Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Sep 7;252(3):1028–1034. doi: 10.1111/nph.71567

Contrasting influences of ectomycorrhizal fungi on decomposition depending on soil fertility

Björn D Lindahl 1,✉, Karina E Clemmensen 2, Christopher W Fernandez 3, Peter G Kennedy 4, Mathias Mayer 5,6, Thomas C Parker 7
PMCID: PMC13628524  PMID: 42703871

Summary

Despite their dominance in many terrestrial ecosystems, the impact of ectomycorrhizal fungi on organic matter decomposition is notably variable across different ecological settings. Here we outline how the influence of ectomycorrhizal fungi on decomposition of belowground organic matter pools depends, not only on the traits of the ectomycorrhizal fungi, but also on the relative dominance of other interacting fungal guilds, in a manner that is predictable across wide gradients in soil fertility. Specifically, we propose that the dominant effect of ectomycorrhizal fungi shifts from ‘priming’ of saprotrophs in the most fertile soils, to inhibition of saprotrophs when conditions become nitrogen‐limited, and to active ‘mining’ of organic matter when nutrient availability is severely constrained. Thus, ectomycorrhizal fungi retard decomposition of organic matter at intermediate soil fertility but accelerate decomposition both in the most fertile and the least fertile soils. These ideas may be applied both on local fertility gradients and at the global biome scale, helping to reconcile inconsistent relationships between ectomycorrhizal fungi and soil organic matter dynamics.

Keywords: decomposition, forest, Gadgil effect, mycorrhizal guilds, plant–soil feedback, priming, saprotroph


Ecosystem types along a gradient of increasing nutritional and climatic constraints with an overall transition from carbon (C)to nitrogen (N) limitation on decomposition.

graphic file with name NPH-252-1028-g002.webp


I. Introduction

The dynamics of soil organic matter are regulated by an interplay between biological and environmental controls (Schmidt et al., 2011). On the biological side, there are striking and globally important connections between the dominant mycorrhizal types of vegetation and belowground organic matter accumulation (Read, 1991; Steidinger et al., 2019). Yet, empirical evidence for the regulatory roles of mycorrhizal fungi in decomposition is often contradictory, and different mechanisms appear to be operating depending on ecological context (Frey, 2019; Choreño‐Parra & Treseder, 2024; Pena et al., 2025). While dominance by arbuscular mycorrhizal plants has consistently been linked to an inorganic nutrient economy, dominance by ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal plants facilitates mobilisation of organic nutrients (Phillips et al., 2013). Ectomycorrhizal‐dominated ecosystems show wide variation in terms of climate, soil types, and vegetation (Read & Perez‐Moreno, 2003), and the ecological settings in which ectomycorrhizal fungi interact with other fungal guilds to regulate organic matter turnover diverge accordingly. Moreover, unlike the more phylogenetically constrained arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, the ectomycorrhizal symbiosis has evolved independently across multiple fungal lineages (Kohler et al., 2015), resulting in wide variation in enzymatic capabilities, mycelial exploration strategies, and modes of soil resource mobilisation (Jörgensen et al., 2025).

Fungi have evolved distinct capabilities to decompose organic matter of varying qualities (Table 1). Whereas hydrolases that depolymerise polysaccharides and polypeptides are ubiquitous among most fungal groups (except arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) and common among prokaryotes, potent oxidative mechanisms required to degrade phenolic compounds, such as lignin, tannin, and melanin, have evolved primarily among Agaricomycetes (Floudas et al., 2012). Thus, Agaricomycetes are generally better equipped than other fungi to decompose recalcitrant substrates, including wood, tannin‐rich litter and melanin‐rich mycelial necromass. This extensive ability to degrade plant litter was largely lost, as ectomycorrhizal fungal lineages evolved from saprotrophic agaricomycete ancestors, although most ectomycorrhizal fungi can acquire organic nutrients from easily hydrolysed proteins and microbial necromass (Auer et al., 2024). However, some ectomycorrhizal fungal lineages have retained the potent oxidative enzyme systems of their saprotrophic ancestors, and these mycorrhizal decomposers play a critical role in severely nitrogen‐limited ecosystems, liberating nutrients from recalcitrant pools (Lindahl & Tunlid, 2015; Barbi et al., 2026). Recently, ectomycorrhizal fungi were proposed to vary along a trait spectrum, from ‘absorbers’, with rapidly growing, hydrophilic mycelium and low decomposer capacity, to ‘miners’, with slowly growing, hydrophobic mycelium and high decomposer capacity (Table 1; Jörgensen et al., 2025; Cox, 2026). This spectrum partly overlaps with the exploration types proposed by Agerer (2001), which are frequently used as an integrating ectomycorrhizal fungal trait related to organic matter dynamics (e.g. Khalfallah et al., 2024).

Table 1.

Here we outline six fungal guilds in order of increasing decomposer capabilities and provide examples of important fungal groups (focusing on common soil fungi).

Guild Decomposer capabilities Examples of taxonomic groups
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Little capacity to depolymerise organic resources Glomeromycota
Ectomycorrhizal absorbers Take up soluble nitrogen and hydrolyse proteins and microbial necromass, but cannot access tannin‐bound or melanised resources Atheliales, a Thelephoraceae, Amanita, Clavulina, Hygrophorus, Inocybe, Laccaria, Tricholoma, Cenococcum, Elaphomyces
Hydrolytic saprotrophs Hydrolyse polysaccharides and proteins, but cannot oxidise lignified tissues or use tannin‐bound or melanised resources Mucoromycota, Dothidiomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Microbotryomycetes, Eurotiales, Tremellales
Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi and other stress tolerants Have versatile hydrolytic capabilities and oxidative phenol oxidases, but lack peroxidases Leotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Sebacinales
Ectomycorrhizal miners Can access most organic N, using peroxidases or Fenton reactions Cortinariaceae, some Russulaceae, Hebeloma, Hysterangium, Paxillus, Bankeraceae, Gautieria, Piloderma a
Saprotrophic Agaricomycetes Can fully decompose most organic substrates, including lignified litter Mycena, Gallerina, Gymnopus, and other Agaricales, Trechisporales, Cantharellales
a

The degrading capacity of Piloderma species (Atheliales) remains uncertain.

Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi have versatile hydrolytic capabilities and may produce a variety of enzymes targeting plant cell wall polysaccharides, potentially allowing them to shift between biotrophic symbiosis and free‐living saprotrophic strategies (Martino et al., 2018). In an influential paper, Read & Perez‐Moreno (2003) suggested that the capacity to exploit organic nutrient pools is more extensively developed in ericoid mycorrhizal fungi than in ectomycorrhizal fungi. However, they also acknowledged the large variation among ectomycorrhizal fungal groups, which has been increasingly highlighted by more recent research (Zak et al., 2019). Thus, while ericoid mycorrhizal fungi are more versatile decomposers than ectomycorrhizal fungi with distinct ‘absorber’ traits, they lack the potent oxidative mechanisms that facilitate significant losses of more recalcitrant organic matter stocks (Miyauchi et al., 2020). With their retained decomposer capabilities, ectomycorrhizal fungal ‘miners’ seem superior to ericoid mycorrhizal fungi and other stress‐tolerant Ascomycetes in causing significant mass loss of organic humus layers (Lindahl et al., 2021; Mielke et al., 2025).

Here we highlight how the influence of ectomycorrhizal fungi on soil organic matter pools depends, not only on the traits of the ectomycorrhizal fungi themselves, but also on the traits of other fungal guilds with which they interact. We further propose that interactions among fungal guilds are strongly shaped by soil fertility (i.e. pH, water availability, texture, mineralogy, weathering rates, and nutrient and carbon availability through turnover of organic matter), resulting in contrasting effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi on belowground organic matter dynamics.

II. Priming in fertile soils

Ectomycorrhizal fungi can facilitate the transfer of recently assimilated plant carbon from roots into the surrounding soil, where labile carbon compounds may stimulate free‐living saprotrophs and enhance decomposition processes (Frey, 2019). Such root‐dependent stimulation of saprotrophic decomposition is generally referred to as rhizosphere (or mycorrhizosphere) priming (Huo et al., 2017) and may accelerate litter mass loss at the soil surface (Subke et al., 2011; Lang et al., 2021) as well as turnover of older organic matter in mineral soils (Brzostek et al., 2015; Mayer et al., 2023), thus constraining carbon accumulation. Priming can be further enhanced by inputs of easily decomposable hyphal necromass to the soil (Zhang et al., 2019).

On fertile soils where plant available nutrients are abundant and net primary production is high, carbon‐limited hydrolytic saprotrophic fungi and bacteria dominate microbial communities and decomposition (Bahnmann et al., 2018; Mayer et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2022), and relatively high litter quality and soil pH promote rapid litter decay (Prescott & Vesterdal, 2021). This process is further enhanced by active soil fauna, such as earthworms, which fragment and translocate organic material into deeper soil horizons (Barthod et al., 2020). Consequently, the accumulation of an organic layer is constrained, and the stabilisation of soil organic matter is primarily governed by associations with mineral surfaces and incorporation into soil aggregates (Lehmann & Kleber, 2015; Prescott & Vesterdal, 2021). Fast nitrogen mineralisation favours arbuscular mycorrhizal plants (Phillips et al., 2013) and selects for nitrophilic ‘absorbers’ in the ectomycorrhizal fungal community (Pena & Tibbett, 2024; Cox, 2026). Under these conditions, the priming effect of ectomycorrhizal fungi likely plays a dominant ecological role (Choreño‐Parra & Treseder, 2024). For example, in ectomycorrhizal fungal communities dominated by Thelephorales, these fungi likely contributed substantially to hyphal transfer of plant‐derived carbon to soil bacteria (Gorka et al., 2019). Further, in a temperate Fagus forest on fertile soil, tree girdling decreased the abundance of ectomycorrhizal fungi (notably Clavulina spp.), decreased the abundance of hydrolytic saprotrophic fungi (mainly Mortierella and Trichoderma spp.), and reduced decomposition (Mayer et al., 2023), suggesting disrupted ectomycorrhizal fungal priming.

III. Inhibition as fertility declines

As soil fertility declines, net primary production and the quality of plant litter generally decrease as the contents of lignin and tannin increase (Cornwell et al., 2008). In parallel, as soils become more acidic, activities of soil fauna and bacteria are reduced, and litter and organic humus layers accumulate on top of the mineral soil (Prescott & Vesterdal, 2021). As bacterial and fungal saprotrophs are increasingly constrained by low nitrogen availability, the stimulatory priming effect of carbon‐rich mycorrhizal exudates declines. In addition, decreasing quality of fungal mycelium (e.g. high melanin content and C : N ratios) may turn necromass priming into inhibition of decomposition (Fernandez & Koide, 2014; DeLancey et al., 2024; Carrillo et al., 2025). Decomposition depends increasingly on saprotrophic Agaricomycetes with potent oxidative capabilities, and low nitrogen mineralisation reduces the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. At intermediate soil fertility, ectomycorrhizal fungal communities typically remain dominated by ‘absorbers’ with low decomposer capabilities. These ectomycorrhizal fungi compete with the more potent saprotrophic Agaricomycetes for limiting nitrogen, hampering their activity as well as overall decomposition in line with the ‘Gadgil hypothesis’ (Gadgil & Gadgil, 1971; Fernandez & Kennedy, 2016). The magnitude of this effect appears to increase as litter quality and nutrient availability decrease (Kyaschenko et al., 2017; Smith & Wan, 2019; Fernandez et al., 2020; Mayer et al., 2023). Importantly, soil pH may modulate the strength of this competitive effect by altering organic nitrogen availability to ectomycorrhizal fungi and saprotrophs. Specifically, as pH increases (c. > 5), organic nitrogen bound to polyphenol complexes dissociates and becomes more accessible to hydrolytic attack. This greater availability may enable ‘absorber’ ectomycorrhizal fungi to compete more directly with saprotrophs for the released nitrogen pool, potentially intensifying the Gadgil suppression of organic matter decomposition (Fernandez & See, 2025). For example, in a temperate Pinus forest, hampering of roots by trenching suppressed the ectomycorrhizal fungal community (particularly Thelephora spp.), increased nitrogen availability, and stimulated fungal saprotrophs (e.g. Mortierella and Trechispora spp.) as well as leaf litter decomposition rates (Fernandez et al., 2020). In ecosystems with a pronounced Gadgil suppression, organic matter decomposition and accumulation depend on the ectomycorrhizal to saprotrophic fungal ratios, with slower decomposition and higher soil carbon accumulation at high ratios (DeLancey et al., 2024).

IV. Nitrogen mining on infertile soils

On less fertile soils, saprotrophic decomposers are increasingly constrained by low pH and low nutrient availability (Lindahl et al., 2021), with most nitrogen tightly bound in recalcitrant organic complexes (Fernandez & See, 2025). In parallel, stress‐tolerant ericaceous dwarf shrubs and mosses become dominant in the forest understory, which further deteriorates litter quality (Cornelissen et al., 2001) and suppresses decomposers through chemical antagonism and competition from ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (Fanin et al., 2022; Mielke et al., 2025). As a result, the ectomycorrhizal fungal community shifts in favour of species with more prominent oxidative decomposer capacities – organic matter ‘miners’ (Pellitier & Zak, 2021; Argiroff et al., 2022; Packard et al., 2025). These species confine saprotrophs to the uppermost layer of fresh plant litter and reinforce the Gadgil suppression in the litter layer, whereas the more decomposed humus is dominated by ectomycorrhizal fungi and stress‐tolerant Ascomycetes. In this setting, the ectomycorrhizal fungal miners stand out as the principal decomposers in the humus (Clemmensen et al., 2015; Barbi et al., 2026). For example, in a boreal Picea/Pinus forest, root severing by trenching largely eliminated the ectomycorrhizal fungal community (12% of which were Cortinarius species). This stimulated litter mass loss rates, indicating Gadgil suppression of early stages of decomposition, but at the same time the loss of ectomycorrhizal fungal ‘miners’ led to a 91% reduction of Mn‐peroxidase activity in the humus layer (Sterkenburg et al., 2018). Further, across a fertility gradient of coniferous forests in northern Sweden, saprotrophic Agaricomycetes (mainly Mycena spp.) decreased in abundance with declining pH (5 => 3), whereas a group of related Cortinarius spp. were more common in unfertile forests, and their presence was linked to 33% lower carbon storage in the organic horizon (Lindahl et al., 2021). In Pseudotsuga stands planted across a natural soil fertility gradient, peroxidase activities increased whereas carbon stocks in the organic horizon decreased with declining soil fertility, linked to increasing abundance of Piloderma spp. in the ectomycorrhizal community (Kranabetter et al., 2025). Notably, the importance of ectomycorrhizal fungi as decomposers has been proposed to be conditional on an ericaceous understory (Ward et al., 2021) and low pH (Fernandez & See, 2025).

In the least fertile boreal forests, as well as in alpine, arctic, and heathland ecosystems, plants and soil fungi are under severe stress from nutrient limitation, acidic conditions, low temperatures, short growing seasons and, sometimes, soil anoxia. In these environments, ericoid dwarf shrubs and non‐mycorrhizal sedges take over and deploy diverse nutrient acquisition strategies to facilitate their slow growth (McKane et al., 2002). Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi can mobilise limited amounts of organic‐bound nitrogen to meet the low demand from hosts, and their versatile decomposer capabilities may enable them to play dual roles as both plant mutualistic symbionts and free‐living degraders of organic matter (Martino et al., 2018) throughout seasonal cycles. However, they lack potent oxidative enzymes, and when the primary production of ectomycorrhizal hosts declines, and competition from ericoid mycorrhizal fungi intensifies (Fanin et al., 2022; Mielke et al., 2025), ectomycorrhizal ‘miners’ may lack the energy required to maintain organic matter oxidation (Clemmensen et al., 2015; Packard et al., 2025). Low availability of manganese, required for the activity of manganese peroxidases, may put additional constraints on oxidative decomposition in ectomycorrhizal forests (Zhang et al., 2024). When more productive shrubs/trees establish in ericoid‐dominated ecosystems, increased photosynthesis allows for higher carbon allocation to ectomycorrhizal ‘miners’, and increased decomposition and nutrient mobilisation could cause a ‘tipping point’ associated with significant losses of organic matter (Clemmensen et al., 2015; Parker et al., 2015, 2021; Defrenne et al., 2023). For example, in a sub‐arctic Betula forest with soil fungal communities dominated by stress‐tolerant Helotiales, Chaetothyriales and Sebacinales spp., elimination of ectomycorrhizal fungi (44% of which were Cortinarius species) decreased decomposition of organic substrates. However, above the forest line in the alpine heath, ‘miners’ were more rare in the ectomycorrhizal fungal community (7% Cortinarius species), and large amounts of organic matter accumulated belowground, despite low input rates (Clemmensen et al., 2021).

V. Conclusions

Altogether, the contrasting interactions in different ecological contexts imply that the role of ectomycorrhizal fungi as regulators of organic matter dynamics shifts along soil fertility gradients (Fig. 1). Such gradients may either be local, depending on different hydrology, disturbances, soil types, bedrock, and elevation, or at the biome scale, depending on macro‐climatic factors. In the most fertile ectomycorrhizal‐dominated ecosystems (typically lowland deciduous forests), ectomycorrhizal fungi facilitate decomposition by priming of hydrolytic saprotrophic fungi and bacteria. When ecosystem fertility and organic matter quality decrease (such as in mixed and coniferous temperate forests), more potent Agaricomycetes are required to maintain decomposition, and less potent ectomycorrhizal fungal ‘absorbers’ may suppress decomposition by competing for limiting nutrients, in line with the Gadgil hypothesis. Even further down the fertility gradient (e.g. in many boreal forests), saprotrophs are restricted and decomposition depends primarily on ectomycorrhizal fungal ‘miners’, which drive decomposition in competition with the less potent ericoid mycorrhizal fungi. In alpine and arctic conditions, neither saprotrophic Agaricomycetes nor ectomycorrhizal fungal miners thrive, and the absence of efficient decomposers may lead to slow decomposition and accumulation of vast organic matter pools, despite low primary production. We, thus, propose that ectomycorrhizal fungi accelerate decomposition at both ends of the fertility gradient but suppress decomposition at intermediate fertility. This hypothesis may be tested by a series of standardised field experiments along fertility gradients, which may be either local or more geographically dispersed and climate‐related. In such experiments, the influence of ectomycorrhizal fungi could be disrupted by tree girdling or root severing (trenching), after which decomposition rates could be estimated using mesh bags filled with organic substrates or based on long‐term changes in organic matter pools. A challenge is to account for treatment‐induced alterations of inputs (roots and mycorrhizal mycelium). Indirect assays, such as enzyme activity analyses and litter chemical analyses may complement direct measurements of organic matter losses, and metatranscriptomic analyses of gene expression may be used to test hypotheses about mechanisms.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Ecosystem types along a gradient of increasing nutritional and climatic constraints with an overall transition from carbon (C)‐ to nitrogen (N)‐limitation on decomposition. Soil organic matter (OM) types are portrayed by the relative dominance of litter, humus or mineral soil (rather than total stocks). Along this gradient, the soil fungal community transitions from a dominance of saprotrophic (red) and mycorrhizal fungal guilds (blue) towards dominance of stress‐tolerant and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (light brown). Positive (+) and negative (−) interactions between fungal guilds are indicated by black symbols. Within the saprotrophic guild, fungi relying mainly on hydrolytic enzymes dominate when litter quality is high, decomposition is rapid and C limitation prevails. Here, soil organic matter (OM) is predominantly in the form of relatively fresh litter or mineral associated organic matter. As N limitation intensifies and litter quality declines, fungi with oxidative capacities increase in abundance. Within the mycorrhizal guilds, in the most fertile systems, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and ectomycorrhizal ‘absorbers’ benefit from mineralised nutrients and facilitate saprotrophs by transporting C into the soil. In less fertile systems, the ectomycorrhizal ‘absorbers’ instead compete with saprotrophs for mineral and hydrolysable N compounds. As N is increasingly bound in the organic humus layer, pH decreases, and ericoid plants increase in abundance, ectomycorrhizal ‘miners’ with oxidative capacities take over as the principal decomposers. The most climatically constrained systems are dominated by stress tolerants, with potentially versatile saprotrophic/biotrophic lifestyles, but without prominent oxidative decomposer capacities (leading to humus accumulation). Thus, moving from high to low soil fertility, the net ectomycorrhizal (EM) effect on organic matter decomposition changes from ‘priming’, that is, stimulation, of free‐living saprotrophic decomposers in the most fertile soils, via ‘inhibition’ of saprotrophic activities due to competition for limiting N, that is, a Gadgil effect, to ‘mining’, that is, direct decomposition of organic matter where nitrogen is more strongly limiting, and finally neutral in the least fertile ecosystems, where ectomycorrhizal fungi play a subordinate role.

Although Gadgil suppression has been proposed as a global driver of belowground organic matter accumulation in ectomycorrhizal ecosystems (Averill et al., 2014), we propose that this positive ectomycorrhizal effect on carbon sequestration is conditional on intermediate levels of ecosystem fertility and not valid in too rich soils (no N limitation of decomposition) or too poor soils (ectomycorrhizal miners drive decomposition). Incorporation of this context dependency may provide a more nuanced understanding of how ectomycorrhizal fungi interplay with soil carbon dynamics and help to explain why ectomycorrhizal fungi correlate positively with belowground carbon pools on the largest scales (Steidinger et al., 2019) yet often appear to stimulate organic matter turnover in local studies (Choreño‐Parra & Treseder, 2024; DeLancey et al., 2025). We conclude that ectomycorrhizal interactions are decisive for the biological regulation of organic matter stability in temperate and boreal ecosystems. Biological and environmental constraints on decomposition should be evaluated together with organic inputs (amounts and qualities) for a better understanding and management of ecosystems as carbon sinks.

Competing interests

None declared.

Author contributions

BDL initiated the project. BDL, KEC, CWF, PGK, MM and TCP all participated in the writing of the paper.

Disclaimer

The New Phytologist Foundation remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in maps and in any institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Agerer R. 2001. Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza 11: 107–114. [Google Scholar]
  2. Argiroff WA, Zak DR, Pellitier PT, Upchurch RA, Belke JP. 2022. Decay by ectomycorrhizal fungi couples soil organic matter to nitrogen availability. Ecology Letters 25: 391–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auer L, Buée M, Fauchery L, Lombard V, Barry K, Clum A, Copeland A, Daum C, Foster B, LaButti K et al. 2024. Metatranscriptomics sheds light on the links between the functional traits of fungal guilds and ecological processes in forest soil ecosystems. New Phytologist 242: 1676–1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Averill C, Turner BL, Finzi AC. 2014. Mycorrhiza‐mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage. Nature 505: 543–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bahnmann B, Mašínová T, Halvorsen R, Davey ML, Sedlak P, Tomšovský M, Baldrian P. 2018. Effects of oak, beech and spruce on the distribution and community structure of fungi in litter and soils across a temperate forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 119: 162–173. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbi F, Menzel U, Simone D, Niskanen T, Lindahl BD. 2026. Ectomycorrhizal Cortinariaceae species dominate class II peroxidase gene expression in a boreal forest soil. New Phytologist 252: 400–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barthod J, Dignac MF, Le Mer G, Bottinelli N, Watteau F, Kögel‐Knabner I, Rumpel C. 2020. How do earthworms affect organic matter decomposition in the presence of clay‐sized minerals? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 143: 107730. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brzostek ER, Dragoni D, Brown ZA, Phillips RP. 2015. Mycorrhizal type determines the magnitude and direction of root‐induced changes in decomposition in a temperate forest. New Phytologist 206: 1274–1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carrillo Y, Stuart EK, Powell JR. 2025. Necromass of diverse root‐associated fungi suppresses decomposition of native soil carbon via impacts of their traits. Ecology Letters 28: e70216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Choreño‐Parra EM, Treseder KK. 2024. Mycorrhizal fungi modify decomposition: a meta‐analysis. New Phytologist 242: 2763–2774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clemmensen KE, Brandström‐Durling M, Michelsen A, Hallin S, Finlay RD, Lindahl BD. 2021. A tipping point in carbon storage when forest expands into tundra is related to mycorrhizal recycling of nitrogen. Ecology Letters 24: 1193–1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Clemmensen KE, Finlay RD, Dahlberg A, Stenlid J, Wardle DA, Lindahl BD. 2015. Carbon sequestration is related to mycorrhizal fungal community shifts during long term succession in boreal forests. New Phytologist 205: 1525–1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cornelissen JHC, Aerts R, Cerabolini B, Werger MJA, van der Heijden MGA. 2001. Carbon cycling traits of plant species are linked with mycorrhizal strategy. Oecologia 129: 611–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JH, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Pérez‐Harguindeguy N et al. 2008. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecology Letters 11: 1065–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cox F. 2026. Nitrogen impacts on ectomycorrhizal fungi: from resource exchange to forest carbon cycling. Journal of Experimental Botany 77: 4847–4856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Defrenne CE, Moore JAM, Tucker CL, Lamit LJ, Kane ES, Kolka RK, Chimner RA, Keller JK, Lilleskov EA. 2023. Peat loss collocates with a threshold in plant‐mycorrhizal associations in drained peatlands encroached by trees. New Phytologist 240: 412–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. DeLancey LC, Maillard F, Hobbie SE, Kennedy PG. 2024. Shifting fungal guild abundances are associated with altered temperate forest soil carbon stocks. Ecosystems 27: 986–998. [Google Scholar]
  18. DeLancey LC, McCarthy MJ, Peterson K, Yeam JJ, Kaminsky L, Smith ME, Peay KG, Hobbie SE, Kennedy PG. 2025. More exceptions than rules: Variable effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi on leaf litter decomposition in temperate pine forests. Journal of Ecology 113: 3799–3811. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fanin N, Clemmensen KE, Lindahl BD, Farrell M, Nilsson MC, Gundale MJ, Kardol P, Wardle DA. 2022. Ericoid shrubs shape fungal communities and suppress organic matter decomposition in boreal forests. New Phytologist 236: 684–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fernandez CW, Kennedy PG. 2016. Revisiting the ‘Gadgil effect’: do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest soils? New Phytologist 209: 1382–1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernandez CW, Koide RT. 2014. Initial melanin and nitrogen concentrations control the decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal litter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 77: 150–157. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fernandez CW, See CR. 2025. The pH influence on ectomycorrhizal nitrogen acquisition and decomposition. New Phytologist 246: 867–875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fernandez CW, See CR, Kennedy PG. 2020. Decelerated carbon cycling by ectomycorrhizal fungi is controlled by substrate quality and community composition. New Phytologist 226: 569–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Floudas D, Binder M, Riley R, Barry K, Blanchette RA, Henrissat B, Martínez AT, Otillar R, Spatafora JW, Yadav JS et al. 2012. The paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science 336: 1715–1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Frey SD. 2019. Mycorrhizal fungi as mediators of soil organic matter dynamics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 50: 237–259. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gadgil RL, Gadgil PD. 1971. Mycorrhiza and litter decomposition. Nature 233: 133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gorka S, Dietrich M, Mayerhofer W, Gabriel R, Wiesenbauer J, Martin V, Zheng Q, Imai B, Prommer J, Weidinger M. 2019. Rapid transfer of plant photosynthates to soil bacteria via ectomycorrhizal hyphae and its interaction with nitrogen availability. Frontiers in Microbiology 10: 168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Huo C, Luo Y, Cheng W. 2017. Rhizosphere priming effect: A meta‐analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 111: 78–84. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jörgensen K, Clemmensen KE, Fransson P, Manzoni S, Wallander H, Lindahl BD. 2025. A trait spectrum linking nitrogen acquisition and carbon use of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 246: 2425–2434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Khalfallah F, Bon L, El Mazlouzi M, Bakker MR, Fanin N, Bellanger R, Bernier F, De Schrijver A, Ducatillon C, Fotelli MN et al. 2024. “Ectomycorrhizal exploration type” could be a functional trait explaining the spatial distribution of tree symbiotic fungi as a function of forest humus forms. Mycorrhiza 34: 203–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kohler A, Kuo A, Nagy LG, Morin E, Barry KW, Buscot F, Canbäck B, Choi C, Cichocki N, Clum A et al. 2015. Convergent losses of decay mechanisms and rapid turnover of symbiosis genes in mycorrhizal mutualists. Nature Genetics 47: 410–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kranabetter JM, Innes F, Norris CE, Philpott TJ, Lacourse T, Hawkins BJ. 2025. Diverging soil peroxidase activity under ectomycorrhizal versus arbuscular mycorrhizal conifers with increasing C:N and exchangeable manganese. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 209: 109913. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kyaschenko J, Clemmensen KE, Karltun E, Lindahl BD. 2017. Below‐ground organic matter accumulation along a boreal forest fertility gradient relates to guild interaction within fungal communities. Ecology Letters 20: 1546–1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lang AK, Jevon FV, Vietorisz CR, Ayres MP, Hatala Matthes J. 2021. Fine roots and mycorrhizal fungi accelerate leaf litter decomposition in a northern hardwood forest regardless of dominant tree mycorrhizal associations. New Phytologist 230: 316–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lehmann J, Kleber M. 2015. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528: 60–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lindahl BD, Kyaschenko J, Varenius K, Clemmensen KE, Dahlberg A, Karltun E, Stendahl J. 2021. A group of ectomycorrhizal fungi restricts organic matter accumulation in boreal forest. Ecology Letters 24: 1341–1351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lindahl BD, Tunlid A. 2015. Ectomycorrhizal fungi – potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs. New Phytologist 205: 1443–1447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Martino E, Morin E, Grelet G‐A, Kuo A, Kohler A, Daghino S, Barry KW, Cichocki N, Clum A, Dockter RB et al. 2018. Comparative genomics and transcriptomics depict ericoid mycorrhizal fungi as versatile saprotrophs and plant mutualists. New Phytologist 217: 1213–1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mayer M, Matthews B, Sandén H, Katzensteiner K, Hagedorn F, Gorfer M, Berger H, Berger TW, Godbold DL, Rewald B. 2023. Soil fertility determines whether ectomycorrhizal fungi accelerate or decelerate decomposition in a temperate forest. New Phytologist 239: 325–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mayer M, Rewald B, Matthews B, Sanden H, Rosinger C, Katzensteiner K, Gorfer M, Berger H, Tallian C, Berger TW et al. 2021. Soil fertility relates to fungal‐mediated decomposition and organic matter turnover in a temperate mountain forest. New Phytologist 231: 777–790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. McKane RB, Johnson LC, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Rastetter EB, Fry B, Giblin AE, Kielland K, Kwiatkowski BL, Laundre JA et al. 2002. Resource‐based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra. Nature 415: 68–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mielke LA, Klein J, Ekblad A, Finlay RD, Lindahl BD, Clemmensen KE. 2025. Fungal guild interactions slow decomposition of boreal forest pine needle litter and humus. New Phytologist 247: 2367–2380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Miyauchi S, Kiss E, Kuo A, Drula E, Kohler A, Sánchez‐García M, Morin E, Andreopoulos B, Barry KW, Bonito G et al. 2020. Large‐scale genome sequencing of mycorrhizal fungi provides insights into the early evolution of symbiotic traits. Nature Communications 11: 5125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Packard EE, Pérez‐Izquierdo L, Clemmensen KE, Dahlberg A, Spohn M, Stendahl J, Lindahl BD. 2025. Ectomycorrhizal decomposers and their niche(s) in boreal forests. Functional Ecology 39: 1998–2014. [Google Scholar]
  45. Parker TC, Subke JA, Wookey PA. 2015. Rapid carbon turnover beneath shrub and tree vegetation is associated with low soil carbon stocks at a subarctic treeline. Global Change Biology 21: 2070–2081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Parker TC, Thurston AM, Raundrup K, Subke J‐A, Wookey PA, Hartley IP. 2021. Shrub expansion in the Arctic may induce large‐scale carbon losses due to changes in plant‐soil interactions. Plant and Soil 463: 643–651. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pellitier PT, Zak DR. 2021. Ectomycorrhizal fungal decay traits along a soil nitrogen gradient. New Phytologist 232: 2152–2164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pena R, Awad A, Nawaz A, Shang Y, Wubet T, Tibbett M. 2025. Unravelling the facilitation‐competition continuum among ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 208: 109865. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pena R, Tibbett M. 2024. Mycorrhizal symbiosis and the nitrogen nutrition of forest trees. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 108: 461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Phillips RP, Brzostek E, Midgley MG. 2013. The mycorrhizal‐associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon–nutrient couplings in temperate forests. New Phytologist 199: 41–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Prescott CE, Vesterdal L. 2021. Decomposition and transformations along the continuum from litter to soil organic matter in forest soils. Forest Ecology and Management 498: 119522. [Google Scholar]
  52. Read DJ. 1991. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experientia 47: 376–391. [Google Scholar]
  53. Read DJ, Perez‐Moreno J. 2003. Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems – a journey towards relevance? New Phytologist 157: 475–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schmidt MWI, Torn MS, Abiven S, Dittmar T, Guggenberger G, Janssens IA, Kleber M, Kögel‐Knabner I, Lehmann J, Manning DAC et al. 2011. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 47: 49–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith GR, Wan J. 2019. Resource‐ratio theory predicts mycorrhizal control of litter decomposition. New Phytologist 223: 1595–1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Steidinger BS, Crowther TW, Liang J, Van Nuland ME, Werner GDA, Reich PB, Nabuurs GJ, de‐Miguel S, Zhou M, Picard N et al. 2019. Climatic controls of decomposition drive the global biogeography of forest‐tree symbioses. Nature 569: 404–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sterkenburg E, Clemmensen KE, Ekblad A, Finlay RD, Lindahl BD. 2018. Contrasting effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi on early and late stage decomposition in a boreal forest. ISME Journal 12: 2187–2197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Subke J‐A, Voke NR, Leronni V, Garnett MH, Ineson P. 2011. Dynamics and pathways of autotrophic and heterotrophic soil CO2 efflux revealed by forest girdling. Journal of Ecology 99: 186–193. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ward EB, Duguid MC, Kuebbing SE, Lendemer JC, Warren RJ, Bradford MA. 2021. Ericoid mycorrhizal shrubs alter the relationship between tree mycorrhizal dominance and soil carbon and nitrogen. Journal of Ecology 109: 3524–3540. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yu K, Van Den Hoogen J, Wang Z, Averill C, Routh D, Smith G, Drenovsky R, Scow K, Mo F, Waldrop M. 2022. The biogeography of relative abundance of soil fungi versus bacteria in surface topsoil. Earth System Science Data 14: 4339–4350. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zak DR, Pellitier PT, Argiroff WA, Castillo B, James TY, Nave LE, Averill C, Beidler KV, Bhatnagar J, Blesh J et al. 2019. Exploring the role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in soil carbon dynamics. New Phytologist 223: 33–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhang Y, Hobbie SE, Schlesinger WH, Berg B, Sun T, Zhu J. 2024. Exchangeable manganese regulates carbon storage in the humus layer of the boreal forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 121: e2318382121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhang Z, Phillips RP, Zhao W, Yuan Y, Liu Q, Yin H. 2019. Mycelia‐derived C contributes more to nitrogen cycling than root‐derived C in ectomycorrhizal alpine forests. Functional Ecology 33: 346–359. [Google Scholar]

Articles from The New Phytologist are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES