Abstract
This perspective, marking the 30th anniversary of the Tissue Engineering journal, discusses the exciting trends in the global commercialization of tissue engineering technology. Within a historical context, we present an evolution of challenges and a discussion of the last 5 years of global commercial successes and emerging market trends, highlighting the continued expansion of the field in the northeastern United States. This leads to an overview of the last 5 years’ progress in clinical trials for tissue-engineered therapeutics, including an analysis of trends in success and failure. Finally, we provide a broad overview of preclinical research and a perspective on where the state-of-the-art lies on the horizon.
Impact Statement
This perspective, marking the 30th anniversary of the Tissue Engineering journal, discusses the exciting trends in the global commercialization of tissue engineering technology.
Keywords: tissue engineering, industry, market, company, stem cells, biomaterials, clinical translation, regenerative medicine
Introduction: A Historical Perspective
In the mid-20th century surgical advances made organ allotransplantation possible for kidneys, liver, lungs, hearts, and other major organs. 1 –4 These strides represented a considerable bound in modern medicine, one where collaborative effort between physicians, surgeons, and scientists partially mitigated challenges with transplant rejection that plagued progress. In the present day, the success of allotransplantations has continued to prevent deaths and prolong lives globally.
Unfortunately, allotransplantation is an imperfect solution. Donor matching can prove challenging or impossible, and transplant recipients who avoid rejection still require lifelong reliance on immunosuppressants. 5,6 Furthermore, allotransplantation remains entirely dependent on qualifying recently deceased or charitable living donors, the deficit of which expands annually. 7,8 By the early 1990s, the recognition of this new class of challenges had set the stage for the birth of a new field, aiming to pioneer the development of autologously sourced and manufactured tissues. Autologous cell sources would resolve the need for immunosuppression, and manufacturing organs could alleviate organ supply shortages. In this era, clinical trials of autologous chondrocyte implantation had just generated positive results on follow-up, 9 and a patient with Poland’s syndrome received the first engineered implant—a cell-laden synthetic polymer sternum. 10
Fittingly, researchers began to pursue ‘tissue engineering’; 11 many early investigations are attributable to the research partnership of Robert Langer, an engineer at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Joseph P. Vacanti, a surgical physician at Boston Children’s Hospital. The two, alongside a global cohort of prominent researchers, were among the first to investigate the methods required to realize engineered tissue constructs. 12 Their early and guiding definitions of the field defined it as an “interdisciplinary field that applies the principles of engineering and the life sciences toward the development of biological substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue or whole organ function” (Fig. 1).
FIG. 1.

Three perspectives on the 30-year evolution of tissue engineering (A) Timeline of historical milestones in tissue engineering. (B) Tissue engineering paradigm incorporating the process of cell isolation from patient source; cell, material, or signal selection for the fabrication of tissue engineered construct; and maturation of the construct in vitro prior to implantation. (C) Volume of tissue engineering, biomaterials, and stem cell publications from 1994 to 2022 demonstrating parallel growth in the field. [data from pubmed.gov, PubMed database keyword search: tissue engineering, biomaterials, and stem cell, filtering for years 1994 to 2022].
However, despite the great promise of the field, progress to clinical translation has been slow, hindered by gaps in knowledge related to autologous stem cell harvest and directed differentiation to somatic cell phenotypes, difficulties in precise manufacturing of tissue constructs, and challenges with maintaining cellular viability and function in large tissue constructs. 13 –16 Irrespective of these fundamental biology and biomedical engineering gaps, the field has maintained a record of clinical advances alongside major preclinical achievements (Fig. 1a). 1 –4,9,10,17 –27 For example, in 2001, a 4-year-old girl received an engineered pulmonary artery that demonstrated impressive postoperative performance at a 7-month follow-up22. Only 5 years later came the discovery of stem cells with inducible pluripotency (iPSCs), 23,24,28 which were used less than a decade later to fabricate a retinal sheet implanted in a woman with macular degeneration. 27
Now, 30 years from its inception, the field of tissue engineering has several therapeutic products on the market for applications in the regeneration of articular cartilage, bone, and burn wounds. 29,30 Furthermore, the field has evolved from its original definition and purpose, now encompassing ex-vivo tissue constructs that aim to recapitulate native tissue structure and function (Fig. 1b). These constructions are becoming increasingly popular as performance assessment platforms, so much so that they now play a role in regulatory approval of therapeutics beyond tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. These changes have arisen since the latest review on the tissue engineering industry. 31 In this study, we plan to discuss in detail the expansion of tissue engineering as an industry within the last five years of growth.
In this review, we discuss the following three key elements of the field of tissue engineering: 1) commercialized technology and approved therapeutics that have reached patients’ bedside, 2) ongoing clinical trials to investigate the safety and efficacy of therapies, and 3) preclinical directions at the industry and academic level. While discussing these topics, we aim to highlight key historical events in the last 30 years of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, provide the reader with detailed discussions of the most contemporary trends in the field, and finally, predict the discipline’s overall future.
Methods
Herein we pursue an evolution of methodologies, choosing best practices from previous iterations of reviewing the tissue engineering discipline, including the first set of reviews by Lysaght. 31 –34
Identification of potential tissue engineering companies
Potential tissue engineering companies were identified (Fig. 2) through the following: 1) abstraction from prior reviews, 32,34,35 2) a PubMed search of peer-reviewed literature for abstracting companies listed in affiliation and conflict of interest statements, 3) the most current list of FDA-approved cellular & gene therapies, and 4) a ClinicalTrials.gov search for trials listing companies as sponsors or collaborators. We limited all database searches to results from 2019 to September 2023, such that we only include data since the last review. Specific documentation of search terms and data scope are described in the next section of the methods. We defined search terms based on previous reviews, in-laboratory discussions, and consultation with our university’s specialist librarian in bioengineering. The consolidated dataset consisted of 6,259 companies and was deduplicated and cleaned to remove names of individuals, hospitals, government agencies, universities, foundations, and trusts. The finalized list of potential TERM companies included 3,324 entries.
FIG. 2.

Methods for Identifying Active Tissue Engineering Companies. Tissue engineering companies were identified from author affiliations and conflict of interest statements in the last 5 years of PubMed searchable literature, listings of sponsors and collaborators of trials indexed by ClinicalTrials.gov, and FDA approved cell and gene therapies. An inclusion/exclusion criterion narrowed the list to currently active tissue engineering and regenerative medicine companies.
Companies were further classified by stage based on the stage of their leading product as commercial, clinical, or preclinical stage. Commercial products were defined as products that were commercially available to customers, clinical products were defined as potential products currently undergoing clinical trial investigation, and preclinical products were defined as products that are still in the in vitro or in vivo experimental testing phase. Furthermore, companies were categorized by their product sector as stem cell companies, biomaterial companies, or cells and biomaterial companies. Stem cell companies were defined as companies whose leading product used a cell therapeutic as its primary mode of action, biomaterial companies were defined as those whose leading product used a biomaterial or hydrogel technology as its primary mode of action, and cell and biomaterial companies were defined as companies whose leading product used a combination of a cell and biomaterial or hydrogel technology for therapeutic purposes. The authors acknowledge that these categorizations comprise company views at a snapshot in time which can evolve quickly as products change and are based on the author’s interpretation of openly available company information.
Search criteria
The PubMed literature search identified 2,180 publications from 2019 to 2023 that included the terms tissue engineer* or regenerative medicine, any of the terms compan*, LLC, or corporation within the author affiliations, or compan*, LLC, corporation, or owner* within the conflict-of-interest statements. The ClinicalTrials.gov database search identified 3,401 clinical trials from 2019 to 2023 that included any of the terms tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, stem cell, biomaterials, scaffold, hydrogel, or bioprinting; however, it excluded trials including the term cord.
FDA Approved Therapeutics: Consisted of the 32 approved therapeutics in the Cell & Gene Therapies category as of June 30th, 2023.
For analysis of publication volume in the field of tissue engineering a PubMed search was performed for publications from 1994 to 2022 using the keywords tissue engineering, biomaterials, and stem cells independently.
Inclusion–exclusion criteria
We identified a total of 3,324 potential tissue engineering companies through the described methods. We built upon criteria in prior reviews to narrow these companies to include only those performing tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. We defined a tissue engineering company as one that utilizes cells, biomaterials, and signals individually or together for recapitulating or regenerating native tissues. Specifically, we included cell and stem cell therapies, biomaterials, and scaffold or hydrogel technologies. We excluded companies performing gene therapies, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, cord and stem cell blood banks or storage, drug-eluting stents, unmodified allo/xeno-transplantation, bone marrow therapies, classical orthopedic biomaterials, antibody therapies, and cosmetics. After exclusion of the inactive companies, we identified 347 international tissue engineering companies.
Financial data abstraction
We obtained relevant financial data on each of the 347 included companies through abstraction from the Mergent Intellect international business directory 36 and from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K or 10-Q filings obtained through the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. Finally, the cumulative sales from companies identified from the Mergent Intellect data abstracted for this review were compared with that reported in past iterations of the review. 34,35
International Tissue Engineering Commercialization
Our investigations have identified 347 tissue engineering companies internationally, 87% being private companies (Table 1). Notably, our selection criteria are more conservative by exclusion of blood and tissue banks, which made up a substantial portion of all companies in past iterations of this review. 34,35 Despite this, 347 companies represent a 71% growth in the number of companies since the figure was last reported by Jaklenec et al. in 2012 (Fig. 3b). 35 Furthermore, an estimated quarter of these companies originated in the last five years, indicating healthy expansion of the field.
Table 1.
List of Identified Tissue Engineering Companies, Their Locations, Stages, Product Sectors, and Website Link
| Company | Location | Stage | Ownership | Sector | Sales (USD) | Employees | Website |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-D matrix | Newton, MA | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $17,441,244 | 108 | https://3dmatrix.com/us/ |
| 3DBio therapeutics | Long Island city, NY | Clinical trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $410,137 | 4 | https://3dbiocorp.com/ |
| 4D Biomaterials | Nottingham, England | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,816,584 | 9 | https://4dbiomaterials.co.uk/ |
| Accurate International Biotechnology Co | Guangzhou, China | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $182,612 | 4 | https://en.bio-accurate.com/ |
| Acell | Columbia, MD | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $100,794,336 | 438 | https://marketing.integralife.com/acell |
| Acera Surgical | St. Louis, MO | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $4,875,411 | 41 | https://acera-surgical.com/ |
| Aesculap Biologics | Breinigsville, PA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $2,222,917 | 25 | https://www.aesculapbiologics.com/ |
| Akan Biosciences | Gaithersburg, MD | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $102,915 | 2 | https://akanbio.com/ |
| Allevi | Philadelphia, PA | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $1,151,243 | 6 | https://www.allevi3d.com/ |
| AlloSource | Centennial, CO | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $155,893,092 | 160 | https://allosource.org/ |
| AMASA Therapeutics | Boston, MA | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | https://www.amasatx.com/ | ||
| American CryoStem Corporation | Eatontown, NJ | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $20,590 | 6 | https://www.americancryostem.com/ |
| Angiocrine Bioscience | San Diego, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $4,057,719 | 22 | https://angiocrinebioscience.com/ |
| Angiograft | Amherst, NY | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $172,593 | 3 | https://angio-graft.com/ |
| Anika Therapeutics | Bredford, MA | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $156,236,000 | 277 | https://anika.com/ |
| Anterogen Co | Seoul, South Korea | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $4,930,068 | 42 | http://anterogen.com/ |
| AntiCancer | San Diego, CA | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $4,271,708 | 29 | http://www.anticancer.com/ |
| APIE Therapeutics | Research Triangle Park, NC | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $284,009 | 3 | https://apie-therapeutics.com/ |
| Appia Bio | Culver City, CA | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $9,857,989 | 24 | https://www.appiabio.com/ |
| Aracari Biosciences | Irvine, CA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $466,741 | 4 | https://aracaribio.com/ |
| Aran Biomedical | Galway, Ireland | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $14,847,137 | 10 | https://www.aranbiomedical.com/ |
| Aroa Biosurgery Limited | Auckland, New Zealand | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $14,344,650 | 150 | https://aroa.com/ |
| Arthro Kinetics | Germany | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $310,536 | 16 | https://www.arthro-kinetics.com/ |
| Artivion (formerly Cryolife) | Atlanta, GA | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $313,789,000 | 1,200 | https://artivion.com |
| Asia Cell Therapeutics Co | Hong Kong SAR, China | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | https://asiacelltherapy.com/ | ||
| Aspect Biosystems | Vancouver, Canada | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $796,290 | 5 | https://www.aspectbiosystems.com/ |
| Astellas | Tokyo, Japan | Preclinical | Public | Stem Cells | $11,263,597,123 | 14,484 | https://www.astellas.com/ |
| Athersys | Cleveland, OH | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | $5,325,000 | 97 | https://www.athersys.com/ |
| Atreon Orthopedics | Dublin, OH | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $247,767 | 8 | https://www.atreonortho.com/ |
| Auto Tissue Berlin | Berlin, Germany | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $3,404,682 | 30 | https://autotissue.de/ |
| Avery Therapeutics | Tucson, AZ | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $889,363 | 5 | https://averythera.com/ |
| Avita Medical | Santa Clarita, CA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $34,421,000 | 114 | https://ir.avitamedical.com/ |
| Avobis Bio | Newark, DE | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $100,267 | 6 | https://www.avobisbio.com/ |
| Axcelon Biopolymers | Canada | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $3,273,440 | 10 | https://axcelonbp.com/ |
| Axogen | Alachua, FL | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $138,584,000 | 199 | https://ir.axogeninc.com/ |
| Axolotl Biosciences | Victoria, Canada | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,433,322 | 9 | https://www.axolotlbiosciences.com/ |
| Axonova Medical | Philadelphia, PA | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $29,465 | 1 | https://axonovamed.com/ |
| Baxter | Deerfield, IL | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $15,113,000,000 | 60,000 | http://baxter.com |
| Baylx | Irvine, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $418,748 | 8 | https://www.baylxinc.com/ |
| Beike Biotechnology | China | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $33,103,200 | 600 | https://beikebiotech.com/ |
| BellaSeno | Leipzig, Germany | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $535,000 | 19 | https://www.bellaseno.com/ |
| BetaCell | Belgium | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $20,027,840 | 70 | https://www.beta-cell.com/ |
| BHI Therapeutic Sciences | Hackensack, NJ | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $256,338 | 8 | https://bhisciences.com/ |
| Bioactive Surfaces | Madrid, Spain | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $33,443 | 2 | https://www.bioactivesurfaces.com/ |
| BioAesthetics Corporation | Durham, NC | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $352,545 | 2 | https://bio-aesthetics.com/ |
| Biocardia | Sunnyvale, CA | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | $1,352,000 | 36 | https://www.biocardia.com/ |
| Biocomposites | England | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $51,994,519 | 88 | https://biocomposites.com/ |
| BIOFABICS Lda | Porto, Portugal | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $46 | 7 | https://biofabics.com/ |
| BioGend Therapeutics Co | Taipei, Taiwan | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,014,857 | 31 | https://www.biogend.com/ |
| BioIntegrate | New York, NY | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $76,543 | 6 | https://biointegrate.com/ |
| BioLife4D | Buffalo Grove, IL | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $199,958 | 7 | https://biolife4d.com/ |
| BiomeSense | Chicago, IL | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $418,752 | 1 | https://www.biomesense.com/ |
| BioRestorative Therapies | Melville, NY | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | $119,800 | 10 | https://www.biorestorative.com/ |
| Biorez | Utica, NY | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $615,553 | 7 | https://www.conmed.com/ |
| Biorg | Winston-Salem, NC | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $258,977 | 7 | https://www.biorg.com/ |
| BioTissue AG | Miami, FL | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $38,430,099 | 270 | https://biotissue.com/ |
| Biotissue Technologies | Germany | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $316,000 | 7 | https://biotissue.ch/ |
| BioXcellerator | Antioquia, Colombia | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $97,505 | 42 | https://www.bioxcellerator.com/ |
| Blue Cell Therapeutics | Copenhagen, Denmark | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $245,064 | 15 | https://blue-cell.com/ |
| BlueRock Therapeutics | Cambridge, MA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $26,120,907 | 168 | https://www.bluerocktx.com/ |
| Body Organ Biomedical Corporation | Taipei City, Taiwan | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $785,822 | 53 | https://aeonastron.com/ |
| Bonalive Biomaterials | Turku, Finland | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $4,452,431 | 44 | https://www.bonalive.com/ |
| Boston Sight | Needham, MA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $8,192,679 | 45 | https://www.bostonsight.org/ |
| BrachyFoam | Charlottesville, VA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $90,969 | 1 | https://www.advaray.com/ |
| Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics | New York City, NY | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | 17 | https://brainstorm-cell.com/ | |
| Brightlands Chemelot Campus B.V. L.F. | Geleen, Netherlands | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $35,490 | 71 | https://www.brightlands.com/ |
| BTI Biotechnology Institute | Alava, Spain | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $24,559,991 | 49 | https://bti-biotechnologyinstitute.com/ |
| CAM Bioceramics | Leiden, Netherlands | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $310,536 | 4 | https://cambioceramics.com/ |
| Capricor Therapeutics | San Diego, CA | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | $2,551,469 | 48 | https://www.capricor.com |
| Cardioplant | Pensa, Russia | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $1,476,648 | 30 | https://cardioplant.ru/en |
| Cell Reprogramming and Therapeutics | Wauwatosa, WI | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $230,898 | 2 | https://cellrtherapeutics.com/ |
| Cell Therapy Sciences | Coventry, England | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $403,742 | 5 | https://www.celltherapysciences.co.uk/ |
| Cellatoz Therapeutics | Gyeonggi-do, Korea | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $18,261,200 | 400 | https://cellatozrx.com/ |
| Cellatrix | St. Louis, MO | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $130,622 | 2 | https://cellatrix.com/ |
| Cellf Bio | Winston-Salem, NC | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $283,242 | 3 | http://www.cellfbio.com/ |
| Cellfiber | Tokyo, Japan | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $510,727 | 16 | https://cellfiber.jp/ |
| CellGenix Technologie Transfer GmbH | Germany | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $11,024,028 | 142 | https://cellgenix.com/ |
| CellGro Technologies | Lincoln, NE | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $86,457 | 4 | https://cellgrotechnologies.com/ |
| CELLINK | Gothenburg, Sweden | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $5,197,902 | 45 | https://www.cellink.com/ |
| Cells for Cells | Santiago, Chile | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,529,000 | 40 | https://c4c.cl/ |
| CellSeed | Tokyo, Japan | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $911,665 | 30 | https://www.cellseed.com/ |
| Cellular Logistics | Madison, WI | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $660,350 | 4 | https://cellogistics.com/ |
| Celluminova AB | Linköping, Sweden | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | 2 | https://celluminova.se/ | |
| Cellus Medicina Regenerativa | Santiago, Chile | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $542,000 | 7 | https://www.cellus.cl/ |
| CHA Biotech Co | Seongnam, South Korea | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $994,000 | 6 | http://en.chabio.com/ |
| Changchun SinoBiomaterials Co | Changchun, China | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $3,647,775 | 131 | http://sinobiom.globalchemmade.com/ |
| Citospin | Valladolid, Spain | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,519,787 | 16 | https://www.citospin.com/ |
| Co.don | Germany | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $11,645,100 | 150 | https://www.codon.de/ |
| Cognate BioServices Inc | Baltimore, MD | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $12,548,567 | 30 | https://www.cognatebioservices.com/ |
| CollaMedix Inc | Cleveland, OH | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $282,130 | 4 | https://collamedixinc.com/ |
| CONMED Corporation | Utica, NY | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,045,472,000 | 4,100 | https://www.conmed.com/ |
| Contura | London, England | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $11,515,443 | 33 | https://contura.com/ |
| Convelo Therapeutics | Cleveland, OH | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $508,869 | 3 | https://www.convelotx.com/ |
| Cook Biotech | West Lafayette, IN | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $33,823,989 | 120 | https://www.cookbiotech.com/ |
| Cook MyoSite | Pittsburgh, PA | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $22,945,023 | 160 | https://www.cookmyosite.com/ |
| CorestemChemon Inc. | Gyeonggi, South Korea | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $34,627,164 | 394 | https://www.corestemchemon.com/ |
| CTM Medical | Palm Beach, FL | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $797,839 | 16 | https://www.ctmbiomedical.com/ |
| Curasan | Wake Forest, NC | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $373,520 | 1 | https://curasaninc.com/ |
| Curi Bio | Seattle, WA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $3,028,329 | 23 | https://www.curibio.com/ |
| Cyfuse Biomedical KK | Tokyo, Japan | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $2,700,354 | 26 | https://en.cyfusebio.com/ |
| Cynata Therapeutics Limited | Victoria, Australia | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $45,975 | 100 | https://www.cynata.com/ |
| CytoMed Therapeutics Pte | Johor, Malaysia | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $182,612 | 4 | https://w2.cytomed.sg/ |
| Cytopeutics Sdn. Bhd. | Cyberjaya, Malaysia | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $4,101,696 | 36 | https://www.cytopeutics.com/ |
| Cytori Therapeutics | Raffles Quay, Singapore | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $2,872,500 | 54 | https://www.cytori.com/ |
| Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables | Charlotte, NC | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $3,922,000,000 | 600 | https://www.dentsplysirona.com/ |
| Depuy (J&J) | New Brunswick, NJ | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $1,808,333,277 | 12,000 | https://www.jnjmedtech.com |
| Deverra Therapeutics | Seattle, WA | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $1,108,930 | 7 | https://www.deverratx.com/ |
| Dimension Inx | Chicago, IL | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $2,443,404 | 14 | https://www.dimensioninx.com/ |
| Dome Therapeutics | Woodstock, MD | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | https://liew76.wixsite.com/mysite-1 | ||
| Dynomics | San Francisco, CA | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $182,612 | 4 | https://www.dynomics.com/ |
| ECM-Therapeutics | Warrendale, PA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $811,240 | 6 | https://ecmtherapeutics.com/ |
| Educell | Slovenia | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $1,441,562 | 19 | https://www.educell.si/ |
| EHL Bio Co. | Seoul, South Korea | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $11,913,396 | 34 | https://www.ehlbio.co.kr/ |
| Elevate Bio | Waltham, MA | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $30,151,394 | 204 | https://elevate.bio/ |
| Emanate Biomedical | New York, NY | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $63,798 | 5 | https://www.emanatebiomedical.com/ |
| Endomimetics | Birmingham, AL | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $157,465 | 2 | https://endomimetics.com/ |
| EpiBone | Jersey City, NJ | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $2,755,189 | 30 | https://www.epibone.com/ |
| Epirium Bio | San Diego, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $1,011,261 | 1 | https://epirium.com/ |
| EpiSkin | France | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $14,171,129 | 58 | https://www.episkin.com/ |
| eQcell | Ontario, Canada | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $474,890 | 2 | https://www.eqcell.com/ |
| Escape Therapeutics Inc | San Jose, CA | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $78,949 | 6 | http://escapetherapeutics.com/ |
| ExacTech | Gainesville, FL | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $313,397,000 | 1,000 | https://www.exac.com/ |
| ExCellThera | Montreal, Quebec | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $546,432 | 6 | https://excellthera.com/ |
| Fate Therapeutics | San Diego, CA | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | $96,300,000 | 80 | https://fatetherapeutics.com/ |
| Fibr align Corporation | Union City, CA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $628,046 | 2 | https://www.fibralignbio.com/ |
| FibroBiologics | Houston, TX | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $226,538 | 6 | https://fibrobiologics.com/ |
| Fidia Farmaceutici | Italy | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $427,975,524 | 1,022 | http://www.fidiapharma.it |
| Fluicell AB | Mölndal, Sweden | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $284,164 | 20 | https://www.fluicell.com/ |
| FluidForm | Waltham, MA | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,149,673 | 8 | https://www.fluidformbio.com/ |
| Fujifilm Cellular Dynamics | Madison, WI | Preclinical | Public | Stem Cells | $74,513,073 | 150 | https://www.fujifilmcdi.com/ |
| FuturaMedical | Surrey, United Kingdom | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $527,118 | 12 | https://www.futuramedical.com/ |
| Gamida Cell | Boston, MA | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $5,836,119 | 35 | https://www.gamida-cell.com/ |
| Gelesis | Boston, MA | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $25,767,000 | 103 | https://www.gelesis.com/ |
| Gelmetix | Cheshire, United Kingdom | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $679,692 | 8 | https://www.gelmetix.com/ |
| GELOMICS PTY | Queensland, Australia | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $19,286 | 22 | https://www.gelomics.com/ |
| GenAssist | Greenwood Village, CO | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | https://genassist.co/ | ||
| GeniPhys | Indianapolis, IN | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $68,631 | 1 | https://www.geniphys.com/ |
| GID Bio | Louisville, CO | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $69,382 | 5 | https://gidbio.com/ |
| Gli align | London, England | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $60,060 | 2 | https://glialign.com/ |
| Greenstone Biosciences | Palo Alto, CA | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $693,660 | 10 | https://greenstonebio.com/ |
| Grigory Karmy | Ontario, Canada | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $383,520 | 2 | https://karmyclinic.com/ |
| Guidon Pharmaceutics | Beijing, China | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $1,083,000 | 28 | http://www.guidonpharmaceutics.com/ |
| Gunze Limited | Kyoto, Japan | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,008,934,510 | 5,214 | https://www.gunze.co.jp/ |
| Gwo Xi Stem Cell Applied Technology Co. | Hsinchu County, Taiwan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $5,830,666 | 49 | https://en.gwoxi.com.tw/ |
| H-CYTE | Tampa, FL | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $453,460 | 8 | https://hcyte.com/ |
| HEALIOS K.K. | Tokyo, Japan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $648,990 | 71 | https://www.healios.co.jp/ |
| Heart Cells Company | Edenbridge, England | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $454,314 | 9 | https://www.heartcellsfoundation.com/ |
| HeartBeat.bio | Vienna, Austria | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | 7 | https://heartbeat.bio/ | |
| Heartseed | Tokyo, Japan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $9,298,944 | 43 | https://heartseed.jp/ |
| Help Therapeutics | Jiangsu, China | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $42,808 | 45 | https://en.helptherapeutics.com/ |
| Histocell | Derio, Spain | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $2,484,758 | 32 | https://histocell.com |
| Histogenics Corporation | Malvern, PA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $163,814 | 8 | https://ocugen.com/ |
| Hologenix | Pacific Palisades, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Biomaterials | $521,929 | 5 | https://hologenixllc.com/ |
| Holostem Terapie Avanzate S.r.l. | Modena, Italy | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $1,532,524 | 81 | https://www.holostem.com/ |
| Honya Medical | Tainan, Taiwan | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $615,976 | 8 | https://www.honya-m.com/ |
| HUB Organoids | Utrecht, Netherlands | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $772,518 | 4 | https://www.huborganoids.nl/ |
| Humabiologics | Phoenix, Arizona | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $2,250,265 | 13 | https://humabiologics.com/ |
| Humacyte | Research Triangle, NC | Preclinical | Public | Biomaterials | $1,565,000 | 137 | https://humacyte.com/ |
| Hy2Care BV | Enschede, Netherlands | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $26,331 | 8 | https://www.hy2care.com/ |
| Hybrid Organ GMBH | Germany | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $892,636 | 10 | https://www.hybrid-organ.com/ |
| Hyperstem SA | Lugano, Switzerland | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $1,269,272 | 10 | https://hyperstems.wordpress.com/ |
| Hyundai Bioland Co. | Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $83,662,920 | 320 | https://www.hyundaibioland.co.kr/ |
| IBSA Pharma Inc | France | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $711,354 | 5 | https://www.ibsa-pharma.fr/ |
| iCamuno Biotherapeutics | Jiangsu, China | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $1,734,814 | 38 | https://www.icamunobio.com/ |
| iHeart Japan Corporation | Kyoto, Japan | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $987,946 | 13 | http://www.iheartjapan.jp/ |
| Ilaya Medical Company | Kiev, Ukraine | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | https://ae.ilaya.com/ | ||
| IMEL | Waltham, MA | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $102,217 | 3 | https://imelbiotx.com/ |
| Immusoft | Seattle, WA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $1,014,419 | 1 | https://www.immusoft.com/ |
| ImStem Biotechnology | Farmington, CT | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $531,317 | 3 | https://www.imstem.com/ |
| INDUSTRIE BIOMEDICHE INSUBRI SA | Ticino, Switzerland | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $310,536 | 4 | https://www.ibi-sa.com/ |
| InGeneron | Houston, TX | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $1,878,537 | 8 | https://ingeneron.com/ |
| Inion Ltd | Finland | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $5,730,227 | 16 | https://www.inion.com/ |
| Innervace | New York, NY | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $41,517 | 1 | https://www.innervace.com/ |
| Innovacell | Innsbruck, Austria | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $278,240 | 14 | https://innovacell.at/en/ |
| Integra LifeSciences | Princeton, NJ | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $1,557,666,000 | 3,700 | https://www.integralife.com/ |
| International Stem Cell Corporation | Carlsbad, CA | Preclinical | Public | Stem Cells | $8,180,000 | 35 | https://www.internationalstemcell.com/ |
| InVivo Therapeutics | Burlington, MA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $4,281,758 | 7 | https://www.invivotherapeutics.com/ |
| Japan Tissue Engineering Co. | Aichi, Japan | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $15,074,667 | 215 | https://www.jpte.co.jp/ |
| jCyte | Newport Beach, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $883,172 | 2 | https://www.jcyte.com/ |
| Jiuzhitang Maker (Beijing) Cell Technology Co. | Beijing, China | Clinical Trials | Stem Cells | https://en.jztmaker.com/ | |||
| Juventas Cell Therapy | Beijing, China | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $11,586,120 | 230 | http://www.juventas.cn/ |
| Kang Stem Biotech Co. | Seoul, South Korea | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $12,193,148 | 688 | https://kangstem.com/ |
| Karis Bio | Seoul, South Korea | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $182,612 | 9 | https://karisbio.com/ |
| KeraNetics | Winston-Salem, NC | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $4,321,838 | 28 | https://www.keranetics.com/ |
| Kerecis | Reykjavik, Iceland | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $15,433,220 | 58 | https://www.kerecis.com/ |
| KLISBio | Milan, Italy | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | https://www.klis.bio/ | ||
| Kolon TissueGene | Rockville, MD | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $4,826,189 | 20 | https://www.tissuegene.com/ |
| K-Pharma | Tokyo, Japan | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $15,697,024 | 18 | https://en.kpharma.co.jp/ |
| Kuros Biosurgery | Switzerland | Clinical Trials | Private | Biomaterials | $310,536 | 4 | https://kurosbio.com/ |
| Lattice Medical | Loos, France | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $31,158 | 10 | https://www.lattice-medical.com/ |
| Lavior Pharma | Miami, FL | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $2,588,820 | 13 | https://lavior.com/ |
| LifeNet Health | Virginia Beach, VA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $455,372,311 | 500 | https://www.lifenethealth.org/ |
| LifeSprout | Baltimore, MD | Clinical Trials | Private | Biomaterials | $573,767 | 4 | https://www.lifesproutbio.com/ |
| Likarda | Kansas City, MO | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $508,667 | 4 | https://likarda.com/ |
| LinkoCare Life Sciences AB | Linköping, Sweden | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | 2 | https://www.linkocare.com/ | |
| Longeveron | Miami, FL | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | $1,222,000 | 24 | https://longeveron.com/ |
| LyGenesis | Pittsburgh, PA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | https://www.lygenesis.com/ | ||
| MatTek Corporation | Ashland, MA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $19,378,610 | 80 | https://www.mattek.com/ |
| Medeor Therapeutics | San Francisco, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $2,812,903 | 27 | https://www.medeortx.com/ |
| Medi | Whitsett, NC | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $32,626,188 | 130 | https://www.mediusa.com/ |
| Medicem Technology SRO | Prague, Czech Republic | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $4,539,826 | 17 | https://www.medicem.com/ |
| Medipost Co | Gyeonggi, South Korea | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | $48,022,348 | 294 | https://www.medi-post.co.kr/ |
| Medtronic | Minneapolis, MN | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $3,981,465,304 | 57,711 | https://www.medtronic.com/ |
| Meluha Life Sciences SDN BHD | Putrajaya, Malaysia | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $878,440 | 10 | https://meluhatx.com/ |
| Mepsgenlab | Seoul, South Korea | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $133,144 | 18 | https://www.mepsgen.com/ |
| Meridigen Biotech Co. | Taipei City, Taiwan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $15,908,456 | 92 | http://www.meridigen.com/ |
| Mesoblast | Melbourne, Australia | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $13,300,687 | 8 | https://www.mesoblast.com/ |
| MIACH Orthopedics | Westborough, MA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,137,453 | 7 | https://www.miachortho.com/ |
| Mimedx | Marietta, GA | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $267,841,000 | 735 | https://www.mimedx.com/ |
| MIMETAS | Oegstgeest, Netherlands | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $4,752,085 | 94 | https://www.mimetas.com/ |
| Mimetis Biomaterials | Barcelona, Spain | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $39,188 | 10 | https://mimetis.com/ |
| Minovia Therapeutics | Tirat Carmel, Israel | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $519,806 | 28 | https://minoviatx.com/ |
| MIRAE CELL BIO | Seoul, South Korea | Clinical Trials | Stem Cells | http://miraecellbio.com/ | |||
| Miromatrix Medical | Silver Spring, MD | Clinical Trials | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $953,470 | 36 | https://www.unither.com/ |
| Morphocell Technologies | Laval, Canada | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $3,600,784 | 11 | https://www.morphocell.com/ |
| Nadir s.r.l | Venice, Italy | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $30,074 | 3 | https://nadir-tech.it/ |
| Nanofiber Solutions | Dublin, Ohio | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $1,049,827 | 12 | https://nanofibersolutions.com/ |
| NanoRegMed | London, England | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $63,417 | 2 | https://www.nanoregmed.com/ |
| NC Biomatrix BV | Eindhoven, Netherlands | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $110,000 | 3 | https://ncbiomatrix.com/ |
| NeoBiosis | Gainesville, FL | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $3,121,696 | 16 | https://www.neobiosis.com/ |
| Neotherix | United Kingdom | Clinical Trials | Private | Biomaterials | $157,364 | 4 | https://www.neotherix.com/ |
| Neuralstem | Rockville, MD | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $110,000 | 4 | https://www.neuralstem.com/ |
| Neurona Therapeutics | South San Francisco, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $9,134,995 | 17 | https://www.neuronatherapeutics.com/ |
| Neurotech | Lincoln, RI | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $3,691,533 | 15 | http://www.neurotechusa.com/ |
| NextCell Pharma Ab | Huddinge, Sweden | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $544,525 | 20 | https://www.nextcellpharma.com/ |
| Northern Therapeutics | Quebec, Canada | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | https://www.northernther.com/ | ||
| Novadip | Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | 36 | https://novadip.com/ | |
| Noveome Biotherapeutics | Pittsburgh, PA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $5,273,561 | 35 | https://noveome.com/ |
| Novo Nordisk | Bagsværd, Denmark | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $114,802,345 | 390 | https://www.novonordisk.com/ |
| NovoHeart | Boston, MA | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $72,291 | 5 | https://www.novoheart.com/ |
| NS Pharma | Paramus, NJ | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $11,228,715 | 45 | https://www.nspharma.com/ |
| Nuo Therapeutics | Houston, TX | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $547,402 | 3 | https://www.nuot.com/ |
| Nuwacell Biotechnologies Co. | Hefei, China | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $5,419,200 | 100 | https://en.nuwacell.com/ |
| Obatala Sciences | New Orleans, LA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $457,925 | 2 | https://www.obatalasciences.com/ |
| Oligo Medic | Quebec, Canada | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $2,581,656 | 11 | https://www.oligomedic.com/ |
| Opexa Therapeutics | The Woodlands, TX | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | $97,000 | 2 | https://www.opexatherapeutics.com/ |
| Opsis Therapeutics | Madison, WI | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | https://opsistx.com/ | ||
| Orbsen Therapeutics | Galway, Ireland | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $310,536 | 9 | https://orbsentherapeutics.com/ |
| Orca Biosystems | Menlo Park, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $12,266,373 | 101 | https://orcabio.com/ |
| OrganaBio | South Miami, FL | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $2,433,887 | 15 | https://www.organabio.com/ |
| Organogenesis | Canton, MA | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $450,893,000 | 910 | https://organogenesis.com/ |
| Organovo | San Diego, CA | Clinical Trials | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $370,000 | 24 | https://organovo.com/ |
| Osiris Therapeutics | London, England | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $142,824,000 | 360 | https://www.smith-nephew.com/ |
| Osteopore International | MedTech Park, Singapore | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $214,575 | 5 | https://www.osteopore.com/ |
| Pandorum International | Bangalore, India | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $64,156 | 6 | https://pandorum.com/ |
| Paragen Technologies | Dublin, OH | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $77,860 | 6 | https://www.paragentechnologies.com/ |
| PharmaBio Corporation | Kanagawa, Japan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $1,270,004 | 28 | https://www.pharmabio.co.jp/ |
| PharmaExceed | Pavia, Italy | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | 4 | https://www.pharmaexceed.com/ | |
| Pharmicell Co. | Seoul, South Korea | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $45,016,136 | 1,395 | http://www.pharmicell.com/ |
| PhoenixSongs Biologicals | Branford, CT | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $477,843 | 4 | http://www.phoenixsongsbio.com/ |
| PolarityTE | Salt Lake City, UT | Clinical Trials | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $814,000 | 80 | https://www.polarityte.com/ |
| Polymedics | Denkendorf, Germany | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,009,829 | 9 | https://polymedics.com/ |
| PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty | Victoria, Australia | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $17,208,733 | 250 | https://polynovo.com/ |
| PrimeGen US | Irvine, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $2,667,280 | 20 | https://primegenus.com |
| ProKidney | Winston-Salem, NC | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $3,518,161 | 20 | https://prokidney.com/ |
| Propagenix | Gaithersburg, MD | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $724,893 | 4 | https://propagenix.com/ |
| PT. Prodia Stem Cell Indonesia | Jakarta, Indonesia | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | https://prostem.co.id/ | ||
| PuREC Co. | Tokyo, Japan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $817,549 | 12 | https://www.purec-global.com/ |
| Q Therapeutics | Salt Lake City, UT | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $1,731,598 | 14 | https://www.qthera.com/ |
| Quthero | Miami, FL | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $73,490 | 3 | https://quthero.com/ |
| R3 Stem Cell | Phoenix, AZ | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $237,935 | 8 | https://r3stemcell.com/ |
| R3 Vascular | Mountain View, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $565,876 | 4 | https://www.r3vascular.com/ |
| ReGelTec | Baltimore, MD | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $499,256 | 10 | https://regeltec.com/ |
| ReGen Theranostics | Rochester, MN | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $293,669 | 3 | https://regentheranostics.com/ |
| REGENERA SA | Lugano, Switzerland | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $310,536 | 4 | https://regenera.at/ |
| Regeneration Biomedical | Newport Beach, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $920,266 | 11 | https://www.regenerationbiomedical.com/ |
| Regenerative Patch Technologies | San Francisco, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $244,857 | 8 | https://regenerativepatch.com/ |
| Regeneris Medical | North Attleboro, MA | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $736,404 | 6 | https://www.regenerismedical.com/ |
| Regeneus | Paddington, Australia | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $1,917,426 | 42 | https://regeneus.com.au/ |
| Regenics A/S | Norway | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $271,989 | 3 | https://www.regenics.no/ |
| Regenosca SA | Lausanne, Switzerland | Clinical Trials | Private | Biomaterials | $388,170 | 5 | https://www.regenosca.com/ |
| Regulaxis | Romainville, Italy | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $34,345 | 3 | http://www.regulaxis.com/ |
| Rejoni | Bedford, MA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $392,150 | 2 | https://rejoni.com/ |
| RenovoDerm | Dublin, OH | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $134,364 | 5 | https://www.renovoderm.tech/ |
| Replication Medical | Monmouth Junction, NJ | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $270,815 | 4 | http://www.replicationmedical.com/ |
| ReproCELL | Yokohama, Japan | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $5,938,185 | 20 | https://www.reprocell.com/ |
| REVA Medical | San Diego, CA | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $7,876,802 | 51 | https://www.revamedical.com/ |
| Revivicor | Blacksburg, VA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $2,756,835 | 25 | https://www.revivicor.com/ |
| RHEACELL & Co. | Heidelberg, Germany | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $1,552,680 | 20 | https://www.rheacell.com/ |
| Ronawk | Overland Park, KS | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $678,537 | 10 | https://ronawk.com/ |
| RoosterBio | Frederick, MD | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $2,557,396 | 7 | https://www.roosterbio.com/ |
| Rousselot B.V. Gent | Ghent, Belgium | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $711,656 | 4 | https://www.rousselot.com/ |
| RTI Surgical | Gainesville, FL | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $33,367,586 | 200 | https://www.rtix.com/ |
| Sana Biotechnology | Seattle, WA | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $4,632,719 | 18 | https://sana.com/ |
| SanBio Company Limited | Tokyo, Japan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $46,738,688 | 65 | https://www.sanbio.com/ |
| Satellite Biosciences | Watertown, MA | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,072,266 | 4 | https://satellite.bio/ |
| Sclnow Biotechnology Co. | Beijing, China | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $34,108,740 | 180 | http://en.sclnow.com/ |
| SeaSpine | Carlsbad, CA | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $28,046,502 | 100 | https://www.seaspine.com/ |
| Secant Group | Telford, PA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $64,205,040 | 150 | https://secant.com/ |
| Sentien Biotechnologies | Lexington, MA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $804,122 | 4 | https://sentienbiotech.com/ |
| SEWON Cellontech | Korea | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $10,586,444 | 100 | http://www.cellontech.com |
| Shanghai Celliver Biotechnology Co. | Shanghai, China | Commercial | Cells and Biomaterials | http://www.celliverbio.com/ | |||
| Shiningbiotek Company Limited | Taipei City, Taiwan | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $3,652,000 | 200 | https://www.shining-biotech.com/ |
| Shoreline Biosciences | San Diego, CA | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $2,074,662 | 25 | https://shorelinebio.com/ |
| SILTISS | Saint-Viance, France | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $33,954 | 4 | https://www.siltiss.fr |
| Skin2NeuronPty | Surry Hills, Australia | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $456,303 | 11 | https://www.skin2neuron.org/ |
| SkinAxis | Cedar Knolls, NJ | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $266,835 | 6 | https://www.skinaxis.com/ |
| Skye Biologics | El Segundo, CA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,016,527 | 40 | https://www.skyebiologics.com/ |
| Smith & Nephew | Memphis, Tennessee | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $694,350,396 | 1,849 | https://www.smith-nephew.com/ |
| Soft Tissue Regeneration/Biorez | Utica, NY | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $1,045,472,000 | 4,100 | https://www.conmed.com/ |
| SolasCure Limited | Cambridge, England | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $3,826,444 | 11 | https://solascure.com/ |
| Stemedica Cell Technologies | San Diego, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $9,794,582 | 48 | https://www.stemedica.com/ |
| Stempeutics | Bangalore, India | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $394,330 | 28 | https://www.stempeutics.com/ |
| StimLabs | Roswell, GA | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $2,664,738 | 15 | https://stimlabs.com/ |
| Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma | Osaka, Japan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $2,363,174 | 24 | https://www.sumitomo-pharma.com/ |
| SweetBio | Memphis, TN | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $9,821,973 | 10 | https://www.sweetbio.com/ |
| Swiss Medica XXI Century | St. Gallen, Switzerland | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | https://www.startstemcells.com/ | ||
| SymbiOx | Macul, Chile | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | https://www.symbiox.org/ | ||
| Taiwan Bio Therapeutics Co. | Tapei City, Taiwan | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $1,444,055 | 20 | https://twbio-thera.com/ |
| Taiwan Mitochondrion Applied Technology Co | Zhubei, Taiwan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $913,060 | 20 | https://en.mitobiomed.com/ |
| Tarian Medical | Dublin, OH | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $71,608 | 5 | https://www.paragentechnologies.com/tarian-medical |
| Tenpoint Therapeutics Limited | London, England | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $647,497 | 68 | https://www.tenpointtherapeutics.com/ |
| Tepha | Cambridge, MA | Preclinical | Private | Biomaterials | $11,350,946 | 63 | http://www.tepha.com |
| Tetec Tissue Engineering Technologies AG | Reutlingen, Germany | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $13,100,540 | 13 | https://www.tetec-ag.de/en.html |
| The Electrospinning Company | Oxfordshire, United Kingdom | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,447,269 | 23 | https://www.electrospinning.co.uk/ |
| Thomas Advanced Medical | Los Angeles, CA | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $210,580 | 5 | https://thomasadvancedmedical.com/ |
| Throne Biotechnologies | Paramus, NJ | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $187,065 | 10 | https://thronebio.com/ |
| Thymmune Therapeutics | Cambridge, MA | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $41,517 | 1 | https://www.thymmune.com/ |
| Tianjin Weikai Bioengineering | Tianjin, China | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $5,803,000 | 30 | http://www.tj.xinhuanet.com/web/uninova/en/index.htm |
| TiGenix SAU | Madrid, Spain | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $54,138,711 | 4 | https://www.asebio.com/en/members/directory/tigenix |
| TISSIUM | Paris, France | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $7,920,498 | 76 | https://tissium.com/ |
| Tissue Click | Hove, United Kingdom | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $501,170 | 4 | https://www.tissueclick.com/ |
| Tissue Regenix | United Kingdom | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $24,476,000 | 85 | https://www.tissueregenixus.com |
| TissueByNet Corp | Tokyo, Japan | Commercial | Cells and Biomaterials | https://en.tissuebynet.com/ | |||
| TissueTech | Miami, FL | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $18,738,094 | 150 | https://biotissue.com/ |
| Titan Pharma | San Francisco, CA | Clinical Trials | Public | Biomaterials | $557,000 | 11 | http://www.titanpharm.com |
| TransTissue Technologies | Berlin, Germany | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,086,876 | 14 | https://transtissue.com/ |
| Tristem Limited | United Kingdom | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $76,459 | 4 | http://www.tristemcorp.com |
| Trustem | Lake Forest, IL | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $342,221 | 5 | https://trustemcell.com/ |
| Tuohua Biological Technology Co. | Jilin, China | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $5,425,400 | 62 | http://www.tuohuashengwu.com/ |
| Typeone Srl | Lecce, Italy | Preclinical | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $359,121 | 19 | https://www.typeone.it/ |
| U.S. Stem Cell Inc | Sunrise, FL | Clinical Trials | Public | Stem Cells | $82,049 | 2 | https://us-stemcell.com/ |
| UnicoCell Biomed CO. | Taipei City, Taiwan | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | $464,634 | 30 | https://www.unicocell.com/ |
| Ventrix | San Diego, CA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $486,226 | 1 | https://ventrixbio.com/ |
| Vericel Corporation | Cambridge, MA | Commercial | Public | Cells and Biomaterials | $164,365,000 | 273 | https://www.vcel.com/ |
| Vetherapy | San Francisco, CA | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $297,770 | 5 | https://www.vetherapy.co/ |
| VetStem | Poway, CA | Commercial | Private | Stem Cells | $988,605 | 11 | http://www.vet-stem.com |
| Videregen Limited | Leeds, United Kingdom | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $363,759 | 13 | https://www.videregen.com/ |
| Viscus Biologics | Cleveland, OH | Commercial | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $3,466,663 | 15 | https://viscusbiologics.com/ |
| Vitro Biopharma | Golden, CO | Preclinical | Public | Stem Cells | $3,293,293 | 10 | https://www.vitrobiopharma.com/ |
| Vycellix | Tampa, FL | Preclinical | Private | Stem Cells | $98,366 | 8 | https://vycellix.com/ |
| Wright Medical Group | Memphis, TN | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $356,923,899 | 898 | https://www.wright.com/ |
| Xeltis | Eindhoven, Netherlands | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $1,009,242 | 13 | https://xeltis.com/ |
| XenoTherapeutics | Boston, MA | Clinical Trials | Private | Cells and Biomaterials | $990,086 | 1 | https://www.xenotx.org/ |
| Xintela AB | Lund, Sweden | Clinical Trials | Private | Stem Cells | 10 | https://www.xintela.se/ | |
| Xtant Medical | Belgrade, MT | Commercial | Private | Biomaterials | $349,228 | 3 | https://xtantmedical.com/ |
| Zimmer Biomet | Warsaw, IN | Commercial | Public | Biomaterials | $6,939,900,000 | 1,842 | https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/ |
FIG. 3.

(A) Heatmap of tissue engineering companies included in our review. Each point represents a single company, while the intensity is determined by their reported sales in USD. (B) Trend in number of tissue engineering companies identified over the last 3 decades of reviews. (C) Estimated sales volume from the tissue engineering industry. (D) Breakdown of identified tissue engineering company stages, product sectors, and attributed sales estimates.
The largest volume of companies, employees, and sales resides most heavily in the northeastern United States, continuing with historical trends (Fig. 3a). Nevertheless, there is a great deal of activity internationally as the industry has expanded to form large hubs worldwide. Of these, additional hotspots exist on the United States’ west coast, in the Asian Pacific (particularly in Japan and the Republic of Korea), and in Western Europe (specifically the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy).
These 347 international companies made an estimated 53.7 billion USD in cumulative sales, 15 times the amount from a decade prior (Fig. 3c). The majority (77%) of all sales come from commercial-stage companies (41.4 bn USD), which represent about 47% of all companies (Fig. 3d). The extraordinary sales of commercial-stage tissue engineering companies are trailed by preclinical stage companies which have net about 11.6 bn USD, constituting 20% of all sales and representing 20% of all companies. Finally, about a third of companies are in the clinical trials phase and yield a small subset of the estimated cumulative sales totaling less than 1 bn USD.
The distribution of companies by product sector varies based on stage. Commercial companies are dominated by the ‘Cells and Biomaterials’ product sector, followed by ‘Stem Cell’ products and then ‘Biomaterials’ (Fig. 3d). In contrast, both preclinical and clinical trials are primarily dominated by companies pursuing stem cell products as their primary offering. We interpret this distribution to suggest that precommercial investigations are primarily interested in the capabilities and efficacies of cellular therapies, which are newer from a historical perspective. In this line of thinking, commercialized companies leverage well-studied and established biomaterials alongside novel understanding of cell behavior to produce their products.
Overall, the commercialization of tissue engineering technologies has continued its healthy expansion.
Ongoing Clinical Trials
The advancement of tissue engineered therapies to commercial translation unsurprisingly relies on the performance of safety and efficacy assessed through clinical trials. In this study, we focus briefly on the U.S. clinical trial landscape to provide one perspective of the advancement of the field. This subpopulation is of interest due to the heightened overall activity of tissue engineering within the United States and the abundant information that is readily available and openly shared.
We searched the ClinicalTrials.gov database for tissue engineering trial entries between 2019 and 2023, representing the previous five years since the last review. There were 3,388 clinical trial entries that satisfied our search criteria. Most studies were in trial phase 1 or 2 or combination trials performing investigations qualifying as both phase 1 and 2 (Fig. 4). These also represented the largest rates of clinical trial failure (e.g., withdrawal, termination, or suspension), as was evidenced by the decreased rate of failure for trials in phase 3. Most trials were interventional, to develop tissue engineered or regenerative medicine therapeutics.
FIG. 4.

Ongoing tissue engineering clinical trials from 2019 to 2023. Clinical trials are stratified by trial phase and status, with a representation of what subset of trials are interventional or observational.
Relative to the preclinical and commercial product sectors, companies in clinical trials make up a small fraction of sales which is to be expected. Interestingly, most of the companies we identified that were in clinical trials were investigating stem cell therapies (68%), followed by therapies involving both cells and biomaterials (27%) and those utilizing only biomaterials (5%) (Fig. 3d). The product sector distribution for clinical trial stage companies in juxtaposition with commercial companies is an interesting one, particularly because clinical trials stage companies immediately precede commercial ones. Nonetheless, the fraction of commercial companies is greatest for cell and biomaterial products. These differences may be clinically driven due to the likelihood of improvement for clinical efficacy when combining cell and biomaterials into a therapeutic or alternatively it may be a conscious business decision and an indication that multimodality approaches incur lower risk due to greater ease in defense of intellectual property. Nonetheless, the volume of companies involved in tissue engineering clinical trials is substantial and harbors great promise for the identification of therapeutic strategies to a host of diseases.
Preclinical Directions
Preclinical-stage companies are responsible for 20% of estimated cumulative sales and make up 20% of identified companies. These companies are operating in the stem cell, biomaterial, and cells and biomaterials product sectors to engineer biological products that can aid in the repair or replacement of lost function.
Stem cells
Approximately 51% of the companies operating in the preclinical space focus on the translation of stem cell therapies to the clinic. Half of these identified companies are in the United States, whereas international presence is concentrated in Canada, Europe, and Asia (Fig. 3a). Many of these companies are focused on the translation of allogeneic multipotent or pluripotent therapies to the clinic. These therapies have the advantage of harnessing the multilineage potential of these cells for a wide range of tissue applications, can be delivered to many patients for therapeutic efficacy, and require reduced manufacturing cost and improved scalability due to the use of a single or few donors. 37 Companies like Vitro Biopharma, Shoreline Bio, Sana Biotechnology, Cellatoz Therapeutics, and Morphocell are working in this area to deliver rapidly translatable stem cell-derived therapies for various disease targets. In addition, companies are using innovative gene editing technology to overcome the barrier in immunological response caused using allogeneic cells. For example, Universal Cells, a subsidiary of Astellas Pharma Inc., is developing allogeneic pluripotent cells using gene editing to knock out the HLA receptor for the development of universal cells that can be administered to almost any patient. 38
In the academic space, researchers are making strides to engineer more efficacious stem cell therapies that overcome the barriers currently experienced with stem cell delivery, such as isolation and expansion of cells for manufacturing, uncontrolled differentiation, and immune rejection. 39 One solution that can make this therapy safer and more widely accepted is the use of an engineered kill switch that deactivates cells when they become defective. Martin et al. engineered genetically modified cells for iPSC-based therapies that can target the killing of injected human pluripotent stem cells that are undifferentiated or malfunctioning. 40 This step will bring the cell therapy field one step closer to engineering cell products that are safe, efficacious, and able to restore tissue function.
Biomaterials
Companies in the preclinical sector that are focused on engineering biomaterial technologies make up 4% of total identified tissue engineering companies, a number that has decreased in previous years. Many of these companies are focused on the use of naturally derived biomaterials for scaffold or hydrogel fabrication to treat a wide range of diseases. 3D scaffolds can provide bioactive support for tissue formation, porosity for cell infiltration and migration, and mechanical properties mimicking the tissue of interest. 41 Natural biomaterials have the advantage of biocompatibility, enhanced bioactivity, and promotion of cell proliferation and migration. 42 Companies like Angiograft, Medicem, Klis Bio, and Quthero are developing a broad range of therapeutic naturally derived materials to treat diseases.
Academic researchers in the biomaterials space are similarly focused on utilizing scaffold and hydrogel technologies to regenerate tissue function, with an emerging interest in the use of decellularized materials. Decellularized tissues from allogeneic or xenogeneic sources are another attractive scaffold used for the regeneration of tissue due to their retention of proteins native to human tissue that provide the structural integrity needed to build tissues, such as collagen, laminin, fibronectin, and elastin. 43 The decellularization process allows for removing immunogenic DNA content while preserving the extracellular matrix from native tissue, building a framework for cell integration and tissue vascularization. Qiu et al. fabricated decellularized periosteal hydrogels that showed the induction of macrophage function, promoted mesenchymal stromal cell differentiation, and stimulated more robust bone formation compared with collagen I hydrogels. 44 The future expansion of decellularized tissue used for organ reconstruction to improve their bioactivity and minimize the body’s immune response can be explored by allowing for control over the degradation speed of the scaffolds, standardizing the quality control process for manufacturing of these materials, and incorporating vascular structures to encourage long-term survival and integration of the tissue. 45
Cells and biomaterials
Companies in the preclinical space that are focused on products combining cells and biomaterials represent 5% of the identified tissue engineering companies. Most of these companies are headquartered in the United States, with few companies operating in parts of Europe and Asia. These companies are using tissue engineering technologies to combine cells with biomaterials to restore or regenerate tissue function. There are three primary technologies that companies are using in these areas as follows: (1) 3D bioprinting, (2) organoid technology, or (3) injectable hydrogel or scaffolding technologies. 3D bioprinting has emerged as an attractive additive manufacturing technique to assemble complex tissues through the precise deposition of cells and extracellular matrix. Companies like FluidForm Bio and BIOLIFE4D are using bioprinting to work toward the regeneration of whole organs to address the organ shortage. Organoid technologies are being developed for the in vitro design of multicellular self-organizing tissue models that can replicate tissue function, serving as an intermediate between preclinical and clinical models. Dynomics is using organoid technology to assemble in vitro models of cardiac tissue. Injectable hydrogels and implantable scaffolds provide a functional and supportive matrix for the delivery of therapeutic cells. Companies like Satellite Bio, Innervace, and Regenera lead the industry in the development of cell and material matrices that can regenerate lost tissue.
From an academic research perspective, many bioengineers are focused on the translation of tissue models using tissue engineering techniques like bioprinting, organoid fabrication, and organ-on-a-chip models. 3D printing strategies can build layer-by-layer structures composed of biocompatible materials in complex, anatomically relevant geometries. Extrusion-based, inkjet, stereolithography-based printing, and laser-assisted bioprinting are commonly used to engineer tissue constructs with feature resolutions ranging from 10 to 200 microns. 46 The fabrication of multilayered tissues has been demonstrated to recapitulate the native 3D microenvironment for many tissue types. Recent advances involve the fabrication of complex tissues such as personalized 3D-printed nipple areolar complex grafts that can serve as long-term implants in mastectomy patients, showing great potential to transform the field of breast reconstruction. 47 Research focusing on improving the complexity of these grafts through vascularization, stimuli-responsive shape, or function change and enhancing bioink formulation is ongoing to further capture the intricacy of biological tissues.
The use of multiple cell types and materials to fabricate 3D organoids furthers the complexity and function of the tissue model. Revah et al. demonstrated the generation of self-organizing iPSC-derived human cortical organoids that can successfully integrate and function in transplanted animal models. 48 Similarly, organ-on-a-chip models are becoming more advanced to mimic the function of tissues and provide another source to study the drug response of tissues in vitro. In December 2022, the FDA announced that animal testing is no longer needed to translate drugs or biologics to clinical trials, accelerating the ability of cell-based assays, organoids, organ-on-a-chip, and artificial intelligence to rapidly and accurately screen drug products to facilitate the translation of more in vitro models to the clinic while maintaining the same safety, efficacy, and quality standards. 49,50
Great strides have been made to move forward with the clinical translation of tissue-engineered products without animal testing. The field of tissue engineering is rapidly moving toward a future that involves the development of viable and translatable tissues to address the global organ shortage. For successful clinical translation of these therapeutics, researchers within the field of tissue engineering need to collaborate with physicians, regulatory agencies, and funding agencies to ensure that tissue engineered constructs meet the needs of patients, regulatory bodies, and potential investors.
Conclusions
Over the last 30 years, the tissue engineering and regenerative medicine field has made remarkable strides to expand into a multidisciplinary field. Originating as a promising concept, many advancements have been made following the discovery and implementation of technologies, including additive manufacturing modalities such as 3D bioprinting, reprogrammable iPSCs for therapeutic and diagnostic applications, and self-assembling organoids for in vitro tissue models. While the field has expanded globally, most companies with tissue-engineered products are heavily present in the United States, primarily in the Northeastern and Pacific regions. Internationally, companies are in the Asian Pacific countries of Japan, the Republic of Korea, and the Western European countries of the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy and minimal presence in South America with one company coming out of Chile. The ‘Stem Cells’ and ‘Cells and Biomaterials’ sectors have shown the largest increase in companies compared to previous data collected, with ‘Stem Cells’ representing 68% of products in clinical trials and ‘Cells and Biomaterials’ representing 54% of products in the commercial stage. 32 Over the last five years, the tissue engineering market has grown by 40 billion USD. Part of this increase is attributable to efforts by the FDA to streamline the regulatory process by reorganizing and using alternative testing methods to address products with low yield or chemistry, manufacturing, and controls challenges when they arise.
To perform our assessment, we made great efforts to cast a wide net when identifying companies internationally, and to do so we replicated methods from several prior publications on commercialization of tissue engineering as a whole. 31 –34 However, these methods are not without their limitations. We identified companies from associations with results of database searches for literature and clinical trials using key terms related to tissue engineering. While we succeeded in identifying several thousand entries which we parsed for tissue engineering companies, the choice of databases and search terms may introduce some bias to the results. Second, many of our quantitative findings are reliant on the accuracy of international business databases, which while we believe these to be reliable, 51 may have some inaccuracies intractable by the authors. For example, in pinpointing estimates of cumulative sales and number of employees attributable to tissue engineering endeavors, we anticipate that our reports are more accurate for smaller organizations than for larger ones with multiple subsidiaries that may or may not also be performing tissue engineering. We attempted to account for this by only including the tissue engineering subsidiaries of large companies performing business in multiple sectors, when possible.
In the future, the dominance of stem cell-based products seen in companies within the clinical trial sector is expected to lead to more commercialization of these products depending upon success in clinical trial results and regulatory approval. The efforts in past 30 years of tissue engineering are being realized through the domination of ‘Cell and Biomaterial’ based products in the commercial sector, highlighting the growth of tissue engineering as a reputable field. While biomaterial products still represent a substantial portion of commercial and preclinical products, the functionalization of these materials with bioactive cellular products is now more dominant in the field—a shift only realized in the last five years.
Despite government and industry investment in the field, there are only a modest number of commercially available tissue engineered products classifiable by the native definitions of the field. The field has therefore embraced parallel or complementary technologies that address the goals of tissue engineering as the science and regulatory frameworks advance toward realization. Some might consider this as a failing of the field. However, considering the audacity of the approach—building implantable tissues—we suggest that the rate of clinical impact of the field is at worst appropriate and perhaps remarkable.
To appropriately triage new therapies, regulatory agencies have pursued adaptations that make clearer how innovative engineered tissues will be scrutinized as potential therapeutics and what role they will play in the assessment of therapies. In the United States, the FDA has responded to the complexity of these products and the significant amount of detail required to review them by establishing the Office of Therapeutic Products in 2022 and making modifications to the regulatory pipeline. 49,52 While significant strides have been made in the last five years, there are still many remaining challenges for tissue engineered products. Production scale-up, product consistency, and reproducibility are all active challenges in the field. The most significant challenge is supplying adequate nutrition and oxygen, which, if solved, will result in achieving the original aspirations of the field: to develop fully functional tissue and organ constructs. In conclusion, over the last 30 years, the tissue engineering and regenerative medicine field has metamorphosized from a visionary concept to a tangible force, driving innovation in both the health care and biotechnology spaces. The field holds the potential to reshape the medical landscape, offering renewed hope for patients, researchers, and clinicians alike.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Lily Griner from the University of Maryland Libraries for providing valuable guidance on acquisition of financial data. The authors also acknowledge that Figure 1b and Figure 2 were created with Biorender.com
Authors’ Contributions
R.B.F., A.S., and P.H. contributed to the experimental design, data collection and analysis, and writing of the article. S.H., M.W., M.U., L.A.G., L.N., and M.Z.L. contributed to the data collection by assisting with company identification, inclusion/exclusion determination, and financial data acquisition. P.H. assisted with the article preparation. J.P.F. oversaw experiments, performed data analysis, and oversaw the article preparation.
Data Access Statement
Data from our experiments and analysis will be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Disclosure Statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Information
This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 HD112031, R01 CA279815, P41 EB023833), the Osteo Science Foundation (23052316), the Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund (MSCRFD-6126), and the MPower Professorship.
References
- 1. Hardy JD. The first lung transplant in man (1963) and the first heart transplant in man (1964). Transplant Proc, 1999; 31(1–2):25–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Von Kaulla KN, et al. Homotransplantation of the liver in humans. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1963; 117:659. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Murray JE, Merrill JP, Harrison JH. Kidney transplantation between seven pairs of identical twins. Ann Surg, 1958; 148(3):343–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Barnard CN, Cooper DKC. Clinical transplantation of the heart: A review of 13 years’ personal experience. J R Soc Med, 1981; 74(9):670–674; doi: 10.1177/014107688107400910 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bastani B. The present and future of transplant organ shortage: Some potential remedies. J Nephrol, 2020; 33(2):277–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Caplan AL. Finding a solution to the organ shortage. Cmaj, 2016; 188(16):1182–1183; doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Abouna GM. Organ shortage crisis: Problems and possible solutions. Transplant Proc, 2008; 40(1):34–38; doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.11.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ghorbani F, Khoddami-Vishteh HR, Ghobadi O, et al. Causes of family refusal for organ donation. Transplant Proc, 2011; 43(2):405–406; doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, et al. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med, 1994; 331(14):889–895; doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410063311401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vacanti CA. The history of tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med, 2006; 10(3):569–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science, 1993; 260(5110):920–926; doi: 10.1126/science.8493529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Vacanti JP, Vacanti CA. The History and Scope of Tissue Engineering. In: Principles of Tissue Engineering. Elsevier; 2014; pp. 3–8. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wang X. Bioartificial organ manufacturing technologies. Cell Transplant, 2019; 28(1):5–17; doi: 10.1177/0963689718809918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Malchesky PS. Artificial organs 2010: A year in review. Artif Organs, 2011; 35(3):316–350; doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01225.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Badwaik R. 3D printed organs: The future of regenerative medicine. Jcdr, 2019; 13(11):FE01–FE08; doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2019/42546.13256 [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hunsberger J, Simon C, Zylberberg C, et al. Improving patient outcomes with regenerative medicine: How the Regenerative Medicine Manufacturing Society plans to move the needle forward in cell manufacturing, standards, 3D bioprinting, artificial intelligence-enabled automation, education, and training. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2020; 9(7):728–733; doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Thomas ED, Storb R. Technique for human marrow grafting. Blood, 1970; 36(4):507–515; doi: 10.1182/blood.V36.4.507.507 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Buckner CD, Epstein RB, Rudolph RH, et al. Allogeneic marrow engraftment following whole body irradiation in a patient with leukemia. Blood, 1970; 35(6):741–750; doi: 10.1182/blood.V35.6.741.741 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kumar RJ, Kimble RM, Boots R, et al. Treatment of partial-thickness burns: A prospective, randomized trial using TranscyteTM. ANZ J Surg, 2004; 74(8):622–626; doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03106.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science, 1998; 282(5391):1145–1147; doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Shamblott MJ, Axelman J, Wang S, et al. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998; 95(23):13726–13731; doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shin'oka T, Imai Y, Ikada Y. Transplantation of a tissue-engineered pulmonary artery. N Engl J Med, 2001; 344(7):532–533; doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, 2007; 318(5858):1917–1920; doi: 10.1126/science.1151526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 2007; 131(5):861–872; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Alper J. Geron gets green light for human trial of ES cell–derived product. Nat Biotechnol, 2009; 27(3):213–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Manley NC, Priest CA, Denham J, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cells: Preclinical efficacy and safety in cervical spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2017; 6(10):1917–1929; doi: 10.1002/sctm.17-0065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Mandai M, Watanabe A, Kurimoto Y, et al. Autologous induced stem-cell–derived retinal cells for macular degeneration. N Engl J Med, 2017; 376(11):1038–1046; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 2006; 126(4):663–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Golchin A, Farahany TZ. Biological products: Cellular therapy and FDA approved products. Stem Cell Rev Rep, 2019; 15(2):166–175; doi: 10.1007/s12015-018-9866-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) C for BE and R (CBER). Approved Cellular and Gene Therapy Products; 2023. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/cellular-gene-therapy-products/approved-cellular-and-gene-therapy-products [Last accessed June 30, 2023. ].
- 31. Hoffman T, Khademhosseini A, Langer R. Chasing the paradigm: Clinical translation of 25 years of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, 2019; 25(9-10):679–687; doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kim YS, Smoak MM, Melchiorri AJ, et al. An overview of the tissue engineering market in the United States from 2011 to 2018. Tissue Eng Part A, 2019; 25(1-2):1–8; doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lysaght MJ, Reyes J. The growth of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng, 2001; 7(5):485–493; doi: 10.1089/107632701753213110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lysaght MJ, Jaklenec A, Deweerd E. Great expectations: Private sector activity in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and stem cell therapeutics. Tissue Eng Part A, 2008; 14(2):305–315; doi: 10.1089/tea.2007.0267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Jaklenec A, Stamp A, Deweerd E, et al. Progress in the tissue engineering and stem cell industry “Are we there yet?” Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 2012; 18(3):155–166; doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Anonymous. Mergent Intellect. n.d.
- 37. Kimbrel EA, Lanza R. Pluripotent stem cells: The last 10 years. Regen Med, 2016; 11(8):831–847; doi: 10.2217/rme-2016-0117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Lanza R, Russell DW, Nagy A. Engineering universal cells that evade immune detection. Nat Rev Immunol, 2019; 19(12):723–733; doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0200-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, et al. Stem cells: Past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2019; 10(1):68; doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1165-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Martin RM, Fowler JL, Cromer MK, et al. Improving the safety of human pluripotent stem cell therapies using genome-edited orthogonal safeguards. Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1):2713; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16455-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bose S, Ke D, Sahasrabudhe H, et al. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog Mater Sci, 2018; 93:45–111; doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ullah S, Chen X. Fabrication, applications and challenges of natural biomaterials in tissue engineering. Applied Materials Today, 2020; 20:100656; doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100656 [Google Scholar]
- 43. Huang S, Fu X. Naturally derived materials-based cell and drug delivery systems in skin regeneration. J Control Release, 2010; 142(2):149–159; doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Qiu P, Li M, Chen K, et al. Periosteal matrix-derived hydrogel promotes bone repair through an early immune regulation coupled with enhanced angio- and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 2020; 227:119552; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Zhang X, Chen X, Hong H, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: Recent trends and emerging strategies in tissue engineering. Bioact Mater, 2022; 10:15–31; doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, et al. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials, 2020; 226:119536; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Van Belleghem S, Mahadik B, Snodderly K, et al. Dual extrusion patterning drives tissue development aesthetics and shape retention in 3d printed nipple-areola constructs. Adv Healthc Mater, 2021; 10(23):e2101249; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Revah O, Gore F, Kelley KW, et al. Maturation and circuit integration of transplanted human cortical organoids. Nature, 2022; 610(7931):319–326; doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05277-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Zushin P-JH, Mukherjee S, Wu JC. FDA modernization act 2.0: Transitioning beyond animal models with human cells, organoids, and AI/ML-based approaches. J Clin Invest, n.d; 133(21):e175824; doi: 10.1172/JCI175824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Strauss D. Advancing Alternative Methods for Regulatory Use. 2022.
- 51. Leaming A. Mergent Intellect. Charleston Adv, 2016; 18(2):32–36. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Wang L, Johnson AN. A Pragmatic approach to navigating FDA guidance for therapeutic product development in malignant hematological disease. Blood, 2023; 142(Supplement 1):7268–7268; doi: 10.1182/blood-2023-187200 [Google Scholar]
