Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Sep 30;21(9):e0357788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357788

Causes of hospitalization among people living with HIV in a tertiary-care hospital in Bogotá, Colombia, 2018–2024

Daniela Lucía Rico-Bolívar 1,2, Cándida Díaz-Brochero 1,2,3, Rebecca Hattemer 4, Camila Andrea Bejarano-Mora 2, Laura Bejarano-Mora 2, Moises A Huaman 5, Sandra Liliana Valderrama-Beltrán 1,2,*
Editor: Felix Bongomin6
PMCID: PMC13626370  PMID: 42814691

Abstract

Background and objective

Despite expanded access to antiretroviral therapy (ART), people living with HIV (PLWH) continue to experience high hospitalization rates, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to describe the causes of hospitalization in a cohort of PLWH treated at a high-complexity referral center in Bogotá, Colombia, and to assess variations across the pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic periods of COVID-19.

Methodology

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including hospitalization episodes among adults with confirmed HIV infection between 2018 and 2024. Clinical characteristics, causes of hospitalization, and outcomes were compared across the epidemiological periods related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

A total of 872 hospitalization episodes corresponding to 584 patients were analyzed. The median age was 34 years, and 89.1% were men. Although 68.7% of patients had a history of ART use, 54.8% were admitted with detectable viral load. Non–AIDS-defining causes predominated across all periods (61.8%), with a progressive increase from the pre-pandemic to the post-pandemic period (55.3%, 63.1%, and 70.1%, respectively). A sustained increase in hospitalizations due to mental health disorders was observed over time (4.3%, 4.6%, and 7.8%). Among AIDS-defining conditions, tuberculosis (15.8%) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (14.9%) were the most frequent. Hospitalizations due to opportunistic infections were associated with longer length of stay (median 14 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001) and higher 30-day mortality (8.6% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001) compared with non–AIDS-defining hospitalizations, with a proportional increase in events attributable to tuberculosis and Kaposi sarcoma.

Conclusions

An epidemiological transition towards non-AIDS-defining causes of hospitalization is evident, comparable to patterns observed in high-income countries; however, a substantial burden of tuberculosis, Kaposi sarcoma, and late HIV diagnosis persists, likely reflecting ongoing structural gaps in HIV care. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in hospitalizations related to mental health disorders was observed. Taken together, these findings highlight the urgent need to strengthen early diagnosis, active case finding, and tuberculosis prevention, as well as to enhance the implementation of comprehensive care models that improve retention in care for PLWH in low- and middle-income countries.

Introduction

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), first identified in 1983 [1], has caused approximately 44.1 million deaths worldwide and has remained a global public health challenge for more than four decades [2]. Since its introduction, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has advanced rapidly, and access to these drugs has increased exponentially. The United Nations’ goal is to end the AIDS pandemic by 2030 through the 95-95-95 strategy (diagnosing at least 95% of people living with HIV (PLWH), ensuring that 95% of them receive ART, and achieving sustained viral suppression in 95% of those on treatment) [3].

As of 2024, an estimated 40.8 million people were living with HIV globally; of these, 31.6 million were receiving ART, compared to the 7.7 million reported in 2010 [4]. This expansion in treatment coverage has resulted in a significant decline in HIV-related morbidity and mortality. Cohorts from high-income countries have documented a reduction in opportunistic infections and AIDS-defining illnesses, alongside a relative increase in non-AIDS-defining comorbidities associated with population aging and the chronic nature of the infection [5–7].

A recent meta-analysis of hospital admissions among PLWH, covering the period 2014–2023, confirmed that AIDS-related diseases remain a predominant cause of hospitalization worldwide, particularly in resource-limited regions [8]. However, the distribution of admission causes is heterogeneous: in Europe and the United States, non-AIDS-defining illnesses—such as cardiovascular disease, non-AIDS-defining malignancies, and metabolic complications—predominate. Conversely, in low- and middle-income countries, opportunistic infections and AIDS-defining illnesses remain the leading causes of hospitalization, accounting for nearly 62% of admissions in Latin America [8].

In Colombia, national surveillance data identified 185,954 people living with HIV in 2024, corresponding to a prevalence of approximately 356 per 100,000 inhabitants. During the same year, 14,555 new cases were reported, with an adjusted incidence of 26.90 per 100,000 inhabitants and an adjusted all-cause mortality rate of 4.01 per 100,000 inhabitants; both indicators declined compared with the previous year [9]. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage reached 80.74% of registered cases, and 89.42% of those receiving treatment achieved viral suppression [9]. Despite the availability of these surveillance indicators, evidence on hospitalization among PLWH in Colombia remains scarce. No national hospitalization rate has been published, and the most comprehensive evidence available comes from a 2017 multicenter study conducted in six hospitals in Medellín, in which infectious diseases—particularly tuberculosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, and other opportunistic infections—were the leading causes of hospitalization and death [10]. Recent national evidence regarding hospitalization profiles in the era of widespread ART availability remains limited, especially in high-complexity institutions.

To our knowledge, there are no recent studies evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the causes of hospitalization in Colombia. The objective of this study was to characterize the causes of hospitalization in a cohort of adults with HIV infection treated at a tertiary-care hospital in Bogotá, Colombia, describe their variations according to the epidemiological periods of the COVID-19 pandemic, and discuss these findings in the context of current literature.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), a private, not-for-profit university hospital affiliated with the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Bogotá, Colombia. Bogotá is the capital and largest city of the country, with a population of approximately 7.9 million in 2024 [11]. Colombia has a near-universal health insurance system that operates through contributory and subsidized schemes, with care delivered by healthcare institutions of varying levels of complexity. As a high-complexity teaching and referral center, HUSI provides specialized medical and surgical care. Its Infectious Diseases service includes a dedicated HIV care program serving people living with HIV affiliated with multiple health insurers (Empresas Promotoras de Salud, EPS), which reinforces HUSI’s role as a referral center for HIV care in Bogotá and surrounding areas. Eligibility was based on HIV status rather than on the reason for admission. We included all hospitalization episodes of adults (≥18 years) with a length of stay >24 hours and a confirmed diagnosis of HIV infection established before admission or during hospitalization, according to international diagnostic guidelines [12]. The study period comprised admissions from January 1, 2018, through June 30, 2024. Episodes in which patients were referred or transferred to another institution within the first 72 hours of admission were excluded because complete characterization of the clinical event and its outcomes could not be ensured.

The unit of analysis was the hospitalization episode. To promote independence of events, readmissions were not considered new episodes when they occurred within 30 days of discharge and corresponded to the same primary cause, or at any later time if they were related to complications directly attributable to the index event. In contrast, readmissions for a different primary cause were considered new independent hospitalization episodes, regardless of the time elapsed since discharge.

Data processing and collection

Patients were identified by querying an institutional database of all HUSI hospitalizations using a broad set of infectious-disease ICD-10 codes. This case-finding strategy intentionally included diagnoses beyond HIV and therefore retrieved records that did not correspond to confirmed HIV infection. Retrieved records were manually reviewed to confirm HIV infection, and records that did not correspond to confirmed HIV infection were excluded. Eligibility was then verified by cross-referencing the Infectious Diseases service database, which also identified additional eligible hospitalization episodes not captured through administrative coding.

Clinical and sociodemographic data were extracted from the electronic medical records by trained members of the research team, including physicians and residents, and entered into a structured REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) database [13,14]. Data collection was standardized using a predefined instrument with controlled response options and built-in field-validation rules. As a quality-control measure, a sample of records was independently cross-checked against the source medical records by a second reviewer, and any identified discrepancies were corrected by returning to the primary source. All sociodemographic variables, including educational level and sexual orientation, were obtained exclusively from the electronic medical records; no direct patient interviews were conducted for this study. These variables had been documented during routine clinical care by members of the interdisciplinary care team, including physicians, nursing staff, and social workers. Variables not documented in the medical record were treated as missing.

Study variables

Sociodemographic variables included age, sex, sexual orientation, and educational level. Sexual orientation was abstracted as documented during routine clinical care and categorized as heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, or not documented. Educational level was categorized as primary, secondary, technical, university/professional, or not documented, and was used as a proxy for socioeconomic position. Psychoactive substance use was based primarily on patient self-report documented during routine clinical care, including the structured psychosocial assessment performed by the social work team, and was subsequently abstracted from the electronic medical record. No study-specific interviews or toxicological testing were performed. Substance use was recorded as a multiple-response variable using predefined categories: intravenous drug use, inhaled drug use, other drug use, and active cigarette smoking. Clinical variables included timing of HIV diagnosis, clinical stage according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), baseline immune status at diagnosis, comorbidities, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. Admission laboratory values were recorded to characterize immunovirological status (CD4 cell count and HIV viral load). Outcomes included length of hospital stay, ICU admission, 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality.

Causes of hospitalization were classified into two main groups: AIDS-defining conditions and non–AIDS-defining conditions. The latter included the following subcategories: non-opportunistic infections, surgical conditions, neurologic conditions, gastrointestinal conditions, cardiovascular conditions, non–AIDS-related neoplasms, pulmonary conditions, genitourinary conditions, autoimmune conditions, trauma-related conditions, mental health conditions, endocrine conditions, renal conditions, adverse drug reactions, and other causes.

Determination of the cause of hospitalization

For each episode, diagnoses directly related to the reason for admission were identified and recorded as the main cause(s) of hospitalization. Classification was based on the clinical judgment of the treating team verified by the research investigators. When two conditions contributed equally to the admission, both were recorded as co-primary causes, allowing more than one primary etiology per episode. Clinically relevant diagnoses identified during hospitalization that were not the initial reason for admission (e.g., nosocomial infections or decompensation of comorbidities) were recorded as secondary causes.

Operational definitions

Causes of hospitalization were grouped into AIDS-defining conditions, based on the CDC definition [15], and non–AIDS-defining conditions, defined as any primary diagnosis not included in the AIDS-defining category [16,17]. HIV clinical stage was categorized according to the current CDC classification [18].

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) was assessed by patient self-report elicited by the treating clinical team during routine care and documented in the electronic medical record; this information was subsequently abstracted by the research team, and no adherence interviews were conducted specifically for this study. For the purposes of this study, optimal adherence was defined as taking ≥95% of prescribed doses in the prior month [19,20]. Adherence below this threshold was classified as suboptimal and included behaviors ranging from intermittent missed doses to treatment interruption. Treatment interruption was further categorized as short-term (<1 month) or prolonged (≥1 month).

For outcome assessment, 30-day readmission was defined as any inpatient readmission within 30 days of discharge, regardless of whether the cause was the same as or different from that of the index episode, consistent with prior studies in people with HIV [21].

To examine reasons for hospitalization across the COVID-19 context, admissions were stratified into three epidemiological periods based on milestones declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the declaration of a health emergency in Colombia [22]: (1) pre-pandemic, admissions before March 1, 2020; (2) pandemic, admissions from March 1, 2020, to May 5, 2023; and (3) post-pandemic, admissions after May 5, 2023.

Statistical analysis

We performed descriptive analyses of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes. Normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation, SD) for normally distributed variables and median (interquartile range, IQR) for non-normally distributed variables. Categorical variables are reported as counts and proportions (n, %). Missing data were not imputed; analyses were performed using available cases for each variable, and the corresponding analytic denominator is reported in the tables. Variables conditional by design were analyzed within their applicable subgroups and were not considered missing when not applicable. Values recorded as unknown or not documented were retained as separate categories in descriptive analyses. The extent of missing data for individual variables is reported in the corresponding tables.

Mortality outcomes included in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality. For patients discharged before day 30, survival status was verified using the General Social Security Health System affiliation database (ADRES/BDUA) from the Colombian Ministry of Health and Social Protection [23].

Group comparisons (AIDS-defining vs non–AIDS-defining causes) and comparisons across pandemic periods were conducted using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and Student’s t test or the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables, as appropriate. A two-sided p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results were displayed using bar charts and line graphs. Data processing and statistical analyses were performed in R, version 4.4.2.

Ethical considerations

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Research and Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (approval No. FM-CIE-0316–25). Given the retrospective design based on medical record review, the study was classified as “research without risk” under local regulations and was therefore exempt from informed consent. Medical records were accessed for research purposes between August 15, 2025, and November 30, 2025. Only the authors involved in data collection had access to information that could identify individual participants during this process; however, all data were anonymized by assigning unique, non-traceable codes to each record, ensuring confidentiality during analysis.

Results

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics

A total of 2,109 records from the hospital administrative database were reviewed. Of these, 857 corresponded to individuals with confirmed HIV infection, whereas 1,252 did not and were excluded after review. Among the 857 records with confirmed HIV infection, 108 episodes were excluded (70 because patients were transferred to another institution within the first 72 hours and 38 because they were readmissions due to the same etiology). An additional 123 eligible hospitalization episodes of people living with HIV, identified through the Infectious Diseases service database but not captured by administrative coding, were included, yielding a final analytic sample of 872 hospitalization episodes among 584 individuals with confirmed HIV infection. The case-identification and inclusion process is summarized in S3 Fig. Characteristics are reported at the episode level (n = 872), as individuals could contribute more than one hospitalization (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of people living with HIV hospitalized at HUSI, Bogotá, Colombia, between 2018 and 2024, stratified by cause of admission (n = 872).

Characteristics Total (n = 872) AIDS defining illness

n= 333 (38.2%)
Non-AIDS defining illness

n=539 (61.8%)
P Value
Male, n (%) 777 (89.1) 284 (85.3) 493 (91.5) 0.019
Age, median (IQR) 34.0 (28.0–47.0) 35.0 (29.0–46.0) 33.0 (27.0–48.5) 0.161
Age group (years) 0.237
18- < 30 290 (33.3) 97 (29.1) 193 (35.8)
30- < 40 255 (29.2) 108 (32.4) 147 (27.3)
40- < 50 141 (16.2) 64 (19.2) 77 (14.3)
50- < 60 128 (14.7) 50 (15.0) 78 (14.5)
60- < 70 40 (4.6) 9 (2.7) 31 (5.8)
≥70 18 (2.1) 5 (1.5) 13 (2.4)
Sexual orientation, n (%) 0.006
Homosexual 449 (51.5) 149 (44.7) 300 (55.7)
Heterosexual 291 (33.4) 139 (41.7) 152 (28.2)
Bisexual 59 (6.8) 23 (6.9) 36 (6.7)
Unknown 73 (8.4) 22 (6.6) 51 (9.5)
Education level, n (%) <0.001
University/Professional 171 (19.6) 41 (12.3) 130 (24.1)
Technical 174 (20.0) 58 (17.4) 116 (21.5)
High school 357 (40.9) 161 (48.3) 196 (36.4)
Primary education 142 (16.3) 67 (20.1) 75 (13.9)
Unknown 27 (3.1) 6 (1.8) 21 (3.9)
Comorbidities, n (%)
Malignancy 72 (8.3) 22 (6.6) 50 (9.3) 0.38
HTN 51 (5.8) 14 (4.2) 37 (6.9) 0.266
Dyslipidemia 40 (4.6) 13 (3.9) 27 (5.0) 0.75
Asthma 25 (2.9) 6 (1.8) 19 (3.5) 0.334
Hypothyroidism 23 (2.6) 9 (2.7) 14 (2.6) 0.996
COPD 22 (2.5) 3 (0.9) 19 (3.5) 0.056
Other comorbidities* 59 (6.8) 17 (5.1) 42 (7.8) 0.163
Any substance use, n (%) 314 (36.0) 125 (37.5) 189 (35.1) 0.505
Intravenous drugs, n (%) 13 (1.5) 6 (1.8) 7 (1.3) 0.837
Inhaled drugs, n (%) 167 (19.2) 58 (17.4) 109 (20.2) 0.593
Active smoking, n (%) 226 (25.9) 86 (25.8) 140 (26.0) 0.999
Coinfections, n (%)
Chronic hepatitis B 32 (3.7) 11 (3.3) 21 (3.9) 0.903
Inactive hepatitis B carrier 36 (4.1) 11 (3.3) 25 (4.6) 0.629
Hepatitis C 39 (4.5) 4 (1.2) 35 (6.5) 0.001
None 772 (88.5) 308 (92.5) 464 (86.1) 0.016
HIV status and treatment
New HIV diagnosis, n (%) 129 (14.8) 69 (21.2) 60 (11.0) 0.001
Time since diagnosis, years (IQR) 1.5 (0.1–6.9) 0.5 (0.0–3.8) 3.0 (0.4–8.0) <0.001
Immunological status at diagnosis
CD4 cell count at diagnosis, Median (IQR) (n = 564) 115.0 (47.8–253.0) 57.0 (30.0–129.0) 192.0 (81.2–356.2) <0.001
Stage of infection at diagnosisa, n (%) <0.001
Stage I 57 (6.5) 2 (0.6) 55 (10.2)
Stage II 131 (15.0) 20 (6.0) 111 (20.6)
Stage III 445 (51.0) 241 (72.4) 204 (37.8)
Unknown 239 (27.4) 70 (21.0) 169 (31.4)
Immunovirological status at admission
CD4 cell count, Median (IQR) (n = 723) 192.0 (57.5–378.0) 58.0 (23.0–132.0) 290.0 (146.8–456.0) <0.001
Stage of infectiona, n (%) <0.001
Stage I 107 (12.3) 0 (0.0) 107 (19.9)
Stage II 222 (25.5) 0 (0.0) 222 (41.2)
Stage III 529 (60.7) 333 (100) 196 (36.4)
Unknown 14 (1.6) 0 (0.0) 14 (2.6)
CD4 Nadir cell count, Median (IQR) (n = 611) 88.0 (30.0–212.0) 40.0 (17.0–94.0) 156.0 (57.5–323.5) <0.001
HIV viral load, n (%) <0.001
Detectable 478 (54.8) 251 (75.4) 227 (42.1)
Undetectable (< 50 copies/mL) 287 (32.9) 43 (12.9) 244 (45.3)
Unknown 107 (12.3) 39 (11.7) 68 (12.6)
HIV viral load, copies/mL, Median (IQR) (n = 478) 87992 (8397–394 998) 179,000 (38,266–500,876) 41,043 (1,024–210,327)
History of ART use, n (%) 599 (68.7) 178 (53.5) 421 (78.1) <0.001
ART regimen (among treated), n (%) (n = 599)
INSTI + 2 NRTI 196 (32.7) 59 (34.7) 137 (31.9) 0.579
PI + 2 NRTI 196 (32.7) 47 (27.6) 149 (34.7) 0.117
NNRTI + 2 NRTI 159 (26.5) 47 (27.6) 112 (26.1) 0.778
INSTI + PI 15 (2.5) 4 (2.4) 11 (2.6) 1.000
INSTI + PI + 2 NRTI 6 (1.0) 2 (1.2) 4 (0.9) 0.679
Other/unknown b 27 (4.6) 11 (6.5) 16 (3.7) 0.215
Time on ART, years (IQR) (n = 465) 2.3 (0.6–5.9) 1.4 (0.3–4.8) 2.7 (0.7–6.1) 0.189
Adherence (among treated), n (%) <0.001
Suboptimal** 178 (29.7) 89 (50.0) 89 (21.1)
Prophylaxis, n (%)
P. jirovecii prophylaxis 252 (28.9) 130 (39.0) 122 (22.6) <0.001
MAC prophylaxis 48 (5.5) 27 (8.1) 21 (3.9) 0.03
Hospitalization
Period of hospitalization, n (%) 0.036
Pre-COVID-19 † 291 (33.4) 130 (39.0) 161 (29.9)
During COVID-19 ‡ 417 (47.8) 154 (46.2) 263 (48.8)
Post-COVID-19 ‡‡ 164 (18.8) 49 (14.7) 115 (21.3)
Hospital stays, days – median (IQR) 8.0 (4.0–15.0) 14.0 (8.0–25.0) 6.0 (3.0–10.0) <0.001
ICU admission, n (%) 59 (6.8) 38 (11.4) 21 (3.9) <0.001
ICU stay, days Median (IQR) (n = 59) 6.0 (3.0–11.0) 5.5 (3.0–8.8) 7.0 (5.0–13.0) 0.198
Readmission within 30 days, n (%) 111 (12.7) 63 (18.9) 48 (8.9) <0.001
In-hospital Mortality, n (%) 37 (4.2) 27 (8.1) 10 (1.9) <0.001
30-day Mortality, n (%) 42 (4.8) 28 (8.6) 14 (2.6) <0.001

Abbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HTN, hypertension; ICU, intensive care unit; INSTI, integrase strand transfer inhibitor; IQR, interquartile range; MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NRTI, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI, protease inhibitor; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.Symbols: *Includes kidney failure, heart failure, T2DM, and obesity. **Suboptimal adherence: less than 95% of doses taken. †Pre-COVID-19: admissions before March 1, 2020. ‡During COVID-19: admissions from March 1, 2020, to May 5, 2023 (date when the WHO declared the end of the global health emergency). ‡‡Post-COVID-19: admissions after May 5, 2023. aDefined according to CDC classification. bIncludes atypical combinations, simplification regimens, multidrug rescue regimens, and cases without detailed medication records. Missing/not documented data: sexual orientation, 73/872 (8.4%); educational level, 27/872 (3.1%); stage at HIV diagnosis, 239/872 (27.4%); CD4 count at diagnosis, 308/872 (35.3%); CD4 count at admission, 149/872 (17.1%); CD4 nadir, 261/872 (29.9%); and HIV viral load status at admission, 107/872 (12.3%). Among episodes involving patients receiving ART (n = 599), time on ART was unavailable in 134 (22.4%) and adherence was not documented in 2 (0.3%). Unknown/not documented values were retained as separate categories in descriptive analyses when applicable. Substance-use categories were non-mutually exclusive.

Most episodes occurred in young adults, with a median age of 34 years (IQR, 28–47). Overall, 62.5% of episodes involved individuals aged 18–40 years, and there was a marked male predominance (89.1%; n = 777). Regarding educational attainment, 80.5% of episodes involved individuals who had completed at least secondary education (39.6% secondary, 20.0% technical education, and 19.6% a university/professional degree).

The most frequent comorbidities were malignancy (8.3%; n = 72), hypertension (5.8%; n = 51), and dyslipidemia (4.6%; n = 40). Psychoactive substance use was reported in 36.0% of episodes, most commonly tobacco smoking (25.9%) and inhalant use (19.2%). Regarding coinfections, hepatitis B virus infection was documented in 7.8% of episodes (4.1% inactive carriers and 3.7% chronic infection), and hepatitis C virus infection in 4.5%.

Immunovirological status and antiretroviral therapy

Among episodes in individuals with a prior HIV diagnosis (85.2%), the median time from HIV diagnosis to hospital admission was 1.5 years (IQR, 0.1–6.9). New HIV diagnoses accounted for 14.8% of episodes (n = 129).

At admission, immune compromise was common. The median CD4 + T-cell count was 192 cells/µL (IQR, 57.5–378), and 60.7% of hospitalization episodes were classified as CDC stage 3 (n = 529) (Table 1).

Overall, 68.7% of episodes (n = 599) involved individuals with prior antiretroviral therapy (ART) use, with a median treatment duration of 2.3 years (IQR, 0.6–5.9). INSTI-based and PI-based regimens were the most common, each accounting for 32.7% (n = 196) of treated episodes. Among episodes with prior ART use, suboptimal adherence was documented in 29.7% (n = 178). Within this subgroup, 52.8% (n = 94) had discontinued ART for >1 month, representing 15.7% of all episodes with prior ART use.

Causes of hospitalization

Across the study period, non–AIDS-defining conditions accounted for 539 episodes (61.8%), whereas AIDS-defining conditions accounted for 333 episodes (38.2%) (Table 1).

Compared with AIDS-defining episodes, non–AIDS-defining episodes were associated with a more favorable sociodemographic and clinical profile, including: (i) higher educational attainment (technical/university education: 45.5% vs 29.5%); (ii) a more favorable ART history (prior ART use: 78.1% vs 53.4%; optimal adherence: 78.8% vs 50.0%); (iii) longer time since HIV diagnosis (median, 3.0 vs 0.5 years); and (iv) better immunovirological status, including a less severe CD4 nadir (median, 156 vs 40 cells/µL), higher CD4 count at admission (median, 290 vs 58 cells/µL), and better virological control (detectable viral load: 42.1% vs 75.4%).

In contrast, AIDS-defining episodes were associated with worse hospital outcomes, including longer length of stay (median, 14.0 vs 6.0 days), more frequent ICU admission (11.4% vs 3.9%), and higher 30-day mortality (8.6% vs 2.6%) than non–AIDS-defining episodes.

Temporal trends and the effect of the pandemic

The 872 hospitalization episodes were distributed across the three COVID-19 epidemiological periods as follows: 291 in the pre-pandemic period, 417 during the pandemic, and 164 in the post-pandemic period.

Patient characteristics and outcomes across the study periods are presented in Table 2 (see S2 Table for full details). The proportion of hospitalizations due to AIDS-defining conditions decreased progressively, falling from 44.7% in the pre-pandemic period to 29.9% in the post-pandemic period, a trend compensated by a reciprocal increase in non–AIDS-defining causes (p = 0.006) (Fig 1).

Table 2. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of people living with HIV hospitalized at HUSI, Bogotá, Colombia (2018–2024), stratified by COVID-19 pandemic period (n = 872).

Characteristics Pre-COVID-19 pandemic During COVID-19 pandemic

Post-COVID-19 pandemic
Total Total Total
N= 291 N=417 N=164
Male, n (%) 262 (90.0) 370 (88.7) 145 (88.4)
Age, median (IQR) 34.0 (27.0 - 49.0) 34.0 (28.0 - 46.0) 36.0 (29.0 - 49.0)
Sexual orientation, n (%)
Homosexual 140 (48.1) 219 (52.5) 90 (54.9)
Heterosexual 109 (37.5) 132 (31.7) 50 (30.5)
Bisexual 19 (6.5) 25 (6.0) 15 (9.1)
Unknown 23 (7.9) 41 (9.8) 9 (5.5)
Education level, n (%)
University 51 (17.5) 89 (21.3) 31 (18.9)
Technical 60 (20.6) 89 (21.3) 25 (15.2)
High school 120 (41.2) 172 (41.2) 65 (39.6)
Primary education 52 (17.9) 53 (12.7) 37 (22.6)
Unknown 8 (2.7) 14 (3.4) 5 (3.0)
Comorbidities, n (%)
Malignancy 27 (9.3) 29 (7.0) 16 (9.8)
HTN 16 (5.5) 23 (5.5) 12 (7.3)
Dyslipidemia 16 (5.5) 16 (3.8) 8 (4.9)
Asthma 6 (2.1) 14 (3.4) 5 (3.0)
Hypothyroidism 6 (2.1) 12 (2.9) 2 (1.2)
COPD 5 (1.7) 11 (2.6) 0 (0.0)
Other Comorbidities* 21 (7.2) 30 (7.2) 8 (4.9)
Any substance use, n (%)
Intravenous drugs 5 (1.7) 5 (1.2) 3 (1.8)
Inhaled drugs 56 (19.2) 72 (17.3) 39 (23.8)
Active smoking 68 (23.4) 110 (26.4) 48 (29.3)
Coinfections, n (%)
Chronic Hepatitis B 13 (4.5) 14 (3.4) 5 (3.0)
Inactive hepatitis B carrier 15 (5.2) 18 (4.3) 3 (1.8)
Hepatitis C 10 (3.4) 17 (4.1) 12 (7.3)
None 256 (88.0) 369 (88.5) 147 (89.6)
HIV status and treatment
New HIV diagnosis, n (%) 43 (14.8) 65 (15.6) 21 (12.8)
Time since diagnosis, years (IQR) 1.3 (0.2 - 5.8) 1.1 (0.1 - 6.8) 3.8 (0.6 - 9.2)
Immunological status at diagnosis
CD4 cell count at diagnosis, Median (IQR) (n=564) 108.0 (52.0 - 258.0) 110.0 (43.8 - 243.2) 129.0 (49.0 - 256.0)
Stage of infection at diagnosis, n (%)a
Stage I 17 (5.8) 29 (7.0) 11 (6.7)
Stage II 52 (17.9) 58 (13.9) 21 (12.8)
Stage III 160 (55.0) 220 (52.8) 65 (39.6)
Unknown 62 (21.3) 110 (26.4) 67 (40.9)
Immunovirological status at admission
CD4 cell count, Median (IQR) (n=723) 152.0 (53.8 - 342.0) 207.0 (75.2 - 391.0) 216.0 (54.0 - 397.0)
Stage of infection, n (%)a
 Stage I 27 (9.3) 62 (14.9) 18 (11.0)
 Stage II 66 (22.7) 108 (25.9) 48 (29.3)
 Stage III 192 (66.0) 243 (58.3) 94 (57.3)
 Unknown 6 (2.1) 4 (1.0) 4 (2.4)
CD4 Nadir cell count, Median (IQR) (n=611) 73.0 (29.5 - 193.0) 94.5 (37.2 - 221.8) 89.5 (16.0 - 197.5)
HIV viral load, n (%)
 Detectable 161 (55.3) 230 (55.2) 87 (53.0)
 Undetectable (< 50 copies/mL) 91 (31.3) 139 (33.3) 57 (34.8)
 Unknown 39 (13.4) 48 (11.5) 20 (12.2)
HIV viral load, copies/mL, Median (IQR) (n=478) 92,045 (4,157 - 432,000) 91,264 (8,123 - 388,521) 85,400 (15,246 - 261,150)
History of ART use, n (%) 207 (71.1) 271 (65.0) 121 (73.8)
Time on ART, years (IQR) (n=465) 1.3 (0.4 - 4.6) 2.2 (0.5 - 5.8) 4.1 (2.2 - 8.0)
ART Regimen (among treated, n) n=207 n=271 n= 121
PI + 2 NRTI: 73 (35.3) 91 (33.6) 32 (26.4)
INSTI + 2 NRTI 60 (29.0) 85 (31.4) 51 (42.1)
NNRTI + 2 NRTI 52 (25.1) 85 (31.4) 22 (18.2)
INSTI + PI 7 (3.4) 4 (1.5) 4 (3.3)
INSTI + PI + 2 NRTI: 3 (1.4) 2 (0.7) 1 (0.8)
Other/unknownb 12 (5.8) 4 (1.5) 11 (9.1)
Adherence (among treated), n (%) n=207 n=271 n= 121
Suboptimal** 63 (30.4) 70 (25.8) 45 (37.2%)
Prophylaxis, n (%)
P. jirovecii prophylaxis 101 (34.7) 118 (28.3) 33 (20.1)
MAC prophylaxis 31 (10.7) 15 (3.6) 2 (1.2)
Hospitalization
Hospital stay, days – median (IQR) 8.0 (4.0 - 16.0) 8.0 (4.0 - 15.0) 8.0 (3.8 - 15.0)
ICU admission, n (%) 19 (6.5) 23 (5.5) 17 (10.4)
ICU stay, days Median (IQR) 4.0 (2.5 - 9.5) 9.0 (6.5 - 13.0) 4.0 (3.0 - 6.0)
Readmission within 30 days, n (%) 39 (13.4) 55 (13.2) 17 (10.4)
In-hospital Mortality, n (%) 13 (4.5) 15 (3.6) 9 (5.5)

Abbreviations: ART: Antiretroviral therapy; COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; HTN: Hypertension; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; INSTI: Integrase strand transfer inhibitor; IQR: Interquartile range; MAC: Mycobacterium avium complex; NNRTI: Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NRTI: Nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI: Protease inhibitor; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Symbols: * Other Comorbidities: Includes Kidney failure, Heart failure, T2DM, Obesity. **Suboptimal adherence: Less than 95% of doses taken. †Pre-COVID-19: Admissions before March 1, 2020. ‡During COVID-19: Admissions from March 1, 2020, to May 5, 2023 (date when WHO declared the end of the global health emergency). ‡‡Post-COVID-19: Admissions after May 5, 2023. aDefined according to CDC classification. bIncludes atypical combinations, simplification regimens, multidrug rescue regimens, and cases without detailed medication records. Missingness for study variables is reported in Table 1; analyses were based on available cases.

Fig 1. Temporal trends in causes of hospitalization: AIDS-defining vs. non-AIDS-defining events across the COVID-19 pandemic periods.

Fig 1

Changes in patient characteristics across periods When examining the evolution of patient characteristics, notable shifts in behavioral risk factors and treatment patterns were identified.

Regarding behavioral factors, a progressive increase in substance use and coinfections was documented. Active smoking rose from 23.5% (n = 68) in the pre-pandemic period to 29.3% (n = 48) in the post-pandemic period, while inhaled drug use increased from 19.2% to 23.8%. Similarly, the prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection doubled, rising from 3.4% (n = 10) to 7.3% (n = 12) in the final period.

With respect to HIV-related characteristics, the proportion of de novo HIV diagnoses showed a slight decrease in the post-pandemic era. When contrasted with the observed increase in time since diagnosis among hospitalized patients, this finding suggests a profile of greater chronicity within the study population. Regarding antiretroviral therapy, the use of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)–based regimens increased markedly, significantly displacing protease inhibitor– and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor–based regimens. Despite this therapeutic modernization, rates of suboptimal adherence and presentation with advanced disease remained high and constant across all three periods.

In the subgroup of episodes due to AIDS-defining conditions, the post-pandemic period was characterized by indicators of greater social vulnerability and clinical severity. On one hand, the proportion of patients with only primary education remained high, with an upward trend (30.6%; n = 15; S2 Table); on the other, a higher proportion of ICU admissions and in-hospital mortality was recorded compared to previous periods.

Regarding the distribution of the main causes of admission, although non–AIDS-defining illnesses constituted the largest overall category, AIDS-defining conditions were the leading specific group, accounting for 333 of the 872 episodes (38.2%), followed by non–AIDS-defining infections (n = 293; 33.6%). Gastrointestinal or hepatic conditions (n = 44; 5.0%), neurological disorders (n = 42; 4.8%), surgical conditions (n = 33; 3.8%), and mental health disorders (n = 28; 3.2%) were documented less frequently (S1 Fig)

Among the defining causes of AIDS, tuberculosis (pulmonary and extrapulmonary) was the most frequent etiology (15.8% of the group), closely followed by Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (14.9%), cytomegalovirus disease (13.8%), and Kaposi sarcoma (10.6%) (Table 3).

Table 3. Primary causes of admission of people living with HIV hospitalized at HUSI, Bogotá, Colombia (2018–2024), stratified by COVID-19 pandemic period (n = 872).

Cause of admission Total (n=872) Pre-COVID-19 pandemic n=291 (33.4%) During COVID-19 pandemic n=417 (47.8%) Post-COVID-19 pandemic n=164 (18.8%) P value
AIDS-defining illness, n (%) 333 (38.2) 130 (44.7) 154 (36.9) 49 (29.9) 0.003
Type of AIDS-defining illness, n (%)
Tuberculosis (any site) 55 (15.8) 17 (12.5) 23 (14.6) 15 (27.3)
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia 52 (14.9) 23 (16.9) 21 (13.3) 8 (14.5)
Cytomegalovirus disease 48 (13.8) 18 (13.2) 27 (17.1) 3 (5.5)
Kaposi sarcoma 37 (10.6) 16 (11.8) 12 (7.6) 9 (16.4)
Cerebral toxoplasmosis 36 (10.3) 17 (12.5) 16 (10.1) 3 (5.5)
Disseminated cryptococcosis 23 (6.6) 10 (7.4) 7 (4.4) 6 (10.9)
Chronic intestinal Cryptosporidiosis 17 (4.9) 3 (2.2) 11 (7.0) 3 (5.5)
HIV wasting syndrome 17 (4.9) 3 (2.2) 11 (7.0) 3 (5.5)
Disseminated histoplasmosis 17 (4.9) 8 (5.9) 8 (5.1) 1 (1.8)
Esophageal candidiasis 16 (4.6) 10 (7.4) 5 (3.2) 1 (1.8)
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 15 (4.3) 4 (2.9) 9 (5.7) 2 (3.6)
Primary CNS lymphoma 5 (1.4) 4 (2.9) 1 (0.6) 0 (0.0)
Recurrent pneumonia 3 (0.9) 1 (0.7) 2 (1.3) 0 (0.0)
Salmonella septicemia 3 (0.9) 1 (0.7) 2 (1.3) 0 (0.0)
HIV-related encephalopathy 2 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 2 (1.3) 0 (0.0)
Mycobacterium (other species) 2 (0.6) 1 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.8)
Non-AIDS defining illness, n (%) 539 (61.8) 161 (55.3) 263 (63.1) 115 (70.1) 0.006
Type of non-AIDS-defining illness, n (%)
Non-AIDS defining infection 293 (54.4) 90 (55.9) 143 (54.4) 60 (52.2%)
Gastrointestinal causes 44 (8.2) 19 (11.8) 18 (6.8) 7 (6.1%)
Neurological causes 42 (7.8) 12 (7.5) 23 (8.7) 7 (6.1%)
Surgical conditions 33 (6.1) 7 (4.3) 22 (8.4) 4 (3.5%)
Mental health 28 (5.2) 7 (4.3) 12 (4.6) 9 (7.8%)
Non-HIV-related neoplasms 19 (3.5) 4 (2.5) 11 (4.2) 4 (3.5%)
Pulmonary causes 19 (3.5) 5 (3.1) 9 (3.4) 5 (4.3%)
Cardiovascular causes 9 (1.7) 4 (2.5) 3 (1.1) 2 (1.7%)
Adverse effects of therapy 9 (1.7) 2 (1.2) 4 (1.5) 3 (2.6%)
Musculoskeletal injuries 8 (1.5) 2 (1.2) 5 (1.9) 1 (0.9%)
Other causes* 64 (11.9) 20 (12.4) 26 (9.9) 18 (15.7)

Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CNS, central nervous system; MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Note: More than one principal diagnosis could be assigned to a single admission when two conditions contributed equally to the reason for hospitalization; therefore, the sum of the individual categories may exceed the total number of admissions. Percentages for non-AIDS-defining illnesses were calculated based on the total number of non-AIDS-defining diagnoses. *Includes genitourinary causes, renal disease, autoimmune conditions, metabolic/endocrine diseases, poisoning/external causes, and other miscellaneous conditions.

Regarding changes in AIDS-defining conditions over the study period, we observed a clear shift in their distribution. Tuberculosis (all forms) increased substantially, from 12.5% in the pre-pandemic period to 27.3% in the post-pandemic period, becoming the leading cause in the latter. In contrast, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, which was the most frequent AIDS-defining condition in the pre-pandemic period (16.9%), decreased to third place in the post-pandemic period (14.5%). Kaposi sarcoma showed an upward trend, increasing from 11.8% to 16.4%, and ranked as the second most frequent AIDS-defining condition in the post-pandemic period (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Top 5 AIDS-defining causes of admission.

Fig 2

Among the 539 episodes attributed to non–AIDS-defining conditions, non-opportunistic infections were the predominant category, accounting for 54.4% (n = 293). Within this category, gastrointestinal infections were the most frequent (27.0%; n = 79), followed by pneumonia (15.7%; n = 46) (S2 Fig).

Although the overall mix of non–AIDS-defining causes was largely stable across periods, admissions for mental health disorders increased in the post-pandemic period (5.5%) compared with the pre-pandemic period (2.4%). This increase coincided with a downward trend in non-opportunistic infections (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Top 5 non-AIDS-defining causes of admission.

Fig 3

In addition to the primary cause of admission, secondary concomitant conditions were identified in 23.7% of episodes. The most frequent were non–AIDS-defining infections (n = 66), wasting syndrome (n = 41), and esophageal candidiasis (n = 17) (S1 Table).

Hospital outcomes

The median length of hospital stay was 8.0 days (IQR, 4.0–15.0). Overall, 6.8% of episodes (n = 59) required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), with a median ICU stay of 6.0 days (IQR, 3.0–11.0). Readmission to the same institution within 30 days of discharge occurred in 111 episodes (12.7%). Of these, 71 (64.0%) were related to the same cause as the index hospitalization, whereas 40 (36.0%) were attributed to different primary causes. In-hospital mortality was 4.2% (n = 37), and 30-day mortality was 4.8% (n = 42). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher among episodes due to AIDS-defining conditions (8.6% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001). Across periods, in-hospital mortality remained stable: 13 events (4.5%) in the pre-pandemic period, 15 (3.6%) during the pandemic, and 9 (5.5%) in the post-pandemic period.

Discussion

In this cohort of hospitalizations at a tertiary-care referral center, non–AIDS-defining conditions accounted for the majority of admissions (61.8%) and became progressively more frequent across the periods evaluated. Although the overall frequency of AIDS-defining conditions decreased, these conditions remained associated with greater clinical severity, as reflected by longer hospital stays and higher 30-day mortality (8.6% vs. 2.6%).

This morbidity profile suggests a local evolution consistent with prior national reports. Whereas Montúfar-Andrade et al. (2009–2011) and Álvarez et al. (2014–2015) reported AIDS-defining admissions in 66% and 54.6% of cases, respectively [10,24], our cohort documented a lower overall proportion (38.2%), with a decline within our center from 44.7% in the pre-pandemic period to 29.9% in the post-pandemic period.

However, this transition has not been uniform across Latin America. Meta-analyses published before 2015 estimated that AIDS-defining conditions accounted for approximately 40% of admissions (range, 15%–65%) [25], whereas more recent pooled estimates have reported proportions as high as 62.4% (52.6%–71.3%) [8], likely reflecting heterogeneity across health systems. These differences are evident at the cohort level. In Rio de Janeiro, Coelho et al. (2007–2013) described a pattern similar to ours, with a reduction in AIDS-defining admissions from 49.2% to 38.3% and a parallel rise in non–AIDS-defining admissions [26]. In contrast, cohorts in Mexico and Brazil have continued to report proportions above 50%, contributing to the marked variability in regional aggregate estimates [27,28].

Overall, our findings suggest that this hospital reflects an ongoing epidemiological transition. The proportion of AIDS-defining admissions is lower than historical regional estimates (≈62%) [8] and aligns with reports from other Latin American academic referral centers (Brazil) [26] and recent evidence from Ecuador (37.3%), even when considering methodological differences [29]. Nonetheless, these proportions remain substantially higher than the < 15%–30% reported in North America and Western Europe [7,8,25,30,31], underscoring the need to strengthen early diagnosis strategies and retention in care to close the remaining gap.

This positive trend may be partly explained by improvements in the HIV care cascade in Colombia. During 2014–2015, although ART coverage exceeded 80%, viral suppression was achieved in only 50%–55% of cases [32,33]. By 2023–2024, 80.6% of people receiving ART achieved viral suppression [9]. Despite these gains, our results highlight a gap between population indicators and the hospitalized population: although 68.7% of episodes involved individuals with prior ART use, more than half presented with detectable viral loads, particularly those admitted with AIDS-defining conditions. This pattern suggests persistent challenges in adherence, access, or continuity of ART among individuals who ultimately require hospitalization, limiting a full transition toward the chronic comorbidity pattern observed in high-income settings. Late diagnosis likely contributes as well, as reported regionally by Belaunzarán-Zamudio et al., and is consistent with our cohort, in which 51% of patients had an advanced clinical stage at the time of diagnosis [34].

Within AIDS-defining conditions, tuberculosis remains the most frequent etiology globally (19%), followed by bacterial pneumonia and Pneumocystis jirovecii infection [8]. This distribution closely mirrors our findings, where tuberculosis (15.8%) and P. jirovecii pneumonia (14.9%) ranked first and second, supporting the persistence of advanced disease despite expanded ART coverage. In Colombia, tuberculosis is the leading cause of hospitalization (23.3%–37%) and mortality in most series [10,24,35], although regional heterogeneity exists. Two local studies reported cerebral toxoplasmosis as the leading cause of admission, diverging from the broader Latin American pattern in which tuberculosis predominates [36,37].

We examined causes of hospitalization across pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic periods. Although some patterns likely reflect secular trends, the increase in tuberculosis admissions is notable and consistent with the rebound in tuberculosis detection and reporting following the COVID-19–related disruptions in health services described globally and regionally [38]. The burden of tuberculosis/HIV coinfection is substantial; globally, it is estimated that approximately one-quarter of people with HIV may have active tuberculosis [39]. Locally, Puentes-Ariza et al. reported that 52.3% of tuberculosis cases in a high-complexity hospital in Bogotá occurred among PLWH [40], highlighting the clinical and programmatic synergy between these conditions and the need for integrated screening strategies.

Improved detection is associated with updated national guidelines prioritizing molecular testing [41] and the pandemic-driven expansion of laboratory capacity. These techniques increase sensitivity by 23% in paucibacillary disease—common in HIV—contributing to the higher number of identified cases [42].

Regarding AIDS-defining malignancies, Kaposi sarcoma increased steadily in our cohort, reaching 16.4% in the post-pandemic period, exceeding the global average reported across studies (10.6%). This contrasts with historical local trends and with high-income settings, where ART has been associated with an approximately 70% reduction in the incidence of AIDS-defining cancers [43] and where Colombian series previously reported Kaposi sarcoma as the cause of admission in only 2.0%–4.0% of cases [10,24,44]. Nonetheless, this burden is consistent with the Latin American pattern described by the CCASAnet network, in which Kaposi sarcoma remains the most frequent HIV-associated neoplasm and accounts for 55% of cancer diagnoses in the region [45]. Recent reports from Peru similarly describe advanced presentations, with visceral involvement in 57.4% of cases, closely linked to lack of prior ART and late diagnosis [46].

Among non–AIDS-defining conditions, non-opportunistic infections were the leading cause of hospitalization, although their relative frequency decreased slightly across periods. This aligns with a recent meta-analysis identifying bacterial infections as the second leading cause of hospitalization globally (26%) [8] and with North American series (2005–2015) reporting approximately 25% of admissions due to bacterial infections [8]. In Latin America, the burden is often higher; for example, in Rio de Janeiro, bacterial infections accounted for 53.4% of admissions, whereas in our cohort they represented 33.6%—still substantial, though lower than that report [26].

The observed increase in mental health–related admissions warrants particular attention, given the bidirectional relationship between psychopathology, substance use, adherence, and outcomes. Colombian evidence (Medellín, 2010–2016) has identified psychiatric disorders, social instability, and substance dependence as key determinants of ART nonadherence [10]. In this context, the rise in psychiatric causes—especially in the post-pandemic period—may indicate an emerging pattern resembling that of high-income settings, where neuropsychiatric morbidity becomes more prominent as populations age and move beyond advanced AIDS.

This pattern is consistent with international evidence. A meta-analysis reported that psychiatric disorders accounted for 13% of hospitalizations in Europe (2007–2015) [25], and in New York, psychiatric services were involved in 15.1% of admissions, ranking as the primary cause in 7.2% [30]. London cohorts have also reported a substantial burden of depression and self-harm, exacerbated by substance use [7]. The concurrent rise in inhalant use and smoking observed in our cohort underscores a public health challenge that requires integrated harm-reduction and psychosocial support strategies beyond virological control.

Despite improvements in outpatient management, mortality among hospitalized people with HIV remains substantial globally. Burke et al. (2014–2023) estimated an overall mortality rate of 17% in adults, with regional variation [8]. In our cohort, 30-day mortality was 4.8%, at the lower end of the range reported nationally [8,10,24], consistent with the availability of tertiary-care resources and potentially effective inpatient management. However, within the subgroup admitted with AIDS-defining conditions, case-fatality increased in the post-pandemic period (from 7.7% to 14.3%). This pattern may reflect delayed care and persistent late diagnosis, although the observational design does not allow causal inference.

Overall, the persistence of AIDS -defining conditions— together with the increase in mortality within this subgroup—highlights ongoing structural gaps in HIV care. Closing the gap with international benchmarks will likely require strategies that extend beyond medication availability, including active case finding, early diagnosis, psychosocial support to improve adherence, and multidisciplinary models of care.

Limitations

This study has limitations inherent to its retrospective, single-center design. First, reliance on clinical records may introduce information bias. To mitigate this risk, medical records underwent peer review and systematic triangulation of information, integrating outpatient and inpatient documentation as well as assessments by social work and psychology teams, which provided complementary detail on sociodemographic, psychosocial, and clinical variables. ART adherence was based on self-report documented during routine clinical care and was therefore subject to recall and social-desirability bias, potentially resulting in overestimation of adherence. Admission HIV viral load provided an objective complementary marker of treatment response. Substance-use information was also largely self-reported and was not confirmed by toxicological testing; therefore, underreporting or misclassification cannot be excluded.

Second, as a tertiary-care university referral center, HUSI likely concentrates more severe cases than lower levels of care. This may overestimate the frequency and severity of AIDS-defining conditions (e.g., visceral Kaposi sarcoma) and may also influence mortality estimates; therefore, generalizability to less complex hospitals is limited.

Third, the analysis of COVID-19–related changes relied on chronological periods defined by administrative milestones, without the ability to fully control for potential confounders such as insurance changes, service reorganization, migration flows, or ongoing improvements in outpatient care. Accordingly, the role of the pandemic should be interpreted cautiously. Our findings are consistent with a combination of secular improvements in the HIV care cascade and pandemic-related disruptions. Although delayed care during COVID-19 peaks and the broader socioeconomic impact of the pandemic may have contributed to later and more severe presentations in the recovery period, the observational design and incomplete information on all confounders preclude attributing these changes solely to the pandemic.

Fourth, excluding patients transferred to another institution within the first 72 hours may have introduced selection bias. Although this criterion was necessary to ensure complete ascertainment of clinical outcomes, early transfers in our healthcare system are often driven by insurance-related administrative processes rather than clinical severity. This exclusion may therefore have limited representation of the full clinical spectrum and reduced the generalizability of our findings. However, given the relatively small proportion of excluded cases (7%), we expect any resulting effect on our main findings to have been modest.

Despite these limitations, strengths include the cohort size, systematic inclusion of all hospitalization episodes over an extended period, and rigorous clinical classification of admission causes, providing robust local evidence in a setting of epidemiological transition and useful inputs for service planning and public health decision-making.

Conclusions

Our study documents an ongoing epidemiological transition in causes of hospitalization among people living with HIV in a tertiary-care center in Colombia. Although AIDS-defining conditions—particularly tuberculosis—continue to account for a substantial proportion of admissions, their relative frequency declined markedly in the post-pandemic period. This pattern resembles trends described in high-income settings; however, the persistent burden of tuberculosis, Kaposi sarcoma, and late diagnosis suggests ongoing structural gaps in HIV care in low- and middle-income contexts.

At the same time, non–AIDS-defining admissions increased, including a growing contribution from mental health–related conditions and substance use, particularly in the post-pandemic period. Collectively, these findings support the need for comprehensive care models that strengthen early diagnosis, tuberculosis prevention and active screening, mental health services, harm reduction, and retention in care to reduce preventable hospitalizations and avoidable mortality among people living with HIV.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Main causes of hospitalization at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), 2018–2024.

(TIF)

pone.0357788.s001.tif (39KB, tif)
S2 Fig. Frequency and temporal distribution of non–AIDS-defining infections.

The analysis is based on 293 hospitalization episodes due to non–AIDS-defining infectious causes. A total of 308 diagnoses were documented, reflecting multiple coinfections in 17 episodes. The y-axis displays the absolute (n) and relative (%) frequency of each infection calculated based on the total number of episodes (N = 293). Bars represent the distribution stratified by epidemiological period.

(TIF)

pone.0357788.s002.tif (405.5KB, tif)
S3 Fig. Study flow diagram of hospitalization episodes among people living with HIV, HUSI, Bogotá, 2018–2024.

(TIF)

pone.0357788.s003.tif (958.2KB, tif)
S1 Table. Secondary causes of admission of people living with HIV hospitalized at HUSI, Bogotá, Colombia (2018–2024), stratified by COVID-19 pandemic period (n = 872).

Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CNS, central nervous system; MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex; PML, Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Note: Because multiple secondary diagnoses could coexist during the same hospitalization, the sum of the individual categories may exceed the total number of patients.

(DOCX)

pone.0357788.s004.docx (31.5KB, docx)
S2 Table. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of people living with HIV hospitalized at HUSI, Bogotá, Colombia (2018–2024), stratified by admission cause and COVID-19 pandemic period.

This table serves as a complement to Table 2, presenting the complete detailed data for all sociodemographic and clinical variables across the three epidemiological periods.

(DOCX)

pone.0357788.s005.docx (37.5KB, docx)
S1 Dataset. De-identified dataset containing the demographic and clinical data of the 872 hospitalization episodes analyzed in the study.

(XLSX)

pone.0357788.s006.xlsx (796.8KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff of the Infectious Diseases Department and the Medical Records Department at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio for their logistical support in retrieving the clinical data used in this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Weiss RA. Special anniversary review: Twenty-five years of human immunodeficiency virus research: Successes and challenges. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2008;152:201–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. HIV and AIDS. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hiv-aids. 2025. Accessed 2025 December 14. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization. Global health sector strategies on, respectively, HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections for the period 2022–2030. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS U. AIDS, crisis and the power to transform: UNAIDS Global AIDS Update 2025. Geneva: UNAIDS. 2025. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/2025-07/2025-global-aids-update-JC3153_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smith CJ, Ryom L, Weber R, Morlat P, Pradier C, Reiss P, et al. Trends in underlying causes of death in people with HIV from 1999 to 2011 (D:A:D): a multicohort collaboration. The Lancet. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Davy-Mendez T, Napravnik S, Hogan BC, Althoff KN, Gebo KA, Moore RD. Hospitalization rates and causes among persons with HIV in the United States and Canada, 2005-2015. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021;223(12):2113–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rein SM, Lampe FC, Chaloner C, Stafford A, Rodger AJ, Johnson MA, et al. Causes of hospitalisation among a cohort of people with HIV from a London centre followed from 2011 to 2018. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06082-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Burke RM, Sabet N, Ellis J, Rangaraj A, Lawrence DS, Jarvis JN. Causes of hospitalisation among people living with HIV worldwide, 2014–23: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. 2025;12(5):e355-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Colombian Fund for High-Cost Diseases H-CA ccount. HIV situation in Colombia 2024. Bogotá, D.C., Colombia: High-Cost Account. 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Álvarez Barreneche MF, Restrepo Castro CA, Hidrón Botero A, Villa Franco JP, Trompa Romero IM, Restrepo Carvajal L, et al. Hospitalization causes and outcomes in HIV patients in the late antiretroviral era in Colombia. AIDS Res Ther. 2017;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12981-017-0186-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). Population projections based on the 2018 National Population and Housing Census (CNPV). Bogotá (CO): DANE. 2023. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/proyecciones-de-poblacion [Google Scholar]
  • 12.World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1992;41(RR-17):1–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hasse B, Ledergerber B, Furrer H, Battegay M, Hirschel B, Cavassini M, et al. Morbidity and Aging in HIV-Infected Persons: The Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2011;53(11):1130–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu Y, Hao Y, Xiao J, Wu L, Liang H, Han J. Trends in rates and causes of hospitalization among people living with HIV in the antiretroviral therapy era: A retrospective cohort study in China, 2008–2020. Front Public Health. 2022;10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.00010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Selik RM, Mokotoff ED, Branson B, Owen SM, Whitmore S, Hall HI. Revised surveillance case definition for HIV infection—United States, 2014. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63(RR-03):1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Paterson DL, Swindells S, Mohr J, Brester M, Vergis EN, Squier C, et al. Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Simoni JM, Kurth AE, Pearson CR, Pantalone DW, Merrill JO, Frick PA. Self-report measures of antiretroviral therapy adherence: A review with recommendations for HIV research and clinical management. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(3):227–45. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9078-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berry SA, Fleishman JA, Moore RD, Gebo KA. Thirty-day hospital readmissions for adults with and without HIV infection. HIV Med. 2016;17(3):167–77. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ministry of Health and Social Protection of Colombia. Resolution 385 of 2020: Declaring a health emergency due to the COVID-19 coronavirus and adopting measures to combat the virus. Bogotá, D.C.: Ministry of Health and Social Protection. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Administrator of Resources of the General Social Security System for Health (ADRES). Consult your EPS. https://www.adres.gov.co/consulte-su-eps 2025. Accessed 2025 December 17.
  • 24.Montúfar Andrade F, Quiroga A, Builes C, Saldarriaga C, Aguilar C, Mesa M. Epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus infection in patients hospitalized in a high-complexity and university teaching institution in Medellín, Colombia. Infectio. 2016;20(1):9–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ford N, Shubber Z, Meintjes G, Grinsztejn B, Eholie S, Mills EJ, et al. Causes of hospital admission among people living with HIV worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. 2015;2(10):e438-44. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00137-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coelho LE, Ribeiro SR, Veloso VG, Grinsztejn B, Luz PM. Hospitalization rates, length of stay and in-hospital mortality in a cohort of HIV infected patients from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2017;21(2):190–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jardim BA, Jardim TA, França JC, Breda GL, Pavanelli GM, Pavanelli AM, et al. Thirty-day readmission rates in a cohort of people living with HIV in southern Brazil, 2015 to 2017. Int J STD AIDS. 2022;33(5):433–41. doi: 10.1177/09564624211047679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Caro-Vega Y, Guerrero-Torres L, Cárdenas-Ortega A, Martin-Onraët A, Rodríguez-Zulueta P, Romero-Mora K. Characteristics and outcomes of people living with HIV hospitalized at tertiary healthcare institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico City. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lapo-Talledo GJ, Zamora Cevallos ÁL, Arteaga Reyes CR, Sánchez Redrobán JD, Delgado Pinargote JE, Espinoza Guevara ÁM, et al. HIV disease hospitalizations and factors associated with in-hospital mortality in Ecuador: A nationwide analysis from 2015 to 2023. HIV Med. 2025;26(7):1108–24. doi: 10.1111/hiv.70040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lazar R, Kersanske L, Xia Q, Daskalakis D, Braunstein SL. Hospitalization rates among people with HIV/AIDS in New York City, 2013. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2017;65(3):469–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Davy-Mendez T, Napravnik S, Wohl DA, Durr AL, Zakharova O, Farel CE. Hospitalization rates and outcomes among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus in the southeastern United States, 1996-2016. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020;71(7):1616–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.High-Cost Account (CAC), Colombian Fund for High-Cost Diseases. Situation of HIV/AIDS in Colombia 2014. Bogotá, Colombia: High-Cost Account. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Colombian Fund for High-Cost Diseases. Situation of HIV/AIDS in Colombia 2015. Bogotá, D.C., Colombia: High-Cost Account. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Belaunzarán-Zamudio PF, Rebeiro PF, Caro-Vega Y, Castilho J, Crabtree-Ramírez BE, Cesar C, et al. Transitions through the HIV continuum of care in people enrolling in care with advanced HIV disease in Latin America. IJID Reg. 2024;14:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Figueroa-Agudelo FN, Cabrera-Garcia HB, Zapata-Cárdenas A, Donado-Gómez JH. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with a new diagnosis of HIV. Infectio. 2019;23(3):246–52. doi: 10.22354/in.v23i3.788 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Solórzano CA, Muñeton G, Luengas EL, Solarte EC, Cardenas J, Riveros DG. Opportunistic infections in HIV-naive patients at a level IV hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. Infectio. 2025;29(3):134–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Agudelo-Gonzalez S, Murcia-Sanchez F, Salinas D, Osorio J. Opportunistic infections in HIV patients at the University Hospital of Neiva, Colombia. Infectio. 2015;19(2):52–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2025. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Khojasteh-Kaffash S, Habibzadeh A, Moghaddam S, Afra F, Samieefar N, Fateh A. Tuberculosis trends in the post-COVID-19 era: is it going to be a global concern?. Health Science Reports. 2025;8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Puentes-Ariza GC, Meléndez-Rhenals S, Nocua-Báez LC, Páez-Ardila H. Prevalence and characterization of human immunodeficiency virus coinfection in patients hospitalized with tuberculosis in a reference hospital in Bogotá. Biomedica. 2025;45(3):423–35. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.7664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ministry of Health and Social Protection of Colombia. Resolution 227 of 2020, adopting the technical and operational guidelines of the National Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Program (PNPCT) and enacting other provisions. 227. Bogotá, D.C.: Ministry of Health and Social Protection. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shiels MS. Proportions of Kaposi sarcoma, selected non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and cervical cancer in the United States occurring in persons with AIDS, 1980-2007. JAMA. 2011;305(14):1450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sánchez Ochoa AD, Coronel NS, García Agudelo L, Avellaneda LC. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with HIV treated in a hospital in the Colombian Orinoco region 2018-2023. IJFCM. 2024;8(1):24–6. doi: 10.15406/ijfcm.2024.08.00344 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fink VI, Shepherd BE, Cesar C, Krolewiecki A, Wehbe F, Cortés CP, et al. Cancer in HIV-infected persons from the Caribbean, Central and South America. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;56(5):467–73. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31820bb1c3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mendoza Mori LM, Valenzuela Medina JB, Gotuzzo Herencia JE, Bravo Puccio FG, Mejía Cordero FA, Mohanna Barrenechea S, et al. Kaposi’s sarcoma in people living with HIV/aids in a public referral hospital in Peru. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2022;39(3):352–6. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2022.393.10883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Felix Bongomin

29 Jun 2026

Dear Dr. Valderrama-Beltrán,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 13 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

As the corresponding author, your ORCID iD is verified in the submission system and will appear in the published article. PLOS supports the use of ORCID, and we encourage all coauthors to register for an ORCID iD and use it as well. Please encourage your coauthors to verify their ORCID iD within the submission system before final acceptance, as unverified ORCID iDs will not appear in the published article. Only  the individual author can complete the verification step; PLOS staff cannot  verify ORCID iDs on behalf of authors.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Felix Bongomin, MB ChB, Ph.D., FECMM

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We are unable to open your Supporting Information file “S1_Table.docx, S2_Fig.tiff and S1_Fig.tiff” Please kindly revise as necessary and re-upload.

3. We note that there is identifying data in the Supporting Information file “S1_Dataset.xlsx” Due to the inclusion of these potentially identifying data, we have removed this file from your file inventory. Prior to sharing human research participant data, authors should consult with an ethics committee to ensure data are shared in accordance with participant consent and all applicable local laws.

Data sharing should never compromise participant privacy. It is therefore not appropriate to publicly share personally identifiable data on human research participants. The following are examples of data that should not be shared:

-Name, initials, physical address

-Ages more specific than whole numbers

-Internet protocol (IP) address

-Specific dates (birth dates, death dates, examination dates, etc.)

-Contact information such as phone number or email address

-Location data

-ID numbers that seem specific (long numbers, include initials, titled “Hospital ID”) rather than random (small numbers in numerical order)

Data that are not directly identifying may also be inappropriate to share, as in combination they can become identifying. For example, data collected from a small group of participants, vulnerable populations, or private groups should not be shared if they involve indirect identifiers (such as sex, ethnicity, location, etc.) that may risk the identification of study participants.

Additional guidance on preparing raw data for publication can be found in our Data Policy (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-human-research-participant-data-and-other-sensitive-data) and in the following article: http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long.

Please remove or anonymize all personal information (<specific identifying information in file to be removed>), ensure that the data shared are in accordance with participant consent, and re-upload a fully anonymized data set. Please note that spreadsheet columns with personal information must be removed and not hidden as all hidden columns will appear in the published file.

4. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Dear Editor,

I would like to thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The study addresses an important and timely topic regarding hospitalization patterns among people living with HIV in a tertiary care hospital in Bogotá, Colombia, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the manuscript is well structured, clinically relevant, and contributes valuable evidence to HIV epidemiology and health services research.

However, several important issues related to methodological transparency, clarity of definitions, and completeness of reporting require revision in order to improve interpretability, reproducibility, and scientific rigor.

The specific comments are outlined below.

Introduction

1. A more integrated epidemiological overview of HIV in Colombia is needed in the introduction. In particular, a unified presentation of key indicators such as prevalence, incidence, mortality, and hospitalization rates is essential. At present, these indicators are reported in a fragmented manner, which limits a comprehensive understanding of the national burden of disease.

Methods Section:

2. It is necessary to explicitly address the implications of excluding patients transferred within 72 hours in the limitations section. This decision may introduce selection bias and reduce the generalizability of the study findings.

3. A brief description of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), including its role as a tertiary referral center and its contribution to HIV-related hospitalizations in Bogotá, should be provided. In addition, a short description of Bogotá (population size and general characteristics of the healthcare system) would help international readers better understand the study setting.

4. The description of data extraction and entry into the REDCap database lacks clarity. It is not specified who performed data entry or whether standardized procedures or quality control measures were implemented. Furthermore, it is unclear whether sociodemographic variables (including socioeconomic status and sexual orientation) were obtained from electronic medical records or through direct patient interviews. If these variables were extracted from clinical records, the authors should clarify who originally recorded them and how data reliability and completeness were ensured.

5. A separate subsection defining and operationalizing study variables should be added. In particular, socioeconomic status and sexual orientation should be clearly defined and categorized, and their measurement procedures should be explicitly described.

6. The assessment of antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence based on self-report requires further clarification. It should be specified whether this information was collected by research staff or clinical personnel, and whether it was obtained from medical records or direct patient interviews. If recorded in clinical charts, the manuscript should clarify how this information was originally collected and the extent to which it can be considered reliable, given the known limitations of self-reported adherence data.

7. The statistical analysis section does not adequately describe the handling of missing data. The authors should report the extent of missingness for each variable, specify the methods used to handle missing data (e.g., complete-case analysis or imputation).

Results Section:

8. “In total, 2,109 records from the hospital administrative database were reviewed, of which 857 were related to HIV diagnoses or AIDS-defining conditions.” At this stage of the manuscript, it remains unclear whether all patients with confirmed HIV infection were included regardless of admission diagnosis (both AIDS-defining and non–AIDS-defining conditions), or whether inclusion was restricted to HIV/AIDS-related admissions only. This ambiguity regarding inclusion criteria should be clearly clarified either in the Methods section or at the beginning of the Results section to ensure transparency of the study population definition.

9. The variable related to psychoactive substance use requires clearer definition and methodological description in the Methods section. It is not specified whether this information was obtained through self-report, extracted from electronic medical records, or based on clinical assessment. Furthermore, the criteria used to classify different types of substance use (e.g., smoking, inhalants, and other substances) should be explicitly described, along with clarification of data validity and reliability.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review?  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Sep 30;21(9):e0357788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357788.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


13 Aug 2026

Response to Reviewers

Manuscript ID: PONE-D-25-67550

Title: Causes of hospitalization among people living with HIV in a tertiary-care hospital in Bogotá, Colombia, 2018–2024

We thank the Academic Editor and Reviewer for their careful evaluation of our manuscript. We have addressed all comments and revised the manuscript accordingly. Changes are shown in the marked-up manuscript, and a clean revised version is also provided.

Journal Requirement 1

Comment:

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response:

Thank you. We reviewed the PLOS ONE style and file-naming requirements and revised the manuscript and Supporting Information files accordingly. The Supporting Information captions are included at the end of the revised manuscript, after the References section. The corresponding files have been named consistently with their citations and captions in the manuscript: S1_Table.docx, S2_Table.docx, S1_Fig.tif, S2_Fig.tif, S3_Fig.tif, and S1_Dataset.xlsx.

Journal Requirement 2

Comment:

We are unable to open your Supporting Information file “S1_Table.docx, S2_Fig.tiff and S1_Fig.tiff.” Please kindly revise as necessary and re-upload.

Response:

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. We recreated the three Supporting Information files and verified that they can be opened correctly. The S1 Table was saved as a new standalone DOCX file without the supporting figures embedded within it. The S1 and S2 Figures were re-encoded as standard RGB TIFF files with LZW compression and a resolution of 300 dpi. Additional white margins were included around the figures to prevent the titles, labels, and legends from being cropped. The corrected files have been re-uploaded as S1_Table.docx, S1_Fig.tif, and S2_Fig.tif.

Journal Requirement #3: Identifying information in the S1 Dataset

Comment:

We note that there is identifying data in the Supporting Information file “S1_Dataset.xlsx.” Please remove or anonymize all personal information, ensure that the data shared are in accordance with participant consent, and re-upload a fully anonymized dataset.

Response:

We thank the Editorial Office for identifying this concern. We carefully reviewed and further de-identified the S1 Dataset in accordance with the PLOS Data Policy for human research participant data.

We deleted all columns containing specific calendar dates, including the dates of HIV diagnosis, hospital admission, ART initiation, hospital discharge, death, ICU admission, and ICU discharge. These columns were permanently removed and were not hidden.

To preserve the analytical value of the dataset, relevant dates were replaced with derived time intervals expressed in whole days, including hospital length of stay, time from HIV diagnosis to admission, time receiving ART before admission, time from hospital admission to ICU admission, ICU length of stay, and time from hospital admission to death. No calendar dates remain in the revised dataset.

We also deleted the following five free-text variables because they contained detailed clinical descriptions that could potentially contribute to indirect identification:

● other_comorbidity

● neoplasm_cause_specify

● other_cause

● neoplasm_condition_specify

● other_condition

In addition, the original record identifier was replaced. The dataset rows were randomly reordered, and a new sequential record_id ranging from 1 to 872 was generated. This new identifier has no correspondence with the original REDCap identifier, hospital identifier, or medical record number.

The remaining dataset contains no names, initials, addresses, contact information, IP addresses, geographic information, medical record numbers, or other direct personal identifiers. Age is reported only in completed years. We also verified that there are no hidden rows or columns containing identifying information.

The revised data dictionary was updated accordingly, and the de-identified dataset has been re-uploaded as S1_Dataset.xlsx.

The study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia (protocol approval No. 2025/052; approval letter No. FM-CIE-0316-25).

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1:

Dear Editor,

I would like to thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The study addresses an important and timely topic regarding hospitalization patterns among people living with HIV in a tertiary care hospital in Bogotá, Colombia, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the manuscript is well structured, clinically relevant, and contributes valuable evidence to HIV epidemiology and health services research.

However, several important issues related to methodological transparency, clarity of definitions, and completeness of reporting require revision in order to improve interpretability, reproducibility, and scientific rigor.

The specific comments are outlined below.

Introduction

1. A more integrated epidemiological overview of HIV in Colombia is needed in the introduction. In particular, a unified presentation of key indicators such as prevalence, incidence, mortality, and hospitalization rates is essential. At present, these indicators are reported in a fragmented manner, which limits a comprehensive understanding of the national burden of disease.

Methods Section:

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important suggestion. We revised the Introduction to provide a more integrated overview of the HIV epidemiological situation in Colombia. The revised paragraph now presents national data on HIV prevalence, incidence, all-cause mortality, ART coverage, and viral suppression in a unified manner. We also explicitly acknowledge that a national hospitalization rate for people living with HIV has not been published and summarize the most comprehensive available evidence on causes of hospitalization in Colombia. This revision provides a clearer overview of the national burden of HIV and better highlights the evidence gap addressed by our study.

The corresponding changes have been incorporated into the Introduction on page 4, lines 79–93.

2. It is necessary to explicitly address the implications of excluding patients transferred within 72 hours in the limitations section. This decision may introduce selection bias and reduce the generalizability of the study findings.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important observation. We agree that excluding hospitalization episodes involving transfer to another institution within the first 72 hours may have introduced selection bias and limited the generalizability of our findings. This criterion was applied to ensure complete ascertainment of clinical events and outcomes, including total length of stay, ICU admission, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality, which could not be reliably assessed once care continued at another institution. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that early transfers—often driven in our setting by insurance-related administrative processes rather than clinical severity—may represent a distinct clinical profile. We have therefore added this issue to the limitations section, noting that the exclusion may have reduced representation of the full clinical spectrum. However, given the relatively small proportion of excluded cases (7%), we expect any resulting effect on our main findings to have been modest.

The corresponding changes have been incorporated into the Limitations section on page 29, lines 515–521.

3. A brief description of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), including its role as a tertiary referral center and its contribution to HIV-related hospitalizations in Bogotá, should be provided. In addition, a short description of Bogotá (population size and general characteristics of the healthcare system) would help international readers better understand the study setting.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this helpful suggestion. We expanded the Methods section to provide additional context on both the study setting and the role of HUSI in HIV care. We added a brief description of Bogotá, including its population size and the general organization of the Colombian health insurance system. We also clarified that HUSI is a high-complexity teaching and referral center and that its Infectious Diseases service includes a dedicated HIV care program serving people living with HIV affiliated with multiple health insurers, supporting its role as a referral center for HIV care in Bogotá and surrounding areas.

The corresponding changes have been incorporated into the Methods section (“Study design and population”) on page 5, lines 101–111.

4. The description of data extraction and entry into the REDCap database lacks clarity. It is not specified who performed data entry or whether standardized procedures or quality control measures were implemented. Furthermore, it is unclear whether sociodemographic variables (including socioeconomic status and sexual orientation) were obtained from electronic medical records or through direct patient interviews. If these variables were extracted from clinical records, the authors should clarify who originally recorded them and how data reliability and completeness were ensured.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important comment. We have revised the Methods section to clarify the data extraction and quality-control procedures. Clinical and sociodemographic data were extracted from the electronic medical records by trained members of the research team, including physicians and residents, and entered into a structured REDCap database using a predefined instrument with controlled response options and built-in field-validation rules. As a quality-control measure, a sample of records was independently cross-checked against the source medical records by a second reviewer, and identified discrepancies were corrected by returning to the primary source. We also clarified that sociodemographic variables, including educational level and sexual orientation, were obtained exclusively from the electronic medical records and had been documented during routine clinical care by members of the interdisciplinary care team. No direct patient interviews were conducted for this study, and variables not documented in the medical record were treated as missing.

The corresponding changes have been incorporated into the Methods section (“Data processing and collection”) on pages 6–7, lines 134–144.

5. A separate subsection defining and operationalizing study variables should be added. In particular, socioeconomic status and sexual orientation should be clearly defined and categorized, and their measurement procedures should be explicitly described.

Response:

We thank the reviewer for highlighting this point. We clarified the description of the sociodemographic variables and noted that the variable collected in our database was educational level, rather than socioeconomic status as stated in the original version; the manuscript has been corrected accordingly. Although socioeconomic status was not directly measured, educational level was available and was used as a proxy for socioeconomic position. We also added a separate “Study variables” subsection to the Methods that explicitly defines and categorizes the main study variables, including sexual orientation and educational level, and describes how they were measured.

The corresponding changes have been incorporated into the Methods section (“Study variables” subsection) on page 7, lines 145–149.

6. The assessment of antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence based on self-report requires further clarification. It should be specified whether this information was collected by research staff or clinical personnel, and whether it was obtained from medical records or direct patient interviews. If recorded in clinical charts, the manuscript should clarify how this information was originally collected and the extent to which it can be considered reliable, given the known limitations of self-reported adherence data.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important observation. We clarified that ART adherence was based on patient self-report elicited by the treating clinical team during routine care and documented in the electronic medical record; this information was subsequently abstracted by the research team. No adherence interviews were conducted specifically for this study. We also clarified the operational definition used for adherence and explicitly acknowledged the limitations of self-reported adherence, including recall and social-desirability bias, which may lead to overestimation. In addition, we noted that admission HIV viral load was available as an objective complementary marker of treatment response.

The corresponding changes have been incorporated into the Methods section on page 8, lines 181–187, and the Limitations section on page 28, lines 496–499.

7. The statistical analysis section does not adequately describe the handling of missing data. The authors should report the extent of missingness for each variable, specify the methods used to handle missing data (e.g., complete-case analysis or imputation).

Response:

We thank the reviewer for this important observation. We have expanded the Statistical Analysis section to clarify the handling of missing data. No imputation was performed, and analyses were conducted using available data for each variable. Variables that were conditional by design were analyzed within their applicable subgroups and were not considered missing when not applicable. Values recorded as unknown or not documented were retained as separate categories in descriptive analyses. In addition, the extent of missingness and the corresponding analytic denominators are now explicitly reported in Table 1, with Table 2 referring to these data.

These changes have been incorporated into the Statistical Analysis section on page 9, lines 202–206; the note to Table 1 on page 16, lines 289–296; and the note to Table 2 on page 21, lines 341–342.

Results Section:

8. “In total, 2,109 records from the hospital admini

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

pone.0357788.s007.docx (2.2MB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Felix Bongomin

23 Aug 2026

Causes of hospitalization among people living with HIV in a tertiary-care hospital in Bogotá, Colombia, 2018–2024

PONE-D-25-67550R1

Dear Dr. Valderrama-Beltrán,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Felix Bongomin, MB ChB, Ph.D., FECMM

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Overall, the revisions satisfactorily address the concerns raised in this review. Subject to final editorial and minor language/consistency checks, I consider the manuscript substantially improved and suitable for publication.

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review?  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Felix Bongomin

PONE-D-25-67550R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Valderrama-Beltrán,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS One and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS One Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Felix Bongomin

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Main causes of hospitalization at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), 2018–2024.

    (TIF)

    pone.0357788.s001.tif (39KB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Frequency and temporal distribution of non–AIDS-defining infections.

    The analysis is based on 293 hospitalization episodes due to non–AIDS-defining infectious causes. A total of 308 diagnoses were documented, reflecting multiple coinfections in 17 episodes. The y-axis displays the absolute (n) and relative (%) frequency of each infection calculated based on the total number of episodes (N = 293). Bars represent the distribution stratified by epidemiological period.

    (TIF)

    pone.0357788.s002.tif (405.5KB, tif)
    S3 Fig. Study flow diagram of hospitalization episodes among people living with HIV, HUSI, Bogotá, 2018–2024.

    (TIF)

    pone.0357788.s003.tif (958.2KB, tif)
    S1 Table. Secondary causes of admission of people living with HIV hospitalized at HUSI, Bogotá, Colombia (2018–2024), stratified by COVID-19 pandemic period (n = 872).

    Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CNS, central nervous system; MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex; PML, Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Note: Because multiple secondary diagnoses could coexist during the same hospitalization, the sum of the individual categories may exceed the total number of patients.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0357788.s004.docx (31.5KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of people living with HIV hospitalized at HUSI, Bogotá, Colombia (2018–2024), stratified by admission cause and COVID-19 pandemic period.

    This table serves as a complement to Table 2, presenting the complete detailed data for all sociodemographic and clinical variables across the three epidemiological periods.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0357788.s005.docx (37.5KB, docx)
    S1 Dataset. De-identified dataset containing the demographic and clinical data of the 872 hospitalization episodes analyzed in the study.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0357788.s006.xlsx (796.8KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx

    pone.0357788.s007.docx (2.2MB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES