great promise for the identification of therapeutic strategies to a host of diseases.

Preclinical Directions

Preclinical-stage companies are responsible for 20% of estimated cumulative sales and make up 20% of identified companies. These companies are operating in the stem cell, biomaterial, and cells and biomaterials product sectors to engineer biological products that can aid in the repair or replacement of lost function.

Stem cells

Approximately 51% of the companies operating in the preclinical space focus on the translation of stem cell therapies to the clinic. Half of these identified companies are in the United States, whereas international presence is concentrated in Canada, Europe, and Asia (Fig. 3a). Many of these companies are focused on the translation of allogeneic multipotent or pluripotent therapies to the clinic. These therapies have the advantage of harnessing the multilineage potential of these cells for a wide range of tissue applications, can be delivered to many patients for therapeutic efficacy, and require reduced manufacturing cost and improved scalability due to the use of a single or few donors. 37 Companies like Vitro Biopharma, Shoreline Bio, Sana Biotechnology, Cellatoz Therapeutics, and Morphocell are working in this area to deliver rapidly translatable stem cell-derived therapies for various disease targets. In addition, companies are using innovative gene editing technology to overcome the barrier in immunological response caused using allogeneic cells. For example, Universal Cells, a subsidiary of Astellas Pharma Inc., is developing allogeneic pluripotent cells using gene editing to knock out the HLA receptor for the development of universal cells that can be administered to almost any patient. 38

In the academic space, researchers are making strides to engineer more efficacious stem cell therapies that overcome the barriers currently experienced with stem cell delivery, such as isolation and expansion of cells for manufacturing, uncontrolled differentiation, and immune rejection. 39 One solution that can make this therapy safer and more widely accepted is the use of an engineered kill switch that deactivates cells when they become defective. Martin et al. engineered genetically modified cells for iPSC-based therapies that can target the killing of injected human pluripotent stem cells that are undifferentiated or malfunctioning. 40 This step will bring the cell therapy field one step closer to engineering cell products that are safe, efficacious, and able to restore tissue function.

Biomaterials

Companies in the preclinical sector that are focused on engineering biomaterial technologies make up 4% of total identified tissue engineering companies, a number that has decreased in previous years. Many of these companies are focused on the use of naturally derived biomaterials for scaffold or hydrogel fabrication to treat a wide range of diseases. 3D scaffolds can provide bioactive support for tissue formation, porosity for cell infiltration and migration, and mechanical properties mimicking the tissue of interest. 41 Natural biomaterials have the advantage of biocompatibility, enhanced bioactivity, and promotion of cell proliferation and migration. 42 Companies like Angiograft, Medicem, Klis Bio, and Quthero are developing a broad range of therapeutic naturally derived materials to treat diseases.

Academic researchers in the biomaterials space are similarly focused on utilizing scaffold and hydrogel technologies to regenerate tissue function, with an emerging interest in the use of decellularized materials. Decellularized tissues from allogeneic or xenogeneic sources are another attractive scaffold used for the regeneration of tissue due to their retention of proteins native to human tissue that provide the structural integrity needed to build tissues, such as collagen, laminin, fibronectin, and elastin. 43 The decellularization process allows for removing immunogenic DNA content while preserving the extracellular matrix from native tissue, building a framework for cell integration and tissue vascularization. Qiu et al. fabricated decellularized periosteal hydrogels that showed the induction of macrophage function, promoted mesenchymal stromal cell differentiation, and stimulated more robust bone formation compared with collagen I hydrogels. 44 The future expansion of decellularized tissue used for organ reconstruction to improve their bioactivity and minimize the body’s immune response can be explored by allowing for control over the degradation speed of the scaffolds, standardizing the quality control process for manufacturing of these materials, and incorporating vascular structures to encourage long-term survival and integration of the tissue. 45

Cells and biomaterials

Companies in the preclinical space that are focused on products combining cells and biomaterials represent 5% of the identified tissue engineering companies. Most of these companies are headquartered in the United States, with few companies operating in parts of Europe and Asia. These companies are using tissue engineering technologies to combine cells with biomaterials to restore or regenerate tissue function. There are three primary technologies that companies are using in these areas as follows: (1) 3D bioprinting, (2) organoid technology, or (3) injectable hydrogel or scaffolding technologies. 3D bioprinting has emerged as an attractive additive manufacturing technique to assemble complex tissues through the precise deposition of cells and extracellular matrix. Companies like FluidForm Bio and BIOLIFE4D are using bioprinting to work toward the regeneration of whole organs to address the organ shortage. Organoid technologies are being developed for the in vitro design of multicellular self-organizing tissue models that can replicate tissue function, serving as an intermediate between preclinical and clinical models. Dynomics is using organoid technology to assemble in vitro models of cardiac tissue. Injectable hydrogels and implantable scaffolds provide a functional and supportive matrix for the delivery of therapeutic cells. Companies like Satellite Bio, Innervace, and Regenera lead the industry in the development of cell and material matrices that can regenerate lost tissue.

From an academic research perspective, many bioengineers are focused on the translation of tissue models using tissue engineering techniques like bioprinting, organoid fabrication, and organ-on-a-chip models. 3D printing strategies can build layer-by-layer structures composed of biocompatible materials in complex, anatomically relevant geometries. Extrusion-based, inkjet, stereolithography-based printing, and laser-assisted bioprinting are commonly used to engineer tissue constructs with feature resolutions ranging from 10 to 200 microns. 46 The fabrication of multilayered tissues has been demonstrated to recapitulate the native 3D microenvironment for many tissue types. Recent advances involve the fabrication of complex tissues such as personalized 3D-printed nipple areolar complex grafts that can serve as long-term implants in mastectomy patients, showing great potential to transform the field of breast reconstruction. 47 Research focusing on improving the complexity of these grafts through vascularization, stimuli-responsive shape, or function change and enhancing bioink formulation is ongoing to further capture the intricacy of biological tissues.

The use of multiple cell types and materials to fabricate 3D organoids furthers the complexity and function of the tissue model. Revah et al. demonstrated the generation of self-organizing iPSC-derived human cortical organoids that can successfully integrate and function in transplanted animal models. 48 Similarly, organ-on-a-chip models are becoming more advanced to mimic the function of tissues and provide another source to study the drug response of tissues in vitro. In December 2022, the FDA announced that animal testing is no longer needed to translate drugs or biologics to clinical trials, accelerating the ability of cell-based assays, organoids, organ-on-a-chip, and artificial intelligence to rapidly and accurately screen drug products to facilitate the translation of more in vitro models to the clinic while maintaining the same safety, efficacy, and quality standards. 49,50

Great strides have been made to move forward with the clinical translation of tissue-engineered products without animal testing. The field of tissue engineering is rapidly moving toward a future that involves the development of viable and translatable tissues to address the global organ shortage. For successful clinical translation of these therapeutics, researchers within the field of tissue engineering need to collaborate with physicians, regulatory agencies, and funding agencies to ensure that tissue engineered constructs meet the needs of patients, regulatory bodies, and potential investors.

Conclusions

Over the last 30 years, the tissue engineering and regenerative medicine field has made remarkable strides to expand into a multidisciplinary field. Originating as a promising concept, many advancements have been made following the discovery and implementation of technologies, including additive manufacturing modalities such as 3D bioprinting, reprogrammable iPSCs for therapeutic and diagnostic applications, and self-assembling organoids for in vitro tissue models. While the field has expanded globally, most companies with tissue-engineered products are heavily present in the United States, primarily in the Northeastern and Pacific regions. Internationally, companies are in the Asian Pacific countries of Japan, the Republic of Korea, and the Western European countries of the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy and minimal presence in South America with one company coming out of Chile. The ‘Stem Cells’ and ‘Cells and Biomaterials’ sectors have shown the largest increase in companies compared to previous data collected, with ‘Stem Cells’ representing 68% of products in clinical trials and ‘Cells and Biomaterials’ representing 54% of products in the commercial stage. 32 Over the last five years, the tissue engineering market has grown by 40 billion USD. Part of this increase is attributable to efforts by the FDA to streamline the regulatory process by reorganizing and using alternative testing methods to address products with low yield or chemistry, manufacturing, and controls challenges when they arise.

To perform our assessment, we made great efforts to cast a wide net when identifying companies internationally, and to do so we replicated methods from several prior publications on commercialization of tissue engineering as a whole. 31 –34 However, these methods are not without their limitations. We identified companies from associations with results of database searches for literature and clinical trials using key terms related to tissue engineering. While we succeeded in identifying several thousand entries which we parsed for tissue engineering companies, the choice of databases and search terms may introduce some bias to the results. Second, many of our quantitative findings are reliant on the accuracy of international business databases, which while we believe these to be reliable, 51 may have some inaccuracies intractable by the authors. For example, in pinpointing estimates of cumulative sales and number of employees attributable to tissue engineering endeavors, we anticipate that our reports are more accurate for smaller organizations than for larger ones with multiple subsidiaries that may or may not also be performing tissue engineering. We attempted to account for this by only including the tissue engineering subsidiaries of large companies performing business in multiple sectors, when possible.

In the future, the dominance of stem cell-based products seen in companies within the clinical trial sector is expected to lead to more commercialization of these products depending upon success in clinical trial results and regulatory approval. The efforts in past 30 years of tissue engineering are being realized through the domination of ‘Cell and Biomaterial’ based products in the commercial sector, highlighting the growth of tissue engineering as a reputable field. While biomaterial products still represent a substantial portion of commercial and preclinical products, the functionalization of these materials with bioactive cellular products is now more dominant in the field—a shift only realized in the last five years.

Despite government and industry investment in the field, there are only a modest number of commercially available tissue engineered products classifiable by the native definitions of the field. The field has therefore embraced parallel or complementary technologies that address the goals of tissue engineering as the science and regulatory frameworks advance toward realization. Some might consider this as a failing of the field. However, considering the audacity of the approach—building implantable tissues—we suggest that the rate of clinical impact of the field is at worst appropriate and perhaps remarkable.

To appropriately triage new therapies, regulatory agencies have pursued adaptations that make clearer how innovative engineered tissues will be scrutinized as potential therapeutics and what role they will play in the assessment of therapies. In the United States, the FDA has responded to the complexity of these products and the significant amount of detail required to review them by establishing the Office of Therapeutic Products in 2022 and making modifications to the regulatory pipeline. 49,52 While significant strides have been made in the last five years, there are still many remaining challenges for tissue engineered products. Production scale-up, product consistency, and reproducibility are all active challenges in the field. The most significant challenge is supplying adequate nutrition and oxygen, which, if solved, will result in achieving the original aspirations of the field: to develop fully functional tissue and organ constructs. In conclusion, over the last 30 years, the tissue engineering and regenerative medicine field has metamorphosized from a visionary concept to a tangible force, driving innovation in both the health care and biotechnology spaces. The field holds the potential to reshape the medical landscape, offering renewed hope for patients, researchers, and clinicians alike.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lily Griner from the University of Maryland Libraries for providing valuable guidance on acquisition of financial data. The authors also acknowledge that Figure 1b and Figure 2 were created with Biorender.com

Authors’ Contributions

R.B.F., A.S., and P.H. contributed to the experimental design, data collection and analysis, and writing of the article. S.H., M.W., M.U., L.A.G., L.N., and M.Z.L. contributed to the data collection by assisting with company identification, inclusion/exclusion determination, and financial data acquisition. P.H. assisted with the article preparation. J.P.F. oversaw experiments, performed data analysis, and oversaw the article preparation.

Data Access Statement

Data from our experiments and analysis will be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Disclosure Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Information

This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 HD112031, R01 CA279815, P41 EB023833), the Osteo Science Foundation (23052316), the Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund (MSCRFD-6126), and the MPower Professorship.

References

  • 1. Hardy JD. The first lung transplant in man (1963) and the first heart transplant in man (1964). Transplant Proc, 1999; 31(1–2):25–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Von Kaulla KN, et al. Homotransplantation of the liver in humans. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1963; 117:659. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Murray JE, Merrill JP, Harrison JH. Kidney transplantation between seven pairs of identical twins. Ann Surg, 1958; 148(3):343–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Barnard CN, Cooper DKC. Clinical transplantation of the heart: A review of 13 years’ personal experience. J R Soc Med, 1981; 74(9):670–674; doi: 10.1177/014107688107400910 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bastani B. The present and future of transplant organ shortage: Some potential remedies. J Nephrol, 2020; 33(2):277–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Caplan AL. Finding a solution to the organ shortage. Cmaj, 2016; 188(16):1182–1183; doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Abouna GM. Organ shortage crisis: Problems and possible solutions. Transplant Proc, 2008; 40(1):34–38; doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.11.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ghorbani F, Khoddami-Vishteh HR, Ghobadi O, et al. Causes of family refusal for organ donation. Transplant Proc, 2011; 43(2):405–406; doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, et al. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med, 1994; 331(14):889–895; doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410063311401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Vacanti CA. The history of tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med, 2006; 10(3):569–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science, 1993; 260(5110):920–926; doi: 10.1126/science.8493529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Vacanti JP, Vacanti CA. The History and Scope of Tissue Engineering. In: Principles of Tissue Engineering. Elsevier; 2014; pp. 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wang X. Bioartificial organ manufacturing technologies. Cell Transplant, 2019; 28(1):5–17; doi: 10.1177/0963689718809918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Malchesky PS. Artificial organs 2010: A year in review. Artif Organs, 2011; 35(3):316–350; doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01225.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Badwaik R. 3D printed organs: The future of regenerative medicine. Jcdr, 2019; 13(11):FE01–FE08; doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2019/42546.13256 [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hunsberger J, Simon C, Zylberberg C, et al. Improving patient outcomes with regenerative medicine: How the Regenerative Medicine Manufacturing Society plans to move the needle forward in cell manufacturing, standards, 3D bioprinting, artificial intelligence-enabled automation, education, and training. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2020; 9(7):728–733; doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Thomas ED, Storb R. Technique for human marrow grafting. Blood, 1970; 36(4):507–515; doi: 10.1182/blood.V36.4.507.507 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Buckner CD, Epstein RB, Rudolph RH, et al. Allogeneic marrow engraftment following whole body irradiation in a patient with leukemia. Blood, 1970; 35(6):741–750; doi: 10.1182/blood.V35.6.741.741 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kumar RJ, Kimble RM, Boots R, et al. Treatment of partial-thickness burns: A prospective, randomized trial using TranscyteTM. ANZ J Surg, 2004; 74(8):622–626; doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03106.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science, 1998; 282(5391):1145–1147; doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Shamblott MJ, Axelman J, Wang S, et al. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998; 95(23):13726–13731; doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Shin'oka T, Imai Y, Ikada Y. Transplantation of a tissue-engineered pulmonary artery. N Engl J Med, 2001; 344(7):532–533; doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, 2007; 318(5858):1917–1920; doi: 10.1126/science.1151526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 2007; 131(5):861–872; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Alper J. Geron gets green light for human trial of ES cell–derived product. Nat Biotechnol, 2009; 27(3):213–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Manley NC, Priest CA, Denham J, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cells: Preclinical efficacy and safety in cervical spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2017; 6(10):1917–1929; doi: 10.1002/sctm.17-0065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Mandai M, Watanabe A, Kurimoto Y, et al. Autologous induced stem-cell–derived retinal cells for macular degeneration. N Engl J Med, 2017; 376(11):1038–1046; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 2006; 126(4):663–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Golchin A, Farahany TZ. Biological products: Cellular therapy and FDA approved products. Stem Cell Rev Rep, 2019; 15(2):166–175; doi: 10.1007/s12015-018-9866-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) C for BE and R (CBER). Approved Cellular and Gene Therapy Products; 2023. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/cellular-gene-therapy-products/approved-cellular-and-gene-therapy-products [Last accessed June 30, 2023. ].
