Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Sep 1;22(55):e74934. doi: 10.1002/smll.74934

One‐Step, High‐Yield Deconstruction of Kraft Lignin Into a Redox‐Active Small Molecule Using Sonicated Emulsive Water Microdroplets

Supriya Das 1,2, Yuting Zhou 1,2, Seth W Croslow 1,2, Shi Li 3, Dong Ok Kim 1, Armando Santiago‐Carboney 1, Shaofeng Huang 1,2, Hung V Nguyen 2,4, Charles M Schroeder 1,2,4,5, Jonathan V Sweedler 1,2, Rajeev S Assary 3, Jeffrey S Moore 1,2, Joaquín Rodríguez‐López 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13630413  PMID: 42682022

ABSTRACT

Lignin is an abundant biofeedstock that holds great potential for producing renewable organic chemicals, but its effective valorization is difficult due to low conversion rates and the need for harsh reaction conditions, which impact selectivity. Here, we introduce an alternative to catalyzed thermochemical and electrochemical methods consisting of a fast one‐step (∼20 min) uncatalyzed use of sonicated emulsive water microdroplets (SEWMs) to efficiently deconstruct Kraft lignin (∼14.2 kDa). We converted Kraft lignin selectively and in high yield (∼56% ± 5%) into SEMILL‐A (∼656 Da), composed of possible structural isomers of a redox‐active small molecule to which we assigned a structure consisting of substituted nitrophenyl units attached to a coumarin dicarboxylic acid core. Characterization of SEMILL‐A was carried out using infrared spectroscopy, 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, high‐resolution mass spectrometry, chromatography, and electrochemical analysis. We show the possibility of SEWMs to activate C─C bond cleavage and to facilitate reductive nitration in Kraft lignin and a model compound. Our study highlights a distinctive reactive environment within SEWMs where sonochemical excitation and redox microdroplet chemistry synergistically enable novel deconstructive pathways for biofeedstock valorization.

Keywords: deconstruction, kraft lignin, microdroplets, redox, valorization


This study reports a rapid (∼20 min), uncatalyzed deconstruction of Kraft lignin (∼14.2 kDa) using sonicated emulsive water microdroplets (SEWMs) in the presence of 2.5 M HNO3. The work demonstrates the combined synergistic effect of sonochemical excitation and microdroplet redox chemistry to induce C─C bond cleavage and reductive nitration to transform Kraft lignin into SEMILL‐A (∼656 Da), composed of possible structural isomers of a redox‐active small molecule.

graphic file with name SMLL-22-e74934-g002.webp

1. Introduction

In recent years, significant efforts have been focused on using renewable biofeedstocks to replace chemicals typically derived from petroleum [1, 2]. The U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Department of Agriculture established a goal to grow the percentage of materials and chemicals made from bio‐based substances from 5% in 2005 to 25% in 2030 [3]. Lignin is the second most abundant polymer on earth and occurs naturally as an integral part of lignocellulose in plants [4]. It is an amorphous polymer comprising three major phenylpropanoid units (monolignols) linked by carbon–carbon and ether bonds [5, 6, 7]. (Figure 1a, adapted from ref 7). In contrast to the polysaccharide components of lignocellulose biomass, which are further used in the paper and pulp industry, 50 million tons of lignin produced annually worldwide are discarded as waste and incinerated to produce steam and process energy [8]. From this perspective, efficient methods for transforming lignin into value‐added products are crucial for the overall economic viability and sustainability of lignocellulose biorefineries [1, 9, 10]. However, its deconstruction into well‐defined carbon‐containing compounds such as aromatics and heterocycles remains challenging due to its cross‐linked aromatic structure and the prevalence of strong C─C bonds.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Deconstruction of lignin using sonicated emulsive water microdroplets: (a) A representative structure of pine tree lignin, showcasing the structural irregularity and different C─C and C─O linkages. (b) Visual representation of color changes observed in Kraft lignin after treatment with SEWMs. This was accomplished by sonicating ∼8 mL 1:3 water(2.5 M HNO3):hexadecane with 100 mg Kraft lignin in a 20‐mL borosilicate vial for 15–20 min. The dark brown suspension of Kraft lignin is transformed into an orange aqueous solution, named SEMILL‐A, which is isolated as an orange powder in contrast to the black Kraft lignin powder. (c) Schematic of experimental setup for the generation of water microdroplets through oil‐water via sonication. (d) An optical microscope image of sonicated emulsive water microdroplets (SEWMs). (e) Sonication in the absence of the oil phase to form microdroplets does not lead to the formation of SEMILL‐A, and the conversion of the dark Kraft lignin powder is significantly lower. (f) SEMILL‐A as a pH‐sensitive indicator, transforming from a yellowish aqueous solution at pH 2 to a deep red aqueous solution at pH 10.

Conventional methods used to transform lignin are often energy and chemically intensive, often relying on metal‐catalyzed or harsh reaction conditions to alter its structure, typically breaking it down into smaller fragments [11]. Successful methods to do so include thermochemical pyrolysis, gasification, reductive catalytic fractionation, and microwave‐assisted methods [11, 12]. Chemical treatments, including acid and base‐catalysis, oxidative treatments, and hydrolysis in strong chemical environments, can also accomplish transformations of lignin [2]. Electrocatalytic depolymerization of lignin is a relatively recent method for deriving value‐added products from lignin in a sustainable manner using electricity as a replacement for chemical reagents in milder conditions [13, 14]. However, high‐temperature electrochemical batch reactors are often needed to increase efficiency and selectivity, increasing the chance of electrode corrosion and fouling, reducing electrolyzer lifetime, and increasing their cost [15, 16]. Biological processes utilizing bacteria, fungi, or enzymes also exist [17, 18]. A significant focus of the aforementioned processes has been placed on the production of molecules such as vanillin and its derivatives, which are of interest to the food industry. The inherent chemical diversity of lignin motivated us to explore alternative methodologies that could overcome the use of high temperature and catalysts to produce potentially different chemical compounds.

Accelerating chemical processes using aqueous microdroplets is an emerging and powerful method for performing otherwise slow processes in bulk without harsh reaction conditions or the use of catalysts [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25] – some pioneer works among those are accelerated bimolecular reactions [26], C─C bond formation [27], synthesis and catalysis in charged droplets [28, 29], generation of nano‐structured patterns and nanobrushes via microdroplets [30, 31], etc. Microdroplets can be generated using a variety of techniques, including electrosprays [32], nebulizers [33, 34], and sonicated water‐in‐oil microemulsions (e.g., SEWMs). Although microdroplet studies have revealed enhanced reactivity [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40], the exact mechanisms underlying their operation remain unclear [39]. Large interfacial electrostatic fields [38], redox reactions including those between oil and water phases [38, 39, 40, 41], and improved mass transport [42] are aspects that have been implicated in their mode of action. Recently, we reported on SEWMs using a hexadecane oil phase, resulting in an ambipolar redox microenvironment where reductive conditions, evidenced by the evolution of H2, simultaneously enabled the reduction of atmospheric O2 to generate oxidizing reactive oxygen species such as H2O2 and ∙OH, all occurring at room temperature using a simple commercial ultrasonic bath [39]. The work reported on using spray droplets’ mechanochemistry to disintegrate minerals into nanoparticles aligns well with our work on lignin deconstruction [43, 44]. Here, we sought to harness the combined chemical, redox, and sonochemical components [45] of SEWMs to pursue a complex mechanochemical transformation without the need for any added catalyst, as is usually required for deconstructing Kraft lignin. Despite the structural complexity of lignin, we surprisingly found conversion into a small, discrete chemical compound bearing evidence of C─O, C─C bond cleavage and redox via nitro group incorporation from NO3− found in solution. This compound was obtained in high yield using a single, uncatalyzed reaction step, which only occurred when using inherently biphasic SEWMs.

2. Results and Discussion

We generated SEWMs using water/hexadecane as the biphasic system, with the aqueous phase acidified with 2.5 M HNO3. Kraft lignin, a dark, insoluble powder, was initially suspended in a mixture of acidic aqueous solution and hexadecane in a 1:3 ratio by volume (Figure 1c), contained in a borosilicate glass container and positioned as described in Note S1. During the 15–20 min of ultrasonic irradiation, which generates SEWMs of diameters of ∼ 2.2 µm (Figure 1d), the dark suspension transformed into a bright orange emulsion, which separated from a black insoluble residue (Figure 1b). This median droplet size (Figure S21) is consistent with that identified for the production of a large number of reactive species under sonication due to curvature‐dependent enhancement and a high surface‐area‐to‐volume ratio, which can be enhanced via sonomechanochemistry in these micron‐sized water droplets. This geometric effect has been reported to create intense electrostatic fields that strongly accelerate interfacial redox chemistry [46, 47]. We centrifuged the mixture to separate the hexadecane phase, which could be stored for reuse. The orange aqueous solution from the SEWMs procedure was filtered from the rest of the precipitate, extracted with ethyl acetate, dried in a rotary evaporator to remove excess solvent, and lyophilized in a freeze‐dryer to yield a bright orange powder (Figure 1b). A control experiment was performed in an aqueous‐acidified suspension in the absence of hexadecane oil, and thus without generating emulsive microdroplets. Even with a longer sonication time of 1 hour, it was clear that a lower degree of transformation had occurred, if any (Figure 1e), and its analysis showed profound differences from the feature experiment using SEWMs (Figure S2). Similarly, adding other inorganic acids (e.g., H2SO4 or HCl) or bases (e.g., KOH) in the absence of NO3− simply generates an emulsion but does not result in the formation of the orange compound. Emulsification of Kraft lignin with only the oil/water phase is also insufficient to cause any transformation. Additionally, only mixing 2.5 M nitric acid with Kraft lignin for an extended time did not yield any change in the reaction mixture. Although we are unable to pinpoint the participation of exact reactive species for this complex transformation, purging the system with Ar to remove oxygen from the system showed no similar transformation to form the bright‐orange solution, obtained under ambient conditions (Figure S20). Our previous work showed that SEWMs preferentially reduce O2 in a 2e − pathway to generate reactive oxygen species, which seem to be required to generate SEMILL‐A. Thus, we established that the generation of SEWMs via ultrasonication using a biphasic system is necessary for the swift and profound transformation of lignin described here.

As discussed in the following sections, the water‐soluble orange powder, which we call SEMILL‐A (sonicated emulsive microdroplet discovered in Illinois‐A), was obtained in high yield and likely consists of isomeric forms of a compound with a molecular weight 656 Da. Starting from 100 mg of Kraft lignin with a M n of 14 200 Da, the yield of SEMILL‐A (the lyophilized orange powder) was 56% ± 5% by weight (n = 12 independent experiments), obtained by comparing the initial compound mass to that of the lyophilized final product. The final mass of SEMILL‐A plus the dried black residue was calculated to be ∼ 109 ± 2 mg and thus was higher than the weight of the starting material (100 mg) due to the addition of oxygen and nitrogen to the final products. The Kraft lignin used here is extracted from pine wood pulp, and the structural diversity in the reactant typically extends to the products [48]. The diverse structural variation of lignin also imposes significant challenges in using commercial lignin as the starting material for the industrial production of value‐added products. As we will describe below, the discrete nature of SEMILL‐A points to a distinct direction to generate eco‐sourced, structurally diverse, redox‐active molecules from a variety of complex biofeedstocks. SEMILL‐A is redox‐active, pH‐sensitive (Figure 1f), and its structure contains a coumarin core and derivatized nitrophenol units, making it attractive for electrochemical, analytical, and synthetic applications.

