Clinical relevance of Fusarium
Fungi within the genus Fusarium are known plant pathogens that cause devastating diseases on many agriculturally important crops [1,2]. However, they are also important animal and human pathogens and are recognized as one of the high-priority fungal infectious agents responsible for invasive fungal diseases by the World Health Organization [3]. While this diverse genus is currently divided into 23 species complexes [4], only a few of these are associated with human infections. Most notably, the F. solani species complex (FSSC) and F. oxysporum species complex (FOSC) have been estimated to account for ~80% of all clinical Fusarium infections [5]. Within these species complexes, genotypes of Fusarium associated with clinical infections can be genetically diverse. For instance, at least 26 sequence types (STs) of F. oxysporum were identified among clinical infections with different frequencies [6]. Among clinical isolates, ST 33 is the most common worldwide, and is frequently associated with plumbing systems [7], including hospital waters [8].
Fusarium is one of the most common etiological agents responsible for fungal keratitis [9]. Able to form a complex biofilm on contact lenses facilitating disease development [10], Fusarium was responsible for a multistate contact lens-associated keratitis outbreak [11,12]. Fusarium infections in immunocompetent individuals are usually superficial, causing localized infections such as nail infections termed onychomycosis. However, cases of invasive or disseminated infections are increasing in frequency with the growing immunocompromised patient population [13]. Patients with hematological malignancies, neutropenia, or those who have undergone transplantation, in particular hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients, have an increased risk of developing severe life-threatening invasive infections or disseminated fusariosis [13,14]. It is postulated that most invasive Fusarium infections begin through inhalation of the conidia into the pulmonary system, which then germinate and colonize the alveolar tissue [13]. Alternatively, disruption of the integrity of the skin by physical trauma, ulcers, burns, or catheter-associated open wounds, provide an opportunity for Fusarium to infect [13]. Infections by the fungus may present in a wide range of symptoms for a patient, where some of the variables include patient immune status, location of infection, and likely the specific fungal isolate responsible for the infection. Many of these variables have been recently discussed by Nucci and Anissie, 2023, and we refer the reader to this review article for specific information regarding epidemiology and clinical presentation of Fusarium infections.
The intrinsic resistance to many commonly prescribed antifungal agents, including the echinocandins and some of the triazoles, contributes to the high rate of mortality associated with fusariosis within specific patient populations [13,15]. As observed in other medically relevant fungi, multiple factors are involved in increased antifungal resistance in Fusarium. The genomes of Fusarium carry three copies of the CYP51 gene [16], also widely known as ERG11, that encodes the cytochrome P450 sterol 14α-demethylase. A key enzyme in fungal ergosterol biosynthesis and the target of azole drugs, the increased copy number of CYP51 likely contributes to increased resistance to these therapeutic drugs. Expression studies after treatment with antifungal agents have shown up-regulation of genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis and membrane biosynthetic pathways, as well as multiple efflux pumps [17]. An ABC transporter involved in cellular removal of antifungal agents and an NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase that supplies the necessary electrons for ergosterol biosynthesis have been directly shown to increase antifungal resistance [18,19].
Despite the medical importance recognized by the WHO, Fusarium is understudied as a clinically important fungal pathogen. Only recently have genomes become publicly available for Fusarium isolates of clinical origin [16,20], and subsequent functional genomic studies are just beginning to be implemented [21,22]. Challenges that have delayed the exploration of Fusarium as a medically relevant pathogen include: (1) the vast genetic diversity among clinical isolates; (2) limitations in the number of dominant selectable markers available for genetic screens; (3) the intrinsic resistance of the fungi to many compounds; and (4) our limited understanding of the cross-kingdom nature of this group of fungal pathogens that includes many agriculturally important plant pathogens.
While research into the clinical aspect of these fungi is still in its infancy, evidence is rapidly accumulating to support the existence of genetic bases underlying human infection. First, even though the human-infecting FOSC strains are quite diverse (26 STs), a single dominant lineage is responsible for a majority of reported clinical cases, ST 33 and closely related STs such as ST 128, which is evident in the limited epidemiological studies of global reported outbreaks [8,12,23]. This implies that some genetic factor(s) associated with this lineage may contribute to infection. In addition, potential virulence factors for mammalian infections have been identified in some Fusarium species and isolates [16,21].
The Fusarium accessory genome, adaptability, and virulence
The notion that there are genetic determinants that contribute to FOSC virulence to humans is also supported by their genomic information. One distinct genomic feature recognized in both FSSC and FOSC genomes is genomic compartmentalization. A genome within these species complexes can be partitioned into two categories: the core genome, encompassing genes conserved within the species complex involved in essential cellular processes, and the accessory genome harboring nonessential genes that are rapidly evolving.
In plant pathogenic isolates of F. oxysporum, it is within the accessory genome that host-specific virulence factors are enriched and therefore influence the host range of the isolate. The accessory genome can be organized into entire chromosomes, referred to as accessory chromosomes, or genomic regions usually located in the sub-telomeric regions of core chromosomes [24,25]. Importantly, accessory chromosomes have experimentally been demonstrated to be laterally transferred from one isolate to another, thus transferring the virulence [24]. Conversely, accessory chromosomes of an individual isolate can be spontaneously lost, and therefore the isolate can lose its host-specific virulence [26].
As with plant pathogenic isolates, clinical isolates within the FOSC also carry distinct sets of accessory chromosomes encoding putative virulence factors against mammalian hosts [16]. Four unique accessory chromosomes not present in plant pathogenic FOSC isolates were reported in the genome of an FOSC isolate from a fusariosis patient (Fig 1). The 5.3 Mb accessory genome of this isolate encoded 812 putative genes and was enriched for genes involved in metal ion and cation transport and responses to extracellular stimuli. Specifically, these genes are significantly enriched for metal ion binding and oxidation-reduction, including a homolog of human ceruloplasmin (CP), a major copper-carrying protein in the blood that is essential for normal iron homeostasis [16], which may function in circumventing host nutritional immunity. Of particular interest was an increase in the number of PacC homologs in the accessory genome. PacC is an important transcription factor that is involved in controlling the fungal response to changes in pH and ΔpacC mutants are significantly reduced in virulence in a murine model of infection [27]. The increased copy number may offer an adaptive advantage for the pathogen under alkaline mammalian host pH conditions. Interestingly, the paralogous copies of PacC in the accessory genome were flanked by transposable elements [16]. Experimental evolution studies of FOSC isolates have documented that stressful conditions induce transposable element activity and their dynamic nature can result in increased fungal fitness [28]. Not present in plant pathogenic strains, the accessory genome of this fusariosis strain is partially conserved in another clinical FOSC isolate from a keratitis patient [16]. The ~140 kb shared region, which includes one of the PacC paralogs, suggests there could exist common loci within the accessory genome that play a role in pathogenesis on mammalian hosts.
Fig 1. Schematic representation of the genome organization of clinical isolate ST 128 NRRL 32931.

(A) the eleven core chromosomes and their sizes (Mb) and (B) the four accessory chromosomes and their sizes (Mb). The dark area on the 1.20 Mb accessory chromosome is shared with the accessory genome of another sequenced clinical isolate MRL8996 (NRRL 47514) and encodes a PacC homolog. Figure created in BioRender.
The genotypic distinctions carried by accessory genes between the plant pathogenic and human pathogenic isolates are also reflected in phenotypic assays. Compared to strains isolated from plant hosts, clinical strains displayed increased thermotolerance, reflecting the adaptation of these human pathogens to the mammalian environment [21]. An in vivo assay using a mouse keratitis model demonstrated the ability to cause severe corneal colonization by the keratitis strain [21]. Both the clinical F. oxysporum fusariosis strain and the keratitis strain exhibited enhanced virulence when compared to a plant pathogenic strain in an immunocompromised mouse model, as measured by animal survival kinetics, tissue damage, and cytotoxicity to mammalian host cells associated with inflammatory dysregulation and impaired cellular recruitment [22].
The evidence of increased thermotolerance and virulence on a mammalian host in conjunction with a conserved core genome and distinct accessory chromosome, supports the role of the accessory genome in pathogenicity on mammals.
Virulence factors of F. oxysporum in clinical infections
While a plethora of general and host-specific virulence factors have been reported in isolates of the FOSC with respect to plant pathogenicity, only a few have been confirmed to be involved in pathogenesis in a murine model of infection. A complex trait controlled by diverse biological processes, most of the known genes conferring virulence to mammalian hosts can be classified into three groups: (1) regulation of cellular signaling (i.e., transcription factors/regulators), (2) secreted effectors and secondary metabolites, and (3) maintaining heavy metal homeostasis (Table 1). Currently, most reported virulence factors with experimental validation are encoded in the core genome. A highly promising research area, the contribution of individual genes from the accessory genome of clinical FOSC isolates remains largely unexplored.
Table 1. Summary of confirmed virulence factors contributing to disease development in F. oxysporum.
| Virulence factor | Function | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Cellular Signaling | ||
| PacC | Transcription factor regulating pH response | [27] |
| Fmk1 | MAP kinase | [27,30] |
| Fgb1 | G-protein β subunit | [30] |
| WC-1 | Photoreceptor involved in light signal transduction | [31] |
| VeA, VelB, VelC, LaeA | Members of the velvet regulatory complex | [32] |
| Secreted proteins and secondary metabolites | ||
| Fpr1 | Secreted protein in CAP superfamily – hypothesized to be involved in tissue invasion and/or evading host immune system | [29] |
| Fub1 | The key polyketide synthase responsible for fusaric acid biosynthesis | [33] |
| SidC, SidD | Each is a key nonribosomal peptide sythetase responsible for production of the siderophores ferricrocin and triacetylfusarinine, respectively | [32] |
| Heavy metal homeostasis | ||
| HapX | A bZIP transcription factor | [35,36] |
| CrpF | Copper transporter | [37] |
| Mt1 | Metallothionein | [38] |
One of the most noteworthy virulence factors reported in F. oxysporum is the pathogenesis-related protein Fpr1 [29]. This secreted protein belongs to the CAP protein superfamily (PF00188), including mammalian Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, insect Ag5-antigens, and plant PR-1 proteins. This effector is found in many ascomycete fungi and is remarkably expanded in Candida albicans with five members. The expression of this effector is induced when cultivating F. oxysporum in human blood and in an in vivo mouse model. Even though the mechanism remains unknown, Fpr1 is required for full virulence and it is speculated to be involved in promoting tissue invasion and/or evading the host immune system [29].
The induction of the effector Fpr1 is under the control of the MAP kinase Fmk1 [30]. While mutants of fmk1 maintain wild-type levels of virulence [27], a double mutant with the G-protein β subunit fgb1 is significantly reduced in virulence, indicating multiple signaling pathways collectively coordinate mammalian virulence [30].
In addition to the PacC transcription factor described above, other reported regulators involved in F. oxysporum pathogenicity include the photoreceptor white collar 1 (WC-1). Even though WC-1 functions in perceiving light and subsequently controlling aerial hyphae, hydrophobicity, and carotene production, a wc-1 mutant is reduced in virulence when compared to the parental wild-type [31], which is hypothesized to be caused by an increased production of secondary metabolites.
Another critical regulator involved in pathogenicity is the velvet complex, composed of VeA, VelB, VelC, and LaeA. VeA and LaeA are required for full virulence of F. oxysporum on both tomato plants and in an immunosuppressed mouse model [32]. This regulatory complex is involved in many developmental aspects of the fungus, including growth, conidiation, as well as chromatin architecture and secondary metabolite production. Biosynthesis of fusaric acid is abolished in the ΔveA and ΔlaeA mutants [32]. Mutation of FUB1, the gene encoding the essential polyketide synthase responsible for biosynthesis of fusaric acid, also results in a reduction in virulence [33], although to a lesser degree than mutation of the velvet complex subunits suggesting other factors contributing to virulence are under transcriptional control of the velvet complex.
One of the other potential factors under control of the velvet complex that could contribute to virulence is the production of the siderophores ferricrocin and triacetylfusarinine C, which are synthesized by the nonribosomal peptide sythetases SidC and SidD [32]. Production of siderophores and their role in maintaining iron levels have been well established as important virulence factors for a number of medically important fungi [34]. In support of the importance of iron acquisition during F. oxysporum infection, deletion of the bZIP transcription factor HapX, which regulates iron homeostasis, results in an avirulent mutant that is limited in its ability to colonize the kidneys and lungs of infected animals [35]. Additionally, a ΔhapX strain exhibits significantly decreased corneal opacification and growth when compared to the WT isolate in an interstromal mouse model of infection [36]. Proteins involved in copper acquisition have also been shown to be involved in virulence on mammals, as mutants of the copper transporter CrpF are increased in virulence [37], and mutants of the metallothionein Mt1 display reduced survival in macrophages although there is no significant difference in virulence [38].
More recently, an additional potential mechanism linking fungal metabolism to virulence has been proposed. A recent preprint reported a role for sterol metabolism in shaping virulence of F. oxysporum in mammalian hosts [22]. Clinically derived isolates were found to exhibit altered ergosterol homeostasis, including increased extracellular ergosterol release, which was associated with enhanced pathogenicity in a murine infection model. Mechanistically, extracellular ergosterol promoted macrophage cytotoxicity through caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis and modulated inflammatory signaling by inducing pro-inflammatory cytokines while suppressing chemokine production, resulting in impaired neutrophil recruitment. These findings suggest that fungal sterol metabolism may contribute to virulence not only through its role in membrane biology but also by directly influencing host immune responses.
Models to study Fusarium infection
There is a growing interest in studying Fusarium spp. as medically important fungi and models to evaluate and study their virulence are rapidly developing (Fig 2). Multiple mouse models of infection have been established for use with members of the FOSC. Systemic models of fusariosis based on intravenous infection of neutropenic mice have been used to study disseminated disease, in which chlamydospores, the survival spore of Fusarium, are produced in infected tissues [39]. Murine models of pulmonary infection have also been developed using intranasal or intratracheal inoculation, resulting in rapid disease progression and high mortality that underscore the capacity of Fusarium to cause severe respiratory disease in immunocompromised hosts [40]. A contact lens-associated model of infection for Fusarium keratitis has been established and demonstrated that hyphae preincubated on the contact lens could establish a corneal infection within 24 hours [21,41].
Fig 2. Summary of ex vivo and in vivo models to study invasive Fusarium infections.

Figure created in BioRender.
To reduce animal usage, ex vivo models have also been applied to study fungal infectivity in mammalian hosts, with primary cells and macrophage cell lines representing some of the most widely used systems. For instance, primary human cornea fibroblasts [42] and epithelial cell lines [43] have been developed to assess fungal virulence factors associated with keratitis. Phagocytes constitute the first line of defense against invading fungal cells, and hence, the initial interaction between host phagocytes and fungal cells plays a crucial role in determining the outcome of infection [44,45]. Both primary macrophages and immortalized cell lines (e.g., THP-1, J774.1, or RAW 264.7) are commonly used to model these interactions [46]. Cell lines offer practical advantages, including ease of culture, reproducibility, and suitability for high-throughput screening. However, they often exhibit altered or attenuated immune responses compared to primary cells. In contrast, primary macrophages more faithfully recapitulate physiological immune signaling, including pattern recognition receptor engagement, cytokine production, and polarization states, but are limited by donor variability and experimental scalability. Among primary macrophages, both murine- and human-derived cells are widely used. Murine macrophages provide experimental accessibility and compatibility with in vivo models, whereas human macrophages offer greater translational relevance, capturing species-specific immune pathways that may influence host–pathogen interactions [47,48].
These systems have been instrumental in defining key aspects of Fusarium–phagocyte interactions. For example, live-cell video microscopy of J774.1 macrophages challenged with F. oxysporum germlings showed that macrophages migrate toward and engulf the fungus with kinetics similar to those previously reported only for Candida albicans, with comparable engulfment times (~6.7 min) and uptake efficiency (~95% to 96% of bound cells internalized within 15 min) [49]. Notably, macrophages migrated more rapidly toward F. oxysporum germlings than toward C. albicans. Following internalization, continued hyphal growth caused macrophage lysis and fungal escape. Furthermore, intracellular F. oxysporum arrested macrophage cytokinesis, producing multinucleated daughter cells that remained connected by the fungal hypha, a phenotype not described for C. albicans. Species-level comparisons using primary human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages further showed that hyphal damage scales with effector-to-target ratio, but that F. solani hyphae resist immune-mediated killing more than both F. oxysporum and the weakly pathogenic mold Verticillium nigrescens, suggesting resistance to phagocyte-mediated killing correlates with the pathogenic potential of Fusarium species rather than representing a generic characteristic of filamentous fungi [50]. Together, these findings highlight the dynamic interplay between fungal morphogenesis, immune activation, and host cell damage that shapes the outcome of fusariosis at the cellular level, and begin to distinguish Fusarium-specific evasion strategies from those documented for other fungal pathogens.
Demonstrating a striking similarity in the infection process, environmental amoebas have also been used as powerful models to study the ecology and cellular microbial-phagocyte interactions. The free-living amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii, which grows optimally at ~30 °C and remains viable at higher temperatures in some strains, has been widely exploited as an alternative system for studying fungal–phagocyte interactions at ambient conditions [51]. Amoebae and macrophages share conserved features such as phagocytosis, phagosome maturation, and microbicidal processes, enabling modeling of key host–pathogen interactions. In this context, A. castellanii provides a complementary platform that captures aspects of the environmental and ecological interactions that may shape microbial virulence prior to encounter with mammalian hosts.
Studies using this model have provided insights into Fusarium ecology and host interaction dynamics. F. solani conidia are readily internalized by A. castellanii but remain viable and can germinate intracellularly, with emerging hyphae eventually breaching the trophozoite, indicating that this species actively resists rather than merely tolerates amoebal predation [51]. Moreover, co-culture with live amoebae, as well as exposure to amoebal lysates or conditioned media, significantly enhances fungal growth, suggesting that amoeba-derived factors can promote Fusarium proliferation independently of direct cell contact. Interestingly, these interactions appear to be mutually beneficial in a strain-dependent manner. Exposure to F. solani increased encystment in some A. castellanii strains and enhanced chlorhexidine resistance in another, whereas passage of F. solani through amoeba increased its cytopathic activity toward mammalian cells, indicating a potentially mutualistic or permissive relationship rather than a purely predatory one. These findings extend the amoeboid predator–fungal virulence hypothesis, which proposes that environmental amoebae select for fungal traits promoting resistance to mammalian phagocytes [52]. In contrast to a purely predator–prey relationship, the Fusarium–Acanthamoeba interaction appears to confer reciprocal benefits to both organisms. These findings support the idea that amoeba–fungus interactions in environmental niches may influence fungal fitness and persistence, and could have downstream implications for infection, including in the context of keratitis.
Both macrophage- and amoeba-based systems are amenable to real-time monitoring of fungal–phagocyte interactions at single-cell resolution, enabling dynamic analysis of processes such as uptake, intracellular survival, and escape through live-cell imaging and flow cytometry. These models are also compatible with medium- to high-throughput approaches, although amoeba-based systems offer practical advantages in scalability and cost. However, both systems represent reductionist models that do not recapitulate the full complexity of in vivo infection, lacking multicellular immune interactions, tissue-specific microenvironments, and systemic immune responses. This limitation is particularly pronounced for amoebae, which operate outside of a mammalian immune context and therefore provide a more distant approximation of host–pathogen interactions.
Another heterologous model that has proven useful in assessing Fusarium virulence has been the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella [53]. This insect model can be maintained close to human physiological temperature and possesses an innate immune system, including phagocytic hemocytes that are similar to mammalian phagocytes and are able to ingest the fungal conidium, and antimicrobial effector responses, enabling the study of systemic host–pathogen interactions in a whole-organism context.
Studies using Galleria have provided important insights into Fusarium pathogenesis and host interactions, while highlighting a feature that is unusual among medically important fungi: the same F. oxysporum isolate is able to cause disease in tomato plants, immunosuppressed mice, and Galleria, providing a rare trans-kingdom model for directly comparing virulence mechanisms across plant, invertebrate, and mammalian hosts. Infection with this isolate results in dose-dependent killing of larvae at both 30 °C and 37 °C following microconidia injection, and heat-killed conidia fail to induce mortality, demonstrating that virulence depends on active fungal growth rather than toxic or structural properties of the inoculum. Imaging with GFP-labeled strains revealed extensive hyphal proliferation within the hemocoel, interactions with hemocytes, and eventual dissemination throughout the larval body [54]. Importantly, mutants exhibiting reduced virulence in murine infection models display comparable attenuation in Galleria, supporting the predictive value of this model for identifying mammalian virulence determinants. In parallel, FSSC clinical isolates exhibit high lethality in larvae regardless of their clinical origin, with macroconidia displaying greater virulence than microconidia [53]. Killing kinetics in this model correlate with disease severity observed in murine infections, further reinforcing its relevance. Importantly, antifungal treatment with amphotericin B significantly prolongs survival in infected larvae, validating Galleria as a platform for antifungal efficacy testing.
Compared with ex vivo cell-based systems, Galleria provides greater biological complexity while remaining experimentally tractable and cost-effective, allowing simultaneous assessment of fungal dissemination, host survival, and antifungal efficacy at the whole-organism level. However, it lacks adaptive immunity and does not fully recapitulate mammalian immune signaling, positioning it as an intermediate model between reductionist cell-based systems and vertebrate infection models.
Concluding remarks
The compartmentalized genome organization of clinical Fusarium isolates presents an investigation focal point to understand the contribution of accessory genes to human infection and to elucidate virulence mechanisms of this cross-kingdom pathogen. The completion of the genomes of several clinical isolates and the establishment of in vivo and ex vivo infection models offer tremendous opportunities to study this group of critically understudied medically important fungal pathogens. However, there are challenges and many unanswered questions that the Fusarium research community is facing. We know there are shared accessory genes among several related STs. Will more distantly related STs also share these potential virulence factors, or is the ability to infect mammalian hosts derived from convergent evolution? Even though the FOSC community is adapting the fusariosis strain NRRL 32931 [16], the keratitis strain MRL8996 [21], and the common ST33 strain FoCI-2 [20] as models to study infections [22], genotyping additional strains is necessary to understand the diversity of this highly dynamic pathogen group. One challenge, and also an opportunity, is the compartmentalized nature of FOSC genomes. Since all FOSC genomes share most of their genes as part of the core genome, it is desirable and possible to have a database that links annotations derived from individual genome projects to a unified nomenclature based on orthologs. Understanding the intrinsic antifungal resistance among this group of pathogens is another pressing question. With the growing population that is immunocompromised, there is an urgent need to develop effective anti-Fusaria drugs based on the understanding of their virulence and the mechanisms of intrinsic antifungal resistance.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Michielse CB, Rep M. Pathogen profile update: Fusarium oxysporum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10(3):311–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00538.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coleman JJ. The Fusarium solani species complex: ubiquitous pathogens of agricultural importance. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17(2):146–58. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Geiser DM, Al-Hatmi AMS, Aoki T, Arie T, Balmas V, Barnes I. Phylogenomic analysis of a 55.1-kb 19-gene dataset resolves a monophyletic Fusarium that includes the Fusarium solani species complex. Phytopathology. 2021;111:1064–79. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-20-0330-LE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guarro J. Fusariosis, a complex infection caused by a high diversity of fungal species refractory to treatment. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32(12):1491–500. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1924-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.O’Donnell K, Gueidan C, Sink S, Johnston PR, Crous PW, Glenn A, et al. A two-locus DNA sequence database for typing plant and human pathogens within the Fusarium oxysporum species complex. Fungal Genet Biol. 2009;46(12):936–48. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Short DPG, O’Donnell K, Zhang N, Juba JH, Geiser DM. Widespread occurrence of diverse human pathogenic types of the fungus Fusarium detected in plumbing drains. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(12):4264–72. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05468-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.O’Donnell K, Sutton DA, Rinaldi MG, Magnon KC, Cox PA, Revankar SG, et al. Genetic diversity of human pathogenic members of the Fusarium oxysporum complex inferred from multilocus DNA sequence data and amplified fragment length polymorphism analyses: Evidence for the recent dispersion of a geographically widespread clonal lineage and nosocomial origin. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(11):5109–20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5109-5120.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cintra MEC, da Silva Dantas M, Al-Hatmi AMS, Bastos RW, Rossato L. Fusarium keratitis: A systematic review (1969 to 2023). Mycopathologia. 2024;189(5):74. doi: 10.1007/s11046-024-00874-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Imamura Y, Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, Lattif AA, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Pearlman E, et al. Fusarium and Candida albicans biofilms on soft contact lenses: model development, influence of lens type, and susceptibility to lens care solutions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(1):171–82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00387-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chang DC, Grant GB, O’Donnell K, Wannemuehler KA, Noble-Wang J, Rao CY, et al. Multistate outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with use of a contact lens solution. JAMA. 2006;296(8):953–63. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.8.953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.O’Donnell K, Sarver BAJ, Brandt M, Chang DC, Noble-Wang J, Park BJ, et al. Phylogenetic diversity and microsphere array-based genotyping of human pathogenic Fusaria, including isolates from the multistate contact lens-associated U.S. keratitis outbreaks of 2005 and 2006. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(7):2235–48. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00533-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nucci M, Anaissie E. Invasive fusariosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2023;36: e00159–22. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00159-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Muhammed M, Anagnostou T, Desalermos A, Kourkoumpetis TK, Carneiro HA, Glavis-Bloom J, et al. Fusarium infection: Report of 26 cases and review of 97 cases from the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2013;92(6):305–16. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Muhammed M, Coleman JJ, Carneiro HA, Mylonakis E. The challenge of managing fusariosis. Virulence. 2011;2(2):91–6. doi: 10.4161/viru.2.2.15015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Y, Yang H, Turra D, Zhou S, Ayhan DH, DeIulio GA, et al. The genome of opportunistic fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum carries a unique set of lineage-specific chromosomes. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0770-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Castillo-Castañeda A, Cañas-Duarte SJ, Guevara-Suarez M, Guarro J, Restrepo S, Celis Ramírez AM. Transcriptional response of Fusarium oxysporum and Neocosmospora solani challenged with amphotericin B or posaconazole. Microbiology. 2020;:936–46. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.James JE, Lamping E, Santhanam J, Cannon RD. PDR transporter ABC1 is involved in the innate azole resistance of the human fungal pathogen Fusarium keratoplasticum. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:673206. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.673206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.He D, Feng Z, Gao S, Wei Y, Han S, Wang L. Contribution of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase to azole resistance in Fusarium oxysporum. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:709942. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.709942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shea TP, Coleman JJ, Cuomo CA. Genome assembly of a clinical Fusarium oxysporum ST33 isolate. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2026;15(7):e0026926. doi: 10.1128/mra.00269-26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ayhan DH, Abbondante S, Martínez-Soto D, Wu S, Rodriguez-Vargas R, Milo S, et al. Host-specific adaptation in Fusarium oxysporum correlates with distinct accessory chromosome content in human and plant pathogenic strains. mBio. 2025;16(8):e0095125. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00951-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rocha MC, Adeoye J, Hayby H, Wu M, Ortigossa ES, Garbe E. Sterol remodeling in Fusarium oxysporum drives mammalian virulence through pyroptosis and chemokine suppression. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9124666/v1 [DOI]
- 23.Balmas V, Fancellu F, Sanna S, Scherm B, Migheli Q, Malbrán I. Water distribution systems in Sardinian hospitals host invasive clonal lineages of the Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium solani species complexes. Mycologia. 2021;113(4):725–33. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2021.1905497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ma L-J, van der Does HC, Borkovich KA, Coleman JJ, Daboussi M-J, Di Pietro A, et al. Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium. Nature. 2010;464(7287):367–73. doi: 10.1038/nature08850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang Y, Liu S, Mostert D, Yu H, Zhuo M, Li G, et al. Virulence of banana wilt-causing fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum tropical race 4 is mediated by nitric oxide biosynthesis and accessory genes. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9(9):2232–43. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01779-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vlaardingerbroek I, Beerens B, Schmidt SM, Cornelissen BJC, Rep M. Dispensable chromosomes in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17(9):1455–66. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ortoneda M, Guarro J, Madrid MP, Caracuel Z, Roncero MIG, Mayayo E, et al. Fusarium oxysporum as a multihost model for the genetic dissection of fungal virulence in plants and mammals. Infect Immun. 2004;72(3):1760–6. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1760-1766.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.López Díaz C, Ayhan DH, Rodríguez López A, Gómez Gil L, Ma L-J, Di Pietro A. Transposons and accessory genes drive adaptation in a clonally evolving fungal pathogen. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):6982. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62213-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Prados-Rosales RC, Roldán-Rodríguez R, Serena C, López-Berges MS, Guarro J, Martínez-del-Pozo Á, et al. A PR-1-like protein of Fusarium oxysporum functions in virulence on mammalian hosts. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(26):21970–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.364034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Prados-Rosales RC, Serena C, Delgado-Jarana J, Guarro J, Di Pietro A. Distinct signalling pathways coordinately contribute to virulence of Fusarium oxysporum on mammalian hosts. Microbes Infect. 2006;8(14–15):2825–31. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ruiz-Roldán MC, Garre V, Guarro J, Mariné M, Roncero MIG. Role of the white collar 1 photoreceptor in carotenogenesis, UV resistance, hydrophobicity, and virulence of Fusarium oxysporum. Eukaryot Cell. 2008;7(7):1227–30. doi: 10.1128/EC.00072-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.López-Berges MS, Hera C, Sulyok M, Schäfer K, Capilla J, Guarro J, et al. The velvet complex governs mycotoxin production and virulence of Fusarium oxysporum on plant and mammalian hosts. Mol Microbiol. 2013;87(1):49–65. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.López-Díaz C, Rahjoo V, Sulyok M, Ghionna V, Martín-Vicente A, Capilla J, et al. Fusaric acid contributes to virulence of Fusarium oxysporum on plant and mammalian hosts. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19(2):440–53. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Haas H, Eisendle M, Turgeon BG. Siderophores in fungal physiology and virulence. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2008;46:149–87. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.López-Berges MS, Capilla J, Turrà D, Schafferer L, Matthijs S, Jöchl C, et al. HapX-mediated iron homeostasis is essential for rhizosphere competence and virulence of the soilborne pathogen Fusarium oxysporum. Plant Cell. 2012;24(9):3805–22. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.098624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leal SM Jr, Roy S, Vareechon C, Carrion S deJesus, Clark H, Lopez-Berges MS, et al. Targeting iron acquisition blocks infection with the fungal pathogens Aspergillus fumigatus and Fusarium oxysporum. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(7):e1003436. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lorenzo-Gutiérrez D, Gómez-Gil L, Guarro J, Roncero MIG, Capilla J, López-Fernández L. Cu transporter protein CrpF protects against Cu-induced toxicity in Fusarium oxysporum. Virulence. 2020;11(1):1108–21. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1809324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lorenzo-Gutiérrez D, Gómez-Gil L, Guarro J, Roncero MIG, Fernández-Bravo A, Capilla J, et al. Role of the Fusarium oxysporum metallothionein Mt1 in resistance to metal toxicity and virulence. Metallomics. 2019;11(7):1230–40. doi: 10.1039/c9mt00081j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schäfer K, Di Pietro A, Gow NAR, MacCallum D. Murine model for Fusarium oxysporum invasive fusariosis reveals organ-specific structures for dissemination and long-term persistence. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lionakis MS, Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Wiederhold NP, Raad II, Samonis G, et al. Pentamidine is active in a neutropenic murine model of acute invasive pulmonary fusariosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(1):294–7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.1.294-297.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sun Y, Chandra J, Mukherjee P, Szczotka-Flynn L, Ghannoum MA, Pearlman E. A murine model of contact lens-associated Fusarium keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(3):1511–6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brown ME, Montgomery ML, Kamath MM, Nicholas S, Liu Y, Karamichos D, et al. A novel 3D culture model of fungal keratitis to explore host-pathogen interactions within the stromal environment. Exp Eye Res. 2021;207:108581. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2021.108581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zimmermann A, Theuersbacher J, Han H, Herzog L, Schrenker B, Lotz C, et al. A 3D Fusarium keratitis model reveals isolate-specific adhesion and invasion properties in the Fusarium solani species complex. mSphere. 2025;10(11):e0032825. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00328-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Erwig LP, Gow NAR. Interactions of fungal pathogens with phagocytes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(3):163–76. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hünniger K, Kurzai O. Phagocytes as central players in the defence against invasive fungal infection. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;89:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ding T, Du Y, Yang B, Tian W, Li J, Xie J. Comprehensive review of macrophage models: Primary cells and immortalized lines across species. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1640935. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1640935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dill-McFarland KA, Peterson G, Lim PN, Skerrett S, Hawn TR, Rothchild AC, et al. Shared and distinct responses of human and murine alveolar macrophages and monocyte-derived macrophages to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Immunohorizons. 2025;9(11):vlaf051. doi: 10.1093/immhor/vlaf051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.David C, Brea D, Verney C, Cezard A, Vasseur V, Briard B, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of murine and human ex vivo cultured alveolar macrophages. ERJ Open Res. 2025;11(3):00859–2024. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00859-2024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schäfer K, Bain JM, Di Pietro A, Gow NAR, Erwig LP. Hyphal growth of phagocytosed Fusarium oxysporum causes cell lysis and death of murine macrophages. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Winn RM, Gil-Lamaignere C, Maloukou A, Roilides E, EUROFUNG Network. Interactions of human phagocytes with moulds Fusarium spp. and Verticillium nigrescens possessing different pathogenicity. Med Mycol. 2003;41(6):503–9. doi: 10.1080/1369378030001615394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nunes TET, Brazil NT, Fuentefria AM, Rott MB. Acanthamoeba and Fusarium interactions: A possible problem in keratitis. Acta Trop. 2016;157:102–7. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fu MS, Liporagi-Lopes LC, Dos Santos SR Júnior, Tenor JL, Perfect JR, Cuomo CA, et al. Amoeba predation of Cryptococcus neoformans results in pleiotropic changes to traits associated with virulence. mBio. 2021;12(2):e00567-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00567-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Coleman JJ, Muhammed M, Kasperkovitz PV, Vyas JM, Mylonakis E. Fusarium pathogenesis investigated using Galleria mellonella as a heterologous host. Fungal Biol. 2011;115(12):1279–89. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Navarro-Velasco GY, Prados-Rosales RC, Ortíz-Urquiza A, Quesada-Moraga E, Di Pietro A. Galleria mellonella as model host for the trans-kingdom pathogen Fusarium oxysporum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011;48(12):1124–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