  • 31. Hoffman T, Khademhosseini A, Langer R. Chasing the paradigm: Clinical translation of 25 years of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, 2019; 25(9-10):679–687; doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kim YS, Smoak MM, Melchiorri AJ, et al. An overview of the tissue engineering market in the United States from 2011 to 2018. Tissue Eng Part A, 2019; 25(1-2):1–8; doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lysaght MJ, Reyes J. The growth of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng, 2001; 7(5):485–493; doi: 10.1089/107632701753213110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lysaght MJ, Jaklenec A, Deweerd E. Great expectations: Private sector activity in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and stem cell therapeutics. Tissue Eng Part A, 2008; 14(2):305–315; doi: 10.1089/tea.2007.0267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Jaklenec A, Stamp A, Deweerd E, et al. Progress in the tissue engineering and stem cell industry “Are we there yet?” Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 2012; 18(3):155–166; doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Anonymous. Mergent Intellect. n.d.
  • 37. Kimbrel EA, Lanza R. Pluripotent stem cells: The last 10 years. Regen Med, 2016; 11(8):831–847; doi: 10.2217/rme-2016-0117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Lanza R, Russell DW, Nagy A. Engineering universal cells that evade immune detection. Nat Rev Immunol, 2019; 19(12):723–733; doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0200-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, et al. Stem cells: Past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2019; 10(1):68; doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Martin RM, Fowler JL, Cromer MK, et al. Improving the safety of human pluripotent stem cell therapies using genome-edited orthogonal safeguards. Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1):2713; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16455-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Bose S, Ke D, Sahasrabudhe H, et al. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog Mater Sci, 2018; 93:45–111; doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ullah S, Chen X. Fabrication, applications and challenges of natural biomaterials in tissue engineering. Applied Materials Today, 2020; 20:100656; doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100656 [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Huang S, Fu X. Naturally derived materials-based cell and drug delivery systems in skin regeneration. J Control Release, 2010; 142(2):149–159; doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Qiu P, Li M, Chen K, et al. Periosteal matrix-derived hydrogel promotes bone repair through an early immune regulation coupled with enhanced angio- and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 2020; 227:119552; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Zhang X, Chen X, Hong H, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: Recent trends and emerging strategies in tissue engineering. Bioact Mater, 2022; 10:15–31; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, et al. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials, 2020; 226:119536; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Van Belleghem S, Mahadik B, Snodderly K, et al. Dual extrusion patterning drives tissue development aesthetics and shape retention in 3d printed nipple-areola constructs. Adv Healthc Mater, 2021; 10(23):e2101249; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Revah O, Gore F, Kelley KW, et al. Maturation and circuit integration of transplanted human cortical organoids. Nature, 2022; 610(7931):319–326; doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05277-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Zushin P-JH, Mukherjee S, Wu JC. FDA modernization act 2.0: Transitioning beyond animal models with human cells, organoids, and AI/ML-based approaches. J Clin Invest, n.d; 133(21):e175824; doi: 10.1172/JCI175824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Strauss D. Advancing Alternative Methods for Regulatory Use. 2022.
  • 51. Leaming A. Mergent Intellect. Charleston Adv, 2016; 18(2):32–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wang L, Johnson AN. A Pragmatic approach to navigating FDA guidance for therapeutic product development in malignant hematological disease. Blood, 2023; 142(Supplement 1):7268–7268; doi: 10.1182/blood-2023-187200 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tissue Engineering. Part A are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES