Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Sep 30;17:10367. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-77974-3

Sphingolipids associate with the chlamydial nucleoid and mark developmental transitions in Chlamydia trachomatis

Marcel Rühling 1,6,✉,#, Fabienne Wagner 1,#, Till Epprecht 2, Paul F Köhling 1, Fabian Schumacher 3, Stefan Sachs 4, Louise Kersting 5, Julian Fink 5, Lina Girndt 5, Burkhard Kleuser 3, Markus Sauer 4, Jürgen Seibel 5, Gregor L Weiss 2, Thomas Rudel 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13627705  PMID: 42816552

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen and a leading cause of sexually transmitted infections worldwide. During its biphasic developmental cycle, infectious, non-replicative elementary bodies alternate with replicative reticulate bodies within a membrane-bound intracellular niche known as the inclusion. C. trachomatis relies heavily on host-derived metabolites, including sphingolipids, which are essential for inclusion integrity, bacterial growth and production of infectious progeny. Here, using expansion microscopy, we uncover an unexpected localization of sphingolipid derivatives within the highly condensed DNA nucleoids of elementary bodies. These sphingolipids are released from nucleoids prior to DNA decondensation during the elementary-to-reticulate body transition, the earliest phenotypic event in the complex developmental cycle of these bacteria. Thereafter, nucleoids undergo a characteristic DNA decondensation process that we visualized by expansion microscopy. By combining super-resolution imaging with a FRET-based metabolic tracking approach and lipidomics, we identified sphingomyelin derived from the sphingolipid analogues as the sphingolipid species predominantly associated with the condensing nucleoids of elementary bodies. Notably, reticulate bodies arrested in their developmental stage fail to accumulate sphingomyelin, suggesting a potential role for this lipid in stage-specific DNA condensation.

Subject terms: Pathogens, Cellular microbiology, Bacterial development, Cellular microbiology


During the developmental cycle of the pathogenic bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis, non-replicative bacterial cells (elementary bodies, EBs) alternate with replicative forms within membrane-bound inclusions within infected host cells. Here, the authors identify sphingolipid derivatives within the highly condensed DNA nucleoids of EBs, suggesting a potential role for this lipid in stage-specific DNA condensation.

Introduction

Sphingolipids are essential components of eukaryotic membranes and also function as bioactive signalling molecules1. They regulate diverse cellular processes for instance by acting as ligands for receptors, such as sphingosine-1-phosphate2, or as components of lipid microdomains (also called lipid rafts) that influence protein distribution at the host cell surface3–7. Dysregulation of cellular sphingolipid levels are associated with diseases8,9 underscoring the importance of maintaining physiological sphingolipid levels through a tightly regulated metabolic network1. Central to sphingomyelin (SM) catabolism are sphingomyelinases (SMases), which hydrolyse SM by removing its polar phosphocholine head group to generate ceramide10. In humans, SMases are classified according to their pH optimum as neutral11, acidic12,13 or alkaline14. These enzymes play essential roles in regulating membrane composition and signal transduction15,16 and have also been implicated in promoting bacterial and viral infections17–21. SMases constitute important virulence factors in several bacterial pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus22 and Chlamydia pneumoniae23.

The obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis is a major cause of sexually transmitted diseases24. C. trachomatis exhibits a biphasic developmental cycle comprising infectious elementary bodies (EBs) and metabolically active, replicative reticulate bodies (RBs)25,26. Upon adherence to host cells, EBs interact with host receptors and inject effector proteins into the host cell cytosol via the type three secretion system (T3SS), thereby triggering actin polymerization and bacterial internalization into a membrane-bound vacuole27–30. Once inside the host cell, EBs differentiate into RBs and establish a large replicative compartment, the so called inclusion. At later stages of the intracellular life cycle, RBs redifferentiate into EBs, which are ultimately released from host cells to disseminate the infection. During RB-EB redifferentiation, histone-like proteins mediate DNA condensation and formation of a chlamydial nucleoid, a process that is essential for transcriptionally down regulating gene expression in the metabolically less active EB state. Conversely, nucleoid disassembly during EB-to-RB differentiation initiates gene expression26,31–33. While recent efforts provide mechanistic insights into RB-to-EB transformation34, the process of how EBs develop into RBs is mostly unknown25. Currently, it is thought that EB-to-RB and RB-to-EB differentiation occurs via poorly defined intermediate developmental stages, the so-called intermediate bodies25,34–36.

The chlamydial genome only encodes ~900 genes37 and thus lacks important metabolic pathways. Therefore, C. trachomatis is highly dependent on host cell metabolites including amino acids35, nucleotides38 and lipids39. Sphingolipids have been shown to be particularly important in C. trachomatis infection40–43. For instance, they are acquired by the bacteria via the ceramide transfer protein (CERT) that is recruited to the chlamydial inclusion. Subsequently, sphingolipids are incorporated into bacterial and inclusion membranes39,42–46. SM, the most abundant sphingolipid in human cells, was demonstrated to stabilize chlamydial inclusions and facilitates replication40,41. SM can be acquired by redirecting exocytic vesicles originating from the Golgi apparatus, the site of SM de novo synthesis, to the inclusion membrane47. Moreover, SM formation was observed in absence of the host SM biosynthesis machinery during C. trachomatis infection, suggesting the existence of a chlamydial SM synthase and highlighting the importance of this particular sphingolipid species for the bacteria48,49. By contrast, other sphingolipids, such as sphingosine, possess bactericidal properties and play a role for the host immune response to C. trachomatis and other pathogens46,50,51.

The diffraction limit of light restricts the spatial resolution of conventional light microscopy to ~250 nm52. Introduced in 2015, expansion microscopy (ExM) is a super-resolution imaging technique that can circumvent this fundamental limitation53. During ExM, a fixed specimen is embedded into a swellable hydrogel that, upon contact to water, expands and thereby the spatial distance between individual fluorophore is mechanically enlarged resulting in an enhanced resolution achievable on conventional microscopes. The so-called expansion factor is defined by the gel composition and determines how much a gel can expand in each spatial direction (e.g. 4-fold or 8-fold, referred to as 4x ExM or 8x ExM, respectively)54,55. Proteins can be efficiently anchored into the gel matrix and can be visualized by antibodies56 or fluorescently tagged N-hydroxysuccinimide esters (NHS esters), in so-called pan-ExM57. By contrast, most naturally occurring lipids are not embedded into the hydrogel and the limited option to stain lipids poses additional challenges. However, we44,45 and others58 developed protocols that enable ExM of functionalized lipid derivatives.

Here, we used a variety of imaging modalities to investigate SM distribution during the chlamydial life cycle. Unexpectedly, we observed highly dynamic incorporation and removal of an SM derivative within bacterial nucleoids during the developmental cycle, suggesting a previously unrecognized role for SM in DNA organization.

Results

Sphingolipids are essential for replication and the formation of infectious progeny during C. trachomatis infection40,41; however, their specific function within Chlamydia remains unknown. We previously introduced two trifunctional SM derivatives (TFSM1 and TFSM2) that can be visualized at nanoscale resolution via 4x ExM (Supp. Fig. 1, Supp. Note 1)45,46. We here optimized these tools to further investigate the distribution and metabolization of TFSMs throughout the entire chlamydial developmental cycle.

EBs possess a cell pole enriched with TFSM

Visualizing TFSMs by 4x ExM allowed detection of individual bacteria within an inclusion, while visualization of structures within EBs is challenging due to their small size of 200-300 nm. To investigate the lipid distribution within EBs, we combined TFSM2 labeling with 8x ExM55,59 thereby further enhancing the spatial resolution achievable on conventional microscopes. This approach revealed a characteristic lipid accumulation at a single site within EBs (Fig. 1a, b). We excluded the possibility that this pattern is caused by staining or expansion artifacts by analyzing expansion factors and signal-to-background ratios (Supp. Fig. 2, Supp. Note 2).

Fig. 1. TFSM accumulates at a specific site within EBs.

Fig. 1

HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis in presence (a, b) or absence (c, d) of TFSM2 for 32 h and stained for TFSM2 (a, b; donor+FRET) or proteins by an NHS ester (c, d, pan-ExM). Samples were visualized by 8x ExM. c and d show a 3D reconstruction. Zoomed areas are indicated by a white rectangle in a and c. TFSM2 (b) or protein (d) accumulation sites are marked by arrows. n = 5 (a, b) or n = 3 (c, d). Scale bar: 8 µm (~1 µm with 8-fold expansion factor).

In certain cases, ExM can cause deformation of bacterial particles, when protocols are not carefully adjusted60.Additionally, the treatment of infected cells with TFSMs could cause the accumulation. To excluded these potential sources for artifacts, we combined 8x ExM with pan-ExM, an approach based on NHS ester staining of endogenous proteins57. This strategy enables the visualization of the sample ultrastructure independently of TFSM labeling (Fig. 1c). By pan-ExM, we did not only demonstrate the structural integrity of individual chlamydial particles but also detected a similarly localized accumulation to that observed in TFSM2-labeled samples (Fig.1d), suggesting that one pole of the EB is enriched in both sphingolipids and proteins. This polar enrichment was confirmed by 3D reconstructions of individual EBs (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2. EBs possess a TFSM-enriched cell pole opposed to the T3SS.

Fig. 2

a, TFSM is enriched at one EB hemisphere. 3D reconstruction of a single elementary body (EB) stained for TFSM (donor) and whole protein (pan-ExM) recorded by 8x ExM. Scale bar: 1 µm (~125 nm with 8x expansion factor). n = 1. b-e, lipid-enriched membrane sites are located distal from the plasma membrane during EB adherence. HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis in the presence of TFSM2 for 1 h to allow EBs to adhere to host cells. Cells were washed and imaged by 8x ExM (b, c). Tangent on the EB-plasma membrane contact site was delineated and the angle between the tangent and the accumulation was determined (c, d). Individual angle measurements are visualized as dots in e. n = 3. Scale bar: 5 µm (b, 625 nm with 8x expansion factor) and 1 µm (c, 125 nm with 8x expansion factor). f-i, Type 3 secretion system (T3SS) and membrane stacks are located at opposing sites of EBs. Cryo-electron tomogram of an whole EB (f) and 3D segmentation used for analysis (g). Angles between T3SS and the membrane stack were determined in the 3D segmentation (h). Individual angle measurements between T3SSs and membrane stack are visualized as dots in i. (26 EBs from n = 2 biological replicates). Scale bar: 200 nm (whole EB) and 50 nm (magnified images). j, membrane stacks are enriched in sphingolipids. The orientations between the T3SS and membranes stacks (cryo-ET, grey; f-i) and between the EB-plasma membrane contact site and the lipid accumulation (8x ExM, green; b-e) is compared. n = 2 (T3SS vs. membrane stack) or n = 3 (host attachment vs accumulation). Panels d, e, h and i were created in BioRender. Rühling, M. (2026)https://BioRender.com/j3eps1q.

The asymmetric accumulation of lipids to one pole prompted us to analyze the orientation of EBs during attachment to the host plasma membrane by 8x ExM (Fig. 2b–e and Supplementary Movie 1). The lipid accumulation was typically observed at the EB pole opposing the host cell during attachment. To quantify its spatial orientation, we defined the tangent at the point of EB-plasma membrane attachment and determined the angle between this tangent and the lipid accumulation (Fig. 2c, d). The analysis demonstrated a strong bias towards localization distal to the plasma membrane, with the TFSM-enriched hemisphere of the EB exhibiting an average orientation angle of ~60° (Fig. 2e).

To further elucidate the EB architecture, we visualized whole and cryo-focused ion beam (FIB) thinned EB preparations by cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET, Fig.2f, g). This analysis revealed that the T3SS is predominantly localized to one bacterial cell pole (n = 105 EBs), while characteristic membrane stacks were positioned at the opposing pole in 71 % of the analyzed cells (Fig. 2f, g, and Supplementary Movie 2) consistent with previous observations27. The absence of the membrane stack in the remaining tomograms likely reflects technical limitations of cryo-EM, such as cell thinning during sample preparation or missing-wedge artifacts, rather than true biological heterogeneity. Importantly, EB preparations with and without TFSM treatment exhibited indistinguishable ultrastructural features, indicating that TFSM labeling does not measurably alter EB architecture under the conditions used in this study.

We quantified the orientation of the membrane stack in relation to the T3SS by determining the angle between the two structures (see, Fig. 2h), which yielded an average of ~135° (Fig. 2i). We assume that the T3SS is located in close proximity to the plasma membrane during adherence to host cells27. By comparing the orientation between the T3SS and the membrane stack (cryo-ET), and the orientation between EB-host attachment sites and the TFSM-enriched cell pole (8x ExM), we concluded that the TFSM-enriched EB pole also contains additional membrane stacks (Fig. 2j).

Taken together, our data suggest that EBs possess a polarized architecture in which one cell pole is enriched in sphingolipid derivatives and associated membrane structures, while the opposing cell pole contains the T3SS that contacts host cells during attachment. The spatial segregation of these features implies that the sphingolipid-enriched pole is unlikely to play a direct role in host cell adhesion and bacterial uptake. Instead, it may serve a distinct function during the chlamydial developmental cycle, which we sought to investigate in the present study.

Sphingolipid derivatives are incorporated into chlamydial nucleoids

The membrane stacks are usually aligned with the inner EB membrane, which explains a general increase in lipids detected at this cell pole (Fig. 2f, g). However, in our 8x ExM samples, we frequently observe a spheroidal TFSM-enriched structure that protruded into the cytosol of the EB (Fig. 1a; Fig. 3d, e). This morphology could not be readily explained by membrane stacks alone. Comparison of 8x ExM and cryo-ET images revealed a striking correspondence between these structures. The region occupied by the TFSM-positive protrusion in 8x ExM images coincided with a rather homogenous electron-dense and ribosome-depleted area in cryo-electron tomograms of cryo-FIB thinned EBs. Previous studies have identified this region as the chlamydial nucleoid27, which contains highly condensed bacterial DNA (Fig. 3a, b, and Supplementary Movie 2). These observations therefore suggest that sphingolipid derivatives are associated not only with the membrane-rich pole of the EB but also with the nucleoid region.

Fig. 3. TFSM is incorporated into chlamydial nucleoids.

Fig. 3

a-c, Cryo-ET reveals a close association of the chlamydial nucleoid with membrane stacks. An elementary body (EB) preparation was plunge-frozen, thinned by cryo-FIB milling, imaged by cryo-ET and a representative tomogram (a) was 3D-segmented (b). Scale bar: 200 nm. Association of nucleoids with additional membrane stacks in tomograms was categorized as “fully aligned”, “in contact” and “not-associated” (c). T3SS: type 3 secretion system. n = 2. d-f, TFSM2 colocalizes with EB DNA. HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis in the presence of TFSM2 and visualized by 8x ExM. TFSM2 was stained by BODIPY-FL-DBCO. DNA and proteins were stained by Hoechst and a fluorescent NHS ester (pan-ExM), respectively (d, e). A plot profile of a selected area (white line in d) was measured, and particles/nucleoids were marked by arrows and brackets (f). Scale bar: 4 µm (d) and 0.8 µm (e), (0.5 µm and 0.1 µm with 8-fold expansion factor, respectively). n = 3. g, h, TFSM2 colocalizes with EB DNA. HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis in the presence or absence of TFSM2 for 32 h and imaged by 8x ExM. Regions containing EBs or RBs were selected and analyzed independently for Pearson’s (g) or Manders’ overlap coefficient. n = 3 (h). Statistics: Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (g) or two-way ANOVA and uncorrected Fisher’s LSD (h). Data are presented as mean values +/- standard deviation.

In 69% of the analyzed EBs in the tomograms, in which we detected both the nucleoid and the membrane stack (n = 26), the nucleoid was fully aligned with the membrane stack, whereas in an additional 23% of the cells, the nucleoid was slightly offset but still remained in contact with the membranes (Fig. 3b, c). In two cells (8%) no apparent association between nucleoid and membrane stack was detected. Thus, we hypothesized that the TFSM accumulation co-localizes with the chlamydial nucleoid.

To determine the spatial relationship between EB nucleoids and the TFSM accumulation, we performed 8x ExM and stained TFSM2 with BODIPY-FL-DBCO, proteins by pan-ExM and DNA with Hoechst. To assess the degree of spatial overlap, we generated plot profiles of different chlamydial particles. This analysis revealed a striking colocalization of TFSM2 and DNA (Fig. 3d, e). Interestingly, this colocalization was specific to EB nucleoids and was not observed in RBs, in which DNA appeared non-condensed and distributed throughout the bacterial cell (Fig. 3d, f).

Because click-labeling dyes can produce substantial background fluorescence, we assessed whether the observed nucleoid signal could result from staining artifacts. To this end, we measured the mean BODIPY-FL fluorescence in individual nucleoids in samples infected in presence or absence of TFSM2 (Supp. Fig. 3a, b, Supp. Note 3). Nucleoids in TFSM2-treated samples displayed significantly higher fluorescence, excluding staining artifacts originating from the click dye. Colocalization of DNA with α-NH2-ω-N3-C6-ceramide, a molecule developed for membrane visualization by ExM44, further confirmed the close association of lipids with the chlamydial nucleoids (Supp. Fig. 3b, Supp. Note 3).

To quantify the TFSM-DNA colocalization, we determined Pearson’s (Fig. 3g) and Manders’ (Fig. 3h) coefficients between Hoechst and BODIPY-FL channels in regions containing either EBs or RBs. Both measurements showed a strong correlation between the lipid and EB nucleoids but were markedly lower for non-condensed RB DNA. Strikingly, ~90% of nucleoid areas also contained TFSM, an effect observed only in the presence of TFSM, again excluding staining artifacts of the click dye. These results provide quantitative support for the co-localization of the TFSM accumulation with condensed chlamydial DNA. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that TFSM-derived lipids accumulate within, or in immediate proximity to, the chlamydial nucleoid.

As TFSMs are designed sphingolipid derivatives, we next visualize endogenous membranes in relation to the chlamydial nucleoid. Therefore, we tested whether the recently developed ExM-compatible membrane probe pGk13a61 associates with the nucleoid. pGk13a enabled visualization of cellular membranes and individual bacterial particles via 8x ExM (Supp. Fig. 4a, b). Similar to TFSM, we detected a pGk13a accumulation on one EB pole that closely associates with the nucleoid (Supp. Fig. 4c–e) and supposably corresponds to the membrane stack detected by cryo-ET. Although, pGk13a and Hoechst signal completely overlapped in several particles (Supp. Fig. 4c, d), we frequently observed that the signals only partially colocalize. Additionally, we did not detect the cytosolic spheroidal lipid protrusion, which was characteristic for samples visualized by TFSM.

These data support our hypothesis that membrane stacks build an interphase between the inner membrane and the nucleoid. At the same time, the more extensive distribution of TFSM-derived signals suggest that sphingolipid derivatives may occupy regions beyond those visualized by pGk13a.

Lipid derivatives are released from nucleoids early during EB-to-RB differentiation

Next, we elucidated the association of TFSM within the bacterial nucleoids in the early developmental cycle of C. trachomatis. Upon host cell entry, EBs differentiate into RBs, a process that is poorly understood25. Because DNA in RBs is decondensed, nucleoids must be dissembled during EB-to-RB differentiation. To investigate the dynamics of this transition, we infected HeLa 229 cells preloaded with TFSM2 and visualized lipid and DNA during the first 6 h of infection by 8x ExM (Fig. 4a). Within the first hour p.i., most bacterial particles were either attached to the host plasma membrane or located at the cell periphery, indicating that invasion had occurred recently (see also Fig. 2b, c). By 3 h p.i., bacteria clustered in small groups, and by 5 h p.i. most bacteria were located at one single intracellular site adjacent to the host nucleus. These observations are consistent with previous reports showing the localization of chlamydial inclusions at the peri-Golgi and microtubule organization center (MTOC)47,62,63.

Fig. 4. Lipid-DNA association is resolved during EB-RB differentiation.

Fig. 4

a, Chlamydial particles gather at a certain site in host cells. HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis in the presence of TFSM2 and fixed at the indicated time points. The samples were stained with BODIPY-FL-DBCO and 8-fold expanded. DNA was visualized with Hoechst. Particles are marked with white arrows (1 h p.i.) or circles (3 and 5 h p.i.). n = 3. Scale bar: 40 µm (~5 µm with 8-fold expansion factor). b c Visualization of EB-to-RB differentiation during the first 6 h of infection. Samples were prepared as described in a and fixed at the indicated time points. Images were reconstructed in 3D (c). Scale bar: 2 µm (~250 nm with 8-fold expansion factor). n = 3. d-f Lipid content of nucleoids decreases during DNA decondensation. Regions containing nucleoids in intracellular or extracellular bacteria were selected in Hoechst channels. Mean intensities of BODIPY-FL (d, e) and Hoechst (e) in selected nucleoids as well as the size (f) of the selected nucleoids were measured. P-values refer to comparison between the indicated time point and 1 h (e) or 5 min (f). n = 3, where n is the averaged mean fluorescence intensity or nucleoid size of all detected nucleoids within a biological replicate. Statistics: Two-way ANOVA and Šídák’s (d) or Tukey’s multiple comparison (e), one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison (f). Data are presented as mean values +/- standard deviation.

We next analyzed individual bacteria over time (Fig. 4b). At 1 h p.i., extracellular EBs attached to the plasma membrane retained TFSM2 within nucleoids, which remained associated with the inner bacterial membrane. In contrast, intracellular bacteria frequently exhibited morphological changes, with condensed nucleoids devoid of TFSM and relocated to the center of the bacterial particle. These observations indicate that dissociation of the lipid-DNA association and detachment of the nucleoid from the bacterial envelope are among the earliest detectable steps in EB-to-RB differentiation.

By 3 h to 4 h p.i., the bacterial DNA still appeared at a single location, but subsequently adopted a characteristic decondensation pattern, frequently appearing as multiple distinct foci (Fig. 4c). By 6 h p.i., DNA was often completely decondensed and distributed throughout the bacterial cytosol (Fig. 4b), resembling the nucleoid organization of RBs at mid-to-late stages of infection (Fig. 3d). During the first 6 h of infection, particle diameters increased from ~200 nm to 750 nm, while after 32 h p.i. RBs in average measured 1 µm in size (Supp. Fig. 3c).

To quantify the lipid content of bacterial DNA, we selected individual DNA foci in the Hoechst channel, determined average fluorescence intensities in the lipid (BODIPY-FL) channel and subtracted the background signal detected in samples not incubated with TFSM2 (Fig. 4d, e). Extracellular EBs showed only marginal TFSM2 incorporation after 5 min p.i., while a high TFSM2 signal was detected by 1 h p.i. (Fig. 4d). These results indicate that TFSM2 is taken up by plasma membrane-attached EBs from the host or the environment and subsequently incorporated into the nucleoid.

The TFSM content in nucleoids of extracellular bacteria remained constant during the first 6 h of infection, whereas TFSM-DNA association decreased in intracellular bacteria over time (Fig. 4d, e).

To detect DNA decondensation, we measured the Hoechst mean intensity (Fig. 4e) or the size of DNA foci (Fig. 4f) in intracellular bacteria. During the first 5 h of infection, Hoechst intensity decreased while the area of individual DNA foci increased, demonstrating progressive unwrapping of DNA. Significant changes in both measures were detected first at 4 h p.i. By 6 h p.i., the size of DNA foci had decreased while the total area containing DNA had increased, as DNA became nearly fully decondensed in most particles. These data indicate that nucleoid decondensation during EB-to-RB differentiation is a continuous process that proceeds within the first 6 h of infection through several morphologically distinct stages. These stages can be distinguished by the degree of DNA-TFSM association and the number and distribution of DNA foci.

Metabolized TFSM enriches in Chlamydia inclusions during RB-to-EB redifferentiation

Direct interaction between DNA and zwitterionic lipids, such as SM, has been reported in vitro64–71. However, we previously proposed that the polar phosphocholine head group of TFSMs is primarily cleaved off within C. trachomatis inclusions45,46. This processing should generate the less polar ceramide metabolite, which is less likely to form strong interactions with DNA or proteins and hence, it would be unexpected that ceramide would associated with the nucleoid during maturation of the chlamydial inclusion and formation of infectious progeny. To better understand the nature and fate of sphingolipids during inclusion maturation, we investigated SM metabolism during C. trachomatis infection.

First, we analysed SM transport to the chlamydial inclusion in general. Therefore, we treated infected HeLa cells with BODIPY-FL-C12-SM, a lipid analogue that possesses a longer acyl chain than TFSMs. Hence, it should more adequately mimic the physiological transport of naturally occurring lipids. However, it is still less hydrophobic than naturally occurring SM species such as C16-SM and thus may behave differently. Direct conjugation of the BODIPY-FL fluorophore to this lipid analogue enables its visualization without further staining procedures, thereby minimizing the risk for dye artefacts.

We observed uptake of this derivative into chlamydial inclusions in both, WT and CERT K.O. cells (Supp. Fig. 5a). This suggests that this SM derivative can reach the inclusion independently of CERT, indicating the presence of vesicular SM transport routes to the C. trachomatis inclusion as previously described72. However, imaging of BODIPY-FL-C12-SM only demonstrates uptake and localization of the lipid and does not provide information about its metabolization.

In contrast, TFSMs can be used not only to visualize SM distribution but also allow monitoring SM turnover with spatial resolution (Supp. Fig. 1)45. Using click chemistry, TFSMs can be equipped with two fluorophores, one at the headgroup and one at the tail of the lipid analogues. Importantly, the sites where fluorophores are attached to the lipid tail of the molecules differ between TFSM1 (sphingoid backbone) and TFSM2 (acyl side chain). If the chosen fluorophores form a FRET pair, FRET efficiency measurements can be used to detect degradation of TFSMs through SMases by conventional microscopy or 4x ExM45. The FRET efficiency correlates with the concentration of non-metabolized “native” TFSM in the selected area, while a relatively low FRET efficiency indicates predominant presence of a TFSM metabolite. Therefore, TFSMs provide a unique tool to simultaneously monitor sphingolipid localization and metabolism, enabling investigation of the role of sphingolipids during inclusion maturation.

To elucidate the dynamics of TFSM metabolization during infection, we measured the FRET efficiency in inclusions and host cell areas by FRET acceptor bleaching over an infection course of 46 h (Fig. 5a) to determine the native TFSM content of inclusions. We observed similar FRET efficiencies in inclusions and host cell membranes at 16 h p.i., while the FRET efficiency in inclusions decreased at later time points of infection starting at 24 h p.i. (Fig. 5b). TFSM degradation within inclusions was further assessed by normalizing inclusion FRET efficiency to that of the host cell (ratio “inclusion vs. host cell”). Consistently, the FRET efficiency ratio decreased during infection, indicating an enrichment of metabolized TFSM in inclusions compared to the host cell in the mid-late infection cycle. This trend was observed in both unexpanded samples and samples subjected to 4x ExM (Fig. 5c; Supp. Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5. Accumulation of metabolized TFSM in inclusions is associated with RB-EB redifferentiation.

Fig. 5

a-c, Metabolized TFSM accumulates in inclusions during maturation. HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis for different time points, stained for TFSM2 and analyzed by conventional confocal microscopy (a, b) or 4x ExM (c). FRET acceptor bleaching of host cell membranes (blue rectangles) or chlamydial inclusions (white circles) was performed to determine FRET efficiency. Ratios of FRET efficiencies detected in inclusions vs. host cells were calculated (b, green and c). Scale bars: 10 µm. n = 3. d, e, Blockage of RB-EB redifferentiation attenuates accumulation of metabolized TFSM in inclusions. HeLa cells were infected with C. trachomatis serovar L2 CtrR3 and expression of the sRNA CtrR3 was induced by addition of anhydrous tetracycline (AHT) or left uninduced. Samples were stained for TFSM2 and analyzed by 4x ExM (d). FRET acceptor bleaching was performed in regions containing host cell membranes or chlamydial inclusions and ratios “inclusion vs. host cell” were calculated (e) and compared to results of wildtype C. trachomatis serovar L2. Scale bars: 20 µm (with 4x expansion factor ~5 µm). Adj. p values in e relate to comparison of -AHT and +AHT. n = 3. Statistics: Two-way ANOVA and Šidák’s multiple comparison (b, e) or mixed-effects model (REML) and Tukey’s multiple comparison (c). Data are presented as mean values +/- standard deviation.

Commonly, EB formation initiates at ~24 h p.i.25, the earliest time point at which we detected accumulation of metabolized TFSM in inclusions. This temporal overlap led us to hypothesize that TFSM is metabolized during RB-to-EB redifferentiation. To identify whether TFSM metabolization is connected to inclusion maturation, we used a C. trachomatis strain that conditionally overexpresses the chlamydial sRNA CtrR3, which prevents EB formation73. Anhydrous tetracycline (AHT)-induced overexpression of CtrR3 during infection of HeLa cells was validated by RT-qPCR (Supp. Fig. 5c) and infection was monitored by 4x ExM (Fig. 5d). In the absence of AHT, inclusions developed comparably to those of the wildtype strain, whereas induction of CtrR3 overexpression impaired inclusion maturation, most notably by the absence of EBs (Fig. 5d) and the presence of enlarged RBs (Supp. Fig. 5d; Supp. Note 4). Next, we measured FRET efficiency in inclusions and host cell areas by acceptor bleaching, which revealed that CtrR3 expression markedly impaired TFSM metabolization (Fig. 5e), evident by similar FRET efficiencies, and thus native TFSM content, in inclusions and host cells. In summary, these data indicate that metabolized TFSM accumulates within chlamydial inclusions during RB-to-EB redifferentiation.

TFSM is metabolized within chlamydial inclusions

Because C. trachomatis strongly depends on host cell metabolites35,38,39, we hypothesized that TFSM is metabolized by host enzymes and subsequently shuttled into the inclusion. To test this possibility, we investigated whether central host factors of sphingolipid metabolism such as CERT or SMases contribute to TFSM metabolization during C. trachomatis infection (Supp. Fig. 6 and Supp. Note 5). We found no evidence for infection-induced upregulation of host SMases, neither at the expression level (Supp. Fig. 6a, b) nor the cellular SMase activity (Supp. Fig. 6c, d). Consistently, we detected, using our FRET-based approach, that metabolized TFSM still accumulated in inclusions upon pharmacological inhibition of neutral SMase (NSM) and/or genetic ablation of acid SMase (ASM, Supp. Fig. 6e). Next, we investigated whether host ceramide transport could be involved in accumulation of metabolized TFSM in inclusions. CERT mediates non-vesicular transport of ceramide and is recruited to the inclusion membrane. Hence, metabolized TFSM could be theoretically channeled into inclusions via CERT. As described previously43, infection was impaired in host cells lacking CERT. However, the enrichment of metabolized TFSM within inclusions was still detected in CERT K.O. cells by the FRET-based readout, even though with slightly delayed kinetics, supporting that metabolized TFSM accumulates within the inclusion even in the absence of detectable contributions from host ASM and NSM activity, or CERT under our experimental conditions.

Since our data did not support a critical role for these host factors in the enrichment of metabolized TFSM, we hypothesized that TFSM is converted within the inclusion. Therefore, we localized metabolized TFSM in individual bacterial particles by imaging inclusions at different time points p.i. by 4x ExM. Overlay images of FRET and donor channels revealed a high proportion of metabolized TFSM in EBs at 24 h and 32 h p.i. as indicated by the green color of these particles compared to RBs and host cells (Fig. 6a).

Fig. 6. TFSM is metabolized within chlamydial inclusions.

Fig. 6

a, b, Visualization of individual bacterial particles by 4x ExM. HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis in presence of TFSM2 and recorded via 4x ExM (a) at the indicated infection time. Chlamydial particles were classified as reticulate body (RB), intermediate body (IB) or elementary body (EB). n = 3. Scale bar: 8 µm (~2 µm with 4x expansion factor) in a, 2 µm (~0.5 µm with 4x expansion factor) in b. c, 4x ExM enables measuring the TFSM content of individual chlamydial particles. Individual bacteria in inclusions recorded in a, were selected. These particles were classified as RBs associated with the inclusion membrane, “other” RBs (RBs not-associated with the inclusion membrane), intermediate bodies (IB, possess a characteristic TFSM accumulation in their center) and elementary body (EB). FRET efficiency in whole inclusion (horizontal line) and individual particles (dots) were determined and normalized to the FRET efficiency measured in host cell areas (set to 1). Normalized FRET efficiency (ratio “particle vs. host cell”) was plotted against particle diameter. Particles <0.5 µm were considered as EBs. Red: IBs, green: RBs (particles >0.5 µm) associated with the inclusion membrane, black: other particles, dotted line: average FRET efficiency detected in whole inclusions. n = 3. d Membrane-associated RBs possess higher FRET efficiency than IBs and EBs. Average FRET efficiencies of individual particle classes were determined. n = 3, where n is the averaged FRET efficiency of all particles assigned to the respective particle class in one biological replicate. e, f, Untargeted HPLC-MS/MS screening for TFSM metabolites. HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis or left uninfected in presence of TFSM1. After 24 h or 40 h p.i., lipids were extracted and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS. Peak areas of TFSM1-ceramide (e) and TFSM1-SM (f) were normalized to the sum of C16:0 SM and C16:0 ceramide peaks as a measure of the amount of cellular material used for lipid extraction. n = 4 (24 h p.i.) or n = 3 (40 h p.i.). Statistics: One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison (d), two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison (e, f). Data are presented as mean values +/- standard deviation.

To further resolve the dynamics of TFSM metabolization on single particle level, we determined the FRET efficiency of whole inclusions as well as of individual bacteria by acceptor bleaching and normalized the results to the FRET efficiency detected in host cell areas (Fig. 6c). We plotted the diameter of the particles against the corresponding FRET efficiency (Fig. 6c) to distinguish between RBs (diameter > 500 nm) and EBs (diameter <500 nm) and further identified RBs associated with the inclusion membrane (“membrane RBs”). A small subset of particles exhibited a characteristic TFSM accumulation in their center, and we categorized these bacteria as intermediate bodies (IBs, Fig. 6b).

At 16 h p.i., we exclusively detected RBs that were predominantly associated with the inclusion membrane and possessed similar TFSM content as the host cell (Fig. 6c, d). TFSM content detected in membrane-associated RBs slightly decreased during infection (24 h p.i. and 32 h p.i.) but remained similar compared to host cell areas. This indicates a similar TFSM content of membrane-associated RBs and host cells also at later stages of infection. By contrast, we measured a significantly decreased FRET efficiency in IBs and EBs, suggesting a higher proportion of metabolized TFSM contained by these particles. In summary, our data suggest that membrane-associated RBs predominantly take up native TFSM, which is metabolized during RB-to-EB differentiation (Fig. 6d) and subsequently accumulates on the nucleoid-containing EB cell pole (Fig. 1, Fig. 2).

SM is formed from TFSM-derived ceramide during C. trachomatis infection

Although the FRET-based readout allows detection of TFSM metabolization with high spatial resolution, it does not provide the chemical identity of TFSM metabolite(s). To identify TFSM-derived metabolites formed during infection, we infected HeLa 229 cells in the presence of TFSM1, extracted the lipids, and screened for predefined TFSM1 metabolites by high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS; Supp. Fig. 8). Among the molecules that we included in the screen, only the TFSM1-ceramide and, surprisingly, the TFSM1-SM metabolites were found in detectable concentrations (Fig. 6e, f).

Importantly, TFSM1-SM contains the functionalized amine and azide groups of TFSM1 in the backbone and the acyl chain but possesses a natural phosphocholine head group as confirmed by accurate mass and MS/MS fragmentation patterns. Interestingly, levels of both metabolites increased between 24 and 40 h p.i. and were markedly higher than in uninfected control cells during late-stage infection (Fig. 6f). This increase was more pronounced for the TFSM1-SM metabolite compared to TFSM1-ceramide. These observations support a model in which TFSM is transiently metabolized to ceramide, that subsequently serves as a substrate for TFSM1-SM synthesis, resulting in the accumulation of TFSM1-SM in the inclusion. This model would also explain the apparent discrepancy discussed earlier, as TFSM1-SM in contrast to TFSM1-ceramide, possess a polar headgroup, which could interact with DNA in the nucleoid64–71,74. Consequently, TFSM1-SM represents a plausible candidate for the sphingolipid species associated with condensed chlamydial nucleoids.

In summary, we propose a model in which SM is acquired by RBs attached to the inclusion membrane (Fig. 7). During RB-to-EB redifferentiation, SM is transiently metabolized to ceramide and then resynthesized to SM, which is then incorporated into to the bacterial nucleoid. EBs are released by host cells and subsequently infect neighboring cells. Upon host cell entry, the lipid-DNA association is resolved and DNA decondensation is initiated.

Fig. 7. Proposed model for the role of sphingolipids during C. trachomatis infection.

Fig. 7

Sphingomyelin (SM) is taken up from the host by membrane-associated RBs. During RB-EB redifferentiation, SM is metabolized to ceramide and resynthesized to SM, which is incorporated in EB nucleoids. EBs are released and internalized by neighboring cells. During RB-EB differentiation, first lipids are released from nucleoids and DNA decondensation is initiated thereafter. RB: reticulate body, IB: intermediate body, EB: elementary body. Figure created in BioRender. Rühling, M. (2026) https://BioRender.com/npfqk7b.

Discussion

Despite intensive research, the role of lipids in DNA organisation remains poorly understood, largely due to the limited methodology for studying the interactions between these two molecule classes75. The presence of lipid converting enzymes76–78 and lipid droplets79–81 in eukaryotic nuclei strongly suggests that lipids can modulate genetic information. However, only a few examples linking lipids directly to DNA regulation have been described. For instance, the bioactive lipid sphingosine-1-phosphate can directly impact epigenetics by interacting with histone deacetylases82 and SM-enriched membrane domains can influence transcription83. Cholesterol has been shown to bind eukaryotic histones and thus, it is incorporated into nucleosomes84–86. In bacteria, DNA is tethered to the cell envelope, which was hypothesized to facilitate the co-translational membrane incorporation of transmembrane proteins87–92.

Here, by combining ExM and cryo-ET, we delineate the lipid distribution in chlamydial EBs and uncovered a massive colocalization of lipid derivatives with the nucleoids of these particles as ~90% of the nucleoid area contained the lipid analogues in our measurements (Fig. 3h). In contrast, membranes labeled with pGk13a exhibited a more variable spatial relationship with the nucleoid. In some EBs, the pGk13a signal only partially overlapped with the nucleoid (Supp. Fig. 4c, d), whereas in others, an extensive overlap between DNA and membrane signal was observed (Supp. Fig. 4e, f). Moreover, pGk13a did not reveal the characteristic spheroidal lipid protrusion into the area containing the nucleoid as found for samples stained by TFSM. The interpretation of these observations is limited by the spatial resolution of the current approach. Clear visualization of the interface between membranes and DNA lays beyond the resolution limit of 8x ExM, which, on a conventional confocal microscope, is restricted to ~30 nm. Hence, it remains elusive whether the nucleoid in these particles is in close proximity to the membrane or if membranes also penetrate into the membrane-facing side of the nucleoid.

One possible explanation for the differences between TFSM and pGk13a labeling is that these probes visualize distinct lipid pools. While pGk13a was designed to stain membranes, it likely does not label lipids bound to proteins or DNA. This could explain the discrepancy between the pGk13a and TFSM labeling, as latter could form complexes with protein or DNA thereby resulting in a distribution throughout the whole nucleoid. Furthermore, the positively charged headgroup of pGK13a could favor interaction with acidic lipids such as phosphatidyl serine, while zwitterionic lipids such as SM are less efficiently labeled.

Importantly, the lipid derivatives used for ExM possess C6 acyl chains, which are shorter than those found in naturally occurring lipids where fatty acid residues usually contain 14 or more C atoms93,94. Acyl chain length affects the properties of lipid molecules, for instance, lipid analogs containing shorter chain lengths are more likely to undergo spontaneous intermembrane transfer in liposome-based in vitro systems95–97. Thus, TFSM transport and localization could differ from natural long chain SM species. Our current methodology does not allow the visualization of natural lipids or long chain lipid analogs via ExM. In future studies, it will be important to develop approaches that enable visualization of naturally occurring lipids at nanoscale resolution to investigate whether these lipids are as well incorporated into EB nucleoids.

Although direct interaction of DNA with SM74 and other zwitterionic lipids64–71 has been demonstrated in vitro, a structural role of phospholipids in DNA organization within a living organism has, to our knowledge, not been reported. The use of lipids for DNA condensation could have important benefits for an obligate intracellular bacterium. First, because lipids are hijacked from the host cell, this strategy may present a more energy-efficient alternative to de novo synthesis of histone-like proteins. Still, it remains elusive whether, and if so, how lipids can actively contribute to DNA condensation in C. trachomatis. Interestingly, a recent study reported that nucleoid formation is independent from histone-like proteins98. Hence, it is tempting to speculate that lipids can functionally replace protein-mediated DNA condensation. In addition, dynamic remodeling of lipid–DNA interactions through lipid metabolism or lipid exchange could provide a mechanism for the rapid initiation of nucleoid decondensation and, consequently, the regulation of genome accessibility during EB-to-RB differentiation.

Consistent with this notion, dissociation of TFSM from nucleoids is one of the earliest events observed during EB-to-RB differntiation and occurs shortly after EBs enter their host cell and before the nucleoid decondenses (Fig. 4b). Other studies have reported expression of genes in C. trachomatis99 and other Chlamydia100,101 at this early time point during infection, which might be initiated through dissociation of the nucleoid from membranes.

The stimulus for and the mechanism behind DNA unwrapping in EBs is mostly unknown and to date only a methylerythritol phosphate metabolite has been described to disrupt DNA-histone interactions26. Interestingly, we measured uptake of TFSM2 by EBs attached to the plasma membrane and its subsequent incorporation into nucleoids (Fig. 4d). This raises the possibility that EBs could also take up negatively charged lipids such as phosphatidyl serine or phosphoinositides, the latter of which are enriched in phagosomal membranes102. Alternatively, C. trachomatis encodes several D-type phospholipases with unknown function103, which could convert zwitterionic to negatively charged phospholipids. In both scenarios, presence of negatively charged lipids in nucleoids could destabilize the DNA complex and initiate DNA decondensation.

Important previous studies investigated early events after host cell entry of C. trachomatis99 and other Chlamydia104,105 by electron microscopy (EM). However, DNA and lipids cannot be labeled specifically in EM, and localizing nucleoids is further complicated by a general high electron density of EBs upon negative staining and the limited image quality of older micrographs. Similar challenges exist in cryo-ET, as we and others27 only indirectly identified nucleoids by detecting the ribosome-depleted areas within EBs. Consequently, both the incorporation of lipids into nucleoids as well as the well-orchestrated DNA decondensation processes during EB-to-RB differentiation have likely been overlooked in previous studies. In contrast, 8x ExM enables fluorescent labeling of DNA and lipid derivatives with ~30 nm spatial resolution, allowing precise three-dimensional tracking of DNA decondensation in the particularly small EBs (Fig. 4b, c).

Using ExM, we show that EB-to-RB differentiation proceeds through multiple morphologically distinct intermediate forms (Fig. 4b, c), which can be distinguished by the structure and organization of the DNA within the particles. Importantly, dissociation of TFSM from the nucleoid and detachment of the nucleoid from the inner bacterial membrane are very early events in EB-to-RB differentiation and were observed in intracellular bacteria already 1 h p.i. Thereafter, DNA is decondensed stepwise, where the nucleoids decompose into several DNA foci between 4 and 5 h p.i. and are completely decondensed 6 h p.i..

Furthermore, our study provides new insights into sphingolipid metabolism within chlamydial inclusions. This advance was made possible by establishing quantitative FRET measurements of individual bacteria, which is an important improvement of our previous methodology, where we determined TFSM content of bacteria by calculating FRET/donor ratio images45,46. By our advanced imaging approach, we identified that TFSM is metabolized during RB-to-EB redifferentiation (Fig. 5) and that TFSM metabolites accumulate in mature EBs (Fig. 6c, d). This hypothesis is further supported by the impaired TFSM metabolization upon overexpression of the chlamydial sRNA CtrR3, which blocks RB-to-EB redifferentiation. However, overexpression of CtrR3 strongly alters the expression profile of C. trachomatis73, and therefore its effects are not limited to developmental regulation. Nevertheless, the pronounced effect of CtrR3 overexpression on TFSM metabolism may prove a useful tool for identification of sphingolipid-metabolizing enzymes expressed by C. trachomatis in future studies.

Surprisingly, we only measured enhanced levels of TFSM1-ceramide and TFSM1-SM upon infection by mass spectrometry, whereas other TFSM1 metabolites were not found in detectable amounts (Supp. Fig. 8). While these data demonstrate that TFSM is predominantly metabolized to TFSM1-ceramide and TFSM1-SM during infection, the formation of other low abundant TFSM metabolites, which fall below the detection limit of our lipidomics approach, cannot be excluded.

Interestingly, TFSM1-SM and its upstream metabolite TFSM-ceramide increased during the course of infection (Fig. 6e, f). Since lipidomics analysis was performed with whole cell lipid extracts, these measurements cannot provide information about the cellular localization of detected lipid metabolites. However, our FRET efficiency measurements indicate a strong accumulation of TFSM metabolites within inclusions but not host cell areas during infection (Fig. 5a, b). Together, these data support a model in which SM is metabolized to ceramide after RBs detach from the inclusion membrane and redifferentiate into EBs, followed by re-synthesis of SM, which ultimately accumulates in mature EBs.

Consistent with our findings, previous studies demonstrated that C. trachomatis can synthesize SM in absence of the host cell SM machinery48,49. However, the upstream metabolic processes and the origin of the ceramide used as substrate for SM biosynthesis remained elusive, because either natural lipids or lipid derivatives tagged only in the backbone were detected in these studies. By contrast, TFSMs harbor molecular tags in the head group and the ceramide backbone, which enabled detection of TFSM-derived SM metabolites (TFSM-SM) in which the alkyne-containing artificial headgroup is replaced by a natural phosphocholine head group. This facilitated the identification of SM resynthesize from TFSM-derived ceramide during C. trachomatis infection. In a related study106, we recently demonstrated that this generation of TFSM2-SM from TFSM2 is independent from host SM synthases, suggesting the presence of a chlamydial enzyme catalyzing SM biosynthesis in line with previous studies48,49.

The functional reason for the transient ceramide generation remains unclear. We speculate that ceramide is required for a certain step during EB formation e.g. for membrane remodeling or for subcellular localization of the lipid. Unlike SM, which contains a polar head group, ceramide can flip between the membrane leaflets107 and thus, transient ceramide generation might mediate the translocation of the lipid through the membrane bilayer, which in case of SM would require the action of specific enzymes.

CERT is crucial for inclusion development, since infection, consistently with previous reports108,109, was impaired in CERT K.O. cells (Supp. Fig. 6e). The interplay between CERT and the complex SM metabolization described in the present study remains elusive. Previously, it was suggested that CERT fuels SM biosynthesis on the inclusion membrane by the host SM synthesis machinery43 or within the inclusion itself by a putative chlamydial SM synthase48,49. However, it is unclear whether infection depends on CERT-mediated ceramide transport to the inclusions or solely on the presence of CERT on the inclusions membrane for instance to form ER-inclusions contact sites as suggested by others108. We suggest a model in which the activity of a chlamydial SM synthase is sustained by both, ceramide taken up from the host and SM-derived ceramide generated within the inclusion.

Beyond their structural role in membranes, we hypothesis that lipids may also play non-canonical roles in DNA organization. Future studies should aim to resolve the structure of the DNA-lipid-histone interface and determine whether i.) lipids directly interact with DNA, ii.) are associated with DNA-binding proteins or iii.) rather mediate the tethering of the nucleoid to the bacterial cell envelope. The interaction between lipids and DNA is challenging to investigate and is hence understudied75. We propose that combining fixable lipid derivatives with super resolution imaging represents a powerful tool to further elucidate the role of lipids in DNA biology.

Methods

Functionalized lipids

The following functionalized lipids were provided by Jürgen Seibel, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Germany: α-NH2-ω-N3-C6-ceramide44, trifunctional sphingomyelin 1 (TFSM1)45, trifunctional sphingomyelin 2 (TFSM2)45.

Cell culture

HeLa 229 cells (ATCC® CCL-2.1™), HeLa wildtype (WT; ATCC® CCL-2™), CERT K.O.109 (Dagmar Heuer, Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Germany) and ASM K.O. cells110 (Martin Fraunholz, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany) were cultured in standard medium [RPMI+GlutaMAXTM medium (GibcoTM, Cat. No. 72400054) containing 10 % (v/v) heat-inactivated (56  °C for 30 min) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma Aldrich. Cat. No. F7524)]. McCoy cells (ATCC® CRL-1696TM) were cultured in McCoy’s 5 A (Modified) medium (GibcoTM, Cat. No. 26600080) containing 10 % (v/v) heat-inactivated FBS. Standard tissue culture procedures were used to maintain the cells. The cells were cultured in humidified atmosphere with 5 % CO2 (v/v) at 37  °C using standard tissue culture procedures.

Chlamydia culture

The preparation of Chlamydia was adapted from a previous publication111. The L2 /434/Bu (ATCC VR-902B) serovar and the L2/434/Bu (ATCC VR-902B) serovar transformed with CtrR3 of Chlamydia trachomatis were used for this study. HeLa 229 cells were infected with Chlamydia trachomatis at MOI 1, which was then expanded for 48 h. The L2 CtrR3 strain was cultured in presence of 500 ng/mL spectinomycin-dihydrochloride pentahydrate (Sigma, Cat No. S4014-5G). Glass beads (2.85–3.45 mm, Roth, Cat. No. A557.1) were used to disrupt and mechanically lyse the cells, followed by centrifugation of the cells for 10 min at 755 × g at 4  °C. To collect the bacteria, the supernatant was centrifuged for 30 min at 40,000 × g at 4  °C. 1 x sucrose–phosphate–glutamic acid (SPG) buffer [7.5 % sucrose (Roth, Cat. No. 4621.2), 0.052 % KH2PO4 (Roth, Cat. No. 3904.1), 0.122 % Na2HPO4 (Roth, Cat. No. P030.2), 0.072 % L-glutamine (Gibco, Cat. No. 25030081)] was used to wash the bacterial pellets and the centrifugation step was repeated. The chlamydial pellet was resuspended in 1 x SPG buffer and passed through G20 (B. Braun, Cat. No. 612-0141) and G18 (B. Braun, Cat. No. 612-0147) hollow needles to singularize the Chlamydia. The bacteria were stored at −80 °C. Titration was used to determine MOI 1 and PCR was used to confirm that the Chlamydia were free from Mycoplasma contamination.

Chlamydia infection in presence of lipid derivatives to visualize inclusions in mid-late infection cycle

HeLa WT and ASM K.O. cells were cultured in RPMI + GlutaMAXTM medium containing 2 % heat-inactivated FBS two days before the experiments. At the day of the experiment, HeLa WT and ASM K.O. cells were seeded in a 24-well plate (2 × 105 cells per well) on cover slips in RPMI + GlutaMAXTM medium containing 1 % heat-inactivated FBS. Cells were allowed to adhere for 6 h. The medium was exchanged with fresh medium containing 1 % heat-inactivated FBS and the cells were infected with C. trachomatis at MOI 1. For TFSM2 treatment, the medium was exchanged to RPMI + GlutaMAXTM medium containing 1 % heat-inactivated FBS and 10 µM TFSM2 at 3 h after infection. In case of GW4869 treatment, 10 µM GW4869 (Biozol, Cat No. MCE-HY-19363) was added 3 h after infection together with TFSM2. HeLa 229 and HeLa WT or CERT K.O. cells were seeded a day prior to the experiment in a 24-well plate (6 × 104 cells per well) on cover slips. The next day, medium was exchanged with fresh standard medium and the cells were infected with C. trachomatis at MOI 1. In case of TFSM2 treatment, 3 h after infection the medium was exchanged to RPMI + GlutaMAXTM medium containing 1 % heat-inactivated FBS and 10 µM TFSM2. In case of α-NH2-ω-N3-C6-ceramide, 1 h before fixation the medium was exchanged to RPMI + GlutaMAXTM medium containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 10 µM α-NH2-ω-N3-C6-ceramide. For the L2 CtrR3 strain; CtrR3 overexpression was induced by addition of 100 ng/mL anhydrotetracycline-hydrochloride (AHT; Supelco, Cat. No. 37919-100MG-R) 3 h after infection together with the addition of 10 µM TFSM2 as described above. In this case, medium was replaced with medium containing fresh AHT and TFSM2 every 16 h. For all experimental approaches, the cells were washed 2 × with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; Gibco, Cat. No. 14190169) at the indicated time points and processed as described below.

Chlamydia infection of TFSM2-preloaded HeLa 229 cells to visualize the first 6 h of infection

HeLa 229 cells were seeded a day prior to the experiment in a 24-well plate (6 × 104 cells per well) on cover slips. After 3 h, the medium was exchanged with fresh medium containing 1% heat-inactivated FBS and 10 µM TFSM2. The next day, cells were infected with C. trachomatis at MOI 25 (5 min and 1 h time point) or at MOI 15 (2 h to 6 h time point) and centrifuged for 10 min at 188 x g at RT. At the indicated time points, the cells were washed 2 × with DPBS fixed and processed as described below.

Uptake of BODIPY™-FL-C12-Sphingomyelin

HeLa WT or CERT K.O. cells were seeded a day prior to the experiment in a 24-well plate (6 × 104 cells per well) on cover slips. The next day, medium was exchanged with fresh standard medium and the cells were infected with C. trachomatis at MOI 1. At 3 h p.i., the medium was exchanged to RPMI + GlutaMAXTM medium containing 1 % heat-inactivated FBS and 10 µM BODIPY™-FL-C12-Sphingomyelin (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. D7711). 40 h after infection, the cells were washed 2 × with DPBS (GibcoTM). Fixation and DNA staining were performed as described below.

Fixation, click staining of lipids and antibody staining

After infections were performed as described above, samples were fixed with 4 % PFA in PBS (Morphisto, Cat. No. 11762.0100) containing 0.25 % glutaraldehyde (Sigma, Cat. No. 10333) for 30 min/RT. Samples were washed thrice with PBS, permeabilized with 0.2 % Triton X-100 (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. 28314) in PBS for 20 min/RT and again washed thrice with PBS. Samples that were to be stained with antibodies were blocked with 10 % FBS in PBS for 1 h/RT. Azide functions in lipid analogs were stained with BODIPY-FL-DBCO (conventional/unexpanded: 2 µM, 4x ExM: 4 µM, 8x ExM: 20 µM; Jena Bioscience, Cat.No. CLK-040-05) in Hank’s buffered salt solution (HBSS) for 1 h/37 °C at 170 rpm. Samples were washed 5x with PBS. Subsequently, alkyne groups of TFSM derivatives were stained with AZDye546 azide [Jena Bioscience, Cat. No. CLK-1283; product discontinued and we recommend using AZDye546-picolyl-azide (Jena Bioscience, Cat. No. CLK-1284) alternatively] in click buffer [50 μM CuSO4, 2.5 mM sodium ascorbate (Sigma, Cat. No. A4034), 250 μM Tris(3-hydroxypropyltriazolylmethyl)amine (THPTA; Sigma, Cat. No. 762342) in DPBS] for 1 h/37 °C at 170 rpm. The dye concentrations was depending on whether samples were expanded or imaged conventionally (conventional/unexpanded: 10 µM, 4x ExM: 20 µM, 8x ExM: 40 µM). Samples were washed 5x with PBS for 15 min on a see-saw rocker.

For antibody staining, samples were first incubated with primary antibody [anti-CERT, (1:200 dilution, Abcam, Cat.No. ab72536) and anti-chlamydial HSP60 (1:400, Enzo Life Sciences, Cat. No. ALX-804-071)] in 10 % FBS in PBS for 1 h/RT or at 4 °C overnight. Samples were washed thrice with PBS and incubated with secondary antibody [goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. A11001) or goat anti-rabbit CF568 (Sigma, Cat. No. SAB4600310), dilution 1:200] in 10 % FBS in PBS for 1 h/RT or at 4 °C overnight. Samples were washed thrice in PBS. If indicated, unexpanded samples were stained with 5 µg/mL Hoechst 34580 (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No.H21486) in PBS for 30 min/RT and washed thrice with PBS for 15 min/RT on a see-saw rocker. DNA in ExM samples was stained after the expansion process (see below).

Subsequently, cover slips were either mounted in Mowiol [24 g glycerol (Roth, Cat. No. 3783.2), 9.6 g Mowiol®4-88 (Roth, Cat. No 0713.2), 48 mL 0.2 M TRIS-HCl pH 8.5 (Sigma Aldrich, Cat. No T1503), 24 mL Millipore water] or further processed for ExM.

Expansion microscopy

The protocols for 4x and 8x ExM are based on previous publications54,55,112,113. After antibody and/or click labeling, samples were postfixed with 0.25 % glutaraldehyde in PBS for 10 min/RT and washed thrice with PBS. For each specimen, a tube containing 96 µL 4x monomer solution [1x PBS (Sigma, Cat. No. D1408), 2.5 % (v/v) acrylamide (Sigma, Cat. No. A9926 or Sigma, Cat. No. A4058), 0,15 % (v/v) N,N´-methylenebisacrylamide (Sigma, Cat. No. M1533), 8.625 % (w/v) sodium acrylate (Sigma, Cat. No. 408220 or Santa Cruz, Cat. No. 236893), 2 M NaCl (Sigma, Cat. No. S5886) in MilliQ water] or containing 97 µL 8x monomer solution [1xPBS, 1,1 M sodium acrylate, 2 M acrylamide (Sigma, Cat. No. A4058), 0.009 % (v/v) N,N´-methylenebisacrylamide in MilliQ water] were prepared. The cover slip was placed upside down into a drop (~20 µL) of the respective monomer solution to remove residual PBS. Subsequently, 2 µL 10 % (w/v) ammonium persulfate (APS; Sigma, Cat. No. A3678) and 2 µL N,N,N´,N´-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED, Sigma, T9281) were added to tubes containing 4x monomer solution, while 1.5 µL 10 % (w/v) APS or 1.5 µL 10 % (v/v) TEMED were added to 8x monomer solution. Immediately, the solution was mixed and 56 µL (Ø 12 mm cover slip) or 80 µL (Ø 15 mm cover slip) were transferred on parafilm and the cover slip was placed into the drop upside down. Samples for 4x ExM were incubated for 75 min at RT in an enclosed chamber. Samples for 8x ExM were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in an enclosed and humidified chamber. Afterwards, gels were removed from the cover slip and incubated with 8 U/mL proteinase K (Sigma, Cat. No. P4850) in digestion buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8 (Sigma, Cat. No. T1503), 1 mM EDTA (Sigma, Cat. No. ED2P), 0.5 % (v/v) Triton-X 100 (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. 28314), 0.8 M guanidine HCl (Sigma, Cat. No. 50933) in MilliQ water] for 30 min/RT. Samples were incubated in excess of MilliQ water in Ø150 mm petri dishes and water was exchanged (usually 3-4 times) until samples were completely expanded.

Gels were cut into pieces of ~1 cm×1 cm and either stain for proteins (pan-ExM) and/or DNA or directly imaged in a humidified poly-L-lysin-coated (Sigma, Cat. No. A-005-C) imaging chamber (Ibidi, Cat. No. 82107) or on a silanized Ø24 mm cover slip in a sample holder (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. A7816) flooded with MilliQ water.

Pan-ExM and DNA staining of expanded samples

Expanded gels were cut into pieces of ~2 cm×2 cm and incubated in 40 µg/mL Atto594-NHS ester (pan-ExM57; Atto-Tec, Cat. No. AD594-31 or Sigma, Cat. No. 08741) and/or 12.5 µg/mL Hoechst 34580 (DNA staining; Thermo Fisher, Cat. No.H21486) in 100 mM NaHCO3 for 1.5 h/RT on a see-saw rocker. Afterwards, gels were washed 6-times with MilliQ water for 15 min each on a see-saw rocker at RT. Samples were imaged in a humidified poly-L-lysin-coated imaging chamber or on a silanized Ø24 mm cover slip in a sample holder (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. A7816) flooded with MilliQ water.

pGk13a staining and 8x ExM

The protocol for pGk13a staining was adapted from a previous publication61. HeLa 229 cells were seeded a day prior to the experiment in a 24-well plate (6 × 104 cells per well) on cover slips. The next day, medium was exchanged with fresh standard medium and the cells were infected with C. trachomatis at MOI 1. 32 h after infection, the cells were washed 2 x with DPBS. Cells were fixed with 4 % PFA supplemented with 0.5 % CaCl2 (Roth, Cat. No. 5239.1) in PBS overnight (overnight means ≥ 16 h) at 4 °C on a see-saw rocker. An 11.1 mg/ml pGk13a stock solution was prepared by dissolving pGk13a in 1:1 anhydrous DMSO (Sigma, Cat. No. 276855-1 L):water (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. J71786.AP). The samples were washed 3 x for 1 h at 4 °C with DPBS and afterwards were incubated in pGK13a labeling solution (98.5 % DPBS, 1.5 % pGK13a stock solution) overnight at 4 °C on a see-saw rocker. After quickly rinsing the samples with 1 x DPBS the samples were anchored using 0.1 mg/mL Acryloyl-X SE [6-((Acryloyl)amino)hexanoic acid, succinimidyl ester, Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. A20770] in DPBS overnight at 4 °C on a see-saw rocker. After the Acryloyl-X SE was discarded, samples were washed 3 x with DPBS for 1 h at 4 °C on a see-saw rocker. Next, gelation for 8x ExM and proteinase K digestion were performed as described above. The gels were transferred into 15 mL falcons each and were washed 3 x with DPBS for 30 min at RT on a roller mixer. Afterwards, DPBS was discarded, and the gels were incubated in 20 µM BODIPY-FL-DBCO in HBSS overnight at 4 °C on a roller mixer. The next day, the BODIPY-FL-DBCO solution was discarded, and the samples were washed 3 x with DPBS for 30 min at RT on a roller mixer. Samples were incubated in excess of MilliQ water in Ø150 mm petri dishes and water was exchanged (usually 3-4 times) until samples were completely expanded. Expanded gels were cut into pieces of ~2 cm×2 cm and DNA staining was performed as described above. Samples were imaged in a humidified poly-L-lysine-coated imaging chamber or on a silanized Ø24 mm cover slip in a sample holder flooded with MilliQ water.

Cover slip silanization

Ø24 mm cover slips (VWR, Cat. No. 631-1583) were rinsed with MilliQ water and incubated with MilliQ water in an ultrasonic cleaning bath for 15 min. Subsequently, MilliQ water was exchanged with 5 M KOH (Roth, Cat. No. 6751.1) and cover slips were further incubated in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min. Cover slips were rinsed thrice with MilliQ water, incubated with 99 % EtOH (Sigma, Cat. No. 32221-2.5L-M) in an ultrasonic cleaning bath for 15 min and air dried. Each cover slip was covered with silanization solution [90% (v/v) EtOH, 5 % (v/v) AcOH (Roth, Cat. No. 3738.5), 5 % MilliQ water, 0.1 % (3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilan (Sigma, A3648)], air dried and dipped in MilliQ water and 99 % EtOH until unbound silane was removed. Cover slips were stored at −20 °C.

Determining TFSM metabolization by FRET acceptor bleaching

For unexpanded/conventional samples the in-built FRET AB wizard of the Leica TCS SP5 (Leica LAS AF Version 2.7.3.9723) or Leica Stellaris 5 (software LAS X Version 4.9.0.30221; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) software was used. Areas containing an inclusion or a host cell membrane were selected for acceptor (AZDye546) bleaching and donor (BODIPY-FL) signals were determined pre- and post-bleaching. FRET efficiencies were calculated by the formular:

FRETeff=100⋅donorpost−donorpredonorpost 1

For each biological replicate, at least 5 different sites per sample were measured and results were averaged.

Acceptor bleaching experiments of 4x ExM samples were performed at a Leica Stellaris 5 confocal microscope (software LAS X Version 4.9.0.30221). Therefore, donor signal (BODIPY-FL) of infected cell(s) was recorded. Afterwards, the acceptor (AZDye546) was bleached within the whole frame, and the donor signal post-bleaching was recorded. Individual bacterial particles and host cell areas were selected manually in Fiji (v2.9.0)114 and FRET efficiency in all selected regions of interest (ROIs) were determined based on donor fluorescence pre- and post-bleaching. FRET efficiencies determined in individual particles were normalized to FRET efficiencies determined in host cell areas (set to 1) in the same image. Particle diameters were determined in Fiji (v2.9.0) and plotted against the corresponding FRET efficiency using ggplot115 and R studio (R version 4.3.2)116. Particles were classified as “EBs” (particles with diameters <500 nm and not classified as IBs), “IBs“ (particles with characteristic TFSM accumulation in their center, independent from particle diameter), “membrane-associated RBs” (particles with diameter >500 nm, attached to the inclusion membrane and not classified as IBs) and “other RBs” (particles with diameter >500 nm, not attached to the inclusion membrane and not classified as IBs). Negative FRET efficiencies were set to 0 and average normalized FRET efficiencies were calculated for each particle class.

Analyzing EB nucleoids for lipid content and DNA condensation

HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis for 32 h and processed for 8x ExM. Staining for TFSM2/α-NH2-ω-N3-C6-ceramide with BODIPY-FL-DBCO, for DNA with Hoechst 34580 and, if indicated, for pan-ExM with an Atto594 NHS ester was performed as described above. Then, regions within inclusions were imaged with a 63x oil objective and 3x optical zoom on a Leica Stellaris 5 confocal microscope (software LAS X Version 4.9.0.30221). Images were further processed and analyzed in Fiji (v2.9.0)114.

For measuring the lipid content (BODIPY-FL signal) in individual nucleoids at mid/late-stage infection (here 32 h p.i.), regions containing RB DNA or host cell nuclei were removed from images. A median filter (2 pixels) was applied to the Hoechst channel, and nucleoids were selected with the “analyze particles” function in Fiji (v2.9.0). Fluorescence mean intensities in all three channels of unprocessed images were measured and the average fluorescence of all measured nucleoids was determined using R studio (R version 4.3.2). Samples not incubated with the clickable lipid derivatives but stained with BODIPY-FL-DBCO were used as controls. Ratios of samples incubated with lipid derivatives and untreated samples were calculated.

For determining colocalization between lipid and DNA, BODIPY-FL channels were corrected for background staining. Therefore, the fluorescence mean intensity value detected in nucleoids of samples not incubated with the lipid derivatives were subtracted from all pixels of the BODIPY-FL channel. Then, a median filter (2 pixels) was applied to BODIPY-FL and Hoechst channels. RBs and EBs were analyzed separately. Therefore, all regions containing RBs were removed manually from the images for analyzing EBs and vice versa, all EBs were removed from images for RBs analysis. Subsequently, the colocalization between Hoechst and BODIPY-FL channels (Manders’ and Pearson’s coefficient) was determined with the Fiji plug-in “JACoP V2.1.4”117,118. Since EB nucleoids contained stronger BODIPY-FL signals compared to RB membranes, different thresholds were applied to RB and EB regions during determining Manders’ coefficient.

For analyzing DNA during early infection (5 min-6 h p.i.), extra- and intracellular regions were selected based on TFSM2 signal and a mask was created to categorize particles as intracellular or extracellular. Areas containing host cell nuclei were removed from the images. A median filter (2 pixels) was applied to the Hoechst channel and nucleoids were selected with the “analyze particles” function in Fiji (v2.9.0). Size of the selected regions corresponds to the nucleoid area. Fluorescence mean intensities in all channels were measured in unprocessed images and the average fluorescence of all DNA particles was calculated in R studio. To correct background staining in the BODIPY-FL channel, the results of samples prepared in absence of TFSM2 were subtracted from TFSM2-treated samples, yielding the lipid content of nucleoids.

Determining signal-to-background ratios

HeLa 229 cells were infected with C. trachomatis in presence or absence of TFSM for 32 h or 40 h. Samples were stained with BODIPYL-FL-DBCO and accumulations detected in EBs were selected manually using Fiji (v2.9.0)114. Mean BODIPY-FL intensity in the selected areas were measured and the signal-to-background (STB) ratio was determined by the formular:

ratioSTB=BODIPY_FL+TFSM−BODIPY_FL−TFSMBODIPY_FL−TFSM 2

Cryo-ET

Plunge freezing of C. trachomatis EBs

For cryo-ET, dense suspensions of C. trachomatis EBs (~1’000’000 cells/µL), with or without TFSM treatment, were plunge frozen using a Vitrobot (Thermo Scientific) or a Leica GP2 (Leica Microsystems). Briefly, 3.5 μL of cell suspension was applied to glow-discharged Quantifoil R2/2 copper grids and blotted for 8 s only from the back, by replacing the front blotting paper with a Teflon sheet when the Vitrobot was used119. The grids were then vitrified in liquid ethane–propane and stored in liquid nitrogen until further use.

Cryo-FIB milling

Electron-transparent lamellae were prepared following an established cryo-FIB workflow120. Vitrified grids were clipped into AutoGrid rings (Thermo Scientific), transferred under cryogenic conditions to an EM VCM loading station (Leica Microsystems), where they were mounted onto a 40° pre-tilted cryo holder (Leica Microsystems). Using an EM VCT500 cryo-transfer system (Leica Microsystems), grids were transferred to an EM ACE600 (Leica Microsystems) and coated with ~8 nm tungsten before transfer to a Crossbeam 500 cryo dual-beam FIB-SEM (Zeiss). Lamellae positions were selected using SEM imaging (3 − 5 kV, 58 pA), and milling patterns were defined and executed using SmartFIB. Rectangular patterns were milled with stepwise reduction of ion beam current (700, 300, 100 pA) and lamella thickness, followed by a final polishing step at 50 pA, targeting a final lamella thickness of ~180 nm. Milled grids were stored in liquid nitrogen until imaging.

Cryo-ET data acquisition

Tilt series were acquired on a 300 kV Titan Krios G4 (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a K3 direct electron detector and a BioContinuum energy filter (20 eV slit, Gatan). Data were collected using SerialEM121 and SPACETomo122 at a pixel size of 2.678 Å, −6 μm defocus, and a total dose of ~140 e⁻/Ų. Dose-symmetric tilt series were recorded over ±60° with 3° increments. For Fig. 3 and Supplementary Movie 2, FIB-milled lamellae of EBs without TFSM were imaged, whereas for Fig. 2, plunge-frozen grids of EBs with and without TFSM were imaged without FIB milling.

Tomogram reconstruction, segmentation, and analysis

Tilt series were reconstructed using IMOD123,124. Frame alignment was performed with alignframes, followed by patch-tracking alignment and weighted back-projection at 4× binning. Tomograms were denoised and missing-wedge corrected using DeepDeWedge125. For Fig. 3b and Supplementary Movie 1, semantic segmentation was performed using a U-net trained in Dragonfly (v2024.1, Comet Technologies) on manually annotated slices, as described previously126. Segmentations were visualized and smoothed in ChimeraX (v1.9)127 using the ArtiaXplugin (0.6.0)128.

Subtomogram averaging of the type III secretion system (T3SS) for segmentation purposes was performed in Dynamo (v1.1.558)129. T3SS particles were manually picked as dipoles, followed by extraction, alignment, and averaging. The resulting density was refined in ChimeraX (v1.9) and mapped back into the segmented volumes using ArtiaX (0.6.0).

For Fig. 2, tomograms of non-milled EBs were manually segmented in IMOD (v5.1.0). Cells were approximated as spheres, T3SS positions were annotated, and membrane stacks were labelled in every tenth slice with smooth interpolation. Angles between T3SSs and membrane stacks were measured manually. Visualizations were generated in Blender (v4.5, https://www.blender.org).

Determining the orientation of the lipid accumulation and plasma membrane attachment

For measuring the orientation of the lipid accumulation during plasma membrane attachment of EBs, HeLa 229 cells preloaded with TFSM2 were infected with C. trachomatis for 1 h. TFSM2 was stained with click dyes as described above. Then, cells were visualized by 8x ExM, and z-stacks were recorded on a Leica Stellaris 5 confocal microscope (software Leica LAS X Version 4.9.0.30221). In Fiji (v2.9.0), the orientation of the lipid accumulation in respect to the plasma membrane within individual EBs was analyzed. Therefore, a tangent was delineated manually on the EB-plasma membrane attachment site. Then, the angle between this tangent and the lipid accumulation within the EB was measured. Angles can take values between 0° and 90°.

For measuring the orientation between the T3SS and membrane stacks, an EB preparation was visualized by cryo-ET. The center of T3SS structures was determined manually and a vertical line between the T3SS center and the particle center was delineated. The same procedure was repeated for the center of the membrane stacks. The angle between the two lines describes the orientation of the T3SS in respect to the membrane stacks. Angles can take values between 0° and 180°.

Measuring TFSM1 metabolites by lipidomics

HeLa 229 cells were seeded a day prior to the experiment in a 6-well plate (24 h time point: 5 × 105 cells per well for infected samples and 2.5 × 105 cells per well for uninfected samples, 40 h time point: 2.5 × 105 cells per well for infected samples and 1.25 × 105 cells per well for uninfected samples). The next day, the medium was exchanged with fresh standard medium. The cells were infected with C. trachomatis at MOI 1 or left uninfected. 3 h after infection, the medium was exchanged with medium containing 1 % heat-inactivated FBS and 10 µM TFSM1 for one well per time point and condition. At the indicated time points, cells were washed 2 × with DPBS, resuspended in 1 mL methanol (LC-MS CHROMASOLV, Fluka analytical, Cat. No. 34966-1 L). Lipids were extracted as described130 and analyzed for the indicated TFSM1 metabolites (Supp. Fig. 8). Two strategies were used for this purpose. In an initial untargeted approach, the lipid extracts were separated chromatographically on a 1290 Infinity II HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with a Poroshell 120 EC-C8 column (3.0 × 150 mm, 2.7 μm; Agilent Technologies) and the TFSM1-derived lipid metabolites were identified using a 6550 quadrupole-time-of-flight (Q-TOF) instrument (Agilent Technologies). Further details on chromatography, MS detection, and the identities of the sphingolipid metabolites analyzed are provided in the Supplementary Methods. To confirm the structure of the TFSM1-ceramide and TFSM1-SM metabolites identified in this way, they were further analyzed on a 6495 C triple-quadrupole (QQQ) instrument (Agilent Technologies) with regard to their MS/MS fragmentation behavior. For both methods, analogous chromatographic conditions and, as far as possible, identical settings for the electrospray ion source were used. A previously published method for quantifying canonical cellular sphingolipids served as the basis130. Metabolite identification was performed using MassHunter Qualitative Analysis software (version 10.0) with the “Find by Formula” algorithm. All detected metabolites had a mass error (Δm/z) of less than 1 ppm. Peak assignment and integration were performed using MassHunter Quantitative Analysis software (for QTOF, version 10.1).

Production of C. trachomatis CtrR3

Primers used for cloning procedures are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primers for cloning

Cloning
Nr Name Sequence (5’−3’) Source
1 pBOMB5_Backbone1_fwd GGATAGACATTAGCTACAGAATC This study
2 pBOMB5_Backbone1_rev TGAAAACCGCCACTGGACGTCGGATCCGTGAT This study
3 pBOMB5_Backbone2_rev CTGCAGGTACCTCCTGTCAGACCAAGTTTACTC This study
4 pBOMB5_Backbone2_fwd GATTCTGTAGCTAATGTCTATCC This study
5 pBOMB5_SmR_fwd ATCACGGATCCGACGTCCAGTGGCGGTTTTCATGGCTTG This study
6 pBOMB5_SmR_rev CTAGACATTTAAGCGGCCGCCGTACGCGTCGACTTACCAATGCTTAATCAGTGAGG This study
7 pBOMB5_TetR_rev GCGGCCGCTTAAATGTCTAGATTAGATAAAAGTAAAGTGATTAAC This study
8 pBOMB5_TetR_fwd AACTTGGTCTGACAGGAGGTACCTGCAGATTTAAGACCCACTTTCACATTTAAGTTG This study
9 pBOMB5-tet-Bb1_fwd GTGTCCTCCCAAATAACGAGTCCACCGAGTTCC This study
10 pBOMB5-tet-Bb1_rev CCAGAAATTCAATGCGTTTTCTTCT This study
11 pBOMB5-tet-Bb3_fwd AGAAGAAAACGCATTGAATTTCTGG This study
12 pBOMB5-tet-Bb3_rev CGAAAAGAGAGACCACATGGTC This study
13 pBOMB5-tet-Bb2_fwd CTCGTTATTTGGGAGGACACGAAAATCCAAGATTCCCC This study
14 pBOMB5-tet-Bb2_rev GACCATGTGGTCTCTCTTTTCG This study

pBOMB5-tet-aadA-CtrR3 Plasmid Generation

The pBOMB5-tet-aadA plasmid was generated from the pBOMB4-tet-aadA plasmid in accordance with the already published model73. DNA fragments were amplified using Phusion™ High-Fidelity DNA-Polymerase (ThermoFisher, Cat. No. F530) and PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR & Gel cleanup Kit (QIAGEN, Cat. No. 28506). E. coli-transformants were cultured in LB-Medium [10 % Peptone (Roth, Cat. No. 8952), 5 % yeast extract (Roth, Cat. No. 2363), 5 % NaCl (Roth, Cat. No. P029)] and LB-Agar plates [LB-Medium with 15 % Agar (Becton Dickinson, Cat. No. 257353)] containing 100 µg/mL spectinomycin. Plasmids were isolated using the NucleoSpin Plasmid Mini Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Cat. No. 740588) and NucleoBond Xtra Midi EF Midi Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Cat. No. 740420). The sequences of the final plasmids were confirmed by Sanger and Nanopore sequencing by Microsynth Seqlab GmbH (Göttingen, Germany).

To generate the pBOMB5-tet-aadA plasmid, first the ampicillin resistance cassette and the tet-inducible expression cassette were removed, and the orientation of the Tet-Repressor (Tet-R) was reversed. To this end, the backbone was split into two fragments and amplified using the primers 1 + 2 and 3 + 4 respectively. The spectinomycin resistance cassette (SmR) was amplified using the primers 5 + 6, the Tet-R with the primers 7 + 8. The plasmid was generated using the In-Fusion Snap Assembly Master Mix (Takara, Cat. No. 638947) and transformed into Stellar competent cells (Takara, Cat. No. 636763).

Next, the CtrR3 sRNA backbone containing random bases in the hairpin was cloned into the pBOMB5-tet-aadA plasmid by digesting the pBOMB5-tet-aadA vector and a gBlock (Integrated DNA Technologies) encoding for the sRNA and the Tet-inducible promoter, with FastDigest SalI (Thermo Scientific, Cat. No. FD0644) and FastDigest NotI (Thermo Scientific, Cat. No. FD0594) and subsequently ligated using T4 DNA Ligase (Thermo Scientific, Cat. EL0011). The newly generated plasmid was transformed into chemically competent E. coli DH5α (homemade).

To change the bases in the hairpin of the CtrR3, the vector was amplified using the primer pairs 9 + 10, 11 + 12 and 13 + 14, followed by In-Fusion cloning and Stellar transformation. After successful sequence validation, the plasmid was transformed into chemically competent E. coli JM110131 (homemade) to obtain unmethylated plasmid DNA for Chlamydia transformation.

Chlamydia transformation

The pBOMB5-tet-aadA-CtrR3 plasmid was transformed into C. trachomatis serovar L2/434/Bu (ATCC VR-902B) as previously published132. To prepare crude stocks of C. trachomatis for transformation, McCoy cells were infected with MOI 1. At 40 h p.i. the cells were lysed by scraping and the lysate was centrifuged at 20,000 x g and 4 °C for 30 min. The pellet was resuspended in appropriate amounts of 1x SPG. To pellet the cell debris, the suspension was centrifuged at 200 x g and 4 °C for 5 min. The crude stocks were stored at −80 °C. The MOI of the crude stocks was determined by performing a sham transformation. Therefore, McCoy cells were seeded in 6-well plates. The next day, different amounts of crude stock were mixed with 50 µL CaCl2-tranformation buffer [10 mM Tris pH7.4 (Sigma Aldrich, Cat. No. T1503), 50 mM CaCl2 (Roth, Cat. No. 5239) in water], incubated for 30 min at RT and mixed every 10 min. The incubation was stopped by adding HBSS. This inoculum was used to infect the McCoy cells by replacing the medium in the wells followed by a centrifugation for 1 h at 900 x g and 20 °C. Afterwards, HBSS was replaced with McCoy Medium + 10 % FBS + 1 µg/mL cycloheximide (Sigma Aldrich, 01810). MOI 1 was determined by light microscopy 24 h p.i.

C. trachomatis was transformed using McCoy cells seeded in 6-well plates. For each well, 2 µg unmethylated plasmid DNA was mixed with 50 µL CaCl2-transformation buffer and Chlamydia of the crude stock to reach MOI 2. After 30 min incubation at RT with mixing every 10 minutes, the reaction was stopped by adding 2 ml HBSS and subsequently infecting McCoy cells (P0). After 1 h centrifugation at 900 x g and 20 °C HBSS was replaced with McCoy + 10 % FBS + 1 µg/mL cycloheximide. Selection of the transformants was started 8 h p.i. by adding 500 µg/ml spectinomycin to the cell culture medium. After 48 h p.i. the infection was passaged onto fresh McCoy cells by lysing the infected cells with a cell scraper, centrifuging the lysate for 30 min at 20,000 x g/4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in 2 mL fresh McCoy Medium + 10 % FBS + 1 µg/mL cycloheximide + 500 µg/mL spectinomycin and centrifuged for 5 min at 200 x g and 4 °C. The supernatant was used to infect a fresh layer of McCoy cells by 15 min centrifugation of the plate at 900 x g and 37 °C. This step was repeated after 48 h until fluorescent inclusions appeared at P2. Next, crude stocks were prepared, and chlamydia culture was performed as described above.

ASM and NSM activity assays

The assays are based on previously published protocols133,134. HeLa 229 cells were seeded a day prior to the experiment in a 12-well plate (1 × 105 cells per well for infection and 0.5×105 for uninfected controls). The next day, the medium was exchanged with fresh standard medium. The cells were infected with C. trachomatis at MOI 1 or left uninfected for the indicated duration. Cells were transferred to ice, washed thrice with DPBS and 100 µL/well SMase lysis buffer [250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2 % TX-100, 1xRoche protein inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, Cat. No. 11873580001)] were added. Cells were scraped from the well, transferred into a reaction tube and incubated for 5 min/4 °C. Then, lysates were incubated in an ultrasonic bath for 5 min/4 °C and then further incubated for 5 min/4 °C. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation 20.000xg/4 °C/5 min. Protein concentrations were determined with a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. 23227) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For NSM assays, a volume corresponding to 10 µg protein was incubated with 100 µL NSM assay buffer [200 mM HEPES pH 7, 200 mM MgCl2, 0.05 % Nonidet P-40 (AppliChem, Cat. No. A1694,0250)] complemented with 0.58 µM BODIPY-FL-C12-SM (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. D7711) for 22 h/37 °C/300 rpm. For ASM assays, a volume corresponding to 1 µg protein was incubated with 100 µL ASM assay buffer [500 µM ZnCl2, 200 mM sodium acetate pH 5.0, 500 mM NaCl, 0.02 % Nonidet P-40] complemented with 0.58 µM BODIPY-FL-C12-SM for 4 h/37 °C/300 rpm.

Reactions were stopped by addition of 250 µL 2:1 CHCl3:MeOH. Samples were vortexed, centrifuged 13.000 x g/3 min/RT and 25 µL of the lower organic phase were transferred into a fresh reaction tube. The solvent was removed for 20 min/45 °C in a SpeedVac evaporator. The pellet was resuspended in 10 µL 2:1 CHCl3:MeOH and spotted in 2.5 µL steps onto a thin layer chromatography plate (Alugram, Xtra Sil G/UV254, layer 0.2 mm/silica gel 60; Macherey-Nagel/VWR, Cat. No. 552-1006), which was developed with 80:20 CHCl3:MeOH. BODIPY-FL fluorescence was recorded with a Typhoon RGB scanner (Amersham, scan software Version 2.0.0.6).

Fluorescence intensities of the upper (BODIPY-FL-C12-ceramide, product) and lower band (BODIPY-FL-C12-SM, educt) were measured in Fiji (v2.9.0). The enzyme activity was determined based on the amount of generated product, assay time and used protein amount.

RT-qPCR

HeLa 229 cells were seeded a day prior to the experiment in a 6-well plate (2.5 × 105 cells per well that will be infected and 1.25 × 105 cells per well that will not be infected). The next day, the medium was exchanged with fresh standard medium, and the cells were infected with C. trachomatis at MOI 1 or left uninfected. For the L2 CtrR3 strain CtrR3 overexpression was induced 3 h after infection by addition of 100 ng/mL AHT. Medium containing fresh AHT was exchanged every 16 h. At the indicated time points, the cells were washed 2 × with DPBS and RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Cat. No. 74104) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was removed using the RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen, Cat. No. 79254) and cDNA was generated using the Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, Cat. No K1622) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The GreenMasterMix (2X) High ROX (Gennaxon, Cat. No M3052.0500) and the StepOnePlus system (Life Technologies) were used to perform the RT-qPCR according to the StepOne software (version 2.3) and data was reanalyzed using the Design & Analysis Software 2.7.0 (Thermo Scientific). Analysis of the data was performed according to the 2(−ΔΔCt) method135 using Excel (Microsoft). YWHAZ was used as endogenous control for human genes, OMCB was used as endogenous control for chlamydial genes. Primers used for RT-qPCR are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Primer for RT-qPCR

Primer Sequence Source
CtrR3_for CGGCCTCTCCTTCTGTATGC This study
CtrR3_rev GCCTAGTGGGGAATCTTGGA This study
OMCB_for GACACCAAAGCGAAAGACAACAC 137
OMCB_rev ACTCATGAACCGGAGCAACCT 137
SMPD1_for GCTGGCTCTATGAAGCGATGGC Origene:https://www.origene.com/catalog/gene-expression/qpcr-primer-pairs/hp200515/acid-sphingomyelinase-smpd1-human-qpcr-primer-pair-nm_000543
SMPD1_rev AGAGCCAGAAGTTCTCACGGGA Origene:https://www.origene.com/catalog/gene-expression/qpcr-primer-pairs/hp200515/acid-sphingomyelinase-smpd1-human-qpcr-primer-pair-nm_000543
SMPD2_for TGGTGCTCAACGCCTATGTGAC https://www.origene.com/catalog/gene-expression/qpcr-primer-pairs/hp206667/nsmase-smpd2-human-qpcr-primer-pair-nm_003080
SMPD2_rev GTCTGCCTTCTTGGATGTGTGG https://www.origene.com/catalog/gene-expression/qpcr-primer-pairs/hp206667/nsmase-smpd2-human-qpcr-primer-pair-nm_003080
SMPD3_for GAAGGACAACAAGGTCCCAGT This study
SMPD3_rev CAACTCCGGCTGGTCAATGG This study
SMPD4_for CGGCCCAAAGAGGTGGAAG This study
SMPD4_rev CAGGTGAGGGAACGCCATAG This study
YWHAZ_for ACTTTTGGTACATTGTGGCTTCAA 138
YWHAZ_rev CCGCCAGGACAAACCAGTAT 138

Statistics and data representation

Statical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (Version 10.1.2. and Version 11.0.1). Details can be found in the corresponding figure legends. All data are represented as mean ± standard deviation. The n value given in figure legends corresponds to biological replicates, if not state otherwise.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

41467_2026_77974_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (45.1KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1 (6.4MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 2 (8.7MB, mp4)
Reporting Summary (79.7KB, pdf)

Source data

Source Data (214.6KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Dagmar Heuer (Rober Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany) for providing CERT K.O. cells as well as Martin Fraunholz and Fabio Schmelz (Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany) for providing ASM K.O. cells. We are grateful to Adriana Moldovan for valuable scientific discussion. We thank Janna Eilts for valuable advice regarding super resolution microscopy. Kathrin Stelzner, Arpita Mohanty and Adriana Moldovan provided primers. Daniel Herrmann’s technical support during the HPLC-MS/MS analyses is greatly appreciated. We thank Christian Häring and Guru Amudhan for providing access to the Typhoon RGB scanner and their advice. Figures were created in BioRender.

Author contributions

M.R., F.W. and T.R. conceptualized the study. M.R., F.W. and T.R. wrote the manuscript. M.R., F.W., T.E., P. F. K., F.S., S.S., B.K., M.S., G. L. W. performed and analyzed biological experiments. L.K., J.F., L.G. and J.S. performed chemical synthesis. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. Correspondence to Marcel Rühling and Thomas Rudel.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Kentaro Hanada and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Funding

The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) funded the Leica TCS SP5 CLSM under project code 116162193 and the Leica Stellaris 5 CLSM under project code INST93/1159-1 FUGG. ScopeM at ETH Zürich is acknowledged for access to cryoEM instrumentation. This work was supported by the DFG within the research training group RTG2581 (M.S, B.K., J.S., T.R.), and the Collaborative Research Center SFB 1583 (T.R.). T.R. receives funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program Grant No. ERC-2018-ADG/NCI-CAD (T.R.). M.R. was supported by funds of the Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts and the University of Würzburg to the Graduate School of Life Sciences (GSLS), University of Würzburg. This work was supported by the DFG FOR3004 SYNABS, SA829/19-1 to M.S. and S.S.. M.S. and S.S. are supported by European Research Council (ERC) funding under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 835102). We would like to acknowledge the assistance of the Core Facility BioSupraMol supported by the DFG. Work in Zurich (G.L.W.) was supported by the Fondation Jean-Jacques et Felicia Lopez-Loreta and by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) Grant TMSGI3_226208. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data availability

The cryo-electron tomograms generate in this study have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) under accession numbers EMD-59116 – EMD-59119. The lipidomics data evaluated in this study are included in the Supplementary Information and Source Data. The high-resolution MS raw data recorded to identify the TFSM1 metabolites have been deposited to the MetaboLights136 repository with the study identifier MTBLS15303. Otherwise, all data generated or analysed during this study are included in the published article and its supplementary information files. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Marcel Rühling, Fabienne Wagner.

Contributor Information

Marcel Rühling, Email: marcel.ruehling@uni-wuerzburg.de.

Thomas Rudel, Email: thomas.rudel@uni-wuerzburg.de.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77974-3.

References

  • 1.Hannun, Y. A. & Obeid, L. M. Sphingolipids and their metabolism in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.19, 175–191 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee, M. J. et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate as a ligand for the G protein-coupled receptor EDG-1. Science279, 1552–1555 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Augé, N., Nègre-Salvayre, A., Salvayre, R. & Levade, T. Sphingomyelin metabolites in vascular cell signaling and atherogenesis. Prog. Lipid Res.39, 207–229 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simons, K. & Ikonen, E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature387, 569–572 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bieberich, E. Sphingolipids and lipid rafts: Novel concepts and methods of analysis. Chem. Phys. Lipids216, 114–131 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lai, E. C. Lipid rafts make for slippery platforms. J. Cell Biol.162, 365–370 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sviridov, D., Mukhamedova, N. & Miller, Y. I. Lipid rafts as a therapeutic target. J. Lipid Res.61, 687–695 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schuchman, E. H. & Desnick, R. J. Types A and B Niemann-Pick disease. Mol. Genet. Metab.120, 27–33 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mehta, A. Epidemiology and natural history of Gaucher’s disease. Eur. J. Intern. Med.17, S2–S5 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Slotte, J. P. Biological functions of sphingomyelins. Prog. Lipid Res.52, 424–437 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.De Rooij, R. E., Liem, K. O., Brouwer-Schipper, J. W., Husmann, G. G. & Hooghwinkel, G. J. A method for the determination of sphingomyelinase activity. Clin. Chim. Acta59, 71–79 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schneider, P. B. & Kennedy, E. P. Sphingomyelinase in normal human spleens and in spleens from subjects with Niemann-Pick disease. J. Lipid Res.8, 202–209 (1967). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yamanaka, T., Hanada, E. & Suzuki, K. Acid sphingomyelinase of human brain. Improved purification procedures and characterization. J. Biol. Chem.256, 3884–3889 (1981). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nyberg, L., Duan, R. D., Axelson, J. & Nilsson, A. Identification of an alkaline sphingomyelinase activity in human bile. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1300, 42–48 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pavoine, C. & Pecker, F. Sphingomyelinases: their regulation and roles in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Cardiovasc. Res.82, 175–183 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Breiden, B. & Sandhoff, K. Acid Sphingomyelinase, a Lysosomal and Secretory Phospholipase C, Is Key for Cellular Phospholipid Catabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Grassme, H. et al. Acidic sphingomyelinase mediates entry of N. gonorrhoeae into nonphagocytic cells. Cell91, 605–615 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Luisoni, S. et al. Co-option of Membrane Wounding Enables Virus Penetration into Cells. Cell Host Microbe18, 75–85 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peters, S. et al. Neisseria meningitidis Type IV Pili Trigger Ca(2+)-Dependent Lysosomal Trafficking of the Acid Sphingomyelinase To Enhance Surface Ceramide Levels. Infect. Immun. 87, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Rühling, M. et al. A Novel Rapid Host Cell Entry Pathway Determines Intracellular Fate of Staphylococcus aureus. eLife (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Mueller, N., Avota, E., Collenburg, L., Grassmé, H. & Schneider-Schaulies, S. Neutral Sphingomyelinase in Physiological and Measles Virus Induced T Cell Suppression. PLoS Pathog.10, e1004574 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Doery, H. M., Magnusson, B. J., Cheyne, I. M. & Gulasekharam, J. A Phospholipase in Staphylococcal Toxin which hydrolyses Sphingomyelin. Nature198, 1091–1092 (1963). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Peñate Medina, T. A. et al. Identification of Sphingomyelinase on the Surface of Chlamydia pneumoniae: Possible Role in the Entry into Its Host Cells. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis.2014, 412827 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mohseni, M., Sung, S. & Takov, V. in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing Copyright ©2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC., Treasure Island (FL); 2025).
  • 25.Stelzner, K., Vollmuth, N. & Rudel, T. Intracellular lifestyle of Chlamydia trachomatis and host–pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.21, 448–462 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grieshaber, N. A., Fischer, E. R., Mead, D. J., Dooley, C. A. & Hackstadt, T. Chlamydial histone-DNA interactions are disrupted by a metabolite in the methylerythritol phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101, 7451–7456 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nans, A., Saibil, H. R. & Hayward, R. D. Pathogen-host reorganization during Chlamydia invasion revealed by cryo-electron tomography. Cell. Microbiol.16, 1457–1472 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rucks, E. A. Type III Secretion in Chlamydia. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.87, e00034–00023 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stallmann, S. & Hegemann, J. H. The Chlamydia trachomatis Ctad1 invasin exploits the human integrin β1 receptor for host cell entry. Cell. Microbiol.18, 761–775 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Subbarayal, P. et al. EphrinA2 receptor (EphA2) is an invasion and intracellular signaling receptor for Chlamydia trachomatis. PLoS Pathog.11, e1004846 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grieshaber, N. A., Sager, J. B., Dooley, C. A., Hayes, S. F. & Hackstadt, T. Regulation of the Chlamydia trachomatis histone H1-like protein Hc2 is IspE dependent and IhtA independent. J. Bacteriol.188, 5289–5292 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grieshaber, N. A., Grieshaber, S. S., Fischer, E. R. & Hackstadt, T. A small RNA inhibits translation of the histone-like protein Hc1 in Chlamydia trachomatis. Mol. Microbiol.59, 541–550 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barry, C. E., Hayes, S. F. & Hackstadt, T. Nucleoid Condensation in Escherichia coli That Express a Chlamydial Histone Homolog. Science256, 377–379 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee, J. K. et al. Replication-dependent size reduction precedes differentiation in Chlamydia trachomatis. Nat. Commun.9, 45 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rajeeve, K. et al. Reprogramming of host glutamine metabolism during Chlamydia trachomatis infection and its key role in peptidoglycan synthesis. Nat. Microbiol.5, 1390–1402 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Moulder, J. W. Interaction of chlamydiae and host cells in vitro. Microbiol. Rev.55, 143–190 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thomson, N. R. et al. Chlamydia trachomatis: genome sequence analysis of lymphogranuloma venereum isolates. Genome Res.18, 161–171 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tipples, G. & McClarty, G. The obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis is auxotrophic for three of the four ribonucleoside triphosphates. Mol. Microbiol.8, 1105–1114 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wylie, J. L., Hatch, G. M. & McClarty, G. Host cell phospholipids are trafficked to and then modified by Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Bacteriol.179, 7233–7242 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Robertson, D. K., Gu, L. & Rowe, R. K. & Beatty, W. L. Inclusion Biogenesis and Reactivation of Persistent Chlamydia trachomatis Requires Host Cell Sphingolipid Biosynthesis. PLoS Pathog.5, e1000664 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Van Ooij, C. et al. Host cell-derived sphingolipids are required for the intracellular growth of Chlamydia trachomatis. Cell. Microbiol.2, 627–637 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hackstadt, T., Scidmore, M. A. & Rockey, D. D. Lipid metabolism in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected cells: directed trafficking of Golgi-derived sphingolipids to the chlamydial inclusion. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA92, 4877–4881 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Elwell, C. A. et al. Chlamydia trachomatis Co-opts GBF1 and CERT to Acquire Host Sphingomyelin for Distinct Roles during Intracellular Development. PLoS Pathog.7, e1002198 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gotz, R. et al. Nanoscale imaging of bacterial infections by sphingolipid expansion microscopy. Nat. Commun.11, 6173 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rühling, M. et al. Trifunctional sphingomyelin derivatives enable nanoscale resolution of sphingomyelin turnover in physiological and infection processes via expansion microscopy. Nat. Commun.15, 7456 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Moldovan, A. et al. Chlamydia trachomatis exploits sphingolipid metabolic pathways during infection of phagocytes. mBio, e0398124 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Hackstadt, T., Rockey, D. D., Heinzen, R. A. & Scidmore, M. A. Chlamydia trachomatis interrupts an exocytic pathway to acquire endogenously synthesized sphingomyelin in transit from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane. EMBO J.15, 964–977 (1996). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kumagai, K. et al. Chlamydial Infection-Dependent Synthesis of Sphingomyelin as a Novel Anti-Chlamydial Target of Ceramide Mimetic Compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Tachida, Y. et al. Chlamydia trachomatis-infected human cells convert ceramide to sphingomyelin without sphingomyelin synthases 1 and 2. FEBS Lett.594, 519–529 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Verhaegh, R., Becker, K. A., Edwards, M. J. & Gulbins, E. Sphingosine kills bacteria by binding to cardiolipin. J. Biol. Chem.295, 7686–7696 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Possemiers, S., Van Camp, J., Bolca, S. & Verstraete, W. Characterization of the bactericidal effect of dietary sphingosine and its activity under intestinal conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol.105, 59–70 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Abbe, E. Beiträge zur Theorie des Mikroskops und der mikroskopischen Wahrnehmung. Arch. Mikrosk. Anat.9, 413–468 (1873). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chen, F., Tillberg, P. W. & Boyden, E. S. Optical imaging. Expansion microscopy. Science347, 543–548 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chozinski, T. J. et al. Expansion microscopy with conventional antibodies and fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods13, 485–488 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Damstra, H. G. J. et al. Visualizing cellular and tissue ultrastructure using Ten-fold Robust Expansion Microscopy (TREx). eLife11, e73775 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ku, T. et al. Multiplexed and scalable super-resolution imaging of three-dimensional protein localization in size-adjustable tissues. Nat. Biotechnol.34, 973–981 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.M’Saad, O. & Bewersdorf, J. Light microscopy of proteins in their ultrastructural context. Nat. Commun.11, 3850 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.White, B. M., Kumar, P., Conwell, A. N., Wu, K. & Baskin, J. M. Lipid Expansion Microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 18212–18217 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sachs, S., Reinhard, S., Eilts, J., Sauer, M. & Werner, C. Visualizing the trans-synaptic arrangement of synaptic proteins by expansion microscopy. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 18 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 60.Kunz et al. The Expandables: Cracking the Staphylococcal Cell Wall for Expansion Microscopy. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.11, 644750 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shin, T. W. et al. Dense, continuous membrane labeling and expansion microscopy visualization of ultrastructure in tissues. Nat. Commun.16, 1579 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Clausen, J. D., Christiansen, G., Holst, H. U. & Birkelund, S. Chlamydia trachomatis utilizes the host cell microtubule network during early events of infection. Mol. Microbiol.25, 441–449 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Grieshaber, S. S., Grieshaber, N. A. & Hackstadt, T. Chlamydia trachomatis uses host cell dynein to traffic to the microtubule-organizing center in a p50 dynamitin-independent process. J. Cell Sci.116, 3793–3802 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.McManus, J. J., Rädler, J. O. & Dawson, K. A. Does Calcium Turn a Zwitterionic Lipid Cationic? J. Phys. Chem. B107, 9869–9875 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Uhríková, D., Lengyel, A., Hanulová, M., Funari, S. S. & Balgavý, P. The structural diversity of DNA-neutral phospholipids-divalent metal cations aggregates: a small-angle synchrotron X-ray diffraction study. Eur. Biophys. J.36, 363–375 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pisani, M., Bruni, P., Caracciolo, G., Caminiti, R. & Francescangeli, O. Structure and Phase Behavior of Self-Assembled DPPC−DNA−Metal Cation Complexes. J. Phys. Chem. B110, 13203–13211 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McManus, J. J., Rädler, J. O. & Dawson, K. A. Observation of a Rectangular Columnar Phase in a DNA−Calcium−Zwitterionic Lipid Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc.126, 15966–15967 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Francescangeli, O. et al. Structure of self-assembled liposome-DNA-metal complexes. Phys. Rev. E67, 011904 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mengistu, D. H., Bohinc, K. & May, S. Binding of DNA to Zwitterionic Lipid Layers Mediated by Divalent Cations. J. Phys. Chem. B113, 12277–12282 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Malghani, M. S. & Yang, J. Stable Binding of DNA to Zwitterionic Lipid Bilayers in Aqueous Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B102, 8930–8933 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gromelski, S. & Brezesinski, G. DNA Condensation and Interaction with Zwitterionic Phospholipids Mediated by Divalent Cations. Langmuir22, 6293–6301 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Banhart, S., Schäfer, E. K., Gensch, J. M. & Heuer, D. Sphingolipid Metabolism and Transport in Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia psittaci Infections. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol.7, 223 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wang, K. et al. A Reverse Genetic Approach for Studying sRNAs in Chlamydia trachomatis. mBio13, e0086422 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Manzoli, F. A., Muchmore, J. H., Bonora, B., Sabioni, A. & Stefoni, S. Interaction between sphingomyelin and DNA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta277, 251–255 (1972). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sayed, A., Eswara, K., Teles, K., Boudellioua, A. & Fischle, W. Nuclear lipids in chromatin regulation: Biological roles, experimental approaches and existing challenges. Biol. Cell117, e2400103 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mizutani, Y. et al. Nuclear localization of neutral sphingomyelinase 1: biochemical and immunocytochemical analyses. J. Cell Sci.114, 3727–3736 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Igarashi, N. et al. Sphingosine kinase 2 is a nuclear protein and inhibits DNA synthesis. J. Biol. Chem.278, 46832–46839 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Albi, E. & Magni, M. V. Sphingomyelin synthase in rat liver nuclear membrane and chromatin. FEBS Lett.460, 369–372 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Welte, M. ichaelA. Expanding Roles for Lipid Droplets. Curr. Biol.25, R470–R481 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Layerenza, J. P. et al. Nuclear lipid droplets: A novel nuclear domain. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids327–340, 2013 (1831). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Uzbekov, R. & Roingeard, P. Nuclear lipid droplets identified by electron microscopy of serial sections. BMC Res. Notes6, 386 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hait, N. C. et al. Regulation of histone acetylation in the nucleus by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Science325, 1254–1257 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Conte, C. et al. Sphingomyelin regulates the transcriptional machinery in nuclear lipid microdomains. Commun. Biol.8, 1303 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Silva, I. T. G., Fernandes, V., Souza, C., Treptow, W. & Santos, G. M. Biophysical studies of cholesterol effects on chromatin[S]. J. Lipid Res.58, 934–940 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Erickson, S. K., Da Vison, A. M. & Gould, R. G. Correlation of rat liver chromatin-bound free and esterified cholesterol with the circadian rhythm of cholesterol biosynthesis in the rat. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Lipids Lipid Metab.409, 59–67 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fernandes, V., Teles, K., Ribeiro, C., Treptow, W. & Santos, G. Fat nucleosome: Role of lipids on chromatin. Prog. Lipid Res.70, 29–34 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lynch, A. S. & Wang, J. C. Anchoring of DNA to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane through cotranscriptional synthesis of polypeptides encoding membrane proteins or proteins for export: a mechanism of plasmid hypernegative supercoiling in mutants deficient in DNA topoisomerase I. J. Bacteriol.175, 1645–1655 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Leibowitz, P. J. & Schaechter, M. in Int. Rev. Cytol.41, (eds. Bourne, G. H. Danielli, J. F. & Jeon, K. W.) 1–28 (Academic Press, 1975).
  • 89.Norris, V. Hypothesis: chromosome separation in Escherichia coli involves autocatalytic gene expression, transertion and membrane-domain formation. Mol. Microbiol.16, 1051–1057 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Roggiani, M. & Goulian, M. Chromosome-Membrane Interactions in Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet.49, 115–129 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Libby, E. A., Roggiani, M. & Goulian, M. Membrane protein expression triggers chromosomal locus repositioning in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA109, 7445–7450 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Gogou, C., Japaridze, A. & Dekker, C. Mechanisms for Chromosome Segregation in Bacteria. Front. Microbiol.12, 685687 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hammad, S. M. et al. Blood sphingolipidomics in healthy humans: impact of sample collection methodology. J. Lipid Res.51, 3074–3087 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Grösch, S., Schiffmann, S. & Geisslinger, G. Chain length-specific properties of ceramides. Prog. Lipid Res.51, 50–62 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Bai, J. & Pagano, R. E. Measurement of Spontaneous Transfer and Transbilayer Movement of BODIPY-Labeled Lipids in Lipid Vesicles. Biochemistry36, 8840–8848 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Silvius, J. R. & Leventis, R. Spontaneous interbilayer transfer of phospholipids: dependence on acylchain composition. Biochemistry32, 13318–13326 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Jones, J. D., Almeida, P. F. & Thompson, T. E. Spontaneous interbilayer transfer of hexosylceramides between phospholipid bilayers. Biochemistry29, 3892–3897 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wang, Y. et al. Chlamydial histone homologs control developmental fitness in the next infection cycle. mSphere11, e00358–00326 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Shaw, E. I. et al. Three temporal classes of gene expression during the Chlamydia trachomatis developmental cycle. Mol. Microbiol.37, 913–925 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wichlan, D. G. & Hatch, T. P. Identification of an early-stage gene of Chlamydia psittaci 6BC. J. Bacteriol.175, 2936–2942 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Plaunt, M. R. & Hatch, T. P. Protein synthesis early in the developmental cycle of Chlamydia psittaci. Infect. Immun.56, 3021–3025 (1988). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Botelho, R. J., Scott, C. C. & Grinstein, S. Phosphoinositide involvement in phagocytosis and phagosome maturation. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.282, 1–30 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Nelson, D. E. et al. Inhibition of chlamydiae by primary alcohols correlates with the strain-specific complement of plasticity zone phospholipase D genes. Infect. Immun.74, 73–80 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wolf, K., Fischer, E. & Hackstadt, T. Ultrastructural Analysis of Developmental Events inChlamydia pneumoniae-Infected Cells. Infect. Immun.68, 2379–2385 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Costerton, J. W., Poffenroth, L., Wilt, J. C. & Kordová, N. Ultrastructural studies of the nucleoids of the pleomorphic forms of Chlamydia psittaci 6BC: a comparison with bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol.22, 16–28 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Wagner, F. et al. Monitoring Sphingomyelin Biosynthesis at Nanoscale Resolution by Expansion Microscopy. bioRxiv, 2026.2005.2027.726241 (2026).
  • 107.López-Montero, I. et al. Rapid Transbilayer Movement of Ceramides in Phospholipid Vesicles and inHumanErythrocytes*. J. Biol. Chem.280, 25811–25819 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Derré, I., Swiss, R. & Agaisse, H. The Lipid Transfer Protein CERT Interacts with the Chlamydia Inclusion Protein IncD and Participates to ER-Chlamydia Inclusion Membrane Contact Sites. PLoS Pathog.7, e1002092 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Koch-Edelmann, S. et al. The cellular ceramide transport protein CERT promotes Chlamydia psittaci infection and controls bacterial sphingolipid uptake. Cell. Microbiol.19, e12752 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Rühling, M. et al. A Novel Rapid Host Cell Entry Pathway Determines Intracellular Fate of Staphylococcus aureus. eLife (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 111.Paland, N. et al. Reduced display of tumor necrosis factor receptor I at the host cell surface supports infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Biol. Chem.283, 6438–6448 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Damstra, H. G. J. et al. Ten-fold Robust Expansion Microscopy. Bio Protoc.13, e4698 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Damstra, H. G. J. et al. Visualizing cellular and tissue ultrastructure using Ten-fold Robust Expansion Microscopy (TREx). bioRxiv, 2021.2002.2003.428837 (2021).
  • 114.Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 676–682 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Wickham, H. ggplot2 Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Edn. 2. (Springer Cham, 2016).
  • 116.RStudioTeam RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio,. PBC (2020).
  • 117.Cordelières, F. P. & Bolte, S. (2008).
  • 118.Bolte, S. & Cordelières, F. P. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J. Microsc.224, 213–232 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Weiss, G. L., Medeiros, J. M. & Pilhofer, M. in Bacterial Protein Secretion Systems: Methods and Protocols. (eds. Journet, L. & Cascales, E.) 353–375 (Springer New York, New York, NY; 2017).
  • 120.Zachs, T. et al. Fully automated, sequential focused ion beam milling for cryo-electron tomography. eLife9, e52286 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol.152, 36–51 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Eisenstein, F., Fukuda, Y. & Danev, R. Smart parallel automated cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Methods21, 1612–1615 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer Visualization of Three-Dimensional Image Data Using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol.116, 71–76 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Mastronarde, D. N. Correction for non-perpendicularity of beam and tilt axis in tomographic reconstructions with the IMOD package. J. Microsc.230, 212–217 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wiedemann, S. & Heckel, R. A deep learning method for simultaneous denoising and missing wedge reconstruction in cryogenic electron tomography. Nat. Commun.15, 8255 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Heebner, J. E. et al. Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms. JoVE, e64435 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 127.Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci.30, 70–82 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Ermel, U. H., Arghittu, S. M. & Frangakis, A. S. ArtiaX: An electron tomography toolbox for the interactive handling of sub-tomograms in UCSF ChimeraX. Protein Sci.31, e4472 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Castaño-Díez, D., Kudryashev, M., Arheit, M. & Stahlberg, H. Dynamo: A flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments. J. Struct. Biol.178, 139–151 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Prell, A., Wigger, D., Huwiler, A., Schumacher, F. & Kleuser, B. The sphingosine kinase 2 inhibitors ABC294640 and K145 elevate (dihydro)sphingosine 1-phosphate levels in various cells. J. Lipid Res.65, 100631 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Yanisch-Perron, C., Vieira, J. & Messing, J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mpl8 and pUC19 vectors. Gene33, 103–119 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Wolf, K., Rahnama, M. & Fields, K. A. Genetic Manipulation of Chlamydia trachomatis: Chromosomal Deletions. Methods Mol. Biol.2042, 151–164 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Muhle, C. & Kornhuber, J. Assay to measure sphingomyelinase and ceramidase activities efficiently and safely. J. Chromatogr. A1481, 137–144 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Krones, D. et al. Staphylococcus aureus α-Toxin Induces Acid Sphingomyelinase Release From a Human Endothelial Cell Line. Front. Microbiol. 12 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 135.Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods25, 402–408 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Yurekten, O. et al. MetaboLights: open data repository for metabolomics. Nucleic Acids Res.52, D640–d646 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Butcher, R. et al. Reduced-cost Chlamydia trachomatis-specific multiplex real-time PCR diagnostic assay evaluated for ocular swabs and use by trachoma research programmes. J. Microbiol. Methods139, 95–102 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Chua, S. L., See Too, W. C., Khoo, B. Y. & Few, L. L. UBC and YWHAZ as suitable reference genes for accurate normalisation of gene expression using MCF7, HCT116 and HepG2 cell lines. Cytotechnology63, 645–654 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41467_2026_77974_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (45.1KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1 (6.4MB, mp4)
Supplementary Movie 2 (8.7MB, mp4)
Reporting Summary (79.7KB, pdf)
Source Data (214.6KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The cryo-electron tomograms generate in this study have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) under accession numbers EMD-59116 – EMD-59119. The lipidomics data evaluated in this study are included in the Supplementary Information and Source Data. The high-resolution MS raw data recorded to identify the TFSM1 metabolites have been deposited to the MetaboLights136 repository with the study identifier MTBLS15303. Otherwise, all data generated or analysed during this study are included in the published article and its supplementary information files. Source data are provided with this paper.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES