Skip to main content
Respiratory Research logoLink to Respiratory Research
. 2026 Aug 21;27:377. doi: 10.1186/s12931-026-03872-3

Relationship between asthma, obesity and other comorbidities: the Australasian Severe Asthma Registry

Hayley A Scott 1,2,✉, Joy Lee 3,4,5, Eve Denton 4,5, Adrian Barnett 6, Paul Griffiths 7, Peter G Middleton 8,9, Philip M Hansbro 10
PMCID: PMC13628815  PMID: 42823689

Abstract

Background

The impact of obesity and sex on asthma outcomes and inflammation in the real-world setting is not completely understood. The aim of this study was to profile obesity and other comorbidities in a cohort of male and female adults with asthma; to understand the impact of obesity on asthma outcomes; and to examine sex-specific relationships between obesity and airway inflammation.

Methods

We profiled comorbidities including obesity, as well as clinical asthma outcomes and airway inflammation, in patients with asthma enrolled in the Australasian Severe Asthma Registry. Data were analysed using t-tests (parametric data) or Wilcoxon rank sum tests (non-parametric data). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine the effects of obesity and asthma severity on clinical and inflammatory outcomes.

Results

We assessed 1,019 patients with severe (n = 882) and non-severe (n = 137) asthma. Patients with severe asthma were 67% more likely to have obesity, while patients with severe asthma and obesity were more likely to be female. Obesity was associated with a higher prevalence of asthma-related hospitalisation in the previous 12 months, in both severe (26.2% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.001) and non-severe asthma (12.5% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001). Obesity was also associated with poorer asthma control and lung function, and higher sputum neutrophils. Interestingly, sputum %neutrophils correlated with body mass index in females (rs=0.370, p = 0.003), but not males (rs=0.092, p = 0.495). Neutrophilic airway inflammation was associated with poorer lung function and asthma control.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that obesity is associated with a significantly worse clinical asthma presentation in the real-world setting and increases the risk of asthma-related hospitalisation. Critically, our findings suggest that obesity is associated with increased neutrophilic airway inflammation in females, but not males, providing some insight into possible sex-related differences in severe asthma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-026-03872-3.

Keywords: Asthma, Severe asthma, Comorbidity, Obesity, Asthma symptoms, Airway inflammation, Sex

Background

Asthma affects approximately 300 million people worldwide, with 5–10% of people with asthma living with severe asthma [1–4]. Severe asthma significantly increases asthma-related burden [5] and accounts for 60% of asthma-related healthcare expenditure [6], corresponding to a 10-fold higher cost per patient compared with those with non-severe asthma.

Obesity prevalence has increased rapidly since the 1980’s, now affecting 1 in 8 people globally [7]. Obesity increases the risk of a wide range of comorbidities, including asthma [8]. In addition to increasing asthma risk, there is some evidence that obesity may also contribute to worse asthma outcomes. Indeed, obesity is a leading risk factor for disability adjusted life years in people with asthma and is estimated to account for almost half of asthma-related deaths globally [9]. Because of the substantial negative impact obesity has on respiratory morbidity and mortality, it is critical to better understand the influence of obesity on asthma outcomes in the real-world setting, as well as the mechanisms through which this occurs, in order to optimise clinical care and health outcomes.

The mechanisms involved in the association between obesity and asthma are not fully understood, however there is evidence that both obesity and a high fat diet (which is more common in people with obesity) independently induce inflammatory changes that underpin asthma pathogenesis [10–12]. Other proposed mechanisms include the presence of comorbidities including metabolic syndrome, female sex hormones, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), as well as mechanical effects of excess weight on lung physiology and the microbiome [13, 14]. It is likely a combination of factors that are responsible, however these relationships are complex and poorly understood.

Here, we interrogate the Australasian Severe Asthma Registry (ASAR) to profile obesity and other co-morbidities in this large real-world cohort of adults from Australia and New Zealand with severe and non-severe asthma (> 1,000), to better understand the clinical implications of comorbid asthma and obesity within the real-world setting and explore whether airway inflammation and sex influences asthma outcomes. We hypothesised there would be a higher prevalence of obesity and other comorbidities in patients with severe asthma. We also hypothesised that people living with both severe asthma and obesity would be more likely to be female, have poorer clinical asthma outcomes, elevated airway inflammation, and a higher prevalence of other comorbidities, compared with people living with severe asthma but without obesity.

Methods

Data were obtained from the ASAR, a clinical quality registry that encompasses both cross-sectional and prospective longitudinal data collected from adults with severe and non-severe asthma across 28 sites in Australia and New Zealand. Prior to 2019, all patients provided written, informed consent. To ensure a representative population, a transition to opt-out consent was approved by the Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care in 2019. ASAR is under the governance of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ). Recruitment commenced in 2013, with systematic, de-identified, annual data collection via an electronic data capture system (REDCap) [15]. Ethical approval was obtained according to each site’s Human Research Ethics Committee in Australia (2019/ETH03836) and New Zealand (2/CEN/69/AM09).

Patients were ≥ 18 years old with confirmed asthma demonstrated by variable airflow obstruction (VAO), either at their first visit or documented within the past 10 years. Patients with severe asthma were on the highest level of recommended treatment [maximal inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy with second controller] and had poor asthma control, as described previously [16]. The comparison group was adults with non-severe asthma who were also prescribed maintenance inhaled controller therapy and had partially-to-well controlled asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire, ACQ6 < 1.5 [17] or Asthma Control Test, ACT > 20) [18], and stable disease with no infection, exacerbation or change in preventer therapy in the previous 4 weeks. Additional detail is outlined in the Supplementary Methods.

Registry assessments

Data collection included demographics, body mass index (BMI), asthma and allergy history, smoking history, comorbidities, respiratory medications, exacerbation history and health care resource utilisation. Height and weight were measured without shoes. The asthma-related quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) [17] and ACQ6 [19] were administered. Asthma exacerbations in the previous year were quantified as previously defined [20]. Clinical assessments included spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and induced sputum (if available). Induced sputum was collected using 4.5% hypertonic saline and processed according to Gibson [21]. Eosinophilic asthma was defined as sputum %eosinophils ≥ 3% and/or FeNO ≥ 30ppb. Neutrophilic asthma was defined using age-adjusted sputum neutrophil cut-points according to Brooks [22].

Assessment of comorbidities

Diagnosis of comorbidities was by physician assessment, including:

  • Pulmonary and upper airways: allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, vocal cord dysfunction, OSA, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hyperventilation dysfunctional breathing, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; and.

  • Extra-pulmonary: Obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, anxiety, depression, GORD, osteoporosis, eczema and anaphylaxis.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using Intercooled Stata 18.5 (StataCorp) with a significance threshold of 0.05. Demographic characteristics were summarised as percentages for categorical variables, mean (standard deviation) for parametric variables, or median (interquartile range) for non-parametric variables. Patients with severe versus non-severe asthma were compared with a t-test (parametric data) or Wilcoxon rank sum test (non-parametric data). Group comparisons of proportions were compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared test. Correlations were examined using the Spearman rank test (rs).

The effects of obesity and asthma severity on clinical and inflammatory outcomes were analysed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The robust variance estimator was applied to account for outcomes being skewed. Models were adjusted for asthma severity (severe/non-severe), obesity (yes/no), inhaled corticosteroid dose (beclomethasone dipropionate equivalents/day), oral corticosteroid dose (mg/day), biologic use (yes/no) and smoking status (never/ex/current), except in models where that particular variable was the dependent variable. Results for group comparisons were presented as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. An interaction between asthma severity and obesity was completed to test whether clinical asthma outcomes and inflammation differed according to these variables; this model was also adjusted for the same variables outlined above.

Change in asthma outcomes from baseline to 12 months was examined in patients with severe asthma, grouped according to biologic medication use and obesity status. Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA with post-hoc t-test, or Kruskal-Wallis with post-hoc Wilcoxon rank sum test. To account for multiple comparisons in the longitudinal data, p-values < 0.017 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

Patients were enrolled into ASAR between 2013 and 2023. After excluding 55 patients who did not have baseline data available for height, weight and/or asthma severity, there were 882 patients with severe asthma and 137 with non-severe asthma (Table 1). Clinical characteristics of the severe and non-severe asthma cohorts were similar. Mean age at enrolment was 54 years and mean age at asthma diagnosis was 23 years.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics, according to asthma severity

Characteristic Severe asthma (n = 882) Non-severe asthma (n = 137) P-value
BMI (kg/m2) (n = 1,019) 30.9 (8.1) 28.3 (5.7) < 0.001
 Underweight, n (%) 16 (1.8%) 1 (0.7%) < 0.001
 Normal weight, n (%) 182 (20.6%) 37 (27.0%)
 Overweight, n (%) 261 (29.6%) 59 (43.1%)
 Obese Class I, n (%) 213 (24.2%) 22 (16.1%)
 Obese Class II, n (%) 105 (11.9%) 12 (8.8%)
 Obese Class III, n (%) 105 (11.9%) 6 (4.4%)
Sex (n, %female) (n = 1,017) 551/880 (62.6%) 79/137 (57.7%) 0.267
Age (years) (n = 1000) 54.7 (14.8) 54.1 (16.6) 0.677
Age at asthma onset (years) (n = 881) 22.9 (19.2) 22.9 (20.3) 0.969
Ethnicity (n = 890) < 0.001
 Caucasian 653/761 (85.8%) 99/129 (76.7%)
 Aboriginal 7/761 (0.9%) 1/129 (0.8%)
 Pacific Islander 8/761 (1.1%) 1/129 (0.8%)
 Asian 56/761 (7.4%) 26/129 (20.2%)
 Southeast Asian 4/761 (0.5%) 0/129 (0%)
 Other 33/761 (4.3%) 2/129 (1.6%)
Respiratory Medications
 ICS dose (BDP µg/day) (n = 1,018) 1600 (1000, 2000) 800 (400, 1000) < 0.001
 Daily OCS use 229/860 (26.6%) 5/133 (3.7%) < 0.001
 OCS dose for OCS users (mg/day) (n = 222) 10 (5, 13) 10 (8, 25) 0.572
 Anti-IgE (Omalizumab) 110/849 (13.0%) 0/131 (0%) < 0.001
 Anti-IL-5 (Mepolizumab/Benralizumab) 200/870 (23.0%) 0/131 (0%) < 0.001
 Anti-IL-4 (Dupilumab) 19/854 (2.2%) 0/131 (0%) 0.085
Smoking status (n, %)
 Never smoked 519/854 (60.8%) 85/134 (63.4%) 0.228
 Ex-smoker 305/854 (35.7%) 48/134 (35.8%)
 Current smoker 30/854 (3.5%) 1/134 (0.8%)
Pack years of current and ex-smokers (n = 372) 11 (4, 27) 7 (1, 17) 0.009

Definition of abbreviations: BDP  Beclomethasone dipropionate, BMI  Body mass index, ICS  Inhaled corticosteroid, OCS  Oral corticosteroid. Underweight = BMI < 18.5 kg/m2; Normal weight = BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; Overweight = BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2; Obese Class I = BMI 30–34.9 kg/m2; Obese Class II = BMI 35–39.9 kg/m2; Obese Class III = BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2

Patients with severe asthma had a higher BMI (30.9 ± 8.1 kg/m2) compared with those with non-severe asthma (28.3 ± 5.7 kg/m2, p < 0.001) (Table 1) and were 1.64 times more likely to have obesity. Patients with severe asthma had a higher daily dose of ICS, more prevalent use of daily oral corticosteroid and biologic (anti-IgE, anti-IL-5) medication, more severe airflow limitation, worse asthma control, more frequent asthma exacerbations, worse asthma-related quality of life, and higher sputum %eosinophils (Table 1). Neutrophilic asthma [22] was also more prevalent in severe asthma than in non-severe asthma (19.3% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.045) (Table S1).

Patients with severe asthma had a higher recorded prevalence of pulmonary and upper airway comorbidities, including nasal polyps (19.2% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.001), OSA (15.8% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.009), bronchiectasis (7.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.042) and COPD (9.4% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.026) (Table S1). This group also had a higher prevalence of GORD (42.6% vs. 32.9%, p = 0.030) (Table S1).

Impact of obesity and asthma severity on clinical asthma outcomes

Asthma was more poorly controlled (ACQ) in patients with versus without obesity [mean difference, MD (95% CI) = 0.33 (0.16 to 0.50), p < 0.001] and in patients with severe asthma versus non-severe asthma [MD (95% CI) = 1.21 (0.99 to 1.43), p < 0.001; Fig. 1a; Table 2, Table S4]. Asthma-related quality-of-life (AQLQ) was also worse in patients with versus without obesity [MD (95% CI) = -0.36 (-0.54 to -0.19), p < 0.001] and in patients with severe asthma versus non-severe asthma [MD (95% CI) = -1.04 (-0.44 to -0.19), p < 0.001] (Fig. 1b; Table 2, Table S4), and this pattern was consistent across all AQLQ domains. Higher BMI correlated with worse ACQ (rs=0.196, p < 0.001) and worse AQLQ (rs=-0.196, p < 0.001).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mean (SD) (a) asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) score, (b) asthma-related quality of life (AQLQ) score, (c) pre-bronchodilator %predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and (d) pre-bronchodilator %predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), according to asthma severity and body mass index (BMI)

Table 2.

Patient characteristics, according to asthma severity and body mass index

Severe Asthma Non-severe Asthma P-value
BMI < 30 kg/m2
(n = 459)
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
(n = 423)
BMI < 30 kg/m2
(n = 97)
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
(n = 40)
BMI < 30 versus BMI ≥ 30 Severe versus Non-severe Asthma Asthma Severity x Obesity Interaction
BMI (kg/m2) (n = 1,019) 25.2 (3.1) 37.0 (7.3) 25.4 (3.0) 35.4 (4.4) < 0.001 0.574 0.058
Age (years) (n = 1,000) 54.6 (15.8) 54.8 (13.8) 52.5 (17.1) 58.0 (14.6) 0.116 0.302 0.073
Age at asthma onset (years) (n = 881) 20 (7, 35) 17 (5, 38) 16 (5, 37) 19 (6, 45) 0.571 0.879 0.309
Respiratory Medications
 ICS dose (BDP µg/day) (n = 1,018) 1600 (1000, 2000) 1800 (1000, 2000) 800 (400, 1000) 800 (450, 1000) 0.008 < 0.001 0.990
 OCS dose (mg/day) (n = 981) 0 (0, 1) 0 (0, 4) 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 0) 0.184  0.001 0.746
 Pack years of current and ex-smokers (n = 372) 10 (3, 29) 12 (4, 26) 3 (1, 13) 18 (7, 25) 0.154 0.001 0.072
Lung function
 Pre-bronchodilator FEV1%pred (n = 765) 65.6 (22.5) 64.2 (20.0) 81.7 (20.6) 77.0 (18.6) 0.315 < 0.001 0.519
 Post-bronchodilator FEV1%pred (n = 702) 72.0 (23.4) 70.8 (20.2) 84.4 (21.9) 79.9 (16.6) 0.331 < 0.001 0.600
 Pre-bronchodilator FVC %pred (n = 756) 85.1 (19.9) 78.8 (18.2) 91.3 (17.4) 93.0 (34.8) 0.001 0.002 0.212
 Pre-bronchodilator %FEV1/FVC (n = 789) 60.0 (14.2) 64.0 (13.1) 70.7 (12.0) 66.6 (14.8) 0.003 < 0.001 0.013
Asthma control (ACQ) score (n = 902) 2.17 (1.27) 2.54 (1.32) 0.91 (0.89) 1.06 (1.20) < 0.001 < 0.001 0.237
AQLQ score (n = 888) 4.76 (1.31) 4.33 (1.38) 5.88 (0.92) 5.74 (1.13) < 0.001 < 0.001 0.137
 Activity limitation domain 4.91 (1.33) 4.37 (1.39) 5.97 (1.01) 5.77 (1.13) < 0.001 < 0.001 0.097
 Symptoms domain 4.62 (1.42) 4.24 (1.47) 5.83 (0.96) 5.68 (1.22) 0.001 < 0.001 0.264
 Emotional function domain 4.62 (1.63) 4.30 (1.76) 5.89 (1.16) 5.76 (1.43) 0.018 < 0.001 0.403
 nvironmental stimuli domain 4.90 (1.52) 4.48 (1.64) 5.71 (1.08) 5.75 (1.31) 0.005 < 0.001 0.079
No. of exacerbations in previous year (n = 506) 0 (0, 3) 1 (0, 3) 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 1) 0.122 < 0.001 0.848
Airway Inflammation
 Sputum %eosinophils (n = 118) 3.8 (1.1, 15.8) 1.5 (0.5, 6.0) 1.3 (0.3, 6.1) 1.0 (0.2, 1.5) 0.205 0.055 0.386
 Sputum %neutrophils (n = 117) 22.7 (9.3, 50.3) 36.8 (19.3, 68.8) 17.9 (7.4, 35.4) 33.5 (13.5, 49.1) 0.023 0.512 0.879
 FeNO (ppb) (n = 433) 28 (12, 50) 23 (12, 57) 23 (14, 37) 17 (15, 39) 0.113 0.396 0.364

Definition of abbreviations: ACQ  Asthma Control Questionnaire, AQLQ  Asthma-related Quality of Life Questionnaire, BDP  Beclomethasone dipropionate, BMI = body mass index, FeNO  Fractional exhaled nitric oxide, FEV1  Forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC  Forced vital capacity, ICS  Inhaled corticosteroids, OCS  Oral corticosteroids

P-values adjusted for asthma severity, obesity, inhaled corticosteroid dose (beclomethasone dipropionate equivalents/day), oral corticosteroid dose (mg/day), biologic use (yes/no) and smoking status (never/ex/current), except in models where that particular variable is the dependent variable

Patients with severe asthma had a lower pre-bronchodilator %predicted FEV1 than patients with non-severe asthma, however there was no impact of obesity on %predicted FEV1 (Fig. 1c; Table 2, Table S4). Patients with versus without obesity had a lower %predicted FVC [MD (95% CI) = -5.2 (-8.3 to -2.1)%, p = 0.001]. Similarly, patients who had severe asthma versus non-severe asthma also had a lower %predicted FVC [MD (95% CI) = -8.4 (-13.8 to -2.1)%, p = 0.002] (Fig. 1d; Table 2, Table S4). There was a significant interaction between obesity and asthma severity, whereby patients who had both obesity and severe asthma had a higher FEV1/FVC (p = 0.031, Table 2, Table S4). This result was driven by the lower FVC, but not FEV1, observed in patients with both severe asthma and obesity.

A higher proportion of patients with severe asthma and obesity had experienced an asthma exacerbation in the previous 12 months compared with patients with severe asthma but without obesity (81.2% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.014; Fig. 2; Table 3). This included 1.67 times the odds of hospitalisation for asthma, 2.00 times the odds of ICU admission for asthma, and 1.35 times the odds of an unscheduled doctor’s visit for asthma (Fig. 2; Table 3). In the non-severe asthma group, the presence of obesity quadrupled the odds of hospitalisation for asthma (12.5% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001) (Table 3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Proportion of patients with severe asthma without versus with obesity, who in the past year had: (a) an asthma exacerbation, (b) used oral corticosteroids, (c) an asthma-related hospitalisation, and (d) an ICU stay

Table 3.

Categorical patient characteristics, according to asthma severity and body mass index

Severe Asthma Non-severe Asthma P-value*
BMI < 30 kg/m2 BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 P-value BMI < 30 kg/m2 BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 P-value
Sex (n, %female) (n = 1,017) 270/457 (59.1%) 281/423 (66.4%) 0.024 51/97 (52.6%) 28/40 (70.0%) 0.061 0.019
Respiratory Medications
 Daily oral corticosteroid use 116/451 (25.7%) 113/409 (27.6%) 0.527 3/95 (3.2%) 2/38 (5.3%) 0.564 < 0.001
 Anti-IgE (Omalizumab) 56/448 (12.5%) 54/401 (13.5%) 0.676 0/94 (0.0%) 0/37 (0.0%) - < 0.001
 Anti-IL-5 (Mepolizumab/Benralizumab) 102/453 (22.5%) 98/417 (23.5%) 0.730 0/94 (0.0%) 0/37 (0.0%) - < 0.001
 Anti-IL-4 (Dupilumab) 11/448 (2.5%) 8/406 (2.0%) 0.631 0/94 (0.0%) 0/37 (0.0%) - 0.357
Exacerbation in previous year (n, %) 341/459 (74.3%) 341/420 (81.2%) 0.014 38/97 (39.2%) 22/39 (56/4%) 0.067 < 0.001
 Hospitalised (n, %) 72/459 (15.7%) 111/423 (26.2%) < 0.001 3/97 (3.1%) 5/40 (12.5%) < 0.001 < 0.001
 Intensive Care Unit stay (n, %) 12/459 (2.6%) 22/423 (5.2%) 0.046 1/97 (1.0%) 1/40 (2.5%) 0.515 0.090
 Visited emergency room (n, %) 71/459 (15.5%) 86/423 (20.3%) 0.059 4/97 (4.1%) 2/40 (5.0%) 0.820 < 0.001
 Unscheduled doctor visit (n, %) 142/459 (30.9%) 176/423 (41.6%) 0.001 22/97 (22.7%) 11/40 (27.5%) 0.549 < 0.001
 Oral corticosteroids prescribed (n, %) 313/459 (68.2%) 308/423 (72.8%) 0.133 31/97 (32.0%) 19/40 (47.5%) 0.086 < 0.001
Airway Inflammation
 Eosinophilic airway inflammation (n, %) 111/203 (54.7%) 84/185 (45.4%) 0.068 23/54 (42.6%) 7/22 (31.8%) 0.383 0.071
 Neutrophilic airway inflammation (n, %) 6/44 (13.6%) 11/44 (25.0%) 0.177 0/20 (0.0%) 1/8 (12.5%) 0.107 0.076

*p-value for overall difference between groups

Exploring airway inflammation and sex as potential drivers of poorer asthma outcomes in obesity-related asthma

Patients with severe asthma and obesity were more likely to be female compared with patients with severe asthma without obesity (66.4% vs. 59.1%, p = 0.024; Table 3). There was a similar pattern in non-severe asthma, however this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.061).

Baseline characteristics were compared in patients who had sputum samples collected compared with those who did not (Table S5). Patients living with obesity had higher sputum %neutrophils than patients without obesity [MD (95% CI) = 12.1 (1.7 to 22.4)%, p = 0.023] (Table 2, Table S4). When examined by asthma severity, this effect was more pronounced in patients with severe asthma (Fig. 3a). Sputum %neutrophils were positively correlated with BMI (rs=0.256, p = 0.005). Interestingly, this correlation was apparent in females (rs=0.370, p = 0.003) but not males (rs=0.092, p = 0.495) (Fig. 4). Women with obesity had higher sputum %neutrophils than women without obesity [39.4 (22.0, 68.8)% vs. 19.3 (8.5, 36.0)%, p = 0.013]. Conversely, there was no significant difference in sputum %neutrophils in men with obesity compared with men without obesity [30.8 (17.5, 64.5)% vs. 21.1 (10.0, 52.8)%, p = 0.254]. Sputum %neutrophils correlated with worse asthma control (rs=0.254, p = 0.005) and lower FEV1%predicted (rs=-0.356, p < 0.001), FVC %predicted (rs=-0.321, p < 0.001) and FEV1/FVC (rs=-0.193, p = 0.044).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Median (IQR) (a) sputum %neutrophils, (b) sputum %eosinophils, and (c) fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), according to asthma severity and body mass index (BMI)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Correlation between body mass index (BMI) and sputum %neutrophils in (a) females (rs=0.370, p = 0.003), and (b) males (rs=0.092, p = 0.495)

There was no difference in sputum %eosinophils in patients with versus without obesity (p = 0.205) (Table 2, Table S4, Fig. 3b), and there was no correlation between sputum %eosinophils and BMI (rs=-0.123, p = 0.177), asthma control, or lung function parameters. FeNO did not differ according to asthma severity (p = 0.396) or the presence of obesity (p = 0.113) (Fig. 3c). There was no correlation between FeNO and BMI (rs=0.005, p = 0.915).

Effect of obesity on the presence of other comorbidities

Obesity was associated with a higher prevalence of recorded OSA, diabetes and GORD, in both severe and non-severe asthma (Table S6). Patients with severe asthma and obesity also had a higher prevalence of anxiety and depression, and a lower prevalence of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, compared with patients with severe asthma who did not have obesity (Figure S1; Table S6).

Longitudinal changes in clinical outcomes in patients with severe asthma after 12 months of biologic medication

Patients with severe asthma and obesity who were prescribed biologic medication lost weight over the 12-month follow-up period [-2.3 (5.3)kg] (Table 4). Interestingly, weight loss was also observed in patients with severe asthma and obesity who were not prescribed biologic medication [-1.7 (6.7)kg] (Table 4). There was a significant reduction in daily OCS dose in patients with obesity prescribed biologic medication [-4.3 (10.6)mg/day, p = 0.018], while there was no significant change in daily OCS dose in patients prescribed a biologic who did not have obesity [-0.6 (6.1), p = 0.551] (Figure S2). There were statistically significant improvements in both ACQ and AQLQ in patients with and without obesity prescribed biologic medication (Figure S2). There was also a small improvement in these parameters in patients not prescribed biologic medication (Table 4). While there was a significant improvement in lung function in patients prescribed biologic medication without obesity (pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC), there was no change in lung function in patients with obesity prescribed biologic medication (Figure S2; Table 4).

Table 4.

Changes in patient characteristics at 12 months in adults with severe asthma, according to biologic medication use and BMI

Using Biologic Medication at 12 Months Not Using Biologic Medication at 12 Months P-value §
BMI < 30 kg/m2
(n = 48)
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
(n = 37)
P-value BMI < 30 kg/m2
(n = 125)
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
(n = 111)
P-value
Weight (kg) (n = 321) 1.1 (5.9) -2.3 (5.3) *† 0.008 -0.1 (3.9) ‡ -1.7 (6.7) *† 0.024 0.004
Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) (n = 169) 0.24 (0.09, 0.67) * 0.05 (-0.11, 0.19) † 0.003 -0.02 (-0.17, 0.09) † 0.10 (-0.07, 0.18) *† 0.022 < 0.001
Pre-bronchodilator FEV1%pred (n = 156) 8.8 (3.2, 18.0) * 1.6 (-2.0, 7.7) † 0.013 1.2 (-3.6, 5.5) † 3.4 (-2.8, 7.9) † 0.348 0.002
Post-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) (n = 138) 0.17 (0.01, 0.37) * 0.04 (-0.04, 0.22) 0.252 -0.04 (-0.09, 0.07) † -0.01 (-0.16, 0.13) † 0.695 0.006
Post-bronchodilator FEV1%pred (n = 133) 5.3 (0.1, 12.0) * 1.4 (-1.0, 6.2) 0.317 0.3 (-3.1, 4.0) -0.5 (-6.3, 5.4) 0.576 0.052
Pre-bronchodilator FVC (L) (n = 168) 0.34 (0.49) * -0.02 (0.46) † 0.014 -0.04 (0.46) † 0.08 (0.37) † 0.120 0.002
Pre-bronchodilator FVC %pred (n = 155) 7.5 (16.3) * 2.2 (11.4) 0.242 0.9 (12.9) 2.3 (17.0) 0.640 0.297
Pre-bronchodilator %FEV1/FVC (n = 168) 5.1 (13.0) * 0.2 (9.0) 0.152 -0.2 (6.4) 0.9 (8.1) 0.417 0.058
Asthma control (ACQ) score (n = 277) -1.75 (1.30) * -1.82 (1.52) * 0.838 -0.35 (1.16) *†‡ -0.35 (1.02) *†‡ 0.970 < 0.001
AQLQ score (n = 270) 1.53 (1.43) * 0.92 (1.28) * 0.072 0.32 (1.12) *†‡ 0.38 (1.03) *†‡ 0.681 < 0.001
 Activity limitation domain 1.26 (1.56) * 0.87 (1.33) * 0.278 0.28 (1.13) *†‡ 0.29 (1.12) *†‡ 0.937 < 0.001
 Symptoms domain 1.66 (1.58) * 0.94 (1.33) * 0.047 0.37 (1.26) *† 0.46 (1.14) *† 0.577 < 0.001
 Emotional function domain 1.62 (1.72) * 0.87 (1.53) * 0.063 0.37 (1.43) *† 0.49 (1.40) *† 0.548 < 0.001
 Environmental stimuli domain 1.29 (1.98) * 1.07 (1.52) * 0.613 0.25 (1.30) †‡ 0.27 (1.23) *†‡ 0.910 < 0.001
Oral corticosteroid dose (mg/day) -0.6 (6.1) -4.3 (10.6) * 0.377 1.2 (10.6) -1.6 (6.2) * 0.135 0.224
No. of exacerbations in previous year (n = 111) -2 (-4, 0) * -3 (-4, -1) * 0.181 0 (0, 0) †‡ 0 (0, 0) †‡ 0.677 < 0.001
FeNO (ppb) (n = 65) -1 (-25, 11) -10 (-39, 12) 0.609 1 (-3, 9) -3 (-18, 4) 0.268 0.664

Data presented as mean (SD) or median (IQR)

ACQ  Asthma Control Questionnaire, AQLQ  Asthma-related Quality of Life Questionnaire, BD Bronchodilator, FeNO Fractional exhaled nitric oxide, FEV1 Forced Expiratory Volume in 1-second, FVC Forced Vital Capacity

* p < 0.05 at baseline versus at 12 months

† p < 0.017 versus patients using biologic medication at 12 months without obesity

‡ p < 0.017 versus patients using biologic medication at 12 months with obesity

§ p-value for overall difference between groups

Discussion

In this real-world study, we demonstrate that severe asthma is associated with an increased prevalence of a range of comorbidities including obesity, OSA, nasal polyps, bronchiectasis and GORD. We also show that the presence of obesity further increases the prevalence of a range of comorbidities in adults with severe asthma, including OSA, diabetes, anxiety, depression, and GORD. Our data demonstrates that obesity is associated with worse respiratory outcomes in patients with severe asthma, including asthma control, asthma-related quality of life and lung function, as well as an increased odds of experiencing an asthma exacerbation, including hospitalisation and intensive care admission for asthma. Importantly, we show that a higher BMI is associated with sputum neutrophilia in women, but not in men, and that airway neutrophils correlate with worse asthma control and lung function.

Obesity is a known risk factor for developing asthma that is more severe and difficult to treat, and is associated with a reduced quality of life [23]. In line with our observations, other studies of registry data also demonstrate a high prevalence of obesity in the “difficult” asthma group, with increased medication requirements and a higher prevalence of comorbidities [24, 25]. The increased risk of comorbidities may be due to a number of factors including increases in mechanical forces associated with excess adiposity that may influence OSA, or altered metabolic processes widely known to be associated with diabetes, GORD, cardiovascular disease and stroke [26]. Obesity is also known to impact immune cell function, which increases susceptibility to infectious exacerbations and may contribute to more frequent unplanned doctor visits and hospital admissions [27].

Hypothesis-free cluster analyses have identified an obesity-related asthma phenotype that is characterised by obesity, female-predominance, late onset asthma, neutrophilic or mixed granulocytic airway inflammation, and high-dose ICS therapy [13, 28–32]. In support of this, a meta-analysis demonstrated that sputum neutrophils are 5% higher in adults with asthma and obesity compared with those with asthma but without obesity [33]. Our findings extend on this, as we show in a real-world setting that patients with comorbid asthma and obesity are more likely to be female, have a higher ICS dose, and that the obesity-induced increase in sputum neutrophils is only evident in females. The mechanisms driving this increased neutrophilic airway inflammation in women with obesity is unknown, but it is possible that sex hormones and adiposity may have an interconnected role, as obesity is linked with sex hormone abnormalities [34, 35]. Australian data demonstrates that women are twice as likely to die from asthma than men [36]. In pre-menopausal women, up to half of emergency room presentations for asthma occur during the late luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, comprising the days immediately prior to menstruation [37]. In post-menopausal women, menopausal hormone therapy, consisting of estrogen or estrogen plus progestogen, has been linked with an increased asthma incidence and wheeze [38]. Excess adiposity also leads to inflammasome activation, which upregulates IL-1β release leading to neutrophilic airway inflammation [39, 40]. Taken together, this suggests a mechanism through which women with obesity are more susceptible to neutrophilic airway inflammation and asthma-related mortality.

Lung function impairment is known to occur in both asthma and obesity [41], and determining the relative contribution of each is challenging. Small airway dysfunction is associated with severe asthma and is related to airway remodelling and air trapping, which also occurs in obesity [41]. Additionally, lung and thoracic compliance is affected by obesity and influences lung function. Accumulation of adipose tissue in the thoracic and abdominal cavities impairs diaphragmatic and chest wall movement, reduces thoracic compliance and increases pleural pressure, with resultant restrictive ventilatory defect with reduction in functional residual capacity [42–44]. The effect on total lung capacity and residual volume is modest even in severe obesity [43], but expiratory reserve volume is reduced. In our cohort, FEV1 was influenced by asthma severity but not obesity, whilst FVC was reduced by both asthma severity and obesity. An inverse association between obesity and FVC was also identified in a Norwegian study of people with non-severe asthma [45]. FVC can be decreased by air trapping, airway remodelling, and reduced thoracic compliance [46, 47], all of which could be reasonably encountered in people with obesity and asthma. This observation in our cohort appears to be due to a more marked reduction in FVC in those with severe asthma and obesity, as those with obesity and non-severe asthma demonstrated a generally preserved FVC. This may be partly explained by the fact that patients with severe asthma had a higher prevalence of morbid obesity, however it is likely there are also other factors involved.

Our longitudinal data shows that patients with severe asthma and obesity prescribed biologic medication experienced significant weight loss at 12 months, whereas patients prescribed a biologic who did not have obesity did not lose weight. Another study, which also observed weight loss in patients with asthma and obesity after being prescribed biologic medication, postulated this could be explained by a reduction in daily OCS use [48]. Our data shows a significant 4 mg/day reduction in OCS dose in patients with obesity who commenced biologic medication, while there was no change in daily OCS in patients prescribed a biologic who did not have obesity. We hypothesise that improved diet quality and increased energy expenditure in the setting of reduced asthma symptoms may also contribute to these observations. Although we were unable to examine this directly in our study, our hypothesis is supported by our observation that patients with severe asthma and obesity not prescribed biologic medication also experienced a reduction in asthma symptoms that corresponded with a small reduction in weight.

Our study confirms that people with severe asthma and obesity benefit from biologic therapy. While there was no change in lung function in patients with obesity, there was a significant reduction in asthma exacerbations and OCS use, and improvements in asthma symptoms and asthma-related quality of life. In line with our observations, a meta-analysis of the MENSA and MUSCA trials also observed biologic use was associated with a reduction in exacerbations in patients with obesity, while there was no change in lung function [49]. Longitudinal data from the UK Severe Asthma Registry supports our findings, with patients with obesity across the range of BMI categories demonstrating improvements in asthma control, but not in lung function [50]. In contrast, Oliveira [51] did observe improvements in FEV1 in patients with obesity after 12 months of omalizumab, however these patients also lost 5% body weight. This highlights the need to conduct research examining whether weight loss augments the beneficial effects of biologic therapy in patients with obesity.

A strength of this study is that it is the first to detail differences in a wide range of clinical and inflammatory asthma outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients with and without obesity, recruited across 28 sites in Australia and New Zealand. Another strength is that we were able to examine airway inflammation as a potential driver of the poorer outcomes observed in obesity-related asthma, including sex-based differences. Additionally, regression modelling was adjusted for potential confounders including ICS dose, OCS use, biologic use, and smoking history, all of which may plausibly influence body weight, inflammatory profiles, exacerbation frequency, and lung function. A limitation is that we did not have data on body composition (adipose tissue quantity and distribution), dietary intake, metabolic health, microbiomes and metabolomes, sex hormones, and numerous molecular and cellular factors that may have an impact. Additionally, there was only sputum data available for a subset (117) of patients, which may affect the generalisability of the findings. Nonetheless, this data provides important insight into the comorbidities experienced by patients with severe and non-severe asthma, including obesity, and demonstrates for the first time in a real-world setting that the previously discovered elevation in neutrophilic airway inflammation observed in adults with obesity-related asthma is only apparent in females.

Conclusions

In conclusion, severe asthma is associated with an increased risk of a number of comorbidities, including obesity. Our real-world data clearly demonstrates that obesity is associated with more severe disease, neutrophilic airway inflammation, increased exacerbation risk, and other comorbidities. We observed that neutrophilic airway inflammation is higher in women with obesity, but not men with obesity, highlighting a potential mechanism to explain the increased asthma severity observed in females with asthma. We also show that biologic treatment is effective in reducing asthma symptoms and exacerbations in patients with severe asthma and obesity, despite no effect on lung function; thus supporting its efficacy in people with severe asthma and obesity. Given the poorer outcomes observed in this population, targeted treatment of obesity as part of the management of asthma may provide additional benefit beyond standard asthma care. More research is warranted to better understand the sex-based differences in obesity-related asthma as well as the ideal treatment approach for this population.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 1. (215.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the TSANZ registry team and the Australasian Severe Asthma Network for their support with data collection and management for this manuscript.

Abbreviations

ACQ

Asthma Control Questionnaire

ACT

Asthma Control Test

AQLQ

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire

ASAR

Australasian Severe Asthma Registry

BMI

Body Mass Index

COPD

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

FeNO

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide

FEV1

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1-second

FVC

Forced Vital Capacity

GORD

Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease

ICS

Inhaled Corticosteroids

OCS

Oral Corticosteroids

ICU

Intensive care unit

OSA

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

VAO

Variable Airflow Obstruction

VCD

Vocal Cord Dysfunction

Authors’ contributions

HAS, JL, ED, AB, PG and PMH conceptualised the study. HAS analysed the data. All authors interpreted the data, contributed to writing the manuscript, and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Nil.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Australasian Severe Asthma Registry (ASAR) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the ASAR.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Prior to 2019, all patients provided written, informed consent. To ensure a representative population, a transition to opt-out consent was approved by the Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care in 2019. ASAR is under the governance of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ). Recruitment commenced in 2013, with systematic, de-identified, annual data collection via an electronic data capture system (REDCap) [15]. Ethical approval was obtained according to each site’s Human Research Ethics Committee in Australia (2019/ETH03836) and New Zealand (2/CEN/69/AM09).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Unrelated to this study, Joy Lee has received speaker fees from Sanofi, GSK, Inside Practice, United Clinical, National Asthma Council and AstraZeneca. She has received travel grants from GSK, Sanofi and AstraZeneca. She is on the leadership committee of the National Allergy Centre of Excellence and has served on an advisory board for AstraZeneca. Peter Middleton has received grants from the National Health and Medical Research Centre (Ideas Grant #2036793), HCF Australia, Canadian Institutes of Health and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, the Limbic, MedEd and vertex unrelated to this study. Eve Denton declares speaker fees from Sanofi, GSK and Boehringer Ingelheim, travel grants from Menerini, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, research funding from AstraZeneca in conjunction with Optimum Patient Care Global Ltd and grants to her institution from AstraZeneca GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and Seqirus, for unrelated projects. Adrian Barnett has received speaker fees from GSK, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim and travel grants from AstraZeneca and GSK. Philip Hansbro was supported by a fellowship and grants from the NHMRC (1175134, 2010287, 2008937) and by University of Technology, Sydney. Hayley Scott and Paul Griffiths declare they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.ABS. Asthma Latest release Contains key statistics and information about asthma and its prevalence in Australia 2022. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health-conditions-and-risks/asthma/latest-release.
  • 2.Chung KF, Wenzel SE, Brozek JL, Bush A, Castro M, Sterk PJ, et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(2):343–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Foster JM, McDonald VM, Guo M, Reddel HK. I have lost in every facet of my life: the hidden burden of severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(3). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4.GINA. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2025 Available from. https://www.ginasthma.org.
  • 5.Hiles SA, Harvey ES, McDonald VM, Peters M, Bardin P, Reynolds PN, et al. Working while unwell: Workplace impairment in people with severe asthma. Clin experimental allergy: J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;48(6):650–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sadatsafavi M, Lynd L, Marra C, Carleton B, Tan WC, Sullivan S, et al. Direct health care costs associated with asthma in British Columbia. Can Respir J. 2010;17(2):74–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Phelps NH, Singleton RK, Zhou B, Heap RA, Mishra A, Bennett JE, et al. Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2024;403(10431):1027–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Beuther DA, Sutherland ER. Overweight, Obesity, and Incident Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(7):661–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li X, Cao X, Guo M, Xie M, Liu X. Trends and risk factors of mortality and disability adjusted life years for chronic respiratory diseases from 1990 to 2017: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ. 2020;368:m234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Desai D, Newby C, Symon FA, Haldar P, Shah S, Gupta S, et al. Elevated Sputum Interleukin-5 and Submucosal Eosinophilia in Obese Individuals with Severe Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(6):657–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scott HA, Gibson PG, Garg ML, Wood LG. Airway inflammation is augmented by obesity and fatty acids in asthma. Eur Respir J. 2011;38(3):594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sharma V, Cowan DC. Obesity, Inflammation, and Severe Asthma: an Update. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021;21(12):46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Peters U, Dixon AE, Forno E. Obesity and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(4):1169–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alemao CA, Budden KF, Gomez HM, Rehman SF, Marshall JE, Shukla SD, et al. Impact of diet and the bacterial microbiome on the mucous barrier and immune disorders. Allergy. 2020;76(3):714–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.GINA. Diagnosis and Management of Difficult-to-treat and Severe Asthma in adolescent and adult patients 2019. April 2019: Available from: https://ginasthma.org/severeasthma/.
  • 17.Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Epstein RS, Ferrie PJ, Jaeschke R, Hiller TK. Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials. Thorax. 1992;47(2):76–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, et al. Development of the asthma control test☆A survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(1):59–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Juniper EF, O′byrne PM, Gh G, Pj F. King Dr. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J. 1999;14(4):902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gibson PG, Yang IA, Upham JW, Reynolds PN, Hodge S, James AL, et al. Effect of azithromycin on asthma exacerbations and quality of life in adults with persistent uncontrolled asthma (AMAZES): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10095):659–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gibson PG, Wlodarczyk JW, Hensley MJ, Gleeson M, Henry RL, Cripps AW, et al. Epidemiological association of airway inflammation with asthma symptoms and airway hyperresponsiveness in childhood. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(1):36–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brooks CR, Gibson PG, Douwes J, Van Dalen CJ, Simpson JL. Relationship between airway neutrophilia and ageing in asthmatics and non-asthmatics. Respirol (Carlton Vic). 2013;18(5):857–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dixon AE, Holguin F, Sood A, Salome CM, Pratley RE, Beuther DA, et al. An official American Thoracic Society Workshop report: obesity and asthma. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2010;7(5):325–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gibeon D, Batuwita K, Osmond M, Heaney LG, Brightling CE, Niven R, et al. Obesity-Associated Severe Asthma Represents a Distinct Clinical Phenotype Analysis of the British Thoracic Society Difficult Asthma Registry Patient Cohort According to BMI. Chest. 2013;143(2):406–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang E, Wechsler ME, Tran TN, Heaney LG, Jones RC, Menzies-Gow AN, et al. Characterization of Severe Asthma Worldwide: Data From the International Severe Asthma Registry. Chest. 2020;157(4):790–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Engin A. The Definition and Prevalence of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;960:1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ray A, Bonorden MJL, Pandit R, Nkhata KJ, Bishayee A. Infections and immunity: associations with obesity and related metabolic disorders. J Pathol translational Med. 2023;57(1):28–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Haldar P, Pavord ID, Shaw DE, Berry MA, Thomas M, Brightling CE, et al. Cluster analysis and clinical asthma phenotypes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(3):218–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moore WC, Hastie AT, Li X, Li H, Busse WW, Jarjour NN, et al. Sputum neutrophil counts are associated with more severe asthma phenotypes using cluster analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(6):1557–e635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ilmarinen P, Tuomisto LE, Niemelä O, Tommola M, Haanpää J, Kankaanranta H. Cluster Analysis on Longitudinal Data of Patients with Adult-Onset Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunology: Pract. 2017;5(4):967–e783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fingleton J, Travers J, Williams M, Charles T, Bowles D, Strik R, et al. Treatment responsiveness of phenotypes of symptomatic airways obstruction in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(3):601–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sutherland ER, Goleva E, King TS, Lehman E, Stevens AD, Jackson LP, et al. Cluster Analysis of Obesity and Asthma Phenotypes. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Scott HA, Ng SH, McLoughlin RF, Valkenborghs SR, Nair P, Brown AC, et al. Effect of obesity on airway and systemic inflammation in adults with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2023;78(10):957–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Singh P, Covassin N, Marlatt K, Gadde KM, Heymsfield SB. Obesity, Body Composition, and Sex Hormones: Implications for Cardiovascular Risk. Comprehensive Physiology: Wiley; 2021. pp. 2949–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chang E, Varghese M, Singer K. Gender and Sex Differences in Adipose Tissue. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(9):69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Australian Bureau of Statistics. Causes of Death, Australia, 2024 – Latest release. 14 November 2025. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/causes-death-australia/latest-release.
  • 37.Skobeloff EM. The Effect of the Menstrual Cycle on Asthma Presentations in the Emergency Department. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(16):1837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.McCleary N, Nwaru BI, Nurmatov UB, Critchley H, Sheikh A. Endogenous and exogenous sex steroid hormones in asthma and allergy in females: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(4):1510–e38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wood LG, Garg ML, Gibson PG. A high-fat challenge increases airway inflammation and impairs bronchodilator recovery in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(5):1133–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wood LG, Li Q, Scott HA, Rutting S, Berthon BS, Gibson PG, et al. Saturated fatty acids, obesity, and the nucleotide oligomerization domain–like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(1):305–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pepys J, Lombardi C, Comberiati P, Landi M, Berti A, Heffler E, et al. Small airway dysfunction and obesity in asthmatic patients: a dangerous liaison? Explor Asthma Allergy. 2023;1(3):73–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ladosky W, Botelho MAM, Albuquerque JP. Chest mechanics in morbidly obese non-hypoventilated patients. Respir Med. 2001;95(4):281–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jones RL, Nzekwu M-MU. The Effects of Body Mass Index on Lung Volumes. Chest. 2006;130(3):827–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dixon AE, Peters U. The effect of obesity on lung function. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2018;12(9):755–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Klepaker G, Henneberger PK, Hertel JK, Holla ØL, Kongerud J, Fell AKM. Influence of asthma and obesity on respiratory symptoms, work ability and lung function: findings from a cross-sectional Norwegian population study. BMJ Open Respiratory Res. 2021;8(1):e000932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sorkness RL, Bleecker ER, Busse WW, Calhoun WJ, Castro M, Chung KF, et al. Lung function in adults with stable but severe asthma: air trapping and incomplete reversal of obstruction with bronchodilation. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(2):394–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hoftman N, Eikermann E, Shin J, Buckley J, Navab K, Abtin F, et al. Utilizing Forced Vital Capacity to Predict Low Lung Compliance and Select Intraoperative Tidal Volume During Thoracic Surgery. Anesth Analgesia. 2017;125(6):1922–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nanzer AM, Taylor V, Hearn AP, Kavanagh JE, Patrick T, Green L, et al. The impact of steroid-sparing biologic therapies on weight loss in obese individuals with severe eosinophilic asthma. Eur Respir J. 2023;62(2):2300245. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 49.Albers FC, Papi A, Taillé C, Bratton DJ, Bradford ES, Yancey SW, et al. Mepolizumab reduces exacerbations in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, irrespective of body weight/body mass index: meta-analysis of MENSA and MUSCA. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Gonem S, Redmond C, Busby J, Patel P, Jackson DJ, Mansur AH, et al. Effects of Obesity on Response to Asthma Biologic Treatment: Longitudinal Data From the United Kingdom Severe Asthma Registry. J Allergy Clin Immunology: Pract. 2025;13(11):3002–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Oliveira MJ, Vieira M, Coutinho D, Ladeira I, Pascoal I, Ferreira J, et al. Severe asthma in obese patients: Improvement of lung function after treatment with omalizumab. Pulmonology. 2019;25(1):15–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1. (215.9KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Australasian Severe Asthma Registry (ASAR) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the ASAR.


Articles from Respiratory Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES