Abstract
Otomycosis is a fungal infection of the external auditory canal that may extend to the tympanic membrane. Although commonly caused by Aspergillus and Candida species, infections due to uncommon fungal pathogens may present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We report the case of a 46-year-old woman who presented to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) with intense pruritus of the right external auditory canal, associated with a whitish discharge and tympanic perforation on otoscopic examination. Mycological analysis of the ear discharge identified Candida lusitaniae. To our knowledge, this represents the first case of otomycosis due to C. lusitaniae reported in our department, underscoring the importance of accurate fungal identification for guiding appropriate antifungal therapy in atypical or refractory otomycosis.
Keywords: amphotericin b, antifungal susceptibility, candida lusitaniae, maldi-tof mass spectrometry, non-albicans candida infection, otomycosis
Introduction
Otomycosis is a superficial fungal infection of the external auditory canal that accounts for a substantial proportion of cases of otitis externa worldwide, particularly in hot and humid climates [1]. It is most commonly caused by Aspergillus species (notably A. niger and A. fumigatus) and, less frequently, by Candida species, chiefly C. albicans [1]. Recognised risk factors include local trauma (cotton-tip swab use, hearing-aid or earplug wear), chronic moisture exposure (swimming, humid environments), prior antibiotic or corticosteroid use, immunosuppression, and diabetes mellitus [1]. While generally considered a benign and self-limiting condition, otomycosis can become recurrent or refractory, especially when the causative organism is unusual or when local risk factors persist, underscoring the need for accurate mycological identification to guide treatment [1,2].
Among the less common agents implicated in otomycosis, Candida lusitaniae, the anamorph of Clavispora lusitaniae, deserves particular attention. Originally described as a commensal of the digestive tract of warm-blooded animals, this opportunistic yeast was long considered rare and poorly pathogenic. It is now recognised as an emerging infectious agent, primarily implicated in nosocomial infections among immunocompromised patients [3]. Its clinical significance lies chiefly in its unusual antifungal susceptibility profile: it can rapidly develop acquired resistance, notably to amphotericin B and, less consistently, to fluconazole [4,5]. Biologically, C. lusitaniae is characterised by germ-tube negativity and the absence of true hyphae, in contrast to C. albicans. It also exhibits phenotypic variability, including variable fermentation and assimilation profiles for sugars such as glucose, maltose, and galactose. On microscopic examination, it may form variable pseudohyphae, which can occasionally appear branched or curved. These characteristics, together with its variable colony morphology on differential media such as CHROMagar Candida (CHROMagar, Paris, France), may complicate its identification and lead to confusion with other Candida species [3,4]. This phenotypic plasticity, combined with its ability to colonise diverse human and hospital reservoirs (digestive flora, skin, contaminated medical devices), facilitates its transition from a commensal to a pathogenic state in a range of anatomical sites in immunocompromised patients and, more rarely, in immunocompetent individuals.
Although C. lusitaniae has been described in various clinical settings, its involvement in otomycosis remains exceptionally rare, and the available literature on this specific localisation is limited, leaving its clinical characteristics and diagnostic challenges in ear infections insufficiently documented. This case therefore contributes to the sparse literature on C. lusitaniae otomycosis, expanding current knowledge of this pathogen as a cause of otitis and highlighting the importance of considering uncommon Candida species in the differential diagnosis of external ear fungal infections.
Case presentation
A 46-year-old immunocompetent woman, with a known history of hepatic steatosis and chronic moderate hypoalbuminaemia, presented to the Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) Outpatient Clinic in March 2026 with intense pruritus of the right ear evolving over approximately 10 days. Otoscopic examination revealed a creamy mycotic discharge associated with partial tympanic perforation and no signs of active otitis media (Figure 1). As no prior otoscopic examination was available, it could not be determined whether this perforation pre-existed or was related to the current fungal infection. No recent local antifungal or antibiotic treatment had been administered. The case history revealed no repeated swimming, no use of topical corticosteroids, and no associated chronic ENT pathology.
Figure 1. Otoscopic examination of the patient's ear canal at presentation showing whitish fungal debris and a central tympanic membrane perforation.

A sample was collected from the secretions of the external auditory canal using a sterile auricular swab and sent to the mycology laboratory. The specimen was inoculated onto Sabouraud agar and incubated at 25°C. After 48 hours of incubation, abundant growth of smooth, moist, creamy-white colonies was observed (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Culture on Sabouraud agar without chloramphenicol: (A) reverse side; (B) obverse side.

Direct microscopic examination of a fresh preparation from the Sabouraud agar culture showed oval to round budding yeast cells without pseudohyphae formation, consistent with a non-filamentous yeast. A subculture was then performed on CHROMagar Candida for diagnostic orientation. After incubation at 37°C, the colonies initially appeared whitish to cream in colour. With prolonged incubation, they progressively developed purple pigmentation, suggesting a non-albicans Candida species (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Fungal colonies on Sabouraud agar culture after prolonged incubation showing variable pigmentation ranging from whitish/cream to purple (A). Direct microscopic examination of the culture (×400 magnification) showing oval to round budding yeast cells without pseudohyphae formation (B).

In (A), the arrows indicate colonies displaying the purple pigmentation that developed on the chromogenic agar after prolonged incubation. In (B), the arrows indicate the oval to round budding yeast cells observed on direct microscopic examination.
Identification was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Bruker Biotyper; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), which identified Candida lusitaniae (Clavispora lusitaniae) with a score of 2.3, with all 10 of the top spectral matches concordantly identifying the same species. According to manufacturer-recommended interpretive criteria, a score ≥ 2.00 indicates reliable species-level identification [6], confirming the diagnosis (Table 1). No antifungal susceptibility testing was performed. Topical treatment consisted of nystatin powder (100,000 units/g) insufflation into the external auditory canal three times daily for two weeks, combined with regular drying of the ear canal. The clinical course was favourable, with complete resolution of pruritus and discharge at the two-week follow-up visit, and no recurrence. At the one-month follow-up, the patient reported no symptoms and otoscopic examination showed complete resolution of the external auditory canal inflammation. No treatment-related complications were observed. Given the persistent tympanic membrane perforation, the patient was subsequently scheduled for tympanoplasty.
Table 1. Top 10 MALDI-TOF reference spectra matches identifying the clinical isolate as Clavispora lusitaniae (Candida lusitaniae).
Score interpretation (Bruker Biotyper criteria): ≥2.00 = high-confidence species-level identification; 1.70-1.99 = secure genus-level identification, probable species-level; <1.70 = unreliable identification [6].
MVD: MALDI Validation Database (Bruker validated reference spectrum); MALDI: matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation
| Rank | Reference strain | Score value | Confidence |
| 1 | Clavispora lusitaniae 13043263_3 MVD | 2.30 | High confidence |
| 2 | Clavispora lusitaniae | 2.19 | High confidence |
| 3 | Clavispora lusitaniae | 2.16 | High confidence |
| 4 | Clavispora lusitaniae | 2.07 | High confidence |
| 5 | Clavispora lusitaniae | 1.97 | Secure genus identification |
| 6 | Clavispora lusitaniae 13026679_3 MVD | 1.95 | Secure genus identification |
| 7 | Clavispora lusitaniae | 1.94 | Secure genus identification |
| 8 | Clavispora lusitaniae | 1.89 | Secure genus identification |
| 9 | Clavispora lusitaniae | 1.88 | Secure genus identification |
| 10 | Clavispora lusitaniae | 1.87 | Secure genus identification |
Discussion
Otomycosis due to C. lusitaniae represents an exceptional clinical entity. While yeasts of the genus Candida account for approximately 10% to 15% of otomycosis cases, the majority are attributed to C. albicans and C. parapsilosis, species recognised for their cutaneous and mucosal tropism [2,4]. C. lusitaniae, by contrast, remains a rare opportunistic species, initially isolated from environmental sources and animal intestinal flora, but whose human pathogenicity has progressively gained recognition over recent decades [5]. The distinctive feature of C. lusitaniae lies in its dual biological identity: a non-filamentous yeast and possible commensal of mucous membranes, but also a potentially multidrug-resistant opportunistic pathogen, notably against amphotericin B [7]. Its profile distinguishes it from other non-albicans yeasts by its capacity to develop rapid adaptive resistance under therapeutic pressure, a phenomenon attributed to mutations in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway (ERG3, ERG6) [8].
The cases included in Table 2 were selected from published case reports and case series describing human infections caused by C. lusitaniae. Only reports providing sufficient clinical and microbiological information to allow comparison with the present case were included. Epidemiologically, the majority of reported infections due to C. lusitaniae concern immunocompromised patients or those hospitalised in intensive care units, often with indwelling medical devices. However, several recent reports describe localised infections in immunocompetent subjects, including pulmonary, cutaneous, and urinary presentations [4]. Our case aligns with this emerging trend, illustrating the possibility of a localised infection due to C. lusitaniae in a patient with a generally preserved immune status but with minor metabolic disorders. From a diagnostic standpoint, accurate identification of C. lusitaniae remains a mycological challenge. Traditional methods (morphology, subculture on chromogenic agar, carbohydrate assimilation tests) frequently lead to its misidentification as other non-albicans yeasts. The use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry or molecular testing now represents the reference standard for reliable identification. The high score obtained in our case attests to the performance of this technology, already recognised as the tool of choice for the rapid detection of rare Candida species [6].
Table 2. Previously published cases of infections related to Candida lusitaniae.
M: male; F: female; y: years; AmpB: amphotericin B
| Age | Sex | Infection site | Patient background | Treatment | Outcome | Country | Reference |
| 54 y | M | Pulmonary empyema | Immunocompetent | IV then oral fluconazole | Recovery | USA | Haseeb ul Rasool et al. [4] |
| 15 y | M | Post-lung transplant candidaemia | Immunocompromised | Echinocandin IV | Recovery | Greece | Apsemidou et al. [5] |
| 64 y | F | Candiduria | Diabetic | Fluconazole | Recovery | Morocco | Dahraoui et al. [8] |
| 56 y | M | Candiduria | Diabetic | Fluconazole | Recovery | Morocco | Dahraoui et al. [8] |
| 50 y | M | Candidaemia | Immunocompromised | Micafungin (rapid cross-resistance) | Death (unspecified) | USA | Scott et al. [9] |
| 37 y | F | Fungal stomatitis | Diabetic | Miconazole | Recovery | Italy | Veraldi et al. [10] |
| 55 y | F | Recurrent vaginitis | Immunocompetent | Intravaginal boric acid | Recovery | USA | Silverman et al. [11] |
| 3 y | F | Candidaemia | Immunocompromised | AmB → Caspofungin → Azoles | Death | Switzerland | Asner et al. [12] |
| 46 y | F | Intraperitoneal infection | Immunocompetent | Fluconazole | Recovery | Poland | Wawrysiuk et al. [13] |
From a pathophysiological perspective, this yeast may act as a local opportunistic pathogen, particularly when environmental factors create conditions conducive to overgrowth (chronic humidity, microbiome imbalance, local microtrauma, or tympanic scarring). The chronic hypoalbuminaemia observed in our patient may have contributed to a slight impairment of local immune defences, thereby facilitating auricular colonisation. More broadly, the pathogenicity of C. lusitaniae is thought to be multifactorial, resulting from a combination of moderate adhesion capacity, variable biofilm formation, cell-surface hydrophobicity, limited enzymatic secretion, and stress-adaptation and morphogenesis-related signalling pathways [14]. Taken together, these virulence traits suggest that C. lusitaniae possesses a real, though comparatively modest, pathogenic potential, which becomes clinically significant mainly in immunocompromised hosts.
The therapeutic approach is guided by the site and severity of the infection. For superficial forms, topical polyenes such as nystatin remain effective. Conversely, invasive forms require individualised systemic treatment, often based on second-generation triazoles (voriconazole, posaconazole). C. lusitaniae is notable for its intrinsic resistance to amphotericin B and its capacity to develop resistance to flucytosine and azoles [14], with cross-resistance between echinocandins and azoles reported in 30-40% of echinocandin-resistant isolates in the United States [14], as well as the possibility of dynamic heteroresistance induced by fluconazole exposure [7,14]. The choice of topical nystatin in our patient warrants discussion given the presence of tympanic membrane perforation. In our department's clinical experience, nystatin has been used safely in several patients with perforated tympanic membranes, with good tolerance and no observed hearing complications. This is further supported by studies applying nystatin directly to the middle ear, which have shown no evidence of ototoxicity or cochlear hair-cell damage [15]. This is consistent with the favourable outcome observed in the present case, with complete resolution of symptoms and no adverse effects at follow-up. To our knowledge, this represents the first case of otomycosis due to C. lusitaniae identified in our department. It also appears to be one of the first published auricular isolates of C. lusitaniae in the literature. The favourable outcome of our case following topical nystatin therapy nonetheless suggests that the species retains good clinical susceptibility in superficial infections in immunocompetent hosts.
Finally, the rarity of documented auricular cases of C. lusitaniae calls for heightened clinical vigilance. This is particularly relevant as the incidence of non-albicans Candida yeasts continues to increase, making accurate species-level identification using modern diagnostic techniques essential for guiding appropriate treatment and anticipating potential antifungal resistance.
Conclusions
This case demonstrates that C. lusitaniae, although rarely implicated in otomycosis, can cause localised auricular infection even in the absence of immunosuppression. The phenotypic overlap between C. lusitaniae and other non-albicans Candida species underscores the importance of accurate fungal identification, which enabled confident species-level diagnosis in this case. Clinical resolution was achieved with topical nystatin alone, with complete resolution of symptoms and no recurrence at one-month follow-up, illustrating a favourable outcome despite the species' recognised potential for acquired antifungal resistance, particularly to amphotericin B, in systemic disease.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Jalal Abderrahmani, Mohammed Amine Nejjari, Aziza Hami
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Jalal Abderrahmani, Mohammed Amine Nejjari, Aziza Hami
Drafting of the manuscript: Jalal Abderrahmani, Mohammed Amine Nejjari, Aziza Hami
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Jalal Abderrahmani, Mohammed Amine Nejjari, Aziza Hami
Supervision: Jalal Abderrahmani, Mohammed Amine Nejjari, Aziza Hami
References
- 1.Etiology, predisposing factors, clinical features and diagnostic procedure of otomycosis: a literature review. Bojanović M, Stalević M, Arsić-Arsenijević V, et al. https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/9/6/662. J Fungi (Basel) 2023;9 doi: 10.3390/jof9060662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Otomycosis: diagnosis and treatment. Vennewald I, Klemm E. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.12.003. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28:202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Candida lusitaniae: biology, pathogenicity, virulence factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Mendoza-Reyes DF, Gómez-Gaviria M, Mora-Montes HM. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:5121–5135. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S383785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Candida lusitaniae, an emerging opportunistic pathogen in immunocompetent populations: a case report. Haseeb ul Rasool M, Swaminathan G, Hosna AU, Ishfaq S, Trandafirescu T. Cureus. 2023;15 doi: 10.7759/cureus.43211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Candida lusitaniae breakthrough fungemia in an immuno-compromised adolescent: case report and review of the literature. Apsemidou A, Füller MA, Idelevich EA, Kurzai O, Tragiannidis A, Groll AH. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof6040380. J Fungi (Basel) 2020;6 doi: 10.3390/jof6040380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.A moldy application of MALDI: MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry for fungal identification. Patel R. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6463175/ J Fungi (Basel) 2019;5 doi: 10.3390/jof5010004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Candida lusitaniae in Kuwait: prevalence, antifungal susceptibility and role in neonatal fungemia. Khan Z, Ahmad S, Al-Sweih N, Khan S, Joseph L. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213532. PLoS One. 2019;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Candida lusitaniae candiduria: about two observations. (Article in French) Dahraoui S, Kabbage S, El Abbassi S, et al. J Mycol Med. 2016;26:23–24. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rapid evolution of multidrug resistance in a Candida lusitaniae infection during micafungin monotherapy. Scott NE, Edwin Erayil S, Kline SE, Selmecki A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023;67 doi: 10.1128/aac.00543-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Genital-oral transmission of Candida lusitaniae. Veraldi S, Bortoluzzi P, Germiniasi F, Grancini A. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09564624241296582. Int J STD AIDS. 2025;36:158–160. doi: 10.1177/09564624241296582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Candida lusitaniae as an unusual cause of recurrent vaginitis and its successful treatment with intravaginal boric acid. Silverman NS, Morgan M, Nichols WS. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1784662/ Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2001;9:245–247. doi: 10.1155/S1064744901000400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Acquired multidrug antifungal resistance in Candida lusitaniae during therapy. Asner SA, Giulieri S, Diezi M, Marchetti O, Sanglard D. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:7715–7722. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02204-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Candida lusitaniae - a case report of an intraperitoneal infection. Wawrysiuk S, Rechberger T, Futyma K, Miotła P. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6107095. Prz Menopauzalny. 2018;17:94–96. doi: 10.5114/pm.2018.77310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rojas OC, González GM. Infectious Diseases. IntechOpen; 2025. Candida lusitaniae from commensal to opportunistic: a growing clinical concern. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Effect of nystatin on guinea pigs' inner ear. Woods O, Saliba I. Neurotox Res. 2011;20:301–306. doi: 10.1007/s12640-011-9242-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
