Skip to main content
Scientific Data logoLink to Scientific Data
. 2026 Sep 30;13:1362. doi: 10.1038/s41597-026-08397-4

Genome assembly and gene annotation of Babesia ovis Israeli strain (Piroplasmida: Babesiidae) using PacBio HiFi sequencing

Guilherme Borges Dias 1,✉, Gisele Albuquerque 2, Hannes Yngve 3, Monica L Mazuz 4, Ana Domingos 5, Sandra Antunes 5,✉
PMCID: PMC13627686  PMID: 42816510

Abstract

Babesia ovis is a unicellular parasite of sheep and goats transmitted by the tick Rhipicephalus bursa. B. ovis infection is widespread and can be lethal, and therefore there is need for a deeper understanding of its biology and pathogenesis. There is currently a single genome available for a clinical isolate of B. ovis, and no laboratory strains have been sequenced so far. In this study we have sequenced and assembled the genome of the Israeli laboratory strain of B. ovis using highly accurate long-read sequencing (PacBio HiFi). The resulting assembly has high contiguity, with the four largest contigs comprising 96% of the assembly and representing putative near-complete chromosomes. Annotation identified 3,549 genes, of which 3,046 (85.6%) could be functionally annotated. BUSCO analysis on the annotated genes revealed 95.5%, 98.8% and 100% completeness of the Aconoidasida, Apicomplexa, and Alveolata lineages, respectively. Comparative analysis with other annotated piroplasmida genomes reveals the vast majority of predicted genes clustered in orthogroups. The availability of a high-quality genome assembly for a tractable laboratory strain could prove impactful in unlocking more basic and applied research avenues to be pursued for this important parasite system.

Background & Summary

Babesia ovis is a tick-borne apicomplexan parasite that infects sheep and goats, primarily in Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, and parts of Central Asian regions1,2. Transmitted by the tick Rhipicephalus bursa, B. ovis is responsible for ovine babesiosis, a disease that can cause severe clinical outcomes such as fever, anemia, hemoglobinuria, and high mortality rates, especially in naïve or young animals2. The disease poses significant economic burdens due to loss of livestock, reduced productivity, and treatment costs. Despite its impact on animal health, B. ovis remains poorly understood at the molecular level. One of the major limitations in advancing B. ovis research is the scarcity of high-quality genomic resources. Genomic data are essential for understanding parasite biology, pathogenesis, antigenic diversity, and drug resistance mechanisms, as well as for the development of effective diagnostics and vaccines3. To date, only one genome sequence of B. ovis—from a field-derived clinical isolate—has been made publicly available4. However, the absence of genome assemblies from laboratory-adapted strains has constrained both functional genomics and comparative analyses. Laboratory strains are particularly valuable for experimental validation, molecular manipulation, and standardized biological assays, all of which require well-characterized, stable reference genomes5. To help close this gap, our study aimed to generate a high-quality, chromosome-level genome assembly of the Israeli laboratory strain of B. ovis. We employed state-of-the-art long-read sequencing technology (PacBio HiFi), which is particularly well-suited for resolving repetitive and AT-rich regions commonly found in apicomplexan genomes. The approach combined in vitro culture of B. ovis, high-purity DNA extraction, and state-of-the-art assembly and annotation pipelines. By producing a comprehensive genome resource from a lab strain, our goal was to provide a standardized and genetically tractable reference for future molecular and evolutionary studies. The resulting dataset will serve as a foundational genomic resource to support diverse areas of research, including population genomics, vaccine and drug target discovery, and host–pathogen interaction studies. It also opens the door to comparative genomic analyses within the Babesia genus and broader Apicomplexa phylum. Importantly, the availability of a well-annotated, experimentally accessible genome will facilitate integration of B. ovis into modern functional genomics workflows and could contribute to improved control strategies for ovine babesiosis.

Methods

Parasite culture and DNA extraction

Babesia ovis in vitro cultures were established in ovine erythrocytes under biosafety level 2 conditions as described elsewhere6–8. Briefly, a cryopreserved Israeli field isolate of B. ovis, originally obtained from a naturally infected sheep in Israel and maintained at the Kimron Veterinary Institute, Israel, was thawed and used to initiate the culture in 10% (vol/vol) defibrinated lamb red blood cells (RBCs). Parasites at passage 39 were used in the present study. The isolate was not cloned during its passage history. The base medium was HEPES-buffered Medium 199 (with Earle’s salts, L-glutamine, and amino acids) supplemented with 20% (vol/vol) ovine serum, antibiotic–antimycotic solution (final concentrations: 0.05 µg/mL amphotericin B, 20 U/mL penicillin, 20 µg/mL streptomycin), 1 mM L-cysteine-HCl, 2 mM bathocuproine-disulfonic acid, and 25 mM TES buffer (N-[tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid). Cultures were maintained at 37 °C under a microaerophilic atmosphere (5% CO2, 2% O2, 93% N2) in a modular incubator chamber. Culture medium was replaced daily, and parasitaemia was monitored by preparing thin blood smears stained with Hemacolor® rapid stain. Intraerythrocytic parasites were readily observed on daily smears under a 100 × oil-immersion objective (≈1000 × total magnification), confirming successful in vitro propagation of B. ovis. For DNA extraction, cultures with parasitaemia levels above 8%, typically reached 8–9 days after culture initiation, were used to maximize parasite DNA yield while limiting host DNA contamination, given the anucleate nature of ovine erythrocytes. The cultures were centrifuged to pellet the cells, and genomic DNA was extracted from the parasites using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each extraction, a culture volume corresponding to approximately 10 µL of packed RBCs was used, estimated to contain ~3 × 10^8 erythrocytes (corresponding to at least ~2.4 × 10^7 parasitized erythrocytes at > 8% parasitaemia). The extracted DNA was eluted in 100 µL of buffer, and DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA purity was assessed by UV spectrophotometry, recording the A260/A280 and A260/A230 absorbance ratios. Two independent B. ovis DNA samples were obtained from separate cultures (labeled DNA B. ovis 1 and DNA B. ovis 2). DNA B. ovis 1 had a concentration of 17.4 ng/µL, with A260/A280 = 1.91 and A260/A230 = 1.8 (in 100 µL volume). DNA B. ovis 2 yielded 14.2 ng/µL, with A260/A280 = 1.95 and A260/A230 = 1.8 (100 µL volume). These yield and purity values indicate that moderate amounts of parasite DNA were obtained, and the purity ratios (~1.9 for A260/A280 and ~1.8 for A260/A230) were within acceptable ranges, reflecting highly pure DNA suitable for genomic analyses.

Library preparation and sequencing

Input QC of the DNA was performed using the Dropsense96 instrument (Trinean/Lunatic), Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen) and FEMTO Pulse system (Agilent) to evaluate concentration, purity and size. Sample shearing was achieved using the Megaruptor 3 DNA Shearing System (Diagenode) at speed 30. An AMPure bead purification was performed after the shearing. The sample libraries were prepared according to the “Preparing whole genome and metagenome libraries using SMRTbell prep kit 3.0” (102-166-600 REV02 MAR2023) (Pacbio) using the SMRTbell prep kit 3.0 (PacBio 102-182-700). The samples were size selected using SMRTbell cleanup beads according to Pacbio’s protocol. Quality control of sheared DNA and SMRTbell libraries was performed on the Fragment Analyzer System (Agilent). Primer annealing and polymerase binding was performed using the Sequel II binding kit 3.2. The library was sequenced on the Sequel IIe instrument, using the Sequel II sequencing plate 2.0 and the Sequel II SMRT Cell 8 M with movie time 30 hours and pre-extension time 2 hours.

Sequencing generated 2,920,915 HiFi reads with a total yield of 28.8 Gbp. With an estimated genome size of less than 10 Mbp, this puts the HiFi theoretical coverage at approximately 2800x. Because genome assembly with extremely high coverage can be detrimental to quality, downsampling was performed. A random sample of reads representing 10% (approximately 280x genome coverage) of the original dataset was produced using seqtk (seed = 2) v1.3-r106 (available at https://github.com/lh3/seqtk).

Genome properties and genome assembly

GeneScopeFK9 was used to estimate genome size, using as input the histogram of 21-mer counts produced from the subsampled HiFi reads with FastK v1.2 (available at https://github.com/thegenemyers/FASTK). This analysis revealed a peak at 288x coverage representing the haploid genome, and an additional peak at 80x possibly representing residual sequencing errors or host DNA contamination (Fig. 1). The k-mer-based estimated genome size was 8.59 Mbp, with 87% unique and 13% repetitive portions. The fraction of repeats roughly matches the results of the RepeatMasker step performed for annotation (see below).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Genome size estimation for Babesia ovis (Israeli strain) from a subsample of the PacBio HiFi data. The main peak indicates coverage of 288x, assuming a haploid genome. A smaller peak can be observed at ~80x potentially indicating residual errors or host contamination.

Hifiasm v0.19.810 was used to assemble the downsampled HiFi reads with default parameters. The resulting draft assembly was scanned for contamination using the blobtoolkit pipeline v4.1.711, and contigs with a taxonomic assignment other than Apicomplexa were removed. In addition, two short contigs matching Apicomplexa but with lower coverage than expected (<100x) and devoid of any BUSCO genes (Alveolata, Apicomplexa, and Aconoidasida OrthoDB v10) were also removed.

Since no mitochondrial contig was detected in the de novo assembly, we used the related B. bovis mtDNA (NC_009902.1) as a reference to map PacBio HiFi reads with minimap2 v2.24-r112212. We then extracted mapped reads with samtools v1.713, and assembled them using MBG v1.0.1614. The resulting assembly is a linear sequence of 6,067 bp.

One contig, ptg000012c (109,501 bp), had a comparatively low GC content (20.6%) and was flagged as being circular by hifiasm. This contig included approximately 3 tandem copies of the apicoplast genome. In order to recover a single complete apicoplast genome we first mapped all reads to contig ptg000012c using minimap2 v2.24-r112212 and then assembled the mapped reads using MBG v1.0.1614. This resulted in a single circular sequence of 34,948 bp (JBOFAQ010000010.1).

The final decontaminated assembly had a length of 9 Mbp and comprised 9 contigs plus the apicoplast and mitochondrial segments. Importantly, the four longest contigs span 8.67 Mbp or 96% of the total assembly, matching the expected number of chromosomes for B. ovis in its haploid genome (n = 4).

Genome annotation

Prior to structural annotation we created a species-specific repeat library using the RepeatModeler2 v2.0.2a package15. From this repeat library, identification and masking of repeat sequences present in the genome was performed using RepeatMasker v4.1.5 (available at https://www.repeatmasker.org/). With this approach, approximately 16% of the genome was masked, roughly matching the predicted repetitive fraction from k-mer frequency analysis (Fig. 1).

Structural annotation was performed on the repeat-masked genome with Braker v3.0.316 incorporating external evidence in the form of all alveolata proteins from OrthoDB v1117 (https://bioinf.uni-greifswald.de/bioinf/partitioned_odb11). Redundant gene models with source “GeneMark.hmm3” were removed.

The predicted genes were functionally annotated using the NBIS functional_annotation nextflow pipeline v2.0.0 (https://github.com/NBISweden/pipelines-nextflow). Briefly, this pipeline performs similarity searches between the annotated proteins and the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database (downloaded on 2022-12; 568,363 proteins) using BLAST. Then it uses InterProScan18 to query the proteins against InterPro v59-91 databases19, and merges results using AGAT v1.2.020.

Functional annotation of the predicted genes with Interproscan detected a large number of genes (3,046 out of 3,549) that could be associated with functional information from one of the InterPro databases.

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) were annotated using tRNAscan-SE v2.0.1221. This analysis identified 46 tRNA genes. Ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) were annotated using barrnap v0.0.9 (available at https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap). This analysis identified 13 rRNA genes including 3 copies of 18S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNAs, and 4 copies of 5S.

Comparative analysis

To gain further insight into the quality of gene annotation and the utility of this genome for comparative studies we have analysed the predicted proteome for Babesia ovis in the context of other available annotated piroplasmida proteomes in GenBank and RefSeq. The selected species were Babesia ovis isolate Selcuk (GCA_023705535.2), Babesia microti strain RI (GCA_000691945.2), Babesia duncani isolate WA1 (GCA_028658345.1), Babesia caballi isolate USDA-D6B2 (GCA_024862765.1), Babesia ovata strain Miyake (GCA_002897235.1), Babesia bigemina strain Bond (GCA_000981445.1), Babesia bovis strain T2bo (GCA_000165395.2), Babesia sp. strain Xinjiang (GCA_002095265.1), Theileria equi strain WA (GCA_000342415.1), Theileria orientalis strain Shintoku (GCA_000740895.1), Theileria annulata strain Ankara isolate clone C9 (GCA_000003225.1), Theileria parva strain Muguga (GCA_000165365.1), and Plasmodium falciparum isolate 3D7 (GCA_000002765.3) as an outgroup. The comparative analysis was performed using OrthoFinder v2.5.522 with default parameters.

The analysis of shared orthologous groups correctly recovers the inferred piroplasmida phylogeny, including the paraphyly of B. microti23 (Fig. 2A). B. ovis (Israeli) forms a clade in the tree with B. ovis (Selcuk), and B. bovis is the next closest species. Nearly all B. ovis predicted genes cluster in orthogroups with other piroplasmida genomes (Fig. 2B) and very few species-specific orthogroups are identified, likely because of the inclusion of the Selcuk isolate (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Orthogroup analysis of Babesia ovis in the context of other piroplasmida genomes. (A) Species tree inferred from orthogroup gene trees with STAG22 and rooted using inferred gene duplications with STRIDE33. Plasmodium falciparum was included as an outgroup to piroplasmida. (B) Percentage of genes clustered in orthogroups for each species. (C) Number of species-specific orthogroups.

Data Records

Data generated in this study, including the raw PacBio HiFi reads and genome assembly, were deposited to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The raw PacBio HiFi reads are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession SRP52189124. The whole-genome assembly is available in GenBank under accession GCA_051529585.125. The predicted gene models are available in Figshare26.

Technical Validation

The final assembly has a contig N50 of 2.41 Mbp. We inspected the assembled contigs for the presence of telomeric sequences using tidk v0.2.3127 and the Apicomplexa telomeric motif “CCTAAA”28. The presence of the motif was visualised with karyoploteR v1.26.029. This analysis highlights the presence of the telomeric motif on both ends of JBOFAQ010000003.1, indicating this might be a complete chromosome. The telomere is also observed on the right end of JBOFAQ010000001.1 and JBOFAQ010000004.1, and on the left end of JBOFAQ010000002.1. In addition, two short contigs, JBOFAQ010000006.1 and JBOFAQ010000007.1 also present the telomeric motif on their left end (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Telomere analysis of Babesia ovis (Israeli strain) genome assembly. The abundance of the apicomplexa telomere motif “CCTAAA”28 was measured in non-overlapping 10 kb windows and plotted as red bars along the assembled contigs.

To investigate potential misassemblies we have aligned the Israeli strain assembly to another assembly generated for an isolate of B. ovis from Turkey (GCA_023705535.2, isolate Selcuk) generated using Nanopore, PacBio, and Illumina data4. This comparison was performed with a Circos consistency plot30 and indicates no large-scale discordances between both assemblies, with the Israeli strain possessing greater contiguity compared to Selcuk (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Circos consistency plot between the assemblies of two strains of Babesia ovis (Israeli and Selcuk). Colored rectangles on the left-hand side of the image represent the contigs from the Israeli strain assembly whereas grey rectangles on the right-hand side represent scaffolds from the Selcuk strain.

Completeness of the assembly and annotation (predicted proteins) was assessed using BUSCO v5.4.631 with default parameters. Three BUSCO lineages from OrthoDB v1032 were used, the Alveolata (n = 171), Apicomplexa (n = 446), and Aconoidasida (n = 1,135). Completeness is high and duplication low for both the assembly and annotation (Table 1). Interestingly, the completeness is higher in the annotation than in the assembly itself, especially for the aconoidasida gene set (Table 1). This is also observed for many other piroplasmida genomes (BUSCO stats available at https://piroplasmadb.org/), and could reflect sensitivity limitations of BUSCO on genome mode compared with evidence-based gene annotation.

Table 1.

Benchmarking Universal Single-copy Orthologs (BUSCO) analysis of Babesia ovis (Israeli) genome and annotation.

BUSCO statistic Lineage
alveolata (n = 171) apicomplexa (n = 446) aconoidasida (n = 1,135)
Complete 99.4 / 100 96.4 / 98.8 83.6 / 95.5
Single-copy 99.4 / 99.4 96 / 97.5 83.2 / 93.4
Duplicated 0 / 0.6 0.4 / 1.3 0.4 / 2.1
Fragmented 0.6 / 0 0.7 / 0.4 5.2 / 1.2
Missing 0 / 0 2.9 / 0.8 11.2 / 3.3

BUSCO statistics (%) are presented for each lineage gene set with the first value before the slash referring to the genome and the second value referring to the annotation.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge FCT for funds to and R&D unit Global Health and Tropical Medicine (UID/04413/2025) (https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/04413/2025) and the Associated Laboratory in Translation and Innovation Towards Global Health REAL (LA/P/0117/2020) and support of the National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI) / Uppsala Genome Center and UPPMAX for providing assistance in massive parallel sequencing and computational infrastructure. Work performed at NGI / Uppsala Genome Center has been funded by RFI / VR and Science for Life Laboratory, Sweden.

Author contributions

S.A. conceived and designed the project, prepared material for sequencing, and drafted the manuscript. A.D. contributed to project design and manuscript drafting. G.A. contributed to parasite culture. M.M. contributed to parasite culture and prepared material for sequencing. H.Y. prepared the sequencing libraries. G.B.D. performed data analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the project 2022.03176.PTDC, BabRed- A toolbox to decipher the cross-talk between Babesia ovis and the host cell. https://doi.org/10.54499/2022.03176.PTDC.

Code availability

All software used in this project was executed with default options for their respective version unless otherwise noted in the methods. Command line arguments used are available in GitHub (https://github.com/gbdias/b_ovis_supplementary_code).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Guilherme Borges Dias, Email: guilherme.borges.dias@icm.uu.se.

Sandra Antunes, Email: santunes@ihmt.unl.pt.

References

  • 1.Yeruham, I., Hadani, A. & Galker, F. Some epizootiological and clinical aspects of ovine babesiosis caused by Babesia ovis—a review. Veterinary Parasitology74, 153–163 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Esmaeilnejad, B. et al. A review of Babesiosis caused by Babesia ovis in small ruminants. Tropical Animal Health and Production57, 1–20 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li, D. F. et al. Pushing the frontiers of babesiosis research: in vitro culture and gene editing. Trends in Parasitology41, 317–329 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yamagishi, J., Ceylan, O., Xuan, X. & Sevinc, F. Whole genome sequence and diversity in multigene families of. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.13, 1194608 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Müller, J. & Hemphill, A. In vitro culture systems for the study of apicomplexan parasites in farm animals. International Journal for Parasitology43, 115–124 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Levy, M. G. & Ristic, M. Babesia bovis: continuous cultivation in a microaerophilous stationary phase culture. Science207, 1218–1220 (1980). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Erster, O. et al. Quantitative analysis of Babesia ovis infection in sheep and ticks. Vet. Parasitol.221, 39–45 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rosa, C. et al. Transient transfection of Babesia ovis using heterologous promoters. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases10, 101279 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ranallo-Benavidez, T. R., Jaron, K. S. & Schatz, M. C. GenomeScope 2.0 and Smudgeplot for reference-free profiling of polyploid genomes. Nat. Commun.11, 1432 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods18, 170–175 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Challis, R., Richards, E., Rajan, J., Cochrane, G. & Blaxter, M. BlobToolKit - Interactive Quality Assessment of Genome Assemblies. G310, 1361–1374 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics34, 3094–3100 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience10 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Rautiainen, M. & Marschall, T. MBG: Minimizer-based sparse de Bruijn Graph construction. Bioinformatics37, 2476–2478 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.117, 9451–9457 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brůna, T., Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Stanke, M. & Borodovsky, M. BRAKER2: automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP + and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genom Bioinform3, lqaa108 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kuznetsov, D. et al. OrthoDB v11: annotation of orthologs in the widest sampling of organismal diversity. Nucleic Acids Res.51, D445–D451 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics30, 1236–1240 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Paysan-Lafosse, T. et al. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res.51, D418–D427 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.NBISweden/AGAT: AGAT-v1.4.0, 10.5281/zenodo.11106497. [DOI]
  • 21.Chan, P. P., Lin, B. Y., Mak, A. J. & Lowe, T. M. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res.49, 9077–9096 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol.20, 238 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cornillot, E. et al. Sequencing of the smallest Apicomplexan genome from the human pathogen Babesia microti. Nucleic Acids Res.40, 9102–9114 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.IHMT-UNL. NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttp://identifiers.org/insdc.sra:SRP521891 (2025).
  • 25.IHMT-UNL. GenBank. http://identifiers.org/insdc.gca:GCA_051529585.1 (2025).
  • 26.Dias, G. B. et al. Gene annotation of Babesia ovis (Israeli strain). figshare 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.29828864.V1 (2025). [DOI]
  • 27.A Telomere Identification Toolkit, 10.5281/zenodo.10091385. [DOI]
  • 28.Baptista, R. et al New T2T assembly of IOWA annotated with reference genome gene identifiers. bioRxiv 10.1101/2023.06.13.544219 (2023). [DOI]
  • 29.Gel, B. & Serra, E. karyoploteR: an R/Bioconductor package to plot customizable genomes displaying arbitrary data. Bioinformatics33, 3088–3090 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jupiter Plot: A Circos-based tool to visualize genome assembly consistency, 10.5281/zenodo.1241235. [DOI]
  • 31.Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO Update: Novel and Streamlined Workflows along with Broader and Deeper Phylogenetic Coverage for Scoring of Eukaryotic, Prokaryotic, and Viral Genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol.38, 4647–4654 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kriventseva, E. V. et al. OrthoDB v10: sampling the diversity of animal, plant, fungal, protist, bacterial and viral genomes for evolutionary and functional annotations of orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res.47, D807–D811 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. STRIDE: Species Tree Root Inference from Gene Duplication Events. Mol. Biol. Evol.34, 3267–3278 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. IHMT-UNL. NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttp://identifiers.org/insdc.sra:SRP521891 (2025).
  2. Dias, G. B. et al. Gene annotation of Babesia ovis (Israeli strain). figshare 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.29828864.V1 (2025). [DOI]

Data Availability Statement

All software used in this project was executed with default options for their respective version unless otherwise noted in the methods. Command line arguments used are available in GitHub (https://github.com/gbdias/b_ovis_supplementary_code).


Articles from Scientific Data are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES