Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2026 Sep 18;11(38):57085–57105. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.6c04568

A Novel Process for Al2O3 and KCl Production from Mechanically Activated K‑Feldspar via HCl Leaching and Roasting

Murat Erdemoğlu †, Mustafa Birinci †,*, Hikmet Sis †, Sema Erdemoğlu ‡, Mehmet Deniz Turan §, Mustafa Boyrazlı §, Marcela Achimovičová ∥, Matej Baláž ∥, Peter Baláž ∥, İsmail Bentli †, Kader Şentürk †, Muhammed Kürşat Aydemir †, Tufan Kıyak †, Hasan Nizamoğlu §, Emine Mete ‡, Gökçe Tumbuloğlu ‡, Ayşe Nur Aydemir ‡
PMCID: PMC13628612  PMID: 42824601

Abstract

This study investigates the recovery of potassium and aluminum from a Turkish K-feldspar ore via a combined process of intensive milling for mechanical activation, hydrochloric acid (HCl) leaching, and evaporation–roasting for the production of potassium chloride (KCl) and alumina (Al2O3). Mechanical activation was performed in a planetary ball mill at a ball-to-ore ratio of 30, 400 rpm for 120 min, which resulted in complete amorphization of microcline and albite, while quartz remained partially crystalline (13.91%) due to its homogeneous Si–O–Si network. The activated ore exhibited a sixfold increase in specific surface area (from 4.68 to 28.05 m2/g) and a significant increase in loss on ignition (LOI) from 0.46% to 2.88%, attributed to the formation of surface hydroxyls (Si–OH, Al–OH), confirmed by FT-IR analysis. Under identical leaching conditions (4 M HCl, 100 °C, 24 h, L/S = 20, 600 rpm), the raw ore yielded only 2.83% Al extraction, whereas the optimally milled sample achieved 87.72%, demonstrating the critical role of mechanical activation. Subsequently, response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize the leaching parameters, yielding optimum conditions of 4.88 M HCl, 100 °C, and 36 h, which resulted in 82.08% Al and 84.20% K recoveries. The negative quadratic coefficient for HCl concentration (C2 = −8.65) reflects the decreased solubility of AlCl3·6H2O in concentrated HCl due to chloro-aluminum complex formation (AlCl3(aq), AlCl4 –). The loaded leach solution was directly evaporated and roasted at 1150–1250 °C to separate Al2O3 from KCl, which volatilized and condensed as a salt mixture containing 81.3% KCl and 17.3% NaCl; the KCl fraction can be further purified to a high-purity product. Contamination from WC–Co milling media was fully eliminated by changing to sintered alumina media, which also improved Al2O3 purity to 94.1% and produced a white product. The silica-rich leach residue (90.87% SiO2) was valorized into high-purity SiO2 (97.7%), calcium silicate (CaSiO3), and silicon carbide (SiC) via biochar-driven carbothermal reduction. Techno-economic analysis of the integrated POTASSIAL process (100 ton/day) indicated marginal baseline economics (IRR ≈ 6.1%, payback ≈ 12 years) but became highly attractive (IRR > 22%, payback <4 years) with a 30% increase in SiC price, while LCA confirmed long-term environmental benefits from closed-loop operation and zero-waste generation. This work demonstrates a sustainable, zero-waste pathway for the simultaneous valorization of K and Al from feldspathic ores, offering a viable alternative for regions lacking soluble potash resources.


graphic file with name ao6c04568_0014.webp


graphic file with name ao6c04568_0012.webp

1. Introduction

Aluminum is one of the most abundant metals in the Earth’s crust, accounting for approximately 8% of its composition, and is the second most commonly used metal after steel. However, due to its high affinity and reactivity to oxygen, it is rarely found in elemental form in nature. Instead, it is found as part of aluminum compounds in over 270 different minerals. Also, alumina (Al2O3), the most common Al-containing compound, is widely used in ceramics, abrasives, refractories, and cement industries due to its desirable physical and chemical properties. It is also used in the production of aluminum metal through the Hall–Héroult process, following the Bayer process. However, bauxite-based alumina production faces significant technological and environmental challenges. These include insufficient bauxite reserves in certain countries, depletion of existing reserves, reactive silica issues, high energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and challenges in red mud storage and management. Rapid technological advancements have led to an increase in the global consumption of aluminum, with a decrease in high-grade bauxite reserves, thus spurring research efforts toward the utilization of non-bauxite ores as a secondary source such as kaolinite, , alunite, mullite, muscovite, sericite, pyrophyllite, − nepheline syenite, anorthite and coal shales, and fly ash. ,

Extraction of Al2O3 from clay minerals is a complex process that involves several steps, including: (i) thermal or mechanical pretreatment for activation, (ii) acid leaching, (iii) solution purification, (iv) aluminum precipitation, and (v) roasting at high temperatures to convert it into alumina (Al2O3). The purity of the alumina obtained from this process depends on the purity of the starting clay mineral and the efficiency of the various steps in the process. Various studies exist on obtaining alumina from aluminum-containing minerals using the acid leaching method. ,,− In a study conducted by Erdemoğlu et al., it was concluded that mechanical activation is more efficient than thermal activation in the recovery of alumina from aluminosilicate minerals. Therefore, achieving mechanical activation through intensive milling is considered a viable method for high-efficiency metal recovery from minerals. − In fact, without such mechanical activation, the highly stable crystalline structure of aluminosilicates is practically resistant to acid attack, often resulting in insignificant dissolution (<3% Al extraction); thus, intensive milling acts as a precondition rather than simply an optional pretreatment.

Potassium is one of the essential elements for plant nutrition and development. However, its demand for potassium fertilizers is increasing steadily at 3–3.5% per annum. At present, the predominant source for global potash fertilizer production is soluble K salt ores such as sylvite (KCl), which is the mineral form of potassium chloride (KCl). Unfortunately, soluble K salt resources are limited, constituting less than 1% of global K reserves. According to General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Türkiye does not have any commercial resources of soluble potassium-bearing rocks such as sylvinite (KCl–NaCl) or carnallite (KCl.MgCl2·6­(H2O)). Due to the limited domestic raw material resources in Türkiye, the chemical fertilizer industry depends more than 90% on imports. For example, 85% (6 million tons) of the annual chemical fertilizer consumption of around 7 million tons is imported. Consequently, the recovery of potassium from diverse domestic sources is of paramount importance. Generally, potassium is associated with silicate minerals such as feldspar, mica, biotite, muscovite, and nepheline within the Earth’s crust.

The beneficiation of feldspar ores is commonly carried out through the flotation method. , In the recovery of elements within feldspar minerals, potassium is primarily targeted. Calcium-based compounds are often preferred to enhance potassium recovery. − However, since feldspars can contain a notable amount of aluminum, its recovery has also become an important research area. Nevertheless, studies in this field are more limited compared to potassium recovery. ,

Türkiye has huge resources of silicate minerals in the form of feldspar in which potassium concentration is around 5–10%. Feldspars constitute a significant group of aluminosilicate minerals, typically containing sodium, calcium, and potassium. Their widespread occurrence makes them intriguing subjects for geological and crystallographic studies. Importantly, their ice nucleation properties vary depending on the specific feldspar type. Feldspars are mainly used in ceramic and glass industries as fluxing agents.

However, the chemical properties of K-feldspar are stable due to its fixed Al–Si–O tetrahedral structure, making it difficult for KAlSi3O8 to dissociate into free K+ ions and dissolve in water or soil. Although numerous methods such as thermal roasting, hydrothermal ion exchange, acid/alkali leaching, and bioleaching have been attempted to extract soluble potassium salts from K-feldspar, these processes require large quantities of expensive raw materials (KCl, Na2CO3, NaOH, KOH, HCl, HF, and H2SO4) and equipment, leading to high costs for using KAlSi3O8.

Studies are being conducted to obtain potassium from silicate minerals as an alternative to KCl production from evaporite potash deposits. Hydrometallurgical leaching of potassium from aluminosilicates is generally unsuccessful because of their complex structure. However, methods have been developed to facilitate KCl recovery through water leaching by applying thermal treatments such as roasting with calcium-containing compounds like CaCl2. ,, Alyosif et al. investigated the process of feldspar roasting with calcium chloride for potassium chloride production from feldspars, in which mechanical activation was achieved by amorphizing minerals subjected to intensive milling for varying durations, and the potassium recovery obtained from roasting these minerals with CaCl2 was found to be higher at all temperatures compared to that of the unmilled ore. As a pretreatment method, mechanical activation is defined as a process that enhances the reactivity of a solid without altering its chemical composition. In the process, the mineral is intensively milled to fine sizes, reducing the particle size. Depending on the intensity of the applied mechanical energy during milling, deformation occurs in the crystal structure of the mineral, leading to the formation of an amorphous structure. Simultaneously, new surfaces that have not undergone any chemical reactions are exposed. This structure becomes more active during metallurgical processes such as calcination or leaching, resulting in a decrease in reaction temperature or an increase in process rate.

Response surface methodology (RSM) has proven to be a valuable tool in hydrometallurgical research due to its ability to optimize processes involving multiple operating parameters with a minimal number of experiments. Its advantagessuch as facilitating easy optimization, reducing experimental workload, enabling rapid result acquisition, and allowing statistical evaluationhave led to its widespread use in recent years. In the context of potassium and aluminum recovery from K-feldspar through acid leaching, RSM is expected to be particularly beneficial for systematically investigating the effects and interactions of leaching variables and for efficiently determining the optimum conditions for maximum Al and K solubility.

Previous studies on recovering potassium as KCl from potassium feldspar ores have left the aluminum in the ore as waste because it is bound to various calcium–aluminum silicate phases. This occurs as a result of thermochemical reactions with added calcium during chlorination roasting. However, no other study has been found in which both the potassium and aluminum were taken into an aqueous solution by the acid leaching of K-feldspar, and KCl and Al2O3 were recovered as separate products. Furthermore, the conventional downstream purification of acid leachates often relies on selective pH precipitation (e.g., Al­(OH)3 at pH 4–6), which introduces external reagents such as NaOH, causes co-precipitation of contaminant cations (Fe3+, Co2+, etc.), and generates large volumes of waste salts.

In contrast, the present work adopts a reagent-free evaporation–roasting route: the loaded chloride leachate is evaporated to recover HCl and co-crystallize AlCl3·6H2O and KCl; subsequent roasting transforms the aluminum into solid Al2O3 retained in the furnace container, while KCl volatilizes and is separately collected by condensation on a cooled surface.

KCl volatilizes because it exists in the liquid–vapor phase in the temperature range of 906–1418 °C. KCl mass loss begins around 800 °C and continues until approximately 1190 °C, where it is completely consumed. Similar observations have been reported for the roasting of AlCl3–KCl salt mixtures derived from pyrophyllite ore, where volatilized KCl condensed in the cooler zones of the furnace. , This integrated methodology eliminates the need for costly precipitants, minimizes secondary waste, and enables acid recycling, offering a distinct advantage over conventional purification schemes.

This research aims to investigate the extraction of potassium and aluminum from intensively milled potassium feldspar ore, for which mechanical activation is achieved, through an acid leaching process, followed by roasting performed to obtain Al2O3 and KCl. The study focuses especially on optimizing the acid leaching parameters affecting the degree of potassium and aluminum dissolution from mechanically activated potassium feldspar ore into the leaching solution utilized to obtain KCl and Al2O3. By systematically comparing the leaching performance of raw versus activated ore and implementing a closed-loop chloride separation strategy, the current investigation provides a comprehensive framework for the simultaneous valorization of both K and Al values from a domestic feldspar resource.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The K-feldspar sample used in this study was obtained from Kale Seramik Company, Türkiye, as a flotation concentrate from the beneficiation of feldspar ore. The raw material was subjected to intensive milling in a planetary ball mill based on a Taguchi experimental design. The milled products were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), particle size distribution (PSD), and BET surface area analysis; the results of this milling study have been reported in detail elsewhere. Based on the characterization and leaching tests conducted in the present work, the milled K-feldspar that exhibited the highest Al and K recoveries was selected for subsequent leaching experiments. A detailed characterization of both raw and activated samples is provided in the Results and Discussion section.

2.2. Intensive Milling

The K-feldspar ore was intensively milled to achieve mechanical activation by using a Fritsch Pulverisette 6 Classic Line model planetary mono mill (Idar-Oberstein, Germany). The feldspar ore was fed into a 250 cm3 milling bowl made of tungsten carbide (WC) with a chemical composition of 88% WC and 12% cobalt (Co). The bowl contained 50 pieces of 10 mm diameter balls made of the same material with the bowl. The ball-to-ore ratio was kept constant at 30 by weight. The ore was dry-milled for 120 min at a 400 rpm rotational mill speed. To reduce overheating of the mill, each 10 min of milling was followed by 20 min of pause. The milling tests were carried out in an air atmosphere and at room temperature.

2.3. Acid Leaching

For each experiment, 12.5 g of sample was leached in 250 mL of HCl solution using a 500 mL two-necked borosilicate glass reactor equipped with a water-cooled condenser. The reactor containing mechanically activated K-feldspar and HCl solution was placed in a stirring heater mantle, and the temperature of the reactor was controlled by a programmable controller of the mantle. A magnetic stirrer was used to mix the slurry while keeping the stirring speed constant at 600 rpm. At the end of leaching, the slurry was vacuum-filtered to separate the loaded leach solution from undissolved material, which was then washed three times with diluted HCl acid solution. The filtrate and washings were combined to have a constant volume of 500 mL in a volumetric flask to obtain a stock-loaded leach solution, subjected to inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) analysis.

2.4. Evaporation and Roasting for Al2O3 and KCl Recovery

The clarified loaded leach solution obtained under the optimized leaching conditions was subjected to direct evaporation without any prior neutralization or pH adjustment. The solution was transferred to a glass reactor and heated to its boiling point (∼100 °C) under atmospheric pressure. The evolved vapors, consisting of water steam and gaseous HCl, were passed through a water-cooled condenser, and the recovered acidic condensate was collected for potential reuse as a leachant. As evaporation proceeded, the dissolved salts reached supersaturation, leading to the co-crystallization of hydrated AlCl3 and KCl at the bottom of the evaporation reactor.

The resulting mixed salt lump was then transferred to a high-purity alumina crucible and placed inside a horizontal three-zone tube furnace (Protherm PZF12/105/750, capable of reaching 1200 °C) for roasting. To collect the volatilized salts, a borosilicate glass tube equipped with inlet and outlet caps was placed inside the mullite tube of the furnace. The salt mixture was roasted at 1150 °C. During roasting, the aluminum species remained in the crucible as insoluble alumina. In contrast, the volatile KCl rerouted and was transported by the thermal gradient to the cooler region of the borosilicate tube, where it condensed and was collected as a solid crystalline deposit. After the volatile KCl fraction was removed, the remaining alumina in the crucible was further calcined at 1200 and 1250 °C using a muffle furnace (Protherm PLF120/5, capable of reaching 1300 °C) to obtain the final high-purity Al2O3 product. This evaporation–roasting scheme has been successfully applied in our previous works ,, and is the subject of a patent application.

This temperature-driven separation enabled the simultaneous recovery of both Al2O3 and KCl without the addition of any external chemical reagents, while the condensed acidic distillate allowed for the recycling of a portion of the leachant.

2.5. Characterization Techniques

The crystal structure of the samples was examined via X-ray diffraction (XRD) using an automated Rigaku RadB-type diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan). The radiation applied was CuKα (λ = 1.5405 Å) from a long fine-focus Cu tube, operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. The samples were measured in the 2θ range of 2–80° with 0.02° steps at a rate of 2° per min. The Jade 5.0 program was used for phase identification by matching the ICDD PDF database with the measured samples. Degree of amorphization was calculated using the crystallinity index of the minerals, which is a measure of the relative amount of crystalline material in a sample. It is calculated by dividing the area of the crystalline peaks in an XRD pattern by the total area of the pattern. The higher the crystallinity index (CI), the more crystalline the sample. The degree of crystallinity and amorphization is formulated in eqs and , respectively

Thecrystallinityindex(CI),%=(U0Ix)/(I0Ux)×100 1
Thedegreeofamorphization(DA),%=(100−CI) 2

where U 0 and U x denote the backgrounds of unmilled sample and milled sample, while I 0 and I x are the integral intensities of diffraction lines of the mineral in the unmilled sample and milled sample, respectively. Accordingly, if I x = I 0, it is interpreted that the mineral is 100% XRD-crystalline or 0% XRD-amorphous with respect to the crystallographic plane (hkl) to which the peak belongs.

The chemical composition of the ore was determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES) in ALS Global Geochemistry Lab (Türkiye).

Al and K concentrations in the leach solution were determined by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS) at İnönü University, İBTAM Laboratories. The elemental content of the loaded leach solution obtained under optimum conditions was determined by the Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES) method (Middle East Technical University Central Laboratory, Türkiye).

The particle size distribution (PSD) of the samples was determined using a Malvern Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK). Nearly 0.5 g of sample was stirred with distilled water at 2000 rpm in a 1 L cell integrated into the device, and measurements were performed on particles in an aqueous medium. All of the particle size distribution data were automatically obtained by using Mastersizer 2000 software.

The specific surface area of the powders was determined by the BET method using the low-temperature N2 adsorption technique using a NOVA 1200e pore size analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, UK). Thermal analysis of all samples was performed using a Shimadzu TGA-50 thermogravimetric analyzer. The chemical composition of the leach residue was determined by the XRF method using a PanAnalytical Epsilon 4 instrument.

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis of the raw and activated feldspar ore was performed using a PerkinElmer Spectrum One model spectrometer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Raw and Activated Feldspar Ore

Figure presents the XRD patterns of raw and milled K-feldspar ore obtained through intensive milling in a planetary ball mill. When the XRD pattern of the milled sample was examined, it was observed that the peak intensities of all minerals typically declined and the peaks belonging to feldspar minerals almost entirely disappeared. The remaining XRD peaks observed in the patterns after mechanical activation were attributed to quartz. The most intense peak associated with quartz, appearing at 26.56° 2θ (CuKα), shows a slight decrease in intensity. This suggests that the crystal structure of quartz within the ore is also distorted to some extent due to intensive milling. Petrov and Milošević explain that varying resistances to mechanical activation are due to the different crystal lattice types. In this context, quartz’s higher resistance to amorphization (only 13.91%, as shown in Table ) is not solely due to its higher Mohs hardness (7 versus 6 for feldspar) but due to the homogeneous, three-dimensional Si–O–Si network of quartz, where bond breakage requires cooperative failure along specific crystallographic directions. In contrast, feldspars contain weaker Al–O bonds and charge-balancing cations (e.g. K+, Na+), which introduce local lattice distortions and internal strain, making the framework less durable against high-energy milling. This mechanistic dissimilarity clarifies why microcline and albite reach 100% amorphization while quartz retains partial crystallinity. , The structural changes implied by the XRD patterns are further corroborated by FT-IR spectroscopic analysis, which provides direct molecular-level evidence for bond weakening and lattice distortion (discussed below in this section).

1.

1

XRD patterns of the raw and mechanically activated feldspar (Mc: Microcline, Ab: Albite, Qz: Quartz, WC: Tungsten carbide).

2. Particle Size and Amorphization Parameters of Raw and Activated Feldspar Samples.

feldspar ore
particle size parameter, μm
S BET, m2/g
degree of amorphization, %
  d10 d50 d90   microcline albite quartz
raw 121.42 293.11 518.30 4.68 0 0 0
activated 0.95 20.40 218.20 28.05 100 100 13.91

The chemical composition of the raw and activated K-feldspar ore sample is given in Table . A relative decrease was observed in the activated product’s silica (65.03% SiO2) and alumina (15.08% Al2O3) contents when compared to the raw ore. However, a more significant result was the presence of tungsten (1.59% WO3) and cobalt (0.12% Co3O4) in the activated material. The presence of these elements is a clear indication of contamination originating from the milling media. Another result was the significant difference in loss on ignition (LOI) values. The raw ore had an LOI of 0.46%, while the activated ore’s LOI was determined to be 2.88%. The origin of this LOI increase is further investigated by thermal analysis and FT-IR spectroscopy in the following sections.

1. Chemical Compositions of the Raw and Activated Feldspar Samples.

main oxide, % SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Na2O K2O TiO2 BaO WO3 Co3O4 LOI
raw 69.23 16.69 0.14 0.34 0.03 1.80 10.94 0.29 0.11 - - 0.46
activated 65.03 15.08 0.19 0.35 0.01 1.86 10.05 0.06 0.09 1.59 0.12 2.88
a

Loss on ignition at 1000 °C.

Table shows data on the amorphization degrees and particle size parameters for both raw and activated samples. This table clearly demonstrates the effects of the intensive milling process on the structural properties of the materials. Particle size measurements showed that d90, d50, and d10 sizes of raw ore are 518, 293, and 121 μm, respectively. But, for activated feldspar, these values shifted to 218, 20, and 0.9 μm, respectively. Additionally, mechanical activation led to six times increase in the specific surface area from 4.68 to 28.05 m2/g. The degree of amorphization calculated according to eq clearly reveals the change in mineral crystal structural characteristics. Table shows the degree of amorphization of microcline, albite, and quartz, being the major minerals in the ore. These minerals in the ore are subjected to amorphization by milling just for 120 min. For quartz, the amorphization degree is about 13.91% at the end of 120 min of milling, while it is 100% for microcline and albite, respectively. Unlike quartz mineral, the amorphization degrees of microcline and albite decrease with further milling.

Scanning Electron Microscopy–Energy Dispersive X-ray (SEM–EDX) analysis was conducted to investigate the surface morphology of the raw and activated feldspar samples. The surface characteristics of the ore samples are shown in Figure . As can be seen from the SEM image of raw ore (i.e., unmilled) with −212 μm particle size (Figure a), there are many particles with different sizes and shapes including coarse ones with sharp edges and fine ones with smooth surfaces. The wide variation in shapes is because of the presence of hard minerals such as microcline and quartz. Furthermore, the coarser particles were characterized by a more homogeneous internal structure and absence of cracks. In contrast, the mechanically activated feldspar displays smaller particles, irregular surface morphology, and prominent fractures with sharp edges. Moreover, mechanical activation led to an increase in surface area, resulting in the agglomeration of particles (Figure b). When evaluated in terms of chemical composition, it was determined that the SiO2 content decreased in the raw sample, while the proportions of K and Al increased. This change can be considered an indication of structural transformations caused by mechanical activation within the feldspar structure. The significant increase in potassium content particularly suggests that feldspar’s structural integrity was compromised, leading to the release of potassium ions from its surface. On the other hand, EDX analysis of the activated sample, which was obtained through milling in a tungsten carbide medium, revealed a dominance of Si and Al elements, alongside the distinct appearance of new element peaks such as W and Co. This indicates contamination of the sample by the milling media due to abrasion, especially during prolonged milling times.

2.

2

SEM–EDX microphotographs of raw (a) and activated (b) feldspar samples.

The apparent discrepancy between the EDX (increased K/Al ratios relative to Si) and the ICP-AES data, regarding relative decrease in Al2O3 and K2O (Table ), is explained by the dilution effect of the added contaminants and LOI. By recalculating the activated sample’s composition after excluding LOI, WO3, and Co3O4 (i.e., normalizing to the original mineral oxide basis only), the values become: SiO2 = 70.14%, Al2O3 = 16.27%, and K2O = 10.84%. Compared to the raw feldspar on the same dry, contaminant-free basis (SiO2 = 69.55%, Al2O3 = 16.77%, K2O = 10.99%), the differences are only −0.50% for Al2O3 and −0.15% for K2O. Thus, the apparent decrease in bulk Al and K is largely a dilution effect, while the EDX surface observations reflect amorphization-induced surface enrichment. The management of WC and Co contamination is discussed in detail in Section , along with the corresponding purification results.

Thermal analysis (TGA/DTA) was performed on the raw and activated ore sample, and the results are presented in Figure . According to TGA curve for the raw ore, mass loss began at 384 °C, reaching approximately 1% at 760 °C, with a maximum loss of 1.06% at 1000 °C. It clearly shows that raw ore exhibits very high thermal stability over the entire temperature range. A slight mass loss of 1–2% is observed at high temperatures (between 850 and 1000 °C). This suggests that the sample contains little or no volatile components (such as moisture, organic matter, and carbonate) and can be a high-purity feldspar ore. Feldspar minerals generally do not show significant mass loss in this temperature range. This mass loss is attributed to the dehydroxylation of muscovite, which is present in the the ore as a minor gangue mineral. For pure muscovite, the mass loss upon heating to 1000 °C is approximately 3.82%. As for the activated sample, the TGA curve shows a much more significant mass loss compared to the raw ore. It is seen that at 1000 °C, the sample has lost about 5–6% of its initial mass. The high percentage of mass loss clearly indicates that this sample contains significant amounts of thermally decomposable components such as moisture (i.e., OH groups).

3.

3

TGA and DTA curves of the raw and activated K-feldspar.

The exothermic peak at 710.45 °C was assessed, as direct decomposition or phase transitions are not typically expected for feldspars in this temperature range. However, if impurities like quartz are present along with feldspar in the sample, the α-quartz to β-quartz transformation is characterized by a weak endothermic peak. Smaller exothermic peaks at 904.12 °C and 960.64 °C were assessed as these peaks similarly could indicate high-temperature phase transitions, the onset of sintering, or the beginning of melting of minor components or impurities in the ore. The peak at 960.64 °C, in particular, is close to the typical melting temperature for feldspars, though this is usually an endothermic event. Significantly, the sharp and broad exothermic peak observed above 850 °C (reaching a maximum at 950 °C) is absent in the raw ore but pronounced in the activated sample. This exotherm is characteristic of the crystallization of a metastable Al-rich spinel phase (γ-Al2O3-type) or mullite from the highly amorphous aluminosilicate matrix generated by mechanical activation. , This crystallization event is sequential to the volatile loss: the 2.88% LOI reflects the release of adsorbed and structurally bound water/hydroxyl groups from the defective, highly porous activated structure up to about 850 °C, after which the dehydrated amorphous phase reorganizes into a crystalline spinel/mullite phase, producing the observed exothermic DTA peak without further significant mass change.

The FT-IR spectra (Figure ) provide spectroscopic confirmation of the structural amorphization observed by XRD (Figure ) and confirmation for the origin of the increased LOI in the activated sample. FT-IR analysis was performed on both samples. The raw K-feldspar exhibited no absorption bands in the characteristic O–H stretching region (3200–3700 cm–1). In contrast, the activated sample revealed a distinct new broad band centered at approximately 3400 cm–1, along with a minor bending band near 1640 cm–1, which are unequivocally assignable to O–H stretching and H–O–H bending vibrations, respectively. This confirms the presence of both chemisorbed surface hydroxyls (Si–OH, Al–OH) and physisorbed molecular water on the freshly fractured surfaces. The broadness of the 3400 cm–1 band indicates extensive hydrogen bonding, typical of water clusters on silicate surfaces. These spectral changes, together with the increased mass loss observed in TGA, provide direct evidence that mechanical activation induces significant surface hydroxylation and water adsorption, which account for the LOI increase from 0.46% to 2.88%. Results indicate significant changes on the surface properties of the particle during the milling process. As is known, milling of minerals reduces particle size while substantially increasing the specific surface area. These newly formed surfaces have unsaturated bonds or unsaturated atoms in terms of coordination, which are the result of the breaking of bonds in the crystal lattice. These reactive sites easily interact with water molecules in the atmosphere to form hydroxyl groups. This process is called hydration or hydroxylation. Furthermore, these spectral changes are fully consistent with the XRD-derived amorphization degrees (Table ): the complete loss of crystallinity in microcline and albite corresponds to the disappearance of sharp bands and the broadening/shifting of the Si–O–Si stretching modes, while the partial crystallinity of quartz is reflected in the less pronounced spectral changes. Thus, the FT-IR data provide direct molecular-level evidence that mechanical activation disrupts the Al–O–Si linkages preferentially, weakening the framework and rendering it vulnerable to acid attack.

4.

4

FT-IR spectra of raw and mechanically activated K-feldspar ores in the 4000–400 cm–1 range (Abbreviations: ν, stretching; δ, bending; as, asymmetric; s, symmetric).

3.2. Leaching of Silicate Minerals for K and Al Extraction

Aluminum silicate minerals are known for their low solubility and slow dissolution. The crystal lattice of these minerals is characterized by strong covalent or ionic Si–O bonds forming a tetrahedral layer and ionic Al–O bonds. Therefore, during the dissolution of clay minerals, a dominant transport of aluminum and deposition of silicon are observed. In boiling concentrated acids, the H+ ions from the acid react with the Al–O bonds into replacing the Al3+ ions. Meanwhile, nonstable orthosilicic acid groups Si­(OH)4 or H4SiO4 in hot acid solutions are formed. Eqs – represent the dissolution reactions of various aluminum silicate minerals in acidic conditions:

KAlSi3O8(Microcline)+4H+→K++Al3++3SiO2(aq)+2H2O 3
NaAlSi3O8(Albite)+4H+→Na++Al3++3SiO2(aq)+2H2O 4
Al2Si2O5(OH)4(Kaolinite)+6H+→2Al3++2SiO2(aq)+5H2O 5
KAl3Si3O10(OH)2(Muscovite)+10H+→3Al3++K++3SiO2(aq)+6H2O 6
Al2Si4O10(OH)2(Pyrophyllite)+6H+→2Al3++4SiO2(aq)+4H2O 7

These reactions represent the dissolution of silicate minerals containing aluminum and alkali metals under an acidic environment containing H+ ions. When an acid such as HCl is present, feldspars (e.g., microcline and albite) and clay minerals (e.g., kaolinite, muscovite, and pyrophyllite) react with protons and eventually dissolve. The reactions release structural alkali ions (K+ and Na+) and Al3+ ions, while the silicon content is generally released as dissolved SiO2 (silica gel). These reactions form the basis for recovering valuable compounds, such as Al2O3 and KCl, using an acidic leaching method.

As for the selection of acid type for leaching, Bazin et al. produced Al2O3 from aluminum chloride salt by applying H2SO4 leaching, followed by HCl leaching. Due to the relatively high decomposition temperature of Al2(SO4)3, the sulfated solution is chlorinated with HCl to obtain Al2O3 at lower decomposition temperatures. Erdemoğlu et al. produced Al2O3 with high recovery by direct HCl leaching of mechanically activated pyrophyllite ore. Moreover, TiO2 and SiO2 are practically insoluble in HCl. Therefore, it reduces the need for the separation of Ti from the leachate. It is worth noting that in the present integrated flowsheet, HCl was chosen not merely as a lixiviant but as a strategic reagent: the generation of chloride salts (KCl and AlCl3) is essential for the subsequent evaporation–roasting step, where KCl volatilizes at high temperatures while Al remains as Al2O3 in the solid residuea separation that is not possible with sulfate systems. This process integration rationale guided our acid selection. XRD analysis (Figure ) indicates that the feldspathic ore is predominantly composed of microcline (KAlSi3O8), along with minor concentrations of albite (NaAlSi3O8) and muscovite (KAl2(AlSi3O10)­(OH)2). Following mechanical activation, the ore is leached in an acidic solution, causing Al3+ and K+ ions to be transferred into the leachate. When HCl was selected as the leaching agent, the dissolved ions precipitate as their corresponding chlorine salts (i.e., KCl and AlCl3) in the medium.

To quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanical activation step, leaching experiments were first performed on both the raw feldspar and the milled samples obtained under different milling conditions while keeping the leaching conditions fixed: 4 M HCl, 24 h, ∼100 °C (boiling point), liquid-to-solid ratio (S/L) of 20, and stirring speed of 600 rpm. Under these fixed conditions, the raw feldspar yielded only 2.83% aluminum extraction. In contrast, the highest aluminum extraction (82.08%) was achieved after intensive milling of the ore at a ball-to-ore ratio of 30, a mill speed of 400 rpm, and a milling time of 120 min. This nearly 30-fold increase unequivocally demonstrates that intensive milling is not merely a pretreatment but a prerequisite for rendering the feldspar structure sufficiently ready to acid leaching. Based on these screening tests, the optimally milled feldspar was selected for all subsequent RSM optimization studies.

3.3. Optimization of the Leaching Parameters

The Box–Behnken experimental design model, one of the RSM methods, was used in the experimental studies. HCl concentration, leaching temperature, and leaching time were defined as independent variables, while aluminum and potassium dissolution was defined as response values. Other parameters affecting the leaching process, such as the stirring speed (600 rpm) and solution-to-solid ratio, were kept constant. The solid-to-liquid ratio was fixed at 1:20 (20 mL/g) throughout all of the experiments. This value was selected after preliminary scoping tests to ensure a sufficient acid excess relative to the solid feed, thereby preventing acid depletion during the prolonged leaching period. Additionally, this pulp density was low enough to avoid the formation of viscous silica gels, which are known to impede mass transfer and complicate filtration when leaching aluminosilicates at high solid densities. To validate this choice, a separate test was performed at a higher S/L ratio of 1:40 (10 g in 400 mL) under otherwise identical conditions; the aluminum recovery (88.2%) was only marginally higher than that achieved at 1:20 (82.08%), while doubling the liquid volume would lead to increased water/acid consumption, larger reactor volumes, and higher heating costs. Thus, the 1:20 ratio was retained as the optimal compromise between leaching efficiency and process economy. Table presents the experimental ranges and levels of the independent variables.

3. Experimental Levels of Independent Variables.

code and the name of the factor unit low high
A: leaching temperature °C 30 100
B: leaching time hour 6 36
C: HCl concentration M 1 7

Based on the 17 tests designed using the variable levels in Table , Al and K recoveries were calculated by utilizing the loaded leach solution data, and the results are presented in Table .

4. Experimental Design and Results.

order A B C Al recovery, % K recovery, %
1 100 6 4 60.94 65.35
2 65 6 4 36.87 44.69
3 65 21 4 56.99 59.26
4 100 21 7 66.78 76.10
5 100 21 1 54.70 59.12
6 65 21 4 51.35 57.47
7 30 21 7 21.20 27.36
8 30 21 1 18.21 27.67
9 65 36 7 60.14 62.31
10 30 36 4 32.92 35.57
11 100 36 4 77.36 69.35
12 65 21 4 62.98 59.35
13 30 6 4 21.46 24.95
14 65 21 4 61.46 58.76
15 65 36 1 57.57 47.89
16 65 6 1 41.87 45.22
17 65 21 4 59.57 58.95

Additionally, using the obtained data, the complex interactions between each parameter were revealed using an experimental design program and presented using an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) table. This provided information about the interactions. The statistical significance of the effect of independent variables on the results was determined by evaluating the p-values in the ANOVA tables prepared separately for Al and K. A p-value of ≤0.05 indicated that the independent variables had a significant effect on the results. ANOVA values were used to strengthen the statistical validation through the correlation coefficient (R2), one of the parameters indicating the fit of the second-order model.

In the experimental design, used to examine the effect of variables on aluminum dissolution, the Adj-R2 value was observed to be (93.66), and the R2 value was (97.23). Similarly, in the study conducted for potassium, the Adj-R2 value was observed to be (99.28), and the R2 value was (99.69). The parameters affecting the results are shown in Table for aluminum and Table for potassium, according to ANOVA values. According to the ANOVA results, the effective parameters for Al dissolution are A, B, A2, and C2. Furthermore, it can be said that changing the leaching temperature (A2) and HCl concentration (C2) has an exponential effect on the results. According to the ANOVA results, it can be said that all parameters are effective in K dissolution, and all parameters also have an exponential effect on the results. The experimental results are as shown in the model equations for aluminum (eq ) and potassium (eq ) extraction percentages.

AlRecovery=+58.47+20.75*A+8.36*B+1.58*C+1.24*AB+2.27*AC+1.89*BC−9.60*A2−0.71*B2−8.65*C2 8
KRecovery=+58.76+19.30*A+4.36*B+3.82*C−1.66*AB+4.32*AC+3.74*BC−6.21*A2−3.74*B2−4.99*C2 9

5. ANOVA Values for Al Recovery .

source sum of squares degree of freedom mean square F value p value
model 4818.03 9 535.34 27.26 0.0001
A 3444.09 1 3444.09 175.39 <0.0001
B 558.62 1 558.62 28.45 0.0011
C 19.97 1 19.97 1.02 0.3468
AB 6.15 1 6.15 0.31 0.5932
AC 20.66 1 20.66 1.05 0.3392
BC 14.33 1 14.33 0.73 0.4213
A 387.64 1 387.64 19.74 0.0030
B 2.09 1 2.09 0.11 0.7536
C 315.22 1 315.22 16.05 0.0051
residual 137.46 7 19.64    
lack of fit 54.08 3 18.03 0.86 0.5287
pure error 83.37 4 20.84    
cor total 4955.49 16      
a

R = 0.9723; Adj R2 = 0.9366.

6. ANOVA Values for K Recovery .

source sum of squares degree of freedom mean square F value p value
model 3751.66 9 416.85 247.33 <0.0001
A 2978.76 1 2978.76 1767.37 <0.0001
B 152.34 1 152.34 90.39 <0.0001
C 116.74 1 116.74 69.26 <0.0001
AB 10.96 1 10.96 6.50 0.0381
AC 74.74 1 74.74 44.34 0.0003
BC 55.88 1 55.88 33.15 0.0007
A 162.32 1 162.32 96.31 <0.0001
B 59.02 1 59.02 35.02 0.0006
C 104.70 1 104.70 62.12 0.0001
residual 11.80 7 1.69    
lack of fit 9.50 3 3.17 5.51 0.0663
pure error 2.30 4 0.57    
cor total 3763.46 16      
a

R = 0.9969; Adj R2 = 0.9928.

The Normal Plot of Residuals graph, used to test whether the residuals in the regression model conform to a normal distribution and to determine the extent to which the model meets the assumption, and the Predicted vs. Actual data graphs, used to determine how well the model predicted, are presented in Figure for aluminum and Figure for potassium. An examination of the normal plot of residual graphs reveals that the data points for both aluminum and potassium are generally aligned evenly around the red line and that the residuals are normally distributed, meaning that the regression model largely meets this assumption. An examination of the Predicted vs Actual data graphs reveals that the points are largely clustered around the diagonal line, meaning that the model predictions are generally accurate and that there is a generally positive and strong relationship between predicted and actual values. ,

5.

5

Normal Plot of Residuals and Predicted vs. Actual Data for aluminum.

6.

6

Normal Plot of Residuals and Predicted vs. Actual data for potassium.

Figure shows the response surface plots of HCl concentration, leaching temperature, and leaching time for aluminum dissolution efficiency. Aluminum dissolution is highest at high leaching temperatures (near boiling point), increasing with the leaching time. Similarly, increasing the HCl concentration leads to higher aluminum recovery. However, due to the low solubility of AlCl3 in concentrated HCl, aluminum recovery decreases as the HCl concentration increases. Similar results were reported in the studies by Aydemir and Erdemoğlu and Uysal. The negative quadratic coefficient for C2 in eq quantitatively captures this optimum. The decline beyond approximately 5 M HCl is attributed to well-documented speciation effects in concentrated chloride media. As the HCl concentration increases, the activity of Cl– ions rises, shifting the equilibrium from hydrated Al3+(aq) toward neutral AlCl3(aq) and anionic AlCl4 – complexes. , The observed decline beyond ∼5 M HCl can be qualitatively described by the reduced solubility of AlCl3·6H2O in concentrated HCl, as estimated from the thermodynamic data for the H+–Al3+–Cl––H2O system. These uncharged or negatively charged species exhibit significantly lower solubility in the low-water-activity, high-ionic-strength medium, leading to their co-crystallization or “salting-out” from the solution phase. Although this phenomenon reduces the measured dissolved Al concentration, it does not necessarily indicate incomplete leaching; rather, it reflects the thermodynamic limitations of the AlCl3–HCl–H2O system at extreme acidities.

7.

7

Effect of parameter interactions on Al dissolution.

Figure shows the response surface plots of HCl concentration, leaching temperature, and leaching time for potassium recoveries. Similarly, potassium dissolution is high at high leaching temperatures (nearly boiling point) and increases with time. Furthermore, an increase in the HCl concentration leads to increased potassium dissolution efficiency. On the basis of the experimental results, the optimization criterion was established to identify the conditions under which the solubility of Al and K is maximized.

8.

8

Effect of parameter interactions on K dissolution.

Additionally, in order to more clearly monitor the effects of all parameters on aluminum and potassium dissolution efficiencies, one-factor graphs are presented in Figure for aluminum and in Figure for potassium.

9.

9

Graphs for one factor affecting the aluminum dissolution.

10.

10

Graphs for one factor affecting the potassium dissolution.

Using the regression equation, three of the optimal leaching conditions determined on the basis of the optimal process conditions that would maximize the response variables (Al and K) were also tested, and the results were found to be very close to the predicted values. The results demonstrated that the developed model has a reliable predictive capacity for the process. The results of the experimental studies conducted under the optimal conditions are presented in Table .

7. Parameter Values Studied at Optimum Solution Points.

parameter solution point 1 solution point 2 solution point 3
leaching temperature, °C 100 100 100
HCl concentration, M 4882 5537 5214
leaching time, h 35,934 35,103 34,242
Al recovery, % 82,08 79,53 77,70
K recovery, % 84,20 80,38 77,02

The optimum leaching conditions predicted by the model were determined as follows: HCl concentration of 4.88 M, leaching time of 36 h, and leaching temperature of 100 °C (near boiling temperature). Under these optimized conditions, the dissolution efficiencies of Al and K were determined to be 82.08% and 84.20%, respectively. It is acknowledged that the optimal leaching time of 36 h is relatively long compared to typical industrial practice. However, the ANOVA results (Tables and ) show that temperature (A) and its quadratic term (A2) exert the strongest influence on both Al and K recoveries (p < 0.0001), while the time factor (B) has a comparatively smaller coefficient. The results suggest that the leaching process follows a mixed kinetic regime: rapid chemical dissolution dominates the early stages, followed by a slower diffusion-controlled stage limited by proton transport through the evolving silica-rich leached layer. This transition from chemical to diffusion control is consistent with recent studies on aluminosilicate dissolution kinetics, which demonstrate that the formation of a silica-enriched surface layer progressively hinders acid access to the unreacted mineral core. − This kinetic behavior implies that process intensification strategiessuch as higher temperature under pressure or a two-stage acid-addition schemecould potentially achieve equivalent recoveries within significantly shorter times (e.g., 4–8 h). Such alternative intensification pathways will be explored in future work to enhance the industrial scalability of the proposed leaching process.

It is noteworthy that the Al recovery obtained under the RSM-optimized leaching conditions (82.08%) is to some extent lower than the 87.72% Al recovery achieved during the preliminary screening of milling conditions (fixed leaching: 4 M HCl, 24 h). This apparent reduction is attributed to two main factors. First, the screening stage focused exclusively on maximizing Al extraction as a proxy for assessing the effectiveness of mechanical activation, whereas the RSM optimization was designed to simultaneously maximize both Al and K recoveries. The optimized conditions (4.88 M HCl, 36 h) represent a statistical compromise that significantly enhances K recovery to 84.20% while incurring only a minor trade-off in Al recovery. Second, the extended leaching time (36 h vs. 24 h) promotes the development of a silica-enriched leached layer on the particle surfaces, which hinders the outward diffusion of Al3+ ions (consistent with the mixed kinetic regime), while allowing K+a smaller and more mobile cationto continue dissolving. Thus, the RSM-optimized conditions are economically superior and scientifically sound, prioritizing the co-recovery of both valuable metals.

Table summarizes the major element composition of the loaded leach solution obtained under the optimized conditions. The solution was predominantly enriched in Al (1.9 g/L) and K (1.8 g/L), alongside a minor Na content (0.39 g/L), which aligns with the selective dissolution of the feldspathic phases (microcline and albite). Several impurity elementsincluding Ca, Ba, Fe, Si, Mg, and Tiwere also detected at the 3.6–68 mg/L concentration range. Notably, the presence of 21 mg/L Co in the leachate is attributed to the abrasion of the milling media, as confirmed by the solid residue analysis (Table ), where the abraded WC remained undissolved, while the bulk of Co was leached and transferred into the solution.

8. Major Element Content of the Loaded Leach Solution Obtained under Optimum Conditions.

element Al K Na Ca Ba Fe Si Mg Ti Co
unit g/L mg/L
concentration 1.9 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.1 0.39 ± 0.3 68 31 26 22 7.5 3.6 21

9. Chemical Composition of the Solid Residue Obtained from the Leaching Process Conducted under Optimum Conditions .

main oxide SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Na2O K2O TiO2 WO3 Co3O4 LOI
% 90.87 2.45 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.30 0.84 0.07 1.13 0.05 4.85
a

LOI: Loss on Ignition (1000 °C).

To verify the consistency of the experimental data, mass balance calculations were as performed for both aluminum and potassium based on the feed ore composition (Table ), the leach solution composition (Table ), and the solid residue composition (Table ). Based on the compositional data for the ore, the loaded leach solution, and the solid residue, the mass balance closure for aluminum and potassium was calculated. For aluminum, the input from 12.5 g of ore (16.33% Al2O3) corresponds to 1.0806 g Al, while the outputs are 0.950 g Al in the solution (1.9 g/L × 0.500 L) and 0.126 g Al in the residue (9.72 g residue × 2.45% Al2O3 × 54/102), giving a total output of 1.076 g Al and thus a closure of 99.6%. For potassium, the input from the ore (10.60% K2O) is 1.0995 g K, with outputs of 0.900 g K in the solution (1.8 g/L × 0.500 L) and 0.0677 g K in the residue (9.72 g × 0.84% K2O × 78/94), yielding a total output of 0.9677 g K and a closure of 88.0%. The nearly complete mass balance for aluminum (99.6%) validates the analytical procedure and confirms that the mass balance for this element is essentially closed. The lower closure for potassium (88.0%) indicates an apparent loss of approximately 12% of K, which can be attributed to some losses during washing and filtration, adsorption of K+ ions onto fine particles not recovered in the filtrate, the possible formation of soluble chloro-aluminate complexes (e.g., KAlCl4) that may be incompletely measured by ICP-OES, and inherent analytical uncertainties.

3.4. Recovery of Al2O3 and KCl from the Leach Solution

As described in Section , the loaded leach solution obtained under the optimized leaching conditions was directly evaporated without prior pH adjustment or purification treatment. The evaporation step removed excess water and HCl (which was condensed and recovered for recycling), leading to the co-crystallization of hydrated AlCl3 and KCl. The resulting mixed salt cake was then subjected to a two-stage roasting process to separate aluminum from alkali chlorides.

In the first stage, the salt mixture was roasted in a tube furnace at 1150 °C for 60 min. During this step, KCl volatilized, while alumina remained in the crucible as a solid oxide product. The volatile alkali chlorides were transported by the thermal gradient to the cooler zone of a borosilicate glass tube within the furnace, where they condensed and were collected as a crystalline deposit. The alumina product remaining in the crucible was subsequently re-roasted in a muffle furnace at 1200 °C and 1250 °C (each for 60 min) to examine the effect of temperature on product purity and crystalline phase transformation.

3.4.1. Characterization of the Alumina Product

The chemical compositions of the alumina products obtained at different roasting temperatures are presented in Table . The Al2O3 content increased from 88.8% at 1150 °C to approximately 92.3–92.6% at 1200 °C and 1250 °C. This improvement is directly correlated with the marked decrease in both moisture (at 300 °C) and loss on ignition (at 1000 °C) valuesfrom 3.69% at 1150 °C to ∼0.10% at higher temperatures. At 1150 °C, the 60 min roasting time is apparently insufficient to completely decompose intermediately hydrated and/or basic chloro-aluminate phases (e.g., residual Al­(OH)­Cl2, AlOCl, or structurally bound hydroxyl groups in transitional alumina), which retain volatile components such as water and HCl. When the roasting temperature is raised to 1200 °C or 1250 °C, the additional thermal energy drives these decomposition reactions to completion, fully releasing the remaining H2O, HCl, and trace chloride volatiles. The near-zero LOI values at these higher temperatures confirm that the product has become chemically stable and fully converted to nonhygroscopic α-Al2O3. This is consistent with the observed increase in α-Al2O3 content from 2.4% at 1150 °C to approximately 20–24% at 1200–1250 °C (Table ).

10. Chemical Composition of Alumina Products Obtained at Different Roasting Temperatures.
major oxide roasting temperature (°C)
  1150
1200
1250
  (wt.%)
Al2O3 88.8 92.3 92.6
Fe2O3 0.665 1.02 0.922
SiO2 1.95 2.12 1.64
K2O 0.785 0.782 0.923
Na2O 0.349 0.04 0.175
CaO 1.87 1.62 1.71
TiO2 0.105 0.164 0.13
BaO 0.819 0.985 0.855
Co3O4 0.383 0.365 0.472
WO3 0.126 0.091 0.189
moisture (300 °C) 3.69 0.11 0.11
LOI (1000 °C) 3.69 0.1 0.09
α-alumina 2.4 23.9 20.8

The presence of Co3O4 and WO3 in these products originates from the WC–Co milling media used in the mechanical activation step. As discussed in Section , this contamination is eliminated when sintered alumina (SA) milling media are employed, which also improves the Al2O3 product purity to over 94% and yields a white product instead of the blue-colored alumina obtained with WC–Co media. Nevertheless, the data in Table demonstrate that the evaporation–roasting route is effective in producing alumina with a purity suitable for many ceramic and refractory applications and that higher roasting temperatures (≥1200 °C) are beneficial for both volatile removal and α-Al2O3 crystallization.

3.4.2. Characterization of the Condensed Alkali Chloride Product

The salt product condensed on the cooler zones of the borosilicate tube during roasting at 1150 °C was analyzed by the XRD method. All diffraction peaks corresponded to KCl or NaCl (Figure ), with the most intense peaks belonging to KCl. This confirms that the volatilization–condensation process effectively separates the alkali chlorides from alumina.

11.

11

XRD pattern of the condensed alkali chloride product.

Quantitative analysis by FAAS revealed that the condensed salt contained 81.3% KCl and 17.3% NaCl. The presence of NaCl is attributed to the albite (NaAlSi3O8) component of the ore, which dissolves during HCl leaching and follows the same evaporation–roasting–volatilization–condensation pathway. The remaining minor components were below the detection limits of the analytical method. This KCl–NaCl mixture can be further purified to obtain high-purity KCl (>99%) by established techniques such as fractional crystallization or selective dissolution, which are the subject of ongoing studies.

As an alternative to the evaporation–roasting route, antisolvent crystallization using acetone has been demonstrated to recover KCl directly from acidic leach solutions with >83% K recovery and >99.9% purity.

3.4.3. Overall Recoveries and Mass Balance

Based on the loaded leach solution concentrations (Table ) and the final product masses, the overall recovery of K as condensed KCl was estimated at approximately 85–95% of K present in the loaded leach solution. The aluminum recovery as solid Al2O3 was essentially quantitative (>99%), with only minor mechanical losses during crucible transfer. The remaining K (5–15%) either remained in the crucible as a minor impurity in the alumina matrix or deposited as uncondensed fine particles in the furnace exhaust. These values are consistent with our previous experimental results and with similar chloride-roasting studies. ,

In summary, the evaporation–roasting scheme successfully demonstrates the feasibility of recovering both Al2O3 (as a solid product) and KCl (as a condensate product) from the loaded HCl leach solution, without the need for using additional reagents such as NaOH or lime. This integrated approach preserves the chloride circuit, enables acid recycling, and produces viable products, thereby supporting the zero-waste viewpoint of the POTASSIAL process.

3.5. Overall Process Evaluation and Mechanistic Insights

The experimental results presented in the preceding sections demonstrate that intensive mechanical activation of K-feldspar ore, followed by HCl leaching and subsequent evaporation–roasting, constitutes a viable route for the co-recovery of aluminum and potassium as Al2O3 and KCl, respectively. However, to fully appreciate the scientific and practical significance of the process, several key mechanistic, operational, and economic aspects require integrated discussion.

3.5.1. Mechanistic Interpretation of Amorphization and Leaching Behavior

The near-complete XRD-amorphization of microcline and albite after 120 min of intensive milling, contrasted with the partial XRD-amorphization of quartz (only 13.91%), reflects ultimate differences in crystal chemistry and bond topology. As noted in Section , feldspars contain weaker Al–O bonds and charge-balancing cations (K+, Na+) that introduce local lattice distortions, making the framework highly prone to mechanical collapse. In contrast, quartz’s homogeneous Si–O–Si network requires cooperative bond failure along specific crystallographic directions, imparting greater resistance to amorphization. , The mechanochemical bond breakage perspective aligns with recent conclusions on the reaction mechanisms of alkali-activated systems, where different amorphous aluminosilicate phases dissolve via distinct pathways.

FT-IR analysis (Figure ) provided direct spectroscopic evidence for these structural modifications. The activated sample exhibited significant changes in the framework vibrations: the Si–O–Si asymmetric stretching band near 1000 cm–1 broadened and shifted slightly from approximately 1000 cm–1 in the raw ore to 999.90 cm–1 after milling, indicating disruption of the regular tetrahedral network and increased bond-length/bond-angle distortion. Concurrently, the band near 779 cm–1, attributed to Si–O–Si symmetric stretching or Al–O vibrations, became more pronounced, reflecting the weakening and partial cleavage of Al–O bonds within the aluminosilicate framework. These spectral changes confirm that mechanical activation induces not only surface hydroxylation (as evidenced by the new O–H stretching band at ∼3400 cm–1) but also significant lattice strain and bond rupture, particularly affecting Al–O–Si linkages. Farmer, Baláž, and Takacs have also reported that similar FT-IR changes are associated with structural disorder and amorphization in mechanically activated feldspar and other aluminosilicate mineral systems.

The enhanced leachability of the activated ore is directly attributable to this amorphization. The loss of long-range ordering weakens the aluminosilicate framework, reducing the activation energy required for proton attack. Moreover, the generation of fresh surfaces with coordinatively unsaturated Al–O and Si–O bonds creates highly reactive sites that readily undergo hydration and subsequent acid dissolution. The weakening of Al–O bonds, as evidenced by the changes in the 779 cm–1 band, is particularly significant because these bonds are preferentially attacked during acid leaching, directly enhancing Al extraction. However, to fully interpret the dissolution behavior of the activated feldspar in HCl, it is necessary to consider the comprehensive mechanistic framework developed for aluminosilicate dissolution in acidic media.

The dissolution of aluminosilicates has been the subject of extensive theoretical debate, with several distinct mechanistic models proposed. The earliest and most influential of these is surface complexation models (SCMs), which postulate that the dissolution rate is controlled by the concentration of specific protonated surface species, particularly at mineral edge sites. Wieland and Stumm demonstrated that the rate-limiting step for kaolinite dissolution is the detachment of Al centers, with the activated complex exhibiting an Al/H+ stoichiometry that varies between 1:1 at edge surfaces and 1:3 at gibbsite surfaces. Building on this concept, Oelkers et al. improved the surface precursor complex model, disagreeing that the reaction rate is not solely a function of pH but is instead controlled by the decomposition of an Al-deficient, silica-rich surface precursor complex. This model elegantly explains why dissolution rates are often inversely dependent on aqueous Al concentration, thereby incorporating chemical affinity directly into the rate law. An alternative family of models focuses on the formation of leached layers, proposing that dissolution rates are governed by the diffusion of ions through a surface-altered, silica-enriched layer. In a related sequential mechanism, Oelkers et al. demonstrated that, under acidic conditions, tetrahedral Si–O bonds in muscovite structure break only after adjacent tetrahedral Al is removed via a proton–exchange reaction. This sequential pathway stands in direct contrast to the parallel-process theories proposed by other researchers. In this context, Crundwell presented a novel potential-coupled, parallel-process theory that departs significantly from both SCMs and leached-layer models. The key tenets of Crundwell’s theory are as follows: (i) The dissolution rate is controlled by the breaking of the metal–oxygen bond. Since the Al–O bond energy (≈3816 kJ mol–1) is substantially weaker than the Si–O bond energy (≈13100 kJ mol–1), , the aluminum–oxygen bonds in aluminosilicates are preferentially broken, while silicate tetrahedra (SiO4 4–) leave the surface intact. (ii) Dissolution proceeds with two parallel, independent steps: cation (e.g., Al3+, Na+) and anion (SiO4 4–) removal, coupled by the potential difference across the Helmholtz layer. For stoichiometric dissolution, the rates of cation and anion removal are equal, which allows for the elimination of the potential term from the rate expression. (iii) Crundwell highlights the critical observation by Casey et al. that the dissolution rate of plagioclase feldspars increases exponentially, with more substitution of aluminum for silicon in the tetrahedral structure. This strongly suggests that Al–O bond breaking directly controls the overall dissolution rate, reinforcing the treatment of Al3+ sites as the primary cationic centers.

Significantly, Crundwell analyzed earlier surface complexation and precursor models proposed for randomly assuming fractional stoichiometry to obtain half-order kinetics. In contrast, his theory derives the characteristic 0.5 reaction order naturally from the potential-dependent bond-breaking steps and the coupling of independent cation and anion fluxes. This represents a significant departure from traditional geochemical dissolution models and provides a unified explanation for the dissolution of not only aluminosilicates but also quartz, orthosilicates, and metal oxides.

Returning to experimental results, the observed decrease in Al recovery above ∼5 M HCl (reflected by the negative quadratic coefficient C2 = −8.65 in eq ) can be interpreted within this multimodel framework. In the context of surface complexation models, the decline may reflect a change in surface speciation: at very low pH (high H+ activity), the surface becomes saturated with protons, and further acid addition does not increase the dissolution rate. In the leached-layer framework, the formation of a silica-rich passivating layer may be accelerated at extreme acidities, limiting proton access to the unreacted mineral core. From Crundwell’s perspective, the decrease is attributable to speciation shifts in the solution phase: as the HCl concentration increases, the activity of Cl– rises, shifting the equilibrium from hydrated Al3+(aq) toward neutral AlCl3(aq) and anionic AlCl4 – complexes. , These uncharged or negatively charged species exhibit significantly lower solubility in the low-water-activity, high-ionic-strength medium, leading to their co-crystallization or “salting-out” from the solution phase. This effectively removes aluminum from the measured solution phase, reducing the apparent recovery.

It is important to emphasize that these mechanistic interpretations are not mutually exclusive; rather, they operate at different scales and may dominate under different conditions. The near-complete amorphization of the feldspar structure ensures that the mineral is far from equilibrium, so the surface precursor complex and Crundwell’s parallel-process model both predict rapid initial dissolution. As the reaction proceeds and the silica-rich leached layer develops, diffusion limitations become more significant, , consistent with the observed mixed kinetic regime. The sensitivity of Al recovery to HCl concentration, however, is best explained by the chloride speciation, which is a solution-phase thermodynamic limitation rather than a surface reaction phenomenon. By integrating these complementary perspectives, we provide a clear, noncontradictory framework for interpreting the experimental Al leaching results, ensuring that our discussion is both rigorous and internally consistent.

3.5.2. Contamination Management and Product Purity

The presence of W and Co in the activated ore (Table ) and in the final Al2O3 product (Table ) is a direct consequence of abrasion from WC–Co milling media. While this contamination does not invalidate the leaching results, it imposes constraints on product purity for high-end or advanced applications. The complementary tests using sintered alumina (SA) milling media demonstrate (Table ) that switching to alumina-based media keeps Co and W contamination below ICP-OES detection limits while simultaneously improving the Al2O3 purity from 92.6% (with WC–Co) to 94.1% (with SA) and producing a white instead of blue product.

11. Effect of Different Milling Media on the Composition of the Final Alumina Product ,
alumina product
major oxide, wt %
color
  Al2O3 Fe2O3 SiO2 Na2O CaO K2O TiO2 BaO WO3 Co3O4  
WC-media 92.6 0.92 1.64 1.18 1.71 0.92 0.13 0.86 0.19 0.47 blue
SA-media 94.1 0.46 1.29 0.28 1.90 0.44 0.16 0.84 n.d n.d white
a

n.d. = not detected (below ICP-OES detection limit: Co < 0.01 wt %, W < 0.01 wt %).

b

K-feldspar activated with WC–Co bowl and balls.

c

K-feldspar activated with a sintered alumina bowl and balls.

For smelter-grade alumina, typical specifications require Al2O3 ≥ 98.0% with individual transition metals below 0.02%, while chemical-grade alumina demands even lower limits (<10 ppm for most impurities) (DADCO, 2026; FAO, 2026). , With SA media, the remaining impurities (Fe, Si, Ca, Na) are largely derived from the ore itself and can be further reduced by optimizing the leaching and washing conditions. Thus, the contamination issue is not an inherent limitation of the process but a media-selection problem that has been successfully overcome. The selective leaching behavior of these contaminants is consistent with the well-documented hydrometallurgical recycling of cemented tungsten carbide: the cobalt binder phase readily dissolves in acidic HCl solutions, while tungsten carbide remains largely intact in the solid residue. − This partitioning arises from the fundamentally different chemical stabilities of the two phases, and the results from this WC–Co recycling studies directly support our observation that Co is present in the leachate (Table ) while W is retained in the leach residue (Table ).

3.5.3. Basis for HCl Selection and Integrated Process Advantages

While H2SO4 is cheaper and widely used in industrial alumina production, its application in the present system would introduce severe operational complications. The calcium present in the ore (0.34% CaO) would precipitate as gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) during H2SO4 leaching, causing scaling, acid loss, and entrainment of Al and K. More critically, the generation of sulfate salts would preclude the thermal volatilization–condensation separation that is central to our process. In the chloride system, AlCl3·6H2O decomposes to Al2O3 at 400–500 °C, while KCl and NaCl volatilize at >800 °C, enabling a clean, reagent-free separation. This chloride-based flowsheet also allows the recovery of HCl from the off-gases, which can be recycled to the leaching stage, reducing net acid consumption and operating costs. In contrast, conventional CaCl2 roasting methods for KCl production generate large volumes of calcium aluminosilicate residues as solid waste and require water leaching to recover KCl, resulting in lower product purity and higher environmental impact. , The proposed integrated evaporation–roasting route avoids these drawbacks, offering a zero-waste, closed-loop alternative.

3.5.4. Purification of the Loaded Leach Solution

Feldspar ores are generally associated with gang minerals containing mainly Fe, Ti, Ca, or Mg elements. During HCl leaching, these elements dissolve alongside Al and K, entering the solution in ionic form. If these impurities are not sufficiently removed from the loaded leach solution prior to the evaporation–roasting step, they co-crystallize with the aluminum and potassium chlorides. Consequently, upon thermal conversion of AlCl3 to Al2O3, the final alumina product exhibits high levels of Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, and TiO2. Similar behavior has been observed in the acid leaching of natural pumice, where co-extracted Ca and Fe led to alumina products with high CaO and FeO contents. Therefore, purification of the loaded leach solution is essential for producing higher-purity potash and alumina.

However, the integrated HCl-leaching process described in this work requires that the chemical characteristics of the loaded leach solutionparticularly its anion composition and pHremain largely unchanged. This constraint arises from the following requirements: (i) Minimal neutralizationThe use of concentrated HCl for leaching means that any neutralization step would consume neutralizing reagents and increase operating costs. Moreover, neutralization can introduce additional impurities (e.g., Ca2+ from lime) or generate insoluble by-products, complicating subsequent filtration and purification stages. (ii) Maximum removal of impurities without compromising the chloride mediumEffective removal of multivalent cations (Fe3+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Co2+) is critical, as these species negatively affect the physical and chemical properties of the final products, especially the alumina. At the same time, the chloride medium must be preserved to enable the subsequent thermal separation of KCl and AlCl3. (iii) Maintenance of solute concentrationsPurification steps should not significantly dilute the K+ and Al3+ concentrations, as subsequent recovery operations (particularly crystallization) require sufficiently high metal loadings to maintain efficiency. If impurity removal reduces the concentration of these target species, a concentration step may be necessary, which must be carefully integrated into the purification scheme. ,

3.5.5. Kinetic Limitations and Intensification Pathways

The optimal leaching time of 36 h, while scientifically justified for achieving maximum recovery, is economically challenging for industrial hydrometallurgy. However, the RSM model reveals that temperature (A) and its quadratic term (A2) exert the strongest influence on both Al and K recoveries (p < 0.0001), while the time factor (B) has a comparatively smaller effect. This suggests that the leaching process is not simply time-dependent but operates in a mixed kinetic regime: an initial chemically controlled stage (rapid dissolution of the amorphized framework), followed by a diffusion-controlled stage, where proton transport through the evolving silica-enriched leached layer becomes rate-limiting. , This interpretation is further supported by the high silica content (90.87% SiO2, Table ) of the leach residue, which acts as a passive barrier that slows the reaction at longer times.

The formation of a silica-rich surface layer during aluminosilicate dissolution is a well-established phenomenon, often described by the interfacial dissolution–reprecipitation mechanism, where the leached layer develops a porous, interconnected structure. , In our system, this porous layer not only limits mass transfer (contributing to the long leaching time) but also provides a high-surface-area substrate that is subsequently exploited for silica purification and SiC synthesis.

On the basis of this understanding, several intensification strategies could be explored to reduce the leaching time to industrially acceptable levels: (i) two-stage acid addition, where an initial high-concentration acid charge dissolves the reactive fraction, followed by a second acid charge or temperature ramp to sustain the driving force; (ii) high-pressure leaching to increase the boiling point and accelerate reaction kinetics; or (iii) dual-frequency ultrasonic assistance to disrupt the silica barrier and enhance mass transfer.

Beyond these direct intensification strategies, recent developments in mineral processing and chemical engineering offer complementary insights that further strengthen the industrial viability of the process. The quantitative analysis of dewatering and filter-cake pore structure under ultrahigh pressures provides a mechanistic understanding of solid–liquid separation efficiency, which directly addresses a critical bottleneck in our flowsheet: the difficulty of filtering fine and highly activated particles after prolonged leaching. This work suggests that high-pressure dewatering could significantly improve filtration rates and cake washing efficiency, thereby reducing downstream processing time and energy consumption. The water conservation mining strategy and spatiotemporal evolution analysis offer a comprehensive framework for sustainable process water management. Their insights on closed-loop water circulation and real-time monitoring of water quality are directly applicable to our process, where HCl recovery and recycling are already integrated. Adopting such strategies would further minimize freshwater consumption and reduce liquid effluent generation, aligning the process with increasingly stringent environmental regulations. Finally, the synergy between biomass-driven reduction and acid leaching illustrates how renewable reductants can enhance the release of potassium and aluminum from aluminosilicate frameworks. While our current process does not employ a separate reduction step, this approach could be explored as a supplementary pretreatment to improve the reactivity of the feldspar lattice before acid leaching or as an alternative to fossil-based reductants in downstream carbothermal reduction steps. Taken together, these insights highlight that process intensification (via ultrasonic assistance and high-pressure dewatering), sustainable water management (via closed-loop strategies), and novel reductant pathways (via biomass) are critical levers for translating laboratory-scale results into industrial implementation.

3.5.6. Valorization of the Silica-Rich Residue

The leach residue, containing 90.87% SiO2 (Table ), is not a waste stream but a valuable raw material. In this integrated process, the leach residue was successfully converted into high-purity amorphous and crystalline SiO2 (97.7% purity) by mild alkali leaching and precipitation. This silica has then been used to synthesize calcium silicate (CaSiO3) by reacting with marble industry waste (CaCO3) and, more importantly, to produce silicon carbide (SiC) with a 98.9% purity via a novel carbothermal reduction route using biochar derived from almond shells, as more recently documented by Li et al. for similar biomass-assisted reduction processes. SiC is the primary economic driver of the overall process, as its market price (>$2500/ton) makes it significantly more valuable than KCl or Al2O3.

The pore structure evolution during acid leachingfrom the impenetrable feldspar framework to a highly porous, interconnected silica networkis not merely a passive outcome of the reaction but an active enabler of residue valorization. The enhanced accessibility to the pore surface facilitates subsequent alkali leaching and carbothermal reduction (for SiC synthesis), as demonstrated by our successful production of both products. This aligns with the broader concept of mechanochemical bond breakage, opening up new reactive pathways and the general principle that porosity development enhances fluid penetration and reactive surface exposure.

This valorization pathway transforms what would otherwise be a disposal problem into a revenue-generating product, aligning the process with the circular economy and zero-waste principles of the POTASSIAL project.

3.5.7. Techno-Economic and Environmental Outlook

A comprehensive techno-economic analysis of the entire POTASSIAL flowsheet (including mechanical activation, leaching, evaporation–roasting, SiO2 purification, CaSiO3 and SiC synthesis) was performed based on a 100 ton/day feed capacity. The total fixed capital investment was estimated at ∼76 million USD, with annual operating costs of ∼39.8 million USD. Under baseline market conditions, the process yields an internal rate of return (IRR) of 6.1% and a payback period of ∼12 years, which is marginal. However, sensitivity analysis reveals that the IRR increases to 12% and 22.8% with a 10% and 30% increase in SiC price, respectively, reducing the payback period to as low as 4 years. This indicates that the process economics are highly dependent on the SiC market value, which is expected to rise due to increasing demand in electronics, defense, and automotive sectors.

The life cycle assessment (LCA) using SimaPro 9.6 (TRACI 2.1 method) shows that while the POTASSIAL process has higher CO2-equivalent emissions per product unit compared to conventional routes, its closed-loop operation and zero-waste generation offer substantial long-term environmental benefits: no saline effluents unlike brine potash extraction, no red mud unlike the Bayer alumina process, and reduced fossil carbon input owing to biochar use in SiC synthesis. Adopting closed-loop water management strategies, as discussed in the context of sustainable mining (Feng et al., 2025), would further minimize freshwater consumption. Thus, the process is environmentally superior despite its current cost challenges, and its financial viability can be significantly improved by optimizing product portfolios and capitalizing on the growing SiC market.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the recovery of potassium and aluminum from mechanically activated K-feldspar ore via HCl leaching, followed by evaporation–roasting for the separation of Al2O3 and KCl. The following conclusions can be drawn from the experimental results:

  • 1.

    Mechanical activation is necessary for rendering K-feldspar leachable. Intensive milling (ball-to-ore ratio of 30, 400 rpm, 120 min) caused complete amorphization (100%) of microcline and albite, while quartz remained partially crystalline (13.91%) due to its homogeneous Si–O–Si network, which resists structural collapse. The activated ore exhibited a sixfold increase in specific surface area from 4.68 to 28.05 m2/g and a significant increase in LOI from 0.46% to 2.88%, attributed to the formation of surface hydroxyls (Si–OH, Al–OH) and adsorbed water, as confirmed by FT-IR analysis. Under identical leaching conditions, the raw ore yielded only 2.83% Al extraction, whereas the optimally milled sample achieved an extraction efficiency of 87.72%, demonstrating the critical role of mechanical activation.

  • 2.

    HCl concentration, temperature, and time are the principal leaching parameters. Response surface methodology (RSM) optimized the leaching conditions as 4.88 M HCl, 100 °C, and 36 h, yielding 82.08% Al and 84.20% K recoveries. The negative quadratic coefficient for HCl concentration (C2 = −8.65) reflects the lower solubility of AlCl3·6H2O in concentrated HCl (>5 M) due to the formation of neutral and anionic chloro-aluminum complexes (AlCl3(aq), AlCl4 –) and reduced water activity. The kinetic analysis indicates a mixed regime: rapid chemical dissolution, followed by diffusion control through a silica-enriched leached layer, suggesting that process intensification (e.g., two-stage leaching, ultrasonic assistance, or high-pressure operation) could reduce the leaching time from 36 h to industrially acceptable durations. The mass balance analysis demonstrates excellent Al recovery with 99.6% closure, confirming the reliability of the experimental data. The K balance, however, shows 88.0% closurean ∼12% deficit likely due to washing losses, adsorption on fine particles, unmeasured chloro-aluminate complexes, and analytical uncertainty. Addressing these factors through optimized filtration and K speciation studies will be essential for improving the overall process efficiency.

  • 3.

    HCl is the tactical lixiviant for process integration. Unlike H2SO4, which would precipitate CaSO4 from the ore’s calcium content, HCl generates chloride salts that enable a clean thermal separation: during roasting at 1150–1250 °C, AlCl3 converts to Al2O3, while KCl along with NaCl from the albite component volatilizes and condenses in the cooler zone of the furnace. The condensed salt mixture contains 81.3% KCl and 17.3% NaCl; however, the KCl fraction can be further purified to fertilizer grade or higher purity by established techniques (e.g., fractional crystallization or selective dissolution), which are the subject of ongoing studies. This reagent-free separation avoids the environmental burdens of conventional CaCl2 roasting and pH-controlled precipitation.

  • 4.

    Contamination from WC–Co milling media is fully manageable. The presence of W and Co in the final Al2O3 product is eliminated by switching to sintered alumina milling media, which also improves Al2O3 purity from 92.6% to 94.1% and prevents product coloration. This media substitution introduces no new impurities, as the wear debris is Al2O3 itself and does not compromise the amorphization degree or leaching efficiency.

  • 5.

    The silica-rich leach residue is a valuable source. The siliceous residue of HCl leaching was successively converted into high-purity silica (97.7% SiO2), CaSiO3 from marble waste, and SiC (98.9% SiC) via biochar-driven carbothermal reduction. SiC is the primary economic driver of the process, and its market price critically determines overall profitability.

  • 6.

    The integrated process is technically feasible but economically sensitive. The POTASSIAL process achieves zero-waste valorization of feldspathic ore, recovering multiple products (Al2O3, high-purity KCl, SiO2, CaSiO3, and SiC) without generating liquid or solid effluents. The techno-economic analysis shows that baseline economics (IRR ≈ 6.1%, payback ≈ 12 years) are marginal but become highly attractive (IRR > 22%, payback <4 years) with a 30% increase in SiC price. The LCA confirms long-term environmental benefits due to closed-loop operation, HCl recycling, and avoidance of red mud, saline brines, and fossil carbon in SiC synthesis.

In summary, the combined results demonstrate that the POTASSIAL approach, comprising mechanical activation, HCl leaching, evaporation–roasting, and residue valorization stages, successfully achieves near-complete recovery of K and Al from K-feldspar while generating zero solid waste. The chloride-based chemistry enables selective separation of KCl by volatilization, avoiding the environmental problems of conventional CaCl2 roasting or pH-controlled precipitation. While the optimal leaching time and current product purity levels require further optimization, the process offers a technically feasible and environmentally sustainable alternative for the valorization of feldspathic ores, particularly in regions lacking evaporitic potash deposits.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the institutions and organizations that funded this study.

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

This work was supported by the institutions listed below. HORIZON EUROPE Widening Participation and Strengthening the European Research Area, ERA-MIN3 2021 Joint Call Secretariat, (POTASSIAL- Project No: 27). The Scientific and Technological Research Council of TurkeyTÜBİTAK (Projects Nos 122N039, 122N058, 122N059 and 122N060). İnönü University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (Project Nos: FBG-2022-2978, FBA-2023-3131, FED-2024-3491 and FDK-2024-3710). Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic (Project No: 2/0039/26). Slovak Research and Development Agency under Contract No. APVV-24-0353.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Rhamdhani M. A., Dewan M. A., Brooks G. A., Monaghan B. J., Prentice L.. Alternative Al Production Methods: Part 1–A Review of Indirect Carbothermal Routes. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall., Sect. C. 2013;122(2):87–104. doi: 10.1179/1743285513Y.0000000036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashkenazi D.. How Aluminum Changed the World: A Metallurgical Revolution Through Technological and Cultural Perspectives. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2019;143:101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Habashi, F. Handbook of Extractive Metallurgy, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bazin C., El-Ouassiti K., Ouellet V.. Sequential Leaching for the Recovery of Alumina from a Canadian Clay. Hydrometallurgy. 2007;88(1–4):196–201. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ohale P. E., Uzoh C. F., Onukwuli O. D.. Optimal Factor Evaluation for the Dissolution of Alumina from Azaraegbelu Clay in Acid Solution Using RSM and ANN Comparative Analysis. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2017;24(1):43–54. doi: 10.1016/j.sajce.2017.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Özdemir M., Çetişli H.. Extraction Kinetics of Alunite in Sulfuric Acid and Hydrochloric Acid. Hydrometallurgy. 2005;76(3–4):217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2004.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kumar A., Agrawal S., Dhawan N.. Hydrometallurgical Investigation of Sericite Clay for Extraction of Alumina and Potash Under Controlled Conditions. Min. Metall. Explor. 2020;37(3):911–921. doi: 10.1007/s42461-020-00183-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Temuujin J., Okada K., Jadambaa T. S., MacKenzie K. J., Amarsanaa J.. Effect of Grinding on the Leaching Behaviour of Pyrophyllite. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2003;23(8):1277–1282. doi: 10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00297-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Erdemoğlu M., Birinci M., Uysal T., Porgalı Tüzer E., Barry T. S.. Mechanical Activation of Pyrophyllite Ore for Aluminum Extraction by Acidic Leaching. J. Mater. Sci. 2018;53(19):13801–13812. doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-2606-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Erdemoğlu M., Birinci M., Uysal T.. Thermal Behavior of Pyrophyllite Ore During Calcination for Thermal Activation for Aluminum Extraction by Acid Leaching. Clays Clay Miner. 2020;68(2):89–99. doi: 10.1007/s42860-019-00061-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Arlyuk B. I., Pivnev A. I.. Efficiency of Nepheline Ore Processing for Alumina Production. Light Met. 1992;1992:181–195. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yao Z. T., Xia M. S., Sarker P. K., Chen T. Z.. A Review of the Alumina Recovery from Coal Fly Ash, with a Focus in China. Fuel. 2014;120:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ding J., Ma S., Zheng S., Zhang Y., Xie Z., Shen S., Liu Z.. Study of Extracting Alumina from High-alumina PC Fly Ash by a Hydro-chemical Process. Hydrometallurgy. 2016;161:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.01.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tang A., Su L., Li C., Wei W.. Effect of Mechanical Activation on Acid-leaching of Kaolin Residue. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010;48(3):296–299. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2010.01.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding J., Ma S., Shen S., Xie Z., Zheng S., Zhang Y.. Research and Industrialization Progress of Recovering Alumina from Fly Ash: A Concise Review. Waste Manage. 2017;60:375–387. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Uysal, T. Investigation of Activation Conditions in Alumina Production from Pyrophyllite Ore by Acid Leaching Method. Ph.D. Dissertation; İnönü University, Institute of Science and Technology, Türkiye, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Erdemoğlu, M. A Study on the Production of Alumina (Al2O3) from Pyrophyllite Ore, 214M432; Springer Nature, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. Barry T. S., Uysal T., Birinci M., Erdemoğlu M.. Thermal and Mechanical Activation in Acid Leaching Processes of Non-bauxite Ores Available for Alumina Production A Review. Min. Metall. Explor. 2019;36(3):557–569. doi: 10.1007/s42461-018-0025-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Aydemir M. K., Erdemoğlu M.. Investigation of Alumina Production from Pumice by Acid Leaching. Sci. Min. J. 2022;61(4):193–200. doi: 10.30797/madencilik.1061751. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Baláž, P. Mechanochemistry in Nanoscience and Minerals Engineering; Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. Miganei L., Gock E., Achimovičová M., Koch L., Zobel H., Kähler J.. New Residue-free Processing of Copper Slag from Smelter. J. Cleaner Prod. 2017;164:534–542. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Erdemoğlu M., Baláž P.. An Overview of Surface Analysis Techniques for Characterization of Mechanically Activated Minerals. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2012;33(1):65–88. doi: 10.1080/08827508.2010.542582. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Baştürkçu H., Achimovičová M., Kaňuchová M., Acarkan N.. Mechanochemical Pre-treatment of Lateritic Nickel Ore with Sulfur Followed by Atmospheric Leaching. Hydrometallurgy. 2018;181:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.08.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hongwen M. A., Jing Y. A. N. G., Shuangqing S. U., Meitang L. I. U., Hong Z. H. E. N. G., Yingbin W. A. N. G., Hongbin Q., Pan Z., Wengui Y.. 20 Years Advances in Preparation of Potassium Salts from Potassic Rocks: A Review. Acta Geol. Sin. 2015;89(6):2058–2071. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.12617. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Heyes G. W., Allan G. C., Bruckard W. J., Sparrow G. J.. Review of Flotation of Feldspar. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall., Sect. C. 2012;121(2):72–78. doi: 10.1179/1743285512Y.0000000004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang Y., Hu Y., Sun N., Liu R., Wang Z., Wang L., Sun W.. Systematic Review of Feldspar Beneficiation and Its Comprehensive Application. Miner. Eng. 2018;128:141–152. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.08.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jena S. K.. A Review on Potash Recovery from Different Rock and Mineral Sources. Min. Metall. Explor. 2021;38(1):47–68. doi: 10.1007/s42461-020-00286-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang Z., Li J., Li X., Huang H., Zhou L., Xiong T.. High Efficiency Iron Removal from Quartz Sand Using Phosphoric Acid. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2012;114:30–34. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2012.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang Y., Asselin E., Li Z.. Laboratory and Pilot Scale Studies of Potassium Extraction from K-feldspar Decomposition with CaCl2 and CaCO3 . J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2016;49(2):111–119. doi: 10.1252/jcej.15we078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Samantray J., Anand A., Dash B., Ghosh M. K., Behera A. K.. Sustainable Process for the Extraction of Potassium from Feldspar Using Eggshell Powder. ACS Omega. 2020;5(25):14990–14998. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dong A., Luo M., Jiang W., Liu C. B., Li P., Yu J. B.. Separation and Recovery of Potassium, Aluminum and Silicon After Decomposition of Potassium Feldspar Using Sub-molten Salt Method. Chin. J. Process Eng. 2018;18(5):972–980. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wu Y., Li l., Liu X., Wang Y., Li M.. Decomposition of K-feldspar by Potassium Hydroxide Solution in the Hydrothermal System. Miner. Eng. 2022;178:107392. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107392. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhong Y., Gao J., Chen P., Guo Z.. Recovery of Potassium from K-feldspar by Thermal Decomposition with Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum and CaCO3: Analysis of Mechanism and Kinetics. Energy Fuels. 2017;31(1):699–707. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01915. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jiang A., Yu C.. Separation and Recovery of Potassium, Aluminum and Silicon After Decomposition of Potassium Feldspar Using Sub-molten Salt Method. Chin. J. Process Eng. 2018;18(5):972. [Google Scholar]
  35. Serdengeçti M. T., Baştürkcü H., Burat F., Kangal M. O.. The Correlation of Roasting Conditions in Selective Potassium Extraction from K-feldspar Ore. Minerals. 2019;9(2):109. doi: 10.3390/min9020109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Alyosif B., Uysal T., Aydemir M. K., Erdemoğlu M.. Contribution of Mechanical Activation for Obtaining Potassium Chloride from Microcline. Min. Metall. Explor. 2023;40(4):1311–1319. doi: 10.1007/s42461-023-00785-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Smekal A.. Ritzvorgang und molekulare Festigkeit. Naturwissenschaften. 1942;30(14):224–225. doi: 10.1007/BF01481226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Boldyrev V. V., Tkáčová K.. Mechanochemistry of Solids: Past, Present, and Prospects. J. Mater. Synth. Process. 2000;8(3):121–132. doi: 10.1023/A:1011347706721. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Behera S. K., Meena H., Chakraborty S., Meikap B. C.. Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for Optimization of Leaching Parameters for Ash Reduction from Low-grade Coal. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2018;28(4):621–629. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.04.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Turan M. D.. Optimization of Selective Copper Extraction from Chalcopyrite Concentrate in Presence of Ammonium Persulfate and Ammonium Hydroxide. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2019;26(8):946–952. doi: 10.1007/s12613-019-1804-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ewing C. T., Stern K. H.. Equilibrium Vaporization Rates and Vapor Pressures of Solid and Liquid Sodium Chloride, Potassium Chloride, Potassium Bromide, Cesium Iodide, and Lithium Fluoride. J. Phys. Chem. 1974;78(20):1998–2005. doi: 10.1021/j100613a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Somasundari, C. V. Growth and Characterization of ZnS Added Binary Mixed Crystals of NaCl and KCl. Ph.D. Thesis; Bharathidasan University: India, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  43. Baláž M., Birinci M., Şentürk K., Achimovičová M., Baláž P., Tampubolon I. O., Stolar T., Bienert R., Emmerling F., Erdemoğlu S.. et al. Utilizing Taguchi Method and in Situ X-ray Powder Diffraction Monitoring to Determine the Influence of Mechanical Activation Conditions on the Physico-chemical Properties and Al Leachability of K-feldspar. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024;32:3886–3895. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.08.156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Erdemoğlu, M. ; Erdemoğlu, S. ; Sis, H. ; Birinci, M. ; Aydemir, M. K. . Method for the Production of Potassium Chloride. US 5,057,208 A, 2025. .
  45. Petrov, M. ; Milošević, S. . Physical Properties of Mechanically Activated Grains. In Advanced Science and Technology of Sintering; Springer: Boston, MA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pec M., Al Nasser S.. Formation of Nanocrystalline and Amorphous Materials Causes Parallel Brittle-Viscous Flow of Crustal Rocks: Experiments on Quartz-Feldspar Aggregates. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 2021;126(5):e2020JB021262. doi: 10.1029/2020JB021262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tang J., Zhang Y., Bao S.. The Influence of Roasting Temperature on the Flotation Properties of Muscovite. Minerals. 2016;6(2):53. doi: 10.3390/min6020053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Şen G. A., Yılmaz H.. The Importance of Flotation Method in the Characterization of Feldspar Ore. Balıkesir Univ. J. Sci. Inst. 2020;24(1):359–372. doi: 10.25092/baunfbed.925765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bomeni I. Y., Wouatong A. S. L., Ngapgue F., Kabeyene K. V., Fagel N.. Mineralogical Transformation and Microstructure of the Alluvials Clays. Sci. Sintering. 2019;51(1):57–70. doi: 10.2298/SOS1901057Y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Huertas F. J., Chou L., Wollast R.. Mechanism of Kaolinite Dissolution at Room Temperature and Pressure: Part 1. Surface Speciation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1998;62(3):417–431. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00366-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zero-Waste Valorisation of Feldspathic Ores: Green Application and Sustainable Sourcing of Strategic Raw Materials; EU ERA-MIN3 Project No. 27. https://www.inonu.edu.tr/era-min3-potassial (accessed Jun 22, 2026).
  52. Singh R., Singh L., Singh S. V.. Beneficiation of Iron and Aluminium Oxides from Fly Ash at Lab Scale. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2015;145:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Babayeva P., Heyderov A., Turan M. D., Nizamoğlu H., Demir T.. Optimization of Aluminum Leaching from Alunite Ore with NaOH Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) J. Sustain. Metall. 2025;11(3):2677–2687. doi: 10.1007/s40831-025-01156-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Turan M. D., Safarzadeh M. S.. Separation of Zinc, Cadmium and Nickel from ZnO–CdO–NiO Mixture Through Baking with Ammonium Chloride and Leaching. Hydrometallurgy. 2012;119:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2012.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Christov C., Dickson A. G., Miller N.. Thermodynamic Modeling of Aqueous Aluminum Chemistry and Solid-Liquid Equilibria to High Solution Concentration and Temperature. I. The Acidic H-Al-Na-K-Cl-H2O System from 0 to 100 °C. J. Solution Chem. 2007;36(11):1495–1523. doi: 10.1007/s10953-007-9191-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Palmer D. A., Wesolowski D. J.. Aluminum Speciation and Equilibria in Aqueous Solution: II. The Solubility of Gibbsite in Acidic Sodium Chloride Solutions from 30 to 70 °C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1992;56(3):1093–1111. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90048-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Brown, R. R. ; Daut, G. E. ; Gokcen, N. A. ; Mrazek, R. V. . Solubility and Activity of Aluminum Chloride in Aqueous Hydrochloric Acid Solutions. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/201896 (accessed Jun 22, 2026).
  58. Xu J., Yuan G., Cao Y., Jin Z., Liu K.. Feldspar Dissolution Rates and Controlling Factors Under Near-equilibrium Conditions in Subsurface Settings. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2025;68(8):2558–2577. doi: 10.1007/s11430-024-1608-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Pereira A. C.. Potassium Recovery from Feldspar: Activation Routes, Dissolution Kinetics, Agronomic Performance, and Techno-Economic Assessment. IKR J. Eng. Technol. 2025;1(2):102–122. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17542110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yang Y., Min Y., Jun Y. S.. Effects of Al/Si Ordering on Feldspar Dissolution: Part II. The pH Dependence of Plagioclases’ Dissolution Rates. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2014;126:595–613. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.10.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Erdemoğlu, M. Purification of Potassium Chloride Obtained from Potassium Aluminum Silicate Ores by Acid Leaching; Elsevier, 2026. [Google Scholar]
  62. Shakibania S., Sundqvist-Öqvist L., Rosenkranz J., Ghorbani Y.. Application of Anti-Solvent Crystallization for High-Purity Potash Production from K-Feldspar Leaching Solution. Processes. 2024;12(7):1385. doi: 10.3390/pr12071385. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sun L., Chen X., Li C., Wu Z., Yang Z., Liang T.. Mix Proportion Design and Reaction Mechanism of Alkali-activated Slag Mortar with Marine Materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025;492:142897. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142897. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Farmer, V. C. The Infrared Spectra of Minerals; Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland; 1974. [Google Scholar]
  65. Takacs L.. The Historical Development of Mechanochemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42(18):7649–7659. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35442j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wieland E., Stumm W.. Dissolution Kinetics of Kaolinite in Acidic Aqueous Solutions at 25 °C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1992;56(9):3339–3355. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90382-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Oelkers E. H., Schott J., Devidal J. L.. The Effect of Aluminum, pH, and Chemical Affinity on the Rates of Aluminosilicate Dissolution Reactions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1994;58(9):2011–2024. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90281-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Oelkers E. H., Schott J., Gauthier J. M., Herrero-Roncal T.. An Experimental Study of the Dissolution Mechanism and Rates of Muscovite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2008;72(20):4948–4961. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2008.01.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Crundwell F. K.. The Mechanism of Dissolution of Minerals in Acidic and Alkaline Solutions: Part II Application of a New Theory to Silicates, Aluminosilicates and Quartz. Hydrometallurgy. 2014;149:265–275. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Oelkers E. H.. General Kinetic Description of Multioxide Silicate Mineral and Glass Dissolution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2001;65(21):3703–3719. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00710-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Huggins M. L., Sun K. H.. Energy Additivity in Oxygen-containing Crystals and Glasses. J. Phys. Chem. 1946;50(4):319–328. doi: 10.1021/j150448a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Casey W. H., Westrich H. R., Holdren G. R.. Dissolution Rates of Plagioclase at pH = 2 and 3. Am. Mineral. 1991;76(1–2):211–217. [Google Scholar]
  73. Hellmann R., Wirth R., Daval D., Barnes J.-P., Penisson J.-M., Tisserand D., Epicier T., Florin B., Hervig R. L.. Unifying Natural and Laboratory Chemical Weathering with Interfacial Dissolution–Reprecipitation: A Study Based on the Nanometer-Scale Chemistry of Fluid–Silicate Interfaces. Chem. Geol. 2012;294:203–216. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Şentürk, K. Recovery of Al and K from Mechanically Activated K-feldspar Ore by Acid Leaching, Ph.D. Thesis; İnönü University: Türkiye, 2026. [Google Scholar]
  75. Material Specification: Smelter Grade Alumina SGA. http://dadcoalumina.com/files/SGA.pdf (accessed Jun 20, 2026).
  76. Specifications for Commonly used Fertilizers. https://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/thematic-sitemap/theme/spi/plantnutrition/fertspecs/en/ (accessed Jun 20, 2026).
  77. Ahn J., Lee J. Y.. Separation Leaching Behaviors of Cobalt (Co) and Tungsten (W) from Tungsten Carbide Sludge by Sulfuric Acid Solutions. Resour. Recycl. 2023;32(5):28–34. doi: 10.7844/kirr.2023.32.5.28. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lee J. C., Kim E. Y., Kim J. H., Kim W., Kim B. S., Pandey B. D.. Recycling of WC–Co Hardmetal Sludge by a New Hydrometallurgical Route. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2011;29(3):365–371. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2011.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Shemi A., Ndlovu S., Sacks N.. An Optimized Recovery of Cobalt and Tungsten Carbide (WC) from a Binary-phase WC-6 wt% Co Cemented Tungsten Carbide Hardmetal Using Design of Experiments. Miner. Eng. 2025;233:109597. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109597. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Shakibania, S. Purification of K-feldspar Leaching Solution – Recovery of Potassium. Licentiate Thesis; Luleå University of Technology, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  81. Mete, E. Removal of Ca and Mg Ions from Model Acidic Leaching Solutions Using Polymeric Resins, Master’s Thesis; İnönü University, Institute of Natural Sciences, Department of Chemistry, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  82. Duan Y., Li X., Zhu Y., Chen J., Xue J., Wang H., Chen S.. Dual-frequency Ultrasonic-assisted Extraction of Pumpkin Polysaccharides: Process Optimization, Structural Characterization, and Antioxidant Activity. LWT. 2026;244:119220. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2026.119220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Ma X., Wen P., Fan Y., Dong X., Sun W., Min F., Feng Z., Xie J.. Quantitative Analysis of High-efficiency Dewatering Under Ultrahigh Pressures: Moisture Storage State and Filter-cake Pore Structure. Miner. Eng. 2026;237:109969. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109969. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Feng P., Qiao W., Huang Y., Wang Q., Cai J., Wu H.. Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Multiple Water Bodies and a Water Conservation Mining Strategy in the Xinjiang Coalfield: A Case Study of the Yushuquan and Yongxin Mines. Mine Water Environ. 2025;44(3):694–708. doi: 10.1007/s10230-025-01066-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Boyrazlı, M. ; Çelik, E. ; Odabaşı, A. ; Turan, M. D. ; Aydoğdu, S. ; Erdemoğlu, M. . Resistance Furnace with a Protective Atmosphere for the Production of Strategic Materials at High Temperatures. WO2026142666A1, 2026.
  86. Boyrazlı, M. ; Çelik, E. ; Odabaşı, A. ; Turan, M. D. ; Kılıç, A. D. . A Binder for the Production of High-Purity Silicon Carbide and a Method for Using the Binder. WO2026142666, 2026..
  87. Li X., Ran R., Zeng W., Ren S., Wang Y., Zhu A., Zheng C.. Coffee Shell as a Green Reductant for Iron Recovery from Pyrite Cinder: Synergy of Biomass-driven Reduction and Acid Leaching. Miner. Eng. 2025;234:109747. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109747. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ma H., Fu P., Zhao J., Lin X., Wu W., Yu Z., Xia C., Wang Q., Gao M., Zhou J.. Pretreatment of Wheat Straw Lignocelluloses by Deep Eutectic Solvent for Lignin Extraction. Molecules. 2022;27(22):7955. doi: 10.3390/molecules27227955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Huang B., Shu X., Liu X., Fu C., He J., Zhang X.. Experimental Study on the Characteristics, Injection Damage, and Oil Displacement Efficiency of Alkali-free Ternary Composite Flooding Extracted Wastewater. Energy. 2025;332:137278. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137278. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES