ABSTRACT
Pregnancy loss (PL) remains a major limitation to reproductive efficiency in livestock, with a substantial proportion originating during early embryo development, particularly between blastocyst hatching and implantation. This developmental window encompasses complex processes of lineage differentiation and morphogenesis. Accumulating evidence indicates that intrinsic defects in embryonic development, most notably within the epiblast, are key contributors to PL, especially following in vitro embryo production. Mechanistic investigation of this period has historically been limited by reliance on resource‐demanding in vivo approaches. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the molecular regulation of early embryo development in ungulates and the factors associated with PL during the post‐hatching period. We further synthesize recent advances in molecular technologies, extended embryo culture systems, and three‐dimensional endometrial models that are transforming the study of post‐hatching embryo development in livestock species. Collectively, these advances provide a foundation for refining assisted reproductive technologies and developing predictive strategies to mitigate PL, thereby enhancing reproductive efficiency and sustainability in livestock production systems.
Keywords: bovine, embryo, ovine, post‐hatching, pregnancy loss
1. Introduction
Reproductive efficiency is essential for the sustainability of animal production systems. Successful reproduction depends on a series of tightly regulated biological processes, including gametogenesis, fertilization, embryonic and foetal development, and ultimately parturition. However, pregnancy loss (PL) has a major negative impact on animal production systems. The incidence of PL varies substantially depending on the production system and reproductive management. For example, PL is generally higher in dairy compared to beef cattle, likely reflecting differences in metabolic stress (Reese et al. 2020; Sartori et al. 2025), and also differs according to the reproductive strategy used, including timed artificial insemination (AI) and timed embryo transfer of fresh or frozen in vitro‐produced embryos. Notably, PL is higher following ET compared to AI, and calving rates are reduced after transfer of frozen embryos relative to fresh ET or AI (Crowe, Sánchez, Moore, McDonald, McCabe, et al. 2025). Although failures may occur at any stage, PL during the first weeks of gestation represents a major limitation to reproductive performance and economic viability, reaching up to 50% in cattle (Berg et al. 2022; Crowe, Sánchez, Moore, McDonald, McCabe, et al. 2025; Dunne et al. 2000; Wiltbank et al. 2016) and up to 40% in ewes and pigs (Almeida and Dias 2022; Diskin and Morris 2008; Wilmut et al. 1986). During this period, tightly coordinated events of cell proliferation and lineage specification are required to ensure successful implantation and subsequent foetal development.
Following fertilization, the zygote undergoes cleavage divisions culminating in blastocyst formation between days (D) 6 and 8 in ungulates. Embryonic losses during this first developmental stage are estimated to range between 10% and 28% in cattle (Diskin and Sreenan 1980; Reese et al. 2020; Roche et al. 1981) (Figure 1). Until the blastocyst stage, the embryo remains enclosed within the zona pellucida. Hatching from this glycoprotein shell marks the onset of post‐hatching development, a second developmental period characterized by complex lineage specification events and extensive morphogenetic remodelling. In rodents and primates, the hatched blastocyst implants shortly thereafter. In contrast, ungulates undergo a prolonged preimplantation period known as conceptus elongation, during which rapid proliferation of extraembryonic membranes transforms the spherical blastocyst into a filamentous conceptus prior to implantation. Concurrently, gastrulation and somitogenesis occur within a flat embryonic disc (ED) while the conceptus remains free‐floating in the uterine lumen (Pérez‐Gómez, Gonzalez‐Brusi, Bermejo‐Alvarez, et al. 2021). This poorly accessible developmental window, often referred to as the ‘black box’ of development, represents the period most susceptible to PL in livestock (Martínez De Los Reyes et al. 2026). Post‐hatching PL in cattle range between 26% and 34% (Berg et al. 2010; Pérez‐Gómez, Gonzalez‐Brusi, Bermejo‐Alvarez, et al. 2021), with approximately one‐third of viable blastocysts failing to complete conceptus elongation (Santos et al. 2004). In contrast, PL after the first month of gestation accounts for less than 6% (Reese et al. 2020) (Figure 1). Notably, comparable patterns are observed in humans, which also develop a flat ED: only ∼30% of conceptions result in live birth, while ∼60% are lost before or around implantation during the first 3 weeks of development, often without clinical detection (Larsen et al. 2013).
FIGURE 1.

Average pregnancy rate during the pre‐hatching, post‐hatching, and post‐implantation stages in cattle. Representative embryo developmental stages corresponding to each period are shown.
Collectively, these observations underscore the urgent need to elucidate the molecular mechanisms regulating post‐hatching development in ungulates, which are the basis for understanding early PL in livestock. Historically, progress has been constrained by the difficulty of recapitulating post‐hatching development in vitro and by the limited availability of molecular tools for functional studies in non‐rodent species. However, recent advances in extended embryo culture systems, single‐cell transcriptomics, genome editing, and endometrial models now enable mechanistic investigations of early embryo development in livestock. In this review, we discuss the molecular regulation of early embryo development in ungulates and its association with PL, highlighting emerging technologies that are transforming the field.
2. Molecular Regulation of Embryo Development in Ungulates
Early mammalian embryogenesis has been extensively characterized in the mouse, which has served as the principal experimental model for several decades. Although the initial stages of embryo development are broadly conserved across mammals, accumulating evidence reveals substantial divergence in gene regulatory networks between rodents and non‐rodent species, particularly ungulates.
During early cleavage stages, embryos rely on maternal transcripts and proteins until embryonic genome activation (EGA), which occurs at the 2‐cell stage in mice and at the 4–8‐cell stage in ungulates and primates (Piliszek and Madeja 2018) (Figure 2). In the mouse, polarization of outer blastomeres at the 8‐cell stage initiates trophectoderm (TE) versus inner cell mass (ICM) specification via Hippo/YAP signalling (Korotkevich et al. 2017; Maître et al. 2016). Activation of Tead4 in outer blastomeres promotes the expression of TE‐specific genes, including Cdx2, Elf5, and Eomes, while repressing pluripotency factors such as Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2. This establishes mutually exclusive expression domains of TE and ICM transcription factors prior to blastocyst formation (Niwa et al. 2005; Wicklow et al. 2014).
FIGURE 2.

Pre‐implantation embryonic development in ungulate species. Embryonic genome activation (EGA) occurs around the 4‐ to 8‐cell stage. By day (D) 5–7, a blastocyst composed of trophectoderm (TE) and Inner Cell Mass (ICM) cells is formed. Around blastocyst hatching from the zona pellucida, the ICM differentiates into the epiblast (EPI) and the hypoblast (HYPO). Hypoblast cells will subsequently migrate along the inner surface of the TE. After formation of the embryonic disc (ED) from the EPI, the polar TE, termed Rauber's layer (RL), is eliminated around D10–12, preceding the emergence of the first mesoderm (MESO) cells and primitive streak (PS) formation during conceptus elongation. In ungulates, all of these events occur prior to implantation.
In contrast, ungulates display substantial differences in the timing and function of these key transcription factors. In cattle, pigs and sheep, CDX2 protein expression is limited prior to blastocyst formation and, in contrast to the mouse, it does not repress OCT4 in TE cells until late blastocyst stages (Berg et al. 2011; Goissis and Cibelli 2014; Kirchhof et al. 2000; Kuijk et al. 2008; Martínez De Los Reyes, Carvajal‐Serna, et al. 2024). Furthermore, EOMES and ELF5 are not expressed in porcine and bovine blastocysts (Ramos‐Ibeas et al. 2019; Wei et al. 2017). TEAD4, which is essential for blastocyst formation in mice (Nishioka et al. 2008; Yagi et al. 2007), is dispensable in cattle, rabbits, and humans (Pérez‐Gómez, González‐Brusi, Flores‐Borobia, Galiano‐Cogolludo, et al. 2024; Pérez‐Gómez, González‐Brusi, Muniesa‐Martínez, et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2024). Similarly, CDX2 deficiency prevents blastocyst formation in mice (Strumpf et al. 2005) but not in bovine embryos (Goissis and Cibelli 2014; Shi et al. 2023). In contrast, OCT4 ablation impairs blastocyst development in human embryos but not in mice (Fogarty et al. 2017; Stamatiadis et al. 2021), and conflicting results have been reported in bovine embryos (Daigneault et al. 2018; Luo et al. 2022; Simmet et al. 2018).
At the time of blastocyst hatching, the second lineage segregation gives rise to the epiblast, which will form the future foetus, and the hypoblast, which together with the TE form the extraembryonic membranes. In mice, epiblast versus hypoblast specification is driven by mutually exclusive expression of Nanog and Gata6 within the late ICM (Plusa et al. 2008). However, this ‘salt‐and‐pepper’ pattern is not conserved in primates and ungulates, where GATA6 expression is not initially restricted to the hypoblast and becomes lineage‐specific only at later stages (Blakeley et al. 2015; Kuijk et al. 2008; Martínez de Los Reyes, Flores‐Borobia, et al. 2024; Ramos‐Ibeas et al. 2019).
Despite the morphological similarities, these interspecies differences in the molecular regulation of pre‐hatching development challenge mouse‐centred paradigms of early embryo development.
In contrast to the shared morphology found during pre‐hatching embryo development, post‐hatching development differs markedly across mammalian species. Both rodent and primate embryos implant into the uterus shortly after hatching, whereas ungulates undergo an extended pre‐implantation period known as conceptus elongation. Following blastocyst hatching, the hypoblast proliferates and migrates to cover the inner surface of the mural TE, thereby enclosing the blastocoel cavity. The polar TE, which is in direct contact with the epiblast, forms Rauber's layer (RL) in ungulates. This transient structure undergoes apoptosis prior to elongation, exposing the epiblast to the uterine environment (van Leeuwen et al. 2020). After RL removal, both the mural TE and the hypoblast undergo extensive expansion (Figure 2). This coordinated growth transforms the embryo from spherical to ovoid, tubular and ultimately filamentous stages, reaching up to 20 cm in sheep (Davenport et al. 2023), 30 cm in cattle (Maddox‐Hyttel et al. 2003), and 100 cm in pigs (Geisert et al. 1982) by the time of implantation, which occurs approximately at D14 in pigs (Waclawik et al. 2017), D15 in sheep (Guillomot et al. 2004), and D19 in cattle (Bazer et al. 2009).
In contrast to the mouse embryo, in which the epiblast forms a three‐dimensional cup‐shaped structure where gastrulation takes place, primate and ungulate embryos develop a flat ED. In these species, an increased cell density at the posterior region of the ED precedes the formation of the primitive streak (PS), marking the onset of gastrulation and the establishment of the three germ layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm (Guillomot et al. 2004; Kobayashi et al. 2017) (Figure 2). Current understanding of mammalian gastrulation is largely derived from studies in the mouse. However, key structures involved in gastrulation in the mouse, such as the extraembryonic ectoderm (ExE), which is derived from the polar TE and serves as a major source of signalling cues, are absent in non‐rodent species (Bedzhov et al. 2014; Martínez De Los Reyes et al. 2026). In mice, BMP4 produced by the ExE is essential for PS formation (Winnier et al. 1995). In contrast, in ungulates, the polar TE‐derived RL disappears prior to gastrulation (van Leeuwen et al. 2020), and BMP4 expression is not detected until the emergence of mesoderm cells at the onset of PS formation (González‐Brusi et al. 2026; Simpson et al. 2024). Consequently, the potential signalling gradients and molecular mechanisms driving gastrulation in ungulates remain poorly defined.
3. Factors Associated With PL During Post‐Hatching Development in Livestock
Traditionally, PL during post‐hatching development has been primarily attributed to insufficient conceptus elongation, failures in embryo‐maternal communication, or uterine dysfunction (Sartori et al. 2025; Wiltbank et al. 2016). The timing of conceptus attachment—assessed by rising concentrations of pregnancy‐specific protein B (PSBP) in maternal blood—has also been associated with PL. Cows exhibiting a delayed increase in PSBP, indicative of prolonged post‐hatching development, show a higher likelihood of PL (Crowe, Sánchez, Moore, et al. 2025; Santos et al. 2023).
After entering the uterus at the morula stage, the embryo undergoes blastocyst formation and hatching, followed by conceptus elongation prior to placentation. During this period, the embryo is entirely dependent on uterine secretions collectively termed histotroph. The histotroph is primarily produced by the glandular epithelium and consists of a complex mixture of proteins, lipids, amino acids, growth factors, extracellular vesicles (EVs), and a wide range of bioactive molecules (Forde, McGettigan, et al. 2014; Forde, Simintiras, et al. 2014; Nakamura et al. 2019; Simintiras et al. 2019). Its essential role in post‐hatching development is supported by functional evidence demonstrating that the absence of endometrial glands in sheep results in failure of conceptus elongation (Gray et al. 2001). Importantly, histotroph composition changes dynamically during early pregnancy probably matching embryonic needs (Mathew et al. 2022). Consequently, alterations in its composition can compromise post‐hatching development and predispose to PL (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3.

Schematic representation of proposed embryonic and maternal factors involved in post‐hatching pregnancy loss in ruminants. IFNt, Interferon tau; MRP, maternal recognition of pregnancy; P4, progesterone.
At the end of a normal estrous cycle, pulsatile secretion of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) induces regression of the corpus luteum (CL) (Wathes and Lamming 1995). In ruminants, the presence of an embryo leads to transient suppression of endometrial PGF2α synthesis induced by TE‐derived interferon‐tau (IFNT), thereby maintaining CL function and continued progesterone (P4) production. This process, termed maternal recognition of pregnancy (MRP), is essential for pregnancy establishment (Brooks et al. 2014; Mathew et al. 2022; Rowson and Moor 1967). Some studies suggest that the magnitude of the endometrial response to the embryo is influenced by conceptus size (Sánchez et al. 2019) or by IFNT concentration (Talukder et al. 2023). In addition, endometrial responsiveness to IFNT varies among individuals and has been reported to correlate with subsequent fertility in dairy heifers (Madureira et al. 2024). However, recent evidence challenges the prevailing MRP model in ruminants. Pregnancies have been reported in cattle following transfer of IFNT knockout (KO) embryos (Wolf et al. 2026), and lambs have been born after natural mating from sheep KO for IFNAR2, encoding interferon alpha and beta receptor subunit 2 (Davies et al. 2024). These studies are currently under review and reported in an abstract, respectively. Thus, further functional studies are required to determine whether alternative or redundant mechanisms for pregnancy recognition exist.
Classical studies estimate that approximately one‐third to one‐half of PL is attributable to maternal factors, whereas the remaining proportion results from embryo‐related causes (Domingues et al. 2023; Ealy et al. 2019). Among the latter, embryo quality and origin‐i.e., in vitro‐produced (IVP) vs. in vivo‐derived‐are major determinants of PL (Ealy et al. 2019; McMillan et al. 1997; Sartori et al. 2025). In cattle, the number of commercially produced IVP embryos has increased markedly, exceeding 2 million worldwide in 2024, compared with fewer than 300,000 in vivo‐derived embryos (Viana 2025). Despite this expansion, the developmental competence of IVP embryos remains suboptimal. PL following AI are estimated at 45%–65% in lactating dairy cattle and 10%–30% in beef cattle (Ealy et al. 2019; Gatea et al. 2018; Lucy 2001; Pohler et al. 2015; Santos et al. 2004; Wiltbank et al. 2016). In contrast, pregnancy failure rates in recipients of IVP embryos range from 59% to 85%, with approximately 40% of cows receiving an IVP blastocyst no longer pregnant by D18‐21 of gestation (Block and Hansen 2007; Ealy et al. 2019; McMillan et al. 1997; Reichenbach et al. 1992). These findings point to profound alterations in post‐hatching development associated with IVP.
At the level of the extraembryonic membranes, IVP conceptuses exhibit delayed or inefficient early elongation, with partial compensatory growth in surviving conceptuses (Barnwell et al. 2015; Bertolini, Beam, et al. 2002; Lonergan et al. 2007). Altered TE function has been inferred from differences in endometrial transcriptomic responses to IVP compared to in vivo‐derived conceptuses (Mansouri‐Attia et al. 2009; Mathew et al. 2019). Although IFNT has been proposed as a mediator of these effects, reports on IFNT mRNA and protein abundance in IVP versus in vivo embryos are inconsistent, and its contribution to altered endometrial signalling remains unclear (Arnold et al. 2006; Bertolini, Beam, et al. 2002; Kubisch et al. 2001; Stojkovic et al. 1995). Although comparatively understudied, IVP pregnancies have also been associated with impaired development of the yolk sac, a hypoblast‐derived extraembryonic structure that mediates nutrient and gas exchange with the histotroph (Freyer and Renfree 2009; Jollie 1990; Shi et al. 1985). These abnormalities are characterized by defective villous architecture, reduced vascularization, and transcriptional alterations (Alberto et al. 2013; Mess et al. 2017).
Although developmental defects in extraembryonic lineages may occur, the epiblast appears to be the lineage most susceptible to environmental insults occurring during post‐hatching development (Figure 3). A substantial proportion of IVP‐derived conceptuses (23%–65%) exhibit normal TE and hypoblast development but lack an ED, resulting in anembryonic pregnancies incapable of foetal development (Alexopoulos et al. 2008; Bertolini, Beam, et al. 2002; Bertolini, Mason, et al. 2002; Block et al. 2007; Desmet et al. 2020; Fischer‐Brown et al. 2004; Ideta et al. 2007; Loureiro et al. 2011) (reviewed in Ealy et al. 2019; Pérez‐Gómez, Gonzalez‐Brusi, Bermejo‐Alvarez, et al. 2021). This lineage‐specific susceptibility is evident from the blastocyst stage, when IVP embryos show reduced ICM cell numbers (Gjorret et al. 2003; Iwasaki et al. 1990; Knijn et al. 2003; Pomar et al. 2005). Consistently, IVP‐derived conceptuses frequently display smaller EDs than in vivo‐derived counterparts (Bertolini, Beam, et al. 2002), and pregnancy retention rates are dramatically reduced following transfer of IVP conceptuses lacking a detectable ED compared with those with visible EDs (62.5% vs. 6.7%, respectively) (Bertolini, Mason, et al. 2002). Comparable phenotypes have been described in ovine and bovine embryos generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), a technology associated with widespread developmental perturbations (Chavatte‐Palmer et al. 2012; Hall et al. 2013). In SCNT embryos, the incidence of ED absence ranges from 20% to 58% (Alexopoulos et al. 2008; Degrelle et al. 2012; Ideta et al. 2007; Rodríguez‐Alvarez et al. 2010; Smith et al. 2010; Tveden‐Nyborg et al. 2005), and transcriptional alterations are disproportionately more evident in the epiblast relative to extraembryonic lineages (Alexopoulos et al. 2008; Degrelle et al. 2012; Hirasawa et al. 2013; Oda et al. 2010).
This phenomenon has often been overlooked, as many studies assessing embryo quality during elongation have relied primarily on conceptus length without evaluating ED formation (Barnwell et al. 2016; Kasimanickam et al. 2021; O'Hara et al. 2014; Sánchez et al. 2019). Importantly, early pregnancy detection methods in cattle, such as assessment of interferon‐stimulated genes in peripheral granulocytes (Kizaki et al. 2013) and detection of pregnancy associated glycoproteins (PAGs) in milk or blood (Filho et al. 2020; Roberts et al. 2015), rely exclusively on signals derived from the TE and therefore cannot confirm proper ED formation or foetal development. Consequently, epiblast‐specific developmental failures often escape pregnancy detection and ultimately manifest as late PL (Fischer‐Brown et al. 2004). Moreover, because pregnancy diagnosis is typically performed around D30, most early PL remain undetected (Sartori et al. 2025).
Collectively, these observations indicate that although PL during post‐hatching development may result from an inadequate maternal environment and/or impaired embryo‐maternal communication, intrinsic defects in embryonic development are major contributors to post‐hatching PL. In this sense, in vitro embryo production can impair proper lineage differentiation and morphogenetic processes during post‐hatching development, with a particularly pronounced impact on the epiblast.
4. Emerging Technologies to Investigate the Molecular Regulation of Post‐Hatching Development and Associated PL
Investigation of post‐hatching development has historically been constrained by the reliance on labour‐intensive and resource‐demanding in vivo approaches, including embryo transfer followed by posterior recovery. Fortunately, the emergence of extended embryo culture systems, three‐dimensional (3D) endometrial culture platforms, and advanced molecular technologies, such as single‐cell transcriptomics and genome editing, has begun to provide new insights into the regulation of post‐hatching development and its association with PL (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4.

Emerging technologies to investigate the molecular regulation of post‐hatching development in livestock. The integration of advanced molecular techniques, extended embryo culture platforms, and three‐dimensional (3D) endometrial models has the potential to unravel the mechanisms driving post‐hatching development, as well as the underlying causes of pregnancy loss during this period.
4.1. Modelling Embryo‐Maternal Communication in Vitro During Post‐Hatching Development
The application of 3D endometrial culture systems to livestock species offers a scalable and high‐throughput strategy to model embryo‐maternal crosstalk during conceptus elongation, with improved physiological relevance compared to conventional 2D cultures. Microfluidic and organ‐on‐a‐chip technologies enable the controlled co‐culture of endometrial epithelial and stromal cells, allowing manipulation of hormonal and metabolic conditions (De Bem et al. 2021). Spheroids represent relatively simple 3D cellular aggregates and have been used in bovine to assess endometrial responses to key pregnancy‐associated molecules such as IFNT and P4 (Rahman et al. 2020). Organoids, by contrast, are derived from tissue‐specific progenitor cells, are self‐organizing, and require an extracellular matrix to form (Gunti et al. 2021). Endometrial organoids (EOs), initially established in mouse and human, recapitulate key features of the in vivo endometrium, support long‐term expansion and hormonal responsiveness to model different stages of the estrous cycle, and are mainly composed of glandular cells, responsible for histotroph secretion in ungulates (Boretto et al. 2017; Fitzgerald et al. 2019; Turco et al. 2017).
In livestock, porcine EOs have been developed as a platform to investigate embryo‐maternal crosstalk during conceptus elongation; however, these EOs were derived from uteri at the metaestrous stage, and evidence supporting embryo viability and conceptus elongation within this in vitro system has not yet been demonstrated (Saadeldin et al. 2024). Similarly, EOs from bovine uteri at the estrous or mid‐late luteal phase, which are responsive to IFNT and P4, have been established and characterized (Devkota et al. 2026; Edge et al. 2025). Nevertheless, blastocysts cultured with intra‐organoid fluid did not exhibit improved developmental outcomes (Devkota et al. 2026). Derivation of EOs from pregnant uteri during the conceptus elongation phase would more accurately reflect the physiological uterine environment encountered by the embryo. Integration of such stage‐matched EO systems with extended embryo culture platforms has the potential to extend the current window of development in vitro. Importantly, this combined approach would provide an experimentally tractable framework to interrogate embryo–maternal signalling mechanisms while reducing dependence on in vivo experimentation.
4.2. Investigating Post‐Hatching Development in Vitro Through Advanced Molecular Technologies and Extended Embryo Culture
Recent advances in molecular technologies allow investigation of post‐hatching development at an unprecedented resolution. Single‐cell and multi‐omics approaches currently provide high‐resolution characterization of the developmental timing and molecular mechanisms governing cell fate specification. In livestock species, single‐cell transcriptomic studies have begun to define lineage segregation and pluripotency transitions during conceptus elongation. In pigs, analyses have focused on lineage dynamics and epiblast pluripotency states during early elongation up to E11 spherical/ovoid embryos (Dufour et al. 2024, 2026; Ramos‐Ibeas et al. 2019), as well as on gastrulation up to elongated stages (E11.5 to E15) (Simpson et al. 2024). In cattle, embryos spanning spherical (E12) to elongated (E18) stages have been profiled, with particular emphasis on extraembryonic membranes (Scatolin et al. 2024). In sheep, recent studies have characterized pluripotency transitions up to elongated stages (E14) (Zhang et al. 2025), as well as conceptus elongation, symmetry breaking and gastrulation between E11 and 13.5 (González‐Brusi et al. 2026). Additional work has integrated single‐cell profiling of conceptuses and their corresponding endometrium at pre‐ and peri‐implantation stages (E9 to 19), providing insight into embryo‐maternal signalling interactions (Jia et al. 2023). Importantly, all of these datasets have been generated exclusively from in vivo‐derived embryos.
Conventional embryo culture systems support in vitro development only up to blastocyst hatching, precluding experimental manipulation during later stages. Thus, functional interrogation of post‐hatching development has remained limited, largely due to reliance on embryo transfer followed by conceptus recovery (Alexopoulos et al. 2008; Clemente et al. 2009; Diskin and Morris 2008; van Leeuwen et al. 2014). To overcome this limitation and to support in vitro development of the epiblast, we developed an extended culture system based on N2B27 medium (Ramos‐Ibeas et al. 2022, 2020). N2B27 is a chemically defined medium composed of Neurobasal and DMEM/F12 supplemented with N2 and B27, widely used for embryonic stem cell derivation and maintenance (Nichols and Ying 2006). N2B27 contains amino acids, lipids, vitamins, hormones, and growth factors not present in earlier post‐hatching culture systems, in which the epiblast failed to develop (Alexopoulos et al. 2005; Brandão et al. 2004; Vajta et al. 2004). Using this system, bovine blastocysts develop beyond hatching, achieving complete hypoblast migration and epiblast survival, resulting in formation of an early ED by D12 to 15 (Ramos‐Ibeas et al. 2020, 2023). Building on these findings, the system was adapted for ovine embryos, where further optimization through supplementation with activin A and a ROCK inhibitor supported ED development up to early gastrulation by D14, a key milestone in development (Ramos‐Ibeas et al. 2022). Similarly, other authors have recently reported extended embryo culture media based on uterine composition, diverse growth factors, and B27 supplement—the most successful additive—supporting bovine embryo survival up to D12, and proper lineages development of bovine embryos up to D10 (Isaac et al. 2024; Isaac and Pfeffer 2021).
This in vitro platform represents a substantial advance, as it enables direct assessment of embryo developmental competence during the post‐hatching period without reliance on experimental animals. Traditionally, embryo quality assessment has relied either on the expression of selected molecular markers, often with limited predictive value and low reproducibility (Corcoran et al. 2006; Cánepa et al. 2014; Fujii et al. 2024; Guzeloglu et al. 2026; Rabaglino and Hansen 2024; Suwik et al. 2021), or on embryo transfer experiments, which require large numbers of animals, entail high costs, and are subject to significant biological variability. Extended embryo culture offers a powerful alternative for improving in vitro embryo production protocols and associated technologies, such as embryo vitrification, by allowing direct visualization and quantitative assessment of post‐hatching developmental progression entirely in vitro. Key measurable parameters include embryo survival and growth, hypoblast migration along the inner TE surface, epiblast survival and proliferation, and ED formation.
This system has been used to assess embryo viability in very diverse settings. For instance, we have used it to evaluate the developmental competence of heterologous ibex–goat blastocysts generated from domestic goat oocytes fertilized using different protocols with Iberian ibex sperm, an endemic species from Spain (Martínez de Los Reyes, Carvajal‐Serna, et al. 2024). In a separate application, the platform was used to assess the viability of bovine blastocysts produced following automatic zygote denudation using a microfluidics‐based device. Extended culture revealed proper lineage development and post‐hatching competence, thereby validating the approach (Guerrero‐Sánchez et al. 2025). Independent studies have similarly employed N2B27‐based post‐hatching culture to examine the effects of supplementation with bioactive molecules, including interleukin‐6, interleukin‐11, and leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), on vitrified bovine blastocysts after thawing (Oliver et al. 2025, 2024), as well on ED development during post‐hatching development (Oliver et al. 2026). In addition, bovine blastocyst‐like structures derived from stem cells have been cultured in parallel with IVP blastocysts for over 2 weeks, demonstrating sustained growth (Pinzón‐Arteaga et al. 2023).
Beyond embryo quality assessment, post‐hatching in vitro culture allows us to investigate through targeted addition or removal experiments, the roles of hormones, growth factors, metabolites, and signalling pathways whose dysregulation during post‐hatching development may contribute to PL. For instance, pharmacological inhibition of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signalling demonstrated its essential role in epiblast and hypoblast development between D6 and 14 in sheep (Galiano‐Cogolludo et al. 2023). Such functional analyses were previously restricted to pre‐hatching stages, the endpoint of conventional culture systems. Indeed, using conventional embryo culture, we demonstrated that MEK signalling is required for hypoblast specification at the blastocyst stage. Extended culture further revealed its requirement for subsequent hypoblast proliferation and migration between D7‐8 and 12 in ovine embryos (Martínez de Los Reyes, Flores‐Borobia, et al. 2024).
Using this system, we also investigated the role of arachidonic acid (AA) during bovine post‐hatching development. Among the critical lipids present in the histotroph, AA serves as a precursor for prostaglandins synthesis, which play key roles during early embryogenesis (Dorniak et al. 2011; Lewis et al. 1982; Menezo et al. 1982). Whereas pre‐hatching embryos were unresponsive to AA supplementation, elevated AA concentrations significantly impaired survival and growth of post‐hatching embryos (González‐Brusi et al. 2023). Consistent with these observations, we examined the role of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma (PPARG), a mediator of lipid and prostaglandin synthesis proposed to be essential for conceptus elongation (Brooks et al. 2015; Cammas et al. 2006; Ribeiro et al. 2016). By combining CRISPR‐mediated gene ablation with extended embryo culture, we demonstrated that embryonic PPARG is dispensable for post‐hatching development, a finding subsequently validated in vivo following embryo transfer and recovery (Pérez‐Gómez, González‐Brusi, Flores‐Borobia, Martínez De Los Reyes, et al. 2024).
The platform has also enabled functional analysis of endocrine factors, including melatonin, a hormone central to reproductive seasonality in sheep. While melatonin has been extensively studied during oocyte maturation, fertilization, and pre‐hatching development, extension of these analyses to post‐hatching stages up to D12 revealed no beneficial effects of melatonin supplementation on developmental rates or lineage development. Instead, high concentrations impaired epiblast survival (Carvajal‐Serna et al. 2025).
Combining genome editing technologies with extended embryo culture allows precise functional dissection of the molecular determinants of post‐hatching development. Using this approach, we demonstrated that TEAD4, an essential transcription factor for TE specification in mice (Nishioka et al. 2008; Yagi et al. 2007), is dispensable for bovine TE development during both blastocyst formation and post‐hatching stages (Pérez‐Gómez, González‐Brusi, Flores‐Borobia, Galiano‐Cogolludo, et al. 2024; Pérez‐Gómez, González‐Brusi, Muniesa‐Martínez, et al. 2021). Similarly, CRISPR‐mediated knockout of the TE‐associated transcription factor GATA3 in ovine embryos did not affect TE development but impaired epiblast development during post‐hatching stages (Martínez de Los Reyes et al. 2025).
Finally, this strategy has provided mechanistic insights into early embryonic lethality associated with deleterious haplotypes in cattle. Although several haplotypes have been linked to PL, the precise developmental stage at which arrest occurs remained unknown, despite its importance for reproductive management. We investigated Holstein haplotype 5 (HH5), which involves a mutation in the transcription factor B1 mitochondrial (TFB1M) gene and is associated with PL before D60 (Cooper et al. 2014). Using a combination of CRISPR‐mediated gene ablation and extended embryo culture, we determined that TFB1M‐deficient embryos develop normally until D12 in vitro but arrest by E14 in vivo, failing to initiate elongation (Pérez‐Gómez, Hamze, et al. 2024). Similarly, we modelled Holstein haplotype 3 (HH3), which involves loss of Structural Maintenance of Chromosome 2 (SMC2) gene. Using an exclusively in vitro approach, we demonstrated that SMC2‐deficient embryos arrest by D12 without the need for embryo transfers (Pérez‐Gómez, Flores‐Borobia, Hamze, Galiano‐Cogolludo, et al. 2024).
Together, these studies establish the combination of advanced molecular technologies and extended embryo culture as a robust platform for mechanistic investigation of post‐hatching development and PL, enabling functional analyses that were previously inaccessible in livestock species.
5. Conclusions and Future Directions
Post‐hatching development represents a critical yet underexplored period in livestock species, during which a substantial proportion of PL originate. Beyond failures in maternal recognition of pregnancy or uterine dysfunction, accumulating evidence indicates that intrinsic defects in embryonic development are major determinants of post‐hatching PL. In vitro embryo production is consistently associated with developmental alterations, with the epiblast displaying a disproportionate vulnerability compared with extraembryonic tissues. This is exemplified as evidenced by the high incidence of IVP‐derived elongated conceptuses lacking an ED. However, the detection of PL associated with this phenotype remains challenging, as current early pregnancy detection methods in cattle rely exclusively on signals derived from the TE. Consequently, detectable early PL likely represent only ‘the tip of the iceberg’, underestimating the true prevalence of embryonic failure.
Despite the absence of major breakthroughs to reduce PL incidence in livestock, significant progress has been achieved in recent years in elucidating the molecular mechanisms governing early embryo development in livestock species. Looking forward, the ongoing revolution in single‐cell omics is expected to further refine our understanding of early embryo development in ungulates. In parallel, the development of extended embryo culture systems, together with genome editing technologies and 3D endometrial models, is transforming our capacity to interrogate post‐hatching development and embryo‐maternal communication in a controlled and mechanistic manner (Figure 4). Beyond advancing fundamental knowledge, these approaches provide a foundation for the development of predictive tools to identify pregnancies at risk of failure and animals predisposed to PL prior to breeding, as well as for the optimisation of assisted reproductive technologies. Ultimately, such advances hold promise for improving reproductive efficiency and the sustainability of livestock production systems.
Author Contributions
P.R.‐I. conceived the review. A.S.‐S. prepared the figures. A.S.‐S. and P.R.‐I. contributed to literature analysis and manuscript writing. All authors contributed substantially to the development of the concepts discussed in the review, critically revised the manuscript, and approved the final submitted version.
Funding
This work has been funded by the project PID2024‐155682NB‐I00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
- Alberto, M. L. , Meirelles F. V., Perecin F., et al. 2013. “Development of Bovine Embryos Derived From Reproductive Techniques.” Reproduction, Fertility and Development 25, no. 6: 907–917. 10.1071/RD12092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexopoulos, N. I. , Maddox‐Hyttel P., Tveden‐Nyborg P., et al. 2008. “Developmental Disparity Between In Vitro‐Produced and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Bovine Days 14 and 21 Embryos: Implications for Embryonic Loss.” Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 136, no. 4: 433–445. 10.1530/REP-07-0392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexopoulos, N. I. , Vajta G., Maddox‐Hyttel P., French A. J., and Trounson A. O.. 2005. “Stereomicroscopic and Histological Examination of Bovine Embryos Following Extended In Vitro Culture.” Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 17, no. 8: 799–808. 10.1071/RD04104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Almeida, F. R. C. L. , and Dias A. L. N. A.. 2022. “Pregnancy in Pigs: The Journey of an Early Life.” Domestic Animal Endocrinology 78: 106656. 10.1016/j.domaniend.2021.106656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnold, D. R. , Bordignon V., Lefebvre R., Murphy B. D., and Smith L. C.. 2006. “Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Alters Peri‐Implantation Trophoblast Differentiation in Bovine Embryos.” Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 132, no. 2: 279–290. 10.1530/rep.1.01217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnwell, C. V. , Farin P. W., Ashwell C. M., Farmer W. T., Galphin S. P., and Farin C. E.. 2016. “Differences in mRNA Populations of Short and Long Bovine Conceptuses on Day 15 of Gestation.” Molecular Reproduction and Development 83, no. 5: 424–441. 10.1002/mrd.22640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnwell, C. V. , Farin P. W., Whisnant C. S., Alexander J. E., and Farin C. E.. 2015. “Maternal Serum Progesterone Concentration and Early Conceptus Development of Bovine Embryos Produced in Vivo or in Vitro.” Domestic Animal Endocrinology 52: 75–81. 10.1016/j.domaniend.2015.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bazer, F. W. , Spencer T. E., Johnson G. A., Burghardt R. C., and Wu G.. 2009. “Comparative Aspects of Implantation.” Reproduction 138, no. 2: 195–209. 10.1530/REP-09-0158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bedzhov, I. , Graham S. J., Leung C. Y., and Zernicka‐Goetz M.. 2014. “Developmental Plasticity, Cell Fate Specification and Morphogenesis in the Early Mouse Embryo.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369, no. 1657. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berg, D. K. , Ledgard A., Donnison M., et al. 2022. “The First Week Following Insemination Is the Period of Major Pregnancy Failure in Pasture‐Grazed Dairy Cows.” Journal of Dairy Science 105, no. 11: 9253–9270. 10.3168/jds.2021-21773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berg, D. K. , Smith C. S., Pearton D. J., et al. 2011. “Trophectoderm Lineage Determination in Cattle.” Developmental Cell 20: 244–255. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berg, D. K. , van Leeuwen J., Beaumont S., Berg M., and Pfeffer P. L.. 2010. “Embryo Loss in Cattle Between Days 7 and 16 of Pregnancy.” Theriogenology 73, no. 2: 250–260. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertolini, M. , Beam S. W., Shim H., et al. 2002. “Growth, Development, and Gene Expression by In Vivo‐ and In Vitro‐Produced Day 7 and 16 Bovine Embryos.” Molecular Reproduction and Development 63, no. 3: 318–328. 10.1002/mrd.90015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertolini, M. , Mason J. B., Beam S. W., et al. 2002. “Morphology and Morphometry of In Vivo‐ and In Vitro‐Produced Bovine Concepti From Early Pregnancy to Term and Association With High Birth Weights.” Theriogenology 58, no. 5: 973–994. 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)00935-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blakeley, P. , Fogarty N. M., del Valle I., et al. 2015. “Defining the Three Cell Lineages of the Human Blastocyst by Single‐Cell RNA‐Seq.” Development (Cambridge, England) 142, no. 18: 3151–3165. 10.1242/dev.123547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Block, J. , Fischer‐Brown A. E., Rodina T. M., Ealy A. D., and Hansen P. J.. 2007. “The Effect of in Vitro Treatment of Bovine Embryos With IGF‐1 on Subsequent Development in Utero to Day 14 of Gestation.” Theriogenology 68, no. 2: 153–161. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Block, J. , and Hansen P. J.. 2007. “Interaction Between Season and Culture With Insulin‐Like Growth Factor‐1 on Survival of In Vitro Produced Embryos Following Transfer to Lactating Dairy Cows.” Theriogenology 67, no. 9: 1518–1529. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boretto, M. , Cox B., Noben M., et al. 2017. “Development of Organoids From Mouse and Human Endometrium Showing Endometrial Epithelium Physiology and Long‐Term Expandability.” Development (Cambridge, England) 144, no. 10: 1775–1786. 10.1242/dev.148478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandão, D. O. , Maddox‐Hyttel P., Løvendahl P., Rumpf R., Stringfellow D., and Callesen H.. 2004. “Post Hatching Development: A Novel System for Extended In Vitro Culture of Bovine Embryos.” Biology of Reproduction 71, no. 6: 2048–2055. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.025916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brooks, K. , Burns G., and Spencer T. E.. 2014. “Conceptus Elongation in Ruminants: Roles of Progesterone, Prostaglandin, Interferon Tau and Cortisol.” Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 5, no. 1: 53. 10.1186/2049-1891-5-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brooks, K. E. , Burns G. W., and Spencer T. E.. 2015. “Peroxisome Proliferator Activator Receptor Gamma (PPARG) Regulates Conceptus Elongation in Sheep.” Biology of Reproduction 92, no. 2: 42. 10.1095/biolreprod.114.123877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cammas, L. , Reinaud P., Bordas N., Dubois O., Germain G., and Charpigny G.. 2006. “Developmental Regulation of Prostacyclin Synthase and Prostacyclin Receptors in the Ovine Uterus and Conceptus During the Peri‐Implantation Period.” Reproduction 131, no. 5: 917–927. 10.1530/rep.1.00799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cánepa, M. J. , Ortega N. M., Monteleone M. C., et al. 2014. “Expression Profile of Genes as Indicators of Developmental Competence and Quality of In Vitro Fertilization and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Bovine Embryos.” PLoS One 9, no. 9: e108139. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carvajal‐Serna, M. , Martínez de Los Reyes N., Marigorta P., Bermejo‐Álvarez P., and Ramos‐Ibeas P.. 2025. “Melatonin Supplementation Does Not Improve Ovine Pre‐ Or Post‐Hatching Development In Vitro.” Theriogenology 241: 117428. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chavatte‐Palmer, P. , Camous S., Jammes H., Le Cleac'h N., Guillomot M., and Lee R. S.. 2012. “Review: Placental Perturbations Induce the Developmental Abnormalities Often Observed in Bovine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.” Placenta 33, no. Suppl: S99–S104. 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clemente, M. , de La Fuente J., Fair T., et al. 2009. “Progesterone and Conceptus Elongation in Cattle: A Direct Effect on the Embryo or an Indirect Effect via the Endometrium?” Reproduction 138: 507–517. 10.1530/rep-09-0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, T. A. , Wiggans G. R., Null D. J., Hutchison J. L., and Cole J. B.. 2014. “Genomic Evaluation, Breed Identification, and Discovery of a Haplotype Affecting Fertility for Ayrshire Dairy Cattle.” Journal of Dairy Science 97, no. 6: 3878–3882. 10.3168/jds.2013-7427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corcoran, D. , Fair T., Park S., et al. 2006. “Suppressed Expression of Genes Involved in Transcription and Translation in In Vitro Compared With in Vivo Cultured Bovine Embryos.” Reproduction 131: 651–660. 10.1530/rep.1.01015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crowe, A. D. , Sánchez J. M., Moore S. G., et al. 2025. “Incidence and Timing of Pregnancy Loss Following Timed Artificial Insemination or Timed Embryo Transfer With a Fresh or Frozen In Vitro‐Produced Embryo.” Journal of Dairy Science 108, no. 1: 1022–1038. 10.3168/jds.2024-25139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crowe, A. D. , Sánchez J. M., Moore S. G., et al. 2025. “Time to Presumptive Conceptus Attachment and Subsequent Pregnancy Loss in Pasture‐Based Lactating Dairy Cows Following Artificial Insemination With Conventional or X‐Sorted Semen or Embryo Transfer.” Journal of Dairy Science 108, no. 5: 5420–5432. 10.3168/jds.2024-25725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daigneault, B. W. , Rajput S., Smith G. W., and Ross P. J.. 2018. “Embryonic POU5F1 Is Required for Expanded Bovine Blastocyst Formation.” Scientific Reports 8, no. 1: 7753. 10.1038/s41598-018-25964-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davenport, K. M. , Ortega M. S., Johnson G. A., Seo H., and Spencer T. E.. 2023. “Review: Implantation and Placentation in Ruminants.” Animal 17, no. Suppl 1: 100796. 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davies, C. , Peterson E., Thomas A., Giles A., Polejaeva I., and Rutigliano H.. 2024. “Rethinking Pregnancy Recognition in Ruminants: Initial Insights on Pregnancy in Type I Interferon Receptor (IFNAR2) Knockout Ewes.” (pp. 65–66). SSR 57th Annual Meeting.
- De Bem, T. H. C. , Tinning H., Vasconcelos E. J. R., Wang D., and Forde N.. 2021. “Endometrium on‐a‐Chip Reveals Insulin‐ and Glucose‐Induced Alterations in the Transcriptome and Proteomic Secretome.” Endocrinology 162, no. 6. 10.1210/endocr/bqab054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Degrelle, S. A. , Jaffrezic F., Campion E., et al. 2012. “Uncoupled Embryonic and Extra‐Embryonic Tissues Compromise Blastocyst Development After Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.” PLoS One 7, no. 6: e38309. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Desmet, K. L. J. , Marei W. F. A., Richard C., et al. 2020. “Oocyte Maturation Under Lipotoxic Conditions Induces Carryover Transcriptomic and Functional Alterations During Post‐Hatching Development of Good‐Quality Blastocysts: Novel Insights From a Bovine Embryo‐Transfer Model.” Human Reproduction 35, no. 2: 293–307. 10.1093/humrep/dez248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devkota, I. , Bonomo Z. L., Fuego D. M., et al. 2026. “Establishment and Functional Characterization of Bovine Endometrial Epithelial Organoids.” FASEB Journal 40, no. 4: e71515. 10.1096/fj.202503351R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diskin, M. G. , and Morris D. G.. 2008. “Embryonic and Early Foetal Losses in Cattle and Other Ruminants.” Reproduction in Domestic Animals 43, no. Suppl 2: 260–267. 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diskin, M. G. , and Sreenan J. M.. 1980. “Fertilization and Embryonic Mortality Rates in Beef Heifers After Artificial Insemination.” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 59, no. 2: 463–468. 10.1530/jrf.0.0590463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Domingues, R. R. , Andrade J. P. N., Cunha T. O., et al. 2023. “Is Pregnancy Loss Initiated by Embryonic Death or Luteal Regression? Profiles of Pregnancy‐Associated Glycoproteins During Elevated Progesterone and Pregnancy Loss.” JDS Communications 4, no. 2: 149–154. 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dorniak, P. , Bazer F. W., and Spencer T. E.. 2011. “Prostaglandins Regulate Conceptus Elongation and Mediate Effects of Interferon Tau on the Ovine Uterine Endometrium.” Biology of Reproduction 84, no. 6: 1119–1127. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.089979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dufour, A. , Kurylo C., Stöckl J. B., et al. 2024. “Cell Specification and Functional Interactions in the Pig Blastocyst Inferred From Single‐Cell Transcriptomics and Uterine Fluids Proteomics.” Genomics 116, no. 2: 110780. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2023.110780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dufour, A. , Rossignol M. N., Manceau P., et al. 2026. “Single‐Cell Omics Uncover Gene Dynamics Shaping Embryonic and Extra Embryonic Lineages in Pig Blastocysts.” IScience 29, no. 1: 114519. 10.1016/j.isci.2025.114519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunne, L. D. , Diskin M. G., and Sreenan J. M.. 2000. “Embryo and Foetal Loss in Beef Heifers Between Day 14 of Gestation and Full Term.” Animal Reproduction Science 58, no. 1–2: 39–44. 10.1016/s0378-4320(99)00088-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ealy, A. D. , Wooldridge L. K., and McCoski S. R.. 2019. “Board Invited Review: Post‐Transfer Consequences of in Vitro‐Produced Embryos in Cattle.” Journal of Animal Science 97, no. 6: 2555–2568. 10.1093/jas/skz116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edge, J. C. , Amelkina O., Tinning H., et al. 2025. “Bovine Endometrial Organoids: A New Tool to Study Conceptus‐Maternal Interactions in Mammals.” Biology of Reproduction 114: 1241–1257. 10.1093/biolre/ioaf252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Filho, R. V. O. , Franco G. A., Reese S. T., et al. 2020. “Using Pregnancy Associated Glycoproteins (PAG) for Pregnancy Detection at Day 24 of Gestation in Beef Cattle.” Theriogenology 141: 128–133. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer‐Brown, A. E. , Lindsey B. R., Ireland F. A., et al. 2004. “Embryonic Disc Development and Subsequent Viability of Cattle Embryos Following Culture in Two Media Under Two Oxygen Concentrations.” Reproduction, Fertility and Development 16, no. 8: 787–793. 10.1071/rd04026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fitzgerald, H. C. , Dhakal P., Behura S. K., Schust D. J., and Spencer T. E.. 2019. “Self‐Renewing Endometrial Epithelial Organoids of the Human Uterus.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116, no. 46: 23132–23142. 10.1073/pnas.1915389116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fogarty, N. M. E. , McCarthy A., Snijders K. E., et al. 2017. “Genome Editing Reveals a Role for OCT4 in Human Embryogenesis.” Nature 550, no. 7674: 67–73. 10.1038/nature24033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forde, N. , McGettigan P. A., Mehta J. P., et al. 2014. “Proteomic Analysis of Uterine Fluid During the Pre‐Implantation Period of Pregnancy in Cattle.” Reproduction 147, no. 5: 575–587. 10.1530/REP-13-0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forde, N. , Simintiras C. A., Sturmey R., et al. 2014. “Amino Acids in the Uterine Luminal Fluid Reflects the Temporal Changes in Transporter Expression in the Endometrium and Conceptus During Early Pregnancy in Cattle.” PLoS One 9: e100010. 10.1371/journal.pone.0100010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freyer, C. , and Renfree M. B.. 2009. “The Mammalian Yolk Sac Placenta.” Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution 312, no. 6: 545–554. 10.1002/jez.b.21239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujii, T. , Mukai T., Hasegawa S., Hirata T. I., and Sawai K.. 2024. “Evaluation of Bovine Embryo Quality Based on Gene Expression Profiling Using Whole‐Transcriptome Amplification.” Journal of Reproduction and Development 70, no. 4: 259–263. 10.1262/jrd.2024-007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galiano‐Cogolludo, B. , Marigorta P., Yus Girón V., Bermejo‐Álvarez P., and Ramos‐Ibeas P.. 2023. “Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFβ) Pathway Is Essential for Hypoblast and Epiblast Development in Ovine Post‐Hatching Embryos.” Theriogenology 196: 112–120. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gatea, A. O. , Smith M. F., Pohler K. G., et al. 2018. “The Ability to Predict Pregnancy Loss in Cattle With ELISAs That Detect Pregnancy Associated Glycoproteins Is Antibody Dependent.” Theriogenology 108: 269–276. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geisert, R. D. , Brookbank J. W., Roberts R. M., and Bazer F. W.. 1982. “Establishment of Pregnancy in the Pig: II. Cellular Remodeling of the Porcine Blastocyst During Elongation on Day 12 of Pregnancy.” Biology of Reproduction 27: 941–955. 10.1095/biolreprod27.4.941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gjorret, J. O. , Knijn H. M., Dieleman S. J., Avery B., Larsson L. I., and Maddox‐Hyttel P.. 2003. “Chronology of Apoptosis in Bovine Embryos Produced in Vivo and in Vitro.” Biology of Reproduction 69, no. 4: 1193–1200. 10.1095/biolreprod.102.013243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goissis, M. D. , and Cibelli J. B.. 2014. “Functional Characterization of CDX2 During Bovine Preimplantation Development in Vitro.” Molecular Reproduction and Development 81, no. 10: 962–970. 10.1002/mrd.22415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- González‐Brusi, L. , Martínez De Los Reyes N., Marigorta P., et al. 2026. “A Single‐Cell Transcriptomic Atlas of Symmetry Breaking Across Eutherian Mammals.” bioRxiv. 10.64898/2026.02.27.708463. [DOI]
- González‐Brusi, L. , Pérez‐Gómez A., Quiroga A. C., Tamargo C., Ramos‐Ibeas P., and Bermejo‐Álvarez P.. 2023. “Effect of Arachidonic Acid on Pre‐ and Post‐Hatching.” Reproduction, Fertility and Development 35, no. 12: 614–621. 10.1071/RD23053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray, C. A. , Taylor K. M., Ramsey W. S., et al. 2001. “Endometrial Glands Are Required for Preimplantation Conceptus Elongation and Survival.” Biology of Reproduction 64, no. 6: 1608–1613. 10.1095/biolreprod64.6.1608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero‐Sánchez, J. , Fernández‐Blanco G., Lamas‐Toranzo I., et al. 2025. “A Novel Microfluidics‐Based Device Achieves Automatic Cumulus Cells Removal and Optimal Embryo Development in Cattle.” Animal Reproduction Science 279: 107953. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2025.107953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guillomot, M. , Turbe A., Hue I., and Renard J. P.. 2004. “Staging of Ovine Embryos and Expression of the T‐Box Genes Brachyury and Eomesodermin Around Gastrulation.” Reproduction 127, no. 4: 491–501. 10.1530/rep.1.00057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gunti, S. , Hoke A. T. K., Vu K. P., and London N. R.. 2021. “Organoid and Spheroid Tumor Models: Techniques and Applications.” Cancers (Basel) 13, no. 4: 874. 10.3390/cancers13040874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guzeloglu, A. , Bishop J. V., Georges H. M., et al. 2026. “Identification of Transcriptome Markers Associated With in Vitro Bovine Embryo Quality in Single Embryos and Biopsies†.” Biology of Reproduction 114, no. 2: 531–542. 10.1093/biolre/ioaf260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall, V. , Hinrichs K., Lazzari G., Betts D. H., and Hyttel P.. 2013. “Early Embryonic Development, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, and Pluripotent Stem Cell Biology in Domestic Mammals.” Veterinary Journal 197, no. 2: 128–142. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirasawa, R. , Matoba S., Inoue K., and Ogura A.. 2013. “Somatic Donor Cell Type Correlates With Embryonic, but Not Extra‐Embryonic, Gene Expression in Postimplantation Cloned Embryos.” PLoS One 8, no. 10: e76422. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ideta, A. , Urakawa M., Aoyagi Y., and Saeki K.. 2007. “Early Development in Utero of Bovine Nuclear Transfer Embryos Using Early G1 and G0 Phase Cells.” Cloning and Stem Cells 9, no. 4: 571–580. 10.1089/clo.2007.0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isaac, E. , Berg D. K., and Pfeffer P. L.. 2024. “Using Extended Growth of Cattle Embryos in Culture to Gain Insights Into Bovine Developmental Events on Embryonic Days 8 to 10.” Theriogenology 214: 10–20. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isaac, E. , and Pfeffer P. L.. 2021. “Growing Cattle Embryos Beyond Day 8—An Investigation of Media Components.” Theriogenology 161: 273–284. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwasaki, S. , Yoshiba N., Ushijima H., Watanabe S., and Nakahara T.. 1990. “Morphology and Proportion of Inner Cell Mass of Bovine Blastocysts Fertilized In Vitro and In Vivo.” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 90, no. 1: 279–284. 10.1530/jrf.0.0900279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia, G. X. , Ma W. J., Wu Z. B., et al. 2023. “Single‐Cell Transcriptomic Characterization of Sheep Conceptus Elongation and Implantation.” Cell Reports 42, no. 8: 112860. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jollie, W. P. 1990. “Development, Morphology, and Function of the Yolk‐Sac Placenta of Laboratory Rodents.” Teratology 41, no. 4: 361–381. 10.1002/tera.1420410403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kasimanickam, R. K. , Kasimanickam V. R., Kumar N., and Reisenauer C.. 2021. “Day 7 Embryo Quality and Suboptimal Uterine Environment Influence Morphometry of Day 16 Conceptus in Dairy Cows.” Theriogenology 163: 10–17. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirchhof, N. , Carnwath J. W., Lemme E., Anastassiadis K., Schöler H., and Niemann H.. 2000. “Expression Pattern of Oct‐4 in Preimplantation Embryos of Different Species.” Biology of Reproduction 63, no. 6: 1698–1705. 10.1095/biolreprod63.6.1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kizaki, K. , Shichijo‐Kizaki A., Furusawa T., Takahashi T., Hosoe M., and Hashizume K.. 2013. “Differential Neutrophil Gene Expression in Early Bovine Pregnancy.” Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 11: 6. 10.1186/1477-7827-11-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knijn, H. M. , Gjørret J. O., Vos P. L., et al. 2003. “Consequences of in Vivo Development and Subsequent Culture on Apoptosis, Cell Number, and Blastocyst Formation in Bovine Embryos.” Biology of Reproduction 69, no. 4: 1371–1378. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.017251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi, T. , Zhang H., Tang W. W. C., et al. 2017. “Principles of Early Human Development and Germ Cell Program From Conserved Model Systems.” Nature 546, no. 7658: 416–420. 10.1038/nature22812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korotkevich, E. , Niwayama R., Courtois A., et al. 2017. “The Apical Domain Is Required and Sufficient for the First Lineage Segregation in the Mouse Embryo.” Developmental Cell 40, no. 3: 235–247.e237. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kubisch, H. M. , Larson M. A., Ealy A. D., Murphy C. N., and Roberts R. M.. 2001. “Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Interferon‐Tau Secretion by In Vivo‐ and In Vitro‐Derived Bovine Blastocysts.” Animal Reproduction Science 66, no. 1–2: 1–13. 10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00086-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuijk, E. W. , Du Puy L., Van Tol H. T., et al. 2008. “Differences in Early Lineage Segregation Between Mammals.” Developmental Dynamics 237, no. 4: 918–927. 10.1002/dvdy.21480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsen, E. C. , Christiansen O. B., Kolte A. M., and Macklon N.. 2013. “New Insights Into Mechanisms Behind Miscarriage.” BMC Medicine 11: 154. 10.1186/1741-7015-11-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis, G. S. , Thatcher W. W., Bazer F. W., and Curl J. S.. 1982. “Metabolism of Arachidonic Acid In Vitro by Bovine Blastocysts and Endometrium.” Biology of Reproduction 27, no. 2: 431–439. 10.1095/biolreprod27.2.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lonergan, P. , Woods A., Fair T., et al. 2007. “Effect of Embryo Source and Recipient Progesterone Environment on Embryo Development in Cattle.” Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 19, no. 7: 861–868. 10.1071/rd07089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loureiro, B. , Block J., Favoreto M. G., et al. 2011. “Consequences of Conceptus Exposure to Colony‐Stimulating Factor 2 on Survival, Elongation, Interferon‐τ Secretion, and Gene Expression.” Reproduction 141, no. 5: 617–624. 10.1530/REP-10-0511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lucy, M. C. 2001. “Reproductive Loss in High‐Producing Dairy Cattle: Where Will It End?” Journal of Dairy Science 84, no. 6: 1277–1293. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70158-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo, L. , Shi Y., Wang H., et al. 2022. “Base Editing in Bovine Embryos Reveals a Species‐Specific Role of SOX2 in Regulation of Pluripotency.” PLoS Genetics 18, no. 7: e1010307. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maddox‐Hyttel, P. , Alexopoulos N. I., Vajta G., et al. 2003. “Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Characterization of the Initial Post‐Hatching Development of Bovine Embryos.” Reproduction 125, no. 4: 607–623. 10.1530/rep.0.1250607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madureira, G. , Mion B., Van Winters B., Peñagaricano F., Li J., and Ribeiro E. S.. 2024. “Endometrial Responsiveness to Interferon‐Tau and Its Association With Subsequent Reproductive Performance in Dairy Heifers.” Journal of Dairy Science 107, no. 9: 7371–7391. 10.3168/jds.2023-24627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maître, J. L. , Turlier H., Illukkumbura R., et al. 2016. “Asymmetric Division of Contractile Domains Couples Cell Positioning and Fate Specification.” Nature 536, no. 7616: 344–348. 10.1038/nature18958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mansouri‐Attia, N. , Sandra O., Aubert J., et al. 2009. “Endometrium as an Early Sensor of In Vitro Embryo Manipulation Technologies.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, no. 14: 5687–5692. 10.1073/pnas.0812722106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martínez De Los Reyes, N. , Carvajal‐Serna M., Flores‐Borobia I., et al. 2024. “Optimized Heterologous In Vitro Fertilization With Iberian Ibex Sperm and Domestic Goat Oocytes.” Theriogenology Wild 4: 100075. 10.1016/j.therwi.2024.100075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Martínez de Los Reyes, N. , Flores‐Borobia I., Carvajal‐Serna M., Marigorta P., Bermejo‐Álvarez P., and Ramos‐Ibeas P.. 2024. “MEK Signalling Pathway Is Required for Hypoblast Specification and Migration in Ovine.” Reproduction 167, no. 6: e240003. 10.1530/REP-24-0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martínez de Los Reyes, N. , Flores‐Borobia I., González‐Brusi L., et al. 2025. “GATA3 Is Not Required for Sheep Trophectoderm Development, but It Plays a Role in Post‐Hatching Epiblast Survival.” Reproduction 170, no. 1. 10.1530/REP-25-0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martínez De Los Reyes, N. , Siegmund‐Sabater A., Flores‐Borobia I., et al. 2026. “Extended Embryo Culture: Illuminating a Black Box of Early Development in Ruminants.” Reproduction, Fertility and Development 38, no. 1: RD25156. 10.1071/RD25156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathew, D. J. , Peterson K. D., Senn L. K., Oliver M. A., and Ealy A. D.. 2022. “Ruminant Conceptus‐Maternal Interactions: Interferon‐Tau and Beyond.” Journal of Animal Science 100, no. 7. 10.1093/jas/skac123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathew, D. J. , Sánchez J. M., Passaro C., et al. 2019. “Interferon Tau‐Dependent and Independent Effects of the Bovine Conceptus on the Endometrial Transcriptome†.” Biology of Reproduction 100, no. 2: 365–380. 10.1093/biolre/ioy199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMillan, W. , Peterson A., Hall D., and Donnison M.. 1997. “Embryo and Recipient Contributions to Embryo Loss to Day 60 in Heifers Receiving Either One or Two in Vitro‐Produced Embryos.” Theriogenology 1: 370. [Google Scholar]
- Menezo, Y. , Renard J. P., Delobel B., and Pageaux J. F.. 1982. “Kinetic Study of Fatty Acid Composition of Day 7 to Day 14 Cow Embryos.” Biology of Reproduction 26, no. 5: 787–790. 10.1095/biolreprod26.5.787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mess, A. M. , Carreira A. C. O., Marinovic de Oliveira C., et al. 2017. “Vascularization and VEGF Expression Altered in Bovine Yolk Sacs From IVF and NT Technologies.” Theriogenology 87: 290–297. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura, K. , Kusama K., Ideta A., Kimura K., Hori M., and Imakawa K.. 2019. “Effects of miR‐98 in Intrauterine Extracellular Vesicles on Maternal Immune Regulation During the Peri‐Implantation Period in Cattle.” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1: 20330. 10.1038/s41598-019-56879-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nichols, J. , and Ying Q. L.. 2006. “Derivation and Propagation of Embryonic Stem Cells in Serum‐ and Feeder‐Free Culture.” Methods in Molecular Biology 329: 91–98. 10.1385/1-59745-037-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nishioka, N. , Yamamoto S., Kiyonari H., et al. 2008. “Tead4 Is Required for Specification of Trophectoderm in Pre‐Implantation Mouse Embryos.” Mechanisms of Development 125, no. 3–4: 270–283. 10.1016/j.mod.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niwa, H. , Toyooka Y., Shimosato D., et al. 2005. “Interaction Between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 Determines Trophectoderm Differentiation.” Cell 123: 917–929. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oda, M. , Shiota K., and Tanaka S.. 2010. “Trophoblast Cell Lineage in Cloned Mouse Embryos.” Development, Growth & Differentiation 52, no. 3: 285–291. 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Hara, L. , Forde N., Kelly A. K., and Lonergan P.. 2014. “Effect of Bovine Blastocyst Size at Embryo Transfer on Day 7 on Conceptus Length on Day 14: Can Supplementary Progesterone Rescue Small Embryos?” Theriogenology 81, no. 8: 1123–1128. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.01.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, M. A. , Alward K. J., Rhoads M. L., and Ealy A. D.. 2025. “Human Recombinant Interleukin‐6 and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Improve Inner Cell Mass Cell Number but Lack Cryoprotective Activities on in Vitro‐Produced Bovine Blastocysts.” Animals (Basel) 15, no. 5. 10.3390/ani15050668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, M. A. , Mercadante V. R. G., and Ealy A. D.. 2026. “Interleukin‐6 and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Differentially Modify Embryonic Disk Composition in Post Hatching Bovine Embryos†.” Biology of Reproduction. 10.1093/biolre/ioag083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, M. A. , Speckhart S. L., Edwards J. L., Rhoads M. L., and Ealy A. D.. 2024. “Human Recombinant Interleukin‐6 Improves the Morphological Quality of Cryopreserved in Vitro Produced Bovine Blastocysts.” Theriogenology 226: 173–180. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez‐Gomez, A. , González‐Brusi L., Bermejo‐Alvarez P., and Ramos‐Ibeas P.. 2021. “Lineage Differentiation Markers as a Proxy for Embryo Viability in Farm Ungulates.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8: 680539. 10.3389/fvets.2021.680539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez‐Gómez, A. , Flores‐Borobia I., Hamze J. G., et al. 2024. “SMC2 Ablation Impairs Bovine Embryo Development Shortly After Blastocyst Hatching.” Reproduction 168, no. 5. 10.1530/REP-24-0211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez‐Gómez, A. , González‐Brusi L., Flores‐Borobia I., et al. 2024. “The Role of TEAD4 in Trophectoderm Commitment and Development Is Not Conserved in Non‐Rodent Mammals.” Development 151, no. 20. 10.1242/dev.202993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez‐Gómez, A. , González‐Brusi L., Flores‐Borobia I., et al. 2024. “PPARG Is Dispensable for Bovine Embryo Development up to Tubular Stages.” Biology of Reproduction 111, no. 3: 557–566. 10.1093/biolre/ioae083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez‐Gómez, A. , González‐Brusi L., Muniesa‐Martínez I., García‐Sacristán P., Ramos‐Ibeas P., and Bermejo‐Álvarez P.. 2021. “Trascription Factor TEAD4 Is Not Required for Bovine Blastocyst Formation.” Reproduction, Fertility and Development 34, no. 2: 259–260. 10.1071/RDv34n2Ab49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez‐Gómez, A. , Hamze J. G., Flores‐Borobia I., et al. 2024. “HH5 Double‐Carrier Embryos Fail to Progress Through Early Conceptus Elongation.” Journal of Dairy Science 107, no. 8: 6371–6382. 10.3168/jds.2023-24482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piliszek, A. , and Madeja Z. E.. 2018. “Pre‐Implantation Development of Domestic Animals.” Current Topics in Developmental Biology 128: 267–294. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2017.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinzón‐Arteaga, C. A. , Wang Y., Wei Y., et al. 2023. “Bovine Blastocyst‐Like Structures Derived From Stem Cell Cultures.” Cell Stem Cell 30, no. 5: 611–616.e617. 10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plusa, B. , Piliszek A., Frankenberg S., Artus J., and Hadjantonakis A. K.. 2008. “Distinct Sequential Cell Behaviours Direct Primitive Endoderm Formation in the Mouse Blastocyst.” Development 135, no. 18: 3081–3091. 10.1242/dev.021519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pohler, K. G. , Green J. A., Geary T. W., et al. 2015. “Predicting Embryo Presence and Viability.” In Advances in Anatomy, Embryology, and Cell Biology, vol. 216, 253–270. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-15856-3_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pomar, F. J. R. , Teerds K. J., Kidson A., et al. 2005. “Differences in the Incidence of Apoptosis Between in Vivo and in Vitro Produced Blastocysts of Farm Animal Species: A Comparative Study.” Theriogenology 63, no. 8: 2254–2268. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rabaglino, M. B. , and Hansen P. J.. 2024. “Development of a Formula for Scoring Competence of Bovine Embryos to Sustain Pregnancy.” Biochem Biophys Rep 39: 101772. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, A. M. I. , Yamashita S., Islam M. R., et al. 2020. “Type‐I Interferon Regulates Matrix Metalloproteinases Clearance of the Bovine Endometrial Spheroid.” Animal Science Journal 91, no. 1: e13350. 10.1111/asj.13350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramos‐Ibeas, P. , González‐Brusi L., Used M. T., et al. 2022. “In Vitro Culture of Ovine Embryos up to Early Gastrulating Stages.” Development 149, no. 6. 10.1242/dev.199743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramos‐Ibeas, P. , Lamas‐Toranzo I., Martínez‐Moro Á., et al. 2020. “Embryonic Disc Formation Following Post‐Hatching Bovine Embryo Development In Vitro.” Reproduction 160: 579–589. 10.1530/REP-20-0243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramos‐Ibeas, P. , Pérez‐Gómez A., González‐Brusi L., Quiroga A. C., and Bermejo‐Álvarez P.. 2023. “Pre‐Hatching Exposure to N2B27 Medium Improves Post‐Hatching Development of Bovine Embryos in Vitro.” Theriogenology 205: 73–78. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramos‐Ibeas, P. , Sang F., Zhu Q., et al. 2019. “Pluripotency and X Chromosome Dynamics Revealed in Pig Pre‐Gastrulating Embryos by Single Cell Analysis.” Nature Communications 10, no. 1: 500. 10.1038/s41467-019-08387-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reese, S. T. , Franco G. A., Poole R. K., et al. 2020. “Pregnancy Loss in Beef Cattle: A Meta‐Analysis.” Animal Reproduction Science 212: 106251. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reichenbach, H. D. , Liebrich J., Berg U., and Brem G.. 1992. “Pregnancy Rates and Births After Unilateral or Bilateral Transfer of Bovine Embryos Produced in Vitro.” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 95, no. 2: 363–370. 10.1530/jrf.0.0950363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro, E. S. , Santos J. E., and Thatcher W. W.. 2016. “Role of Lipids on Elongation of the Preimplantation Conceptus in Ruminants.” Reproduction 152, no. 4: R115–R126. 10.1530/REP-16-0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts, J. N. , Byrem T. M., and Grooms D. L.. 2015. “Application of an ELISA Milk Pregnancy Test in Beef Cows.” Reproduction in Domestic Animals 50, no. 4: 651–658. 10.1111/rda.12546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roche, J. F. , Bolandl M. P., and McGeady T. A.. 1981. “Reproductive Wastage Following Artificial Insemination of Heifers.” Veterinary Record 109, no. 18: 401–404. 10.1136/vr.109.18.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez‐Alvarez, L. , Sharbati J., Sharbati S., Cox J. F., Einspanier R., and Castro F. O.. 2010. “Differential Gene Expression in Bovine Elongated (Day 17) Embryos Produced by Somatic Cell Nucleus Transfer and in Vitro Fertilization.” Theriogenology 74, no. 1: 45–59. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rowson, L. E. , and Moor R. M.. 1967. “The Influence of Embryonic Tissue Homogenate Infused Into the Uterus, on the Life‐Span of the Corpus Luteum in the Sheep.” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 13, no. 3: 511–516. 10.1530/jrf.0.0130511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saadeldin, I. M. , Han A., Bang S., et al. 2024. “Generation of Porcine Endometrial Organoids and Their Use as a Model for Enhancing Embryonic Attachment and Elongation.” Reproduction 167, no. 2. 10.1530/REP-23-0429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez, J. M. , Mathew D. J., Behura S. K., et al. 2019. “Bovine Endometrium Responds Differentially to Age‐Matched Short and Long Conceptuses†.” Biology of Reproduction 101, no. 1: 26–39. 10.1093/biolre/ioz060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos, A. , Minela T., Branen J., and Pursley J. R.. 2023. “Time to Increase in Pregnancy‐Specific Protein B Following Artificial Insemination Is a Direct Determinant of Subsequent Pregnancy Loss in Lactating Dairy Cows.” Journal of Dairy Science 106, no. 5: 3734–3747. 10.3168/jds.2022-22553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos, J. E. , Thatcher W. W., Chebel R. C., Cerri R. L., and Galvão K. N.. 2004. “The Effect of Embryonic Death Rates in Cattle on the Efficacy of Estrus Synchronization Programs.” Animal Reproduction Science 82‐83: 513–535. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sartori, R. , Balistrieri M., Silva L. O. E., et al. 2025. “Pregnancy Loss in Cattle With Emphasis on Embryo Transfer Programs.” Animal Reproduction 22, no. 3: e20250045. 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2025-0045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scatolin, G. N. , Ming H., Wang Y., et al. 2024. “Single‐Cell Transcriptional Landscapes of Bovine Peri‐Implantation Development.” IScience 27, no. 4: 109605. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi, W. K. , Hopkins B., Thompson S., Heath J. K., Luke B. M., and Graham C. F.. 1985. “Synthesis of Apolipoproteins, Alphafoetoprotein, Albumin, and Transferrin by the Human Foetal Yolk Sack and Other Foetal Organs.” Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 85: 191–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi, Y. , Hu B., Wang Z., et al. 2023. “Functional Role of GATA3 and CDX2 in Lineage Specification During Bovine Early Embryonic Development.” Reproduction 165, no. 3: 325–333. 10.1530/REP-22-0269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simintiras, C. A. , Sánchez J. M., McDonald M., and Lonergan P.. 2019. “The Influence of Progesterone on Bovine Uterine Fluid Energy, Nucleotide, Vitamin, Cofactor, Peptide, and Xenobiotic Composition During the Conceptus Elongation‐Initiation Window.” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1: 7716. 10.1038/s41598-019-44040-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simmet, K. , Zakhartchenko V., Philippou‐Massier J., Blum H., Klymiuk N., and Wolf E.. 2018. “OCT4/POU5F1 Is Required for NANOG Expression in Bovine Blastocysts.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, no. 11: 2770–2775. 10.1073/pnas.1718833115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simpson, L. , Strange A., Klisch D., et al. 2024. “A Single‐Cell Atlas of Pig Gastrulation as a Resource for Comparative Embryology.” Nature Communications 15, no. 1: 5210. 10.1038/s41467-024-49407-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith, C. S. , Berg D. K., Berg M., and Pfeffer P. L.. 2010. “Nuclear Transfer‐Specific Defects Are Not Apparent During the Second Week of Embryogenesis in Cattle.” Cellular Reprogramming 12, no. 6: 699–707. 10.1089/cell.2010.0040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatiadis, P. , Boel A., Cosemans G., et al. 2021. “Comparative Analysis of Mouse and Human Preimplantation Development Following POU5F1 CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting Reveals Interspecies Differences.” Human Reproduction 36, no. 5: 1242–1252. 10.1093/humrep/deab027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stojkovic, M. , Wolf E., Büttner M., et al. 1995. “Secretion of Biologically Active Interferon Tau by In Vitro‐Derived Bovine Trophoblastic Tissue.” Biology of Reproduction 53, no. 6: 1500–1507. 10.1095/biolreprod53.6.1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strumpf, D. , Mao C. A., Yamanaka Y., et al. 2005. “Cdx2 Is Required for Correct Cell Fate Specification and Differentiation of Trophectoderm in the Mouse Blastocyst.” Development 132, no. 9: 2093–2102. 10.1242/dev.01801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suwik, K. , Boruszewska D., Sinderewicz E., Kowalczyk‐Zieba I., Staszkiewicz‐Chodor J., and Woclawek‐Potocka I.. 2021. “Expression Profile of Developmental Competence Gene Markers in Comparison With Prostaglandin F.” Reproduction in Domestic Animals 56, no. 3: 437–447. 10.1111/rda.13880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talukder, A. K. , Rabaglino M. B., Browne J. A., Charpigny G., and Lonergan P.. 2023. “Dose‐ and Time‐Dependent Effects of Interferon Tau on Bovine Endometrial Gene Expression.” Theriogenology 211: 1–10. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turco, M. Y. , Gardner L., Hughes J., et al. 2017. “Long‐Term, Hormone‐Responsive Organoid Cultures of Human Endometrium in a Chemically Defined Medium.” Nature Cell Biology 19, no. 5: 568–577. 10.1038/ncb3516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tveden‐Nyborg, P. , Peura T. T., Hartwich K. M., Walker S. K., and Maddox‐Hyttel P.. 2005. “Morphological Characterization of Pre‐ and Peri‐Implantation in Vitro Cultured, Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer and in Vivo Derived Ovine Embryos.” Reproduction 130, no. 5: 681–694. 10.1530/rep.1.00850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vajta, G. , Alexopoulos N. I., and Callesen H.. 2004. “Rapid Growth and Elongation of Bovine Blastocysts In Vitro in a Three‐Dimensional Gel System.” Theriogenology 62, no. 7: 1253–1263. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Leeuwen, J. , Berg D. K., Smith C. S., Wells D. N., and Pfeffer P. L.. 2014. “Specific Epiblast Loss and Hypoblast Impairment in Cattle Embryos Sensitized to Survival Signalling by Ubiquitous Overexpression of the Proapoptotic Gene BAD.” PLoS One 9, no. 5: e96843. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Leeuwen, J. , Rawson P., Berg D. K., Wells D. N., and Pfeffer P. L.. 2020. “On the Enigmatic Disappearance of Rauber's Layer.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117, no. 28: 16409–16417. 10.1073/pnas.2002008117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viana, J. H. M. 2025. “2024 Statistics of Embryo Production and Transfer in Domestic Farm Animals.” In (Vol. 43). Embryo Technology Newsletter.
- Waclawik, A. , Kaczmarek M. M., Blitek A., Kaczynski P., and Ziecik A. J.. 2017. “Embryo‐Maternal Dialogue During Pregnancy Establishment and Implantation in the Pig.” Molecular Reproduction and Development 84, no. 9: 842–855. 10.1002/mrd.22835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wathes, D. C. , and Lamming G. E.. 1995. “The Oxytocin Receptor, Luteolysis and the Maintenance of Pregnancy.” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement 49: 53–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei, Q. , Zhong L., Zhang S., et al. 2017. “Bovine Lineage Specification Revealed by Single‐Cell Gene Expression Analysis From Zygote to Blastocyst.” Biology of Reproduction 97, no. 1: 5–17. 10.1093/biolre/iox071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wicklow, E. , Blij S., Frum T., et al. 2014. “HIPPO Pathway Members Restrict SOX2 to the Inner Cell Mass Where It Promotes ICM Fates in the Mouse Blastocyst.” PLoS Genetics 10, no. 10: e1004618. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilmut, I. , Sales D. I., and Ashworth C. J.. 1986. “Maternal and Embryonic Factors Associated With Prenatal Loss in Mammals.” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 76, no. 2: 851–864. 10.1530/jrf.0.0760851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiltbank, M. C. , Baez G. M., Garcia‐Guerra A., et al. 2016. “Pivotal Periods for Pregnancy Loss During the First Trimester of Gestation in Lactating Dairy Cows.” Theriogenology 86, no. 1: 239–253. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winnier, G. , Blessing M., Labosky P. A., and Hogan B. L.. 1995. “Bone Morphogenetic Protein‐4 Is Required for Mesoderm Formation and Patterning in the Mouse.” Genes & Development 9, no. 17: 2105–2116. 10.1101/gad.9.17.2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolf, E. , Ali A., Zakhartchenko V., et al. 2026. “Pregnancy Establishment in Cattle Without Embryonic Interferon Tau.” Research Square. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8509201/v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X. , Shi Y., Hu B., et al. 2024. “TEAD4 Regulates KRT8 and YAP in Preimplantation Embryos in Mice but Not in Cattle.” Reproduction 167, no. 3. 10.1530/REP-23-0322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yagi, R. , Kohn M. J., Karavanova I., et al. 2007. “Transcription Factor TEAD4 Specifies the Trophectoderm Lineage at the Beginning of Mammalian Development.” Development 134, no. 21: 3827–3836. 10.1242/dev.010223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J. , Li R., Luo R., et al. 2025. “Tracing and Capturing the Epiblast Pluripotency of Sheep Preimplantation Embryos.” Advanced Science (Weinheim) 12, no. 36: e17764. 10.1002/advs.202417764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
