Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Sep 17;20(38):26215–26223. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6c11574

Anisotropic Γ‑Valley Interlayer Excitonic Emission in Anisotropic-Isotropic 2D Heterostructures

Tae Keun Yun †,‡, Byeongchan Lee §, Soyeong Kwon †,∥, Jieun Yeon ‡, Doohee Cho ‡, Young Woo Choi §,*, Kwanpyo Kim ‡,*, SungWoo Nam †,⊥,*
PMCID: PMC13629670  PMID: 42915760

Abstract

In-plane anisotropy of 2D materials and their heterostructures provides an essential degree of freedom for enabling direction-selective physical responses. However, realizing anisotropic optical responses in interlayer exciton (ILE) of type-II van der Waals heterostructures has remained elusive, as most heterostructures rely on high-symmetry group-VI transition metal dichalcogenides, and attempts to introduce low-symmetry layers are hindered by interlayer momentum mismatch leading to inefficient radiative recombination. Here, we demonstrate anisotropic ILE emission in ReS2/WS2 enabled by Γ-point momentum matching. Polarization-resolved photoluminescence (PL) reveals three distinct ILE peaks, appearing at 1.37–1.42 eV for 1L-ReS2/2L-WS2 and 1.32–1.37 eV for 2L-ReS2/2L-WS2. Time-resolved, power- and temperature-dependent PL measurements, together with first-principles many-body calculations, confirm strongly anisotropic interlayer excitons from a direct Γ-point interlayer bandgap. Furthermore, ILE intensity is independent of excitation polarization due to dominant WS2 absorption, providing a stable exciton supply for exciton transport. These findings position momentum-matched anisotropic-isotropic heterostructures as a platform for polarization-selective optoelectronics and anisotropic excitonics.

Keywords: interlayer exciton, optical anisotropy, ReS2 , WS2 , momentum-matching, linear dichroism, Γ-valley


graphic file with name nn6c11574_0007.webp


graphic file with name nn6c11574_0005.webp

Introduction

Anisotropic 2D materials, such as black phosphorus (BP) with a puckered structure and ReS2 with a distorted 1T structure in group-VII transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), have emerged as promising platforms for direction-selective physical responses owing to their reduced crystal symmetry and in-plane anisotropy. − Incorporating such low-symmetry 2D materials into van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures offers a viable route to impart anisotropy to heterostructure properties, particularly in type-II vdW heterostructures hosting interlayer exciton (ILE) with long lifetimes, aligned out-of-plane dipoles, and moiré tunability. − However, most previous studies have focused on heterobilayers of high-symmetry group-VI TMDCs, which exhibit in-plane polarization-isotropic emission. , While BP shows strong anisotropy and a thickness-independent direct band gap in the mid-infrared region, − its high chemical reactivity limits long-term stability. In contrast, ReS2 is air-stable and has a strongly symmetry-broken triclinic lattice with pronounced anisotropic properties. − Its principal axis can also be reoriented under external stimuli, including e-beam irradiation and strain, , positioning ReS2 as a compelling low-symmetry building block to realize anisotropic ILE when combined with high-symmetry group-VI TMDCs.

To date, most studies have focused on employing anisotropic 2D materials as templates to induce anisotropy in the intralayer excitonic emission of group-VI TMDCs, rather than realizing anisotropic ILE. − Theoretically, materials such as BP and GeSe have been proposed as potential hosts for anisotropic ILE. , Other than device-level photocurrent response based on interlayer absorption of type-II heterostructures involving anisotropic materials like BP and ReS2, , to the best of our knowledge, direct observation of in-plane anisotropic ILE emission has not been reported.

The lack of optically active anisotropic ILE stems from momentum mismatch between anisotropic 2D materials and monolayer group-VI TMDCs. While BP and ReS2 have band edges at the Γ-point, , group-VI monolayers exhibit their band edges at the K-point. This momentum mismatch renders the interlayer excitonic transitions momentum-forbidden, thereby suppressing ILE emission in such systems.

Here, we demonstrate anisotropic ILE emission in heterostructures composed of monolayer or bilayer ReS2 and bilayer WS2, enabled by Γ-point momentum matching. Polarization-resolved photoluminescence (PL) reveals three distinct ILE peaks whose polarization directions correlate with those of ReS2 intralayer excitons in both monolayer- and bilayer-ReS2-based heterostructures. , The ILE peak energies appear at 1.37–1.42 eV for 1L-ReS2/2L-WS2 and 1.32–1.37 eV for 2L-ReS2/2L-WS2. Time-resolved, excitation-power-dependent, and temperature-dependent PL measurements confirm that these peaks exhibit key signatures of direct Γ-matched ILE. Based on first-principles GW and Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) calculations, we show that the ReS2/WS2 heterostructures have a direct Γ-point interlayer bandgap and find strongly anisotropic interlayer excitons consistent with experimental observations. In addition, the overall ILE emission intensity remains independent of excitation polarization due to dominant WS2 absorption at 2.33 eV excitation, whereas ReS2 intralayer excitons exhibit anisotropy. , These results establish momentum-matched anisotropic-isotropic heterostructures, such as ReS2/WS2 heterostructures as a hybrid anisotropic-isotropic platform enabling both polarization-selective optoelectronics and anisotropic excitonics.

Results and Discussion

The schematic drawing of the ReS2/WS2 heterostructure and its anisotropic ILE emission is shown in Figure a. The ILE is illustrated to exhibit pronounced anisotropy with respect to the Re-chain direction of ReS2 (crystallographic b-axis), consistent with the polarization behavior of intralayer excitons in ReS2. , All samples were encapsulated with hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) to enhance the spectral resolution and emission intensity of the ILE. PL measurements were performed at 3 K in a cryostat using a continuous-wave 532 nm laser that was linearly polarized in-plane, unless otherwise noted. Time-resolved PL (TRPL) measurements were conducted using a pulsed 405 nm laser (see Methods). For convenience, we denote n-layer ReS2 and WS2 as nR and nW, respectively.

1.

1

Formation of ILE in ReS2/WS2 heterostructures. (a) Schematic of ILE formation and their anisotropic optical properties. (b) PL spectra measured from different layer configurations (nR: n-layer ReS2 and nW: n-layer WS2). (c) Band structures of ReS2/WS2 heterostructures calculated from the GW method. The blue and red dots indicate ReS2 and WS2 layer states, respectively. (d) Optical microscopy image of the ReS2/WS2 heterostructure. The highlighted regions within the black box indicate areas with different layer configurations. (e) PL mapping result corresponding to the boxed region in (d), with intensity representing the integrated signal over the magenta-shaded energy range (1.35–1.44 eV) in (b).

To investigate whether momentum matching induces ILE emission, we measured PL spectra of ReS2/WS2 heterostructures with different layer number configurations. Figure b compares the PL spectra of individual layers and nR/2W (n = 1, 2) heterostructures (PL spectra of 1W and nR/1W are shown in Supporting Figure S6). Distinct low-energy emission peaks in the range of 1.2–1.4 eV are observed exclusively in nR/2W, appearing at energies well below those of the constituent intralayer excitons, allowing unambiguous identification of interlayer excitonic transitions. Detailed spectral features of the individual layers are provided in Supplementary Note 1.

Figure c shows the GW quasiparticle band structure of both the 1R/2W and 2R/2W systems. Both systems have direct Γ-point bandgaps of 1.669 and 1.574 eV, respectively. The conduction band is dominated by ReS2 states and the valence band by WS2 states, indicating a type-II band alignment.

Figure d shows an optical microscopy (OM) image of a representative fabricated heterostructure. PL mapping performed over the boxed region reveals uniform low-energy emission across the heterostructure area (Figure e), confirming the interlayer origin of the observed ILE emission. Fabrication details and sample information are provided in Supplementary Note 1 and Supporting Table S1.

To extract the characteristics of direct ILE, we performed temperature-dependent PL, TRPL, and power-dependent PL measurements. Figure a shows temperature-dependent PL spectra from 3 to 293 K. Because direct excitonic emission does not require phonon-assisted recombination, the ILE intensity becomes stronger at lower temperatures, , which is clearly illustrated in Figure b where the integrated intensity within the shaded region of Figure a is plotted as a function of temperature. The slight decrease between 3 and 10 K is likely associated with lower-lying dark states, as previously observed in ReS2 and WS2. ,

2.

2

Temperature and power dependence of PL and TRPL results. (a) PL spectra of 2L-ReS2/2L-WS2 at different temperatures. (b) Integrated PL intensity over the yellow-shaded energy range in (a) as a function of temperature. (c) TRPL results for direct excitons in 1L-WS2 (intralayer exciton), for ILE in 1L-ReS2/2L-WS2, and for ILE in 2L-ReS2/2L-WS2, as shown in the inset. (d) Power-dependent PL intensity maps of 2L-ReS2/2L-WS2 in the spectral ranges containing ILE and the intralayer excitons of 2L-ReS2. The dashed lines are guides to the eye showing the evolution of the peak positions. (e) Peak energies of IX3 and X2 as a function of excitation power, extracted from (d). (f) Integrated PL intensities of IX3 and X2 as a function of excitation power on log–log scales. The solid lines are fits to I ∝ P α , yielding αIX3=0.81 and αX2=0.93 .

Since an ILE features spatially separated electron and hole, it is expected to have a longer lifetime than an intralayer exciton. To verify this, we compared the TRPL signals of the 1W intralayer exciton and the ILEs in 1R/2W and 2R/2W (Figure c). The decay curves were fitted with a biexponential function (solid lines), yielding average lifetimes of 257, 489, and 650 ps for 1W, 1R/2W, and 2R/2W, respectively (inset of Figure c). Although reported K-valley ILE population lifetimes can range from approximately 1 ns to over 100 ns, these long decay times can arise because excitons outside the light cone must first relax into radiative states. In contrast, an intrinsic radiative lifetime of 0.40 ns has been measured for a momentum-direct ILE. Our ILE lifetimes of 489–650 ps are comparable to this intrinsic time scale, consistent with a reduced momentum-space relaxation bottleneck in the proposed momentum-matched Γ-point transition. The longer lifetime of 2R/2W compared with 1R/2W is consistent with the increased electron–hole separation in the thicker ReS2 layer, as illustrated schematically in the inset (all fitted parameters are summarized in Supporting Table S2).

Figure d presents the power-dependent PL spectra of 2R/2W as intensity maps. The extracted peak energies in Figure e show a clear blueshift of the peak labeled IX3 (details discussed later) with increasing excitation power, whereas the intralayer exciton X2 shows no systematic blueshift. This behavior is consistent with the interaction-induced blueshift commonly observed for ILEs at increasing exciton density. , In addition, the integrated PL intensities follow I ∝ P α , with αIX3=0.81 and αX2=0.93 (Figure f). The more sublinear power dependence of IX3, compared with the nearly linear dependence of X2, is consistent with previous observations of interlayer and intralayer excitons, respectively.

To investigate the anisotropic optical response of ILE in 2R/2W, polarization-resolved PL measurements were performed by systematically varying both the analyzer angle Φ and the excitation polarization angle Θ relative to the b-axis of ReS2 (Figure a). We first examined the polarization anisotropy of the ILE emission by fixing Θ = 0° and rotating Φ counterclockwise in 10° increments. The analyzer angle-dependent color map and stacked spectra in Figure b reveal a periodic modulation of the ILE intensities with Φ, indicating pronounced polarization anisotropy inherited from the in-plane anisotropy of ReS2.

3.

3

Anisotropic optical properties of ILEs in 2L-ReS2/2L-WS2. (a) Experimental setup for tuning analyzer and excitation polarization angles relative to the b-axis of ReS2. (b) PL spectra with fixed excitation polarization (0°) and varying analyzer angles (10° steps). Top: color map, bottom: stacked spectra (0–90°). (c) Enlarged view of the ILE region in (b). Top: no analyzer, middle: analyzer at 0°, bottom: analyzer at 90°. Three ILE peaks (IX1–IX3) are identified. (d) Polar plots of normalized fitted amplitudes. Left: ILE peaks, right: intralayer excitons (X1, X2) of ReS2. ILE shows similar anisotropy to intralayer excitons. (e) PL spectra with varying excitation polarization angle (10° steps) without analyzer. Top: color map, bottom: stacked spectra (0–90°), showing isotropic ILE behavior. (f) Polar plots of normalized fitted amplitudes for IX3 and X1.

To resolve the spectral components contributing to this angular dependence, Figure c displays the magnified ILE energy range (1.25–1.44 eV) under three analyzer conditions: without analyzer (top), Φ = 0° (middle), and Φ = 90° (bottom). Without an analyzer, IX2 is largely obscured by IX3, whereas polarization-resolved spectra at 0° and 90° resolve three ILE peaks at 1.329 eV (IX1), 1.351 eV (IX2), and 1.363 eV (IX3). Their microscopic origins and corresponding interlayer transitions are further supported by the BSE calculations discussed in Figure . Two intralayer excitonic peaks from 2R, X1 (1.603 eV) and X2 (1.652 eV), are also observed, exhibiting the same polarization dependence as previously reported. , While IX1 intensity remains almost unchanged with Φ, IX2 and IX3 exhibit strong analyzer angle dependence (Figure b).

4.

4

Ab initio calculations of anisotropic ILEs in 2L-ReS2/2L-WS2. (a) Band-to-band composition of the three ILEs at Γ. The valence band v1 lies on the WS2 layers and the two lowest conduction bands c1 and c2 on the ReS2 layers, and all three transitions are momentum-direct at Γ. At Γ, v1 is W d z2, and c1 and c2 share the same Re d z2 character. Arrow widths are proportional to the weight of each exciton carried by that channel, and the weight is printed above each arrow. The weight is that of the BSE eigenvector, summed over the Brillouin zone. IX1 carries 79.5% into c2 and 20.3% into c1, IX2 17.6% and 82.2%, and IX3 5.1% and 94.8%. (b, c) Exciton wave function |χ S (r e ,r h )|2 of IX1 in real space as a function of (b) electron positions with a hole fixed in WS2, and (c) hole positions with an electron fixed in ReS2, respectively. (d) Optical absorption spectra from the GW-BSE calculations. The solid line corresponds to polarization parallel to the Re-chain direction (0°), while the dotted line indicates polarization perpendicular to it (90°). The ILEs show an anisotropic optical response depending on the polarization angle. The energy of the first exciton is below the experimental measurement range. (e) Polarization-dependent oscillator strengths of IX1 (red), IX2 (green), and IX3 (blue), respectively.

To compare anisotropy, the fitted peak amplitudes of the ILE peaks (IX1, IX2, IX3) and intralayer excitons (X1, X2) were plotted independently in polar coordinates, as shown in Figure d (left: ILEs, right: intralayer excitons). The detailed spectral features of ILE peaks and the principle used to quantify their anisotropy are discussed in Supplementary Note 2. The peak amplitudes as a function of Φ were fitted using I(Φ) = I min + I p cos2(Φ – Φ max ) where I min , I p , and Φ max are the fitting parameters corresponding to the offset, polarization strength, and the angle of maximum intensity, respectively. The extracted values of Φ max are 87.4° and 0.5° for IX2 and IX3, respectively, while those for X1 and X2 are 3.9° and 77.5°. Similar ILE energies and emission polarization anisotropy are observed across samples with substantially different twist angles (Supporting Figures S7 and S8), demonstrating the relative twist-angle insensitivity of the Γ-matched ILE, consistent with prior reports on other Γ-matched systems. , Details of the twist-angle determination and sample-to-sample comparison are provided in Supplementary Notes 1 and 2. The extracted fitting parameters are summarized in Supporting Table S1.

To directly compare the anisotropy of ILE peaks with X1 and X2, we analyzed all peaks extracted from the same 2R/2W spectrum. The polarization axes of the two ILE peaks can be assigned: IX2 shares the polarization axis of X2 (approximately perpendicular to the b-axis), whereas IX3 aligns with X1 (approximately parallel to the b-axis). We also note that IX2 is completely quenched near Φ = 0° whereas X2 is not (Figure c). X1 and X2 exhibit nearly identical anisotropy in both 2R/2W and isolated 2R (Supporting Figure S10), consistent with previous reports.

To quantify the anisotropic behavior, we calculated the degree of linear dichroism ρ=Imax−IminImax+Imin for each peak, where I max and I min denote the fitted extreme amplitudes. IX2 and IX3 exhibit substantially larger ρ values than their corresponding intralayer excitons, X2 and X1, with enhancement factors of 1.88 and 1.28, respectively. This enhancement may additionally reflect interface-induced symmetry breaking, consistent with reports that interlayer-coupling-induced lattice relaxation can enhance excitonic polarization anisotropy in ReS2-based heterostructures. All extracted values are summarized in Supporting Table S1.

Since ReS2 exhibits anisotropic absorption , whereas WS2 is isotropic, it is important to clarify whether ILE formation depends on the excitation polarization. Using 2.33 eV excitation, which lies well above the ReS2 excitonic resonances and also efficiently excites WS2, we removed the analyzer and rotated the excitation polarization angle in 10° increments (Figure a). The resulting spectra in Figure e show that the ILE intensities remain nearly constant regardless of Θ, whereas X1 and X2 retain clear angular dependence, consistent with the anisotropic absorption of ReS2. , This contrast is highlighted in Figure f, where the same polar-fit analysis described above reveals that IX3 exhibits negligible excitation angle dependence, whereas X1 remains anisotropic. The anisotropic ratio η=ImaxImin of IX3 and X1 is 1.02 and 1.60, respectively, confirming isotropic and anisotropic formation of the ILE and intralayer exciton, respectively. Results for the remaining peaks are provided in Supporting Figure S11. The ILE formation remains excitation-polarization-insensitive in the two samples with the same stacking sequence despite their substantially different twist angles (7.6° and 27.9°), whereas the sample with reversed stacking at 3.1° shows excitation-polarization dependence (Supporting Figure S9). These results suggest that both stacking sequence and low-angle structural reconstruction may influence optical anisotropy, which requires further investigation. Anisotropic ILE emission is also observed in the 1R/2W, and the same set of analyses applied to 2R/2W is provided in Supplementary Note 3.

We further performed first-principles GW-BSE calculations , to investigate excitons in the 2R/2W heterostructure. Figure b and c show the modulus squared of the exciton wave functions |χS(re,rh)|2 , where we find that electrons are strongly confined within the ReS2 layers while holes are confined to the WS2 layers, confirming their interlayer nature. Figure d shows optical absorption spectra obtained from the BSE calculations. We identify three ILE peaks IX1 (1.186 eV), IX2 (1.273 eV), and IX3 (1.293 eV) corresponding to the experimental measurements. These ILE peaks are predominantly composed of transitions involving the highest valence band (v1) and the lowest two conduction bands (c1, c2) at the Γ-point. IX1 is built mainly on c2 while IX2 and IX3 are built mainly on c1 (Figure a). Figure e shows polarization-dependent oscillator strengths. IX1 and IX2 are polarized perpendicular and IX3 is parallel to the Re-chain direction. The three ILEs share the same dipole matrix elements and differ only in their envelopes (Supplementary Note 4). The optical anisotropy of the ILEs does not depend on the stacking registry of the interface (Supplementary Note 5). We note an additional exciton peak at 1.135 eV, which is below the experimental measurement range.

Discussion

While previous studies on ReS2/WS2 heterobilayers have reported ultrafast charge transfer arising from their type-II band alignment, ILE emission has not been observed, which has been primarily attributed to momentum mismatch between monolayer ReS2 with its conduction band minimum (CBM) at the Γ-point, , and monolayer WS2, whose valence band maximum (VBM) lies at the K-point. Momentum matching of the interlayer band edges is crucial for optically active ILE emission. ,, In this context, Γ-point ILE emission has been demonstrated in type-II heterostructures composed of isotropic 2D materials such as InSe, or PbI2, whose CBM lies at Γ, combined with bilayer WS2 with its VBM also at Γ. , However, the 3-fold in-plane symmetry of the isotropic constituents limits anisotropic optical responses. In contrast, we observed anisotropic ILE peaks in the range of 1.2–1.4 eV by combining bilayer WS2 with ReS2, demonstrating that the anisotropy of ReS2 is imparted to the resulting ILE. These ILE peaks appear well below the energies of the constituent intralayer excitons, unlike prior reports where spectral overlap led to ambiguity. , Moreover, the observed anisotropy arises intrinsically from ReS2 rather than from extrinsically induced symmetry breaking, such as strain, metastructure, or magnetic field. −

Conclusions

In conclusion, direct interlayer excitonic transitions enabled by Γ-point momentum matching between monolayer or bilayer ReS2 and bilayer WS2 give rise to robust anisotropic interlayer excitonic emission consisting of three distinct ILE peaks, whose polarization orientations originate from the intrinsic optical anisotropy of ReS2 and remain similar across the investigated twist angles. The ILE peak centers appear in the range of 1.37–1.42 eV for 1L-ReS2/2L-WS2 and 1.32–1.37 eV for 2L-ReS2/2L-WS2 heterostructures. Polarization analysis further reveals that ILE exhibits markedly stronger anisotropy than the intralayer excitons of ReS2. In contrast, the excitation-insensitive formation of anisotropic ILE provides a stable exciton supply for reliable exciton transport. Our GW–BSE calculations further corroborate the experimental observations by revealing a direct Γ-point interlayer bandgap and strongly anisotropic ILE. These findings position momentum-matched anisotropic-isotropic heterostructures as a platform for polarization-selective optoelectronics and anisotropic excitonics.

Methods

Sample Preparation

To assemble the ReS2/WS2 heterostructure, we used mechanical exfoliation and dry transfer. Multilayer ReS2 and WS2 were exfoliated from their bulk crystals (2D Semiconductors and HQ Graphene) with mechanical exfoliation (the Scotch tape method) onto SiO2/Si substrate and PDMS (Gel-Pak X4), respectively. We prepared WS2 with a cleaved edge along the isotropic crystallographic direction, exhibiting 60° angles at the corners, and ReS2 with a clearly defined b-axis along the anisotropic crystallographic direction. We sequentially stacked WS2 and ReS2 onto SiO2/Si while aligning the crystal axes, utilizing a rotation stage (Zaber XLSM025A) having an angular accuracy of up to 80 millidegrees (0.08°). We used a transfer stage (Newport XYZ-PPP) inside a humidity-controlled glovebox to reduce the effects of adsorbates, contaminants, and oxidation of sample during transfer.

Characterization

PL/Raman spectroscopy, and time-resolved PL measurements were conducted using a customized confocal Raman microscope (NanoBase XPER Raman system). For PL and Raman measurements, gratings with 300 lines per mm (lpmm) and 1800 lpmm were used, respectively, providing spectral resolutions of 0.9 nm and 4.3 cm–1. For excitation angle-dependent microscopic investigations, a linear polarizer and a half-wave plate were incorporated in the incident laser path to adjust the laser polarization direction relative to the b-axis of ReS2. An analyzer was added and rotated for polarization-resolved PL measurements. Area mapping of optical responses was performed with 1 μm spatial resolution using a galvo-mirror scanner, and area-averaged spectra were extracted to minimize discrepancies caused by surface roughness in single-point spectra.

For PL/Raman spectroscopy, a continuous-wave 532 nm green laser (Cobolt Tor) was used as the excitation source and emitted and scattered light was collected by the detector. Laser power was controlled using a continuous neutral density filter. Charge-coupled device camera (iVac 316, Andor) was employed for detection of PL/Raman signals.

TRPL measurements were performed using a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) system, consisting of a single-photon avalanche detector (PDM series, PicoQuant) and time-tagging electronics (TimeHarp 260, PicoQuant) with a timing resolution of 30 and 25 ps, respectively. A 405 nm picosecond pulsed diode laser (PDL 800D, PicoQuant) operating at an 80 MHz repetition rate was used for excitation. To isolate the 405 nm excitation light and selectively detect either neutral 1W excitons or the ILE emission from 1R/2W and 2R/2W, a 405 ± 10 nm bandpass filter was inserted in the excitation path, and a 610 ± 10 nm bandpass filter or an 875 nm long-pass filter was placed before the detector.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) topography images and data were obtained using a Park Systems XE-7 under ambient conditions.

Calculations

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Quantum ESPRESSO package. We used the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional and the optimized Vanderbilt norm-conserving pseudopotentials. , The van der Waals interactions were included within the Grimme-D2 scheme. Electron wave functions are expanded in plane wave basis with an energy cutoff of 80 Ry, and the Brillouin zone was sampled by an 8 × 8 × 1 k-point grid.

We used energetically the most favorable stacking structures between each ReS2 and WS2 layer. The determination of these structures and the resulting stacking at each interface are given in Supplementary Note 5. We construct a commensurate supercell based on 1 × 1 ReS2 unit cell and 2 × 2 WS2 unit cells. This configuration results in strains of +0.06% and −0.76% (+0.03% and +0.60%) for ReS2 (WS2) along a- and b-axes, respectively.

GW-BSE calculations were performed by using the BerkeleyGW package. In the GW calculations, the dielectric matrix was calculated with a cutoff of 20 Ry, and 5000 bands were included and we used the generalized plasmon pole model. In self-energy calculations, we employed the nonuniform neck subsampling (NNS) method with 10 subsampled points, corresponding to an effective q-grid of 1154 × 1154 × 1. The Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) was solved on a fine k-point grid of 48 × 48 × 1, considering 10 valence and 10 conduction bands. The Coulomb truncation scheme for slab geometry was applied.

Supplementary Material

nn6c11574_si_001.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

S. N. acknowledges support from the AFOSR (FA9550-23-1-0134), ONR (N000142412533), NSF (CMMI-2306039), NASA (80NSSC25K7278), and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (RS-2024-00408180). T. K. Y. and K. K. acknowledge support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (RS-2025-00560649). T. K. Y., K. K., and D. C. acknowledge support from the GlobalLearning & Academic research institution for Master’s, PhD students, and Postdocs (G-LAMP) Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Ministry of Education (No. RS-2024-00442483). B. L. and Y. W. C. acknowledge support from GlobalLearning & Academic research institution for Master’s, PhD students, and Postdocs (LAMP) Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (No. RS-2024-00441954), as well as the National Supercomputing Center with supercomputing resources, including technical support (KSC-2025-CRE-0432).

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.6c11574.

  • Sample characterization and structural information, including layer-number and crystal-orientation determination, heterostructure fabrication, AFM measurements, and SAED-based twist-angle identification; additional ILE spectra, twist-angle and stacking-sequence statistics, polarization-resolved and excitation-polarization-dependent PL analyses, spectral fitting, and anisotropy quantification; anisotropy and GW-BSE analysis of the 1R/2W heterostructure; analysis of ILE polarization axes, interference of electron–hole pair contributions, band anisotropy, and interface stacking configurations; sample parameters and TRPL fitting results (PDF)

#.

T.K.Y. and B.L. contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Li L., Yu Y., Ye G. J., Ge Q., Ou X., Wu H., Feng D., Chen X. H., Zhang Y.. Black Phosphorus Field-Effect Transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014;9:372–377. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Tongay S., Sahin H., Ko C., Luce A., Fan W., Liu K., Zhou J., Huang Y.-S., Ho C.-H., Yan J., Ogletree D. F., Aloni S., Ji J., Li S., Li J., Peeters F. M., Wu J.. Monolayer Behaviour in Bulk ReS2 Due to Electronic and Vibrational Decoupling. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3252. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Li L., Han W., Pi L., Niu P., Han J., Wang C., Su B., Li H., Xiong J., Bando Y., Zhai T.. Emerging In-Plane Anisotropic Two-Dimensional Materials. InfoMater. 2019;1:54–73. doi: 10.1002/inf2.12005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li X., Liu H., Ke C., Tang W., Liu M., Huang F., Wu Y., Wu Z., Kang J.. Review of Anisotropic 2D Materials: Controlled Growth, Optical Anisotropy Modulation, and Photonic Applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 2021;15:2100322. doi: 10.1002/lpor.202100322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gao Z., Jiang Z.-H.-Y., Li J.-D., Li B.-W., Long Y.-Y., Li X.-M., Yin J., Guo W.-L.. Anisotropic Mechanics of 2D Materials. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2022;24:2200519. doi: 10.1002/adem.202200519. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fang H., Battaglia C., Carraro C., Nemsak S., Ozdol B., Kang J. S., Bechtel H. A., Desai S. B., Kronast F., Unal A. A., Conti G., Conlon C., Palsson G. K., Martin M. C., Minor A. M., Fadley C. S., Yablonovitch E., Maboudian R., Javey A.. Strong Interlayer Coupling in van der Waals Heterostructures Built from Single-Layer Chalcogenides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111:6198–6202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405435111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rivera P., Schaibley J. R., Jones A. M., Ross J. S., Wu S., Aivazian G., Klement P., Seyler K., Clark G., Ghimire N. J., Yan J., Mandrus D. G., Yao W., Xu X.. Observation of Long-Lived Interlayer Excitons in Monolayer MoSe2-WSe2 Heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6242. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Unuchek D., Ciarrocchi A., Avsar A., Watanabe K., Taniguchi T., Kis A.. Room-Temperature Electrical Control of Exciton Flux in a van der Waals Heterostructure. Nature. 2018;560:340–344. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0357-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jauregui L. A., Joe A. Y., Pistunova K., Wild D. S., High A. A., Zhou Y., Scuri G., De Greve K., Sushko A., Yu C.-H., Taniguchi T., Watanabe K., Needleman D. J., Lukin M. D., Park H., Kim P.. Electrical Control of Interlayer Exciton Dynamics in Atomically Thin Heterostructures. Science. 2019;366:870–875. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jin C., Regan E. C., Yan A., Utama M. I. B., Wang D., Zhao S., Qin Y., Yang S., Zheng Z., Shi S.. et al. Observation of Moiré Excitons in WSe2/WS2 Heterostructure Superlattices. Nature. 2019;567:76–80. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0976-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tran K., Moody G., Wu F., Lu X., Choi J., Kim K., Rai A., Sanchez D. A., Quan J., Singh A., Embley J., Zepeda A., Campbell M., Autry T., Taniguchi T., Watanabe K., Lu N., Banerjee S. K., Silverman K. L., Kim S.. et al. Evidence for Moiré Excitons in van der Waals Heterostructures. Nature. 2019;567:71–75. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0975-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jiang Y., Chen S., Zheng W., Zheng B., Pan A.. Interlayer Exciton Formation, Relaxation, and Transport in TMD van der Waals Heterostructures. Light: sci. Appl. 2021;10:72. doi: 10.1038/s41377-021-00500-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhao S., Cheng Y., Tao L.. Modulation and Optoelectronic Applications of van der Waals Interlayer Excitons. ACS Photonics. 2024;11:2529–2545. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.3c01839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xia F., Wang H., Jia Y.. Rediscovering Black Phosphorus as an Anisotropic Layered Material for Optoelectronics and Electronics. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4458. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Qiao J., Kong X., Hu Z.-X., Yang F., Ji W.. High-Mobility Transport Anisotropy and Linear Dichroism in Few-Layer Black Phosphorus. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4475. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Higashitarumizu N., Wang S., Wang S., Kim H., Bullock J., Javey A.. Black Phosphorus for Mid-Infrared Optoelectronics: Photophysics, Scalable Processing, and Device Applications. Nano Lett. 2024;24:13107–13117. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Favron A., Gaufrès E., Fossard F., Phaneuf-L’heureux A.-L., Tang N. Y.-W., Lévesque P. L., Loiseau A., Leonelli R., Francoeur S., Martel R.. Photooxidation and Quantum Confinement Effects in Exfoliated Black Phosphorus. Nat. Mater. 2015;14:826–832. doi: 10.1038/nmat4299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chenet D. A., Aslan B., Huang P. Y., Fan C., van der Zande A. M., Heinz T. F., Hone J. C.. In-Plane Anisotropy in Mono- and Few-Layer ReS2 Probed by Raman Spectroscopy and Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy. Nano Lett. 2015;15:5667–5672. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin Y.-C., Komsa H.-P., Yeh C.-H., Björkman T., Liang Z.-Y., Ho C.-H., Huang Y.-S., Chiu P.-W., Krasheninnikov A. V., Suenaga K.. Single-Layer ReS2: Two-Dimensional Semiconductor with Tunable In-Plane Anisotropy. ACS Nano. 2015;9:11249–11257. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Aslan B., Chenet D. A., van der Zande A. M., Hone J. C., Heinz T. F.. Linearly Polarized Excitons in Single- and Few-Layer ReS2 Crystals. ACS Photonics. 2016;3:96–101. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00486. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ho C.-H., Liu Z.-Z.. Complete-Series Excitonic Dipole Emissions in Few Layer ReS2 and ReSe2 Observed by Polarized Photoluminescence Spectroscopy. Nano Energy. 2019;56:641–650. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jeong J., Kim H.-S., Kwon G., Jeong K., Lee H., Lee J. H., Park M., Lee C., Yu S., Kim H.. et al. Ferroelastic-Ferroelectric Multiferroicity in van der Waals Rhenium Dichalcogenides. Adv. Mater. 2022;34:2108777. doi: 10.1002/adma.202108777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Usman A., Aly M. A., Masenda H., Thompson J. J. P., Gunasekera S. M., Mucha-Kruczyński M., Brem S., Malic E., Koch M.. Enhanced Excitonic Features in an Anisotropic ReS2/WSe2 Heterostructure. Nanoscale. 2022;14:10851–10861. doi: 10.1039/d2nr01973f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xie X., Ding J., Wu B., Zheng H., Li S., He J., Liu Z., Wang J.-T., Liu Y.. Anisotropic Optical Characteristics of WS2/ReS2 Heterostructures with Broken Rotational Symmetry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023;123:222101. doi: 10.1063/5.0170276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kwon S., Yun T. K., Ma P. J., Nam S.. Harnessing In-Plane Optical Anisotropy in WS2 Through ReS2 Crystal. Nanophotonics. 2025;14:1553–1561. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen Y., Quek S. Y.. Tunable Bright Interlayer Excitons in Few-Layer Black Phosphorus Based van der Waals Heterostructures. 2D Mater. 2018;5:045031. doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/aadf40. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maity N., Srivastava P., Mishra H., Shinde R., Singh A. K.. Anisotropic Interlayer Exciton in GeSe/SnS van der Waals Heterostructure. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021;12:1765–1771. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen Y., Tan C., Wang Z., Miao J., Ge X., Zhao T., Liao K., Ge H., Wang Y., Wang F.. et al. Momentum-Matching and Band-Alignment van der Waals Heterostructures for High-Efficiency Infrared Photodetection. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eabq1781. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq1781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Che Z., Deng W., Li J., Zhao C., Wang F., Wu Y., Wang Q. J., Qiu C., Zhang Y.. Polarization-Sensitive Momentum-Matching Interlayer Excitons for Infrared Photodetection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025;35:2416994. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202416994. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhao W., Ghorannevis Z., Chu L., Toh M., Kloc C., Tan P.-H., Eda G.. Evolution of Electronic Structure in Atomically Thin Sheets of WS2 and WSe2 . ACS Nano. 2013;7:791–797. doi: 10.1021/nn305275h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mueller T., Malic E.. Exciton Physics and Device Application of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Semiconductors. Npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2018;2:29. doi: 10.1038/s41699-018-0074-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jadczak J., Kutrowska-Girzycka J., Smoleński T., Kossacki P., Huang Y. S., Bryja L.. Exciton Binding Energy and Hydrogenic Rydberg Series in Layered ReS2 . Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37655-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu F., Zheng S., He X., Chaturvedi A., He J., Chow W. L., Mion T. R., Wang X., Zhou J., Fu Q., Fan H. J., Tay B. K., Song L., He R.-H., Kloc C., Ajayan P. M., Liu Z.. Highly Sensitive Detection of Polarized Light Using Anisotropic 2D ReS2 . Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26:1169–1177. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201504546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dhara A., Chakrabarty D., Das P., Pattanayak A. K., Paul S., Mukherjee S., Dhara S.. Additional Excitonic Features and Momentum-Dark States in ReS2 . Phys. Rev. B. 2020;102:161404(R. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.161404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Cadiz F., Courtade E., Robert C., Wang G., Shen Y., Cai H., Taniguchi T., Watanabe K., Carrere H., Lagarde D., Manca M., Amand T., Renucci P., Tongay S., Marie X., Urbaszek B.. Excitonic Linewidth Approaching the Homogeneous Limit in MoS2-Based van der Waals Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. X. 2017;7:021026. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ubrig N., Ponomarev E., Zultak J., Domaretskiy D., Zólyomi V., Terry D., Howarth J., Gutiérrez-Lezama I., Zhukov A., Kudrynskyi Z. R., Kovalyuk Z. D., Patané A., Taniguchi T., Watanabe K., Gorbachev R. V., Fal’ko V. I., Morpurgo A. F.. Design of van der Waals Interfaces for Broad-Spectrum Optoelectronics. Nat. Mater. 2020;19:299–304. doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0601-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Poudyal S., Deka M., Adhikary P., D R., Barman P. K., Yadav R., Biswal B., Rajarapu R., Mukherjee S., Nanda B. R. K., Singh A., Misra A.. Room Temperature, Twist Angle Independent, Momentum Direct Interlayer Excitons in van der Waals Heterostructures with Wide Spectral Tunability. Nano Lett. 2024;24:9575–9582. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c02180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Arora A., Wessling N. K., Deilmann T., Reichenauer T., Steeger P., Kossacki P., Potemski M., Michaelis de Vasconcellos S., Rohlfing M., Bratschitsch R.. Dark Trions Govern the Temperature-Dependent Optical Absorption and Emission of Doped Atomically Thin Semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101:241413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.241413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Choi J., Florian M., Steinhoff A., Erben D., Tran K., Kim D. S., Sun L., Quan J., Claassen R., Majumder S., Hollingsworth J. A., Taniguchi T., Watanabe K., Ueno K., Singh A., Moody G., Jahnke F., Li X.. Twist Angle-Dependent Interlayer Exciton Lifetimes in van der Waals Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021;126:047401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.047401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Barré E., Karni O., Liu E., O’beirne A. L., Chen X., Ribeiro H. B., Yu L., Kim B., Watanabe K., Taniguchi T., Barmak K., Lui C. H., Refaely-Abramson S., da Jornada F. H., Heinz T. F.. Optical Absorption of Interlayer Excitons in Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Heterostructures. Science. 2022;376:406–410. doi: 10.1126/science.abm8511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sim S., Lee D., Noh M., Cha S., Soh C. H., Sung J. H., Jo M.-H., Choi H.. Selectively Tunable Optical Stark Effect of Anisotropic Excitons in Atomically Thin ReS2 . Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13569. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang X., Xie X., Li S., Chen J., He J., Liu Z., Wang J.-T., Liu Y.. Layer-Dependent Modulation of Optical Anisotropy in MoS2/ReS2 van der Waals Heterostructures. Nano Res. 2025;18:94907365. doi: 10.26599/NR.2025.94907365. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hybertsen M. S., Louie S. G.. Electron Correlation in Semiconductors and Insulators: Band Gaps and Quasiparticle Energies. Phys. Rev. B. 1986;34:5390–5413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rohlfing M., Louie S. G.. Electron-Hole Excitations and Optical Spectra from First Principles. Phys. Rev. B. 2000;62:4927–4944. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4927. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zereshki P., Yao P., He D., Wang Y., Zhao H.. Interlayer Charge Transfer in ReS2/WS2 van der Waals Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:195438. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gehlmann M., Aguilera I., Bihlmayer G., Nemšák S., Nagler P., Gospodarič P., Zamborlini G., Eschbach M., Feyer V., Kronast F., Młyńczak E., Korn T., Plucinski L., Schüller C., Blügel S., Schneider C. M.. Direct Observation of the Band Gap Transition in Atomically Thin ReS2 . Nano Lett. 2017;17:5187–5192. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Özçelik V. O., Azadani J. G., Yang C., Koester S. J., Low T.. Band Alignment of Two-Dimensional Semiconductors for Designing Heterostructures with Momentum Space Matching. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94:035125. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.035125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhao W., Ribeiro R. M., Toh M., Carvalho A., Kloc C., Castro Neto A. H., Eda G.. Origin of Indirect Optical Transitions in Few-Layer MoS2, WS2, and WSe2 . Nano Lett. 2013;13:5627–5634. doi: 10.1021/nl403270k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Luo Y., Su W., Chen F., Wu K., Zeng Y., Lu H.-W.. Observation of Strong Anisotropic Interlayer Excitons. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15:54808–54817. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c12429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Qin Y., Wang R., Wu X., Wang Y., Li X., Gao Y., Peng L., Gong Q., Liu Y.. Ultrafast Electronic Dynamics in Anisotropic Indirect Interlayer Excitonic States of Monolayer WSe2/ReS2 Heterojunctions. Nano Lett. 2023;23:8643–8649. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Bai Y., Zhou L., Wang J., Wu W., McGilly L. J., Halbertal D., Lo C. F. B., Liu F., Ardelean J., Rivera P., Finney N. R., Yang X.-C., Basov D. N., Yao W., Xu X., Hone J., Pasupathy A. N., Zhu X.-Y.. Excitons in Strain-Induced One-Dimensional Moiré Potentials at Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Heterojunctions. Nat. Mater. 2020;19:1068–1073. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0730-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang C., Wu K., Wu L., Cao G., Liu X., Zhang C., Wu S., Yuan X., Zhang L., Li X.. et al. Polarization-Sensitive Enhancement of Photoluminescence and Interlayer Absorption in WSe2/InSe Heterostructure via Plasmonic Metastructure. Small. 2025;21:2411761. doi: 10.1002/smll.202411761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hou S., Xie X., Ding J., Li S., Chen J., He J., Liu Z., Wang J.-T., Liu Y.. Unveiling Spin-Dependent Polarization Dynamics of Interlayer Excitons in TMD-Based Heterostructures. Small. 2025;21:e03316. doi: 10.1002/smll.202503316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Giannozzi P., Baroni S., Bonini N., Calandra M., Car R., Cavazzoni C., Ceresoli D., Chiarotti G. L., Cococcioni M., Dabo I., Dal Corso A., de Gironcoli S., Fabris S., Fratesi G., Gebauer R., Gerstmann U., Gougoussis C., Kokalj A., Lazzeri M., Martin-Samos L.. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A Modular and Open-Source Software Project for Quantum Simulations of Materials. J. Phys.: condens. Matter. 2009;21:395502. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M.. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:3865–3868. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hamann D. R.. Optimized Norm-Conserving Vanderbilt Pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;88:085117. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. van Setten M. J., Giantomassi M., Bousquet E., Verstraete M. J., Hamann D. R., Gonze X., Rignanese G.-M.. The PseudoDojo: Training and Grading a 85 Element Optimized Norm-Conserving Pseudopotential Table. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2018;226:39–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Grimme S.. Semiempirical GGA-Type Density Functional Constructed with a Long-Range Dispersion Correction. J. Comput. Chem. 2006;27:1787–1799. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Deslippe J., Samsonidze G., Strubbe D. A., Jain M., Cohen M. L., Louie S. G.. BerkeleyGW: A Massively Parallel Computer Package for the Calculation of the Quasiparticle and Optical Properties of Materials and Nanostructures. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2012;183:1269–1289. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.12.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. da Jornada F. H., Qiu D. Y., Louie S. G.. Nonuniform Sampling Schemes of the Brillouin Zone for Many-Electron Perturbation-Theory Calculations in Reduced Dimensionality. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;95:035109. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ismail-Beigi S.. Truncation of Periodic Image Interactions for Confined Systems. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;73:233103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.233103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nn6c11574_si_001.pdf (2.4MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Nano are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES