Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2026 Sep 30;11(10):1192–1196. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2026.2732728

First record of the complete chloroplast genome of the Sri Lankan endemic species, Artocarpus nobilis Thwaites (Moraceae)

Harichandra Khalingarajah a,b,✉, Partheepan Thavarajah b, Ziqi Zhang c, Zachary Rochelin d, Mamadou Abdoulaye Konare e, Gwendolyn Felocity Ban f, Frédéric Anderson Konkobo g, Lamin Manjang h, Shiou Yih Lee a,✉
PMCID: PMC13629763  PMID: 42825214

Abstract

Artocarpus nobilis Thwaites (Moraceae), endemic to Sri Lanka and classified as Vulnerable, was subjected to complete chloroplast genome sequencing and analysis. The 161,196-bp long genome had a GC content of 36% and comprised a large single-copy region of 89,878 bp, a short single-copy region of 19,982 bp, and two inverted repeats of 25,668 bp each. It contained 131 genes, including 86 protein-coding, eight rRNA, and 37 tRNA genes. Phylogenetic analysis showed A. nobilis is closely related to A. heterophyllus and A. integer. These genomic data support future conservation and breeding studies.

Keywords: Artocarpus nobilis, Ceylon breadfruit, Moraceae, genetic resources, genome structure

Introduction

Artocarpus nobilis Thwaites 1861, an endemic species to the wet tropical regions of southwestern Sri Lanka, is commonly known as Ceylon breadfruit or wal dhel (wal-del) by the locals (Madushani et al. 2014). The plant is a monoeceious, large evergreen tree reaching up to 25 m in height, large alternately arranged dark green leaves, producing large cylindrical syncarpous fruits (Figure 1) (Senadeera et al. 2022). The tree is valued for its edible fruit, timber, and rich phytochemicals used in Ayurveda for various ailments (Hill et al. 2025). The species is rich in bioactive compounds such as phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidants, fatty acids, and ascorbic acid, as well as exhibits notable pharmacological properties, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and enzyme inhibitory activities (Hill et al. 2025).

Figure 1.

A tall broadleaf tree with dense foliage is shown on the left (A), featuring two green leaf samples displaying adaxial and abaxial surfaces in the center (B), and a developing fruit on a branch with glossy leaves to the right (C).

Morphological characteristics of Artocarpus nobilis. (A) Mature tree in natural habitat, (B) distinctive leathery long leaves, (C) early stage of a large, round or oval fruit. Photos by N. M. I. Anjalie.

Although studies on Artocarpus are abundant due to the importance of several species as staple foods in many regions, genetic and genomic investigations remain comparatively limited, particularly for A. nobilis. Based on the NCBI GenBank database, only 21 short gene sequences of A. nobilis have been deposited (as of May 14, 2026), comprising four chloroplast gene loci and the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. In the wild, A. nobilis is threatened by anthropogenic activities, such as deforestation, habitat loss, and overharvesting, resulting in its classification as Vulnerable on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List (IUCN, 2026). Therefore, expanding the genomic resources available for this species is essential to support future genetic conservation, population management, and breeding programmes for its sustainable utilization and long-term preservation.

In this study, we sequenced, assembled and annotated the complete chloroplast (cp) genome sequence of A. nobilis using next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics tools. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted to evaluate the molecular placement and evolutionary relationship of A. nobilis with related species within Artocarpus. The genomic information generated in this study will provide valuable molecular resources for evolutionary studies and future conservation efforts within the genus Artocarpus

Materials and methods

Leaf specimens were collected from Udubaddawa, Sri Lanka (7° 28′47.8ʺN 79° 57′12.3ʺE), with voucher specimens deposited at the Herbarium of the University of Jaffna (https://jfn.ac.lk/, Mr. Partheepan Thavarajah, tpartheepan@univ.jfn.ac.lk) under the voucher number UJ/FSC/P/2024-21. No prior approval is required for specimen collection by the local authorities.

Total genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA). DNA library preparation was conducted using the TruSeq DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, USA) and next-generation sequencing was carried out on the Illumina NovaSeq platform (Illumina, USA) at Guangzhou Jierui Biotechnology, China. Cp genome assembly was carried out using GetOrganelle v1.7.7.0 (Jin et al. 2020), with the cp genome sequence of Artocarpus heterophyllus (GenBank no.: MK303549) as the reference genome. Gene annotation was done using GeSeq v2.03 (Tillich et al. 2017). To avoid misidentification due to local alignment errors in automated annotation pipelines, the annotated pafI sequence was extracted and manually BLAST-searched against closely-related cp genomes to validate identity. The genome map and information on the cis- and trans-splicing genes, were generated and identified using CPGview (Liu et al. 2023).

The cp genome sequences of 15 species of Artocarpus, with Broussonetia papyrifera (GenBank no.: PP584596; Zerega et al. 2010) and Morus alba (GenBank no.: OP380683; Clement & Weiblen, 2009) included as outgroup, were used in the phylogenetic analysis. Genome sequence alignment was carried out using MAFFT v7 (Katoh and Standley 2013). The aligned genome sequence dataset was analyzed using both maximum-likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) approaches implemented through the RAxML-HPC2 v8.2.12 and MrBayes v3.2.7a pipelines, respectively, available on the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010). For the ML analysis, the general time-reversible model with gamma-distributed rate variation among sites (GTR+G) was applied, with branch support assessed using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. For the BI analysis, a 4 × 4 nucleotide substitution model together with a mixed nucleotide model were employed. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations were performed for two million generations, with trees sampled at intervals of every 100 generations. The final tree result was visualized using FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut 2018).

Results

With a minimum coverage of 187× and an average read mapping depth of 1,138 (Supplementary Figure 1), the complete cp genome sequence was 161,196 bp in length, with a GC content of 36% (Figure 2). The large single-copy (LSC) region had a length of 89,878 bp, while the small single-copy (SSC) region was 19,982 bp. The paired inverted repeats (IRs) were each 25,668 bp, separating the LSC and SSC regions (Figure 2). A total of 131 genes were predicted, including 86 CDS, 37 tRNA genes, and eight rRNA genes. Among them, 16 genes contained introns, including 10 CDS (atpF, ndhA, ndhB, petB, petD, rpl2, rpl16, rpoC1, rps12, and rps16) and six tRNA genes (trnA-UGC, trnG-UCC, trnL-GAU, trnK-UUU, trnL-UAA, and trnV-UAC). The pafI was validated and confirmed of its identity by comparing its complete gene sequence to at least three published cp genomes, i.e. A. altilis (GenBank no: MW367444; De Souza et al. 2021), A. heterophyllus (GenBank no: PQ835412; Liu et al. 2017), and A. tamaran (GenBank no.: PQ493654; Lestari et al. 2024) via BLAST. Two genes, pafI and rps12, were found to contain two introns. The structure of the trans-splicing gene rps12 and the other thirteen cis-splicing genes, including atpF, clpP1, ndhA, ndhB, ndhB, pafI, petB, petD, rpl16, rpl2, rpl2, rpoC1, and rps16, were identified (Supplementary Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Circular map of Artocarpus nobilis chloroplast genome, 161,196bp, with labeled genes and regions. The diagram illustrates the chloroplast genome of Artocarpus nobilis, with a total length of 161,196 base pairs. It features an outer ring that shows colored gene annotations categorized by function, including photosystems and ribosomal proteins. Key genomic regions labeled are LSC (Large Single Copy), SSC (Small Single Copy), IRA (Inverted Repeat A), and IRB (Inverted Repeat B). The inner ring contains gray shaded areas representing GC content. Lines connect genes to their labels, enhancing understanding of their positions and roles within the genome.

Chloroplast genome map of Artocarpus nobilis generated using OGDraw. The first circle represents the annotated genes, with different colors indicating their respective functional categories; the corresponding functional classification is provided in the legend at the bottom left. The second circle delineates the large single-copy, small single-copy, and inverted repeat regions of the plastome. The third circle illustrates the variation in GC content across the genome. Genes on inside of map are transcribed in clockwise direction; genes on outside of map are transcribed in counter clockwise direction.

Both ML and BI analyses produced identical topologies; therefore, only the ML tree is presented, with the posterior probability (PP) value of the BI tree indicated next to the bootstrap support (BS) value (Figure 3). Based on current sampling size, the phylogenetic relationship within Artocapus is mostly resolved (BS ≥75%, PP ≥0.95), except for the divergence between A. nitidus and A. petolotii (PP =0.7). Artocarpus nobilis was fully resolved in the present analysis and was closely related to A. heterophyllus and A. integer.

Figure 3.

Phylogenetic tree showing relationships of Artocarpus species and outgroups, with Artocarpus nobilis in red and bootstrap values noted. The figure presents a complex phylogenetic tree illustrating relationships among several Artocarpus species, with Artocarpus nobilis highlighted in red. Branches display bootstrap values, indicating reliability ranging from 89/1 to 100/1. Morus alba is shown as the outgroup, while Broussonetia papyrifera is included at the end. A horizontal scale bar indicates a genetic distance of 0.0050, providing context for the evolutionary relationships based on genetic data.

Phylogenetic tree based on the complete chloroplast genome sequence of 13 selected species of Artocarpus, with Broussonetia papyrifera (GenBank no.: PP584596; Zhou et al. 2025) and Morus alba (GenBank no.: OP380683; Zeng et al. 2022) included as outgroup, using PhyloSuite. The bootstrap support (BS; left) and posterior probability (PP; right) values are indicated at each branch node, of which BS ≥ 75% and PP ≥ 0.95 are indicated with an asterisk (*). the following sequences were used: Artocarpus altilis (GenBank no.: PV917083; unpublished), Artocarpus camansi (GenBank no.: MW149075; De Souza et al. 2020), Artocarpus elasticus (GenBank no.: OR664166; Qiu et al. 2026), Artocarpus excelsus (GenBank no.: OR664167; unpublished), Artocarpus gomezianus (GenBank no.: MW837773; Lin et al. 2021), Artocarpus gongshanensis (GenBank no.: PX111449; unpublished), Artocarpus heterophyllus (GenBank no.: MK303549; Wang et al. 2019), Artocarpus hypargyreus (GenBank no.: MN720648; Li et al. 2020), Artocarpus integer (GenBank no.: MT900597; unpublished), Artocarpus lacucha (GenBank no.: ON881696; unpublished), Artocarpus nitidus (GenBank no.: PX696983; Qiu et al. 2026), Artocarpus petelotii (GenBank no.: MW250918; Chen and Liu 2021), Artocarpus tamaran (GenBank no.: PQ493654; Lestari et al. 2024), Artocarpus tonkinensis (GenBank no.: MZ379793; Tang et al. 2022), Artocarpus nobilis (GenBank no: PZ439993; this study).

Discussion

This is the first report on the complete cp genome sequence of A. nobilis. The cp genome of A. nobilis exhibited a gene structure, size, and gene content were consistent with other published Artocarpus cp genomes, i.e. A. altilis (Wei et al. 2023), A. gomezianus (Lin et al. 2021), and A. gongshanensis (Zhang et al. 2026). The low branch support observed in the phylogenetic tree may reflect limited taxon sampling, which can increase phylogenetic error (Magee et al. 2024). Previous studies based on concatenated cp loci and ITS sequences placed A. nobilis within section Artocarpus (Senavirathna et al. 2020). Whereas nuclear gene analyses supported its placement in section Duricarpus (Gardner et al. 2020; Gardner and Zerega 2021). In contrast, phylogenetic analysis using complete cp genomes in the present study positioned A. nobilis closer to subgenus Cauliflori than to subgenus Artocarpus. This may support recognition of Duricarpus as a distinct subgenus sister to Cauliflori, rather than a section within subgenus Artocarpus. The differing placements likely result from variation in the molecular datasets used, as complete cp genomes may provide evolutionary signal distinct from limited cp loci or nuclear datasets (De Las Rivas et al. 2002). Nevertheless, broader sampling of Duricarpus species is needed to better resolve its phylogenetics relationships.

Supplementary Material

figs2_2.JPG
figs1_2.JPG

Acknowledgments

The first author, Mr. Harichandra Khalingarajah, is a recipient of the Graduate Research Scholarship Scheme 2 at the INTI International University, Malaysia.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the INTI IU Research Seeding Grant under Grant [number INTI-FHLS-03-03-2022 and INTI-FHLS-01-09-2025].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Permission for sample collection

Although Artocarpus nobilis is listed as Vulnerable under the IUCN Red List, no permission for sample collection was required by the local authority for research purposes during sampling time.

Data availability statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov under the accession number PZ439993. The associated BioProject, SRA, and BioSample numbers are PRJNA1392671, SRR36581763, SAMN54269468 respectively.

References

  1. Chen H, Liu Q.. 2021. The plastid genome of a narrowly distributed species Artocarpus petelotii (Moraceae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 6(2):454–455. 10.1080/23802359.2020.1871434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clement WL, Weiblen GD.. 2009. Morphological Evolution in the Mulberry Family (Moraceae). Systematic Botany. 34(3):530–552. 10.1600/036364409789271155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. De Las Rivas J, Lozano JJ, Ortiz AR.. 2002. Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes: functional annotation, genome-based phylogeny, and deduced evolutionary patterns. Genome Res. 12(4):567–583. 10.1101/gr.209402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. De Souza UJB, et al. 2021. The complete chloroplast genome of Artocarpus altilis (Moraceae) and phylogenetic relationships. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 6(8):2291–2293. 10.1080/23802359.2021.1945504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Souza UJB, Vitorino LC, Bessa LA, Silva FG.. 2020. The complete plastid genome of Artocarpus camansi: a high degree of conservation of the plastome structure in the family Moraceae. Forests. 11(11):1179. 10.3390/f11111179 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gardner EM, et al. 2020. Paralogs and off-target sequences improve phylogenetic resolution in a densely sampled study of the breadfruit genus (Artocarpus, Moraceae. Syst Biol. 70(3):558–575. 10.1093/sysbio/syaa073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gardner E, Zerega N.. 2021. Taxonomic updates to Artocarpus subgenus Artocarpus (Moraceae) and allied taxa with a particular focus on the species native to Singapore. GBS. 73(2):309–374. 10.26492/gbs73(2).2021-08 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hill LK, Gupta AK, Sharma M, Jha AK.. 2025. A comparative review of breadfruit seeds (Treculia africana, Artocarpus nobilis, and Artocarpus heterophyllus): nutritional composition, bioactive compounds, and processing techniques. South Afr J Botany. 181:290–301. 10.1016/j.sajb.2025.03.062 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jin J-J, et al. 2020. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 21(1):241. 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Katoh K, Standley DM.. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4):772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lestari R, et al. 2024. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of the endangered and endemic Bornean fruit Artocarpus tamaran Becc. Front Plant Sci. 15:1513364. 10.3389/fpls.2024.1513364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li D-L, Gul J, He J-M.. 2020. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Artocarpus hypargyreus. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 5(1):910–911. 10.1080/23802359.2020.1715293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lin X, Lin T, Zhixia S, Priyadi A.. 2021. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Artocarpus gomezianus (Moraceae) from Xishuangbanna, China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 6(10):2890–2892. 10.1080/23802359.2021.1973603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu J, et al. 2017. The complete chloroplast genome of Artocarpus heterophyllus (Moraceae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 3(1):13–14. 10.1080/23802359.2017.1413317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu S, et al. 2023. CPGView: a package for visualizing detailed chloroplast genome structures. Mol Ecol Resour. 23(3):694–704. 10.1111/1755-0998.13729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Madushani H, Fernando T, Wijesundara R, Siriwardane D.. 2014. First report of white root disease of Artocarpus nobilis in Sri Lanka caused by Rigidoporus microporus. J Natn Sci Foundation Sri Lanka. 42(2):197. 10.4038/jnsfsr.v42i2.6998 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Magee A, Karcher M, Matsen FA, IV, Minin VM.. 2024. How trustworthy is your tree? Bayesian phylogenetic effective sample size through the lens of Monte Carlo error. Bayesian Anal. 19(2):565–593. 10.1214/22-ba1339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T.. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), p 1 5. 10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Qiu Q, Chen X, Lin W.. 2026. The complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis of Artocarpus nitidus subsp. lingnanensis (Moraceae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 11(4):541–545. 10.1080/23802359.2026.2642520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rambaut A. 2018. FigTree: a graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees [Computer software]. https://github.com/rambaut/figtree
  21. Senadeera SPNN, Ranaweera CB, Silva ARN.. 2022. Review on Artocarpus nobilis Thw. (Moraceae): an endemic plant of Sri Lanka. APRJ. 10:57–64. 10.9734/aprj/2022/v10i1183 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Senavirathna HMTN, et al. 2020. Assessment of the taxonomic status of the members of genus Artocarpus (Moraceae) in Sri Lanka. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 67(5):1163–1179. 10.1007/s10722-020-00902-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tang L-M, Liu X, Lin J-Y, Qin B, Chen C-Z.. 2022. The complete chloroplast genome of Artocarpus tonkinensis, a tree native to China with diverse beneficial medicinal applications. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 7(1):4–5. 10.1080/23802359.2021.1997116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tillich M, et al. 2017. GeSeq – Versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(W1):W6–W11. 10.1093/nar/gkx391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang J-X, et al. 2019. Complete plastome sequence of Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (Moraceae): an ediable fruit cultivated throughout the tropics. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 4(1):977–978. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1581105 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wei L, et al. 2023. The complete plastome sequence of Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson ex FA Zorn) Fosberg,(Moraceae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 8(1):154–156. 10.1080/23802359.2022.2163595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zeng Q, et al. 2022. Comparative and phylogenetic analyses of the chloroplast genome reveal the taxonomy of the Morus genus. Front Plant Sci. 13:1047592. 10.3389/fpls.2022.1047592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zerega NJ, Nur Supardi N, Motley TJ.. 2010. Phylogeny and Recircumscription of Artocarpeae (Moraceae) with a Focus on Artocarpus. Syst Bot. 35(4):766–782. 10.1600/036364410X539853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang R, et al. 2026. Comparative plastome analysis of Artocarpus species in China: insight into adaptive evolution and mutational hotspot regions. Ecol Evol. 16(1):e72881. 10.1002/ece3.72881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhou L, et al. 2025. Phylogenomic analyses and DNA barcoding development within Moraceae: insights into genomic features, mutational hotspots, and adaptive evolution. Ecol Evol. 15(11):e72399. 10.1002/ece3.72399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Rambaut A. 2018. FigTree: a graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees [Computer software]. https://github.com/rambaut/figtree

Supplementary Materials

figs2_2.JPG
figs1_2.JPG

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov under the accession number PZ439993. The associated BioProject, SRA, and BioSample numbers are PRJNA1392671, SRR36581763, SAMN54269468 respectively.


Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES