Abstract
Diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap4A) and related dinucleoside tetraphosphates (Ap4Ns) are important stress-signaling molecules that coordinate bacterial adaptation to changing environmental conditions. Although the enzymes for turnover of Ap4A are known in several bacteria, the structural basis for substrate recognition and the cellular consequences of impaired Ap4A turnover remain poorly understood. Here, we characterize the Histidine-Aspartate (HD)-domain hydrolase YqeK from Bacillus subtilis. Deletion of yqeK impaired growth in stationary phase, sporulation, and biofilm formation, demonstrating a general role under nutrient limitation. YqeK forms a homodimer and functions as a manganese-dependent phosphohydrolase, symmetrically cleaving Ap4A into two ADP molecules and removing Ap4A caps from RNA. The enzyme was active not only toward Ap4A but also toward the mixed dinucleotides Ap4G, Ap4C, and Ap4U in both in vitro and in vivo assays, hence acting as a broad-spectrum regulator of Ap4N homeostasis. To understand this promiscuity, we determined crystal structures of YqeK in its apo- and ADP-bound state and in complex with a non-hydrolysable Ap4A analogue. The structures revealed an asymmetric recognition mechanism in which one nucleoside moiety and the proximal phosphate groups are tightly coordinated, whereas the distal nucleoside is accommodated largely through nonspecific interactions, explaining the ability of YqeK to process diverse substrates. Together, our findings establish YqeK as a central regulator of dinucleotide homeostasis and RNA metabolism and provide the structural framework for Ap4N recognition by HD-domain phosphohydrolases.
Keywords: hydrolase, alarmone, nucleotide, bacteria, regulation, stress response, biofilm, sporulation
Diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap4A) is a universal signaling molecule that links cellular stress responses to changes in physiology and survival across diverse organisms (recently reviewed in (1, 2, 3)). Multiple studies have demonstrated that Ap4A exerts diverse functions in bacteria, impacting processes such as cell division timing (4), catabolite repression and motility (5), adaptation to heat, oxidative (6, 7) and disulfide stress (8). Further effects of elevated Ap4A levels include increased sensitivity to aminoglycoside treatment (9, 10), reduced sporulation (11), and altered pathogenicity and biofilm formation (12, 13, 14, 15).
Ap4A is primarily produced by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs), particularly lysyl-tRNA synthetase (e.g., (16, 17)), which catalyze the formation of Ap4A through transfer of AMP from the aminoacyl-adenylate intermediate to ATP in the absence of tRNA (18). In addition to Ap4A, several ARSs can generate other dinucleoside tetraphosphates, including Ap4U, Ap4C, and Ap4G, through analogous reactions in which UTP, CTP, or GTP, respectively, serve as acceptors in place of ATP. Furthermore, Ap4A synthesis is not restricted to ARSs. A variety of additional enzymes, including several ligases and other nucleotide-processing enzymes, have been reported to produce Ap4A under specific physiological conditions, highlighting the existence of multiple routes for Ap4N formation in the cell (reviewed in: (3)).
Ap4A levels are tightly controlled by specific hydrolases and phosphorylases, depending on the respective organism (19): Nudix hydrolases (named for NUcleoside DIphosphate linked to some other moiety, X) are conserved across both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms (20). They constitute a functionally diverse protein family, acting on a wide range of substrates, including the bacterial alarmones (p)ppGpp and Ap4A (20, 21). Ap4A-degrading members of the Nudix hydrolases catalyzes the asymmetric cleavage of the molecule, producing ATP and AMP (22, 23, 24). Asymmetric cleavage of Ap4A can also occur via phosphorolysis, in which inorganic phosphate (Pi) is used to generate ATP and ADP. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for example, the phosphorylases Apa1 and Apa2 are able to catalyze this reaction type (25, 26).
Besides the asymmetric cleavage, Ap4A can also be symmetrically cleaved by hydrolysis into two ADP molecules. In Escherichia coli and other beta- and gamma proteobacteria, this reaction is catalyzed by bis(5′-nucleosyl)-tetraphosphatase ApaH (27). The Gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis contains the protein phosphatase PrpE, which has a wide substrate spectrum including Ap4A (28). Additionally, B. subtilis harbors the HD-domain family protein YqeK, which can also efficiently cleave Ap4A in a symmetric manner (29, 30). Besides its role as an Ap4A hydrolase, YqeK also acts as an RNA decapping enzyme; accordingly, yqeK deletion in B. subtilis elevates Np4 RNA capping and enhances resistance to disulfide stress (8). In Staphylococcus aureus, yqeK deletion causes massive accumulation of Ap4A, impairs resistance to nitrosative and organic acid stress, and reduces virulence gene expression and hemolytic activity, identifying YqeK as a key regulator of stress adaptation and pathogenicity (31).
To further define the physiological role of YqeK, we investigated its contribution to growth, sporulation, and biofilm formation in B. subtilis, all of which were affected upon deletion of the corresponding gene. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that YqeK is a manganese-dependent phosphohydrolase that symmetrically cleaves both Ap4A and Ap4A-capped RNA. It exhibited broad substrate specificity and efficiently hydrolyzed not only Ap4A but also the related dinucleoside tetraphosphates Ap4U, Ap4C, and Ap4G. Structural analyses demonstrated that tight coordination of only one of the two nucleoside moieties mechanistically explains this promiscuity. Together, our findings establish YqeK as a multifunctional regulator of nucleotide signaling and RNA metabolism and how HD-domain phosphohydrolases accommodate a broad range of substrates.
Results
Deletion of yqeK affects growth, sporulation, and biofilm formation
To investigate the physiological role of YqeK in the Gram-positive model organism B. subtilis, we constructed a markerless yqeK deletion mutant, as well as complementation and overexpression strains, and analyzed growth, sporulation efficiency, biofilm formation, and metabolite/nucleotide profiles. Deletion of yqeK did not cause a pronounced growth defect under nutrient-rich conditions. In LB medium, the ΔyqeK mutant and the complemented strain only showed a slight reduction in final OD compared with the wild type 168 (WT) (Fig. S1A). In contrast, growth in liquid minimal medium revealed a more pronounced phenotype. Compared with the WT strain 168 and the complemented strain, the ΔyqeK mutant exhibited a significant defect in late stationary phase, reflected by a marked decrease in optical density (Fig. 1A). Consistently, spotting assays of cultures harvested in exponential phase (Fig. S1B) and stationary phase (Fig. 1B) showed a reduced colony-forming capacity of the ΔyqeK mutant on solid minimal medium, indicating impaired survival and/or recovery under nutrient-limiting conditions. Together, these data reveal that YqeK is most likely dispensable under nutrient-rich conditions but is required for optimal fitness during growth in minimal medium, particularly during stationary phase.
Figure 1.

Deletion of yqeK impairs growth, sporulation, and biofilm formation in B. subtilis. Growth curves (A) and spot titer assay (B) of B. subtilis WT 168, the yqeK deletion strain [ΔyqeK (RS24)], the complementation strain [ΔyqeK, amyE::yqeK (ΔyqeK + yqeK), (RS38)], the overexpression strain [amyE::yqeK (+yqeK), (RS34)], and the sigF deletion strain [ΔsigF::ery (NH52)]. Optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was measured in SMM medium at 37 °C using a plate reader. Error bars represent standard deviations from three technical replicates. For the spot titer assay, cells were grown in SMM at 37 °C to early stationary phase, adjusted to equal optical density, serially diluted, and 3 μl of each dilution were spotted onto solid SMM. (C) Shown are phase contrast and fluorescence images of cells (indicated strains) stained with SYTO9 grown for 24 h in SMM medium (Scale bar: 5 μm). (D) B. subtilis biofilm morphology on MSgg solid medium 72 h post-inoculation in the absence and presence of 1 mM IPTG for wild type strain NCIB3610, the yqeK deletion strain ΔyqeK (RS25), the complementation strain [ΔyqeK, (ΔyqeK + yqeK), amyE::yqeK (RS39)] and overexpression strain [amyE::yqeK (+yqeK), (RS35)].
The complementation and overexpression strains were generated using the chromosomal integration vector pDR111, in which yqeK is expressed from the IPTG-inducible Phy promoter (32, 33). Addition of IPTG did not result in further induction of YqeK, as verified by Western blot analysis of cell extracts using a specific α-YqeK antibody (Fig. S2B). This is consistent with the known substantial basal activity of the promoter in the absence of IPTG (34). Consequently, the complemented and overexpression strains overproduce YqeK in the absence of IPTG. This observation applies to all subsequent in vivo experiments presented in this study.
Because nutrient limitation is a key trigger for developmental programs in B. subtilis (e.g., (35, 36), we next analyzed sporulation efficiency and biofilm formation. In minimal medium, deletion of yqeK caused a pronounced defect in sporulation, reducing sporulation efficiency from 23.13 ± 7.2% in the wild type to 1.03 ± 0.6%. This phenotype was fully rescued by complementation with yqeK, restoring sporulation efficiency to 22.95 ± 6.9% (Fig. 1C). For comparison, we included a sigF::ery mutant, which lacks the early forespore-specific sigma factor σF essential for sporulation progression beyond stage II (37). As expected, the sigF::ery strain formed minicells in minimal medium and displayed reduced growth under these conditions (Fig. 1A). However, spotting assays revealed that the sigF deletion mutant retained colony-forming capacity comparable to that of the WT (Figs. 1B and S1C), indicating that its defect primarily affects sporulation rather than general viability in contrast to the ΔyqeK mutant. Sporulation assays performed in DSM medium yielded similar results (Fig. S1, C and D). Whereas the WT strain 168 sporulated with an efficiency of about of approximately 80%, the ΔyqeK mutant showed a strong reduction to approximately 20%. Notably, this sporulation defect could not be complemented under these conditions, suggesting that either yqeK expression must be precisely controlled or that the sporulation defect depends on a physiological context not fully recapitulated by the complementation strain.
We next assessed the ability of the different strains to form mature biofilms using macro-colony formation on solid MSgg medium (38). As expected and consistent with a previous report (13), deletion of yqeK caused a severe defect in macro-colony formation in both the undomesticated NCIB3610 background (Fig. 1D) and the laboratory strain 168 (Fig. S1E). Whereas WT NCIB3610, complementation, and yqeK overexpression strains displayed normal, wrinkled biofilms, the ΔyqeK mutant formed flat, less structured colonies lacking the characteristic surface wrinkles. Nonetheless, the ΔyqeK biofilm did not resemble that of an, for example, epsH, tasA and remA matrix mutants, which are typically completely flat and devoid of any structures (39, 40, 41), indicating that yqeK deletion partially, but not completely, disrupts biofilm architecture.
Strain NCIB3610 produces the major biofilm matrix components including EPS and protein-related matrix components. Laboratory strain 168 is defective in robust matrix production due to domestication-associated mutations in matrix-related genes (42, 43). Despite this difference, the yqeK deletion displayed similar macro-colony defects in both backgrounds. This finding suggests that the biofilm-associated structural defect caused by yqeK deletion is not solely dependent on the presence or absence of major matrix components but rather reflects a more upstream or global effect on developmental programs such as sporulation and biofilm formation. Whereas we could detect clear phenotypes for the yqeK deletion, overexpression of yqeK in the 168 background revealed only mild physiological effects. These included a prolonged stationary phase (Fig. 1A), larger colony-forming units (CFU; Fig. 1B), and an increase in macro-colony diameter on solid minimal medium (Fig. S1E). Taken together, these results demonstrate that YqeK contributes to multiple developmental and physiological processes in B. subtilis, including stationary-phase fitness, sporulation, biofilm formation and potentially motility.
YqeK symmetrically hydrolyzes Ap4A and Ap4A-capped RNA in a manganese-dependent manner
A previous study identified YqeK as an Ap4A hydrolase (29). To further characterize its biochemical properties, recombinant YqeK proteins from B. subtilis (BsYqeK) and Geobacillus thermodenitrificans (GtYqeK) were purified to near homogeneity. BsYqeK and GtYqeK exhibit high sequence identity of 68.3% and conservation of the catalytic residues (Fig. S3). Both proteins were purified using a two-step procedure consisting of nickel-affinity chromatography followed by size-exclusion chromatography. For BsYqeK, additional purification steps were introduced, including EDTA treatment and anion-exchange chromatography prior to size-exclusion chromatography, to obtain metal-free protein preparations for subsequent in vitro High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) experiments. For GtYqeK, we also included an EDTA treatment to remove any potentially bound metal ions. In contrast, no EDTA treatment was performed during the purification of the GtYqeK sample used for crystallization (see below). Analytical size-exclusion chromatography showed that both Bs- and GtYqeK eluted as a single major species with an apparent molecular mass of approximately 42 kDa, indicating that the proteins predominantly exist as a homodimer in solution (Fig. 2A). This is further supported by bacterial hybrid assays performed (Fig. S2A). Given that Ap4A is a canonical substrate of YqeK, we first confirmed the ability of YqeK to symmetrically hydrolyze Ap4A into two ADP molecules by HPLC (Fig. 2B). Because YqeK is predicted to be a metal-dependent phosphohydrolase, we tested the effects of several divalent cations, including Mn2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Co2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, and Fe2+, on Ap4A hydrolysis by EDTA-treated BsYqeK and GtYqeK at metal concentrations of 20 and 500 μM (Fig. S4). For EDTA-treated BsYqeK, Mn2+ and Co2+ supported extensive and predominantly symmetrical hydrolysis of Ap4A to ADP at both concentrations. Fe2+ and Cu2+ supported hydrolysis but also promoted AMP formation, whereas Ni2+ supported only partial hydrolysis at 20 μM Mg2+, Ca2+, and Zn2+ supported little or no activity. EDTA-treated GtYqeK showed a similar metal-dependent activity profile, with Mn2+ and Co2+ supporting extensive ADP formation, Fe2+ and Cu2+ producing AMP in addition to ADP, and only limited activity observed with Mg2+, Ca2+, and Zn2+. GtYqeK purified without EDTA treatment was also analyzed for comparison and retained Ap4A hydrolysis activity, likely because metal ions acquired during protein production and purification remained bound. Although Co2+ supported robust activity in vitro, the reported total cell-associated concentrations of Mn2+ and Co2+ in B. subtilis are 26.4 ± 3.1 μM and 0.25 ± 0.15 μM, respectively (44), making Mn2+ a physiologically plausible cofactor. Based on its robust and predominantly symmetrical activity across the tested conditions, Mn2+ was used as an experimental cofactor in subsequent Ap4A hydrolysis assays. Nevertheless, direct determination of the YqeK-bound metal in vivo will be required to establish its physiological metalation state.
Figure 2.

YqeK is a Ap4A hydrolase.A, analytical size-exclusion chromatography of purified BsYqeK and GtYqeK. Both proteins elute at approximately 42 kDa, consistent with a homodimer. The grey shaded profile and calibration line represent the molecular-weight standards used to estimate the apparent molecular masses. The inset shows the SDS-PAGE of BsYqeK and GtYqeK. B, HPLC analysis of Ap4A hydrolysis by BsYqeK with or without manganese, which promotes symmetrically converts of Ap4A into ADP. C, ITC analysis of Ap4A binding to B. subtilis YqeK. D, enzyme-kinetic analysis of B. subtilis YqeK mediated hydrolysis of Ap4A. A hyperbolic fit according to Michaelis-Menten was used to determine Km and Vmax. E, 5′-Ap4A-RNA decapping of BsYqeK in vitro. Schematic representation of the 5′-Ap4A-RNA decapping reaction (left) and analysis of in vitro decapping (right) of WT BsYqeK and BsYqeK (H50A/D51A) mutant proteins and the positive control EcApaH using APB urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
ITC revealed direct binding of Ap4A to BsYqeK with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 74.1 ± 19.6 μM, indicating moderate substrate affinity (Fig. 2C). Because YqeK can hydrolyze Ap4A, the ITC signal may include heat contributions from both binding and turnover; therefore, the derived Kd represents an apparent value. We next characterized the catalytic properties of YqeK by steady-state kinetic analysis. Initial reaction velocities increased with increasing substrate concentrations and approached saturation at higher Ap4A levels, consistent with Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Fig. 1D). Fitting of the data yielded an apparent Michaelis constant (Km) of 5.6 ± 1.9 μM and a maximum velocity (Vmax) of 0.20 ± 0.01 μM s−1. In this regard, the Km-value of BsYqeK is consistent with that of its S. aureus counterpart (i.e., 3.2 μM; (29)), as both enzymes display markedly lower values than those reported for Streptococcus pneumoniae SP1746/YqeK (69 μM; (15)) and Streptococcus pyogenes YqeK (216 μM; (30)), potentially reflecting species-specific differences in substrate recognition and binding. Altogether, these data demonstrate that BsYqeK is a manganese-dependent Ap4A hydrolase that binds its substrate with micromolar affinity and efficiently converts Ap4A into ADP through symmetric phosphoanhydride bond cleavage. Besides its role as an Ap4A hydrolase, YqeK has recently been reported to function as an RNA decapping enzyme, and deletion of yqeK in B. subtilis leads to elevated levels of Np4-capped RNAs and increased resistance to disulfide stress (8). To confirm this activity, we generated in vitro-transcribed Ap4A-capped RNA and incubated it with purified BsYqeK. Analysis of the reaction products demonstrated efficient removal of the Ap4A cap by YqeK (Fig. 2E). Thus, YqeK functions as a bifunctional hydrolase that targets both free Ap4A and Ap4A-capped RNA, linking dinucleotide signaling with RNA metabolism.
BsYqeK hydrolyzes multiple Ap4N dinucleotides in vitro and in vivo
To determine whether BsYqeK is specific for Ap4A or capable of hydrolyzing related dinucleoside polyphosphates, we examined its substrate spectrum using a panel of mixed-base Ap4N compounds. HPLC analysis revealed manganese-dependent hydrolysis of Ap4C, Ap4G, and Ap4U. In all cases, the reaction products were consistent with symmetric cleavage of the inter-nucleotide polyphosphate chain. Accordingly, Ap4A was converted into two ADP molecules, whereas the mixed-base Ap4N substrates yielded ADP together with the corresponding nucleoside diphosphate.
To compare substrate preferences, Ap4A hydrolysis was defined as 100% relative activity. YqeK hydrolyzed all tested Ap4N substrates, albeit with different efficiencies (Table 1; Fig. S5). Among the alternative substrates, Ap4G was processed most efficiently, exhibiting a relative activity of 86.1 ± 3.9%. Ap4C and Ap4U were hydrolyzed less efficiently but still retained substantial activity, with relative activities of 60.9 ± 1.4% and 57.2 ± 3.5%, respectively.
Table 1.
Relative Activity and Binding Affinity of YqeK Toward Ap4N Substrates
| Nucleotides | Relative activity (%) | Binding affinity (Kd in μM) |
|---|---|---|
| Ap4A | 100 | 74.1 ± 19.6 |
| Ap4G | 86.13 ± 3.94 | 130 ± 107.6 |
| Ap4C | 60.94 ± 1.42 | 33 ± 14.1 |
| Ap4U | 57.18 ± 3.48 | 144 ± 64.6 |
Relative hydrolytic activities of YqeK toward different Ap4N dinucleotides, normalized to Ap4A (set to 100%). Substrate-binding affinities were determined by isothermal titration calorimetry and are reported as Kd values (μM). Data represent mean ± standard deviation (s.d.) or mean ± fitting error, as appropriate.
To assess substrate recognition, binding affinities were determined by ITC (Table 1; Fig. S6). YqeK bound all tested dinucleotides with micromolar affinity. Ap4C and Ap4A displayed comparable binding, with Kds of 33.2 ± 14.1 μM and 74.1 ± 19.6 μM, respectively. Binding to Ap4G and Ap4U was weaker and more variable, with Kd values of 130 ± 107.6 μM and 144 ± 64.6 μM, respectively. Since YqeK can hydrolyze Ap4N substrates, the ITC signal may include both binding and turnover heat. Thus, the derived affinities should be interpreted as apparent values, which may partly explain the limited saturation observed for some substrates. Notably, substrate affinity did not strictly correlate with catalytic activity, indicating that efficient turnover depends not only on substrate binding but also on productive positioning within the active site.
To determine whether the broad substrate specificity observed in vitro is also relevant in vivo, we performed targeted metabolomic analyses of nucleotide extracts from WT 168, ΔyqeK, overexpression and the complementation strains. Samples were collected at OD600 0.5, 1.0, 3.0 and after overnight growth (OD600 2.0), and metabolite abundances were normalized to culture density. Consistent with the biochemical data and a previous study showing increased levels of multiple Ap4N species in B. subtilis cells lacking YqeK (29), deletion of yqeK resulted in the significant accumulation of Ap4A, Ap4G, Ap4C, and Ap4U across all growth phases (Fig. 3). Among these, Ap4A displayed the strongest increase, whereas the remaining Ap4N species accumulated to varying extents. Complementation of the mutant restored metabolite levels toward those observed in the wild type, confirming that the observed changes were attributable to the loss of YqeK activity. The accumulation of several structurally distinct Ap4N species in the ΔyqeK mutant closely mirrors the substrate spectrum determined in vitro and demonstrates that YqeK functions as a broad-spectrum dinucleoside polyphosphate hydrolase also in vivo. Together, these findings establish YqeK as a key regulator of cellular Ap4N homeostasis that is capable of hydrolyzing diverse dinucleoside tetraphosphates differing in both nucleobase composition.
Figure 3.

Quantification of intracellular Ap4N dinucleotides. Targeted QQQ LC–MS/MS analysis of Ap4A, Ap4G, Ap4C and Ap4U in B. subtilis WT 168, deletion (ΔyqeK), overexpression (+yqeK) and complementation (ΔyqeK + yqeK) strains at OD600 0.5 (A), 1.0 (B), 3.0 (C) and overnight culture, OD600 2.0 (D). Metabolite levels were normalized to dilution-corrected culture density and are shown as pmol/OD600.ml. Bars indicate mean values; points represent nine measurements from three biological replicates, with three technical replicates per clone. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Technical triplicates were averaged within each biological replicate, and each growth stage was analyzed separately by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test against ΔyqeK within each nucleotide group. Adjusted p values are indicated as ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
Structural basis for promiscuous dinucleoside tetraphosphate recognition by YqeK
To better understand the molecular basis of Ap4N degradation and the broad substrate specificity of YqeK, we determined crystal structures of GtYqeK in its apo state and in complex with ADP and the non-hydrolyzable Ap4A analog Ap2Cp2A (Table 2; Fig. 4, A–C). The overall architecture of YqeK is consistent with that of previously characterized HD-domain phosphohydrolases. Structural comparison with available apo structures of YqeK homologs from other bacterial species revealed a high degree of conservation, with root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs) of 0.7 to 1.0 Å over approximately 160 aligned Cα atoms, indicating that the overall fold is preserved across the family (Fig. S8). The binuclear metal-binding architecture, including the coordinating residues, the relative positions of the metal ions, and overall coordination geometry, is also highly conserved despite differences in the identities of the bound metal ions (Fig. S9). The substrate-binding pocket of GtYqeK harbours two zinc ions that are primarily coordinated by H21, H50, and D127, and by H83, H109, and D51, respectively (Fig. 4A and S7A). The presence of zinc in the active site was confirmed by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy performed on apo crystals (Fig. S7B). We speculate that the zinc ions originated from trace metal contaminants encountered during expression and/or purification of the non-EDTA-treated protein preparation used for crystallization (compare also above). Because the protein was purified in the absence of EDTA, residual Zn2+ present in the cells (lysates), buffer components (e.g., phosphate salts, NaCl), chromatography materials, or other laboratory reagents could have been retained by the protein and subsequently visualized in the crystal structure.
Table 2.
Crystallographic Statistics of Yqek Structures
| Apo-YqeK (PDB-ID: 31LP) | YqeqeK-ADP (PDB-ID: 31LQ) | YqeK-Ap2Cp2A (PDB-ID: 31LR) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data collection | |||
| X-ray source | ESRF, Grenoble | DESY, Hamburg | DESY, Hamburg |
| Beamline ID30A-3 | Beamline P13 | Beamline P13 | |
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.967697 | 1.05965 | 0.97625 |
| Space group | P41212 | P41212 | P41212 |
| Cell dimensions (Å) | 73.13 73.13 95.99 | 73.28 73.28 95.72 | 73.79 73.79 99.94 |
| Resolution (Å) | 45.52–1.65 (1.75–1.65) | 47.86–1.70 (1.80–1.70) | 46.26–1.40 (1.48–1.40) |
| Total reflections | 872,448 (143,841) | 758,538 (125,929) | 1,442,830 (217,256) |
| Unique reflections | 31,989 (5087) | 29,330 (4635) | 54,950 (8734) |
| Multiplicity | 27.27 (28.28) | 25.86 (27.17) | 26.26 (24.87) |
| Completeness (%) | 100.0 (99.9) | 100.0 (100.0) | 100.0 (100.0) |
| Rmeas (%) | 11.4 (227.4) | 7.5 (161.0) | 9.3 (152.9) |
| CC1/2 | 99.9 (84.1) | 99.9 (88.9) | 99.8 (84.0) |
| I/σ(I) | 19.14 (2.21) | 22.44 (1.76) | 18.70 (1.67) |
| Mosaicity (°) | 0.044 | 0.133 | 0.064 |
| Wilson B-factor (Å2) | 33.87 | 42.26 | 31.47 |
| Refinement | |||
| Resolution (Å) | 36.57–1.65 | 34.22–1.70 | 34.61–1.40 |
| Rwork, Rfree | 0.1784, 0.2002 | 0.1912, 0.2098 | 0.1416, 0.1648 |
| Reflections | 30,384, 1599 | 27,830, 1465 | 52,831, 2099 |
| (working, test set) | |||
| Completeness (%) | 99.94 | 99.88 | 99.95 |
| r.m.s.d. from ideal | |||
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Bond angles (°) | 0.742 | 0.882 | 0.889 |
| Total number of atoms | 1725 | 1635 | 1804 |
| Mean B value (Å2) | |||
| Overall | 31.74 | 45.71 | 34.28 |
| Protein | 30.81 | 45.50 | 32.30 |
| Water | 40.80 | 49.92 | 46.96 |
| Other | 35.55 | 46.73 | 45.24 |
Values in parentheses denote the highest resolution shell.
Figure 4.

Structural insights into GtYqeK. Overall structures of GtYqeK (A) in the apo state, (B) in a complex with ADP, and (C) in a complex with the non-hydrolysable Ap4A analog Ap2Cp2A. (D) Detailed view of the deeply buried nucleotide-binding pocket in GtYqeK. E, F, structural comparison of the ADP- and Ap2Cp2A-bound states reveal rearrangements of individual amino acid side chains in the phosphate-binding region and the second nucleotide-binding pocket.
Superposition of the apo and ADP/Ap2Cp2A-bound structures revealed no major conformational changes upon ligand binding and yielded RMSDs of only 0.142 Å over 178 Cα atoms (apo versus ADP) and 0.135 Å over 162 Cα atoms (apo versus Ap2Cp2A), indicating that the nucleotide-binding pocket is largely preformed and does not require substantial structural rearrangements for substrate recognition (Fig. 4, B and C). The Ap2Cp2A molecule occupies a surface-exposed binding cleft extending toward the catalytic center (Fig. 4, C–F). One adenosine moiety is deeply buried within the nucleotide-binding pocket, where the adenine base is stabilized by hydrophobic and hydrogen-bonding interactions. Specifically, the adenine ring engages in π–alkyl interactions with L164 and L81, while additional specificity is provided by hydrogen bonds involving the backbone carbonyl and amide groups of Y172 as well as the hydroxyl group of T175. The same interactions are observed in the GtYqeK-ADP complex. In contrast, the second adenosine moiety of Ap2Cp2A is positioned closer to the protein surface and is sandwiched between the aromatic side chains of F135 and F163. Binding of the ligand is accompanied by a subtle reorientation of F163 relative to the ADP structure, enabling optimal π–π stacking interactions with the nucleobase (Fig. 4, D–F).
The tetraphosphate chain is coordinated primarily through electrostatic interactions with a cluster of positively charged residues. The side chains of R18, K54, and R133 contribute the majority of phosphate contacts, whereas H83 and E80 provide additional stabilizing interactions with the shifted α-phosphate. Notably, binding of the phosphate chain induces a reorientation of the guanidinium group of R133, which, together with R18, forms a triangular interaction network around the β- and γ-phosphates of the ligand (Fig. 4C). Unexpectedly, all direct protein contacts are restricted to the proximal portion of the dinucleotide. The α-, β-, and γ-phosphates participate extensively in substrate recognition, whereas neither the terminal δ-phosphate nor the ribose moiety of the surface-exposed nucleoside establishes direct contacts with the protein, which resembles the coordination of the outward-facing nucleobase relying predominantly on aromatic stacking. The structure provides a molecular basis for the broad substrate spectrum of YqeK. Whereas one nucleoside moiety and the proximal phosphate groups are recognized through a network of specific interactions that anchor the substrate in the active site, the distal nucleoside is bound predominantly through nonspecific aromatic stacking and remains largely solvent-exposed. This “asymmetric recognition strategy” enables YqeK to tolerate substantial variation in nucleobase identity while maintaining productive substrate binding and catalysis, thereby explaining its promiscuous activity toward diverse Ap4N dinucleotides.
Structure-based mutational analysis of YqeK
To validate our structural analysis and the residues predicted to contribute to Ap4A binding and hydrolysis, we performed site-directed mutagenesis. H50 and D51 are located adjacent to the catalytic metal center and were selected to probe the functional importance of the metal-coordination site. R18 and R133 establish key interactions with the polyphosphate chain, whereas F135 and F163 flank the solvent-exposed adenine moiety and are positioned to stabilize substrate binding through aromatic stacking interactions.
The H50A/D51A mutant retained detectable Ap4A binding by ITC, although with reduced affinity relative to WT YqeK (Kd = 106 ± 47.6 μM versus 74.1 ± 19.6 μM). Despite this residual binding, Ap4A hydrolysis was strongly impaired by the H50A/D51A substitution, consistent with a primary role for these residues in metal-dependent catalysis rather than substrate binding alone (Table 3; Figs. S10 and S11). Mutation of the substrate-coordinating residues had a more severe effect. The R18A/R133A mutant, which disrupts the phosphate-binding network, showed no detectable Ap4A binding by ITC and no detectable ADP formation by HPLC. Similarly, the F135A/F163A mutant abolished detectable substrate binding and hydrolysis, indicating that aromatic stabilization of the distal nucleobase is required for productive substrate engagement. Together, these mutational data support the structural model in which YqeK activity depends on an intact metal coordination site, arginine-mediated phosphate recognition and aromatic positioning of the nucleobase. This organization enables productive Ap4A binding and its metal-dependent hydrolysis. Taken together, these results further strengthen the proposed catalytic mechanism and substrate-binding mode of YqeK.
Table 3.
Ap4A Hydrolysis and Binding Affinity by YqeK Variants
| Yqek variants | Relative activity (%) | Binding affinity (Kd in μM) |
|---|---|---|
| WT YqeK | 100 | 74.1 ± 19.6 |
| YqeK (H50A/D51A) | No detectable hydrolysis | 106 ± 47.6 |
| YqeK (R18A/R133A) | No detectable hydrolysis | No detectable binding |
| YqeK (F135A/F163A) | No detectable hydrolysis | No detectable binding |
Relative Ap4A hydrolase activity and ITC-derived Ap4A binding affinities of WT YqeK and structural mutants. WT activity was set to 100%. Binding affinities were determined by isothermal titration calorimetry and are reported as Kd values in μM. “Not detected” indicates that hydrolysis or binding was below the detection limit under the assay conditions used.
Discussion
YqeK coordinates Ap4N homeostasis during B. subtilis stress adaptation
Our data demonstrate that YqeK is a key regulator of Ap4N homeostasis in B. subtilis and that its activity is required for optimal fitness under nutrient-limiting conditions. Based on current evidence, YqeK possesses two distinct biochemical activities: it degrades free Ap4N dinucleotides (this study (29, 30, 31)) and removes Ap4N caps from RNA molecules (this study (8)). At present, however, it remains unclear whether the physiological phenotypes associated with loss of YqeK arise predominantly from dysregulation of free Ap4N pools, altered RNA de-capping, or a combination of both processes.
Notably, deletion of yqeK has only minor effects during exponential growth despite causing substantial accumulation of multiple Ap4N species. Instead, the most pronounced defects become apparent during prolonged nutrient limitation, including reduced stationary-phase fitness, impaired sporulation, and defective biofilm formation. These observations suggest that the physiological importance of YqeK is linked not simply to the presence of Ap4N molecules but rather to their dynamic regulation during adaptation to nutrient-depleted environments. The observation that YqeK overproduction also causes physiological phenotypes further argues that both excessive accumulation and excessive depletion of Ap4Ns are detrimental, implying that precise control of intracellular Ap4N levels is required for normal cellular behavior.
Our biochemical and structural analyses provide a mechanistic explanation for how YqeK fulfils this role. Similar to the unrelated bacterial Ap4A hydrolase ApaH (5), YqeK catalyzes symmetric cleavage of dinucleoside tetraphosphates and functions as an RNA de-capping enzyme, highlighting striking functional parallels between these two enzyme families. However, YqeK belongs to the HD-domain phosphohydrolases and employs a distinct catalytic architecture. The structure reveals a preformed active site containing a binuclear metal center that coordinates the phosphate chain and promotes metal ion-dependent hydrolysis. Mutational analysis confirms that residues involved in metal coordination are essential for catalysis, whereas residues contacting the phosphate chain and the distal nucleobase are required for productive substrate binding. Together, these data support a model in which YqeK recognizes substrates through a combination of phosphate-chain recognition (i.e., the “p4” of Ap4N), anchoring of one nucleoside moiety, and aromatic stabilization of the solvent-exposed distal base. This asymmetric recognition mechanism also explains the remarkable substrate promiscuity of YqeK. Whereas one nucleoside moiety (i.e., the “A” of Ap4N) is recognized through specific interactions, the second nucleobase remains largely solvent-exposed and forms predominantly nonspecific aromatic contacts (i.e., “N” of Ap4N). This architecture enables efficient hydrolysis of Ap4A, Ap4G, Ap4C, and Ap4U, as observed both in vitro and in vivo, and provides a structural framework for understanding how HD-domain phosphohydrolases accommodate chemically diverse dinucleoside tetraphosphates while maintaining catalytic efficiency.
The broad substrate specificity of YqeK is likely physiologically advantageous. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and other enzymes generate a variety of Ap4N species (reviewed in (1, 2)), particularly under nutrient limitation and/or stress conditions, and our metabolomic analyses demonstrate that several of these compounds accumulate in the absence of YqeK. A hydrolase restricted to a single substrate would therefore be insufficient to maintain dinucleotide homeostasis. Instead, YqeK appears to function as a central clearance enzyme that prevents excessive accumulation of multiple signaling dinucleotides.
More broadly, our findings support the emerging view that Ap4N molecules are bona fide signaling nucleotides rather than merely by-products of aberrant metabolism (e.g., as discussed in: (45)). Together with previous studies demonstrating that Ap4A modulates IMPDH activity (6) and regulates protein acetylation through the adaptor AcuB (46, 47), the physiological consequences of altered YqeK activity indicate that Ap4N accumulation influences diverse cellular processes. We therefore propose that YqeK serves as a key component of bacterial stress-response networks by controlling the abundance of free and RNA-associated Ap4N molecules. Through this function, YqeK enables the transient accumulation of alarmone-like dinucleotides during stress while ensuring their timely removal during adaptation and recovery.
A binuclear metal center is essential for YqeK function
Our biochemical and structural analyses demonstrate that YqeK is a metal-dependent phosphohydrolase whose catalytic activity relies on a binuclear metal center. Consistent with other members of the HD-domain phosphohydrolase family, coordination of two divalent metal ions is essential for substrate hydrolysis, as substitution of metal-coordinating residues abolished catalytic activity. The crystal structure further shows that the metal ions directly coordinate the phosphate chain of the substrate and position the catalytic water molecule, providing a structural basis for the observed metal dependence.
Although several divalent cations supported YqeK activity in vitro, these observations should not necessarily be interpreted as evidence that all of these metals function as physiological cofactors. Metalation of proteins in vivo is dictated by intracellular metal availability and homeostasis rather than by the intrinsic catalytic competence of individual metal ions (48). Accordingly, free intracellular Co2+ and Ni2+ concentrations are maintained at extremely low levels because these metals can be toxic through non-specific protein binding and oxidative stress (e.g., (49, 50)). Instead, they are tightly regulated and selectively delivered to a small number of dedicated metalloenzymes. In contrast, Mn2+ is abundant under many physiological conditions and serves as the preferred cofactor for numerous phosphohydrolases. We therefore consider Mn2+ to be the most likely physiological metal cofactor for YqeK, whereas activation by Co2+ and Ni2+ most likely reflects the inherent metal permissiveness commonly observed among HD-domain enzymes. The apparent ability of YqeK to utilize multiple divalent cations in vitro may nevertheless have physiological significance. Metal occupancy of metalloenzymes can vary depending on environmental conditions, and fluctuations in intracellular metal availability during nutrient limitation or other stresses could influence YqeK activity. Such modulation would provide an additional regulatory layer linking Ap4N turnover to bacterial adaptation. Whether YqeK undergoes metal exchange in vivo and whether changes in manganese availability directly affect Ap4N homeostasis remain questions for future investigation.
Experimental procedures
Strain construction
The yqeK gene in B. subtilis was disrupted by replacement with a kanamycin resistance cassette, following the strategy described in (51). Approximately 1 kb of DNA fragments upstream and downstream of yqeK were amplified by PCR and fused with the kanamycin resistance gene flanked by lox sites using overlap extension PCR. The resulting construct contained the kanamycin cassette between the yqeK flanking regions, enabling homologous recombination. The assembled PCR construct was introduced into B. subtilis by natural competence transformation, and transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing kanamycin. Correct integration of the kanamycin cassette at the yqeK locus was verified by colony PCR using primers annealing outside the flanking regions, and the junctions were confirmed by sequencing. To generate a markerless deletion, the kanamycin cassette was subsequently excised by transient expression of Cre recombinase, resulting in Cre-mediated recombination between the lox sites and leaving a single residual lox site at the locus.
For ectopic gene expression in B. subtilis, the integrative plasmid pDR111 was employed. This vector enables stable chromosomal integration at the amyE locus through double-crossover homologous recombination and confers spectinomycin resistance for selection of transformants. Gene expression is driven by the IPTG-inducible Phyperspank promoter, allowing controlled and tunable expression of the cloned gene in response to inducer concentration. Genes of interest were amplified by PCR and cloned into pDR111 using standard molecular biology procedures. All plasmid constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing prior to transformation. Recombinant plasmids were introduced into B. subtilis strains via natural competence, and transformants were selected on LB agar supplemented with spectinomycin. Correct chromosomal integration at the amyE locus was verified by colony PCR and phenotypically confirmed by the loss of amylase activity on starch-containing agar plates. The ΔsigF mutant strain was generated by natural transformation of the recipient strain with genomic DNA obtained from a previously constructed ΔsigF strain kindly provided by Dr Ilka Bischoff (Marburg/Heidelberg). Transformants were selected under the appropriate conditions, and successful transfer of the mutation was confirmed by PCR.
Sporulation assay
All sporulation assays were performed according to previously established protocols with minor modifications (52). Sporulation was induced by nutrient exhaustion using either DIFCO Sporulation Medium (DSM) or a chemically defined Minimal Medium (SMM), as indicated for individual experiments. Bacterial strains were recovered from glycerol stocks by streaking onto LB agar plates, and single colonies were used to inoculate LB broth. Cultures were incubated overnight at 37 °C with shaking. Overnight cultures were diluted into fresh LB medium and grown to mid-exponential phase to obtain pre-cultures. Cells were subsequently diluted into prewarmed DSM or SMM and incubated at 37 °C with continuous shaking. Sporulation was initiated through nutrient depletion, and cultures were allowed to progress through exponential growth and into stationary phase until maximal sporulation was achieved, typically within 24 to 48 h after inoculation.
Sporulation efficiency and spore formation were monitored by phase-contrast microscopy. For fluorescence-based analyses, culture samples were harvested by centrifugation, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and stained with SYTO9 and propidium iodide according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma-Aldrich). Fluorescently stained cells were subsequently analyzed by microscopy or flow cytometry, as appropriate. Where indicated, residual vegetative cells were eliminated by heat treatment at 80 °C for 20 min prior to analysis to enrich for heat-resistant spores.
Biofilm assay
B. subtilis NCIB3610 and 168 derived strains were cultured in LB containing appropriate antibiotics at 37 °C for 14 h. Daily cultures were grown in LB at 37 °C to an OD600 of 1.0 without antibiotics. For biofilm growth, bacteria from a liquid LB culture were collected and transferred to solid MSgg medium as previously described [5 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), 100 mM 3-(N-morpholino) propane-sulfonic acid (pH 7.0), 2 mM MgCl2, 700 μM CaCl2, 50 μM MnCl2, 100 μM FeCl3, 1 μM ZnCl2, 2 μM thiamine, 0.5% (v/v) glycerol, 0.5% (w/v) glutamate]. before inoculation (2 μl) on MSgg plates (MSgg medium fortified with 1.5% (w/v) Bacto agar, 6- well plates, dried overnight) and/or 1 mM IPTG (13, 38, 53). Plates were sealed and incubated up to 72 h at 30 °C. For each strain, we analyzed at least 3 biological replicates.
Spot titer assays
B. subtilis strains were recovered from cryo-stocks and streaked onto LB agar plates supplemented with appropriate antibiotics, followed by incubation at 37 °C overnight. A single colony was used to inoculate LB liquid medium, and cultures were grown at 37 °C to mid-exponential phase (OD600). Cultures were then normalized to an OD600 of 1.0 using fresh LB- or SMM medium. Serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared by transferring 100 μl of culture into 900 μl of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Subsequently, 3 μl of each dilution was spotted onto solid LB or SMM agar plates. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, followed by an additional 24 h incubation at room temperature.
Microscopy
Cells cultivated in SM- or DS- medium at 37 °C and 200 rpm were transferred onto 1% (w/v) agarose pads. Images were taken with an Axio Observer.Z1 (Zeiss) microscope equipped with a Plan Apochromat 100×/1.4 Oil Ph3 phase contrast objective and a pco.edge 3.1 sCMOS camera (PCO). An X-Cite 120PC metal halide light source (EXFO) and ET-DAPI, or ET-TexasRed filter cubes GFP missing for SYTO9 (Chroma) were used for fluorescence detection. Images were recorded with VisiView 3.3.0.6 (Visitron Systems, Germany) and processed with Fiji.
Metabolomics
Bacterial endometabolites were extracted from wild-type and mutant strains by rapid cold methanol quenching followed by methanol/chloroform extraction. Three biological replicates were analyzed for each strain, with three technical replicates prepared from each biological replicate. Strains were streaked from −80 °C glycerol stocks onto LB agar plates and incubated overnight with appropriate antibiotics. Single colonies were used to inoculate LB overnight cultures at 37 °C. Cultures were diluted the following day to OD600 = 0.1 in LB medium and grown to exponential phase. These pre-cultures were used to inoculate main cultures in SMM at OD600 = 0.1, followed by incubation at 37 °C and 200 rpm. Four sampling points were selected based on growth-curve progression. For quenching, 1 ml of culture was transferred into pre-cooled microcentrifuge tubes containing 1 ml of 70% (v/v) methanol prepared from LC–MS-grade methanol and Milli-Q water. Tubes were pre-cooled at −80 °C for 48 h and handled in a pre-cooled aluminum rack. Samples were mixed by inversion and centrifuged immediately at 13,000×g for 10 min at −9 to −10 °C.
Culture density was measured immediately before sampling. High-density cultures were diluted 1:10 with fresh medium before OD600 measurement to ensure that the measurements were within the linear range of the spectrophotometer. The measured OD600 values were multiplied by the dilution factor of 10. For each sample, 1 ml of culture was harvested, and metabolite amounts were normalized to the dilution-corrected culture density of the harvested sample, expressed as OD600 mL. Supernatants were removed, and pellets were stored at −80 °C. For extraction, frozen pellets were kept cold and extracted with OD600-normalized volumes of methanol/TE buffer, pH 7.0, 1:1 v/v; TE buffer contained 10 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA. A volume of 100 μl extraction solvent was used per 1 ml culture at OD600 = 0.5 and scaled proportionally. An equal volume of cold chloroform was added, and pellets were resuspended by brief vortexing. Samples were extracted for 2 h with shaking at low temperature, followed by centrifugation at maximum speed for 10 min at −9 to −10 °C. The upper aqueous phase was collected, filtered through a syringe filter and stored at −80 °C until QQQ LC–MS/MS analysis.
Quantification of nucleotides by HPLC-MS
Nucleotides were quantified using a bio-inert Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC system coupled to an Agilent 6470 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Agilent Technologies). Chromatographic separation was performed on a SeQuant ZIC-pHILIC column. Solvent A consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate (pH 9.0) in water, whereas solvent B consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate (pH 9.0) in 90% (v/v) acetonitrile. A linear gradient was applied from 75% to 40% solvent B over 9 min. Mass spectrometric analysis was carried out using electrospray ionization (ESI) in negative ionization mode. Metabolites were detected by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), with argon serving as the collision gas. Quantification was performed using external calibration curves covering a concentration range of 0 to 50 μM. Data acquisition and analysis were conducted using MassHunter Workstation Quantitative Analysis for QQQ (Version 10.1, Agilent Technologies).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Technical triplicates were averaged within each biological replicate, yielding three independent biological values per condition. Each growth stage was analyzed separately by two-way ANOVA, with nucleotide and strain as factors and including their interaction. Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test was used to compare WT, +yqeK, and ΔyqeK + yqeK with the ΔyqeK strain within each nucleotide group. Multiplicity-adjusted p values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Protein production and purification
The yqeK open reading frames from B. subtilis and G. thermodenitrificans were amplified from genomic DNA using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase and gene-specific primers designed from sequences obtained from NCBI. PCR products were cloned into using the NdeI, XhoI, and BsaI restriction sites. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the NEB Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit to generate the variants YqeK(H50A/D51A), YqeK(R18A/R133A) and YqeK(F135A/F163A). All constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing and transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) for recombinant protein production. For protein expression, cells were grown in LB medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) D-(+)-lactose monohydrate and incubated at 30 °C for 16 h. Cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl) and disrupted using an M1-10L Microfluidizer (Microfluidics). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and the clarified lysate was subjected to a three-step purification procedure. Hexa-histidine (His6)-tagged proteins were initially purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using HisTrap HP columns (Cytiva). Columns were equilibrated and washed with lysis buffer supplemented with 40 mM imidazole, and proteins were eluted with 250 mM imidazole. BsYqeK was subsequently treated with 25 mM EDTA to remove residual divalent metal ions and concentrated using Amicon Ultra 10-kDa centrifugal filters (Millipore). The concentrated protein was further purified by anion-exchange chromatography on tandem HiTrap Q HP columns (Cytiva) equilibrated in 20 mM HEPES (pH 8.0) and 50 mM NaCl. Bound proteins were eluted using a linear gradient from 50 mM to 1 M NaCl. Final purification was achieved by size-exclusion chromatography on a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 column (Cytiva) equilibrated in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl, and 20 mM KCl (SEC Buffer). GtYqeK was purified using a two-step procedure comprising nickel-affinity chromatography followed by size-exclusion chromatography under the conditions described above. For metal-dependence assays, GtYqeK was treated with 25 mM EDTA before size-exclusion chromatography. In contrast, the protein used for crystallization was purified without EDTA treatment. Protein purity was monitored by SDS-PAGE following each purification step. Protein concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically using a NanoDrop Lite instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The apparent molecular masses and oligomeric states of purified BsYqeK and GtYqeK were assessed by analytical size-exclusion chromatography using an ÄKTA pure chromatography system equipped with a Superdex 75 Increase 10/300 Gl column (Cytiva). The column was equilibrated with SEC buffer, and protein elution was monitored at 280 nm. Ribonuclease A, ovalbumin, conalbumin, aldolase, and ferritin were used as calibration standards, and apparent molecular masses were estimated from the resulting calibration curve.
Enzymatic activity assay
Ap4A hydrolysis by BsYqeK and GtYqeK was analyzed by HPLC. Endpoint (1 min) reactions were performed in SEC buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl, and 20 mM KCl, with 1 μM YqeK, 500 μM Ap4A, and either 20 or 500 μM of the indicated divalent metal ion (Ca2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Ni2+, or Zn2+). Assays were performed using EDTA-treated BsYqeK and GtYqeK. GtYqeK purified without EDTA treatment was also analyzed for comparison. For steady-state kinetic analysis, reactions were performed using 5 nM YqeK, 500 μM Mn2+ and increasing concentrations of Ap4A. Final Ap4A concentrations ranged from 1 to 100 μM. All reactions were initiated by addition of enzyme and incubated at 37 °C. Aliquots were removed at 5, 20, 40 and 60 s and quenched with acetonitrile. After centrifugation at 14,000×g for 30 min, supernatants were analyzed by HPLC. ADP formation was quantified from integrated peak areas using an ADP standard curve. Initial velocities were calculated from the linear phase of ADP formation over time and fitted to the Michaelis–Menten equation to determine apparent kinetic parameters. HPLC analyses were carried out on an Agilent 1260 Infinity system equipped with a Metrosep A Supp 5-150/4.0 column, using a 10 μl injection volume. Nucleotides were separated isocratically in 90 mM ammonium carbonate (pH 9.25) at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min, detected by UV absorbance at 260 nm, and identified by comparison with nucleotide standards.
In vitro transcription and decapping of 5′-Ap4A-capped RNA
In vitro transcription was performed using a double-stranded DNA template (5′-CAG TAA TAC GAC TCA CTA TTA GGC CTC TCG CTCT GCT GGG TGT GCG CTT GC-3′ (54), containing a T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence and a template sequence (underlined) with a single A at the start to ensure incorporation of Ap4A at the 5′ end. The reaction was performed using the HiScribe T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit (New England Biolabs, #E2040S) with the addition of 8 mM Ap4A (Jena Bioscience), 10 mM UTP and CTP, and 2 mM GTP. The reaction was incubated for 16 h at 37 °C, followed by DNase I digestion (New England Biolabs, #M0570S) for 15 min and denaturation at 65 °C for 15 min in 2X loading buffer (80% (w/v) formamide, 0.02% (w/v) SDS, 0.02% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 0.01% (w/v) xylene cyanol and 1 mM EDTA). The final transcription product was loaded onto a 15% (v/v) polyacrylamide gel supplemented with 8 M urea, 1X TAE, and 0.2% (w/v) acryloylaminophenyl boronic acid (APB). Ap4A-RNA was further gel extracted using the crush and soak method with 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.3) for 30 min at −80 °C, 5 min at 90 °C, and 16 h at 4 °C with constant mixing. The RNA was subsequently filtered using a 0.45 μm Costar Spin-X Centrifuge Tube Filter (Sigma, #CLS8162-96EA), precipitated with isopropanol at −80 °C for 16 h, washed twice with 70% (v/v) ethanol and resuspended in nuclease-free water. To determine decapping activity, 2 μM of BsYqeK protein (or EcApaH) was incubated with 100 ng of 5′-Ap4A-capped RNA in a reaction buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 200 mM NaCl and 10 mM of MgCl2 for 30 min at 37 °C in a 10 μl reaction volume. The reaction was then denatured in 2X loading buffer at 65 °C for 15 min and run on a 15% (v/v) polyacrylamide gel supplemented with 8 M urea, 1X TAE and 0.2% (w/v) APB. The final decapping products were visualised with the InstaS GelStick Imager (InstaS Science Imaging) after staining with SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid Gel Stain solution (ThermoFisher, #S11494).
Isothermal titration calorimetry
Binding of nucleotide substrates to BsYqeK was measured by isothermal titration calorimetry. Purified WT YqeK and YqeK variants were buffer-exchanged into SEC buffer before analysis, and nucleotide ligands were prepared in the same buffer to minimize heat of dilution. Protein and ligand solutions were clarified by centrifugation before loading. All ITC experiments were performed with 50 μM YqeK in the cell at 25 °C. Nucleotide substrates were loaded into the syringe and titrated into protein. WT YqeK was titrated with Ap4A at 2.5 mM, Ap4G at 1.5 mM, Ap4C at 2 mM and Ap4U at 2 mM. YqeK variants were analyzed using Ap4A as the ligand under the same protein concentration, with Ap4A loaded in the syringe. Raw injection heats were integrated and fitted using a single-site binding model. Dissociation constants (Kd) were obtained from the fitted binding isotherms. Experiments with no saturable heat change above background were reported as showing no detectable binding under the assay conditions used.
Crystallization and structure determination
Initial crystallization attempts with YqeK from B. subtilis did not yield diffraction-quality crystals. Therefore, the homolog from G. thermodenitrificans was selected, as proteins from thermophilic organisms are typically more stable and often crystallize more readily than those from mesophilic species. GtYqeK purified without EDTA treatment was used for all crystallization experiments. Crystals of apo GtYqeK, GtYqeK in complex with ADP, and GtYqeK in complex with a non-hydrolysable Ap4A analog (methyl-bridged between the four phosphate moieties) (Biolog) were obtained by the sitting-drop vapor diffusion method at 20 °C. Drops consisting of equal volumes of protein solution (1.5 mM) and reservoir solution were dispensed with a Gryphon robotic system into SWISSCI MRC 3-well plates. For complex formation, ADP or Ap2Cp2A was added to the protein solution at a final concentration of 20 mM and 10 mM, respectively. Initial screening was carried out with the NeXtal JCSG Core Suites I-IV. Apo crystals of GtYqeK were obtained from crystallization conditions containing 0.1 M sodium/potassium phosphate and 2.5 M sodium chloride. Crystals of GtYqeK in complex with ADP were obtained from conditions comprising 0.05 M calcium acetate, pH 8.0, 0.1 M imidazole, and 35% (v/v) 2-ethoxyethanol as the precipitant. Crystals of GtYqeK in complex with Ap2Cp2A were obtained from conditions containing 0.4 M potassium/sodium tartrate. Prior to data collection, all crystals were cryoprotected with 30% (v/v) glycerol and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K at beamline ID30A-3 (ESRF) for apo GtYqeK and at beamline P13 (DESY) for GtYqeK in complex with ADP and the non-hydrolyzable Ap4A analog Ap2Cp2A. To identify bound metals, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) scans of apo crystals were performed at beamline ID30B (ESRF). Diffraction data were processed with XDS (55) using XDSAPP3 (https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889812011715). Initial phases were obtained by molecular replacement using the phenix.phaser module (56) of the PHENIX suite (57) with the AlphaFold3 model (58) of GtYqek as search model (TFZ = 45.0; LLG = 1538). The refined apo structure was subsequently used to solve the GtYqeK-ADP (TFZ = 81.4; LLG = 6983) and GtYqeK-Ap2Cp2A (TFZ = 79.3; LLG = 13,208) complex structures. After automated model building with phenix.autobuild (59), final models were obtained through iterative cycles of manual model building in COOT (60, 61) and refinement with phenix.refine (62). Ligand restraints for Ap2Cp2A were generated with Grade2 (Global Phasing Ltd; https://grade.globalphasing.org/).
Data availability
Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 31LP (apo GtYqeK), 31LQ (GtYqeK-ADP) and 31LR (GtYqeK-Ap2Cp2A), respectively.
Supporting information
This article contains supporting information.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through the Research Training Group GRK2937 “Microbial Nucleotide Metabolism” (to: L. R., G. B., P. B., R. H.). We thank Biolog Life Science Institute (Bremen, Germany) for the synthesis and provision of the non-hydrolysable Ap4A analog used in this study, as well as the beamline staff at ESRF (Grenoble, France) and DESY (Hamburg, Germany) for their support during data collection. We are grateful to Ilka Bischoffs and Max Kilian for providing the DNA templates used for generation of the sigF::ery strain. We sincerely thank Prof. Dr Martin Thanbichler (Marburg, Germany) for letting us to use the microscope. G. B. and L. R. are principal investigators in the DFG-Cluster of Excellence “Microbes for Climate (M4C)). The authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI) to assist with language editing and improvement of manuscript text. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions were reviewed and verified by the authors.
Author contributions
R. D. S., P. B.-M., and G. B. writing – review & editing; R. D. S., S. K., and G. B. visualization; R. D. S., P. B.-M., and G. B. validation; R. D. S., P. B-M., F. B., N. H., M. B., U. L., J. F., and S. K. investigation; R. D. S., P. B.-M., F. B., N. H., G. B., and S. K. formal analysis; R. D. S., P. B.-M., and G. B. conceptualization; P. B.-M. and G. B. writing – original draft; P. B.-M., J. F., G. B., L. R., and J. P.-F. supervision; P. B.-M. and G. B. funding acquisition; P. B.-M., F. B., and S. K. data curation; M. B., U. L., R. H., G. B. methodology; J. P.-F. project administration.
Reviewed by members of the JBC Editorial Board. Edited by Karin Musier-Forsyth
Contributor Information
Gert Bange, Email: gert.bange@synmikro.uni-marburg.de.
Patricia Bedrunka-Meinert, Email: patricia.bedrunka@synmikro.uni-marburg.de.
Supporting information
References
- 1.Young M.K., Wang J.D. From dusty shelves toward the spotlight: growing evidence for Ap4A as an alarmone in maintaining RNA stability and proteostasis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2024;81 doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2024.102536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zegarra V., Mais C.N., Freitag J., Bange G. The mysterious diadenosine tetraphosphate (AP4A) Microlife. 2023;4 doi: 10.1093/femsml/uqad016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ferguson F., McLennan A.G., Urbaniak M.D., Jones N.J., Copeland N.A. Re-evaluation of diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap(4)A) from a stress metabolite to bona fide secondary messenger. Front Mol. Biosci. 2020;7 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.606807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nishimura A., Moriya S., Ukai H., Nagai K., Wachi M., Yamada Y. Diadenosine 5',5'''-P1,P4-tetraphosphate (Ap4A) controls the timing of cell division in Escherichia coli. Genes Cells. 1997;2:401–413. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.1300328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Farr S.B., Arnosti D.N., Chamberlin M.J., Ames B.N. An apaH mutation causes AppppA to accumulate and affects motility and catabolite repression in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989;86:5010–5014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.13.5010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Giammarinaro P.I., Young M.K.M., Steinchen W., Mais C.N., Hochberg G., Yang J., et al. Diadenosine tetraphosphate regulates biosynthesis of GTP in Bacillus subtilis. Nat. Microbiol. 2022;7:1442–1452. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01193-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Johnstone D.B., Farr S.B. AppppA binds to several proteins in Escherichia coli, including the heat shock and oxidative stress proteins DnaK, GroEL, E89, C45 and C40. EMBO J. 1991;10:3897–3904. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04959.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Basu D., Ingle S., Luciano D.J., Belasco J.G. YqeK governs the acquisition and removal of nucleoside tetraphosphate caps in Firmicutes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2026;54:1–13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ji X., Zou J., Peng H., Stolle A.S., Xie R., Zhang H., et al. Alarmone Ap4A is elevated by aminoglycoside antibiotics and enhances their bactericidal activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116:9578–9585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1822026116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ji X., Yu R., Zhu M., Zhang C., Zhou L., Cai T., et al. Diadenosine tetraphosphate modulated quorum sensing in bacteria treated with kanamycin. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23:353. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-03113-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kimura Y., Tanaka C., Sasaki K., Sasaki M. High concentrations of intracellular Ap4A and/or Ap5A in developing Myxococcus xanthus cells inhibit sporulation. Microbiology (Reading) 2017;163:86–93. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Monds R.D., Newell P.D., Wagner J.C., Schwartzman J.A., Lu W., Rabinowitz J.D., et al. Di-adenosine tetraphosphate (Ap4A) metabolism impacts biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens via modulation of c-di-GMP-dependent pathways. J. Bacteriol. 2010;192:3011–3023. doi: 10.1128/JB.01571-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Branda S.S., Gonzalez-Pastor J.E., Dervyn E., Ehrlich S.D., Losick R., Kolter R. Genes involved in formation of structured multicellular communities by Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186:3970–3979. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3970-3979.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cervoni M., Sposato D., Ferri G., Bahre H., Leoni L., Rampioni G., et al. The diadenosine tetraphosphate hydrolase ApaH contributes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenicity. Plos Pathog. 2024;20 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jin Y., Ke J., Zheng P., Zhang H., Zhu Z., Niu L. Structural and biochemical characterization of a nucleotide hydrolase from Streptococcus pneumonia. Structure. 2024;32:1197–1207.e1194. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2024.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hilderman R.H., Zimmerman J.K., Dang C.V., Grothusen J.R. Characterization of a homogeneous arginyl- and lysyl-tRNA synthetase complex isolated from rat liver. Kinetic mechanism for lysyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 1983;258:13592–13596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hilderman R.H., Ortwerth B.J. A preferential role for lysyl-tRNA4 in the synthesis of diadenosine 5',5'''-P1,P4-tetraphosphate by an arginyl-tRNA synthetase-lysyl-tRNA synthetase complex from rat liver. Biochemistry. 1987;26:1586–1591. doi: 10.1021/bi00380a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goerlich O., Foeckler R., Holler E. Mechanism of synthesis of adenosine(5')tetraphospho(5')adenosine (AppppA) by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Eur. J. Biochem. 1982;126:135–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06757.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guranowski A. Specific and nonspecific enzymes involved in the catabolism of mononucleoside and dinucleoside polyphosphates. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000;87:117–139. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(00)00046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McLennan A.G. The Nudix hydrolase superfamily. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2006;63:123–143. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5386-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Steinchen W., Bange G. The magic dance of the alarmones (p)ppGpp. Mol. Microbiol. 2016;101:531–544. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Abdelghany H.M., Bailey S., Blackburn G.M., Rafferty J.B., McLennan A.G. Analysis of the catalytic and binding residues of the diadenosine tetraphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase from Caenorhabditis elegans by site-directed mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:4435–4439. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211983200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cartwright J.L., McLennan A.G. Formation of a covalent Nepsilon2-guanylylhistidyl reaction intermediate by the GTP:GTP guanylyltransferase from the brine shrimp Artemia. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1999;361:101–105. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1998.0970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arif S.M., Varshney U., Vijayan M. Hydrolysis of diadenosine polyphosphates. Exploration of an additional role of Mycobacterium smegmatis MutT1. J. Struct. Biol. 2017;199:165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Plateau P., Fromant M., Schmitter J.M., Blanquet S. Catabolism of bis(5'-nucleosidyl) tetraphosphates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172:6892–6899. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.12.6892-6899.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hou W.T., Li W.Z., Chen Y., Jiang Y.L., Zhou C.Z. Structures of yeast Apa2 reveal catalytic insights into a canonical AP(4)A phosphorylase of the histidine triad superfamily. J. Mol. Biol. 2013;425:2687–2698. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guranowski A., Jakubowski H., Holler E. Catabolism of diadenosine 5',5"'-P1,P4-tetraphosphate in procaryotes. Purification and properties of diadenosine 5',5"'-P1,P4-tetraphosphate (symmetrical) pyrophosphohydrolase from Escherichia coli K12. J. Biol. Chem. 1983;258:14784–14789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Iwanicki A., Herman-Antosiewicz A., Pierechod M., Seror S.J., Obuchowski M. PrpE, a PPP protein phosphatase from Bacillus subtilis with unusual substrate specificity. Biochem. J. 2002;366:929–936. doi: 10.1042/BJ20011591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Minazzato G., Gasparrini M., Amici A., Cianci M., Mazzola F., Orsomando G., et al. Functional characterization of COG1713 (YqeK) as a novel diadenosine tetraphosphate Hydrolase family. J. Bacteriol. 2020;202 doi: 10.1128/JB.00053-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yang K., Hu S., Yao Y., Li K., Wang Z., Wang X., et al. Investigation of the structure and functional activity of the YqeK protein in Streptococcus pyogenes with high efficiency in hydrolyzing Ap4A. Microorganisms. 2025;13:230. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vidaud J., Coker J.F., Silva J., Davidson G.S., Anderson C.C., Bassett G.M., et al. Loss of the Ap4A hydrolase YqeK impairs stress adaptation and virulence gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. bioRxiv. 2026 doi: 10.64898/2026.05.18.725918. [preprint] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shimotsu H., Henner D.J. Construction of a single-copy integration vector and its use in analysis of regulation of the trp operon of Bacillus subtilis. Gene. 1986;43:85–94. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90011-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang M., Galizzi A., Henner D. Nucleotide sequence of the amylase gene from Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983;11:237–249. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Guerout-Fleury A.M., Frandsen N., Stragier P. Plasmids for ectopic integration in Bacillus subtilis. Gene. 1996;180:57–61. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00404-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fujita M., Losick R. Evidence that entry into sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is governed by a gradual increase in the level and activity of the master regulator Spo0A. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2236–2244. doi: 10.1101/gad.1335705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Serra C.R., Earl A.M., Barbosa T.M., Kolter R., Henriques A.O. Sporulation during growth in a gut isolate of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2014;196:4184–4196. doi: 10.1128/JB.01993-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lopez D., Vlamakis H., Kolter R. Generation of multiple cell types in Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009;33:152–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Branda S.S., Gonzalez-Pastor J.E., Ben-Yehuda S., Losick R., Kolter R. Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001;98:11621–11626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191384198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hoffmann T., Mrusek D., Bedrunka P., Burchert F., Mais C.N., Kearns D.B., et al. Structural and functional characterization of the bacterial biofilm activator RemA. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5707. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26005-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Roux D., Cywes-Bentley C., Zhang Y.F., Pons S., Konkol M., Kearns D.B., et al. Identification of Poly-N-acetylglucosamine as a major polysaccharide component of the Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:19261–19272. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.648709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Romero D., Aguilar C., Losick R., Kolter R. Amyloid fibers provide structural integrity to Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107:2230–2234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910560107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McLoon A.L., Guttenplan S.B., Kearns D.B., Kolter R., Losick R. Tracing the domestication of a biofilm-forming bacterium. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193:2027–2034. doi: 10.1128/JB.01542-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kearns D.B., Chu F., Rudner R., Losick R. Genes governing swarming in Bacillus subtilis and evidence for a phase variation mechanism controlling surface motility. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;52:357–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.03996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Randazzo P., Anba-Mondoloni J., Aubert-Frambourg A., Guillot A., Pechoux C., Vidic J., et al. Bacillus subtilis Regulators MntR and Zur Participate in Redox Cycling, Antibiotic Sensitivity, and Cell Wall Plasticity. J. Bacteriol. 2020;202 doi: 10.1128/JB.00547-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Despotovic D., Brandis A., Savidor A., Levin Y., Fumagalli L., Tawfik D.S. Diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap4A) - an E. coli alarmone or a damage metabolite? FEBS J. 2017;284:2194–2215. doi: 10.1111/febs.14113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zheng L., Li W., Christ M., Paczia N., Buckel W., Mais C.N., et al. Mechanistic and structural insights into the itaconate-producing trans-aconitate decarboxylase Tad1. PNAS Nexus. 2025;4 doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zheng L., Young M.K.M., Steinchen W., Guo Z., Jalomo-Khayrova E., Liu B.X., et al. A protein adaptor mediating Ap4A-dependent control of protein acetylation. Nat. Commun. 2026;17(1):3089. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70006-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Waldron K.J., Robinson N.J. How do bacterial cells ensure that metalloproteins get the correct metal? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7:25–35. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Macomber L., Hausinger R.P. Mechanisms of nickel toxicity in microorganisms. Metallomics. 2011;3:1153–1162. doi: 10.1039/c1mt00063b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chandrangsu P., Rensing C., Helmann J.D. Metal homeostasis and resistance in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017;15:338–350. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Koo B.M., Kritikos G., Farelli J.D., Todor H., Tong K., Kimsey H., et al. Construction and analysis of two genome-scale deletion libraries for Bacillus subtilis. Cell Syst. 2017;4:291–305.e297. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Higgins D., Dworkin J. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis sporulation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012;36:131–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00310.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Asally M., Kittisopikul M., Rue P., Du Y., Hu Z., Cagatay T., et al. Localized cell death focuses mechanical forces during 3D patterning in a biofilm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012;109:18891–18896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212429109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang X., Yu D., Yu J., Hu H., Hang R., Amador Z., et al. Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain-containing proteins have NAD-RNA decapping activity. Nat. Commun. 2024;15:2261. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46499-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kabsch W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010;66:125–132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.McCoy A.J., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Adams P.D., Winn M.D., Storoni L.C., Read R.J. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007;40:658–674. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liebschner D., Afonine P.V., Baker M.L., Bunkoczi G., Chen V.B., Croll T.I., et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 2019;75:861–877. doi: 10.1107/S2059798319011471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Abramson J., Adler J., Dunger J., Evans R., Green T., Pritzel A., et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 2024;630:493–500. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Terwilliger T.C., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Afonine P.V., Moriarty N.W., Zwart P.H., Hung L.W., et al. Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2008;64:61–69. doi: 10.1107/S090744490705024X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Emsley P., Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W.G., Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010;66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Afonine P.V., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Echols N., Headd J.J., Moriarty N.W., Mustyakimov M., et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2012;68:352–367. doi: 10.1107/S0907444912001308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 31LP (apo GtYqeK), 31LQ (GtYqeK-ADP) and 31LR (GtYqeK-Ap2Cp2A), respectively.