2.1. Functional Group Characterization and Electrochemical Analysis

The functional group characterization of SEMILL‐A was carried out first using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Figure 2a). Compared to the original Kraft lignin, SEMILL‐A showed an intense peak at 1720 cm−1, attributed to the carbonyl C═O stretching vibration, indicating oxidation of Kraft lignin. The aromatic ring stretch vibration (1560 cm−1) is present in both compounds, but with a decreased intensity in SEMILL‐A. The growth of the 1360 cm−1 peak and the simultaneous appearance of a sharp feature at 1600 cm−1 suggest the incorporation of nitro functional groups attached to an aromatic ring in SEMILL‐A. The broad conjoined peak at 1420 cm−1 in both samples indicates persistence of the O─H deformation mode of phenol [49, 50]. Finally, the appearance of a broad peak around 3500 cm−1 suggested the presence of the phenolic and carboxylic ‐OH groups in the modified structure. Overall, the significant changes in the number, intensity, and broadness of peaks observed in FTIR suggest a dramatic transformation of the traditionally assigned lignin building units [51, 52] (Figure S1).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Functional group and electrochemical characterization of Kraft lignin and SEMILL‐A: (a) FTIR spectra of Kraft lignin and SEMILL‐A. (b) 500 MHz 1H NMR of Kraft lignin and SEMILL‐A in DMSO‐d6. (c) Electrochemical characterization of SEMILL‐A using cyclic voltammetry at different concentrations and using a Pt electrode (1 mm radius) as the working electrode in DMF + 0.1 M TBAPF6 inside an Ar‐filled glovebox. The top inset shows a comparison with the cyclic voltammogram of Kraft lignin, demonstrating the distinct redox activity of SEMILL‐A. Bottom inset shows a linear plot of peak current (I P) versus the square root of the scan rate (√ν) according to the Randles–Ševčík equation. Potentials referenced vs. a polypyrrole quasi‐reference electrode (PpyQRE). (d) Attenuated total reflectance – surface enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy (ATR‐SEIRAS) on Au electrode at different potentials referenced vs. PpyQRE, at a concentration of 1 mg/mL of SEMILL‐A in DMF + 0.1 M TBAPF6.

The 1H NMR analysis of Kraft lignin and SEMILL‐A also displayed significant changes in their structural properties, as shown in Figure 2b. Although the NMR results obtained from Kraft lignin showed broad bands due to its intensive polymeric framework [52], sharp, intense peaks were observed for SEMILL‐A. Upon structural analysis, the multiplet peaks between 7 – 8 ppm correspond to aromatic protons (ascribed to a coumarin core and nitrophenol units, vide infra), whereas the peaks around 9 – 10 ppm correlate well with a second type of protons (ascribed to ‐OH protons of nitrophenol units, vide infra) [53]. The intense, sharp peaks near 4 ppm primarily resulted from the presence of ether bonds and aliphatic protons adjacent to the strong electron‐withdrawing units observed in the structure, which connect the coumarin core to the nitrophenol units. Carboxylic acid protons were observed around 13–14 ppm, ascribed to the coumarin core.

2D‐NMR methods such as 2D‐HSQC NMR (Figure S7) and 2D‐COSY NMR (Figure S8) were used to complement 13C NMR analysis (Figure S5), allowing us to assign the protons found in 1H NMR to their corresponding carbons. The small peak at around 9–10 ppm, which is not present in the 2D‐HSQC NMR spectrum, suggests that phenolic protons are indeed present. 2D DOSY NMR spectra further supported the formation of a discrete kind of compound as the main product, having an estimated diffusion coefficient value of 4.5 × 10−10 m2/s in DMF (Figure S9). The diffusion coefficient obtained via electrochemical simulation (Figure S16) was 3.5 × 10−10 m2/s, showing agreement with the DOSY NMR data.

The functional groups identified in NMR and IR were further confirmed through functional group spot tests. Nitro (‐NO2) group incorporation was confirmed by the Mulliken–Berker test, where a positive result exhibits an Ag mirror on the wall of the test tube (Figure S18a). On the other hand, Tollens' test for aldehydes using a similar Ag mirror was negative. Aliphatic primary alcohol groups tested positive with the Jones reagent but tested negative with the Lucas test for secondary and tertiary alcohols (Figure S18b). Aqueous solutions of SEMILL‐A displayed titratable acid‐base behavior, showing at least two neutralization events with pKa ∼ 5 and pKa ∼ 8, with the first suggesting a weak acid and the second within the range of nitrophenols [54] (Figure S17).

We assessed the redox activity of SEMILL‐A by performing cyclic voltammetry (CV) studies in a glovebox without the interference of moisture and oxygen. The compound showed a single wave, devoid of evident redox‐active contaminations, which exhibited chemically reversible behavior with electrochemical quasi‐reversibility in solvents such as dimethylformamide (DMF) with reduction and oxidation peaks at around −1.2 and −0.6 V vs. polypyrrole quasi‐reference electrode (Fc/Fc+) (PpyQRE), respectively. The correlation of this feature to SEMILL‐A was evidenced by the increase in the peak current with increasing concentration in solution (Figure 2c). In comparison, no comparable redox behavior was observed for Kraft lignin in DMF. Scan‐rate dependent CV (Figure S15a) experiments showed a linear dependency of peak current (I P) with the square root of scan‐rate (√ν), indicating a diffusion‐limited process dominated by solubilized SEMILL‐A.

To verify the molecular nature of the CV signatures discussed above, we used in situ attenuated total reflectance surface‐enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy [55] (ATR‐SEIRAS) as shown in Figure 2d. A solution of 1 mg/mL of SEMILL‐A in DMF with 0.1 M TBAPF6 as the supporting electrolyte was electrolyzed in contact with an etched gold surface used as the electrode to generate the SEIRAS effect [55]. IR bands corresponding to the transformation of bonds were identified during the electrochemical process. With increasing negative potential, and across the redox waves observed in Figure 2c, we observed an increasing intensity of the peak at 1675 cm−1 and the appearance of a broad band at around 2900 cm−1, which are indicative of N─H modes (bending and stretching, respectively), with the former also having been ascribed to ─C═N bond stretching. On the other hand, the 1550 cm−1 peak denoting N─O stretching showed depletion during electrolysis, ascribing the redox activity to the reduction of ‐NO2 functional groups, which may generate N─H modes in the presence of the acidic protons of the structure. Previous work has identified redox‐active conjugated nitrophenolic units converting reversibly to 6‐iminocyclohexa‐2,4‐dien‐1‐one [56]. The electrochemical behavior highly resembles that of other aromatic nitro derivatives, both in redox potential and electrochemical reversibility [57, 58].

2.2. Structural Analysis Through Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

We next characterized the Kraft lignin deconstruction process. Previous reports have suggested the formation of numerous products during lignin depolymerization via chemical treatment [10, 46]. To evaluate the small‐molecule, discrete nature of SEMILL‐A and to understand the extent of deconstruction, we utilized matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI‐MS), which is a soft ionization technique that provides the exact molecular weights of the products formed in comparison to a polypeptide standard. Analysis of the MALDI‐TOF spectra revealed an intense peak at 656.08 m/z for SEMILL‐A (Figure 3a), consistent with the formation of a discrete organic compound as the major component of the obtained powder in high yield.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Mass spectrometric characterization of SEMILL‐A: (a) MALDI‐TOF spectra for the determination of the molecular weight and number of species present within the mass window of 600 – 3500 m/z, analyzed on a 384‐ground steel target plate with α‐cyano‐4‐hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) matrix and polypeptide standard. The appearance of a single peak at 656.08 Da implies the highest molecular weight of the product obtained (SEMILL‐A). (b) FT‐ICR analysis of SEMILL‐A within the mass window of 100 – 1000 m/z, analyzed on a 384‐ground steel target plate with α‐cyano‐4‐hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) matrix and polypeptide standard. The plot is indicative of the formation of a molecule with a base unit of 234.01 Da and two repeating units of 211.02 Da. (c) CID MS/MS analysis of the peak at 234.01 Da for structural analysis – the low energy CID and high energy CID MS/MS conclude the base unit to be 2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3,6‐dicarboxylic acid. (d) CID MS/MS analysis of the mass loss of 211.02 Da (neutral fragment) for structural elucidation – the fragment is correlated well with the molecular unit of 3‐hydroxy‐2‐(4‐hydroxy‐3‐nitrophenyl)propanal or one of its structural isomers.

We further refined the analysis of SEMILL‐A using MALDI coupled to the Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance method (MALDI‐FTICR) with a higher laser power to assess product formation in the mass range 100 to 1000 m/z. In addition to the originally observed peak (656.06 m/z), we observed the appearance of a second peak at 445.03 m/z with a 211.02 m/z mass difference between consecutive peaks at both higher and lower m/z (Figure 3b). There is also a base fragment of 234.01 m/z, which is observed in the original spectra in Figure 3b. These results indicate the formation of a molecule composed of a base unit of 234.01 Da, along with two repeating units of molecular weight around 211.02 Da. This thesis was further solidified with the MS/MS analysis of the 656.06 Da peak, which showed the appearance of the same peaks at 445.04 and 234.01 Da (Figure S14). During laser irradiation, the weaker C─O bonds are susceptible to dissociation to yield smaller fragments.

To further establish the structure of SEMILL‐A, collision‐induced dissociation tandem mass spectrometry (CID MS/MS) analysis was performed on the isolated 234.01 Da peak and the mass loss of 211.02 Da in positive mode. The observed low‐ and high‐energy mass spectra for the 234.01 Da unit correlated well with the main framework of a coumarin molecule with two carboxylic acid functional groups, identified to be 2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3,6‐dicarboxylic acid or one of its structural isomers (Figure 3c). Further analysis of the fragment with a mass of 211.02 Da was found to be a neutral loss, but with higher laser power, we obtained the CID MS/MS spectrum in the positive mode. Careful analysis of the high‐resolution fragmentation pattern matched well with 3‐hydroxy‐2‐(4‐hydroxy‐3‐nitrophenyl)propanal or one of its isomeric structures, confirming the presence of a nitrophenol framework as the redox‐active conjugated units participating in the redox behavior (Figure 3d). Taken together, mass spectrometry analysis strongly suggests that SEMILL‐A consists of an organic molecule that has substituted nitrophenyl units attached to a coumarin dicarboxylic acid core, with the following generalized structure assigned in Scheme 1. Such a structure is plausibly derived from that of Kraft lignin after significant C─C bond cleavage [7], rearrangement, and ‐NO2 incorporation [59] from the HNO3 used within SEWMs, via C─N bond formation [60]. UV–vis spectra further confirmed the presence of a coumarin core with an absorption peak at 280 nm along with a shoulder peak at 350 nm for the conjoined nitrophenol unit, in agreement with DFT analysis (Figure S19a). The DFT analysis of the FTIR spectra also indicated the presence of similar functional groups in these model compounds (Figure S19b).

SCHEME 1.

SCHEME 1

A representative generalized structure of probable candidates for SEMILL‐A obtained after SEWMs treatment of Kraft lignin.

Although instrumental characterization of SEMILL‐A unequivocally shows its discrete molecular nature, the extent of depolymerization was tested with gel permeation chromatography (GPC), high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and dialysis to validate the formation of a small molecule from lignin. Triplicate GPC data of SEMILL‐A, dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF), showed only one consistent peak (39 min) with a M n (number average molecular weight) of 0.4 kDa (with respect to the polystyrene standard). Not consistently observed, a smaller broad peak appearing earlier in the chromatogram (28 min), with a M n value around 11–13 kDa (Figure S10), was also evident. The latter value is consistent with the M n value of 14.2 kDa reported by the Kraft lignin supplier, confirming the accuracy of our results.

HPLC‐MS demonstrated the appearance of an intense peak at 7.9 min in the chromatogram (Figure 4a) that is consistent with 656 m/z, and thus consistent with the high‐resolution MS analysis of pure SEMILL‐A powder (Figure 4b). Although the HPLC peak is broad, we did not see evidence of the formation of other compounds via MS (Figure S11 and S12). HPLC‐MS analysis was further confirmed via GCMS analysis of SEMILL‐A, which also gave us the same mass spectrometric pattern for SEMILL‐A (Figure S12a). Finally, dialysis of the original Kraft lignin and SEMILL‐A with a membrane of molecular weight cut‐off (MWCO) of 1 kDa clearly showed permeation of a colorful aqueous solution for our product (Figure 4c), in stark contrast to Kraft lignin, which did not show signs of permeation with membranes of 1 kDa or even 8 kDa (Figure 4d). Together, these results unambiguously point to the deconstruction of polymeric lignin into a class of structurally related small molecules obtained in high yield via SEWMs, which constitute the vast majority of SEMILL‐A.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Chromatographic and membrane‐based analysis of SEMILL‐A. (a) Liquid chromatography showed the appearance of a single broad peak of significance at 7.9 min. (b) Corresponding mass spectrometric analysis of the peak signified the presence of peaks at 656 m/z and 234 m/z, correlating well with the high‐resolution mass spectrometric data. (c) Dialysis of SEMILL‐A with a membrane of 1 kDa MWCO showed clear permeation of the compound, rendering it a small molecule of molecular weight below 1 kDa. (d) Dialysis of Kraft lignin with membranes of 1 and 8 kDa MWCO showed no permeation of the polymer, proving its molecular weight to be above 8 kDa (M n ∼ 14.2 kDa reported by Sigma–Aldrich).

2.3. Mechanistic Understanding Through Model Compound

A noteworthy feature of the reported transformation of Kraft lignin into SEMILL‐A is the possibility to break selected C─C bonds in the lignin biopolymer. SEWMs create a complex redox environment where sonochemical excitation [43], coupled with the simultaneous generation of reducing (H2) and oxidizing species (H2O2, ·OH) [39], could activate C─C bonds, as has been demonstrated for homobenzylic ether (HBE) models that are inspired by the chemistry of lignin [61]. The degree of deconstruction and rearrangement needed to produce a compound like SEMILL‐A suggests significant C─C and C─O bond cleavage along with other secondary bond ruptures. For this purpose, we utilized a standard dimeric model compound for Kraft lignin with the IUPAC name 1‐(4‐hydroxy‐3,5‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐2‐(2‐methoxyphenoxy)propane‐1,3‐diol to show this possibility [61, 62] (Figure 5a). Treatment of the model compound using SEWMs under the same conditions for producing SEMILL‐A and following extraction and lyophilization resulted in a reddish‐orange solid powder, here named SEMILL‐B. 1H NMR comparison of the spectra for the starting compound and SEMILL‐B showed once more significant changes. Figure 5a shows a peak at a chemical shift around 9.5 ppm, indicating the formation of an aldehyde group due to C─C bond cleavage, and the appearance of two soluble products as a result. As with SEMILL‐A, the presence of HNO3 resulted in incorporation of nitro groups into the resulting aromatic rings, possibly mediated by the reductive generation of reactive nitrogen species.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Deconstruction of a Kraft lignin model compound within SEWMs. (a) The structure and 1H NMR spectra of the model compound and 1H NMR spectra of SEMILL‐B. (b) Electrochemical characterization through cyclic voltammetry of SEMILL‐B in DMF with 0.1 M TBAPF6 using a Pt (1 mm radius) working electrode inside an Ar‐filled glovebox. (c) Gas chromatography and the corresponding mass spectra for the peaks observed, along with the possible structure of the products constructed through C─C bond cleavage of the model compound.

CV analysis of the electrochemical properties of SEMILL‐B (Figure 5b) shows a remarkable resemblance in the voltammetric peaks around −1.2 V vs. PpyQRE (Fc/Fc+), again suggesting the participation of the aromatic ‐NO2 group in the observed redox process. Characterization of the product(s) was performed with GC‐MS, which confirmed the presence of two distinct products. The mass spectra associated with those individual peaks showed a high resemblance to structures like 4‐nitroguaiacol and 2‐(2‐methoxy‐5‐nitrophenoxy)acetaldehyde, respectively (Figure 5c). These results strongly suggest that our SEWMs strategy is capable of generating conditions to cleave C─C bonds [63], to incorporate nitro group functionalities through forming C─N bonds [60], and to selectively deconstruct molecules by taking advantage of their unique reactive microenvironment.

3. Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrate a powerful strategy to deconstruct and derivatize lignin, a major biofeedstock, to produce SEMILL‐A, a compound with distinct properties using a one‐step, uncatalyzed approach via SEWMs. The liquid chromatograph, GPC, and the mass spectrometric analysis strongly suggest that the majority of SEMILL‐A consists of a discrete, ∼656 Da small molecule of interest, along with a small fraction of water‐soluble oligomeric residues. Although details about the mechanism and control of the reaction pathway to select desirable products are yet to be elucidated, our procedure highlights unprecedented simplicity to afford complex chemical transformations, including C─C, C─O bond cleavage and nitration. SEMILL‐A shows promising electrochemical properties due to the incorporation of redox‐active aromatic nitro functional groups, as well as the formation of quinones and coumarins, which could be potentially useful for energy storage [45] and, more generally, for producing eco‐sourced redox‐active molecules with structural diversity [64, 65, 66, 67, 68]. For example, coumarins are used as anticoagulant agents in medicine [69, 70, 71, 72], and obtaining SEMILL‐A could be a first step to produce a chemical input for active molecules. Furthermore, SEMILL‐A can be utilized as an acid‐base indicator with rich dye‐like properties, turning from yellow to red as the pH is changed from acidic to basic. Targeted conversion of lignin into a specific isolable product can impose challenges due to variations in structural properties for different feedstocks, regions, and seasons. Despite these hurdles, our procedure using SEWMs generates SEMILL‐A and shows the possibility of carrying out a complex transformation using simple reacting conditions.

Our results also highlight the ability of SEWMs to generate a unique reactive microenvironment that synergistically exploits sonochemical and mechanical excitation, and the generation of reactive chemical intermediates, opening a vast space for new chemical reactions to take place within these microreactors [73, 74]. Our group will explore in greater detail the generation of reactive nitrogen species at SEWMs, which are critical to the generation of SEMILL‐A. Our methodology uniquely deconstructs a complex biopolymer at room temperature, utilizing water as the primary component of the reactive medium. It leverages an inexpensive ultrasonic bath as instrumentation, with a relatively mild concentration of nitric acid in comparison to other lignin digestion protocols, and is fast, requiring only ∼20 min for full conversion in our small‐scale setup without any added homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysts. Our groups are actively working on the deconstruction and valorization of a variety of wastes and feedstocks using this promising technique based on SEWMs. We hope this study demonstrates a new perspective on chemical deconstruction, inspiring future studies addressing complex chemical and materials problems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.D. and J.R‐L.; Methodology: S.D.; Experiments performed: S.D., Y.Z., S.W.C., S.L., D.O.K., A.S‐C., S.H., and H.V.N.; Visualization: S.D., Y.Z., S.W.C., and S.L.; Funding acquisition: J.R‐L.; Project administration: J.R‐L.; Supervision: J.R‐L. and S.D.; Writing – original draft: S.D. and J.R‐L. Writing – review and editing: S.D., J.R‐L., J.S.M., C.M.S., J.V.S., and R.S.A.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

The supporting information contains details of the characterization of SEMILL‐A. under supporting information section.

Supporting File: smll74934‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.pdf.

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Science Foundations for Energy Earthshots Program, under Award Number DE‐SC0024892. The acquisition of the timsTOF fleX MALDI 2 instrument was supported by the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, under Award Number S10OD032242. We thank the SCS NMR Lab for its technical support. The Bruker 500‐MHz NMR Spectrometer was obtained with the financial support of the Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust, Muscatine, Iowa, USA. The authors express their gratitude to Sonam Rani from Prof. Joaquín Rodríguez‐López research group for cross‐verifying the reproducibility of SEMILL‐A production and helping with the Graphical abstract.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.

References

  • 1. Ragauskas A. J., Beckham G. T., Biddy M. J., et al., “Lignin Valorization: Improving Lignin Processing in the Biorefinery,” Science 344, no. 6185 (2014): 1246843, 10.1126/science.1246843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Upton B. M. and Kasko A. M., “Strategies for the Conversion of Lignin to High‐Value Polymeric Materials: Review and Perspective,” Chemical Reviews 116, no. 4 (2016): 2275–2306, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Perlack R. D., Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion‐Ton Annual Supply (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Becker J. and Wittmann C., “A Field of Dreams: Lignin Valorization Into Chemicals, Materials, Fuels, and Health‐Care Products,” Biotechnology Advances 37, no. 6 (2019): 107360, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Boerjan W., Ralph J., and Baucher M. L. B., “Lignin Biosynthesis,” Annual Review of Plant Biology 54, no. 1 (2003): 519–546, 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Melro E., Filipe A., Sousa D., Medronho B., and Romano A., “Revisiting Lignin: A Tour Through Its Structural Features, Characterization Methods and Applications,” New Journal of Chemistry 45, no. 16 (2021): 6986–7013, 10.1039/D0NJ06234K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhang C., Shen X., Jin Y., Cheng J., Cai C., and Wang F., “Catalytic Strategies and Mechanism Analysis Orbiting the Center of Critical Intermediates in Lignin Depolymerization,” Chemical Reviews 123, no. 8 (2023): 4510–4601, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Demuner I. F., Colodette J. L., Demuner A. J., and Jardim C. M., “Biorefinery Review: Wide‐Reaching Products Through Kraft Lignin,” BioResources 14, no. 3 (2019): 7543–7581, 10.15376/biores.14.3.Demuner. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Abu‐Omar M. M., Barta K., Beckham G. T., et al., “Guidelines for Performing Lignin‐First Biorefining,” Energy & Environmental Science 14, no. 1 (2021): 262–292, 10.1039/D0EE02870C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Prasomsri T., Shetty M., Murugappan K., and Román‐Leshkov Y., “Insights Into the Catalytic Activity and Surface Modification of MoO3 During the Hydrodeoxygenation of Lignin‐Derived Model Compounds Into Aromatic Hydrocarbons Under Low Hydrogen Pressures,” Energy & Environmental Science 7, no. 8 (2014): 2660–2669, 10.1039/C4EE00890A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Couch R. L., Price J. T., and Fatehi P., “Production of Flocculant From Thermomechanical Pulping Lignin via Nitric Acid Treatment,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 4, no. 4 (2016): 1954–1962, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Liu W.‐J., Jiang H., and Yu H.‐Q., “Thermochemical Conversion of Lignin to Functional Materials: A Review and Future Directions,” Green Chemistry 17, no. 11 (2015): 4888–4907, 10.1039/C5GC01054C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Du X., Zhang H., Sullivan K. P., Gogoi P., and Deng Y., “Electrochemical Lignin Conversion,” ChemSusChem 13, no. 17 (2020): 4318–4343, 10.1002/cssc.202001187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yang C., Maldonado S., and Stephenson C. R. J., “Electrocatalytic Lignin Oxidation,” ACS Catalysis 11, no. 16 (2021): 10104–10114, 10.1021/acscatal.1c01767. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ayub R. and Raheel A., “High‐Value Chemicals From Electrocatalytic Depolymerization of Lignin: Challenges and Opportunities,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 7 (2022): 3767, 10.3390/ijms23073767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. NaderiNasrabadi M., Rakshit S. K., Viswanathan G., Chen Z., Harrington P. B., and Staser J. A., “A Techno‐Economic Analysis for Integrating an Electrochemical Reactor Into a Lignocellulosic Biorefinery for Production of Industrial Chemicals and Hydrogen,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 193, no. 3 (2021): 791–806, 10.1007/s12010-020-03452-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bugg T. D. and Rahmanpour R., “Enzymatic Conversion of Lignin into Renewable Chemicals,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 29 (2015): 10–17, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mujtaba M., Fraceto L. F., Fazeli M., et al., “Lignocellulosic Biomass From Agricultural Waste to the Circular Economy: A Review With Focus on Biofuels, Biocomposites and Bioplastics,” Journal of Cleaner Production 402 (2023): 136815, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136815. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cooks R. G. and Holden D. T., “Breaking Down Microdroplet Chemistry,” Science 384, no. 6699 (2024): 958–959, 10.1126/science.adp7627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lee K., Lee H.‐R., Kim Y. H., et al., “Microdroplet‐Mediated Radical Polymerization,” ACS Central Science 8, no. 9 (2022): 1265–1271, 10.1021/acscentsci.2c00694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lee J. K., Samanta D., Nam H. G., and Zare R. N., “Micrometer‐Sized Water Droplets Induce Spontaneous Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141, no. 27 (2019): 10585–10589, 10.1021/jacs.9b03227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Banerjee S. and Zare R. N., “Syntheses of Isoquinoline and Substituted Quinolines in Charged Microdroplets,” Angewandte Chemie 127, no. 49 (2015): 15008–15012, 10.1002/ange.201507805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lee J. K., Samanta D., Nam H. G., and Zare R. N., “Spontaneous Formation of Gold Nanostructures in Aqueous Microdroplets,” Nature Communications 9, no. 1 (2018): 1562, 10.1038/s41467-018-04023-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kulyk D. S., Miller C. F., and Badu‐Tawiah A. K., “Reactive Charged Droplets for Reduction of Matrix Effects in Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry,” Analytical Chemistry 87, no. 21 (2015): 10988–10994, 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Yan X., Bain R. M., and Cooks R. G., “Organic Reactions in Microdroplets: Reaction Acceleration Revealed by Mass Spectrometry,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55, no. 42 (2016): 12960–12972, 10.1002/anie.201602270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Girod M., Moyano E., Campbell D. I., and Cooks R. G., “Accelerated Bimolecular Reactions in Microdroplets Studied by Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry,” Chemical Science 2, no. 3 (2011): 501–510, 10.1039/C0SC00416B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Müller T., Badu‐Tawiah A., and Cooks R. G., “Accelerated Carbon─Carbon Bond‐Forming Reactions in Preparative Electrospray,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 51, no. 47 (2012): 11832–11835, 10.1002/anie.201206632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lee J. K., Banerjee S., Nam H. G., and Zare R. N., “Acceleration of Reaction in Charged Microdroplets,” Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 48, no. 4 (2015): 437–444, 10.1017/S0033583515000086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Li A., Luo Q., Park S., and Cooks R. G., “Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions of Nanoparticles Formed by Electrospray Ionization of Coinage Metals,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53, no. 12 (2014): 3147–3150, 10.1002/anie.201309193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li A., Baird Z., Bag S., et al., “Using Ambient Ion Beams to Write Nanostructured Patterns for Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy,” Angewandte Chemie 126, no. 46 (2014): 12736–12739, 10.1002/ange.201406660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sarkar D., Mahitha M. K., Som A., et al., “Metallic Nanobrushes Made Using Ambient Droplet Sprays,” Advanced Materials 28, no. 11 (2016): 2223–2228, 10.1002/adma.201505127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Song X., Basheer C., Xia Y., et al., “One‐Step Formation of Urea From Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Using Water Microdroplets,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 47 (2023): 25910–25916, 10.1021/jacs.3c10784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Mohajer M. A., Basuri P., Evdokimov A., et al., “Spontaneous Formation of Urea from Carbon Dioxide and Ammonia in Aqueous Droplets,” Science 388, no. 6754 (2025): 1426–1430, 10.1126/science.adv2362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kooij S., Astefanei A., Corthals G. L., and Bonn D., “Size Distributions of Droplets Produced by Ultrasonic Nebulizers,” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 6128, 10.1038/s41598-019-42599-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Qiu L. and Cooks R. G., “Simultaneous and Spontaneous Oxidation and Reduction in Microdroplets by the Water Radical Cation/Anion Pair,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 41 (2022): 202210765, 10.1002/anie.202210765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Xiong H., Lee J. K., Zare R. N., and Min W., “Strong Concentration Enhancement of Molecules at the Interface of Aqueous Microdroplets,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 124, no. 44 (2020): 9938–9944, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c07718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lee J. K., Walker K. L., Han H. S., et al., “Spontaneous Generation of Hydrogen Peroxide from Aqueous Microdroplets,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 39 (2019): 19294–19298, 10.1073/pnas.1911883116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Xiong H., Lee J. K., Zare R. N., and Min W., “Strong Electric Field Observed at the Interface of Aqueous Microdroplets,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, no. 17 (2020): 7423–7428, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Asserghine A., Baby A., N'Diaye J., et al., “Dissolved Oxygen Redox as the Source of Hydrogen Peroxide and Hydroxyl Radical in Sonicated Emulsive Water Microdroplets,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147, no. 14 (2025): 11851–11858, 10.1021/jacs.4c16759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wei Z., Li Y., Cooks R. G., and Yan X., “Accelerated Reaction Kinetics in Microdroplets: Overview and Recent Developments,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 71, no. 1 (2020): 31–51, 10.1146/annurev-physchem-121319-110654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Chamberlayne C. F. and Zare R. N., “Microdroplets Can Act as Electrochemical Cells,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 156, no. 5 (2022): 054705, 10.1063/5.0078281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Rovelli G., Jacobs M. I., Willis M. D., Rapf R. J., Prophet A. M., and Wilson K. R., “A Critical Analysis of Electrospray Techniques for the Determination of Accelerated Rates and Mechanisms of Chemical Reactions in Droplets,” Chemical Science 11, no. 48 (2020): 13026–13043, 10.1039/D0SC04611F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Pradeep T. M. M., “Microdroplet Mechanochemistry,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 14, no. 1 (2026): 25–30, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c12102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Spoorthi B. K., Debnath K., Basuri P., Nagar A., Waghmare U. V., and Pradeep T., “Spontaneous Weathering of Natural Minerals in Charged Water Microdroplets Forms Nanomaterials,” Science 384, no. 6699 (2024): 1012–1017, 10.1126/science.adl3364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Suslick K. S. S., “Sonochemistry,” Science 247, no. 4949 (1990): 1439–1445, 10.1126/science.247.4949.1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Haun J., Ji J., and Mao H., “High‐Throughput Characterization of Individual Microdroplets Unveils Ultrasound‐Enhanced Radical Production,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 148, no. 3 (2026): 3752–3759, 10.1021/jacs.5c20375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Lee K., Mehrgardi M. A., and Zare R. N., “Interfacial Curvature, Not Simply Size, Controls Spontaneous Hydrogen Peroxide Formation in Water Microdroplets,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 147, no. 36 (2025): 33240–33247, 10.1021/jacs.5c11575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ralph J., MacKay J. J., Hatfield R. D., O'Malley D. M., Whetten R. W., and Sederoff R. R., “Abnormal Lignin in a Loblolly Pine Mutant,” Science 277, no. 5323 (1997): 235–239, 10.1126/science.277.5323.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Bock P., Nousiainen P., Elder T., et al., “Infrared and Raman Spectra of Lignin Substructures: Dibenzodioxocin,” Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 51, no. 3 (2020): 422–431, 10.1002/jrs.5808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ahmad Z., Paleologou M., and Xu C. C., “Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin Using Nitric Acid under Ambient Conditions,” Industrial Crops and Products 170 (2021): 113757, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Zhang M., Resende F. L. P., Moutsoglou A., and Raynie D. E., “Pyrolysis of Lignin Extracted From Prairie Cordgrass, Aspen, and Kraft Lignin by Py‐GC/MS and TGA/FTIR,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 98 (2012): 65–71, 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Mancera C., Ferrando F., Salvadó J., and El Mansouri N. E. K., “Kraft Lignin Behavior During Reaction in an Alkaline Medium,” Biomass and Bioenergy 35, no. 5 (2011): 2072–2079, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Fujio M., Mishima M., Tsuno Y., Yukawa Y., and Takai Y., “The Substituent Effect. V. NMR Chemical Shifts of Hydrogen‐Bonding Hydroxyl Proton of Phenols in DMSO,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan 48, no. 7 (1975): 2127–2133, 10.1246/bcsj.48.2127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Bailey‐Darland S., Krueger T. D., and Fang C., “Ultrafast Spectroscopies of Nitrophenols and Nitrophenolates in Solution: From Electronic Dynamics and Vibrational Structures to Photochemical and Environmental Implications,” Molecules 28, no. 2 (2023): 601, 10.3390/molecules28020601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Siddiqui A.‐R., N'Diaye J., Santiago‐Carboney A., Martin K., Bhargava R., and Rodríguez‐López J., “Spectroelectrochemical Determination of Thiolate Self‐Assembled Monolayer Adsorptive Stability in Aqueous and Non‐Aqueous Electrolytes,” The Analyst 149, no. 10 (2024): 2842–2854, 10.1039/D4AN00241E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Dias J. D. S., Kurz M. H. S., Gonçalves F. F., Zanoelo E. F., and Benincá C., “Electrochemical Conversion of Contaminant P‐Nitrophenol to p‐Aminophenol and High‐Value p‐Quinones: Mechanism, Kinetics and Modeling,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 12, no. 3 (2024): 112523, 10.1016/j.jece.2024.112523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Baran M. J., Braten M. N., Montoto E. C., et al., “Designing Redox‐Active Oligomers for Crossover‐Free, Nonaqueous Redox‐Flow Batteries With High Volumetric Energy Density,” Chemistry of Materials 30, no. 11 (2018): 3861–3866, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01318. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Burgess M., Hernández‐Burgos K., Cheng K. J., Moore J. S., and Rodríguez‐López J., “Impact of Electrolyte Composition on the Reactivity of a Redox Active Polymer Studied Through Surface Interrogation and Ion‐Sensitive Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy,” The Analyst 141, no. 12 (2016): 3842–3850, 10.1039/C6AN00203J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Martínez R. F., Cravotto G., and Cintas P., “Organic Sonochemistry: A Chemist's Timely Perspective on Mechanisms and Reactivity,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry 86, no. 20 (2021): 13833–13856, 10.1021/acs.joc.1c00805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Grooms A. J., Huttner R. T., Stockwell M., et al., “Programmable C−N Bond Formation Through Radical‐Mediated Chemistry in Plasma‐Microdroplet Fusion,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64, no. 4 (2025): 202413122, 10.1002/anie.20241312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Qian H., Counihan M. J., Doan H. A., et al., “Mesolytic Cleavage of Homobenzylic Ethers for Programmable End‐Of‐Life Function in Redoxmers,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 10, no. 14 (2022): 7739–7753, 10.1039/D1TA10291E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Biannic B. and Bozell J. J., “Efficient Cobalt‐Catalyzed Oxidative Conversion of Lignin Models to Benzoquinones,” Organic Letters 15, no. 11 (2013): 2730–2733, 10.1021/ol401065r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Subbotina E., Rukkijakan T., Marquez‐Medina M. D., Yu X., Johnsson M., and Samec J. S. M., “Oxidative Cleavage of C–C Bonds in Lignin,” Nature Chemistry 13, no. 11 (2021): 1118–1125, 10.1038/s41557-021-00783-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Symons P., “Quinones for Redox Flow Batteries,” Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 29 (2021): 100759, 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100759. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Han C., Li H., Shi R., et al., “Organic Quinones Towards Advanced Electrochemical Energy Storage: Recent Advances and Challenges,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 7, no. 41 (2019): 23378–23415, 10.1039/C9TA05252F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Guruprasadagowda Y. K., Harish M. N. K., Tripathy D., and Sampath S., “Tetrakis Coumarin as Efficient Electrode Material for Rechargeable Lithium Ion Battery,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 908 (2022): 116081, 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Pahlevaninezhad M., Leung P., Velasco P. Q., Pahlevani M., Walsh F. C., and Roberts E. P. L., “A Nonaqueous Organic Redox Flow Battery Using Multi‐Electron Quinone Molecules,” Journal of Power Sources 500 (2021): 229942, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Mamuk A. E., Koçak Ç., Aslan S., and Bal Altuntaş D., “Electrochemical Properties of Coumarin 500 Encapsulated in a Liquid Crystal Guided Electrospun Fiber Core and Their Supercapacitor Application,” ACS Applied Energy Materials 5, no. 10 (2022): 12078–12089, 10.1021/acsaem.2c01287. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Flores‐Morales V., Villasana‐Ruíz A. P., Garza‐Veloz I., González‐Delgado S., and Martinez‐Fierro M. L., “Therapeutic Effects of Coumarins With Different Substitution Patterns,” Molecules 28, no. 5 (2023): 2413, 10.3390/molecules28052413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Patil S. A., Kandathil V., Sobha A., et al., “Comprehensive Review on Medicinal Applications of Coumarin‐Derived Imine–Metal Complexes,” Molecules 27, no. 16 (2022): 5220, 10.3390/molecules27165220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Ferreira V. F., De Carvalho A. S., Ferreira P. G., Lima C. G. S., De C., and Da Silva F., “Quinone‐Based Drugs: An Important Class of Molecules in Medicinal Chemistry,” Medicinal Chemistry 17, no. 10 (2021): 1073–1085, 10.2174/1573406416666201106104756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Zhang L., Zhang G., Xu S., and Song Y., “Recent Advances of Quinones as a Privileged Structure in Drug Discovery,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 223 (2021): 113632, 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Del Río J. C., Rencoret J., Gutiérrez A., Elder T., Kim H., and Ralph J., “Lignin Monomers From Beyond the Canonical Monolignol Biosynthetic Pathway: Another Brick in the Wall,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 8, no. 13 (2020): 4997–5012, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Li T., Ma X., Fedotov D., et al., “Structure Elucidation of Prenyl‐ and Geranyl‐Substituted Coumarins in Gerbera Piloselloides by NMR Spectroscopy, Electronic Circular Dichroism Calculations, and Single Crystal X‐Ray Crystallography,” Molecules 25, no. 7 (2020): 1706, 10.3390/molecules25071706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information contains details of the characterization of SEMILL‐A. under supporting information section.

Supporting File: smll74934‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.pdf.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.


Articles from Small (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES