Abstract
Background
Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) were listed on the WHO bacterial priority pathogens list in 2017. These gram-negative bacteria often cause healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), which pose an increasing threat to public health. This study aimed to isolate and identify CRPAs and CRABs from a tertiary care hospital in central Nepal and characterize carbapenem resistance genes at the molecular level.
Materials and methods
A total of 59 isolates, including 27 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 32 Acinetobacter baumannii, were collected from different clinical samples from April 2021 to December 2022. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined via the Kirby disc diffusion method. The modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) was used for phenotypic confirmation of carbapenem resistance. Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect carbapenem resistance genes.
Results
Among the 59 isolates, 76.3% were multidrug resistant (MDR), 63.0% were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), and 62.7% were carbapenem resistant. Among the carbapenem-resistant isolates (n = 37), 75.7% of metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) producers and 70.3% carried at least one carbapenem resistance gene. The blaCTX−M gene was predominant among the ESBL-positive isolates, present in 58.8% of the P. aeruginosa isolates and 87.5% of the A. baumannii isolates, whereas 29% of both isolates harbored the blaTEM gene. Among the CR-PA isolates, 58.3% carried blaVIM−2, 16.7% carried blaNDM−1, and 8.33% carried blaOXA−23. Among the CR-AB isolates, 56% harbored blaOXA−23, 32% carried blaNDM−1, 16% had both blaNDM−1 and blaOXA−23, and 8% contained both blaOXA−58 and blaOXA−23.
Conclusion
This study highlights a significant burden of MDR and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, with the co-occurrence of carbapenem resistance genes, in a clinical setting in Nepal. Our findings suggest that active surveillance of antibiotic resistance in pathogens could inform clinicians and healthcare providers about the treatment of infections.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-026-05377-x.
Keywords: Carbapenem resistance, ESBLs, MBL, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, Co-occurrence, Nepal
Introduction
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii are included in the ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) group of pathogens identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as critical-priority pathogens [1], indicating urgent interventions with novel antibiotics. These are non-lactose-fermenting gram-negative bacteria (NLF-GNB) and are epidemiologically significant as opportunistic pathogens [2], which often cause hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), such as catheter-associated urinary tract infections, surgical site infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bacteremia, septicemia, meningitis, malignant external otitis, intra-abdominal infection, and wound infections [3]. The ability of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa in a hospital environment enhances antimicrobial resistance, posing a notable mortality threat, especially in developing countries such as Nepal [4]. Infections caused by these bacteria pose a treatment challenge because of their emerging intrinsic and acquired resistance to different classes of antibiotics worldwide [5]. Carbapenem, a broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotic, is frequently used as a “last-line” drug of choice for the empirical treatment of critically ill patients infected with these bacteria [6].
Over the past two decades, the burden of antibiotic resistance related to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteremia has increased substantially in Nepal due to the widespread use of antibiotics [7, 8]. Previous reports have shown that last-resort antibiotics such as carbapenems and polymyxin are used excessively in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) in healthcare settings [9]. Recent studies have shown high carbapenem resistance among E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa in Southeast Asia, including Nepal [6, 10, 11].
A recent study in Nepal reported that more than 75% of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii are phenotypically carbapenem-resistant [12, 13]. Additionally, these pathogens are highly resistant to multiple antibiotics due to intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms, including biofilm formation, enzymatic inactivation, porin loss, and efflux pump formation. Beta-lactam hydrolyzing enzymes such as Ambler class D (oxacillinase-23, 24, 58, and 143), Ambler class B (metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs): IMP, VIM, NDM, SPM, GIM, and SIM), and Ambler class A (extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs): TEM, SHV, and CTX) are responsible for antibiotic resistance in these bacterial isolates [2].
Coinfection by these pathogens leads to severe disease, leading to deadly outcomes [4]. Moreover, the prevalence of these two pathogens and their antibiotic resistance is greater in Nepal [12, 13]. This highlights the importance of focusing on P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii from the ESKAPE group because of their high resistance, nosocomial prevalence, and clinical severity. However, few studies have reported carbapenemase-associated genes in CR-PA and CR-AB isolates in this region [14, 15]. Extensive information on the distribution of carbapenemase enzymes and associated genes in CR-PA and CR-AB within clinical settings remains limited. In particular, the distribution of major resistance genes and their correlation with phenotypic resistance patterns remains insufficiently characterized. Our study aimed to identify phenotypes and genotypes to characterize carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa from a tertiary care hospital in central Nepal. Genotypic testing is essential for accurate antibiotic susceptibility results, as it reveals the prevalence and types of carbapenemase-encoding genes carried by phenotypically antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the clinical setting [9]. The findings of this study might aid in understanding local antibiotic resistance surveillance and genetic epidemiological data for antibiotic stewardship programs and in developing a new strategic action plan for the treatment of MDR and carbapenem-resistant isolates for clinicians or healthcare providers in Nepal.
Materials and methods
Ethical considerations
Ethical approval (IRC no. 077/78/54) was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Committee of the KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Tribhuvan University. Informed consent was obtained from each participant after clearly mentioning the benefits and possible outcomes of this study. After obtaining consent, demographic information was recorded. The personal details of the participants were kept confidential and archived.
Study design, site, and period
A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2021 to December 2022 at the KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital (KMCTH) located in Lalitpur and the Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Nepal. The clinical specimens were collected and processed at the microbiology and molecular laboratory, KMCTH, for bacterial isolation and identification. The isolates identified as P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii were further investigated for carbapenem resistance phenotypically and genotypically at the Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University.
Study population and Sample collection
The study population was considered from inpatients and outpatients visiting KMCTH, including all age groups and both genders. A total of 1207 non-duplicated clinical samples, including wound swabs/pus, sputum, urine, blood, tracheal aspirates, and catheter tips, were randomly collected aseptically in clean, sterile, wide-mouth and leak-proof containers, appropriate for each specimen type, following standard microbiological guidelines. The properly labeled sample with no visible signs of contamination was accepted; otherwise, a repeat sample was requested. Patient samples with incomplete demographic information, unlabeled or duplicated samples, and contaminated samples were excluded from the study.
Specimen culture for bacterial isolation and identification
All clinical specimens were inoculated on blood agar, MacConkey agar, and chocolate agar (Himedia Laboratories, India) for bacterial isolation, which was subsequently incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The blood specimens were collected under aseptic conditions and diluted in BHI broth in a ratio of 1:10 and thoroughly mixed to ensure homogeneity. The BHI broth was incubated at 37 °C for 96 h, with subcultures transferred onto blood agar, chocolate agar, and MacConkey agar plates at 24-hour intervals. Blood agar and chocolate agar plates were incubated in a 5–10% CO₂ containing incubator for 24 h [16, 17]. After incubation, colony morphology characterization, Gram staining, and biochemical tests were performed to identify the isolates. Furthermore, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii must be confirmed via special characteristic tests.
In brief, P. aeruginosa isolates were identified as non-lactose fermenting, grew aerobically on MacConkey agar, gram-negative, slender rods that exhibited motility, catalase, and oxidase, both positive, citrate-positive, alkaline/alkaline reaction without H₂S production on Triple Sugar Iron (TSI) agar, urease-negative, thrived at 42 °C, and were greenish pigmented on cetrimide agar (Himedia Laboratories, India) [18].
Similarly, Acinetobacter spp. were initially identified as non-lactose-fermenting, gram-negative cocobacilli, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative, non-motile, indole-negative, citrate-positive, urease-negative, alkaline/alkaline reaction without H₂S production on Triple Sugar Iron (TSI) agar, with aerobic growth on MacConkey agar at 44 °C [19]. Further, genotypic identification of A. baumannii was subsequently performed by detecting the blaOXA−51 gene, an intrinsic marker of A. baumannii [19].
Pure cultures of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates were preserved in tryptic soy broth (TSB) supplemented with 40% glycerol until further experiments and stored at -80 °C.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
To test the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the isolates, the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method was performed on Mueller–Hinton agar (Hi-media Laboratories, India), and the results were interpreted according to CLSI (2020) [20]. The following antimicrobial discs were used for breakpoint determination: piperacillin (PI; 100 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (PIT; 100/10 µg), ceftriaxone (CTR; 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ; 30 µg), cefotaxime (CTX; 30 µg), cefepime (CPM; 30 µg), aztreonam (AT; 30 µg), imipenem (IMP; 10 µg), meropenem (MRP; 10 µg), amikacin (AK; 30 µg), gentamicin (GEN; 10 µg), and ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5 µg). (Himedia Laboratories, India). We considered MDR isolates that were resistant to two or more antibiotics from different classes, such as beta-lactam, β-lactam combination, aminoglycoside, carbapenem, and fluoroquinolone antibiotic classes [14].
Phenotypic detection of ESBLs
The isolates that were resistant to cefotaxime (30 µg) and/or ceftazidime (30 µg) were tested for ESBL production via combined disc methods involving the use of ceftazidime (30 µg) and ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (30 µg/10 µg) discs and cefotaxime (30 µg) and cefotaxime/clavulanic acid (30 µg/10 µg) discs. A disc was placed 20 mm apart, and a zone of ≥ 5 mm in the cefotaxime or ceftazidime with clavulanic acid disc compared with the cefotaxime or ceftazidime disc alone was considered positive for ESBL production after overnight culture on MHA plates [20].
Phenotypic detection of carbapenem-resistant
Bacterial isolates that showed intermediate resistance or resistance to imipenem or meropenem were suspected to be carbapenemase producers [21]. The modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) was employed to detect carbapenemase production in isolates. An ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) synergy test was used to confirm metallo-β-lactamase production.
Briefly, a 10-µL loopful of test organism was obtained from an overnight culture on a BA plate and mixed into 2 mL of tryptic soy broth (TSB). The mixture was vortexed for 10–15 s, and a 10-µg meropenem disk was added to each tube using sterile forceps, ensuring the entire disk was immersed in the suspension. Incubation was carried out at 37 °C for 4 h ± 15 min. Meanwhile, a 0.5 McFarland turbidity solution of E. coli ATCC 25,922 was prepared in NB. The MHA plate was then inoculated with E. coli ATCC 25,922 following standard procedures. The plates were allowed to dry for 5–10 min before the meropenem disks were added. The meropenem disk from each TSB meropenem disk suspension was slowly extracted. The flat side of the loop was pressed against the edge of the disk to leverage surface tension and extract the disk from the liquid. The loop was then gently dragged and compressed along the inside edge of the tube to clear any excess inoculated media from the disk before placing it on the MHA plate inoculated with the meropenem-susceptible E. coli ATCC 25,922 indicator strain. Up to four disks were placed on a 90 mm MHA plate. The MHA plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h, after which the inhibition zones were analyzed according to standard disk diffusion methods [22]. For screening of MBL, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was used for synergistic effects with imipenem discs [imipenem and imipenem + EDTA (10 µg/750 µg)], and the zone of inhibition was compared with that of imipenem alone for the screening of MBL producers [23].
MIC test for carbapenem
The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a carbapenem (meropenem) for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii was determined via the agar dilution method [20]. The test was performed independently in duplicate samples, and discrepant results were repeated. Briefly, a twofold dilution series of meropenem at different concentrations (0.5–1024 µg/mL) was incorporated into MHA plates. Bacterial suspensions were prepared from fresh overnight pure cultures and adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Then, bacterial suspension was diluted to a 1:10 ratio in NB and spotted 1 µL onto each of the meropenem-containing agar plates, and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. The E. coli ATCC 25,922 was included in each testing batch as a quality control strain, whereas the negative control was considered the only culture medium used to ensure sterility. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C, the MIC readings were recorded and interpreted according to the CLSI M100 [20]. The results were accepted only when MIC values fell within CLSI-recommended ranges for the quality control strain. Isolates with carbapenem MICs of ≥ 8 µg/mL were considered resistant, those with MICs of 4 µg/mL were considered intermediate, and those with MICs of ≤ 2 µg/mL were considered susceptible [20].
Molecular detection of ESBL- and carbapenemase-encoding genes
The extraction of plasmid DNA from bacterial cultures in the logarithmic growth phase was conducted via the phenol: chloroform method [24]. The quality and purity of the extracted DNA template were assessed using NanoDrop measurements (NanoDrop, Thermo Scientific, USA).
The single-plex PCR assay was carried out via a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, USA) with primer pairs (Macrogen, Korea) for blaCTX−M, blaTEM, blaNDM−1, blaVIM−2, blaOXA−23, blaOXA−51, and blaOXA−58 to detect beta-lactamase genes [] (Supplementary information, S1 Table). The reaction was carried out in a total volume of 25 µL (12.5 µL of 1X FIREpol Master Mix (Solis Biodyne, Estonia), 3 µL of template genomic DNA, 3.0 µL of 10 picomole primers (1.5 µL of forward primer and 1.5 µL of reverse primer), and 6.5 µLof nuclease-free water). The PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%) with DNA-stained safe dye (Sigma–Aldrich, Germany) at 70 V for 50 min. The amplified ESBL and carbapenemase genes were visualized in a gel documentation system (Azure Biosystems, USA), and band sizes were compared along with a 100 bp DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific, USA).
Previously confirmed carbapenemase- and ESBL-producing isolates were used as positive controls for PCR amplification, including blaNDM−1, blaOXA−23, blaOXA−51, and blaOXA−58, producing Acinetobacter baumannii strains provided by Prof. Dr. Balaji Veeraraghavan, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India [25]; blaVIM−2, producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa, provided by Anil Shah from Annapurna Neurological Institute and Allied Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal [15] and blaTEM and blaCTX−M genes producing clinical isolates of E. coli, maintained in our department [26] were used as positive controls, and nuclease-free water was used as a negative control in each PCR run.
Quality control
The sterility of freshly prepared culture media was confirmed by incubating 5% of the plates at 37 °C for 24 h to check for potential contamination. All antibiotic discs and Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) were inspected for manufacture, expiration date, and lot number, and stored under appropriate conditions. The quality of antibiotic disks was assessed with E. coli ATCC 25,922 by the AST method.
Data analysis and interpretation
All the study data were entered into the worksheet of the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Software (Student version) and were used to analyze the data. The data and results were presented using percentages, rates, and inferential statistics. Comparative analyses were performed on bacterial species with specimen type, hospitalization status (inpatient/outpatient), age group, gender, and resistance phenotypes (ESBL, MBL, and carbapenem resistance) to identify factors potentially associated with antimicrobial resistance and to describe the rate of resistant isolates. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The figure was created via GraphPad Prism software.
Results
During the study period, 1,207 clinical specimens were collected and analyzed. Among the 1207 clinical specimens, 22.5% (95% CI: 20.2–24.8; n = 272/1207) showed bacterial growth. Out of the 272 total bacterial culture positives, 20.2% (95% CI: 15.4–25.0; n = 50/272) were gram-positive, and 79.8% (95% CI: 75.0-84.6; n = 217/272) were gram-negative (S-Fig. 1). Among the total gram-negative isolates, 14.7% (10.0-19.4; n = 32/217) were A. baumannii, and 12.5% (8.1–16.9; n = 27/217) were P. aeruginosa.
Distribution of NLF-GNB isolates, MDR, ESBL, carbapenem resistance, and MBL-producing isolates, with demographic data (age and sex) and hospital settings, is described in Table 1. Among the isolates, a higher prevalence of MDR, carbapenem resistance, ESBL, and MBL producers was detected in females than in males, but the difference was not statistically significant. In the age group category, a higher rate of MDR (37.8%; n = 17/45) was found in the 41–60-year age group, followed by the 21–40-year and older age groups (≥ 61 years). In contrast, carbapenem-resistant, ESBL-producing, and MBL-producing isolates were more prevalent in the younger age group (21–40 years), followed by the 41–60 years and ≥ 61 years age groups. The predominant MDR and carbapenem-resistant isolates were found in inpatient populations rather than in OPD patients. However, there was no statistically significant difference between these two groups of the population (Table 1).
Table 1.
Distributions of NLF-GNB, MDR, ESBL, Carbapenem-resistant, and MBL among demographic groups
| Variables | Total isolate (n = 59) | MDR (n = 45/59) | ESBL(n = 24/59) | Carbapenem Resistant (n = 37/59) | MBL (n = 28/59) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics |
P. aeruginosa
(n = 27) |
A. baumannii
(n = 32) |
P. aeruginosa
(n = 19) |
A. baumannii
(n = 26) |
P. aeruginosa
(n = 17) |
A. baumannii
(n = 7) |
P. aeruginosa
(n = 12) |
A. baumannii (n = 25) | P. aeruginosa (n = 10) | A. baumannii (n = 18) |
| Gender (n/% at 95% CI)* | ||||||||||
| Male |
13/48.1 (95% CI: 29.2–67.0) |
14/43.7 (95% CI: 26.5–60.9) |
9/47.4 (95% CI: 22.4–70.4) |
11/42.3 (95% CI: 23.3–61.3) |
9/52.9 (95% CI: 28.9–76.9) |
2/28.6 (95% CI: -4.4-61.6) |
5/41.7 (95% CI: 13.7–69.7) |
9/36.0 (95% CI: 17.0–55.0) |
5/50.0 (95% CI: 19.0–81.0) |
7/38.9 (95% CI: 15.9–61.9) |
| Female |
14/51.9 (95% CI: 33.0-70.8) |
18/56.3 (95% CI: 39.1–73.5) |
10/52.6 (95% CI: 29.6–75.6) |
15/57.7 (95% CI: 38.7–76.7) |
8/47.1 (95% CI: 23.1–71.1) |
5/71.4 (95% CI: 38.4-104.4) |
7/58.3 (95% CI: 30.3–86.3) |
16/64.0 (95% CI: 45.0–83.0) |
5/50.0 (95% CI: 19.0–81.0) |
11/61.1 (95% CI: 38.1–84.1) |
| Age Group (Years) (n/% at 95% CI)* | ||||||||||
| ≤ 20 |
2/7.4 (95% CI: -2.4-17.2) |
5/15.6 (95% CI: 3.0-28.2) |
1/5.3 (95% CI: -4.8-15.4) |
5/19.2 (95% CI: 4.1–34.3) |
1/5.9 (95% CI: -5.3-17.1) |
1/14.3 (95% CI: -11.6-40.2) |
- |
4/16.0 (95% CI: 1.6–30.4) |
- |
4/22.2 (95% CI: 3.0-41.4) |
| 21–40 |
6/22.2 (95% CI: 6.5–37.9) |
13/40.7 (95% CI: 23.7–55.7) |
5/26.3 (95% CI: 6.5–46.1) |
10/38.5 (95% CI: 19.8–57.2) |
5/29.4 (95% CI: 7.8–51.0) |
4/57.1 (95% CI: 20.5–93.7) |
3/25.0 (95% CI: 0.5–49.5) |
10/40.0 (95% CI: 20.8–59.2) |
3/30.0 (95% CI: 1.6–58.4) |
8/44.4 (95% CI: 21.4–67.4) |
| 41–60 |
9/33.3 (95% CI: 15.5–55.1) |
9/28.1 (95% CI: 12.8–43.4) |
7/36.8 (95% CI: 15.1–58.5) |
8/30.8 (95% CI: 13.1–48.5) |
6/35.3 (95% CI: 12.6–58.0) |
2/28.6 (95% CI: -4.9-62.1) |
4/33.3 (95% CI: 6.7–59.9) |
8/32.0 (95% CI: 13.7–50.3) |
4/40.0 (95% CI: 9.6–70.4) |
3/16.7 (95% CI: -0.5-33.9) |
| ≥ 61 |
10/37.1 (95% CI: 18.9–55.3) |
5/15.6 (95% CI: 3.0-28.2) |
6/31.6 (95% CI: 10.7–52.5) |
3/11.5 (95% CI: 0.8–23.8) |
5/29.4 (95% CI: 7.8–51.0) |
- |
5/41.7 (95% CI: 13.8–69.6) |
3/12.0 (95% CI: 0.7–24.7) |
3/30.0 (95% CI: 1.6–58.4) |
3/16.7 (95% CI: -0.5-33.9) |
| Hospital Setting (n/%at 95% CI)* | ||||||||||
| Inpatients |
15/55.6 (95% CI: 36.9–74.3) |
21/65.6 (95% CI: 49.1–82.1) |
12/63.2 (95% CI: 41.5–85.5) |
16/61.5 (95% CI: 42.8–80.2) |
8/47.1 (95% CI: 23.4–70.8) |
5/71.4 (95% CI: 37.9-104.9) |
8/66.7 (95% CI: 40.2–93.2) |
19/76.0 (95% CI: 59.3–92.7) |
6/60.0 (95% CI: 30.0–90.0) |
13/72.2 (95% CI: 55.7–88.7) |
| Outpatients |
12/44.4 (95% CI: 25.7–63.1) |
11/34.4 (95% CI: 17.9–50.9) |
7/36.8 (95% CI: 15.1–58.5) |
10/38.5 (95% CI: 17.1–54.5) |
9/52.9 (95% CI: 29.2–76.6) |
2/28.6 (95% CI: -4.9-62.1) |
4/33.3 (95% CI: 6.8–59.8) |
6/24.0 (95% CI: 7.3–40.7) |
4/40.0 (95% CI: 10.0–70.0) |
5/27.8 (95% CI: 11.3–44.3) |
MDR Multidrug resistant, ESBL Extended-spectrum β-Lactamase, MBL Metallo-β-Lactamase
*A simple proportion-based prevalence CI at 95% level of significance calculation for n ≤ 50
In total, most of the isolates were obtained from sputum samples (40.7%, n = 24), followed by pus/wound swabs (20.3%, n = 12) (Table 2). We found a significant difference in the distribution of NLF-GNB isolates among different types of samples (p = 0.0253).
Table 2.
Prevalence of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii in different samples collected from inpatients and outpatients
| Specimen | Inpatients (n = 36) | Outpatients (n = 23) | Total (n = 59) (n/% at 95% CI)* |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
P. aeruginosa (n = 18) (n/%) |
A. baumannii (n = 18) (n/%) |
P. aeruginosa (n = 9) (n/%) |
A. baumannii (n = 14) (n/%) |
||
| Sputum | 5 (27.8) | 9 (50.0) | 3 (33.3) | 7 (50.0) | 24 (40.7; 95% CI:28.1–52.5) |
| Pus/Wound swabs | 6 (33.4) | 2 (11.1) | 3 (33.3) | 1 (7.1) | 12 (20.3; 95% CI:10.2–30.5) |
| Urine | 5 (27.8) | - | 2 (22.2) | 2 (14.3) | 9 (15.3; 95% CI: 6.8–22.0) |
| Blood | 1 (5.5) | 3 (16.7) | - | 2 (14.3) | 6 (10.2; 95% CI: 1.7–18.6) |
| Tips (ET, Catheter & Foleys) | 1 (5.5) | 4 (22.2) | 1 (11.1) | 2 (14.3) | 8 (13.5;95% CI: 4.8–22.2) |
*A simple proportion-based prevalence CI at the 95% level was calculated for the total isolated and not applicable for the subgroup data due to the small frequency
Antimicrobial susceptibility test of the isolates
The majority of P. aeruginosa (n = 27) isolates were resistant to ceftazidime (63%), followed by gentamicin (59.3%) (Table S3). In the case of A. baumannii (n = 32), the highest level of resistance was observed against ceftriaxone (96.1%), followed by ceftazidime (93.7%), cefotaxime (87.5%), piperacillin (87.5%), ciprofloxacin (87.5%), piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime (84.4%), gentamicin (81.3%), and carbapenem (78.1%).
Carbapenem-resistant (CR) isolates
Among the 59 isolates, 62.7% (n = 37/59) were resistant to both meropenem and imipenem (carbapenem) (Table S3). The highest percentage of CR isolates was found in sputum samples (37.8%, n = 14/37), followed by pus/wound swabs (21.6%, n = 8/37) and tips, including ETs, catheters, and Foleys (6.2%, n = 6/37). The frequency of CR isolates significantly differed according to the specimen type (p = 0.0253) (Table S2).
Of the 37 CR isolates, the MIC values of meropenem for P. aeruginosa (n = 12) and A. baumanni (n = 25) ranged from 0.5 µg/mL to 512 µg/mL and from 0.5 µg/mL to 256 µg/mL, respectively. The MIC50 is higher in A. baumanni (64 µg/mL), and the MIC90 is higher in P. aeruginosa (256 µg/mL) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), MIC Range, MIC50, and MIC90 against meropenem (carbapenem) among the isolates
| MIC value of Carbapenem (Meropenem) (µg/mL) |
Organism | |
|---|---|---|
| P. aeruginosa (n = 27) | A. baumannii (n = 32) | |
| 0.5 | 3 | 1 |
| 1 | 4 | 1 |
| 2 | 5 | 2 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 |
| 8 | 2 | 1 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1 | 1 |
| 64 | 1 | 15 |
| 128 | 5 | 7 |
| 256 | 4 | 2 |
| 512 | 1 | 0 |
| MIC Range | 0.5–512 | 0.5–512 |
| MIC50 | 8 | 64 |
| MIC90 | 256 | 128 |
MIC Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, µg/mL Concentration of antibiotic in microgram per milliliter, MIC50 MIC value at which growth was inhibited in 50% of isolates, MIC90 MIC value at which growth was inhibited in 90% of isolates
Prevalence of multidrug-resistant, ESBL-producing, and carbapenemase-producing NLF-GNB strains
Among the 59 isolates, 45 (76.3%) were confirmed as MDR isolates, among which 57.8% (n = 26/45) were A. baumannii and 42.2% (n = 19/45) were P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, of the 59 NLF-GNB isolates, 24 were confirmed to be ESBL positive, and P. aeruginosa (n = 17) was more common than A. baumannii (n = 7). Additionally, 62.7% (n = 37/59) were carbapenem-resistant, and a higher contribution was A. baumannii (n = 25/37). Whereas 75.7% (n = 28/37) carbapenem-resistant isolates were metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-positive, comprising 64.3% (n = 18/28) were A. baumannii and 35.7% (n = 10/18) were P. aeruginosa. The frequencies of MDR, ESBL, and carbapenemase-producing NLF-GNB (MBL) strains are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4.
Distributions of MDR, CR, ESBL, and MBL among NLF-GNB isolates
| Features | Bacterial isolates (n/% at 95% CI) | Total (n/% at 95% CI) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. aeruginosa (n = 27) | A. baumannii (n = 32) | (n = 59) | ||
| MDR | 19 (70.4; 95% CI: 53.6–87.0) | 26 (81.3; 95% CI: 68.4–93.2) | 45 (76.3;95% CI:62.0-86.2) | 0.328 |
| ESBL | 17 (62.9; 95% CI: 44.3–84.1) | 7 (21.9; 95% CI:8.8–38.5) | 24 (40.7; 95% CI:29.0-53.3) | *0.001 |
| CR | 12 (44.4; 95% CI: 25.0-68.3) | 25 (78.1;95% CI:66.7–93.6) | 37 (62.7; 95% CI:50.1–57.3) | *0.008 |
| MBL | 10 (37.0; 95% CI:18.2–56.4) | 18 (56.3; 95% CI:41.3–71.2) | 28 (47.5; 95% CI:33.2–59.3) | 0.141 |
A simple proportion-based prevalence CI at 95% level of significance calculation for n ≤ 50
MDR Multidrug resistant, ESBL Extended-spectrum β-Lactamase, CR Carbapenem resistant, MBL Metallo-β-Lactamase
*Statistically significant (P < 0.05)
Distribution of ESBL genes
A total of 24 isolates of the 59 were phenotypically ESBL-positive, where 66.7% (n = 16/24) P. aeruginosa and 29.2% (n = 7/24) A. baumannii were examined for the presence of ESBL-encoding genes via PCR. Among them, 25% (n = 6/24) of the isolates harbored both the blaCTX−M and blaTEM genes (four of the P. aeruginosa isolates and two of the A. baumannii isolates). A higher frequency of blaCTX−M was detected in ESBL-positive A. baumannii (n = 5/7; 71.4%), whereas blaTEM was more frequent in P. aeruginosa (25.0%; n = 4/16) (Table S4 and Fig. 1A).
Fig. 1.

The presence of single genes or the occurrence of ESBL (A) and carbapenemase (B) genes in P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii
Distribution and co-occurrence of carbapenemase genes
All the isolates (n = 59) were examined for the presence of four carbapenemase genes, MBLs (blaNDM−1 and blaVIM−2), and OXA (blaOXA−23 and blaOXA−58), which are carbapenem resistance genes, via specific target primers described previously (Table S1).
Of the total CR isolates, 70.2% (n = 26/37) harbored at least one carbapenemase-encoding gene. Among these, 45.9% (n = 17/37) of the isolates contained metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) genes (Ambler class B), including blaNDM−1 in 10 isolates and blaVIM−2 in 7 isolates. Additionally, 48.6% (n = 18/37) of the isolates harbored OXA genes (Ambler class D), with blaOXA−23 present in 16 isolates and blaOXA−58 in 2 isolates. In the CRPA, blaVIM−2 was dominant (58.3%, n = 7/12), followed by blaNDM−1 and blaOXA−23 (16.7%, n = 2/12). Similarly, blaOXA−23 was highest (56.0%, n = 14/25) in CR-AB, followed by blaNDM−1 (32.0%, n = 8/25) and blaOXA−58 (8.0%, n = 2/25) (Table S4).
In total, 21.6% (n = 8/37) of the CR isolates coharbored more than one carbapenemase-encoding gene, whereas 47.4% (n = 18/37) of the isolates harbored a single gene. Specifically, four CR-AB isolates carried blaNDM−1 + blaOXA−23, two CR-AB isolates carried blaOXA−23 + blaOXA−58, and one CR-PA isolate tested positive for blaNDM−1 + blaVIM−2. Additionally, one CR-PA isolate was found to carry all three different carbapenemase-encoding genes (blaNDM−1 + blaVIM−2 + blaOXA−23) (Fig. 1B).
Although 11 isolates (four P. aeruginosa and seven A. baumannii) were phenotypically carbapenem-resistant, the associated genes were not detected. Interestingly, one of the carbapenem-susceptible isolates carried the blaNDM−1 and blaOXA−23 genes (Table S4).
Discussions
In this study, 22.5% (n = 272/1207) of the total clinical specimens were bacterial culture positive; among them, 21.69% (n = 59/272) were A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. The species identification of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii was based on conventional phenotypic methods, with blaOXA−51 detection additionally used to support the identification of A. baumannii. Although these approaches are routinely employed in clinical microbiology laboratories, multiple identification criteria were applied to enhance diagnostic accuracy. However, the absence of comprehensive molecular confirmation may have resulted in occasional species misclassification, particularly among closely related non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria. Consequently, the reported resistance phenotypes and genotypes should be interpreted cautiously. Future studies employing molecular identification methods, including sequencing-based approaches, are warranted to improve species-level accuracy and resistance surveillance.
CR-AB and CR-PA are the most common pathogens associated with nosocomial infections in Nepal [10]. A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa are frequently isolated from sputum and wound/pus samples. Carbapenem-resistant isolates were also more prevalent in those two samples, which may be due to their greater representation or could be linked to their ability to adapt to and resist specific environments where they persist. These results suggest that the dominance of antibiotic-resistant bacteria may differ in terms of survival mechanisms at different anatomical sites [27–30].
This investigation showed a high level of antibiotic resistance profile in clinical isolates to commonly used antibiotics. Approximately three-fourths of the A. baumannii isolates and half of the P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenem antibiotics. These comparative differences in resistance rates among the pathogens could be attributed to individual intrinsic resistance mechanisms [31]. Interestingly, our antimicrobial pattern was similar to several earlier observations of antibiotic resistance in Nepal [14, 32, 33].
Among the A. baumannii isolates, approximately 80% were carbapenem-resistant, which is a relatively lower prevalence than that reported in the research conducted by Joshi et al. (97.7%) in Kathmandu [14]. In contrast, another study conducted in tertiary care hospitals in Nepal reported a lower rate of CR-AB (51%) [34] than our study. Similarly, our neighboring countries, India (14.3%) [35] and Pakistan (22.0%) [36], also reported a low prevalence of CR-AB in clinical samples. In our findings, approximately 45% of P. aeruginosa isolates were carbapenem-resistant, which is similar to the results of a study conducted by Olalekan et al. in Nigeria [37]. However, in South Asian countries, Bangladesh reported approximately 40% carbapenem resistance, whereas Pakistan reported 65% carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa isolates [38]. These differences in outcomes could be the distributions of pathogens being influenced by microbial ecology, the hospital environment, infection control practices, patient care practices, coinfections, antibiotic use, study populations, geographic areas, and sample processes [11].
Moreover, we found that the range of MICs of meropenem was different for both P. aeruginosa (0.5–512 µg/mL) and A. baumannii (0.5–256 µg/mL), which could be related to the uncontrolled consumption of carbapenem antibiotics, constant exposure to antibiotics, and the accumulation of multiple resistant mechanisms in the clinical isolates [8].
The inpatient department showed an ideal environment for MDR and carbapenem-resistant organisms. These might be due to the vulnerable immunocompromised hosts, the use of invasive medical devices, and frequent antimicrobial therapy [39]. We found that 81.3% of A. baumannii strains were MDR, which was higher than a previous study conducted in Nepal. Studies conducted in various regions of Nepal reported 30.7%-75.9% rates of MDR A. baumannii [15, 34, 40]. In addition, 70.4% of the P. aeruginosa isolates were MDR in our study, which is higher than the findings of other studies in Nepal, and other studies reported the percentage ranged from 14.3% to 60.1% [15, 34, 40]. These results indicate that a higher prevalence of MDR isolates in our clinical setting, which creates limited treatment options for empirical treatment and higher mortality and morbidity rates, with respiratory tract infection, surgical site infection, and increased risk of spread in hospital environments.
This study also reported 40.7% prevalence of ESBL production among A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa isolates (Table 4). Notably, this study showed similarities with ESBL-producing P. aeruginosa from Kathmandu [34]. This study detected blaTEM and blaCTX−M genes among a subset of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa isolates. The occurrence of blaTEM and blaCTX−M genes in A. baumannii was relatively lower than that in P. aeruginosa. This study revealed that the blaCTX−M gene (66.7%) was higher than the blaTEM gene (29.2%), and 25% of both genes coexisted. The previous studies have reported their presence in non-lactose fermenting Gram-negative bacteria, including A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa in India and Gaza [35, 41]. Although ESBL genes are predominantly associated with Enterobacterales, given that these ESBL variants are relatively uncommon in non-lactose fermenting bacteria and sequencing-based confirmation was limited, these findings are interpreted conservatively. Consequently, the precise sequence identity, genetic context, and functional expression of these amplicons remain unverified. Their detection in non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli in this study might be due to horizontal gene transfer of ESBL-associated resistance genes in the hospital. However, horizontal acquisition of ESBL-associated genes represents a plausible explanation; this mechanism was not investigated in the present study.
We found that 75.7% (n = 28/37) of our carbapenem-resistant isolates produced MBL, among them two-thirds were A. baumannii (n = 18/28), and one-third were P. aeruginosa (n = 10/28). These results are well supported by a study conducted in Iran by Namaei et al. 2021 [42]. The previous studies have reported a lower prevalence of MBL-producing isolates in eastern Nepal [33, 43] and Kathmandu [34] than that observed in the present study. However, other studies reported that MBL production in A. baumannii ranges from 54 to 66.7% [33, 44], whereas in P. aeruginosa ranges from 8 to 45% in Nepal [32–34].
Among the CR isolates, 70.2% (n = 26/37) harbored at least one carbapenemase-encoding gene. Although 11 isolates (four P. aeruginosa and seven A. baumannii) were phenotypically carbapenem-resistant, the associated tested genes were not detected. These results might indicate that a significant amount of resistance is driven by structural changes (e.g., porin loss or altered efflux pumps) rather than the presence of specific resistance genes. PCR targets specific enzymes based on the primer design and will miss these structural changes, resulting in a higher phenotypic resistance rate than genotypic rate [45]. Moreover, some carbapenem-susceptible isolates identified via phenotypic detection may indeed be positive for carbapenemase genes by genotyping [46]. In the present study, we detected blaONDM−1 and blaOXA−23 in one isolate and blaCTX−M in two isolates of P. aeruginosa via PCR assays. Such genotype–phenotype discordance has been previously reported among carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria [21]. This discrepancy may be attributed to low-level or silent gene expression, absence of strong upstream promoter elements such as ISAba1, gene mutations that impair enzyme function, or limitations in phenotypic susceptibility testing, lack of complementary resistance mechanisms (e.g., porin loss or efflux pump overexpression), or the presence of nonfunctional resistance genes [47]. However, these mechanisms were not investigated in the present study, and therefore their contribution to the observed discordance cannot be determined. Consequently, these interpretations are provisional and require validation in future studies incorporating gene expression analysis, sequencing-based characterization, and functional assays to elucidate the mechanisms underlying carbapenemase gene-positive phenotypically susceptible isolates.
Furthermore, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates harboring various carbapenemase resistance genes, including blaNDM−1, blaVIM−2, blaOXA−23, and blaOXA−58, were identified in this study (Fig. 1B). The co-occurrence of blaNDM−1 and blaVIM−2 in P. aeruginosa and of blaNDM−1, blaOXA−23, and blaOXA−58 in A. baumannii was reported. This finding agrees with various studies that have successfully reported the coexistence of antibiotic resistance genes among clinical isolates [48]. These multiple resistance genes found in the same isolates, as observed in our study, are indicative of the existence of multidrug-resistant pathogens and a variety of resistance mechanisms in clinical environments that could be responsible for the difficulty in treating and curing diseases.
The blaVIM−2 is the dominant gene in MBL-producing P. aeruginosa [49]. Similar results were found in our study; blaVIM−2 was also the predominant MBL gene among the CR-PAs co-occurring with blaNDM−1. These findings were also supported by previous studies conducted in Nepal [50, 51]. In contrast, a study from Nigeria revealed that the blaNDM−1 gene was more predominant than the blaVIM−2 gene among MBL-producing isolates [37].
More than half of the CR-AB isolates carried blaOXA−23, which was the predominant gene in our study. Other similar studies have also well documented blaOXA−23 as predominant among CR-ABs [36, 52]. A previous study in Nepal, CR-AB, has shown that the coexistence of blaOXA−23 with blaNDM−1 is significantly [14, 53]. This study also emphasized that blaOXA−23 and blaONDM−1 could coexist in CR-AB more than in previous studies. Notably, 8% of the isolates had the blaOXA−58 gene, which actively coexists with blaOXA−23 and was reported in clinical CR-AB isolates in 2015 for the first time, in Nepal [53]. Moreover, very few CR-AB clinical isolates carry blaOXA−58 and are reported in the global context [53]. The co-occurrence of multiple resistance genes is a concern; it will increase the prevalence of carbapenem resistance in the future and limit therapeutic options for A. baumannii infections in a healthcare setting.
This study has some limitations. It was conducted at a single tertiary care hospital, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other healthcare settings and geographic regions. The relatively small number of isolates reduced the statistical power for subgroup analyses and limited the robustness of comparisons between resistance gene groups. In addition, species identification of the isolates was based on phenotypic and biochemical characteristics, with blaOXA−51 PCR used to support A. baumannii identification. However, sequencing-based confirmation was not performed, and the possibility of species misidentification, particularly among closely related members of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus–baumannii complex and other Pseudomonas strains, cannot be completely excluded. Moreover, the molecular analysis was limited to a selected panel of carbapenemase and β-lactamase genes and did not assess other potentially relevant resistance determinants. Similarly, mobile genetic elements and additional mechanisms contributing to antimicrobial resistance, including integrons, plasmids, transposons, efflux pumps, and porin alterations, were not investigated. As a result, the full genetic context, transmission dynamics, and molecular epidemiology of carbapenem resistance could not be comprehensively characterized. Future multicenter studies incorporating larger sample sizes, sequencing-based species confirmation, and comprehensive genomic analyses are warranted to provide a more complete understanding of antimicrobial resistance in these clinically important pathogens.
Conclusion
Overall, this study revealed a high prevalence of MDR and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates harboring multiple carbapenem resistance genes in the hospital setting of Nepal. This poses a significant challenge to the effective treatment and management of patients with currently available antibiotics in hospital settings, particularly in the developing countries of Nepal. Therefore, active surveillance and continuous monitoring of antibiotic resistance patterns in pathogens are essential to guide clinicians and healthcare providers in optimizing patient care and improving treatment outcomes.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Material 1. S1 Fig. 1: Frequencies of total bacterial species isolated from total samples. CONS: Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. Table S1: PCR primers used for the detection of the ESBL and carbapenem-resistant genes in this study. Table S2: Distribution of carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant isolates in various clinical specimens processed in this study. Table S3: Results of the antibiotic resistance profile by disk diffusion among P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates. S-Table 4: Distribution of ESBL and Carbapenem-resistant genes in P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the patients who provided consent and the clinical specimens for this study.
Abbreviations
- AMR
Antimicrobial resistance
- CLSI
Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute
- CR
carbapenem resistance
- CR-PA
carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- CR-AB
carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; CPase: carbapenemase
- CONS
coagulase negative Staphylococcus
- EDTA
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- ESBLs
extended-spectrum beta-lactamases
- GNB
gram-negative bacilli
- HAI
healthcare-associated infection
- IRC
Institutional Review Committee
- KMCTH
KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital
- KPC
Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase
- LMICs
low- and middle-income countries
- MBLs
metallo-beta-lactamases
- MDR
multidrug-resistant
- MIC
minimum inhibitory concentration
- NGS
next-generation sequencing
- NLF
non-lactose fermenter
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- SPSS
Statistical Package for Social Sciences
- WHO
World Health Organization
Authors’ contributions
GS was responsible for the concept development, design of the study, collection of data, conducting the experimental work, analysis of data, preparing the figure, writing the article, and final approval of the manuscript. SB, PD and ABC assist with sample collection, laboratory experimental work and data analysis. BR helped in data entry, analysis, writing and editing the manuscript. LKK, RT, SKR, and DRJ supervised the study and reviewed and revised the manuscript for the final draft.
Funding
This study was carried out with the in-house resources of the Central Department of Microbiology, T.U., and with no specific grants from public, private, or nonprofit organizations.
Data availability
All the information produced during this research work is presented within the manuscript and in the Supplementary file. Any queries regarding the research will be addressed by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital (Ref. No.: 077/078/54). Written consent was obtained from each patient for voluntary participation before collecting demographic data and samples. The Declaration of Helsinki and the guidelines of the Nepal Health Research Council were adhered to throughout the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.World Health Organization, Bacterial Priority Pathogens, List. 2017. bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development, and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. 2017. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed.
- 2.Oliveira DMP, De, Forde BM, Kidd TJ, Harris PNA, Schembri MA, Beatson SA, et al. Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;33(3):00181–219. 10.1128/cmr.00181-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abdeta A, Bitew A, Fentaw S, Tsige E, Assefa D, Lejisa T, et al. Phenotypic characterization of carbapenem nonsusceptible gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12):e0256556. 10.1371/journal.pone.0256556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tomczyk S, Zanichelli V, Grayson ML, Twyman A, Abbas M, Pires D, et al. Control of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae, acinetobacter baumannii, and pseudomonas aeruginosa in healthcare facilities: A systematic review and reanalysis of quasiexperimental studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(5):873–84. 10.1093/cid/ciy752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Balasubramanian R, Boeckel TP, Van, Carmeli Y, Cosgrove S, Laxminarayan R. Global incidence in hospital-associated infections resistant to antibiotics: An analysis of point prevalence surveys from 99 countries. PLoS Med. 2023;20(6):e1004178. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hsu L-Y, Apisarnthanarak A, Khan E, Suwantarat N, Ghafur A, Tambyah PA. Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacteriaceae in South and Southeast Asia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30(1):1–22. 10.1128/CMR.masthead.30-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zellweger RM, Basnyat B, Shrestha P, Prajapati KG, Dongol S, Sharma PK, et al. Changing antimicrobial resistance trends in Kathmandu, Nepal: A 23-year retrospective analysis of bacteraemia. Front Med. 2018;5:262. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rijal KR, Banjara MR, Dhungel B, Kafle S, Gautam K, Ghimire B, et al. Use of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance in Nepal: a nationwide survey. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11554. 10.1038/s41598-021-90812-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kamel NA, Tohamy ST, Yahia IS, Aboshanab KM. Insights on the performance of phenotypic tests versus genotypic tests for the detection of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli in resource-limited settings. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22(1):248. 10.1186/s12866-022-02660-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Suwantarat N, Carroll KC. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in Southeast Asia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;5(1):1–8. 10.1186/s13756-016-0115-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetsc hinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shrestha PM, Kattel HP, Sharma S, Bista P, Basnet BK, Ghimire P, et al. Metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from two tertiary care centers in a district of Nepal: A descriptive cross-sectional study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2024;62(271):202–6. 10.31729/jnma.8498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bhatta S, Pradhan M, Chaudhary R. Multidrug-resistant among Non-Fermenting gram-negative bacteria isolated in the department of microbiology of a tertiary care center. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2023;61(267):868–70. 10.31729/jnma.8330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Joshi PR, Acharya M, Kakshapati T, Leungtongkam U, Thummeepak R, Sitthisak S. Coexistence of bla OXA-23 and bla NDM-1 genes of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from Nepal: Antimicrobial resistance and clinical significance. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6(21):1–7. 10.1186/s13756-017-0180-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ansari M, Aryal SC, Rai G, Rai KR, Pyakurel S, Bhandari B, et al. Prevalence of multidrug-resistance and blaVIM and blaIMP genes among gram-negative clinical isolates in tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Iran J Microbiol. 2021;13(3):303–11. 10.18502/ijm.v13i3.6392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Syangtan G, Khanal LK, Bista S, Chand AB, Maharajhan BL, Dawadi P, et al. Panton-Valentine leucocidin gene in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from tertiary care hospital in Nepal. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2024;18(7):1010–9. 10.3855/jidc.17743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cheesbrough M. District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries Part-II. Second Edi. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 34–234. www.cambridge.org. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kamali E, Jamali A, Ardebili A, Ezadi F, Mohebbi A. Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance, biofilm forming potential, and the presence of biofilm-related genes among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):4–9. 10.1186/s13104-020-4890-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Abouelfetouh A, Torky AS, Aboulmagd E. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Egypt. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(185):1–9. 10.1186/s13756-019-0611-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 30th Edition. The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. USA. 2020. https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/.
- 21.Elbadawi HS, Elhag KM, Mahgoub E, Altayb HN, Ntoumi F, Elton L, et al. Detection and characterization of carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacilli isolates recovered from hospitalized patients at Soba University Hospital, Sudan. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):136. 10.1186/s12866-021-02133-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tamma PD, Simner PJ. Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms from Clinical Isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(11):e01140–18. 10.1128/JCM.01140-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yong D, Lee K, Yum JH, Shin HB, Rossolini GM, Chong Y. Imipenem-EDTA disk method for differentiation of metallo-β-lactamase-producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(10):3798–801. 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3798-3801.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sambrook J, Russell DW. In: Argentine J, editor. Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual. 3 ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.
- 25.Vijayakumar S, Anandan S, Prabaa D, Kanthan K, Vijayabaskar S, Kapil A, et al. Insertion sequences and sequence types profile of clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii collected across India over four year period. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(7):1022–8. 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sah RSP, Dhungel B, Yadav BK, Adhikari N, Shrestha UT, Lekhak B, et al. Detection of TEM and CTX-M Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Specimens at Tertiary Care Heart Hospital. Diseases. 2021;9(15):1–14. 10.3390/diseases9010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schrader SM, Vaubourgeix J, Nathan C. Biology of antimicrobial resistance and approaches to combat it. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(549). 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz6992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, et al. Characterization of a new metallo-β-lactamase gene, blaNDM-1, and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(12):5046–54. 10.1128/AAC.00774-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gutiérrez O, Juan C, Cercenado E, Navarro F, Bouza E, Coll P, et al. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Spanish hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(12):4329–35. 10.1128/AAC.00810-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Woodford N, Ellington MJ, Coelho JM, Turton JF, Ward ME, Brown S, et al. Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;27(4):351–3. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ruekit S, Srijan A, Serichantalergs O, Margulieux KR, Mc Gann P, Mills EG, et al. Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant ESKAPEE pathogens from clinical samples in Chonburi, Thailand (2017–2018). BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):695. 10.1186/s12879-022-07678-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Maharjan R, Shrestha B, Shrestha S, Angbuhang KB, Lekhak B, Nepal K, et al. Detection of Metallo-β-Lactamases and carbapenemase production Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from burn wound infection. Tribhuvan Univ J Microbiol. 2020;7(1):67–74. 10.3126/tujm.v7i0.33800. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shrestha M, Baral R, Shrestha LB. Metallo-β lactamase producing nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli from various clinical isolates in a tertiary care hospital: A descriptive cross-sectional study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021;59(241):875–80. 10.31729/jnma.6408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pandey R, Mishra SK, Shrestha A. Characterization of ESKAPE pathogens with special reference to multidrug resistance and biofilm production in a Nepalese hospital. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:2201–12. 10.2147/IDR.S306688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kumari N, Kumar M, Katiyar A, Kumar A, Priya P, Kumar B, et al. Genome-wide identification of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) isolates retrieved from hospitalized patients in Bihar, India. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8477. 10.1038/s41598-022-12471-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zahra N, Zeshan B, Qadri MMA, Ishaq M, Afzal M, Ahmed N. Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteria isolated from surgical ICU patients in Pakistan. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2021;14(4):e113008. 10.5812/JJM.113008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Olalekan A, Bader BK, Iwalokun B, Wolf S, Lalremruata A, Dike A, et al. High incidence of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Lagos, Nigeria. JAC-Antimicrobial Resist. 2023;5(2):dlad038. 10.1093/jacamr/dlad038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Diorio-Toth L, Irum S, Potter RF, Wallace MA, Arslan M, Munir T, et al. Genomic Surveillance of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates reveals an additive effect of carbapenemase production on carbapenem resistance. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(3):e0076622. 10.1128/spectrum.00766-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gales AC, Stone G, Sahm DF, Wise MG, Utt E. Incidence of ESBLs and carbapenemases among Enterobacterales and carbapenemases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected globally: results from ATLAS 2017–2019. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023;78(7):1606–15. 10.1093/jac/dkad127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baral S, Pokharel A, Subramanya SH, Nayak N. Clinico-epidemiological profile of Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas infections, and their antibiotic resistant pattern in a tertiary care center, Western Nepal. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2019;9(4):804–11. 10.3126/nje.v9i4.26962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.El Aila NA, Al Laham NA, Ayesh BM. Prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase and molecular detection of blaTEM, blaSHV and blaCTX-M genotypes among gram-negative bacilli isolates from pediatric patient population in Gaza strip. BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):99. 10.1186/s12879-023-08017-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Namaei MH, Yousefi M, Askari P, Roshanravan B, Hashemi A, Rezaei Y. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli harboring blaIMP-1 and blaVIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase genes in Birjand, south–east Iran. Iran J Microbiol. 2021;13(4):470–9. 10.18502/ijm.v13i4.6971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kumari M, Bhattarai NR, Rai K, Pandit TK, Khanal B, Multidrug-Resistant. Acinetobacter: Detection of ESBL, MBL, blaNDM-1 Genotype, and Biofilm Formation at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern Nepal. Int J Microbiol. 2022;2022: 8168000. 10.1155/2022/8168000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Yadav SK, Bhujel R, Hamal P, Mishra SK, Sharma S, Sherchand JB. Burden of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection in hospitalized patients in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:725–32. 10.2147/IDR.S239514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Koch RE, Barth J, Clark AE, Desai D, Kim J, Pybus CA, et al. Antibiotic resistance genotype, phenotype, and clinical outcomes in patients with Gram-negative infections at Rabin Medical. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;13(1):1–17. 10.1128/spectrum.00383-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tawfick MM, Alshareef WA, Bendary HA, Elmahalawy H, Abdulall AK. The emergence of carbapenemase bla NDM genotype among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from Egyptian cancer patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(7):1251–59. 10.1007/s10096-020-03839-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pitout LFMJ, Croxen M, Dingle MRMTC. Three separate acquisitions of bla NDM–1 in three different bacterial species from a single patient. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023;42(10):1275–80. 10.1007/s10096-023-04651-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Paul D, Dhar D, Maurya AP, Mishra S, Sharma GD, Chakravarty A, et al. Occurrence of coexisting blaVIM-2 and blaNDM-1 in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from India. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016;15(31):1–6. 10.1186/s12941-016-0146-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Van Der Bij AK, Van Mansfeld R, Peirano G, Goessens WHF, Severin JA, Pitout JDD, et al. First outbreak of VIM-2 metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Netherlands: Microbiology, epidemiology and clinical outcomes. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;37(6):513–8. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Acharya M, Joshi PR, Thapa K, Aryal R, Kakshapati T, Sharma S. Detection of metallo-β-lactamases-encoding genes among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):718. 10.1186/s13104-017-3068-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Takahashi T, Tada T, Shrestha S, Hishinuma T, Sherchan JB, Tohya M, et al. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates in Nepal. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021;26:279–84. 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ranjbar R, Farahani A. Study of genetic diversity, biofilm formation, and detection of Carbapenemase, MBL, ESBL, and tetracycline resistance genes in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from burn wound infections in Iran. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1):172. 10.1186/s13756-019-0612-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shrestha S, Tada T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Ohara H, Shimada K, Satou K, et al. Molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in a university hospital in Nepal reveals the emergence of a novel epidemic clonal lineage. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;46(5):526–31. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material 1. S1 Fig. 1: Frequencies of total bacterial species isolated from total samples. CONS: Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. Table S1: PCR primers used for the detection of the ESBL and carbapenem-resistant genes in this study. Table S2: Distribution of carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant isolates in various clinical specimens processed in this study. Table S3: Results of the antibiotic resistance profile by disk diffusion among P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates. S-Table 4: Distribution of ESBL and Carbapenem-resistant genes in P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates.
Data Availability Statement
All the information produced during this research work is presented within the manuscript and in the Supplementary file. Any queries regarding the research will be addressed by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
